I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Wednesday, 10 December 2014 5.00pm Māngere-Otāhuhu
Local Board Office |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Lydia Sosene |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Carrol Elliott, JP |
|
Members |
Nick Bakulich |
|
|
Tafafuna'i Tasi Lauese, JP |
|
|
Christine O'Brien |
|
|
Leau Peter Skelton |
|
|
Walter Togiamua |
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
Janette McKain Local Board Democracy Advisor
2 December 2014
Contact Telephone: (09) 262 5283 Email: janette.mckain@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
10 December 2014 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
8.1 Deputation - Pacific Steel 5
8.2 Deputation - Otahuhu Rovers Rugby League Club 6
9 Public Forum 6
10 Extraordinary Business 6
11 Notices of Motion 7
12 Manukau Ward Councillors Update 9
13 Performance Report for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for the four months ended 31 October 2014 11
14 Auckland Transport Monthly Update Report - December 2014 69
15 Local Event Support Fund – Round Two Allocations 87
16 Mangere East CCTV 91
17 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Open Space Network Plan 95
18 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Onew Group at 47 Yates Road, Mangere 99
19 Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines 103
20 Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Community Group Funding – Work Programme Report Analysis for 2013/2014 125
21 Request for feedback on the draft Local Approved Product Policy 141
22 Long-term Plan 2015-2025: Local consultation material 159
23 Adoption of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Engagement and Communications Strategy 171
24 For Information: Reports referred to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 185
25 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Action/Reports Pending 187
26 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Workshop Notes 195
27 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members portfolio update 205
28 Chairpersons Announcements 209
29 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Welcome
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 19 November 2014, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
Purpose
Craig Dixon, General Manager of Pacific Steel, would like to present to the local board an outline of change of ownership implications for part of the former Pacific Steel Group, and their future plans for the two sites (the rolling mill and wire mill). In addition, the deputation will provide an overview of the community support programme, both current and planned.
|
Recommendation/s That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board thanks Craig Dixon for his attendance and presentation.
|
Purpose
Bella Tamotu would like to update the local board on the Ōtāhuhu Rovers Rugby League Club.
|
Recommendation/s That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board thanks Bella Tamotu for her attendance and presentation.
|
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from www members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Manukau Ward Councillors Update
File No.: CP2014/25901
Purpose
1. A period of time (10 minutes) has been set aside for the Manukau Ward Councillors to have an opportunity to update the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board on regional matters.
Executive Summary
2. Not applicable.
That the verbal reports from Cr Alf Filipaina and Cr Arthur Anae be received.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Janette McKain - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
|
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Performance Report for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for the four months ended 31 October 2014
File No.: CP2014/27217
Purpose
1. To update the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members on progress towards their objectives for the year from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 as set out in the Local Board agreement.
Executive summary
2. A financial performance report is presented to the local boards for the accounting quarters ending September, December, March and June. This report replaces the September quarter and presents performance for the year to date October 2014.
3. Auckland Council departments and Council Controlled Organisations (CCOs) also present regular performance reports to the local boards
4. To improve overall performance reporting the Financial Advisory Services – Local Boards team produces a combined quarterly financial report, department report and CCO report
5. The attached omnibus consolidation contains the following reports this quarter
• Local board financial performance report
• Local Community Development, Arts and Culture (CDAC) activity overview
• Local Libraries overview
• Local Infrastructure and Environmental Services (IES) overview
· Treasury Report
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) Receive the Performance Report for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for the period ended October 2014
|
Comments
6. In consultation with local boards this omnibus report provides the elected members with a comprehensive and common overview of local activities from council departments and CCO’s.
7. The Performance Report includes departmental and CCO reports for inclusion and discussion. Some of these will be six monthly reports depending on their traditional reporting cycles.
8. Local Infrastructure and Environmental Services has included a quarterly report for the first time. This is expected to be a standard report every quarter.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
9. The report is presented to the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members at a workshop prior to the ordinary meeting.
Maori impact statement
10. Maori, as stakeholders in the council, are affected and have an interest in any report of the local board financials. However, this financial performance report does not impact specific outcomes or activities. As such, the content of this report has no particular benefit to, or adverse effect on Maori
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Mangere-Otahuhu Performance Report to October 2014 |
13 |
Signatories
Authors |
Faithe Smith - Lead Financial Advisor |
Authorisers |
Christine Watson - Manager Financial Advisory Services - Local Boards Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
MĀNGERE-ŌTĀHUHU LOCAL BOARD
PERFORMANCE REPORT
4 MONTHS ENDING OCTOBER 2014
Table of contents
1. Summary
· Highlights &Achievements
· Watching Brief and Recommendations
2. Key Initiatives & Projects
· Progress Updates
3. Local Activity Overview
· Community Developments, Arts and Culture
· Libraries
· Infrastructure and Environmental Services
![]() |
4. Other Reports
· Treasury
![]() |
5. Financial Report to October 2014
Section 1 – The executive summary
Highlights and Achievements
Over the previous four months the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has:
· adopted the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Plan
· approved Chair’s message and local board comments on the 2014 Annual Report
· signed off the deferral of 2014/15 capex projects
· attended Ambury Farm Day in October attended by 20,000
· continued to participate in projects for revitalisation of Sturges Park
· saw the greatly supported water safety rules come into effect in October
· approved allocations for local events, community funding and LIPs (especially Boggust Park)
· hosted 12 new cadets into Auckland Council, with a workshop including information on local board elections, processes, decision-making, community involvement and planning
· presented local board views on the Mangere Gateway Programme to the Auckland Development Committee, including seeking governing body support
· given support with other local boards in The Southern Initiative area to a project: “Maori Input into Local Board Decision-making”
· continued to be active in the liquor licensing process impacting the District Licensing Committee decisions
· allocated funds to engage relevant expertise to facilitate ongoing liquor licence objections
· developed the Community Action Against Alcohol Harm page and tool in Facebook
· approved 2014/15 work programmes for
o local and sports parks capital and renewals
o aquatic and recreation renewals
· reviewed and provided feedback on
o Financial Policy issues for the 2015-2025 Long Term Plan
o Local Alcohol Policy Project – Draft policy for local boards
o Community Facility Network Plan
o Review of allocation of decision-making
o Fees and charges decisions
Section 1 – The executive summary cont..
Watching Brief
Otahuhu Arts Facility
The local board set aside $50k in this year’s budget to carry out an analysis and feasibility study for an arts facility in Otahuhu. With the current library space coming free in the next financial year this would be an opportunity to realise the aspirations of the community to support artists and creative groups in the area. Funding for such a facility would require reprioritising budgets from other activities or seeking financial support through a range of mechanisms available.
Recommendation
The feasibility project will be carried out by the Auckland Council Community Policy and Planning department and is expected to commence in December. Their primary role is to present an analysis to the local board with enough information to prepare a business case for this initiative within the existing space
Section 2 – Update on Key Initiatives and Projects
Local library services
This group of activities covers libraries located within the local board area. The libraries are located at Māngere Bridge, Māngere East, Māngere Town Centre and Ōtāhuhu.
We plan to spend $2.5 million operating expenditure (opex) and $3.0 million capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus is to continue improving the digital library, engaging children and young people, developing quality library facilities, delivering programmes and services that inspire learning and participation, sharing Auckland’s unique stories through the heritage and research collections and delivering sustainable and customer-driven collections.
A key initiative we have planned for 2014/2015 is progressing and completing the construction of the Ōtāhuhu library as part of the Ōtāhuhu Recreation Precinct development.
This initiative supports the of ‘Provide high quality recreation and community facilities’ priority of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
The development of the Otahuhu Precinct including the new library has reached the halfway point. It is on track to open mid 2015. The local board has begun investigations into how to utilise the free space at the old Otahuhu Library
Local community services
This group of activities covers local community facilities, local community development initiatives and local community safety programmes. Local community facilities include five community centres and halls as well as Nga Tapuwae.
We plan to spend $1.5 million operating expenditure (opex) and $223,000 capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus is on continuing to support a number of community development initiatives.
Key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include:
· Town centre crime prevention projects
· Providing contestable funding for community projects, events and partnerships
· Improving utilisation of facilities and building capacity in the community
· Local community gardening projects
· Developing social innovation opportunities – new ideas led by communities to solve existing social, economic and environmental challenges.
These initiatives support the ‘Provide high quality recreational and community facilities’ and ‘Increase the wellbeing of our communities’ priorities of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
CDAC supported the Pakuranga Neighbourhood Support Committee in providing street co-ordinator level training to the Mangere Neighbourhood Support group. This was the first capacity building support for Mangere and involved as part of the training, the recruiting of volunteers. Two volunteers were recruited just two days after the training.
Local arts, culture and events services
This group of activities covers local arts and culture facilities, local arts and culture and local events. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board supports the Metro Theatre and the new Māngere Arts Centre. Local events in the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board area include local Christmas events and ANZAC Day events.
We plan to spend $1.6 million operating expenditure (opex) and $32,000 capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
We will continue supporting a calendar of events and providing contestable funding for community-based events that make our area vibrant.
The key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include:
· On-going support to the Māngere Arts Centre
· A funding partnership for Manukau Youth Orchestra
· Delivering volunteer awards in the community.
These initiatives support the ‘Provide high quality recreational and community facilities’ and ‘Increasing the wellbeing of our communities’ priorities of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
The agreed refurbishments in the Metro Theatre are in the early stages. As outlined in the watching brief section of this report the local board has begun investigations into how to utilise the free space at the old Otahuhu Library as an arts centre for Otahuhu. Funding partnerships and grants are proceeding to plan, and events funding approvals have resulted in $125k allocated so far for this financial year.
Local parks services
This group of activities covers local parks located within the local board area. Within the local board area there are approximately 178 local parks covering 266 hectares, including Māngere Centre Park, Walter Massey and David Lange parks.
We plan to spend $6.3 million operating expenditure (opex) and $3.5 million capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus will be on maintaining and renewing assets in our parks and reserves such as toilets, playgrounds, furniture, car parks, sports field surfaces and planting. We will support the management of public open spaces through a planned approach to serve the interests of all users. We will develop parks concept plans to guide prudent investment and prioritisation of projects. Our aim is to make our communities proud of our parks and reserves.
The key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include:
· Progressing and completing the walkway at Peninsula Point reserve
· Kiwi esplanade walkway widening and development
· Walter Massey Park upgrade to enhance quality of the sports field
· Projects to protect our coastline and harbour.
These initiatives support the ‘Preserve our heritage and environment’ priority of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
The Parks capital works programme has been delayed throughout the Capex review and deferral process. Only 5% of a comprehensive works programme has been delivered year to date. Most of the projects have now been appointed project managers and the bulk of work will commence over the better weather to come. There are no current issues with the delivery of works
Local recreation services
This group of activities covers local recreation facilities and initiatives. Recreation centre facilities include Ōtāhuhu Recreation and Youth Centre and Moana-Nui-ā-Kiwa Leisure Centre.
Provision is made for adult entry to Moana-Nui-ā-Kiwa swimming pool without charge. The costs of this are met from a targeted rate of approximately $13.78 on each separately used or inhabited part of residential properties in the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board area. Adults must pay to enter most other pools in Auckland.
We plan to spend $5.6 million operating expenditure (opex) and $16.3 million capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus will be on building the new pool at the Ōtāhuhu recreation precinct. We will also progress and complete the upgrade of the Moana-Nui-ā-Kiwa pool which includes the children’s splash pool and changing rooms.
These initiatives support the ‘Provide high quality recreational and community facilities’ priority of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
Two important streams of aquatics work are currently being carried out with the new pool at Otahuhu in full process and on target, and the refurbishment at Moana-nui-a-kiwa pool at Mangere also very busy. Some delays at the latter have been resolved and both pools are due for completion this financial year.
Local economic development
This group of activities covers local business area planning, and local street environment and town centres. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board has an influence on local developments and infrastructure to maximise the economic opportunities for local businesses and industries in the area. It also provides political representation and support to the business improvement district (BID) programme executive boards, including Ōtāhuhu Mainstreet and Commercial Association.
The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board is responsible for maintaining the streetscape and town centres such that they are tidy, free of rubbish and provide a welcoming environment. Note that the service levels for regional and principal town centres will be met from budgets held by the governing body, in this case Ōtāhuhu town centre.
We plan to spend $1.5 million operating expenditure (opex) and $900,000 capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus will be on continuing to work with our business associations and supporting our BID programmes, providing strong leadership for our town centres, enhancing the look and feel of amenities for a better business environment.
The key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include:
· Progressing the Ōtāhuhu Linkages project which will create a strong, active pedestrian and physical connection between the Ōtāhuhu town centre, the expanded recreation precinct and the new Ōtāhuhu bus/rail interchange
· Resolving an all-weather cover solution at the Māngere Town Centre
· Providing an on-going annual subsidy to four of the five business improvement districts (BIDs), namely, Māngere Town Centre, Mahunga Drive, Māngere Bridge and Māngere East
· Preparing an integrated business precinct plan for the industrial south which will develop a coordinated approach and projects to enhance the economic performance of the industrial areas in south Auckland.
These initiatives support the ‘Support a strong local economy’ and ‘Ensure our area is well connected’ priorities of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
Funding around the Otahuhu Linkages project was analysed as part of the Capex review process, and has now been resolved. The all-weather canopy at Mangere Town Centre is proving to have major stumbling blocks with both funding and addressing the primary reason for the canopy as an all-weather solution. This is an on-going topic being managed in conjunction with City Transformation and has recently involved AC solicitor advice. Most of the BID top-ups have been paid.
Local built and natural environment
This group of activities covers local environment and heritage protection. We plan to spend $177,000 operating expenditure (opex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus will be on protecting our waterways and making them more accessible to our people.
The key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include:
· Mangrove removal and management
· Improving access to and use of our waterways, through walkway development and pollution controls
· Providing on-going support to the Māngere Mountain Education Trust.
These initiatives support the ‘Preserve our heritage and environment’ priority of our local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
Work programmes for this fund will be discussed by the local board in November.
Local governance
This group of activities covers local planning, policy and governance activities of the local board, including development of local board plans and local bylaws. The local board receives strategic and policy advice, as well as democracy, community engagement and administrative support. This enables local board members to represent their communities, deliver effective local leadership and make informed decisions on local issues, activities and facilities.
We plan to spend $1.8 million operating expenditure (opex) and $15,000 capital expenditure (capex) on these activities in 2014/2015.
Our focus will be to continue to develop the local board’s working relationship with the governing body, council-controlled organisations and external stakeholders.
The local board receives strategic and policy advice, as well as support for its democracy processes, community engagement and administration. This support enables local board members to be effective leaders in their communities and make decisions that contribute to shaping the local area.
The key initiatives we have planned for 2014/2015 include an on-going community engagement programme. Targeted engagement will be undertaken on issues of community interest, with an emphasis on including the views of young people in the area.
These initiatives support the ‘Increase the wellbeing of our communities’ priority local board plan.
Oct 2014 update
There is considerable underspend in discretionary funds which
will be allocated over the coming months
Section 3 – Activity Overview for the last 4 months
Community Development, Arts and Culture (CDAC)
Highlights and Achievements
On 3 September 2014, Māngere Arts Centre – Ngā Tohu o Uenuku celebrated its fourth birthday. The occasion was marked by the opening of an exhibition by Auckland-based senior Tongan artist Sopolemalama Filipe Tohi. The Tukutuku Kafa Mei Lotomoana exhibition is part two of a survey exhibition by the artist. The opening attracted over 120 people and was featured in the NZ Herald on 27 September 2014. Journalist Adam Gifford interviewed the artist, outlining his biography as a migrant to Auckland in 1978 and the development of his creative practice in New Zealand. The exhibition coincided with the end of Tongan Language Week.
Successful productions in the theatre during quarter one have included Okareka Dance Company’s acclaimed dance production Mana Wahine, The Tautai of Digital Winds, and a much-improved Showtime Mangere 2014. Blackfriars Theatre Company’s The Merchant was highly attended with 852 people attending over the course of four days. Quarter one of 2014/2015 saw an increase in both the number of events (from 35 to 70) and total attendance (from 4123 to 6557) at the theatre over the same period last year.
Promotional posters for Mana Wahine and The Merchant
CDAC staff play a lead role in developing and supporting Pacific Wardens in our communities. In 2008, Pacific Wardens realised they had no way to prove their authority when assisting the public. This need became even more obvious during the Rugby World Cup in 2011. Finally on 17 July 2014, Pacific Wardens from Counties Manukau were presented with photo identifications. The wardens value these identification cards highly, as they enhance a warden’s authority and professionalism in the community. Counties Manukau Police, project sponsors and the chairs of Mangere-Otahuhu and Otara-Papatoetoe Local Boards were at the presentation. It was also an opportunity to acknowledge the fine work the wardens do in our communities. In September 2014, two Pacific Wardens were acknowledged for their long service by the Mayor. A ceremony was held with police to celebrate the achievements. Staff have successfully negotiated for Counties Manukau Pacific Wardens to travel free of charge on trains and on public buses. The wardens will be able to travel for free from any stop whilst in their uniform. In return, the wardens will provide monitoring and surveillance while travelling.
Police with Pacific Wardens
Since its initial launch in quarter four 2013/2014, the Turanga Housing Initiative has supported 17 families across the region, including families from the Mangere-Otahuhu community. Each participating family now has an annual budget, a formal debt elimination plan and even a 12 month saving plan.
The Sustainable South Initiative celebrates the concept of ‘garden to table and back’ and was designed to close the loop between gardening, food production, waste management and improve community food resilience. The collaborative project was developed by Gardens 4 Health, CDAC staff and council’s Waste Minimisation team. A number of events were held in the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board area during quarter one, with people participating in a week of workshops and activities around waste reduction, composting and gardening. Bokashi composting system was the subject of a course held at Kokiri ki Papatuanuku Marae. Participants learnt how to create their own Bokashi buckets for turning household food waste into compost for their backyard gardens.
Bokashi Composting Course at Kokiri ki Papatuanuku Marae
Staff have supported the Mangere/Otahuhu youth group as they worked to become a voice and connection between young people, community and the local board. The group numbers have increased from zero to 31. The youth group has championed community issues such as child poverty and alcohol. The group’s efforts have resulted in the group being acknowledged and nominated for the Te Rangatahi Mo Te Ora award by Ngati Whatua and the Auckland District Health Board.
Staff have partnered with the Environmental Services unit and other departments in a six month placement programme for Makaurau Marae. With advice and support from the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board, staff organised a placement to support the development of Makaurau Marae’s nursery and social enterprise initiatives. Te Kawerau a Maki is an important stakeholder in the South Auckland landscape, and the six month placement where the intern experiences a number of different areas of our organisation is an opportunity to strengthen relationships between council and mana whenua. Staff are providing mentoring, networking and capacity building as part of building the business model of the nursery to make it more viable and sustainable.
Participants in the Makarau Marae placement project
Over the past year, a building revitalisation project has been underway at Mataatua Marae. Staff have secured 200 chairs for the marae and carpet for the whare nui to replace the worn out carpet that has caused safety issues for users of the marae. A volunteer clean-up day has been organised on 13 November 2014, to complete a physical clean-up of the marae including repairing of fencing, water blasting and painting.
Youth: Upskilling and decision making opportunities
Staff organised training and development for Mangere-Otahuhu Youth Board members from 9-11 September 2014, on ‘inspiring youth communication strategies’ with the Inspiring Stories Trust. The local youth representative for Mangere-Otahuhu on the Youth Advisory Panel has received training in youth participation, engagement and representation, Treaty of Waitangi, leadership and Auckland Council democratic processes. Feedback was sought from the Mangere-Otahuhu Youth Advisory Panel representative on the following policies and strategies through the Youth Advisory Panel:
· draft Community Facilities Network Plan
· YAP Work programme
· Long Term Plan Priorities
· Local Approved Product Policy for the sale of psychoactive substances.
On 19 September 2014, staff launched ‘Uniquely South - Social Enterprise 101’, an introductory social enterprise programme to support community organisations in Auckland South. The workshop was for organisations and entrepreneurs venturing into the social enterprise space. 45 people were introduced to a business model to assist them to lift their ideas off the ground. The team will host a breakfast where these community organisations can pitch their ideas to receive kick start funds towards their projects. The seed fund will be created from the registration fees. Five organisations from Mangere-Otahuhu were represented. Two of the five participants have received sponsorship onto the Social Enterprise Foundation Course which started in October 2014 at AUT University.
