I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Great Barrier Environment Committee will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 23
June 2015
10.00am
Claris
Conference Centre
19 Whangaparapara Road
Claris
Great Barrier Island
|
|
Great Barrier Environment Committee
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Susan Daly
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Jeff Cleave
|
|
|
Members
|
Izzy Fordham
|
|
|
|
Judy Gilbert
|
|
|
|
Christina Spence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
|
Jacqueline Fyers
Democracy/Engagement Advisor
17 June 2015
Contact Telephone: (09) 373 6218
Email: jacqueline.fyers@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
9 Public Forum 5
10 Extraordinary Business 5
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Infrastructure and Environmental Services Update Report 7
13 Mullberry Grove Community Pest Coordinator Role 19
14 Interim funding for water quality monitoring programme 21
15 Draft Auckland Stormwater Network Discharge Consent
application 23
16 Aotea local voluntary fishing code of conduct 35
17 Community group and agency reports 39
18 Consideration of Extraordinary
Items
Chairperson SP Daly will welcome everyone in attendance. Deputy
Chair JC Cleave will lead a karakia.
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from
decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any
private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Great Barrier Environment Committee:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Wednesday, 22 April 2015, including the
confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of
the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been
received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been
received.
8 Deputations
Standing
Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are
required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications
are approved by the Chairperson of the Great Barrier Environment Committee.
This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the
published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as
resolved by the meeting.
At the close
of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
9 Public Forum
A period of
time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to
address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3
minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been
received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with
at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so
decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item
cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting
if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to
the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the
beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the
item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation
may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent
meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had
been received.
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Infrastructure
and Environmental Services Update Report
File No.:
CP2015/09535
Purpose
1. To inform the Great Barrier
Environment Committee (the Committee) about the activities of the
Infrastructure and Environmental Services (I&ES) department over April and
May 2015.
Executive
Summary
2. This report is a regular update
to inform and update the Committee on the Great Barrier environment work
programme. The report also informs the Committee on regional programmes that
impact on the local board area.
|
Recommendations
That the Great Barrier Environment Committee:
a) Notes the
information in the Infrastructure and Environmental Services update report.
|
Discussion
3. The committee partially agreed
its environment work programme at its September 2014 meeting (resolution number
GBESP/2014/29), with further decision-making to support a sustainability
stocktake and community pest coordinator delegated to the Committee Chair and
Deputy Chair. The work programme is funded from the board’s biosecurity pest
management and environmental enhancement budget lines, and is made up of the
following projects;
· Management
of leptinella population at Awana;
· Water
quality monitoring at Tryphena;
· Community
Pest Coordinator;
· Sustainability
stocktake;
· Weed
survey;
· Weed
management and rodent monitoring at Kaitoke;
· Rabbit
control; and
· Rainbow
Skink monitoring.
4. An update on the local
environment work programme is appended as Attachment A, with highlights noted
in Table 1 below.
|
Project
|
|
|
Water Quality Monitoring Programme
|
· A total of two monitoring rounds
(including both high tide and freshwater samples) have been undertaken, with
samples sent to the Watercare laboratory in Auckland for analysis.
· The results will be analysed following
three or four months of data collection.
|
|
Threatened Plants
|
· Construction
of the fence to protect the leptinella population at Awana has been
completed.
|
Table 1: Highlights
– Local Environment Work Programme
5. A detailed update on both local
and regional biosecurity update is appended as Attachment B.
6. Local environmental initiatives
are also supported through regional funding. Highlights noted in Table 2
below.
|
The Environment Is At Its Best
Here
|
|
Zero Waste
|
|
· The governing body resolved that there will be no
removal of the subsidy for waste services on Great Barrier. Any costs of
providing such services over and above revenue received from the targeted
rate collected from Great Barrier properties would be met from the solid
waste targeted rate for the Auckland region.
|
Table 2: Highlights
– Regional Environment Work Programme
Consideration
Local
Board Views
7. This report and attachments
specifically detail the activities delivered by the three units of I&ES (Stormwater,
Solid Waste and Environmental Services) within the local board area which
support and contribute to the Great Barrier Local Board outcome – The
environment is at its best here.
