Howick Local Board Dog Access Review Hearing
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of the Dog Access Review hearing of the Howick Local Board held in the Howick Local Board Meeting Room, Pakuranga Library Complex, 7 Aylesbury Street, Pakuranga on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 10.07am.
Chairperson |
David Collings |
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Adele White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members |
Katrina Bungard |
|
|
|
|
Jim Donald |
Left at 1.42pm |
|
|
|
John Spiller |
|
|
|
|
Steve Udy |
From 11.22am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABSENT
Garry Boles |
|
|
|
Lucy Schwaner |
|
|
|
Bob Wichman |
|
|
|
Howick Local Board 23 and 25 August 2016 |
|
1 Welcome
The Chair opened the meeting and welcomed everyone.
2 Apologies
Resolution number HW/2016/299 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That the Howick Local Board: a) accept the apology from Members G Boles, L Schwaner, RD Wichman for absence, and Member SA Udy for lateness. |
3 Declaration of Interest
There were no declarations of interest.
4 |
Hearing and deliberations report on proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area |
|
Documents tabled during the hearings will be attached to a hard copy of the Minutes and will be available on the Auckland Council website |
|
Resolution number HW/2016/300 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That the Howick Local Board: a) in relation to proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area: i) receive the submissions in Attachment C to the report entitled ‘Hearing and deliberations report on proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area’. ii) hear the submitters who wish to be heard in support of their submission. |
|
Resolution number HW/2016/301 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That the Howick Local Board: b) thank the following submitters for attending the hearing and speaking in support of their submission: i) Julie Seddon (Submission #86) ii) Marisa Bramwell (Submission #101) iii) Jill Bolscher (Submission #347) iv) Sandra Good (Submission #462) v) Lesley Carter (Submission #113) vi) Julie Annabell (Submission #633) vii) Julie Perry (Submission #973) viii) Rebekah Williams (Submission #4) ix) Fiona Bates (Submission #509) x) Lawrence Thom (Submission #584) xi) Pamela Simms (Submission #1026) xii) Willard Martin (Submission #474) xiii) Kym O’Toole (Submission #953) xiv) Robert Young (Submission #614) xv) Amy Young (Submission #589) xvi) Deborah Geisler (Submission #124) xvii) Chris Osborne (Submission #957) xviii) Gary Thomason (Submission #697) |
|
a Tabled by Marisa Bramwell #101 b Tabled by Jill Bolscher #347 c Tabled by Sandra Good #462 d Tabled by Julie Annabell #633 e Tabled by Pamela Simms #1026 f Tabled by Chris Osborne #957 g Tabled by Gary Thomason #697 |
Resolution number HW/2016/302 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Member K Bungard: That the Howick Local Board agree to adjourn the meeting at 10.45am. The meeting reconvened at 11.15am. |
Secretarial Note: Late cancellations by submitters meant there was a time lapse waiting for others to arrive. The Chair adjourned the meeting to wait for their arrival. Secretarial Note: Member SA Udy arrived at the meeting at 11.22am.
|
Resolution number HW/2016/303 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That the Howick Local Board agree to adjourn the meeting at 11.42am. The meeting reconvened at 12.53pm. |
Secretarial Note: The meeting adjourned for lunch.
|
Resolution number HW/2016/304 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Member JR Donald: That the Howick Local Board agreed to adjourn the meeting at 1.40pm. The meeting reconvened at 2.02pm. Member JR Donald left the meeting at 1.42pm and was not present for the rest of the meeting. |
Secretarial Note: Due to no shows and late cancellations there was a time lapse. The Chair adjourned the meeting to wait for the arrival of the next submitter. Secretarial Note: Member JR Donald left the meeting at 1.42pm.
|
Resolution number HW/2016/305 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That the Howick Local Board agree to adjourn the meeting at 2.28pm. The meeting reconvened at 2.50pm. |
Secretarial Note: The meeting adjourned for afternoon tea while waiting for submitters to arrive.
|
Resolution number HW/2016/306 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Member K Bungard: That the Howick Local Board agree to adjourn the meeting at 3.15pm until Thursday 25th August 2015, at 12 noon for deliberations.
|
Howick Local Board Dog Access Review Hearing
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of the deliberations of the Howick Local Board Dog Access Review held in the Howick Local Board Meeting Room, Pakuranga Library Complex, 7 Aylesbury Street, Pakuranga on Tuesday, 25 August 2016 at 12.16 pm.
present
Chairperson |
David Collings |
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Adele White |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members |
Katrina Bungard |
|
|
|
|
Jim Donald |
|
|
|
|
John Spiller |
|
|
|
|
Steve Udy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABSENT
Garry Boles |
|
|
|
Lucy Schwaner |
|
|
|
Bob Wichman |
|
|
|
Howick Local Board 23 and 25 August 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Chair reconvened the meeting at 12.16pm on 25th August 2016. |
Resolution number HW/2016/307 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Deputy Chairperson AJ White: That following deliberations the Howick Local Board agreed to adjourn the meeting at 5.30pm. The meeting reconvened at 6.25pm to consider recommendations. |
Secretarial Note: The meeting was adjourned while staff completed the report to be tabled.
|
4 |
Continued: Hearing and deliberations report on proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area |
|
The Deliberations worksheets were tabled at the deliberations meeting on 25th August 2016 and will be filed with a hard copy of the Minutes. A copy will be available on the Auckland Council website. The decision report ‘Hearing panel decision report on local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area 2016’ was tabled at the deliberations meeting on 25th August 2016 and will be filed with a hard copy of the Minutes. A copy will be available on the Auckland Council website.
|
|
Resolution number HW/2016/308 MOVED by Chairperson DA Collings, seconded by Member JR Donald: That the Howick Local Board: c) adopt the decisions recorded in the ‘Deliberation worksheet – Howick Local Board area’ tabled at the meeting. d) adopt the report entitled ‘Hearing panel decision report on local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area 2016’ tabled at the meeting. e) adopt the amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012 in Attachment A of the decision report ‘Hearing panel decision report on local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area 2016’ tabled at the meeting, with a commencement date of 1 July 2017 f) delegate to the Manager Social Policy and Bylaws in consultation with the Chair to make any minor edits to (c), (d) and (e) to correct any identified errors or typographical edits. g) request the Governing Body to give effect to the decisions in (e) by making any necessary amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012 and Auckland Council Dog Management Bylaw 2012. h) thank the community and the submitters for their submissions. |
|
a Deliberations Worksheet b Hearing panel decision report on local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area 2016 with Attachment A (Amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on dogs 2012) |
7.47 pm The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Howick Local Board HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:........................................................
ATTACHMENT A: DELIBERATIONS WORKSHEET
Attachment B Deliberation worksheet – Howick Local Board area
The worksheet below summarises the information in the hearing and deliberation report on proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area, in a table format, to assist with deliberations.
The last two columns are to be completed during deliberations and will be used to inform the drafting of the Panel decision report.
During its deliberations the Panel considered all relevant matters in response to submissions.
Table 1 Southwest Coastline of Howick (Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek, including Pakuranga Creek)
A number of submission points related to the foreshore and adjacent reserves along the south western coastline. For this reason, the matters to be considered in relation to these two submission topics are considered jointly in the table below.
|
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff recommendation (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
(A) Wakaaranga Creek |
A1. Wakaaranga Creek foreshore to Bramley Drive Foreshore |
Prohibited |
Prohibited |
· 19 support the proposal · 18 want under control access · 9 do not support the proposal
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To Identify Wakaaranga Creek foreshore area as prohibited to dogs. Reasons include: For the protection of wildlife to align with the Department of Conservation prohibition of dogs on foreshore on southern side of Wakaaranga Creek. |
To Identify Wakaaranga Creek foreshore area as a highly sensitive area, where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline· to align with the Department of Conservation prohibition of dogs on foreshore on southern side of Wakaaranga Creek. |
|
A2 Wakaaranga Creek Reserve |
Off leash |
On leash |
1 wants an under control off a leash rule as: · there aren’t enough off leash areas around the Rotary walkway · cannot see the wildlife risk
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify Wakaaranga Creek Reserve as an under control on leash area for the protection of wildlife.
Option 2: To identify Wakaaranga Creek Reserve as an under control off leash area, to provide for the recreational needs of dog owners, before they access the Rotary walkway.
|
To continue to identify Wakaaranga Creek Reserve as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide for the under control off a leash recreational needs of dog owners, before accessing the Rotary Walkway.
|
Local Board (independent of decision) to investigate fencing along the foreshore to prevent dogs from accessing foreshore. Also investigate signage to build public awareness of nesting birds in salt marsh |
|
A3 Rotary Walkway Reserve to Bramley Drive Reserve
(adjacent to Wakaaranga Creek foreshore)
|
On leash |
On leash |
· 19 support the proposal · 18 want under control access · 9 do not support the proposal
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the Bramley Drive Reserve area of the Rotary walkway as an under control on leash area. Reasons include: · the protection of shore birds and wildlife · public safety and comfort. |
To continue to identify the Bramley Drive Reserve area of the Rotary Walkway from the Galloway Crescent as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline · public safety and comfort of other users on a popular walkway. |
|
|
B to D (Wakaaranga Creek to Lagoon Drive (includes Rotary Walkway) |
BD1 Foreshore from Bramley Drive to Lagoon Drive (Pakuranga Road)
|
Off leash |
Prohibited |
· 19 support the proposal as it is inappropriate for dogs to be in ecologically sensitive areas · 18 want under control on leash access as they cannot see how an on leash dog is a threat to wildlife · 9 do not support the proposal
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas of the Tamaki River (i.e. Bramley Drive to Lagoon Drive) as prohibited to dogs for the protection of wildlife. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline.
|
To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas of the Tamaki River (i.e. Bramley Drive to Pakuranga Road, adjacent to bridge), as a highly sensitive area, where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline.
|
|
BD2 Rotary Walkway Esplanade reserves and parks from Bramley Drive Reserve to Lagoon Drive
(including Fisher Parade Esplanade reserve; Bus Stop Reserve; Tamaki Bay Esplanade Reserve; Williams Avenue Esplanade Reserve; Dayspring Way Esplanade Reserve) |
On leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along Bramley Drive to Lagoon Drive (i.e. Rotary walkway), as under control on leash to dogs. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline · for public safety and comfort of other users of the walkway.
