Date:                      

Time:

Meeting Room:

Venue:

 

Thursday 2 July 2015

9.30am

Level 2 Reception Lounge
Auckland Town Hall
301-305 Queen Street
Auckland

 

Regional Strategy and Policy Committee

 

OPEN ATTACHMENTS

 

Attachments Under Separate Cover

 

 

ITEM   TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                         PAGE

   

9          Registration of Interest for the Expansion of Rural Broadband

A.      ROI Support response                                                                                            3    



Regional Strategy and Policy Committee

02 July 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registration                    Response Form

 

In response to the Registrations of Interest – Support

Seeking information and commitments from local authorities in support of:

·   Ultra-Fast Broadband 2

·   Rural Broadband Initiative 2

·   Mobile Black Spot Fund

Date of this Registration: 10 July 2015

 



 

 

Mihi

He mihi ki te kaahui tūpuna,

te taura-here mō tātou te muka tāngata,

ki ngā mana ātua, kia tau te mauri.

 

He kura tangihia, he maimai aroha,

rātou kua whetūrangitia ki a rātou

tātou te hunga mata-rerehua ki a tātou

 

E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karangatanga maha,

tēnā rā koutou katoa.

 


 


1. About the Respondent

Our profile

This is a Registration of interest by Auckland Council (the Respondent) alone to supply the Requirements. 

Item

Detail

Local authority name:

Auckland Council

Physical address:

135 Albert Street, Auckland Central, Auckland 1010

Postal address:

Auckland Council

Private Bag 92300

Victoria Street West

Auckland 1142

Website:

www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

 

Our Point of Contact

Item

Detail

Contact person:

Jim Quinn

Position:

Chief of Strategy

Phone number:

n/a

Mobile number:

027 592 6002

Email address:

jim.quinn@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

 


 

2. Response to the Requirements

Questions relating to the ROI Requirements

 

1.   Programme(s) you are interested/able to support

 

·    Ultrafast Broadband 2 (UFB2)

·    Rural Broadband Initiative 2 (RBI2)

·    Mobile Black Spot Fund (MBSF)

 

 


 

UFB2

Through engagement with communities outside of the UFB1 footprint, and with support from geospatial analysis, Auckland Council has identified:

·    11 major gaps in UFB1 coverage within the Metropolitan Urban Limit

·    17 rural towns outside of the Metropolitan Urban Limit and not included in UFB1

These have been grouped into candidate areas that would benefit from an upgrade under UFB2.  These candidate areas include (in prioritised order):

1.   Gaps in UFB1 coverage within the Metropolitan Urban Limit:

Laingholm

Ormiston

Hingaia

Whenuapai West

Long Bay

Orewa West

Mangere South

Hobsonville East

Otara West

Birdwood

Swanson

1.   Warkworth

2.   Helensville

3.   Wellsford

4.   Huia / Cornwallis

5.   Clevedon

6.   Snells Beach / Algies Bay

7.   Matakana

8.   Stillwater

9.   Piha

10. Point Wells

11. Kawakawa Bay / Orere Point

12. Patumahoe

13. Waiheke Island

14. Leigh / Matheson Bay

15. Omaha

16. Parau (Armour Bay)

17. Whitford

Candidate areas for UFB2 were prioritised based on:

·    Number of businesses, the usually resident population, and population density

·    Qualitative assessment of the extent of upgrade benefits

·    Qualitative assessment of demand and likely uptake of UFB2 services

Included with this ROI Support document in Appendix 1 is a profile for each of the above candidate areas.  Each profile indicates the area that would benefit from an upgrade, and provides key information as requested in the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Registrations of Interest – Support document released 12 March 2015.  Also provided electronically is the data used to develop these profiles.

Auckland Council encourages the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and telecommunications network operators to use the information provided as a starting point for more detailed investigation of the needs of each community.  Auckland Council is available to support this investigation, and is also available to support infrastructure deployment planning once the allocation of funding has been decided.

 

1        Areas of Local authority Assistance

a)   Consents

i)          Auckland Council Resource Consents

The Major Infrastructure Projects Team (MIPT), Resource Consents Department, is able to make a tangible and constructive contribution to the on-going success of the further rollout of Ultrafast Broadband 2 (UFB2), the Rural Broadband Initiative 2 (RBI2), and the deployment of cellphone infrastructure under the Mobile Black Spot Fund (MBSF).  The MIPT have extensive experience in managing and delivering consents for telecommunications infrastructure projects across the Auckland region and, therefore, can deliver consistent and integrated consenting outcomes.

On receipt of an application or a pre-application request a dedicated resource consent planner (or planners, as circumstances dictate) will be allocated from the MIPT to take ownership of, and be accountable for, the necessary resource consenting process that surrounds the deployment of either UFB or RBI.  We encourage early and frequent engagement on the project to ensure the resource consent process can be delivered to secure the aspirations and imperatives of the broadband proponents.  This ensures a consistent, timely and cost-effective approach to the consent process. Depending on the circumstances of the applications, we are keen to work with the applicant’s planning team to explore flexible and innovative approaches to delivering these consents which could include identifying activities and or specific sections that could be covered by global consents or work methodologies.