Participants at ‘Uniquely South-Social Enterprise 101’
Celebrations at Mangere Community House - Whare Koa
The opening of Cook Island Language Week on 4 August 2014 saw 140 people, including 46 students from the Rise up Trust Academy Junior School, the Cook Island Consul General, dignitaries and local community members together at the community house. Staff in partnership with the tivaevae group - Vaine Titi hosted the event. Over the week, there was a continuous stream of visitors to the community house to see the arts, crafts and sit with the ‘mamas’ to learn Kuki Airani Reo and culture. As a result of the group’s efforts, Vaine Titi was invited to be part of the Consul General Network meeting with Cook Island leaders from around Auckland. Funding was offered to the ‘mamas’ to tutor their arts and crafts and the group was invited to attend the Koroneihana o Kīngi Tuheitia - Anniversary of Kīngi Tuheitia’s coronation along with 200 representatives of the Cook Island community from Takitimu Marae Mangere Bridge.
The opening of Cook Island Language Week at Mangere Community House
Planning for Love and Light Christmas in Centre Park 2014 on 22 December 2014 has created opportunities for youth locally and from neighbouring communities. By the end of July 2014, 30 young people were involved in the design of the event. A working group of 17 youth leaders have formed and have met fortnightly. Youth involved in the planning and the working group come from council’s Youth Cadets, AUT interns, Papatuanuku Kokiri Marae, Otahuhu Mangere Youth Group, Strive Community Trust, and church youth groups. Collaboration between representatives from Papatuanuku Kokiri Marae, Manukau Live Steamers Inc. and Mangere Community House, have created a strong support network for young people to drive this.
Staff are working with the Otahuhu Town Hall and Community Centre Inc. and Strive Community Trust to complete and sign their 2014/2015 funding agreement and Licence to manage and occupy documents. Payments have been made in October 2014 to Otahuhu Town Hall and Community Centre Inc. for $89,831 and to Strive Community Trust for $99,580.
Otahuhu Family Fun Day
A workshop for 2014/2015 contestable funding was held on 2 July 2014, and a report presented to the board to confirm decisions made at the workshop. A total of $50,560 was allocated to community groups and organisations. An additional 10 line items totalling $44,328 were allocated to the community via the local board on 18 June 2014, as part of its CDAC annual work programme.
Watching Brief
An operational review is in progress for the Māngere Arts Centre - Ngā Tohu o Uenuku. During a three-week period in September 2014, a survey was conducted with stakeholders and the community, with the aim of answering the following questions:
· Is the Māngere Arts Centre - Ngā Tohu o Uenuku achieving its vision and purpose?
· Is the centre engaging local audiences and the community?
The survey had a high response rate, with 103 people providing a wide range of feedback, suggestions and views. In addition to the survey, a workshop was held on 30 September 2014, to discuss the vision and purpose of the centre. Twelve invited participants attended including local board members. Both the survey and workshop results will inform the development of a new business plan for the centre. Findings from the project will be summarised and reported to the board in quarter two.
Mangere Arts Centre - Ngā Tohu o Uenuku, Mangere Town Centre, and the town centre courtyard will feature as key sites to be activated from 20 to 22 November 2014 during the Southside Arts Festival - Urbanesia. The local board has been kept updated via the arts portfolio holders on progress about the festival. A media launch for the festival was held on 23 September 2014, at the Mangere Arts Centre – Ngā Tohu o Uenuku.
Key Arts and Culture Activities in Quarter 2: October to December 2014 |
||
Māngere Community Stage (Southside Arts Fesitval 2014 - Urbanesia) |
Māngere Town Centre |
20 November |
Southside Arts Festival - Cult Couture (signature event) |
Māngere Arts Centre |
20 November – 22 November |
Propagation Stations
Staff partnered with Gardens4Health to identify volunteer organisations capable of becoming growing and distribution hubs called Propagation Stations. There are now 18 propagation stations established in Auckland South. Kirby Bible Study group, the Pukapuka community, Mangere College, SISDAC Youth, Otahuhu Intermediate and Mangere Community House are all participating propagation stations within the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board area. The volunteers are supported to upskill and educate others in plant propagation and the seedlings they grow are freely distributed to local communities in need. This initiative arose from a Community Development partnership with the Aronui Trust, who initially provided free seedlings for community garden groups.
The team behind Neighbours Day nationally (Lifewise, Inspiring Communities, Mental Health Foundation and Neighbourhood Support) is seeking to build Neighbours Day into a 365 days a year movement. Towards this aim, the ‘Summer of Neighbourliness’ will be launched in 2014, inviting neighbours to connect during the summer months. There will be a media release on 24 October 2014 in Auckland and associated media. A press kit will be shared with local boards in October 2014. Interested local boards can work with staff, community coordinators and portfolio holders to promote the Summer of Neighbourliness in their area. Lifewise is also promoting a Good Neighbour Competition which is open for nomination on 8 October 2014, and closes on 12 November 2014.
As a pilot, council staff members are working with stakeholders who lease a number of premises, on a proposal to grant one lease to these groups for multiple sites. Multi premise leases would mean past leases are surrendered and one new lease entered into for the multiple properties. Special conditions for specific properties will be catered for through lease schedules. Each schedule will be approved by the local board which has allocated decision making responsibility for the individual properties. As the proposal progresses, the board will be informed of the results of the trial and potential application in this local board area.
Planning for the 2014 Christmas events and annual events is well underway and permits are being issued up to six weeks prior to an event occurring. Round two of the Local Event Support fund opened on 1 September 2014, and closes on 31st October 2014.
Performance & CAPEX
Graffiti
There were 1703 graffiti incidents in Mangere-Otahuhu between July and September 2014. This is a 33% reduction compared to the same period last year. The number of requests for service graffiti also fell by 37%, with all 29 being removed within the 24 hour target time. This indicates that graffiti levels are down and contractors are proactively removing graffiti before it is seen by the public.
A new hire fee framework for community facilities has been implemented in line with resolutions passed by local boards during the past four months. From 1 July 2014, the new framework supersedes all previous legacy hire fee arrangements, and establishes clear and consistent ‘policy’ and operational guidelines for hire fees for arts facilities, community centres and venues for hire. The framework is designed to enable local board priorities, greatly improve the customer experience for those hiring facilities, and simplify the process of administering the service.
Improved business practices including the implementation of an effective cancellation process and management of internal bookings, has resulted in more accurate utilisation being recorded for our venues for hire. Mangere Community House utilisation has dropped with the loss of several regular hirers and a reduction in access to bookable space due to maintenance work requirements.
The increase in visitor numbers for Otahuhu Town Hall and Community Centre has been impacted by large functions held in the main hall for activities organised by centre staff and for private functions.
Due to the implementation of a single booking and invoicing system across Auckland, revenue is now being shown against the utility for community facilities. Comparison to 2013/2014 cannot be made at this stage but reports will be presented to local boards in January 2015 that will detail revenue impact, utilisation rate changes and customer impact and experience
Regional
The media launch for the Southside Arts Festival 2014 - Urbanesia took place on 23 September 2014, at Māngere Arts Centre - Nga Tohu o Uenuku, attracting a capacity crowd of 200. The launch was structured as promenade-theatre style, moving invited guests and media through the centre with a series of performance cameos. Cr Alf Filipaina spoke, and choreographer and dancer Paris Goebel announced her newly-commissioned dance theatre piece for the Southside Gig event. The festival runs from 12-29 November 2014. There was strong uptake from media including a story in the Manukau Courier, a Tagata Pasifika feature and a 531PI radio news grab. Facebook and social media responses have been highly active. The NZ Herald has confirmed upcoming stories and for the first time, the festival has its own promotional trailer which is achieving airplay.
Guests at the media launch of Southside Arts Festival 2014 – Urbanesia
A total of six teams worked with mentors on their Kickstart Challenge - social enterprise ideas over the last three months. Teams presented their ideas to a panel of five judges to compete for a prize pool of $3,000. Judges awarded two teams with seed capital to get their ideas off the ground. Second place winners, the Phoenix Foundation will provide meaningful service opportunities for high school students in a “buddy programme” with primary school students. Team Gyropad which took the top prize, will recycle old notebooks into new ones. The team is made up of very enterprising college students on a scholarship at the University of Auckland. Over the coming months, staff will be working with the teams to help implement and prototype their products.
Kickstart Challenge participants
A site visit to the Elevator Group in Mangere and Vision West in Waitakere was organised for project partners and staff. This is part of the Social Enterprise learning series, to share and disseminate knowledge of best practices on how to run viable social enterprises.
Site visit to the Elevator Group
Child Injury Profiles
Child injury profiles presented to the Community Development and Safety Committee meeting in August 2014, revealed the most recent child injury statistics for the Auckland region. The profiles, developed in partnership with Safekids Aotearoa, were designed for quick and easy analysis of injury data for the region and each local board area. Falls are the leading cause of unintentional injury for children in Mangere-Otahuhu, as highlighted in the Mangere-Otahuhu profile:
Mangere-Otahuhu Child Injury profile indicating number of incidents
Accessibility Plans for Southern Local Boards
In 2011, Auckland Council and the Be. Institute entered into a strategic relationship. This relationship is managed by CDAC. A key deliverable of this work is working with local boards to become ‘Accessible Local Boards’. Planning is underway to work with the five Auckland South local boards to enable them to devise ‘access plans’. Whilst the work with each local board will be specific to that board, it has been agreed that in order to maximise access, each local board will have an assessment of a specific physical environment conducted, including cost of upgrades. The four areas of focus to maximise access by all the community are: Culture, Community engagement, Environment and local board projects. In May 2014, staff facilitated a workshop with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board in partnership with the Be. Institute. The parameters of the future access work are currently being scoped.
The 2014/2015 Social Housing work programme was endorsed by the Community Development and Safety Committee on 13 August 2014 and by the Seniors Panel on 22 September 2014. The work programme emphasises safety including security doors and footpaths.The Social Housing rent harmonisation policy options were work shopped by the Budget Committee on 5 August 2014 and local board chairs on 18 August 2014. Further workshops with both groups are planned for 20 October 2014. Staff have been visiting residents to support them to manage increases in their rent payments and to increase the proportion of payments made through cost-effective methods. This has been an extensive exercise throughout September leading up to the change on 21 October 2014. Staff are working closely with staff at the Onehunga Community Centre, supporting activities on offer to older persons.
Movies in Parks
Planning for the 2015 Movies in Parks series is well advanced and the local board have had an opportunity to discuss with the regional delivery team their requirements. A movie in the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board area is scheduled for 23 January 2015, at David Lange Park.
Music in Parks
The music in parks schedule is currently nearing finalisation and a total of 33 music events are scheduled from 10 January through to 15 March and will cover the region from Franklin in the South to Rodney in the North. There are currently no events scheduled for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board area.
ANZAC Day
Planning for Anzac Day 2015 has commenced, with discussions being held with a wide range of stakeholders, including the RSA. Plans for a range of enhanced services to acknowledge the centenary will be presented to the local board for their feedback and endorsement in coming months.
Auckland Heritage Festival
The Auckland Heritage Festival ran from 27 September to 12 October 2014. This popular annual programme brought together over 200 community events from across the region. For Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board are this included Letters from the Front from 29 September–10 October 2014 at the Archives New Zealand Auckland Regional Office in Mangere.
Two citizenship ceremonies were held in quarter one with approximately 1800 people taking the oath and becoming New Zealand citizens.
Libraries
Local Overview
· The July school holidays theme was “Wild”. Themed events were designed to create meaningful play for children and their families and to encourage children to visit the library to develop literacy skills.
· Matariki was celebrated with children's events, workshops and learning sessions including story times, craft and Te Reo classes.
· Adult Learner's Week was celebrated on 8 - 14 September. The libraries delivered workshops, talks and classes that encouraged adult learners to develop their skills and capabilities.
· Libraries celebrated Cook Islands and Tongan Language Weeks. Activities included storytimes and song sessions, and demonstrations of instruments, dancing and crafts.
· Family History Month was celebrated libraries in August with events and programmes including talks, seminars and workshops on the subject of family history and genealogy.
Project Updates
Library |
Project description |
Status |
Mangere East Library |
Upgrade CCTV system |
Started |
Mangere East Library |
Upgrade toilets |
Not Started |
Mangere Town Centre Library |
Renew the HVAC system |
Started |
Otahuhu Recreation Precinct Building Project
· Construction is ongoing and running to programme. Anticipated completion end of June 2015.
Regional Update
· World War 1914-1918: An exhibition “It’ll be over by Christmas” opened in Central City Library on 9 July and ran until 12 October. The exhibition from Sir George Grey Special Collections depicted New Zealand’s contribution to the First World War, both at the front and at home. This moving exhibition was planned to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the start of the First World War and is part of the WW100 programme at Auckland Libraries.
· Libraries delivered an extensive Auckland-wide Matariki programme. Over 12,000 people attended children's events, kapa haka, learning sessions and exhibitions from 28 June to 28 July.
· Libraries celebrated Te Wiki o Te Reo/ Māori Language Week with events to learn about and celebrate Te Reo Māori.
· Family History Month was celebrated in libraries in August. Over 180 events and programmes including talks, seminars and workshops on the subject of family history and genealogy were delivered.
· Comic Book Month was celebrated to promote comics, graphic novels and zines collections. Over 1000 people attended talks on kiwi comics, manga, drawing workshops, competitions and Auckland Libraries' own comics conference, LibraryCon.
· Advance voting stations in libraries across
Auckland proved popular in the lead-up to the general election on 20 September
and offered valuable access to the electoral process for many Aucklanders.
Seventeen branches of Auckland Libraries offered access to advance voting and
special voting between 3 and 19 September. Library staff also helped
unregistered voters to enrol.
Mangere Bridge Library
Highlights
· Two new services for patrons commenced in July. A Justice of the Peace is based in the library on Monday afternoons from 1pm - 3:30pm. This service has been very well utilised. The new Wellness book club runs once a month on a Thursday morning. This is organised and run by a local resident and is well supported by the community.
· During the July school holidays several well attended events were held, and Matariki featured with some fun star gazing activities. It was the first time the courtyard was utilised and the survival skills activity was a great success with the children able to construct a wonderful shelter.
· Several classes from Waterlea School visited the library during August to further their knowledge of Matariki. One of the librarians read them a Matariki story before they explored library resources.
· The library courtyard was officially opened and blessed in August. This featured in local publications and the feedback from the community continues to be positive. It is a lovely spot to socialise, or sit and read.
· September was Comic Book Month. Throughout the month every storytime has had a different theme, from superheroes when a local police officer read to the children, to princes and princesses. The children enjoyed getting into character and dressing up for their visit to the library.
· The highlight for September was the Children’s book club Scooby Doo mystery where children had to solve the mystery of who the monster was and why the library was targeted.
Performance Measures
Mangere East Library
Highlights
· Matariki celebrations included storytime for local pre-schoolers with over 45 participants involved in the big read, ‘Tane and the stars’. As part of the Matariki celebrations a breakfast was offered to the community, sharing time to reflect on what they were thankful for.
· During the July school holidays, children submitted their own designs for the Matariki ‘design your own t-shirt’ competition. Participants enjoyed a Connect Four tournament and, as part of the Wild theme for the school holidays, made their own wild hibiscus flowers. A ‘wild’ scavenger hunt engaged teams of children collecting information at stations around the library to complete activities.
· Power Up, a collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Martin Hautus Institute, was launched at Mangere East Library on 2 September. This initiative is targeted at Pacific families with children who are studying NCEA. It is a 10 week study programme for students to assist with studying and involving families so that they are able to support their children throughout this process. Participants have increased from 60 in the first session to 120 indicating a positive response from the community.
· A genealogy specialist librarian delivered an interactive workshop on using the family history database, Find My Past as part of the Family History Month programme. Positive feedback was received from participants who found this workshop very useful for finding family links.
· September was Comic Book Month. Two cartoon drawing workshops and a quiz about Manga and comics drew interest from keen comic book fans. Library members of all ages submitted entries in the ‘Create Your Own Comic Strip’ competition where their strips were uploaded onto the Mangere East Facebook page and judged to win a pass to Armageddon.
Performance Measures
Mangere Town Centre Library
Highlights
· Matariki was celebrated with events such as the preschool storytime big read of ‘Tane and the stars’ on 1 July; an author talk on the Puanga star constellation by Dr Sam Rerekura at the TC Book Marks group on 22 July, and the ‘Matariki Floor Show’ on 23 July, which drew a large audience. In July over 325 people attended Matariki events held in the library.
· One hundred and seventy children participated in the “wild and wacky” July School holidays programmes. “Food Factor” explored food science; a giant-sized totem pole artwork was created; ukulele lessons were provided; and a digital technology and traditional board games session was delivered to meaningfully engage and inspire our children and young people.
· STRIVE Community Trust presented a “Rise Up against Bullying” session in the library. The key message was to encourage young people to speak out when they see or experience bullying behaviour.
· Family History Month in August saw three weekly sessions offering: ‘Beginning your Family History Research’, ’Pacific Island Resources for Family History’, and ‘Searching your family history on the internet’.
· Cook Island Language Week and Tongan Language Week were celebrated in August and September. Sixty-three people attended two Cook Island special programmes and 140 people attended our various Tongan Language Week events.
· A Knitting Club group was established in September to foster new connections. The group meets fortnightly from 5.30 – 6.30pm on Thursday evenings.
· Two interactive digital storytime sessions were delivered in Arabic for Al Madinah Primary School junior classes on 8 September.
· The Library hosted an Adult Education Providers Expo on Wednesday 10 September with 12 providers promoting their courses in the library during Adult Learners Week.
Performance Measures
Otahuhu Library
Highlights
· Tongan Language Week was celebrated in September. Members of the local Tongan community supplied traditional Tongan crafts which were labelled in Tongan and displayed in the library. A Tongan Language storytime and performance was organised with the local Early Childhood Centres in the area. 170 children from six centres attended these sessions. The cultural storytime provided a very strong way of connecting with our community and also bringing the Pacific Community into the library.
· August was Family History Month. The library hosted a session on ‘Beginning Your Family History’ by family history librarians from Central Library. A small group allowed for a very interactive session and the participants, who were local, have since gone on to arrange their own network and meetings.
· Otahuhu Library was used as a venue for advance voting in the 2014 General Election. For the entire advance voting period 1,727 votes were cast at the library including 258 on Friday 19 September. At times there were queues of voters going out the door and on to the footpath. During this time the opportunity was used to sign up new members who were visiting the library for the first time.
· Auckland War Memorial Museum Pasifika Outreach team visited the library in September. Students from Otahuhu Primary and St Josephs’ School attended the workshops, in all 116 children attended the three sessions. Students were able to learn about traditional Pacific musical instruments and were given the opportunity to try blowing a conch shell, and use a bull roarer. The traditional tale of Kiore e te Eke (rat and octopus) was told and the chance for the students to use traditional tools was also provided. This was the first time that many of the students have played with traditional instruments and tools. This collaboration has proved very successful with the Pacific Community.
Performance Measures
Libraries and Information – 2014/15 Work Programme |
MANGERE-OTAHUHU |
Mangere-Otahuhu local board plan priorities (2011-2014) |
||||||||||||||
Libraries contribute to the following strategic priorities: • Build the Ōtāhuhu pool and complete the recreation precinct • Provide high quality recreational and community facilities • Increase the well being of our communities |
||||||||||||||
Library hours of service 2014/15 |
||||||||||||||
Mangere Bridge Library Open six days per week Monday: 9am - 5pm, Tuesday: 9am - 5pm, Wednesday: 9am - 5pm, Thursday: 9am - 8pm, Friday: 9am - 5pm, Saturday: 9.30am - 12:30pm Mangere East Library Open six days per week Monday: 9am - 8pm, Tuesday: 9am - 5pm, Wednesday: 9am - 5pm, Thursday: 9am - 8pm, Friday: 9am - 5pm, Saturday: 9.30am - 12.30pm |
Mangere Town Centre Library Open six days per week Monday: 9am - 5pm, Tuesday: 9am - 5pm, Wednesday: 9am - 5pm, Thursday: 9am - 7pm, Friday: 9am - 5pm, Saturday: 9.30am - 4pm Otahuhu Library Open six days per week Monday to Friday: 9am - 5.30pm, Saturday: 10am - 4pm |
|||||||||||||
New Library Builds: |
||||||||||||||
Otahuhu Library and recreation precinct |
||||||||||||||
Renewals programme 2014/15: |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Programmes and Events 2014/15 |
||||||||||||||
Regular programmes: Mangere Bridge Library • Wriggle and rhyme – 1 one hour session per week • Storytime – 1 one hour session per week • Block party (Lego) – 1 session per month • Kids book club – 1 session per week • Ace of clubs (Teen book club) – 1 session per month • Computer workshops – 1 day per week • Tea and Topics – 1 session per month • Writer's group – 1 session per month • The wellbeing book club – 1 session per month • Book a Librarian (various topics covered) Mangere East Library • Wriggle and rhyme – 1 one hour session per week • Book a Librarian (various topics covered) |
Mangere Town Centre Library • Wriggle and rhyme – 1 one hour session per week • Storytime – 1 one hour session per week • Homework centre – 3 sessions per month • Basic computer classes – 1 two and a half hour session per week • Bookmarks (book club) – 1 session per month • Chit chat – 1 session per month • Book a Librarian (various topics covered) Otahuhu Library • Wriggle and rhyme – 1 one hour session per week • Storytime – 1 one hour session per week • CV basics – 2 one hour sessions per week • Book a Librarian (various topics covered) • Akozone Study Support Centre (3 sessions per week) |
|||||||||||||
Libraries and Information – 2014/15 Work Programme |
MANGERE-OTAHUHU |
Contd….
