I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Papakura Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Wednesday, 26 April 2017 4.30pm Local Board
Chambers |
Papakura Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Brent Catchpole |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Felicity Auva'a |
|
Members |
Hon George Hawkins, QSO |
|
|
Bill McEntee |
|
|
Michael Turner |
|
|
Katrina Winn |
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
Trish Wayper Local Board Democracy Advisor
20 April 2017
Contact Telephone: (09) 295 1331 Email: Trish.Wayper@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
9 Public Forum 5
10 Extraordinary Business 5
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Councillors' Update 7
13 Auckland Transport Update April 2017 - Papakura Local Board 9
14 Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 17
15 New community leases - group-owned buildings - 30 Old Wairoa Road and 13 Opaheke Road 23
16 Papakura Pony Club Incorporated Request For Financial Assistance To Relocate From Opaheke Park, Papakura 35
17 New Road Name Approval for
the residential subdivision by Housing New Zealand across various sites in
Papakura including:
• 6
– 8 Old Wairoa Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2015/3005]
• 3
– 5 Dominion Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4207]
• 32
– 34 President Avenue, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4196]
• 50
– 52 Pukeroa Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/2564]
• 25 – 35
Porchester Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4134] not yet determined 39
18 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Pakenham Group Limited at 170 – 190 Walters Road and 543 – 587 Mill Road, Takanini 51
19 Business Improvement District (BID) Programme Annual Report to Papakura Local Board 57
20 Land owner approval for proposed stream planting at Hangaia Stream Esplanade Reserve, 41 and 41R Firth Street, 20 Cameron Place, Drury and Karaka Reserve, 10R Karaka Road, Drury. 67
21 Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Six-Monthly Update 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017 73
22 Leona McKenzie Memorial Seat - Short Street, Opaheke 81
23 Local board feedback on Government’s Urban Development Authorities Discussion Document 97
24 Local Government New Zealand conference and Annual General Meeting 2017 231
25 Approval of the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 235
26 Papakura Local Board Submissions 283
27 Alteration of the business meeting schedule for the Papakura Local Board 289
28 Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term 291
29 For Information: Reports referred to the Papakura Local Board 297
30 Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes 299
31 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
32 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 315
C1 Acquisition of land for open space - Papakura 315
1 Welcome
Mr Smith will lead the meeting in prayer – or whatever set text we decide will appear here.
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Papakura Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 22 March 2017, including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Papakura Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/06079
Purpose
1. An opportunity is provided for Ward Councillors’ Daniel Newman, and Sir John Walker to update the Board on regional matters of interest.
Executive Summary
2. Nil.
a) That the Councillors’ update be received. |
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Auckland Transport Update April 2017 - Papakura Local Board
File No.: CP2017/06713
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to; respond to resolutions and requests on transport-related matters, provide an update on the current status of Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF), provide a summary of consultation material sent to the Board and, provide transport related information on matters of specific application and interest to the Papakura Local Board and its community.
Executive summary
2. In particular, this report covers:
· Responses to resolutions made by the Board on 22 March 2017 meeting
· Auckland Transport’s strategic alignment
· A Local Board Transport Capital Fund update
· Auckland Transport projects that are being delivered in Papakura
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Note the Auckland Transport update April 2017 report
|
Comments
Responses to Papakura Local Board Resolutions
3. The resolution is recorded below in italics. Auckland Transport’s response is in normal font below the resolution.
4. Resolution number PPK/2017/22
a. Thanks Auckland Transport for installing hit sticks as a measure to stop bus strikes of the covered walkway. Regrettably the solution has failed to prevent such strikes as a further incident has occurred therefore Auckland Transport are requested to provide a more effective solution
5. Since being installed the hit sticks have stopped bus strikes on the eastern side of Railway Street West. The most recent bus strike was on the corner of Averill Street and Railway Street West. This area had not been identified as subject to bus strikes. After this most recent bus strike, the area has been included in the investigation into measures to reduce bus strikes to the covered walkway.
b. Requests that all outstanding aspects of the covered walkway be completed by the end of April 2017 as it has been a protracted and unsatisfactory implemented project.
6. The resolution has been noted. A meeting for local board members is being organised with Auckland Transport staff to agree the actions required to fix the problem. A date for the meeting has yet to be confirmed.
c. Requests that Auckland Transport report back to the board on the request from the February 2017 business meeting concerning the traffic exiting the railway station carpark in front of buses to alleviate safety risks.
7. As noted in the Auckland Transport Update - March 2017 to the Papakura Local Board, this potential hazard has been logged and is being investigated. The results will be shared with the local board once the investigation has been concluded in late April or May 2017.
d. Requests Auckland Transport to investigate making local bus trips in Papakura within four kilometres of the railway station free to HOP card users.
8. Travel within a single Fare Zone is one price. Therefore if travelling on a bus to connect with a train at the Papakura Train Station, the bus travel is effectively free of charge if the trip originated within the Manukau South Zone.. The zone surrounding Papakura Station is shown below. It is considerably larger than four kilometres. Super Gold Card holders travel free after 9am
Figure 1- Manukau South Fare Zone.
Travel anywhere within the purple zone whether by bus or train or both is one fare - $ 1.80 with ATHOP
e. Requests Auckland Transport to supply the board with definitive information and timeframes concerning the proposed Park and Ride carpark for the Papakura Railway Station
9. A workshop was organised to brief the local board on 12 April 2017, but has been rescheduled for 3 May 2017 to brief the local board on progress. As previously noted, geotechnical testing of the ground conditions has impacted on the overall feasibility of the project. Further information will be provided to Local Board Members at the upcoming workshop.
Strategic alignment
Transport Future Urban Growth/ Redoubt Road - Mill Road Corridor
10. This project has significant strategic implications to the future of the local board area. This is an ongoing strategic project between Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and New Zealand Transport Agency to support the growth in Papakura, Takanini and Drury. It provides an alternate route to these areas in the south in addition to the motorway.
11. An initial workshop was held with the local board to brief them on the current stage of the project with a follow up session held on the 29 March 2017 focussing on the future stages of the project within Takanini, Papakura & Drury.
New Network and Light Rail
12. The most recent announcement that light rail is being investigated in more detail highlights the significant work to address the future transport needs of Auckland. This decision aligns with the Auckland Plan priority for the development of ‘a transformational improvement in the speed, capacity, reliability and connectivity of the public transport system’.
13. The announcement on 24 March 2017 that the New Zealand Transport Agency and Auckland Transport boards have agreed that there will be a staged, integrated transition from bus to light rail transit from the airport to the city centre, based on future demand and capacity, and to commence route protection for this important gateway corridor between two of Auckland’s key growing employment areas.
Auckland Transport’s actions against advocacy plans
14. This section provides a report about how Auckland Transport is supporting the Papakura local boards ‘Advocacy initiatives’ from the 2014-17 Local Board Plan. The table below notes the local boards key transport related ‘advocacy initiatives’
15. Table 1: Advocacy Initiative Status
Advocacy Initiative |
Key Initiative |
Status |
A safe cycling and walking network across the south |
Links in cycling and walking network and coastal routes |
The Great South Road cycle lane – Takanini was completed in December 2015.
This provides current and future residents in the fast growing areas of Papakura travel options
The Great South Road is a critical part of Auckland’s Regional Cycle Network as set out in the Auckland Plan.
|
Clear links between town centre and rail station |
The covered walkway from the rail station to the main street, was a project delivered by Auckland Transport through the boards Local Board Transport Capital Fund.
This project highlights the role of the local board in ‘place shaping’ and provides a clear physical link from the train station to the main street of Papakura.
|
|
Better and safer connections by road and rail |
Better and more joined up bus services, travel information and low bus floors |
Auckland Transport Service Improvements – This project will bring together at 5 stations including Papakura the ticket and information kiosks to improve customer service levels.
Safer Public Transport – This seeks to improve public safety on public transport by - Installing gates and fencing around key stations, including Papakura - Seeking law changes to remove non-paying patrons to be removed from trains - Seeking law changes to empower staff working on the Auckland Transport Metro Network.
|
Transport capital fund update
Updates
16. The Local Board Transport Capital Fund is a capital budget provided to all local boards and delivered by Auckland Transport. Local Boards can use this fund to deliver projects that they deem important but are not part of Auckland Transport’s work programme. The limitations being that the project must:
· Be safe.
· Not impede network efficiency.
· Be in the road corridor. Although projects running through parks can be considered if there is a transport outcome.
17. Papakura local board annual funding is approx.
· $315,491 carried over from 2016/17 financial year
· $331,660 for the 17/18 financial year
· $346,396 for the 18/19 financial year
· $351,517 for the 19/20 financial year (although the election is in 2019 the 19/20 Financial Year starts before the election so this money can be spent by this term’s local board).
· The annual increase is because the fund will now be adjusted for inflation each year.
18. Local Boards can consolidate up to three years of the funding available to them in an electoral term to allocate to projects. For the Papakura local board this means a total of approx. $1.34 million could be spent on transport projects in this electoral term.
19. Auckland Transport encourages all local boards to identify potential projects early in their electoral term to ensure that project planning, procurement and delivery can be undertaken within the current electoral term
Projects
20. Currently the Papakura Local Board is currently undertaking work to identify possible projects through planning workshops held on the 22 February 2017. A follow up workshop will be held on the 3 May 2017 to prioritise potential projects to be investigated.
21. These will be formally reported to the local board to resolve those projects to be progressed.
22. The table below details the current projects being progressed on behalf of the local board.
Table 2: LBTCF – Current projects
Projects |
Current Status
|
Problem or Opportunity Being Addressed |
Current Status |
Connection of Railway Station and Town Centre
|
|
Improving physical linkage from the town centre with the railway station via a covered walkway. |
‘Rough Order of Cost’ requested by the local board in May 2015. ‘Detailed Design’ authorised by the local board in December 2015 on a Rough Order of Cost of $760,000. ‘Construction’ started in June 2016. Physical works completed. Only image reinstallation is to be completed. |
Notes: A ‘traffic light’ code is used to summarise the status of projects. The colours are used as follows: Green – Project progressing ‘on time’ and on budget. Orange – An issue has been identified that may need to be resolved. Red - An major issue has been identified that needs to be resolved Black – The project has been investigated and the Papakura local board has decided not to pursue it at this time. |
Papakura Park & Ride
23. As noted in previous reports to the local board, Auckland Transport is investigating a trial for Papakura Park and ride facility to cope with the increase in patronage on the Auckland Transport Metro network.
24. An engineering study (including assessment of geotechnical) was completed before Christmas and feasibility of this project is being progressed. The results of the current work will be completed in by April 2017
25. A workshop will be held with the local board on the 3rd May 2017 to brief them on the result of the feasibility study.
Upcoming projects and activities
Consultations
26. Auckland Transport provides the Papakura local board with the opportunity to comment on transport projects being delivered in this local board area.
27. In this reporting period for March, no consultations were put forward for comment by the local board.
28. Traffic Control Committee (TCC) decisions are reported on a monthly basis. In March there was one TCC decision in the local board area.
29. Table 1 – Traffic Control Committee Decision March 2017
Bellbird Street / Saddleback Crescent / Warbler Crescent / Stichbird Crescent / Unnamed Roads |
Permanent Traffic and Parking changes Combined |
No Stopping At All Times, Give-Way Control |
Not Carried |
Regional and sub-regional projects
Roads and Streets Framework (RASF) and Transport Design Manual (TDM)
30. Auckland Transport is reviewing the Auckland Transport Code of Practice (ATCOP) with the resulting outcome is its replacement with:
· A ‘Roads and Streets Framework’ – That will guide decision-making in the road corridor to provide a better balance between local place-making and transport movement functions and priorities.
· A ‘Transport Design Manual’ – That provides technical direction about design standards.
31. The aim is to make guidelines for road corridor infrastructure more flexible and responsive to local needs but still maintain high technical standards.
The sub-regional workshops are currently being scheduled for 20/ 27 March 2017. Details will be confirmed shortly and local board invites sent out promptly.
Public Transport Supporting Events
32. The recent Adele concert demonstrated how an efficient public transport network contributes to making Auckland a better place to live. Due to the large numbers estimated to attend the three different concert dates, Auckland Transport provided additional bus and train services for people travelling to the concert.
33. Estimated figures Auckland Transport carried 80% of the crowd to the concert on trains and buses – 27,000 on trains and 7600 on buses.
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) Traffic Conditions Radio Station
34. Auckland Transport and NZTA have partnered to trial a short-range radio service for broadcasting travel information to motorists on route.
35. 102.2 OnRoute FM, will trial on-air for six months from March 2017 providing updates on transport network incidents, road works and other matters that affect people’s journeys on SH 1 and 20. Listeners will hear alerts and advisories from NZTA, Auckland Transport, Police and in an emergency Auckland Civil Defence. Commercial advertising is not permitted. The coverage area is shown below.
Figure 3: Coverage Area of Traffic Condition Radio Broadcasts
36. For more information visit www.nzta.govt.nz/onrouteFM or www.at.govt.nz/projects, or you can email onroutefm@nzta.govt.nz.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
37. The Board’s views will be incorporated during consultation on any proposed schemes.
Māori impact statement
38. No specific issues with regard to impacts on Maori are triggered by this report and any engagement with Maori will be carried out on an individual project basis.
Implementation
39. All proposed schemes are subject to prioritisation, funding and consultation.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018
File No.: CP2017/04183
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Purpose
1. The purpose of the report is to present the Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 to the Papakura Local Board for adoption.
Executive Summary
2. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year.
4. This report presents the Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 for adoption (see Attachment A).
That the Papakura Local Board: a) adopt the Papakura Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018.
|
Comments
5. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
6. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year. The local board grants programme guides community groups and individuals when making applications to the local board.
7. The local board community grants programme includes:
· outcomes as identified in the local board plan;
· specific local board grant priorities;
· which grant types will operate, the number of grant rounds, and opening and closing dates;
· any additional criteria or exclusions that will apply; and
· other factors the local board consider to be significant to their decision-making.
8. Once the local board community grants programme for the 2017/2018 financial year has been adopted, the types of grants, grant rounds, criteria and eligibility will be advertised through an integrated communication and marketing approach, which includes utilising the local board channels.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
9. The Community Grants Programme has been developed by the local board to set the direction of their grants programme. This programme is reviewed on an annual basis.
Māori impact statement
10. All grant programmes should respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing, by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Māori. The application form requires the applicant to outline how their project aims to increase Māori outcomes.
Implementation
11. An implementation plan is underway and the local board grants programme will be locally advertised through the local board and council channels. Targeted advertising and promotion will be developed for target populations, including migrant and refugee groups, disability groups, Māori and iwi organisations.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Papakura Local Board Grant Programme 2017/2018 |
19 |
Signatories
Authors |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager |
Authorisers |
Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
26 April 2017 |
|
New community leases - group-owned buildings - 30 Old Wairoa Road and 13 Opaheke Road
File No.: CP2017/04131
Purpose
1. To seek approval for new community leases to
· Papakura City Brass Band Incorporated for the property at 30 Old Wairoa Road, Papakura
· Papakura Contract Bridge Club Incorporated for the property at 13 Opaheke Road, Papakura.
Executive summary
2. Community leases are one of the ways in which the council provides support to local community organisations, assisting them to sustain the activities and experiences they provide in alignment with recognised local priorities.
3. For the recommended leases, a process has been followed which includes a review of the tenants’ performance, that the organisations are sustainable, the services and programmes offered are beneficial to the community and that they align with objectives stated in the Auckland Plan and Papakura Local Board Plan 2014.
4. Each of the groups own the buildings and improvements at the addresses listed. As outlined in the Auckland Council Community Occupancy Guidelines July 2012, groups that own their own buildings have a right to apply for a new lease at the end of their occupancy term. There is no requirement to undertake an expression of interest process.
5. Community Outcomes Plans have been agreed to by each group and will be an attachment to the new leases subject to local board approval. The groups will report annually against the target performance measures.
6. It is recommended that new leases be approved for these groups under the terms and conditions specified in the recommendations below.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) approve a new community ground lease for Papakura City Brass Band Incorporated for 30 Old Wairoa Road, Papakura (outlined in green in Attachment A) under the following terms and conditions: i) Term – 10 years commencing 1 May 2017 with one 10 year right of renewal. ii) Rent - $1.00 (+ GST) per annum, if demanded. iii) An approved Community Outcomes Plan (Attachment B) attached to the lease document. iv) All other terms and conditions in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 and the Auckland Council Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012. b) approve a new community ground lease for Papakura Contract Bridge Club Incorporated for 13 Opaheke Road, Papakura (outlined in green in Attachment C) under the following terms and conditions: i) Term – 10 years commencing 1 May 2017 with one 10 year right of renewal. ii) Rent - $1.00 (+ GST) per annum, if demanded. iii) An approved Community Outcomes Plan (Attachment D) attached to the lease document. c) All other terms and conditions in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 and the Auckland Council Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012.
|
Comments
7. Where a group owns the building, the recommended term of a new community lease is 10 years with one 10 year right of renewal. The recommended rental is $1.00 (+ GST) per annum, if requested. The group is responsible for maintenance and utilities costs for the building. A Community Outcomes Plan will be an attachment to the new lease, subject to local board approval, and will be reported upon annually.
Papakura City Brass Band Incorporated
8. Papakura City Brass Band Incorporated was first registered as an incorporated society on 16 September 1963. The band has recently discovered reference, dated 1865, of a band in Papakura. They also have an undated photograph taken around 100 years ago.
9. The band currently has 30 senior members, 20 junior members and a learner class of 20. They are a member of the Brass Band Association of New Zealand and are therefore eligible to participate in competitions and educational programmes. Members are also eligible to audition for selection to play in national brass bands. They have had members participate in the National Brass Band of New Zealand, the National Youth Brass Band and the National Secondary Schools Brass Band. The Papakura City Brass Band won the C Grade Championship in 2010 and 2011. In 2012/2013 they received an upgrade to B Grade and will compete at this level at the 2017 National Championships in April.
10. The Papakura Brass Band teaches the playing of brass band instruments and promotes the study and advancement of band music. They currently run a primary school-age learner programme, a junior band (mostly secondary school-aged members) and a senior band (comprising of members aged between 15 and 75+).
11. No previous lease documents are held by either council or the band. Therefore they were asked to make an application for a new ground lease under the terms of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012.
12. The land is held in fee simple by Auckland Council under the Local Government Act 2002 and is described as Part Lot 3 DP 10784, 5172 m2 - NA427/165.
