I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Great Barrier Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 18 April 2017 1.00pm Claris
Conference Centre |
Great Barrier Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Izzy Fordham |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Luke Coles |
|
Members |
Jeff Cleave |
|
|
Susan Daly |
|
|
Shirley Johnson |
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
Guia Nonoy Democracy Advisor
10 April 2017
Contact Telephone: (09) 301 0101 Email: guia.nonoy@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
9 Public Forum 5
10 Extraordinary Business 5
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Great Barrier Local Board applications for Local Grants Round Two 2016/2017 7
13 Great Barrier Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 9
14 Approval of the draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017 9
15 Reallocation of unspent locally driven initiatives budget 9
16 Approval to reallocate unspent locally driven initiatives budget to support plague skink eradication 9
17 Local Government New Zealand conference and annual general meeting 2017 9
18 Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Six-Monthly Update 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017 9
19 Governance Forward Work Calendar 9
20 Great Barrier Local Board Workshop Proceedings 9
21 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Welcome
Chairperson IM Fordham will welcome everyone in attendance. Member J Cleave will lead a karakia.
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 21 March 2017, including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Great Barrier Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
Great Barrier Local Board applications for Local Grants Round Two 2016/2017
File No.: CP2017/05700
Purpose
1. To approve funding or part funding or to decline applications submitted to Great Barrier local grants round two, for 2016/2017.
2. In addition, the local board has requested to rescind a capital grant made to Tryphena Community Hall Society Incorporated in round one of this financial year.
Executive summary
3. The Great Barrier Local Board has set a capital grants budget of $252,000 and a community grants budget of $115,000 for the 2016/2017 financial year.
4. A total of $126,881.00 remains in the capital budget and a total of $53,873.45 remains in the community grants budget to be allocated for local grant round two, 2016/2017.
5. Six capital applications were received in this round, requesting a total of $175,688. Fourteen community grant applications were received in this round, requesting a total of $102,934.
6. In addition, a capital grant in round one of this financial year was awarded to Tryphena Community Hall Society’s project to re-roof Tryphena Community Hall (GBI/2016/147). However, this project will not be proceeding and the local board is requested to rescind this resolution.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) rescind the capital grant awarded in round one, 2016/2017 to Tryphena Community Hall Society for $50,000. b) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each capital application received in local grant round two listed in table one. Table one: Great Barrier capital grant round two applications
c) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each community grants application received in local grant round two listed in table two. Table two: Great Barrier local grant round two applications
|
Comments
7. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme (see Attachment A).
8. The local board grants programme sets out:
· local board priorities
· lower priorities for funding
· exclusions
· grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· any additional accountability requirements.
9. The community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, radio, and community networks.
10. The Great Barrier Local Board has operated two local grant rounds for this financial year. Capital applications have been received for consideration in each round.
11. The Great Barrier Local Board has set a capital grants budget of $252,000 and a community grants budget of $115,000 for the 2016/2017 financial year.
12. A total of $126,881.00 remains in the capital budget and a total of $53,873.45 remains in the community grants budget to be allocated for local grant round two 2016/2017.
13. Six capital applications were received in this round, requesting a total of $175,688. Fourteen community grant applications were received in this round, requesting a total of $102,934.
14. In
addition, Tryphena Community Hall Society’s project to re-roof Tryphena
Community Hall was awarded a capital grant in round one of this financial year
(application: LG1704-104), “Towards the
re-roof project for the Tryphena Community Hall
*Subject to a full assessment by the council asbestos expert and other funding
being secured for the balance of the project total by March 2017. Please note
$50,000 is the capital grants limit for funding per project. (GBI/2016/147).
15. This project will not be proceeding at this time and the local board is requested to rescind this resolution. If the grant is rescinded, the remaining capital grants budget for this financial year will increase to $176,881.00.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
16. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Great Barrier Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
17. The board is requested to note that section 50 of the Community Grants Policy states “We will also provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.”
18. A one-page summary of each application is attached (see Attachment B).
Māori impact statement
19. The provision of community grants provides opportunities for all Aucklanders to undertake projects, programmes, activities that benefit a wider range of individuals and groups, including Māori. As a guide for decision-making, in the allocation of community grants, the new community grants policy supports the principle of delivering positive outcomes for Māori.
Implementation
20. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted Long-term Plan 2015-2025 and local board agreements.
21. Following the Great Barrier Local Board allocating funding for round two of the capital and local grants for 2016/2017, staff will notify the applicants of the local board decision on receipt of the official minutes being released.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Great Barrier local grants programme 2016/2017 |
9 |
b⇩ |
Great Barrier capital grants and local grants round two application summaries |
9 |
Signatories
Authors |
Jaimee Wieland - Community Grants Coordinator Jacqueline Fyers – Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
18 April 2017 |
|
Great Barrier Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018
File No.: CP2017/04335
Purpose
1. To present the Great Barrier Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 for adoption.
Executive Summary
2. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year.
4. This report presents the Great Barrier Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 for adoption (see attachment A).
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) adopt the Great Barrier Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018. |
Comments
5. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
6. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year. The local board grants programme guides community groups and individuals when making applications to the local board.
7. The local board community grants programme includes:
· outcomes as identified in the local board plan
· specific local board grant priorities
· which grant types will operate, the number of grant rounds and opening and closing dates
· any additional criteria or exclusions that will apply
· other factors the local board consider to be significant to their decision-making.
8. Once the local board community grants programme for the 2017/2018 financial year, has been adopted, the types of grants, grant rounds, criteria and eligibility with be advertised through an integrated communication and marketing approach which includes utilising the local board channels.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
9. The Community Grants Programme has been developed by the local board to set the direction of their grants programme. This programme is reviewed on an annual basis.
Māori impact statement
10. All grant programmes should respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Maori wellbeing by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Maori. Applicants are asked how their project may increase Maori outcomes in the application form.
Implementation
11. An implementation plan is underway and the local board grants programme will be locally advertised through the local board and council channels. Targeted advertising and promotion will be developed for target populations, including migrant and refugee groups, disability groups, Maori and iwi organisations.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Great Barrier Local Board Grant Progamme 2017/2018 |
9 |
Signatories
Author |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager |
Authorisers |
Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
18 April 2017 |
|
Approval of the draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017
File No.: CP2017/05567
Purpose
1. To approve:
- the draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017,
- the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan summary for public consultation,
- key engagement events to be held as part of the consultation.
Executive summary
2. The Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 requires that each local board complete a local board plan for adoption by 31 October 2017.
3. The draft plan (Attachment A) and the summary (Attachment B) are attached to this report for the local board to approve for public consultation.
4. Consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure (SCP) is taking place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
5. The formal engagement events the board will conduct are detailed as follows:
· Have Your Say, Claris Conference Centre, Saturday 10 June, 10am-12pm
· Have Your Say, Auckland Town Hall, Tuesday 20 June, 5pm-7pm
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) approve the draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017 for public consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure. b) approve the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan summary. c) in the event that minor edits are required to the draft local board plan or summary the board delegates to the Chairperson to work with staff as a matter of urgency. d) approve the scheduled formal engagement events, as follows: · Have Your Say, Claris Conference Centre, Saturday 10 June, 10am-12pm · Have Your Say, Auckland Town Hall, Tuesday 20 June, 5pm-7pm |
Comments
6. Local board plans are strategic plans for the following three years and beyond. The plans reflect the priorities and preferences of the community. They guide how the local board:
· makes decisions on local activities and projects
· provides input into regional strategies and policies
7. The plans inform the development of council’s 10-year budget. They also form the basis for development of the annual local board agreement for the following three financial years and subsequent work programmes.
8. The local board is required to use the SCP to consult on the draft local board plan. The period for the SCP is from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
9. As part of meeting these SCP requirements, a full draft of the local board plan and summary will be made available on the Shape Auckland website, at local libraries, council service centres and the local board office. The summary will also be delivered to all households in the local board area, and engagement events will be scheduled during the SCP period of 22 May to 30 June 2017. These will be advertised on the Shape Auckland website, through local and regional publications, online and through social media.
Consideration
10. The draft plan has been developed by considering the following (amongst others):
· previous community engagement
· The Auckland Plan
· Quality of Life Survey 2016
· 2013 Census Data
· Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2012
· Draft Coastal Management Strategy 2015
· Supporting Growth – Delivering Transport Networks (a joint initiative between AT, Auckland Council and NZTA)
Local board views and implications
11. The local board’s views have driven the development of the draft plan attached to this report.
Māori impact statement
12. As part of pre-engagement on the draft plan, the board have:
· considered pre-existing feedback from Māori
13. During the development of the final plan, and throughout the rest of the term, the board also intend to:
· send a copy of the draft plan to Mana Whenua and Mataawaka for formal submission during the SCP
· continue to develop relationships with Mana Whenua and Mataawaka by engaging in bi-annual sub-regional hui
Implementation
14. Formal consultation for the draft local board plan will take place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
15. Amendments will be made to the final plan during August and September 2017.
16. The local board will adopt the final plan in October 2017.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017 |
9 |
b⇩
|
Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan 2017 summary |
9 |
Signatories
Author |
Jacqueline Fyers – Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
Te Rohe ā-Poari o Aotea
Great Barrier Local Board area
Aotea Great Barrier Island is a remote and beautiful island with a diverse, resilient and independent community characterised by heart and grit. It is made up of Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea people, Māori, pioneer families, hippy settlers, new residents, summer bach owners and descendants of all these groups. We have 939 permanent residents plus part-time residents with second homes.
We have no reticulated water, power or public transport, running our own power, water, septic and drainage systems. We value and protect our way of life. We face unique challenges and are proud of our can do attitude and innovative approach to living on our island paradise.
Our median age is 54 years; 70 per cent of us own our houses and 44 per cent of us live alone. We are bicultural with 90 per cent identifying as European and 18 per cent as Māori. The median full time household income is $31,100 per annum, considerably lower than the regional median of $76,500, and lowest across all Auckland’s local boards.
We have three primary schools with children of secondary school age moving to the city for boarding school or enrolling in Te Kura (correspondence school). Our top industries are accommodation, food and construction.
