|
Auckland
Development Committee
08 December
2015
|
|
1 Apologies
2 Declaration of Interest
There were no
declarations of interest.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
4 Petitions
There were no
petitions.
5 Public Input
|
5.1
|
Panuku Development Auckland's Transform class (formally known as
Type 1) urban renewal program - Ben Ross
|
|
|
Cr J Watson entered the meeting at 9.36
am.
Cr C Brewer entered the meeting at
9.37 am.
Cr ME Lee entered the meeting at 9.38
am.
Cr ME Lee
left the meeting at 9.47 am.
|
|
|
Ben Ross
addressed the committee and answered questions from the members.
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/220
MOVED
by Chairperson PA Hulse, seconded by Deputy Chairperson C Darby:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) thank Ben Ross for his
presentation regarding Panuku Development Auckland's
Transform class (formally known as Type 1) urban renewal program.
CARRIED
|
Note: Item 6.1, Local Board Input - Kings School - Hanna Block was
taken prior to item 5.2, Public Input - Kings School - Hanna Block.
|
6.1
|
Local Board Input - Kings School - Hanna Block
|
|
|
Cr ME Lee
returned to the meeting at 9.49 am.
|
|
|
Troy Churton,
Orakei Local Board member addressed the committee in relation to the
demolition of the Hanna Block at Kings school.
|
|
|
Resolution
number AUC/2015/221
MOVED
by Cr CE Fletcher, seconded by Cr AJ Anae:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) thank Troy Churton, Orakei
Local Board planning spokesperson for his attendance and presentation.
CARRIED
|
|
5.2
|
Public Input - Kings School - Hanna Block
|
|
|
The following
speakers addressed the committee in support of notice of requirement
for a heritage order for the Hanna Block at the King’s School in Remuera:
-
Rob Thomas – Campaign to Save the King’s
School Hanna Block
-
Malcolm Brown – Kings School Architect,
-
Dr Myles Gregory
- Sue Cooper – Remuera Heritage
Alan Matson –
Auckland Civic Trust also addressed the committee in relation to the Kings
School – Hanna Block.
Simon Oxner –
longtime resident also speak in relation to the Kings School – Hanna Block
and tabled a tea town design .
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/222
MOVED
by Chairperson PA Hulse, seconded by Cr CE Fletcher:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) thank
Rob Thomas – Campaign to Save the King’s School,
Malcom Brown – Kings School Architect, Dr Myles Gregory, Sue Cooper – Remuera
Heritage, Alan Matson – Auckland Civic Trust and Simon Oxner for their
attendance and presentation.
CARRIED
|
|
|
Attachments
a 8 December 2015, Auckland
Development Committee, Item 5.2, Rob Thomas - Save the King's School Hanna
Block presentation
b 8 December 2015, Auckland
Development Committee, Item 5.2, Malcolm Brown, Kings School Architect letter
c 8 December 2015, Auckland
Development Committee, Item 5.2, Wellington East Girls' College Rebuild,
Newspaper Article.
d 8 December 2015, Auckland
Development Committee, Item 5.2, Simon Oxner - Hanna Block Tea Towel Design
|
6 Local Board Input
Item 6.1, Local
Board Input - Kings School - Hanna Block occurred prior to item 5.2, Public
Input - Kings School - Hanna Block.
7 Extraordinary Business
There was no
extraordinary business.
8 Notices of Motion
There were no
notices of motion.
11
|
Auckland Development Committee Work Programme 2015/2016 - December
Update
|
|
|
Cr ME Lee
left the meeting at 10.34 am.
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/225
MOVED
by Deputy Chairperson C Darby, seconded by Cr LA Cooper:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) note progress against the
forward work programme from July – December 2015, and note the updated
programme to September 2016.
CARRIED
|
|
|
Notes:
i) Pursuant to Standing
Order 1.8.6, Cr C Casey requested her dissenting vote be recorded, in
particular, the dissenting vote is against the plan change thread and Three
Kings Land Exchange within the work programme.
ii) Pursuant to Standing
Order 1.8.6, Cr CE Fletcher requested her dissenting
vote be recorded, in particular, the dissenting vote is against the strategic
direction planning of Auckland Council.
iii) Pursuant to Standing
Order 1.8.6, Cr D Quax requested that his dissenting vote be
recorded and that his endorsement of Cr CE Fletcher’s statement be noted.
iv) Pursuant
to Standing Order 1.8.6, Cr SL Stewart requested her dissenting vote be
recorded, in particular, the dissenting vote is against the council agreeing
on a number of matters that are the subject of the Proposed Auckland Unitary
Plan (PAUP) hearings.
|
|
|
Cr ME Lee returned to the meeting at 10.35 am.
|
|
12
|
Priority Development Locations and Panuku Development Auckland
Work Programme
|
|
|
Cr MP Webster left the meeting at
10.55 am.