Regarding the activity status of, in particular Aerial deployment of telecommunications infrastructure, the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) is reasonably permissive.  Under the PAUP, new overhead telecommunication lines and new support structures are generally permitted in the rural, future urban, quarry and marinas zones. These are Discretionary in the residential, centres and open space zones. It is Restricted Discretionary in the industrial zones and general business zones, but a Permitted activity in the Heavy Industry zone.

The PAUP also recognises the need to provide for the continued operation of the network utilities. Therefore, as a Permitted activity, a number of standards have been developed to enable the minor upgrading of the existing infrastructure. This includes alterations and additions to telecommunication lines, including the placement of new lines on existing poles, as well as providing for modifications of existing poles.

 

ii)         Works in the Road Corridor

At present Auckland Transport have a dedicated team of 4 site auditors/advisors, 1 Corridor Access Request (CAR) coordinator and 1 relationship manager, that manage the UFB rollout from preliminary design application through to final walkover and putting the work into warranty, for the entire Auckland region.

Having a dedicated team allows for a consistent view of the overall project, approach to management of work sites and when setting conditions for things such as reinstatement requirements.  It has also helped build strong working relationships with the key stakeholders.

The team has a consistent approach and work collaboratively to problem-solve and agree conditions to better manage the project that produces a better outcome for all involved.  Weekly meetings are used to work through any ongoing issues, better coordinate with other works such as footpath renewals, and discuss things such as new methods of deployment.

Each cabinet/FFP area can also be covered by one CAR and an agreed set of fees which includes a set number of site audits. Non-compliance notices and other performance-related charges sit outside of this fee structure.

With an understanding of scope and expectations around the next stage of the RBI rollout, Auckland Transport could explore a similar approach to that initiative, and for works under the Mobile Black Spot Fund.

 

b)   Identification of infrastructure

Relevant infrastructure has been identified in each community profile (see Appendix 1).  The data used to develop each profile is also provided electronically.

 

2        Uptake and awareness assistance

Based on community engagement undertaken as part of the development of this registration of interest, Auckland Council understands that demand for improved broadband is consistently high across rural Auckland and that the factor limiting the uptake of broadband services in rural areas is an undersupply of quality and affordable broadband services, and where services are available, a limited awareness that those services are available.

To that end Auckland Council commits to working with the successful network operator(s) to raise awareness of residents and businesses with a focus on:

·    The services that are available

·    Where those services are available

·    The timing of infrastructure deployment under UFB2, RBI2, and the MBSF

·    Minimising disruption associated with infrastructure deployment under those three programmes

This approach is consistent with Auckland Council’s commitment to UFB1 and RBI1.

Uptake and awareness assistance will be further detailed in the Digital Enablement Plan that is due to be submitted in September 2015.

3        Investment options

Auckland Council is investing significant resource in support of the deployment of better broadband infrastructure under UFB2, RBI2, and the MBSF.  This includes the investigation and planning of infrastructure deployment, resource consenting, corridor access, and communications and community engagement.


 

 

RBI2

Through engagement with communities outside of the UFB1 footprint, and with support from geospatial analysis, Auckland Council has identified 24 communities that fall outside of current plans for ultrafast broadband, that would benefit from an upgrade under the RBI2 programme.  These have been grouped into the candidate areas listed below in prioritised order:

1.   Bethells Beach / Te Henga

2.   Waiwera Valley

3.   Makarau

4.   Taupaki

5.   Opanuku Road

6.   Kingseat / Clarks Beach

7.   Karekare

8.   Ara-Kotinga

9.   Anawhata

10. Waitoki

11. Wainui

12. Hunua

13. Glenbrook

14. Waimauku

15. Kaukapakapa

16. Great Barrier Island

17. Awhitu

18. South Head

19. Rodney North

20. Muriwai

21. Coatesville

22. Riverhead / Paremoremo

23. Tapora

24. Rakino Island

Candidate areas for RBI2 were prioritised based on:

·    Number of businesses, the usually resident population, and population density

·    Qualitative assessment of the extent and severity of connectivity issues

·    Qualitative assessment of demand and likely uptake of RBI2 services

Included with this ROI Support document in Appendix 2 is a profile for each of the above candidate areas.  Each profile indicates the area that would benefit from an upgrade, and provides key information as requested in the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Registrations of Interest – Support document released 12 March 2015.  Also provided electronically is the data used to develop these profiles.

Auckland Council encourages the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and telecommunications network operators to use the information provided as a starting point for more detailed investigation of the needs of each community.  Auckland Council is available to support this investigation, and is also available to support infrastructure deployment planning once the allocation of funding has been decided.

1        Areas of Local authority Assistance

a)       Consents

i)    Auckland Council Resource Consents

The Major Infrastructure Projects Team (MIPT), Resource Consents Department, is able to make a tangible and constructive contribution to the on-going success of the further rollout of Ultrafast Broadband 2 (UFB2), the Rural Broadband Initiative 2 (RBI2), and the deployment of cellphone infrastructure under the Mobile Black Spot Fund (MBSF).  The MIPT have extensive experience in managing and delivering consents for telecommunications infrastructure projects across the Auckland region and, therefore, can deliver consistent and integrated consenting outcomes.