Papakura Contract Bridge Club Incorporated
13. Papakura Contract Bridge Club Incorporated was first registered as an incorporated society on 26 October 1960. An inaugural meeting was held upstairs at the Star Theatre in the corner of Great South Road and Averill Street in Papakura. Around 30 people attended the meeting and the club formally got underway in February 1959. The club moved premises several times before the School of Engineering social hall at Ardmore became available for relocation in 1971. The Papakura Borough Council made the land at Opaheke Road available for the building.
14. The club currently has 80 members who are offered three playing sessions per week (Monday daytime, Wednesday evenings and Friday afternoons). They are a member of New Zealand Bridge and the Auckland Northland region. Papakura Contract Bridge holds two annual tournaments (February and August) and a charity tournament each autumn. In February each year 11-weeks of lessons are offered and at the end of the programme those attending are invited to join the club. New members are supported with a President’s Night held in June.
15. The Papakura Borough Council entered into a license to occupy with the club in March 1972. This agreement has remained in place since that time. The club was asked to apply for a ground lease for the property under the terms of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012.
16. The land is held in fee simple by Auckland Council under the Local Government Act 2002 and is described as Allotment 139 Section 11 Village of Papakura, comprising 1012m2, and contained in NA14D/1316 (Limited as to Parcels).
Consideration
Local board views and implications
17. The recommendations within this report fall within local board’s allocated authority relating to local, recreation, sports and community facilities.
18. These new leases were discussed with the Papakura Local Board at their workshop held on 8 March 2017.
Māori impact statement
19. Support for Maori initiatives and outcomes are detailed in Te Toa Takitini, Auckland Council’s Maori Responsiveness Framework. An aim of community leasing is to increase targeted support for Maori community development projects. Additionally it seeks to improve access to facilities for Maori living in the Papakura Local Board area.
Implementation
20. All costs involved in the preparation of lease documents are borne by Auckland Council.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
30 Old Wairoa Road, Papakura - site map |
27 |
b⇩
|
Papakura City Brass Band Inc. - community outcomes plan |
29 |
c⇩
|
13 Opaheke Road, Papakura - site map |
31 |
d⇩
|
Papakura Contract Bridge Club Inc. - community outcomes plan |
33 |
Signatories
Authors |
Jenny Young - Community Lease Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rod Sheridan - General Manager Community Facilities Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Pony Club Incorporated Request For Financial Assistance To Relocate From Opaheke Park, Papakura
File No.: CP2017/05064
Purpose
1. To request the Papakura Local Board (PLB) provide the Papakura Pony Club Incorporated (PPC) a grant of $6782 to fund the relocation of their club to a new operational base in Bombay, Auckland.
Executive summary
2. As a result of the new park development planned for Opaheke Park, the PPC was required to relinquish their lease for club use at Opaheke Park in early 2017.
3. The development of Opaheke Park will be undertaken by Motleon Ltd the company developing the Bellfield Special Housing Area (SHA) which is sited adjacent to Opaheke Park. The initial phase of the future park development is programmed to begin by mid-2017.
4. The area where the PPC had been located will become a landscaped water catchment management area, a key component of the SHA development. It will compromise of ponds, paths and a boardwalk network linking to the rest of the park.
5. The PPC has now secured a new location on private land in Lowry Rd, Bombay. This location is within the Auckland region and will meet their club’s needs. The PPC are intending to relocate to this site in May 2017.
6. The cost of the club’s move to Bombay is estimated to cost $11,782. Motleon Ltd have contributed $5000 towards the relocation costs, leaving the club with a shortfall of $6782.
7. The PPC are formerly requesting that the Papakura Local Board consider a grant of $6,782 to enable the PPC to relocate to their new site in Bombay.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Provide a grant of $6,782 to the Papakura Pony Club Incorporated to assist the club’s move to their new location in Bombay, Auckland. b) That the grant of $6,782 is provided from the Papakura Local Board Community Response Fund (LDI Opex).
|
Comments
8. Due to the impending development at Opaheke Park, the PPC have to relocate their facility to a new site. Community services staff have been working with the club since late 2016 to find an area of Auckland Council reserve that would be suitable for PPC activities. While finding a location on Council land was unsuccessful, a new site for the club to relocate to has been found at Lowry Rd, Bombay.
9. The requirement for the PPC to relinquish their lease to operate from Opaheke Park has been challenging for the club and has resulted in numerous meetings and discussions with the PLB and Council staff. However the PPC is now in the process of complying with the requirement for the club to leave Opaheke Park.
10. The PPC is not a large club and the logistics along with the cost to relocate a pony club are significant. The club is requesting financial assistance from the PLB to enable the club to relocate with financial ease, noting that the PPC still has the cost to establish their new facility at their Bombay site.
11. Motleon Ltd has consistently acknowledged that the situation has not been easy for the club and has contributed $5000.00 towards the PPC relocation costs, leaving the club needing to secure a further $6,782.00 to enable the move.
12. The proposed grant combined with the contribution from Motleon Ltd will cover the full cost of the dismantling of the PPC covered container style complex, specialist lifting gear for the containers, all jumps removed, transporter hire, travel, cross country course design along with the costs associated with re-establishment of all these facilities at their new site.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
13. The PLB has worked closely with the PPC throughout negotiations and discussions regarding the termination of this lease. In these discussions the PLB has acknowledged the difficult situation that the PPC was facing having to relocate from Opaheke Park.
14. The club while small, are resourceful, however the cost to relocate will not be easy financially for the club. The grant will assist the club significantly as they still have further costs associated with establishing facilities on their new site.
15. Should the club not secure this funding at this time to enable their move there will be a delay in the club’s planned departure timetable.
Māori impact statement
16. Mana whenua engagement regarding the exit of the Papakura Pony Club Incorporated from Opaheke Park has not occurred. This outcome is specific to the terminated lease between Auckland Council and the PPC. If the club had been relocated onto public open space, iwi would have been engaged but because the relocation is onto private property, engagement was not required.
Implementation
17. Motleon Ltd has had a delay in initiating a start on the Bellfield SHA and has agreed to an extension period (30 April 2017) in order to provide PPC additional time to plan their departure from Opaheke Park.
18. Should the PLB agree to provide the grant as requested the PPC will complete their relocation from Opaheke Park in early May 2017.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Greg Lowe - Parks Liaison & Development Team Leader |
Authorisers |
Mace Ward - General Manager Parks, Sports and Recreation Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision
by Housing New Zealand across various sites in Papakura including:
• 6 – 8 Old Wairoa Road,
Papakura [R/JSL/2015/3005]
• 3 – 5 Dominion Road,
Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4207]
• 32 – 34 President
Avenue, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4196]
• 50 – 52 Pukeroa Road,
Papakura [R/JSL/2016/2564]
• 25 – 35 Porchester
Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4134] not yet determined
File No.: CP2017/05212
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Papakura Local Board, for six new road names for private lanes created through different resource consents sought by Housing New Zealand within the Papakura District. The private lanes will serve the new increased density at the following sites:
i) 6 – 8 Old Wairoa Road
ii) 3 – 5 Dominion Road
iii) 32 – 34 President Ave
iv) 50 – 52 Pukeroa Road
v) 25 – 35 Porchester Road
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming for the Auckland Council.
3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘Kukutai Lane, Wiki Lane, Hapai Lane, Huritao Lane, Pohuehue Lane and Tumanako Lane’ (applicant’s preferred road names) and alternative names, Whanake Lane, Akapuka Lane, Korokia Lane, Neinei Land and Para Lane were determined to meet the road naming criteria.
4. It is noted that the proposed alternative Kohuhu Lane does not meet the road naming criteria as this name is already in use within the Auckland region.
5. Furthermore, consultation with New Zealand Post found that the following road name does not meet their addressing standards being Kohuhu Lane. New Zealand Post also commented that Wiki Lane is already in use in Mount Wellington, however, this road name does not appear in Auckland Council GIS system.
6. The applicant undertook consultation with the iwi within the Papakura Local Board area and only Kowhai Olsen of Te Ahiwaru responded referring to Nagaati Tamaoho in this instance. No comment from Nagaati Tamaoho was received.
7. The road names ‘Kukutai Lane, Wiki Lane, Hapai Lane, Huritao Lane, Pohuehue Lane and Tumanako Lane’ (applicant’s preferred road names) and alternative names, Whanake Lane, Akapuka Lane, Korokia Lane, Neinei Land and Para Lane are considered for approval by the Local Board.
That the Papakura Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval, the road names Kukutai Lane, Wiki Lane, Hapai Lane, Huritao Lane, Pohuehue Lane and Tumanako Lane’ proposed by the Applicant for the new private roads created by way of various resource consents under the Resource Management Act 1991 at i) 6 – 8 Old Wairoa Road ii) 3 – 5 Dominion Road iii) 32 – 34 President Ave iv) 50 – 52 Pukeroa Road v) 25 – 35 Porchester Road while noting that alternatives ‘Whanake Lane, Akapuka Lane, Korokia Lane, Neinei Land and Para Lane’ were also determined to meet the road naming criteria. |
Comments
8) The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allowed that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the Local Board’s approval.
Six (6) private roads are to be created to serve residential subdivisions completed by Housing New Zealand in Papakura across different addresses being:
i) 6 – 8 Old Wairoa Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2015/3005]
ii) 3 – 5 Dominion Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4207]
iii) 32 – 34 President Avenue, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4196]
iv) 50 – 52 Pukeroa Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/2564]
v) 25 – 35 Porchester Road, Papakura [R/JSL/2016/4134] not yet determined
Figure 1: Shows the development and location of Kukutai Lane that will be accessed off Old Wairoa Road.
Figure 2: Shows the development and location of Wiki Lane that will be accessed off Dominion Road.
Figure 3: Shows the development and location of Hapai Lane that will be accessed off President Ave.
Figure 4: Shows the development and location of Huritao Lane that will be accessed off Pukeroa Place.
Figure 5: Shows the development and location of Pohuehue Lane that will be accessed off Pukeroa Place.
Figure 6: Shows the development and location of Tumanako Land that will be accessed off Porchester Road
The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the road created as part of the Housing New Zealand developments at the specified addresses in Papakura:
Preference |
Proposed New Road Name |
Meaning |
Preferred Names |
6-8 Old Wairoa Road - Kukutai Lane
3-5 Dominion Road - Wiki Lane
32-34 President Ave - Hāpai Lane
50-52 Pukeroa Rd - Huritao Lane
13-15 Pukeroa Rd, Pohuehue Lane
25-35 Porchester Road, Tūmanako Lane
|
According to the applicant the late Rev. Waaka KUKUTAI– lived in Papakura, Kaumatua from Tainui Tribunal descendants. Worked alongside Housing New Zealand and the Community in Papakura.
According to the applicant the late Potoro Wiki - Lived in Papakura, Kaumatua from Ngapuhi descendants. Worked alongside Housing New Zealand for a number of years.
Support, lift up, elevate, to begin
To consider, reflect upon, mull over, contemplate.
Muelenbeckia complexa, NZ native shrub.
To hope for, wish for, hope |
Alternative Names (for any of the above roads) |
Whanake Lane
Akapuka Lane
Korokia Lane
Kōhūhū Lane
NeiNei Lane
Para Lane
|
to move onwards, move upwards, to grow, to rise
griselinia lucida, shining broadleaf shrub, native plant
corokia species, native plant
Pittosporum tenuifolium, tree
Dracophylla latifolium, plant
Marattia salicina, King fern |
Decision Making
9) The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
10) The Applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines;
11) All of the road names proposed meet the criteria of the road naming guidelines except for the proposed alternative Kohuhu Lane as this name is already in use within the Auckland region.
12) The suffixes used for each proposed road is consistent with the road type description as they are all private roads.
13) The following preferred names ‘‘Kukutai Lane, Wiki Lane, Hapai Lane, Huritao Lane, Pohuehue Lane and Tumanako Lane’ (applicant’s preferred road names) meet the road naming criteria, it is recommended for consideration for approval while noting that the following alternate names are also appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming guidelines being Whanake Lane, Akapuka Lane, Korokia Lane, Neinei Land and Para Lane.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
14) The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Maori impact statement
15) The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
Consultation
16) All the road names were also sent to all iwi within the Papakura Local Board area by the Council and no comments were received. The applicant undertook consultation with the iwi within the Papakura Local Board area and only Kowhai Olsen of Te Ahiwaru responded referring to Nagaati Tamaoho in this instance. No comment from Nagaati Tamaoho was received.
17) Consultation has been undertaken with NZ Post and the following names do not meet their standards being Kohuhu Lane. New Zealand Post also commented that Wiki Lane is already in use in Mount Wellington, however, this road name does not appear in Auckland Council GIS system.
Financial and Resourcing Implications
18) The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Council’s Administrative Charges.
Legal and Legislative Implications
19) The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
20) The Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Virginia Loh - Resource Consents Administrator |
Authorisers |
Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Pakenham Group Limited at 170 – 190 Walters Road and 543 – 587 Mill Road, Takanini
File No.: CP2017/05239
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Papakura Local Board, for new road names for roads created through the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 at 170 – 190 Walters Road and 543 – 587 Mill Road, Takanini.
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming for the Auckland Council.
3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘Castlepoint Avenue, Black Beech Crescent, Heartwood Street, Red Beech Road, Sapwood Crescent, Softwood Avenue, Silver Beech Street, Hardwood Drive, Hard Beech, Leatherwood Road, Kakabeak Way and Kanono Road’ (applicant’s preferred road names) and alternative names, Koroheke Crescent, Koropupu Street, Kanono Road, Toropapa Crescent, Makomako Avenue, Mikimiki Street, Mountain Tree Fern Drive, Gully Tree Fern Street, Soft Tree Fern Close, Twig Drive, Branch Crescent, Understory Street, Canopy Road, Heketara Crescent, Trunk Avenue, Griselinia Street, Hukihuki Drive, Grandifola Street, Pittosporum Close, Earlywood Road, Bark Road, Deciduous Way and Ngaeroa Road were determined to meet the road naming criteria.
4. It is noted that the following road names Lancewood Close and Lemonwood Drive (preferred road names) as well as the proposed alternatives Willow Avenue, Rangiora Avenue, Oak Road and Beech Way do not meet the road naming criteria as these names are already in use within the Auckland region.
5. Furthermore, consultation with New Zealand Post found that the following road names do not meet their addressing standards being Willow Avenue, Rangiora Avenue, Lancewood Close, Lemonwood Drive, Oak Road, Beech Way.
6. The road names ‘Castlepoint Avenue, Black Beech Crescent, Heartwood Street, Red Beech Road, Sapwood Crescent, Softwood Avenue, Silver Beech Street, Hardwood Drive, Hard Beech, Leatherwood Road and Kakabeak Way’ proposed by the Applicant and alternatives Koroheke Crescent, Koropupu Street, Kanono Road, Toropapa Crescent, Makomako Avenue, Mikimiki Street, Mountain Tree Fern Drive, Gully Tree Fern Street, Soft Tree Fern Close, Twig Drive, Oak Road, Branch Crescent, Understory Street, Canopy Road, Heketara Crescent, Trunk Avenue, Griselinia Street, Hukihuki Drive, Grandifola Street, Pittosporum Close, Earlywood Road, Bark Road, Deciduous Way and Ngaeroa Road are considered for approval by the Local Board.
That the Papakura Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval, the road names Castlepoint Avenue, Black Beech Crescent, Heartwood Street, Red Beech Road, Sapwood Crescent, Softwood Avenue, Silver Beech Street, Hardwood Road, Hard Beech, Leatherwood Road, Kakabeak Way and Kanono Road proposed by the Applicant for the new road created by way of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Area Act 2013 at 170 – 190 Walters Road and 543 – 587 Mill Road, Takanini while noting that alternatives ‘Koroheke Crescent, Koropupu Street, Kanono Road, Toropapa Crescent, Makomako Avenue, Mikimiki Street, Mountain Tree Fern Drive, Gully Tree Fern Street, Soft Tree Fern Close, Twig Drive, Oak Road, Branch Crescent, Understory Street, Canopy Road, Heketara Crescent, Trunk Avenue, Griselinia Street, Hukihuki Drive, Grandifola Street, Pittosporum Close, Earlywood Road, Bark Road and Deciduous Way, Ngaeroa Road’ were also determined to meet the road naming criteria. |
Comments
7. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allowed that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the Local Board’s approval.
Thirteen new roads and a Jointly Owned Access Lot are to be created to serve a residential subdivision of 265 lots. This development has been approved under the Housing Accord and Special Housing Area Act 2013 referenced SLC-65615 and PV17 by Council.
Figure One: Location and Layout of new Road
The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the road created as part of the development at 170 – 190 Walters Road and 543 – 587 Mill Road, Takanini.
Decision Making
8. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
9. The Applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines;
10. All of the road names proposed meet the criteria of the road naming guidelines except for Lancewood Close and Lemonwood Drive (preferred road names) as well as the proposed alternatives Willow Avenue, Beech Way, Oak Road and Rangiora Avenue as these names are already in use within the Auckland region.
11. The suffixes used for each proposed road are consistent with the road type description.
12. The following preferred names ‘Castlepoint Avenue, Black Beech Crescent, Heartwood, Red Beech Road, Sapwood Crescent, Softwood Avenue, Silver Beech Street, Hardwood Drive, Hard Beech, Leatherwood Road, Kakabeak Way and Kanono Road’ meet the road naming criteria, it is recommended for consideration for approval while noting that the following alternate names are also appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming guidelines being Koroheke Crescent, Koropupu Street, Kanono Road, Toropapa Crescent, Makomako Avenue, Mikimiki Street, Mountain Tree Fern Drive, Gully Tree Fern Street, Soft Tree Fern Close, Twig Drive, Branch Crescent, Understory Street, Canopy Road, Heketara Crescent, Trunk Avenue, Griselinia Street, Hukihuki Drive, Grandifola Street, Pittosporum Close, Earlywood Road, Bark Road, Deciduous Way and Ngaeroa Road.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
13. The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Maori impact statement
14. The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
Consultation
15. All the road names were also sent to all iwi within the Papakura Local Board area by the Council and no comments were received.
16. Consultation has been undertaken with NZ Post and the following names do not meet their standards Willow Avenue, Rangiora Avenue, Lancewood Close, Lemonwood Drive, Oak Road, Beech Way.
Financial and Resourcing Implications
17. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Council’s Administrative Charges.
