I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Howick Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Monday, 15 May 2017 6.00pm Howick Local
Board Meeting Room |
Howick Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
David Collings |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Katrina Bungard |
|
Members |
Garry Boles |
|
|
Jim Donald, JP |
|
|
John Spiller |
|
|
Mike Turinsky |
|
|
Adele White |
|
|
Bob Wichman |
|
|
Peter Young, JP |
|
(Quorum 5 members)
|
|
Carol McGarry Democracy Advisor
8 May 2017
Contact Telephone: 027 591 5024 Email: carol.mcgarry@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 Leave of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
8.1 Deputation - Auckland British and European Classic Car Show 5
9 Public Forum 6
10 Extraordinary Business 6
11 Notices of Motion 6
12 Chairperson's Report 7
13 Councillor Update 9
14 Auckland Transport Update - May 2017 11
15 New Road Name Approval for the subdivision by Murphys Development Ltd, at 125D Murphys Road, Flat Bush. 47
16 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Lumina Developments at 27, 35, 35A Howe Street, Howick. 51
17 Howick Local Board ACE work programme 2017/2018 55
18 Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 69
19 Howick Local Grant Round Two and Quick Response Round Three 2016/2017 75
20 Auckland Council’s
Quarterly Performance Report: Howick Local Board
For Quarter Three, 1 January - 31 March 2017 231
21 Allocation of 2016/2017 Community Response Fund 283
22 Allocation of 2016/2017 Community Response Fund 285
23 Allocation of Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) capex funding 287
24 Urgent Decisions - World Masters Games 289
25 Governance Forward Work Calendar 295
26 Workshop Records 299
27 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Welcome
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Howick Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Monday 10 April 2017, as a true and correct record. b) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 4 May 2017, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Howick Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
There were no notices of motion.
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/01012
Purpose
1. This item gives the Chairperson an opportunity to update the Board on any announcements and note the Chairperson’s written report.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the Chairperson’s verbal update and written report.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Carol McGarry - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
|
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/01017
Purpose
1. An opportunity for the Ward Councillor’s to update the Board on regional matters of interest.
2. A period of time (10 minutes) has been set aside for the Ward Councillor’s to update the Board on regional matters.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the verbal report from Councillor Dick Quax and Councillor Sharon Stewart.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Carol McGarry - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
|
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
Auckland Transport Update - May 2017
File No.: CP2017/08262
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to; respond to resolutions and requests on transport-related matters, provide an update on the current status of Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF), request approval for new LBTCF projects, provide a summary of consultation material sent to the Board and, provide transport related information on matters of specific application and interest to the Howick Local Board (HLB) and its community.
Executive summary
2. This month a decision is required on to progress the Buckland Beach Walking Improvements project as well as information on the following matters:
· Auckland Transport Quarterly Report
· A Local Board Transport Capital Fund update.
· Auckland Transport projects that are being delivered in Howick.
· Attachments include a register of local issues and media releases specific to the Howick area.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the Auckland Transport Update – May 2017 report b) request that Auckland Transport complete detailed design of the following projects that have been identified in community consultation about the Buckland’s Beach Walking Improvements project: i. building a roundabout at the intersection of Buckland’s Beach and Whitcombe Roads. ii. converting The Parade to a ‘one way’ system including investigation of crossings, speed control measures and whether options exist for retention of ‘two way’ access into Laing’s Road.
|
Comments
Auckland Transport Quarterly Reporting
3. Auckland Transport provides quarterly reports about the organisations activities. Attachment A is provide information about Auckland Transport’s regional and local activities. Attachment B provides information about Auckland Transport’s work with local schools.
4. This paragraph provides a report about how Auckland Transport is supporting the HLB’s transport ‘Advocacy Initiatives’ recorded in the Local Board Plan. In this report the HLB’s transport related ‘Advocacy Initiatives’ from the 2013-16 term are recorded in the table below providing a summary of actions being taken that support them.
Table 1: Advocacy Initiative Status – 2013-16 Local Board Plan
Advocacy Initiative |
Key Initiative |
Status |
A well-integrated efficient public transportation system |
Investigate options for further ferry transport in the area |
Until late-2016 Auckland Transport’s focus has been on current services.
Since late -2016 Auckland Transport has been implementing the PTOM process and new ferry contracts are being negotiated later this year including some service improvements that we will be able to confirm later in 2017.
|
Input into East/West Connections and SMART project |
The HLB has provided regular submissions to Auckland Transport and New Zealand Transport Agency about this project.
Auckland Transport has discussed advocacy about these projects with the HLB during the Long Term Plan and Regional Land Transport Plan process. |
|
Working well with businesses |
Fund streetscape improvements as part of the draft East Tāmaki Corridor Management Plan |
Crookes Road project delivered. Auckland Transport has discussed working with the HLB to investigate ideas for the area around the new park development at the former Greenmount landfill site. |
Well designed and quality development in Howick |
Continue to partner with Auckland Transport to develop the Half Moon Bay area as a transport hub |
Auckland Transport has worked with the HLB to construct a new ferry pier.
Auckland Transport is currently applying for resource consent to complete the planned bus turning area and drop off point at the pier. |
Local services and infrastructure in place to meet Howick’s growth |
Develop the potential for an integrated planning solution for the Howick Village area e.g. place audit |
Auckland Transport is actively supporting the Howick Village Plan. |
Note: When the new HLB plan 2016-19 is ratified that plan’s ‘Advocacy Initiatives’ will replace current set. |
Local board transport capital fund (LBTCF) update
5. The LBTCF is a capital budget provided to all Local Boards by Auckland Council and delivered by Auckland Transport. Local Boards can use this fund to deliver projects that they believe are important but are not part of Auckland Transport’s work programme. The limitations being that the project must:
· Be safe.
· Not impede network efficiency.
· Be in the road corridor. Although projects running through parks can be considered if there is a transport outcome.
6. HLB’s funding in this term is approx. $ 2.9 million.
7. Auckland Transport encourages all Local Board’s to identify potential projects as early as possible to ensure delivery within the current electoral term.
Projects
8. Early in this electoral term the HLB started identifying possible projects and planning workshops have been held and reported about previously.
