I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the CBD Advisory Board will be held on:

Date:                      

Time:

Meeting Room:

Venue:

 

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

3.00pm

Reception Lounge, Level 2, Town Hall,

301-305 Queen Street, Auckland

 

CBD Advisory Board

OPEN AGENDA

 

 

MEMBERSHIP

 

Chairperson

Connal Townsend

Chief Executive, Property Council of NZ

Deputy Chairperson

Earl Gray

Partner, Simpson Grierson

Members

Dick Ayres

Member, CBD Residents Advisory Group

 

Dr Lucy Baragwanath

Strategic Relationships Advisor, Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Strategic Engagement) University of Auckland

 

Len Brown, JP

Mayor, Auckland Council

 

Jenny Bygrave

Head of Strategic Developments, Auckland University of Technology

 

Tim Coffey

Member, CBD Residents Advisory Group

 

Shale Chambers

Chair Waitemata Local Board

 

Daniel Clay

Ngati Whatua o Orakei Corporate Limited

 

Julian de Beer

Managing Director, de Beer Marketing & Communications

 

Barbara Holloway

Town Manager, Karangahape Road Business Association

 

Mike Lee

Councillor, Auckland Council

 

Alex  Swney

Chief Executive, Heart of the City

 

Vacant

SkyCity

 

Vacant

 

 

(Quorum 7 members)

 

 

Tam White

Democracy Advisor

20 March 2014

Contact Telephone: (09) 307 7253

Email: tam.white@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

 


 

 

 

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

ITEM   TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                        PAGE

 

Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson

1          Apologies                                                                                                                        5

2          Declaration of Interest                                                                                                   5

3          Confirmation of Minutes                                                                                               5

4          Extraordinary Business                                                                                                5

5          Terms of Reference                                                                                                       7

6          Allocation of City Centre Targeted Rate Revenue                                                  21

7          Introduction - City Centre Integration Group                                                           27

8          CBD Targeted rate funded projects - Maintenance standards                              29

9          PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report                            31 

10        Consideration of Extraordinary Items 

 

 


 

Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson

 

An election of the chairperson and deputy chairperson will be conducted by the Team Leader City Transformation Project.

 

1          Apologies

 

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

 

2          Declaration of Interest

 

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

 

3          Confirmation of Minutes

 

That the Central Business District Advisory Board:

a)         confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 and its meeting held on Wednesday 27 November 2013 minutes as a true and correct record.

The minutes have been circulated separately pending confirmation.

 

 

4          Extraordinary Business

 

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

 

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

 

(a)        The local authority by resolution so decides; and

 

(b)        The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

 

(i)         The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

 

(ii)        The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

 

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

 

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

 

(a)        That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

 

(i)         That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

 

(ii)        the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b)        no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

 

 

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

Terms of Reference

 

File No.: CP2014/05204

 

Purpose

1.       To seek the CBD Advisory Board’s approval for the Terms of Reference.

Executive Summary

2.       The CBD Advisory Board at its meeting on 26 February 2014 delegated the chair, deputy chair and the Manager City Transformation to review the Terms of Reference and suggest changes for the Board’s consideration and endorsement at the March meeting.

3.       The CBD Advisory Board also approved the recommendation to the Mayor to change the CBD Advisory Board’s name to Auckland City Centre Advisory Board which is reflected in the revised draft Terms of Reference (Attachment A).

4.       The chair and deputy chair also considered the Board’s composition as delegated by the Board’s resolution of 26 February and have recommended as follows[This keeps the Board at 17, although some members suggest the board is too big/cumbersome.  Given the lateral thinking and input expected, the chair and deputy consider the board can be larger than a governance board and 17 members is manageable.]