Option 2: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along Bramley Drive to Lagoon Drive (i.e. Rotary walkway), as under control off leash to dogs. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline · for public safety and comfort of other users of the walkway.
|
To continue to identify the Rotary Walkway (parks and esplanade reserves from the Galloway Crescent access way to Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge) as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline · public safety and comfort of other users on a popular walkway. |
|
||
D to G Lagoon Drive to Pandora Place |
DG1 Foreshore of Dayspring Way to Pandora Place (including Millen Avenue Esplanade) |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas (from Lagoon Drive (Pakuranga Rd) to Tiraumea Drive) as prohibited to dogs. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas from Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge) to Tiraumea Drive, as highly sensitive areas, where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
|
|
DG2 Esplanade and parks from Dayspring Way Esplanade to Pandora Place Esplanade (including Millen Avenue Esplanade) |
Off leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along Lagoon Drive to Tiraumea Drive), as under control on leash to dogs. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline.
Option 2: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along Lagoon Drive to Tiraumea Drive), as under control off leash to dogs. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline. |
To continue to identify the parks and esplanade reserves from Pakuranga Road, (adjacent to bridge) to Tiraumea Drive, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule. |
|
||
G Tiraumea Drive Reserve and foreshore |
G1 Foreshore of Tiraumea Drive Reserve |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore area around Tiraumea Drive Reserve as prohibited to dogs. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
To identify the foreshore area around Tiraumea Drive Reserve as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
|
|
G2 Tiraumea Drive Reserve |
Off leash |
On leash |
· 2 want this area off a leash as it is a large and safe area for dogs to run off leash
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the Tiraumea Drive Reserve as an under control on leash area for the protection of wildlife (roosting shorebirds). Reasons include: · for the protection of shorebirds. Option 2: To identify the Tiraumea Drive Reserve as an under control off leash area to provide for off leash dog access. Reasons include: · provide off leash access in a large reserve. |
To continue to identify Tiraumea Drive Reserve, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule. |
|
|
(G to H) Edgewater to Freemantle |
GH 1 Foreshore of Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Place |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
· 19 support the proposal as it is inappropriate for dogs to be in ecologically sensitive areas · 18 want under control on leash access as they cannot see how an on leash dog is a threat to wildlife · 9 do not support the proposal
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore (including intertidal and saltmarsh areas) adjacent to Edgewater Drive Reserve to Freemantle Place Reserve as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats in inter-tidal areas. |
To identify the foreshore (including intertidal and saltmarsh areas) adjacent to Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Place Reserve as a highly sensitive area, where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
|
GH2 Esplanade and reserves of Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Place
(including Riverina Esplanade) |
Off leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the Edgewater Drive Esplanade Reserve to Freemantle Drive Esplanade Reserve, as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline and to inhibit off leash dogs from access the foreshore.
Option 2: To identify the Edgewater Drive Esplanade Reserve to Freemantle Drive Esplanade Reserve, as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control off leash.
Reasons include: · provide for dog access |
To continue to identify the parks and esplanade reserves from Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Drive Esplanade Reserve, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule. |
|
||
(H to I) Pakuranga Creek |
HI 1 Foreshore of Freemantle Place to Ennis Avenue Reserve and Elm Park
|
Off leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas along the Pakuranga Creek as prohibited to dogs. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats in inter-tidal areas. |
To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas along the Pakuranga Creek as highly sensitive areas, where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline.
|
|
|
HI 2 Esplanades and reserves from Freemantle Place, Stonedon Reserve to Ennis Avenue Reserve
Includes reserves on either side of the Pakuranga Creek (i.e. Trugood Esplanade, Stonedon Esplanade) |
Off leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along the Pakuranga Creek, as under control on leash to dogs. Reasons include: · for the protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline and to inhibit off leash dogs from access the foreshore. Option 2: To identify the parks and esplanade reserves along the Pakuranga Creek, as under control off leash to dogs. Reasons include: · to provide dog access areas. |
To continue to identify the parks and esplanade reserves along the Pakuranga Creek, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule. |
|
||
(J) Frank Nobillo Esplanade and Burswood Esplanade |
J1 Frank Nobillo to Burswood Esplanade Foreshore |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
· 19 support the proposal as it is inappropriate for dogs to be in ecologically sensitive areas · 18 want under control on leash access as they cannot see how an on leash dog is a threat to wildlife · 9 do not support the proposal · 1 verbal submitter about this area (referred to as Golf Lands)
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore (including intertidal and saltmarsh areas) adjacent to Frank Nobillo Reserve to Burswood Esplanade Reserve as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · to protect the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
To identify the foreshore (including intertidal and saltmarsh areas) adjacent to Frank Nobilo Reserve to Burswood Esplanade Reserve as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline. |
|
J2 Frank Nobillo to Burswood Esplanade (Reserves) |
Off leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the reserves from Frank Nobillo Reserve to Burswood Esplanade Reserve as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on leash. Reasons include: · for the protection of wildlife.
Option 2: To retain the current rule and identify the reserves from Frank Nobillo Reserve to Burswood Esplanade Reserve where dogs are allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include: · to provide off leash dog access. |
To continue to identify Frank Nobilo Reserve and Burswood Esplanade Reserve , as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule.
Note: this includes the Burswood walkway |
|
Submission Topic 2 – Highly Sensitive areas
Table 2
|
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff recommendation (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
Mangemangeroa |
2.1a. Mangemangeroa Reserve foreshore |
Prohibited |
Prohibited |
· 12 support the proposal for the protection of wildlife and non-compliance with on leash rule · 36 want the retention of the on leash rule in Mangemangeroa · 21 oppose the prohibition and want access with their dogs · 5 verbal submissions spoke against the prohibition of access at Mangemangeroa reserve
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To retain the current rule and identify the foreshore adjacent to Mangemangeroa Reserve as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · Mangemangeroa Creek foreshore is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat · the presence of dogs on or off a leash dogs are a risk to wildlife in these habitats. |
To identify the foreshore and intertidal areas adjacent to Mangemangeroa Reserve as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · the Mangemangeroa Creek foreshore is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat for birdlife · the presence of dogs is a risk to wildlife in these habitats. |
|
2.1b. Mangemangeroa Reserve (including bush walks) |
On leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the Mangemangeroa Reserve (including bush walks) as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · to limit the dog access into the foreshore areas.
Option 2: To retain the current on a leash dog access rule in the Mangemangeroa Reserve Reasons include: · to provide access to dog owners and their dogs, while protecting wildlife. |
To identify the Mangemangeroa Reserve as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · prohibition of dogs in these areas is too restrictive · to provide dog access (albeit on a leash) · under control on a leash rule provides an adequate level of wildlife protection. |
|
||
2.2a. Chisbury Terrace Reserve foreshore |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the foreshore adjacent to Chisbury Terrace Reserve as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · Mangemangeroa Creek (which includes the foreshore adjacent to Chisbury Terrace Reserve) is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat · the presence of dogs on or off leash dogs are a risk to wildlife in these habitats. |
To identify the foreshore and intertidal areas adjacent to Chisbury Terrace Reserve (excluding boardwalks where dogs are allowed under control on a leash) as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · the Mangemangeroa Creek foreshore area to The Sandspit is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat for birdlife · the presence of dogs on the foreshore is a risk to birdlife in these habitats.
|
|
||
2.2b. Chisbury Terrace Reserve |
Off leash |
Prohibited |
Option 1: To identify the Chisbury Terrace Reserve as a highly sensitive area where dogs are prohibited. Reasons include: · for the protection of wildlife.
Option 2: To identify the Chisbury Terrace Reserve area as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash area. Reasons include: · to better protect wildlife on the adjacent foreshore · public comfort along the coastal walkway and bushwalk.
Option 3: To retain the current rule and identify Chisbury Terrace Reserve as a under control off a leash area. Reasons include: · to enable dog access. |
To identify the Chisbury Terrace Reserve (including boardwalks) area as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · prohibition of dogs in these areas is too restrictive · to provide dog access (albeit on a leash) · under control on a leash rule provides an adequate level of wildlife protection. |
|
||
|
Foreshore/ intertidal areas of Pohutakawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve to The Sandspit |
|
|
|
|
To identify the foreshore and intertidal areas adjacent to Pohutakawa Esplanade Reserve and The Sandspit as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · the Mangemangeroa Creek foreshore area to The Sandspit is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat for birdlife · the presence of dogs on the foreshore is a risk to birdlife in these habitats. |
|
|
Esplanade and reserves along Pohutakawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve to The Sandspit |
|
|
|
|
To identify the esplanades and reserves from Pohutakawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve to The Sandspit as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · prohibition of dogs in these areas is too restrictive · to provide dog access (albeit on a leash) · under control on a leash rule provides an adequate level of wildlife protection. |
|
Submission Topic 5– Standard areas
Table 5.1
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff comments (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
5.1. Tainui Reserve (adjacent to northern end of Cockle Bay) |
Time and season |
On leash |
· 1 wants an under control off a leash rule · 1 supports proposal
Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the Tainui Reserve as standard area where dogs are allowed under control on leash. Reasons include: · there is a well-used playground here with children running around at most times of the day · as a thoroughfare, dogs should be able to access the area under control on a leash.
Option 2: To maintain the current time and season rule for this area. Reasons include: · to maintain the status quo. |
To identify the Tainui Reserve (Cockle Bay Reserve north) as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · Tainui Reserve contains a playground that is well used at most times of the day · as a thoroughfare, dogs should be able to access the area under control on a leash. |
|
5.2. Murphy’s Bush
|
On leash in bushwalks, off leash elsewhere |
On leash |
· 1 commented on the bush walks versus the rest of the reserve and want less restrictive rules · 2 dog owners support the proposal · 1 wants off leash access Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the Murphy’s Bush as standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · for the protection of wildlife.
