I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee will be held on:
|
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 14 October 2014 2.00pm Council
Chamber |
|
Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee
OPEN AGENDA
|
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson |
Janet Fitzgerald, JP |
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Brenda Steele |
|
|
Members |
Beth Houlbrooke |
|
|
|
Greg Sayers |
|
(Quorum 2 members)
|
|
|
Raewyn Morrison Local Board Democracy Advisor
6 October 2014
Contact Telephone: (09) 427 3399 Email: raewyn.morrison@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee 14 October 2014 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
9 Public Forum 5
10 Extraordinary Business 6
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Large Grants, Community Grants Fund and Small Youth Grant Fund 2014/2015 7
13 Rodney Natural Heritage Fund Allocation 2014/2015 (Round 1) 279
14 Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Fund Allocation 2014/2015 (Round 1) 293
15 Te Awaroa Youth Club request for change of purpose to grant
This report was not available when the agenda was compiled.
16 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Welcome
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 5 June 2014, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days’ notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests to speak had been received.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
|
Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee 14 October 2014 |
|
Large Grants, Community Grants Fund and Small Youth Grant Fund 2014/2015
File No.: CP2014/21215
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to present applications received for the Large Grants, Community Grants Fund and Small Youth Grants 2014-15. The Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee is required to fund, part-fund or decline these applications.
Executive summary
2. For the 2014-15 financial year, the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee set a total community funding budget of $413,416, broken up into the following grants funds:
· Large Grants Fund – Community: $61,000. Council has received 26 applications requesting $633,536.
· Large Grants Fund – Recreation: $80,000. Council has received 13 applications requesting $301,828.
· Large Grants Fund – Youth: $75,000. Council has received 18 applications requesting $580,547.
· Community Grants Fund: $164,146. Council has received 22 applications requesting $107,985.
· Small Grants Fund – Youth: $33,000. Council has received six applications requesting $25,318.00.
|
That the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee: a) considers the applications listed in Table One and agrees to fund, part-fund or decline each application. Table One: Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Community Funding Large Grants Fund – Community Applications
b) considers the applications listed in Table Two and agrees to fund, part-fund or decline each application. Table Two: Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Community Funding Large Grants Fund – Recreation Applications
c) considers the applications listed in Table Three and agrees to fund, part-fund or decline each application. Table Three: Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Community Funding Large Grants Fund – Youth Applications
d) considers the applications listed in Table Four and agrees to fund, part-fund or decline each application. Table Four: Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Community Grants Fund Applications
e) considers the applications listed in Table Five and agrees to fund, part-fund or decline each application. Table Five: Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Small Grants Fund - Youth Applications
|
Comments
3. In March 2013, the Regional Development and Operations Committee (RDOC) resolved to continue the interim community funding approach for the 2013/2014 financial year (RDO/2013/32).
4. One community funding round is scheduled for this financial year. The round closed on 15 July 2014.
5. The Large Grants Funds – Community, Recreation and Youth provide contestable grants to community organisations that provide a comprehensive range of services and operate within the Rodney Local Board area and the Hibiscus Coast Subdivision of the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board. The grants offer substantial levels of funding that can be used for capital costs, project funding or operational costs.
6. The Community Grants Scheme is designed to support and promote existing and potential social service, recreation and community organisations at the local level.
7. The Small Grants Fund – Youth is designed to support existing youth service providers at the local level by providing support for small capital purchases or projects.
8. This fund is allocated at the local board’s discretion. In accordance with its fiduciary duties, the local board is to act honestly, avoid conflicts of interest and act in what the local board believes to be the best interests of the community.
9. The Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee Community Fund closed on 15 July 2014. The funds were advertised through local community networks, local media and on the Auckland Council website.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
10. The Rodney and Hibiscus Bays Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee’s feedback on the community funding applications was sought at a workshop with the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee on 14 October 2014.
Māori impact statement
11. Community funding is a general programme of interest and accessible to a wide range of groups, including Maori. Maori are therefore likely to benefit alongside other groups in the community.
Implementation
12. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted annual plan.