8. The Committee has full delegation
to consider matters relating to biodiversity and biosecurity, water quality,
and waste management. Therefore, it is the appropriate forum for reporting of
activities delivered by the I&ES department.
Maori
Impact Statement
9. While this report is for
information only and does not require any decision making, it is recognised
that environmental management, water quality and land management has integral
links with the mauri of the environments and concepts of kaitiakitanga.
General
Implementation
Issues
10. There are no implementation issues
arising from this report. Although the water quality monitoring programme
funded by the board is not being delivered by the I&ES department, it has
been included in this report to provide a comprehensive update on the board’s
entire environment work programme.
11. A report back on the entire
2014/2015 environment work programme will be provided to the August 2015
Environment Committee meeting, alongside a report recommending the 2015/2016
local environment work programme for approval.
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Local Environment Work Programme
updated
|
11
|
|
bView
|
Local Board Biosecurity Update - May
|
15
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Emma Joyce - Relationship Advisor
Jeremy Warden – Biosecurity Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and
Environmental Services
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Mullberry Grove Community Pest Coordinator Role
File No.: CP2015/10694
Purpose
1. To approve
funding to ensure continuity of the Mulberry Grove pest coordinator over the
2014/2015 2015/2016 financial year cross-over period.
Executive
Summary
2. The Great
Barrier Environment Committee (the Committee) allocated funding of $11,000 to support
community pest control and monitoring at Mulberry Grove as part of its
2014/2015 environment work programme. This funding has supported a Great
Barrier resident to work with the Mulberry Grove community on a rat trapping
and monitoring programme and to survey weeds for control.
3. At a Great
Barrier Local Board (the board) workshop in May 2015, board members noted that
they did not want to see the programme lapse while discussions on funding other
local environmental initiatives continued. As such, this report recommends
agreeing funding for continuing the Mulberry Grove Pest Coordinator role
independent of the full local environment work programme.
|
Recommendations
That the Great Barrier
Environment Committee:
a) Agrees to
continue funding the Mulberry Grove Community Pest Coordinator in 2015/2016
from the Great Barrier Local Board’s Community Pest Coordinator budget line.
b) Notes that the
full 2015/2016 local environment work programme will be considered at the
August 2015 Committee meeting.
|
Comments
4. As part of its
2014/2015 environment work programme, the Committee created a community pest
coordinator role to lead and facilitate community-led pest control in Mulberry
Grove. The coordinator has been engaging with properties in rat trapping and monitoring.
Recently, the focus is on weed control.
5. Current funding
for the coordinator will expire at the end of June 2015. However, approval of
the 2015/2016 environment work programme will not be considered by the
Committee until August 2015. As such, this report recommends that the Committee
confirm that its 2015/2016 community pest coordinator budget line be used to
support the continuation of the Mulberry Grove role.
Consideration
Local
Board views and implications
6. The Committee
funded a pest coordinator position as part of its 2014/2015 environment work
programme.
7. Funding
community-led pest control work is listed as key initiative in the Aotea Great
Barrier Local Board Plan.
Māori
impact statement
8. No consultation
with Maori was undertaken for the purposes of this report.
Implementation
9. There are no implementation issues arising from this report. Regular
reporting on project delivery will be as part of the regular report from the
Infrastructure and Environmental Services department, or as required.
10. A report seeking approval of the full 2015/2016 local environment
work programme will be considered at the August 2015 Committee meeting.
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Emma Joyce - Relationship Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and
Environmental Services
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Interim funding for water quality monitoring programme
File No.: CP2015/09413
Purpose
1. To approve
interim funding to ensure continuity of the Tryphena water quality monitoring
programme over the financial year end period, while recruitment for a person to
undertake the sample collection is completed.
Executive
Summary
2. The Great
Barrier Environment Committee (the Committee) allocated funding to a water
quality monitoring programme in Tryphena as part of its 2014/2015 environment
work programme. Monitoring of eight sites in the Tryphena is undertaken monthly
with analysis of samples undertaken at the Watercare laboratory in Auckland.
3. In order to
ensure there is no period when monitoring is not undertaken, it is recommended
that the board allocate interim funding of $6,400 to continue monitoring at
Tryphena. Interim funding will allow the programme to continue while
discussions continue on the full 2015/2016 environment work programme.