Legal and Legislative Implications
18. The decision sought from the Papakura Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
19. The Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Melanie Sopoaga - Resource Consent Administrator |
Authorisers |
Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Business Improvement District (BID) Programme Annual Report to Papakura Local Board
File No.: CP2017/04673
Purpose
1. This report provides information to Papakura Local Board regarding accountability for Business Improvement District programme targeted rate grant funding for the business association operating a BID programme in the board’s area.
2. The report is a requirement of the Auckland Council BID Policy (2016), which came into effect on 1 July 2016.
Executive summary
3. The 2016 Auckland Council BID policy was developed to encourage improved governance of BID committees and management, which will improve financial methods, programme delivery and transparency to their members.
4. This report indicates business associations’ compliance with the BID policy. Information presented is based on documents submitted by BID programmes to council’s BID team to date. The report recommends that the local board should recommend to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for BID programmes in their area in the coming financial year, based on their compliance with the policy.
5. The BID covered by this report is:
· The Papakura Business Association
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Recommends to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for the Papakura BID programme for the 2017/18 financial year and include this amount in the 2017-2018 Annual Plan. |
Comments
6. The Council Business Improvement District (BID) Policy 2016 outlines the principles behind the council BID programme and establishes the process for establishing, expanding, and terminating BIDs, as well prescribing standards and guidelines for operating BIDs. Accountability requirements are a key part of these standards. Please see Attachment A for a description of key elements of the BID programme.
Local board allocated decision-making
7. Local boards are allocated a number of governance and decision-making responsibilities. One of these is annually recommending BID programme targeted rates to the governing body to allow collection of targeted rate revenue for business associations that operate BID programmes. This action assures that the local board and their BIDs are in alignment on their goals for town centre development in their respective areas.
8. Approval of specific dollar amounts of BID targeted rates for each BID rests with the governing body as part of its approval of the 2017-2018 Annual Plan.
9. A number of local boards provide additional funding to local BIDs but accountability for that funding is additional to the requirements under the BID policy. If a local board makes an additional grant to a BID, the accountability requirements pertaining to that grant should be agreed as part of that grant process, and are not included in this report.
Compliance with BID Policy
10. The Auckland Council BID Policy (2016) is the means for council to ensure accountability for targeted rate funding by requiring regular reporting. Specifically, BIDs are required to provide council the following documents as approved at their annual AGM:
· A current strategic plan – This shows that the BID has carefully considered medium to long term opportunities and has allocated resources to accomplished priorities.
· Signed audited accounts for the most recently completed fiscal year (required only every two years for smaller BIDs) - Provide assurance that the BID is managing its members’ targeted rates funds responsibly.
· A report on the year just completed. – Evidence that their programmes address priorities of the strategic plan and benefit ratepayers.
· A business plan for the coming year – Forward planning, based on the strategic plan, sets one-year goals.
· An indicative budget for the following year - The Council Annual Plan requires targeted rates be identified a year in advance to coincide with the Annual Plan process which sets all rates.
· Programme Agreement between each BID and council – This embodies basic parameters of the council/ BID relationship. It is renewed every three years, or a term mutually acceptable to council and the BID.
11. The Papakura BID is in compliance with the BID policy for the year 2015-2016 for the purpose of striking the BID targeted rate in the Annual Plan for 2017-2018. The level of compliance by the Papakura Business Association is indicated by Attachment B.
12. Some BIDs are planning an increase in their targeted rates revenue this year. For a comparison of BID targeted rates please see Attachment C.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
13. Recommending that the governing body strike the targeted rate for the BID in the Papakura local board area means that the BID programme will continue to raise funds from targeted rates on ratepayers in its district, and provide services in accordance with its members’ priorities as stated in its Strategic Plans.
Māori impact statement
14. This decision will have no adverse effects on, or particular benefits to, the Maori population.
Implementation
15. If the local board accepts the recommendations of this report, it will recommend to the governing body that the targeted rates for each BID be struck as stated in the 2017-2018 Annual Plan. The governing body will approve specific dollar amounts for each BID as part of its approval of the Annual Plan.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Key Elements of BID programme. |
61 |
b⇩
|
Papakura BID Compliance Table |
63 |
c⇩
|
BID Targeted Rates Comparison Table |
65 |
Signatories
Authors |
Steven Branca - BID Partnership Advisor |
Authorisers |
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance & External Partnerships Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Annual Report to Local Boards on BID Policy Compliance
Business Improvement Districts: Key Elements
What is a BID? |
· A specified commercial area – town centre, industrial area, or a combination – designated for a targeted rate with boundaries agreed by the local board and business association. |
· Commercial property owners in that area vote in a formal ballot to raise a specified targeted rate amount from their own properties within the district, after a thorough consultation process. |
· The targeted rates are collected by council through regular rates invoicing of ratepayers. Those rates are then transferred quarterly by council to the business association which operates the BID programme. |
· 100% of rates are returned to the association. |
· The business association uses these funds to provide programmes and services according to priorities established by its membership (ratepayers and businesses) that directly benefit the members. |
· These programmes are guided by a multi-year Strategic Plan and annual Business Plan approved by the membership at the Annual General Meeting. |
· Services provided by the BID may not replace normal council services. |
· A BID is not an extension of council. |
Advantages of a BID
|
· Ratepayers decided for themselves whether to raise a targeted rate from their own property. |
· Funds raised from targeted rates are returned directly to the business association in the area they are raised from. |
· The targeted ratepayers have full control over how their money is used. |
· Targeted rates provided an assured source of funding for on-going programmes, which allows hiring of professional staff to alleviate the burden of relying on volunteers. |
· By speaking with one unified voice they can have more influence in advocating for the interests of their community.
|
· They can raise additional funding to augment their targeted rates revenue.
|
Council’s expectations and roles
|
· The governing body strikes the targeted rate for all BIDs as part of the Annual Plan process. |
· Council sets accountability requirements through its BID policy, and the BID team monitors compliance throughout the year. |
· Council does not tell the association how to use its BID money, nor does it interfere in the governance or management of the BID.
|
· Council staff report to local boards annually on compliance with the BID policy. |
· In the case of serious concerns such as indications of poor financial management, violations of the policy, or ineffectiveness, council may directly intervene in the management of the organisation as allowed by the BID policy.
|
Local Board roles:
|
· The local board approves establishment and expansion of all BIDs. |
· Local boards are delegated the authority to recommend to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for BIDs in its area as part of the Annual Plan process. |
· Local boards maintain regular contact with the BIDs to keep their local economic development and other interests aligned. |
· The board appoints a local board representative to the executive committee of each BID/business association to serve as a conduit of information to and from council. |
###
26 April 2017 |
|
Business Improvement District (BID) Programme - Annual Report to Papakura Local Board 2016/17
Attachment B: Papakura Business Association BID Programme
Papakura Business Association has met the requirements of the BID programme for the 2015-16 financial year for the purpose of striking the targeted rate.
Reporting Status
Requirement FY 2015-2016 |
Status |
Comments |
A strategic plan for next 3 – 5 years - reviewed every 3 years. |
Compliant |
2014-2019 Strategic Plan in effect. |
Audited financial accounts and audit management letter. |
Compliant |
Provided |
Business plan including: · A minimum of three key performance indicators and budget allocations for programme areas. |
Compliant |
Provided |
Annual review report: · Achievement of previous year’s objectives against business plan.
|
Compliant |
Provided |
2017-2018 Indicative Budget |
Compliant |
Provided |
Annual BID programme reporting and alignment meeting between Papakura Local Board and business association board. |
Compliant |
Meeting scheduled for 21 March 2017. |
BID Programme Agreement |
Compliant |
Fully signed agreement provided. |
Summary |
Recommend Targeted Rate |
Staff are satisfied that Papakura BID is in substantial compliance with policy reporting requirements for the purpose of the recommendation of this report. |
26 April 2017 |
|
Land owner approval for proposed stream planting at Hangaia Stream Esplanade Reserve, 41 and 41R Firth Street, 20 Cameron Place, Drury and Karaka Reserve, 10R Karaka Road, Drury.
File No.: CP2017/05250
Purpose
1. To request land owner approval from Papakura Local Board for Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited to undertake planting along the stream at Karaka Reserve, 10R Karaka Road, Drury and the esplanade reserve at Hangaia Stream, 41and 41R Firth Street and 20 Cameron Place, Drury.
Executive summary
2. Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited (the applicant) has applied to establish riparian margin planting along Hangaia Stream Esplanade Reserve and Karaka Reserve and to manage weeds and pests for a three year period to ensure the plants are established.
3. The decision to accept the riparian planting as appropriate mitigation for offsetting adverse effects associated with stream works within Drury 1 Precinct will be considered as part of the resource consent process and is not a part of this landowner approval process.
4. There are significant benefits for riparian planting on council owned streams, particularly where those reserves and streams are devoid of vegetation or overgrown with weed species. The planting schedule is outlined in Attachment A. This has been reviewed by council’s arborist who has indicated the species chosen and planned approach is acceptable from an ecological perspective
5. The proposal from Karaka and Drury Developments Limited would be at its cost to:
a. plant the riparian margins of streams as a consequence of the Stream Ecological Valuation calculations associated with any separate resource consent process for Drury 1 Precinct
b. prepare a planting plan in accordance with council guidelines (TP148) for riparian planting. This step has been completed and the planting plan approved by Council arboriculture specialist
c. be responsible for the maintenance for an agreed period of three years
6. No adverse effects to the esplanade reserve are anticipated, and the works will facilitate the future coastal walkway and integration of the neighbouring residential development into the wider coastal setting.
7. Staff recommend that the local board approve the application. Community and iwi support was demonstrated by the absence of submissions during the notification of the Plan Variation 15 and Qualifying Development for Bremner Road SHA 8. It supports the Papakura Local Board Plan 2014 outcome: Treasured for its environment and heritage
· We value and protect the land of our ancestors and the shores of Pāhurehure.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) approve Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited to undertake stream planting and to manage weeds and pests at Hangaia Stream Esplanade and Karaka Reserve as outlined in the landscape planting plan in Attachment A. b) delegate to the Manager, Land Advisory Services, Community Facilities, to execute the land owner approval.
|
Comments
8. Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited (the applicant) have applied for landowner approval to undertake riparian planting of streams and the esplanade reserve at Hangaia Stream esplanade, 41 and 41R Firth Street, 20 Cameron place, Drury and Karaka Reserve, 10R Karkaka Road, Drury. The local board has delegated authority to approve landowner applications. The type of planting reviewed and approved by council’s arborist for the steam planting is indicated in Attachment A.
9. Weed and pest maintenance will be managed by the applicant for a period of three years to ensure the plants are established prior to hand-over to council.
Applicant Proposal
10. The proposed riparian stream planting including the detailed landscape plans, implementation plans and weed and pest control plans have been provided and will be part of the conditions of land owner approval. The proposed works will facilitate the removal of weeds, rubbish and debris from the site.
11. The Bremner Road Special Housing Area precinct development provides for the sustainable use of the land and enables an overall environmental benefit in terms of riparian and stream protection and enhancement that will be undertaken across the majority of the esplanade reserve.
12. The specific details of future neighborhood reserves proposed as part of this overall development are to be work-shopped with the local board to enable full consideration of the options. This will be reported back to a local board business meeting.
Option 1 – Papakura Local Board approve the landowner application
13. Staff recommend that the local board approves Karaka and Drury Consultants Limited to undertake the proposed riparian stream and esplanade reserve planting and to manage weeds and pests at the sites listed.
Option 2 – Papakura Local Board decline the landowner application
14. If the local board does not approve the application the improvements and maintenance of the weeds and pests on the reserves will not happen. This does not support the Papakura Local Board Plan, 2014 outcome: We value and protect the land of our ancestors and the shores of Pāhurehure. Staff do not recommend this option.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
15. A further workshop is planned to discuss the development planned for the Bremner Road Special Housing Area and the proposed neighbourhood reserves. The board have indicated support for this development. The application supports the Papakura Local Board Plan 2014 Outcome: Well-connected and easy to move around:
· We like to live in Papakura because it is so well-connected by road, rail and bus and has lots of safe cycling and walking links.
16. This will provide for growth in the right place at the right time by providing for a variety of housing forms, including higher density development around the local centre.
Māori impact statement
17. The applicant has proactively engaged with iwi throughout the Bremner Road special housing area process. Ngāti Tamaoho, Ngāti Te Ata and Te Akitai provided cultural impact assessments and are supportive of the opportunities for affordable housing and ecological restoration.
Implementation
18. The applicant is ready to undertake the planting, weed and pest mitigation on approval of this landowner application.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Landscape planting plan and schedule |
71 |
Signatories
Authors |
Raewyn Sendles - Land Use Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rod Sheridan - General Manager Community Facilities Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Six-Monthly
Update 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017
File No.: CP2016/25249
Purpose
1. To give the Papakura Local Board an overview of Panuku Development Auckland. The report also notes any major issues, projects and activities within the local board area for the six months 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017.
Executive summary
2. Panuku Development Auckland was established in September 2015 as a result of the merger of two Council Controlled Organisations – Waterfront Auckland and Auckland Council Property Limited.
3. Panuku helps to rejuvenate parts of Auckland – from small projects that refresh a site or building, to major transformations of town centres or neighbourhoods.
4. Comprised of six Directorates, Panuku manages around $1.5 billion of council’s property portfolio, which we continuously review to find smart ways to generate income for the region, grow the portfolio or release land or property that can be better used by others.
5. Panuku works with government, iwi, not-for-profit and private organisations. We use our skills, knowledge and connections to bring land and resources together to create the best outcome for Aucklanders.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Receive the Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Update 1 September 2016 to 28 February 2017
|
Local Activities
Portfolio Management
6. Panuku manages “non-service” property owned by the council and Auckland Transport (AT) that are not currently needed for service or infrastructure purposes. These are properties that are not immediately required for delivery of a council service or infrastructure development but are being held for use in a planned future project such as road construction, the expansion of parks or development of future town centres.
7. The property portfolio comprises 1437 properties containing 1119 leases as at 28 February 2017. The current portfolio includes vacant land, industrial buildings, warehouses, retail shops, cafes, offices, medical centres and a large portfolio of residential rental homes.
8. The return on the property portfolio for the period ending 31 December 2016 was above budget with a net surplus to the Auckland Council (AC) and AT shareholders of $3.9m ahead of budget.
9. The average monthly tenantable occupancy rate for the 6 month period is more than 98% which is above the SOI target of 95%.
Properties Managed in the Papakura Local Board Area
10. Panuku Development Auckland currently manages 18 commercial and residential properties within the Papakura Local Board area.
Commercial Properties |
10 |
Residential Properties |
8 |
Total Properties Managed |
18 |
Business Interests
11. Panuku also optimises the commercial return from business interests it manages on council’s behalf. This comprises two forestry enterprises, two landfills and four quarries.
12. There are currently no managed business interests in the Papakura Local Board area.
Portfolio Strategy
Optimisation
13. The 2015-2025 Long-Term Plan reflects a desire of council to materially reduce or slow down expenditure and unlock value from assets no longer required or which are sub-optimal for service purposes. In response to this, prior to the establishment of Panuku, Auckland Council Property Limited (ACPL) developed a new method of dealing with service property, called optimisation.
14. Asset optimisation deals with “service property”. It is self-funding, it maximises efficiencies from service assets, and maintains levels of service whilst releasing property for sale or development. A key element of optimisation is that the sale proceeds are locally reinvested to advance approved projects and activities on a cost neutral basis. It does not include the Auckland Transport portfolio. Panuku continues to advance this programme of work. This includes the development of a cross-council project to coordinate and execute asset sales and optimisation.
Portfolio Review and Rationalisation
Overview
15. Panuku is required to undertake ongoing rationalisation of the council’s non-service assets. This includes identifying properties from within council’s portfolio that may be suitable for potential sale and development if appropriate. Panuku has a particular focus on achieving housing and urban regeneration outcomes. Identifying potential sale properties contributes to the Auckland Plan focus of accommodating the significant growth projected for the region over the coming decades, by providing the council with an efficient use of capital and prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects.
Performance
16. July 2016 to June 2017 Target
UNIT |
TARGET |
ACHIEVED |
COMMENTS |
Portfolio Review |
$75m disposal recommendations |
$35.5 million as at 28 February 2017 |
These recommendations include $13.25 million of sites that are identified for development projects. |
17. Panuku works closely with the council and AT to identify potentially surplus properties to help achieve disposal targets.
18. July 2017 to June 2018 Target
UNIT |
TARGET |
COMMENTS |
Portfolio Review |
To be determined as part of the statement of intent with Council. |
The target will include disposal recommendations and sales for sites that are identified for housing development and urban regeneration projects |
Process
19. Once identified as a potential sale candidate a property is taken through a multi-stage Rationalisation Process. The agreed process includes engagement with: the council, Council Controlled Organisations (CCOs), local board and Mana Whenua. This is followed by Panuku Board approval, engagement with local ward councillors and the Independent Māori Statutory Board and finally a governing body decision.
Under review
20. Properties currently under review in the Papakura Local Board area are listed below. The list includes any properties that may have recently been approved for sale or development and sale by the governing body.
PROPERTY |
DETAILS |
78A Great South Road, Papakura |
A vacant commercial property that was acquired to enable stormwater infrastructure works. These works are currently been undertaken. The rationalisation process was undertaken while these works are underway to establish the future of this site following the completion of the works. Consultation with council and its CCOs, iwi authorities and the Papakura Local Board about this property has been undertaken. The Papakura Local Board is not opposed to the disposal of 78A Great South Road, Papakura, but would like a public right of way easement registered over part of the site. A report will be submitted to the Finance and Performance Committee’s 11 April 2017 meeting for a final decision on the proposed disposal. |
26-32 O'Shannessey Street, Papakura |
An off street car park that the Auckland (AT) Transport Board resolved in 2015 as having no current or future transport function, and subsequently transferred to Panuku for rationalisation. Panuku are further investigating with AT the removal of transport designation for the carpark, and liaising with council parks regarding walking access adjacent to the property. |
Acquisitions and Disposals
21. Panuku manages the acquisition and disposal of property on behalf of Auckland Council. We buy property for development, roads, infrastructure projects and other service needs. We manage the sale of properties that are surplus to council requirements. These properties may be sold with or without contractual requirements for development.
Acquisitions
22. 12 properties have had purchase agreements signed this financial year for open space purposes around the region at a value of $19.1m, and three properties have been purchased for storm water purposes at a value of $16.2m.
