I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the CBD Advisory Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Wednesday, 26 March 2014 3.00pm Reception Lounge, Level 2, Town Hall, 301-305 Queen Street, Auckland |
CBD Advisory Board OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Connal Townsend |
Chief Executive, Property Council of NZ |
Deputy Chairperson |
Earl Gray |
Partner, Simpson Grierson |
Members |
Dick Ayres |
Member, CBD Residents Advisory Group |
|
Dr Lucy Baragwanath |
Strategic Relationships Advisor, Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Strategic Engagement) University of Auckland |
|
Len Brown, JP |
Mayor, Auckland Council |
|
Jenny Bygrave |
Head of Strategic Developments, Auckland University of Technology |
|
Tim Coffey |
Member, CBD Residents Advisory Group |
|
Shale Chambers |
Chair Waitemata Local Board |
|
Daniel Clay |
Ngati Whatua o Orakei Corporate Limited |
|
Julian de Beer |
Managing Director, de Beer Marketing & Communications |
|
Barbara Holloway |
Town Manager, Karangahape Road Business Association |
|
Mike Lee |
Councillor, Auckland Council |
|
Alex Swney |
Chief Executive, Heart of the City |
|
Vacant |
SkyCity |
|
Vacant |
|
(Quorum 7 members)
|
|
Tam White Democracy Advisor 20 March 2014 Contact Telephone: (09) 307 7253 Email: tam.white@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz |
CBD Advisory Board 26 March 2014 |
|
Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson
1 Apologies 5
2 Declaration of Interest 5
3 Confirmation of Minutes 5
4 Extraordinary Business 5
5 Terms of Reference 7
6 Allocation of City Centre Targeted Rate Revenue 21
7 Introduction - City Centre Integration Group 27
8 CBD Targeted rate funded projects - Maintenance standards 29
9 PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report 31
10 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson
An election of the chairperson and deputy chairperson will be conducted by the Team Leader City Transformation Project.
1 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Central Business District Advisory Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 and its meeting held on Wednesday 27 November 2013 minutes as a true and correct record. |
The minutes have been circulated separately pending confirmation. |
4 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
CBD Advisory Board 26 March 2014 |
|
File No.: CP2014/05204
Purpose
1. To seek the CBD Advisory Board’s approval for the Terms of Reference.
Executive Summary
2. The CBD Advisory Board at its meeting on 26 February 2014 delegated the chair, deputy chair and the Manager City Transformation to review the Terms of Reference and suggest changes for the Board’s consideration and endorsement at the March meeting.
3. The CBD Advisory Board also approved the recommendation to the Mayor to change the CBD Advisory Board’s name to Auckland City Centre Advisory Board which is reflected in the revised draft Terms of Reference (Attachment A).
4. The chair and deputy chair also considered the Board’s composition as delegated by the Board’s resolution of 26 February and have recommended as follows: [This keeps the Board at 17, although some members suggest the board is too big/cumbersome. Given the lateral thinking and input expected, the chair and deputy consider the board can be larger than a governance board and 17 members is manageable.]
· corporate sector including financial and other professional services (2) (recommending adding a representative from the Banking/Financial sector)
· urban design/architects institute (1)
· tourism/travel (1) (SkyCity representative to be confirmed)
· mainstreet representative organisations (2)
· retail (1)
· education (The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology) (2)
· Ngati Whatua (1)
· residents (representative from the CBD Residents Advisory Group) (2) [There is some suggestion from board members this should be (1) with the change to residents not contributing to the targeted rate.]
· Property Council (1)
· arts and cultural sector (1)
· Auckland Councillors (4) (2) Mayor
and Councillor Mike Lee*
· Waitamata Local board (1)* Shale Chambers
* in the case of political representatives, an alternate should also be named
That the CBD Advisory Board: a) approve the revisions to the Terms of Reference for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Draft revised terms of reference for the Auckland Central City Advisory Board |
9 |
bView |
2014 meeting dates |
19 |
Signatories
Authors |
Tam White - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project |
CBD Advisory Board 26 March 2014 |
|
These terms of reference set out the roles, responsibilities and
working arrangements for the Auckland City
Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board.
The board is a key advisory body, with no decision-making or autonomous budgetary authority.