Option 2: To retain the current rules that: · identify the bush areas in Murphy’s Bush as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on leash · identify areas south of the car park as areas dogs are allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include: · to enable off leash access, whilst protecting wildlife. |
To retain and clarify the current rules that: · identify the open grass area north of the car park in Murphy’s Bush as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash · identify all other areas (including all bush areas and bushwalks) in Murphy’s Bush as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide under control off a leash opportunities in Murphy’s Bush while providing for public comfort and protection of wildlife in bush areas · to make the rule easier to understand.
|
|
5.3. Point View Reserve |
On leash in bushwalks, off leash elsewhere |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the Point View Reserve area as standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · for the protection of wildlife.
Option 2: To retain the current rules that: · identify the bush walk areas in Point View Reserve as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash · other spacious grassy areas in Point View Reserve as a dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include: · to enable off leash access, while protecting wildlife. |
To retain and clarify the current rules that: · identify the open grass areas of Point View Reserve as a dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash · identify all other areas (including all bush areas and bushwalks) in Point View Reserve as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide under control off a leash opportunities in Point View Reserve while providing for public comfort and protection of wildlife in bush areas.
|
|
Submission Topic 3 – High Use areas
Table 3.1 Areas time and season rules apply
|
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff comments (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
|||||||
Areas time and season rule applies |
|
|||||||||||||
3.1.1 Cockle Bay Beach |
Time and season rule, including adjoining reserves |
Time and season rule, adjoining reserves on leash |
· 1 wants area south of Cockle Bay (towards Shelley Beach) to be under control off a leash at all times Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: Adopt time and season rule for areas 1-6, excluding adjoining reserves. Reasons include: · these are key beach areas which are busy in summer months · the adjoining reserves will be subject to default rule · when dog owners are using the beach, they are unlikely to differentiate between the adjoining grassed area and the sandy beach, therefore where two rules apply, it can be confusing.
Option 2: Adopt time and season rule for areas 1-6, including adjoining reserves. Reasons include: · these are key beach areas which are busy in summer months · the adjacent reserves will be subject to time and season rule as per status quo · holistic consideration of the beach area, i.e. dog owners are not going to differentiate between the grassed area and the sandy beach, this rule applies to the whole beach area.
|
To identify the beach as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 3.2).
To identify both Cockle Bay Reserve (south) and Cockle Bay Reserve (north – a reserve with a playground and also known as Tainui Reserve), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · adjoining reserves of Cockle Bay north (Tainui Reserve) and Cockle Bay south have different use types compared to the beach that warrant an under control on a leash rule · Cockle Bay Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day that warrant a time and season rule.
|
|
|
|||||||
3.1.2. Howick Beach (from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Road) |
Time and season rule, including adjoining reserves |
Time and season rule adjoining reserves on leash |
· no specific submissions Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
To identify Howick Beach ((from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Rd)) as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 3.2).
To identify the area adjacent to Howick Beach (including Howick Beach Reserve), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash
Reasons include: · the area adjacent to the beach include a car park and Howick Beach Reserve which are access points to the beach that warrant an under control on a leash rule · Howick Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day, that warrant a time and season rule · the beach and foreshore area northwest of the boat ramp is a dog friendly area, where dogs are allowed under control off a leash at any time, including when they are prohibited on the remainder of the beach in summer.
|
|
|
||||||||
3.1.3. Mellons Bay Beach (southeast of water pipe) |
Time and season rule, including adjoining reserves |
Time and season rule adjoining reserves on leash |
· 8 oppose time and season rule on this beach · 2 verbal submissions want an under control off a leash rule on this beach Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
To identify the Mellons Bay Beach (from southeast of water pipe) as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 3.2).
To identify the grass reserve at the end of Mellons Bay Road (i.e. 181R Mellons Bay Road), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the adjoining reserve at Mellons Bay Beach is adjacent to the car park and is an access point that warrants an under control on a leash rule · Mellons Bay Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day, that warrants a time and season rule · the area west of the water pipe is a dog friendly area, where dogs are allowed under control off a leash at any time. |
|
|
||||||||
3.1.4. Eastern Beach (south of northernmost water pipe) |
Time and season rule, including adjacent reserves |
Time and season rule, adjoining reserves on leash |
· 2 want under control off a leash rule on this beach · 1 supports a time and season rule on this beach Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
To identify identify Eastern Beach (south of northernmost water pipe), Bucklands Beach (south of boat ramp at Devon Rd), Little Buckland’s Beach, and grass strips between the beaches and adjacent roads, as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 3.2).
To identify the Eastern Beach Caravan Park, adjacent to Mcleans Park, as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
To identify the Warren Boardwalk on southern end of Little Bucklands Beach as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the grass strip that adjoins the beach, and is adjacent to the road, is part of the total beach environment · the use of the beach (including the grass strip) changes in seasons and at different times of the day, that warrants a time and season rule · dog friendly access at the northern end of the beach allows for under control off a leash dog access at any time of the year · the Warren Boardwalk starts at the southern end of Little Bucklands Beach. An under control on a leash rule ensures reasonable access to and along the walkway. |
|
|
||||||||
3.1.5. Bucklands Beach (south of boat ramp at Devon Road) |
Time and season rule, including adjacent reserves |
Time and season rule, adjoining reserves on leash |
· no specific submissions Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
|
|
|||||||||
3.1.6. Little Bucklands Beach |
Time and season rule, including adjacent reserves |
Time and season rule, adjoining reserves on leash |
· no specific submissions
Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
|
|
|||||||||
Submission Topic 3 – High Use areas
Table 3.2 Time and season rule
|
Option 1 (Current rule) |
Option 2 (Region wide times and season) |
Option 3 (Proposed rule) |
Preference from submissions (Mostly dog owners) |
People’s Panel (Dog Owners) |
Panel (Non-dog owners) |
Staff recommendation |
Panel decision |
Summer mornings |
Before 9am |
Before 10am |
Before 10am |
Before 10am |
Before 10am |
Before 10am |
Before 10am |
Before 10 am |
Summer core hours |
9am to 7pm |
10am to 5pm |
10am to 7pm |
10am to 7pm |
10am to 6pm |
10am to 5pm |
10am to 7pm |
10am to 7pm |
Summer evenings |
After 7pm |
After 5pm |
After 7pm |
After 7pm |
After 6pm |
After 5pm |
After 7pm |
After 7pm |
Summer season start |
Daylight Savings start |
Labour weekend |
Labour weekend |
*Daylight Savings start OR Labour Weekend |
1 December |
Daylight savings start |
Labour weekend |
Start of daylight savings |
Summer season finish |
Daylight Savings end |
1 March |
31 March |
*Daylight savings OR 31 March |
1 March |
Daylight Savings finish |
31 March |
End of daylight savings |
Winter mornings |
Off leash |
* Before 10am |
* Before 10am |
Off leash |
Off leash |
On leash |
Off leash |
Off leash |
Winter core hours |
Off leash |
* 10am to 4pm |
* 10am to 4pm |
Off leash |
Off leash |
On leash |
Off leash |
Off leash |
Winter evenings |
Off leash |
* After 4pm |
* After 4pm |
Off leash |
Off leash |
On leash |
Off leash |
Off leash |
Key:
Prohibited |
On a leash |
Off a leash |
Reasons include: · to provide for public safety and comfort when beaches are at their busiest (i.e. summer core hours between 10am and 7pm) · to provide for the recreational needs of dog owners when the beaches are quiet (i.e. under control off a leash before 10am and after 7pm in summer and at any time in winter) · the proposal for winter core hours of 10am to 4pm (under control on a leash), and possible alternative hours of 11am to 1pm is too restrictive on dog owners, particularly given the tidal nature of Howick beaches and their use in winter · using daylight savings to define the summer season retains a current and known part of the rule · summer start time of 10am aligns with the regional wide summer season start time.
|
Submission Topic 4– Dog Friendly areas
Table 4
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff comments (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
4.1 Musick Point Esplanade Reserve (foreshore area) |
On leash |
Off leash |
· 7 support · 2 want more restrictive rules
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment.
|
Option 1: To identify the foreshore area of Musick Point Esplanade Reserve where dogs are allowed under control off leash. Reasons include: · to provide dog access in areas where there is no identified public safety risks or risks to wildlife that justify a more restrictive rule.
Option 2: To identify the foreshore area of Musick Point Esplanade Reserve as an area where dogs are allowed under control on leash. Reasons include: · to retain the status quo |
To identify the foreshore area of Musick Point Esplanade Reserve as a dog friendly area, where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide dog access on the foreshore where there is no identified public safety risks or risks to wildlife that justify a more restrictive rule. |
Note: for signage to be clear for the off leash area |
4.2 Musick Point Esplanade Reserve (area next to golf course) |
On leash |
On leash |
Option 1: To identify the Musick Point Esplanade reserve (top of cliff) as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · this area is adjacent to a privately owned golf course, were dogs off a leash may cause a nuisance to other users · much of the council owned portion of Musick Point Reserve is a road, where default under control on a leash rules apply. |
To identify the area of Musick Point Esplanade reserve at the top of the cliff as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the reserve at the top of the cliff is adjacent to a privately owned golf course, were dogs off a leash may cause a nuisance to other users · much of the council owned portion of Musick Point Reserve is a road, where default under control on a leash rules apply. |
|
|
4.3 Eastern Beach (area north of northernmost water pipe) |
Off leash |
Off leash |
· 3 want under control off a leash rule · 1 wants area protected for wildlife concerns
Refer to general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment.
|
Option 1: To identify the Eastern beach area (north of the northernmost water pipe), as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include: · to provide at all times under control off a leash access for dog owners, particularly when the beach is prohibited in summer · no identified wildlife concerns that justify a more restrictive rule. Option 2: To identify the Eastern Beach area north of the northernmost water pipe, as an area where dogs are allowed under control on leash. Reasons include: · to provide dog owners with opportunities for under control off a leash dog access during summer at low tide. |
To identify the Eastern beach area (north of the northernmost water pipe), as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide opportunities for under control off a leash dog access at any time on part of the beach · no identified wildlife concerns that justify a more restrictive rule.