On receipt of an application or a pre-application request a dedicated resource consent planner (or planners, as circumstances dictate) will be allocated from the MIPT to take ownership of, and be accountable for, the necessary resource consenting process that surrounds the deployment of either UFB or RBI.  We encourage early and frequent engagement on the project to ensure the resource consent process can be delivered to secure the aspirations and imperatives of the broadband proponents.  This ensures a consistent, timely and cost-effective approach to the consent process. Depending on the circumstances of the applications, we are keen to work with the applicant’s planning team to explore flexible and innovative approaches to delivering these consents which could include identifying activities and or specific sections that could be covered by global consents or work methodologies.

Regarding the activity status of, in particular Aerial deployment of telecommunications infrastructure, the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) is reasonably permissive.  Under the PAUP, new overhead telecommunication lines and new support structures are generally permitted in the rural, future urban, quarry and marinas zones. These are Discretionary in the residential, centres and open space zones. It is Restricted Discretionary in the industrial zones and general business zones, but a Permitted activity in the Heavy Industry zone.

The PAUP also recognises the need to provide for the continued operation of the network utilities. Therefore, as a Permitted activity, a number of standards have been developed to enable the minor upgrading of the existing infrastructure. This includes alterations and additions to telecommunication lines, including the placement of new lines on existing poles, as well as providing for modifications of existing poles.

ii)   Works in the Road Corridor

At present Auckland Transport have a dedicated team of 4 site auditors/advisors, 1 Corridor Access Request (CAR) coordinator and 1 relationship manager, that manage the UFB rollout from preliminary design application through to final walkover and putting the work into warranty, for the entire Auckland region.

Having a dedicated team allows for a consistent view of the overall project, approach to management of work sites and when setting conditions for things such as reinstatement requirements.  It has also helped build strong working relationships with the key stakeholders.

The team has a consistent approach and work collaboratively to problem-solve and agree conditions to better manage the project that produces a better outcome for all involved.  Weekly meetings are used to work through any ongoing issues, better coordinate with other works such as footpath renewals, and discuss things such as new methods of deployment.

Each cabinet/FFP area can also be covered by one CAR and an agreed set of fees which includes a set number of site audits. Things like non-compliance notices and other performance related charges sit outside of this fee structure.

With an understanding of scope and expectations around the next stage of the RBI rollout Auckland Transport could explore a similar approach to that initiative, and for works under the Mobile Black Spot Fund.

 

a)       Identification of infrastructure

Relevant infrastructure has been identified in each community profile (see Appendix 2).  The data used to develop each profile is also provided electronically.

2        Uptake and Awareness Assistance

Based on community engagement undertaken as part of the development of this registration of interest Auckland Council understands that demand for improved broadband is consistently high across rural Auckland and that the factor limiting the uptake of broadband services in rural areas is an undersupply of quality and affordable broadband services, and where services are available, a limited awareness that those services are available.

To that end Auckland Council commits to working with the successful network operator(s) to raise awareness of residents and businesses with a focus on:

·    The services that are available

·    Where those services are available

·    The timing of infrastructure deployment under UFB2, RBI2, and the MBSF

·    Minimising disruption associated with infrastructure deployment under those three programmes

This approach is consistent with Auckland Council’s commitment to UFB1 and RBI1.

Uptake and awareness assistance will be further detailed in the Digital Enablement Plan that is due to be submitted in September 2015.

3        Investment options

Auckland Council is investing significant resource in support of the deployment of better broadband infrastructure under UFB2, RBI2, and the MBSF.  This includes the investigation and planning of infrastructure deployment, resource consenting, corridor access, and communications and community engagement.


 

Mobile Black Spot Fund

Through engagement with communities across rural Auckland, and with support from geospatial analysis, Auckland Council has identified 29 mobile black spots.  A list of these black spots is included below and spatially represented in Appendix 3:

·    Franklin Local Board

·    Awhitu

 

·    Clevedon

 

·    Hunua

 

·    Kawakawa

 

·    Orere Point

 

·    Pukekohe East

·    Great Barrier Local Board

·    Karaka Bay

 

·    Kawa

 

·    Motairehe

 

·    Okiwi

 

·    Wairahi

·    Rodney Local Board

·    Algies Bay

 

·    Coatesville

 

·    Makarau

 

·    Matakana

 

·    South Head

 

·    Te Arai

 

·    Tomarata

 

·    Wainui

 

·    Wellsford

 

·    Kaukapakapa

 

·    Riverhead

 

·    Tahekeroa

 

·    Warkworth

·    Waiheke Local Board

·    Rakino Island

·    Waitakere Ranges Local Board

·    Bethells Beach

 

·    Henderson Valley

 

·    Huia

 

·    Waitakere

 

Auckland Council encourages the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and telecommunications network operators to use the information provided as a starting point for more detailed investigation of the needs of each community.  Auckland Council is available to support this investigation, and is also available to support infrastructure deployment planning once the allocation of funding has been decided.

1        Areas of Local authority Assistance

i)    Auckland Council Resource Consents

The Major Infrastructure Projects Team (MIPT), Resource Consents Department, is able to make a tangible and constructive contribution to the on-going success of the further roll-out of Ultrafast Broadband 2 (UFB2), the Rural Broadband Initiative 2 (RBI2), and the deployment of cellphone infrastructure under the Mobile Black Spot Fund (MBSF).  The MIPT have extensive experience in managing and delivering consents for telecommunications infrastructure projects across the Auckland region and, therefore, can deliver consistent and integrated consenting outcomes.