The board will assist the Auckland Council, specifically the governing body and the Waitemata Local Board and Auckland council controlled organisations to oversee and be a key advisor to the Auckland Council on achieving the vision and strategic outcomes of Auckland’s CBD Into the future (2004-2014), the City Centre Masterplan, the expenditure of the CBD targeted rate, and CBD issues.
The CBD Into the Future strategy’s vision is to “grow and consolidate the CBD’s international reputation as one of the world’s most vibrant and dynamic business and cultural centres.” The strategic outcome areas supporting the vision are that Auckland’s CBD will be:
· recognised as one of the world’s premier business locations
· a high quality living urban environment
· the most popular destination for Aucklanders and visitors to the region
· a world class centre for education research and development
· a place that feels like the heart and expresses the soul of Auckland.
Role of the Auckland City Centre Advisory
Board CBD Advisory Board
The role of the board is to:
1. Assist the council to plan, shape and drive the delivery of the CBD strategies
2. Report stakeholder views and promote dialogue on initiatives within the CBD portfolio
3. Act as sounding board for the CBD transformation projects team on new and existing initiatives
4. Champion and provide leadership for the CBD strategies in the wider community
5. Maintain an overview of the strategies and action plans to assist with integration of the initiatives
6. Monitor the progress of the CBD strategies and action plans
7. Provide guidance into the portfolio of projects funded via the CBD targeted rate
8. Establish and safeguard the pursuit of excellence of all projects in the CBD portfolio from inception to delivery.
9. Provide input to or lead other CBD stakeholder reference groups on specific projects or relevant council strategies impacting the CBD
11. Review or recommend any proposed changes to the targeted rate policy
12. Review and provide feedback on the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects :
a) concept designs
b) developed designs
c) endorse the concept designs prior to going out for public consultation
13. Provide a sounding board to the designers for the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects
14. Ensure a cohesive approach to the designs of the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects
Note: These roles are also shared by the governing body and the Waitemata Local Board and Auckland council controlled organisations as appropriate and are not solely the function of the CBD Advisory Board.
These roles and responsibilities are detailed below, with an explanation of what they will mean in practice.
(a) Assist the council to plan, shape and drive the delivery of the CBD strategies
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· come prepared to meetings having pre-read and considered agendas and associated documents
· participate actively in the CBD strategy review process led by Auckland Council
· bring their own ideas for programme and process improvements to the board’s attention
· feed ideas and comments into the council’s decision making processes (eg making recommendations to the council committees through officer reports).
(b) Report stakeholder views and promote dialogue on initiatives within the CBD portfolio
This means the board members, individually and collectively will:
· actively engage their networks in dialogue about the CBD strategies and programmes
· bring ideas and comments from their networks/stakeholders back to board meetings for discussion
· ensure their networks get feedback on any ideas and issues they raise.
(c) Act as a sounding board for the CBD transformation projects team on new and existing initiatives
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· receive and discuss reports and presentations from CBD transformation projects team members
· provide comment and feedback on ideas and initiatives brought to it by CBD transformation projects team members
· actively debate issues but seek, ultimately, to develop a single board view on ideas
and initiatives brought to it
· request that reviews of projects be conducted for consideration by Council.
(d) Champion and provide leadership for the CBD strategies in the wider community
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· invest time and effort into understanding the CBD strategies and its programme of action
· seek opportunities to speak positively about the strategies to external audiences
· provide media comment if requested by
the CBD Advisory Auckland City Centre Advisory
Board Chair.
(e) Maintain an overview of the strategies and action plans to assist with integration of the initiatives
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· familiarise themselves with the three year action plans (with a particular focus on the current year’s programme of action/works)
· actively monitor opportunities for CBD transformation projects to leverage from/add value to each other
· identify potential conflicts between individual projects and/or project objectives
· debate and provide a view on trade offs between projects and between the objectives of individual projects
· identify and bring to the board’s attention potential conflicts and synergies between external (non-council) and the council initiatives, perspectives and programmes.
(f) Monitor the progress of the CBD portfolio
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· receive and actively consider progress reports presented to the board
· identify any concerns about progress
· recommend ways of addressing any progress delays or issues (e.g. reviewing the scope, quantity, timing, of and/or resources for delivering on projects).