23. No properties were purchased in the Papakura Local Board area during the reporting period.
Disposals
24. For the eight months to February 2017 the Panuku disposals team has achieved $17.94m of unconditional net sales proceeds from the sale of 10 properties against the 2016/17 disposals target of $20.0m for the year. The disposals target is agreed with council and is reviewed on an annual basis.
25. One property was sold in the Papakura Local Board area: 9 Austen Place, Pukekohe.
Housing for Older People
26. Council owns and operates 1412 units located in 62 villages across Auckland to provide rental housing to older people in Auckland. The Housing for Older People (HfOP) Project is a council initiative that involves procuring a third party provider to partner with council in delivering the rental housing service.
27. Following the approval by the Panuku Board on 8 December 2015, the Auckland Development Committee noted that HfOP would be an Unlock project for Panuku and that Panuku would prepare a High Level Project Plan (HLPP) that provided the foundation for Panuku to develop and reposition the portfolio to better the needs of older people in Auckland.
28. The HLPP was approved by the Panuku Board in August 2016.
29. On 21 December 2015, council announced that The Selwyn Foundation will be its preferred joint venture partner to manage the HfOP portfolio. Panuku has been negotiating a joint venture agreement with Selwyn. The Joint Venture Company (JVCo) will deliver the service and improve the housing portfolio.
30. Community Housing Provider (CHP) Application was submitted to Ministry Business Innovation Employment (MBIE) by the JVCo on 20 December 2016.
31. Auckland Council has delegated Panuku to lead the development programme. A HLPP is being prepared by Panuku to cover the multi-year redevelopment of the network of village sites.
32. The following HfOP villages are located within the Papakura Local Board area:
Village |
Address |
Number of units |
Coles Crescent Village |
17 Coles Crescent, Papakura |
7 |
Conifer Grove Court |
12 Challen Close, Takanini |
10 |
Marne Road Village 1 |
14 Marne Road, Papakura |
5 |
Marne Road Village 2 |
22 Marne Road, Papakura |
5 |
Pahurehure Flats Village |
14-16 Don Street, Papakura |
24 |
Waimana Court |
15 Waiari Road, Takanini |
21 |
Regional Activities
33. Good progress has been made in our priority development areas, with HLPPs being worked on for Onehunga, Papatoetoe, Avondale and Henderson. In Manukau and Northcote, leading on from the council’s approval of the HLPP, Framework Plans (which are more detailed plans on the development of the locations, including reference plans for each development site) have been developed.
34. Often it is the smaller projects that can make a huge difference in a community over a relatively short period – the placemaking activities, the development of public space, or the optimisation of council properties. Panuku is identifying these projects, and a key focus will be on delivering more of these projects within the locations that we work.
Highlights
35. The highlights for the last six months were:
a) Sir John Wells ended his term as chairperson in November. Sir John has had a long association with the Council family, including being chairperson of ACPL prior to its amalgamation into Panuku. Richard Aitken was appointed chairperson to replace Sir John.
b) Roger MacDonald was appointed as the Chief Executive of Panuku, and he started in the role in November. Roger originates from the United Kingdom, and has delivered large scale urban redevelopment projects across the world, in Africa, the Middle East and in the UK.
c) The Panuku Board agreed that Barrowcliffe Place, Manukau is a “pilot project” to form a consortium comprising a Community Housing Provider, with a Mana Whenua partner(s) and other suitable development and funding partner(s), to develop the site. The aim will be to deliver a mix of market and affordable housing where sustainable and accessible design components will be tested.
d) The first tenants have moved into the Mason Brothers building in the Wynyard Quarter. The building is part of stage one of Precinct Properties’ programme of developing the commercial sites in the Wynyard Quarter. The development of 12 Madden Street, which Auckland Toursim, Events and Economic Development (ATEED) have taken the head lease for the establishment of Grid AKL, will be completed in July 2017.
e) Stage Two of the Hobsonville Airfields Development was tendered, and a preferred tenderer has been selected after a number of tenderers submitted strong bids. The due diligence process is underway. The 9.9ha site will see 500 homes of mixed typology constructed.
f) Lot 1, 187 Flat Bush Road was also tendered and a development agreement has been signed. 30 homes will be constructed on the 1.9 hectare site, with construction commencing within a year of the sale.
g) The ASB Waterfront Theatre was opened on 22 September 2016. Panuku (on behalf of council) provided the site, contributed to the funding and provided design review and oversight for the project. The theatre is a key component of the activation of the Wynyard Quarter.
h) The Water Edge Symposium was held in November, with invited waterfront experts attending from the USA, Asia, Europe and the Pacific. As well as discussing international case studies, the symposium workshopped ideas about how to develop the Onehunga/Manukau harbour water edge, and this thinking is feeding into the planning for the Onehunga Transform project.
i) The Silo Park Summer Programme has seen thousands of people visit the waterfront over the summer period, to enjoy the night markets, catch movies at the Silo cinema, and enjoy the various forms of entertainment on offer, cementing the waterfront as the place to be in Auckland over summer.
j) After an audit of Panuku against ACC’s Workplace Safety Management Practices external accreditation, Panuku attained Tertiary standard, reflecting its commitment to continual improvement in health and safety.
Future outlook
36. Over the next few months, Panuku will:
k) Formalise the joint venture between the council and The Selwyn Foundation (JVCo) to manage the Housing for Older People portfolio and tenants with legal agreements being negotiated and Community Housing Provider registration being prepared. JVCo will take over the management of the Housing for Older People portfolio in July 2017.
l) The lease of the Panuku office accommodations expires in mid-2017. Options are being considered, and it is likely that it will be more cost effective for Panuku to move to a modest-quality building in the Central Business District rather than remaining in its current building.
m) Tawera Group is marketing residential apartments to gather pre-sales for the redevelopment of the Civic Administration Building, which is part of the Civic Quarter development. This follows on from the signing of the Development Agreement between Panuku and the Tawera Group.
n) Panuku is working on a refresh of the Waterfront Strategy, which will frame future development within the CBD waterfront area. This work will be reported to the council in March 2017, with draft Framework Plans reported in May 2017.
o) Panuku has been reviewing how to improve the transparency of its board meetings and interactions with the media. Panuku will hold as many of its monthly board meetings in the open as possible. A public-excluded session will be held at each meeting to discuss confidential matters. Agendas for each meeting will continue to be posted on the Panuku website (panuku.co.nz) prior to the meeting. Board papers (with confidential information redacted) will also be posted online. Members of the public will be invited (via the Panuku website) to present to the board on issues relevant to Panuku.
All media enquiries will be responded to in a timely fashion and all information is shared with the media unless it is of a confidential nature. Major projects are outlined on our website and all key documents (such as our Annual Report and the project plans for our development locations) are available online.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
37. This report is for the local board’s information.
38. Panuku requests that all feedback and/or queries you have relating to a property in your local board area be directed in the first instance to localboard@developmentauckland.co.nz
Māori impact statement
39. Tāmaki Makaurau has the highest Māori population in the world with one in four Māori in Aotearoa living here.
40. Māori make up 12% of the region’s total population who mainly live in Manurewa, Henderson-Massey, Papakura, Ōtara-Papatoetoe, Māngere-Ōtahuhu and Franklin. Māori have a youthful demographic with 50% of Māori in Tāmaki Makaurau under the age of 25 years. 5% of the Māori population in the region are currently 65 years and over.
41. There are 19 Mana Whenua in the region, with 14 having indicated an interest in Panuku lead activities within the local board area.
42. Māori make up 28 percent of the local board population, and there is one marae located within the local board area.
43. Panuku work collaboratively with Mana Whenua on a range projects including potential property disposals, development sites in the area and commercial opportunities. Engagement can be on specific individual properties and projects at an operational level with kaitiaki representatives, or with the Panuku Mana Whenua Governance Forum who have a broader mandate.
44. Panuku will continue to partner with Māori on opportunities which enhance Māori social and economic wellbeing.
Implementation
45. There are no implementation issues.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Sven Mol - Stakeholder Relations Coordinator - Panuku Development Auckland |
Authorisers |
Toni Giacon - Team Leader Stakeholder and Community Engagement Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Leona McKenzie Memorial Seat - Short Street, Opaheke
File No.: CP2017/05741
Purpose
1. Seeking approval to fund the installation of a memorial seat in Short Street, Papakura, in memory of Leona McKenzie to acknowledge her years of work on the Opaheke School road crossing.
Executive summary
2. Leona McKenzie’s family members have approached the local board requesting assistance with the installation of a memorial seat on the street berm outside Opaheke School on Short Street, Papakura. The family would like to acknowledge the years of service Leona had given to the Opaheke School road crossing.
3. Installing a memorial seat on a street berm requires an Auckland Transport Encroachment Licence which carries a $1,000 non-refundable fee. Also depending on the scale of works a Corridor Access Request application may be required. The schedule of fees relating to a Corridor Access Request is attached as attachment C.
4. If the encroachment is permanent, a memorandum of encumbrance would be required to be registered against the adjoining properties’ land title as no cost to Auckland Transport.
5. The board has two options to fund this application:
i) Fund the project from the locally driven initiatives (LDI) capital expenditure (capex) budget.
ii) Fund the project as an operational expenditure (opex) grant.
6. The benefits and risks associated with each option are discussed in paragraph 27. The recommendation is that the Board approve an operational grant of $5,000 to the family of Leona McKenzie to install a memorial seat acknowledging Leona’s Opaheke School road crossing work over many years.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) agree to an operational grant of $5,000 to the family of Leona McKenzie from the ___________ budget as a contribution to the installation of the memorial seat acknowledging the work Leona did with the Opaheke School road crossing. b) request staff ensure the Leona McKenzie family are aware of the following conditions relating to the grant: i) the Leona McKenzie family are responsible for any repairs and maintenance to the memorial seat installed on Short Street, Papakura, going forward. ii) the memorial seat will be removed at no cost to council or Auckland Transport should it fall in disrepair and not be maintained by the family.
|
Comments
7. Leona McKenzie’s family members have approached the local board requesting assistance with the installation of a memorial seat on the street berm outside Opaheke School on Short Street, Papakura, to acknowledge Leona McKenzie’s years of service on the Opaheke School road crossing.
8. Installing a memorial seat on a street berm requires an Auckland Transport Encroachment Licence and a Corridor Access Request to be approved.
9. The Auckland Council duty planner has advised that if the memorial seat is on Auckland Transport road reserve no building or resource consent would be required.
Auckland Transport Encroachment Licence
10. If the memorial seat is to be erected on Auckland Transport land, an encroachment licence will be required. See attachment A for a copy of an application form. There is a non-refundable cost of $1,000.
11. A road encroachment licence authorises a right to occupy an area of legal road, but does not give the licence-holder exclusive possession in the way a lease does.
Applying for an Encroachment Licence
12. The Auckland Transport website advises the following process for applying for an encroachment licence.
13. Property owners or developers must submit an application to Auckland Transport and receive approval before placing any encroaching object on, under or above a legal road.
14. Auckland Transport reserves the right to exercise its discretion not to proceed with the licence or encumbrance at any point during the application process.
Who can apply
15. Usually only the owners of land immediately adjoining the legal road can apply for a licence. Any other applicant is likely to have their application declined unless they get prior written consent from adjoining landowners (and service/utility authorities if any of their utilities are affected).
16. Only those properties immediately next to the land in question are adjoining owners. This does not include neighbours who are one or more properties removed.
Application process
17. The application process is as follows:
No. |
Task |
Action |
1. |
Initial enquiry |
Make an initial enquiry to Auckland Transport to see if they will consider the encroachment licence. |
2. |
Formal application |
If the initial enquiry is confirmed by Auckland Transport, then you can submit a formal application. Also required with the application: · Written consent from adjoining landowners. · Signed consents from service authorities (if any of their utilities are affected), copies of plans, aerials (if applicable), cross sections etc. · Non-refundable deposit of $1,000 (incl. GST). |
Memorandum of Encumbrance
18. Consent to a licence by Auckland Transport does not constitute regulatory approval to placement of encroachments within the road corridor. In cases where the encroachment may be permanent, a memorandum of encumbrance will be required to be entered into and registered against the adjoining properties' land title at no cost to Auckland Transport.
19. There is further information regarding the encroachment licence and the process within the following link:
Corridor Access Request (CAR)
20. If the applicant is digging within the road corridor, they may also need to lodge a Corridor Access Request (CAR) separate from any licence.
21. However, if single excavations are only in the grass berm and are less than 3m² or less than 6 linear metres, a CAR is not required, unless the work site or equipment encroaches onto the road corridor.
22. See attachment B for details about the information required for applying for a Corridor Access Request.
23. See attachment C for the fee schedule relating to CAR applications.
24. Detailed information regarding how to apply for a Corridor Access Request can be found at the following website: https://at.govt.nz/about-us/working-on-the-road/corridor-access-requests/
Consideration
Options for Funding
25. The Papakura Local Board has two options to fund this project.
iii) Fund the project from the Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) capital expenditure (capex) budget.
iv) Fund the project as an LDI operational expenditure (opex) grant.
26. The following table outlines the options with the benefits and risks:
No. |
Option |
Benefits |
Risks |
1. |
Fund the memorial seat from the local board capital budget. (LDI capex)
|
· The memorial seat becomes an Auckland Council asset. · The seat is maintained to a standard. |
· The local board will pay the consequential operational expenditure going forward. · The project would need to meet the criteria for a locally driven initiative criteria. · The processes could take some time to work through.
|
2. |
Grant an amount to the family and they install the seat. (LDI opex grant)
|
· The family would drive the project forward through to installation. · Although the memorial seat is on public land the family would be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep.
|
· There is a potential risk of setting a precedent if the board funds this request outside of the contestable grants funding round. · Although the memorial seat is on public land the family would be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep. · The public would perceive the seat to be a council asset. Any delay in repair or lack of maintenance would reflect poorly on council. |
Process for a locally driven initiative capital expenditure item
27. The process for a LDI capex item is as follows:
i) The local board and department delivering the project agree on the initiative plus on how it will be maintained going forward, which means agree the consequential opex maintenance and renewals.
ii) The costings are approved by Katrina Morgan in Investigation and Design who is in charge of the LDI Capex fund project costs.
iii) The local board formally resolve the spend.
iv) The department factor the item into their work programme to deliver.
Local board views and implications
28. The local board is being asked to make a decision about:
i) whether it wishes to fund this project or not and
ii) from which budget - the LDI capex budget or opex as a grant.
Māori impact statement
29. No consultation has been undertaken with mana whenua in relation to this project at this point.
30. Māori may benefit from the installation of the memorial seat in terms of having public access to a seat on a road berm.
Implementation
31. There are issues with implementation if the board choose to fund the memorial seat from the LDI Capex budget. There is no department to drive the project.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Auckland Transport application for encroachment form |
87 |
b⇩
|
Information relating to applying for a Corridor Access Request |
91 |
c⇩
|
Auckland Transport Fee Schedule - Corridor Access Requests |
93 |
Signatories
Authors |
Lee Manaia - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Madelon De Jongh - Senior Local Board Advisor Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Local board feedback on Government’s Urban Development Authorities Discussion Document
File No.: CP2017/06329
Purpose
1. To provide an opportunity for local boards to formally provide feedback on the government’s Urban Development Authorities Discussion Document.
Executive summary
2. The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Urban Development Authorities Discussion Document, released in February 2017, proposes new legislation for urban development authorities.
3. The potential legislation is the government’s direct response to recommendations made by the Productivity Commission during the Using Land for Housing inquiry (2015). The government signaled the proposal in August 2016.
4. The discussion document notes that the urban development authority proposal is one of a number of initiatives to improve the urban development system overall, others being the Resource Legislation Amendment Bill and the Productivity Commission inquiry into Better Urban Planning.
5. The proposed legislation is intended to complement the government’s recent introduction of a National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity and the Housing Infrastructure Fund.
6. The purpose of the proposed legislation is to enable better urban development at scale, where projects are complex or strategically important.
7. The legislation would enable local and central government:
· to empower nationally or locally significant urban development projects to access more enabling development powers and land use rules; and
· to establish new urban development authorities to support those projects where required.
8. The intention is to overcome barriers to large scale urban development identified by the Productivity Commission’s Using Land for Housing inquiry.
9. The proposed legislation would enable publicly-controlled urban development authorities to plan and oversee the necessary development. Urban development authorities would be granted access powers to overcome these barriers, where applicable and strategically appropriate. This may include:
· powers to acquire parcels of land,
· powers to plan and fund infrastructure
· powers to buy, sell or lease land and buildings and fund infrastructure, and
· override existing and proposed district plans.
10. Developments could include housing, commercial premises, associated infrastructure, and amenities including parks, community spaces or shopping centres. Projects could also be greenfield and part of city expansion. Projects would not be limited to solely housing related projects. Development powers will not be available for stand-alone infrastructure projects.
11. The planning and consenting system as a whole; and any ability for urban development authorities to access powers under the Building Act 2004 and the Building Code will not be considered in this discussion document or during the further development of the urban development authority proposal.
12. In its submission to the Productivity Commission Using Land for Housing draft report in June 2015, the council raised the following points regarding urban development authorities. These are that the council:
· agrees that there can be high value in urban development agency models
· does not support the establishment of a government urban development agency in Auckland
· supports and believes there is scope for government to undertake complementary development activities and work alongside Development Auckland (now Panuku)
· does not support the removal of planning powers from local government to an urban development agency as local government is better placed to undertake local planning.
· recommends government undertakes an evaluation of existing development initiatives it has been involved in in Auckland, e.g. Tamaki Redevelopment Company Limited, and Hobsonville Point Company Limited.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) endorse the attached feedback on the Urban Development Authorities discussion document. |
Consideration
Local board views and implications
13. Local board chairpersons were invited to make an Expression of Interest to be a member of the Political Reference Group providing direction to staff on the submission.
14. The purpose of this report is to seek local board feedback which will be attached to the Auckland Council submission at the Planning Committee.
15. A committee report with the draft Political Reference group submission points will be reported to the 2 May meeting of the Planning Committee, with delegated sign off for the final submission for the 19 May deadline. The submission closing date is very tight and local board feedback will be tabled at the 2 May Planning Committee meeting. We would be grateful for any specific comments you wish to be considered for council submission to be:
· in a word document, regarding the overall proposal to enact new legislation as well as the specific proposals which are included within the overall proposal (see Appendix 1), provided by 28 April 2017. Any feedback received after 28 April and before 15 May 2017 will be attached to the final submission.