Events: The libraries will deliver events throughout the year in relation to selected regional programmes of events which includes: Comic book month, Diwali, Maori language week, Matariki, New Zealand book month, New Zealand music month, Pacific Language weeks, Pasifika, Samoan language week, Waitangi, Lunar New Year, School holiday programmes, and Dare to Explore summer reading programme |
||||||||||||||
Service levels 2014/15 |
||||||||||||||
|
Libraries and Information – 2014/15 Work Programme |
REGIONAL |
Work to be completed at a regional level to support local service delivery:
(By focus area from Te Kauroa – Auckland Libraries 10 year strategic plan)
Focus area 1: The digital library |
Outcome: Your library available anywhere, anytime |
14/15 objectives: • Focus staff training on delivering effective digital literacy programmes as priorities • Begin implementation of Libraries Digital plan • Upgrade the Library management system • Improve the customer experience through the library technology offer, including faster PCs, more eBooks/tablets and a new content management system for the website |
Focus area 2: Children and young people |
Outcome: Every child a reader, every child a library member |
14/15 objectives: • Focus staff training on delivering effective reading literacy programmes as priorities |
Focus area 3: Library spaces |
Outcome: Engaging spaces at the heart of community |
14/15 objectives: • Finalise the Libraries Facility development plan • Deliver new libraries in Ranui, Te Atatu, Devonport, Otahuhu, and Waiheke, and progress the new library build at Massey |
Focus area 4: Customer and community connection |
Outcome: Programmes and services that inspire learning and participation |
14/15 objectives: • Develop a Library Service model • Implement the departmental Maori responsiveness plan • Continue to support innovation, including maker spaces and outreach • Develop a departmental Pacific services plan |
Focus area 5: Heritage and research |
Outcome: Auckland’s unique stories shared and celebrated |
14/15 objectives: • Promote the heritage and research collections in innovative ways |
Focus area 6: Collections |
Outcome: Sustainable and customer driven collections |
14/15 objectives: • Create and deliver the first annual collections action plan based on understanding of customer and community requirements |
Infrastructure and Environmental Services
This is the first quarterly report from the Infrastructure and Environmental Services department to be included in the consolidated Quarterly Performance Report coordinated by the local board finance team. In order to align our quarterly reporting with the Quarterly Performance Report for the 2014/2015 financial year, it has been necessary for this report to cover an extended reporting period (May to September 2014).
Local Board-funded projects
Infrastructure and Environmental Services has been allocated the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board (the board) Environmental Initiatives, including Manukau Harbour budget line for delivery in 2014/2015. At the time of writing this report, the board had not yet formally agreed a work programme supporting that budget line. A proposed environment work programme will be presented to the board at its November 2014 meeting for agreement. The proposed work programme includes funding for the Manukau Harbour Forum work programme, industry pollution prevention programme, water sensitive design and ecological restoration.
The table below reports on activities undertaken by the Infrastructure and Environmental Services department with funding from the local board.
Local Board Priority |
Budget |
Initiative |
|
Budget Allocated |
Budget spent |
A place where natural environment is protected and preserved A place where communities thrive and belong
|
Community Response Fund |
Makaurau Marae Placement |
At its March 2014 meeting, the board provided part funding for a representative of Makaurau Mare to undertake a six month placement with Auckland Council. The placement commenced in August 2014 with an initial six weeks working alongside local parks staff. The second part of the placement is providing an opportunity for the Marae representative to learn about biodiversity, land management and water quality issues with staff from Environmental Services. As part of this placement, Makaurau Marae hosted a Whakawhanautanga Day for board members and council staff to facilitate a better understanding of the iwi and hapū in the area, the cultural, spiritual, historical associations of iwi and hapū in the area, how iwi and hapū practice kaitiakitanga in their rohe, and Māori tikanga and kawa. The total cost of this project is $35,300 with additional funding from Environmental Services and Community Development. The board contribution to this project is $7,650. |
$7,650 |
$7,650 |
Regional Programmes with local impacts
The table below reports on activities undertaken by the Infrastructure and Environmental Services Department as part of regional programmes delivered in the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board area.
Local Board Priority – A place where natural environment is protected and preserved |
Thriving Ecosystems and Improving Water Quality |
· The Biosecurity team visited Otuataua Stonefields to check for variegated thistle with no populations being found. Overall, the management of pest plants in this area is good. · Biosecurity and Southern Regional Parks staff reported and assisted the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to undertake a response to a potential sighting of the exotic Australian tree frog, Litoria peroneii, which is not present in New Zealand. Specimens collected at Ambury Regional Park were subsequently identified by MPI as a different Australian frog species, Litoria aurea, which is already known to be present in New Zealand. A low level of continued surveillance has been recommended by MPI, as L. peroneii was recently intercepted at Auckland airport. A further precautionary check is therefore warranted during the frog breeding season. · Temporary possum signage has been installed at entry points to Otahuhu Mt Richmond to advise visitors of the installation of timms traps (unset a present). Signage has been installed at four other maunga. (Note that Otahuhu Mt Richmond is in the Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board area). Rabbit control commenced on Māngere and Ōtāhuhu in October 2014. |
Local Board Priority - A place where communities thrive and belong |
Zero Waste (waste minimisation) |
· Support provided to the Makaurau Marae community composting project, including provision of Bokashi Bins and training for the nursery manager. · Council has a contract with the Mangere East Family Services Centre who employs two part-time facilitators to engage with Mangere and Otahuhu residents and communities in getting prepared for the new waste changes. They have been engaged in facilitating awareness raising sessions and upskilling local residents as waste champions. A very successful skill share session was held at Papatuanuku Marae in July where waste champions from across the south shared their passion and enthusiasm for waste minimisation. Nine residents from Mangere were also trained up to work alongside Council’s Waste Wise Advisors on a door knocking campaign in Mangere as part of the Recycling Right Campaign. · In Mangere Bridge, Council has a contract with Friends of Ambury Farm, through the Residents and Ratepayers Association. The group has been holding wastewise workshops, preserving workshops and composting workshops. They have set up a soft plastic collection at the Sunday market where the plastic is collected and recycled by a group called Rematerialise. |
Section 4 – Other Reports
Treasury report for the quarter ending 30 September 2014
The treasury report provides a summary of how Auckland Council is complying with the Treasury Management Policy limits and the performance of treasury activities against benchmarks.
Key highlights and achievements for the quarter include:
Ø John Bishop was appointed Treasurer
Ø offshore roadshow meetings with, Norwegian, Swiss and Japanese investors
Ø positive annual review meetings with Standards and Poor’s and Moody’s rating agencies, with rating outcome expected in late October
Ø issue of a domestic $250m wholesale five-year bond settling early October.
The focus of treasury remains minimising funding costs, managing liquidity and interest rate risk, diversifying the investor base and lengthening the term of debt.
Debt
Parent Gross debt as at 30 September 2014 was $5.8 billion ($5.6 billion as at 30 June 2014). After allowing for $208 million of cash investments ($152 million as at 30 June 2014), net debt was $5.6 billion ($5.4 billion as at 30 June 2014).
Borrowing limits |
Policy maximum |
Annual[1] |
Budget |
Compliance |
Net debt as a percentage of total revenue |
275 % |
177% |
195 % |
Yes |
Net interest as a percentage of total revenue |
15 % |
11 % |
11% |
Yes |
Net interest as a percentage of rates income |
25 % |
19 % |
19 % |
Yes |
Debt portfolio performance |
September Actual |
Average YTD |
Budget as per plan |
Benchmark (including credit margin) |
Cost of funds versus budget |
5.53 % |
5.50 % |
5.69 % |
5.50 % |
Our September cost of funds remains below our budgeted cost of funds. However, it is above the benchmark due to the lengthening of the average duration of our debt portfolio to 7.8 years.
Debt Opening position |
Net Debt Issued |
Debt as at 30 Sept 14 |
Treasury forecast increase in Debt |
Treasury forecast closing position |
Annual Plan closing position |
Variance |
$ 5,553 m |
$ 212 m |
$ 5,765 m |
$ 651 m |
$ 6,416 m |
$ 6,670 m |
$ 254 m |
Treasury’s forecast closing gross debt position at 30 June 2015 is $6,416 million includes cash of $98 million. The parent debt level in the Annual Plan is $6,670 million, a positive variance of $254 million due to higher planned cash holdings of $143 million and $111 million for capital expenditure that will be funded after year end.
Debt Maturity Profile (all debt and excludes swaps) |
Actual |
Actual % |
15% to 60% of debt to mature between 0 to 3 years. |
$ 1,966 m |
34 % |
20% to 60% of debt to mature between 3 to 7 years. |
$ 1,460 m |
25 % |
10% to 65% of debt to mature beyond 7 years. |
$ 2,340 m |
41 % |
Fixed Rate Debt [2] |
Actual |
Actual % |
Fixed rate debt to be between 50 per cent and 95 per cent of total debt. |
$ 4,673 m |
90 % |
15 per cent to 60 per cent of fixed rate debt to reprice between one to three years. |
$ 1,025 m |
22 % |
15 per cent to 60 per cent of fixed rate debt to reprice between three to five years. |
$ 1,133 m |
24 % |
15 per cent to 60 per cent of fixed rate debt to reprice between five to ten years. |
$ 2,490 m |
53 % |
0 per cent to 40 per cent of fixed rate to reprice beyond ten years |
$ 25 m |
1 % |
|
Amount on issue |
Change |
|||
30 September 2014 |
30 June 2014 |
YTD |
|||
Commercial paper |
$ 275 m |
5 % |
$ 125 m |
2 % |
ñ $ 150 m |
Retail bonds |
$ 1,121 m |
19 % |
$ 1,121 m |
20 % |
- |
Wholesale bonds |
$ 1,295 m |
22 % |
$ 1,469 m |
27 % |
ò $ 174 m |
Local Government Funding Agency |
$ 1,375 m |
24 % |
$ 1,175 m |
21 % |
ñ $ 200 m |
Offshore funding |
$ 1,355 m |
24 % |
$ 1,355 m |
24 % |
- |
Crown EMU facility |
$ 344 m |
6 % |
$ 308 m |
6 % |
ñ $ 36 m |
Total debt |
$ 5,765 m |
100 % |
$ 5,553 m |
100 % |
ñ $ 212 m |
The graph below shows the full maturity profile of Auckland Council debt. There is a limit of $1 billion of debt to mature in any rolling six-month period.
Investments
Total cash and liquid investments held as at 30 June 2014 was $152 million. Council has a range of funds totalling $25 million held in trust. Treasury manages the Trust and Reserves portfolio to optimise the return within the guidelines contained in the council’s treasury policy.
Trust and Reserves Portfolio performance |
Actual |
Benchmark |
|
Investment returns to exceed 20 per cent weighting of NZX 90 day Bank Bill Index and 80 per cent weighting to NZX “A” Grade index |
Monthly |
0.43 % |
0.34 % |
Year to date |
1.52 % |
1.90 % |
Credit Exposure to Counterparties
Our counterparty credit exposure is well within the policy limit of no more than $800 million of assessed credit exposure for AA- rated (or better) entities and not more than $400 million for entities rated between A- and A+. No exposure is permitted to entities that are rated below A- unless they are a local authority.
Risk measure |
Counterparty |
Limit |
Actual |
In policy |
Credit exposure |
NZ Government |
£ 100 % |
0 % |
Yes |
Local Government Funding Agency |
£ 100 % |
1 % |
Yes |
|
Registered banks >AA- / A1+ |
£ 100 % |
90 % |
Yes |
|
Registered banks >A- / A1 |
£ 100 % |
9 % |
Yes |
|
Rated local authorities >A- / A1 |
£ 75 % |
0 % |
Yes |
|
Unrated local authorities |
£ 40 % |
0 % |
Yes |
|
Other corporate issuers and SOEs >AA- / A1+ |
£ 75 % |
0 % |
Yes |
|
Other corporate issuers and SOEs >A- / A1 |
£ 40 % |
0 % |
Yes |
Section 5 – Financial Report
Financial Performance Report for the Otara-Papatoetoe Local Board
for the four months ended October 2014
1. Financial Overview and Top Projects Summary
Net Cost of Service and Capital Expenditure relating to the local board is summarised below and further discussed in the report in respect of each Group of Activity.
Table 1: Financial Overview
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $5.83m which is $693k under budget.
Revenue of $526k is $18k less than budget. In the Community Services area facilities revenue is on track, while the revenue for Youth Connections is not yet accounted across the programme. Recreation services revenue is down 4% in the fitness and Learn to Swim programmes. Mangere Arts Centre and Metro Theatre have overall a favourable increase in hireage revenue.
Operating Expenditure of $6.36m is $712k under budget. There is underspend in all local activities, significantly in the following, and detailed under each activity:
· Outsourcing mainly in Parks ($244k)
· Depreciation not yet costed ($111k)
· Property and repair costs ($160k)
· Materials and Other expenses, mainly in recreation services ($146k)
· Environmental work programme to be approved November ($35k)
Capital Expenditure year to date is $7.08m which is $3.24m behind budget. New work programmes delayed by the capex review process are just coming on stream. The significant capital programmes for the local board are
· Otahuhu Recreation Precinct which is on track with no risks impacting the deadline.
· Moana-nui-a-kiwa pool refurbishments is slightly delayed following issues around identification of some in-ground services, but is expected to recover to schedule.
· Otahuhu Town Centre revitalisation work has been slightly delayed around the capex review process, but is back on track to be completed this year as planned.
Local libraries
Table 1: Financial Overview: Local library facilities and services
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $811k which is $28k under budget.
Revenue of $30k is $3k better than budget with no issues to report.
Operating Expenditure of $841k is $24k (3%) under budget. The main underspend has been in cleaning, repairs and security over all four libraries.
Capital expenditure is $854k for the year, under delivered by $396k. All spend is on the new Otahuhu Library which is still on track to be completed this year.
Local community services
Table 3: Financial Overview: Local community services
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $578k which is almost on budget.
Revenue of $58k is $13k lower than budget. This variance is mainly Youth Connections ($15k) where funding and costs are not yet transacted to local boards.
Operating expenditure of $578k is underspent by $11k due mostly to overs and unders:
· Youth connections underspend of $30k as transactions not yet posted
· Nga Tapuwae term grant first installment paid, and second installment not due until Feb 2015 although budget is phased earlier ($53k)
· Kiingi Taawhiao cottage has no maintenance spend as not yet in use ($14k)
· Staff costs allocated in community halls is slightly increased ($10k)
· Rates overall $10k over as alignment process with property still ongoing
· Response repairs for Metro Theatre including leaky roof and guttering ($13k)
· Discretionary community grants have been approved earlier than budget phase ($45k)
Capital expenditure is $11k for the year, under delivered by $6k. The majority was spent on a security system and engagement at Kiingi Taawhiao Cottage. A programme of work for CCTV Cameras project ($43k) is before the board in December.
Local arts, culture and events services
Table 4: Financial Overview: Local arts, culture and events services
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $429k, which is $66k under budget
Revenue of $54k is $13k better than budget as Mangere Arts Centre and Metro Theatre both share a significant increase of $28% in hireage revenues.
Operating expenditure of $482k is $66k below budget and is mainly expenses for Mangere Arts Centre that are underspent in depreciation ($48k) not calculated for the site but budgeted (similar to previous year) and property costs, materials and other expenses ($18k)
Capital expenditure of $32k planned this year on Metro Theatre refurbishment is just in the first stages.
Local parks services
Table 5: Financial Overview: Local parks
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $1.71m, under budget by $359k.
Operating expenditure is $359k under budget due to:
· Full facility contract is underspent in response maintenance callouts ($40k)
· Mangere Mountain Education Trust grant first payment is not due until Jan 2015 ($48k)
· General capital fund for depreciation on capital spend is not yet coded ($49k)
· No spend YTD on Mangrove removal/Manukau Harbour/Tamaki Estuary initiatives (100k)
· No spend YTD on Arboriculture programmes ($96k)
Capital expenditure of $204k * has been spent this year against a budget of $377k. The capex deferrals process is now complete and projects have been allocated to managers who are confident of delivery this year. The capital works progress list is at the end of this financial report.
*A credit of $50k has been returned to the parks capital accounts being prior year adjustments for capital items that were identified at audit as operational items eg planting, horticultural renewals.
Local recreation services
Table 6: Financial Overview: Local recreational initiatives and facilities
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $1.15m, which is almost on budget over this activity
Revenue of $384k is $18k lower than budget accounted for two areas:
· Fitness ($6k) decrease is similar to region trend. Additional market campaigns and focus on numbers retention has slowed last year’s trend locally. This is an ongoing effort.
· Learn to Swim programme ($11k) have been affected by recent works at the facility
Operating expenditure is $23k below budget with this amount reflected in
· Otahuhu Recreation Centre tracking to budget
· Moana-nui-a kiwa has an overspend of $33k in staff following the Learn to Swim programme being moved in-house, after budgets were sealed. There is a $6k underspend in response repairs. Underspend of $77k in other expenses is expected to continue its trend and is forecast for close to $200k end of year underspend. This will offset any negative salary impacts and hopefully revenue shortfalls should they continue.
· Sturges park approved works pothole sealing and access work of $17k has been paid from this year’s facilities partnership fund. This cost is to be reversed to be absorbed by Parks.
Capital expenditure of $6m has been spent, most significantly on the pool development at Otahuhu ($5.7m) with a further $300k on Moana-nui-a-kiwa pool. The two workstreams will be complete this financial year.
Local economic development
Table 7: Financial Overview: Local economic development
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $662k, which is $59k below budget.
Operating expenditure is underspent $59k, with one BID top-up still to be paid ($30k) and business centre public conveniences budget actually costed in Parks ($18k)
Capital expenditure is $52k against a budget of $208k. Otahuhu Town Centre revitalisation work has been slightly delayed around the capex review process, but is back on track to be completed this year as planned.
Local built and natural environment
Table 8: Financial Overview: Local environment and heritage protection
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $24k with a budget of $59k.
Operating Expenditure is $35k under budget. Spent so far is $8.5k for the Manukau Harbour Forum work programme agreed September, and $3k for the Otuataua lizard survey initial phase. The full work programme was approved by the local board in November so work will be able to move forward.
Local governance
Table 9: Financial Overview: Local planning, policy and governance
Comment:
Net Cost of Service is $466k and is $131k below budget.
Revenue in this activity is for central government contribution for citizenship ceremonies when they occur.