On receipt of an application or a pre-application request a dedicated resource consent planner (or planners, as circumstances dictate) will be allocated from the MIPT to take ownership of, and be accountable for, the necessary resource consenting process that surrounds the deployment of either UFB or RBI.  We encourage early and frequent engagement on the project to ensure the resource consent process can be delivered to secure the aspirations and imperatives of the broadband proponents.  This ensures a consistent, timely and cost-effective approach to the consent process. Depending on the circumstances of the applications, we are keen to work with the applicant’s planning team to explore flexible and innovative approaches to delivering these consents which could include identifying activities and or specific sections that could be covered by global consents or work methodologies.

Regarding the activity status of, in particular, Aerial deployment of telecommunications infrastructure, the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) is reasonably permissive.  Under the PAUP new overhead telecommunication lines and new support structures are generally permitted in the rural, future urban, quarry and marinas zones. These are Discretionary in the residential, centres and open space zones. It is Restricted Discretionary in the industrial zones and general business zones, but a Permitted activity in the Heavy Industry zone.

The PAUP also recognises the need to provide for the continued operation of the network utilities. Therefore, as a Permitted activity, a number of standards have been developed to enable the minor upgrading of the existing infrastructure. This includes alterations and additions to telecommunication lines, including the placement of new lines on existing poles, as well as providing for modifications of existing poles.

ii)   Works in the Road Corridor

At present, Auckland Transport have a dedicated team of 4 site auditors/advisors, 1 Corridor Access Request (CAR) coordinator and 1 relationship manager, that manage the UFB roll out from preliminary design application through to final walkover and putting the work into warranty, for the entire Auckland region.

Having a dedicated team allows for a consistent view of the overall project, approach to management of work sites and when setting conditions for things such as reinstatement requirements.  It has also helped build strong working relationships with the key stakeholders.

The team has a consistent approach and work collaboratively to problem-solve and agree conditions to better manage the project that produces a better outcome for all involved.  Weekly meetings are used to work through any ongoing issues, better coordinate with other works such as footpath renewals, and discuss things such as new methods of deployment.

Each cabinet/FFP area can also be covered by one CAR and an agreed set of fees which includes a set number of site audits. Non-compliance notices and other performance-related charges sit outside of this fee structure.

With an understanding of scope and expectations around the next stage of the RBI rollout, Auckland Transport could explore a similar approach to that initiative, and for works under the Mobile Black Spot Fund.

 

a)   Identification of infrastructure, land or land access

Relevant infrastructure has been identified in each community profile (see Appendix 3).  The data used to develop each profile is also provided electronically.

2        Investment options

Auckland Council is investing significant resource in support of the deployment of better broadband infrastructure under UFB2, RBI2, and the MBSF.  This includes the investigation and planning of infrastructure deployment, resource consenting, corridor access, and communications and community engagement.

 

 

3. Our declaration

 

Respondent’s declaration                                                                  

Topic

Declaration

Respondent’s declaration

ROI Process, Terms and Conditions:

I/we have read and fully understand the ROI, including the ROI Process, Terms and Conditions (shortened to ROI-Terms detailed in Section 6, as amended by Section 1, paragraph 1.6. if applicable). I/we confirm that Respondent/s agree to be bound by them.

Agree

Collection of further information:

The Respondent/s authorises the Buyer to:

a.   collect any information about the Respondent, except commercially sensitive pricing information, from any relevant third party, including a referee, or previous or existing client

b.  use such information in the evaluation of this Registration.

The Respondent/s agrees that all such information will be confidential to the Buyer.

Agree

Requirements:

I/we have read and fully understand the nature and extent of the Buyer’s Requirements as described in Section 2. I/we confirm that the Respondent/s has the necessary capacity and capability to fully meet or exceed the Requirements and will be available to deliver throughout the relevant Contract period.

Agree

Ethics:

In submitting this Registration the Respondent/s warrants that it:

a.   has not entered into any improper, illegal, collusive or anti-competitive arrangements with any Competitor

b.  has not directly or indirectly approached any representative of the Buyer (other than the Point of Contact)  to lobby or solicit information in relation to the ROI

c.   has not attempted to influence, or provide any form of personal inducement, reward or benefit to any representative of the Buyer.

Agree

Conflict of Interest declaration:

The Respondent warrants that it has no actual, potential or perceived Conflict of Interest in submitting this Registration, or entering into a Contract to deliver the Requirements. Where a Conflict of Interest arises during the procurement process the Respondent will report it immediately to the Buyer’s Point of Contact.

Agree

Details of Conflict of Interest: not applicable

DECLARATION

I declare that in submitting the Registration and this declaration:

a.    the information provided is true, accurate and complete and not misleading in any material respect

b.    the Registration does not contain Intellectual Property that will breach a third party’s rights

c.     I/we have secured all appropriate authorisations to submit this Registration, to make the statements and to provide the information in the Registration and I/we am/are not aware of any impediments to enter into a Contract to deliver the Requirements.

I understand that the falsification of information, supplying misleading information or the suppression of material information in this declaration and the Registration may result in the Registration being eliminated from further participation in the ROI process and may be grounds for termination of any Contract awarded as a result of the ROI.