|
|
4.4 Mellons Bay Beach (area west of water pipe) |
Off leash |
Off leash |
· 5 comment area is dangerous and slippery and not suitable as an under control off a leash area · 2 verbal submitters comment that area is too dangerous |
Option 1: To identify the Mellons Bay area west of water pipe, as an area where dogs are allowed under control off leash. Reasons include: · to provide dog owners with opportunities for under control off a leash dog access during summer at low tide. |
To identify the area of Mellons Bay Beach, west of water pipe, as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide opportunities for under control off a leash dog access at any time on part of the beach. |
|
4.5 Other 100 of 103 proposed dog friendly areas in Attachment A, Table 9 |
Off leash |
Off leash |
· 21 support proposed dog friendly areas adjacent to time and season beaches · 8 support proposed dog friendly areas in general · 2 think some areas are too close to the road and alternatives should be found · 1 wants more dog friendly areas · 1 wants more dog friendly areas in Flat Bush
Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To identify the other 100 areas in Table 9 of Attachment A of the 23 August Panel agenda as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash area. Reasons include: · to provide dog owners with an easy to understand list of under control off a leash parks. Option 2: To identify the other 100 areas in Table 9 of Attachment A of the 23 August Panel agenda as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash with the following amendments: (i) that the following additional areas be identified as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under off a leash: · [insert]. (ii) that the following proposed dog friendly areas be changed to standard areas where dogs are allowed under on a leash: · [insert]. Reasons include: · [insert]. |
To identify the other 100 areas in Table 9 of Attachment A of the 23 August Panel hearing agenda, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash area.
Reasons include: · to provide for under control off a leash opportunities for dogs and their owners in suitable areas · to make rules easier to understand by providing a clear list of dog friendly areas.
|
|
4.6 Default rule |
Off leash |
On leash |
20 support because : · they feel that dog owners are unable to control their dogs · off leash dogs can interfere with other users in certain areas · they do not want dogs coming up to them 12 oppose because: · the 103 off leash areas are not ideal for a dog to be off a leash · they cannot walk their dogs on quiet neighbourhood parks if the default rule is changed. Refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To establish an under control on a leash default rule. Reasons include: · consistency with region wide default rule · if in doubt, owners can assume parks and reserves are on a leash.
Option 2: To retain the under control off a leash default rule. Reasons include: · to maintain the status quo · so that any new parks and reserves will be off leash by default, rather than on a leash. |
To adopt a default under control on a leash rule on all parks, beach and foreshore areas not specifically identified as prohibited, under control off a leash or designated dog exercise areas.
Reasons include: · if in doubt, owners can assume parks and reserves are on a leash · consistency with region wide default under control on a leash rule. |
|
Submission Topic 6– Ambiguous dog access rules
Table 6
Matter to be considered |
Current rule |
Proposed change |
Summary of submissions |
Staff comments (including reasons and alternative options) |
Panel decision |
Additional notes |
|
6.1 On leash access in parks with farm paddocks |
On leash |
Remove |
· 3 support · refer general submission points in support and opposition to proposal at end of this Attachment. |
Option 1: To remove ambiguous rules and rely on the dog access rule that applies to the wider location. Reasons include: · simplified rules are easier to understand. |
To remove ambiguous rules, and rely on the dog access rule that applies to the wider location. Reasons include: · simplified rules are easier to understand. |
|
Submission Topic 7 – Other Matters
Matter to be considered |
Staff comments |
Panel comment |
Additional notes |
|
Dog owner education |
To note the concerns raised. |
Note the need for better signage at key parks, walkways, particularly where there has been a change in access rule. |
|
|
Improvement to the process |
Board notes other matters raised. Where appropriate, these matters have been considered in other parts of this deliberation worksheet. |
|
||
More dog parks |
|
|||
More rubbish bins |
|
|||
Better enforcement |
|
|||
Control of pests (i.e. cats, rats, stokes) |
|
|||
Complaints about council process and irresponsible dog owners |
|
|||
Highly sensitive areas should be closed to public |
|
General submission points in support and opposition to proposal are as follows: · 8 support proposal in its entirety · 30 oppose proposal in its entirety · 24 want more dog access · 4 want on no restrictions at all, if on a leash at all times. |
ATTACHMENT B: Hearing panel decision report on local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area 2016 with Attachment A (Amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on dogs 2012
File No.:
To report the decisions of the Howick Local Board Dog Access Hearing Panel on proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area.
1. The Howick Local Board adopted the proposed changes at its business meeting on 9 May 2016 (resolution HW/2016/233). The Howick Local Board Dog Access Hearing Panel (‘the Panel’) was appointed to hear, deliberate and make decisions on submissions received about proposed changes to local dog access rules in the Howick Local Board area (resolution HW/2016/233).
2. The panel considered 297 submissions and heard from 18 submitters on 23 August 2016.
3. The key decisions of the panel are:
· to adopt a time and season rule on beaches that continues to allow dogs under control off a leash at any time in winter
· to allow dogs under control off a leash on the foreshore around Musick Point
· to continue under control off a leash dog access on Wakaaranga Creek Reserve
· to continue under control on a leash dog access on the Rotary Walkway
· to allow dogs under control on a leash on park and walkways from Mangemangeroa Reserve to The Sandspit
· to identify over 125 under control off leash at any time areas
· to better protect wildlife in the foreshore (inter-tidal) area of the Tamaki Estuary, Wakaaranga Creek, Pakuranga Creek and Mangemangeroa Creek.
4. The panel’s decisions will be reported to the governing body on 29 September 2016, to make amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012 and the Auckland Council Dog Management Bylaw 2012.
5. In 2012, local boards were delegated responsibility to review dog access rules for local park, beach and foreshore areas (resolution GB/2012/157).
6. Reviewing dog access rules requires a special consultative procedure under the Local Government Act 2002. This process requires:
· the adoption of proposed changes to dog access rules (‘proposed changes’)
· public notification of the proposed changes for submissions
· public hearing, deliberation and decisions on the proposed changes.
7. At its business meeting on 14 December 2015, the Howick Local Board resolved to review its local dog access rules in 2016 (resolution HW/2015/181).
8. Following a pre-consultation period to gather information and initial community views, the Howick Local Board adopted proposed changes on the 9 May 2016 for public consultation (resolution HW/2016/233).
9. The Howick Local Board Dog Access Hearing Panel (‘the Panel’) was also appointed to hear, deliberate and decide on submissions to the proposed changes (resolution HW/2016/233).
10. The proposed changes to dog access rules include to:
· prohibit dogs on the foreshore (including intertidal mangrove) areas along the south western coastline of the local board area. This area extends from Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek and includes Pakuranga Creek
· allow dogs under control on a leash on the reserve and walkway areas along the south western coastline of the local board area. This area includes the Rotary walkway
· prohibit dogs on Mangemangeroa Reserve and Chisbury Terrace Reserve and associated foreshore
· amend and apply the time and season rule on Bucklands Beach (including Little Bucklands Beach), Cockle Bay, Eastern Beach, Howick Beach, and Mellons Bay Beach
· allow dogs under control off a leash to 103 dog friendly areas across the local board area, including to Musick Point Esplanade Reserve and quiet beach areas adjacent to Howick Beach, Bucklands Beach, Eastern Beach and Mellons Bay
· allow dogs under control on a leash on Tainui Reserve
· introduce a default under control on a leash rule
· remove the under control on a leash on any ‘farm paddock in a park occupied by stock’ and replace it with location-specific rules.
11. A full copy of the proposed changes is contained in the hearings agenda.
12. The proposed changes were publicly notified for submissions on 10 June 2016. The submission period closed six weeks later on 17 July 2016. The proposed changes were notified through:
· notices to all registered dog owners with their dog registration reminder letters
· a public notice in the New Zealand Herald on 10 June 2016
· a public notice in the July edition of Our Auckland
· a notice on the Auckland Council website
· a notice in the June People’s Panel e-update
· updates to local board registered stakeholders
· notices to previous submitters on the 2012 dog access review, residing in the Howick Local Board area
· a notice in social media channels (i.e. on Facebook and in Neighbourly)
· a notice in the Howick and Pakuranga Times, Botany and Ormiston Times and Eastern Courier
· Howick Local Board ‘e-bulletin’, which is distributed to the Howick stakeholder database
· flyers and posters in local board offices and libraries.
13. All relevant documents, including submission forms, were posted on the council’s website and made available through local libraries and service centres.
14. The process to consider and decide on proposed changes to local dog access rules is:
· to receive all submissions, including any late submissions
· to conduct public hearings and hear from any submitter who wishes to speak in support of their submission
· to publicly deliberate on the matters raised in written and oral submissions
· to decide on changes to local dog access rules (including a start date) by adopting a decision report containing amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012
· to request that the governing body amend the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012 and Dog Management Bylaw 2012 at its 29 September meeting.
15. The Panel needs to consider the following statutory and policy requirements in its hearing, deliberation and decision:
· public safety and comfort, the protection of wildlife, and the recreational needs of dogs and their owners
· the region-wide standard for summer beach time and season (if a time and season rule is proposed)
· making dog access rules that are easy to understand (i.e. practical, enforceable and clear)
· the views and evidence raised by submitters
· information used to develop the proposed changes (refer to hearings agenda).
16. The above statutory and policy requirements are contained in the hearings agenda.
17. A total of 26 submitters indicated that they wished to be heard. The panel heard from 18 submitters on 23 August 2016 and held deliberations on all submissions on 25 August 2016.
The decisions of the Panel are grouped into the topics aligned with the proposed changes. The changes to local dog access rules to give effect to the decisions are provided in Attachment A, together with the current rules for comparison and completeness.
