I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Thursday, 27 April 2017 6.00pm Waitākere
Ranges Local Board Office |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Greg Presland |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Saffron Toms |
|
Members |
Sandra Coney, QSO |
|
|
Neil Henderson |
|
|
Steve Tollestrup |
|
|
Denise Yates, JP |
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
Glenn Boyd (Relationship Manager) Local Board Services (West)
Tua Viliamu Democracy Advisor
21 April 2017
Contact Telephone: (09) 813 9478 Email: Tua.Viliamu@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 6
5 Leave of Absence 6
6 Acknowledgements 6
7 Update from Ward Councillors 6
8 Deputations 6
9 Public Forum 6
10 Extraordinary Business 7
11 Notices of Motion 7
12 Notice of Motion on Events 9
13 Auckland Transport update - April 2017 13
14 Waitakere Ranges Local Board Quick Response, Round Three 2016-2017 21
15 Business Improvement District (BID) Programme Annual Report to Waitakere Ranges Local Board 59
16 Reinstatement of the Manukau Harbour Forum 67
17 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by The Neil Group at 10 Crows Road, 12-14 Crows Road, 8 Crows Road, Swanson. 73
18 Approval of the draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2017 77
19 Additional business meeting in May 2017 109
20 Chairperson's report - April 2017 111
21 Portfolio update - Member Steve Tollestrup 115
22 Update on member's attendance to the Community Development Conference, Auckland 14-17 February 2017 119
23 Governance Forward Work Calendar 125
24 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Welcome
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
Specifically members are asked to identify any new interests they have not previously disclosed, an interest that might be considered as a conflict of interest with a matter on the agenda.
The following are declared interests of the Waitakere Ranges Local Board.
Board Member |
Organisation / Position |
Sandra Coney |
· Waitemata District Health Board – Elected Member · Women’s Health Action Trust – Patron · New Zealand Society of Genealogists – Member · New Zealand Military Defence Society – Member · Cartwright Collective – Member · Titirangi RSA – Member · Portage Trust – Member · West Auckland Trust Services - Director |
Neil Henderson |
· Portage Trust – Elected Member · West Auckland Trust Services (WATS) Board – Trustee/Director |
Greg Presland |
· Lopdell House Development Trust – Trustee · Titirangi Residents & Ratepayers Group – Committee Member · Whau Coastal Walkway Environmental Trust – Trustee · Combined Youth Services Trust – Trustee · Glen Eden Bid - Member |
Steve Tollestrup |
· Waitakere Licensing Trust – Elected Member · Waitakere Task force on Family Violence – Appointee |
Saffron Toms |
NIL |
Denise Yates |
· Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Committee member · EcoMatters Environment Trust – Trustee
|
Member appointments
Board members are appointed to the following bodies. In these appointments the board members represent Auckland Council.
Board Member |
Organisation / Position |
Sandra Coney |
· Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Trustee |
Neil Henderson |
· Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Trustee · Rural Advisory Panel - Member |
Steve Tollestrup |
· Glen Eden Business Improvement District |
Greg Presland |
· Glen Eden Business Improvement District (alternate) |
Saffron Toms |
· Ark in the Park |
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 23 March 2017, including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Update from Ward Councillors
An opportunity is provided for the Waitakere Ward Councillors to update the board on regional issues they have been involved with since the last meeting.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
Under Standing Order 2.5.1 (LBS 3.11.1) or Standing Order 1.9.1 (LBS 3.10.17) a Notice of Motion has been received from Member Sandra Coney for consideration under item 12.
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/06893
In accordance with Standing Order 3.11.1, the following Notice of Motion has been received from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Member Sandra Coney, for inclusion on the agenda for the Waitākere Ranges Local Board meeting being held on day, Thursday, 27 April 2017:
a) For events on Local Parks and Beaches governed by the Waitakere Ranges Local Board: i. All events involving 100 or more participants, will be brought to the Events and Parks portfolio holders of the Local Board for consideration. ii. Note that participants includes organisers, supporters (eg family and friends) and audience. iii. All commercial marketing activities will be brought to the Events and Parks portfolio holders of the Local Board for consideration, independent of the number of participants. iv. Any proposals which in the opinion of officers or Events and Portfolio holders are contentious, will be brought to the whole board for consideration. v. Note that regularly occurring organised programmes of club training or club sports events associated with local clubs eg cricket, surfing, Nippers, need not be brought to the portfolio holders. Approval is delegated to officers of the Council. vi. This policy does not apply to activities within areas of parks leased by clubs. vii. The Board will not approve events that are associated with alcohol on beaches, and generally, does not support provision of alcohol on parks, but will consider alcohol on parks other than beaches on a case by case basis. viii. Where food or drinks are provided at events, the Board expects that healthy choices are provided. The Board does not support the provision of sugary drinks or foods that contribute to obesity. ix. All park areas, including leased areas, are smokefree. Accordingly, events are smokefree. x. Where there are park management plans, these policies will be adhered to. xi. Within the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area events should be consistent with the objectives of the Act and, in particular, in high use areas, particular consideration will be given to the impacts on local communities. |
Background
The local parks and beaches governed by the Waitakere Ranges Local Board are popular with people, groups and companies wishing to put on events. The Local Board supports events occurring, but wishes to ensure that the events are appropriate, particularly in the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area, which is governed by legislation, the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008. The Act sets objectives for the area and describes heritage features that must be protected.
The Board is aware that events can put pressure on local communities and will seek to mitigate and minimise this, by controlling the number and frequency of events and also by putting conditions on events.
The Board is aware that particular localities are highly sought after for events, but that these may be localities which are also in high demand for passive recreation eg beaches. It will be careful to ensure that there is a relationship between the event and the location, and that, in particular, that the activity does not detract from the heritage objectives of the Act, including protecting amenity and avoiding cumulative effects.
The Board does not have an events policy or plan although one is under preparation. Until that is completed the board wishes to adopt some policies to provide a decision framework for events, that will guide board members and officers of the Council.
Some areas have clauses in management plans that also guide events, as an example, see Attachment A.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Te Henga Reserves Management Plan 2002 (Objective 6, with events policies) |
11 |
Signatories
Authors |
Sandra Coney - Waitakere Ranges Local Board Member |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
27 April 2017 |
|
Auckland Transport update - April 2017
File No.: CP2017/06639
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to; respond to resolutions and requests on transport-related matters, provide an update on the status of Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF), request approval for new LBTCF projects, provide a summary of consultation material sent to the Board and, provide transport related information on matters of specific application and interest to the Waitakere Ranges Local Board and its community.
Executive summary
2. In particular, this report covers:
· Progress report on the Board’s advocacy initiatives
· Progress report on the Board’s transport capital fund projects
· Consultation documents on proposed safety improvements
· Local Board requests on transport-related matters
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) receive the Auckland Transport update April 2017 report. b) approve $300,000 from its Local Board Transport Capital Fund to complete the construction phase for the Sunnyvale Station to Oratia Stage 1, Raised Zebra Crossing across West Coast Road. |
Comments
Strategic alignment
3. The Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2014 - 2017 provides direction to Auckland Transport on the views and preferences of the local community. It has three main themes, each with a number of key initiatives relating to transport and the enhancement of public space along the road corridor.
4. Theme 1 - The Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area is protected.
· Developing a Road Corridor Design Guide for the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area (completed). This will form part of the Auckland Transport Design Manual.
· Implementing Local Area Plans (LAPs). The five existing LAPs for: Oratia; Henderson Valley-Opanuku; Waiatarua; Muddy Creeks; Te Henga (Bethells Beach) and the Waitakere River Valley, have transport related actions for each area.
5. Theme 2 - Our Unique natural environments are healthy and restored.
· Implementing the Waitakere Ranges Strategic Weed Management Plan,
6. Theme 3 - Public transport, cycling and walking are easy, safe and connected.
· Support rail electrification and improvements to bus services.
· Work with our communities on a proposal for a connector shuttle service for coastal / rural areas, similar to the Kowhai connection in Warkworth.
· Support the development of park and ride in Glen Eden.
· Working with Auckland Transport to improve the road corridor in Glen Eden.
· Develop a greenways plan for walking and cycling.
· Investigate options for a cycleway from Project Twin Streams pathway to Glen Eden Town Centre.
· Support the development of a cycleway alongside the western rail line.
· Advocate for rural road safety improvements – including sensible speed limits and provisions for walking and cycling.
7. Auckland Transport is supporting the Local Board initiatives and delivering on its Statement of Intent themes, in the following ways:
· Electric Trains have been rolled out and are in full operation on the western line.
· Feedback on the West Auckland New Bus Network closed at the end of 2014. The feedback was analysed and the final bus route decisions confirmed in mid-2015. The next steps involve tendering for operators, required infrastructure changes and implementation of the New Network in mid 2017.
· Auckland Transport policy around rural and remote communities is currently under review, in light of evaluation of the Kowhai Connection trial and available funds for bus services in the coming 3 years.
· The Swanson Park and Ride and Glen Eden Park and Ride, now relocated in Waikumete Road, have been completed and are now open.
· Auckland Transport is working to determine an indicative Cost Benefit Ratio for a substantially off road shared path facility along the Western Line, between Waitakere Station and New Lynn.
· Auckland Transport will investigate all public requests to improve road safety, review speed limits, and provision of walking and cycling infrastructure. Auckland Transport also has a proactive programme of work across these areas. Auckland Transport has an annual Crash Reduction Programme which identifies areas with high crash rates or a high risk of crashes. Where these are identified, AT will study the location and implement improvements. Auckland Transport reviews speed limits that are above 50 km/h on a regular basis. These reviews focus on areas that are known to be a focus for land development or change in use and they also focus on known problem areas.
Background
8. The Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan includes encouraging people to walk and cycle for commuting and recreational purposes. In order to achieve this, the Local Board wants to improve walkways and cycleways to allow people to walk or cycle to public transport hubs.
9. Auckland Transport are currently constructing a new cycleway along West Coast Road to the west of this site. Based on Waitakere Ranges Local Board direction, Auckland Transport has carried out studies to review various options to improve active transport connections between Oratia, the Project Twin Streams walkways and cycleways, and the Sunnyvale Train Station.
Location
10. This section of West Coast Road is classified as a District Arterial and is situated between Parrs Cross Road and Selak Place in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board area. The site is located in a predominantly residential area. The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) for this section of road is 21,000 vehicles per day (vpd).
11. The redesigned pedestrian crossing is near to a busy roundabout where traffic from Parrs Cross Road merges with West Coast Road. Both are busy arterial roads. The new design to upgrade the pedestrian refuge to a formal pedestrian crossing means that cars will then have to give way to pedestrians.
12. Also, this section of Parrs Cross Road is classified as a District in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board area. The site is located in a predominantly residential area. The AADT for this section of road is 12,500 vehicles per day (vpd).
Scope
13. The design of a shared pedestrian/cyclist path from Sunnyvale Station through to the Oratia Town Centre. The proposed improvements include the construction of a shared pedestrian/cyclist path, raised speed platforms and pedestrian crossings, driveway reconstruction, footpath widening, relocation of street amenities, alterations to pavement markings and signage improvements.
Cost Estimate
14. Auckland Transport is seeking approval to move into construction phase and approved the amount of $300,000 to complete the project.