By signing this declaration the signatory below represents, warrants and agrees that he has been authorised by the Respondent to make this declaration on its behalf.

Signature:

 

 

 

 

Full name:

Jim Quinn

Title / position:

Chief of Strategy

Name of organisation:

Auckland Council

Date:

 

 

 

 


 

Appendix 1: UFB2 Candidate Area Profiles

* source: community feedback

** source: Auckland Council and Statistics New Zealand

[Maps are being developed for each candidate area and will be included in the appropriate section when complete.  Further supporting material provided by some communities may also be included here]

 

Gaps in UFB1 coverage within the Metropolitan Urban Limit

 

Candidate Area

All UFB Coverage Gaps within MUL

Laingholm

Ormiston

Hingaia

Whenuapai West

Long Bay

Orewa West

Mangere South

Hobsonville East

Otara West

Birdwood

Swanson

Priority

1 of 17
(1st equal)

1 of 11

2 of 11

3 of 11

4 of 11

5 of 11

6 of 11

7 of 11

8 of 11

9 of 11

10 of 11

11 of 11

Rateable Units**

2165

1223

93

623

45

87

30

40

10

5

7

2

Population (Usually Resident)**

6776

3312

1465

1309

212

197

115

76

30

30

24

6

Pop Density (SqKm)**

172

705

222

519

130

66

49

8

55

47

53

38

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

2223

1155

409

426

69

64

41

33

10

6

9

1

Median Income ($)**

155856

92538

937700

114150

72925

102200

101100

65000

85000

0

81300

62500

Mobile Access (Household)**

1848

975

317

378

64

57

25

16

8

0

7

1

Internet Access (Household)**

1921

1020

333

404

58

54

22

14

8

0

7

1

Number of Businesses**

36

19

3

4

4

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

 


 

Warkworth

 

Candidate Area

Warkworth

Priority

1 of 17

(1st equal)

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL, RBI Wireless, 3G Modem

Issues Description*

Services slow, sercvices unstable, limited access at peak times, wireless services unreliable, connections do not support business activity

Average Download (Mbps)*

6.54

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.66

Ping (ms)*

33

Rateable Units**

1840

Population (Usually Resident)**

3582

Pop Density (SqKm)**

943

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

1325

Median Income ($)**

60540

Mobile Phone (Households)**

1149

Internet Access (Households)**

1043

Number of Businesses**

24

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

5

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

1

 


 

Helensville

 

Candidate Area

Helensville

Priority

2 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL, RBI Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, inconsistent coverage, quality varied by time of day, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

5.44

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.69

Ping (ms)*

369

Rateable Units**

1121

Population (Usually Resident)**

2535

Pop Density (SqKm)**

1348

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

957

Median Income ($)**

54918

Mobile Phone (Households)**

772

Internet Access (Households)**

667

Number of Businesses**

11

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

173

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

1300

 


 

Wellsford

 

Candidate Area

Wellsford

Priority

3 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL, WiFi

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, require cabinet upgrade

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

796

Population (Usually Resident)**

1587

Pop Density (SqKm)**

810

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

615

Median Income ($)**

40388

Mobile Phone (Households)**

471

Internet Access (Households)**

348

Number of Businesses**

21

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

y

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Huia / Cornwallis

 

Candidate Area

Huia / Cornwallis

Priority

4 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade needed, limited access to RBI wireless, limited access to fixed line

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.39

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.82

Ping (ms)*

98

Rateable Units**

342

Population (Usually Resident)**

652

Pop Density (SqKm)**

80

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

267

Median Income ($)**

65000

Mobile Phone (Households)**

121

Internet Access (Households)**

205

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

200

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Clevedon

 

Candidate Area

Clevedon

Priority

5 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL, 3G, Satellite, Vodem

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, patchy mobile services, rain fade, does not support video content, does not support business activity

Average Download (Mbps)*

4.01

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.57

Ping (ms)*

47

Rateable Units**

153

Population (Usually Resident)**

361

Pop Density (SqKm)**

1203

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

122

Median Income ($)**

91750

Mobile Phone (Households)**

109

Internet Access (Households)**

100

Number of Businesses**

5

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

4

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

7

 


 

Snells Beach / Algies Bay

 

Candidate Area

Snells Beach / Algies Bay

Priority

6 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Slow and variable speeds, unstable connections

Average Download (Mbps)*

11.00

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.95

Ping (ms)*

27

Rateable Units**

2069

Population (Usually Resident)**

3406

Pop Density (SqKm)**

1346

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

1407

Median Income ($)**

52071

Mobile Phone (Households)**

1162

Internet Access (Households)**

1036

Number of Businesses**

21

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

30

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

35

 


 

Matakana

 

Candidate Area

Matakana

Priority

7 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL, RBI, Satellite, Dial-up

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, limited RBI coverage, limited access to fixed-line services, slow speeds at peak times

Average Download (Mbps)*

4.87

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.80

Ping (ms)*

62

Rateable Units**

162

Population (Usually Resident)**

267

Pop Density (SqKm)**

445

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

101

Median Income ($)**

64800

Mobile Phone (Households)**

87

Internet Access (Households)**

84

Number of Businesses**

9

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

5

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

100

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Stillwater

 

