I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Seniors Advisory Panel will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Monday, 17 July 2017 10.30am Reception
Lounge |
Seniors Advisory Panel
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Interim Chairperson |
Janet Clews, CNZM,QSO, JP |
|
Members |
Dr Judy Blakey |
|
|
Roger Fowler, QSM |
|
|
Joan Lardner-Rivlin, QSM |
|
|
Sonny Niha |
|
|
Mihi Te Huia |
|
|
Mere Tunks |
|
|
David Wong Hop |
|
|
|
|
Liaison Councillor |
Linda Cooper, JP |
|
Chief Liaison Councillor |
Dr Cathy Casey |
|
(Quorum 5 members)
|
|
Luka Grbavac Governance Advisor
10 July 2017
Contact Telephone: 021 80 90 37 Email: Luka.Grbavac@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
TERMS OF REFERENCE
(Excerpt – full terms of reference available as a separate document)
The terms of reference set out the purpose, role and protocols of the Panel.
Panel members abide by the Code of Conduct for members of Auckland Council advisory panels.
Purpose
As one of council’s engagement mechanisms with diverse communities, the demographic advisory panels provide advice to the governing body and council staff within the remit of the Auckland Plan on the following areas:
· Auckland Council’s regional policies, plans and strategies
· regional and strategic matters including those that Council-Controlled Organisations deal with
· any matter of particular interest or concern to diverse communities.
Outcomes
The panel’s advice will contribute to improving the outcomes of diverse communities and social cohesion as set out in the Auckland Plan. The panel will advise through their agreed strategic agenda and detailed work programme.
Strategic agenda and work programme
The panel must develop a work programme and set a strategic agenda for the term. The agendas should be focused and integrated across the panels for collaborative input into shared agendas, particularly on the Auckland Plan, the Long-term Plan and annual plans.
The panel should advise on council’s organisational strategies relevant to diverse communities.
The governing body and council staff should work with the panel for the development of their strategic agendas and work programme. An appropriate committee will approve the panel’s work programme and any subsequent major changes to it.
Submissions
The panel must not make formal submissions to Auckland Council on council strategies, policies and plans, for example, the annual plan.
In its advisory role to the council, the panel may have input to submissions made by the council to external organisations but do not make independent submissions, except as agreed with the council.
This does not prevent individual members being party to submissions outside their role as panel members.
Review
The form and functioning of the panels may be reviewed prior to or after, the end of the panel’s term in September 2019.
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
1 Apologies 5
2 Declaration of Interest 5
3 Confirmation of Minutes 5
4 Extraordinary Business 5
5 Public Input Susan Jordan 7
6 Election of Chair and Deputy Chair for the Seniors Advisory Panel for the 2016-2019 term 9
7 Regional Facilities Auckland 13
8 Auckland Transport Presentation 15
9 RIMU Overview 17
10 Councillors Update 19
11 Drafting the Work Programme of the Seniors Advisory Panel 21
12 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
There are no minutes for confirmation.
|
4 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/13466
Purpose
1. To receive information from Susan Jordan on Seniors Dance and the Seniors Dance programme.
Executive summary
2. Susan Jordan is an elder of the dance community having started her professional career as a 10 year old and now almost 70.
3. She has been a performer, academic and arts manager and is now continuing her extensive experience as a teacher, choreographer and producer focused on 65+ with SeniorsDANCE and the SeniorsDANCE Company.
4. Susan is passionate about active, creative aging and sees this as one outcome of Auckland as an age-friendly city.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: 5. note information from Susan Jordan on Seniors Dance and the Seniors Dance programme.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Luka Grbavac - Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
Election of Chair and Deputy Chair for the Seniors Advisory Panel for the 2016-2019 term
File No.: CP2017/12973
Purpose
1. To elect a chairperson and deputy chairperson for the Seniors Advisory Panel.
Executive summary
2. With the new term of the Seniors Advisory Panel, members are required to elect a chairperson and deputy chairperson for the term.
