Agenda of Upper Harbour Local Board

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Upper Harbour Local Board will be held on:

Date:

Time:

Meeting Room:

Venue:

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

7.00pm

Upper Harbour Local Board Office
30 Kell Drive
Albany

Upper Harbour Local Board

OPEN AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chairperson	Brian Neeson, JP
Deputy Chairperson	Lisa Whyte
Members	Callum Blair
	John McLean
	Margaret Miles, JP
	Christine Rankin-MacIntyre

(Quorum 3 members)

Bianca Wildish

Local Board Democracy Advisor

19 August 2014

Contact Telephone: (09) 484 8856

Email: bianca.wildish@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

	Portfolio Activity	Responsibilities	Board Lead/s and Alternate
1	Governance	· Board Leadership · Board-to-Council Relationships · Board-to-Board Relationships · Civic Duties · Advocacy (local, regional, and central government) · Relationships with Maoridom · Relationships with government departments and agencies · Relationship with Property CCO · Relationship with Auckland Waterfront Development · Advocacy with Governing Body (Local Board Plan; Local Board Agreements) · Unitary Plan · Local area plan	Brian Neeson Lisa Whyte
2	Regulatory & Bylaws / Civil Defence Emergency Management .	· Resource consents · Heritage · Liquor · Gambling · Swimming pools fencing · Trees · Bylaws · Relationships with the Civil Defence Emergency Management Group · Community preparedness, disaster response, relief, and recovery	Callum Blair John McLean Christine Rankin-MacIntyre Margaret Miles (Resource Consents only)
3	Events / Arts and Culture	· Community celebration · Community identity · Neighbourhood gatherings and renewal · Event compliance · Relationship with ATEED · Relationship with Regional Facilities CCOs · Tourism · Artistic and cultural service levels · Promoting all aspects of artistic endeavour · Development of public art strategy and policy	Margaret Miles
4	Community and social well-being / Local Facilities	· Community development · Neighbourhood relationships · Funding for neighbourhood projects · Community safety (excl. town centres) · Graffiti removal · Community advocacy · Relationships with Youth · Leisure centres · Community houses · Halls · Community hubs · Arts facilities · Community Partnerships · Asset Management	Callum Blair Margaret Miles

	Portfolio Activity	Responsibilities	Board Lead/s and Alternate
5	Libraries	· Stewardship of libraries · Mobile library	Christine Rankin-MacIntyre Lisa Whyte
6	Sports parks and recreation (active) / Parks, Reserves and playgrounds (passive)	· Stewardship of sports parks · Stewardship of recreation facilities · Relationship with sports clubs · Neighbourhood parks and reserves (incl. esplanade reserves and the coastline) · Design and maintenance · Plantings, playgrounds, bollards, and walkways · Skateparks · Track Network development	Margaret Miles Lisa Whyte
7	Town Centres	· Town centre renewal · Design and maintenance · Community safety within town centres · Business Improvement Districts liaison · Urban design · Built Heritage	Margaret Miles Brian Neeson
8	Transport / Regional Transport and CBD development	· Local transport projects and public transport (incl. roading, footpaths, cycleways) · Liaison on regional Transport matters · 2^nd harbour crossing · Bridge walk cycleway · Inner City Rail Link · Waterfront development · CBD master plan	John McLean Margaret Miles
9	Natural Environment .	· Restoration of wetlands, streams, and waterways · Local priorities in relation to regional environmental management · Costal management including mangrove encroachment and erosion mitigation · Relationships with Watercare · Waste minimisation strategy · Bio security	John McLean Callum Blair Lisa Whyte (waste minimisation only)
10	Economic Development / Financial oversight	· Key relationship with Business Development Manager in Auckland Tourism Events and Economic Development team · Establish and promote local opportunities for increased tourism and economic development · Budgets · Project expenditure · Monitor GB strategy and Finance · Service Levels · Local funding policy	Lisa Whyte Margaret Miles

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 Welcome 7

2 Apologies 7

3 Declaration of Interest 7

4 Confirmation of Minutes 7

5 Leave of Absence 7

6 Acknowledgements 7

7 Petitions 7

8 Deputations 7

8.1 Onboard Skate Inc. 7

9 Public Forum 8

10 Extraordinary Business 8

11 Notices of Motion 8

12 Meeting Minutes Upper Harbour Local Board, Tuesday 12 August 2014 9

13 Psychoactive substances – draft Local Approved Product Policy 21

14 Swimming Pool Fencing Exemption – Special Exemption (Section 6) Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 53