The island sits near the edge of the Hauraki Gulf with its east coast facing out to the Pacific and its west coast facing inwards. Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea are tangata whenua of Aotea, Hauturu (Little Barrier Island), the Pokohinu Islands (Mokohinau Islands), and other outlying islands and rocky outcrops.
The landscape is mountainous with an abundance of flora and fauna and spectacular coastlines. The Department of Conservation (DoC) has established an Aotea Conservation Park covering nearly 60 per cent of the island and there are other sanctuaries including Glenfern, Windy Hill and Motu Kaikoura.
Contents
Great Barrier Local Board area |
2 |
Contents |
4 |
From the Chair |
5 |
About local boards |
6 |
About local board plans |
6 |
Developing our plan |
7 |
Carrying out our plan |
8 |
Outcomes |
|
Our people thrive and life is good |
10 |
Our environment is protected and enhanced |
12 |
Our infrastructure is future-proofed |
14 |
Our economy is sustainable and prosperous |
16 |
Financial information |
18 |
Your Great Barrier Local Board members |
23 |
Statement of proposal for the 2017 Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan
He kōrero mai i te Heamana
From the Chair
Welcome to our draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan.
In the past, we asked you what you would like to see in the plan before presenting a draft. This time, we created our draft using comments you have provided over the years, and we now want your feedback.
Our plan has four outcome areas focused on future-proofing, sustainability and resilience. We aspire for our island to be economically and environmentally self-sufficient as much as possible.
The outcomes, objectives and initiatives outlined in this plan are not ranked in any order of priority; we consider everything to be of equal importance. The four outcome areas are linked and interwoven. For example for our people to thrive, our environment, economy and infrastructure must be right. And for our environment to be protected and enhanced, our people must want to value it and it must have economic benefits and be managed sustainably.
We will continue supporting the aspirations of our community, Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea and our community groups, maintain our infrastructure and care for our ecology.
This term we have some new initiatives, including Aotea Learning Hub, Dark Sky Sanctuary, an emergency water supply, visitor strategy, and encouraging a buy local campaign.
We will be pursuing ideas and actions from the recently completed Ecology Vision, the abattoir and affordable housing feasibility studies, along with the Sea Change-Tai Timu Tai Pari Marine Spatial plan.
We are looking forward to Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea completing their Treaty Settlement and the opportunities this will bring. The Auckland Plan refresh is due in 2018 which gives us a chance to understand what has changed since it was adopted in 2012. Completion and full staffing of the new DoC office will strengthen our relationships and support development of cross agency projects.
We look forward to hearing your
thoughts and working together to create a plan for our island.
Izzy Fordham
Chairperson, Great Barrier Local Board
He kōrero mō ngā poari ā-rohe
About local boards
Auckland Council has a unique model of local government in New Zealand, made up of the governing body (the mayor and 20 ward councillors) and 21 local boards. The governing body focuses on Auckland-wide issues while local boards are responsible for decision-making on local issues, activities and services and provide input into regional strategies, policies and plans.
These local issues, activities and services include:
· supporting local arts, culture, events and sport and recreation
· providing grants and partnering with local organisations to deliver community services
· maintaining and upgrading town centres and facilities including parks, libraries and halls
· caring for the environment and preserving heritage.
Local boards also have a role in representing the view of their communities on issues of local importance.
About local board plans
Local board plans are strategic documents that are adopted every three years. Their purpose is to set a direction for the local area that reflects community priorities and preferences. They guide local board activity, funding and investment decisions. They also influence local board input into regional strategies and plans, including the Auckland Plan..
Auckland Plan |
|
||||
|
Local board plans |
||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Auckland Council's financial plans local board agreements) |
|||||
Each local board develops annual work programmes following confirmation of the budget available to them via the annual budget setting process.
Te whakawhanake i tā mātou mahere
Developing our plan
Our plan is comprised of aspirational outcomes, objectives we want to achieve and some key initiatives to carry out. To make this happen will take the efforts of many working together.
We have identified these by considering what we know about our community, what you have told us is important, and where we think we can make the biggest difference.
This draft has been based on our extensive collective knowledge of Aotea Great Barrier Island, your feedback and thoughts provided since the last plan was written three years ago, official consultations, local board public forum attendances, and direct conversations with us.
We also considered strategies and aspirations for our island contained in the following key plans and policies:
· Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea: Hapu Management Plan and Strategic Plan 2013-2018
· Auckland Council: Auckland Plan, Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2007-2012, Low Carbon Auckland 2014, Auckland Growing Greener 2016
· Sea Change-Tai Timu Tai Pari 2016
· Great Barrier Island community’s Ecology Vision 2016
· A Micro-Abattoir on Great Barrier Island feasibility study 2015
· Affordable Housing feasibility study 2015.
While drafting our plan, certain recurrent themes emerged. We have developed them into guiding principles that will apply across all our initiatives, as we believe they are the key to making a real difference for our community:
· Infrastructure that fits with our environment and is future-proofed e.g. alternative energy sources, zero waste solutions and low carbon systems.
· Island economic sustainability i.e. projects/businesses becoming self-funded over time and growth of local employment opportunities.
· Support for mana whenua aspirations.
Te whakatutuki i tā mātou mahere
Carrying out our plan
Resourcing
We want to do what we can to improve our local board area while being realistic that we cannot do everything with finite resources. This means making the most of what we already have, working with others and acknowledging when we do not have the necessary resources to carry something out.
We believe we can carry out all our proposed key initiatives within our existing resources, or there is provision for them in future years of the 2015-2025 10-year budget. By existing resources we mean:
· finances we receive through our revenue sources such as rates and user charges, and Auckland Transport local board budget
· our assets such as our community centres and parks
· council staff who are responsible for delivering our annual work programme
· our time and energy to represent your views on matters of local importance.
Some of our proposed key initiatives involve investigations or developing plans. It is important to note that this doesn’t mean funding for physical works is a foregone conclusion. Following investigations or plan development, we will consider our next steps which could include seeking funding we don’t currently have or deciding not to progress further.
In some instances, our role is limited to representing your views on matters of local importance because we do not have the decision-making authority and/or funding to carry it out. When this is the case, we will use our time and energy to influence the relevant decision-maker, ensuring they are aware of your views and our support for them.
Empowering communities
We seek to empower and enable our communities. This means listening to what you want to achieve, directing council resources towards community aspirations and supporting diverse communities to have an input into the things they care about and which matter uniquely to them.
We will prioritise activities that are led by the community, encourage and support people from all walks of life to actively participate in their community, and fully use the talents, insights and contributions of our diverse community. We will work with others to enable our communities to achieve their goals.
Working with Māori
Delivering on Auckland Council’s commitment to Māori at a local level is a priority for local boards. The council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its broader statutory obligations to Māori.
We are committed to building a strong relationship with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea which will outline how we work together to improve the lives of all on the island.
We have allocated funding to support resourcing for Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea to engage in mutual issues such as waste recovery and marine protection. We will take an inclusive approach to supporting the aspirations of tangata whenua because we believe that what is good for tangata whenua is generally good for our whole community.
We have considered the Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea Trust Board’s Hapu Management Plan and Strategic Plan 2013-2018 in the development of this draft plan and seek to develop common outcomes for Aotea Great Barrier Island.
With its Treaty Settlement in the process of being confirmed, we look forward to working with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea to support its aspirations for a healthy, well and thriving community.
Whakaotinga: Ka piki te ora ka hua te pai ki tō tātou iwi
Outcome: Our people thrive and life is good
He aha te mea nui o te motu Aotea. He moana, he whenua, he tangata.
What is the essence of Aotea Great Barrier Island? It is the sea, it is the land, and it is the people.
This is how we see our future.
Our community groups are strong and independent. Our health services are locally-led and meet our unique needs. Our elderly can stay here comfortably and our youth can return after finishing their education. All our people live well and thrive. Our natural and cultural heritage is restored and protected. Our community groups achieve their aspirations and our public open spaces are beautiful, functional and designed by locals. There are cemeteries in the north, centre and south of the island. Our children get a good education and there are learning opportunities for all ages.
Opportunities:
· Our successful capital grant fund has assisted community groups to own, maintain and enhance their facilities without the need for council facilities to be developed.
· Our financial support to kick-start the Aotea Learning Hub, in collaboration with Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu and the Interim Aotea Learning Hub Steering group, will give our secondary students the education they need for the future.
· We are currently completing a heritage survey and the findings will provide a great basis for developing a heritage plan.
· We are working on an Aotea Great Barrier Island Life-Long Learning strategy to help strengthen on-island education opportunities for our pre-schoolers, correspondence students and adults.
· The governing body has delegated authority to us to manage and plan for new cemeteries, allowing us to find a potential site at Claris. We will continue seeking a northern site.
Challenges:
· Our small population and remoteness has hampered the provision of the nationally available early childhood education entitlement.
· Keeping our new learning hub going and supported will require significant commitment from the community and agencies alike.
· We feel well supported by our health and family support trusts but it’s always a struggle to fund the services our community needs. We need to look at all options to make sure our people get the care they need.
Outcome: Our people thrive and life is good |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
We support our community groups to do their good work. |
Continue to provide grants to our health, welfare, arts and tourism trusts - provided they can demonstrate this funding is used effectively. |
Continue to provide local and capital grants for our community groups targeted at self-sufficiency, resilience and sustainability. |
|
We celebrate and look after our island’s culture and heritage. |
Agree collaborative projects with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea and deliver as funding allows. |
Develop a heritage plan with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea and support the delivery of key projects from that plan. |
|
We recognise and celebrate the uniqueness of our local communities. |
With our community, co-create a community spaces and reserves plan to inform design and development of community areas highlighting ecological features, local history and narrative artwork, and implement as funding allows. |
Investigate the establishment of cemeteries in Okiwi and Claris in consultation with the community. |
|
We support life-long learning. |
Develop a life-long learning strategy that coordinates learning opportunities for all ages and attracts investment. |
Whakaotinga: Ka tiakina, ka whakapaitia ake tō tātou taiao
Outcome: Our environment is protected and enhanced
‘Aotea Great Barrier Island: A World of its own, Where People and Place are Woven in a Tapestry of Ecological Richness’
Aotea Great Barrier Island Ecology Vision statement 2016
This is how we see our future.