Operating expenditure variances of $134k under budget for the year are:
· Local Board Plan costs not yet transacted ($27k)
· Citizenship and civic ceremonies not spent ($8k)
· Community response fund allocated and spent ahead of budget ($82k)
· Otahuhu arts facility feasibility and analysis $50k about to commence ($17k)
Discretionary Funding and Grants
Table 10: Summary of Allocation of Discretionary Funding
Discretionary Funding Programme |
Available to Allocate |
Allocation Made |
Remaining Funds |
Discretionary Community Grants - Opex |
$419,000 |
$95,000 |
$324,000 |
Events Funds – Opex |
$155,000 |
$125,000 |
$30,000 |
Discretionary Funds – Opex |
$254,000 |
$108,000 |
$146,000 |
Discretionary Funds - Capex |
$426,000 |
$338,000 |
$88,000 |
Discretionary Community Grants – Opex |
Allocation made |
|
|
Round 1 contestable grants |
$94,688 |
|
|
Total |
$94,688 |
Events Funds – Opex |
Allocation Made |
|
|
ANZAC |
30,157 |
Christmas Events (4) |
12,829 |
Otahuhu Family Fun Day |
10,000 |
Mangere East Cultural |
4,000 |
Acceleration on Water Festival |
5,000 |
St Patrick’s Pay |
1,000 |
World Diabetes Day |
2,500 |
Movies in Parks |
9,000 |
CM Sporting Awards |
3,000 |
Head 2 Head Charity Walk |
1,000 |
Auckland Highland Games |
3,500 |
Auckland Niuean Lawn Bowling |
1,400 |
Christmas in Centrepark |
4,000 |
Sutton Park Community is Unity |
6,000 |
Elvis in the Gardens |
1,000 |
NZ Police everyday heroes |
6,160 |
Mangere Bridge Trolley Derby |
5,000 |
MTC Arts Festival |
3,000 |
Manukau Diwali, Navrati and Garba |
6,000 |
Otahuhu Health Expo |
2,500 |
Genesis Youth Tagz Out |
3,000 |
White Ribbon Event |
3,000 |
Nuie Health |
2,000 |
|
|
Total |
$125,046 |
Discretionary Funds – Opex |
Allocation Made |
|
|
Community Facs Provision investigation |
40,000 |
Resource Recovery Network scoping contribution |
10,000 |
Supporting community in Liquor Licence process |
30,000 |
Story of Hope delegate |
107 |
Moyle Park Carpark assessment |
15,000 |
David Lange Basketball Court prof fees from Y14 |
8,130 |
ORC Car Park Lighting from Y14 |
5,100 |
|
|
Total |
$108,337 |
Discretionary Funds – Capex |
Allocation Made |
|
|
Boggust Park Toilets |
100,000 |
MLC Fitness Station bal from Y14 |
11,000 |
Otahuhu Rugby Club Carpark Lighting construction |
84,000 |
Smoke Free signage |
5,000 |
David Lange Basketball Court physical work Part 2 |
100,000 |
David Lange Basketball Court physical work Part 2 additional |
38,230 |
|
|
Total |
$338,230 |
Capital Projects are tracking as follows
10 December 2014 |
|
Auckland Transport Monthly Update Report - December 2014
File No.: CP2014/28412
Purpose
1. This report provides an update on local transport matters over the last month for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board (MOLB).
Executive summary
2. This report contains a general monthly update on transport matters both locally and from across Auckland and a list of issues currently being addressed by Auckland Transport for the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board receives the Auckland Transport Monthly Update Report – December 2014.
|
Comments
Reporting Back on Resolutions
3. Resolution Number: MO/2014/176
a) Requests that the removal of the fencing in the Mangere Town Centre car park, near the Citizen’s Advice Bureau is resolved.
4. On 20 October 2014 the Auckland Transport’s Manager Property met with representatives of the MOLB and discussed the situation with the fence and the car park spaces. At this meeting the Property Team committed to getting this issue resolved and are working with Council to confirm details of the original consent that was issued by the legacy Council and a meeting is being organised with the property owner that erected the fence to discuss their position. At the time this report was written the date for this meeting had not been confirmed.
5. The Manager Property discussed the Local Board and CAB car parks and is planning to re-organise and refurbish them.
Discussion
Auckland Transport Work Programme
6. Auckland Transport aims to provide an annual work programme, to all Local Boards. Auckland Transport’s work programme is decided after Auckland Council’s budget is confirmed so briefing Local Boards has taken longer than predicted.
7. South Auckland Local Boards were briefed about the overall effect of the Long Term Plan by Auckland Transport’s Chief Executive on 15 October 2014. All elected members were invited to attend and the Chief Executive and the Strategy Team spoke about:
· The funding constraints that Auckland Transport is subject too;
· How projects are prioritised within Auckland Transport’s work programme; and
· An opportunity was provided to see ‘live’ examples of how projects are prioritised.
8. On 22 October 2014 Auckland Transport’s Relationship Manager discussed the Chief Executive’s briefing at an MOLB workshop
9. On 26 November 2014 a more detailed workshop was conducted with the full Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board and a number of key points were discussed. The workshop was also an opportunity to circulate the detailed annual work programme.
East - West Study
10. The East - West Study is a project to analyse transport routes between SH20 and SH1 and develop solutions for managing an anticipated increase in road freight of 60%, through that corridor in the next 30 years. In particular, the objective will be to permit better connectivity for the industrial areas of Onehunga-Southdown, East Tamaki-Highbrook, the Airport, Wiri and southern Mt Wellington.
11. In 2014 the project focussed on two key areas:
· Freight movements east-west via Onehunga; and
· Public transport linkages to and from Slyvia Park, Otahuhu, Mangere and the Airport.
12. Consultation regarding these two key areas finished recently.
13. In total around 170 online or written pieces of feedback were received and over 200 people came along to open days, meetings, workshops and hui. The feedback received is now being analysed and a summary of the comments will be released in early 2015.
14. Key points raised in the feedback received included:
· The impact on residential and industrial properties;
· Access to and use of the foreshore;
· Important features in the area, including Gloucester Park (Hopua tuff ring), Ann’s Creek, the foreshore and Mutukaroa – Hamlins Hill, and if the proposed options could diminish or enhance these areas;
· The importance of good walking and cycling facilities;
· The need to identify options to address transport issues over the longer-term rather than a ‘quick fix’; and
· Public transport needs to be more reliable.
Future Streets
15. ‘Future Streets’ is a safety and ‘liveability’ programme that involves redesigning and modifying residential streets to reduce the number of heavy vehicles, slow traffic down and improve walking and cycling routes. Auckland Transport is intending to run the first trial of the ’Future Streets’ programme in Mangere.
16. Both the New Zealand Transport Agency and the MOLB have agreed to help fund the project and Auckland Transport will finalise its commitment at the completion of the Long Term Plan process.
17. The project team is aiming to start building the physical infrastructure in summer 2014/2015 and the ‘Future Streets’ project is progressing according to plan.
18. The design team finished public consultation on 21 November 2014. The team is still collating feedback but is aiming to discuss the project with the MOLB’s Transport representatives in December 2014 later the project team would like to discuss the project with the MOLB and a workshop slot has been requested.
Otahuhu Bus and Rail Interchange Upgrade
19. The Otahuhu Bus and Rail Interchange is being re-developed and upgraded.
20. The project is moving forwards and ‘enabling’ works started on 23 November 2014. This work will progress through Christmas taking advantage of the holiday period to complete work in the rail corridor.
21. It is possible that the project will be advanced further. ‘Pre-loading’, the process of piling spoil on the work site to compress the ground and force water out of the substrate is now planned for February 2014.
22. The main part of the station upgrade is planned to start by the middle of 2015 and the completion date is still the end of 2015.
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport Capital Fund
23. Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has a total pool of approx. $1,971,770 available in this electoral term to spend on transport projects.
24. This money can be used for projects identified by the Local Board, the principal constraints being that the project:
· Will not compromise transport safety;
· Is transport-related;
· Is in the ‘road corridor’ or is part of a recognized cycle route that crosses a park; and
· Does not compromise the efficiency of the road network.
25. In its first electoral term the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board requested a number of projects and the progress of these projects is summarised in Attachment B.
26. So far in this electoral term the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has identified six projects and these are also identified in Attachment B.
27. The largest was the commitment of funding to the ‘Future Steets’ project in Mangere Town Centre. Public consultation for this project was completed on 21 November 2014 and the team is keen to discuss the results with the MOLB. The project’s works are still scheduled for delivery in early 2015.
28. Planning for the work in the carpark linking Mason and Station Roads in Otahuhu is underway and early in 2015 and initial ideas for the area were shown to the public at an ‘Otahuhu Linkages’ project open day on 27 November 2014. The team should be able to provide detailed information to the MOLB in early 2015.
Issues
29. A list of specific transport issues that the MOLB has asked Auckland Transport to investigate is included as Attachment C.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Summary of Engagement |
73 |
bView |
Capital Fund Projects |
77 |
cView |
Issues Report |
85 |
Signatories
Authors |
Ben Stallworthy, Elected Member Relationship Manager, Auckland Transport |
Authorisers |
Jonathan Anyon, Elected Member Relationship Team Manager, Auckland Transport Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Summary of Engagement with Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board on Projects
Project |
Description of Engagement Activities with Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board |
Notes |
Waddon-Windrush |
1. November 2013 – Auckland Transport reported that there was a possibility that the new Regional Land Transport Programme would not include Waddon-Windrush. 2. Late 2013 –early 2014 – Auckland Transport staff work with a variety of agencies to look at other options and identify the opportunity to use the ‘Future Streets’ project to analyse the problem differently. 3. 10 February 2014 - The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board’s Transport representatives met with the leader of the Future Streets Project and discuss this project’s ideas for improving safety from crime in this area 4. 20 February 2014 – Possible options starting to be identified were reported verbally and discussed with Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members during the Local Board’s bus tour of the area. 5. 27 February 2014 – Auckland Transport officers and elected members met to discuss the project and confirmed the Local Board’s priorities and looked at possible options that can be developed by Auckland Transport. 6. Late February 2014 - The ‘Future Streets’ team and Auckland Transport officers started developing options for how to re-model this area to reduce the amount of criminal activity; and encourage walking and cycling. 7. 11 March 2014 – Transport Representatives met with the ‘Future Streets’ project team and work shopped a range of options. 8. 31 March 2014 – All Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members were emailed a copy of an options paper produced by the ‘Future Streets’ project team that described four possible options for the area. 9. April Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Meeting – The options paper was attached to the monthly transport report. 10. 7 May 2014 – The options contained in the options paper were work-shopped with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board members. 11. 21 May 2014 – The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board resolved to request an investigation by Auckland Transport about the feasibility of using the Local Board’s Transport Capital Funds to deliver the project. 12. 16 July 2014 – Rough Order of Cost of $ 173,366 reported back to MOLB. 13. 13 August 2014 – Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board workshop to discuss ‘Future Streets’ included this project in the discussion. 14. 22 October 2014 – Public consultation information circulated to the Transport Portfolio represetatives and signed off on 31 October 2014. 15. 7 November 2014 – Public consultation mail out posted to local residents 16. 7-21 November 2014 – Public consultation period (for Waddon-Windrush works and ‘Future Streets’ package)..
|
At this point the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has identified a preferred option – building an enhanced walking/cycling route.
Auckland Transport is investigating this option along with the ‘Future Streets’ package and aims to brief the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board in December 2014 or January 2015.
A Final Cost for Waddon-Windrush will be provided ASAP.
|
Long Term Plan |
1. March/April 2014 Local Board Meetings – Workshop opportunities for all Local Boards advertised in Auckland Transport’s Monthly Update Report. 2. 14 April 2014 Local Board Southern Cluster Work Shop – This work shop was attended by the Transport Representatives and by another Local Board Member. 3. 15 October 2014 –All Southern Local Boards were briefed by Auckland Transport’s Chief Executive, 4. 22 October 2014 – Auckland Transport’s Relationship Manager met with and discussed the process with a Managere-Otahuhu Local Board workshop. 5. 26 November 2014 – Meeting held with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board to discuss Auckland Transport’s proposed work programme. |
Formal consultation on the Transport component of Auckland Council’s Long Term Plan, and on Auckland Transport’s Regional Land Transport Programme, will take place in January and February 2015.
Currently initial consultation is taking place with Local Boards. |
East-West Study |
1. 22 August 2012 - An initial workshop was attended by representatives of the Mangere- Otahuhu Local Board. 2. After this workshop the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board made a written submission to the project team. 3. 20 February 2013 - A workshop was conducted with representatives from all affected Local Boards, including the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board. 4. After this workshop another written submission was provided by the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board. 5. 20 June 2013 - A briefing was held between the Project Team and Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board representatives. 6. 24 June 2013 - A workshop was conducted with all affected Local Boards including Mangere-Otahuhu. 7. 17 July 2013 - The Project Team met with the whole Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board and discussed proposed options, outlined the reasoning behind the options and discussed this information with the Board Members 8. 28 August 2013 - The Project Team came to the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board regular workshop and discussed the Board’s concerns about the options that were presented. (N.B. details of the discussion were reported to the September 2013 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting) 9. 2 September 2013 - Local Boards that are in the affected area met together and discussed their opinions of the options presented to date provided ideas for other options that could be considered by the Project Team. 10. 7 November 2013 – Auckland Transport officers met with the ‘Respect Our Community’ advocacy group. 11. 11 November 2013 – The local MP Sua William Sio was briefed of the project and invited the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Chair to the meeting. 12. 4 December 2013 – The I East-West project team met with the full Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board and discussed progress and the planned future development of the project. 13. 13 March 2014 – All Local Board’s effected by the project were invited to another work shop. Both Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport representatives attended. 14. Late July 2014 – Public consultation period planned. 15. 26 Juy 2014 – Public open day conducted in Mangere Bridge. 16. 2 August 2014 – Public open day conducted in the Mangere Town Centre. 17. October 2014 - Period of public consultation was undertaken that included a series of public open days and workshops as follows: · 11 October community open day at Onehunga Primary School Hall · 16 October community open day at Otahuhu College Sports Pavillion · 19 October community open day at Te Papapa Squash Club · 20 October community work shop at Te Papapa Squash Club · 21 October community work shop at Pearce Street Hall · 22 October community workshop at Te Papapa Squash Club · 23 October community workshop at Otahuhu College Sports Pavillion 18. 30 October another extra community workshop held at the request of the community.
|
In October 2014 lots of consultation took place and it is planned that the Transport Portfolio Leaders will be briefed on 17 November 2014.
When the information from the consultation is collated and reviewed the team will brief the full MOLB probably in December 2014 or early 2015.. |
Future Streets |
17. 3 April 2013 - The ‘Future Streets’ Project Team met with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for an initial briefing on the project. 18. 21 April 2013 - The ‘Future Streets’ Project Team met with the Transport Portfolio Leads and the Chair and discussed the details of the project. The Project Team asked for assistance engaging with the local community and the Transport Portfolio Leads have provided a list of key local people and organisations that they believe the team should involve in planning this project. 19. 3 July 2013 - The Project Team briefed whole Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board on progress on. 20. 22 January 2014 - The project team briefed the Local Board on progress. 21. 23 January 2014 – Community participatory workshop 22. 10 February 2014 – Catch up with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport representatives 23. 27 February 2014 – Met with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport representatives to discuss Waddon-Windrush 24. 11 March 2014 – Catch up with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport representatives. 25. 16 July 2014 – Community participatory workshop. 26. 16 July 2014 – Projects reported to the Managere-Otahuhu Local Board that can be considered for funding through the Local Board’s Transport Capital Fund. 27. 13 August 2104 – Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board workshop to discuss using Local Board Transport Capital to support this project. 28. 22 October 2014 – Public consultation information circulated to the Transport Portfolio represetatives and signed off on 31 October 2014. 29. 7 November 2014 – Public consultation mail out posted to local residents. 30. 7-21 November 2014 – Public consultation period.
|
The objective is to start building the physical infra-structure in summer 2014 / 15 and at this time the project is progressing according to plan.
|
Otahuhu Rail/Bus Interchange |
1. 6 March 2013 – The Project Team met with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for an initial briefing. 2. 7 October 2013 – The Project Team met with the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board’s Transport Representatives for a briefing and work shop. 3. 6 December 2013 – The Project Team held a public open day that was attended by representatives of the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board. 4. 13 May 2014 – Mangere Otahuhu Local Board Chair briefed on progress, and plans for Pasifika consultation. 5. 14 May 2014 – Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board briefed on progress and plans. 6. 16 July 2014 – Meeting with Otahuhu Business Association. Called by HWM and involved discussing local concerns about the new inter-change. 7. 15/16 August 2014 – Public open days held in Otahuhu.
|
Work has now started on ‘enabling’ works so is |
SMART Study |
1. August 2014 – Catch up meeting scheduled between the Transport Portfolio Leaders and Auckland Transport.
|
Currently this project is moving slowly and there has been little of significance to report. |
10 December 2014 |
|
Summary of Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Transport Capital Fund Projects
2013-16 Electoral Term
Projects Submitted |
Description |
Current Status |
Mangere –East Town Centre Traffic Calming |
The aim of this project is to improve ease of access to the Mangere-East Town Centre for people on foot. |
At the April 2014 Mangere- Otahuhu Local Board meeting the Board resolved to request a Rough Order of Cost for this project. Auckland Transport reported back with a Rough Order of Cost in June 2014 and the Mangere-Otahuhu Detailed design is complete and a Final Cost of $ 30,000 has been provided. The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has authorised expenditure of $ 30,000 to complete this project and plans have been completed and contractors are being organised.
|
Waddon-Windrush Walk/Cycleway |
The walkway is narrow, poorly lit and has become a high crime area and widening the walkway is seen as a solution that will make the area safer with regards to crime. The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has decided to use its Local Board Transport Capital Fund to deliver the project. |
Auckland Transport has reported back a Rough Order of Cost for the project of approx. $ 173,366 The project will include widening the pathway, improving lighting and re-devloping the area in the manner illustrated to make more attractive and safer from crime. Detailed design is underway and public consultation took place between 7-21 November 2014. At this time the project team is reviewing feedback from the consultation period the aim being that by December 2014 or January 2015 a finalised plan can be presented back to the Mangere-Othahuhu Local Board along with a Final Cost. |
Future Streets Walking and Cycling Circuit Windrush-Mascot |
Constructing a iconic fitroute that runs from Windrush Close to Mascot Road. |
Auckland Transport has provided a Rough Order of $ 346,000 for delivery of this project.
At the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board’s 17 September 2014 meeting the Board authorized Auckland Transport to complete design and immediately start construction providing the project’s Final Cost was within the Rough Order of Cost provided. Detailed design is underway and public consultation took place between 7-21 November 2014.
At this time the project team is reviewing feedback from the consultation period the aim being that by December 2014 or January 2015 a finalised plan can be presented back to the Mangere-Othahuhu Local Board.
|
Future Streets Walking and Cycling Route Mascot Road |
Constructing a walking and cycling route that runs along Mascot Road from it’s intersection with Windrush Close to Waddon Road.
It includes significant work on Mascot Road to improve walking and cycling and pedestrian safety on Mascot Road. Propsoed modifications include:
· Better crosssings linking the Wananga with the town centre; · Protected on road cycle lanes; and · Intersections designed to slow traffic and make them safer for pedestrians and cyclists. |
Auckland Transport has provide a Rough Order of $1,180,000 for delivery of this project
At the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board’s 17 September 2014 meeting the Board authorized Auckland Transport to complete design and immediately start construction providing the project’s Final Cost was within the Rough Order of Cost provided. Detailed design is underway and public consultation took place between 7-21 November 2014.
At this time the project team is reviewing feedback from the consultation period the aim being that by December 2014 or January 2015 a finalised plan can be presented back to the Mangere-Othahuhu Local Board.
|
Station Rd (from Mason Ave to Great Sth Rd) |
The overall aim is to upgrade this section of Station Road in accordance with urban design recommendations from the Otahuhu Linkages & Public Realm Initiative and to make it fit with work that is currently funded on the road.
This would include mproved footpaths with modern attractiove street furnitureand there is the opportunity to provide cycle lanes as well.
