I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Waitematā Local Board Hearings
Committee will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Wednesday, 10
September 2014
1.00 pm
Waitematā
Local Board Room
Level 2
35 Graham Street
|
|
Waitematā Local Board Hearings
Committee
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Christopher Dempsey
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Vernon Tava
|
|
|
Members
|
Deborah Yates
|
|
|
|
Greg Moyle
|
|
(Quorum 2 members)
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
9 Public Forum 5
10 Extraordinary Business 5
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Special Exemption Application for 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay,
Auckland 7
13 Special Exemption Application for 46A Brighton Road, Parnell,
Auckland 31
14 Special Exemption Application for 16 Dublin Street, St Marys
Bay, Auckland 117
15 Consideration of Extraordinary
Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
16 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 141
12 Special Exemption Application for 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay,
Auckland
a. Application for a Special Exemption: 9 Argyle
Stree, Herne Bay 141
b. Photos of Special Exemption Application 9
Argyle Street, Herne Bay 141
c. Evaluation from Report Writer for 9 Argyle
Street, Herne Bay 141
13 Special Exemption Application for 46A Brighton Road, Parnell,
Auckland
a. Application 46A Brighton Road, Parnell 141
14 Special Exemption Application for 16 Dublin Street, St Marys
Bay, Auckland
a. Application form and supporting documents 142
2 Apologies
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a
conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other
external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Waitematā Local Board Hearings Committee:
a)
Confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Thursday, 13 March 2014, including the
confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of
the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of
the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of
the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying
for deputations are required to give seven working days’ notice of subject
matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Board.
This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the
published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as
resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests to speak had been received.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been
received.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately
30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on
matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is
allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“An item that is
not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time
when it is open to the public,-
(i) The
reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be
delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“Where an item
is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general
business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be
discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in
respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the
local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of
the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
Special
Exemption Application for 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay, Auckland
File No.: CP2014/19583
Purpose
1. The purpose
of this report is to present to the Waitemata Local Board Hearings Committee
one application for special exemptions from some of the requirements of the
Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 (The Act).
Executive summary
2. The local
board must conduct a hearing and consider each of the applications for special
exemption. The local board must resolve to decline, grant or grant subject to
conditions, the exemptions sought.
|
Recommendations
That the Waitematā Local
Board Hearings Committee:
a) Receive the Special Exemption
Application for 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay, Auckland report.
b) Receive the application by:
i) Gary
Lane of 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay, Auckland.
c) Determine the application, by
way of resolution, to:
i) grant the application for
special exemption as sought, or
ii) grant the application subject
to conditions, or
iii) decline the application for
special exemption sought
|
Comments
3. Each
property, which is the subject of an application before the local board, has
been inspected by Auckland Council pool inspectors. In each case, the
swimming/spa pool fencing does not comply with that Act. The details of
non-compliance in each case vary and are specified in the attachments to this
report. Each applicant has chosen to seek a special exemption from the
requirements of the Act.
4. The purpose
of the Act is stated to be “to promote the safety of young children by
requiring the fencing of swimming pools”.
5. The Act
requires pool owners to fence their pool with a fence. Specific detail on the
means of achieving compliance with the Act is contained in the schedule to the
Act. If a pool is not fenced with a complying fence it is an offence under the
Act, unless exempt.
6. An exemption
can only be granted by the local board after a consideration of the particular
characteristics of the property and the pool, other relevant circumstances and
taking into account any conditions it may impose. Then, only if “satisfied
that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children”, can an exemption be granted.
7. Defining the
immediate pool area will be relevant to considerations concerning the property
and the pool. The immediate pool area means the land in or on which the pool is
situated and as much of the surrounding area that is used for activities or
purposes related to the use of the pool. The Act provides that the fence
should be situated to prevent children moving directly to the pool from the
house, other buildings, garden paths and other areas of the property that would
normally be available to young children.
8. Another
common consideration for local boards in exemption applications will be
instances where a building forms part of the pool fence. Where doors from a
building open into the pool area, the Territorial Authority may grant an
exemption from compliance with clauses 8 to 10 of the schedule to the Act. It
may exempt if it is satisfied that compliance with the Act is impossible,
unreasonable or in breach of any other Act, regulation or bylaw, and the door
is fitted with a locking device that when properly operated prevents the door
from being readily opened by children under the age of 6 years. If the local
board is satisfied that a door within a wall in a building meets that test, the
local board must also be satisfied that an exemption would not significantly
increase the danger to young children.