We lead the way in the Auckland region as a place where the environment is at its best. Pests are so few that our native wildlife and forests flourish. We remain off the grid with an increasing percentage of our energy coming from affordable, renewable and secure sources. Our island is a showcase of the very best in environmental practice with reduced reliance on fossil fuel. We dump only what cannot be reused recycled or composted and lead the region on the path to zero waste and low carbon. Our water and food supply is safe and secure. Our coastal waters are full of life and our streams run clean and free.
Opportunities:
· Aotea Conservation Park has increased the profile of our island’s ecology, and with Glenfern Sanctuary secured in public ownership and run by a local trust, we have a fantastic base to advance our ideas for environmental research and education.
· The successful trial of the Claris Tip Stop Shop shows we can reduce what goes to landfill while simultaneously providing things our community needs.
· AoteaOra Trust’s Off the Grid event is a showcase event for the island and a springboard for ideas that we are uniquely placed to lead on.
· Sea Change-Tai Timu Tai Pari was launched in 2016 and along with the new Marine Protected Areas Act, provides a framework we can use to advance marine protection initiatives.
Challenges:
· The ecology vision project provided some great recommendations but no clear consensus on how best to deal to the island’s pests. To make a real difference, we need to harness the government’s ‘Predator Free 2050’ proposal and our own considerable experience, skills and energy.
· The May 2015 sustainability stocktake survey highlighted issues such as our continued reliance on diesel generators and the age of our septic tanks. Tackling these will require a coordinated effort with Auckland Council, other agencies and private individuals.
· The 2014 storm exposed our households’ vulnerability to water supplies. Rainwater harvesting has since been included in the Retrofit Your Home programme and we are investigating an emergency water supply.
Outcome: Our environment is protected and enhanced |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
We lead our region in ecological health. |
Pursue initiatives from the Ecology Vision document including investigating: · the proposed keystone initiative – The Oases of Aotea · ways to leverage central government and other funding to address our island’s ecological and biosecurity challenges. |
Fund an island-based biodiversity position, initially for three years, to advance agreed community programmes, in conjunction with DoC as appropriate. |
|
We will continue to support the island to achieve off the grid self-sufficiency and invest in infrastructure that safeguards us. |
Develop, and commence implementing, a sustainability and renewable energy strategy for the Island. |
Investigate the supply of clean drinking water. |
|
Investigate smart energy systems that allow island communities to have their own power systems and pave the way for electric vehicles. |
|
Work with the governing body on making Auckland Council owned facilities and vehicles run on alternative energy. |
|
We continue to reduce, reuse and recycle on our pathway to zero waste. |
Work with island-based groups to help develop a waste recovery centre and reduce what goes to landfill. |
We will work towards marine protection around our coastline. |
Deliver marine protection and enhancement in collaboration with mana whenua, the community and the Hauraki Gulf Forum, using Sea Change Tai Timu Tai Pari as a guide. |
Our freshwater streams will all be healthy. |
Continue with targeted freshwater quality monitoring to identify pollution sources and agree actions to resolve them. |
Whakaotinga: Ka āraitia ā tātou tikanga whakahaere eke noa
Outcome: Our infrastructure is future-proofed
This is how we see our future.
Our roads are safe, usable all year round and well maintained. Walkers, cyclists, drivers and truckers share our roads with ease and enjoy breath taking views along the way. All our villages have a park and community building that we love and look after, connected by walkways and cycle trails. We have minimal signage and it fits with our environment. Our locals and visitors can get from place to place by some form of public transport. We have waterways that are fish friendly. Our wharves and airfields meet the needs of locals, visitors and businesses. We have modern efficient communications but our ridgelines are not dotted with cell phone towers. Our houses are warm, sustainable and affordable.
Opportunities:
· There is a limited range of housing options across the island for long-term accommodation, or enabling our increasingly elderly population to stay at home. We need to look at smarter housing options and will investigate recommendations from the Affordable Housing feasibility study
· A substantial investment in broadband infrastructure in recent years has seen significant areas of our island gaining 3G wireless cellphone and internet services. We are looking at ways to address the gaps that still exist in the network.
Challenges:
· Many of our roads are narrow, windy, unsealed, and unmarked, making them a difficult space to share safely. We will focus on improving certain parts of the existing road network combined with off-road connections, such as walkways and cycleways.
· We have bus shelters but no public transport. Our small population makes a bus service uneconomic so we need to look at different, non-standard models.
· The November 2015 Sandhills Road dust suppressant trial failed to deliver any clear results, but we are supporting a further investigation of products and systems on the market.
Outcome: Our infrastructure is future-proofed |
|
Objective |
Key initiative |
We can get around our island in a safe and enjoyable way. |
We seek a transport network which is safe, fits with our environment and meets our shared use values by: · Advocating to Auckland Transport · Improving and completing existing walkways and cycleways and investigate further opportunities to fill gaps in the network. |
Identify key coastal infrastructure needing protection from erosion and develop environmentally sensitive ways to address this. |
|
Our island infrastructure meets our community and visitor needs. |
Investigate the development of a 10-year infrastructure investment plan with central government, the governing body and our community that focuses on priorities our community has identified and takes into account environmental sensitivities. |
Undertake a strategic review on airport and wharf entry points. |
|
We will work to improve freight and transport affordability and efficiency. |
Advocate to central government and Auckland Transport for our main transport services to be brought within the subsidised public transport network. |
Our communities will have cellphone and internet coverage. |
Advocate to central government and work with telcos to extend coverage, achieving connectivity for 95 per cent of the island by 2024. |
Smarter housing opportunities will be explored. |
Investigate opportunities arising from the affordable housing feasibility study. |
Whakaotinga: Ka hua tonu tō tātou ōhanga, ka tōnui tonu ia
Outcome: Our economy is sustainable and prosperous
This is how we see our future.
We have more people, more jobs and more opportunities. Our businesses can make a buck and new ones spring up to meet demand. Our employees earn a living wage. We have thriving social enterprises and can buy locally produced meat and locally caught fish on island. We encourage locals and visitors to buy locally both for sustainability and to support local producers. Our people are supported to upskill, our businesses can find the skills they need and jobs stay on island. We are great hosts to visitors and their experience makes them want to come back with their friends. We engage our many part-time residents to help make the island a great place to live and visit. Our night sky is internationally acclaimed and protected.
Opportunities:
· The development of a visitor strategy is needed to ensure visitor growth is beneficial and doesn’t negatively impact on our resident community, infrastructure and environment.
· We see Glenfern Sanctuary making a significant contribution to our island’s economy by showcasing our environmental, educational, tourism and sustainability future. We are also keen to explore education as an economic opportunity more generally.
· Dark Sky Sanctuary status has the potential to be a game changer for our island. We must encourage the right level of tourism and ensure any on-island development meets Dark Sky Sanctuary lighting restrictions.
· With broadband connectivity improving, there is an opportunity to use technology to increase information sharing, interpretation and education for locals and visitors.
Challenges:
· The hopes we had from the 2016 abattoir feasibility study have yet to be realised due to challenges such as high compliance costs and fattening cattle on-island. We will continue to look at the study’s recommendations as well as further investigating local fish sale restrictions. These support our desire to buy local, reduce packaging and reduce freight of fresh products to the island.
· There is a twofold employment challenge - limited job opportunities within a small market, and a struggle to find people with the right skills for the available jobs. We will be looking at ways to help upskill our people to fill some of these gaps.
Outcome: Our economy is sustainable and prosperous |
|
Objective |
Key initiative |
We will continue to work for local jobs for local people. |
Ensure contracts are locally procured, and contractors are supported, supervised, and upskilled. |
Advocate to Auckland Transport to follow Auckland Council’s new procurement approach. |
|
Our beautiful island is a desired destination. |
Work with our community, Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea, DoC and our island based service providers to develop a Visitor Strategy. |
Support Destination Great Barrier Island and our local businesses to improve visitor experience, explore new tourism opportunities and build local enterprise including eco-tourism and, alongside mana whenua, cultural tourism. |
|
Support achievement of Dark Sky Sanctuary status. |
|
More goods and services are promoted and supplied locally. |
Implement a buy local campaign. |
Investigate opportunities arising from the abattoir feasibility study including the option of a mobile meat-processing facility. |
|
Investigate opportunities for the local sale of island-caught fish. |
|
Local employment and business opportunities will be increased. |
Promote local business/tradespeople through an online skills and services directory that locals and tourists can both access. |
Complete an economic survey of home-based businesses to better inform economic planning. |
He kōrero take pūtea
Financial information
This purpose of this section is to provide a financial overview of the Great Barrier Local Board.
Based on our existing budgets, we believe we can deliver the key initiatives in our draft plan without reducing our existing levels of service or increasing our local revenue sources (such as local targeted rates and fees and charges).
The governing body will be adopting council’s 2018 – 2028 10-year budget in June 2018. It is important to note that this could change the funding for local boards, including projects that are currently provided for in the 2015-2025 10-year budget.
Local activities and levels of service
Local board responsibilities, provided for directly in legislation or allocated to boards, are summarised into local activities. These are described in the table below, along with levels of service statements.
More information regarding of levels of services, including performance measures and performance targets, can be found in the Great Barrier Local Board Agreement 2016/2017. This is available on the Auckland Council website.