15 Status of the Upper Harbour Local Board Discretionary Funds for the 2014/2015 financial year 59

16 Summary of Actions and Reports Requested - Upper Harbour Local Board - August 2014 61

17 Records of the Upper Harbour Local Board Workshops held on 5 and 12 August 2014 67

18 Governing Body Members' Update 73

19 Board Members' Reports 75

20 Consideration of Extraordinary Items

PUBLIC EXCLUDED

21 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 77

14 Swimming Pool Fencing Exemption – Special Exemption (Section 6) Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987

a. 41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour 77

b. 36A Wicklam Lane, Albany 77

1 Welcome

2 Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

3 Declaration of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

4 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 12 August 2014, as a true and correct record.

5 Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.

6 Acknowledgements

At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.

7 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

8 Deputations

8.1 Onboard Skate Inc.

Purpose

1. The purpose of this deputation is to address the Upper Harbour Local Board regarding Onboard Skate Inc.

Executive Summary

2. An overview of the organisation will be provided focusing on the benefits children and youth in the Upper Harbour Local Board community receive through the provision of skateboard and scooter programmes and events.

3. Steve Hodges, CEO, will be in attendance to address the Upper Harbour Local Board.

Recommendation/s

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) receive the deputation from Steve Hodges regarding Onboard Skate Inc.

b) thank Steve Hodges for his attendance and presentation.

9 Public Forum

A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.

10 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

11 Notices of Motion

At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

Psychoactive substances – draft Local Approved Product Policy

File No.: CP2014/17136

Purpose

1. The purpose of the report is to seek local board feedback on the proposed option for the draft Local Approved Product Policy (LAPP).

Executive summary

2. On 6 March 2014 the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee(RSPC) approved a work plan for the development of Auckland Council’s LAPP (REG/2014/34). The LAPP will set rules regarding where retail outlets of psychoactive substances may operate. The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 provides that a policy may regulate the location of retail outlets by reference to broad areas within a district, proximity to other premises selling approved products and/or distance from certain types of premises such as schools, places of worship and other community facilities.

3. On 3 July the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee (RSPC) considered a report setting out the proposed content for the draft Local Approved Product Policy. The committee agreed the following recommendations (REG/2014/86).

a) endorse the proposed draft Local Approved Product Policy that will prevent the sale of approved psychoactive substances in the following areas:

· high deprivation areas as defined by the Ministry of Health’s Deprivation Index score of 8, 9 or 10 indicating areas that fall in the bottom 30% of deprivation scores

· neighbourhood centers as defined by the unitary plan

· within 300m of a high school

· within 100m of a primary school

· within 300m of a mental health or addiction treatment center

· within 500m of an existing psychoactive substance retail licence

b) forward a copy of this report to local boards to be considered on their agendas

c) note that once all the local board feedback has been analysed, a final draft Local Approved Product Policy (LAPP) will be presented to the committee on 9 October 2014 to be approved for public notification via the special consultative procedure

d) note the special consultative procedure will begin in November 2014 with the expected final adoption of the policy in March 2015.

Recommendation/s

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) provide feedback on the draft Local Approved Product Policy option set out in Attachment A of the report entitled “Psychoactive substances – draft Local Approved Product Policy”.

Comments

4. On 6 March 2014 the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee (RSPC) approved a work plan for the development of Auckland Council’s LAPP (REG/2014/34). On 3 July the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee endorsed a preferred option for the LAPP (REG/2014/86).

5. The LAPP will set rules regarding where retail outlets of psychoactive substances may operate. The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 provides that a policy may regulate the location of retail outlets by reference to broad areas within a district, proximity to other premises selling approved products and/or distance from certain types of premises such as schools, places of worship and other community facilities.

6. Six options were considered for the LAPP. Three options were rejected prior to consultation as not being able to achieve the outcomes for a successful LAPP. The remaining three options were discussed with local boards, external stakeholders and council staff. After consideration of feedback and relevant research a preferred option was developed.

7. The preferred option for the LAPP would prevent licences being granted in areas of high deprivation, near high schools and near addiction and mental health treatment centres. It would also limit how close to an existing shop a new shop could open. This option would reduce the availability of these substances in areas where their presence is likely to have the greatest potential for harm. The prevention of harm is achieved while maintaining the intent of the government to allow a regulated sale of these substances.

8. Further details on the rationale for the preferred option for the LAPP are set out in the report that went to the Regional Policy and Strategy Committee on 3 July (refer Attachment A). Local board feedback on this option is being sought through this report. Local board feedback on this preferred option will inform the final draft of the LAPP which will be reported to the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee on 9 October. Local boards will have an opportunity to provide feedback on the final draft in November 2014 – February 2015.

