I hereby give notice that an extraordinary meeting of the Puketāpapa Local Board will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Monday, 10
February 2014
5.30pm
Fickling
Convention Centre
546 Mt Albert Road
Three Kings
|
|
Puketāpapa Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Julie Fairey
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Harry Doig
|
|
|
Members
|
David Holm
|
|
|
|
Ella Kumar
|
|
|
|
Nigel Turnbull
|
|
|
|
Michael Wood
|
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
|
Brenda Railey
Democracy Advisor
4 February 2014
Contact Telephone: 021 820 781
Email: brenda.railey@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Leave of Absence 5
5 Acknowledgements 5
6 Petitions 5
7 Deputations 5
8 Public Forum 5
8.1 Kev Carter, YMCA Auckland 5
9 Extraordinary Business 5
10 Notices of Motion 6
11 Draft Unitary Plan: Puketapapa Local Board Feedback 7
12 Board Member D Holm Report - January 2014 9
13 Consideration of Extraordinary
Items
Member E Kumar, will deliver the welcome message.
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from
decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any
private or other external interest they might have.
4 Leave of Absence
At the close of
the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
5 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been
received.
6 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been
received.
7 Deputations
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been
received.
8 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members
of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority.
A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be
questions from members.
|
8.1 Kev Carter, YMCA
Auckland
|
|
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) thanks Kev
Cater, YMCA Auckland, for his presentation.
|
|
Attachments
a YMCA Albert-Eden Schools Cultural Festival Post Event Report......... 15
|
9 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with
at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so
decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item
cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting
if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to
the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the
beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the
item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation
may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent
meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
10 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been
received.
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
Draft
Unitary Plan: Puketapapa Local Board Feedback
File No.:
CP2014/01404
Purpose
1. This report provides
Puketāpapa Local Board feedback to the Unitary Plan Committee (UPC) on the
Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP). The feedback will inform local board
discussion with the Unitary Plan Committee on 11 and 12 February 2014 and decisions
by the Governing Body on 27 February 2014 on the final Auckland Council
submission.
Executive Summary
2. The development of the Unitary
Plan for Auckland presents a unique opportunity to bring together a large
number of existing resource management plans into a single document and give
effect to the Auckland Plan. The Unitary Plan was notified for public feedback
in September 2013.
3. Local boards have the
opportunity to provide formal feedback on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
for discussion with the UPC at workshops on 11 and 12 February 2014 and to help
inform decision by the UPC on 27 February 2014.
4. This feedback is informed by the
Local Board’s feedback from Phase 1 (September to December 2012), public
feedback from Phase 2 (February 2013 to present) and the Local Board’s own
views, informed by workshops and briefings on the development of the draft
Unitary Plan. In particular, this submission is informed by Stage 2 of the
on-going development of the Three Kings Precinct Plan and the design group
workshops convened with the major landholders over the last three months.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local
Board:
a) provides feedback on the Proposed Auckland
Unitary. (Feedback will be tabled at the meeting)
|
Discussion
5. The
development of the Unitary Plan for Auckland presents a unique opportunity to
bring together a large number of existing resource management plans into a
single document. The Unitary Plan has the potential to improve planning
outcomes by providing a consistency in policy, controls and zoning for managing
development, efficiency gains for Council, business and all other users of the
planning system. Most importantly, it presents an opportunity to simplify the
planning system, broaden the community’s understanding of how Auckland’s built
and natural environment is managed and lead to the improvement in the quality
of Auckland’s environment.
6. Local
boards have been involved and had given input into the development of the
Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan through APC workshops and formal submissions in
November 2012 and June-July 2013.
7. Many of
the matters raised by the Board have been taken into account in the PAUP, but
the Board has further refined some issues, which will be discussed at a
workshop in 5 February and finalized at the Board meeting on 10 February 2014.
Consideration
Local Board Views
8. Input and feedback from all
local boards is being sought as part of the development of the Auckland Council
submission on the PAUP by 28 February 2014.
Maori Impact Statement
9. The development of the Unitary
Plan is of significance to Maori. Consultation requirements with Mana Whenua
are being met by the Council in accordance with an Iwi Engagement Strategy that
meets the requirements of Schedule One of the Resource Management Act 1991.
The Unitary Plan Political Working Party and the Auckland Plan Committee also
has representation from the Independent Maori Statutory Board.
Implementation Issues
10. No issues arising from this
report.
Attachments
There are no
attachments for this report.
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Jill Pierce - Local Board Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Karen Lyons - Manager Local Board
Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship
Manager
|
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
Board Member D Holm Report - January 2014
File No.:
CP2014/01460
Purpose
1. The purpose is
to receive a report.
Executive Summary
2. Attaching
Member Holm’s report.
|
Recommendation/s
That the
Puketapapa Local Board:
a) receive
Member Holm’s report for January 2014 and consider the recommendations.
|
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
D Holm Report
|
11
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Brenda Railey - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Karen Lyons - Manager Local Board
Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship
Manager
|
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
Report Name: Board member report – David
Holm
Petition on undergrounding of high transmission power lines
Background
The Petition asks “The government to commit to
undergrounding high-voltage transmission lines through urban areas over a
reasonable period of time having regard to the resources this entails and to
that end puts money aside from the annual dividend paid by Transpower to meet
the long term cost of this, and ;
As a priority investigates the technology, planning
requirements and interagency collaboration and resourcing needed to achieve the
most cost effective solution to the progressive placing underground of the
transmission lines.”
Further information is available in the document
“Undergrounding Transmission Lines In Urban Areas” published by Transpower (www.transpower.co.nz) in April 2013.
Recommendation/s:
That the Puketapapa Local Board:
a) Receive the report
b) Endorses the petition 2011/96 to Parliament by
David Holm and 1801 other signatories asking the government to commit to
underground high voltage transmission lines through urban areas over a
reasonable period of time and to investigate and report on the technology,
planning and resourcing needed to achieve a cost effective solution to this
c) Authorises Board Member Holm to prepare a
submission by 18 February 2014 to the Commerce Committee in support of this
item.
Signatories
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
ATTACHMENTS
Item 8.1 Attachment a YMCA
Albert-Eden Schools Cultural Festival Post Event Report
Page 15
|
Puketāpapa
Local Board
10 February
2014
|
|