The reconfiguration will link with other work that is planned on Station Road and will improve the carriageway and general traffic management.
|
This project has been investigated and was not supported by the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board.
|
Mason Ave / Station Rd Carpark – Pedestrian Link |
Develop a footpath link from Mason Ave & Station Rd through the car park This will provide better access and a natural pathway from Station Road to the the Mason Ave pedestrian crossing and the new upgraded recreatiosn centre. The proposal also include high standards of lighting, lots of decorative planting and other landscape improvements. Another key feature will be signage directing people using the walkway to areas of interest like the recreations centre and bus stops.
|
Auckland Transport has provide a Rough Order of $ 200,000 for delivery of this project. At the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board’s 17 September 2014 meeting the Board authorized Auckland Transport to complete design and immediately start construction providing the project’s Final Cost was within the Rough Order of Cost provided. Design work is underway and initial concepts discussed with the public at the ‘Otahuhu Linkages’ open day held on 27 November 2014.
|
Funds ‘carried over’ from the previous electoral term: $ 418,508 Three years LBTCF allocations of $ 517,754 per annum: $ 1,553,262 Total LBTCF funds available for allocation this electoral term: $ 1,971,770 |
||
Mangere-East Town Centre Traffic Calming $ 30,000 Waddon-Windrush Walking and Cycling Route $ 173,366 Future Streets Walking and Cycling Circuit Windrush-Mascot $ 346,000 Future Streets Walking and Cycling Route Mascot Road $ 1,180,000 LBTCF fund potentially committed as at 15 October 2014 $ 1,729,000 |
2010-13 Electoral Term
Description |
Current Status |
|
Improving Bus Stops |
The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has identified 18 bus stops that will improve by building shelters at them. The Board authorised $308,000 from the Local Board Transport Capital Fund. |
At this time only the upgrade of the stop at 3 Church Street remains to be completed. The plan for this bus shelter has a number of issues that needed to be checked and the shelter is now being consulted with effected residents. This process is currently underway. |
Bader Drive, Idlewild Road Intersection |
This project involves re-developing the Bader Drive, Idlewild Road intersection to make it safer. |
This intersection has now been modified to make it safer and allow better traffic flow. |
Improving Speed Limit Signage on Favona Road, Mahunga Drive, Coronation Road and Walmsley Road |
|
This project has been completed and the signs have been installed.
|
Otahuhu Main Street Poles and Luminaires |
This project involves upgrading the lighting in the Otahuhu Town Centre. |
This project has been completed and the new light poles and lights installed.
|
Improving Signage from SH1 and SH20 to the Mangere and Otahuhu Town Centres
|
This project involves funding the installation of information signs that direct drivers from the motorway to the Otahuhu Town Centre. At the August Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting release of $75,000 from the Local Board’s Transport Capital Fund was authorised. |
This project has been completed.
|
Mangere Town Centre Bus Stop |
This proposed project involves the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board paying for development of a concept plan for this site as prelude to potentially financing a redevelopment of this facility. |
The bus stop was cleaned up and re-painted. Using Local Board Transport Capital Funds to support this project has been investigated and was not able to be supported. The decision in September 2014 to allocate the majority of the available funds to ‘Future Streets’ and upgrading the Otahuhu Car Park means that there is no money available for allocation to this project. |
Commitments made in the previous electoral term: Bus Shelter Upgrades $ 308,000 Otahuhu Lighting Upgrade $ 160,000 Signs in Mahunga Drive $ 2,000 Bader/Idlewild Intersection Remodelling $ 72,000 Directional Signage SH 1 – Otahuhu and SH 20 – Mangere Town Centre $ 75,000 Total committed (or spent) in the last electoral term $ 617,000 |
Projects Investigated but Not Able to be Delivered
Projects Submitted |
Description |
Current Status |
Massey Road Pedestrian Over-bridge |
This project involves building a pedestrian over bridge on Massey Road in the Mangere East Town Centre. |
Investigated and reported back on at the January 2013 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting.
|
Bus stop at the rear of the Mangere Town Centre |
This project involves establishing a parking area for the courtesy bus that stops at the Mangere-Town Centre. |
Investigated and reported back on at the January 2013 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting. Auckland Transport delivered the bus stop in April 2014 |
Traffic calming in Harania Avenue, Dewhurst Road and Massey Road |
|
Investigated and reported back on at the April 2013 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting. |
Bader Drive / Orly Road Roundabout |
This project involves re-developing the Bader Drive, Orly Road intersection to make it efficient. |
Investigated and reported back on at the January 2013 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board meeting.
|
Signalisation of the Favona Road and Harania Road Intersection
|
The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has already requested that speed calming measures be investigated on Harania Road. This request was turned down because of the effect on public transport of speed bumps or other traffic calming measures. The Board is still concerned about speed and safety in this road and would like signalisation of the Favona/Harania Intersection investigated.
|
This project has been investigated and the results were reported back at the April 2014 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Meeting. The Auckland Transport was asked to re-investigate the request for a signals at this intersection. Auckland Transport’s senior engineer met with the Chair and another elected member onsite and the project and its implications were discussed in detail. The engineer discussed Auckland Transport’s concnerns about signals making the turn out of Harania eaiser and therefore ‘rat –running’ through the street more attractive. A result of the conversation was that in order to to improve driver visibility at the intersection Auckland Transport proposes to install additional parking restrictions (shown in the map below).
Traffic calming in Harania Road was also re-assessed but the road’s importance as a bus route means that putting in humps or other traffic calming devices would effect public transport so is not an appropriate solution. |
10 December 2014 |
|
Issue Title |
Description |
Action |
Oruarangi Speed Limit |
The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board has requested that the speed limit on Oruarangi Road be lowered from 100kmph to 80kmph.
This is to improve pedestrian safety. |
After discussion with NZ Police and New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland Transport committed to conducting speed counts to find out the current speeds on the road.
The counts are counts are finished and the will be more inter-agency working group has recommend a reduction in the speed limit the next step is that the recommendation will be reviewed by Aucklancd Transport’s Traffic Control Committtee in December 2014 or early 2015. |
Fencing in the Mangere Town Centre car park near the CAB.
|
A chain-link fence in this area creates an obstruction and has become an area from rubbish dumping.
|
This issue still continues to be worked on by Auckland Transport.
On 20 October 2014 the Auckland Transport’s Manager Property (who is responsible for the overall management of the car park) met with representatives of the Mangere-Othauhu Local Board and discussed the situation with the fence and the car park spaces.
The Property Team committed to getting this issue resolved and are working with Council toconfirm details of the original consent that was issued by the legacy Council. A meeting is also being organised with the property owner that erected the fence to discuss their position. At the time this report was written the date for this meeting had not been confirmed.
|
Changing the layout the car parks at the rear of the Mangere Library
|
It has been pointed out that when the fence is removed at the rear of the Mangere Library the opportunity exists to remodel the parking in this area so there is more and safer parking in the area,
|
On 20 October 2014 the Auckland Transport’s Manager Property (who is responsible for the overall management of the car park) met with representatives of the Mangere-Othauhu Local Board and discussed the situation with the fence and the car park spaces. The Manager of Property Team discussed the Local Board and CAB car parks and is planning to re-organise and refurbish them.
|
‘No Parking’ signs and markings at the rear of the Local Board Office |
It has been requested that the ‘No Parking’ signage at the rear of the Local Board office is upgraded to make it more visible.
|
On 20 October 2014 the Auckland Transport’s Manager Property (who is responsible for the overall management of the car park) met with representatives of the Mangere-Othauhu Local Board and discussed the situation with the fence and the car park spaces. The Manager of Property Team discussed the Local Board and CAB car parks and is planning to re-organise and refurbish them.
|
Finger signs directing people to the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Office. |
Members have requested that signs directing people tthe Local Board Office be installed in Mangere Town Centre. |
The contractors have been asked to install these signs so they should be installed soon. |
10 December 2014 |
|
Local Event Support Fund – Round Two Allocations
File No.: CP2014/26356
Purpose
1. To present a summary of applications received in round two of the local event support fund for 2014/2015 for Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board is requested to either fund, partially fund or decline the applications.
Executive summary
2. The local events support fund of $124,987 is available for distribution by the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board over the two funding rounds in 2014/2015 financial year.
3. The board allocated $44,328 to annual events in the 2014/2015 Community Development Arts & Culture Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Work Programme adopted on 16 July 2014 (MO/2014/152). A balance of $80,659 remained available in the contestable funding round.
4. The board allocated $50,560 across 15) applications received for round one contestable funding (MO/2014/152).
5. There are two contestable funding rounds held within the 2014/2015 financial year. This is round two, which received 13) applications totalling $163,090.
6. A local events support fund of $30,099 remains available to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board for distribution within round two of the local event support 2014/2015 financial year.
7. A workshop was held with the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board on 26 November 2014 to consider 13 applications. Indicative levels of funding were proposed, to be formally agreed via this report.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) reviews the round two applications received and agree to either fund, partially fund or decline the applications following:
|
Comments
8. The local events support fund provides the opportunity for Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board to work in partnership with local event organisers to develop an events programme that reflects the aspirations of the community and supports the local board plan.
9. The local events support fund has two funding rounds, which close at specified times during the 2014/2015 financial year, as follows:
Round |
Applications Close |
Assessment |
Decision Making |
1 |
31 May 2014 |
June 2014 |
July - August 2014 |
2 |
31 October 2014 |
November 2014 |
December 2014 |
10. Round two of the 2014/2015 Local Events Support Fund received 13 applications totalling $163,090 for consideration, as detailed in the recommendations.
11. The local events support fund of $124,987 is available for distribution by the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board over the two funding rounds in 2014/2015 financial year.
12. Since the new financial year, the following activity has occurred:
i. The board allocated $44,328 to annual events in the 2014/2015 Community Development Arts & Culture Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Work Programme adopted on 16 July 2014 (MO/2014/152). A balance of $80,659 remained available in the contestable funding round.
ii. The board allocated $50,560 across 15 applications received for round one contestable funding (MO/2014/152).
13. A balance of $30,099 remains available to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board for distribution within round two, which is the final funding round within the 2014/2015 financial year.
14. Local event support funding criteria guidelines for 2014/2015 have been established to assist applicants in understanding the focus of this fund and to guide decision-making. The applications have been assessed in accordance with the local event support fund guidelines.
15. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board has the opportunity to refer applications to a more appropriate fund or to allocate funding from within its local event fund.
Consideration
16. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board event funding including the local event support fund. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board has identified key priorities for the local area within its local board plan, some of which could be achieved through events.
17. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board seeks to engage with their diverse communities and provide for their social and cultural needs. Supporting local community events, especially youth and water-based events, assists in building a strong sense of community and ensures that each community maintains its own identity.
Local board views and implications
18. A local board workshop was held on 26 November 2014 to consider the applications to the Local Event Support Fund round two. The local board discussed these applications at their workshop and the resolution which will be presented to the business meeting will reflect the views expressed at the workshop.
Māori impact statement
19. This fund does not specifically target Maori; however Maori communities are likely to benefit from the events supported by the local board, alongside other groups in the community.
Implementation
20. Once the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board has resolved the funding applications, staff will contact all applicants to notify them of the outcome, and commence contracting and payment.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Sharon McGinity - Team Leader, Event Facilitation South |
Authorisers |
Graham Bodman - Manager - Community Development, Arts and Culture Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
File No.: CP2014/27541
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to provide Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board with options regarding the potential installation of a public places CCTV surveillance system in Mangere East and recommendations for optimising its use.
Executive Summary
2. Council currently has a public places CCTV system operating in the local board area at Mangere Central. The board has identified a need to respond to criminal and anti-social issues in the nearby Mangere East town centre, and by way of response has identified a need for a further CCTV system, connected to Mangere Central.
3. The purpose of a public places CCTV system is to enhance the public’s perception of safety, improve the ways we prevent and detect crime and be a source of intelligence and information for police and council.
4. The cost of the installed system, with links to Mangere Central for monitoring purposes and linked to the police for their visibility, is $40,000. Annual operating costs would be about $7,000 to $10,000. Council staff would follow the normal procurement process entering into a contract with an approved CCTV provider.
5. With regard to any potential installation of a new system at Mangere East, it is recommended that the board consider making it a council asset in order that it can be appropriately monitored and maintained.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) approve $40,000 capital expenditure from the local board’s CCTV and town centre safety initiatives budget being directed via the Community Development and Safety unit to purchase and install the CCTV system, including links to the police and council’s Mangere Central monitoring site b) approve the Community Development and Safety unit entering into the council’s procurement process with a council approved CCTV provider, to purchase and install a public places CCTV system in Mangere East town centre, linking it to council’s Mangere Central monitoring site and establishing necessary network links to police c) allow for ongoing maintenance costs of $10,000 per annum for the Mangere East public places CCTV system in the local board’s CCTV and town centre safety initiatives budget d) approve the Mangere East public places CCTV system being placed on council’s asset register.
|
Discussion
6. At this time, council is currently reviewing its CCTV assets and looking to implement a strategic action plan around its use, which will also provide useful guidelines for all users of CCTV. This proposed installation would follow the draft guidelines and conform to the minimum technical standards suggested.
7. The local board has identified a need to respond to criminal and anti-social issues in the Mangere East town centre, and by way of response has identified a need for a CCTV system to help. There are currently no public places CCTV cameras in Mangere East, but there is a nearby council owned public places CCTV system operating in Mangere Central. It is recommended that if a system is installed in Mangere East, it be connected to Mangere Central so it can be monitored on the same screens by staff already contracted to monitor Mangere Central. This would also mean that both systems would also be connected to key police centres (Manukau Police Hub and North Comms - the police’s emergency call centre), allowing direct live viewing of the CCTV system as operationally required. Police have been consulted around this and support the proposal.
8. The total cost of installing a 10 camera public places CCTV system into Mangere East, which includes equipment supply, installation and all network links is $40,000.
9. It is noted that there will be ongoing annual operating costs associated with the provision of the CCTV system. Initial costs in the first year would include appropriate signage in order to comply with the Privacy Act. Ongoing costs include network link, maintenance and any potential repairs. These costs are estimated at $10,000 the first year and approximately $7,000 per annum thereafter.
10. Due to the current status of the local business association in Mangere East, it is recommended that the local board direct that any potential CCTV system purchased remain the council’s assets, and be entered onto the asset register.
11. In the event of a resolution as per the recommendations, council staff would follow the normal council procurement process in order to enter into a contract with an approved CCTV provider.
Consideration
Local Board Views and Implications
12. These proposed improvements are at the request of the local board, whose views of the scope of works were sought via two workshops held in August and November 2014.
Maori Impact Statement
13. There is no known specific positive or negative impact on Maori. However, it is noted that Maori are generally over-represented as both victims and perpetrators in crime statistics.
General
14. The local board has funding for this project available in its current budget and the level of expenditure does not trigger the significance policy. There is also currently sufficient budget existing in the local board’s CCTV and town centre safety initiatives budget to cover the consequential opex costs over the next three years.
Implementation Issues
15. Council has an existing contract for the maintenance and upgrading of the current council owned public places CCTV system. Given the terms of this agreement, this contractor would be approached to undertake the installation works. The completion of works would be done under contract with this provider.
16. There are ongoing maintenance and operational costs associated with the installation of this system, that the board will need to allow for in its long term budget.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Mark Evans - Team Leader Safety South |
Authorisers |
Graham Bodman - Manager - Community Development, Arts and Culture Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Open Space Network Plan
File No.: CP2014/26603
Purpose
1. To seek approval to commence an open space network plan for the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board area and provide funding support for the research and analysis stage.
Executive summary
2. An open space network plan (network plan) is the key tool to implement the Parks and Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan 2013 at a local board level.
3. Parks and Recreation Policy South are commencing work on the research and analysis stage of a network plan for the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu local board area.
4. The project responds to the board’s Area Plan aspiration for a network plan and will support the prioritisation and future delivery of parks and open space projects in the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu local board area.
5. This report seeks the board’s approval to commence this work and requests funds up to $3000 for engaging mana whenua expertise and input. The research and analysis is planned to be completed in April 2015.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) Approve the commencement of the research and analysis stage of an open space network plan for the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board area. b) Approve funding of up to $3000 from the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 2014/15 budget for mana whenua expertise and input at the research and analysis stage of the open space network plan.
|
Comments
6. Network plans are a key tool to implement the Parks and Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan 2013 at a local board level. They are intended to be developed for all 21 local boards. Network plans identify aspirations and actions for parks at a local level in response to local diversity and preferences. This can include identifying opportunities for redevelopment and investment in existing parks, potential acquisitions of new parks, improving park linkages and partnerships.
7. The development of a network plan consists of a number of key stages which are set out in the figure below. The research and analysis stages to be undertaken for Māngere-Ōtāhuhu are outlined in red.
Overview of the open space network planning process (Parks and Open Space Strategic Action Plan 2013).
8. Māngere-Ōtāhuhu is the second local board area to commence work on a network plan. A network plan for the Henderson Massey Local Board area is anticipated to be completed early in 2015.
9. The project responds to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Area Plan aspiration for a network plan, anticipated future growth (Unitary Plan, Special Housing Areas), the identification of Ōtāhuhu as a Spatial Priority Area in the Draft Long Term Plan and the various open space projects and plans underway that include greenways, future streets and Ōtāhuhu linkages.
10. A workshop will be arranged with the local board at the completion of the research and analysis stage. Staff will discuss and provide advice on how best to progress through the remaining planning stages to produce a Māngere - Ōtāhuhu Open Space Network Plan.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
11. The network plan project was presented to member Nick Bakulich at the parks portfolio meeting on 30 September 2014. It was agreed that the project should be considered at a full local board workshop, which subsequently was held on 22 October 2014. The Board resolved that further detailed discussions should be undertaken with the portfolio holders.
12. The project was endorsed at the parks portfolio meeting on 11 November 2014 and was supported in principle subject to formal board approval at their December meeting.
13. It was also agreed at that meeting that the project team will work closely with the Local Board Engagement Advisor on mana whenua engagement for the network plan to ensure alignment with the board’s broader engagement plans with mana whenua.
Māori impact statement
14. This report seeks funding from the local board for mana whenua expertise and input into the research stage of the network plan. The funds will enable the project team to engage with interested iwi groups at the commencement of the project.
15. Through previous engagement with mana whenua on the Parks and Open Space Strategic Action plan a number of Actions to Enable Maori Aspirations were identified. The project team will discuss with mana whenua how best to achieve these aspirations at a local level through the network plan process.
16. Iwi who have interests within the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu local board area will be invited to participate in the research and analysis through workshops and/or meetings. This will assist the project team to understand open space needs, issues and priorities for Maori in Māngere-Ōtāhuhu.
17. Engagement with Maori residents and ratepayers will be undertaken through the public engagement process if the project is progressed beyond the research and analysis stage.
Implementation
18. The research and analysis phase of the network plan is anticipated to be completed in April 2015 and will then be reported to the board at its next scheduled meeting. It is proposed that an additional workshop be arranged to discuss progressing the Māngere - Ōtāhuhu Open Space Network Plan.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Lisa Miers - Planner |
Authorisers |
Anaru Vercoe - Manager, Community Policy & Planning Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Onew Group at 47 Yates Road, Mangere
File No.: CP2014/26658
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board, for a new road name for a private way created by way of subdivision at 47 Yates Road, Mangere.
Executive summary
2. The legacy Manukau City Council had an existing road naming policy which set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria are applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming in the Manukau area, until a policy is developed for the Auckland Council.
3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘Onew Lane’ (applicant’s preferred road name), ‘Mataoho Lane’ and ‘Nga Mara Kai Lane’ were determined to meet the road naming policy criteria.
4. Local iwi groups were consulted and they suggested Mataoho, Nga Mara Kai and Waokauri as their preferred option.
5. The name ‘Onew Lane’, proposed by the Applicant and the names “Mataoho Lane” and “Nga Mara Kai Lane”, proposed by iwi, are recommended for approval to the Local Board.
That the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for the approval, the road name “Onew Lane”, proposed by the Applicant, for the new private way created by way of subdivision at 47 Yates Road, Mangere while noting that ‘Mataoho Lane’ and ‘Nga Mara Kai Lane’, proposed by Iwi, also meet the road naming criteria.
|
Comments
Applicant: Onew Group
Site Address: 47 Yates Road, Mangere
Council’s Reference: Resource Consent No. 44892 SP11446
6. The legacy Manukau City Council Road Naming Policy allowed that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for Council’s approval.
7. The residential subdivision will be serviced by a new private way off Yates Road, Mangere. The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the private way created as part of the development at 47 Yates Road, Mangere.
Preference |
Proposed New Road Name |
Meaning |
Preferred Name |
Onew
|
Name of Applicant |
First Alternative |
Mataoho
|
Mataoho is the volcano god and a number of local Mangere locations reflect this name ie Te Upoko o Mataoho (Mangere Mountain), Te Pane o Mataoho (Mangere Mountain), Te Nga Tapuwae o Mataoho (Pukaki Lagoons) |
Second Alternative |
Nga Mara Kai |
Traditional food gardens |
Y A T E S R O A D
Figure One: Location and Layout of new Road
Decision Making
8. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
9. The Applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the following criteria set out in the legacy Manukau City Council road naming policy;
Manukau City Council Road Naming Policy Assessment |
(a) Not a duplication of names already in current usage in the Auckland region either in spelling or pronunciation; (b) Brief, melodious and easily and readily pronounced; (c) Avoids cartographic problems as the length of the name matches the length of the new road; (d) Being associated with the nature of the environment or have historic or local significance (e) Being a descriptive; (f) Not of possessive form; (g) Has appropriate association with other names in the area; (h) Not in poor taste or likely to cause offence and; (i) Suffix for road name is suitable for road layout |
10. All three of the proposed names are consistent with the criteria of the legacy road naming policy.
11. The proposed suffix ‘Lane ‘is considered appropriate as the new name as it is a narrow passage, an alley.
12. As the Applicant’s preferred name (Onew Lane) meets the criteria, it is recommended fro consideration for approval while noting that the names proposed by the iwi (Mataoho Lane and Nga Mara Kai Lane) are also appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming policy.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
13. The decision sought from the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Maori impact statement
14. The decision sought from the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
Consultation
15. The Applicant undertook consultation with the local iwi groups and Ngati Te Ata indicated their preference for Mataoho, Nga Mara Kai and Waokauri. The Applicant indicated that the iwi expressed that they did not like the chosen name ‘Onew Lane’ and would prefer a name that has some historical/iwi significance in the area. Waokauri was rejected as it already exists as a road name in the area.