Project |
Description |
Current Status |
West Coast Road Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Improvements
|
To construct a shared path outside Oratia Kindergarten and continue along the southern side of West Coast Road until its intersection with Parrs Cross Road. A raised table on West Coast Road between Settler’s Hall and Oratia Kindergarten. A new raised table will be installed at the intersection of West Coast Road and Shaw Road to provide a safe crossing point for pedestrians and cyclists. |
This project is mostly completed but there are some minor changes to road marking to be carried out weather permitting. |
Sunnyvale Station to Oratia Stage 1
|
Request the Local Board to approve the amount of $300,000 to move into construction of a raised zebra crossing across West Coast Road. |
Awaiting board approval |
Financials update
Upcoming projects and activities
Consultation Documents on Proposed Safety Improvements
15. Consultation documents for the following proposals have been provided to the Waitakere Ranges Local Board for its feedback. The material below is included for general information purposes only:
· Upgrade the intersection of Glendale and Oates Roads in Glen Eden - The Waitakere Ranges Local Board provided feedback on the proposal to upgrade Glendale Road / Oates Road intersection which will be considered as part of the consultation process.
· No Stopping at All Times Restriction (Broken Yellow Lines) West Coast Road, Glen Eden
Local Board Response
16. The Local Board were in support of the above proposals.
Traffic Control Committee (TCC) report
17. Decisions of the TCC over the month of March 2017 affecting the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Local Board area are shown below:
Horsman Road |
Waitakere |
No Stopping At All Times |
Rosandich Drive / Unnamed Road |
Sunnyvale |
No Stopping At All Times |
Consideration
Local board views and implications
18. The Board’s views will be incorporated during consultation on any proposed schemes.
Māori impact statement
19. No specific issues with regard to impacts on Maori are triggered by this report and any engagement with Maori will be carried out on an individual project basis.
Implementation
20. All proposed schemes are subject to prioritisation, funding and consultation.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
West Coast Rd - Parrs Parks crossing design |
19 |
Signatories
Authors |
Owena Schuster - Elected Member Relationship Manager |
Authorisers |
Jonathan Anyon - Manager Elected Member Relationship Unit Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
27 April 2017 |
|
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Quick Response, Round Three 2016-2017
File No.: CP2017/03643
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to present applications received for Waitakere Ranges Local Board Quick Response Grants Round Three 2016/2017. The local board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these applications.
Executive summary
2. The Waitakere Ranges Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $74,500.00 for the 2016/2017 financial year.
3. A total of $52,817.84 has been allocated under quick response round one and two and local grants round one, leaving a balance of $21,682.16.
4. Nine applications were received in quick response grants round three, with a total requested of $12,468.00.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) consider the applications listed in Table One and agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application in this round.
Table One: Waitakere Ranges Quick Response Grants: Round Three Applications
|
Comments
5. The implementation of the new Community Grants Policy commenced on 1 July 2015. The policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme for 2016/2017, see Attachment A.
6. The local board grants programme sets out:
· local board priorities
· lower priorities for funding
· exclusions
· grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· any additional accountability requirements.
7. The new community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the new council grant webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters and Facebook pages, council publications, radio, local newspapers and community networks. Staff have also conducted a series of public workshops in local board areas.
8. Nine applications were received in quick response grants round three, with a total requested of $12,468.00.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
9. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Waitakere Ranges Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
10. Section 50 of the Community Grants Policy states “We will also provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.”
Māori impact statement
11. The provision of community grants provides opportunities for all Aucklanders to undertake projects, programmes, and activities that benefit a wider range of individuals and groups, including Maori. As a guide for decision-making, in the allocation of community grants, the new community grants policy supports the principle of delivering positive outcomes for Maori. One organisation in this quick response round has identified as Maori.
Implementation
12. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted Long Term Plan 2015-2025 and local board agreements.
13. Following the Waitakere Ranges Local Board allocating funding for quick response grants round three, Commercial and Finance staff will notify the applicants of the local board decision.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Grants Programme 2016-17 |
25 |
b⇩
|
Waitakere Ranges Quick Response Grants, Round Three 2016-17 application summaries |
29 |
Signatories
Authors |
Daylyn D'Mello - Environmental and Community Grants Advisor |
Authorisers |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
27 April 2017 |
|
Business Improvement District (BID) Programme Annual Report to Waitakere Ranges Local Board
File No.: CP2017/04057
Purpose
1. This report provides information to Waitākere Ranges Local Board regarding accountability for Business Improvement District programme targeted rate grant funding for the business association operating a BID programme in the board’s area.
2. The report is a requirement of the Auckland Council BID Policy (2016), which came into effect on 1 July 2016.
Executive summary
3. The 2016 Auckland Council BID policy was developed to encourage improved governance of BID committees and management, which will improve financial methods, programme delivery and transparency to their members.
4. This report indicates the business association’s compliance with the BID policy. Information presented is based on documents submitted by the BID programme to council’s BID team to date.
5. The report recommends that the local board should recommend to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for BID programme in their area in the coming financial year, based on their compliance with the policy.
6. The BID covered by this report is operated by:
· The Glen Eden Business Association
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) recommend to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for the Glen Eden BID programme for the 2017-18 financial year, and include this amount in the 2017-2018 Annual Plan. |
Comments
7. The Council Business Improvement District (BID) Policy 2016 outlines the principles behind the council BID programme and establishes the process for establishing, expanding, and terminating BIDs, as well prescribing standards and guidelines for operating BIDs. Accountability requirements are a key part of these standards. Please see Attachment A for a description of key elements of the BID programme.
Local board allocated decision-making
8. Local boards are allocated a number of governance and decision-making responsibilities. One of these is annually recommending BID programme targeted rates to the governing body to allow collection of targeted rate revenue for business associations that operate BID programmes. This action assures that the local board and their BIDs are in alignment on their goals for town centre development in their respective areas.
9. Approval of specific dollar amounts of BID targeted rates for each BID rests with the governing body as part of its approval of the 2017-2018 Annual Plan.
10. A number of local boards provide additional funding to local BIDs but accountability for that funding is additional to the requirements under the BID policy. If a local board makes an additional grant to a BID, the accountability requirements pertaining to that grant should be agreed as part of that grant process, and are not included in this report.
Compliance with BID Policy
11. The Auckland Council BID Policy (2016) is the means for council to ensure accountability for targeted rate funding by requiring regular reporting. Specifically, BIDs are required to provide council the following documents as approved at their annual AGM:
· A current strategic plan – This shows that the BID has carefully considered medium to long term opportunities and has allocated resources to accomplished priorities.
· Signed audited accounts for the most recently completed fiscal year (required only every two years for smaller BIDs) - Provide assurance that the BID is managing its members’ targeted rates funds responsibly.
· A report on the year just completed. – Evidence that their programmes address priorities of the strategic plan and benefit ratepayers.
· A business plan for the coming year – Forward planning, based on the strategic plan, sets one-year goals.
· An indicative budget for the following year - The Council Annual Plan requires targeted rates be identified a year in advance to coincide with the Annual Plan process which sets all rates.
· Programme Agreement between each BID and council – This embodies basic parameters of the council/ BID relationship. It is renewed every three years, or a term mutually acceptable to council and the BID.
12. The Glen Eden BID is in compliance with the BID policy for the year 2015-2016 for the purpose of striking the BID targeted rate in the Annual Plan for 2017-2018. The level of compliance by the Glen Eden BID businesses association is shown in Attachment B.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
13. Recommending that the governing body strike the targeted rate for the BID in the Waitakere Ranges local board area means that this BID programme will continue to raise funds from targeted rates on ratepayers in its district, and provide services in accordance with its members’ priorities as stated in their Strategic Plan.
Māori impact statement
14. This decision will have no adverse effects on, or particular benefits to, the Maori population.
Implementation
15. If the local board accepts the recommendations of this report, it will recommend to the governing body that the targeted rates for this BID be struck as stated in the 2017-2018 Annual Plan. The governing body will approve specific dollar amounts for each BID as part of its approval of the Annual Plan.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Key Elements of a BID |
63 |
b⇩
|
Glen Eden BID Compliance Table |
65 |
Signatories
Authors |
Steven Branca - BID Partnership Advisor |
Authorisers |
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance & External Partnerships Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Annual Report to Local Boards on BID Policy Compliance
Business Improvement Districts: Key Elements
What is a BID? |
· A specified commercial area – town centre, industrial area, or a combination – designated for a targeted rate with boundaries agreed by the local board and business association. |
· Commercial property owners in that area vote in a formal ballot to raise a specified targeted rate amount from their own properties within the district, after a thorough consultation process. |
· The targeted rates are collected by council through regular rates invoicing of ratepayers. Those rates are then transferred quarterly by council to the business association which operates the BID programme. |
· 100% of rates are returned to the association. |
· The business association uses these funds to provide programmes and services according to priorities established by its membership (ratepayers and businesses) that directly benefit the members. |
· These programmes are guided by a multi-year Strategic Plan and annual Business Plan approved by the membership at the Annual General Meeting. |
· Services provided by the BID may not replace normal council services. |
· A BID is not an extension of council. |
Advantages of a BID
|
· Ratepayers decided for themselves whether to raise a targeted rate from their own property. |
· Funds raised from targeted rates are returned directly to the business association in the area they are raised from. |
· The targeted ratepayers have full control over how their money is used. |
· Targeted rates provided an assured source of funding for on-going programmes, which allows hiring of professional staff to alleviate the burden of relying on volunteers. |
· By speaking with one unified voice they can have more influence in advocating for the interests of their community.
|
· They can raise additional funding to augment their targeted rates revenue.
|
Council’s expectations and roles
|
· The governing body strikes the targeted rate for all BIDs as part of the Annual Plan process. |
· Council sets accountability requirements through its BID policy, and the BID team monitors compliance throughout the year. |
· Council does not tell the association how to use its BID money, nor does it interfere in the governance or management of the BID.
|
· Council staff report to local boards annually on compliance with the BID policy. |
· In the case of serious concerns such as indications of poor financial management, violations of the policy, or ineffectiveness, council may directly intervene in the management of the organisation as allowed by the BID policy.
|
Local Board roles:
|
· The local board approves establishment and expansion of all BIDs. |
· Local boards are delegated the authority to recommend to the governing body to strike the targeted rate for BIDs in its area as part of the Annual Plan process. |
· Local boards maintain regular contact with the BIDs to keep their local economic development and other interests aligned. |
· The board appoints a local board representative to the executive committee of each BID/business association to serve as a conduit of information to and from council. |
###
27 April 2017 |
|
Business Improvement District (BID) Programme - Annual Report to Waitakere Ranges Local Board 2016/17
Attachment B: Glen Eden Business Association BID programme
Glen Eden Business Association has yet to meet the requirements of the BID programme for the 2015-16 financial year for the purpose of striking the targeted rate.
Reporting Status
Requirement FY 2015-2016 |
Status |
Comments |
A strategic plan for next 3 – 5 years - reviewed every 3 years. |
Compliant |
2017-2022 Strategic Plan in effect. |
Audited financial accounts and audit management letter. |
Compliant |
Provided |
Business plan including: · A minimum of three key performance indicators and budget allocations for programme areas. |
Compliant |
Provided |
Annual review report: · Achievement of previous year’s objectives against business plan.
|
Compliant |
Provided |
2017-2018 Indicative Budget |
Compliant |
Provided |
Annual BID programme reporting and alignment meeting between Waitakere Ranges Local Board and business association board. |
Pending |
All BIDs are advised that this meeting must be scheduled before the end of this fiscal year. |
BID Programme Agreement |
Compliant |
Fully signed agreement provided |
Summary |
Recommend Targeted Rate |
Staff are satisfied that the Glen Eden BID is in substantial compliance with BID policy for the purpose of the recommendation of this report, and that the local board meeting will be held in a timely manner. |
27 April 2017 |
|
Reinstatement of the Manukau Harbour Forum
File No.: CP2017/06212
Purpose
1. To approve the reconstitution of the Manukau Harbour Forum (the forum), including the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board, for the 2016 to 2019 local government term.