(g) Provide guidance into the portfolio of projects funded via the CBD targeted rate
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· familiarise themselves with the CBD targeted rates supported programme of works
· discuss the programme with their networks
· invest time and effort into understanding how and to what extent individual projects contribute to achieving the CBD vision and outcomes
· develop an informed view about project priorities.
(h) Establish and safeguard the pursuit of excellence of all projects in the CBD portfolio from inception to delivery.
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· demonstrate in themselves and their board input and participation their personal best expression of the quality of excellence and its pursuit
· work collectively to ensure that all board goals seek nothing less than the best expression possible of excellence in all inputs into the CBD strategies and action plans
· determine that nothing short of excellence will suffice for Auckland city and the success of its CBD strategies and action plans.
(i) Provide input to or lead other CBD stakeholder reference groups on specific projects or relevant council strategies impacting the CBD.
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· make known to the board their areas of expertise and interest
· actively participate in specially convened CBD stakeholder reference groups
· convene and lead specially convened CBD stakeholder reference groups
· actively participate in consultation on council policies and strategies which have implications for the CBD.
(j) Review or recommend any proposed changes to the CBD targeted rate policy
This means the board members individually and collectively, will:
· receive and discuss information relating to CBD targeted rate policy annually
· make recommendations into council’s decision making processes relating to any targeted rate policy change.
(k) To review and provide feedback on the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects :
i. concept designs
ii. developed designs
iii. endorse the concept designs prior to going out for public consultation
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:
· provide comment and feedback on the designs presented to them by members of the CBD project team
· feed ideas and comments prior to council’s decision making processes.
(l) Provide a sounding board to the designers on CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects
This means the board, individually and collectively, will
· provide constructive feedback to designers in advance of formal consultation processes.
(m) Ensure a cohesive approach to the designs of the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects
This means the board members, individually and collectively, will
· consider the designs from the perspective of their respective sectors, seeking to provide comments on the designs from a holistic perspective.
CBD Advisory Board Auckland City Centre Advisory Board
composition
The
board will be comprised key CBD stakeholders, made up
of up to 17 members comprising 12 14
external stakeholders and 5 (3) political
representatives.
The board members need to demonstrate the following qualities:
· passion and commitment to the development of the CBD
· credibility and prominence in the community
· an understanding of the CBD and support for Auckland Council’s vision
· commitment to playing an active role on the board
· an ability to effectively chair meetings.
The board will be sought from the following sectors or groups [This keeps the Board at 17, although some members suggest the board is too big/cumbersome. Given the lateral thinking and input expected, the chair and deputy consider the board can be larger than a governance board and 17 members is manageable.]:
· corporate sector including financial and other professional services (2) (recommending a representative from the Banking/Financial sector)
· tourism/travel (1) (SkyCity representative to be confirmed)
· retail, including mainstreet representative organisations (2)
· education (The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology) (2)
· Ngati Whatua (1)
· residents (representative from the CBD Residents Advisory Group) (2)
· Property Council (1)
· arts and cultural sector (1)
· Auckland Councillors (4) (2)
· Waitamata Local board (1)
Selection of Members
Selection of members will
follow the “Policy for selection and replacement of Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board members” process.
Each representative should be a person that is able to demonstrate the qualities outlined above.
Chair and Deputy Chair
The roles of Chair and
Deputy Chair will be elected from the non elected/political representatives by
the full board at the first board meeting and thereafter annually at a meeting
determined by the Auckland City Centre Advisory
Board CBD Advisory Board.
[Consider adding a maximum of [3] year for these roles so that we get fresh
approaches.]
Term of office/resignations/replacements
· Board members may represent their stakeholder group/sector for an unlimited number of terms, as membership is sought through representative organisations.
· Term of a Board Member is for a period of three years. [Consider how these renewals should be dealt with. Should we have resignation on a rotating basis so that we get fresh blood?]
· A new Chair and Deputy Chair will be elected annually. [Exclude political representatives from this vote?]
· The Chair and Deputy Chair can be re-elected each year of their term as Board members [Consider adding a maximum of [3] year for these roles so that we get fresh approaches.]
· The Policy
for Selection and Replacement of Auckland City
Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board Members records how the board will receive and process resignations
and subsequent replacements of members, as well as the selection of new the
board members.
Meetings
Meeting schedule/timing/nature
· Members will meet on an (unpaid) voluntary basis.