19. A total of 297 submissions were received with 1261 submission points. Table 1 below summarises the submitter groups.
Table 1: Submitter groups to Howick local dog access review
Submitter group |
Number of submissions |
Percentage of submissions |
Dog owners |
234 |
79% |
Non dog owners |
63 |
21% |
Local residents |
252 |
85% |
Non-local |
45 |
15% |
Local dog owners |
203 |
68% |
Local non dog owners |
49 |
16% |
20. The submission points are summarised by topic areas aligned with proposed changes. Issues outside the scope of the statement of proposal are summarised in Submission Topic 7. For each topic, staff comments and other relevant information is provided where appropriate.
21. A full copy of the submissions is attached in the hearings agenda.
22. The Panel can consider the following general submission points about the proposal under any of the subsequent submission topics.
23. A total of 66 submission points addressed the overall proposal. Of these:
· eight support the proposal in its entirety
· 30 oppose the proposal in its entirety and 24 others want more dog access. Reasons include the need for areas where dogs can exercise freely off a leash for the well-being of their dogs
· four local dog owners want no restrictions at all, if on a leash at all times.
Highly sensitive areas are places where the presence of a dog can have a negative effect on its environment, examples of this include ecologically sensitive habitats where vulnerable species of birds roost, feed or breed.
To protect wildlife, the proposal is:
· to prohibit dogs on the foreshore (including intertidal mangrove) areas along the south western coastline of the local board area. This area extends from Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek and includes Pakuranga Creek (refer Table 7 of Attachment A of the hearing agenda)
· to prohibit dogs on Mangemangeroa Reserve and Chisbury Terrace Reserve and associated foreshore areas.
Currently:
· the Department of Conservation administer and prohibit dogs from the Crown foreshore along parts of the south western coastline of the local board area (Wakaaranga Creek and foreshore adjacent to Curacao Place Esplanade Reserve and Bramley Drive Reserve)
· dogs are allowed under control off a leash on all other foreshore areas along the south western coastline of the local board area
· dogs are prohibited on the foreshore areas of Mangemangeroa Reserve but on the reserve they are allowed under control on a leash on all bush walks and stock paddocks
· dogs are allowed under control off a leash on Chisbury Terrace Reserve and associated foreshore areas.
A total of 121 submission points were received on this topic. Of these:
· 46 commented on south western coastline of the local board area
· 71 commented on Mangemangeroa Reserve and Chisbury Terrace Reserve
· two dog owners wanted Tiraumea Park to allow dogs under control off a leash.
South western coastline of the local board area
Of the 46 submission points that commented on the coastline:
· 19 (10 local non-dog owners and nine local dog owners) support the proposal. Reasons include:
o prohibit dogs for the protection of bird species, it is inappropriate for dogs to be in these ecologically sensitive areas
o some dog owners are unable to control their dogs from accessing these areas.
· 18 submission points (16 dog owners and two non-dog owners) want an under control on a leash rule for the coastline area. Reasons include:
o dogs on a lead are unlikely to be a danger to the wildlife in the area
o a prohibition of dogs to this coastline area is too restrictive and on a leash is more appropriate.
· Nine (eight local dog owners and one local non-dog owner) oppose the proposal. Reasons include:
o insufficient evidence that dogs are a threat to wildlife
o owners are able to keep their dogs under control
o proposal is too restrictive and unfair to dog owners as large areas are prohibited.
Mangemangeroa Reserve and Chisbury Terrace
Of the 71 submission points to Mangemangeroa and Chisbury Terrace reserves:
· 12 (including five local dog owners and five local non-dog owners) support the proposal. Reasons include:
o agree with the protection of wildlife
o dogs interfere with other users, including the cattle
o often dogs are off a leash in these areas and do not comply with the on a leash rule.
· 36 (all local dog owners) want dogs allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include:
o the proposal is too restrictive to dog owners, as many dog owners use the area with their dogs
o dogs on a leash are not a risk to wild life
o the foreshore walkway from Shelley Beach to Mangemangeroa Reserve is well used, including by dog walkers.
· 21 (including 17 local dog owners and three local non-dog owners), oppose the proposal. Reasons include:
o the proposal is too restrictive to dog owners, as many dog owners use the area with their dogs
o insufficient evidence that dogs disturb wildlife
o the area is part of a thoroughfare from the foreshore and coastline.
· two want better enforcement in Mangemangeroa Reserve instead of a ban because they consider that most dog owners are not adhering to the current rules.
The decisions of the panel is as follows:
Matter considered |
Decision and reasons |
Wakaaranga Creek foreshore to foreshore of Bramley Drive Esplanade Reserve |
To identify the foreshore, intertidal and saltmarsh areas from Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek, including Pakuranga Creek as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Reasons include: · to protect birdlife in the ecologically sensitive salt marsh and intertidal bird habitats along the coastline· to align with the Department of Conservation prohibition of dogs on foreshore on southern side of Wakaaranga Creek. |
Foreshore from Bramley Drive Esplanade Reserve to Pakuranga Road (adjacent to the bridge) |
|
Foreshore from Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge) to Pandora Place (including Millen Avenue Esplanade) |
|
Foreshore of Tiraumea Drive Reserve |
|
Foreshore of Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Place Esplanade Reserve |
|
Foreshore of Pakuranga Creek (i.e. foreshore areas of Riverhills Park; Stonedon Esplanade Reserve; Trugood Esplanade Reserve; Riverhills Park; Pakuranga Country Club Esplanade Reserve) |
|
Foreshore of Frank Nobilo Esplanade Reserve to Burswood Esplanade Reserve |
|
Mangemangeroa Reserve foreshore |
To identify the foreshore and intertidal areas adjacent to Mangemangeroa Reserve, Chisbury Terrace Reserve, Pohutukawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve, and The Sandspit as highly sensitive areas where dogs are prohibited.
Note: this excludes the boardwalk, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the Mangemangeroa Creek foreshore area to The Sandspit is a significant ecological area and a significant wetland habitat for birdlife · the presence of dogs on the foreshore is a risk to birdlife in these habitats. |
Chisbury Terrace Reserve foreshore, including the foreshore of Pohutakawa Esplanade and The Sandspit
(i.e. foreshore areas of Mangemangeroa Creek) |
30. A high use area is a place that attracts a lot of people at certain times of the day or year. When there are a lot of people, dogs can affect public safety and comfort and it is appropriate that dogs be prohibited or under control on a leash. At low use times, it may be appropriate that dogs be allowed under control on or off a leash access to meet the recreational needs of dogs and their owners.
31. The proposal identifies six beaches in the Howick Local Board as high use areas, subject to the proposed time and season rule. The six beaches are:
· Cockle Bay Beach
· Howick Beach (from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Road)
· Mellons Bay Beach (southeast of water pipe)
· Bucklands Beach (south of boat ramp opposite Devon Road)
· Eastern Beach (south of northernmost water pipe)
· Little Bucklands Beach.
32. These six beaches are currently subject to the current time and season rule. Table 3 below summarises the current and proposed time and season rule.
Table 3 Current and proposed time and season rules for high use areas
|
Current rule |
Proposed rule |
Summer Morning |
Before 9am |
Before 10am |
Summer Core hours |
9am to 7pm |
10am to 7pm |
Summer evening |
After 7pm |
After 7pm |
Summer Season start and end |
Daylight savings |
Labour weekend to |
Winter mornings |
All times |
Before 10am |
Winter core hours |
All times |
10am to 4pm |
Winter evenings |
All times |
After 4pm |
Key:
Prohibited |
On a leash |
Off a leash |
Submissions on time and season rule
33. A total of 1211 submission points commented on the time and season options. Of these:
· 1063 submission points (88 per cent) were received from locals
· 118 submission points (ten per cent) were received from non-locals
· 986 submission points (81 per cent) from dog owners
· 195 submissions points (16 per cent) from non-dog owners.
34. Eight submission points, all from dog owners, oppose any time and season rule. Reasons include:
· work hours and shift work make walking the dog at restricted hours too difficult
· registration fees for dogs are too high to warrant restriction
· dangerous dogs and irresponsible owners should be specifically targeted, rather than enacting a time and season rule.
35. Table 4 below summarises the preferred time and season option based on number of submissions points For a summary of all time and season rules submission points, refer to Attachment D of the hearing agenda.
Table 4 Preferred time and season rule by total number of submission points
|
Preferred rule |
Total Subs |
Dog owners |
Non-dog owners |
Locals |
Non-Locals |
Summer morning |
Before 10am |
100 |
91 |
9 |
92 |
8 |
Summer core hours |
10am to 7pm |
9 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
Summer evening |
After 7pm |
79* |
71 |
7 |
73 |
5 |
Season start and end |
Daylight savings |
30 |
28 |
2 |
30 |
0 |
Season start and end |
Labour weekend to 31March |
33 |
30 |
3 |
29 |
4 |
Winter mornings |
Off a leash at all times |
96** |
87 |
7 |
89 |
5 |
Winter core hours |
Off a leash at all times |
105 |
97 |
6 |
99 |
4 |
Winter evenings |
Off a leash at all times |
97 |
88 |
7 |
90 |
5 |
Totals |
|
549 |
499 (91%) |
43 (8%) |
510 (93%) |
32 (6%) |
Note: * one submitter did not state if local or owns a dog
** two submitters did not state if local or owns a dog
36. Submitters on the above time and season rules also commented that:
· weekday and weekend access should be different to reflect use
· inclement weather in winter suggests that the beaches are not well used, therefore there shouldn’t be time and season rules
· the tidal nature of some of Howick’s beaches make the time and season rule difficult to comply with.
Submissions on high use areas
37. A total of 12 submission points commented on the six proposed high use beaches to be subject to the proposed time and season rule. Of these:
· eight (all from local dog owners) oppose the identification of Mellons Bay Beach. Two of those want dogs allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include:
o very few non-dog owners use Mellons Bay beach
o do not support the change in dog access rules in this area
o the off leash area at the north west of the water pipe of Mellons Bay beach is too slippery and dangerous for use.
· two dog owners want dogs allowed under control off a leash on Eastern Beach in winter
· in Cockle Bay, one dog owner wants the right hand corner of Cockle Bay (towards Shelley Beach) to be a dog friendly area. Another dog owner wanted less restrictive rules.