9. When granting
a special exemption, the Committee may impose such other conditions relating to
the property or the pool as are reasonable in the circumstances (section 6(2)
of the Act). Issues to be considered include:
a. Will the
exemption be personal to the applicant so that on a sale of the property a new
owner will need to apply for a new exemption? This might be appropriate where
the personal circumstances of the applicant have been considered as a relevant
circumstance and had a bearing on the exercise of the discretion.
b. Will the
exemption be granted for a fixed term and irrespective of changes of ownership
so that the exemption runs with the property?
c. Are there any
other conditions which should be imposed, repairs to existing fencing, or a
requirement for more frequent inspection of the pool (currently pools are
inspected every three years).
10. Any exemption
granted or condition imposed may be amended or revoked by the swimming pool
exemption committee by resolution. The rules of natural justice would however
dictate that this action should not be taken without prior notice to the pool
owner and allowing the pool owner an opportunity to be heard.
Consideration
11. The recommendations contained within this report fall within
the local board’s delegated authority.
12. The Act enables an exemption to be granted from clauses 8 to 10
of the Act (doors in walls of buildings) if the local board is satisfied that
compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in breach of any other
Act, regulation or bylaw and the door is fitted with a locking device that when
properly operated prevents the door from being readily opened by children under
the age of 6 years.
13. The overarching consideration in terms of the Act is that a
resolution to grant an exemption may only be made after having regard to the
particular characteristics of the property and the pool, any other relevant
circumstances and any conditions it may impose, and only if it is satisfied
that such an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children.
14. The local board may resolve to grant, grant subject to
conditions, or decline an application for special exemption.
15. If an application is declined the applicant will be required to
fence their pool in accordance with the Act.
16. The exemption hearing process under the Act does not trigger
the significance policy but it is an important statutory function.
17. The Council is committed to ensuring the Auckland is a safe
place for children to live and play in. Pool fencing issues have a strong
relationship with the Council’s strategic priorities for community safety.
Local board views and implications
18. The local
board is the decision maker in relation to exemption applications under the
Act.
Maori impact statement
19. This report
does not raise issues of particular significance for Maori.
Implementation
20. The decision
must be made by resolution and contain conditions (if any).
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Application for a Special Exemption: 9 Argyle Stree,
Herne Bay - Confidential
|
|
|
bView
|
Photos of Special Exemption Application 9 Argyle
Street, Herne Bay - Confidential
|
|
|
cView
|
Evaluation from Report Writer for 9 Argyle Street,
Herne Bay - Confidential
|
|
|
dView
|
Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987
|
11
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Jan Barnard - Senior Swimming Pools Specialist
|
|
Authorisers
|
Barry Smedts - Manager Compliance
Judith Webster - Relationship Manager
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
Special Exemption Application for 46A Brighton Road,
Parnell, Auckland
File No.: CP2014/20053
Purpose
1. The purpose
of this report is to present to the Waitemata Local Board Hearings Committee
one application for special exemptions from some of the requirements of the
Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 (The Act).
Executive summary
2. The local
board must conduct a hearing and consider each of the applications for special
exemption. The local board must resolve to decline, grant or grant subject to
conditions, the exemptions sought.
|
Recommendations
That the Waitematā Local
Board Hearings Committee:
a) Receive the Special Exemption
Application for 46A Brighton Road, Parnell, Auckland, report.
b) Receive the application by:
i) Susanne
Wood of 46A Brighton Road, Parnell
c) Determine the application, by
way of resolution, to:
i) grant the application for
special exemption as sought, or
ii) grant the application subject
to conditions, or
iii) decline the application for
special exemption sought
|
Comments
3. Each
property, which is the subject of an application before the local board, has
been inspected by Auckland Council pool inspectors. In each case, the
swimming/spa pool fencing does not comply with that Act. The details of
non-compliance in each case vary and are specified in the attachments to this
report. Each applicant has chosen to seek a special exemption from the
requirements of the Act.
4. The purpose
of the Act is stated to be “to promote the safety of young children by
requiring the fencing of swimming pools”.
5. The Act
requires pool owners to fence their pool with a fence. Specific detail on the
means of achieving compliance with the Act is contained in the schedule to the
Act. If a pool is not fenced with a complying fence it is an offence under the
Act, unless exempt.
6. An exemption
can only be granted by the local board after a consideration of the particular
characteristics of the property and the pool, other relevant circumstances and
taking into account any conditions it may impose. Then, only if “satisfied
that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children”, can an exemption be granted.
7. Defining the
immediate pool area will be relevant to considerations concerning the property
and the pool. The immediate pool area means the land in or on which the pool is
situated and as much of the surrounding area that is used for activities or
purposes related to the use of the pool. The Act provides that the fence
should be situated to prevent children moving directly to the pool from the
house, other buildings, garden paths and other areas of the property that would
normally be available to young children.