9. The current progress of all projects is summarised in the table below:
Table 1: Local Board Transport Capital Fund Projects
Projects |
Current Status |
Problem or Opportunity Being Addressed |
Current Status |
Half Moon Bay Ferry Pier and Bus Turnaround
|
|
Providing better facilities for ferry passengers at Half Moon Bay |
‘Rough Order of Cost’ requested by the HLB in 2013. ‘Detailed Design’ was authorised by HLB in October 2014 based on a Rough Order of Cost of $ 4.3 million of which the HLB would provide $ 2.5 million. ‘Construction’ was authorised by HLB in 2015 and has been expanded to include a bus turn around area. The total project is now worth approx. $ 5.9 million including funding from New Zealand Transport Agency and Auckland Transport.
The increase in investment was ‘resolved’ by the HLB on 13 June 2016.
The pier is complete and was opened on 7 April 2017.
The consent process for the ‘landside’ works has been submitted and is being processed. |
Buckland’s Beach Walkway Improvements |
|
Providing safer pedestrian facilities at Buckland Beach |
‘Rough Order of Cost’ of between $ 1.5 and 2.1 million has been provided to the HLB. Concept design was carried out in a number of stages: · 14 July 2014 – Detailed design of a small initial project authorised by resolution. · 8 June 2015 – The HLB expanded the project to include detailed design for a project running the length of ‘The Parade’. · 13 July 2015 Concept design reported to the HLB. This design is broken down into ten separate elements (detailed in February 2017’s report).
‘Construction’ of improvements to pedestrian safety between Numbers 61 and 68A of Buckland’s Beach Road was authorised on 8 August 2016. Using funds from Auckland Council’s Community Facilities Department’s Green Ways and Walk Ways Development Fund.
‘Next Steps’ Consultation about the small section between Numbers 61 and 68A of Buckland’s Beach Road is complete. The HLB reviewed the feedback on 26 April 2017.
On 26 April 2017 the HLB also agreed to proceed with further work on two aspects of the project identified during consultation. |
Howick Village Centre Plan |
|
Supporting improvements to Howick Village that will make it nicer, safer and more pedestrian friendly. |
Auckland Transport is working with the team developing the Howick Village Centre Plan and when this project is more advanced may complete a ROC for proposed work. |
Cascades Walkway |
|
Building a footpath on Cascade Road that will provide access under the bridge on the western edge of the golf course to the walking track that follows the stream. |
Auckland Transport has priced two options with ‘Rough Orders of Cost’ of either approx. $ 83,000 or approx. $ 225,000 depending on the route of the pathway.
HLB Transport Portfolio Members have visited this site and the project is still under consideration. |
Walking and Cycling Access to Half Moon Bay |
|
Develop walking and cycling opportunities around Half Moon Bay. |
The HLB discussed this project on 8 February 2017.
It was decided to let the ferry pier and bus stop improvements become operational before a new project was started. |
Highbrook Cycling and Walking Project |
|
Develop walking and cycling opportunities around Highbrook. |
The HLB was briefed by Auckland Transport about this project on 24 March 2017.
The HLB did not choose to pursue the project at this time. |
Baverstock Road Crossing
|
|
Building traffic calming and a crossing on Baverstock Road to reduce traffic speed and create a safer pedestrian environment |
‘Rough Order of Cost’ of approx. $ 150,000 has been provided to the HLB. The HLB discussed this project on 8 February 2017 and decided not to proceed with the project at this time. |
Notes: A ‘traffic light’ code is used to summarise the status of projects. The colours are used as follows: Green – Project progressing ‘on time’ and on budget. Orange – An issue has been identified that may need to be resolved. Red - An major issue has been identified that needs to be resolved Black – The project has been investigated and the HLB has decided not to pursue it at this time. |
New Projects
10. On 26 April 2017 HLB has identified two projects that they wish to investigate further:
· Building a roundabout at the intersection of Buckland’s Beach and Whitcombe Roads
· Converting The Parade to a ‘one way’ system including investigating crossings, speed control measures and whether options exist for retention of ‘two way’ access into Laing’s Road.
11. Both of these projects were identified by the community during consultation about the Buckland’s Beach Walkway Improvements project. The HLB is interested in conducting a detailed investigation of these ideas and draft resolutions are provided requesting that Auckland Transport start conducted a ‘detailed design’ process and report back with options.
12. This work is to provide the HLB with information for decision-making and will confirm the technical feasibility, safety and cost of the projects. It will also provide a full review of the technical options in accordance with Section 77 of the Local Government Act 2002.
Half Moon Bay Ferry Terminal Update
13. Building a new ferry pier and bus turn around area at Half Moon Bay was HLB’s key Local Board Transport Capital Fund Project in the 2013-16 term. The HLB were briefed on progress at the Half Moon Bay ferry terminal on 26 April 2017.
14. The project is progressing as predicted, the pier is built and consent for the bus turning area is currently being actioned.
Upcoming projects and activities
Consultations
15. Auckland Transport provides the HLB with the opportunity to comment on transport projects being delivered in this Local Board Area.
16. In this reporting period, no projects were put forward for comment by the HLB.
17. Traffic Control Committee (TCC) decisions are reported on a monthly basis. In the previous reporting period there was one TCC decision in the HLB area.
Table 2: TCC Monthly Summary April 2017
Street |
Area |
Work |
Decision |
Reeves Road / Grassways Avenue
|
Howick |
No Stopping At All Times, Stop Control, Flush Median
|
Carried |
Tamure Road / Haku Road / Hangahai Road / Tinaku Road / Peihinga Road / Ormiston Road
|
Flat Bush |
No Stopping At All Times, Prohibited Turn, Give-Way Control, Traffic Island, Round-about Controlled Give-Way
|
Carried |
Castlebane Drive / Charlestown Drive / Downpatrick Drive / Gurtin Drive / Cloonlyon Drive / Drumbuoy Drive / Gurtin Drive / Dunbeg Crescent |
Flat Bush |
No Stopping At All Times, Give-Way Control, Lane Provision |
Carried |
Regional and sub-regional projects
Public Transport Service and Safety Improvements
18. The number of people using public transport in Auckland is reaching record numbers. In the last year 19 million trips were taken on Auckland’s trains.