Local activities |
Levels of service statements |
Local parks, sport and recreation This group of activities covers the management and provision of local parks and open space and recreation activities for both passive and active recreation. It includes swimming pools and leisure centres servicing communities in the local area. |
Provide a range of recreational opportunities catering for community needs on local parks, reserves and beaches.
|
Local community services This group of activities contribute to improved community outcomes by providing places and spaces for community to learn and recreate, and by integrating arts and culture into the everyday lives of Aucklanders. Key activities include locally delivered Libraries & Information (Libraries) and Community Development, Arts and Culture services.
|
Provide safe, accessible, welcoming library facilities that support the delivery of quality learning programmes and services relevant to local communities. Enable Aucklanders and communities to express themselves and improve their wellbeing through customer centric advice, funding, facilitation and permitting. Deliver a variety of events, programmes and projects that improve safety, connect Aucklanders and engage them in their city and communities. Provide safe, reliable and accessible social infrastructure for Aucklanders that contributes to placemaking and thriving communities. |
Local planning and development This group of activities covers local business area planning, local street environment and town centres and local environment and heritage protection. These activities include economic, environmental, heritage and spatial projects, and enable, plan for and deliver great local places. |
There are no measures.
|
Local environmental management This group of activities covers working in partnership with locally based communities and iwi to deliver enhanced environmental outcomes (with a focus in indigenous biodiversity, healthy waterways and sustainable living) that contribute to Māori, community wellbeing and economy. |
Provide leadership & support to protect and conserve the region’s natural environment, historic heritage and Māori cultural heritage.
|
Local governance · This group of activities covers support to local boards such as strategic advice, preparation of local board plans, development of local board agreements, community engagement including relationships with mana whenua and Māori communities, democracy and administration support, and professional development for elected members. |
The measures for this group of activities are covered under the Regional Governance group of activities in the Long-term Plan 2015-2025 where the survey measures determine participation with Auckland Council decision-making in general. This includes local decision-making. There are no significant changes to the measures or targets for 2016/2017.
|
Financial overview
Income, expenditure and capital investment by local activities for the period 2015 to 2018
Annual Plan Financials |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
Operating revenue |
|||
Local community services |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
|||
Local planning and development |
|||
Local environment services |
|||
Total operating revenue |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Operating expenditure |
|||
Local community services |
418 |
770 |
776 |
Local governance |
842 |
842 |
885 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
840 |
637 |
654 |
Local planning and development |
97 |
25 |
63 |
Local environment services |
207 |
267 |
179 |
Total operating expenditure |
2,404 |
2,541 |
2,557 |
Net operating expenditure |
2,402 |
2,538 |
2,555 |
Capital expenditure |
|||
Local community services |
4 |
6 |
|
Local governance |
|||
Local parks, sport and recreation |
627 |
280 |
963 |
Local planning and development |
|||
Local environment services |
|||
Total capital expenditure |
631 |
286 |
963 |
Funding Impact Statement
Financial year ending 30 June |
2016/17 |
Sources of operating funding |
|
General rates, UAGCs, rates penalties |
2,950 |
Targeted rates |
- |
Subsidies and grants for operating purposes |
- |
Fees and charges |
- |
Local authorities fuel tax, fines, infringement fees and other receipts |
2 |
Total operating funding |
2,952 |
|
|
Applications of operating funding |
|
Payment to staff and suppliers |
2,453 |
Finance costs |
87 |
Internal charges and overheads applied |
412 |
Other operating funding applications |
- |
Total applications of operating funding |
2,952 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of operating funding |
- |
|
|
Sources of capital funding |
|
Subsidies and grants for capital expenditure |
- |
Development and financial contributions |
- |
Increase (decrease) in debt |
286 |
Gross proceeds from sale of assets |
- |
Lump sum contributions |
- |
Other dedicated capital funding |
- |
Total sources of capital funding |
286 |
|
|
Application of capital funding |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
- to meet additional demand |
191 |
- to improve the level of service |
- |
- to replace existing assets |
95 |
Increase (decrease) in reserves |
- |
Increase (decrease) in investments |
- |
Total applications of capital funding |
286 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of capital funding |
0 |
|
|
Funding balance |
0 |
-
Ngā Mema o tō Poari ā-Rohe o Aotea
Your Great Barrier Local Board members
|
Members’ details |
|
Izzy Fordham - Chairperson Phone: 021 286 7555 |
|
Luke Coles - Deputy Chairperson Phone: 022 041 7891 |
|
Jeff Cleave Phone: 021 816 047 |
|
Sue Daly Phone: 021 286 8811 |
|
Shirley Johnson Phone: 021 729 684 |
18 April 2017 |
|
Help Shape Aotea Great Barrier Island’s future
PAGE 2: FROM THE CHAIR –
Our draft Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan looks at four outcomes based on future-proofing, sustainability and resilience.
· Our people thrive and life is good.
· Our environment is protected and enhanced.
· Our infrastructure is future-proofed.
· Our economy is sustainable and prosperous.
To achieve this we will continue to support the aspirations of our community and its groups, including Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea. We want to hear your thoughts on our new initiatives, including the Aotea Learning Hub, emergency water supply, visitor strategy, and a buy local campaign.
Our draft plan has taken into consideration ideas and actions from past consultations, our recently completed Ecology Vision, and the abattoir and affordable housing feasibility studies, along with the Sea Change-Tai Timu Tai Pari Marine Spatial plan.
Your input will help us prioritise activities and budgets over the next three years. We encourage you to come along to the Have Your Say events so that we can discuss the options open to us. If you cannot attend, you can provide feedback online or fill in a form found at our office, the service centre and on request.
We look forward to working with you to help create the best plan for our island’s future.
Izzy Fordham
Chair, Great Barrier Local Board
38-219987
(ADD IMAGE IN SPACE)
(INSERT PULL-OUT BOX AT BOTTOM OF PAGE) – generic
This is an overview of our draft local board plan. We encourage you to read the full plan and tell us what you think by Friday 30 June, 2017. Copies of the full plan are available online at shapeauckland.co.nz, and at public libraries, council service centres and local board offices. Or tell us what you think in person – see page XX for details.
PAGE 3: OUTCOMES (INSERT IMAGE SOMEWHERE ON PAGE 3 OR 4)
Headline: What we propose to focus on
We propose to focus on four outcomes and initiatives. Our plan is based on our ideas as well as the feedback you have given to us.
Our people thrive and life is good
Our community is strong and independent and we will continue to support our locally-led health services, community groups and Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea to achieve their aspirations. We will:
• support our community groups to do their good work by continuing to provide funding grants
• develop a heritage plan with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea
• co-create and deliver a community spaces and reserves plan to inform development of our community areas
• develop an Aotea Great Barrier Island Life-long Learning Strategy to coordinate learning opportunities for all ages
• investigate and establish cemeteries in Claris and Okiwi.
Our environment is protected and enhanced
We want to lead the Auckland region in showing that the environment is at its best. We will:
· protect and enhance our island’s unique ecology by pursuing key initiatives from the Ecology Vision and funding a biodiversity position
• support off-grid sustainability initiatives and investments including developing an island sustainability strategy and investigating smart energy systems for our buildings and vehicles
• investigate an emergency water supply
• continue to reduce and recycle and help island-based groups develop a waste recovery centre
• deliver marine protection around our coastline
• continue freshwater stream monitoring.
Our infrastructure is future-proofed
We want our island’s infrastructure to be safe, fit with the environment and meet the ongoing needs of the community. We will:
• seek to improve existing roads, walkways and cycleways and investigate further opportunities to fill gaps in the network
• investigate the development of a 10-year infrastructure plan with central government and the community
• advocate for transport services to be subsidised
• advocate to central government and work with telcos to extend broadband coverage to achieve 95 per cent connectivity
• investigate smarter housing opportunities.
PAGE 4: OUTCOMES CONTINUED
Our economy is sustainable and prosperous
We want to have more jobs, more opportunities to be upskilled and for locals to be able to buy more local produce. We will:
• continue to support local jobs for local people by ensuring contracts are locally procured and contractors are supported and upskilled
• co-develop a visitor strategy with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea, DoC and island based service providers to develop a more cohesive approach to tourism
• further investigate the local sale of island-caught fish and abattoir opportunities
• implement a buy local campaign
• support local employment and business opportunities.
Delivering our local board plan - generic
To deliver a successful plan, we need to focus our limited resources
on what matters most to our community and what we can influence. Find out more in our draft Local Board Plan, available online at shapeauckland.co.nz or at public libraries, council service centres or local board offices.
PAGE x: HAVE YOUR SAY ON GREAT BARRIER LOCAL BOARD’S DRAFT LOCAL BOARD PLAN – generic
Feedback must be received by 4pm on Friday 30 June 2017.
Your feedback will go directly to elected members of Great Barrier Local Board to help inform their decisions.
We encourage you to read a full copy of our draft plan before providing your feedback. Copies of the full plan and submission form are available:
· online at shapeauckland.co.nz
· at public libraries council service centres and local board offices
· or phone us on 09 301 0101 and we will send a copy to you.
Or you can fill out this form and return it to us:
· email - simply scan your completed form and email to localboardplans@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
· on person - drop it off at your local library, service centre or local board office
· by post - place your completed form in an envelope and send to this freepost address:
Local Board Plans
Auckland Council
Freepost Authority 232621
Private Bag 92 300, Auckland 1142
Social media
Comments made through Facebook will be considered written feedback.
Social media
Comments made through the following channels will be considered written feedback:
· Write something on the Great Barrier Local Board Facebook page - facebook.com/greatbarrierLB - and include “Local Board Plan feedback” in your message
Sent a private message using Facebook messenger to GreatBarrierLocalBoard@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz and include “Local Board Plan feedback” in your message
In person
Come and talk to us at one of the events below. This is an opportunity for you to give your feedback in person to Great Barrier Local Board members.
· Have Your Say, Claris Conference Centre, Saturday 10 June, 10am-12pm
· Have Your Say, Auckland Town Hall, Tuesday 20 June, 5pm-7pm
Your name and feedback will be considered public documents. All other personal details will remain private.
First name:
Last name:
Email or postal address:
Local board/s you are providing feedback on:
If you want to give us feedback on more than one draft local board plan you can:
· Complete a separate form for each draft plan. Additional forms are available by calling 09 3010101 or online at shape.auckland.co.nz
· Complete one submission form and attach your comments, making it clear which draft local board plan they apply to.
The following information is optional.
Are you?
Female Male Gender diverse
What age group do you belong to?
<15 15-24 25-34
35-44 45-54 55-64
65-74 75+
Which of the following describes your ethnicity? (Please select as many as
apply)
NZ European Māori
Samoan Tongan
Chinese Indian
Other (please specify)
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation?
· No, these are my personal views
· Yes, I am the official spokesperson for my organisation
If yes, what is the name of your organisation?
Q1. On a scale of one to five, are we on the right track with our proposed local board plan?
[ ] 5 = I strongly agree that the local board is on the right track
[ ] 4 = I agree that the local board is on the right track
[ ] 3 = I neither agree or disagree that the local board is on the right track
[ ] 2 = I disagree that the local board is on the right track
[ ] 1 = I strongly disagree that the local board is on the right track
Q2. Tell us what you like most about our proposed local board plan?