 

·    corporate sector including financial and other professional services (2) (recommending adding a representative from the Banking/Financial sector)

·    urban design/architects institute (1)

·    tourism/travel (1) (SkyCity representative to be confirmed)

·    mainstreet representative organisations (2)

·    retail (1)

·    education (The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology) (2)

·    Ngati Whatua (1)

·    residents (representative from the CBD Residents Advisory Group) (2) [There is some suggestion from board members this should be (1) with the change to residents not contributing to the targeted rate.]

·    Property Council (1)

·    arts and cultural sector (1)

·    Auckland Councillors (4) (2) Mayor and Councillor Mike Lee*

·    Waitamata Local board (1)* Shale Chambers

 

* in the case of political representatives, an alternate should also be named

 

Recommendation/s

That the CBD Advisory Board:

a)      approve the revisions to the Terms of Reference for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board.

 

 


 

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

aView

Draft revised terms of reference for the Auckland Central City Advisory Board

9

bView

2014 meeting dates

19

      

Signatories

Authors

Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authorisers

Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project

 

 

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

Terms of Reference for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board

These terms of reference set out the roles, responsibilities and working arrangements for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board. 

 

The board is a key advisory body, with no decision-making or autonomous budgetary authority.

 

The board will assist the Auckland Council, specifically the governing body and the Waitemata Local Board and Auckland council controlled organisations to oversee and be a key advisor to the Auckland Council on achieving the vision and strategic outcomes of Auckland’s CBD Into the future (2004-2014), the City Centre Masterplan, the expenditure of the CBD targeted rate, and CBD issues.

 

The CBD Into the Future strategy’s vision is to “grow and consolidate the CBD’s international reputation as one of the world’s most vibrant and dynamic business and cultural centres.”  The strategic outcome areas supporting the vision are that Auckland’s CBD will be:

·    recognised as one of the world’s premier business locations

·    a high quality living urban environment

·    the most popular destination for Aucklanders and visitors to the region

·    a world class centre for education research and development

·    a place that feels like the heart and expresses the soul of Auckland.

Role of the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board

The role of the board is to:

1.   Assist the council to plan, shape and drive the delivery of the CBD strategies

2.   Report stakeholder views and promote dialogue on initiatives within the CBD portfolio

3.   Act as sounding board for the CBD transformation projects team on new and existing initiatives

4.   Champion and provide leadership for the CBD strategies in the wider community

5.   Maintain an overview of the strategies and action plans to assist with integration of the initiatives

6.   Monitor the progress of the CBD strategies and action plans

7.   Provide guidance into the portfolio of projects funded via the CBD targeted rate

8.   Establish and safeguard the pursuit of excellence of all projects in the CBD portfolio from inception to delivery.

9.   Provide input to or lead other CBD stakeholder reference groups on specific projects or relevant council strategies impacting the CBD

11. Review or recommend any proposed changes to the targeted rate policy

12. Review and provide feedback on the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects :

a) concept designs

b) developed designs

c) endorse the concept designs prior to going out for public consultation

13. Provide a sounding board to the designers for the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects

14. Ensure a cohesive approach to the designs of the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects

 

Note: These roles are also shared by the governing body and the Waitemata Local Board and Auckland council controlled organisations as appropriate and are not solely the function of the CBD Advisory Board.

 

These roles and responsibilities are detailed below, with an explanation of what they will mean in practice.

 

(a)  Assist the council to plan, shape and drive the delivery of the CBD strategies

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

·       come prepared to meetings having pre-read and considered agendas and associated documents

·       participate actively in the CBD strategy review process led by Auckland Council

·       bring their own ideas for programme and process improvements to the board’s attention

·       feed ideas and comments into the council’s decision making processes (eg making recommendations to the council committees through officer reports).

 

(b)  Report stakeholder views and promote dialogue on initiatives within the CBD portfolio

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively will:

 

·       actively engage their networks in dialogue about the CBD strategies and programmes

·       bring ideas and comments from their networks/stakeholders back to board meetings for discussion

·       ensure their networks get feedback on any ideas and issues they raise.