19. Auckland Transport is improving customer service on public transport. The first project will bring together ticket offices and customer service centres at five train stations. Currently customers need to queue at one point to buy a cash ticket and queue at another to get journey planning advice and other information on AT Metro services. Bringing the ticket offices and customer service centres together will provide a faster ticketing service and give our customers better service overall.
20. The five stations that have two offices that will be combined are Britomart, Newmarket, New Lynn, Papakura and Manukau. There is also a customer service centre at Panmure which will be changed to offer tickets as well. The change will be in place by the end of July 2017.
21. Safety from crime on public transport (particularly trains) has been raised by both Local Boards and the public. Auckland Transport is working to improve the situation and a number of projects are starting to be delivered aimed at improving the situation including:
· New security gates at high risk stations. AT HOP electronic gates will are being installed at eight more stations over the next 18 months: Otahuhu, Manurewa, Papatoetoe, Henderson, Parnell, Middlemore, Glen Innes and Papakura.
· Law changes so that people that do not pay fares can be removed from trains and fined.
· Changing national legislation to allow for staff on trains to be ‘warranted’ (or empowered under legislation to remove people and demand identification)
22. The legislative changes are progressing through Parliament and Auckland Transport is planning a pilot scheme with 18 ‘warranted officers’ working on the AT Metro public transport network. The presence of legally empowered staff will provide a deterrent to fare evaders and provide visible security.
AMETI
23. AMETI is a large transport project that will provide better public transport options between Panmure and Botany. The stage of AMETI currently being delivered is a busway running from Pakuranga to Panmure. The AMETI Eastern Busway will be New Zealand’s first urban busway providing congestion free ‘bus only’ lanes for commuters.
24. Between late April and late May (weather dependant), Auckland Transport’s AMETI Eastern Busway team will be doing investigative work along Pakuranga Road and in some side streets between Panmure Bridge and Ti Rakau Drive. The work is to map underground services. This is part of detailed planning for the AMETI Eastern Busway
Chapel Road
25. This safety driven project is about upgrading Chapel Road between Stancombe Road and Ormiston Road to bring it to an ‘urban arterial standard’. This road used to be rural road and as development has occurred needs to be upgraded. The scope of works includes making the road straighter, building a new bridge, a new signalised intersection, and widening Stancombe Road intersection so that cycle lanes and two southbound traffic lanes will be available.
26. Auckland Transport is working with New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and has requested funding to re-design Chapel Road and replace the bridge. Funding for the project has been agreed in principle by NZTA and the first stage of designing the project has been approved. Funding for subsequent stages of the project will be confirmed as the project progresses.
27. Construction may start as early as 2018, but this start date is based on the best case scenario and obtaining future construction funding from the NZTA.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Auckland Transport Regional and Local Activities |
19 |
b⇩ |
Auckland Transport Schools Programme |
33 |
c⇩ |
Issues Register |
37 |
d⇩ |
Media Clippings |
39 |
Signatories
Authors |
Ben Stallworthy, Elected Member Relationship Manager, Auckland Transport |
Authorisers |
Jonathan Anyon, Manager Elected Member Relationship Unit, Auckland Transport Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the subdivision by Murphys Development Ltd, at 125D Murphys Road, Flat Bush.
File No.: CP2017/06632
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Howick Local Board, for new road names for two new roads created through the subdivision at 125D Murphys Road, Flat Bush.
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming for the Auckland Council.
3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘Annmarie Avenue’ and ‘Gassie Close’ (applicant’s preferred road names), ‘Jodelle Street,’ ‘Chen Rise’ and ‘Guest Close’ were determined to meet the road naming guideline criteria.
4. Local iwi groups and New Zealand Post were consulted and one objection was received from Ngati te Ata who opposed the road names but gave no further comment and did not offer alternative suggestions. New Zealand Post noted that ‘Jodelle Street’ may not be supported by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) and Council as there is already a ‘Jodie Place’ in Flat Bush. LINZ confirmed the names were acceptable.
5. The names ‘Annmarie Avenue’ and ‘Gassie Close’ proposed by the applicant and the names ‘Jodelle Street,’ ‘Chen Rise’ and ‘Guest Close’ are considered for approval by the Local Board.
That the Howick Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval, the road names ‘Annmarie Avenue’ and ‘Gassie Close’, proposed by the applicant, for the new roads created by way of subdivision at 125D Murphys Road, Flat Bush, while noting that ‘Jodelle Street,’ ‘Chen Rise’ and ‘Guest Close’ also meet the road naming criteria. |
Comments
6. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the Local Board’s approval.
27 lots of the 40 lot subdivision (referenced 46555) will be serviced by a new road (Road 1) coming off Redoubt Road, which the applicant seeks to name. 9 lots will be accessed by a second road coming off Road 1.
The applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the two new roads created as part of the development at 125D Murphys Road, Flat Bush.
Preference |
Proposed New Road Name (Road 1) |
Meaning |
Preferred Name |
Annmarie Avenue |
All names have relevance to the developer as they are names of people associated with Murphys Development Ltd. |
First Alternative |
Jodelle Street |
|
Second Alternative |
Chen Rise |
|
Preference |
Proposed New Road Name (Road 2) |
Meaning |
Preferred Name |
Gassie Close |
As above. |
First Alternative |
Guest Close |
|
Figure One: Location and layout of the new roads, highlighted in yellow.
Decision Making
7. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
8. The applicants’ proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines;
9. The applicant’s preferred road names, ‘Annmarie Avenue’ and ‘Gassie Close,’ are considered to be consistent with road naming guidelines.
10. The proposed suffixes of ‘Avenue’ and ‘Close’ (applicant’s preferred) are considered to be appropriate as they reflect the characteristics of the proposed roads, being a broad roadway along the ridgeline lined with trees and a short, enclosed roadway.