4. In addition,
this report seeks approval for funding of $500 to support the costs of
advertising for a person to undertake the monthly sample collection.
|
Recommendations
That the Great Barrier
Environment Committee:
a) Agrees interim
funding of $6,400 to continue monitoring the water quality of eight sites in
Tryphena until end of October 2015 from the Great Barrier Local Board’s
2015/2016 local environment development water quality monitoring budget line.
b) Approves
funding of $500 from the Great Barrier Local Board 2015/2016 local
environment development water quality monitoring budget line to support
advertising for a local resident to undertake sample collection.
c) Notes that
recommendations to continue the water quality monitoring programme, and
possible expansion beyond Tryphena, will be considered as part of the
2015/2016 environment work programme.
|
Comments
5. As part of its
2014/2015 environment work programme, the board instituted a freshwater
monitoring programme in Tryphena. The aim of this programme was to respond to
community interest in understanding water quality issues in the catchment, and
to build on existing knowledge of stream health on Great Barrier. A total of
eight sites in the Tryphena catchment are monitored on a monthly basis, with
samples sent to the Watercare laboratory in Auckland for analysis.
6. Current funding
for the programme will expire at the end of June 2015. However, approval of the
2015/2016 environment work programme will not take place until the following
month. As such, this report recommends that interim funding of $6,400 be
allocated to ensure that monthly monitoring continues until such time as the
full 2015/2016 environment work programme is approved by the Committee. This
funding will ensure there are no months where no monitoring is undertaken.
7. A breakdown of
the costs is noted in table 1 below;
|
|
Approximate Cost
|
|
Sampling Cost
|
$1,500 per month
|
|
Freight
|
$100 per month
|
|
Total
|
$1,600
|
Table
1: Costs of freshwater monitoring programme
8. The board have
requested that the sample collection be undertaken by a local resident to align
with the board’s priority of local jobs for local people. Interim funding until
end of October 2014 will allow the sample collection to continue while
recruitment of a resident to undertake this work is completed. It is also
recommended that local funding be approved to cover the costs of advertising
the role in the Barrier Bulletin.
9. This monitoring
programme is in addition to monitoring undertaken at six streams across the
island as part of the regional state of the environment monitoring reporting,
and at Okupu, Mulberry Grove and Pah Beach as part of the SafeSwim programme.
Consideration
Local
Board views and implications
10. The Aotea Great
Barrier Local Board Plan notes that a freshwater monitoring programme for the
island will address claims of poor stream health resulting from septic tanks or
farming practices.
Māori
impact statement
11. No specific
consultation with Maori was undertaken for the purposes of this report.
Implementation
12. In order to support the board’s priority of supporting local jobs
for local people, the board has noted this programme as an opportunity to
contract an island resident to undertake the sampling. As available funding may
not be sufficient to cover an individual’s costs to establish themselves as a
supplier to Auckland Council (such as obtaining personal liability insurance),
it is suggested that employment of a person to undertake the sampling be
contracted through an existing Great Barrier business.
13. As part of its
decision making on the full water quality programme, the board will need to
decide an appropriate hourly rate for the person(s) undertaking the sampling.
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Emma Joyce - Relationship Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and
Environmental Services
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Draft Auckland Stormwater Network Discharge Consent
application
File No.: CP2015/11035
Purpose
1. To request
formal feedback from the Great Barrier Environment
Committee (the Committee) on stormwater management priorities as part of
consultation on the development of an Auckland wide stormwater network
discharge consent, with particular reference to the Great Barrier Local Board
(the board) area.
Executive
Summary
2. Auckland Council
is seeking formal feedback from the board on Council’s application for consent
to allow the diversion and discharge of water from the urban public stormwater
network (the Network Discharge Consent). Council is seeking a 35 year, process
based, consent as it allows for greater flexibility in managing stormwater
issues, such as flooding, stream health and asset maintenance and renewal. The
consent will support the implementation of a water sensitive design approach to
infrastructure development in Auckland.
3. It is noted that
the network discharge consent (NDC) relates mostly to the management of
stormwater in urban Auckland. However, it is anticipated that the Committee may
want to comment on issues such as coastal health (contaminants) and the
management of freshwater streams.
