I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Heritage Advisory Panel will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 23
September 2014
6.00pm
Level 15
meeting room
1 Greys Avenue
Auckland Council Building
|
|
Heritage Advisory Panel
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Mike Lee
|
|
|
Members
|
Elizabeth Aitken-Rose
|
Allan Matson
|
|
|
David Beamish
|
Jane Matthews
|
|
|
Graeme Burgess
|
Dr Ann McEwan
|
|
|
Leyton Chan
|
Graeme Murdoch
|
|
|
Rob Enright
|
Bill Rayner
|
|
|
Michael Geale
|
Sherry Reynolds
|
|
|
Sally Hughes
|
Lorraine Wilson
|
|
|
La Roche John
|
|
|
|
Jim Mathers
|
|
(Quorum 10 members)
|
|
|
Barbara Watson
Democracy Advisor
18 September 2014
Contact Telephone: (09) 307 7629
Email: barbara.watson@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Purpose
·
Provide advice to the council in
relation to:
- the
direction and content of strategies, policies and initiatives
- any matter that the panel considers to be of
particular interest or concern to the historic heritage of Auckland
·
To deliver advice for improving
the promotion and management of historic heritage of the Auckland region
·
Advise Auckland Council on council
processes and mechanisms for engagement with the historic heritage community,
including owners of heritage buildings in Auckland.
·
To recommend historic heritage
expert membership and provide advice to the Auckland Urban Design Panel.
Scope
To provide a forum for the consideration of issues affecting
historic heritage of the Auckland region and provide advice to the council.
Priorities
The priorities for the panel include:
·
Historic Heritage Plan
·
Issues relating to the Unitary Plan
·
Council processes
·
Input into the Auckland Urban Design Panel.
Membership
The panel’s spokesperson is its chairperson.
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 5
2 Declaration of Interest 5
3 Confirmation of Minutes 5
4 Extraordinary
Business 5
5 Regional Facilities Auckland - Local Board Services 7
6 Update on Unitary Plan 9
7 General Business 11
8 Consideration of Extraordinary
Items
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Declaration of Interest
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a
conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other
external interest they might have.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Heritage Advisory Panel:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Tuesday 22 July 2014, as a true and correct
record.
|
4 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“An item that is
not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time
when it is open to the public,-
(i) The
reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be
delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“Where an item
is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general
business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed
at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in
respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the
local authority for further discussion.”
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
Regional
Facilities Auckland - Local Board Services
File No.: CP2014/19409
Purpose
1. Judy Lawley, Local Board
Engagement Manager for Regional Facilities Auckland, will provide a brief
description of her role between local board services and the advisory panels.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) thank Judy Lawley, Local Board
Engagement Manager of Regional Facilities Auckland for her attendance.
|
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Barbara Watson - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
Update on Unitary Plan
File No.: CP2014/21628
Purpose
1. To update the
Panel on heritage issues raised in submissions to the Unitary Plan.
Executive
summary
2. A brief summary
on issues raised via submissions received on the Unitary Plan. Staff will
present a verbal discussion on the issues.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the report.
|
Comments
3. At the Regional
Policy Statement (RPS) level, a number of themes have emerged. There has been
general support for Historic Heritage with challenges more at the detail level;
e.g. there is no substantial challenge to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
(PAUP) criteria and thresholds.
4. At the Historic
Heritage overlay level, a number of submissions have been received from those
requesting major changes to the objectives and policies on specific matters;
e.g. requests to clarify the extent of place.
5. In regards to
the schedules, there are over 400 submissions requesting the inclusion of
additional historic heritage places.
6. There are 66 category
upgrade requests (Category B to A) and approximately 50 submissions relating to
interiors of buildings. There are approximately 50 submissions requesting
scheduled items be removed.
7. There are also
submissions requesting changes to the New Historic Heritage Areas identified
via the Heritage Surveys Programme.
8. There are
approximately 90 submissions seeking Amendments to Extent of Place or Scope of
Scheduling.
9. There is also a number of
submissions on the pre-1944 & Special Character, as well as Mana Whenua
provisions. Council staff will present a summary of
issues raised at the meeting.
Consideration
Local
board views and implications
10. This matter has
not been discussed with the local board.
Māori
impact statement
11. Heritage is of
fundamental importance to tangata whenua, their culture and traditions. Sites
of significance to tangata whenua are an important part of their heritage,
established through whakapapa. The activities identified in the report
will have varying degrees of impact upon Maori, as a summary of the activities;
this report does not address these matters specifically. Where appropriate,
staff in the Heritage Unit engage with Māori on particular projects and/or
advise other departments where activities may impact upon Māori heritage
values.
Implementation
12. There are no
implementation issues currently.
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Noel Reardon - Manager, Heritage
|
|
Authoriser
|
Ludo Campbell-Reid - Environmental Strategy &
Policy Manager
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
General Business
File No.: CP2014/19410
Purpose
1. To receive and discuss any
correspondence and general business with the panel members.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the correspondence.
|
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Letter dated 11 August 2014 from Auckland Transport re
Remuera Railway Station Preservation Trust
|
13
|
|
bView
|
Extracts from the Waitemata Local Board meetings
regarding the Parnell Heritage Station
|
15
|
Signatories
|
Author
|
Barbara Watson - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
Noel Reardon - Manager, Heritage
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
|
Heritage Advisory
Panel
23 September
2014
|
|
EXTRACTS FROM THE
WAITEMATA LOCAL BOARD MEETINGS REGARDING THE PARNELL HERITAGE STATION
14 MAY 2014
|
12
|
Councillor’s Report
|
|
|
Resolution number WTM/2014/61
MOVED by Chairperson S
Chambers, seconded by Member DA Yates:
a) That
the verbal update from the Waitemata and Gulf Ward Councillor, Mike Lee be
received.
b) That
the Waitemata Local Board:
(i) Notes
the advice from the Heritage Advisory Panel that it considers the heritage
and architectural qualities that should be formally protected and should be
retained, with its heritage locomotive and rolling stock collection, as part
of the Parnell heritage station complex.
(ii) Further
notes the acknowledgement of the heritage assessment for this property
contained in the New Zealand Historic Places Trust submission on the Unitary
Plan as advised by the Panel and advise that Council officers should
undertake their own assessment as a matter of urgency, and that this
assessment be forwarded to Auckland Council Property Limited.
(iii)
Further notes the content of the letter of support from the Chair of the Heritage
Advisory Panel, Cr Mike Lee to Mayor, Len Brown.
(iv)
Supports and endorses the advice of the Heritage Advisory Panel and the
request of the Mayor, that this matter be reconsidered.
(v) That
the Chair be delegated to write to Mayor, Len Brown in terms of these
resolutions.
c) That
Councillor Mike Lee be thanked for his attendance and presentation.
CARRIED
|
8 JULY 2014
|
13
|
Auckland Transport Report -
July 2014
|
|
|
Resolution
number WTM/2014/108
MOVED by
Deputy Chairperson PJ Coom, seconded by Member CP Dempsey:
a) That
the Auckland Transport Report – July 2014 be received.
b) That
the Waitematā Local Board:
i) Notes that Parnell Rail Station concept Option 1 has been
approved by the Auckland Transport Board; and
ii) Delegates to the Transport Portfolio holders, Members Pippa
Coom and Christopher Dempsey to provide feedback on the design of Option 1 to
Auckland Transport.
c) That Jonathan Anyon, Elected Member Relationship Team
Manager, Auckland Transport be thanked for his attendance.
CARRIED
|