11. As the applicant’s preferred names meet the criteria of the Road Naming Guidelines, they are recommended for consideration for approval by the Local Board while noting that the names ‘Jodelle Street,’ ‘Chen Rise’ and ‘Guest Close’ are also appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming guidelines.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
12. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Maori impact statement
13. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
Consultation
14. The applicant has emailed multiple iwi groups within the Howick Local board area. Of the 12 iwi groups contacted, a response was received from Ngai Tai ki Tamaki stating they had no issue with the proposed names, and from Makaurau Trust who deferred interest to Ngai Tai ki Tamaki. A response was also received from Ngati te Ata stating that they were opposed to the names with no reasoning or alternative road names suggested. No further responses have been received from any other iwi groups.
15. New Zealand Post and LINZ were consulted and indicated that all the names provided are acceptable from their perspective.
Financial and Resourcing Implications
16. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Council’s Administrative Charges.
Legal and Legislative Implications
17. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
18. The Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Virginia Loh - Resource Consents Administrator |
Authorisers |
Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Lumina Developments at 27, 35, 35A Howe Street, Howick.
File No.: CP2017/06671
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Howick Local Board, for a new road name for a road created by way of a 18 Lot subdivision at 27, 35, 35A Howe Street, Howick.
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming for the Auckland Council.
3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘JaeDee (Court/Place/Lane)’ (applicant’s preferred road name), and ‘Lumnina (Way)’ (alternate name proposed by applicant) were determined to meet the road naming guideline criteria.
4. Local iwi groups were consulted. Responses were received from Te Ahiwaru and Te Akitai Waiohua, both deferring to Ngai Tai ki Tamaki. No comments on the proposed names or suggested alternative names were offered by the iwi groups.
5. The names ‘JaeDee Court/Place/Lane’ and ‘Lumina Way’ are considered for approval by the Local Board.
6. The applicant has not proposed a road type and have expressed that they do not have any particular preference. In this case, appropriate suffixes include ‘Court’, ‘Place’ ‘Lane’ or ‘Way’.
That the Howick Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval, the road name ‘JaeDee’, proposed by the Applicant, for the new road created by way of subdivision at 27, 35, 35A Howe Street, Howick while noting that ‘Lumina’ also meets the road naming criteria.
|
Comments
7. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the Local Board’s approval.
8. A new cul-de-sac was created as part of a new residential development (granted under resource consent 48496) including an 18 Lot subdivision.
The Applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the road created as part of the development at 27, 35 and 35A Howe Street, Howick.
Preference |
Proposed New Road Name |
Meaning |
Preferred Name |
JaeDee |
Name to honour a family member who passed away over Christmas – inspiration behind the development of the Howe Street Subdivision. |
First Alternative |
Jade |
A variation to the first name, as a tribute to JaeDee. |
Second Alternative |
Lumina |
Company name |
Figure One: Location and Layout of new Road off Howe Street, Howick
Decision Making
9. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to Local Boards.
Assessment
10. The Applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines;
11. One of the criteria states that “Where there is an existing similar/same road name within Auckland Council’s boundary or an adjoining territorial authority’s boundary, a new road name must not be: (a) the same as an existing road name; (b) similar in spelling to an existing road name; or (c) similar in sound to an existing road name”. It is therefore considered that the proposed name ‘Jade Court’ does not meet this criterion.
12. All other proposed road names meet the criteria set out in the road naming guidelines.
13. The applicant has not proposed a specific suffix, but has suggested Court, Way or Place. ‘Court’ and ‘Place’ are described as a ‘short, enclosed roadway’ and ‘Lane’ is described as a ‘narrow roadway between walls. The proposed suffix of ‘Way’ is described as ‘short enclosed roadway’. These are all appropriate for the proposed new road.
14. The proposed road names all meet the criteria for reasons including the following:
· The names are relatively easy to pronounce, spell and write.
· There are no existing similar/ same road names within Auckland Council’s boundary.
15. As the Applicant’s preferred name (Jaedee) meets the criteria, it is recommended for consideration for approval while noting that the alternative name proposed (Lumina) is also appropriate as they comply with all the criteria of the road naming guidelines.
Consideration
Significance of Decision
16. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Maori impact statement
17. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Maori identity.
Consultation
18. The relevant iwi groups were contacted by email to seek feedback on the proposed names. The responses received were as follows:
· Email from Te Ahiwaru, deferring to Ngai Tai
· Email from Te Akitai Waiohua, deferring to Ngai Tai
· The applicant’s agent followed up on it, however no response was received.
19. Consultation was undertaken with NZ Post, and they have confirmed that ‘Jaedee’ and ‘Lumina’ are acceptable. There is already a Jade Avenue in Pakuranga so ‘Jade’ was not considered to be an acceptable name.
20. No written consultation with the neighbours (Lots 1-3 DP 210337) who will be affected by the new road name, has been provided. The applicant will however be consulting them, and believes that based on previous discussions with them, they will not have a problem with the change as they have been fairly happy with the private roading proposal to date.
Financial and Resourcing Implications
21. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with Council’s Administrative Charges.
Legal and Legislative Implications
22. The decision sought from the Howick Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.
Implementation
23. The Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Virginia Loh - Resource Consents Administrator |
Authorisers |
Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
File No.: CP2017/05830
Purpose
1. To approve the Arts, Community and Events 2017/2018 Howick Local Board work programme.
Executive summary
2. This report provides information to support the local board to make decisions required to approve the Arts, Community and Events 2017/2018 work programme.
3. The proposed ACE work programme provides a defined work programme for the 2017/2018 financial year. The work programme covers the following areas:
· Community Empowerment
· Arts and Culture
· Events
· Community Places.
4. The ACE work programme for the Howick Local Board aligns with the following 2014-2017 Howick Local Board Plan priorities:
· valuing our cultural diversity
· an involved and connected community.
That the Howick Local Board : a) approve the 2017/2018 Arts, Community and Events work programme (Attachment A). |
Comments
5. The ACE work programme for 2017/2018 aligns to the following 2014-2017 Howick Local Board Plan priorities:
· valuing our cultural diversity is supported through activities such as community arts programmes and community events.
· an involved and connected community is supported through activities such as capacity building with a youth focus, and community-led placemaking work.
6. The ACE work programme 2017/2018 for the Howick Local Board includes the following areas of activity:
· Community Empowerment: these projects and programmes aim to deliver a range of social outcomes for local residents. This includes work to apply the Empowered Communities Approach through the strategic broker, as well as developing a local Māori responsiveness action plan.