Cr D Quax
left the meeting at 11.02 am.
|
|
|
Note: Changes to the original recommendation
a) were made with the agreement of the meeting.
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/226
MOVED
by Member DE Taipari, seconded by Cr GS Wood:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) note the
material provided on the Priority Development Location Selection process and
the emerging Development Work Programme including
the unlocked locations at Takapuna, Northcote, Henderson, City Centre, Old
Papatoetoe Town Centre, Hobsonville Point and Ormiston Town Centre/Flatbush.
b) endorse the two “Transform” locations of
Manukau (Town centre and surrounds) and Onehunga (Town centre and Port) as
these locations best meet the criteria prioritised by Panuku Development
Auckland given its agreed purpose.
CARRIED
|
|
14
|
Heritage Advisory Panel Recommendation – Kings School
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/228
MOVED
by Cr LA Cooper, seconded by Chairperson PA Hulse:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a)
inform the Heritage Advisory Panel that it has considered its
recommendation and has decided not to issue a notice of requirement for a
heritage order for the Hanna Block at the King’s School in Remuera.
A division
was called for, voting on which was as follows:
|
For
Cr C Brewer
Cr W Cashmore
Cr R Clow
Cr LA Cooper
Deputy Chairperson C Darby
Cr AM Filipaina
Chairperson PA Hulse
Cr DA Krum
Cr CM Penrose
Cr SL Stewart
Cr GS Wood
|
Against
Cr AJ Anae
Cr C Casey
Cr CE Fletcher
Cr ME Lee
Member L Ngamane
Member DE Taipari
Cr J Watson
|
Abstained
|
The motion was
declared carried by 11
votes to 7.
CARRIED
|
|
13
|
Approach for making decisions on the Proposed Auckland Unitary
Plan
|
|
|
Cr ME Lee left the meeting at 12.19
pm.
Cr R Clow left the meeting at 12.19
pm.
Member DE Taipari left the meeting at
12.19 pm.
Deputy Chairperson C Darby left the
meeting at 12.22 pm.
Member DE Taipari returned to the
meeting at 12.28 pm.
Cr R Clow
returned to the meeting at 12.38 pm.
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/229
MOVED
by Cr AM Filipaina, seconded by Chairperson PA Hulse:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a) endorse an approach of
prioritising the council’s response to the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent
Hearings Panel’s recommendations based on topics that will have a significant
impact on the ability of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan to deliver on the
priorities in the Auckland Plan. This approach will result in a focus on the
entire Regional Policy Statement and the following hearing topics:
i. Business
ii. Coastal (including Port Precinct)
iii. Historic heritage
iv. Infrastructure
v. Landscapes
vi. Mana Whenua sites
vii. Māori land and treaty
viii. Natural hazards and flooding
ix. Residential
x. Rural
xi. Rural Urban Boundary
xii. Significant Ecological Areas
xiii. Special character and pre-1944
xiv. Sustainable design
xv. Transport
xvi. Viewshafts
xvii. Waitakere Ranges
xviii. Zoning.
CARRIED
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to
Standing Order 1.8.6, Cr C Casey, Cr CE Fletcher, Cr SL Stewart and Cr J
Watson requested that their dissenting votes be recorded.
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson C Darby
returned to the meeting at 12.45 pm.
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/230
MOVED
by Cr C Casey, seconded by Cr C Brewer:
That the Auckland
Development Committee:
a)
agree that the Local Board Chairs be invited to continue their
involvement in the Unitary Plan process and that this be clarified as part of
the Unitary Plan Committee.
CARRIED
|
Note: Item 14, Heritage Advisory Panel
Recommendation – Kings School was taken prior to item
13, Approach for making decisions on the Proposed
Auckland Unitary Plan.