Q3. Do you have any other comments about our proposed local board plan?
Q4. Last term we engaged widely with our community to develop an ecological vision for the island. Do you believe that this draft plan outlines the next steps for that vision?
Y/N/DK/Comment
Where would you like our future ecology focus to be?
Comment:
Q5. Our plan sets out our approach to being more sustainable, off the grid and locally self-sufficient. To what degree do you believe that this is the right approach for our island?
Completely agree ----- Totally disagree
If you do not believe we should focus on sustainability what would you like to see the plan focus on?
Comment
Need more room? You can attach extra pages, but please make sure they are A4 and include your name and contact details.
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
___________________________________________________________________
□ Yes, I want to be added to your mailing list to be kept informed about news and events in the Great Barrier Local Board area
18 April 2017 |
|
Reallocation of unspent locally driven initiatives budget
File No.: CP2017/05761
Purpose
1. To approve the reallocation of unspent opex from the board’s locally driven initiatives budget to projects without adequate budget which can be delivered in the 2016/17 financial year.
Executive summary
2. There are a number of projects on the 2016/17 work programme which will either not be delivered this financial year or where delivery will result in an underspend of the budget.
3. In some cases this budget can be carried forward as officers have confirmed the project is sufficiently advanced to enable this and the board has indicated an interest for the project continuing.
4. There are also a number of projects that the board has indicated an interest to progress this financial year which are either unfunded or underfunded. Officers propose to reallocate available budget to these projects and have confirmed these can be delivered before the end of the financial year.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) approve the reallocation of the $4,800 of remaining opex in the Skills Development locally driven initiatives budget line to support Aotea Learning Hub costs for terms 2-4. b) approve the reallocation of the $14,400 of remaining opex in the Community Response Fund locally driven initiatives budget line to support Aotea Learning Hub costs for terms 2-4. c) approve the reallocation of remaining opex in the Visitor Maps locally driven initiatives budget line to the Mulberry Grove stone wall budget line for weed removal. d) approve the reallocation of the $10,000 of remaining opex in the FitzRoy Landing reserve locally driven initiatives budget line to support the Motairehe Coastal Erosion project. e) approve the reallocation of the $15,000 of remaining opex in the Moorings consent locally driven initiatives budget line to Great Barrier Island Community Heritage and Arts Village Trust to offset grant paid incorrectly from LDI Capex. |
Comments
2016/2017 Work Programme projects with unspent opex
5. There are 11 projects on the board’s 2016/17 work programme which may not be delivered by the end of this financial year or have a budget underspend. These projects are listed below:
6. Support
engagement with Ngati Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea - Local Board Services
This project consists of $5,000 to support engagement with Ngati Rehua
Ngatiwai ki Aotea which is going to be match funded by Te Waka Angamua. The
project has been on hold awaiting further discussions with Ngati Rehua Ngatiwai
ki Aotea and officers have recommended carrying this budget forward into
financial year 2017/18.
7. Skills
Development - Arts, Community and Events
This project consists of carrying out a survey of local businesses to identify
any skills gaps in the market. The Strategic Broker led this survey and it did
not require any funding to deliver. At the 21 February 2017 business meeting
the board resolved to allocate $15,200 to cover the Term 1 set-up costs for the
Aotea Learning Hub. There is $4,800 remaining in this budget to be reallocated.
8. Community
Response Fund - Arts, Community and Events
This budget line consisted of $15,000 unallocated funds. At the 21 February 2017 business meeting the board
resolved to allocate $600 to fund the Educarents Ltd representative’s
return flights from Christchurch to Great Barrier with one night on island
accommodation. There is $14,400 remaining in this budget to be reallocated.
9. Visitor
Maps - Parks, Sport and Recreation
This project consists of $5,000 to print an annual supply of the visitor
maps. This year’s print order has been placed for the reprint of the
drivers map only which leaves approximately $2,000 remaining in this budget to
be reallocated.
10. FitzRoy
Landing Reserve - Parks, Sport and Recreation
This project has been awaiting Treaty of Waitangi settlement decisions as
the reserve is crown owned and is now unlikely to be progressed this financial
year. Therefore the project is cancelled and budget needs to be reallocated.
11. Ecology
Conversations - Infrastructure and Environmental Services
The final ecology conversations report was endorsed at the December 2016
business meeting. The next step in this project will develop from the recently
completed biodiversity technical review and consultation on the 2017 local
board plan in which the Ecology Vision has been incorporated. There is $33,000
remaining in this budget to be reallocated.
12. Great
Barrier Marine Project - Infrastructure and Environmental Services
This project has not yet been scoped as it is dependent on further
discussions with Ngāti Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea and is now unlikely to be
progressed this financial year . This budget line was for $25,000 and at the 15
November 2016 business meeting the board resolved to allocate $5,500 to fund
the Kaitoke Beach Restoration Final Report. There is $19,500 remaining in this
budget to be reallocated.
13. Biodiversity/Biosecurity
Officer - Infrastructure and Environmental Services
This project consists of $45,000 to fund a fixed term, part time
biodiversity/biosecurity role for the island. The job description was developed
and agreed by November 2016 and recruitment process completed in April 2017.
Due to the delay in recruitment of a suitable person for this role, the full funds
will not be spent by the end of the financial year.
14. Rural
Broadband Initiative 2 - Auckland Plan Strategy & Research
The board was advised not to invest the budget of $10,000 in this
initiative round. Therefore the project is cancelled and budget needs to be
reallocated.
15. Moorings
Consent - Plans & Places
This project consisted of $40,000 to investigate the impacts of the Unitary
Plan Mooring Zones on existing mooring holders and what if anything the board
might do to support locals who needed moorings which were affected by the plan
moorings consent. It was on hold awaiting an assessment of the effects of the
Auckland Unitary Plan and work has recently begun at a quoted cost of $5,000.
At the 15 November 2016 business meeting the board resolved to allocate $10,000
to fund the Dark Sky Accreditation project and at the 21 February 2017 business
meeting to allocate $5,000 to remove and dispose of the dilapidated houseboat
in Puriri Bay. There is $20,000 remaining in this budget to be reallocated.
16. Heritage
Plan - Plans & Places
This project consists of $10,000 to complete a heritage survey. Project funds
allocated to the Maori Cultural Heritage Team is currently on hold awaiting
negotiations with Ngati Rehua Ngatiwai ki Aotea. Officers recommend to carrying
any unspent budget forward into financial year 2017/18.
Proposed projects for unspent opex
17. A couple of urgent projects have been proposed for the current year’s unspent opex and the details are outlined below:
18. Aotea
Learning Hub Term 2-4 proposal
At the 21 February business meeting, the board approved funding of $15,200
for the Aotea Learning Hub to cover Term 1 set-up costs. The Ministry of
Education has since confirmed funding to cover the costs of the full time hub
coordinator. A proposal (Attachment A) has been presented to the board by the
Education Steering Committee for running costs totaling $20,190 for term 2-4 of
the Learning Hub. These running costs include venue hire, cleaning, broadband,
student and staff transportation and teaching consumables.
19. Motairehe
Coastal Erosion
Council’s coastal management services team provided advice to the
board on approaches to managing coastal erosion at five sites on Aotea Great
Barrier. The advice highlighted the potential impact of erosion on the urupā at Motairehe. The board and community
agreed that revetment would be the best option at this site. This option would
trigger a resource consent/coastal permit requirement. Staff have suggested
that the board may wish to contribute funding towards the resource consent
preparation and fees for this project.
20. Plaque
Skink Eradication Programme
Auckland Council and the Department of Conservation (DOC) have prioritised
the redirection of funds to support an eradication programme. The costs
of a full eradication programme are estimated at $240,000 for the remainder of
the 2016/2017 financial year. A contribution of $43,000 is being sought from
the board to this eradication programme. Additional contributions are being
provided from regional budgets and DOC. Further information is provided in a
separate report on this agenda.
21. Dark
Sky Sanctuary Accreditation project
At its 15 November business meeting the board resolved to allocate $10,000
towards the Dark Sky Sanctuary Accreditation project. The project was for the
development of the accreditation application and included costs associated with
astronomy testing. The application was submitted on 27 March 2017. Should the
application be successful, there will be a number of costs associated with
preparing the island for Dark Sky Sanctuary status including a launch, signage,
communications and marketing. Planning and preparation of this may need to
begin before the end of the financial year.
22. Mulberry
Grove weed removal budget
Biosecurity have declined to fund the weed removal that is required as part of
the Mulberry Grove stone wall renewal. The estimated cost for the weed
removal including the vine that is intertwined in the wall itself is $2,725.00
as per the quote from Envirokiwi.
23. Table 1: Eleven projects with unspent opex and the recommended action
Projects with unspent opex |
Recommended action |
Iwi Responsiveness – (Local Board Services) |
Carry project forward into 2017/18 financial year |
Skills Development – (Arts, Community and Events) |
Reallocate remaining $4,800 towards Aotea Learning Hub costs for terms 2-4 |
Community Response Fund – (Arts, Community and Events) |
Reallocate remaining $14,400 towards Aotea Learning Hub costs for terms 2-4 |
Visitor Maps – (Parks, Sport and Recreation) |
Reallocate remaining budget towards the Mulberry Grove stone wall project for weeding work. |
FitzRoy Landing Reserve – (Parks, Sport and Recreation) |
Reallocate remaining $10,000 towards assisting the consenting for the Motairehe Coastal Erosion project |
Ecology Vision – (Infrastructure and Environmental Services) |
Reallocate remaining $33,000 towards the plague skink eradication programme as outlined in a separate report on this agenda |
Great Barrier Marine Project – (Infrastructure and Environmental Services) |
For further discussion |
Biodiversity/Biosecurity officer – (Infrastructure and Environmental Services) |
Reallocate $10,000 towards the plague skink eradication programme as outlined in a separate report on this agenda and carry any unspent funds forward into 2017/18 financial year |
Rural Broadband Initiative 2 – (Auckland Plan Strategy & Research) |
For further discussion |
Moorings Consent – (Local Board Services) |
Reallocate $15,000 to offset Great Barrier Island Community Heritage and Arts Village Trust grant paid incorrectly from LDI Capex |
Heritage Plan – (Plans & Places) |
Carry project forward into 2017/18 financial year |
Consideration
Local board views and implications
24. The board received the quarterly two performance report at its 21 February business meeting which highlighted a number of these projects
25. Officers held a workshop on 4 April to discuss options for some of these 11 projects.
Māori impact statement
26. Four of the 11 projects with unspent opex are linked to Māori engagement. These are as follows:
· Iwi Responsiveness - Local Board Services
· FitzRoy Landing Reserve - Parks, Sport and Recreation
· Great Barrier Marine Project - Infrastructure and Environmental Services
· Heritage Plan - Plans & Places
27. The Iwi Responsiveness and Heritage Plan projects are being recommended to carry forward to next financial year. The FitzRoy Landing Reserve and Marine projects may need to be re-scoped going forward. Officers will work with Mana Whenua as needed to advance these.