38. The decisions of the panel is as follows:
Matter considered |
Decision and reasons |
Time and season rule |
See Table 4A
Reasons include: · to provide for public safety and comfort when beaches are at their busiest (i.e. summer core hours between 10am and 7pm) · to provide for the recreational needs of dog owners when the beaches are quiet (i.e. under control off a leash before 10am and after 7pm in summer and at any time in winter) · the proposal for winter core hours of 10am to 4pm (under control on a leash), and possible alternative hours of 11am to 1pm is too restrictive on dog owners, particularly given the tidal nature of Howick beaches and their use in winter · using daylight savings to define the summer season retains a current and known part of the rule · summer start time of 10am aligns with the regional wide summer season start time. |
Cockle Bay Beach |
To identify the beach as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).To identify both Cockle Bay Reserve (south) and Cockle Bay Reserve (north – a reserve with a playground and also known as Tainui Reserve), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · adjoining reserves of Cockle Bay north (Tainui Reserve) and Cockle Bay south have different use types compared to the beach that warrant an under control on a leash rule · Cockle Bay Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day, that warrant a time and season rule. |
Howick Beach (from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Road) |
To identify Howick Beach ((from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Rd)) as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).To identify the area adjacent to Howick Beach (including Howick Beach Reserve), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the adjoining reserve to Howick Beach (i.e. Howick Beach Reserve) include a car park which is a key access point to the beach that warrant an under control on a leash rule · Howick Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day, that warrant a time and season rule · the beach and foreshore area west of the boat ramp is a dog friendly area, where dogs are allowed under control off a leash at any time. |
Mellons Bay Beach (southeast of water pipe) |
To identify the Mellons Bay Beach (from southeast of water pipe) as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).
To identify the grass areas at the end of Mellons Bay Road (i.e. 181R Mellons Bay Road), as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the adjoining reserve at Mellons Bay Beach is adjacent to the car park and is an access point that warrants an under control on a leash rule · Mellons Bay Beach is busy at certain times of the year and the day, that warrants a time and season rule · the area west of the water pipe is a dog friendly area, where dogs are allowed under control off a leash at any time. |
Eastern Beach (south of northernmost water pipe) |
To identify Eastern Beach (south of northernmost water pipe), including grass strip between the beach and the road, as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).To identify the Eastern Beach Caravan Park, adjacent to Macleans Park, as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the grass strip that adjoins the beach, and is adjacent to the road, is part of the total beach environment · the use of the beach (including the grass strip) changes in seasons and at different times of the day, and warrants a time and season rule · dog friendly access at the northern end of the beach allows for under control off a leash dog access around Musick Point at any time of the year. |
Bucklands Beach (south of boat ramp at Devon Rd) |
To identify Bucklands Beach (south of boat ramp at Devon Rd), including grass strip between the beach and the road, as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).
Reasons include: · the grass strip that adjoins the beach, and is adjacent to the road, is part of the total beach environment · the use of the beach (including the grass strip) changes in seasons and at different times of the day, that warrants a time and season rule · there is a dog friendly area north of this point. |
Little Bucklands Beach |
To identify Little Buckland’s Beach, including grass strip between the beach and the road, as a high use area, subject to time and season rule (Table 4A).To identify the Warren Boardwalk on southern end of Little Bucklands Beach as a standard area, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · the grass strip that adjoins the beach, and is adjacent to the road, is part of the total beach environment · the use of the beach (including the grass strip) changes in seasons and at different times of the day, that warrants a time and season rule · the Warren Boardwalk starts at the southern end of Little Bucklands Beach. An under control on a leash rule ensures reasonable access to and along the walkway, including in summer when dogs are prohibited on the remainder of the beach. |
Table 4A: Panel decision on time and season rule
Time and season |
Panel Decision |
Summer mornings |
Before 10am Dogs area allowed under control off a leash |
Summer core hours |
10am to 7pm Dogs are prohibited |
Summer evenings |
After 7pm Dogs are allowed under control off a leash |
Summer season start |
Daylight savings |
Summer season finish |
Outside of Daylight savings |
Winter mornings |
Dogs are allowed under control off a leash |
Winter core hours |
Dogs are allowed under control off a leash |
Winter evenings |
Dogs are allowed under control off a leash |
Key:
Prohibited |
On a leash |
Off a leash |
39. A dog friendly area is a place that is suitable for dogs to run and play off a leash. These places may have lower levels of public use by non-dog owners, or be of a size that allows for shared use without significant impact on other users of the place.
40. The proposal identifies 103 dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash. This includes Musick Point Esplanade Reserve and quiet beach areas adjacent to Howick Beach, Bucklands Beach, Eastern Beach and Mellons Bay.
41. Currently dogs are allowed under control off a leash on 102 of the above 103 areas. The exception is Musick Point Esplanade Reserve where dogs are currently allowed under control on a leash.
42. A total of 52 general submission points were received on this topic. Of these:
· eight support the proposal. Of these:
o two think some of the 103 parks are not suitable for dogs off a leash. Reasons include areas being too close to the road and alternatives should be found.
· 33 comment on the dog friendly areas next to time and season beaches. Of these:
o 21 support the proposal. This includes Howick Beach (n=7), Bucklands Beach (n=4), Eastern Beach (n=1). Reasons include it provides the flexibility to take dogs to these areas when not allowed on time and season beaches. Some commented that these beaches are tidal and not always accessible
o three support and one opposes the proposed area to the north of Eastern Beach. The submitter in opposition wants to protect reef and shell fish beds in this area and instead wants the dog friendly area to be south of Eastern Beach
o three support and five oppose the proposed area adjacent to Mellons Bay. Reasons for opposition include the area is too slippery and unsafe for dog walkers. Those submitters instead want dog access to Mellons Bay.
· nine comment on Musick Point Esplanade Reserve. Seven in support with some already using it as an off a leash area, one opposes, and another wants a more restrictive rule
· one did not support the proposal for dog friendly areas, commenting that there should be more dog friendly areas, not less
· one submitter asked for more dog friendly areas in the Flat Bush area.
43. The decisions of the panel is as follows:
Matter considered |
Decision and reasons |
Musick Point Esplanade Reserve |
To identify the foreshore area of Musick Point Esplanade Reserve as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include: · to provide dog access on the foreshore where there is no identified public safety risks or risks to wildlife that justify a more restrictive rule
To identify the area of Musick Point Esplanade reserve at the top of the cliff as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash. Reasons include: · the reserve at the top of the cliff is adjacent to a privately owned golf course, were dogs off a leash may cause a nuisance to other users · much of the council owned portion of Musick Point Reserve is a road, where default under control on a leash rules apply. |
Eastern Beach (area north of northernmost water pipe) |
To identify the area of Eastern Beach north of the northernmost water pipe as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide opportunities for under control off a leash dog access at any time on part of the beach, particularly at low tide and when the remainder of the beach is prohibited in summer · no identified wildlife concerns that justify a more restrictive rule. |
Mellons Bay (area west of water pipe) |
To identify the area of Mellons Bay Beach, west of water pipe, as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide opportunities for under control off a leash dog access at any time on part of the beach, particularly at low tide and when the remainder of the beach is prohibited in summer. |
Other 100 of 103 proposed dog friendly areas in Table 9 of Attachment A to the 23 August Panel agenda. |
To identify the other 100 areas in Table 9 of Attachment A of the 23 August Panel hearing agenda, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to provide for under control off a leash opportunities for dogs and their owners in suitable areas · to make rules easier to understand by providing a clear list of dog friendly areas. |
44. A standard area is a place that does not fall into any of the other three categories. These places may include:
· high use areas where the proposed time and season rule would be less appropriate in terms of balancing the need to ensure public safety and comfort and the needs of dogs and their owners
· areas that allow for dogs to be included within family activities without interfering with other users
· places that are not suitable for dogs to run and play off a leash.
45. The proposal identifies the following standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash (full list in Table 10 of Attachment A of the hearing agenda):
· the reserves and walkways adjacent to the south western coastline of the local board area. Currently, the area from Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek (Rotary walkway) is an under control on a leash area. Areas from Millen Avenue Esplanade to Pakuranga Creek (the Pakuranga Country Club Esplanade) are currently an under control off a leash area
· Murphy’s Bush and Point View Reserve. Currently dogs are allowed under control on a leash on bush walks and under control off a leash elsewhere on both reserves.
· Tainui Reserve (adjacent to Cockle Bay). Currently this area has a time and season dog access rule (Table 3)
· all other local park, beach and foreshore areas not specifically identified as a prohibited, time and season or under control off a leash area. This is known as a default dog access rule. Currently, the default dog access rule is under control off a leash.
46. A total 81 submission points were received about this topic. Of these:
· 24 are about Rotary walkway. Of these:
o 11 support the proposal because the walkway is busy and dogs interfere with other users. Some of these submitters want under control on a leash access for the walkway because they incorrectly assumed the proposal prohibited dogs
o 11 oppose the proposal, four of whom want dogs allowed under control off a leash. Reasons include that cyclists are a bigger nuisance and to enhance the experience for dog walkers
o two comment that signage outlining dog access rules need to be clearer and that dangerous dogs along the walkway should be muzzled.
· 16 want dogs allowed under control on a leash on esplanades, walkways, and parks along the south western coastline
· one non-dog owner opposes the proposal on Bramley Drive Reserve
· one dog owner supports the proposal on Fisher Parade Esplanade Reserve
· two dogs owners comment on bushwalks (such as those on Murphy’s Bush and Point View Reserve), one supports the proposal, the other wants less restrictive rules
· two dogs owners comment on Point View Reserve, one supports the proposal, the other wants under control off a leash dog access
· two dogs owners comment on Tainui Reserve, one supports the proposal, the other wants under control off a leash dog access
· one wants to retain the current under control off a leash rule on Tiramea Park because it is a good dog exercise area
· 32 are about the change to the default dog access rule. Of these:
o 20 (seven dog owners, 13 non-dog owners, four non-locals) support the proposal. Reasons include dogs interfere with other users, some dog owners are unable to control dogs off a leash, don’t want dogs coming up to them, and the irresponsible attitude of dog owners
o 12 oppose the proposal. Of these five want under control off a leash, six oppose the proposal, and one wants dogs prohibited from all public places except in specific dog areas
o reasons for opposition include that proposed dog friendly areas are not ideal for an off leash dog and restrict the ability to walk dogs at neighbourhood parks after work hours.