2. To nominate a board member, and an alternate, to represent the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board on the forum.
Executive summary
3. The Manukau Harbour Forum was established in 2012 as a joint committee of nine local boards bordering the Manukau Harbour Member boards recognised the need for joint decision making and advocacy to achieve water quality improvements for the Manukau Harbour.
4. The committee ceases to exist at the end of every electoral term and can be reconstituted following agreement of the entities involved. This report invites boards to consider reconstitution of the forum, and to nominate a board member (and alternate) to represent this board on the Forum.
5. The Forum’s Terms of Reference outlines the purpose. The report also notes that a review of the forum will be undertaken in the next twelve months to develop a future state direction and new three year work programme.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) agree to re-constitute the Manukau Harbour Forum joint committee with the Franklin, Mangere-Otahuhu, Manurewa, Otara-Papatoetoe, Papakura, Puketapapa, Whau, and Waitakere Ranges Local Boards for the 2016/19 electoral term; b) appoint one named member and one named alternate member to the Manukau Harbour Forum; c) confirm that the chairperson and deputy chairperson of the Manukau Harbour Forum will be elected by a majority of members at the first meeting of each electoral term; d) confirm the Terms of Reference for the Manukau Harbour Forum as outlined in Attachment A; e) delegate authority to the Manukau Harbour Forum to make decisions within its terms of reference, noting that any significant or controversial decisions will only be made by the forum with the confirmation by resolution of all the member boards that would be affected by the decision and that the local board will reserve the right to hold and promote a different view to that of the forum on any issue that may impact the local board area; f) confirm that any changes to the forum’s terms of reference will be agreed first by the forum then recommended to the nine member boards for their approval, noting that resolutions must be identical; g) note that in order for the requirements of this agreement for the Manukau Harbour Forum to be reached, the resolutions of each of the nine member boards made in respect of recommendations a) (b)-(f) above (with the exception of (b) where appointees are to be named) must be identical and that in the absence of identical resolutions by all member boards the Forum will not meet the requirements under clause 30a of Schedule 7 to the Local Government Act 2002.
|
Comments
6. Nine local boards (Franklin, Mangere-Otahuhu, Manurewa, Maungakiekie-Tamaki, Otara-Papatoetoe, Papakura, Puketapapa, Whau, and Waitakere Ranges Local Boards) together formed the Manukau Harbour Forum with the view to form a means of collective local board advocacy on common issues affecting the Manukau Harbour.
7. The Manukau Harbour Forum was constituted formally as a joint committee of nine local boards (Franklin, Mangere-Otahuhu, Manurewa, Maungakiekie-Tamaki, Otara-Papatoetoe, Papakura, Puketapapa, Whau, and Waitakere Ranges Local Boards) under standing orders 2.8.1 and 2.8.2.
8. Standing orders 2.8.1 and 2.8.2 enable a local board to appoint a joint committee with another local board or boards. Being a joint committee enables the Forum to conduct business more efficiently, as a local board joint committee can make decisions and provide direction to officers without seeking confirmation and/or ratification from the individual member boards. In accordance with Clause 30(7) of the Local Government Act 2002, the Forum automatically dissolved following the 2016 Local Government elections.
9. The Terms of Reference for the Manukau Harbour Forum setting out the purpose and principles of the forum setting out the purpose and principles of the forum are presented in Attachment A. The purpose of the Forum is to champion a sustainable management approach for the Manukau Harbour. Since its formation the Forum has:
· identified issues, such as mangroves, pacific oysters, coastal erosion, stormwater, recreational access/wharves and Maui Dolphin Sanctuary as high priority;
· funded a work programme consisting of annual seminar, communications programme, and a business to business education programme;
· developed a ‘Manukau Harbour Forum Vision and Strategy’, undertaken a comprehensive stocktake of all research pertaining to the Manukau Harbour and catchment, produced a set of maps and a list of stakeholders;
· received regular updates on marine monitoring within the Manukau Harbour;
· advocated to central government and Auckland Council (e.g. feedback on the Unitary Plan) on issues affecting the Harbour, including hydrodynamic modelling of sediment runoff;
· identified areas of interest and potential projects that the local boards surrounding the Manukau Harbour could progress jointly and through funding from the member local boards’ budget, adopted a work programme to deliver the forum’s objectives.
10. It is recommended that each constituting local board agrees to re-instate the Manukau Harbour Forum for another term and appoints one member plus an alternate to represent the board on the Forum.
11. During the 2016/19 term of the Forum, it is recommended to undertake a review of the role of the Forum in order to recommend a decision-making structure that will enable the objectives relating to the Manukau Harbour to be addressed effectively.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
12. Local boards have previously agreed, through adoption of the forum’s terms of reference, that the Manukau Harbour is a regional asset and it was appropriate that local boards collectively contribute to strategies and outcomes that enhance the social, economic, environmental and cultural well-being of the harbour. The forum has been seen as an effective mechanism to achieve this.
13. The role of the forum is to champion the sustainable management of the Manukau Harbour and adjacent communities. It developed a vision and strategy in line with this which was adopted in September 2014.
14. In the last term, the forum agreed a three year work programme. Following the ratification of this work programme by member boards, each board committed between $8,000 and $15,000 from its budget to implement that work programme.
Māori impact statement
15. The Manukau Harbour Forum recognised mana whenua interest in Manukau Harbour. During the last term, the forum agreed to hold up to three hui per financial year with mana whenua.
16. While the forum did discuss a joint committee with mana whenua, or mana whenua representatives being appointed to the forum, it was agreed that this was inappropriate while treaty negotiations are pending. The forum anticipates receiving further advice and options as to how it interfaces with mana whenua as treaty settlement progresses.
17. Workshops of the Manukau Harbour Forum were held on 13 April and 8 June 2015 to discuss the ongoing role of mana whenua in relation to the forum. Some minor changes were made to the forum’s terms of reference as a result of this to reflect the forum’s obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi, and its desire to work with mana whenua on an ongoing basis.
Implementation
18. Local Board Services provide governance advisory and support services to the Forum. Co-ordination and delivery of the work programmes adopted to date are led by Infrastructure and Environmental Services. It is recommended that the role of Infrastructure and Environmental Services (I&ES) to administer the entire work programme be considered during the proposed review.
19. I&ES has provided full technical support to the forum since its inception It is recommended that as part of the forum’s review, consideration be given to how other council teams can offer support to the forum. I&ES will continue to engage with the forum as an important stakeholder group in the development of an integrated watershed management plan for the Manukau catchment.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Manukau Harbour Forum Terms of Reference |
71 |
Signatories
Authors |
Philippa Hillman - Democracy Advisor, Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board |
Authorisers |
Karen Lyons - General Manager Local Board Services Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Manukau Harbour Forum Joint Committee – Terms of Reference
1. Introduction
The formation of a forum to champion the sustainable management of the Manukau Harbour and adjacent communities has arisen through the collective aspirations of local boards bordering the harbour itself. Local Boards have a statutory responsibility and are democratically accountable for identifying and communicating the interests and preferences of the people in their Local Board area in relation to the content of the strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws of the Auckland Council.
The Manukau Harbour is a regional taonga/treasure for all the peoples of Auckland. It is therefore appropriate that Local Boards collectively contribute to strategies and outcomes that restore and enhance the well-being of the harbour itself.
2. Background / Context
Prior to November 2010, agencies generally approached issues of community concern in alignment with the previous local authority boundaries, and somewhat independently in each area. Five legacy territorial authorities and the Auckland Regional Council had a direct interest in the harbour due to proximity. Under the Auckland Council, the following local boards[1] share a boundary with the harbour:
· Waitakere Ranges
· Whau
· Puketapapa
· Maungakiekie-Tamaki
· Otara-Papatoetoe
· Mangere-Otahuhu
· Manurewa
· Papakura
· Franklin
There is sufficient commonality of issues and interests, for synergies to be gained from a sub-regional approach to advocacy in relation to the management of the Manukau Harbour. This is also supported by the legislative imperative for local boards to work together where the interests and preferences of communities within each local board area will be better served by doing so.
Likely benefits of such an alliance are early identification of and response to emerging issues, a more cohesive approach to multi-causal problems, and greater efficiency and effectiveness of planning and interventions. These benefits are particularly pertinent planning matters relating to:
· Auckland Council’s statutory obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi
· The Auckland Plan and the Unitary Plan
· The Annual Plan and the Long-term Plan (LTP)
· The Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008
· The 1990 Manukau Harbour Action Plan
· National Policy Statements and National Environmental Standards
· The activities of CCOs in relation to the harbour and the coastal environment
· Other harbour and coastal ownership and management issues
3. Purpose
The purpose of the Manukau Harbour Forum is to provide for a means of collective Local Board advocacy on issues affecting the Manukau Harbour, and the adjacent foreshore. Issues to be addressed by the Forum may include:
· Restoration of the health and wellbeing of the Manukau Harbour
· The role of Mana Whenua in relation to the Manukau Harbour
· A unified management-approach to the Manukau Harbour
· Advocacy on issues related to both natural and human activities affecting the harbour foreshore
· Wastewater and stormwater discharges
· The strategic removal of mangroves and Pacific oysters
· Coastal erosion mitigation opportunities
· The enhancement of marine and coastal habitats that assist with increased Biodiversity
· The preservation of sustainable commercial and recreational fisheries within the harbour
· The protection of Maui’s Dolphin and other species
· Catchments and tributary streams that flow into the harbour
· Access to the harbour
· The role of the port operation at Onehunga
4. Principles
The Forum is in principle collectively accountable to the wider community for supporting the development and delivery of the community’s vision in relation to the Manukau Harbour. In practice, individual members are accountable to their own boards and to the constituents whose interests they represent.
The Forum:
· Is strategic, not operational
· Deals only with matters where collaboration and synergy add value (it does not duplicate what already exists, or deal with matters that are better dealt with more locally, i.e. it does not work at a single board level) though it may deal with issues that impact some but not all member boards.
· Is committed to Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi, and it will work actively to ensure that it also acknowledges and recognises the interests of mana whenua through continued development of an open relationship with mana whenua
· Recognises the local, regional, and national significance of the Waitakere Ranges and its foothills and coasts, as set out in the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008, and acknowledges the statutory obligations to protect the Heritage Area.
· Will focus on commonalities rather than differences.
27 April 2017 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by The Neil Group at 10 Crows Road, 12-14 Crows Road, 8 Crows Road, Swanson.
File No.: CP2017/05857
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board, for new road names for roads to vest created by way of subdivision at 10 Crows Road, 12-14 Crows Road, 8 Crows Road, Swanson.
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming.
3. The Applicant The Neil Group, have submitted the following road names in order of preference:
· Road 2 Joseph Kokich Avenue
· Road 3 John Calvert Drive
The Applicant has provided the alternative names:
· Otway Hendrick and Patrick Rice
4. Auckland Council’s road naming criteria typically requires that road names reflect:
· a historical or ancestral linkage to an area;
· a particular landscape, environmental or biodiversity feature; or
· an existing (or introduce) thematic identity in the area
· The criteria also encourage the use of Maori names. Names also need to be easily identifiable and intuitively clear, thus minimising confusion.