13. The decisions sought by this report do not trigger the Auckland Council Significance Policy.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
aView |
Attachment A: Large Grants Fund - Community 2014/2015 Application |
17 |
|
bView |
Attachment B: Large Grants Fund - Recreation 2014/2015 Application Summaries |
101 |
|
cView |
Attachment C: Large Grants Fund - Youth 2014/2015 Application Summaries |
139 |
|
dView |
Attachment D: Community Grants Fund 2014/2015 Application Summaries |
195 |
|
eView |
Attachment E: Small Grants Fund - Youth 2014/2015 Application Summaries |
261 |
Signatories
|
Authors |
Kim Hammond - Community Grants and Support Officer West |
|
Authorisers |
Kevin Marriott – Acting Manager Community Development, Arts and Culture Lesley Jenkins - Relationship Manager |
|
Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee 14 October 2014 |
|
Rodney Natural Heritage Fund Allocation 2014/2015 (Round 1)
File No.: CP2014/21984
Purpose
1. This report presents the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee with funding recommendations for applications received during the first funding round of the Rodney Natural Heritage Fund (RNHF).
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council considers there is a net public benefit derived from providing individuals and community groups caring for the environmental and natural heritage with funds designated towards the restoration and conservation of Auckland’s natural resources.
3. This report presents funding recommendations and information on the nine applications received for the RNHF within the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board areas.
|
That the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee: a) approve the following grant allocations from the Rodney Natural Heritage Fund: i) Allocation of $15,000 to application RNH14_150001 from T&M Stazyk Partnership, as a contribution towards native plants. ii) Allocation of $10,000 to application RNH14_150003 from Manaia Properties Ltd, as a contribution towards stock-proof fencing. iii) Allocation of $5,245 to application RNH14_150004 from Mike Francis Wainunu Trust, as a contribution towards fencing. iv) Allocation of $2,038.75 to application RNH14_150005 from Peter Pearce, as a contribution towards bait stations, herbicides, lures, bait, and traps. v) Allocation of $6,825 to application RNH14_150006 from Brent Hawthorn, as a contribution towards fencing and potting mix. vi) Allocation of $2,300 to application RNH14_150007 from Forest & Bird Society, Hibiscus Coast Branch, as a contribution towards traps, bait stations, trakka tunnels and monitoring cards. vii) Allocation of $6,000 to application RNH14_150009 from Bruce Inwards, as a contribution towards stock-proof fencing. viii) Allocation of $440 to application RNH14_150010 from Redwoods Limited, as a contribution towards bait stations, traps, boxes and bait. ix) Allocation of $4,430 to application RNH14_150011 from Sheila Elwell, as a contribution towards fencing and native plants. |
Discussion
4. The Rodney Natural Heritage Fund (RNHF) is a legacy Rodney District Council contestable fund open to the public to support community initiatives to restore, protect and enhance the biodiversity and natural habitats within the former Rodney District for the enjoyment and benefit of current and future generations.
5. The RNHF supports a wide cross-section of the local community and provides funding support to individuals and community groups for project which have previously included.
· pest and weed control
· restoration planting
· riparian protection
· fencing
6. All applications to the RNHF are reviewed against fund eligibility criteria set out in the fund guidelines and then subject to a merit assessment against the following criteria.
Significance and biodiversity: The significance of the natural area and biodiversity present within it. Assessment of significance and biodiversity will consider the quality and rarity of the ecological feature; size shape and connectivity of the area, age of the vegetation present, quality, biological gradients and presence of any threatened species.
Enduring environmental outcomes: The anticipated improvement in the natural values of an area given the proposed management actions.
Legal protection: The legal status of the natural area, with preference given to proposed projects on private land which result in legal protection of the area of natural value.
Compliance with good practice: The extent to which the project reflects best practice as outlined in the Auckland Council Regional Pest Management Strategy, Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal section or various Council guidelines on the regions native plants and animals.
Funding necessity: The importance of funding to secure the future of an at risk item/place, whether the project is likely to be successfully completed, based on the activities and time frames listed in the application and whether other sources of funding are available.
Community education and partnership: The educational or scientific value of the site will be assessed, including potential for the applicant to connect with other landowners form partnerships and share knowledge.
7. The current interim approach to community funding endorsed by the Regional Development and Operations Committee (RDOC) in May 2011 allocated decision-making responsibility over the RNHF to the Northern Local boards. In March 2014, the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee endorsed the extension of this interim approach to community funding for the 2014/2015 financial year.