47. The decisions of the panel is as follows:
Matter considered |
Decision and reasons |
Wakaaranga Creek Reserve |
To continue to identify Wakaaranga Creek Reserve as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide for the under control off a leash recreational needs of dog owners, before accessing the Rotary Walkway. |
Rotary Walkway Esplanade reserves and parks from Galloway Crescent access way to Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge)This includes: Fisher Parade Esplanade reserve; Rotary Reserve (Bus Stop) Reserve; Tamaki Bay Esplanade Reserve; Williams Avenue Esplanade Reserve; Dayspring Way Esplanade Reserve) |
To continue to identify the Rotary Walkway (parks and esplanade reserves from the Galloway Crescent access way to Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge) as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · protection of shore birds that roost along the shoreline · public safety and comfort of other users on a popular walkway. |
Esplanade and parks from Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge) to Pandora Place Esplanade (including Millen Avenue Esplanade) |
To continue to identify the parks and esplanade reserves from Pakuranga Road (adjacent to bridge), along Highbrook Creek to Pakuranga Creek, as dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash.
Reasons include: · to enable under control off a leash access in areas where no wildlife or public safety and comfort concerns are raised that warrant a more restrictive rule. |
Tiraumea Drive Reserve |
|
Esplanade and reserves of Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve to Fremantle Place (including Edgewater Drive Esplanade and Riverina Esplande) |
|
Esplanades and reserves from Fremantle Place to Ennis Avenue Esplanade Reserve and Elm Park (includes reserves on either side of the Pakuranga Creek (i.e. Trugood Esplanade, Stonedon Esplanade; Riverhills Park) |
|
Frank Nobillo Esplanade Reserve to Burswood Esplanade (Reserves) and Pakuranga Country Club Esplanade |
|
Mangemangeroa Reserve (including bush walks) |
To identify the Mangemangeroa Reserve, Chisbury Terrace Reserve (including boardwalks), Pohutukawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve to The Sandspit as standard areas, where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · prohibition of dogs in these areas is too restrictive · to provide dog access (albeit on a leash) · under control on a leash rule provides an adequate level of wildlife protection (in the reserves and boardwalks) in this area. |
Chisbury Terrace Reserve, Pohutakawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve to The Sandspit |
|
Tainui Reserve (adjacent to Cockle Bay) (12R Shelly Bay Road, playground) |
To identify the Tainui Reserve (Cockle Bay Reserve north) as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · Tainui Reserve contains a playground that is well used at most times of the day · as a thoroughfare, dogs should be able to access the area under control on a leash. |
Murphy’s Bush |
To retain and clarify the current rules that: · identify the open grass area north of the car park in Murphy’s Bush as a dog friendly area where dogs are allowed under control off a leash · identify all other areas (including all bush areas and bushwalks) in Murphy’s Bush as a standard area where dogs are allowed under control on leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide under control off a leash opportunities in Murphy’s Bush while providing for public comfort and protection of wildlife in bush areas · to make the rule easier to understand. |
Point View Reserve |
To retain and clarify the current rules that: · identify the open grass areas of Point View Reserve as a dog friendly areas where dogs are allowed under control off a leash · identify all other areas (including all bush areas and bushwalks) in Point View Reserve as standard areas where dogs are allowed under control on a leash.
Reasons include: · to continue to provide under control off a leash opportunities in Point View Reserve while providing for public comfort and protection of wildlife in bush areas. |
Default rule |
To adopt a default under control on a leash rule on all parks, beach and foreshore areas not specifically identified as prohibited, under control off a leash or designated dog exercise areas.
Reasons include: · if in doubt, owners can assume parks and reserves are on a leash. · consistency with region wide default under control on a leash rule. |
48. The proposal is to remove the current rule about dogs on park farm paddocks and rely on whichever dog access rule applies to the location, such as highly sensitive or standard area.
49. Currently dogs are required to be under control on a leash in any park farm paddock occupied by stock. Mangemangeroa Reserve is the only park with stock in the Howick Local Board area. Submissions on Mangemangeroa Reserve are summarised in Submission topic 1 – Highly sensitive areas.
50. Three submission points in support were received. Reasons include because it makes rules clearer and easier to understand.
51. The decisions of the panel is as follows:
Matter considered |
Decision and reasons |
On leash access in parks with farm paddocks |
To remove ambiguous rules and rely on the dog access rule that applies to the wider location. Reasons include: · simplified rules are easier to understand. |
52. A total of 89 submission points were received in relation to matters that are outside the scope of the proposed changes. The Panel cannot make decisions on these matters but can make recommendations to the relevant authority. Table 8 below summarises the submission points made under this topic.
Table 8 Submission points on other matters
Matter raised |
Total submission points |
Dog owner education |
7 |
Improvement to the process |
16 |
More dog parks |
6 |
More rubbish bins |
5 |
More/better enforcement |
11 |
More/better signage |
8 |
Other suggestions: · the need to control pests such as cats, rats and possums · complaints about council process · complaints about irresponsible dog owners · that highly sensitive areas should be closed to the public |
36 |
53. The hearing panel makes the following comments regarding these matters:
Matter considered |
Comments |
Other matters |
To note the concerns raised, in particular: · the need for better or upgraded signage at key parks and walkways where there has been a change in dog access rules · fencing of areas to better protect wildlife and allow more under control off a leash dog access. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇨ |
Amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012 |
|
23 and 25 August 2016 |
|
Attachment A - Amendments to the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2012
(i)
The changes to the dog access rules
are shown in the right hand column, additions underlined and deletions
in strikethrough.
(ii) The changes to the dog access rules commence on 1 July 2017.
(iii) Region-wide rules are listed after the table below for information purposes. Region-wide rules also apply within the Howick Local Board area. Region-wide rules prevail over any local board rule.
Howick Local Board Area Dog Access Rules
Current local dog access rule |
Amended local dog access rule |
||||||||||||||||||
(1) Dogs are allowed under control off a leash on all parks, beaches or foreshores not specifically identified as a prohibited or under control on a leash area. |
(1) Dogs are
allowed under control off a leash in
the following areas (sports surface and
playground restrictions may apply, see note ** and ***) - |
||||||||||||||||||
(a) Aberfeldy Park (b) Annalong Park (c) Armoy Park (d) Aspatria Place reserve (e) Aviemore Drive drainage reserve (f) Baverstock Park (g) Bell Reserve (h) Blanche Park (i) Bleakhouse Road Promontory Reserve (j) Bob Charles Park (k) Booralee Park (l) Bradbury Park (m) Browns Park (n) Bucklands Beach Domain (o) Bucklands Beach from Devon Road, around the foreshore of Musick Point Esplanade Reserve to northern water pipe on Eastern Beach (p) Burswood Park (q) Burswood Esplanade Reserve (r) Cairngorm Park (s) Caithness Park (t) Cascades walkways (u) Charles Dickens Park (v) Clavoy Park (w) Clydesdale Park (x) Coachman Park (y) Cockle Bay Domain (z) Cornelian Park (Sunderlands Rd) (aa) Corta Bella Place Reserve (ab) Crawford Reserve (ac) Curacao Place Esplanade Reserve (ad) Dairyland Park (ae) Dalwhinnie Park (af) Darren Park (ag) Earnslaw Park (ah) Eastern Beach (north of northernmost water pipe, near Cloverley walkway) (ai) Edendale Park (aj) Edgewater Drive Esplanade Reserve (ak) Elm Park (al) Ennis Avenue Reserve (am) Fortunes Park (Raddock Place Reserve) (an) Fortyfoot Park (ao) Fratley Park (ap) Frank Nobilo Esplanade reserve, including Pebble Beach Place Reserve) (aq) Fremantle Place Esplanade Reserve (ar) Galloway Park (as) Geranium Park (at) Gillard Reserve (au) Glenhouse Reserve (av) Glenlea Park (aw) Glennandrew Park (ax) Glenoaks Reserve (ay) Golfland Park (az) Gossamer Park (ba) Grace Campbell Reserve (bb) Gracechurch Reserve (bc) Guys Reserve (bd) Hawthorndeen Park (be) Haven Park (bf) Hayes Park (bg) Highland Park (bh) Hiltop Park (bi) Himalaya Park (bj) Hope Farm Avenue Esplanade Reserve (bk) Howick Beach (west of boat ramp) (bl) Huntington Park (bm) Jerpoint Park |
(bn) John Gill Park (bo) Kaniere Park (bp) Kellaway Drive Reserve (bq) Kilimanjaro Park (br) Kilkenny Park (bs) Lexington Park (bt) Lloyd Elsmore Park (not sports fields) (bu) Logan Carr Reserve (bv) Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve (bw) Macleans Reserve (bx) Marrendallas Park (by) Marine Parade Esplanade Reserve (ca) McLeay Reserve (cb) Medvale Park (Richmond Reserve) (cc) Mellons Bay (west of water pipe) (cd) Millen Avenue Reserve (ce) Mission Heights Reserve (cf) Mulroy Park (cg) Murphy’s Bush in the open grass area to the north of the car park (ch) Murvale Reserve (ci) Musick Point Esplanade Reserve (foreshore area only) (cj) Neil Morrison Park (ck) Nimrod Park (cl) Orangewood Park (cm) Pandora Park (cn) Pandora Place Esplanade Reserve (co) Paul Place Reserve (cp) Pakuranga Golf Club Esplanade (cq) Pixie Place Reserve (cr) Point View Reserve in open grass areas (cs) Raewyn Place Esplanade Reserve (ct) Redcastle Park (cu) Reelick Park (cv) Reeves Park (cw) Rialto Park (cx) Richard Park (cy) Riverhills Park (cz) Riverina Place Esplanade Reserve (da) Salford Park (db) Seymour Road Esplanade Reserve (dc) Sheffield Place Reserve (dd) Sommerville Park (de) Spencer Park (df) Springs Road Reserve (dg) Spalding Rise Reserve (dh) Stevenson Reserve (di) Stonedon Drive Esplanade Reserve (dj) Tarnica Park (dk) The Boulevard Park (dl) Ti Rakau Park (not sports fields) (dm) Ti Rakau Corner Reserve (dn) Tiaka Place Reserve (do) Tiger Park (dp) Tiraumea Park (dq) Tiraumea Drive Reserve (dr) Tuscany Heights Reserve (ds) Trugood Esplanade Reserve (dt) Wakaaranga Creek Reserve (du) Waikitiroa Reserve (dv) Wayne Francis Park (dw) West Fairway Park (dx) Whaka Maumahara Park (dy) Whiteacres Park (dz) Whitford Park |