16. New Zealand Post has been consulted and indicated no issues with the road names proposed.
Financial and Resourcing Implications
17. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road names and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Council’s Administrative Charges.
Legal and Legislative Implications
18. The decision sought from the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
19. The Southern Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Gayatri Devi - Resource Consent Administrator |
Authorisers |
Heather Harris - Manager Resource Consents Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines
File No.: CP2014/26927
Purpose
1. To seek feedback from local boards on the Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines.
Executive summary
2. The Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines (the guidelines) provide direction on the quantity, distribution and configuration of parks and open space sought by the council in both greenfield developments and the existing urban area.
3. The guidelines were adopted by the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee in August for interim use and feedback during a six month trial period (attachment A). An updated version of the guidelines, incorporating amendments based on feedback, will be reported in early 2015 to the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee and Regional, Strategy and Policy Committee for adoption.
4. The primary focus of the guidelines is ensuring the open space network provides access to a range of high-quality recreation, social and environmental experiences. The guidelines direct how open space should be distributed within both greenfield developments and the existing urban area by establishing triggers in relation to travel distance, resident population or the proximity of other land uses (such as an urban centre) that determine when the open space network should provide for the following experiences:
· Neighbourhood parks
· Suburb parks
· Sub-regional parks
· Civic spaces
· Local sports parks
· Connections
5. For existing urban areas the guidelines focus on improving the quality, accessibility and connectivity of existing open space. The guidelines identity areas of significant and moderate shortfall in the quantity of open space relative to the current and future population within the existing urban area.
6. A target for the quantity of local recreation open space within greenfield developments of 2 hectares per 1000 residents is proposed.
7. The guidelines set out how different types of open space should be laid out and configured in relation to other land uses, such as housing and streets, to ensure that a high quality open space network is achieved.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) Provide feedback on the Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines.
|
Comments
Background and strategic context
8. The Open Space Provision Guidelines (the guidelines) are part of the Parks and Open Spaces Policy Programme and are a key tool to implement the policy direction of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP), the Parks and Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan 2013, the Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan 2013 and the Parks and Open Space Acquisition Policy 2013 (the acquisition policy).
9. The guidelines provide direction on the distribution, quantity and configuration of parks and open space sought by the council in both greenfield developments and the existing urban area. They will inform a range of council activities including:
· Assessing open space acquisition opportunities
· Development of spatial plans (area plans, precinct plan and structure plans)
· Identifying strategic infrastructure requirements, including development of a regional open space network plan
· Informing the development of local open space network plans for local board areas
· Providing advice on council’s open space requirements to developers
10. The guidelines were adopted by the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee in August for interim use and feedback during a six month trial period.
11. A successful open space network responds to the local context and therefore it is expected that variation in the provision of open space will occur across Auckland. The guidelines are intended to set out a framework for assessing open space provision rather than establish strict targets for council or developers to achieve.
12. The guidelines apply to greenfield developments and existing urban areas. They primarily focus on the provision of local parks, rather than sub-regional or region scale open space.
13. The guidelines have three parts, each of which are explained further below:
· Distribution of open space
· Quantity of open space
· Configuration of open space
Distribution of open space (pages 4 to 8 of the guidelines)
14. Ensuring the open space network provides the community with access to a range of high quality recreational, social and environmental experiences is the primary focus of the guidelines.
15. The first part of the guidelines direct how open space should be distributed within both greenfield developments and the existing urban area by describing six experiences the open space network should deliver:
· Neighbourhood parks
· Suburb parks
· Sub-regional parks
· Civic spaces
· Local sports parks
· Connections
16. The guidelines establish triggers in relation to travel distance, size of resident population or the proximity of other land uses (such as an urban centre) that determine when the open space network should provide for each of the experiences. Criteria relating to the size of open space required and key activities provided for are also established for some experiences.
17. Provision targets used by the legacy councils in Auckland as well as other councils in New Zealand and overseas have been considered in establishing the distribution targets (attachment B).
18. Each of the experiences and the relevant triggers for provision are explained below:
Neighbourhood parks and suburb parks
19. Neighbourhood parks and suburb parks describe open space that provides common informal recreation experiences throughout urban areas. The guidelines establish criteria about the typical area of open space required for a neighbourhood park (0.3ha) and suburb park (3ha) and the activities they should provide for (such as play opportuniites, respite, trail networks)
20. Walking distance targets are proposed for neighbourhood parks and suburb parks relative to PAUP zoning. Shorter walking distance targets are proposed for the PAUP zones that provide for higher density residential development. This assists with providing residents in higher-density housing with easy access to informal recreation open space. The following walking distance targets are proposed:
|
Neighbourhood Park
|
Suburb Park |
High density areas: (Terraced Housing and Apartment Zone, Local Centre, Town Centre, Metropolitian Centre and Mixed Use) |
400m walk (approx. 5 mins) |
1000m walk (approx. 12 mins) |
Remaining urban residential areas |
600m walk (approx. 7.5 mins)
|
1500m walk (approx. 18 mins) |
Sub-regional parks
21. Sub-regional parks describe large (typically >30ha) areas of open space that provide for a variety of informal recreation and sport experiences. These parks are usually located within, or on the periphery of, the urban area. Examples include Barry Curtis Park, Western Springs, Auckland Domain.
22. The guidelines propose that Auckland Council will proactively acquire sub-regional parks when opportunities arise and needs are identified through network planning, rather than expect sub-regional parks to be planned for by developers in greenfield areas. The guidelines do not propose a travel distance target for sub-regional parks, but state that residents within each of the northern, central, southern and western areas of urban Auckland should have easy access to a variety of sub-regional parks.
Civic space
23. Civic space describes the squares, plazas, greens, streets and shared spaces within urban centres which provide for social and informal recreation experiences. The provision guidelines propose the quantity and diversity of civic space relate to the scale of the urban centre. A local centre is proposed to be the smallest urban centre to trigger civic space requirements.
Local sports parks
24. Local sports parks describe open space which is used for organised sport, and typically includes facilities such as sports fields, courts and club buildings. Sports parks are also provided for at a sub-regional scale.
25. The guidelines propose that greenfield developments should provide for the local sport park requirements of their residents. Based on existing levels of sports field demand this equates to approximately 3ha of land per 2000 households. A threshold of 2000 households is proposed, as this generates sufficient demand for two sports fields, and results in larger sports parks which have efficiencies in terms of layout, facility use and maintenance. The 3ha minimum size includes allowances for club rooms, car parking and for other facilities such as courts.
26. No target for local sports parks provision is proposed for existing urban areas. The sports park network within the urban area is largely in place, and acquisition opportunities of land suitable for new sports parks are rare.
Connections
27. Creating a connected open space network is one of the areas of focus of the Parks and Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan 2013. The guidelines encourage open space to be distributed to create contiguous networks that have a range of recreational, transport and ecological benefits.
Quantity of open space (pages 9 to 11 of the guidelines)
28. Different policy responses are required for guidance on the quantity of open space between greenfield developments and the existing urban area. In greenfield developments there is generally no existing open space network and there is the ability to determine the amount and distribution of open space. In existing urban areas the open space network is largely in place and there are significant constraints on increasing the amount of open space, including the cost and availability of suitable land.
29. Achieving quantity targets is a secondary focus for the provision of open space.
Quantity of open space in existing urban areas
30. The guidelines do not establish a target for the quantity of open space relative to the population within existing urban areas. Due to the amount of population growth projected within existing urban areas, achieving and maintaining a ratio of open space to population would be unachievable due to financial (the cost of land) and practical constraints (the availability of suitable land).
31. The criteria of the Parks and Open Space Acquisition Policy 2013 (the acquisition policy) establish how the council prioritises acquisition opportunities within the existing urban area in response to population growth. The acquisition policy generally prioritises acquisition opportunities where there is:
· High levels of expected population growth
· Relatively poor access to informal recreation open space
· Low quantity of existing open space relative to the current and future population
32. For the purpose of informing open space acquisition priorities, the quantity of open space across the region has been assessed in relation to:
· The quantity of open space (all types) within each census area unit
· The quantity of recreational open space within each census area unit
· Projected population growth between 2014 and 2030
· Strategic alignment with the Auckland Plan Development Strategy and PAUP zonings
33. Draft quantity analysis is included within the interim guidelines (attachment A, page 10). This map identifies where moderate and significant shortfalls in the quantity of open space relative to the current and future population are located within the existing urban.
Quantity of open space in greenfield developments
34. In greenfield development areas the guidelines set a target for the quantity of local informal recreation open space of 2 hectares per 400 households (approximately 1000 residents). Local informal recreation open space is defined as having an informal recreation, sport or civic open space function and excludes parks considered to serve a sub-regional or regional catchment.
35. Analysis of the existing provision of open space within the urban areas of Auckland, local board areas and ten case study areas has informed recommending a target of 2 hectares per 400 households of informal recreation open space. The target of 2 hectares of local recreation open space per 400 households is relatively consistent with the existing amount of local recreation open space provided in the urban area of Auckland.
36. The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan introduces a green infrastructure corridor zone which is to be applied to land within the 1 in 100 year floodplain in greenfield developments. The integration of green infrastructure and open space land is integral to creating a connected open space network. The guidelines allow for up to 50% of local recreation open space to be provided in the form of green infrastructure where this has demonstrable recreation benefits (such as creating trail networks).
37. No target for the amount of open space required for conservation or green infrastructure corridor purposes is proposed. The values and characteristics of an area determine the need for these open space functions rather than the population of a development. Targets are also not proposed for large sub-regional or regional recreation open space, as it is expected council will identify and acquire land for these functions outside of the greenfield development process (structure planning and subdivision).
Configuration of open space (pages 12 and 13 of the guidelines)
38. The third part of the guidelines sets out how different types of open space should be laid out and configured in relation to other land uses, such as housing and streets, to ensure that a high quality open space network is achieved.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
39. This report seeks the views of local boards on the interim open space provision guidelines. The view of local boards will be reported to the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee and will inform proposed amendments to the guidelines prior to their adoption.
Maori impact statement
40. Engagement with Maori on the guidelines will occur during the trial period.
Implementation
41. Further development and testing of the provision guidelines is occurring during the period for the remainder of 2014. This involves:
· Assessing open space acquisition opportunities against the guidelines
· Testing the guidelines with developers preparing structure plans for special housing areas and future urban zone land
· Engagement with iwi and property developers
· Refinement of the modelling of provision targets
· Illustration of the concepts within the guidelines
42. Final guidelines will be report to the Parks, Recreation and Sport Committee in early 2015 following the trial period.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Interim Open Space Provision Guidelines |
109 |
bView |
Examples of provision targets used by former Auckland Council and other NZ and overseas park authorities |
123 |
Signatories
Authors |
Andrew Beer - Principal Policy Analyst |
Authorisers |
Rob Cairns, Manager Parks & Recreation Policy Anaru Vercoe, GM – Community & Social Policy Penny Pirrit - Regional & Local Planning Manager Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
10 December 2014 |
|
Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Community Group Funding – Work Programme Report Analysis for 2013/2014
File No.: CP2014/27160
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to present to the Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board the 2013/2014 Community Funding programme outcomes.
Executive Summary
2. In the 18 June 2014 Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board meeting, it was resolved under resolution number MO/2014/132 that:
“The Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board
h) requests officers to report back on the effectiveness of the Community Development, Arts and Culture work programme in delivering on the local board plan, with particular focus on grants and contestable funding outcomes.”
3. This report presents a summary of grant allocations made by the Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board in 2013/2014 and an analysis of how they deliver on the local board plan.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) receives the Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Community Group Funding – Work Programme Report Analysis for 2013/2014.
|
Discussion
4. At the 18 June 2014 meeting, the Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board requested a report on the effectiveness of the grant allocations made during 2013/2014 in delivering on the local board plan (Resolution Number MO/2014/132).
5. The Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board community group grants programme for 2013/2014 considered applications in two substantial rounds and one smaller funding round. The total budget for the community group grants for the year was $153,130.
6. This was the first time that all applications were received via the online SmartyGrants application and management system. The annual customer satisfaction survey conducted in 2013/2014 revealed that overall satisfaction with the grant process in the southern local board areas increased from 66% in 2012/2013 to 71% in 2013/2014. The new online process was one of the reasons given for this increase in satisfaction.
7. The two substantial rounds closed on 1 July 2013 and 28 February 2014. Due to the timing of the funding rounds and the dates of school holidays, one additional offline round was run for the annual School Holiday Programme Fund. This closed on 21 June 2013.
8. The School Holiday Programme funding round received two applications, each for a full suite of four school holiday programmes between September 2013 and July 2014. The two applicants requested, and received, a total of $8,400. One hundred per cent of the grants have been accounted for (see Appendix A).
9. The first round received a total of 31 applications by the closing date for the following funds:
· Local Board Discretionary Community Grants Fund (14)
· Community Crime Prevention Fund (5)
· Social Investment Funds (Multiple Boards and Single Board (12)
· School Swimming Pool Fund (0)
10. The total amount of the requests was $213,532.
11. A total of 19 grants were made to the value of $41,201.
12. The second round received a total of 40 applications by the closing date for the following funds:
· Local Board Discretionary Community Grants Fund (22)
· Community Crime Prevention Fund (5)
· Social Investment Funds (Multiple Boards and Single Board) (10)
· Rates Assistance to Community Groups Owning Land in Manukau Fund (3)
13. The requests totalled $355,381.
14. Twenty-nine grants were made to the value of $98,844.
15. The expected outcomes of the projects funded were measured against the 2011 local board plan outcome targets and priorities (for the local board discretionary community grants fund), and the strategic outcome targets in place at the time of application and decision. The applications were made and considered against these outcomes.
16. Local boards have recently adopted their new local board plans in 2014. These new outcomes and priorities will be used to assess applications for grants from 1 July 2015.
17. An analysis of how each 2012/2013 grant allocation relates to the 2011-2014 Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Plan outcomes is found in Attachment A.
Consideration
Local Board Views and Implications
18. The Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board considered all the applications for community group funding at workshops conducted after the closing dates and subsequently awarded grant allocations at their business meetings.
Maori Impact Statement
19. Community funding is a general programme of interest and accessible to a wide range of groups including Maori. During the year, only one group which is identified as a Maori organisation received a grant. However, due to a change in the organisation’s management the grant was not uplifted.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Attachment A: Community Group Grants 2013/2014 |
129 |
Signatories
Authors |
Jenny Young - Community Funding Advisor |
Authorisers |
Graham Bodman - Manager - Community Development, Arts and Culture Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
10 December 2014 |
|
Request for feedback on the draft Local Approved Product Policy
File No.: CP2014/25837
Purpose
1. The purpose of the report is to seek local board feedback on the draft Local Approved Product Policy (LAPP).
Executive summary
2. On 9 October 2014 the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee approved the draft LAPP for public consultation (REG/2014/123). The LAPP sets rules regarding where retail outlets of psychoactive substances may operate. The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 provides that a policy may regulate the location of retail outlets by reference to broad areas within a district, proximity to other premises selling approved products and/or distance from certain types of premises such as schools, places of worship and other community facilities.
3. Local boards are being asked to provide formal feedback on the draft LAPP by the end of December. There will be an opportunity for local boards to present their views to the hearings panel in February 2015.
That the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board: a) provide feedback on the draft Local Approved Product Policy in the attached report.
|
Comments
4. On 9 October 2014 the Regional Strategy and Policy Committee approved a draft LAPP for public consultation (REG/2014/123).
5. The LAPP sets rules regarding where retail outlets of psychoactive substances may operate. The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 provides that a policy may regulate the location of retail outlets by reference to broad areas within a district, proximity to other premises selling approved products and/or distance from certain types of premises such as schools, places of worship and other community facilities.
6. The draft LAPP will prevent licences being granted in areas of high deprivation, near high schools and near addiction and mental health treatment centres. It would also limit how close to an existing shop a new shop could open. The policy also has a separate set of rules for the city centre where licences won’t be granted in areas of high residential deprivation and new shops would have to be a certain distance from existing shops. This draft would reduce the availability of these substances in areas where their presence is likely to have the greatest potential for harm.
7. Public consultation on the draft LAPP will be conducted via a special consultative procedure. The consultation will begin on 28th October and run for four weeks. The consultation is being publicised via social media, Our Auckland, the peoples panel, various public events and advisory panel networks.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
8. Local board views are being sought via this report. Local boards have previously provided feedback on possible options and on a proposed draft. Workshops on the proposed draft were held with a number of boards. 17 boards provided feedback on the specific options, three requested a complete ban. Great barrier declined to comment as they did not consider it an issue for their area.
9. As a result of local board feedback to the proposed draft the following changes were made:
· Buffer zones around schools were increased
· Buffer zones around mental health and addiction treatment centres were increased
· New rules for the city centre were added.
10. Local board feedback is being sought in in a parallel process to the special consultative process. The local board process will last until the end of December with local boards having the opportunity to present their views to the hearings panel in February 2015.
Maori impact statement
11. Māori are over represented amongst the groups of vulnerable people likely to be affected by using approved psychoactive substances. This over representation has two effects. Firstly getting the right option for the LAPP to maximize harm reduction will be more effective for Māori. Secondly, any solutions need to be designed in close collaboration with Māori to ensure they are workable and support wider initiatives aimed at improving Māori outcomes. Both of these goals are consistent with outcomes set out by Auckland Council to improve social outcomes for Māori in Auckland.
12. The consultation process with Māori has been developed in partnership with Māori agencies. A workshop has been undertaken with representatives from Hapai Te Hauora Tapui, an agency representing Māori health providers in the Auckland region, to provide initial feedback. Council staff are working with the Independent Māori Statutory Board, Te Waka Angamua and Hapai Te Hauora Tapui to ensure effective engagement with Māori. The initial work has centred on ensuring information is available to iwi and maata waka.
Implementation
Step |
Estimated timeframe |
1. Special consultative procedure |
28 October – 28 November |
2 Local board consultation |
20 October – 19 December |
3 Hearings |
February 2015 |
4. Adopt final policy |
April 2015 |
5. Implementation and review |
Ongoing |
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Changes from proposed to draft summary |
145 |
bView |
Statement of Proposal - draft LAPP |
147 |
Signatories
Authors |
Callum Thorpe - Principal Policy Analyst |
Authorisers |
Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager Karen Lyons - Manager Local Board Services |
10 December 2014 |
|
Contents
Why do we need a Local Approved Product Policy?
The Draft Local Approved Product Policy
Why were these rules chosen?
Why have separate rules for the city centre?
How will the LAPP decide between two licence applications close to each other?
Why do we need a Local Approved Product Policy?
Why are there approved psychoactive substances?
The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013
The Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 (the Act) sets a regulatory framework for the manufacture and sale of psychoactive substances. By allowing low risk products to be sold the government wanted to reduce harm from to users of the products and prevent a black market in selling unapproved products. The government felt that with a black market there would be no control on what was being sold, how it was made or who was buying it. Without these controls there would be increased harm to people’s health and well-being.
The Act’s stated purpose is to protect the health of, and minimise the harm to, individuals who use psychoactive substances and regulate the availability of psychoactive products. It banned psychoactive substances from being sold in dairies, service stations, supermarkets, convenience stores and places where alcohol is sold. It also restricted the advertising of products and the sale to those under 18.
The Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014
The Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014 ended all of the interim approvals and licences previously granted under the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013. This reversal meant that until regulations are developed there would be no psychoactive substances that were legal to sell and no businesses that could legally sell them. The amendment did not change the intent of the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013 to allow the sale of low risk psychoactive substances.
What gives the council the authority to have a Local Approved Product Policy?
Sections 66 to 69 of the Act let Auckland Council develop a Local Approved Product Policy (LAPP). The LAPP can only make rules about:
· The location of premises from which approved products may be sold by reference to broad areas.
· The location from which approved products may be sold by reference to proximity to other premises from which approved products are sold.
· The location of premises from which approved products may be sold by reference to proximity to premises or facilities of a particular kind or kinds.
How does the Local Approved Product Policy fit into Auckland Council’s vision for the future?