3. The panel must decide whether the election will be conducted by open or closed ballot.
4. The panel must also choose a voting system. Staff recommend that the panel adopt one of the two voting systems outlined in the Local Government Act 2002 (refer to paragraphs 12 and 13 of this report).
5. Once the panel has made these choices, the Lead Officer Support will lead the process for the election of the chairperson.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) decide whether the chairperson and deputy chairperson will be elected by open or closed ballot. b) decide whether the chairperson will be elected using voting system A or voting system B (as described in Schedule 7, Clause 25 of the Local Government Act 2002). c) elect a chairperson. d) elect a deputy chairperson.
|
Comments
6. The panel is required to elect a new chairperson and deputy chairperson. Once the chairperson has been elected the same process for the deputy chair will follow.
7. There is no provision for proxy voting. Only members present may nominate and vote for the chairperson. Candidates can vote for themselves.
Open or closed ballot
8. The panel can choose to elect the chairperson by show of hand, which is an open ballot, or by writing their preference on a ballot paper, which is a closed ballot.
Voting system
9. The panel needs to decide what voting system it wants to use.
10. Staff recommend to undertake the election in accordance with Schedule 7, Clause 25 of the Local Government Act 2002, and to choose one of the two systems that can be used to elect chairpersons and deputy chairpersons of regional councils and other committees. The two systems are described below.
11. System A –
· requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives the votes of a majority of the members of the local authority or committee present and voting, and
· has the following characteristics:
- there is a first round of voting for all candidates
- if no candidate is successful in that round there is a second round of voting from which the candidate with the fewest votes in the first round is excluded
- if no candidate is successful in the second round there is a third, and if necessary subsequent, round of voting from which, each time, the candidate with the fewest votes in the previous round is excluded
- in any round of voting, if two or more candidates tie for the lowest number of votes, the person excluded from the next round is resolved by lot.
12. System B –
· requires that a person is elected or appointed if he or she receives more votes than any other candidate, and
· has the following characteristics:
- there is only one round of voting
- if two or more candidates tie for the most votes, the tie is resolved by lot.
Voting procedure at the meeting
13. The meeting will proceed as follows:
· The interim chair will call the meeting to order and deal with apologies and the initial procedural items.
· The first item of substantive business will be the election of chairperson and the interim chair will hand over the chairing role to the lead officer for the election process, assisted by the governance advisor.
· The lead officer will call for a decision on whether the ballot will be open or closed. This will be by simple voice or show of hands vote.
· The lead officer will then call for a decision on the voting system. Once a member moves one of the systems and is seconded, it will be put to the vote. Again a decision will be by voice or show of hands.
· The lead officer will present nominees for chairperson who have expressed their interest to be the chair in a written format as per the governance advisor’s guidance in May and June. The lead officer may ask for any additional nominees at the meeting. Each candidate must be nominated and seconded by a panel member who is present.
· If there is only one nomination that person will be declared elected and will assume the chair.
· If there is more than one candidate, an election will take place using the voting system agreed earlier.
· If it is closed voting, the governance advisor will undertake the vote, scrutineered by the liaison councillor.
· Once the chairperson is elected, they will assume the chair and carry out the process for electing the deputy chairperson.
· The meeting will then continue with the next item of business.
Consideration
Local board views and implications
14. There are no local board implications.
Māori impact statement
15. There are no items in this report which impact on matters of significance for Māori.
Implementation
There are no significant implication issues.
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Austin Kim - Principal Advisor Panels |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/13046
Purpose
1. To provide panel members with an introduction to the activities and developments of Regional Facilities Auckland.
Executive summary
2. Paul Brewer, Chief Operating Officer of Regional Facilities Auckland (RFA), presents an overview of the organisation.
3. RFA owns and manages 12 major regional facilities and has responsibilities on behalf of Auckland Council for a range of other key venues. The presentation will give an overview of these facilities.