· The board meets monthly, with the flexibility to meet as and when required on specific issues/projects.
· Meetings will generally be of 2 hours duration.
· The Auckland
Council City Transformation Unit Democracy advisor will
arrange the venue and catering for each meeting.
· Meeting agendas will focus on progressing the strategies for the CBD as a whole and on specific projects.
· Subgroups may be formed to expedite progress, with one board member taking responsibility for championing particular projects or outcome area.
· Quorum = The quorum at a meeting consists of half of the members if the number of members [(including vacancies)] is even; or a majority of members if the number of members [(including vacancies)] is odd.
Reporting
The Auckland Council is constituted under a co-governance model. Matters that the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will be considering
which fall under the governing body's decision making responsibilities need to
be reported to the governing body. Similarly, matters that the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will be considering,
which fall under the Waitemata Local Board's decision making responsibilities
need to be reported to the Waitemata Local Board. In addition matters that
relate to the road reserve, need to be discussed and agreed with Auckland Transport.
The Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will make
recommendations as it considers appropriate, and as requested, to the governing
body and the Waitemata Local Board, and/or Auckland council controlled
organisations, depending on which of these bodies has decision making authority
over the matter(s) being reported on.
Twice annual report by board chair to the Governing Committee.
Agenda distribution/minutes
· Agendas for
the board meetings will be distributed 5(3) working days prior to the meeting date.
· A proposed
agenda item may be submitted by a board member to the board secretary (Democracy Advisor, Democracy Services) (City
Transformation unit) up to [15] days prior
to a board meeting. If the item is not accepted by the chair and/or deputy
chair, the member will be advised of the reason prior to the agenda being
circulated.
· Meeting agendas will be set by the chair and/or the deputy chair in consultation with the CBD Transformation Team Leader or City Transformation Portfolio Manager.
· Minutes of the board meetings will be distributed to members and public no later than 5 working days after the board meeting.
Staff support/servicing of board
· The CBD
Transformation Team Leader is responsible for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board.
· The Democracy Advisor, Democracy Services department City
Transformation Portfolio Co-ordinator will act as secretary and will be the
first point of contact for board meetings.
· The secretary will be responsible for arranging board meetings, catering, paperwork, reimbursements, council/board communications etc.
· The City Transformation Portfolio Manager will provide a monthly portfolio report to the board.
· An officer from the City Centre Integration Team will, where practicable, attend board meetings and report.
Resourcing of the board
· $8000 per annum will be allocated to the administration of board meetings – catering, printing, reimbursements etc.
· Members will not be remunerated for participation on the board, however reasonable travel/parking costs may be reimbursed.
Protocols for members/conflicts of interest
· The board will work under a code of conduct for their members and meetings (covering issues such as conflicts of interest, pecuniary interests, qualified privilege etc).
· To assist the board members in the above matter, each board member will provide a list of the organisations they represent and their role within each of these organisations.
Code of conduct
The code of conduct includes protocols around conflicts of interest, respecting confidentiality and ensuring ones actions and comments do not bring the council into disrepute.
With this in mind, board members are to:
· declare any conflicts of interest to the board and then abstain from discussions and decisions where there is a conflict of interest.
(N.B a conflict of interest is likely to occur if a board member has a pecuniary or social interest in a matter being discussed by the board. In other words, the member may stand to benefit from a decision made by the board about that particular matter. An example could be a discussion about a piece of work that the member may propose to carry out as a consultant or contractor. A conflict may also be perceived rather than actual. Such conflicts need to be considered and a decision made as to whether they should be treated as actual).
· raise their concerns with the board, where there is a lack of clarity around whether there is a real conflict of interest or where such a conflict could be perceived, and seek a decision on whether or not the issue is to be considered as if a conflict of interest exists.
· keep confidential any matters brought to it in confidence.
(N.B as a public body council must always justify why something is to be heard in confidence. It is unlikely; therefore, that many confidential matters will be brought to the board)
· ensure that their behaviour or actions do not bring the council into disrepute.
(N.B. This does not prevent members from legitimately challenging council policy decisions.)
Recommendation processes
Board recommendations are to be:
· based on robust information and debate ensuring that the different perspectives of the members are considered
· developed and presented as the board’s view.