Auckland Council has a number of priorities to grow Auckland into the world’s most liveable city. One of key outcomes is a fair safe and healthy Auckland. The LAPP will contribute to this priority by reducing the risk of harm that vulnerable people will experience from legal psychoactive substances. This harm reduction will be achieved by reducing the availability of these substances to vulnerable populations such as high deprivation areas, youth and people with mental health concerns.
As part of Auckland Council’s vision for Auckland, six transformational shifts were identified to help create the world’s most liveable city. The LAPP contributes to two of these – dramatically accelerate the prospects of Auckland’s young people and significantly lift Māori social and economic well-being. The LAPP contributes improved prospects for young people through reducing the exposure to these substances to those still at school and in the most socially deprived communities.
In terms of Māori well-being in Auckland there is a higher proportion of Māori in high deprivation communities compared with low deprivation communities. The goal of the LAPP to stop licences in these high deprivation areas will mean that these communities should experience less harm and consequently Māori should experience less harm.
In line with the Mayors vision for Auckland Council to deliver value for money the LAPP needs to be practical to implement and cost effective.
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
The Draft Local Approved Product Policy
Definitions
Term |
Definition |
Distance restriction |
Distance restrictions will be measured from the two nearest points on the properties boundaries – that is, the boundary of the property not just the building. |
City centre |
As defined in the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan. |
Neighbourhood centre |
As defined by the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan. |
Mental health treatment centre |
A residential facility where people are treated for mental health issues and has been identified by Auckland Regional Public Health Services as at risk of their clients experiencing harm if they were to have easy access to psychoactive substances. |
Addiction treatment centre |
A residential facility where people are treated for addiction issues and has been identified by Auckland Regional Public Health Services as at risk of their clients experiencing harm if they were to have easy access to psychoactive substances. |
High Deprivation |
Census Area Units that have a score on the New Zealand Deprivation Index of 8, 9 or 10. This indicates the area is in the most deprived 30% of New Zealand. |
Residential deprivation |
An area which has a high proportion of people living in social housing. |
For Auckland except for the city centre (See attached maps)
1. For all areas of Auckland apart from the city centre it is proposed that licences to retail legal psychoactive substances will not be granted in:
a) areas of high deprivation
b) neighbourhood centers
c) within 500m of a school teaching students year seven and above
d) within 200m of a school teaching students between years one and six inclusive
e) within 500m of the mental health or addiction treatment center
f) within 500m of an existing psychoactive substances retail licence
g) areas identified as restricted areas on map 1a and 1b.
For the city centre – see map 2
2. For the city centre it is proposed that licences to retail legal psychoactive substances will not be granted in:
a) areas of residential deprivation
b) within 100m of an existing psychoactive substances retail licence.
When will the policy be reviewed?
3. The LAPP will be reviewed in two years from the date it is adopted. This relatively short review period will allow Auckland Council to assess how effective the policy has been in its intent to reduce harm and to recommend any changes in a timely manner. At the first review a decision will be made on future review periods.
Maps
Map 1a Identified restricted area – Otara Papatoetoe
Map 1b Identified restricted area – Manurewa
Map 2 – City centre and restricted area
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Why restrict where they can be sold?
Because psychoactive substances are new and continue to change composition there is almost no information on their impact on communities or groups of people. In lieu of this information the proposed approach is to use the available data concerning the effects of similar substances. The best comparisons concern the effect of alcohol, smoking and other substance use. One of the ideas to reduce harm from substances that a lot of people support is that decreasing the availability of a substance will tend to reduce its use.
Why high deprivation?
One impact that stands out from the research is that areas with high levels of deprivation experience more harm from substance use than areas with low levels of deprivation. When this finding is combined with the idea that decreasing the availability of a substance will tend to reduce its use, there is a strong case that preventing the sale of psychoactive substances in high deprivation areas will prevent harm to those who are more vulnerable to harm.
Why schools?
The youth council representatives and a number of treatment providers advised that the use of these substances in high school aged youth was a considerable problem. Similar to the high deprivation restriction a reduction in availability is proposed to reduce harm.
To reduce the availability of these substances to youth, a control on the location of where they can be sold is needed. To achieve this control over access it is proposed that a 500m zone around schools with year 7 and older students and a 200m buffer zone around schools with year six and younger students.
The 200m buffer zone around schools with year six and younger students is considered to be appropriate as these children are less likely to be able to purchase substances due to their age. This has been demonstrated by the low numbers of youth in this age bracket being treated for substance use or coming to the attention of the Police.
Why treatment centres?
As with schools and high deprivation areas; limiting the availability of these substances to vulnerable people is likely to be the most practical approach to minimising harm. Both mental health treatment centres and addiction treatment centres serve people who would be considered particularly vulnerable to the effects of these substances. Many of the treatment providers expressed a strong preference that they should not be for sale close to any mental health treatment centre. To reduce the availability of these substances to this group of people a 500m buffer around treatment centres is proposed.
Why Neighbourhood centres?
It is proposed to not allow psychoactive substances to be sold in neighbourhood centres. These centres are the small groups of shops within residential areas. People who don’t tend to travel large distances like youth and people struggling with addictions or mental health issues find these locations convenient. By removing the sale of these products out of neighbourhood centres there is an increased probability of reducing harm to those most at risk of harm from using psychoactive substances.
Why restrictions on how close a shop can be to another shop?
Research in New Zealand and overseas has established a link between the density of alcohol outlets and the alcohol related harm experienced by the local communities. It is considered reasonable to assume that there is a high likelihood of a similar link for psychoactive substances. It follows then that a density control mechanism will help the other measures to minimise the harm experienced by users of psychoactive substances. To achieve this control it is proposed to not allow a new licence to sell psychoactive substances within 500m of an existing licence.
Why have other identified areas?
Two small areas have been identified that are commercial areas in mainly high deprivation areas and are only partially covered by the high deprivation census areas. These areas are Hunters Corner in Papatoetoe, and the Manurewa commercial area. In both cases a significant portion of the commercial area is in a very high deprivation area. These are also areas where the local boards have advised that the areas experienced high levels of harm related to the sale of psychoactive substances in the past. It is considered that leaving small areas within these commercial zones where a licence could be granted would be contrary to the stated purpose of the LAPP. These areas are indicated on map1a and 1b.
Why not have other types of sensitive sites?
For each area considered for inclusion as a sensitive site there is a trade-off between the restriction that is imposed and the benefit of reduced harm gained from the decision. There were a number of areas considered as possible sensitive sites where it was difficult to match the potential with the restriction required to achieve it. Potential sites that did not meet the criteria for inclusion were early childhood education centres, churches, playgrounds, public spaces, libraries and community centres.
For example it is difficult to determine what harm would be minimised from adding a buffer to early childhood education centres. The restriction would not protect the students as they are far too young to buy the substances and they would not be exposed to the trade occurring in local shops as the centres tend to be enclosed. .
A buffer zone around places of worship was also strongly considered. A number of stakeholders argued that these places provide services to vulnerable populations and thus should be protected. However the services they provide tend to be of a short duration such as a support meeting and are not conducted equally at every place of worship. Also these places may only offer such services for a portion of the year. This lack of consistency makes it impossible for a general restriction to apply to all places of worship. The alternative option of having a different restriction for each place of worship based on the work they do is not practical to develop or maintain.
Why have separate rules for the city centre?
The city centre of Auckland has been clearly set out as a separate and very different urban landscape from the rest of Auckland. Planning and policy documents such as the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan and the Local Alcohol Policy make this distinction very clear. This uniqueness means the rules that work well for the rest of Auckland will not work so well for its centre.
Why not use the deprivation index?
The New Zealand Deprivation Index is calculated by scoring nine items. These items are effective and providing a measure that closely matching social deprivation in New Zealand. However, when the city centre population is considered it is not so effective. The high number of students who share factors with high deprivation households such as low personal income, no access to a car and no home ownership lead to a high deprivation index that is not a good measure of overall social deprivation in the residential population.
Why are there restrictions on areas of high density social housing?
These broad areas replace the deprivation zones used in the other areas of Auckland. These zones more effectively capture the intent of the deprivation restriction. They represent areas of the city centre where the residents with the highest social deprivation live. By targeting these areas it is considered this restriction will have the same effect as the deprivation restrictions outside the city centre.
Why not have buffer zones around schools?
After discussion with the schools and other city centre stakeholders it was decided that the buffer zone around city centre schools did not provide the same level of protection as it does in a suburban environment. This lack of protection is due to the nature and the density of businesses in the city centre. It was also felt that due to the commercial density in the city the buffer zones would be more restrictive than those in other zones. This mix of reduced effectiveness and increased restriction led to the removal of the buffer zones.
Why is there a smaller exclusion zone around retailers
The smaller buffer zone is due to the significantly greater commercial density in the city centre. This reduction has been supported by the Waitemata Local Board, Heart of the City and Auckland City Mission.
Why is there no mention of neighbourhood centres?
There are no neighbourhood centres in the city centre.
How will the LAPP decide between two licence applications close to each other?
The LAPP is not able to make any provision to distinguish between two licences apart from where they are located. Due to the proposed density rules there may be a situation where two people apply for a licence close to each other. In this case both licences cannot be granted because they would be too close to each other. Deciding which licence should be granted is the job of the Psychoactive Substance Regulatory Authority who makes all of the licensing decisions.
10 December 2014 |
|
Long-term Plan 2015-2025: Local consultation material
File No.: CP2014/28308
Purpose
1. This report seeks adoption of local consultation material for the Long-term Plan 2015-2025 (LTP) by the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board, and agreement to a local targeted rate proposal, for consultation.
Executive Summary
2. Over the last twelve months local boards have been involved in many Long-term Plan 2015 - 2025 workshops and meetings as part of their shared governance role.
3. In October 2014, local boards adopted local board plans which help inform draft LTP budget decisions. In addition to this, advocacy discussions were held between local boards and the governing body at the end of October after which budget decisions for LTP consultation were agreed by the governing body on 6 November.
4. On 18 December 2014, the governing body will meet to adopt the LTP consultation document and supporting information, which includes local consultation material for each local board.
5. Indicative local budgets reflect 6 November governing body decisions and any minor amendments approved within the same funding envelope.
6. Council is required to consult on any proposal that is funded by a local targeted rate. The approval of the governing body must be sought as only it has the power to set a rate.
7. This report seeks adoption of local consultation material for the LTP and agrees a local targeted rate proposal, for consultation.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) adopts local consultation material including: i) a one page (2 side) local board insert; and ii) supporting information, including local funding priorities for 2015/2016, key advocacy areas, indicative local performance targets for 2015/2016 and indicative local budgets for the next 10 years. b) proposes to consult on funding of adult entry to swimming pools without charge, through a local targeted rate of $30.53 per annum. c) notes: i) the allocation of projects within Locally Driven Initiative (LDI) budgets are required to balance in every year. ii) proposed operational savings for asset based services within the parks, community and lifestyle theme are not reflected in draft local budgets, but are instead captured at a regional level. Savings will be applied locally to final LTP budgets following consultation.
iii) high level budgets for programmes of work such as renewals, non-growth projects, parks developments, sportsfield developments and land acquisition will be developed prior to adoption of the final LTP. d) That the Chair be delegated the authority to make any final minor changes to local consultation material for the Long-term Plan 2015 - 2025 prior to publication including online consultation content. |
Discussion
Process
8. Over the last twelve months local boards have been involved in many Long-term Plan 2015- 2025 workshops and meetings as part of their shared governance role.
9. In October 2014, local boards adopted a Local Board Plan which helps inform draft LTP budget decisions. In addition to this, advocacy discussions were held between local boards and the governing body at the end of October after which budget decisions for LTP consultation were agreed by the governing body on 6 November.
10. On 18 December 2014, the governing body will meet to adopt the LTP consultation document and supporting information, which includes the following local consultation material for each local board:
a) a one page (2 side) local board insert in the LTP consultation document (Attachment A); and
b) supporting information, including local funding priorities for 2015/2016, key advocacy areas, indicative local performance targets for 2015/2016, and indicative local budgets for the next 10 years (Attachment B.)
Draft budgets
11. Indicative local budgets reflect 6 November governing body decisions and any minor amendments approved within the same funding envelope.
12. The allocation of projects within Locally Driven Initiative (LDI) budgets are required to balance in every year.
13. Proposed operational savings for asset based services within the parks, community and lifestyle theme are not reflected in draft local budgets, but are instead captured at a regional level. Savings will be applied locally to final LTP budgets following consultation.
14. High level budgets for programmes of work such as renewals, non-growth projects, parks developments, sportsfield developments and land acquisition will be developed prior to adoption of the final LTP.
15. The board is proposing to continue its policy enabling adults to use the Mangere and Otahuhu swimming pools without charge. The rationale is that the board considers that the use of swimming pools delivers important social and public health benefits. As in the past two financial years, the board proposes to fund this policy through a targeted rate on residential properties. This year the targeted rate is estimated to be $30.53 per household.
16. This report seeks adoption of local consultation material for the LTP and agreement of local targeted rate proposals, for consultation.
Next steps
17. Following the governing body meeting on 18 December, information will be provided to local board members on the consultation process and finalising local board agreements.
18. LTP consultation will commence on 23 January 2014 through to mid-March. Through this engagement local boards will seek views on proposals important to the local area to help develop the Local Board Agreement 2015/2016 due for adoption in May 2015. Local Board will also seek views on the local impact of LTP proposals to inform advocacy discussions with the governing body.
19. The governing body will make final LTP budget decisions in May 2015 and meet to adopt the final LTP in June 2015, including 21 local board agreements.
Consideration
Local Boards
20. This report sets out the decisions local boards need to make in order to finalise local consultation material for the Long-term Plan 2015 - 2025.
21. In October 2014, local boards adopted a local board plans which help inform draft LTP budget decisions. In addition to this, advocacy discussions were held between local boards and the governing body at the end of October after which budget decisions for LTP consultation were agreed by the governing body on 6 November.
Maori Impact Statement
22. Many local board decisions are of importance to and impact on Maori. Local board agreements and long-term plans are important tools that enable and can demonstrate council’s responsiveness to Maori. Local board plans, which were developed through engagement with the community including Maori, form the basis of the consultation material of the Long-term Plan 2015-2025.
23. There is a need to continue to build relationships between local boards and iwi, and where relevant the wider Māori community. Ongoing conversations will assist local boards and Māori to understand each other’s priorities and issues. This in turn can influence and encourage Māori participation in council’s decision-making processes. In particular, local board plans and LTP consultation material will influence relevant annual plans and local board agreements for 2015/2016 and beyond.
Implementation Issues
24. Local board financial statements reflect the cost of undertaking local activities within each local board area. Budgets are indicative for consultation purposes and subject to change.
25. Following consultation, proposed initiatives and budgets will be considered and updated to reflect feedback and new information available, prior to adoption of the final LTP.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Insert |
163 |
bView |
Mangere-Otahuhu Supporting Information |
165 |
Signatories
Authors |
Rina Tagore - Senior Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - Manager Local Board Services Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
10 December 2014 |
|
Adoption of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Engagement and Communications Strategy
File No.: CP2014/27893
Purpose
1. To adopt the Engagement and Communications Strategy.
Executive Summary
2. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Engagement and Communications Strategy has been developed to enable the delivery of the Local Board Plan by enhancing the ability of the local board to work in partnership with its communities and other organisations.
3. The strategy guides the work of all officers that undertake engagement or communications on behalf of the local board, or build the capacity of community to enable better engagement with the local board.
4. The strategy is attached to this report.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) Adopts the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Engagement and Communications Strategy (Attachment A).
|
Discussion
5. This strategy has been developed to enable the delivery of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Plan. It seeks to do this by improving the ability of the local board to work with its communities and with other organisations in delivering on the initiatives contained in the Local Board Plan.
6. To address this purpose, Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy was used to inform the development of several measures contained within the strategy to improve engagement and communications.
7. The strategy was developed with input from staff from several departments which will be involved in the implementation of the strategy.
Consideration
Local Board Views and Implications
8. In their feedback to the Draft Significance and Engagement Policy at their October 2014 board meeting (Resolution number MO/2014/225), the local board:
· endorsed the principle-led approach of the Significance and Engagement Policy,
· requested that guidelines and action points be developed to guide implementation of this policy, and
· supported the development of mechanisms to engage and build understanding with those communities who are typically heard from least often.
9. A draft strategy has been reviewed by the local board and discussed at a workshop on 5 November 2014, and the feedback received at that workshop has been integrated into the final strategy.
Maori Impact Statement
10. The strategy seeks to provide a basis for relationships of partnership in accordance with Te Tiriti o Waitangi/ The Treaty of Waitangi.
11. Engagement between the local board and Māori has been the subject of a Māori focus group involving mana whenua and mataawaka participants. This focus group has provided recommendations to the local board on the board’s future endeavours to engage with Māori. These recommendations and the work of this focus group are expected to be the subject of a further report to the local board at a future meeting.
Implementation Issues
12. This strategy will guide the actions of the local board and of all staff conducting public engagement on local activities.
13. To aid in the implementation of this strategy, Local Board Services staff will work with relevant departments to identify how to best serve this strategy via their work programmes. Actions will focus on measuring the success of engagement, maximising the success of engagement, and calendarising future engagement.
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Engagement and Communications Strategy |
173 |
Signatories
Authors |
Thomas Murray - Local Board Engagement Advisor |
Authorisers |
Angeline Barlow, Manager Local Board Communication Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Engagement and Communications Strategy |
December 2014 |
1. Background
Effective public engagement is crucial to the performance of local boards. In accordance with the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act (2009) a key focus for Auckland’s local boards is “enabling democratic decision making by, and on behalf of, communities” (LG(AC)A 2009, s.10a). They therefore engage with the public regularly to gain insight into community aspirations and concerns, and to work alongside other community actors. Council staff often coordinate this engagement, preparing material and organising events where board members engage directly with the public. In other cases, Council staff are the primary points of contact for the public, and public perspectives are communicated with the boards via reports. There is a need for local boards to set objectives to guide the engagement work done on behalf of boards by Council staff.
2. Purpose
The purpose of this engagement strategy is to enable delivery of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Plan by guiding improvements to the engagement work done by Council staff on behalf of The Board.
3. Issues
The Board seeks to enable its communities and mana whenua to be more empowered in the decisions of Council that affect them. However, this goal draws attention to several challenges.
That numerous different departments engage with the community separately on various projects makes it difficult to take a community-centric approach to engagement. Efforts to engage must be coordinated across these to minimise the cost imposed on the community.
The diverse capacities and capabilities of the community also present challenges to effective engagement. Capacity building might assist in enhancing the ability of communities to make the most of engagement opportunities. It will also be important to develop shared understandings of the challenges that The Board and the communities seek to address.
The board also seeks to partner with its communities to deliver aspects of the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Plan. This will require enhancement of the capacity of Council to gather and make use of information about its communities.
4. Engagement Principles
To address the issues outlined above and to further empower local communities, this strategy seeks to give effect to the principles of the Local Government Act 2002 via the framework provided by Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy (see Appendix 1).
5. Implementation
This strategy is to be co-delivered by the Council departments that undertake engagement and communications, and those that build capacity for better engagement in delivering the Local Board Plan. Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy will be embedded in this work via multiple avenues including:
· Reporting on measures of success, (section 6)
· Calendarising upcoming engagement and communications opportunities (section 7),
· Regular Engagement Opportunities led by The Board (section 8),
· High quality and effective communications (section 9),
· Efforts to engage those communities often less-engaged (section 10),
· Special efforts to engage with Maori (section 11), and
· Engagement with communities to enable effective advocacy (section 12).
6. Measures of Success
In order to address the principles of the Local Government Act (2002), staff should gauge their contribution to the principles of the Local Government Act using the measures described in Table 1. These measures can be used by departments to report back to The Board on their work programmes, particularly with regards to programmed work to facilitate engagement or build capacity for better engagement.
Addressing these measures will require staff to actively record information about engagement and communications activities and feedback from the community on engagement processes.
In addition to the measures recorded by staff, Local Board Services will investigate options for computer software to enable Council to systematically record information about The Board’s relationships with the community. This might allow The Board to gain insight into who they are communicating with and how, and to improve this communication.