5. All of the proposed road names are deemed to meet the criteria and are acceptable to NZ Post and Land Information New Zealand (LINZ).
6. The road naming criteria suggests that the road type could be referred to as Avenue, Boulevard or Drive. The applicant’s preferred road type for Road 2 is Avenue and Road 3 is Drive.
7. Therefore, the following road names are put forward for consideration of the Waitakere Ranges Local Board:
· Road 2 Joseph Kokich Avenue
· Road 3 John Calvert Drive
With the alternatives being:
· Otway Hendrick and Patrick Rice
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board a) pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval, the proposed road names for the new roads constructed within the subdivision being undertaken by The Neil Group at 10 Crows Road, 12-14 Crows Road, 8 Crows Road, Swanson. · Road 2 Joseph Kokich Avenue · Road 3 John Calvert Drive With the alternatives being: · Otway Hendrick and Patrick Rice |
Comments
8. According to the Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines, where a new public or private road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the Local Board’s approval.
9. Local iwi were consulted, an email was sent, but as of the writing of this report, no responses had been received.
10. The Applicant has proposed the road names listed in the table below, in order of preference.
Proposed New Road Name |
Meaning |
Road Naming Criteria |
Road 2 Joseph Kokich Avenue (Preferred) |
Joseph Kokich was a soldier from the Swanson area who served in WW1. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
Otway Hendrick |
Otway Hendrick was a soldier from the Swanson area who served in WW1. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
Patrick Rice |
Patrick Rice was a soldier from the Swanson area who served in WW1. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
Road 3 John Calvert Drive (Preferred) |
John Calvert was the former owner of the land. The Calvert family have lived in the area for over 40 years and run the Swanson Butcher Shop (Calverts Butchery) which still continues today. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
Otway Hendrick |
Otway Hendrick was a soldier from the Swanson area who served in WW1. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
Patrick Rice |
Patrick Rice was a soldier from the Swanson area who served in WW1. |
Meets criteria – (Historic significance to the area) |
A map showing
the location of the roads is shown below.
Assessment
11. Auckland Councils road naming criteria typically requires that road names reflect a historical or ancestral linkage to an area or a particular landscape, environmental or biodiversity feature, or reflect an existing (or introduce) thematic identity in an area. The criteria also encourages the use of Maori names. Names also need to be easily identifiable and intuitively clear, thus minimising confusion.
12. The applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines.
13. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names are deemed to meet the assessment criteria.
14. All of the proposed names are acceptable to NZ Post and Land Information New Zealand (LINZ).
15. The road naming criteria suggests that the road type could be referred to as Avenue, Boulevard or Drive. The applicant’s preferred road type for Road 2 is Avenue and Road 3 is Drive.
16. Therefore, the following road names are put forward for consideration of the Waitakere Ranges Local Board:
· Road 2 Joseph Kokich Avenue
· Road 3 John Calvert Drive
With alternatives being:
· Otway Hendrick and Patrick Rice
Consideration
Local board views and implications
17. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long-term Plan 2012-2022, allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to Section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to boards. A decision is sought from the local board in this report.
18. The decision sought from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Māori impact statement
19. The decision sought from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
20. Local iwi were consulted, an email was sent, but as of the writing of this report, no responses had been received.
Implementation
21. The Western Consenting Subdivision Team will ensure that the appropriate road name signage will be installed by the Applicant at their full cost, once an approval is obtained for the new road name and prior to the completion of the subdivision.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Dale Rewa - Subdivision Advisor |
Authorisers |
Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Approval of the draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2017
File No.: CP2017/04548
Purpose
1. To approve, for public consultation:
a) the draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2017;
b) the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan summary; and
c) key engagement events to be held as part of the consultation.
Executive summary
2. The Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 requires that each local board complete a local board plan for adoption by 31 October 2017.
3. The draft plan and summary are attached to this report for the local board to approve for public consultation.
4. Consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure (SCP) is taking place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
5. The formal engagement events the board will conduct are detailed as follows:
· A variety of ‘Have Your Say’ events (to be confirmed);
· A hearing, the date to be confirmed.
That the Waitakere Ranges Local Board: a) approve the draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2017 for public consultation using the Special Consultative Procedure (attachment A) b) approve the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan summary (attachment B). c) in the event that minor edits are required to the draft local board plan or summary the board delegates to the Chair or other delegate to work with staff as a matter of urgency. d) Approves the scheduled formal engagement events, as follows: - A variety of ‘Have Your Say’ events (to be confirmed). - A hearing, the date to be confirmed. |
Comments
6. Local board plans are strategic plans for the following three years and beyond. The plans reflect the priorities and preferences of the community. They guide how the local board:
· makes decisions on local activities and projects
· provides input into regional strategies and policies
7. The plans inform the development of council’s 10-year budget. They also form the basis for development of the annual local board agreement for the following three financial years and subsequent work programmes.
8. The local board is required to use the SCP to consult on the draft local board plan. The period for the SCP is from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
9. As part of meeting these SCP requirements, a full draft of the local board plan and summary will be made available on the Shape Auckland website, at local libraries, council service centres and the local board office. The summary will also be delivered to all households in the local board area, and engagement events will be scheduled during the SCP period of 22 May to 30 June 2017. These will be advertised on the Shape Auckland website, through local and regional publications, online and through social media.
10. Key features of the draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan 2017 include:
· recognising the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area as a taonga for the people of Auckland;
· protecting and enhancing unique natural habitats;
· empowering local communities to build their own place;
· experiencing local arts and culture;
· recognising, celebrating and understanding shared history and heritage;
· improving Glen Eden; and
· improving public spaces, including access to local parks, and good transport, walking and cycling connections.
Consideration
11. The draft plan has been developed by considering:
· previous community engagement;
· regional strategies;
· regional policies; and
· subject matter expert advice from Council departments.
Local board views and implications
12. The local board’s views have driven the development of the draft plan attached to this report.
Māori impact statement
13. During the development of the final plan, and throughout the rest of the term, the board also intend to:
· send a copy of the draft plan to Mana Whenua and Mātāwaka for formal submission during the SCP;
· conduct local level one-on-one hui with Iwi; and
· continue to develop relationships with Mana Whenua and Mātāwaka.
Implementation
· Formal consultation for the draft local board plan will take place from 22 May to 30 June 2017.
· A hearing will be held on a date to be confirmed
· Amendments will be made to produce a final plan during August and September.
· The local board will adopt the final plan in October 2017.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Draft Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan |
81 |
b⇩
|
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Plan Summary |
111 |
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Placeholder
Te Rohe ā-Poari o Te Wao-nui-o-Tiriwa
Waitākere Ranges Local Board
area
The first thing you see when you approach west Auckland is the Waitākere Ranges, which form a natural backdrop to the western skyline and are protected by the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008.
This local board area, full of natural and cultural features, yet close to metropolitan Auckland and subject to pressure from the urban environment, is unique in New Zealand.
Te Kawerau a Maki and Ngāti Whātua are mana whenua in the Waitākere Ranges. Hoani Waititi Marae is a local urban marae.
Our largest and only town centre is Glen Eden, surrounded by the suburban areas of Glen Eden, Parrs Park and Sunnyvale. The townships of Laingholm, Oratia and Waitākere are located in very different settings, and long-established rural communities are clustered around Huia, Parau, Piha, Karekare and Bethells Beach.
Titirangi and Swanson are established small villages with strong local characteristics. Titirangi hosts Te Uru Gallery and is an established centre for the arts. Swanson is a small village which is expanding quickly.
In the 2013 census 48,339 people were living in this area, an increase of 6 per cent from 2006. Labour force participation is above the Auckland average, and at $79,700 median household incomes are higher than the Auckland average of $76,500, though there are significant differences between more and less affluent areas.
Residents have access to council libraries at Titirangi and Glen Eden, two community houses, venues for hire at Ceramco Park and Titirangi Hall, and a variety of halls run by community groups.
Mihi
E nga pītau whakarei o te waka,
e nga rau tītapu o te iwi, e aku hei māpuna,
e taku iti e taku rahi, koutou kua mahue mai nei
hei toka piringa mōku i te ora,
hei ruruhau i nga hau āwhio o te wā.
E aku whakakai pounamu, e aku māpihi maurea,
kia oho te mauri, kia māriri o koutou wairua,
kia hora te marino, tēnā koutou katoa.
Tēnei au te noho atu nei i te tihi o Te Pae o te Rangi,
i tīhorea ai te whenua kia kī ake au,
e koe e te hau o te uru te wawā rā, me te kī mai,
e kore au e ora i ngā hau kōtiu, i āia ai te pūpūtara ki uta.
Nāu nei te tono kia piki ake au i ngā tai whakatū a Kupe
ki Te Waonui a Tiriwa me te Pae o te Rangi,
Kia titiro whakaroto ahau ki te maunga o Puketōtara,
kei raro e rere ana ko te awa o Waitākere
kei tētahi taha ko Puke Whakataratara, kei tua ko Te Whau.
Koinei rā te rohe kāinga o Te Au o Te Whenua me te Te Kawerau a Maki,
ko rātou nei te whāriki i āhei ai te nohoa o tēnei moka o te rohe
e tini whāioio kua whakakāinga ma.,
Kua kōhatu nei nga paparahi ki te whenua,
i tangata whenuatia ai tātou katoa.
I whaikiko ai te kōrero,
“Ko te hapori te tauawhi i te taiao, he mea motuhake, rerenga kē.” Kia hiwa rā, kia hiwa rā.
To all those who adorn the prow of this canoe,
to the revered leaders of the people, to my treasured heirlooms,
the lesser and the greater parts of me,
you who are my refuge in life,
my shelter from the storms of time.
My objects of affection,
let your very being flourish, let your spirit be at peace,
let the calm be widespread, I send greetings to you all.
Here I sit on the ridgeline of Te Pae o te Rangi,
where the land had been laid bare,
and the roaring wind of the west whispers,
that I would not survive the blast of the northerly wind, that would drive the paper nautilus to shore.
It was you who commanded me to ascend from the raised seas of Kupe,
to the forest of Tiriwa, and Te Pae o te Rangi.
So I look inland to Puketotara,
at the foot of which runs the Waitākere river
on one side stands Massey and on the other - Te Whau.
Home of Te Au o te Whenua and Te Kawerau a Maki,
the original settlers, they laid the way for later travellers
to make a home here.
They cast their footprints in stone upon these precincts of the region,
and so made settlers of us all.
Which gives substance to the adage,
“Communities connected to their natural environment are unique and diverse.” Let us grow with vigour.
Ngā upoko kōrero
Contents
Waitākere Ranges Local Board area |
2 |
Mihi |
4 |
Contents |
6 |
From the Chair |
7 |
About local boards |
8 |
About local board plans |
8 |
Developing our plan |
9 |
Carrying out our plan |
10 |
Outcomes |
|
People actively protect the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area |
12 |
Our unique natural habitats are protected and enhanced |
14 |
Local communities feel good about where they live |
16 |
People experience local arts and culture, and recognise our heritage |
18 |
Our urban centres are enjoyable places to be |
20 |
Our community spaces and recreation facilities meet local needs and are easy to get to |
22 |
Financial information |
25 |
Your Waitākere Ranges Local Board members |
30 |
Statement of proposal for the 2017 Waitākere Ranges Local Board Plan
He kōrero mai i te Heamana
From the Chair
In the Waitākere Ranges we are living on the edge – the edge of the super-city, the edge of urban development, and the hard edge of environmental protection.