Candidate Area

Stillwater

Priority

8 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

326

Population (Usually Resident)**

876

Pop Density (SqKm)**

1564

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

315

Median Income ($)**

100457

Mobile Phone (Households)**

278

Internet Access (Households)**

271

Number of Businesses**

7

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

y

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Piha

 

Candidate Area

Piha

Priority

9 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.54

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

704

Population (Usually Resident)**

811

Pop Density (SqKm)**

520

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

336

Median Income ($)**

77688

Mobile Phone (Households)**

266

Internet Access (Households)**

263

Number of Businesses**

7

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

n/a

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Point Wells

 

Candidate Area

Point Wells

Priority

10 of 17

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

3.65

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.27

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

252

Population (Usually Resident)**

384

Pop Density (SqKm)**

985

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

171

Median Income ($)**

56100

Mobile Phone (Households)**

141

Internet Access (Households)**

141

Number of Businesses**

2

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

y

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Kawakawa Bay / Orere Point

 

Candidate Area

Kawakawa Bay / Orere Point

Priority

11 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL, 3G wireless stick

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, services unusable, residents forced to commute for internet access, rain fade

Average Download (Mbps)*

2.71

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.55

Ping (ms)*

469

Rateable Units**

259

Population (Usually Resident)**

375

Pop Density (SqKm)**

682

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

152

Median Income ($)**

60900

Mobile Phone (Households)**

106

Internet Access (Households)**

86

Number of Businesses**

5

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

3

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

56

 


 

Patumahoe

 

Candidate Area

Patumahoe

Priority

12 of 17

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, limited connectivity, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

3.92

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.77

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

273

Population (Usually Resident)**

114

Pop Density (SqKm)**

161

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

195

Median Income ($)**

78333

Mobile Phone (Households)**

167

Internet Access (Households)**

194

Number of Businesses**

9

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

12

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

11

 


 

Waiheke Island

 

Candidate Area

Waiheke Island

Priority

13 of 17

Current Service*

3G Mobile, Satellite, Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, requires cabinet upgrade

Average Download (Mbps)*

3.89

Average Upload (Mbps)*

2.94

Ping (ms)*

32

Rateable Units**

433

Population (Usually Resident)**

3222

Pop Density (SqKm)**

315

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

1389

Median Income ($)**

67764

Mobile Phone (Households)**

1096

Internet Access (Households)**

1032

Number of Businesses**

13

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

y

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Leigh / Matheson Bay

 

Candidate Area

Leigh / Matheson Bay

Priority

14 of 17

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

 

Average Download (Mbps)*

 

Average Upload (Mbps)*

 

Ping (ms)*

 

Rateable Units**

559

Population (Usually Resident)**

598

Pop Density (SqKm)**

433

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

243

Median Income ($)**

59545

Mobile Phone (Households)**

180

Internet Access (Households)**

175

Number of Businesses**

19

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

 

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

 

Total Number of Students*

 

 


 

Omaha

 

Candidate Area

Omaha

Priority

15 of 17

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

 

Average Download (Mbps)*

 

Average Upload (Mbps)*

 

Ping (ms)*

 

Rateable Units**

828

Population (Usually Resident)**

428

Pop Density (SqKm)**

594

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

183

Median Income ($)**

632500

Mobile Phone (Households)**

159

Internet Access (Households)**

132

Number of Businesses**

3

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

 

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

 

Total Number of Students*

 

 


 

Parau (Armour Bay)

 

Candidate Area

Parau (Armour Bay)

Priority

16 of 17

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

 

Average Download (Mbps)*

 

Average Upload (Mbps)*

 

Ping (ms)*

 

Rateable Units**

148

Population (Usually Resident)**

403

Pop Density (SqKm)**

1343

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

144

Median Income ($)**

85000

Mobile Phone (Households)**

123

Internet Access (Households)**

118

Number of Businesses**

3

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

 

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

 

Total Number of Students*

 

 


 

Whitford

 

Candidate Area

Whitford

Priority

17 of 17

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

 

Average Download (Mbps)*

 

Average Upload (Mbps)*

 

Ping (ms)*

 

Rateable Units**

31

Population (Usually Resident)**

87

Pop Density (SqKm)**

964

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

25

Median Income ($)**

121900

Mobile Phone (Households)**

20

Internet Access (Households)**

22

Number of Businesses**

1

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

 

Individuals that Would Work From Home*

 

Total Number of Students*

 

 


 

Appendix 2: RBI2 Candidate Area Profiles

* source: community feedback

** source: Auckland Council and Statistics New Zealand

[Maps are being developed for each candidate area and will be included in the appropriate section when complete.  Further supporting material provided by some communities may also be included here]

 

Bethells Beach / Te Henga

 

Candidate Area

Bethells Beach / Te Henga

Priority

1 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, services largely unsable, frequent time-outs, waiting list for connections, unable to use connections, quality has deteriorated over time

Average Download (Mbps)*

1.86

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.54

Ping (ms)*

804

Rateable Units**

157

Population (Usually Resident)**

309

Pop Density (SqKm)**

97

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

125

Median Income ($)**

61350

Mobile Phone (Household)**

32

Internet Access (Household)**

93

Number of Businesses**

3

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

307

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

83

Total Number of Students*

87

 

 


 

Waiwera Valley

 