(N.B. This does not mean there can be no difference of opinion. What it does mean is that members are expected to support, publicly and not undermine the board’s collective agreed view, even if their personal view differs from the collective view.
This does not prevent members from legitimately expressing their individual or representative organisations view on council policy decisions.)
Review of Board
The board will be reviewed on delivery of the Auckland (Spatial) Plan, and thereafter, every three years.
26 March 2014 |
|
CBD Advisory Board 2014 meeting dates
Date |
Time |
Venue |
23 April 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
28 May 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
25 June 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
23 July 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
27 August 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
24 September 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
22 October 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
26 November |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
17 December 2014 |
3 – 5pm |
Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue |
26 March 2014 |
|
Allocation of City Centre Targeted Rate Revenue
File No.: CP2014/05287
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to provide details to the CBD Advisory Board, of the projects which could be considered for funding using the currently unallocated revenue generated by the City Centre targeted rate.
Executive Summary
2. The City Centre targeted rate (formally the CBD targeted rate) was adopted by the former Auckland City Council in 2004/2005 to fund a programme of projects in the Auckland city centre that will enhance the city centre as a place to work, live, visit and do business. The rate is applied to all ratepayers in the City Centre area.
3. To date the targeted rate has funded a number of public realm improvement projects throughout the city centre, most recently the Shared Space programme. Projects currently being delivered and which are funded by targeted rate include Myers Park, O’Connell Street, Fort Street area, Lorne Street and Freyberg Square.
4. Under the current targeted rate agreement, the revenue generated by the targeted rate is used to fund capex and opex projects as well as the additional depreciation and operational expenditure for the higher quality assets generated by these projects.
5. The current targeted rate agreement is due to end in June 2016. The methods of targeted rate collection and expenditure are currently being reviewed as part of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (LTP) 2015-25 process.
6. It is projected that of the total $41.2million of targeted rate revenue that will be generated under the current programme, $23.3million has yet to be allocated to projects. This includes $5.5m of savings from projects completed in 2013/14.
7. Throughout 2013, the CBD Advisory Board has considered a number of scenarios relating to how the currently unallocated targeted rate could be used to fund projects across the city centre. At the 26 June 2013 CBD Advisory Board meeting, a number of projects were presented by council staff for consideration and to date a number of projects have been shortlisted by the CBD Advisory Board for further scoping. The projects identified for further scoping were:
· Beach Road Public Space
· Freyberg Square Upgrade
· Exchange Lane Upgrade
· Hardinge Street Link
· Myers Park Underpass
· Beresford Square Upgrade
· Disused Nelson Street off-ramp
· Cycleway improvements to Hobson and Nelson Streets
· Way finding strategy and implementation
· Heritage Foreshore Project
8. At the February 2014 CBD Advisory Board meeting, the Board resolved that officer’s report back to the Board with further details, including timing and cost, of these projects.
9. As part of this scoping process, Council staff have explored the risks and benefits of investing targeted rate revenue in projects which may be affected by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and planned private development.
10. The CRL route through the city centre will link Britomart to the existing rail line near Eden Terrace, and will result in three new city centre stations at Aotea, Karangahape Road and Newton. Construction is forecast to commence in 2015/16 and be complete in 2020/21. Private development includes the SkyCity Convention centre and Downtown Shopping Centre.
11. Further details of the shortlisted projects are outlined in Attachment A (Potential City Centre Projects and initiatives to be funded by CBD targeted rate surplus 2014/15 and 2015/16). Further detail will be presented at the March 2014 meeting.