In some ways that is a good thing. There are lots of opportunities here for local people to make the most of their local environment, and to continue carving out our own unique place within the super-city. However, it also gives us a greater level of responsibility for recognising and protecting the intrinsic value of our natural areas and realising that even small actions can have a magnified effect on our larger environment.
We want to do our part to encourage sustainability in the way that we live and in our interaction with and care for our environment. What this means in practice is that we will seek to make sure that all of our programmes are viewed through a sustainability lens, and that we will advocate within the council family for the effects of climate change and environmental degradation to be recognised in all of the council’s policies.
We also want to focus on the needs of our urban communities. We want to make sure the people who live here are enjoying living locally, and are making connections with each other and with the council that will improve their quality of life. This is where the idea of ‘small is beautiful’ is important. Small changes, initiated from within, are the best way to achieve social change. We want to support this process. This benefits council as well, as people who love where they live look after where they live, and often in more exciting and innovative ways than we can imagine.
In this draft local board plan we are setting out our key areas of interest for the next three years and beyond. This is not a list of everything we will do, but a flavour of what we have identified as being important to local communities. Many of the ideas in this draft plan have come from you through feedback provided to us in the past.
Our challenge is to address the needs of all, with a limited budget and resources, over a huge geographical landscape. We know this area has one of the smaller local economies, a population that travels outside of the area for work, and an active and interested community sector. We want to know what you think of how we plan to complement and support it.
Ngā mihi
Greg Presland
Chair, Waitākere Ranges Local Board
He kōrero mō ngā poari ā-rohe
About local boards
Auckland Council has a unique model of local government in New Zealand, made up of the governing body (the mayor and 20 ward councillors) and 21 local boards. The governing body focuses on Auckland-wide issues while local boards are responsible for decision-making on local issues, activities and services and provide input into regional strategies, policies and plans.
These local issues, activities and services include:
· supporting local arts, culture, events and sport and recreation
· providing grants and partnering with local organisations to deliver community services
· maintaining and upgrading town centres and facilities including parks, libraries and halls
· caring for the environment and preserving heritage.
Local boards also have a role in representing the view of their communities on issues of local importance.
About local board plans
· Local board plans are strategic documents that are adopted every three years. Their purpose is to set a direction for the local area that reflects community priorities and preferences. They guide local board activity, funding and investment decisions. They also influence local board input into regional strategies and plans, including the Auckland Plan.
·
Auckland Plan |
|
||||
|
Local board plans |
||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Auckland Council's financial plans local board agreements) |
|||||
·
Each local board develops annual work programmes following confirmation of the budget available to them via the annual budget setting process.
He kōrero mō ngā poari ā-rohe
Developing our plan
Our plan comprises aspirational outcomes, objectives we want to achieve and some key initiatives to carry out. To make this happen will take the efforts of many working together.
We have identified these by considering what we know about our community, what you have told us is important, and where we think we can make the biggest difference.
Te whakatutuki i tā mātou mahere
Carrying out our plan
Resourcing
We want to do what we can to improve our local board area while being realistic that we cannot do everything with finite resources. This means making the most of what we already have, working with others and acknowledging when we do not have the necessary resources to carry something out.
We believe we can carry out all of the proposed key initiatives in our plan within existing resources, or that there is provision for them in future years of the 2015-2025 10-year budget. By existing resources we mean:
· finances we receive through our revenue sources such as rates and user charges,
· our assets such as our community centres and parks
· council staff who are responsible for delivering our annual work programme
· Auckland Transport Local Board Transport Capital fund
Where we do not have the decision-making authority and/or funding to carry an action out we will use our time and energy to influence the relevant decision-maker, ensuring they are aware of your views and our support for them.
Empowering communities
We seek to empower and enable our communities. This means listening to what you want to achieve, directing council resources towards community aspirations and supporting diverse communities to have an input into the things they care about and which matter uniquely to them.
We will prioritise activities that are led by the community, encourage and support people from all walks of life to actively participate in their community, and fully use the talents, insights and contributions of our diverse community. We will work with others to enable our communities to achieve their goals.
Working with Māori
Delivering on Auckland Council’s commitment to Māori at a local level is a priority for local boards. The council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its broader statutory obligations to Māori.
Waitākere Ranges Local Board will focus on building strong and meaningful relationships with local Māori and key Māori organisations to ensure that Māori needs and aspirations are understood. The local board sees particular mutual interests relating to environmental management, youth, community development and place-making, and would like to activate projects around these areas.
Whakaotinga 1: He ngangahau te tiaki a te iwi i te Papa Rāhui ki te Ika Whenua o te Waitākere
Outcome 1: People actively protect the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area
The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area is recognised as a taonga for the people of Auckland.
The Auckland Plan acknowledges that nature and people are inseparable. This is particularly true in the Waitākere Ranges, where most of the 27,720 hectares of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area (the heritage area) sits within our boundaries.
Created in 2008 by an Act of Parliament, the heritage area was put in place to recognise the area’s national, regional and local significance, and to promote the protection and enhancement of its heritage features for present and future generations. A variety of organisations have responsibilities for the heritage area, and the land within it is made up of a combination of public and private landholdings.
A heritage area monitoring report is prepared every five years. The next will be in 2018. We will use it to help us decide which areas of work we should prioritise in the future. We believe the ecological importance of the heritage area needs greater recognition. We will advocate to the governing body to elevate its status and prioritise resourcing actions that will protect the heritage area in the long term.
Locally, there are five Local Area Plans under the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act – Bethells/Te Henga, Waiatarua, Oratia, Henderson Valley/Opanuku, and Muddy Creeks. These plans set out long-term community goals for the future use, character, community wellbeing and environment in these areas. We will continue to focus on carrying out their recommendations.
Outcome 1: People actively protect the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
The heritage area’s special character is celebrated and enhanced. |
Prioritise and carry out recommendations of the 2018 Heritage Area Monitoring Report. |
Work with communities to carry out recommendations from Local Area Plans. |
|
Work with mana whenua and local communities to protect, and tell the stories of, cultural and historic sites of importance. |
|
Help landholders and residents understand their duty of care for the fragile heritage area. |
|
Promote and support small-scale and sustainable home-based business in the heritage area. |
|
Create greater awareness of the values and heritage features of the heritage area. |
|
Seek funding to erect gateway signs to the heritage area. |
Whakaotinga 2: Kei te tiakina me te whakapaitia ake ō tātou toi whenua taketake
Outcome 2: Our unique natural habitats are protected and enhanced
Local communities and the council work together to live sustainably and look after our environment.
Eighty-two per cent of our local board area is native vegetation containing diverse and unique habitats. These habitats are surrounded by both a fragile marine and coastal environment and by New Zealand’s largest metropolitan area. This means we face a number of environmental challenges.
Weeds are a significant threat to habitats in the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area. This area has a large number of private properties within its borders and a lot of roads and tracks. This makes it very easy for weeds to spread, so collaboration and coordination between the council and private landowners is vital to control their impact. We will use our resources to support individuals and groups to control weeds and animal pests.
In the 2016 State of Auckland Marine Report Card, Manukau Harbour has a D-rating overall, based on water quality, contaminants and sediment, and ecology. Our marine environment is threatened by, among other things, poorly performing septic tanks, and water quality in our coastal lagoons is also poor.
We will focus our efforts on ensuring that poorly performing septic tanks are replaced. We have commissioned a coastal and marine environment report and will use this to inform future actions.
When we approve use of land for filming or events, we see how easily human activity can encroach on animal and plant habitats. Our coastal areas contain a number of rare or threatened birds and marine mammals, and the last population of Maui’s dolphin. We want to encourage visitors and residents to take more care around all our native species.
Kauri dieback remains widespread and is an increasing threat to our forest. We currently provide an education resource in the form of a Kauri Coordinator, and will continue to help those who live in and visit the local board area to prevent any further spread of the disease.
Living in a sustainable and resilient way also has an immediate impact on the natural environment. Reducing plastic bag use, avoiding car journeys, and planting trees are all things that contribute in this area. Our work programme will support sustainable choices and the decisions we make will recognise the effects of climate change.
Outcome 2: Our unique natural habitats are protected and enhanced |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Animal pests and weeds are controlled long term, and the fight against kauri dieback continued. |
Carry out weed removal, focusing on areas identified in the Waitākere Ranges Strategic Weed Plan. |
Enable community-based weed and pest control on public and private property. |
|
Fund kauri dieback awareness raising. |
|
Our marine and coastal environments are protected. |
Help residents and landowners act to improve water quality in coastal lagoons. |
Support community efforts to protect marine and coastal environments. |
|
Educate people to respect vulnerable marine animals and plants. |
|
Our visitors and residents make every day sustainable living choices. |
Support local projects which make a positive difference to their environment. |
Whakaotinga 3: He pai tonu ki ngā hapori ā-rohe ake ō rātou wāhi noho
Outcome 3: Local communities feel good about where they live
Our communities celebrate their distinct identities and live, work and play together.
Our area’s residents live in a variety of different ways and places, from the west coast and rural villages to areas of suburban housing and urban townships. Each has its own aspirations, challenges and strengths.
We want our communities to feel proud of their areas. We will seek out opportunities for collaboration to ensure our neighbourhoods are better connected, informed and resilient, and to create opportunities to strengthen local networks.
Locally we have a number of skilled and enthusiastic groups with whom we can partner to support local people to achieve their own outcomes. Supporting and encouraging local events is one way to bring people together. We will programme activities and initiatives which involve and cater for the range of cultures, interests and age groups that represent our community’s make-up.
Through our local grants fund, the board will also support community projects which enhance the places where people live.
There are no secondary schools in our area and we know many people travel out of the area to work. We will look for opportunities to support our youth as they prepare for a future in adulthood and the workforce.
Outcome 3: Local communities feel good about where they live |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Communities are skilled, well informed and engaged. |
Support communities to lead their own place-making initiatives. |
Support Hoani Waititi marae-based programmes, activities and events. |
|
Boost local capacity and skills in less well-resourced areas. |
|
Community events and activities celebrate diverse local identities. |
Fund Waitangi Day celebrations. |
Fund key community events which celebrate our inspiring settings and diverse character. |
|
Young people are supported to achieve. |
Develop the leadership and job skills of young people. |
Support youth-led community projects. |
|
Enable young people to contribute to decision-making. |
|
Mana whenua and mātāwaka are acknowledged and their needs and aspirations are widely known. |
Develop relationships and agree shared goals with local Māori and key Māori organisations. |
Whakaotinga 4: He aro tonu te iwi ki te ao toi, ngā tikanga ā-iwi ake me ā tātou taonga tuku iho
Outcome 4: People experience local arts and culture, and recognise our heritage
We celebrate what makes us unique.
Arts and culture are intrinsic to place-making. In our area we are fortunate to have a range of established partners to work with across the arts and heritage communities. Our investment is significant. We fund and support a wide range of partners in and around the Lopdell Precinct, the most prominent of which is Te Uru - Waitākere Contemporary Gallery. This relationship plays an important role in showcasing Titirangi as the arts hub for the west and stimulating the wider local creative economy.