 

(c)  Act as a sounding board for the CBD transformation projects team on new and existing initiatives

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       receive and discuss reports and presentations from CBD transformation projects team members

·       provide comment and feedback on ideas and initiatives brought to it by CBD transformation projects team members

·       actively debate issues  but seek, ultimately,  to develop a single board view on ideas

            and initiatives brought to it

·        request that reviews of projects be conducted for consideration by Council.

 

(d)  Champion and provide leadership for the CBD strategies in the wider community

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       invest time and effort into understanding the CBD strategies and its programme  of action

·       seek opportunities to speak positively about the strategies to external audiences

·       provide media comment if requested by the CBD Advisory Auckland City Centre Advisory Board Chair.

 

(e)  Maintain an overview of the strategies and action plans to assist with integration of the initiatives

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       familiarise themselves with the three year action plans (with a particular focus on the current year’s programme of action/works)

·       actively monitor opportunities for CBD transformation projects to leverage from/add value to each other

·       identify potential conflicts between individual projects and/or project objectives

·       debate and provide a view on trade offs between projects and between the objectives of individual projects

·       identify and bring to the board’s attention potential conflicts and synergies between external (non-council) and the council initiatives, perspectives and programmes.

 

(f)   Monitor the progress of the CBD portfolio

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       receive and actively consider progress reports presented to the board

·       identify any concerns about progress

·       recommend ways of addressing any progress delays or issues (e.g. reviewing the scope, quantity, timing, of and/or resources for delivering on projects).

 

(g)  Provide guidance into the portfolio of projects funded  via the CBD targeted rate

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       familiarise themselves with the CBD targeted rates supported programme of works

·       discuss the programme with their networks

·       invest time and effort into understanding how and to what extent individual projects contribute to achieving the CBD vision and outcomes

·       develop an informed view about project priorities.

 

(h)  Establish and safeguard the pursuit of excellence of all projects in the CBD portfolio from inception to delivery.

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·    demonstrate in themselves and their board input and participation their personal best expression of the quality of excellence and its pursuit

·    work collectively to ensure that all board goals seek nothing less than the best expression possible of excellence in all inputs into the CBD strategies and action plans

·    determine that nothing short of excellence will suffice for Auckland city and the success of its CBD strategies and action plans.

 

(i)   Provide input to or lead other CBD stakeholder reference groups on specific projects or relevant council strategies impacting the CBD.

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       make known to the board their areas of expertise and interest

·       actively participate in specially convened CBD stakeholder reference groups

·       convene and lead specially convened CBD stakeholder reference groups

·       actively participate in consultation on council policies and strategies which have implications for the CBD.

 

 

(j)   Review or recommend any proposed changes to the CBD targeted rate policy

 

This means the board members individually and collectively, will:

 

·       receive and discuss information relating to CBD targeted rate policy annually

·       make recommendations into council’s decision making processes relating to any targeted rate policy change.

 

(k)  To review and provide feedback on the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects :

i. concept designs

ii. developed designs

iii.   endorse the concept designs prior to going out for public consultation

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will:

 

·       provide comment and feedback on the designs presented to them by members of the CBD project team

·       feed ideas and comments prior to council’s decision making processes.

 

 

(l)   Provide a sounding board to the designers on CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects

 

This means the board, individually and collectively, will

 

·       provide constructive feedback to designers in advance of formal consultation processes.


 

 

(m) Ensure a cohesive approach to the designs of the CBD streetscapes and open space upgrade projects

 

This means the board members, individually and collectively, will

 

·       consider the designs from the perspective of their respective sectors,  seeking to provide comments on the designs from a holistic perspective.


CBD Advisory Board Auckland City Centre Advisory Board composition

 

The board will be comprised key CBD stakeholders, made up of up to 17 members comprising 12 14 external stakeholders and 5 (3) political representatives.  