That the CBD Advisory Board: a) note that of the total $41.2million of targeted rate revenue that will be generated to June 2016, $23.3million is still to be allocated to projects b) note that at the 26 June 2013 CBD Advisory Board meeting, a shortlist of potential projects was agreed for further scoping c) note that scoping has considered the risks and benefits of investing targeted rate revenue in projects which will be impacted by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and significant private developments. d) note that as a result of this scoping council staff recommend the inclusion of the High Street Precinct area in the list of projects that could be funded by unallocated targeted rate, as this area will be relatively unaffected by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and significant private developments. e) consider council staff recommendation that, based on the outcome of the scoping exercise, of the currently unallocated $23.3m targeted rate revenue: · $1m is allocated to Beach Road Public Space upgrade · $2.7 m is allocated to Freyberg Square Upgrade · $2m is allocated to Myers Park underpass and link to Aotea Square · $1m is allocated to development and implementation of city centre way finding strategy · $16.6m is allocated to upgrade of the High Street Precinct area f) request that council staff report to the May 2014 meeting with more detail of the above projects, including outcomes, timings, costs and strategy for delivery. g) note that expenditure of targeted rate revenue up until June 2016 will be undertaken under the current targeted rate agreement h) request that council staff report to the May 2014 on the methods of targeted rate collection and expenditure which are currently being reviewed as part of the Auckland Council Long-term Plan (LTP) 2015-25 process.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Potential City Centre Projects and initiatives to be funded by CBD targeted rate surplus 2014/15 and 2015/16 |
25 |
Signatories
Authors |
Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project |
Authorisers |
John Dunshea – Manager City Transformation Project |
26 March 2014 |
|
Introduction - City Centre Integration Group
File No.: CP2014/05055
Purpose
1. The City Centre Integration Group Manager will present an overview presentation of the group for the CBD Advisory Board’s information.
That the CBD Advisory Board: a) receive the information and thank the City Centre Integration Group Manager.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Tam White - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project |
CBD Advisory Board 26 March 2014 |
|
CBD Targeted rate funded projects - Maintenance standards
File No.: CP2014/04573
Purpose
1. To seek the CBD Advisory Board’s approval on how to proceed with outstanding maintenance issues to ensure outstanding CBD targeted rate funded projects are and will continue to be maintained at the highest service (A+) level.
Executive Summary
2. At the February 2014 meeting, the Board sought answers from staff on outstanding maintenance issues that have not been actioned since November 2013. The democracy advisor undertook to investigate and report back to the board on this issue.
Background
3. The CBD Advisory Board received an update at its meeting in November 2013 and noted the following.
4. A proportion of the CBD Targeted Rate is set aside for consequential opex ($7.5m since 2004/2005). This consequential opex budget is used to fund an increased maintenance standard required on Targeted Rate funded streetscape upgrade projects.
5. The CBD Advisory Board noted that the existing CBD streets that have not been upgraded continue to be maintained at the ‘lower’ level existing standard.
6. The Board notes that the CBD Targeted Rate consequential opex budget contributes to:
· increased standard in footpath sweeping, washing and loose litter collection, Auckland Transport defines this increased standard of cleaning as category ‘A+ in a ‘Major Centre’.
· the extra cost of maintaining and replacing higher specific/value assets e.g. amenity lights, multi-function streetlight poles, street furniture, vegetation, design elements (water features, custom furniture and art works.
7. The Board noted that a number of maintenance issues have developed on upgraded CBD streets over the past year, in both streetscape environment and also in open spaces such as St Patrick’s Square, where maintenance is the responsibility of Auckland Council departments.
8. The Board noted evidence of decreased standard of maintenance and service levels have dropped below the required standard in the CBD and that the CBD Targeted rate is not being used for the purpose for which is taken.
That the CBD Advisory Board: a) request Auckland Council and Auckland Transport staff work together to provide a report to the April 2014 meeting addressing the following points; 1. identifying how the maintenance issue is to be resolved 2. outlining to what extent the CBD Targeted Rate consequential opex budget has been used since July 2012. 3. outlining how the highest ‘A+’ standard of cleaning will be consistently applied to all upgraded CBD streets 4. identifying what auditing and QA processes are in place for CBD streetscape maintenance 5. clarify who is responsible for maintaining design elements and artworks located within an upgraded streetscape 6. determine appropriate protocol for permanent removal of elements from the street for maintenance reasons 7. specifically address the maintenance of St Patrick’s Square and Karangahape Road Bridge. |
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Tam White - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project |
CBD Advisory Board 26 March 2014 |
|
PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report
File No.: CP2014/05292
Purpose
1. To update the CBD Advisory Board on the PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) draft report.
That the CBD Advisory Board: a) receive the PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report. b) request Auckland Council staff to write a full report to the CBD Advisory Board prior to reporting to any Auckland Council committee. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
PENAP draft Final Report 19Mar2014 |
33 |
Signatories
Authors |
Tam White - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project |
|
John Dunshea – Manager City Transformation Project |