Table 1: Measures of success |
|
1 |
Public meeting attendance |
2 |
Number of pieces of feedback per engagement |
3 |
Number of plan/project changes made as result of public feedback |
4 |
Number of new contacts added to local board contacts database |
5 |
Number of new partners in project delivery |
6 |
Referrals of community members from staff to board members, board meetings or grant application processes |
7 |
Number of report-backs to The Board after grant spending |
8 |
Subjective community feedback on engagement methods, timing, and material provided |
7. Engagement Calendar
To address the principles of the Local Government Act departments should seek to identify:
· The items on their work programmes for which public engagement or communication is appropriate
· The appropriate role of board members in any engagement or communications
· The significance of each item for which public communications are required
· The level of community engagement in any decisions
· The role of that department in engagement activities led by other departments
· Measures of success to which they contribute (either by facilitating engagement or building capacity for engagement)
Local Board Services will capture the provided information and record it in a rolling calendar. Appendices 2 and 3 provide a preliminary outline of the Council activity relevant The Board’s upcoming public engagement.
8. Regular Engagement Opportunities
The Board currently seeks to build and maintain ongoing relationships with its communities via the mechanisms outlined in Table 2, below.
Table 2: Regular Engagement Opportunities |
|
Provider |
Mechanism |
Local Board Services |
Office hours |
Board meetings |
|
External |
Nga Manga o Mangere |
Otahuhu Network Meeting |
|
Youth providers forum |
|
Youth group meetings |
|
Business association meetings |
In addition to these opportunities, the board will endeavour to create further opportunities to regularly engage with their communities as below:
· During 2015, The Board will trial a regular community hui with the purpose of enabling two-way conversations with their communities,
· The Board will investigate the usefulness of holding community clinics at town centres, and
· The Board will consider canvassing constituents to scope community issues as they arise.
9. Communications Mechanisms and Services
For engagement to be successful, high-quality and effective communication is essential. Priority communications mechanisms, their uses and measures of success are outlined in Appendix 4. In addition to our key objective of ensuring quality, timely communications are delivered to our community, and encouraging interaction through use of these channels, Local Board Communications will provide the following support services to The Board:
· Communications planning for key projects,
· Media liaison, including advice on speaking to the media,
· Development of media releases for key board-led initiatives where appropriate,
· Advice on future improvements to communications processes, plus feedback and evaluation of current methods, and
· A fortnightly outline of media coverage relating to board activities.
10. Engaging those Less-Engaged
The Board sees potential benefit in engaging more widely within their communities and seeks to engage beyond “the usual suspects”. The above ongoing engagement mechanisms are intended to improve engagement with those less-engaged. In addition to these mechanisms, The Board compels staff to:
· actively seek engagement with those less-engaged where appropriate,
· build capacity among less-engaged groups to engage constructively with The Board, and
· use engagement to increase the understanding of Council and the local boards within the community.
11. Engaging with Maori
Since the establishment of Auckland Council, The Board has sought to foster relationships with mana whenua and mataawaka, and to pursue mutual objectives collaboratively. The Board is committed to working collaboratively with Maori to improve Maori engagement with The Board.
12. Local Board Advocacy
The Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 deems the local boards responsible for “identifying and communicating the interests and preferences of the people in its local board area” (LG(AC)A 2009, s.16b). Council staff should enable this advocacy by:
· Proactively seeking out engagement and communications opportunities to enable advocacy,
· Assisting stakeholders to connect or partner with The Board and discuss advocacy,
· Sharing board resolutions regarding advocacy with relevant stakeholders, and
· Where appropriate, coordinating meetings between board members and stakeholders to enable collaborating in advocacy.
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Principles and Actions of Auckland Council's Draft Significance and Engagement Policy
Principles |
Objectives |
1. Conduct its business in an open, transparent, and democratically accountable manner; and give effect to its identified priorities and outcomes in an efficient and effective manner |
1. conduct community and stakeholder engagement in a genuine effort to listen to, and consider with an open mind, community and stakeholder input; |
2. when presenting options for community and stakeholder feedback, ensure the options are realistic and deliverable; |
|
3. ensure that questions are objective (i.e.: not leading), allowing people to express their views freely; |
|
4. allow enough time and provide adequate resources to ensure participants have been provided fair opportunity to understand the matter and contribute their views |
|
5. provide time to allow for issues that might arise during an engagement process; |
|
6. value contributions made and time given; |
|
7. give timely feedback on the results of the public’s input and decisions made; |
|
8. value, respect and give weight to local knowledge. |
|
2. A local authority should make itself aware of, and should have regard to, the views of all of its communities |
1. build ongoing relationships with communities through a range of approaches such as through advisory panels, the People’s Panel and other reference groups and fora; |
2. provide community members and stakeholders with a reasonable opportunity to present their views, and to participate in a way that suits them; |
|
3. provide ways for the community to raise issues directly with the council so that it is a two-way relationship; |
|
4. identify opportunities to work in partnership with community organisations and leaders to encourage greater community ownership and participation; |
|
5. ensure good information sharing of community views and preferences within council. |
|
3. When making a decision, a local authority should take account of the diversity of the community, and the community's interests; and the interests of future as well as current communities; and the likely impact of any decision on them. |
1. identify ways of reaching out to affected communities and stakeholders, including those who are typically heard from least often; |
2. provide more than one way for people to participate; |
|
3. when required, invest in community capacity building to enable participation; |
|
4. use plain language and avoid jargon and acronyms. |
|
4. A local authority should provide opportunities for Māori to contribute to its decision-making processes |
1. actively consider the recognition and protection of Māori rights and interests within Tamaki Makaurau; |
2. actively consider how to address and contribute to the needs and aspirations of Māori. |
|
3. Supporting Māori community infrastructure that enables early engagement with Māori in the development of appropriate plans and policies; |
|
4. Supporting Māori community infrastructure that enables Māori to guide how they want to engage with Auckland Council. |
|
5. Support Māori to fully engage with the council, for example through capability and capacity building. |
APPENDIX 2
Upcoming Engagement
Department |
Key project |
Anticipated level of engagement* |
Notes |
Community Policy and Planning |
Mangere East multi-use facility |
Collaborate with key stakeholders |
Project may be LTP-dependant |
Otahuhu Art Space |
Collaborate with key stakeholders |
Project may be LTP-dependant |
|
Environmental Services |
Resource Recovery Network |
Collaborate with key stakeholders |
Engagement anticipated at business-case-stage of project |
Local Economic Development |
Integrated Business Precinct Plan for the Industrial South |
? |
Engagement will span multiple boards |
Local and sports parks |
Walkways (Oruarangi, Peninsula Park, Norana-Favona, James Fletcher, Lenore-Blake, Kiwi esplanade) |
Inform wider public |
|
Neighbourhood parks (Ceasar Place playground, Playground and neighbourhood park strategy, Walter Massey extension) |
Consult with users |
|
|
Playgrounds (6x playgrounds, design completed, delivery FY15) |
Inform wider public |
|
|
Boggust Park playground and basketball areas |
Inform wider public |
|
*Levels of engagement include: inform, consult, involve, collaborate, and empower.
APPENDIX 3
Key work programmes which build capacity for improved community engagement.
Department |
Programme/opportunity |
Notes |
Community Development, Arts and Culture |
Capacity Building |
Activities seek to build capacity for communities to engage more effectively with the Board, among other things. |
Placemaking – Neighbourhoods AND town centres |
Activities include “Local area activities and makeovers”, and “develop forums and workshops” – these can assist other projects such as parks renewals. |
|
Individual community centre programming |
In effect, programmed activity builds capacity for communities to engage more effectively with the Board. |
|
Local event fund |
Provides opportunities for the board and staff to engage with community groups whose activities align with the Local Board Plan. |
APPENDIX 4: Communications mechanisms |
||||
Channel |
Objective |
Activity |
Tracking |
Measurables |
(regular) |
• Promote a sense of community through localised themes • Provide timely, relevant and informative updates - local news, events, consultations • Build relationships with local groups, clubs etc. through sharing of information • Promote interactive engagement |
• Scheduling of key posts using engagement/communications calendar (i.e. events, openings, project launches, ceremonies etc.) • Online user survey to gauge interest/relevance in topic areas and inform future strategy |
• Notifications and reporting on page likes, individual post reach, post ‘likes’ and shares |
• Page traffic including likes • Interaction with followers such as comments, posts and photos uploaded • Feedback at promoted events that it was seen advertised on FB • Traffic through links included in posts |
Bulletins (monthly) |
• Inform and engage community with local board related news, activities, funding opportunities etc. • Raise awareness and seek feedback on local board initiatives |
• Rejuvenate Template to include the use of visuals • Work closely with Advisors to capture the most important issues • Utilise Engagement and Communications calendar • Mail chimp database system |
• *Monthly reporting including % of bulletins delivered, opened and click-through rates. • Online survey to gauge interest and receive feedback (preferably incentivised to encourage responses) |
• Subscription rate • Traffic through links included in posts • Feedback |
Our Auckland (monthly) |
• One page per issue showcasing a key local board project/event • Promote local board and individual members/portfolio holders |
• Engagement and Communications calendar to effectively schedule in key stories – i.e. events, openings, project launches, ceremonies etc. |
• Annual readership survey • Downloads for online articles |
• Online readership • Response to articles seeking community input |
Other |
• Targeted communications specific to individual campaigns i.e. media releases, print collateral, paid-for advertising |
• Dependant on factors including: proximity to date of event/activity, priority of activity, capacity, supplier lead-in times, media deadlines etc. |
• Dependant on channel/method used |
• Dependant on channel/method used |
*E-bulletin tracking is subject to anticipated transition to Ubiquity email management system in 2015.
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
For Information: Reports referred to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board
File No.: CP2014/27192
Purpose
1. This report provides a summary of information-only reports and resolutions for circulation to the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board.
2. The Arts and Culture Strategic Action Plan- Part 1 has been referred to local boards from the Arts, Culture and Events Committee meeting on 28 October 2014:
3. Resolution number ART/2014/43
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Deputy Chairperson J Watson:
That the Arts, Culture and Events Committee:
a) adopt the Arts and Culture Strategic Action Plan- Part 1 (attachment A of the agenda)
b) thank the arts and culture organisations, other stakeholders and the general public who made submissions on the draft plan
c) agree that the Chair and Deputy Chair approve any further amendments based on local board feedback to Part 1 of the Arts and Culture Strategic Action Plan
d) note Part 2 of the Strategic Action Plan will be reported to committee by 30 June 2015
e) agree that the Arts and Culture Strategic Action Plan – Part 1 be referred to Local Boards, Advisory Panels and Independent Maori Statutory Board for their information.
CARRIED
4. A copy of the report and attachments can be find on the following links:
http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/Open/2014/10/ART_20141028_AGN_4735_AT.PDF pages 19 to 29.
5. The Orākei Local Board on 6 November 2014, referred the resolutions below regarding coastal inundation to other boards for their information.
6. Resolution number OR/2014/36
MOVED by Chairperson DEC Simpson, seconded by Deputy Chairperson CRJ Davis:
That the Orākei Local Board:
a) receives the Board Member reports.
b) approves Board Member Thomas’s recommendations that the Board:
i) requests the Planning Officer to report on the status of the further assistance, promised by 31 October 2014, to local residents and interest groups who are struggling to engage with the Proposed Unitary Plan hearings process.
ii) requests the Chief Planning Office to update the board on the potential consequences on property owners of Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan coastal inundation proposals including:
· What risk level is being reflected in the proposals
· Whether a more iterative review period (eg. every 10 years) was considered as part of developing the PAUP position
· What changes would likely be reflected on property LIM’s
· Any potential value impact on both new and existing properties in these areas
· The extent to which other comparable councils in NZ and Australia have or are planning to adopt a similar approach
· An indicative map showing potentially affected areas in Auckland.
Iii) circulate the above resolutions regarding coastal inundation to other boards for their information.
iv) opposes the draft Long-term Plan proposal to make BIDs pay for 70 per cent of BID programme expenses and expresses concern that neither local boards or BIDs were made aware of the detail of this.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board: a) note the Arts and Culture Strategic Action Plan report. b) note the Orākei Local Board resolution regarding coastal inundation.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Janette McKain - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Action/Reports Pending
File No.: CP2014/25906
Purpose
1. This report provides an update on actions and reports pending/requested at previous meetings or workshops.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Action/Reports Pending report be received.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
Reports Pending December |
189 |
Signatories
Authors |
Janette McKain - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
10 December 2014 |
|
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board Workshop Notes
File No.: CP2014/25908
Purpose
1. Attached are the notes for the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Workshops held on 5, 12 and 26 November 2014.
That the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board workshop notes from the workshops held 5, 12 and 26 November 2014 be received.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
aView |
5 November Workshop Notes |
197 |
bView |
12 November Workshop Notes |
201 |
cView |
26 November Workshop Notes |
203 |
Signatories
Authors |
Janette McKain - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Carol McKenzie-Rex - Relationship Manager |
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board 10 December 2014 |
|
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board
Workshop Programme
Date of Workshop: Wednesday 5 November 2014
Time: 12.00pm to 4.00pm
Venue: Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board office
Present: Tasi Lauese, Nick Bakulich, Christine O’Brien (from 12.18pm), Walter Togiamua (from 12.28pm), Lydia Sosene (from 12.30pm), Carol McKenzie-Rex (Relationship Manager), Janette McKain (Democracy Advisor), Kenneth Tuai (Advisor), Thomas Murray (Engagement Advisor)
Apologies: Lydia Sosene and Walter Togiamua for lateness, Carrol Elliott and Peter Skelton for absence.
· Tasi Lauese opened the meeting in prayer
Time |
Subject |
Presenter |
Purpose |
12.00 - 12.55pm |
Mangere Town Centre Canopy |
Nicola Mochrie, Vernon Tamatea, Maureen Sheldon |
The Board had a presentation and legal opinion re working with a third party on the Mangere Town Centre Canopy and the enforcements powers for Council. The options are: Option 1: Proceed irrespective of issues with private landholdings Option 2: Discontinue • Agree to discontinue the project • Allocate to another existing identified project The Chair to write to the CEO outlining the Mangere Town Centre Canopy funding and the health and safety issues in the Mangere Town Centre. |
12.55 - 1.05pm |
Mangere East Update |
Manoj Ragupathy, Jim Donald |
Updated the Board in regard to the resolution of the $40k concept plan for Mangere East and the approved inclusion of Centre Park. Officers to get costings on a wider needs analysis for the community in Mangere East and Centre Park and report back to the board in a formal report. |
1.05 - 1.30pm |
SLIPs |
Banita Wallabh |
The Board had a presentation on the current projects. A report will be coming to the November meeting. |
1.30 - 2.00pm |
Film Fees |
Richard Stuckey, Greg Marr, Katie Flannigan |
The Board
had a presentation on the Film Fees and gave feedback on: •
Approaches to filming fees to inform a preferred approach |
2.00 - 2.30pm |
Environmental Protection Bylaw |
Richard Stuckey |
The Board had a presentation on the issues relating to activities on private property that can affect others and options to manage these. Outline: |
2.30 - 3.00pm |
Parks proposal to redirect funds |
Joseph Ormsby, Vincent Perry |
The Board discussed Parks request for reallocation of funding (172K) for Kiwi Esplanade path widening in 2014/15 LTP work programme towards Peninsula park walkway project. A report will be coming to the November business meeting. |
3.00 - 3.30pm |
Local Board engagement strategy |
Thomas Murray, Laura Bromby |
Officers outlined the engagement strategy which will provide direction to all departments involved in the delivery of the Local Board Plan. The Board discussed having by-monthly community meetings in different locations around the board area. A report to go before the board in December. |
3.30 - 4.00pm |
CCTV |
Mark Evans |
The Board had a presentation on ongoing maintenance and running costs for installation of CCTV. A report will be coming to the December meeting. |
Walter Togiamua closed the meeting in prayer.
10 December 2014 |
|
Workshop Programme
Date of Workshop: Wednesday 12 November 2014
Time: 1.00pm to 5.00pm
Venue: Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board office
Present: Lydia Sosene, Carrol Elliott, Tasi Lauese, Nick Bakulich, Christine O’Brien, Walter Togiamua, Carol McKenzie-Rex (Relationship Manager), Janette McKain (Democracy Advisor), Kenneth Tuai (Advisor), Thomas Murray (Engagement Advisor)
Apologies: Walter Togiamua for leaving early, Nick Bakulich for lateness and Peter Skelton for absence.
· Walter Togiamua opened the meeting in prayer
Time |
Proposed Item |
Presenter |
Purpose |
1.00 - 1.20pm |
Kiingi Taawhiao Cottage Opening Event |
Otene Reweti, Vicki Bowers, Darren Kalka |
The Board discussed the Kiingi Taawhiao Cottage and the next stage of the project which is developing the interpretation plan. Officers to supply a list of what might be included in the interpretation plan. The option costs and ongoing operations of the cottage need to be assessed. |
1.20 – 1.30pm |
Final session for draft LTP budget - Introduction |
Kenneth Tuai, Rina Tagore, Thomas Murray, Faithe Smith |
The Board had an overview and an update on the status of the Board budget. |
1.30 – 2.00pm |
Libraries |
Kim Taunga, Cheryl Fowler |
To Board discussed the LTP implications for Library operations and hours. Officers will send through the new proposed hours.
|
2.00 – 3.00pm |
Parks, Sports and Recreation |
Johan Ferreira |
The Board discussed the LTP implications for parks operations, service levels and budgets. |
3.00 – 3.25pm |
Community Development Arts and Culture |
David Mose, Trish Kirkland-Smith |
The Board discussed the LTP implications on: · proposed operating model and funding. · arts funding and delivery. |
3.25 – 3.30pm |
BREAK |
|
|
3.30 – 4.00pm |
Community Policy and Planning |
Dean Williams, Bryce Pomfrett, Megan Tyler |
The Board discussed the LTP implications on: · economic development, BIDs, Mangere Gateway and tourism. · facilities, renewals and upgrades. |
4.00 – 4.30pm |
Infrastructure and Environment |
Mara Bebeich |
The Board discussed the LTP implications for the environmental, marine and waste delivery. |
4.30 – 5.00pm |
Review the draft LTP consultation document |
Kenneth Tuai, Rina Tagore |
The Board reviewed the LTP draft consultation document. |
10 December 2014 |
|
Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board
Workshop Programme
Date of Workshop: Wednesday 26 November 2014
Time: 12.00pm to 4.00pm
Venue: Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board office
Present: Christine O’Brien, Carrol Elliott (from 1.00pm), Peter Skelton (from 12.35pm), Nick Bakulich, Walter Togiamua (from1.22pm), Carol McKenzie-Rex (Relationship Manager), Janette McKain (Democracy Advisor), Thomas Murray (Engagement Advisor)
Apologies: Lydia Sosene and Tasi Lauese for absence and Peter Skelton, Carrol Elliott and Walter Togiamua or lateness.
· Nick Bakulich opened the meeting in prayer
Time |
Subject |
Presenter |
Purpose |
12.00 - 1.00pm |
Maori input into Local Board decision-making |
Wayne Knox (IMSB), Roger Jolley (Te Waka Angamua), Thomas Murray, Carol McKenzie-Rex, |
The Board had a powerpoint on the outcomes of the Focus Group. Purpose: To evaluate and progress opportunities for Māori to contribute to local board decision making Assumptions: • Current practice of including Māori participation in decision making needs to be improved • Local Board decisions often impact on Māori both directly and indirectly • Māori participation in regulatory and non-regulatory decisions can improve outcomes for the whole community • Local Boards are interested and open to considering better ways of working with Māori • Key Findings: 1. Establish an interim political steering group with Mana (delegated powers) comprising equal representation from the local boards and mana whenua to progress the recommendations from this project 2. The interim political steering group would remain in place until appropriate representation from mana whenua is confirmed by iwi 3. Matawaka participation in the interim and final steering group will be by invitation from mana whenua
A report will be coming to the board in February. |
1.00 - 2.00pm |
Auckland Transport Local Board Budget |
Ben Stallworthy |
The Board discussed the 2014/15 – 2015/16 – 2016/17 work programme and gave feedback. The Board would like the Otahuhu Town Centre and the Mangere Town Centre Bus Interchange included in the list. The Board requests a work programme on the footpaths in their area. |
2.00 - 2.30pm |
Local Approved Products Policy |
Callum Thorpe |
The Board discussed and provided feedback on the Local Approved Products Policy (LAPP) and a report is on the December agenda. Hearings will be held in February and the Board will have an opportunity to speak in favour of the LAPP. Officer to provide the Board with the public feedback. |
2.30 - 3.00pm |
Ngai Iwi walkway options |
Sarah Mossman, Joseph Ormsby |
The Board discussed the Ngai Iwi walkway options and safety issues. Officers are working with future streets regarding this project. |
3.00 – 4.00pm |
Round 2 Local Event Support Fund |
Sharon McGinity, Juliette Jones, Uaita Sialii |
The Board discussed the applications for round 2 local event support fund. A report will be coming to the December meeting. |