4. This report provides
an opportunity for the Committee to provide input into the consent application,
with particular reference to what they see as local priorities for stormwater
management.
|
Recommendations
That the Great Barrier
Environment Committee:
a) receives the Draft Auckland
Stormwater Network Discharge Consent application report.
b) provides feedback on the draft
stormwater network discharge consent application, with particular reference
to local priorities for stormwater management.
|
Comments
5. Auckland Council
is developing an application for a network discharge consent (NDC) to allow for
the discharge and diversion of stormwater from the urban public stormwater
infrastructure. The consent will be valid for 35 years with a requirement that
it will be reviewed on a six yearly basis. The consent will both guide
council’s management of stormwater infrastructure, and address priority
issues such as reducing the risk of flooding, improving freshwater quality and
managing the stormwater impacts of growth and development. Further information
on the NDC is appended as Attachment A.
6. While the NDC
applies only to the urban stormwater network, the consent is suggesting
performance measures and targets for managing freshwater streams and
contamination of the marine environment from urban and landuse. As such,
feedback from the board is invited on the NDC. The table appended at Attachment
B shows the targets for stormwater management and how priorities for action in
the board area relate to these.
7. This report provides
an opportunity for the board to provide input into the consent application,
with particular reference to what they see as local priorities for stormwater
management. Paragraphs 8 to 16 below suggest three questions which may guide
how the board frames its feedback alongside comments noted by the stormwater
unit, and the board at an initial workshop in March 2015.
8. Question 1: Does
the Great Barrier Local Board have any comments on the proposed framework of
the Auckland-wide Stormwater Network Discharge Consent?
9. No specific
feedback on the above question was noted at the March 2015 workshop. The
Committee may wish to comment on whether it supports a 35 year process consent,
reviewed every six years, or the water sensitive design approach underpinning
the consent application.
10. Question 2: Is
there any feedback the Local Board would like to provide relating to the
management of the public stormwater network?
11. At the March 2015
workshop, the board commented on current approaches to stormwater management in
the road corridor. It was noted that water sensitive design approaches to
runoff from the road can create issues with managing weeds but kerbing and
channeling may not be appropriate for Great Barrier roads.
12. The Waitakere Ranges and Waiheke Local
Boards presented to the Environment Climate Change and Natural Heritage
Committee (ECCNH Committee) in March 2015 on their concerns that ‘urban’
approaches to stormwater management in the road corridor were not appropriate
for their areas. In receiving the presentation, the ECCNH Committee requested a
report on water sensitive design approaches to stormwater management in the
road corridor. If requested by the Committee, feedback from this consultation
with the board could be incorporated into that report.
13. The board also
commented on community frustration about the amount of litter washing up on
Great Barrier beaches. A report outlining existing council and
community initiatives to reduce litter in the marine environment will be
considered at the June ECCNH meeting.
14. Question 3: Are
there any initiatives relating to stormwater management that the Local Board is
investigating, in addition to those identified in the Great Barrier Local Board
Plan?
15. For reference,
the following initiatives were identified in the Great Barrier Local Board Plan
relating to improving stream and coastal health:
· Establish a freshwater quality monitoring programme;
· All culverts under roads will be fish passage
friendly; and
· Develop a road seal priority plan with our community
and agree funding with Auckland Transport for staged implementation.
16. It is noted that
the board have established a freshwater quality monitoring programme in
Tryphena. Regional (stormwater) funding supported a review of fish passages on
Great Barrier, and remediation of some culverts, in 2013/2014.
17. Any additional
feedback from the Committee on improving stream and coastal health received as
part of this consultation will be referred to stormwater waterways planning
specialists, as well as other relevant Council units.
Consideration
Local
Board views and implications
18. This report asks for formal
feedback from the Great Barrier Local Board on stormwater management priorities
for their local area.
Māori
impact statement
19. Stormwater and environmental
management have integral links with the mauri of the environment and concepts
of kaitiakitanga. Council recognises the significance of stormwater management
to mana whenua and mataawaka.
20. Consultation on this draft Network
Discharge Consent is currently being carried out with all mana whenua who have
indicated an interest in being involved in this project. Mana whenua have also
been consulted on development of the Waitematā Harbour, Manukau Harbour
and Great Tāmaki Consolidated Receiving Environment and their feedback has
informed this consent.