8. In May 2014 the Northern Joint Funding Committee resolved to establish two sub-committees to consider and determine the funding applications and funding amounts of the legacy Rodney District and North Shore City councils. Authority to consider and determine all the Rodney District Council legacy funding applications, including applications to the RNHF, was delegated to the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee.
9. RNHF grant allocation recommendations are presented to the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee twice a year. The first funding round for the RNHF opened for applications on 17 July 2014 and closed on 22 August 2014.
Table One. Summary of RNHF application assessment periods.
|
|
Application cut-off date |
Funding decisions expected |
|
Funding meeting 1 |
22 August 2014 |
October – November 2014 |
|
Funding meeting 2 |
13 March 2015 |
May - June 2015 |
10. The availability of environmental and natural heritage funding and information on the 2014/2015 funding rounds has been promoted through the Auckland Council website, through Auckland Council publications, press advertisements in local print media, community workshops and an email notification to community stakeholders.
Consideration
Current Applications
11. Nine applications to the RNHF round one were received. In total $99,518.97 was requested by these applicants from an available funding pool of $70,000.
12. All applications to the RNHF met the scope of works and eligibility criteria for funding. Application assessments have been completed by an Auckland Council Biodiversity Advisor and grant allocation recommendations are made in line with the RNHF assessment criteria and funding policy. Detailed assessment summaries for each application are presented to the subcommittee for their consideration in a workshop session on 14 October 2014. Based on this assessment funding recommendations are presented for the subcommittee’s consideration.
13. Based on the merit assessment of these applications it is recommended that the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Local Board Funding Subcommittee allocate $52,278.75 to the nine applications received. Funding is recommended as a contribution towards environmental and conservation works for each project.
14. If the recommended grant allocations are approved, $17,721.25 will remain for allocation in the next funding round.
Local Board Views
15. This report seeks the views of affected local boards.
Maori Impact Statement
16. The provision of community funding to support environmental and natural heritage initiatives provides opportunities for all Aucklanders to undertake projects, programmes and activities that benefit Maori. The significance of the site to Maori and the extent to which applications recognise Maori Perspectives is considered as part of the application assessment process.
General
17. Finance and resourcing requirements for the delivery of RNHF 2014/2015 are within current environmental incentive budgets provided in the 2014/15 annual plan.
18. Annually $70,000 is available for allocation through the RNHF. In the first funding round the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee approved the allocation of $52,278.75 to nine applications leaving $17,721.25 available for allocation in the second funding round.
Implementation Issues
19. No implementation issues have been identified. The fund will be allocated in accordance with the decision of the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
aView |
RNH application assessment summary |
283 |
Signatories
|
Authors |
Sonia Parra – Environmental Funding Coordinator Fran Hayton – Funding and Incentives Team Manager |
|
Authorisers |
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and Environmental Services Lesley Jenkins - Relationship Manager |
|
Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee 14 October 2014 |
|
Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Fund Allocation 2014/2015 (Round 1)
File No.: CP2014/22350
Purpose
1. This report presents the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee with funding recommendations for applications received during the first funding round of the Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Fund (RHIAF).
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council considers there is a net public benefit derived from providing individuals and community groups caring for privately owned heritage features with funds towards maintenance and conservation costs.
3. This report presents funding recommendations and information on the one application to the RHIAF received from within the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board areas.
|
That the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee: a) approve the following grant allocations from the Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Fund: i) Allocation of $8,581 to application RHIA14_150001 from Heather Buttle as a contribution towards painting materials and labour.
|
Discussion
4. The Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Fund (RHIAF) is a legacy Rodney District Council contestable fund which is open to the public for the purpose of conserving, restoring, and protecting valued heritage items within the former Rodney District for the enjoyment and benefit of current and future generations.
5. The RHIAF supports a wide cross-section of the local community and provides funding support to individuals and community groups for projects which have previously included.
· Physical works projects for heritage buildings, and archaeological sites such as fencing, painting or building work
· Protective measures such as fencing to protect archaeological sites, earthquake strengthening or fire protection
· Professional services e.g. research, conservation reports, conservation plans, heritage plans, conservation work specifications, management plans or supervision work
· Maintenance of heritage trees such as pruning
6. All applications to the RHIAF are reviewed against the fund eligibility criteria set out in the fund guidelines and are then subject to a merit assessed against the following criteria.