· Arts and Culture: this includes the Estuary Art Awards, funding for City of Manukau Pipes and Drums Inc., and funding for groups such as the Howick Children’s and Youth Theatre and Uxbridge Inc.
· Events: this work programme includes a range of community events such as the Tāmaki River Festival, volunteer recognition and citizenship ceremonies.
· Community Places: this includes the provision of community facilities such as Anchorage Park and Highland Park Community Houses, as well as working to increase participation at community venues.
7. The work programme includes scoped initiatives that align with local board priorities, as well as budget allocation and established timelines.
8. The local board considered the draft work programme at a workshop with ACE staff on 5 April 2017. Staff incorporated the local board’s feedback into the work programme.
9. The local board is requested to approve the ACE work programme for 2017/2018. ACE staff will continue to work with the local board to ensure these projects are delivered.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
10. The local board considered the draft 2017/2018 work programme at a workshop on 5 April 2017. Staff considered the local board’s feedback and incorporated it into the local board work programme (Attachment A).
Māori impact statement
11. One of the Auckland Plan targets is to increase targeted support to Māori community development projects. A key objective of ACE is to deepen and integrate relationships with mana whenua, mataawaka and marae, in our everyday work.
12. The 2017/2018 work programme includes a new line entitled ‘Māori Responsiveness Action Plan’. This item emerged from a review of local board work programmes, which found that overall, local board plans make strong commitments to Māori. However these commitments are not often carried through to detailed action in work programmes (for example benefits to Māori may be included as a by-product of general outcomes, or categorised with ethnic and diverse communities).
13. The benefits of this activity are expected to include:
· collaborating with Māori and forming stronger relationships, decision-making and partnerships
· moving from high level commitments to outcomes
· eliminating the transactional approach to working with Māori
· setting up monitoring through quarterly reporting.
Implementation
14. Once the work programme is approved, ACE staff will monitor progress throughout 2017/2018. The ACE work programme will be implemented within the annual plan 2017/2018 budget and updates on progress will be available at the end of each quarter.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Howick ACE Work Programme17_18 |
59 |
Signatories
Authors |
Sarah Zimmerman - Senior Advisor |
Authorisers |
Graham Bodman - General Manager Arts, Community and Events Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018
File No.: CP2017/07335
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Purpose
1. The purpose of the report is to present the Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 for adoption.
Executive Summary
2. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year.
4. This report presents the Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018 for adoption (see attachment A).
That the Howick Local Board: a) adopt the Howick Local Board Community Grants Programme 2017/2018.
|
Comments
5. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy was implemented on 1 July 2015. The policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
6. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year. The local board grants programme guides community groups and individuals when making applications to the local board.
7. The local board community grants programme includes:
· outcomes as identified in the local board plan
· specific local board grant priorities
· which grant types will operate, the number of grant rounds and opening and closing dates
· any additional criteria or exclusions that will apply
· other factors the local board consider to be significant to their decision-making.
8. Once the local board community grants programme for the 2017/2018 financial year, has been adopted, the types of grants, grant rounds, criteria and eligibility with be advertised through an integrated communication and marketing approach which includes utilising the local board channels.
Consideration
Local Board views and implications
9. The Community Grants Programme has been developed by the local board to set the direction of their grants programme. This programme is reviewed on an annual basis.
Māori impact statement
10. All grant programmes should respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Maori wellbeing by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Maori. Applicants are asked how their project may increase Maori outcomes in the application form.
Implementation
11. An implementation plan is underway and the local board grants programme will be locally advertised through the local board and council channels. Targeted advertising and promotion will be developed for target populations, including migrant and refugee groups, disability groups, Maori and iwi organisations.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Howick Local Board Grant Programme 2017/2018 |
71 |
Signatories
Authors |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager |
Authorisers |
Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
Howick Local Grant Round Two and Quick Response Round Three 2016/2017
File No.: CP2017/07209
Purpose
1. The purpose of this report is to present applications received for Howick Local Grant Round Two and Quick Response, Round Three 2016/2017. The local board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these applications.
Executive summary
2. The Howick Local Board adopted the Howick Local Grants Programme 2016/2017 on 9 May 2016. The document sets application guidelines for community contestable grants.
3. The local board is required to allocate grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of becoming the world’s most liveable city.
4. The Howick Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $435,000 for the 2016/2017 financial year.
5. To date, the Howick Local Board has allocated $79,944 in quick response round one and two and $9,200 through urgent decision. A total of $345,856 remains to be allocated across the remaining 2016/2017 grant rounds.
6. Thirty four applications were received in Local Grant Round Two, (including five multiboard requests); requesting a total of $596,115, see Attachment B. In Quick Response Round Three, 19 applications were received; requesting a total of $38,572, see Attachment C.
That the Howick Local Board: a) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application in this round, listed in Table One. Table One: Howick Local Grant Round Two applications
Table Two: Howick Quick Response Round Three applications
|
Comments
7. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme (see Attachment A).
8. The local board grants programme sets out:
· Local board priorities
· Lower priorities for funding
· Exclusions
· Grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· Any additional accountability requirements.
9. The Howick Local Board will operate four quick response and two local grants rounds for this financial year.
10. The community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, radio, and community networks.
11. The Howick Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $435,000 for the 2016/2017 financial year.
12. It is recommended that the board considers allocating up to $157,000 for Local Grant Round Two and up to $30,000 for Quick Response Round Three.
13. To date, the Howick Local Board has allocated $79,944 in quick response round one and two and $9,200 through urgent decision. A total of $345,856 remains to be allocated across the remaining 2016/2017 grant rounds.
14. In Local Grant Round Two, 34 applications were received (including five multiboard requests); requesting a total of $596,115, see Attachment B. In Quick Response Round Three, 19 applications were received; requesting a total of $38,572, see Attachment C.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
15. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Howick Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or deadline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
16. The board is requested to note that section 50 of the Community Grants Policy states “We will also provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.”