Candidate Area

Waiwera Valley

Priority

2 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, ADSL2+, VDSL, Satellite

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade required, waiting list to get connected, services unusable at peak times

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.82

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.46

Ping (ms)*

470

Rateable Units**

271

Population (Usually Resident)**

653

Pop Density (SqKm)**

19

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

236

Median Income ($)**

84890

Mobile Phone (Household)**

162

Internet Access (Household)**

185

Number of Businesses**

12

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Makarau

 

Candidate Area

Makarau

Priority

3 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, Dial-up, Satellite

Issues Description*

Limited access to fixed-line services, limited access to wireless RBI services, services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

5.98

Average Upload (Mbps)*

2.09

Ping (ms)*

6

Rateable Units**

77

Population (Usually Resident)**

181

Pop Density (SqKm)**

18

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

62

Median Income ($)**

67925

Mobile Phone (Household)**

39

Internet Access (Household)**

48

Number of Businesses**

3

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1801

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

700

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Taupaki

 

Candidate Area

Taupaki

Priority

4 of 24

Current Service*

Dial-up, ADSL, RBI Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet at capacity

Average Download (Mbps)*

1.68

Average Upload (Mbps)*

1.15

Ping (ms)*

292

Rateable Units**

148

Population (Usually Resident)**

483

Pop Density (SqKm)**

54

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

167

Median Income ($)**

83208

Mobile Phone (Household)**

127

Internet Access (Household)**

121

Number of Businesses**

13

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

51

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

40

Total Number of Students*

58

 


 

Opanuku Road

 

Candidate Area

Opanuku Road

Priority

5 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, ADSL unsable, quality has deteriorated over time

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.50

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.30

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

64

Population (Usually Resident)**

260

Pop Density (SqKm)**

130

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

90

Median Income ($)**

73500

Mobile Phone (Household)**

72

Internet Access (Household)**

72

Number of Businesses**

3

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Kingseat / Clarks Beach

 

Candidate Area

Kingseat / Clarks Beach

Priority

6 of 24

Current Service*

RBI wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

333

Population (Usually Resident)**

719

Pop Density (SqKm)**

78

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

241

Median Income ($)**

90283

Mobile Phone (Household)**

213

Internet Access (Household)**

195

Number of Businesses**

24

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Karekare

 

Candidate Area

Karekare

Priority

7 of 24

Current Service*

WiFi

Issues Description*

Cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

104

Population (Usually Resident)**

144

Pop Density (SqKm)**

25

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

48

Median Income ($)**

83900

Mobile Phone (Household)**

37

Internet Access (Household)**

40

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Ara-Kotinga

 

Candidate Area

Ara-Kotinga

Priority

8 of 24

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

Slow connections, unstable connections

Average Download (Mbps)*

4.43

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.66

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

33

Population (Usually Resident)**

91

Pop Density (SqKm)**

294

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

33

Median Income ($)**

92500

Mobile Phone (Household)**

24

Internet Access (Household)**

24

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

25

 


 

Anawhata

 

Candidate Area

Anawhata

Priority

9 of 24

Current Service*

Satellite

Issues Description*

Satellite services expensive, slow, and unreliable, Options limited to satellite and very limited mobile

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.02

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

188

Rateable Units**

36

Population (Usually Resident)**

33

Pop Density (SqKm)**

9

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

14

Median Income ($)**

78900

Mobile Phone (Household)**

8

Internet Access (Household)**

9

Number of Businesses**

1

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

4

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

4

 


 

Waitoki

 

Candidate Area

Waitoki

Priority

10 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, connections unsable at peak times

Average Download (Mbps)*

2.09

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.55

Ping (ms)*

31

Rateable Units**

255

Population (Usually Resident)**

625

Pop Density (SqKm)**

26

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

22

Median Income ($)**

96987

Mobile Phone (Household)**

179

Internet Access (Household)**

176

Number of Businesses**

24

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

7

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Wainui

 

Candidate Area

Wainui

Priority

11 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, require cabinet upgrade, waiting list for connections, no RBI coverage

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.70

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.64

Ping (ms)*

2300

Rateable Units**

142

Population (Usually Resident)**

265

Pop Density (SqKm)**

25

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

88

Median Income ($)**

91012

Mobile Phone (Household)**

63

Internet Access (Household)**

67

Number of Businesses**

9

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

15

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Hunua

 

Candidate Area

Hunua

Priority

12 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL, RBI Wireless, Satellite, Compass Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade required, limited coverage / access, waiting list to connect

Average Download (Mbps)*

4.18

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.82

Ping (ms)*

51

Rateable Units**

306

Population (Usually Resident)**

289

Pop Density (SqKm)**

12

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

260

Median Income ($)**

103824

Mobile Phone (Household)**

221

Internet Access (Household)**

203

Number of Businesses**

5

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

2

Total Number of Students*

8

 


 

Glenbrook

 

Candidate Area

Glenbrook

Priority

13 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, RBI Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.70

Average Upload (Mbps)*

2.30

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

108

Population (Usually Resident)**

210

Pop Density (SqKm)**

114

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

81

Median Income ($)**

60800

Mobile Phone (Household)**

69

Internet Access (Household)**

48

Number of Businesses**

4

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Waimauku

 

