Unitary Plan Committee
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Unitary Plan Committee held in the Level 26, 135 Albert Street, Auckland on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 1.32pm.
Chairperson |
Cr Alf Filipaina |
|
Deputy Chair |
Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse |
From 2.21pm, item C1 |
Members |
Cr Dr Cathy Casey |
|
|
Cr Chris Darby |
From 1.33pm, item 6 |
|
Cr Denise Krum |
|
|
Member Liane Ngamane |
|
|
Member Josie Smith |
Until 2.29pm, C1 |
|
Cr Wayne Walker |
From 1.37pm, item C1 |
|
Cr Penny Webster |
|
ABSENT
Members |
Cr Anae Arthur Anae |
|
Ex-officio |
Mayor Len Brown |
|
Unitary Plan Committee 26 May 2015 |
|
1 Apologies
Resolution number UNI/2015/77 MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr CM Casey: That the Unitary Plan Committee: a) accept the apologies from Cr AJ Anae and Mayor LCM Brown for absence and Deputy Chairperson PA Hulse for lateness. |
2 Declaration of Interest
There were no declarations of interest.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
Resolution number UNI/2015/78 MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr CM Casey: That the Unitary Plan Committee: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Monday, 11 May 2015, including the confidential section, as a true and correct record. |
4 Petitions
There were no petitions.
5 Public Input
There was no public input.
6 Local Board Input
There was no local board input.
Cr C Darby entered the meeting at 1.33pm.
7 Extraordinary Business
There was no extraordinary business.
8 Notices of Motion
There were no notices of motion.
9 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
There was no consideration of extraordinary items.
Resolution number UNI/2015/79 MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Member Ngamane: That the Unitary Plan Committee: a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows: C1 Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan submissions - council position for mediation and hearings - Business Zones
The text of these resolutions is made available to the public who are present at the meeting and form part of the minutes of the meeting. |
1.35pm The public was excluded.
Resolutions in relation to the confidential items are recorded in the confidential section of these minutes and are not publicly available.
5.01pm The public was re-admitted.
restatementS
It was resolved while the public was excluded:
C1 |
Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan submissions - council position for mediation and hearings - Business Zones |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolution number UNI/2015/80 MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Deputy Chairperson PA Hulse: That the Unitary Plan Committee supports: Commercial Activities – Retail b) adding ‘department stores’ to the activity table, with the same activity status as retail greater than 450m2, except in the General Business zone where ‘department stores’ should be a restricted discretionary activity c) adding supermarkets up to 2000m2 to the activity table with the same activity status as supermarkets up to 4000m2, except in the Local Centre zone where supermarkets up to 2000m2 should be a permitted activity d) adding a land use control so that it is a restricted discretionary activity for retail in the Mixed Use zone that proposes to locate further than a 400m walking distance from the City Centre or metropolitan, town or local centres e) rejecting submissions that seek to relax the design provisions for ‘integrated retail developments’ and rejecting submissions that seek to include integrated retail developments in the policies that incentivise supermarkets and department stores in Metropolitan and Town Centres |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr MP Webster: That the Unitary Plan Committee supports: Commercial Activities - Office h) allowing small offices in the Light Industry zone up to 100m2 per tenancy as a restricted discretionary activity, with assessment criteria including the scarcity of the industrial land resource, reverse sensitivity and any cumulative effects of these offices on the vitality of centres. Notification i) deleting the requirement to publicly notify retail and office applications in the Light Industry zone and adding a requirement to publicly notify standalone offices in the Heavy Industry zone. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Secretarial note: Pursuant to Standing Order 3.15.5 Cr CM Casey requested that her dissenting vote be recorded. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr C Darby: That the Unitary Plan Committee: Development Controls for Commercial Zones j) deleting the rule that requires three or more development control infringements to be assessed as a discretionary activity and add new assessment criteria so that the cumulative effects of more than one development control infringement must be considered, and in particular whether or not the scale and design of the development is appropriate to the site k) retaining the height controls except to: i. delete the storey control ii. increase the building height control where height limits are set at 12.5m in the neighbourhood centres, local centres, town centres and Mixed Use zones so that the height limit is 11m plus 2m for roof form (13m overall) iii. increase the building height control where height limits are set at 16.5m in the local centres, town centres and Mixed Use zones, so that the height limit is 16m plus 2m for roof form (18m overall) iv. increase the building height control where height limits are set at 20.5m in the town centres, metropolitan centres and Mixed Use zones, so that the height limit is 19m plus 2m for roof form (21m overall) v. increase the building height control where height limits are set at 24.5m in the town