· sent to Christina Kaiser christina.kaiser@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
If you have any questions please contact Christina Kaiser.
Māori impact statement
16. The proposals in the discussion document will have an impact Māori. The discussion document proposes a process to identify potential Urban Development Authorities and develop related plans that may impact on agreed to planning decisions which were made with Māori engagement and input.
17. The Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) are providing input into the submission. The Political Reference Group set up to work with staff on Auckland Council’s submission includes a member of the IMSB Secretariat.
Implementation
18. There are no implementation issues as a result of this report.
ADD AUTHORISER: Karen Lyons – Manager Local Board Services
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Urban Development Authorities Discussion Document February 2017 |
101 |
b⇩
|
Appendix 1 Questions for Consideration |
227 |
c⇩
|
Appendix 2 Summary diagram of the processes being proposed under the new legislation |
229 |
Signatories
Authors |
Christina Kaiser - Principal Strategic Advisor |
Authorisers |
Jacques Victor - GM Auckland Plan Strategy and Research Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
26 April 2017 |
|
Local Government New Zealand conference and Annual General Meeting 2017
File No.: CP2017/05258
Purpose
1. To inform local boards about the Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Annual General Meeting (AGM) and conference in Auckland from Sunday 23 July to Tuesday 25 July 2017 and to invite local boards to nominate representatives to attend.
Executive Summary
2. The LGNZ annual conference and AGM takes place at SkyCity from 3pm on Sunday 23 July to 2:15pm on Tuesday 25 July 2017.
3. The AGM takes place on the last day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to four official delegates at the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The Governing Body will consider this at its meeting on 23 March 2017. The four official delegates are likely to be the Mayor as a member of the LGNZ National Council (or his nominee), the Deputy Mayor as the Mayor’s alternate for this position, Cr Penny Hulse as the Chair of LGNZ Zone One and a member of LGNZ National Council, and the Chief Executive (or his nominee).
4. In addition to the official delegates, local board members are invited to attend. Historically, given the cost of elected member attendance at the conference it was recommended that one member per local board attend. In 2017, due to the cost savings associated with the conference being held in Auckland, two members per local board can be funded from the elected member development programme budget.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) nominate two representatives to attend the Local Government New Zealand 2017 Conference and Annual General Meeting from Sunday 23 July to Tuesday 25 July 2017. b) confirm that conference attendance including travel and accommodation will be paid for in accordance with the current Auckland Council Elected Member Expense Policy. c) note that any members who wish to attend the annual general manager (AGM) must provide their names to the Kura Kāwana project team as soon as possible to ensure that they are registered with Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ).
|
Comments
5. The 2017 LGNZ Conference and AGM are being held in Auckland. The conference commences with a powhiri and opening ceremony on Sunday 23 July at 3pm and concludes with the LGNZ AGM at 11:15am on Tuesday 25 July (AGM concludes at 2:15pm).
6. The theme of this year’s conference is “Creating pathways to 2050: Liveable spaces and loveable places”. The programme includes:
· Rt Hon Dame Patsy Reddy (Governor-General of New Zealand) will give the opening keynote address on how involving communities in shaping their local places can build a strong sense of local pride, identity and connection.
· Dr David Warburton (Chief Executive, Auckland Transport) and Mayor Lianne Dalziel, (Christchurch City Council) will look at the role of technology in transport and how smart technology can be integrated in councils future plans. Learn about the practical technology trials underway to understand why New Zealand is a world leader in the implementation of Smart City technology.
· Mayor Craig Little (Wairoa District Council) Mayor John Forbes (Opotiki District Council) and Chris Whelan (Chief Executive, Wellington Regional Economic Development Agency) will discuss attracting inward investment to boost local economy. These three councils will share best practice examples of how their approach has opened the door to investment, strengthening the resilience of their local economy.
· Sir Bob Harvey (Champion for Auckland, Auckland Council) Ludo Campbell-Reid (Design Champion and General Manager, Auckland Design Office, Auckland Council) and Viv Heslop (former Sustainability Lead, Panuku Development Auckland) on bringing together policy, practice and research to inform our council leaders on how they can champion change to create and sustain liveable spaces and loveable places.
· A panel discussion on managing community expectations and delivering the Government's objectives for freshwater water quality which is a challenge facing all of New Zealand. Mark Sainsbury will chair this session with Stuart Crosby (Bay of Plenty Regional Councillor) Rahui Papa (Te Arataura Chairman, Waikato Tainui and a representative of the Iwi Chairs Forum) and Ken Taylor (Director, National Science Challenge, Out Land and Water).
· Holly Ransom (futurist and global strategist) will give the closing keynote address presenting views on how and why we must adapt and be future-ready in a period of unprecedented technological, environmental, and demographic change.
Annual General Meeting
7. The AGM takes place on the last day of the conference. Auckland Council is entitled to have four delegates to the AGM, one of whom is the presiding (or voting) delegate. The four official delegates are likely to be the Mayor (or his nominee), the Deputy Mayor, Councillor Cr Penny Hulse (as Chair of Zone One) and the Chief Executive (or his nominee).
8. The Mayor is a member of the LGNZ National Council, the Deputy Mayor is the Mayor’s alternate for this position and Auckland Council’s representative on the Regional Sector Group, Cr Penny Hulse is the Chair of LGNZ Zone One and a member of LGNZ National Council. The Governing Body will consider an item on AGM attendance at its meeting on 23 March 2017.
9. LGNZ requires prior notice of which local board members plan to attend the AGM. Members wishing to attend are asked to register their intention with the Kura Kāwana project as soon as possible so that this information can be collated and provided to LGNZ.
Costs
10. Historically, given the cost of elected member attendance at the conference it was recommended that one member per local board attend. In 2017, due to the cost savings associated with the conference being held in Auckland, two members per local board can be funded from the elected member development programme budget.
11. Conference registration includes attendance at all conference business sessions (Sunday - Tuesday), a satchel and contents, daily catering, the Simpson Grierson welcome reception and the Fulton Hogan conference dinner and EXCELLENCE Awards function.
12. The council hosted tours on Sunday 23 July 2017 are not included in the conference registration. Local board members are welcome to attend these at their own cost.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
13. This is a report to the 21 local boards.
Māori impact statement
14. The Local Government NZ conference will better inform local boards and thereby support their decision making for their communities including Maori.
Implementation
15. The Kura Kāwana programme will co-ordinate and book all conference registrations, as well as requests to attend the AGM.
Signatories (to be replaced once the agenda is built)
Author |
Helen Dodd, Kura Kāwana Programme Leader, Local Board Services |
Authoriser |
Lou Lennane, Business Improvements Manager, Local Board Services Karen Lyons, General Manager, Local Board Services |
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Helen Dodd - Local Board Strategic Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Approval of the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017
File No.: CP2017/05716
Purpose
1. To approve:
· the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 and the Papakura Local Board Plan summary for public consultation;
· key engagement events to be held as part of the consultation.
Executive summary
2. The Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 requires that each local board complete a local board plan for adoption by 31 October 2017.
3. The draft Papakura local board plan and summary, see Attachments A and B for the local board to approve for public consultation.
4. Consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure (SCP) is taking place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
5. The Papakura local board will conduct the following formal engagement events:
· Have Your Say – Wednesday 31 May, 4.30pm-6.30pm, Sir Edmund Hillary Library, Papakura
· Pop-up stall outside the Takanini Countdown – Tuesday 13 June, 10am-12pm, 288 Great South Road, Takanini
· Pop-up stall outside the Drury Superette – Saturday 24 June, 9.30am-11.30am, 232 Great South Road, Drury Town Centre
A hearing will be held on Wednesday 2 August 2017 commencing at 1pm in the Papakura Local Board Meeting Room, Papakura Service Centre, 35 Coles Crescent, Papakura.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Approves the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017 for public consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure. b) Approves the Papakura Local Board Plan summary. c) In the event that minor edits are required to the draft local board plan or summary the board delegates to the Chair to work with staff as a matter of urgency. d) Approves the scheduled formal engagement events, as follows: · Have Your Say – Wednesday 31 May, 4.30pm-6.30pm, Sir Edmund Hillary Library, Papakura · Pop-up stall outside the Takanini Countdown – Tuesday 13 June, 10am-12pm, 288 Great South Road, Takanini · Pop-up stall outside the Drury Superette – Saturday 24 June, 9.30am-11.30am, 232 Great South Road, Drury Town Centre
e) Confirms a hearing will be held on Wednesday, Wednesday 2 August 2017 commencing at 1pm in the Papakura Local Board Meeting Room, Papakura Service Centre, 35 Coles Crescent, Papakura. |
Comments
7. Local board plans are strategic plans for the following three years and beyond. The plans reflect the priorities and preferences of the community. They guide how the local board:
· makes decisions on local activities and projects
· provides input into regional strategies and policies
8. The plans inform the development of council’s 10-year budget. They also form the basis for development of the annual local board agreement for the following three financial years and subsequent work programmes.
9. The local board is required to use the SCP to consult on the draft local board plan. The period for the SCP is from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
10. As part of meeting these SCP requirements, a full draft of the local board plan and summary will be made available on the Shape Auckland website, at local libraries, council service centres and the local board office. The summary will also be delivered to all households in the local board area, and engagement events will be scheduled during the SCP period of 22 May to 30 June 2017. These will be advertised on the Shape Auckland website, through local and regional publications, online and through social media.
Consideration
11. The draft plan has been developed by considering the following (amongst others):
· previous community engagement
· community feedback on the development of an Integrated Area Plan for the Manurewa-Takanini-Papakura area
· the Māori Plan for Tamaki Makaurau
· I Am Auckland – the Children and Young People’s Strategic Action Plan
· Quality of Life Survey 2016
· New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016-2026
· New Zealand Positive Ageing Strategy
· Auckland Transport Regional Land Transport Plan.
12. In addition, the local board has begun a targeted conversation with Mana Whenua and Pasifika communities.
Local board views and implications
13. The local board’s views have driven the development of the draft plan attached to this report.
Māori impact statement
14. Mana Whenua and some local boards in the south have been meeting regularly since 2014 to explore how they can best establish, maintain and improve opportunities for Māori to contribute to local government decision making processes.
15. Initially a working group consisting of Mana Whenua representatives, mataawaka and local boards met, to work on how to improve Māori input into local board decision making. The Papakura Local Board was originally a part of this group, having then left it again chose to participate during this political term.
Implementation
· Formal consultation for the draft local board plan will take place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
· A hearing will be held on Wednesday, 2 August 2017.
· Amendments will be made to the final plan during August and September.
· The local board will adopt the final plan in October 2017.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
20170426 Draft Papakura Local Board Plan |
239 |
b⇩
|
20170426 Summary of Draft Local Board Plan 2017 |
271 |
Signatories
Authors |
Madelon De Jongh - Senior Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board area
Te Rohe ā-Poari o Papakura
Papakura is nestled around the inlets and foreshores of the Manukau Harbour, stretching from the Papakura Stream north of Takanini to Drury village in the south. It is largely suburban but there are also fertile plains and rolling hills which lead out into the nearby Hunua ranges. The area around Takanini was once a huge wetland and peat bog and there are still many ancient Kauri buried there. Red Hill was a key viewpoint for local Māori and Pukekiwiriki Paa gave them a wide overview of the rohe. A long military history helped to shape the modern town but today only SAS (Special Air Service) forces are based locally.
There has been steady population growth, with 45,633 people living in Papakura in 2013, which is an increase of nearly 10 per cent since 2006. At the 2013 census, over a quarter of Papakura’s residents were Māori. The Pacific population approximately 14 per cent and the Asian population is around 13 per cent. Although the number of people aged 65 years and over has risen in the last seven years, nearly a quarter of Papakura’s population are now children aged 14 years and under.
Over recent years, the Papakura area has undergone significant residential development, and this is set to continue into the future.
Mihi
Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata
e uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki
ki te ūnga o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu.
I reira ka toia aku mihi ki te uru ki te Pūkaki-Tapu-a-Poutūkeka,
i reira ko te Pā i Māngere.
E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka a Hoturoa
ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu.
I kona ka rere taku haere mā te ākau ki te puaha o Waikato,
te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, Waikato Taniwharau, he piko he taniwha.
Ka hīkoi anō aku mihi mā te taha whakararo
mā Maioro ki Waiuku ki Mātukureira
kei kona ko ngā Pā o Tahuna me Reretewhioi.
Ka aro whakarunga au kia tau atu ki Pukekohe.
Ka tahuri te haere a taku reo ki te ao o te tonga e whāriki atu rā mā runga i ngā hiwi,
kia taka atu au ki Te Paina, ki te Pou o Mangatāwhiri.
Mātika tonu aku mihi ki a koe Kaiaua
te whākana atu rā ō whatu mā Tīkapa Moana ki te maunga tapu o Moehau.
Ka kauhoetia e aku kōrero te moana ki Maraetai
kia hoki ake au ki uta ki Ōhuiarangi, heteri mō Pakuranga.
I reira ka hoki whakaroto ake anō au i te awa o Tāmaki
ma te taha whakarunga ki te Puke o Taramainuku, kei kona ko Ōtara.
Katahi au ka toro atu ki te Manurewa a Tamapohore,
kia whakatau aku mihi mutunga ki runga o Pukekiwiriki
kei raro ko Papakura ki kona au ka whakatau.
Let this vessel that carries my greetings
travel by way of the Tāmaki River
to the landing place of Tainui canoe at Ōtāhuhu.
There, let my salutations be borne across the isthmus to the Pūkaki lagoon
and the community of Māngere.
Paddling the Manukau Harbour
we follow the Āwhitu Peninsula to the headland.
From there we fly down coast to the Waikato river mouth,
sacred waters of our forebears.
Coming ashore on the Northern side
at Maioro we head inland to Waiuku and Mātukureira,
there too is the Pā at Tāhuna and Reretewhioi.
Heading southward I come to Pukekohe.
My words turn to follow the ancient ridgelines along the Southern boundary,
dropping down into Mercer and Te Pou o Mangatāwhiri.
My greetings reach you at Kaiaua
who gaze across Tīkapa Moana to the sacred mountain, Moehau.
Taking to the sea, my remarks travel to Maraetai
and then to Ōhuiarangi, sentinel to Pakuranga.
There we follow again the Tāmaki River
to Te Puke o Taramainuku, Ōtara resides there.
From here I reach for Manurewa
until my greetings come to rest on Pukekiwiriki
below lies Papakura and there I rest.
Contents
Ngā upoko kōrero
Papakura Local Board area |
2 |
Mihi |
4 |
Contents |
6 |
From the Chair |
7 |
About local boards |
8 |
About local board plans |
8 |
Developing our plan |
9 |
Carrying out our plan |
10 |
Outcomes |
|
A vibrant and prosperous metropolitan centre |
12 |
People in Papakura lead active, healthy and connected lives |
14 |
A strong local economy |
16 |
Papakura is well connected and easy to move around |
18 |
Treasured for its environment and heritage |
20 |
Financial information |
22 |
Your Papakura Local Board members |
27 |
Statement of proposal for the 2017 Papakura Local Board Plan
From the Chair
He kōrero mai i te Heamana
It is my great privilege to present this draft Local Board Plan which describes our aspirations for the Papakura area. The plan has been shaped by your views and thoughts gathered at events, meetings and workshops, and once finalised will be a strategic document to guide the local board’s decision-making for the next three years.
The plan has five key areas of focus which we have drawn together from what you have told us is important to you – the improvement of our town centre and the centres along the Great South Road from Manurewa to Papakura; providing opportunities for people to stay active, healthy and connected; supporting businesses providing local jobs, goods and services; ensuring we have a transport system that is safe, reliable, convenient and affordable; and protecting our environment and heritage for future generations.
Through this plan, the local board is proposing to invest in several key initiatives to help achieve objectives in each of these focus areas. However, operating in a constrained budget environment means we must prioritise our spending and be realistic about what we can achieve. Over the next three years, we will seek to form partnerships and work closely with other organisations and community partners, so that we can get more done.
For some things, we know that people working together in their communities can get better results. That’s why we will seek to empower and enable community groups to help and shape the direction and work together with us as your local board. We also recognise the role of mana whenua in helping to build a prosperous and secure future for Papakura and will work closely with local Māori on matters that are important to them.
Many of you have lived in Papakura for a long time and will have seen a lot of changes over that period. Whether you are a long-term resident or someone new to the area hoping to make Papakura your home, we all have a role in shaping the future together. I urge you to read this draft plan and invite your feedback. Please take this opportunity to have your say and help us to make Papakura an even more wonderful place to live.
Brent Catchpole
Chairperson, Papakura Local Board
About local boards
He kōrero mō ngā poari ā-rohe
Auckland Council has a unique model of local government in New Zealand, made up of the governing body (the mayor and 20 ward councillors) and 21 local boards. The governing body focuses on Auckland-wide issues while local boards are responsible for decision-making on local issues, activities and services and provide input into regional strategies, policies and plans.
These local issues, activities and services include:
· supporting local arts, culture, events and sport and recreation
· providing grants and partnering with local organisations to deliver community services
· maintaining and upgrading town centres and facilities including parks, libraries and halls
· caring for the environment and preserving heritage.
Local boards also have a role in representing the view of their communities on issues of local importance.
About local board plans
Local board plans are strategic documents that are adopted every three years. Their purpose is to set a direction for the local area that reflects community priorities and preferences. They guide local board activity, funding and investment decisions. They also influence local board input into regional strategies and plans, including the Auckland Plan..
Auckland Plan |
|
||||
|
Local board plans |
||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Auckland
Council's financial plans local board agreements) |
|||||
Each local board develops annual work programmes following confirmation of the budget available to them via the annual budget setting process.
Developing our plan
Te whakawhanake i tā mātou mahere
Our plan is comprised of aspirational outcomes, objectives we want to achieve and some key initiatives to carry out. To make this happen will take the efforts of many working together.
We have identified these by considering what we know about our community, what you have told us is important, and where we think we can make the biggest difference.
Carrying out our plan
Te whakatutuki i tā mātou mahere
Resourcing
We want to do what we can to improve our local board area while being realistic that we cannot do everything with finite resources. This means making the most of what we already have, working with others and acknowledging when we do not have the necessary resources to carry something out.