Consideration

Local board views and implications

9. Local board views on the draft LAPP option are being sought via this report. Local boards have previously provided feedback on possible options. Workshops on the proposed options were held with all of the local boards except for Great Barrier, Waiheke and Orakei local boards who declined to be involved in the process. Of the remaining 18 local boards,Whau declined to attend the workshop and did not provide any feedback.

10. Of the 17 local boards who took part in the LAPP workshops 13 endorsed the specified place option as their preferred option. Four boards preferred either the town centre or industrial option, as they felt it provided tighter restrictions in their areas. All of these local boards also provided the specified areas as their second option, acknowledging that it was unlikely that all local boards would opt for their preferred option. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board declined to provide a preferred option. All local board feedback was considered in the selection and development of the option presented for feedback in the current report.

Maori impact statement

11. Māori are over represented amongst the groups of vulnerable people likely to be affected by using approved psychoactive substances. This over representation has two effects. Firstly, getting the right option for the LAPP to maximize harm reduction will be more effective for Māori. Secondly, any solutions need to be designed in close collaboration with Māori to ensure they are workable and support wider initiatives aimed at improving Māori outcomes.

12. A workshop has been undertaken with representatives from Hapai Te Hauora Tapui, which is an agency representing Māori health providers in the Auckland region. Council staff will be working with the Independent Māori Statutory Board and Hapai Te Hauora Tapui to set up hui for iwi feedback. Information from the workshop and hui will be central to the development of the LAPP.

Implementation

Step	Estimated timeframe
1. Local board and stakeholder engagement on draft option Officers will seek feedback from local boards, internal, external and political stakeholders on the approved draft LAPP option.	July – September 2014
2. Final draft LAPP for special consultative procedure Officers will then present a final draft policy to RSPC for approval for consultation.	9 October
3. Special consultative procedure Officers will follow the special consultative procedure set out in section 83 of Local Government Act 2002. This will include public submissions and hearings.	November 2014
4. Local board feedback of final draft Officers will seek formal feedback from local boards on the final draft policy.	November 2014 – February 2015
4. Adopt final policy Following the hearings the draft will be finalised and presented to RSPC for adoption.	March 2015
5. Implementation and review A copy will be sent to Ministry of Health after it has been completed. The LAPP will then be reviewed every five years in accordance with section 69 of the Act.	Ongoing

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a View	Psychoactive Substances Draft Local Approved Products Policy	5

Signatories

Authors

Callum Thorpe - Principal Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Penny Pirrit - Regional & Local Planning Manager

Eric Perry - Relationship Manager

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

Swimming Pool Fencing Exemption – Special Exemption (Section 6) Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987

File No.: CP2014/15437

Purpose

1. The purpose of this report is to present the Upper Harbour Local Board with one application for special exemptions from some of the requirements of the Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 (‘the Act’).

Executive summary

2. The Upper Harbour Local Board Swimming Pool fencing Exemption Working Party, consisting of local board members Neeson, Blair and Rankin-MacIntyre, were requested to consider two applications for special exemption under Section 6 of the fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987.

3. One application pertained to an above ground spa pool and the other to an in ground swimming pool. The officer’s recommendation of granting the exemption of the spa pool application with conditions was accepted by the working party, a site visit was not conducted and the applicant was not contacted to appear before the working party to speak to their application for special exemption.

4. The application pertaining to the in ground swimming pool necessitated a site visit which was conducted by local board member Callum Blair on 14 August 2014. The applicant was provided with the opportunity to speak to their application for special exemption on the occasion of the site visit.

5. After consideration of the applications, the working party’s recommendations are as follows:

· 41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour (in ground swimming pool compliant with NZS 8500-2006). Recommends granting the swimming pool fencing exemption application under the condition that the pool gate is not propped open at any time and that the sliding doors continue to have top bolts affixed.

· 36A Wicklam Lane, Albany (above ground spa pool compliant with NZS 8500-2006). Recommends granting the swimming pool fencing exemption application under the condition that ongoing compliance with section 3.10 of NZS 8500-2006 is maintained at all times.

Recommendation/s

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) receive the report.

b) receive the application from:

i) Mark Birtwhistle – 41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour

ii) Richard Higham - 36A Wicklam Lane, Albany.

c) determine each application, by way of resolution, to:

i) grant the application for special exemption as sought, or

ii) grant the application subject to conditions, or

iii) decline the application for special exemption sought.