16 Consideration
of Extraordinary Items
There were no extraordinary items.
|
17 Procedural
motion to exclude the public
|
|
Resolution
number AUC/2015/232
MOVED by Chairperson PA Hulse, seconded by Cr AM
Filipaina:
That the
Auckland Development Committee:
a) exclude
the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
b) agree that Patrick Dougherty – Acting GM Asset Development Group, Garry
Looker – Acting Manager Development Strategy, Gez Johns – Manager
Communications and Stakeholder Relationships-Northern and Brendon Liggett – Development
Planning Manager of Housing New Zealand be permitted to remain
for Confidential Item C3:Special Housing Areas Tranche 9 Recommendations after
the public has been excluded, because of their knowledge of Special Housing
Areas, which will help the Auckland Development Committee in its
decision-making.
The
general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded,
the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the
specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This
resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government
Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or
interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be
prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of
the meeting in public, as follows:
C1 Confidential
Reports Pending Status Update
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information where the making available of the information would
be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied or who is the subject of the information.
s7(2)(c)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or
which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the
authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information
would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information or
information from the same source and it is in the public interest that such
information should continue to be supplied.
In particular, the report contains commercially sensitive
information regarding development proposals.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
C2 Pakuranga
Town Centre Delegation of Authority Approval
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under
section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information where the making available of the information would
be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied or who is the subject of the information.
s7(2)(c)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or
which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the
authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information
would be likely to damage the public interest.
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to
enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage,
commercial activities.
s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to
enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage,
negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations).
In particular, the report contains commercially sensitive
information regarding development proposals.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of
the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of
information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7.
|
C3 Special
Housing Areas Tranche 9 Recommendations
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information where the making available of the information would
be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied or who is the subject of the information.
s7(2)(c)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or
which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the
authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information
would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information or
information from the same source and it is in the public interest that such
information should continue to be supplied.
In particular, the report contains commercially sensitive
information regarding development proposals.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
C4 Special
Housing Areas: Tranche 9 Further Recommendations
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information where the making available of the information would
be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied or who is the subject of the information.
s7(2)(c)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or
which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the
authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information
would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information or
information from the same source and it is in the public interest that such
information should continue to be supplied.
In particular, the report contains commercially sensitive
information regarding development proposals..
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
C5 Housing
for Older Persons: Procurement of a Preferred Community Housing Provider
Partner
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this
resolution
|
|
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary
to protect information where the making available of the information would
be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person
who supplied or who is the subject of the information.
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to
enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage,
commercial activities.
In particular, the report contains commercial sensitive
information.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely
to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for
withholding exists under section 7.
|
The text of these resolutions was
made available to the public who were present at the meeting and formed part
of the minutes of the meeting.
CARRIED
|
12.52 pm The
public was excluded.
The meeting
adjourned at 12.52 pm and reconvened at 1.33 pm.
Resolutions in
relation to the confidential items are recorded in the confidential section of
these minutes and are not publicly available.
4.43 pm The
public was re-admitted.
restatementS
It was resolved
while the public was excluded:
|
C1
|
Confidential Reports Pending Status Update
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/233
MOVED by Chairperson PA Hulse,
seconded by Member L Ngamane:
That the Auckland Development
Committee:
a) receive the reports pending
status update.
b) agree that the resolution only
be restated in the open minutes.
|
|
C2
|
Pakuranga Town Centre Delegation of Authority Approval
|
|
|
There was no restatement
of the resolutions.
|
Items C3 and C4 were taken together
|
C3
|
Special Housing Areas Tranche 9 Recommendations
|
|
|
MOVED by Chairperson PA Hulse,
seconded by Cr AM Filipaina:
That the Auckland Development
Committee:
n) approve that the
decisions, report and attachments regarding the Special Housing Areas Tranche
9 proposals remain confidential until all due processes have been concluded,
and that the mayor and Deputy Mayor be delegated responsibility to release
information on these SHA proposals as may be required.
|
|
C4
|
Special Housing Areas: Tranche 9 Further Recommendations
|
|
|
This item was considered together with Item C3 above.
|
|
C5
|
Housing for Older Persons: Procurement of a Preferred Community
Housing Provider Partner
|
|
|
Resolution number AUC/2015/246
MOVED by Deputy Chairperson C
Darby, seconded by Cr CE Fletcher:
That the Auckland Development
Committee:
e) delegate
the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Committee, in conjunction with Panuku
Development Auckland, to issue an appropriate explanatory public statement
concerning progress on the project without identifying the preferred partner.
|
4.43 pm The
Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and
declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF
THE Auckland Development Committee
HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:........................................................