centres, metropolitan centres and Mixed Use zones so that the height limit is 25m plus 2m for roof form (27m overall) l) amending the building setback at upper floors control to increase it from 24.5m to 30m in the Metropolitan Centre zone m) increasing the horizontal maximum building dimension control and tower separation control from 50m to 55m n) amending the buildings fronting the street control so that: i. the rule does not apply in the General Business zone ii. the 100 per cent build to requirement in the Local Centre and Neighbourhood Centre zone is reduced to 80 per cent o) amending the minimum floor to floor/ceiling height control to: i. reduce the minimum depth for which the rule applies from 10m to 6m at the ground floor of buildings subject to the Key Retail frontage or General Commercial frontage ii. delete the rule which requires a minimum floor to floor height above ground floor, and add to assessment criteria p) amending the glazing control to: i. allow the glazing height to be measured from the underside of a verandah ii. reduce the ground floor glazing requirement where a building fronts public open space or on the rear and side boundary, from 75 per cent of ground floor height to 50 per cent of ground floor height iii. delete the rule which requires glazing for a publicly accessible through site link and replace with appropriate assessment criteria to address the safety and amenity of through site links
iv. exclude buildings in the Mixed Use zone from glazing requirements if they have residential activities at the ground floor. q) deleting the rule which requires a maximum building setback of 7.5m in the Business Park zone. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Cr C Darby, seconded by Cr CM Casey: That the Unitary Plan Committee: t) agree that recommendations r) and s) currently under debate be referred to the next meeting of the Unitary Plan Committee for further discussion with Auckland Council water planners. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr MP Webster: That the Unitary Plan Committee supports: Assessment Criteria u) amending the size threshold from 450m2 to 1,000m2 for large format retail that is assessed using the assessment criteria in section I3.8 of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr DA Krum: That the Unitary Plan Committee supports: General Activity Status v) amending the activity statuses of a range of activities in business zones as set out below: Centres zones, Mixed Use, General Business and Business Park zones
Heavy Industry and Light Industry zones
P=Permitted C= Controlled RD=Restricted Discretionary D=Discretionary NC=Non-complying
w) amending the commercial activity table in several locations where it measures the size of retail and office activities ‘per site’, so that it measures the size of retail and office activities ‘per tenancy’. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr MP Webster: That the Unitary Plan Committee supports: Identified Growth Corridor objectives, policies and mapping x) working with submitters to assess the merits of a policy only or policy and rule approach to Identified Growth Corridors during mediation, and reporting back to the Unitary Plan Committee or delegated committee members on this matter y) subject to further investigation on the matters identified in Table 1 on page 39 of Attachment A to the report, retaining Lincoln Rd as an Identified Growth Corridor and adding the following Identified Growth Corridors to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan: i. Wairau Rd ii. New North Rd - Kingsland iii. Ti Rakau Drive |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Secretarial note: Pursuant to Standing Order 3.15.5 Cr CM Casey requested that her dissenting vote be recorded. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr MP Webster: That the Unitary Plan Committee: aa) refers recommendation z) currently under debate to the delegated authority committee of the Unitary Plan Committee to make a decision. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Cr MP Webster, seconded by Member Ngamane: That the Unitary Plan Committee: Site-specific Building Frontage Mapping bb) amending all areas of Key Retail frontage in the Mixed Use zone to the General Commercial frontage, with a note in the consequential section of Council’s evidence stating that if the zoning of the affected properties is changed to metropolitan or town centre as part of Topics 066-068 Rezoning, the areas of Key Retail building frontage should remain |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOVED by Chairperson AM Filipaina, seconded by Cr AJ Anae: That the Unitary Plan Committee: Site-specific rezoning and height requests cc) amending the business zone height limits for those sites that are presented to the Unitary Plan Committee on 26 May 2015 dd) amending the zoning of those sites in the industry zones that are presented to the Unitary Plan Committee on 26 May 2015. Restatement ee) the report and attachments regarding – Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan submissions – council position for mediation and hearings – Business Zones will remain confidential until the conclusion of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Hearings. ff) the decisions a) to q), t) to y) and aa) – dd) above will be restated in the open section of the minutes and reflected in the draft provisions on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel website as soon as practicable after the meeting. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Secretarial note: Pursuant to Standing Order 3.15.5 Cr CM Casey requested that her dissenting vote be recorded. |
5.01 pm The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Unitary Plan Committee HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:........................................................