 

The board members need to demonstrate the following qualities:

·    passion and commitment to the development of the CBD

·    credibility and prominence in the community

·    an understanding of the CBD and support for Auckland Council’s vision

·    commitment to playing an active role on the board

·    an ability to effectively chair meetings.

 

The board will be sought from the following sectors or groups [This keeps the Board at 17, although some members suggest the board is too big/cumbersome.  Given the lateral thinking and input expected, the chair and deputy consider the board can be larger than a governance board and 17 members is manageable.]:

·    corporate sector including financial and other professional services  (2) (recommending a representative from the Banking/Financial sector)

·    tourism/travel (1) (SkyCity representative to be confirmed)

·    retail, including mainstreet representative organisations (2)

·    education (The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology) (2)

·    Ngati Whatua (1)

·    residents (representative from the CBD Residents Advisory Group) (2)

·    Property Council (1)

·    arts and cultural sector (1)

·    Auckland Councillors (4) (2)

·    Waitamata Local board (1)

 

Selection of Members

Selection of members will follow the “Policy for selection and replacement of Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board members” process. 

 

Each representative should be a person that is able to demonstrate the qualities outlined above.

 

Chair and Deputy Chair

The roles of Chair and Deputy Chair will be elected from the non elected/political representatives by the full board at the first board meeting and thereafter annually at a meeting determined by the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board[Consider adding a maximum of [3] year for these roles so that we get fresh approaches.]

 

Term of office/resignations/replacements

·    Board members may represent their stakeholder group/sector for an unlimited number of terms, as membership is sought through representative organisations. 

·    Term of a Board Member is for a period of three years. [Consider how these renewals should be dealt with.  Should we have resignation on a rotating basis so that we get fresh blood?]

·    A new Chair and Deputy Chair will be elected annually.  [Exclude political representatives from this vote?]

·    The Chair and Deputy Chair can be re-elected each year of their term as Board members [Consider adding a maximum of [3] year for these roles so that we get fresh approaches.]

 

·    The Policy for Selection and Replacement of Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board Members records how the board will receive and process resignations and subsequent replacements of members, as well as the selection of new the board members.

 

Meetings

Meeting schedule/timing/nature

·    Members will meet on an (unpaid) voluntary basis.

·    The board meets monthly, with the flexibility to meet as and when required on specific issues/projects.

·    Meetings will generally be of 2 hours duration.

·    The Auckland Council City Transformation Unit Democracy advisor will arrange the venue and catering for each meeting.

·    Meeting agendas will focus on progressing the strategies for the CBD as a whole and on specific projects.

·    Subgroups may be formed to expedite progress, with one board member taking responsibility for championing particular projects or outcome area.

·    Quorum = The quorum at a meeting consists of half of the members if the number of members [(including vacancies)] is even; or a majority of members if the number of members [(including vacancies)] is odd.

Reporting

The Auckland Council is constituted under a co-governance model. Matters that the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will be considering which fall under the governing body's decision making responsibilities need to be reported to the governing body. Similarly, matters that the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will be considering, which fall under the Waitemata Local Board's decision making responsibilities need to be reported to the Waitemata Local Board. In addition matters that relate to the road reserve, need to be discussed and agreed with Auckland Transport.

 

The Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board will make recommendations as it considers appropriate, and as requested, to the governing body and the Waitemata Local Board, and/or Auckland council controlled organisations, depending on which of these bodies has decision making authority over the matter(s) being reported on.

 

Twice annual report by board chair to the Governing Committee.

Agenda distribution/minutes

·    Agendas for the board meetings will be distributed 5(3) working days prior to the meeting date.

·    A proposed agenda item may be submitted by a board member to the board secretary (Democracy Advisor, Democracy Services)  (City Transformation unit) up to [15] days prior to a board meeting.  If the item is not accepted by the chair and/or deputy chair, the member will be advised of the reason prior to the agenda being circulated. 

·    Meeting agendas will be set by the chair and/or the deputy chair in consultation with the CBD Transformation Team Leader or City Transformation Portfolio Manager.