We want to continue providing a range of opportunities for community participation and access to the arts. This includes promoting locally relevant arts and themes, and Māori arts and culture, and supporting local creative businesses with our open studios event. We look forward to celebrating Matariki with our community at Arataki Visitors Centre and building upon local links to the Waitākere Ranges Heritage area.
With future townscape improvements in Glen Eden expected to be complemented by private sector housing developments and investment, there is also an opportunity to boost locally generated arts and cultural activities in this area.
Protecting our shared history is also a key way to identify what is unique about our area, and provides a point of reference from which we can inform and influence physical changes to our urban and rural landscapes. For example, Waikumete Cemetery is just one of our many built heritage sites with both local and national importance. We would like it to appear more visibly connected to Glen Eden in the minds of residents and visitors. The board will also make sure our road and place names reflect our shared heritage, and that mana whenua’s relationship to the landscape is recognised.
Once published, we will use the Swanson Heritage Report and Design Guidelines to influence development in this area to reflect the village’s rich heritage.
Outcome 4: People experience the arts, culture and heritage |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Arts and culture are part of the everyday life of all our communities. |
Continue our annual open studios event to promote the local creative economy. |
Fund events which create a sense of place, interest and local identity. |
|
Promote more arts and cultural activities in Glen Eden. |
|
Titirangi is seen as a showcase for arts in the west. |
Ensure Te Uru programmes reflect the unique character of the Waitākere Ranges. |
Ensure arts programming celebrates local creative icons. |
|
Historic and cultural heritage is recognised, celebrated and understood. |
Protect key local sites of cultural and historical importance and tell their stories. |
Hold heritage events which celebrate past, present and future. |
|
Celebrate Matariki at key sites. |
Whakaotinga 5: He wāhi pai tonu hei haerenga ō tātou pokapū ā-tāone
Outcome 5: Our urban centres are enjoyable places to be
Our urban environments are attractive and looking towards the future.
The Auckland Plan prioritises the protection, enhancement and improvement of business-zoned areas and Business Improvement Districts (BIDs). The main way your local board can support economic development or other changes in urban centres is through place-making, or inspiring people to reimagine and reinvent our local places.
Glen Eden is our area’s main town centre. We are committed to making significant improvements, with a town square following on from the 2016 upgrade of the library courtyard. The town centre already has many assets, including an excellent library, a number of up-and-coming businesses and an active business association, with which we will partner to help the township more actively and attractively promote what it has to offer.
In improving the look and feel of Glen Eden we hope to encourage better use of retail spaces to attract investment and support existing businesses to make the most of the opportunities Glen Eden offers.
We do not have the funds to complete the town centre redevelopment identified in the Glen Eden Urban Design Framework and Implementation Plan. In 2013 the complete package was estimated at $32 million, so we will advocate for an appropriate amount of regional funding in the council’s long-term plan to finish this work.
Around our smaller urban centres we will be actively looking to make grants for community projects which will enhance these environments.
Outcome 5: Our urban centres are enjoyable places to be |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Glen Eden is an attractive and welcoming town centre. |
Continue commitment to the major town centre improvement project. |
Ensure public places are family-friendly, inclusive and safe. |
|
Provide better walking connections to the town centre. |
|
Support BID projects which present an attractive town centre. |
|
Local communities are supported to enhance local villages. |
Identify village-focused, community place-making projects which enhance our centres while keeping their essential character. |
Whakaotinga 6: E tūtakina ana ngā hiahia o te rohe e ngā wāhi noho ātea me ngā wāhi mahi hākinakina o te hapori
Outcome 6: Our easy to get to community spaces and recreation facilities meet local needs
Local parks, facilities and walkway connections provide attractive places for people to come together.
Geographically, our area is split between people living urban and rural lifestyles. This means people in the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area rightly have different needs and expectations for their commuting and communal lives than those living more urban lifestyles.
Across the whole area, we want to encourage people to get out and about, meeting others and building supportive networks. We might create the spaces, but there is room for more to be happening at council-owned facilities. It is important that residents know where facilities are and the opportunities for using them. Working with the local people who manage these places and programmes will help with this.
In our rural areas we want to make sure our parks remain understated and accessible. With local and regional parkland so closely intertwined, how we use our parks can easily have a negative effect on the heritage area. As a desirable area for filming and events, we need to be conscious of the impact on the environment.
People are always interested in getting from A to B, for work or for pleasure. Building a local walking network is a slow process but a worthwhile one, and we want to encourage people to use our pleasant walkways. Where financially practicable, we will make targeted improvements to streetscapes. Where it is not, we will work to influence Auckland Transport to prioritise those improvements.
Access to local parks, quality gathering and resting spaces, and good transport, walking and cycling connections is vital for good urban living. We want people to have access to green space and connections between suburbs that support freedom of movement without the car.
We have a number of small urban parks throughout our area, but they are not always as inviting as they might be. We want to improve amenity and recreational use for locals so that these parks are used more regularly – actively for exercise, but also as quiet communal spaces. We know that if the needs of children are addressed when designing community spaces, then they will also be good for adults.
Outcome 6 : Our community spaces and recreation facilities meet local needs and are easy to get to |
|
Objective |
Key initiatives |
Our public spaces are great places for people to meet. |
Improve the attractiveness of small urban parks. |
Ensure improvements to facilities are child-centred, and mobility-friendly. |
|
Support local facilities to become more visible in their communities. |
|
Carry out targeted, small infrastructure projects which enhance streetscapes. |
|
Publicise our pleasant urban walkways. |
|
Develop linked trails through Glen Eden and Titirangi to enable people to get around and exercise in attractive off-road settings. |
|
Improve rural walkways for pedestrians. |
|
People have plenty of sports and recreation opportunities. |
Deliver parks-activation projects which bring the community into our parks and open spaces. |
He kōrero take pūtea
Financial information
This section is to provide a financial overview of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board.
Based on our existing budgets, we believe we can deliver the key initiatives in our draft plan without reducing our existing levels of service or increasing our local revenue sources, such as local targeted rates and fees and charges.
The governing body will be adopting the council’s 2018-2028 10-year budget in June 2018. It is important to note that this could change the funding for local boards, including projects currently provided for in the 2015-2025 10-year budget.
Local activities and levels of service
Local board responsibilities, provided for directly in legislation or allocated to boards, are summarised into local activities. These are described in the table below, along with levels of service statements.
More information regarding of levels of services, including performance measures and performance targets, can be found in the Waitākere Ranges Local Board Agreement 2016/2017. This is available on the Auckland Council website.
Local activities |
Levels of service statements |
Local parks, sport and recreation This group of activities covers the management and provision of local parks and open space and recreation activities for both passive and active recreation. It includes swimming pools and leisure centres servicing communities in the local area. |
Provide a range of recreational opportunities catering for community needs on local parks, reserves and beaches. Provide sports fields that are fit for purpose and cater for community needs. Provide programmes and facilities that ensure more Aucklanders are more active more often. |
Local community services This group of activities contribute to improved community outcomes by providing places and spaces for community to learn and recreate, and by integrating arts and culture into the everyday lives of Aucklanders. Key activities include locally delivered Libraries and Information (Libraries) and Arts, Culture and Events services. |
Provide safe, accessible, welcoming library facilities that support the delivery of quality learning programmes and services relevant to local communities. Enable Aucklanders and communities to express themselves and improve their wellbeing through customer centric advice, funding, facilitation and permitting. Deliver a variety of events, programmes and projects that improve safety, connect Aucklanders and engage them in their city and communities. Provide safe, reliable and accessible social infrastructure for Aucklanders that contributes to place-making and thriving communities. |
Local planning and development This group of activities covers local business area planning, local street environment and town centres and local environment and heritage protection. These activities include economic, environmental, heritage and spatial projects, and enable, plan for and deliver great local places. |
Develop local business precincts and town centres as great places to do business.
|
Local environmental management This group of activities covers working in partnership with locally based communities and iwi to deliver enhanced environmental outcomes (with a focus in indigenous biodiversity, healthy waterways and sustainable living) that contribute to Māori, community wellbeing and economy. |
Provide leadership & support to protect and conserve the region’s natural environment, historic heritage and Māori cultural heritage.
|
Local governance This group of activities covers support to local boards such as strategic advice, preparation of local board plans, development of local board agreements, community engagement including relationships with mana whenua and Māori communities, democracy and administration support, and professional development for elected members. |
The measures for this group of activities are covered under the Regional Governance group of activities in the Long-term Plan 2015-2025 where the survey measures determine participation with Auckland Council decision-making in general. This includes local decision-making. There are no significant changes to the measures or targets for 2016/2017.
|
Financial overview
Income, expenditure and capital investment by local activities for the period 2015 to 2018
Annual Plan Financials |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
Operating revenue |
|
||
Local community services |
327 |
147 |
152 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
|
||
Local planning and development |
|
||
Local environment services |
|
||
Total operating revenue |
327 |
147 |
152 |
Operating expenditure |
|
||
Local community services |
3,964 |
3,650 |
3,727 |
Local governance |
1,015 |
1,018 |
1,062 |
Local parks, sport and recreation |
3,390 |
3,641 |
3,725 |
Local planning and development |
420 |
413 |
328 |
Local environment services |
1,025 |
1,112 |
497 |
Total operating expenditure |
9,814 |
9,833 |
9,339 |
Net operating expenditure |
9,487 |
9,686 |
9,187 |
Capital expenditure |
|
||
Local community services |
409 |
140 |
346 |
Local governance |
|
||
Local parks, sport and recreation |
2,979 |
2,456 |
1,114 |
Local planning and development |
- |
372 |
- |
Local environment services |
|
||
Total capital expenditure |
3,388 |
2,969 |
1,460 |
Funding Impact Statement
Financial year ending 30 June |
2016/17 |
Sources of operating funding |
|
General rates, UAGCs, rates penalties |
11,011 |
Targeted rates |
84 |
Subsidies and grants for operating purposes |
10 |
Fees and charges |
83 |
Local authorities fuel tax, fines, infringement fees and other receipts |
54 |
Total operating funding |
11,242 |
|
|
Applications of operating funding |
|
Payment to staff and suppliers |
9,085 |
Finance costs |
734 |
Internal charges and overheads applied |
1,419 |
Other operating funding applications |
- |
Total applications of operating funding |
11,238 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of operating funding |
4 |
|
|
Sources of capital funding |
|
Subsidies and grants for capital expenditure |
- |
Development and financial contributions |
- |
Increase (decrease) in debt |
2,964 |
Gross proceeds from sale of assets |
- |
Lump sum contributions |
- |
Other dedicated capital funding |
- |
Total sources of capital funding |
2,964 |
|
|
Application of capital funding |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
- to meet additional demand |
344 |
- to improve the level of service |
372 |
- to replace existing assets |
2,252 |
Increase (decrease) in reserves |
- |
Increase (decrease) in investments |
- |
Total applications of capital funding |
2,968 |
|
|
Surplus (deficit) of capital funding |
(4) |
|
|
Funding balance |
0 |
Ngā Mema o tō Poari ā-Rohe o Te Wao-nui-o-Tiriwa
Your Waitākere Ranges Local Board members
|
Members’ details |
|
Greg Presland - Chairperson Phone: 021 285 3666 greg.presland@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Saffron Toms - Deputy Chairperson Phone: 021 904 896 saffron.toms@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Sandra Coney, QSO Phone: 021 446 370 sandra.coney@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Denise Yates, JP Phone: 021 285 7999 denise.yates@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Neil Henderson Phone: 021 286 5666 neil.henderson@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Steve Tollestrup Phone: 021 043 3686 steve.tollestrup@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
27 April 2017 |
|
Additional business meeting in May 2017
File No.: CP2017/05619
Purpose
1. In order to meet annual plan timeframes and provide feedback to the governing body the Waitakere Ranges Local Board needs to hold a meeting in the first week of May 2017.