28. Any plans to address coastal erosion at Motairehe will require engagement with the marae. Remedial action will address the potential impact of erosion on the urupā.
Implementation
29. The Lead Financial Advisor for Great Barrier Local Board will work with the departments to make any necessary changes to the 2016/17 work programme and the departments will ensure any reallocated funds are spent by the end of the financial year
30. The Advisor for Great Barrier Local Board will continue to facilitate performance updates for the local board.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Proposal for Aotea Learning Hub stage two |
9 |
Signatories
Author |
Jacqueline Fyers – Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
18 April 2017 |
|
Approval to reallocate unspent locally driven initiatives budget to support plague skink eradication
File No.: CP2017/04481
Purpose
1. To approve the reallocation of unspent opex from the board’s locally driven initiatives budget lines for ecology conversations and biodiversity officer to support plague skink eradication.
Executive summary
2. Aotea Great Barrier has one of the most intact native lizard populations in the country. Plague skinks have the potential to significantly impact on these populations. Since the discovery of plague skinks at Shoal Bay in 2013, council has led a programme to develop tools to control skinks, such as insect sticky traps and containment fencing. The development of these tools makes eradication of plague skinks possible on Aotea Great Barrier.
3. Auckland Council and the Department of Conservation (DOC) have prioritised the redirection of funds to support an eradication programme on Aotea Great Barrier in recognition that it is of high local and national benefit. A one year intensive operation will be undertaken to confirm the feasibility of a full eradication. The costs of a full eradication programme are estimated at $240,000 for the remainder of the 2016/2017 financial year, with another $200,000 required next financial year to complete the feasibility assessment. If the eradication continues after that, the anticipated costs are around $500,000 per year for a minimum of another four years.
4. This report recommends the reallocation of $43,000 of unspent 2016/2017 Great Barrier locally driven initiatives budget (LDI) as a contribution to this eradication programme. This figure is made up of $33,000 of unspent opex in the board’s 2016/2017 ecology conversations budget line, and $10,000 from the biodiversity officer budget. Additional contributions are being provided from regional budgets and DOC.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) approve the reallocation of the $33,000 of remaining opex in the ecology conversations locally driven initiatives budget line to support plague skink eradication. b) approve the reallocation of a portion not exceeding $10,000 of opex in the biodiversity officer locally driven initiatives budget line to support plague skink eradication. |
Comments
Background
5. The plague skink population discovered at Shoal Bay in 2013 remains the only known population on Aotea Great Barrier. Since that discovery, council’s focus has been on developing the tools to contain and control plague skinks as there were no such tools in 2013. Surveillance for plague skinks at other sites on the island has been funded by the local board, by DOC, and through regional staff time. However, long-term containment of plague skinks at this one site without them ever spreading is impractical. As such, eradication from the island remains the best option for preventing their impact on the native reptile populations present on Aotea Great Barrier.
6. The development of effective control tools (sticky mats and containment fencing) by council and DOC enabled investigation into the feasibility of moving from a control and containment programme to an eradication programme. Table one below provides further information on the development of the proposed eradication programme.
Date |
Action |
December 2016 |
The completion of a revised operational plan for plague skinks concluded that eradication of plague skinks from Aotea Great Barrier was feasible. The eradication programme was costed at $500,000 with funding shared between council, DOC, and the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI). |
February 2017 |
A panel of experts reviewed three options for plague skink management on Aotea Great Barrier; · Fully commit to eradication (option 1) · Discontinue eradication but continue research (option 2); and · Discontinue all control. (option 3) Option one is the preferred option. While eradication is likely to be very difficult to achieve (having not been attempted anywhere before), it is still possible on Aotea Great Barrier subject to meeting resourcing requirements. It would also help council and DOC to refine techniques, develop new ones and then pass those learnings to any future incursion responses on Aotea Great Barrier and other sites like Hauturu (Little Barrier) or the Kermadecs. The methods could also have application for any other reptile species that may make it into New Zealand. Option two was not supported because the experts felt there was still a chance of fully eradicating plague skinks from Aotea Great Barrier, but would not be possible without immediate funding commitments. Option three was not supported both because of the above and the need to develop tools to prevent the species from establishing elsewhere. |
March 2017 |
At a joint meeting between council and DOC, it was agreed to commit funding to an eradication programme. This funding commitment recognises the local and national value of eradicating plague skinks, and the knowledge that can be applied to prevent or control incursions elsewhere. Funding for further research will also be sought from MPI. |
Table 1: Development of proposed eradication programme
Costs of eradication programme
7. The costs of an eradication programme for the remainder of this financial year are estimated at $240,000. A breakdown of costs is noted in table one below;
Project |
Cost |
Containment fencing |
$50,000 |
Insect sticky traps, covers and labour to install and check them daily |
$130,000 |
Tracking cards, other equipment and supplies |
$20,000 |
Increased surveillance elsewhere on the island |
$20,000 |
Project manager |
$20,000 |
Estimated additional opex required to 30 June 2017 |
$240,000 |
Table 2: Estimated costs of proposed eradication programme to end of current financial year.
8. The first 12 months of the eradication programme will more rigorously test methods to confirm the feasibility of eradication. While council and DOC have some confidence in the effectiveness of existing tools, plague skinks have not been eradicated from anywhere in the world. Work will focus on further development of eradication methods and refining the likely costs of the longer term eradication programme.
9. Current funding will only support control over part of the 11 hectare site per year due to the intense resourcing requirements of eradication. For example, the thousands of traps required to capture the skinks alive must be checked daily to euthanise the plague skinks, and to release any native skinks. The containment fence will also need to be checked after every heavy rain event and after strong winds to make sure branches have not fallen across it and allowed skinks to climb out. This means that the eradication is likely to take five years or more.
10. Initially $100,000 council funding has been committed to this programme through a reprioritisation of regional funding from other projects (such as delaying work programmed for late in the financial year into the new year and cancelling small projects that were not being completed due to staff vacancies). DOC will make a similar contribution, bringing the total available to $200,000. Both organisations have committed to find the funding for next financial year and out years as required.
Options for local funding
11. If the Great Barrier Local Board can contribute around $40,000 from unspent opex in this financial year, the project will be able to undertake the whole programme as proposed in table two above. If the board does not contribute this financial year, council and DOC would continue with the lower budget, but it may mean that the skinks cannot be controlled at the rate required to contain them within the site. The further the plague skinks spread, the less feasible eradication becomes.
12. The 2016/2017 funding will support the following immediate actions;
· Installation of a containment fence right around the known distribution of the skinks in Shoal Bay (with permission from the landowners – initial discussions of those affected have been encouraging);
· Placement of hundreds of insect sticky traps at one metre spacings at the ends of the fence;
· Creation of some internal ‘cells’ within the control area and intensively trap them to test our ability to eliminate the skinks from these smaller areas;
· Intensification of the surveillance programme elsewhere on the island; and
· Start working with the MPI to develop some new traps and tools.
13. A total of $33,000 of opex budget in the ecology conversations is currently not tagged to a specific project. The full budget ($45,000) allocated to the biodiversity role position will not be required due to the late recruitment of a person into this role. As such, it is recommended that these budgets be reallocated towards the plague skink eradication programme. Both budgets are intended to support the environment outcomes, and biosecurity initiatives, outlined within the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan. The proposed reallocation similarly supports those outcomes and initiatives.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
14. Biosecurity is highlighted in the Aotea Great Barrier Local Board Plan. Funding of $24,000 in the board’s 2016/2017 LDI supports surveillance of settlement areas for the presence or absence of plague skinks and Argentine ants. The board has also funded a Treasure Islands Ambassador role to undertake inspections of freight heading to the island, and to educate ferry passengers on biosecurity precautions. No local funding has been used for control work to date.
15. A workshop with the board to discuss the proposed reallocation will be held on 11 April 2017 (after this report has been finalised). Feedback from that workshop will be noted at the board meeting. An addendum memo can be prepared if necessary.
Māori impact statement
16. No consultation with Māori has been undertaken for the purposes of this report. Staff will explore options to enable mana whenua participation in the eradication programme. The proposed eradication programme aligns with the pest eradication objective included in the Ngāti Rehua Ngātiwai ki Aotea Hapū Management Plan.
Implementation
17. If the ecology conversations budget is not reallocated to this project, there is a risk of this budget being unspent. No other options for expending that budget in the current financial year have been developed and it is unlikely projects could be developed and delivered prior to the end of June 2017. The board may apply to carry forward this budget with the agreement of the governing body.
18. A demonstrated commitment to expending budgets (for example, contracts, evidence of physical works commencement) is required to approve carry forward of opex. For the biodiversity officer role, a carry forward could be approved on the basis that a person will have started in the position. There is currently no contract tied to the ecology conversations budget line. Although an ecological review of the ecology vision has been completed, this requires further decision making and input from the board. It is unlikely any projects from that review could be scoped and delivered before the end of June 2017.
19. As the level of control anticipated as part of this eradication programme has not yet been attempted, there may be unforeseen problems that result in not all budget allocated to this project being expended before the end of June 2017.
20. The proposed eradication programme recognises the need to significantly increase efforts to reduce the risk of further plague skink (and other pest) incursions onto Aotea Great Barrier. This would require regular inspections of barges, engagement with major suppliers and increased advocacy work, among other things. A vector pathway management programme is currently being prepared with feedback being sought from the board in May 2017.