17. A summary of each application received through Local Grant Round Two is attached, see Attachment B.
18. A summary of each application received through Quick Response Round Three is attached, see Attachment C.
Māori impact statement
19. Community grants provides opportunities for all Aucklanders to undertake projects, programmes, activities that benefit a wider range of individuals and groups, including Maori. As a guide for decision-making, in the allocation of community grants, the new community grants policy supports the principle of delivering positive outcomes for Maori.
Implementation
20. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted Long Term Plan 2015-2025 and local board agreements.
21. Following the Howick Local Board allocating funding to the two grant rounds, commercial and finance staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Howick Local Board Grants Programme 2016/2017 |
83 |
b⇩ |
Howick Local Grants Round Two 2016/2017 application summaries |
85 |
c⇩ |
Howick Quick Response Round Three 2016/2017 application summaries |
185 |
Signatories
Authors |
Sara Chin - Community Grants Advisor |
Authorisers |
Marion Davies - Community Grants Operations Manager Jennifer Rose - Operations Support Manager Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
Auckland Council’s Quarterly Performance Report:
Howick Local Board
For Quarter Three, 1 January - 31 March 2017
File No.: CP2017/08101
Purpose
1. To provide the Howick Local Board members with an integrated quarterly performance report for quarter three 2016/2017, against the local board agreement work programme.
Executive summary
2. This report provides an integrated view of performance for the Howick Local Board, including; financial performance, progress against local board key performance indicators, progress against each operating department work programme, key challenges the board should be aware of and any risks associated with delayed delivery against the Howick 2016/2017 Work Programme.
3. Of significance this quarter, the Howick Local Board welcomed Mike Turinsky as a member following his successful election in the recent by-election.
4. The Howick Local Board has an approved 2016/2017 work programme for the following operating departments:
· Arts, Community and Events, approved on 13 June, 2016
· Parks, Sport and Recreation, approved on 13 June, 2016
· Libraries and Information, approved on 5 July, 2016
· Community Facility Renewals, approved on 13 June 2016 (all except PSR) and 8 August, 2016 (PSR)
· Infrastructure and Environmental Services, approved on 13 June 2016
· Local Economic Development, approved on 12 September, 2016
5. All operating departments with agreed work programmes, have provided a quarterly update against their work programme delivery (attachment B), with all items reported as ‘green’ status (on track). The following items are reported as ‘red’ status (behind delivery, significant risk):
· Macleans Park Stage 2;
· Dog Park Development – 310 Te Irirangi Drive;
· Kilimanjaro Park Play Renewal; and
· World Masters Games Leverage activity in Howick
6. Overall, the financial performance of the board against quarter three, 2016/2017 is on track; however there are some points for the board to be aware of:
· Net cost of service to the end of December 2016 is $13.9m against a budget of $14.5m.
· OPEX for asset based services is 3% ($450) below budget.
· Expenditure for locally driven initiatives is $316k below budget. While community grants have the largest variance to budget, there are still local grants round remaining. The facility partnerships ($300k), green assets ($50k) and youth facility feasibility ($30k) projects have been identified by delivery units as requiring a deferral of budget due to delay in delivery. All deferrals will be confirmed in May 2017.
7. The Key Performance Indicators for the Howick Local Board show a trend of delivery for Q3 that is meeting most indicators (achieved or substantially achieved), with the exceptions being; Percentage of residents who visited a local park or reserve in the last 12 months, Percentage of visitors satisfied with the library environment, Percentage of Aucklanders that feel connected to their neighbourhood and local community, Percentage of attendees satisfied with council delivered and funded local events and Facility utilisation at off-peak times for Council managed community centres and venues for hire. However, the year-end outlook is for 32% of measures to not achieve target. These are explained further in detail in the report, with the full results in attachment D.
8. The overall snapshot for the Howick Local Board indicates performance is tracking positively – although it is noted that there is a slight increase in items reports as “red” status (attachment A).
That the Howick Local Board: a) receive the performance report for the financial quarter ending 31 March 2017
|
Comments
Key highlights for quarter three
9. The Howick Local Board has a number of key achievements to report from the quarter three period, which include:
· Welcoming Mike Turinsky as a member following his successful election in the recent Botany sub-division by-election.
Key project updates from the 2016/2017 Work Programme
10. All operating departments with an approved 2016/2017 Work Programme have provided performance report updates for quarter two (attachment B). The following are progress updates against key projects identified by the operational departments:
· Libraries report that Kia Maia Te Whai, Dare to Explore was a big hit this quarter, with many children and families taking part in their programme to build their literacy and make strong connections with our libraries over the summer. They had a joint celebration party at Lloyd Elsmore Park with 335 children and their families.
Risks identified in the 2016/2017 Work Programme
11. The following are risks that have been identified by operating departments where the progress and performance indicator has been set to ‘amber’ or ‘red’
12.
a) Sports Parks
CF: Project Delivery - Ostrich Farm Sportsfields development (AMBER)
· Timing of works may be impacted relating to surrounding developments and release of infrastructure.
b) Development Projects
CF: Project Delivery – Macleans Park Stage 2 (RED)
· Delays in the PIF coming through from Community Services, causing delay in the scoping process.
CF: Project Delivery – Dog Park Development – 310 Te Irirangi Drive (RED)
· Reassess Issues/Risks upon approval of the concept plan. Delays in the PIF coming through from Community Services, causing delay in the scoping project
CF: Project Delivery - Flat Bush Multi-purpose Facility (AMBER)
· Additional funds are likely to be required to deliver the current project scope. Business case to be finalized and approvals required.
CF: Project Delivery – Flat Bush Aquatic Centre (AMBER)
· Funding needs to be brought forward to ensure deadlines are met. Strategic Case Assessment will be undertaken by Community Facilities Construction Performance Manager prior to further investigation work being undertaken
c) Community Facilities: Renewals
CF: Project Delivery – Howick F17 & F18 Lloyd Elsmore Park Leisure Centre renewals (AMBER)
· Programme has been fast-tracked by separation into multiple stages to achieve critical works (Physical Works Stage 2) in Term 2 (May-August 2017). Current budget is anticipated to be inadequate to undertake all works required of Design Stages 3 and 4/Physical Works Stage 2.
a)
CF: Project Delivery – Kilimanjaro Park Play Renewal (RED)
· Cancelled project. This project was completed in previous years and there is no need to renew.