Executive summary
2. The Waitakere Ranges Local Board holds its business meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of each month. In order to meet annual plan timeframes the Waitakere Ranges Local Board needs to hold an additional meeting in the first week of May in order to provide feedback to the governing body at its May business meeting.
3. It is proposed that the Waitakere Ranges Local Board hold an additional meeting for the purpose of annual plan feedback on Thursday, 4 May 2017 at 9.30am in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office, 39 Glenmall Place, Glen Eden.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) agree to hold an additional meeting on Thursday, 4 May 2017 at 9.30am in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office, 39 Glenmall Place, Glen Eden in order to meet annual plan timeframes.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Chairperson's report - April 2017
File No.: CP2017/06380
The environment, particularly water, is again dominating local news
1. A couple of recent storm events indicate to me very clearly that climate change is occurring and it is likely that these events will become more and more frequent. The first storm a few weeks ago caused significant flooding on Atkinson Road, Brandon Road, Glendale Road and on Great North Road in Kelston where an apartment house flooded for the second time in five years.
2. The flooding also caused the under mining of a couple of buildings on Great North Road in New Lynn. The damage caused to the road has thrown the local road system into chaos. I have never seen congestion in the area this bad.
3. Meanwhile the train system is working superbly. It recently passed another milestone when the 19th million passenger in a calendar year boarded. The annual rate of growth is 19.4% and recently an extra million passengers has been added in every four months.
4. The problem is that at current rates of growth the system's capacity at is going to be fully utilized in the next few years. We may regret not having started the City Rail Link years before.
5. To exemplify the performance of rail I recently caught a weekday 5:30 pm train from Britomart. At about 6:10 pm I reached Glen Eden. The trip was not only a great deal quicker, it was more relaxing and I had much appreciated time to catch up on emails.
6. Now is a very good time to put more train services on the western line if they are available. And I am sure that once people have tried the train system they will not look back.
7. The second storm wobbled at the end and bypassed Auckland. But the destruction it caused to other parts of the North Island suggest that we have no reason to be complacent.
8. The worrying aspect is that our infrastructure is predicated on really large storms occurring rarely. With an increasing frequency of large storm events caused in rising temperatures and water sodden atmosphere we may find that existing infrastructure is inadequate.
The Watercare Treatment Plant
9. This issue continues to be high on the Local Board's radar. Residents and supporters in Oratia are maintaining a well organised and in my view highly effective campaign to persuade Watercare not to site the proposed replacement water treatment plant on Parker Road.
10. They recently held a further well attended, well organized and passionate meeting and invited mayor Phil Goff, local councillors and the local board along. The Mayor requested that Raveen Jaduram, Watercare's chief executive, also attend which he did.
11. He was treated very politely and his presence assisted greatly in my view in having a proper dialogue about the issues surrounding the proposal. Previously Watercare had declined to take part in these meetings. Raveen's presence and the dialogue that occurred suggest strongly to me that this decision was the wrong one. One aspect that Raveen was able to clarify was that Watercare would not seek to have any Resource Consent application handled by a Board of Inquiry.
12. The meeting exemplified to me that ongoing dialogue is vital. And while the process is a conventional one in terms of Resource Consent Applications there is a deep disquiet that a Council Controlled Organisation should not be more accountable to the views of citizens. I am convinced that locals would prefer a more organic discussion where instead of being presented essentially with two options (Oratia or Woodlands Park) there was a discussion about options, whether smaller treatment plants could achieve the necessary goal and what sorts of smart engineering choices could be made to minimise disruption.
13. Residents of Woodlands Park have also started to express concerns at the possibility of a plant on the Manuka Road site. Their concerns and values are similar to those of the Oratia residents, they both cherish and are very protective of the environment they live in and they do not want to see their local environment destroyed.
14. Following is an indicative plan that I have received from Watercare that sets out the potential layout of a future site. If constructed in this area it would wipe out part of the Clarks Bush Track as well as the ecological corridor that extends from Laingholm into TItirangi.
15. If this is Watercare's preferred site I will be advocating for a reduction in the footprint so that the high quality vegetation and the track are preserved. I do not understand why more of the existing plant area cannot be used as already it is proposed that the holding pool be retained.
16. The experience has shown clearly to me the need for reform of the council controlled organizations. There is a virtue in removing day to day management decisions from political influence and financial discipline is important but we currently have the situation where with little notice local communities face potential devastation because of the adoption of a large engineering solution to the city's need for water. There have to be smarter and more environmentally sensitive ways of dealing with the city's growth needs and the need to replace ageing infrastructure.
17. The trouble with the Council Controlled Organisation corporate model is that big engineering cheapest price options tend to dominate. In the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area local people deserve and expect better.
Water quality
18. The trifecta of news involving water is that of water quality, particularly of the West Coast lagoons.
19. Ecomatters Trust has completed an analysis of local septic systems. The result was that 45% of the sampled properties had systems that were either not up to scratch or failing. If this figure was extrapolated across the West Coast it means that 450 systems need improvement or replacement.
20. The local board had a fund of $50,000 available to locals to assist with the replacement of existing systems. Presuming the fund is applied efficiently it means that it would take 45 years to fix up existing systems. The board intends to continue to have the resources available to address the problem but we will be assessing if this is the most efficient spend of the money.
21. And the inner Harbour beaches are also in poor shape. Titirangi Beach and Wood Bay have had preliminary assessments completed which suggest that the sources of pollution are avian, dog and human fecal matter. Investigations to the other beaches are ongoing. I will be urging Watercare to review its infrastructure to see if it is contributing to the problem.
22. I believe that we should set a goal for the water quality standards of our lagoons and inner Harbour beaches. They should be swimmable. And this should not mean that on occasions there is a one in 20 chance of contracting an illness from doing so.
Local Events
23. Finally a couple of photos from recent events to celebrate the strength of community out west. The first is from the recent Holi Festival put on by the Waitakere Indian Association. I have never seen such a happy completely sober group of people in my life!
24. And finally from the Board's Kauri Karnival also held recently and which was very successful.
Greg Presland
Chair Waitakere Ranges Local Board
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) receive the Chairperson’s report. |
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Portfolio update - Member Steve Tollestrup
File No.: CP2017/06383
Purpose
1. This report provides an opportunity for Member Steve Tollestrup to give an update with regards to activity within his portfolio areas.
2. Portfolio holders are responsible for leading policy development in their portfolio area, proposing and developing project concepts, overseeing agreed projects within budgets, being active advocates, accessing and providing information and advice.
3. Member Tollestrup has lead for the portfolios of Community Development, Economic Development, Place-making/Urban Renewal, Ethnic, Peace and Safety.
Executive Summary
WaterCare Parker Road
4. With my Local Board colleagues I have attended most of the meetings organised by residents opposing WaterCare’s proposed Oratia Water Treatment Plant on Parker Road. As with my board colleagues we oppose the construction of the plant on Parker Road and have objected to WaterCare about the poor consultative process the project has used. From a Local Board level ongoing diplomacy and advocacy on behalf of Parker Road residents is taking place.
5. Community Waitakere are presently engaged in a number of Local Board funded community development projects. These include:
5.1 Glen Eden – Selak /Kamara and Zodiac area designed to establish community connections and build local relationships to initiate neighbourhood engagement and support resident aspirations. This location has a high proportion of Housing New Zealand occupants and would be considered lower economic decile. Community Waitakere has been working with residents by holding community gatherings, outdoor events and BBQ’s, ‘Whanua Day,’ utilising the expertise of Sport Waitakere in the support of sporting activities as well as a close working relationship with Glen Eden Community House and Prospect Primary School.
5.2 Community Waitakere is continuing to co-host Hoani Waititi Marae open days, facilitating neighbourhood meetings at the marae, working with local residents and marae for Waitangi Day celebrations.
5.3 Community Waitakere has also been working closely with Albionvale residents in a community beautification of the Tuck Nathan area providing a ‘sow a seed’ day, advocating with residents for the successful fencing off of the Tuck Nathan pond and fostering positive and constructive engagement with marae residents for common outcomes.
5.4 Community Waitakere is also providing community development skills workshops for local community groups. These include Leadership, board development, community funding strategies and options, cross-cultural communication, facilitation skills, budgeting and finance, presentation skills. These programmes are supported by the Waitakere Ranges Local Board.
6. Neighbour’s Day had another successful year with an increased uptake of available funds with many events taking place throughout our Local Board area. I had the pleasure of visiting Neighbour’s Day events in Waitakere Village where a large turnout of locals made the Memorial Hall and adjoining reserve a hub of activity. Likewise Henderson Valley had a good turnout at the Vale Park Reserve with picnic blankets spread out on the grass accompanied to music and games into the early evening. Neighbour’s Day is proving to be a great success and has become part of our regular calendar.
Aotearoa Community Development Association & International Association for Community Development Conference
7. I attended ACDA /IACD conference held Unitec West Auckland February 15-17. This conference brought together Community development specialists and practioners from around New Zealand with a number of international guest contributors. The conference was particularly well attended by representatives from local government throughout New Zealand. This aspect was useful in my community development responsibilities as it gave an opportunity to meet with other colleagues to discuss new initiatives and their outcomes. For a more in depth review please refer to my conference report in this agenda.
Glen Eden Business Proposition meeting and production
8. The local board in partnership with the Glen Eden Business Association and consultants Business Lab facilitated a working group with representatives from local business leaders, commercial property developers and Auckland Council to map out strategies for a Glen Eden promotional package presenting Glen Eden as an opportunity for new business start-up and investment. The goal is to provide a resource to promote Glen Eden town centre and immediate surroundings and supporting the gradual transition to a more vibrant retail and shopping destination. The strategy also includes opportunity for professional services and offices located centrally.
9. Following the workshop a working group reconvened in early April to discuss copy, design and formatting of the commercial proposal and developing strategies for its distribution and promotion. Importantly Glen Eden is being positioned as vibrant West Auckland village with sustainable values and strong supportive community. This character is emphasised throughout in contrast to ‘big box’ retailers.
Thrive
10. A new addition of Thrive is in production and will feature the film industry and local and small businesses in the Heritage area that support it. The film industry is one of West Auckland’s largest economic drivers. The issue will consider case studies of Heritage Area businesses and the relationship between the film industry and the care and stewardship of the ranges and coast as well as the role of the Local board in the management of that relationship.
Swanson Preparing for Growth
11. In partnership with ATEED, the Local Board initiated research on business opportunities and growth for Swanson. This was in response to the expected population growth resulting from the new Penehana housing development and others nearby. The research was collaborative with 21 local businesses and their owners over a five-month period. The research also investigated what ways ATEED and the Local Board could support businesses in Swanson in the future.
12. The research is now complete with 3 recommendations centered on an informal collaborative network of Swanson Businesses. The full report will be presented to the participants late May or early June.
Safety
13. The police held a ‘safer-plates’ drive in the town centre, where for a gold coin donation licence plate screws were replace with tamper proof screws. This is the second such event in the last year and again was well attended by the public. Throughout New Zealand plates are stolen and reused in criminal activity and having tampered proof screws is an important step in reducing these thefts.