21. Reporting on project delivery will be through the board’s quarterly performance report, or as required.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Emma Joyce - Relationship Advisor Phil Brown – Biosecurity Team Leader (North / West) |
Authorisers |
Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
Local Government New Zealand conference and annual general meeting 2017
File No.: CP2017/05564
Purpose
1. To inform local boards about the Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Annual General Meeting (AGM) and conference in Auckland from Sunday 23 July to Tuesday 25 July 2017 and to invite local boards to nominate representatives to attend.
Executive summary
2. The LGNZ annual conference and AGM takes place at SkyCity from 3pm on Sunday 23 July to 2:15pm on Tuesday 25 July 2017.
3. The AGM takes place on the last day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to four official delegates at the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The Governing Body will consider this at its meeting on 23 March 2017. The four official delegates are likely to be the Mayor as a member of the LGNZ National Council (or his nominee), the Deputy Mayor as the Mayor’s alternate for this position, Cr Penny Hulse as the Chair of LGNZ Zone One and a member of LGNZ National Council, and the Chief Executive (or his nominee).
4. In addition to the official delegates, local board members are invited to attend. Historically, given the cost of elected member attendance at the conference it was recommended that one member per local board attend. In 2017, due to the cost savings associated with the conference being held in Auckland, two members per local board can be funded from the elected member development programme budget.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) nominate board members XXX and XXX (two representatives) to attend the Local Government New Zealand 2017 Conference and Annual General Meeting from Sunday 23 July to Tuesday 25 July 2017 b) confirm that conference attendance including travel and accommodation will be paid for in accordance with the current Auckland Council Elected Member Expense Policy c) note that any members who wish to attend the AGM must provide their names to the Kura Kāwana project team as soon as possible to ensure that they are registered with LGNZ. |
Comments
5. The 2017 LGNZ Conference and AGM are being held in Auckland. The conference commences with a powhiri and opening ceremony on Sunday 23 July at 3pm and concludes with the LGNZ AGM at 11:15am on Tuesday 25 July (AGM concludes at 2:15pm).
6. The theme of this year’s conference is “Creating pathways to 2050: Liveable spaces and loveable places”. The programme includes:
· Rt Hon Dame Patsy Reddy (Governor-General of New Zealand) will give the opening keynote address on how involving communities in shaping their local places can build a strong sense of local pride, identity and connection.
· Dr David Warburton (Chief Executive, Auckland Transport) and Mayor Lianne Dalziel, (Christchurch City Council) will look at the role of technology in transport and how smart technology can be integrated in councils future plans. Learn about the practical technology trials underway to understand why New Zealand is a world leader in the implementation of Smart City technology.
· Mayor Craig Little (Wairoa District Council) Mayor John Forbes (Opotiki District Council) and Chris Whelan (Chief Executive, Wellington Regional Economic Development Agency) will discuss attracting inward investment to boost local economy. These three councils will share best practice examples of how their approach has opened the door to investment, strengthening the resilience of their local economy.
· Sir Bob Harvey (Champion for Auckland, Auckland Council) Ludo Campbell-Reid (Design Champion and General Manager, Auckland Design Office, Auckland Council) and Viv Heslop (former Sustainability Lead, Panuku Development Auckland) on bringing together policy, practice and research to inform our council leaders on how they can champion change to create and sustain liveable spaces and loveable places.
· A panel discussion on managing community expectations and delivering the Government's objectives for freshwater water quality which is a challenge facing all of New Zealand. Mark Sainsbury will chair this session with Stuart Crosby (Bay of Plenty Regional Councillor) Rahui Papa (Te Arataura Chairman, Waikato Tainui and a representative of the Iwi Chairs Forum) and Ken Taylor (Director, National Science Challenge, Out Land and Water).
· Holly Ransom (futurist and global strategist) will give the closing keynote address presenting views on how and why we must adapt and be future-ready in a period of unprecedented technological, environmental, and demographic change.
Annual General Meeting
7. The AGM takes place on the last day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to have four delegates to the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The four official delegates are likely to be the Mayor (or his nominee), the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Cr Penny Hulse (as Chair of Zone One) and the Chief Executive (or his nominee).
8. The Mayor is a member of the LGNZ National Council, the Deputy Mayor is the Mayor’s alternate for this position and Auckland Council’s representative on the Regional Sector Group, Cr Penny Hulse is the Chair of LGNZ Zone One and a member of LGNZ National Council. The Governing Body will consider an item on AGM attendance at its meeting on 23 March 2017.
9. LGNZ requires prior notice of which local board members plan to attend the AGM. Members wishing to attend are asked to register their intention with the Kura Kāwana project as soon as possible so that this information can be collated and provided to LGNZ.
Costs
10. Historically, given the cost of elected member attendance at the conference it was recommended that one member per local board attend. In 2017, due to the cost savings associated with the conference being held in Auckland, two members per local board can be funded from the elected member development programme budget.
11. Conference registration includes attendance at all conference business sessions (Sunday - Tuesday), a satchel and contents, daily catering, the Simpson Grierson welcome reception and the Fulton Hogan conference dinner and EXCELLENCE Awards function.
12. The council hosted tours on Sunday 23 July 2017 are not included in the conference registration. Local board members are welcome to attend these at their own cost.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
13. This is a report to the 21 local boards.
Māori impact statement
14. The Local Government NZ conference will better inform local boards and thereby support their decision making for their communities including Maori.
Implementation
15. The Kura Kāwana programme will co-ordinate and book all conference registrations, as well as requests to attend the AGM.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Helen Dodd, Kura Kāwana Programme Leader, Local Board Services |
Authorisers |
Lou Lennane, Business Improvements Manager, Local Board Services Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Six-Monthly
Update 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017
File No.: CP2016/25245
Purpose
1. To give the Great Barrier Local Board an overview of Panuku Development Auckland. The report also notes any major issues, projects and activities within the local board area for the six months 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017.
Background
2. Panuku Development Auckland was established in September 2015 as a result of the merger of two council-controlled organisations (CCOs) – Waterfront Auckland and Auckland Council Property Limited (ACPL).
3. Panuku helps to rejuvenate parts of Auckland – from small projects that refresh a site or building, to major transformations of town centres or neighbourhoods.
4. Comprised of six directorates, Panuku manages around $1.5 billion of council’s property portfolio, which we continuously review to find smart ways to generate income for the region, grow the portfolio or release land or property that can be better used by others.
5. Panuku works with government, iwi, not-for-profit and private organisations. We use our skills, knowledge and connections to bring land and resources together to create the best outcome for Aucklanders.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) receive the Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Update - 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017. |
Local Activities
Portfolio Management
6. Panuku manages “non-service” property owned by Auckland Council (AC) and Auckland Transport (AT) that are not currently needed for service or infrastructure purposes. These are properties that are not immediately required for delivery of a council service or infrastructure development but are being held for use in a planned future project such as road construction, the expansion of parks or development of future town centres.
7. The property portfolio comprises 1437 properties containing 1119 leases as at 28 February 2017. The current portfolio includes vacant land, industrial buildings, warehouses, retail shops, cafes, offices, medical centres and a large portfolio of residential rental homes.
8. The return on the property portfolio for the period ending 31 December 2016 was above budget with a net surplus to council and AT shareholders of $3.9 million ahead of budget.
9. The average monthly tenantable occupancy rate for the six month period is more than 98 per cent which is above the statement of intent (SOI) target of 95 per cent.
Properties Managed in the Great Barrier Local Board Area
10. Panuku currently manages the following three commercial leases within the Great Barrier Local Board area.
Name |
Address |
Activity |
Type |
Fly My Sky |
70 Hector Sanderson Road, Claris (Claris Airport) |
Airline |
Commercial |
Great Barrier Airlines |
70 Hector Sanderson Road, Claris (Claris Airport) |
Airline |
Commercial |
Blackwells Quarry |
25 Hector Sanderson Road |
Fulton Hogan Quarry operation |
Commercial |
11. Ongoing management of the airport leases is best managed by AT. Council staff have been working with AT to achieve this outcome and transfer of Claris Airport leases.
Business Interests
12. Panuku optimises the commercial return from business interests it manages on council’s behalf. This comprises two forestry enterprises, two landfills and four quarries.
13. There is currently one managed business interest in the Great Barrier Local Board area:
14. Blackwell’s Quarry – Blackwell’s quarry is located on Hector Sanderson Road, Great Barrier Island, and is leased from the Blackwells.
15. Fulton Hogan operates this quarry on behalf of Auckland Council. Fulton Hogan have been granted an extension of the term of the Operating Agreement for five years to January 2021.
Portfolio Strategy
Optimisation
16. The 2015-2025 Long-Term Plan reflects a desire of council to materially reduce or slow down expenditure and unlock value from assets no longer required or which are sub-optimal for service purposes. In response to this, prior to the establishment of Panuku, ACPL developed a new method of dealing with service property, called optimisation.
17. Asset optimisation deals with “service property”. It is self-funding, it maximises efficiencies from service assets, and maintains levels of service whilst releasing property for sale or development. A key element of optimisation is that the sale proceeds are locally reinvested to advance approved projects and activities on a cost neutral basis. It does not include the Auckland Transport portfolio. Panuku continues to advance this programme of work. This includes the development of a cross-council project to coordinate and execute asset sales and optimisation.
Portfolio Review and Rationalisation
Overview
18. Panuku is required to undertake ongoing rationalisation of council’s non-service assets. This includes identifying properties from within council’s portfolio that may be suitable for potential sale and development if appropriate. Panuku has a particular focus on achieving housing and urban regeneration outcomes. Identifying potential sale properties contributes to the Auckland Plan focus of accommodating the significant growth projected for the region over the coming decades, by providing the council with an efficient use of capital and prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects.
Performance
19. July 2016 to June 2017 Target
UNIT |
TARGET |
ACHIEVED |
COMMENTS |
Portfolio Review |
$75 million disposal recommendations |
$35.5 million as at 28 February 2017 |
These recommendations include $13.25 million of sites that are identified for development projects. |
20. Panuku works closely with the council and AT to identify potentially surplus properties to help achieve disposal targets.