We believe that the proposed key initiatives in our plan can be implemented within existing resources, or there is provision for them in future years of the 2015-2025 10-year budget. By existing resources we mean:
· finances we receive through our revenue sources such as rates and user charges
· our assets such as our community centres and parks
· council staff who are responsible for delivering our annual work programme
· our Auckland Transport Local Board Transport Capital Fund allocation
· our time and energy to represent your views on matters of local importance.
In some instances, our role is focused on representing your views on matters of local importance, as we do not have the decision-making authority and/or funding to carry them out. When this is the case, we will use our time and energy to influence the relevant decision-makers, ensuring they are aware of your views and our support for them.
Empowering communities
We seek to empower and enable our communities. This means listening to what you want to achieve, directing council resources towards community aspirations and supporting diverse communities to have an input into the things they care about and which matter uniquely to them.
We will prioritise activities that are led by the community, encourage and support people from all walks of life to actively participate in their community, and fully use the talents, insights and contributions of our diverse community. We will work with others to enable our communities to achieve their goals.
Working with Māori
Delivering on Auckland Council’s commitment to Māori at a local level is a priority for the Papakura local board. The council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its broader statutory obligations to Māori.
As part of this commitment, Papakura Local Board will continue to build on its working relationships with local Māori. The board is keen to work in partnership to jointly develop initiatives that respond to Māori aspirations and recognise their position as mana whenua and role as kaitiaki (guardians).
The Papakura Local Board has also endorsed the resolutions of the joint mana whenua and local board members working party for Māori input into local board decision-making. These include:
· establishing a representative mana whenua body for local boards to engage with directly at a governance level
· initiating te ao Māori training for local board candidates and members developed by mana whenua
· inviting mana whenua participation in local board workshops
· convening formal kanohi ki te kanohi (face to face) hui between local board members and mana whenua at marae at the start of each new term
· encouraging local board member participation in mana whenua hui.
Outcome 1: A vibrant and prosperous metropolitan centre
Whakaotinga 1: He pokapū tāone nui hihiri, whaihua
Our town centre is a great place to shop, relax and enjoy the company of family and friends
Papakura is identified in the Auckland Plan as a future ‘metropolitan centre’, which means it will develop into a larger commercial and retail centre to support residential growth in the surrounding area. More and more people are and will live in, or close to, the town centre. Taking advantage of shopping, public transport, leisure and employment opportunities on their doorstep.
It is important that we plan carefully for this expected growth in our population. Above all, we need to make Papakura a place for people, with essential services and great shopping, and places to relax, be entertained and enjoy the company of family and friends. We need to make it safe, welcoming and easy to get around for young and old, a place to celebrate our diversity and recognise our local Māori and cultural heritage.
A lot of the required infrastructure is already in place. There are leisure, sport and recreation facilities (including swimming pool), performing arts venues, an art gallery, library, museum, train station and buses all within easy walking distance. We will need to come together, though, to make the town centre a vibrant and prosperous place for everyone to use and enjoy. The Papakura Local Board will continue to work with mana whenua, local businesses, Auckland Transport, Panuku Development Auckland, central government agencies, non-government organisations, residents and other external partners to bring about change for the better in our town centre.
Last year, Auckland Council committed to developing an Integrated Area Plan for the Great South Road, from Papakura through to Manurewa. The local board has established a Papakura Commercial Project Group which will explore opportunities for new businesses, possibilities for redevelopment of older or vacant sites and the creation of new public spaces to showcase local artists and our strong Māori heritage.
Outcome: A vibrant and prosperous metropolitan centre |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
A well planned metropolitan centre. |
Work with the Papakura Commercial Project Group to plan and support the continued development of the town centre and immediate surrounds. |
Joined-up thinking and planning for the Great South Road and its centres. |
Develop an Integrated Area Plan to guide the development of Papakura and Takanini over the next 30 years. |
A thriving centre where local people choose to shop. |
Introduce programmes to attract new businesses, leisure providers and events to the town centre. |
Implement strategies to improve safety and security in the Papakura town centre. |
|
Regular local cultural and arts experiences in the Papakura town centre. |
Implement a programme of cultural and arts events for the town centre. |
Fund local talent to create street art. |
|
Working with mana whenua and mataawaka to make our Māori heritage more visible. |
Outcome 2: People in Papakura lead active, healthy and connected lives
Whakaotinga 2: Tērā te iwi o Papakura te noho ngangahau, he piki te ora, he tūhonohono te ao
We have great parks and places to play and do the things that we enjoy.
Great places to live enable people to lead rich, satisfying lives and Papakura has a wide variety of opportunities for people to connect with others in the community to enjoy their favourite pastimes. But as our population grows and becomes more diverse, we need to make sure our open space, recreation and community facilities keep pace with demand.
Papakura Local Board will continue to invest in great facilities and events that bring people together. These need to be accessible for everyone, serving multiple needs so that we get the best value for our investment. Places for young and old, and diverse interests and cultures that allow people to express their creativity and passion.
Keeping active, with others or alone is important for long-term health[1]. Many of us are involved in sport, playing competitively or socially, or supporting family and friends on the side-lines. To cater for increased numbers of active people, we are developing new sports fields at Opaheke and Hingaia and maintaining support for developments at Bruce Pulman Park. We plan to improve facilities at existing grounds over the next three years and will advocate to the governing body of Auckland Council for funding to improve the Massey Park outdoor swimming pool, so that it is available all year round for recreational swimmers to use. We will also begin work on a linked-up Greenways[2] network of safe walking, running and cycling pathways.
Many of our local venues host regional, national and international teams and events. These bring visitors in and help boost the local economy as well as showcasing the area’s own local talent and sportspeople. Papakura Local Board will help organisations to bring events here by making sure our facilities continue to meet the highest standards.
Our community venues need to be located and designed to be easily accessible, safe and suited to a variety of purposes. We will work with communities such as the Smith’s Avenue residents to develop facilities together, which meet local needs. These will be important considerations as we plan for more people who will make Papakura their home.
The local board will continue to support and invest in local programmes and activities that contribute to our general health and well-being by granting funds each year to groups and organisations to provide these in our community. We will support our rangatahi (youth) to develop and grow as leaders, and encourage our senior people to contribute their wisdom, experience and skills. You have told us that feeling safe at home and while you’re out and about in Papakura is important to you, so we will be working to address these concerns as well.
Outcome: People in Papakura lead active, healthy and connected lives |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Papakura’s parks, sports and recreation facilities are well used. |
Continue to invest in the development of Bruce Pullman Park, and the Opaheke and Hingaia sports grounds. |
Advocate to the governing body through Council’s 10 year (Long Term Plan) budget process for the upgrade of the Massey Park outdoor swimming pool. |
|
Progressively upgrade existing parks, sports and recreation facilities to meet the needs of all age groups. |
|
Promote Papakura’s sporting facilities to national sports bodies (including schools). |
|
Services and facilities meet the community’s needs now and into the future. |
Ensure that new and existing facilities can be utilised as multi-purpose community hubs. |
Continue with the Smiths Avenue Reserve community led project. |
|
Develop a community hub and library for Takanini. |
|
Communities are supported to achieve their goals and aspirations. |
Help our young people to contribute, prosper and thrive[3]. |
Ensure our older people stay connected and can contribute their skills, wisdom and experience[4]. |
|
Invest in health promotion activities led by community. |
Outcome 3: A strong local economy
Whakaotinga 3: He kaha tonu te ōhanga ā-rohe
Papakura businesses prosper, creating employment opportunities for local people.
Papakura has a diverse local economy with some large, well-known companies located here. Our growing population will attract more businesses to the area, and we want to make sure that residents, especially our youth, have the skills to find employment in the new jobs that will be created.
The indicators for economic growth in Papakura are strong[5]. There is major housing development underway with significant areas of land proposed for future urban growth, bringing new residents with increased spending power and more jobs in building and construction. We have significant employment precincts in and close to our area, including Takanini and the new development underway at Drury South. Transformation of Papakura into an attractive, major metropolitan centre for the south of Auckland will bring more retail and service businesses into the town centre itself.
This will mean new jobs and employment in Papakura, but there are challenges for local people to take advantage of them. While there is currently a larger proportion of low-skilled jobs (44%) in Papakura than in Auckland overall (40%) and a lower number of highly-skilled jobs (31% compared to 37%) this is expected to change over time. We will need to focus on up-skilling our workforce so that this new prosperity is enjoyed locally.
Papakura Local Board will continue to work collaboratively with all sectors to ensure we capture the benefits for local people. This includes local schools, training providers and employers to ensure young people are ready for work and apprenticeships; local business associations and networks to identify the skills needed now and into the future; and not-for-profit organisations that have wider social objectives, such as providing employment for people with otherwise limited opportunities.
The local board is keen to develop ideas that will bring more visitors to Papakura, and will work with Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development (ATEED) and local Māori to cultivate new opportunities for tourism.
We will also support, through funding and other means, community and social enterprises to develop new ideas that might not be viable otherwise. We will work with residents to establish ‘innovation stations’ and community learning hubs where people can learn, share experience and develop ideas.
Outcome: A strong local economy |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Local people find rewarding local employment. |
Set aside funding for scholarships for young people. |
Support job-ready programmes for young people to move into employment. |
|
Enable the development of social enterprise, entrepreneurship and innovation. |
|
Promote the Papakura area as an ideal location for business to set up. |
|
Business in Papakura thrives as local people buy from local businesses. |
Provide leadership through procurement from local businesses.
|
Increase numbers of visitors who contribute to our local economy. |
Promote Papakura as a visitor destination. |
Develop visitor information packages. |
Outcome 4: Papakura is well-connected and easy to move around
Whakaotinga 4: He tūhono tonu, he māmā te haereere noa i Papakura
Our roads should be free from congestion, public transport convenient and reliable, walkways and cycleways safe and connected.
We are fortunate in Papakura to be able to easily use the Auckland rail network or hop on the motorway to get to where we need to go. But those who need to travel outside the area during peak travel times will know how congested our roads are and how long we can spend getting to work.
As Papakura’s population grows and new housing developments are built in and around our area, the transport system will continue to be under pressure. Projects to increase the number of lanes on the motorway between Papakura and Manukau and to improve the Takanini interchange are underway. The introduction of more frequent trains and connected bus services will help too, especially when the City Rail Loop is finished. An alternative four-lane arterial route planned along Mill Road will make a difference too but this is still some time away from completion.
These big projects are funded and managed by Auckland Transport, the New Zealand Transport Agency and Kiwi Rail. But as more people come to live in Papakura, we will also have to make sure that our local roads and transport systems can cope with more of us getting about. The local board will continue to advocate to Auckland Transport for grade separation in Takanini (Manuroa Road, Taka Street and Spartan Road) and to progress the new Mill Road arterial route. We will also push for improved park and ride facilities at both our train stations.
A “Greenways – Local Paths Plan” was completed for Papakura in 2016. This shows how we can provide walking and cycling connections which are safe and pleasant, while also improving local ecology and providing access to recreational opportunities. It will link together areas of housing and employment, parks, shopping centres, recreational facilities, places of interest and transport hubs. We will work with Auckland Transport, other agencies and local communities to scope and begin implementing this plan.
You have shared your concerns with us about the state of some of our walkways and footpaths, which makes it difficult to get around safely in some places, especially for the elderly, those with a disability or families with prams or pushchairs. The local board will advocate to Auckland Transport to progressively fix these so that we can all get to where need to go safely.
Outcome: Papakura is well-connected and easy to move around |
|
Objective |
Key initiative |
Papakura’s cycle ways and walk ways provide safe, connected alternative routes to get us to where we need to go.
|
Begin implementation of the Papakura Greenways – Local Paths and Cycle ways Plan. |
Establish safe, clear, walk and cycle links between key facilities. |
|
Improve, through Auckland Transport, pathway safety including lighting and accessibility. |
|
Public transport is safe, convenient, reliable and affordable. |
Advocate to Auckland Transport and KiwiRail for a third line to futureproof the rail network. |
Advocate to Auckland Transport to improve park and ride facilities at the Papakura and Takanini railway stations. |
|
Our urban roads are safe and free from congestion. |
Continue to advocate Auckland Transport for grade separation in Takanini and progress on the Mill road arterial route.
|
Outcome 5: Treasured for its environment and heritage
Whakaotinga 5: He manawapātia mō tōna taiao me āna taonga tuku iho
We value our natural environment and heritage, protecting and nourishing it for future generations
As Papakura continues to grow, so will the challenges to maintaining a liveable environment and protecting both our natural ecology and built heritage. Pollution and waste will need to be better managed and if possible eliminated, and the quality of our air and water monitored and improved.
Mana whenua connection to the land is both spiritual and cultural. The Manukau Harbour, the streams flowing into it and the land surrounding it sustained and nourished Māori for generations. We need to maintain and improve the health of our environment if it is to continue to provide for us into the future.
Māori as kaitiaki (guardians) have a significant role to play in protecting our environment but it is a responsibility we must all share. Papakura Local Board will seek to partner with local Māori in a joint commitment to ensure a sustainable future for our environment. Together we will champion practices and projects that will serve to strengthen our connection to the land and harbour, and to minimise the long-term impact of growth.
We will continue to support the Manukau Harbour Forum, working with eight other local boards to improve water quality and restore the coastal environment. In addition, we will explore ways to improve the wetlands and waterways that feed into the harbour, and seek to ensure that wastewater and stormwater treatment is of the highest standard.
We must also reduce the waste we produce to help conserve our finite resources for future generations. Recycling helps to reduce the harmful chemicals and greenhouse gasses that are released from rubbish in landfill and to lower the pollution caused by waste. The local board will support the establishment of a network of community recycling centres so that it is easy, convenient and affordable to reuse and recycle unwanted goods and garden waste.
The Papakura area has a rich and diverse history. Understanding the evolution and development of Papakura is part of what helps us identify with the area and makes us feel proud to live here. Sites of historic and cultural significance need to be identified, restored and protected, and the stories of the past captured and told. The local board intends to continue working with mana whenua and the Papakura Museum to make our history more visible and known.
Outcome: Treasured for its environment and heritage |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
The environment in and around our harbour and streams is enjoyed by increasing numbers of people. |
Continue support for the Manukau Harbour Forum. |
Invest in mangrove and Pacific oyster removal and control. |
|
Implement initiatives to improve water quality in our streams and Manukau Harbour. |
|
Programmes to reduce, reuse and recycle are successfully implemented in Papakura. |
Establish a network of recycling centres in partnership with other agencies. |
Promote education and knowledge programmes about recycling. |
|
Papakura’s history and heritage is highlighted and celebrated. |
Identify wāhi tapu (sacred places) and other taonga (treasures). |
Identify heritage buildings and areas. |
Financial information
He kōrero take pūtea
This purpose of this section is to provide a financial overview of the Papakura Local Board.
Based on our existing budgets, we believe we can deliver the key initiatives in our draft plan without reducing our existing levels of service or increasing our local revenue sources (such as local targeted rates and fees and charges).
The governing body will be adopting council’s 2018 – 2028 10 year budget in June 2018. It is important to note that this could change the funding for local boards, including projects that are currently provided for in the 2015-2025 10 year budget.
Local activities and levels of service
Local board responsibilities, provided for directly in legislation or allocated to boards, are summarised into local activities. These are described in the table below, along with levels of service statements.
More information regarding of levels of services, including performance measures and performance targets, can be found in the Papakura Local Board Agreement 2016/2017. This is available on the Auckland Council website.
Local activities |
Levels of service statements |
Local parks, sport and recreation This group of activities covers the management and provision of local parks and open space and recreation activities for both passive and active recreation. It includes swimming pools and leisure centres servicing communities in the local area. |
Provide a range of recreational opportunities catering for community needs on local parks, reserves and beaches. Provide sports fields that are fit for purpose and cater for community needs. Provide programmes and facilities that ensure more Aucklanders are more active more often. |
Local community services This group of activities contribute to improved community outcomes by providing places and spaces for community to learn and recreate, and by integrating arts and culture into the everyday lives of Aucklanders. Key activities include locally delivered Libraries & Information (Libraries) and Community Development, Arts and Culture services. |
Provide safe, accessible, welcoming library facilities that support the delivery of quality learning programmes and services relevant to local communities. Enable Aucklanders and communities to express themselves and improve their wellbeing through customer centric advice, funding, facilitation and permitting. Deliver a variety of events, programmes and projects that improve safety, connect Aucklanders and engage them in their city and communities. Provide safe, reliable and accessible social infrastructure for Aucklanders that contributes to placemaking and thriving communities. |
Local planning and development This group of activities covers local business area planning, local street environment and town centres and local environment and heritage protection. These activities include economic, environmental, heritage and spatial projects, and enable, plan for and deliver great local places. |
Develop local business precincts and town centres as great places to do business.
|
Local environmental management This group of activities covers working in partnership with locally based communities and iwi to deliver enhanced environmental outcomes (with a focus in indigenous biodiversity, healthy waterways and sustainable living) that contribute to Māori, community wellbeing and economy. |
Provide leadership & support to protect and conserve the region’s natural environment, historic heritage and Māori cultural heritage.
|
Local governance This group of activities covers support to local boards such as strategic advice, preparation of local board plans, development of local board agreements, community engagement including relationships with mana whenua and Māori communities, democracy and administration support, and professional development for elected members. |
The measures for this group of activities are covered under the Regional Governance group of activities in the Long-term Plan 2015-2025 where the survey measures determine participation with Auckland Council decision-making in general. This includes local decision-making. There are no significant changes to the measures or targets for 2016/2017.
|
Financial overview
Income, expenditure and capital investment by local activities for the period 2015 to 2018
Annual Plan Financials |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
Operating revenue |
|
||
Local community services |
311 |
355 |
358 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
|
||
Local planning and development |
|
||
Local environment services |
|
||
Total operating revenue |
311 |
355 |
358 |
Operating expenditure |
|
||
Local community services |
3,323 |
3,159 |
3,591 |
Local governance |
993 |
977 |
1,020 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
5,679 |
5,917 |
5,970 |
Local planning and development |
273 |
204 |
323 |
Local environment services |
106 |
43 |
49 |
Total operating expenditure |
10,374 |
10,300 |
10,953 |
Net operating expenditure |
10,063 |
9,945 |
10,595 |
Capital expenditure |
|
||
Local community services |
289 |
167 |
1,152 |
Local governance |
2,505 |
2,680 |
2,389 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
|
||
Local planning and development |
|
||
Local environment services |
|
||
Total capital expenditure |
2,794 |
2,846 |
3,541 |
Funding Impact Statement
Financial year ending 30 June |
2016/17 |
Sources of operating funding |
|
General rates, UAGCs, rates penalties |
11,387 |
Targeted rates |
174 |
Subsidies and grants for operating purposes |
10 |
Fees and charges |
264 |
Local authorities fuel tax, fines, infringement fees and other receipts |
81 |
Total operating funding |
11,916 |
|
|
Applications of operating funding |
|
Payment to staff and suppliers |
9,337 |
Finance costs |
943 |
Internal charges and overheads applied |
1,628 |
Other operating funding applications |
- |
Total applications of operating funding |
11,908 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of operating funding |
8 |
|
|
Sources of capital funding |
|
Subsidies and grants for capital expenditure |
- |
Development and financial contributions |
- |
Increase (decrease) in debt |
2,839 |
Gross proceeds from sale of assets |
- |
Lump sum contributions |
- |
Other dedicated capital funding |
- |
Total sources of capital funding |
2,839 |
|
|
Application of capital funding |
|
Capital expenditure |
406 |
- to meet additional demand |
- |
- to improve the level of service |
2,441 |
- to replace existing assets |
- |
Increase (decrease) in reserves |
- |
Increase (decrease) in investments |
|
Total applications of capital funding |
2,847 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of capital funding |
(8) |
|
|
Funding balance |
0 |
Your Papakura Local Board members
Ngā Mema o tō Poari ā-Rohe o Papakura
|
Members’ details |
|
Brent Catchpole - Chairperson Phone: 021 390 430 |
|
Felicity Auva’a - Deputy Chairperson Phone: 021 526 941 felicity.auvaa@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
George Hawkins Phone: 09 301 0101 george.hawkins@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Bill McEntee Phone: 021 831 639 |
|
Michael Turner Phone: 021 287 9922 |
|
Katrina Winn Phone: 021 572 217 |
26 April 2017 |
|
Summary of the draft Papakura Local Board Plan 2017
Help Shape Papakura’s future
FROM THE CHAIR
It is my privilege to present this summary of our draft local board plan, which describes our aspirations for Papakura.