Implementation
21. Once consultation
on this consent has been completed, it is anticipated the consent application
will be submitted in late 2015. If approved, the consent is likely to become
active by mid-2016 and will help to guide stormwater management going forward.
22. While not all
stormwater-related issues can be addressed through the network discharge
consent process, any additional feedback on stormwater management the board
provides will be provided to the relevant council staff to be addressed in the
appropriate fashion.
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Further information on the Network Discharge Consent
|
27
|
|
bView
|
Table - What Network Discharge Consent Means for Great
Barrier
|
31
|
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Emma Joyce - Relationship Advisor
Janet Kidd – Senior Stornwater Specialist
|
|
Authorisers
|
John Dragicevich - Manager Infrastructure and
Environmental Services
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Aotea local voluntary fishing code of conduct
File No.: CP2015/11274
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to
enable the Great Barrier Environment Committee to consider its response to the
draft April 2015 voluntary code of fishing conduct for Great Barrier waters
tabled at the Great Barrier Local Board’s 13 May 2015 meeting.
Executive
Summary
2. A copy of the code is included at
Attachment A. The draft code was presented in public forum by Bill Carlin and was
co-authored with Peter Blackwell and Steve Oxborough. The sub heading says
“Supported by the Aotea Local Board of Auckland Council” and the authors
advised they are seeking the board’s support for the proposal and its
assistance in promoting community discussion on the proposal.
3. The
Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan’s Outcome 1 The Environment is at its
best here, includes a section on marine protection. This notes that the
board is continuing the work of the previous local board which proposed that
fishing for the table by locals and visitors at reduced limits be introduced,
that commercial fishing be banned from inshore waters, and that a network of
marine protected areas be stablished. The plan supports these initiatives being
progressed as part of Sea Change – Tai Timu Tai Pari which is due for
completion later in 2015.
4. The
local board plan also states that it will continue to pursue these initiatives
in partnership with Ngati Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea and that discussions with the
Ministry for Primary Industries and the Department of Conservation are needed. Consultation with these parties would therefore be expected as a
first step if the board agrees to assist with community consultation on the
proposed code.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Great Barrier
Environment Committee receive the report
|
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Copy of proposed voluntary fishing code of conduct
tabled at 13 May 2015 Great Barrier Local Board meeting
|
37
|
Signatories
|
Author
|
Jacqueline Fyers - RM PA/Office Administrator
|
|
Authoriser
|
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
Community group and agency reports
File No.:
CP2015/10825
Purpose
1. The purpose of
this report is to provide a place where Great Barrier community groups and
agencies with an interest or role in the environment, or the work of the Great
Barrier Environment Committee, can have items considered as part of the
committee’s agenda.
Executive
Summary
2. At its 27
February 2014 meeting, the Great Barrier Environment Committee “agreed to
create a community reports item on its meeting agenda to enable community
groups and agencies with an interest in the environment on Great Barrier to
have material formally considered by the committee noting that this approach
may be discontinued at any time if the committee finds it necessary”.
3. Although the
preference is that reports be submitted in time for inclusion on the agenda,
the option of material being pre-circulated to the committee and other interest
groups is available at the chair’s discretion.
4. The
recommendation against reports included on the agenda will be that the report
be received. It is up to the committee whether it wishes to pass any additional
resolutions to action these requests if appropriate once it has considered the
material provided.
5. The items
received and approved for inclusion on this agenda are attached to this report
as outlined below.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Great Barrier Environment Committee:
a) Receives the Memo from Roger Blakeley,
Chief Planning Officer re Sea
Change –Tai Timu Tai Pari (Hauraki Gulf Marine Spatial Plan) Project outline
and update AoteaOra Community Trust’s introduction and Trustees’ profiles.
|
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
22 April - Memo from Chief Planning
Officer re Sea Change –Tai Timu Tai Pari (Hauraki Gulf Marine Spatial Plan)
Project outline and update
|
41
|
|
bView
|
AoteaOra Community Trust -
Introduction
|
47
|
|
cView
|
AoteaOra Community Trust - Trustees
Profiles
|
53
|
Signatories
|
Author
|
Jacqueline Fyers - RM PA/Office Administrator
|
|
Authoriser
|
John Nash - Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
|
Great Barrier
Environment Committee
23 June 2015
|
|