Discussion

6. Each property, which is the subject of an application before the board, has been inspected by Auckland Council pool inspectors. In each case, the swimming/spa pool fencing does not comply with the Act. The details of non-compliance in each case vary and are specified in the attachments to this report. Each applicant has chosen to seek a special exemption from the requirements of the Act.

7. The purpose of the Act is stated to be “to promote the safety of young children by requiring the fencing of … swimming pools”.

8. The Act requires pool owners to fence their pool with a fence. Specific detail on the means of achieving compliance with the Act is contained in the schedule to the Act. If a pool is not fenced with a complying fence it is an offence under the Act, unless exempt.

9. An exemption can only be granted by the local board after consideration of the particular characteristics of the property and the pool, other relevant circumstances and taking into account any conditions it may impose. Then, only if “satisfied that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young children”, can an exemption be granted.

10. Defining the immediate pool area will be relevant to considerations concerning the property and the pool. The immediate pool area means the land in or on which the pool is situated and as much of the surrounding area that is used for activities or purposes related to the use of the pool. The Act provides that the fence should be situated to prevent children moving directly to the pool from the house, other buildings, garden paths and other areas of the property that would normally be available to young children.

11. Another common consideration for local boards in exemption applications will be instances where a building forms part of the pool fence. Where doors from a building open into the pool area, the territorial local authority may grant an exemption from compliance with clauses 8 to 10 of the schedule to the Act. It may exempt if it is satisfied that compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in breach of any other Act, regulation or bylaw, and the door is fitted with a locking device that when properly operated prevents the door from being readily opened by children under the age of 6 years. If the local board is satisfied that a door within a wall in a building meets that test, the board must also be satisfied that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young children.

12. When granting a special exemption, the local board may impose such other conditions relating to the property or the pool as are reasonable in the circumstances (section 6(2) of the Act). Issues to be considered include:

a) Will the exemption be personal to the applicant so that on a sale of the property a new owner will need to apply for a new exemption? This might be appropriate where the personal circumstances of the applicant have been considered as a relevant circumstance and had a bearing on the exercise of the discretion.

b) Will the exemption be granted for a fixed term and irrespective of changes of ownership so that the exemption runs with the property?

c) Are there any other conditions which should be imposed, repairs to existing fencing, or a requirement for more frequent inspection of the pool (currently pools are inspected every three years).

13. Any exemption granted or condition imposed may be amended or revoked by resolution. The rules of natural justice would however dictate that this action should not be taken without prior notice to the pool owner and allowing the pool owner an opportunity to be heard.

Consideration

14. The recommendations contained within this report fall within the local board’s delegated authority.

15. The Act enables an exemption to be granted from clauses 8 to 10 of the Act (doors in walls of buildings) if the local board is satisfied that compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in breach of any other Act, regulation or bylaw and the door is fitted with a locking device that when properly operated prevents the door from being readily opened by children under the age of 6 years.

16. The overarching consideration in terms of the Act is that a resolution to grant an exemption may only be made after having regard to the particular characteristics of the property and the pool, any other relevant circumstances and any conditions it may impose, and only if it is satisfied that such an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young children.

17. The local board may resolve to grant, grant subject to conditions, or decline an application for special exemption.

18. If an application is declined the applicant will be required to fence their pool in accordance with the Act.

19. The exemption hearing process under the Act does not trigger the significance policy but it is an important statutory function.

20. Auckland Council is committed to ensuring that Auckland is a safe place for children to live and play in. Pool fencing issues have a strong relationship with council’s strategic priorities for community safety.

Local board views and implications

21. The local board is the decision maker in relation to exemption applications under the Act.

Maori impact statement

22. This report does not raise issues of particular significance for Maori.

General

23. Compliance with the Act is a mandatory requirement for all pool owners unless exempt.

24. Council’s pools inspectors have consulted with the applicants in each case. Applicants have been made aware of council’s requirements to ensure fencing is compliant with the Act. The applicants have elected to seek a special exemption for individual reasons.

Implementation

25. The decision must be made by resolution and contain conditions (if any).

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a View	41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour (Under Separate Cover) - Confidential
b View	36A Wicklam Lane, Albany - Confidential
c View	41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour, Site Visit Notes	5

Signatories

Authors

Phillip Curtis - Senior Swimming Pool Specialist

Authorisers

Ian McCormick - Manager Building Control

Eric Perry - Relationship Manager

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

Status of the Upper Harbour Local Board Discretionary Funds for the 2014/2015 financial year

File No.: CP2014/18239

Purpose

1. This report provides an update to the Upper Harbour Local Board on the availability of discretionary funding for the 2014/2015 financial year. It also provides a running total of the balances of the board’s various discretionary funds.