The plan has been shaped by the views and thoughts you’ve shared with us at meetings, workshops and events, and once finalised will guide our decision-making for the next three years.
One of the biggest challenges facing Papakura is significant population growth that will put pressure on our roads and other infrastructure, so a key focus for us is to ensure developments are well planned and built to support that growth.
We also want to improve our town centre and hubs on the Great South Road to attract new business to the area. At the same time, we’ll support local businesses to provide local employment opportunities, particularly for our young people.
We also think it’s important we ensure people have opportunities to stay active, healthy and connected; that our transport system is safe, reliable, convenient and affordable; and our environment and heritage is protected and preserved for future generations.
I invite you to read the full plan and to tell us if we’re on the right
track. I look forward to your feedback.
Brent Catchpole
Chair
Papakura Local Board
This summary is an overview of the statement of proposal for our draft 2017 Papakura Local Board Plan. We encourage you to read the full draft plan, available online at, shapeauckland.co.nz at public libraries, council service centres and local board offices and tell us what you think by Friday 30 June, 2017. Or tell us what you think in person – see page XX for details of local meetings. |
WHAT WE PROPOSE TO FOCUS ON
We propose to focus on five outcomes. Our plan is based on the feedback and ideas that our community has given to us over time.
Outcome 1: A vibrant and prosperous metropolitan centre
We want our town centre to be a great place to shop, relax and enjoy the company of family and friends. We will contribute to this by:
· introducing programmes to attract new businesses, events and leisure operators
· supporting strategies to improve safety and security
· encouraging regular cultural and arts experiences in the Papakura town centre, including street art and events
· ensuring our Māori heritage is more visible throughout Papakura
· encouraging joined-up
thinking and planning of the Great South Road and its centres of Takanini and
Papakura
Outcome 2: People in Papakura lead active, healthy and connected lives
Having plenty of great places and spaces where our people can get together and to do things they love is important, so we will focus on:
· ensuring our local parks and sport recreation facilities are well used by promoting them to national sports bodies and schools
· continuing to invest in developments at Bruce Pullman Park and Opaheke and Hingaia sports grounds
· advocating to the governing body through the 10-year budget process to fund an upgrade of the Massey Park outdoor pool
· developing a community hub and library in Takanini
· continuing the community-led project in Smiths Avenue Reserve.
Outcome
3: A strong local economy
A strong
local economy means local businesses prosper, there are local jobs for local
people and new companies will want to come here. We will encourage this by:
· funding scholarships and supporting job-ready programmes for young people to move into training, study or employment
· working with Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development (ATEED), the Southern Initiative and other partners to attract businesses to Papakura
· enabling social enterprise, entrepreneurship and innovation
· promoting Papakura as a visitor destination.
Outcome 4: Papakura is well-connected and easy to move around
We will do our part to make excellent transport connections and infrastructure a reality by:
· ensuring our cycle and walkways are accessible, well-lit and connected so they get people where they need to go
· asking Auckland Transport to improve park and ride facilities at Papakura and Takanini rail stations
· advocating to Auckland Transport to progress the Mill Road route and for grade separation in Takanini to improve safety and reduce congestion.
Outcome 5: Treasured for its environment and heritage
Papakura’s rich heritage and beautiful natural environment needs to be protected, improved and celebrated for future generations to enjoy. To ensure that happens we want to:
· support programmes that improve the environment and water quality of the Manukau Harbour and our streams
· remove and control mangroves and Pacific oysters from Papakura Local Board coastal areas
· encourage waste minimisation through recycling education programmes
· partner with others to establish a network of recycling centres
· celebrate our heritage by identifying wāhi tapu/sacred sites, taonga/treasures, and heritage buildings and areas.
DELIVERING OUR LOCAL BOARD PLAN
To deliver a successful plan, we need to focus our limited resources on what matters most to our community and what we can influence. Find out more in our draft local board plan, available online at shapeauckland.co.nz or at public libraries, council service centres or local board offices.
HAVE YOUR SAY ON PAPAKURA’S DRAFT LOCAL BOARD PLAN
Feedback must be received by 4pm on Friday 30 June 2017.
Your feedback will go directly to elected members of Papakura Local Board to help inform their decisions.
We encourage you to read a full copy of our draft plan before providing your feedback. Copies of the full plan and submission form are available:
· online at shapeauckland.co.nz
· at public libraries council service centres and local board offices
· or phone us on 09 301 0101 and we will send a copy to you.
Or you can fill out this form and return it to us:
· email - simply scan your completed form and email to localboardplans@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
· on person - drop it off at your local library, service centre or local board office
· by post - place your completed form in an envelope and send to this freepost address:
Local Board Plans
Auckland Council
Freepost Authority 232621
Private Bag 92 300, Auckland 1142
Social media
Comments made through Facebook will be considered written feedback.
· Write something on the Papakura Local Board Facebook page - Facebook.com\PapakuraLB and include “Local Board Plan feedback” in your message
· Send a private message using Facebook Messenger to @PapakuraLB and include “Local Board Plan feedback” in your message.
In person
Come and talk to us at one of the pop-up events below. This is an opportunity for you to find out more about our ideas and provide feedback to board members.
· Tuesday, 13 June, 10am-12pm, outside Takanini Countdown, 288 Great South Road
· Saturday, 24 June, 9.30am-11.30am, Drury Town Centre, 232 Great South Road (outside Drury Superette)
Alternatively, you can attend our have your say drop in session event, where
you can participate in a facilitated discussion with local board:
Wednesday, 31 May, 4.30pm - 6.30pm, Sir Edmund Hillary Library, 209 Great South Road, Papakura.
First name: ________________________________________________________
Last name: ________________________________________________________
Email or postal address: _____________________________________________
Local board/s you are providing feedback on: _____________________________
· Your name and feedback will be considered public documents. All other personal details will remain private.
If you want to give us feedback on more than one draft local board plan you can:
· complete a separate form for each draft plan. Additional forms are available by calling 09 3010101 or online at shape.auckland.co.nz
· complete one submission form and attach your comments, making it clear which draft local board plan they apply to.
The following information is optional.
Are you?
□ Female □ Male □ Gender diverse
What age group do you belong to?
□ <15 □ 15-24 □ 25-34 □ 35-44
□ 45-54 □ 55-64 □ 65-74 □ 75+
Which of the following describes your ethnicity? (Please select as many as
apply)
□ NZ European
□ Māori
□ Samoan
□ Tongan
□ Chinese
□ Indian
□ Other (please specify) _____________________________________
Would you like to speak in support of your submission at a public hearing to be held on Wednesday 2 August, at 1pm. at the Papakura Local Board Office, 35 Coles Crescent, Papakura ?
Yes/ No
Is your feedback on behalf of an organisation?
· No, these are my personal views.
· Yes, I am the official spokesperson for my organisation.
If yes, what is the name of your organisation? ___________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Q1. On a scale of one to five, are we on the right track with our proposed local board plan?
[ ] 5 = I strongly agree that the board is on the right track
[ ] 4 = I agree that the board is on the right track
[ ] 3 = I neither agree or disagree that the board is on the right track
[ ] 2 = I disagree that the board is on the right track
[ ] 1 = I strongly disagree that the board is on the right track
Comments:
Q2. Do you think we have missed anything in the draft plan? If yes, could you explain what it is and why it’s important?
Q3. Please rank our outcomes in order of importance, where 1 is most
important and 5 is least important.
o Outcome 1: A vibrant and prosperous metropolitan centre
o Outcome 2: People in Papakura lead active, healthy and connected lives
o Outcome 3: A strong local economy
o Outcome 4: Papakura is well-connected and easy to move around
o Outcome 5: Treasured for its environment and heritage
Please tell us why.
What do you think of our priorities?
□ Support □ Do not support □ Not sure
Comments:
Need more room? You can attach extra pages, but please make sure they are A4 and include your name and contact details.
All personal information that you provide in this submission will be held and protected by Auckland Council in accordance with our privacy policy (available at aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/privacy and at our libraries and service centres) and with the Privacy Act 1993. Our privacy policy explains how we may use and share your personal information in relation to any interaction you have with the council, and how you can access and correct that information. We recommend you familiarise yourself with this policy.
___________________________________________________________________
□ Yes, I want to be added to your mailing list to be kept informed about news and events in the Papakura Local Board area.
26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Submissions
File No.: CP2017/06699
Purpose
1. This report seeks the Papakura Local Board’s formal endorsement of the following submissions:
· Draft Air Quality Bylaw and Statement of Proposal.
· Clean Water Package
Executive summary
2. N/A
a) That the Papakura Local Board: · Endore the Papakura Local Board submissions on the Draft Air Quality Bylaw and Statement of Proposal and the Clean Water Package
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
20170426 Papakura Local Board Submission on the Draft Quality Bylaw |
285 |
b⇩
|
20170426 Papakura Local Board Submission on the Clean Water Package |
287 |
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
26 April 2017 |
|
Alteration of the business meeting schedule for the Papakura Local Board
File No.: CP2017/06683
Purpose
1. To alter the business meeting schedule for the Papakura Local Board by the addition of 3 May and 7 June 2017 meetings to meet the timeframes for decisions on the Auckland Council Annual Plan 2017/2018.
Executive summary
2. On 16 November 2016 the Papakura Local Board resolved the “Adoption of a business meeting schedule’ for the 2016-2019 electoral term (resolution number PPK/2016/2018.
3. Timeframes for decisions by the Papakura Local Board on the Auckland Council Annual Plan 2017/2018 cannot be met without an alteration to the business meeting schedule.
That the Papakura Local Board: a) Agree to alter the business meeting schedule for the Papakura Local Board by the addition of 3 May and 7 June 2017 meetings.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term
File No.: CP2017/06080
Purpose
1. Providing an updated register of achievements of the Papakura Local Board for the 2016-2019 Electoral Term.
Executive Summary
2. Nil.
a) That the report entitled “Papakura Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Electoral Term” be received. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
20170426 Papakura Local Board Achievements Register |
293 |
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
PAPAKURA LOCAL BOARD
ACHIEVEMENTS REGISTER 2016-2019 ELECTORAL TERM
Date |
ACHIEVEMENT |
11 April 2017 |
Launch of Takanini Business Association |
2 April 2017 |
Papakura Fun Run – Bruce Pulman Park |
31 March 2017 |
Hauora at the Pa – Papakura Marae |
28 March |
Transport Forum - Papakura |
25 March 2017 |
Redhill Funday |
25 March 2017 |
Attended Bruce Pulman Park Indoor Arena Opening |
24 March 2017 |
Attended Police Pay Parade |
23 March 2017 |
Papakura Art Gallery – Exhibition Opening – Tui Tuia with Horomona Horo and Te Kiri o Tane with Nikau Hindin |
22 March 2017 |
Papakura Business Meeting: - Approved the Papakura Art Gallery Business Plan 2017-2020 with amendments. - Approved 16 Quick Response Round Three 2016/2017 applications. - Approved new road names for the residential subdivision by Carhart Investments and Darley Investments Limited at 889 Papakura-Clevedon Road, Ardmore being “Nola Dawn Crescent, Charles Henry Way, Te Aramanu Crescent and Huahua Crescent. - Endorsed the draft Manurewa Takanini Papakura Integrated Plan for community engagement commencing 3 April 2017. - Provided board feedback on Project 17: Auckland Council Maintenance Contracts. - Delegated to the Chair and Work Stream Lead Member Turner to provide feedback and attend the hearings on the draft Air Quality Bylaw for Indoor Domestic Fires. - Allocated up to $15,000 from the board’s Community Response Fund to the Papakura Business Association to commission a comprehensive safety review of the Papakura town centre and immediate surrounds to help inform future local board decision-making. - Allocated $3,500 +GST from the board’s Community Response Fund to the Papakura Business Association to partner with the board to continue the Proud Papakura Proud Initiative for 2017. - Agreed to re-constitute the Manukau Harbour Forum joint committee with the Franklin, Mangere-Otahuhu, Manurewa, Otara-Papatoetoe, Maungakiekie-Tamaki, Puketapapa, Whau and Waitakere Ranges Local boards for the 2016-2019 electoral term. |
20 March 2017 |
Attended Pasifika Fono |
17 March 2017 |
Papakura Parks – site visits |
16 March 2017 |
Attended Maori Communities Engagement Hui at Manukau |
15 March 2017 |
Attended Blessing for the site where Papaka Road will be constructed. |
10 March 2017 |
Papakura Local Board “Have Your Say” Event – Papakura Library |
22 February 2017 |
Papakura Local Board Business Meeting - Agreed to fund the cost of $5,063 from the Community Response Locally Driven Initiatives Fund to the Papakura Business Association Incorporated to support the relocation of Closed Circuit Television from the PBA premises to the Papakura Police Station to improve the monitoring by the CrimeWatch volunteers. - Agreed that the Chair and Deputy Chair liaise with the Papakura Business Association Inc to assess suitable sites for installation of new cameras. - Approved a new community ground lease for Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association Incorporated (Nina Busing Kindergarten) for 13A Clevedon Road, Papakura. - Approved a new road name for the residential subdivision by Karaka Brookview Limited at 241 Park Estate Road, Hingaia. - Approved new road name for three private ways within the residential subdivision by Addison Development at 250 Porchester Road, Takanini. - Reallocated unspent events partnership funding of $22,500 to the three remaining 2016/2017 contestable funding rounds as follows: i) $5,625 towards the Quick Response Round Three ii) $5,625 towards the Quick Response Round Four iii) $11,250 towards the Local Grants Round Two - Approved the scope of the Hawkins Theatre Business Planning Project with the following additions: i) To include a strong focus on improved promotion of the venue ii) To include income and options for increased revenue iii) To include community consultation with stakeholders, and user groups. - Agree that the Papakura Local Board Chair will initiate engagement with mana whenua groups who have registered interest in the Papakura Local Board area, to inform the Hawkins Theatre Business Plan. - Endorsed the Manurewa and Papakura Local Board joint submission on the Point England Development Enabling Bill – January 2017. - Adopted the work stream allocations for the Board and appointed Member Auva’a to the Aircraft Noise Community Consultative Group. - Received the Auckland Council’s Quarterly Performance Report for the Papakura Local Board: Quarter Two, 1 October – 31 December 2016. |
6 February 2017 |
Waitangi Day Celebrations |
27 January 2017 |
Art in the Park |
25 January 2017 |
Papakura Business Meeting: - Approved various road names for the residential subdivision by Housing New Zealand at 75 Walters Road, Takanini - Approved 19 Papakura Local Board Scholarship grants. |
24 January 2017 |
Keri Downs Park - Out and About Programme |
20 January 2017 |
Blessing of Pahurehure Boardwalk and esplanade |
13 January 2017 |
Papakura Kite Day |
16 December 2016 |
Papakura Local Board Christmas Community Morning Tea |
12 December 2016 |
Drury Mile Post Ceremony |
10 December 2016 |
Papakura Christmas Market |
9 December 2016 |
Papakura Carols in the Park |
4 December 2016 |
Papakura Christmas Parade |
27 November 2016 |
Attended Counties Manukau Sport Excellence Awards |
24 November 2016 |
Papakura Citizenship Ceremony |
18 November 2016 |
Attended Vector Pacific Music Awards |
13 November 2016 |
Attended Armistice Day Service |
3 November 2016 |
Inaugural Meeting - Election of Chair, Brent Catchpole - Deputy Chair, Felicity Auva’a |
|
- |
25 February 2017 |
Papakura Town Centre Cleanup |
26 April 2017 |
|
For Information: Reports referred to the Papakura Local Board
File No.: CP2017/06087
Purpose
1. Providing an opportunity for the Board to receive reports, resolutions and memorandums that have been referred from Governing Body Committee meetings, forums or other local boards for the information.
2. The information listed below has been received and circulated to members from the following local board meetings.
No. |
Report Title |
Date sent to Members |
Governing Body Committee or Forum or Local Board
|
1. |
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
That the Papakura Local Board
a) note the information from the following local board meetings:
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes
File No.: CP2017/06088
Purpose
1. Attached is a copy of the notes taken at the Papakura Local Board workshop held on 5 April and 12 April 2017.
Executive Summary
2. Nil
That the Papakura Local Board: a) receive the workshop notes for the workshops held on Wednesday, 5 April and 12 April 2017. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
20170405 Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes |
301 |
b⇩ |
20170412 Papakura Local Board Workshop Notes |
309 |
Signatories
Authors |
Trish Wayper - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Rex Hewitt - Relationship Manager |
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Workshop Record
Workshop record of the Papakura Local Board held in the Papakura Local Board Chambers, Papakura Service Centre, 35 Coles Crescent on Wednesday, 5 April 2017, commencing at 12.30 pm.
