I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Heritage Advisory Panel will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 16
February 2016
5.30pm
Level 2
Reception Lounge
Town Hall
|
|
Heritage Advisory Panel
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Cr Mike Lee
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Sherry Reynolds
|
|
|
Members
|
Elizabeth Aitken-Rose
|
|
|
|
Graeme Burgess
|
|
|
|
John Burns
|
|
|
|
Leyton Chan
|
|
|
|
Helen Geary
|
|
|
|
Rau Hoskins
|
|
|
|
Sally Hughes
|
|
|
|
Allan Matson
|
|
|
|
Jane Matthews
|
|
|
|
Dr Ann McEwan
|
|
|
|
Claudia Page
|
|
|
|
Bill Rayner
|
|
|
|
David Veart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOLOGIES
|
Lorraine Wilson
|
|
(Quorum 10 members)
|
|
|
Elodie Fontaine
Democracy Advisor
11 February 2016
Contact Telephone: (09) 890 4868
Email: Elodie.fontaine@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Purpose
·
Provide advice to the council in
relation to:
- the
direction and content of strategies, policies and initiatives
- any matter that the panel considers to be of
particular interest or concern to the historic heritage of Auckland
·
To deliver advice for improving
the promotion and management of historic heritage of the Auckland region
·
Advise Auckland Council on council
processes and mechanisms for engagement with the historic heritage community,
including owners of heritage buildings in Auckland.
·
To recommend historic heritage
expert membership and provide advice to the Auckland Urban Design Panel.
Scope
To provide a forum for the consideration of issues affecting
historic heritage of the Auckland region and provide advice to the council.
Priorities
The priorities for the panel include:
·
Historic Heritage Plan
·
Issues relating to the Unitary Plan
·
Council processes
·
Input into the Auckland Urban Design Panel.
Membership
The panel’s spokesperson is its chairperson.
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 5
2 Declaration of Interest 5
3 Confirmation of Minutes 5
4 Extraordinary
Business 5
5 Restore Christchurch Cathedral Group - Public Input 7
6 Update on Pre 1944 process and methodology 9
7 Maori Heritage Programme Update 11
8 Regional Facilities Auckland Correspondence 13
9 Consideration of Extraordinary
Items
An apology from
Member Lorraine Wilson has been received.
2 Declaration of Interest
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a
conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external
interest they might have.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Heritage Advisory Panel:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Tuesday, 1 December 2015, including the
confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
4 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“An item that is
not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time
when it is open to the public,-
(i) The
reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be
delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“Where an item
is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general
business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the
meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be
discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in
respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the
local authority for further discussion.”
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
Restore
Christchurch Cathedral Group - Public Input
File No.: CP2016/00697
Purpose
1. To brief the Heritage Advisory
Panel on Christchurch Cathedral.
Executive
Summary
2. Brent Morrissey, from the
Restore Christchurch Cathedral group, to present to the Heritage Advisory Panel
on the campaign to save Christchurch Cathedral from demolition.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the presentation on
Christchurch Cathedral by Brent Morrissey.
|
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Elodie Fontaine – Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
Update on Pre-1944 process and methodology
File No.: CP2016/00784
Purpose
1. To provide the Heritage Advisory
Panel (The Panel) the opportunity to advise on the next steps in regards to the
Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) pre-1944 work program.
Executive
Summary
At its meeting
on 1 December 2015, the Heritage Advisory Panel resolved:
Resolution
number HER/2015/53
MOVED
by Member S Reynolds, seconded by Member L Wilson:
That
the Heritage Advisory Panel:
a)
receive the report
b)
agree to consider and offer advice on approaches to facilitating
protection of the buildings in the pre-1944 layer.
Officers are
currently working out the process and methodology to convert the pre-1944 layer
currently in the PAUP into a proposed plan change. There are two areas of work:
1.
Those areas that Council in evidence and as determined by the survey
meet the criteria for retention in the pre-1944 layer as potential historic
character areas.
2.
Those individual sites that while not meeting the criteria as an area
are specific sites worthy of evaluation to determine whether they meet the
criteria for scheduling.
A number of
factors require consideration:
·
Any work identified above is dependent on the Independent
Hearings Panel’s recommendation and Council’s subsequent response. If the panel
do not retain the pre-1944 layer for the 3 years sought by Council then the
matter will need to be reassessed.
·
Some prioritisation of areas and places will be necessary.
·
The workload of the Heritage Unit and availability of
consultants.
Officers will be presenting on a draft
process and methodology for the panels input.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the report
|
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Authoriser
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
Maori Heritage Programme Update
File No.: CP2016/00924
Purpose
1. To update the Panel on the Maori
heritage programme and seek its advice on survey process.
Executive
Summary
2. Council have approved a
programme of work aimed at identifying surveying assessing and then
appropriately managing sites of value and sites of significance to Iwi. The
program has a goal of investigating approximately 100 sites a year. Several hui
have been held with Iwi who are on board with the project.
3. This work has been on the back
burner while Council and Iwi have addressed the issues arising out of the
identification of the 3600 sites of value in the PAUP.
4. Now that these hearings have
finished staff in partnership with Iwi have identified a number of sites
(approx. 90) that we intend to progress.
5. As this work will involve in
some cases investigation of sites on private land the process that is to be
followed includes seeking advice from this panel, the Rural Advisory panel, the
relevant local boards and then reporting this to Council for approval. This
will then be followed by letters to affected landowners.
6. Officers will present further
detail at the hearing.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the report.
|
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Signatories
|
Author
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Authoriser
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
Regional Facilities Auckland Correspondence
File No.: CP2016/00753
Purpose
1. To inform the Heritage Advisory
Panel of correspondence exchanged with Regional Facilities Auckland.
Executive
Summary
2. The Heritage
Panel meeting on 1 December 2015, following the presentation from the Howick
Historical Village Trust, moved to recommend to appropriate authorities that representatives from Auckland’s smaller
museums and heritage institutions be included in the current dialogue being
carried out by the regional museums and Council.
3. Following on
this motion the Chair wrote on behalf of the Heritage Advisory Panel to Maree
Laurent, Director Cultural Partnerships at Regional Facilities. The letter is
attached as attachment A.
4. Maree
Laurent responded to the Chair’s letter on behalf of the Heritage Advisory
Panel. The correspondence is attached as attachment B.
|
Recommendation/s
That the Heritage Advisory
Panel:
a) receive the correspondence
exchanged with Regional Facilities Auckland
|
Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
aView
|
Correspondence from the Heritage Advisory Panel to
Regional Facilities Auckland
|
15
|
|
bView
|
Correspondence from Regional Facilities Auckland
|
17
|
Signatories
|
Author
|
Elodie Fontaine – Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
Noel Reardon - Manager Heritage
|
|
Heritage
Advisory Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
|
Heritage Advisory
Panel
16 February
2016
|
|