||||||||||||||||||
(2) Dogs are allowed under control off a leash on the following beaches and adjoining parks before 9.00am and after 7.00pm during daylight saving, and are allowed under control off a leash at all times outside of daylight saving. Dogs are prohibited from 9.00am to 7.00pm during daylight saving (a) Cockle Bay Beach. (b) Howick Beach from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Road (c) Mellons Bay Beach southeast of water pipe. (d) Bucklands Beach south of boat ramp opposite Devon Road. (e) Eastern Beach south of northernmost water pipe including picnic area adjoining Macleans Reserve. (f) Little Bucklands Beach. |
2) Dogs are allowed as follows on
the following beach and foreshore areas, at the following times:
(a) Cockle Bay Beach (b) Howick Beach from westernmost boat ramp to Rangitoto View Road (c) Mellons Bay Beach east of water pipe (d) Bucklands Beach (including grass between the beach and The Parade) south of boat ramp opposite Devon Road (e)
Eastern Beach south of northernmost water pipe
(including grass between the beach and The
Esplanade) to (but does not include) Eastern
Beach Caravan Park (f) Little Bucklands Beach (including grass strip between the beach and The Parade) to Warren Boardwalk
|
||||||||||||||||||
(3) Dogs are allowed under control on a leash in the following areas- (a) Any farm paddocks in a park occupied by stock. (b) Musick Point Esplanade Reserve (c) Rotary walkway to Galloway Crescent accessway (d) All bush walks in Mangemangeroa Reserve, Murphy’s Bush and Point View Reserve |
(3) Dogs are allowed under control on a leash on all park, beach and foreshore areas unless specifically identified otherwise (i.e. prohibited, under control off a leash or designated dog exercise areas) Note: sports surface and playground restrictions may apply, see note ** and ***. Dogs are allowed under control on a leash in the following areas-
(a) Musick Point Esplanade Reserve (the top of the cliff, excludes the foreshore area) (b) Eastern Beach Caravan Park (c) Mellons Bay Beach Reserve (Mellons Bay Road) (d) Howick Beach Reserve (Granger Road) (e) Tainui Reserve (also known as Cockle Bay Reserve - north end of beach) (f) Cockle Bay Reserve (south end of Cockle Bay Beach) (g)
Rotary Walkway |
||||||||||||||||||
(i) Bramley Drive Reserve (ii) Fisher Parade Esplanade Reserve (iii) Rotary Reserve (Bus Stop Reserve) |
(iv) Tamaki Bay Drive Reserve (v) Williams Avenue Esplanade Reserve (vi) Kerswell Corner Reserve (vii) Dayspring Way Esplanade Reserve |
||||||||||||||||||
(h) Murphy’s Bush (excluding the open grass area north of the car park) (i) Point View Reserve (excluding the open grass areas) (j) Mangemangeroa Reserve (including bushwalks), Chisbury Terrace Reserve (including walkways and boardwalks), Pohutakawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve up to and including The Sandspit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
4) Dogs are prohibited on Mangemangeroa Reserve foreshore and Crown foreshore of Wakaaranga Creek Tamaki River (DOC Map 6.65). |
(4) Dogs are prohibited (a) foreshore adjacent to Mangemangeroa Reserve, Chisbury Terrace Reserve, Pohutukawa Avenue Esplanade Reserve and The Sandspit (i.e. Mangemangeroa Creek) (b) Crown foreshore of Wakaaranga Creek Tamaki River2 (DOC Map 6.65) (c) All foreshore (intertidal, mangrove and saltmarsh) areas from Wakaaranga Creek to Highbrook Creek, including the Pakuranga Creek. This includes the foreshore areas of the following reserves: |
||||||||||||||||||
(iv) Foreshore of Curacao Place Esplande Reserve (v) Foreshore of Bramley Drive Reserve (vi) Foreshore of Fisher Parade Esplanade Reserve (vii) Foreshore of Rotary Reserve (viii) Foreshore of Tamaki Bay Drive Reserve (ix) Foreshore of Williams Avenue Esplanade Reserve (x) Foreshore of Dayspring Way Esplanade Reserve (xi) Foreshore of Millen Avenue Esplanade Reserve (xii) Foreshore of Pandora Place Esplanade Reserve (xiii) Foreshore of Tiraumea Park (xiv)Foreshore of Mattson Road Esplanade Reserve
|
(xv) Foreshore of Edgewater Drive Esplanade Reserve (xvi) Foreshore of Riverina Place Esplanade Reserve (xvii) Foreshore of Raewyn Place Esplanade Reserve (xviii) Foreshore of Fremantle Place Esplanade Reserve (xix) Foreshore of Stonedon Esplanade Reserve (xx) Foreshore of Riverhills Park (xxi) Foreshore of Trugood Esplanade Reserve (xxii) Foreshore of Ennis Avenue Reserve (xxiii) Foreshore of Burswood Esplanade Reserve (xxiv)Foreshore of Hope Farm Esplanade Reserve (xxv) Foreshore of Frank Nobilo Esplanade Reserve (xxvi)Foreshore of Pakuranga Golf Club Esplanade Reserve |
||||||||||||||||||
Reasons for Department of Conservation dog access rule –
1 High population of protected wildlife vulnerable to dogs 2 Inter-tidal areas with various species vulnerable to dogs
3 Potential conflict with other users (members of the public) 4 Vulnerable wildlife present
** Explanatory Note: The region-wide rule that prohibits dogs on any sports surface (unless exceptions are stated) and that requires dogs to be kept under control on a leash in the vicinity of any sports surface when in use as stated in Schedule 1, Rule 1(2) continues to apply. This note is specified in relation to particular parks where a sportsfield is known to exist to assist readers.
*** Explanatory Note: The region-wide rule that prohibits dogs on any playgrounds and that requires dogs to be kept under control on a leash in the vicinity of any playground when in use as stated in Schedule 1, Rule 1(1) continues to apply. This note is specified in relation to particular parks where a playground is known to exist to assist readers.
(xxvii) The following region-wide dog access rules also apply within the Howick Local Board area but are not within the scope of this review.
Region-wide rules prevail over any local board rule.
(1) Playgrounds under the control of the council
Dogs are prohibited on any playground at all times and must be under control on a leash in the vicinity of any playground when in use.
(2) Sports surfaces under the control of the council
Dogs are prohibited on any sports surface at all times and must be kept under control on a leash in the vicinity of any sports surface when in use.
For the avoidance of doubt, dogs must still be kept under control on a leash in the vicinity of the sports surface when in use.
(3) Roads, private ways, and council-controlled car parks and boating areas
Dogs must be under control and on a leash on all –
(a) formed public roads (including any street, highway, access way, service lane, and any footpath, cycle track, bus stop and berm within the boundaries of the road);
(b) private ways;
(c) council-controlled car parks; and
(d) council-controlled boating areas (including any wharf, jetty, boat ramp, boat marshalling area).
For the avoidance of doubt, this rule does not apply to any unformed road, or any walkway, track or road within or surrounded by a park.
(4) Council cemeteries, council camping grounds and council holiday parks
Council cemeteries
Dogs are allowed under control and on a leash in the following council-controlled cemeteries:
(a) North Shore Memorial Park
(b) Waikumete Cemetery
Dogs are prohibited from all other council-controlled cemeteries unless permission is obtained from the council (e.g. a park manager with the appropriate delegated authority), or signage indicates dogs are allowed and provided the person whom the dog is accompanying complies with any reasonable conditions imposed by the council in relation to the entry or presence of the dog.
Camping grounds and holiday parks under the control of the council
Dogs are prohibited from all council-controlled camping grounds and holiday parks unless permission is obtained from Council (e.g. park manager with delegated authority), or signage indicates dogs are allowed, and provided the person whom the dog is accompanying complies with any reasonable conditions imposed by the Council in relation to the entry or presence of the dog.
(5) Default dog access rules
Unless otherwise stated in the local board dog access rules:
(a) dogs must be under control and on a leash in all council-controlled public places with unrestricted access; and
(b) dogs are prohibited in all other public places (e.g. fenced sports stadiums, libraries, cafes, shopping malls, school grounds, non-council cemeteries and urupa) unless permission is obtained or signage indicates dogs are allowed from –
(i) council, in relation to places under control of the council; or
(ii) the person in charge of the place, in relation to places not under control of the council; and
(iii) provided the person whom the dog is accompanying complies with any reasonable conditions imposed in relation to the entry or presence of the dog.
Explanatory Notes:
Dog Faeces
The owner of any dog that defecates in any public place or private way must immediately remove and dispose of the faeces in a way that does not cause a nuisance.
Dogs confined in a vehicle or cage
Dogs confined in a vehicle or cage are not exempt from prohibited dog access rules. They are exempt from under control on-leash dog access rules.
Working dogs (includes disability assist and police dogs)
Dog access rules in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 do not apply to any working dog accompanying and assisting a person with work, or accompanying a person genuinely engaged in the dog’s training.
Female dog in season
The owner of any female dog in season must ensure that dog does not enter or remain in any public place or private way unless that dog is completely confined in a vehicle or cage for the purposes of transportation, or the owner of that dog has the permission of the occupier or person controlling the public place (such as a veterinary clinic) in relation to the entry or presence of the dog, and complies with any reasonable conditions imposed.
Temporary Changes to Dog Access Rules