· Significance: The project needs to have high heritage significance and regard will be given to whether the resource is scheduled for protection in the Auckland Council District Plan (Rodney Section). The project needs to enhance the qualities for which the heritage item is valued.
· Funding necessity: Priority of the proposed works in the overall maintenance of the heritage values of the resource, including the necessity or urgency of the work. Consideration is given to whether alternative sources of funding are available for the proposed works, including the ability of the applicant to obtain funding from other agencies and their need for financial assistance.
· Public access and educational value: The degree of physical or visual access or other clear public benefit such as educational value. The project relates to maintenance of the heritage resource in the public interest rather than works that are intended to provide private benefit. The project should enhance local amenity and public access to the heritage feature/site and benefit the wider community.
· Compliance with good practice: The project meets the International Council on Monuments and Sites New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage that provides recognised and standard principles for works proposed for heritage resources. The proposed project forms part of an overall plan for the restoration, conservation and/or protection of the heritage values of the resource (rather than ad-hoc work or routine maintenance).
· Recognising Maori perspectives: Projects taking place on sites with significance to Maori or related to the care of marae artefacts and art works should be consistent with tikanga Maori and conservation techniques.
7. The current interim approach to community funding endorsed by the Regional Development and Operations Committee (RDOC) in May 2011 allocated decision-making responsibility over the RHIAF to the Northern Local boards. In March 2014, the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee endorsed the extension of this interim approach to community funding for the 2014/2015 financial year.
8. In May 2014 the Northern Joint Funding Committee meeting resolved to establish two sub-committees to consider and determine the funding applications and funding amounts of the legacy Rodney District and North Shore City councils. Authority to consider and determine all the Rodney District Council legacy funding applications, including applications to the RHIAF, was delegated to the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee.
9. RHIAF grant allocation recommendations are presented to the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee twice a year. The first funding round for the RHIAF opened for applications on 17 July 2014 and closed on 22 August 2014.
Table One. Summary of RHIAF application assessment periods.
|
|
Application cut-off date |
Funding decisions expected |
|
Funding meeting 1 |
22 August 2014 |
October - November 2014 |
|
Funding meeting 2 |
13 March 2015 |
May - June 2015 |
10. The availability of heritage funding and information on the 2014/2015 funding rounds has been promoted through the Auckland Council website, through Auckland Council publications, press advertisements in local print media, community workshops and an email notification to community stakeholders.
Consideration
Current Applications
11. One application to the RHIAF round one was received. This application requested $8,581 from an available funding pool of $50,000.
12. The application met the scope of works and eligibility criteria for funding. An application assessment has been completed by an Auckland Council Heritage Advisor and a grant allocation recommendation has been made in line with the RHIAF assessment criteria and funding policy. A detailed assessment summary for the application is presented to the subcommittee for their consideration in a workshop session on 14 October 2014. Based on this assessment funding recommendations are presented for the subcommittee’s consideration.
13. Based on the merit assessment it is recommended that the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Local Board Funding Subcommittee allocate $8,581 to the application received. Funding is recommended as contributions towards painting materials and labour.
14. If the recommended grant allocation is approved, $41,419 will remain for allocation in the next funding round.
Local Board Views
15. This report seeks the views of affected local boards.
Maori Impact Statement
16. The provision of community funding to support historic heritage initiatives provides opportunities for all Aucklanders to undertake projects, programmes and activities that benefit Maori. The significance of the site to Maori and the extent to which applications recognise Maori Perspectives is considered as part of the application assessment process.
General
17. Finance and resourcing requirements for the delivery of RHIAF 2014/2015 are within current heritage incentive budgets provided in the 2014/15 annual plan.
18. Annually $50,000 is available for allocation through the RHIAF. In the first funding round the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee approved allocation of $8,581 to one application leaving $41,419 available for allocation in the second funding round.
Implementation Issues
19. No implementation issues have been identified. The fund will be allocated in accordance with the decision of the Rodney and Hibiscus Coast Subdivision Local Board Funding Subcommittee.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
aView |
Rodney Heritage Item Assistance Applicant Report (Round 1) |
297 |
Signatories
|
Authors |
Sonia Parra – Environmental Funding Coordinator Fran Hayton – Funding and Incentives Team Manager |
|
Authorisers |
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and Environmental Services Lesley Jenkins - Relationship Manager |