CF: Project Delivery – Ostrich Farm design and consenting (AMBER)
· Timing of works may be impacted relating to surrounding developments and release of infrastructure.
CF: Community Leases – Howick Local Board Accommodation Project (AMBER)
· To be progressed in quarter 4
CF: Community Leases – Meadowlands Multi-sport and community trust (AMBER)
· To be progressed
CF: Community Leases – Pakuranga Bowling Club (AMBER)
· Negotiations occurring with Parks, Sports and Recreation staff about the utilization of the grounds
CF: Community Leases – The Scout Assn. of NZ – Cockle Bay (AMBER)
· Currently negotiating multi-premise lease
d) Local Economic Development: ATEED
CCO: ATEED – Howick Tourism Plan implementation (AMBER)
· Progress has been made in tourism development in 2017. However, there is an outstanding $40k left over from 2016 LED budget.
CCO: ATEED – World Masters Games leverage activity in Howick (RED)
· A lack of information from the WMG2017 with competitors interests and contact information has made it difficult to develop an event or leveraging activities in Howick. Howick BID has not yet submitted a proposal. It is highly unlikely the funding will be spent.
Financial performance
13. The Howick Local Board’s net cost of service to the end of March was $13.9m against a budget of $14.5m.
14. Operating revenue is below budget due to total revenue from Lloyd Elsmore Pool and Leisure Centre tracking behind budget. Despite reduced revenue, the centre is managing expenditure levels to remain profitable. Pakuranga Leisure Centre continues to perform well. In community services venue for hire revenue continues to track ahead of budget with higher utilization than was anticipated when budgets were set
15. Operating expenditure for asset based services is $450k below budget. In community services, both Botany and Howick Libraries are reporting lower staffing costs. For local parks there continues to be lower expenditure to date in the parks maintenance area.
16. Expenditure for locally driven initiatives is $316k below budget. While community grants have the largest variance to budget, there are still local grants round remaining. The facility partnerships ($300k), green assets ($50k) and youth facility feasibility ($30k) projects have been identified by delivery units as requiring a deferral of budget due to delay in delivery. All deferrals will be confirmed in May 2017.
17. Capital investment is below the year to date budget. This is mainly in the park, sport and recreation renewals programme ($2.5m variance to budget). The Lloyd Elsmore Park Leisure Centre upgrade is the main contributor, with the project still in the design phase. Land acquisition for the management of storm water infrastructure is progressing but showing a $1.2m variance below budget with various infrastructure agreements still being progressed. The majority of the capital spend to date is for the development taking place at Barry Curtis Park.
Key performance indicators
18. The local board agreements include level of service statements and associated performance measures to guide and monitor the delivery of local services. This report provides interim performance results and outlook information for Howick Local Board’s measures, showing how we are tracking for the third quarter of FY17.
19. The year-end outlook is for 32 per cent of measures to not achieve target.
20. The local environmental management measure is on track, as are the majority of measures for local parks, sports and recreation, and local community services.
21. Measures that are not on track to be achieved include:
· Percentage of Aucklanders that feel connected to their neighbourhood and local community. The empowered communities approach being implemented in FY17 aims to improve this result.
· Facility utilisation at off-peak times for council-managed community centres and venues for hire. The digital booking system, which began recording bookings in FY17 Q1, is expected to improve customer experience and utilisation, along with a marketing campaign in Q3.
· Percentage of Business Associations meeting their Business Improvement District (BID) Partnership Programme obligations. This currently has a zero per cent outlook as Howick BID has not submitted required accountability documents; staff will work with the BID to encourage completion in Q4.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
22. This report informs the Howick Local Board of the performance to date for the period ending 31 March, 2017.
Māori impact statement
23. No specific initiatives in the work programme contribute to specific Maori outcomes in the local board plan. Iwi are consulted as part of the development and implementation of projects.
Implementation
24. The Senior Advisor Howick Local Board will continue to facilitate performance updates to the local board.
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Work Programme Snapshot |
237 |
b⇩ |
Work Programme Update |
239 |
c⇩ |
Financial Performance |
263 |
d⇩ |
Performance Measure Results |
277 |
Signatories
Authors |
Ian Milnes - Senior Local Board Advisor Howick |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
Allocation of 2016/2017 Community Response Fund
File No.: CP2017/08116
Purpose
1. To allocate funding from the 2016/2017 Community Response Fund for advertising in the “Explore Howick and Beyond Visitors Maps 2017” by Times Newspapers Ltd.
Executive summary
2. The Howick Local Board has a community response fund of $167,000 within the Locally Driven Initiatives [LDI] operational funding budget for the 2016/2017 financial year. The fund can be used at the local board’s discretion.
3. At the time of writing, $65,150 has been allocated from the community response fund.
4. At a workshop on 26 January 2017, the local board gave direction that it supports the allocation of funding of $5,000 for advertising within the “Explore Howick and Beyond Visitors Maps 2017” by Times Newspapers Ltd.
5. The maps will be distributed regularly throughout the year to local accommodation venues, information centres, transport centres, libraries, various local tourism outlets and local businesses that have also advertised in the Howick map. It will also be available on line at the Times Newspapers Ltd website.
That the Howick Local Board: a) Allocate $5,000 from its 2016/2017 community response fund for advertising in the “Explore Howick and Beyond Visitors Maps 2017”.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Ian Milnes - Senior Local Board Advisor Howick |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
Allocation of 2016/2017 Community Response Fund
File No.: CP2017/08162
Purpose
1. To allocate funding from the 2016/2017 Community Response Fund for a digital platform pilot project as part of the development of the Howick Heritage Plan.
Executive summary
2. The Howick Local Board has a community response fund of $167,000 within the Locally Driven Initiatives [LDI] operational funding budget for the 2016/2017 financial year. The fund can be used at the local board’s discretion.
3. At the time of writing, approximately $65,000 has been allocated from the community response fund.
4. The Heritage Plan is an online, guiding, living document and includes information on items of natural significance, data on historical buildings and local features, educational resource material and a collection of personal narratives.