·    Minutes of the board meetings will be distributed to members and public no later than 5 working days after the board meeting. 

Staff support/servicing of board

·    The CBD Transformation Team Leader is responsible for the Auckland City Centre Advisory Board CBD Advisory Board.

·    The Democracy Advisor, Democracy Services department City Transformation Portfolio Co-ordinator will act as secretary and will be the first point of contact for board meetings.

·    The secretary will be responsible for arranging board meetings, catering, paperwork, reimbursements, council/board communications etc.

·    The City Transformation Portfolio Manager will provide a monthly portfolio report to the board.

·    An officer from the City Centre Integration Team will, where practicable, attend board meetings and report.

 

Resourcing of the board

·    $8000 per annum will be allocated to the administration of board meetings – catering, printing, reimbursements etc.

·    Members will not be remunerated for participation on the board, however reasonable travel/parking costs may be reimbursed.

Protocols for members/conflicts of interest

·    The board will work under a code of conduct for their members and meetings (covering issues such as conflicts of interest, pecuniary interests, qualified privilege etc).

·    To assist the board members in the above matter, each board member will provide a list of the organisations they represent and their role within each of these organisations.

Code of conduct

The code of conduct includes protocols around conflicts of interest, respecting confidentiality and ensuring ones actions and comments do not bring the council into disrepute.

 

With this in mind, board members are to:

 

·    declare any conflicts of interest to the board and then abstain from discussions and decisions where there is a conflict of interest.

(N.B a conflict of interest is likely to occur if a board member has a pecuniary or social interest in a matter being discussed by the board.  In other words, the member may stand to benefit from a decision made by the board about that particular matter. An example could be a discussion about a piece of work that the member may propose to carry out as a consultant or contractor.  A conflict may also be perceived rather than actual. Such conflicts need to be considered and a decision made as to whether they should be treated as actual).

 

·    raise their concerns with the board, where there is a lack of clarity around whether there is a real conflict of interest or where such a conflict could be perceived, and seek a decision on whether or not the issue is to be considered as if a conflict of interest exists.

 

·    keep confidential any matters brought to it in confidence.

(N.B as a public body council must always justify why something is to be heard in confidence.  It is unlikely; therefore, that many confidential matters will be brought to the board)

 

·    ensure that their behaviour or actions do not bring the council into disrepute.

(N.B. This does not prevent members from legitimately challenging council policy decisions.)

Recommendation processes

Board recommendations are to be:

·    based on robust information and debate ensuring that the different perspectives of the members are considered

·    developed and presented as the board’s view.

(N.B. This does not mean there can be no difference of opinion. What it does mean is that members are expected to support, publicly and not undermine the board’s collective agreed view, even if their personal view differs from the collective view. 

This does not prevent members from legitimately expressing their individual or representative organisations view on council policy decisions.)

Review of Board

The board will be reviewed on delivery of the Auckland (Spatial) Plan, and thereafter, every three years.

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

 

CBD Advisory Board 2014 meeting dates

 

Date

Time

Venue

23 April 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

28 May 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

25 June 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

23 July 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

27 August 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

24 September 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

22 October 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

26 November

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

17 December 2014

3 – 5pm

Level 15, meeting room, 1 Greys Avenue

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

Allocation of City Centre Targeted Rate Revenue

 

File No.: CP2014/05287

 

Purpose

1.       The purpose of this report is to provide details to the CBD Advisory Board, of the projects which could be considered for funding using the currently unallocated revenue generated by the City Centre targeted rate.

Executive Summary

2.       The City Centre targeted rate (formally the CBD targeted rate) was adopted by the former Auckland City Council in 2004/2005 to fund a programme of projects in the Auckland city centre that will enhance the city centre as a place to work, live, visit and do business. The rate is applied to all ratepayers in the City Centre area.