21. July 2017 to June 2018 Target
UNIT |
TARGET |
COMMENTS |
Portfolio Review |
To be determined as part of the statement of intent with Council. |
The target will include disposal recommendations and sales for sites that are identified for housing development and urban regeneration projects |
Process
22. Once identified as a potential sale candidate a property is taken through a multi-stage Rationalisation Process. The agreed process includes engagement with: the council, CCOs, local board and Mana Whenua. This is followed by Panuku Board approval, engagement with local ward councillors and the Independent Māori Statutory Board and finally a governing body decision.
Under review
23. There are currently no properties under review in the Great Barrier Local Board area.
Acquisitions and Disposals
24. Panuku manages the acquisition and disposal of property on behalf of the council. We buy property for development, roads, infrastructure projects and other service needs. We manage the sale of properties that are surplus to council requirements. These properties may be sold with or without contractual requirements for development.
Acquisitions
25. 12 properties have had purchase agreements signed this financial year for open space purposes around the region at a value of $19.1 million, and three properties have been purchased for storm water purposes at a value of $16.2 million.
26. No properties were purchased in the Great Barrier Local Board area during the reporting period.
Disposals
27. For the eight months to February 2017 the Panuku disposals team has achieved $17.94 million of unconditional net sales proceeds from the sale of 10 properties against the 2016/17 disposals target of $20.0 million for the year. The disposals target is agreed with the council is reviewed on an annual basis.
28. No properties were sold in the Great Barrier Local Board area.
Housing for Older People
29. Council owns and operates 1412 units located in 62 villages across Auckland to provide rental housing to older people in Auckland. The Housing for Older People (HfOP) Project is a Council initiative that involves procuring a third party provider to partner with council in delivering the rental housing service.
30. Following the approval by the Panuku Board on 8 December 2015, the Auckland Development Committee noted that HfOP would be an unlock project for Panuku and that Panuku would prepare a high level project plan (HLPP) that provided the foundation for Panuku to develop and reposition the portfolio to better the needs of older people in Auckland.
31. The HLPP was approved by the Panuku Board in August 2016.
32. On 21 December 2015, council announced that The Selwyn Foundation will be its preferred joint venture partner to manage the HfOP portfolio. Panuku has been negotiating a joint venture agreement with Selwyn. The Joint Venture Company (JVCo) will deliver the service and improve the housing portfolio.
33. Community Housing Provider (CHP) application was submitted to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) by JVCo on 20 December 2016.
34. Auckland Council has delegated Panuku to lead the development programme. A HLPP is being prepared by Panuku to cover the multi-year redevelopment of the network of village sites.
35. There are currently no HfOP villages located in the Great Barrier Local Board area.
Regional Activities
36. Good progress has been made in our priority development areas, with HLPPs being worked on for Onehunga, Papatoetoe, Avondale and Henderson. In Manukau and Northcote, leading on from the Council’s approval of the HLPP, Framework Plans (which are more detailed plans on the development of the locations, including reference plans for each development site) have been developed.
37. Often it is the smaller projects that can make a huge difference in a community over a relatively short period – the placemaking activities, the development of public space, or the optimisation of Council properties. Panuku is identifying these projects, and a key focus will be on delivering more of these projects within the locations that we work.
Highlights
38. The highlights for the last six months were:
a) Sir John Wells ended his term as Chair in November 2016. Sir John has had a long association with the council family, including being Chair of ACPL prior to its amalgamation into Panuku. Richard Aitken was appointed Chair to replace Sir John.
b) Roger MacDonald was appointed as the Chief Executive of Panuku, and he started in the role in November 2016. Roger originates from the United Kingdom, and has delivered large scale urban redevelopment projects across the world, in Africa, the Middle East and in the United Kingdom.
c) The Panuku Board agreed that Barrowcliffe Place, Manukau is a “pilot project” to form a consortium comprising a CHP, with a Mana Whenua partner(s) and other suitable development and funding partner(s), to develop the site. The aim will be to deliver a mix of market and affordable housing where sustainable and accessible design components will be tested.
d) The first tenants have moved into the Mason Brothers building in the Wynyard Quarter. The building is part of stage one of Precinct Properties’ programme of developing the commercial sites in the Wynyard Quarter. The development of 12 Madden Street, which Auckland Tourism, Events & Economic Development (ATEED) has taken the head lease for the establishment of Grid AKL, will be completed in July 2017.
e) Stage Two of the Hobsonville Airfields Development was tendered, and a preferred tenderer has been selected after a number of tenderers submitted strong bids. The due diligence process is underway. The 9.9 hectare site will see 500 homes of mixed typology constructed.
f) Lot 1, 187 Flat Bush Road was also tendered and a development agreement has been signed. 30 homes will be constructed on the 1.9 hectare site, with construction commencing within a year of the sale.
g) The ASB Waterfront Theatre was opened on 22 September 2016. Panuku (on behalf of Council) provided the site, contributed to the funding and provided design review and oversight for the project. The theatre is a key component of the activation of the Wynyard Quarter.
h) The Water Edge Symposium was held in November 2016, with invited waterfront experts attending from the United States of America, Asia, Europe and the Pacific. As well as discussing international case studies, the symposium workshopped ideas about how to develop the Onehunga/Manukau harbour water edge, and this thinking is feeding into the planning for the Onehunga Transform project.
i) The Silo Park Summer Programme has seen thousands of people visit the waterfront over the summer period, to enjoy the night markets, catch movies at the Silo cinema, and enjoy the various forms of entertainment on offer, cementing the waterfront as the place to be in Auckland over summer.
j) After an audit of Panuku against Accident Compensation Corporation’s (ACC) Workplace Safety Management Practices external accreditation, Panuku attained Tertiary standard, reflecting its commitment to continual improvement in health and safety.
Future outlook
39. Over the next few months, Panuku will:
k) Formalise the joint venture between the council and The Selwyn Foundation (JVCo) to manage the Housing for Older People portfolio and tenants with legal agreements being negotiated and Community Housing Provider registration being prepared. JVCo will take over the management of the Housing for Older People portfolio in July 2017.
l) The lease of the Panuku office accommodations expires in mid-2017. Options are being considered, and it is likely that it will be more cost effective for Panuku to move to a modest-quality building in the central business district (CBD) rather than remaining in its current building.
m) Tawera Group is marketing residential apartments to gather pre-sales for the redevelopment of the Civic Administration Building, which is part of the Civic Quarter development. This follows on from the signing of the Development Agreement between Panuku and the Tawera Group.
n) Panuku is working on a refresh of the Waterfront Strategy, which will frame future development within the CBD waterfront area. This work will be reported to the Council in March 2017, with draft Framework Plans reported in May 2017.
o) Panuku has been reviewing how to improve the transparency of its board meetings and interactions with the media. Panuku will hold as many of its monthly board meetings in the open as possible. A public-excluded session will be held at each meeting to discuss confidential matters. Agendas for each meeting will continue to be posted on the Panuku website (panuku.co.nz) prior to the meeting. Board papers (with confidential information redacted) will also be posted online. Members of the public will be invited (via the Panuku website) to present to the Board on issues relevant to Panuku.
All media enquiries will be responded to in a timely fashion and all information is shared with the media unless it is of a confidential nature. Major projects are outlined on our website and all key documents (such as our Annual Report and the project plans for our development locations) are available online.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
40. This report is for the Great Barrier Local Board’s information.
41. Panuku requests that all feedback and/or queries you have relating to a property in your local board area be directed in the first instance to localboard@developmentauckland.co.nz
Māori impact statement
42. Tāmaki Makaurau has the highest Māori population in the world with one in four Māori in Aotearoa living here.
43. Māori make up 12 per cent of the region’s total population who mainly live in Manurewa, Henderson-Massey, Papakura, Ōtara-Papatoetoe, Māngere-Ōtahuhu and Franklin. Māori have a youthful demographic with 50 per cent of Māori in Tāmaki Makaurau under the age of 25 years. Five per cent of the Māori population in the region are currently 65 years and over.
44. There are 19 Mana Whenua in the region, with seven having indicated an interest in Panuku lead activities within the Great Barrier Local Board area.
45. Māori make up 18 per cent of the Great Barrier Local Board population, and there are two marae located within the local board area.
46. Panuku work collaboratively with Mana Whenua on a range projects including potential property disposals, development sites in the area and commercial opportunities. Engagement can be on specific individual properties and projects at an operational level with kaitiaki representatives, or with the Panuku Mana Whenua Governance Forum who have a broader mandate.
47. Panuku will continue to partner with Māori on opportunities which enhance Māori social and economic wellbeing.
Implementation
48. There are no implementation issues.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Sven Mol - Stakeholder Relations Coordinator - Panuku Development Auckland |
Authorisers |
Toni Giacon - Team Leader Stakeholder and Community Engagement John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
Great Barrier Local Board 18 April 2017 |
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
File No.: CP2017/05215
Purpose
1. To present the Great Barrier Local Board with its updated governance forward work calendar.
Executive Summary
2. The governance forward work calendar for the Great Barrier Local Board is in Attachment A. The calendar is updated monthly, reported to business meetings and distributed to council staff.
3. The governance forward work calendars were introduced in 2016 as part of Auckland Council’s quality advice programme and aim to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on meeting agendas is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is expected and when
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar also aims to provide guidance for staff supporting local boards and greater transparency for the public.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) note the Great Barrier Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar – April 2017.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Great Barrier Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar - April 2017 |
9 |
Signatories
Author |
Guia Nonoy - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |
18 April 2017 |
|
Great Barrier Local Board Workshop Proceedings
File No.: CP2017/05216
Executive Summary
Attached is the Great Barrier Local Board workshop proceedings taken at the workshop held on 14 March, 28 March and 4 April 2017.
That the Great Barrier Local Board: a) note the record of proceedings for the workshops held on 14 March, 28 March and 4 April 2017. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Great Barrier Local Board workshop proceedings -14 March 2017 |
9 |
b⇩ |
Great Barrier Local Board workshop proceedings - 28 March 2017 |
9 |
c⇩ |
Great Barrier Local Board workshop proceedings - 4 April 2017 |
9 |
Signatories
Author |
Guia Nonoy - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services John Nash - Relationship Manager Great Barrier & Waiheke |