Executive summary

2. The Upper Harbour Local Board has a number of discretionary funds available in the 2014/2015 financial year. The current balances of the board’s discretionary funds are as follows:

Fund	Total available in 2014/15 ($)	Amount spent ($)	Balance remaining ($)
Local Events Contestable Fund	36,693.00	22,000.00	14,693.00
Local Discretionary Community Grants	92,674.57	0.00	92,674.57
Local Events Support Fund	36,432.25	34,430.00	2,002.25
SLIPs Funding*	62,716.60	0.00	62,716.60

*This amount is subject to change and will be reviewed once all financial year end deferrals are calculated.

3. At its meeting on 12 August 2014, the Upper Harbour Local Board resolved to allocate the following from its Local Events Discretionary Contestable Fund, round 1, as follows:

Applicant	Event	Date	Funding Allocated
OnBoard Skate Inc.	Skate for Change	1/10/14 – 30/4/15	$2,000.00
North Harbour Hockey Association	Ford National Hockey League and National Senior Tour	6 – 14/9/14	$5,000.00
Greenhithe Harcourts Santa Parade	Greenhithe Harcourts Santa Parade	7/12/14	$3,000.00
Getin2Life Youth Development Trust	In2it Summer Series	1/10/14 – 30/4/15	$4,000.00 Subject to receipt of accountability report for 2013/14
Harbour Sport Trust	Mud Rush	14/9/14	$3,000.00
Albany Community Co-ordinator	Our Amazing Place	28/3/15	$5,000.00
TOTAL			$22,000.00

4. At its meeting on 12 August 2014, the Upper Harbour Local Board also resolved to allocate previously agreed funding for multi-year events from its Local Event Support Fund as follows:

Applicant	Event	Date	Funding Allocated
Greenhithe Community Trust	Greenhithe Community Carols	14/12/14	$1,500.00
Greenhithe Community Trust	Greenhithe Spring Carnival	31/10/14	$1,500.00
Tennis Northern	Pascoe NZ Tennis Open	December 2014	$6,000.00
Running Events Limited	Albany Lakes Summer Series	Jan – Mar 2015	$5,680.00
Pinehurst School	Inside Out Sports Expo	March 2015	$5,000.00
TOTAL			$19,680.00

5. At the same meeting the board resolved to contribute $6,250 to an outdoor movie at the Albany Lakes, on Friday, 11 January 2015, and $8,500 for a movie event to be held at Luckens Reserve (West Harbour) on Friday, 13 March 2015. These events will be funded out of the Local Event Support Fund.

Recommendation/s

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) receive the Status of the Upper Harbour Local Board Discretionary Funds for the 2014/2015 financial year report.

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Signatories

Authors	Karen Marais - Local Board Services
Authorisers	Eric Perry - Relationship Manager

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

Summary of Actions and Reports Requested - Upper Harbour Local Board - August 2014

File No.: CP2014/18332

Purpose

1. The purpose of this report is to update the Upper Harbour Local Board on the status of actions and requested reports arising out of local board business meetings.

Executive summary

2. The attached schedule provides a list of the actions and reports requested arising out of the Upper Harbour Local Board business meetings and workshops, and their current status.

3. The completed actions listed will be removed from the list once the board is satisfied that the matter has been resolved.

Recommendation/s

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) receive the Summary of Actions and Reports Requested – Upper Harbour Local Board – August 2014 report.

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a View	Summary of actions and reports requested as at August 2014	5

Signatories

Authors	Karen Marais - Local Board Services
Authorisers	Eric Perry - Relationship Manager

Upper Harbour Local Board

26 August 2014

Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

That the Upper Harbour Local Board:

a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.

14 Swimming Pool Fencing Exemption – Special Exemption (Section 6) Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 - Attachment a - 41 Marina View Drive, West Harbour

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)

Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution

The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7.

s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person.

In particular, the report contains the applicants details.

s48(1)(a)

The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7.

14 Swimming Pool Fencing Exemption – Special Exemption (Section 6) Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 - Attachment b - 36A Wicklam Lane, Albany

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)

Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution

The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7.

s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person.

In particular, the report contains the applicants details.

s48(1)(a)

The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7.

Authors	Bianca Wildish - Democracy Advisor
Authorisers	Eric Perry - Relationship Manager