Candidate Area

Waimauku

Priority

14 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, 3G Mobile

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, require cabinet upgrade

Average Download (Mbps)*

6.93

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.86

Ping (ms)*

41

Rateable Units**

282

Population (Usually Resident)**

732

Pop Density (SqKm)**

283

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

230

Median Income ($)**

113343

Mobile Phone (Household)**

197

Internet Access (Household)**

205

Number of Businesses**

5

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

18

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

611

 


 

Kaukapakapa

 

Candidate Area

Kaukapakapa

Priority

15 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, 3G mobile

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, slow at peak times, limited access to services

Average Download (Mbps)*

2.98

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.77

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

47

Population (Usually Resident)**

141

Pop Density (SqKm)**

49

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

54

Median Income ($)**

65000

Mobile Phone (Household)**

42

Internet Access (Household)**

39

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

10

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

1

 


 

Great Barrier Island

 

Candidate Area

Great Barrier Island

Priority

16 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, Satellite

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, limited coverage, patchy service, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

1.82

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.68

Ping (ms)*

64

Rateable Units**

732

Population (Usually Resident)**

407

Pop Density (SqKm)**

3

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

210

Median Income ($)**

36761

Mobile Phone (Household)**

110

Internet Access (Household)**

104

Number of Businesses**

2

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Awhitu

 

Candidate Area

Awhitu

Priority

17 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, Dial-up, 3G mobile, Wireless, Satellite

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, limited access to all services, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

 

Average Upload (Mbps)*

 

Ping (ms)*

 

Rateable Units**

1120

Population (Usually Resident)**

1336

Pop Density (SqKm)**

7

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

552

Median Income ($)**

56166

Mobile Phone (Household)**

422

Internet Access (Household)**

359

Number of Businesses**

88

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

2

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

1

 


 

South Head

 

Candidate Area

South Head

Priority

18 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, RBI Wireless

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, frequent drop outs, limited coverage

Average Download (Mbps)*

3.93

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.66

Ping (ms)*

42

Rateable Units**

161

Population (Usually Resident)**

268

Pop Density (SqKm)**

5

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

105

Median Income ($)**

58440

Mobile Phone (Household)**

81

Internet Access (Household)**

76

Number of Businesses**

6

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

400

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

460

 


 

Rodney North

 

Candidate Area

Rodney North

Priority

19 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, Dial-up, 3G mobile

Issues Description*

Connection slow, connection unstable, limited fixed-line broadband coverage, limited fixed-wireless broadband coverage, patchy service, extremely variable quality of service

Average Download (Mbps)*

1.71

Average Upload (Mbps)*

6.40

Ping (ms)*

48

Rateable Units**

4183

Population (Usually Resident)**

8311

Pop Density (SqKm)**

18

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

3171

Median Income ($)**

66470

Mobile Phone (Household)**

2493

Internet Access (Household)**

2319

Number of Businesses**

171

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

28

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

4

 


 

Muriwai

 

Candidate Area

Muriwai

Priority

20 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

6.69

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.80

Ping (ms)*

31

Rateable Units**

245

Population (Usually Resident)**

327

Pop Density (SqKm)**

38

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

112

Median Income ($)**

86750

Mobile Phone (Household)**

93

Internet Access (Household)**

92

Number of Businesses**

4

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

2

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Coatesville

 

Candidate Area

Coatesville

Priority

21 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

0.71

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.60

Ping (ms)*

58

Rateable Units**

162

Population (Usually Resident)**

482

Pop Density (SqKm)**

119

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

143

Median Income ($)**

127442

Mobile Phone (Household)**

129

Internet Access (Household)**

138

Number of Businesses**

1

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

1

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

y

Total Number of Students*

y

 


 

Riverhead / Paremoremo

 

Candidate Area

Riverhead / Paremoremo

Priority

22 of 24

Current Service*

ADSL, VDSL

Issues Description*

Services slow, services unstable, cabinet upgrade required

Average Download (Mbps)*

6.21

Average Upload (Mbps)*

0.53

Ping (ms)*

168

Rateable Units**

54

Population (Usually Resident)**

132

Pop Density (SqKm)**

92

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

45

Median Income ($)**

115000

Mobile Phone (Household)**

42

Internet Access (Household)**

42

Number of Businesses**

2

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

1500

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Tapora

 

Candidate Area

Tapora

Priority

23 of 24

Current Service*

Dial-up

Issues Description*

Very slow, unstable

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

44

Population (Usually Resident)**

62

Pop Density (SqKm)**

2

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

27

Median Income ($)**

48350

Mobile Phone (Household)**

19

Internet Access (Household)**

17

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Rakino Island

 

Candidate Area

Rakino Island

Priority

24 of 24

Current Service*

 

Issues Description*

Intermittent access to wireless services

Average Download (Mbps)*

n/a

Average Upload (Mbps)*

n/a

Ping (ms)*

n/a

Rateable Units**

192

Population (Usually Resident)**

15

Pop Density (SqKm)**

10

Total Household (Usually Resident)**

9

Median Income ($)**

45000

Mobile Phone (Household)**

0

Internet Access (Household)**

0

Number of Businesses**

0

Number of Homes with Business Activity*

0

Individuals  Would Work From Home*

n/a

Total Number of Students*

n/a

 


 

Appendix 3: Supporting Information for Mobile Black Spots

[map showing the regional distribution of mobile black spots to be inserted]