8. Another
common consideration for local boards in exemption applications will be
instances where a building forms part of the pool fence. Where doors from a building
open into the pool area, the Territorial Authority may grant an exemption from
compliance with clauses 8 to 10 of the schedule to the Act. It may exempt if
it is satisfied that compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in
breach of any other Act, regulation or bylaw, and the door is fitted with a
locking device that when properly operated prevents the door from being readily
opened by children under the age of 6 years. If the local board is satisfied
that a door within a wall in a building meets that test, the local board must
also be satisfied that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger
to young children.
9. When granting
a special exemption, the Committee may impose such other conditions relating to
the property or the pool as are reasonable in the circumstances (section 6(2)
of the Act). Issues to be considered include:
a. Will the
exemption be personal to the applicant so that on a sale of the property a new
owner will need to apply for a new exemption? This might be appropriate where
the personal circumstances of the applicant have been considered as a relevant
circumstance and had a bearing on the exercise of the discretion.
b. Will the
exemption be granted for a fixed term and irrespective of changes of ownership
so that the exemption runs with the property?
c. Are there any
other conditions which should be imposed, repairs to existing fencing, or a
requirement for more frequent inspection of the pool (currently pools are
inspected every three years).
10. Any exemption
granted or condition imposed may be amended or revoked by the swimming pool
exemption committee by resolution. The rules of natural justice would however
dictate that this action should not be taken without prior notice to the pool
owner and allowing the pool owner an opportunity to be heard.
Consideration
11. The recommendations contained within this report fall within
the local board’s delegated authority.
12. The Act enables an exemption to be granted from clauses 8 to 10
of the Act (doors in walls of buildings) if the local board is satisfied that
compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in breach of any other
Act, regulation or bylaw and the door is fitted with a locking device that when
properly operated prevents the door from being readily opened by children under
the age of 6 years.
13. The overarching consideration in terms of the Act is that a
resolution to grant an exemption may only be made after having regard to the
particular characteristics of the property and the pool, any other relevant
circumstances and any conditions it may impose, and only if it is satisfied
that such an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children.
14. The local board may resolve to grant, grant subject to
conditions, or decline an application for special exemption.
15. If an application is declined the applicant will be required to
fence their pool in accordance with the Act.
16. The exemption hearing process under the Act does not trigger
the significance policy but it is an important statutory function.
17. The Council is committed to ensuring the Auckland is a safe
place for children to live and play in. Pool fencing issues have a strong
relationship with the Council’s strategic priorities for community safety.
Local board views and implications
18. The local
board is the decision maker in relation to exemption applications under the
Act.
Maori impact statement
19. This report
does not raise issues of particular significance for Maori.
Implementation
20. The decision
must be made by resolution and contain conditions (if any).
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Application 46A Brighton Road, Parnell - Confidential
|
|
|
bView
|
Copy Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987
|
35
|
|
cView
|
Copy New Zealand Standard NZS 8500:2006
|
55
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Jan Barnard - Senior Swimming Pools Specialist
|
|
Authorisers
|
Barry Smedts - Manager Compliance
Judith Webster - Relationship Manager
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September 2014
|
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
Special Exemption Application for 16 Dublin Street, St
Marys Bay, Auckland
File No.: CP2014/19896
Purpose
1. The purpose
of this report is to present to the Waitematā Local Board Hearings
Committee one application for special exemptions from some of the requirements
of the Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 (The Act).
Executive summary
2. The local
board must conduct a hearing and consider each of the applications for special
exemption. The local board must resolve to decline, grant or grant subject to
conditions, the exemptions sought.
|
Recommendations
That the Waitematā Local
Board Hearings Committee:
a) Receive the Special Exemption
Application for 16 Dublin Street, St Marys Bay, Auckland, report.
b) Receive the application by:
i) Kelvin
Trevor Gibson of 16 Dublin Street, St Mary Bay
c) Determine the application, by
way of resolution, to:
i) grant the application for
special exemption as sought, or
ii) grant the application subject
to conditions, or
iii) decline the application for
special exemption sought
|
Comments
3. Each
property, which is the subject of an application before the local board, has
been inspected by Auckland Council pool inspectors. In each case, the
swimming/spa pool fencing does not comply with that Act. The details of
non-compliance in each case vary and are specified in the attachments to this
report. Each applicant has chosen to seek a special exemption from the
requirements of the Act.
4. The purpose
of the Act is stated to be “to promote the safety of young children by
requiring the fencing of swimming pools”.
5. The Act
requires pool owners to fence their pool with a fence. Specific detail on the
means of achieving compliance with the Act is contained in the schedule to the
Act. If a pool is not fenced with a complying fence it is an offence under the
Act, unless exempt.
6. An exemption
can only be granted by the local board after a consideration of the particular
characteristics of the property and the pool, other relevant circumstances and
taking into account any conditions it may impose. Then, only if “satisfied
that an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children”, can an exemption be granted.
