I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Upper Harbour Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 8 April 2014 9.30am Upper Harbour
Local Board Office |
Upper Harbour Local Board
OPEN ADDENDUM AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Brian Neeson, JP |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Lisa Whyte |
|
Members |
Callum Blair |
|
|
John McLean |
|
|
Margaret Miles, JP |
|
|
Christine Rankin-MacIntyre |
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
Lesley Sharp Local Board Democracy Advisor
3 April 2014
Contact Telephone: (09) 414 2684 Email: lesley.sharp@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Upper Harbour Local Board 08 April 2014 |
|
25 Local board input into the Council-Controlled Organisations current state assessment 5
Upper Harbour Local Board 08 April 2014 |
|
Local board input into the Council-Controlled Organisations current state assessment
File No.: CP2014/06054
Purpose
1. This report seeks input from the Upper Harbour Local Board into the first phase of the Council-Controlled Organisations review - current state assessment.
Executive Summary
2. Auckland Council is undertaking a review of its seven substantive Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs).
3. The first step of this review consists of an assessment of the current state. Auckland Council has prepared a preliminary assessment reviewing the experience of the council and its CCOs over the last three years from a council perspective, along with a discussion document to guide input.
4. Local boards are invited to provide their input based on the discussion document. Feedback will be reported back to the Governing Body and will inform the first phase of the CCO review (current state assessment) as well as subsequent phases of the review.
That the Upper Harbour Local Board: a) provide input into the Council Controlled Organisations (CCO) review current state assessment, or b) delegate to a member of the Upper Harbour Local Board to provide the board’s input into the review by 30 April 2014. |
Discussion
5. Auckland Council is undertaking a review of its substantive CCOs: Auckland Transport, Auckland Council Property Ltd, Auckland Council Investments Ltd, Auckland Waterfront Development Agency, Auckland Tourism Events and Economic Development, Regional Facilities Auckland, and Waterfront Services Ltd.
6. The review aims to determine whether there is a need to change the scope of activities and functions within any CCO, the structures that the CCOs operate within, or any accountability mechanisms between the CCOs and Auckland Council.
7. Governing body members, local board chairs, the CCOs and the Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) were given the opportunity to provide feedback into the draft Terms of Reference. Common themes amongst the feedback received included:
· the need to reduce duplication between Auckland Council and CCO activities
· views as to where responsibility should lie for strategy/policy development
· questions around effectiveness where an activity is split between Auckland Council and one or more CCO
· the need to assess the impact of change on outcomes and delivery
· the need for effective communication and collaboration across organisations
· the need to achieve constructive and positive engagement with Aucklanders.
8. The feedback contributed to the development of the Terms of Reference. The final version was adopted by the Governing Body on 27 February 2014 and is presented in Attachment A.
9. The Terms of Reference specify the objectives of the review of CCOs as follows:
· To ensure the governance structures and accountability mechanisms:
o Facilitate appropriate alignment of the CCO operations with the Auckland Plan and other council strategies and policies
o Provide an effective and efficient model of service delivery for Auckland Council and Aucklanders
o Provide a sufficient level of political oversight and public accountability.
· In addition, the review will seek to:
o Provide clarity of role and responsibilities e.g. development of strategies, prioritisation of work programmes
o Eliminate duplication and gaps between the Auckland Council group organisations
o Identify any opportunities for better integration of activities and functions.
10. The intention is to complete the review and be ready to implement agreed outcomes by 30 June 2015, which aligns the CCO review with the Long Term Plan process. This timeline is extended from what was initially proposed to allow for full participation and feedback at the appropriate points of the process.
Current state assessment: preliminary findings
11. The first step of the CCO review consists of an assessment of the current state. Auckland Council has prepared a report reviewing the experience of the Council and its CCOs over the last three years from a council perspective.
12. The report, entitled “Auckland Council CCO Review, Current State Assessment (Council Perspective)”, is presented in Attachment B. It is referred to as the CSA in the rest of this report. The CSA is based on interviews with governing body members and input from Auckland Council staff.
13. Key preliminary findings in the CSA are as follows:
· CCOs were seen to deliver well for Auckland, and significant progress has been made over the last three years.
· Some governing body members are considering fine tuning the model while others expect more significant change.
· Views differ about the relative role of the Council and its CCOs in developing mid-level strategies – i.e. strategies that bridge the gap between the Auckland Plan and implementation plans.
· The majority view is that the formal accountability framework between the Council and its CCOs needs to be simplified and streamlined, with more rigorous debate when priorities are being communicated through the letter of expectations.
· Informal accountability and communication is seen just as important as the formal accountability framework.
· Feedback was received on the importance of integration within the council group for effective operation, and of a strong culture of collaboration, as well as other integration mechanisms.
14. The CCOs have prepared a report to reflect their own perspective, with support from Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PWC) and informed by interviews with CCO board members and staff of each of the seven CCOs. The CCO perspective was sought in recognition that the experience of the CCOs is different from that of council, and to utilise the considerable skills and experience within the CCOs to help inform the review.
15. The intention is to augment the current state assessment with input from local boards.
Local board feedback into Auckland Council’s discussion document
16. CCOs, as delivery agents of Auckland Council, have the potential to have a significant impact on positive outcomes for Auckland residents, ratepayers, and visitors. Local boards have an interest in the extent to which CCOs can contribute to their priorities, in projects being undertaken in their area, and in being kept up-to-date on wider regional projects. While the CCOs are accountable to the governing body as shareholder, they also have relationships with local boards who share decision-making responsibilities.
17. Local boards’ views on the CCO current state will enrich the council perspective, and local boards are invited to provide feedback based on the discussion document prepared by Auckland Council. The discussion document, entitled “Auckland Council CCOs, Current State, Council Perspective: Discussion and Questions for Local Boards” provide a series of questions addressed to local boards and is presented in Attachment C.
18. Local boards are encouraged to:
· reflect on their experience working with the CCOs over the last three years
· reflect on what worked well and what can be improved
· provide feedback on the issues and opportunities that the CCO review may address.
19. In providing their feedback, local board members are invited to base their comments on experience and to provide examples to illustrate the local board’s views.
20. Local board input will inform the analysis of CCOs and related activities and functions as part of the first phase of the CCO review (current state assessment) as well as informing subsequent phases of the review.
Consideration
Local Board Views
21. This report seeks the views of the Upper Harbour Local Board, which will inform the CCO review.
Maori Impact Statement
22. The Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) and Te Waka Angamua will be involved at several points in the process of reviewing the CCOs. They have provided input into the development of the Terms of Reference and have been asked to provide comments on the discussion document.
23. Consultation with Māori, including mana whenua, mataawaka and iwi, would form part of any public consultation should this occur during the third phase of the review.
Implementation Issues
24. There are no implementation issues at this stage of the CCO review.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Review of Auckland Council CCOs: Terms of Reference |
9 |
bView |
Auckland Council CCO Review, Current State Assessment (Council Perspective) |
15 |
cView |
Auckland Council CCOs, Current State, Council Perspective: Discussion and Question for Local Boards |
31 |
Signatories
Authors |
Carole Canler - Advisor, Local Board Services Anna Bray - Policy and Planning Manager, Local Board Services |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - Manager Local Board Services Eric Perry - Relationship Manager |