3.       To date the targeted rate has funded a number of public realm improvement projects throughout the city centre, most recently the Shared Space programme. Projects currently being delivered and which are funded by targeted rate include Myers Park, O’Connell Street, Fort Street area, Lorne Street and Freyberg Square.

4.       Under the current targeted rate agreement, the revenue generated by the targeted rate is used to fund capex and opex projects as well as the additional depreciation and operational expenditure for the higher quality assets generated by these projects.

5.       The current targeted rate agreement is due to end in June 2016. The methods of targeted rate collection and expenditure are currently being reviewed as part of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (LTP) 2015-25 process.

6.       It is projected that of the total $41.2million of targeted rate revenue that will be generated under the current programme, $23.3million has yet to be allocated to projects. This includes $5.5m of savings from projects completed in 2013/14.

7.       Throughout 2013, the CBD Advisory Board has considered a number of scenarios relating to how the currently unallocated targeted rate could be used to fund projects across the city centre. At the 26 June 2013 CBD Advisory Board meeting, a number of projects were presented by council staff for consideration and to date a number of projects have been shortlisted by the CBD Advisory Board for further scoping. The projects identified for further scoping were:

·    Beach Road Public Space

·    Freyberg Square Upgrade

·    Exchange Lane Upgrade

·    Hardinge Street Link

·    Myers Park Underpass

·    Beresford Square Upgrade

·    Disused Nelson Street off-ramp

·    Cycleway improvements to Hobson and Nelson Streets

·    Way finding strategy and implementation

·    Heritage Foreshore Project

8.       At the February 2014 CBD Advisory Board meeting, the Board resolved that officer’s report back to the Board with further details, including timing and cost, of these projects.

9.       As part of this scoping process, Council staff have explored the risks and benefits of investing targeted rate revenue in projects which may be affected by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and planned private development. 

10.     The CRL route through the city centre will link Britomart to the existing rail line near Eden Terrace, and will result in three new city centre stations at Aotea, Karangahape Road and Newton. Construction is forecast to commence in 2015/16 and be complete in 2020/21. Private development includes the SkyCity Convention centre and Downtown Shopping Centre.

11.     Further details of the shortlisted projects are outlined in Attachment A (Potential City Centre Projects and initiatives to be funded by CBD targeted rate surplus 2014/15 and 2015/16). Further detail will be presented at the March 2014 meeting.

 

Recommendation/s

That the CBD Advisory Board:

a)      note that of the total $41.2million of targeted rate revenue that will be generated to June 2016, $23.3million is still to be allocated to projects

b)      note that at the 26 June 2013 CBD Advisory Board meeting, a shortlist of potential projects was agreed for further scoping

c)      note that scoping has considered the risks and benefits of investing targeted rate revenue in projects which will be impacted by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and significant private developments.

d)      note that as a result  of this scoping council staff recommend the inclusion of the High Street Precinct area in the list of projects that could be funded by unallocated targeted rate, as this area will be relatively unaffected by the proposed City Rail Link (CRL) route and significant private developments.

e)      consider council staff recommendation that, based on the outcome of the scoping exercise, of the currently unallocated  $23.3m  targeted rate revenue:

·    $1m is allocated to Beach Road Public Space upgrade 

·    $2.7 m is allocated to Freyberg Square Upgrade

·    $2m is allocated to Myers Park underpass and link to Aotea Square

·    $1m is allocated to development and implementation of city centre way finding strategy

·    $16.6m is allocated to upgrade of the High Street Precinct area

f)       request that council staff report to the May 2014 meeting with more detail of the above projects, including outcomes, timings, costs and strategy for delivery.

g)      note that expenditure of targeted rate revenue up until June 2016 will be undertaken under the current targeted rate agreement

h)      request that council staff report to the May 2014 on the methods of targeted rate collection and expenditure which are currently being reviewed as part of the Auckland Council Long-term Plan (LTP) 2015-25 process.