5. A digital platform is required to provide educational, historical, cultural information and interactive features through mobile applications. This would include heritage walking trails, access to site specific information through coded markers and will be cross referenced to related web platforms and sites.
6. This proposal is for a pilot area covering 12-15 sites and matches the draft Howick Village Centre Plan. However the digital platform is capable of covering all aspects of the Heritage Plan content and can easily be expanded in the future.
7. This project was discussed and considered as a priority by the Howick Heritage Plan Steering Group.
8. The pilot is likely to be delivered by end of June 2017.
9. The local board gave direction at the workshop on 3 May 2017 that it supports the allocation of funding of $13,080 from the community response fund for this integrated digital platform as part of the development of the Heritage Plan. The Heritage Plan is part of the local planning and development work programme and regular updates relating to this plan will be provided via the Steering Group and to the local board.
That the Howick Local Board: a) Allocate $13,080 from its 2016/2017 community response fund for a digital platform pilot project as part of the information and education provisions within the Howick Heritage Plan. b) Transfer funding of $13,080 from the community response fund to the local planning and development activity for Integrated Planning Solutions and the 2016/2017 work programme is updated to include the digital platform pilot as part of the development of the Howick Heritage Plan.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Vanessa Leddra - Senior Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
Allocation of Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) capex funding
File No.: CP2017/08216
Purpose
1. To approve up to $20,000 Locally Driven Initiative (LDI) capex funding for the installation of interpretative panels and plaques as part of the development of initiatives in the Howick Heritage Plan .
Executive summary
2. The Howick Local Board has approx. $2.4m over 3 years for CAPEX projects in the Locally Driver Initiatives [LDI] budget for 2015/18. The board generally supports approximately half of the 3 year budget to be spent on projects and approximately half to be accumulated over the next 3 years. Therefore there is approx. $400,000 per annum to be spent.
3. The Heritage Plan is an online, guiding, living document and includes information on items of natural significance, data on historical buildings and local features, educational resource material and a collection of personal narratives. There are a number of initiatives within the plan including the provision of site specific interpretative panels and plaques.
4. Ten priority sites for the interpretative panels have been identified by the Howick Heritage Plan Steering Group. Two significant sites have been chosen initially [Stockade Hill and Howick Beach].
5. The purpose of the these interpretative panels is to inform and educate the public on the history of both Stockade Hill and Howick Beach, in terms of Maori and European settlement. The panels will follow a combined pictorial and narrative format and will have a digital link to the Heritage Plan app.
6. The panels are approx. 2m x 1 m, are double sided and cost up to $13,500 for two panels.
7. Other types of interactive panels include mid sized information boards approximately 1.0m x 0.9m with an indicative cost of $2,000 each. Another proposal is for plaques. These are A4 size metal signs used to address a specific historical narrative and cost approx. $500 each.
8. A Working Group has been set up to look at the content and sites for the content of panels and plaques. Any information relating to pre - European settlement will be vetted by Mana Whenua.
9. The local board gave direction at the workshop on 3 May 2017 that it supports the allocation of funding of $20,000 from the LDI capex fund for interpretative panels and plaques as part of the development of the Heritage Plan.
That the Howick Local Board: a) Approves up to $20,000 Locally Driven Initiatives [LDI] CAPEX funding for the installation of interpretative panels and plaques as part of the information and education provisions within the Howick Heritage Plan.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Authors |
Vanessa Leddra - Senior Local Board Advisor |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
Howick Local Board 15 May 2017 |
|
Urgent Decisions - World Masters Games
File No.: CP2017/08272
Purpose
1. To bring to the Board any urgent decisions made outside of the business meetings.
Executive summary
2. On 31 March 2017, the Howick Local Board agreed an urgent decision process where it was not practical to call the full board together and meet the requirement of a quorum. The process delegates authority to the Chair and Deputy Chair to make an urgent decision on behalf of the full board. The process requires any urgent decisions made to be reported to the full board at the next ordinary business meeting. This report is to bring before the Board these decisions made under that process.
3. Attachment A details the decision for land owner approval for the use of Lloyd Elsmore Park and Bell Park for the World Masters Games rugby and baseball events for the period 20 April to 30 April 2017.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the urgent decision made on 31 March 2017 (Attachment A). |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Signed Decision - World Masters Games |
291 |
Signatories
Authors |
Carol McGarry - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
File No.: CP2017/08267
Purpose
1. To present the Howick Local Board with its updated governance forward work calendar.
Executive Summary
2. The governance forward work calendar for the Howick Local Board is in Attachment A. The calendar is updated monthly, reported to business meetings and distributed to council staff.
3. The governance forward work calendars were introduced in 2016 as part of Auckland Council’s quality advice programme and aim to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on meeting agendas is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is expected and when
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar also aims to provide guidance for staff supporting local boards and greater transparency for the public.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the Howick Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Governance Forward Work Calendar |
297 |
Signatories
Authors |
Carol McGarry - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |
15 May 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/08268
Purpose
1. This report attaches the workshop records taken for the period stated below.
Executive Summary
2. Under Standing Order 1.4.2 and 2.15 workshops convened by the Board shall be closed to the public, however, the proceedings of a workshop shall record the names of members attending and a statement summarising the nature of the information received and nature of matters discussed. No resolutions are passed or decisions reached, but are solely for the provision of information and discussion. This report attaches the workshop records for the period stated below.
That the Howick Local Board: a) note the workshop records for workshops held on 29 and 30 March and 5, 6, 11, 20, 26, 27 April 2017. |
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
29 March 2017 Workshop Record |
301 |
b⇩ |
30 March 2017 Workshop Record |
303 |
c⇩ |
5 April 2017 Workshop Record |
305 |
d⇩ |
6 April 2017 Workshop Record |
307 |
e⇩ |
11 April 2017 Workshop Record |
309 |
f⇩ |
20 April 2017 Workshop Record |
311 |
g⇩ |
26 April 2017 Workshop Record |
313 |
h⇩ |
27 April 2017 Workshop Record |
315 |
Signatories
Authors |
Carol McGarry - Democracy Advisor |
Authorisers |
Sue O'Gorman - Relationship Manager |