7. Defining the
immediate pool area will be relevant to considerations concerning the property
and the pool. The immediate pool area means the land in or on which the pool is
situated and as much of the surrounding area that is used for activities or
purposes related to the use of the pool. The Act provides that the fence
should be situated to prevent children moving directly to the pool from the
house, other buildings, garden paths and other areas of the property that would
normally be available to young children.
8. Another
common consideration for local boards in exemption applications will be
instances where a building forms part of the pool fence. Where doors from a
building open into the pool area, the Territorial Authority may grant an
exemption from compliance with clauses 8 to 10 of the schedule to the Act. It
may exempt if it is satisfied that compliance with the Act is impossible,
unreasonable or in breach of any other Act, regulation or bylaw, and the door
is fitted with a locking device that when properly operated prevents the door
from being readily opened by children under the age of 6 years. If the local
board is satisfied that a door within a wall in a building meets that test, the
local board must also be satisfied that an exemption would not significantly
increase the danger to young children.
9. When granting
a special exemption, the Committee may impose such other conditions relating to
the property or the pool as are reasonable in the circumstances (section 6(2)
of the Act). Issues to be considered include:
a. Will the
exemption be personal to the applicant so that on a sale of the property a new
owner will need to apply for a new exemption? This might be appropriate where
the personal circumstances of the applicant have been considered as a relevant
circumstance and had a bearing on the exercise of the discretion.
b. Will the
exemption be granted for a fixed term and irrespective of changes of ownership
so that the exemption runs with the property?
c. Are there any
other conditions which should be imposed, repairs to existing fencing, or a
requirement for more frequent inspection of the pool (currently pools are
inspected every three years).
10. Any exemption
granted or condition imposed may be amended or revoked by the swimming pool exemption
committee by resolution. The rules of natural justice would however dictate
that this action should not be taken without prior notice to the pool owner and
allowing the pool owner an opportunity to be heard.
Consideration
11. The recommendations contained within this report fall within
the local board’s delegated authority.
12. The Act enables an exemption to be granted from clauses 8 to 10
of the Act (doors in walls of buildings) if the local board is satisfied that
compliance with the Act is impossible, unreasonable or in breach of any other
Act, regulation or bylaw and the door is fitted with a locking device that when
properly operated prevents the door from being readily opened by children under
the age of 6 years.
13. The overarching consideration in terms of the Act is that a
resolution to grant an exemption may only be made after having regard to the
particular characteristics of the property and the pool, any other relevant
circumstances and any conditions it may impose, and only if it is satisfied
that such an exemption would not significantly increase the danger to young
children.
14. The local board may resolve to grant, grant subject to
conditions, or decline an application for special exemption.
15. If an application is declined the applicant will be required to
fence their pool in accordance with the Act.
16. The exemption hearing process under the Act does not trigger
the significance policy but it is an important statutory function.
17. The Council is committed to ensuring the Auckland is a safe
place for children to live and play in. Pool fencing issues have a strong
relationship with the Council’s strategic priorities for community safety.
Local board views and implications
18. The local
board is the decision maker in relation to exemption applications under the
Act.
Maori impact statement
19. This report
does not raise issues of particular significance for Maori.
Implementation
20. The decision
must be made by resolution and contain conditions (if any).
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Application form and supporting documents - Confidential
|
|
|
bView
|
Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987
|
121
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Jan Barnard - Senior Swimming Pools Specialist
|
|
Authorisers
|
Barry Smedts - Manager Compliance
Judith Webster - Relationship Manager
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
|
Waitematā
Local Board Hearings Committee
10 September
2014
|
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987
That the Waitematā Local Board Hearings Committee:
a) exclude the
public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be
considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution
in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the
Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of
this resolution follows.
12 Special Exemption Application for 9 Argyle
Street, Herne Bay, Auckland - Attachment a
- Application for a Special Exemption: 9 Argyle Stree, Herne Bay
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased
person.
In particular, the report contains personal details and
numbers of applicant, photos of property.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
12 Special Exemption Application for 9 Argyle
Street, Herne Bay, Auckland - Attachment b
- Photos of Special Exemption Application 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased
person.
In particular, the report contains personal details and
numbers of applicant, photos of property.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
12 Special Exemption Application for 9 Argyle
Street, Herne Bay, Auckland - Attachment c
- Evaluation from Report Writer for 9 Argyle Street, Herne Bay
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased
person.
In particular, the report contains personal details and
numbers of applicant, photos of property.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
13 Special Exemption
Application for 46A Brighton Road, Parnell, Auckland - Attachment a - Application 46A Brighton Road,
Parnell
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased
person.
In particular, the report contains private details of
names, photos and contact details of applicant.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
14 Special Exemption Application for 16 Dublin Street,
St Marys Bay, Auckland - Attachment a
- Application form and supporting documents
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased
person.
In particular, the report contains personal details and
numbers of applicant, photos of property.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be
likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