 

 


 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

aView

Potential City Centre Projects and initiatives to be funded by CBD targeted rate surplus 2014/15 and 2015/16

25

     

Signatories

Authors

Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project

Authorisers

John Dunshea – Manager City Transformation Project

 

 



CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 



CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

Introduction - City Centre Integration Group

 

File No.: CP2014/05055

 

Purpose

1.       The City Centre Integration Group Manager will present an overview presentation of the group for the CBD Advisory Board’s information.

 

 

Recommendation/s

That the CBD Advisory Board:

a)      receive the information and thank the City Centre Integration Group Manager.

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report. 

Signatories

Authors

Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authorisers

Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project

 

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

CBD Targeted rate funded projects - Maintenance standards

 

File No.: CP2014/04573

 

Purpose

1.       To seek the CBD Advisory Board’s approval on how to proceed with outstanding maintenance issues to ensure outstanding CBD targeted rate funded projects are and will continue to be maintained at the highest service (A+) level.

Executive Summary

2.       At the February 2014 meeting, the Board sought answers from staff on outstanding maintenance issues that have not been actioned since November 2013. The democracy advisor undertook to investigate and report back to the board on this issue.

Background

3.       The CBD Advisory Board received an update at its meeting in November 2013 and noted the following.

4.       A proportion of the CBD Targeted Rate is set aside for consequential opex ($7.5m since 2004/2005). This consequential opex budget is used to fund an increased maintenance standard required on Targeted Rate funded streetscape upgrade projects.

5.       The CBD Advisory Board noted that the existing CBD streets that have not been upgraded continue to be maintained at the ‘lower’ level existing standard.

6.       The Board notes that the CBD Targeted Rate consequential opex budget contributes to:

·    increased standard in footpath sweeping, washing and loose litter collection, Auckland Transport defines this increased standard of cleaning as category ‘A+ in a ‘Major Centre’.

·    the extra cost of maintaining and replacing higher specific/value assets e.g. amenity lights, multi-function streetlight poles, street furniture, vegetation, design elements (water features, custom furniture and art works.

7.       The Board noted that a number of maintenance issues have developed on upgraded CBD streets over the past year, in both streetscape environment and also in open spaces such as St Patrick’s Square, where maintenance is the responsibility of Auckland Council departments.

8.       The Board noted evidence of decreased standard of maintenance and service levels have dropped below the required standard in the CBD and that the CBD Targeted rate is not being used for the purpose for which is taken.

Recommendation/s

That the CBD Advisory Board:

a)      request Auckland Council and Auckland Transport staff work together to provide a report to the April 2014 meeting addressing the following points;

1.   identifying how the maintenance issue is to be resolved

2.   outlining to what extent the CBD Targeted Rate consequential opex budget has been used since July 2012.

3.   outlining how the highest ‘A+’ standard of cleaning will be consistently applied to all upgraded CBD streets

4.   identifying what auditing and QA processes are in place for CBD streetscape maintenance

5.   clarify who is responsible for maintaining design elements and artworks located within an upgraded streetscape

6.   determine appropriate protocol for permanent removal of elements from the street for maintenance reasons

7.   specifically address the maintenance of St Patrick’s Square and Karangahape Road Bridge.

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report. 

Signatories

Authors

Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authorisers

Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014

 

 

PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report

 

File No.: CP2014/05292

 

Purpose

1.       To update the CBD Advisory Board on the PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) draft report.

 

Recommendation/s

That the CBD Advisory Board:

a)      receive the PENAP (Personal Exposure to Noise and Air Pollution) report.

b)      request Auckland Council staff to write a full report to the CBD Advisory Board prior to reporting to any Auckland Council committee.

 

 

Attachments

No.

Title

Page

aView

PENAP draft Final Report 19Mar2014

33

     

Signatories

Authors

Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authorisers

Rachel Eaton – Team Leader City Transformation Project

 

John Dunshea – Manager City Transformation Project

 


CBD Advisory Board

26 March 2014