14. Police Mobile Unit was again brought into the town centre during a weekday to provide local residents and businesses with the opportunity to learn more about police activities and to have access on the day to police services. This is in order to compliment the safety hub and was initiated and supported by our Community Constable Heber Gazu,
15. I attended and spoke at the 2017 AGM of West Auckland Neighbourhood Support. I want to acknowledge the dedication of this hard working group of volunteers who in partnership with the Police and support of the local board work at the neighbourhood level to increase safety and security.
16. I met with Dr Geoff Bridgman who has recently completed a detailed research on perceptions of crime and security in West Auckland. I have invited Dr Bridgman to discuss and detail his findings to the local board. For a precis of his findings please refer to my conference report.
Civil Defence alerts
17. We have had three major weather events warnings for Auckland with some severe damage in the West. Holding responsibility for Civil Defence. I receive dispatches directly from CDEM. Those dispatches have been sent out to residents via community pages and facebook as well as being available on the Auckland Council website.
Miscellaneous
22. With Board colleagues I had the opportunity to meet Neighbourhood initiatives concerned with ecological restoration projects. The purpose of the site visit is for the local board and community representatives to meet and discuss the group’s vision and proposal.
23. The South Titirangi Neighbourhood Network has a long term vision of a pest and weed-free peninsula. They have presented a proposal to the Community Park Ranger for the restoration of local parks in the area. The network is supported by the Gecko Trust. The Waituna Action Group in Woodland’s Park has worked on maintaining and restoring the ecological values of Waituna Reserve for many years. They have recently been supported by Community Park Ranger for the restoration of the site of the future walkway between Rimutaka Place and Huia Road.
24. In Glen Eden we visited the small Milan Drive ecological area which has had extensive restoration thanks to the tireless effort of the local community. This restoration project with its beautiful barked footpath is providing a bush sanctuary in the middle of a highly suburbanised part of Glen Eden. Special mention of the hard work of Gerry Tanguay is especially noted.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) receive the portfolio update from Member Steve Tollestrup.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
Update on member's attendance to the Community Development Conference, Auckland 14-17 February 2017
File No.: CP2017/06386
Purpose
1. To enable Waitākere Ranges Local Board Member Steve Tollestrup to report back to the Waitākere Ranges Local Board on the Community Development Conference, Auckland 14-17 February 2017.
Executive summary
2. Member Steve Tollestrup attended the Community Development Conference as the representative from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board.
3. Member Tollestrup will outline highlights and learnings from the conference for the benefit of the Waitakere Ranges Local Board.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) receive the report from Member Steve Tollestrup for his attendance to the Community Development Conference, Auckland 2017. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Community Development Conference 2017 report |
121 |
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 27 April 2017 |
|
ACDA & IACD
Aotearoa Community Development Association & International Association for Community Development
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
February 15-17, 2017
The Conference’s goal was to address the challenge of Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals to Community Development practitioners, agencies and academics.
It was particularly well attended by district council and local government representatives spanning from Northland to Southland.
Aligning my portfolio responsibilities and interests to the practice streams and programme I attended workshops concerned with Community led economic development, Disaster preparedness and community response, Community safety, Housing and Indigenous knowledge in practice.
A number of workshops concerned with these themes were especially useful and indicate the quality of programme are outlined below.
ABCD CoLabs: Innovative and Sustainable approach to Community Building
This workshop provided an overview of place-based framework for exploring how ABCD and Participator Leadership practices achieve real outcomes to support change in communities.
Asset-based Community Development (ABCD) builds on existing strengths and focuses on the resources already present in community. Combined with Participatory Leadership, the ABCD Co-Labs encourage community members to respond to challenges. The workshop drew on experiences from Northland communities.
Innovation in Council-Community Relations: Far North Thrive Programme
There is strong awareness that the Far North District features badly in employment and income statistics, as well as in poverty, health and poor housing reports. Council’s consultation work for Community Planning, District Vision, and Long Term Plan indicated that people were willing to work their way out of the situation. They didn’t want a handout; they wanted support for a ‘hand-up’.
Following the 2013 Local Body Elections, the incoming Far North District Council decided to include ‘Community Economic Development’ (CED) as a core component of its Economic Development activity for the district. Council hosted a two day Resilient Economies Conference in Kaitaia, (June 2014) to introduce and explore aspects of CED and the process of ‘localising’ an economy.
A resolution from the conference prompted Council to partner with the Akina Foundation to create a Social Enterprise training programme to encourage and support the establishment of Social Enterprises and create a climate of ‘CED optimism and opportunity’.
Measuring Outcomes Using the Balanced Scorecard
Evaluating the effectiveness of policy initiatives in the social services sector is inherently problematic from a quantitative measurement perspective. The question is how do we know our programmes are effective and having the predicted outcomes? This workshop looked at the use of the ‘Balanced Score-card,’ a methodology I have used in the past and familiar with. More empirically based than qualitative evaluation I took the opportunity for a short refresher of this assessment tool.
Perceptions of Community Safety and White Fragility
Unitec and Community Waitakere have recently completed a project looking at the contemporary issues affecting the perceptions of safety in West Auckland communities. A review of eight recent surveys or research reports between 2012 and 2016 into community safety in West Auckland show that the negative perceptions we have about the safety of our community and the people who are part of it, have more impact than the actual amount of crime that is reported in our community. The workshop presented by Dr Geoff Bridgman reviewed the findings of a questionnaire to 159 people covering the age-span, female and male gender, Pākehā/European/Kiwi, Māori, Pacific Island and Asian/other cultures. The research showed that despite a clear fall in reported crime rates in West Auckland people generally believed that crime had increased and was worse than in the rest of Auckland. The data suggests that perceptions of safety in the community are influenced by culture and that one or more cultures are likely to be seen as the problem by the dominant culture. This raises the issue of the role white privilege and, particularly, white fragility in addressing community safety. The workshop also outlined the use of Facebook and social media to heighten anxiety and rely on anecdotal reporting as evidence of increasing crime. I was particularly interested in this workshop as I have suspected this gap between perception and data existed. That leads to me asking the question about what steps can be taken to close this perception gap so that citizens feel more secure. I have arranged for Dr Bridgman to meet with the Local Board and suggest strategies for the future.
What role does the church have in promoting SDGs?
This presentation used as a case study of The Community of St Luke, a local church attended by the presenters and explore the way it promotes SD Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The church has often been accused of being part of the problem but we will explore the ways in which it promotes peace, inclusivity, and social justice. It does this through being an inclusive community; running programmes on progressive theology, interfaith development and restorative justice; and taking action on issues such as sexuality. I was particularly interested in this workshop given the number of churches and faith-based centres in our LB area and asking the question of how they might be better engaged and equipped for supporting social development.
The Politics of Fruit
This workshop reviews the initial findings of a study into community and roadside fruit tree planting over 30 years. The researchers have interviewed participants, conducted a focus group, and reviewed written records including council minute’s reports and press cuttings. Participants reported on the value of community planting projects as a tool for building neighbourhoods and enabling further action for sustainability.
Dialogue practices within community development: In Conversation with Steinbeck
This was the little gem of the conference tucked into late afternoon and Led by Dr Peter Westoby of the University of Queensland. How do we understand the role and practices of dialogue within community development? And what has the philosopher Martin Buber approach to an I / Thou relationship and the critical literacy theorist Paulo Freire got to do with dialogue and community development? Drawing on a passage from the literary classic Grapes of Wrath (set in the Great Depression) by John Steinbeck, this workshop considered some theory and grounded practices of dialogue within community development and how we listen and understand to facilitate empowerment and collaboration.
Manaaki Tangata, an indigenous response to Aotearoa’s Homelessness Crisis
Aotearoa New Zealand currently faces a crisis in housing and homelessness that has been unprecedented in recent years. In contrast to the stereotypical picture of homelessness as affecting single adults with addictions and/or mental health difficulties, what has been revealed is entire families, including with parents who are working, living in very temporary accommodation in garages or even in cars. Government response in provision of public and/or social housing has been criticised as being totally inadequate.
In response to this crisis, in May 2016 the Te Puea Memorial Marae, Mangere, Auckland, opened its doors to homeless families to come and stay on the marae for the winter months. Along with accommodation and food, families and whanau were provided with intensive services to address other social and health needs. Over 62 families, including 77 adults and 104 children, were assisted over a three month period. This initiative received substantial positive media attention.
In this presentation the team from Te Puea Marae told the story of their experience in providing this service. Beyond this immediate crisis a question arises on the relationship between state responsibility for social services, and having room for community based and especially indigenous responses.
The conference was particularly valuable for networking with colleagues throughout the Auckland and the country, sharing insights and being presented with well organised research, applied practice and methodologies.
27 April 2017 |
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
File No.: CP2017/06263
Purpose
1. To present to the board with a governance forward work calendar.
Executive Summary
2. This report introduces the governance forward work calendar: a schedule of items that will come before the board at business meetings over the upcoming months. The governance forward work calendar for the board is included in Attachment A.
3. The calendar aims to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on agendas and workshop material is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is required and when
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar will be updated every month. Each update will be reported back to business meetings and distributed to relevant Council staff. It is recognised that at times items will arise that are not programmed. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar.
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) notes the updated Governance Forward Work Calendar for April 2017 (attachment A).
|
Comments
5. Council’s Quality Advice Programme aims to improve the focus, analysis, presentation and timeliness of staff advice to elected representatives. An initiative under this is to develop forward work calendars for governing body committees and local boards. These provide elected members with better visibility of the types of governance tasks they are being asked to undertake and when they are scheduled.
6. Although the document is new, there are no new projects in the governance forward work calendar. The calendar brings together in one schedule reporting on all of the board’s projects and activities previously approved in the local board plan, long-term plan, departmental work programmes and through other board decisions. It includes governing body policies and initiatives that call for a local board response.
7. This initiative is intended to support the boards’ governance role. It will also help staff to support local boards, as an additional tool to manage workloads and track activities across council departments, and it will allow greater transparency for the public.
8. The calendar is arranged in three columns, “Topic”, “Purpose” and “Governance Role”:
· Topic describes the items and may indicate how they fit in with broader processes such as the annual plan
· Purpose indicates the aim of the item, such as formally approving plans or projects, hearing submissions or receiving progress updates
· Governance role is a higher-level categorisation of the work local boards do. Examples of the seven governance categories are tabled on the following page.
Governance role |
Examples |
Setting direction/priorities/budget |
Capex projects, work programmes, annual plan |
Local initiatives/specific decisions |
Grants, road names, alcohol bans |
Input into regional decision-making |
Comments on regional bylaws, policies, plans |
Oversight and monitoring |
Local board agreement, quarterly performance reports, review projects |
Accountability to the public |
Annual report |
Engagement |
Community hui, submissions processes |
Keeping informed |
Briefings, cluster workshops |
9. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar. The calendar will be updated and reported back every month to business meetings. Updates will also be distributed to relevant Council staff.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
10. All local boards are being presented with governance forward work calendars for their consideration.
Māori impact statement
11. The projects and processes referred to in the governance forward work calendar will have a range of implications for Māori which will be considered when the work is reported.
Implementation
12. Staff will review the calendar each month in consultation with board members and will report an updated calendar to the board.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar - April 2017 |
133 |
Signatories
Authors |
Tua Viliamu - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Glenn Boyd - Relationship Manager Henderson-Massey, Waitakere Ranges, Whau |