PRESENT
Chairperson: Brent Catchpole
Members: Felicity Auva’a
George Hawkins
Bill McEntee (from 12.44 pm)
Michael Turner (until 2.45 pm)
Katrina Winn (from 1.02 pm)
Apologies: There were no apologies.
Also present: Rex Hewitt (Relationship Manager)
Madelon De Jongh (Senior Local Board Advisor)
Lee Manaia (Local Board Advisor)
Trish Wayper (Democracy Advisor)
Faithe Smith (Lead Financial Advisor)
Workshop Item |
Governance role |
Summary of Discussions |
1. Annual Plan Rex Hewitt Relationship Manager |
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The Relationship Manager gave an overview of the process for the board to give feedback on the draft 2017/2018 work programmes. |
Annual Plan Parks, Sports and Recreation Greg Lowe – Parks and Places Specialist Peter Caccioppoli – Senior Activation Advisor Debra Langton – Parks, Sport and Recreation (PSR) Portfolio Manager
|
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The board gave the following feedback on the draft 2017/2018 Parks, Sport and Recreation work programme: 1431 – Counties Manukau Sport – provision of sporting programmes - $57,000 (status quo and as per FY2016/2017 budget). - PSR Portfolio Manager to contact Counties Manukau Sport for an update on of the planned activities for 2017/2018. - PSR Portfolio Manager to advise who the council contact is for the co-ordination / proactive work that was previously undertaken by Willie Iosia? - Staff to report back with the required budget for the volunteer recognition awards. 1924 – Massey Park Stadium - $50,000 (currently in the work programme as LDI: Opex) – Staff advised that this is incorrect as it sits in the ABS: Opex budget. This will be updated in the work programme. 1933 – Papakura outdoor leisure – out and about programme $27,000. The Board would like to receive more details as to what this programme is covering. 982 – Events and recreational activities programme ($20,000) – The board would like to receive more details about this programme and what it is covering. 1428 – Bruce Pulman Park – Relationship - $0.00. Staff recommended taking this out of the budget as this was business as usual. However, the board would like this line to stay included in the work programme in order to ensure the board receives regular updates. 1092 – Papakura – Leisure facilities operation programme - $826,686. PSR Portfolio Manager to follow up with the contractor regarding long standing agreements in relation to fees and charges for volunteer and school groups. 1026 – Mangrove Removal – Pahurehure Inlet and Conifer Grove $100,000. - Questioned whether the $32,000 from FY2016/2017 budget set aside for removing juvenile mangrove plants had been actioned. - Requested that mangrove removal and juvenile removal for FY2017/2018 be split (80/20) into two separate budget lines. - Report back required as to whether this includes the removal of mangroves at Wellington Park. - More information required as to whether or not the post removal reports required under the resource consent will be done with the budget for this financial year (FY2016/2017). 1027 – Papakura Children’s Forest – planting and weed removal - $15,000. 982 – Papakura local parks: Events and recreational activities programme - $20,000. 1184 - Papakura: creating a Maori identity – The board was generally supportive of the proposal. However questions how this links in with the renewals work around signage. Budget line to be added to the work programme for implementation without funding at the moment. 1425 - Papakura: Ecological volunteers and environmental programmes – Programme to be adjusted to reflect that the Friends of Kirk’s Bush who receive the rental from the house to fund the maintenance and upkeep of Kirk’s Bush. - The board would also like staff to make contact with the volunteer groups to ensure the budgets allocated are sufficient for the work being undertaken. 1023 – Bruce Pulman Park - $250,000. Board requested that consultation be undertaken between Council and the Bruce Pulman Park Trust to ensure the best outcome. The LDI capex options would be considered at a separate workshop. Local Board Services to arrange a time. Staff to undertake further work on the suggested options and include the implementation of the Hingaia concept plan. Board also requested the following: - Staff to undertake a review of the use and capacity of all sports parks in Papakura and consultation with the different sport codes and user groups to also ascertain their requirements. This to help and inform planning and future investment from Council. - Allocation of money for the “Field of Dreams” project. |
Annual Plan Arts, Culture and Events Sarah Bramston Strategic Broker Richard McWha Manager, Arts and Culture Ashleigh Siteine Event Facilitator George Makapatama Manager, Strategic Brokers |
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The board gave the following feedback on the draft 2017/2018 Arts and Culture work programme: 482 – Community Arts Programmes – LDI currently states a $30,000 budget. The work programme activities add up to $45,000. Staff advised that the work programme has been updated. 505 – Papakura Arts Gallery – Business Planning Project - Staff advised that this is the implementation of the business plan that was signed of this year by the board. - The board requested costings to be obtained for permanent display cabinets. This to be considered as part of the LDI: Capex workshop. 477 – Hawkins Theatre Operations - $367,193. – Staff advised that CPI adjustments to this budget have been made. 478 – Papakura Art Gallery - $119,840. Staff advised that CPI adjustments to this budget have been made. 480 – Papakura Museum: ABS: Papakura and Districts Historical Society Operational Grant. Staff to ensure that capability is built in the Historical Society to ensure they are able to apply for grant funding to address any shortfall in funding. 532 – Build capacity: youth scholarships $30,000 – Increase in funding supported by the Board. 533 – Capacity building – Papakura Community Groups - $10,000. Item new was previously Civil Defence. Requested a report back to the board at the end of 2017 on which groups were funded and how they were enabled by this funding. 343 – Community Grants - $123,000. Senior Citizen’s funding of $2,000 to be included. 534 – Community-led placemaking – Smiths Avenue - $55,000. Workshop scheduled for 12 April 2017. Faithe Smith confirmed that this funding could be carried over to 2017/2018 if this was due to staff constraints. 535 – Community-led placemaking – town centre initiatives and economic development - $274,000. $40,000 Community Initiatives included the development of an innovation hub. 536 – Increase diverse participation – youth voice and youth-led initiatives - $75,000. - The board wanted to know the outcome of this years’ budget. - A discussion required regarding a youth space in the town centre. Work programme to be adjusted to reflect that a business plan for both the Hawkins Theatre and the Papakura Museum are being developed to ensure the board receives regular reporting on progress. |
Annual Plan Arts, Culture and Events Sarah Bramston Strategic Broker Richard McWha Manager, Arts and Culture Ashleigh Siteine Event Facilitator George Makapatama Manager, Strategic Brokers |
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The board gave the following feedback on the draft 2017/2018 Events work programme: 741 – Local Maori Responsiveness Action Plan - $5,000 – The board asked how this work linked into the work the board is doing in relation to Maori input into local board decision making. 537 – Placemaking: Mara Kai Projects (growing food) - $33,000. Board requested further consultation with residents on the potential Addison Community Garden. 424 – Hire fee subsidy - $5,757 – Legacy arrangement. 422 – Community Venues - $0.00 – The board request research be undertaken to identify why people are not hiring the facilities. 1918 – Community Volunteer Awards – Papakura - $8,000. These were annual events. The board decided to hold them every second year. Next one to be held in 2018. The board want to know what last years budget was spent on. budget.. 252 – Event Partnership Fund – Papakura (Externally delivered events) - $124,500. The individual amounts to be allocated to each event will be discussed at a further workshop. - A review is required of the events the local board is currently funding. This should encompass: - Are these events value for money? - How many people attended the events? - Are there other option to consider? eg: a street festival event delivered in Papakura Town Centre in conjunction with the Papakura Business Association. 253 – Event Partnership Fund (Movies in the Park) - $12,000. Music and movies in park were run together. The music needed to be more family orientated. The sound system for Movies in Parks was not audible. |
Annual Plan Infrastructure and Environment Emma Joyce Relationship Advisor |
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The board gave feedback on the draft 2017/2018 Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme. 295 – Healthy Rentals Project - $30,000 – to be considered.
|
Annual Plan Libraries Gill Pannell Service Delivery Manager (TSI) Community Libraries (South/East)
|
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
The board gave the following feedback on the draft 2017/2018 Libraries work programme: The board notes all budget lines were ABS Opex. 1289 – Library hours of service – Reflect opening hours as 52 hours rather than specifying actual days. May need to be reconsider opening days based on demand. |
2. Relationship Agreements with Mana Whenua Rama Ormsby Head of Maori Relationships and Governance Te Waka Angamua
|
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
Rama outlined the proposed approach to developing mana whenua relationship agreements and tabled a template. The templates had been socialised with mana whenua through a number of hui. The Governing Body had approved the agreement template and the proposed approach to developing these agreements. The next step was for the individual boards to meet with mana whenua chairs and discuss the proposal. Actions: 1. Head of Maori Relationships & Governanceto organise a hui between Papakura Local Board and mana whenua Chairs. 2. Head of Maori Relationships & Governance to forward a copy of the relevant sections from the Resource Consent Amendment Bill changes to Rex. 3. Head of Maori Relationships & Governance to forward data show containing information on status of treaty settlements to the board. 4. Head of Maori Relationships & Governance to discuss with Joy Hames the Kaitiaki and Whaitiaki Agreements Papakura District Council had developed and implemented to determine their current status. |
The workshop concluded at 3.38 pm.
26 April 2017 |
|
Papakura Local Board Workshop Record
Workshop record of the Papakura Local Board held in the Papakura Local Board Chambers, Papakura Service Centre, 35 Coles Crescent on Wednesday, 12 April 2017, commencing at 12.20pm.
PRESENT
Chairperson: Brent Catchpole
Members: George Hawkins (for Item 1)
Katrina Winn
Apologies:
Also present: Rex Hewitt (Relationship Manager)
Lee Manaia (Local Board Advisor)
Trish Wayper (Democracy Advisor)
Workshop Item |
Governance role |
Summary of Discussions |
1. Smiths Avenue Item 1 was held at the Smiths Avenue Facility Sarah Bramston Strategic Broker
Mark Evans Practice Manager - Operations Community Empowerment
Gail Fotheringham Specialist Advisor Community Empowerment
Kiri McCutcheon Advisor Community Empowerment
Angie Tangaere TSI Social Intrapreneur Southern Initiative Peter Loud, Senior Advisor, Community Places George Makapatama, Manager Strategic Broker
|
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
Staff explained that they wanted to undertake a whanau centric co-design process for community-led place making at Smiths Ave. The process is aimed at developing capability and finding a way forward that works for the community. The board members gave the following feedback: · The community needs to see something happening immediately - need to find the quick wins. The community is tired of talkfests. · Health and safety needs to be front of mind. · A masterplan is required. · Need to involve the government agencies: · WINZ · HNZ · Health Services, eg: Breast screen · A collective approach is required · Transparency is required, particularly in tracking money spent on the project · Communications need to be tailored to meet the community’s needs. · An operational budget may be required going forward.
· Need to provide something useful to the community.
Ideas put forward were: · Service providers – collective impact approach · Life skills · Social procurement · Create a reason for people to come · Homework centre · Safety · Social entrepreneur · Innovation · connecting civil infrastructure opportunities · teaching young people how to ride motorbikes or bicycles · skill shed · link in with youth connections work · need to have a dedicated paid person to co-ordinate and develop the relationships. A door to door, face to face approach will be required to develop the relationships. Potential Partners: · Foundation North · Tainui The board members endorsed in principle the Southern Initiative and the Community Led Development Group activating a whanau centric co-design process for place-making at Smiths Ave. The board members stressed that the facility needed to be a multi-use facility and could not be captured by one group. Board members agreed it is important for members to sit on the project group. They felt this project would fall under the community services work stream. |
2. Annual Plan Community Facilities Gwyn De’Arth Area Manager Operational Management & Maintenance, Operational Management & Maintenance, Community Facilities
Jessica Morris Stakeholder Advisor, Stakeholder & Land Advisory, Community Facilities
Hannah Alleyne Principal Programmes Specialist, Investigation & Design, Community Facilities
Jenny Young Community Lease Advisor, Stakeholder & Land Advisory, Community Facilities
Rod Klassen Stakeholder Advisor, Stakeholder & Land Advisory, Community Facilities
|
Setting direction/ priorities/ budget |
Gwyn De’Arth gave an overview of the Community Facilities Snapshot Newsletter highlighting the following points: What didn’t go so well: - Start of winter codes – this was due to weather conditions and summer/winter overlaps of sporting code requirements. - Pukekiwiriki Paa access upgrade – on hold as agreement on scope is required. Project 17 – Maintenance Contracts - Finance and Performance Committee resolved to award new maintenance contracts for local parks, buildings and open spaces which took effect from 1 July 2017. Local boards would be consulted on local services levels at the end of April beginning of May. - Asset list would also be considered at the above workshop in April/May. - Chairperson requested an outline of current levels of service required be presented at the workshop so these could be compared to the new proposed levels of service to allow the board to make informed decisions. Gwyn to provide this information to the board at the workshop.
Jenny Young gave an update on the status of local leases including:
- Papakura Croquet Club – signed their community lease for 2015-2025. - Te Whanau Hapori Charitable Trust – had signed a lease and received the key for Awhi House. - Papakura Potters – lease not signed. - Counties Manukau Softball Association – Building on Prince Edward Park – Club is considering funding options to complete necessary works. Renewals: - Papakura Sports lights renewals – cancelled as funds have been allocated to the Southern Park. Board requested that this be clarified and reported back. - Evanda Link Lights renewal – being scoped for implementation as soon as possible. Annual Plan – 2017/2018 – 2019/2020 Proposed Three-year Capital Work Programme: Hawkins Theatre – renew auditorium seating – does this close the Hawkins Theatre for a period of time and if so have dates been set for this?
Papakura Art Gallery – renew humidity and temperature control unit in storeroom – staff to report back whether this is just the controls. Drury Hall – refurbish badminton floor – What does this include? Lighting needs to be replaced including fluorescent lighting in front hall. Elizabeth Campbell Centre – renew roof. Board felt this facility needed a lot more work done. It needed a complete refurbishment including addressing heating and leakage issues. Centre underutilised because of its current state. Community Facilities to investigate and report back/ Takanini Hall – refurbish perimeter fences and make fit for purpose. Does this include replacement of exterior wood panelling? Takanini Multi-purpose Facility – Board requested clarification of exactly what this funding paid for. Massey Park Aquatic Centre - replaced entry foyer CCTV cameras – this was to update current equipment. Airfield Subdivision – general park development of new open space – Board requested that a map be supplied of the proposed park along with draft of design. Is this where the Walsh Bros Memorial was to be situated? Elsie Morton Reserve – Board requested a report back on the skate park and its location. Ngakaroa Reserve – Structure renewals – Board requested clarification of this item. Check whether it was in the Papakura area as it bordered with Franklin. Requested details of the bridge renewal. Opaheke Reserve – develop new changing rooms and toilets – Board requested to view the design. Opaheke Reserve #1 – new turf cricket block – board would like this project started early if possible. Opaheke Reserve #2 – works like sand slits, drainage – Community Facilities staff to liaise with Sophie Bell concerning sand carpeting versus sand slits. Papakura - renew minor park buildings 2017-18 – board want clarification of what park buildings this referred to. Papakura - Bottletop Bay Esplanade, Central Park Reserve, Papakura Cemetery Carpark renewals – Board want to know which cemetery carpark this referred to. Papakura – Renew seats, bins, signage, bollards etc at various parks – Board only wanted broken signage replaced at this stage. Did this include the erection of bylaws signage? Papakura – renew sport fields (x2) – Board sought clarification of what sports fields this referred to. Ray Small Skateboard Park – board requested an update of this facility. Appropriate staff to present to a workshop. Evanda Link Reserve Lights – 34 lights needed replacing which would cost between $30-$40k. This was to be included in the 2017/2018 work programme for action. |
3. Annual Plan ATEED – Economic Development – Takanini BID Claire Siddens BID Growth Specialist BID Partnership CCO/External Partnerships Auckland Council Governance
|
Setting direction / priorities/ budget
|
The Chair reported that the Takanini Business Association has been officially formed on Tuesday, 11 April 2017. Rob Greaves had been voted in as chairperson and the legal papers were being lodged on Wednesday to become a legal entity. The next steps would be to build the membership. Claire Siddens reported that council staff had been working with the BID group to ensure they were aware of the requirements for forming a BID. The Takanini Business Association had been encouraged to liaise with the Papakura Business Association to form a relationship. The Papakura Local Board would need to approve the BID boundary and the proposal would also need to be put through an Annual Plan process and funding allocated to the project. |
4. Annual Plan Finance Faithe Smith Lead Financial Advisor, Financial Advisory - Local Boards, Corporate Finance and Property
|
Setting direction / priorities/ budget |
The following allocations were suggested: - Local Community Initiatives – Add $6k for Museum top-up - Local Events Fund – Add $2k for Matariki Dawn service. Add further $6k for Papakura Carols in the Park administration. - Local Civic Events – Take out $2k for Matariki dawn and add to Matariki event. - Community Arts Programmes – Add $5k for Art Gallery Programmes - Maori Responsiveness (new) – Increase $5k - Community Response Fund – Reduced to $4k – Any extra funds not assigned to work programmes will be in this total. Cannot exceed $150k. - Mangrove Removal - $100 – Plus any unspent deferrals from Y17 work programme to continue. - Local Economic Development Planning – BID top-up - Local Economic Development Initiatives – Add further $90k for work programme allocation. Fees and Charges: The board agreed to the Fees and Charges as proposed as long as staff ensured that school and volunteer groups could assess the reduced charges for the Hawkins Theatre. Board Advocacy Items: - Grade separation - Park and ride for Papakura train station. |
The workshop concluded at 4.56 pm.
Papakura Local Board 26 April 2017 |
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
That the Papakura Local Board:
a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:
C1 Acquisition of land for open space - Papakura
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities. In particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). In particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. |
s48(1)(a) The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
C2 Acquisition of land for open space - Takanini
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities. In particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). In particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. |
s48(1)(a) The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
[1] Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand: Wellbeing - https://www.mentalhealth.org.nz/home/ways-to-wellbeing/
[2] Papakura Greenways – Local Paths Plan
[3] I Am Auckland – the Children and Young People’s Strategic Action Plan
[4] Supports New Zealand Positive Ageing Strategy Goal 10: Opportunities
[5] Papakura Local Economic Development Action Plan – April 2014