4. It is expected that this presentation will establish a relationship with the panel that will enable RFA to receive input from panel members regarding the special interests of the community group that the panel represents.
5. Feedback from the panel in regard to the ways that RFA can take account of the needs of the community that the panel serves is sought.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) note information on the activities and development of Regional Facilities Auckland b) provide feedback on the ways that Regional Facilities Auckland can take account of the senior community.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Luka Grbavac - Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
Auckland Transport Presentation
File No.: CP2017/13524
Purpose
1. To receive information on the significant issues facing Auckland Transport and current focus, and receive an update on a number of issues of interest to the panel.
Executive summary
2. Bruce Thomas, part of the Stakeholder Managers team of Auckland Transport (AT), will present to the panel on the significant issues facing AT and the current focus.
3. Mr Thomas will also present an update on a number of issues including:
· Bus network redesign.
· Hop and gold card.
· Household transport levy.
· Pedestrian safety.
4. AT is a Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) of Auckland Council. AT’s mission statement is “working together to deliver safe, innovative and sustainable transport for a great city”.
5. AT uses a set of practical, strategic themes to prioritise their focus, and help to achieve their vision. These strategic themes:
· Prioritise rapid, high-frequency public transport.
· Continually transform and elevate our customer's experience.
· Build network optimisation and resilience for travel times.
· Enable quality urban growth to meet demand.
· Fast-track creative, innovative and efficient transport services.
6. AT’s Board of Directors, Executive Leadership Team and 1800 employees implement and deliver infrastructure and services as specified in the Statement of Intent agreed by Auckland Council.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) note the information from Bruce Thomas on the significant issues facing Auckland Transport and current focus. b) note the update on a number of issues which may be of interest to the panel. |
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Luka Grbavac - Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/13639
Purpose
1. To provide panel members with an introduction to the Auckland Council Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU).
Executive summary
2. Eva McLaren, Team Manager Economic and Social Research and Evaluation, presents an overview of RIMU.
3. Auckland Council’s Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU) is a multi-disciplinary hub which produces mandatory and critical evidence to support council’s decision-makers and Aucklanders in managing a growing region.
4. This includes conducting research, monitoring, evaluation and reporting across many council responsibilities to plan for growth and meet legislative requirements under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and the Local Government Acts (LGA) in relation to social, economic, land use and environmental issues. RIMU also helps to maximise strategic alliances and collaboration with central government agencies, the tertiary sectors and community groups and improves visibility by explaining and mobilising knowledge.
5. Examples of RIMU’s focus includes monitoring and reporting on the state and trends of Auckland’s environment, which provides an essential node in New Zealand’s national monitoring programme. A core responsibility of the council is to manage and develop Auckland in a context of sustained growth, so it is important that decision-makers have a clear understanding of the implications of this growth and development in the region.
6. RIMU also provides in-house support for evaluation and quality assurance across Auckland Council. The teams are responsive to the demands of decision-makers throughout the organisation and translate primary and secondary evidence for a variety of end-users and audiences beyond Auckland Council.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) note the overview of RIMU from Eva McLaren.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Luka Grbavac - Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
File No.: CP2017/13264
Purpose
1. To receive information from the Panel’s liaison Councillor.
Executive summary
2. Councillor Linda Cooper, Seniors Advisory Panel Liaison Councillor, will speak on what she sees as the purpose of the panel and what she hopes the panel will achieve by the end of the term.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) receive the information from Councillor Linda Cooper.
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Signatories
Author |
Luka Grbavac - Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
Drafting the Work Programme of the Seniors Advisory Panel
File No.: CP2017/13464
Purpose
1. To discuss the panel’s work programme.
Executive summary
2. Terms of reference for demographic advisory panels require each panel to develop its work programme for the 2016-2019 term. The work programme will offer directions of the panels’ advisory areas for the term.
3. The work programme must be focused on council’s regional plans, policies and strategies that have most impact on the seniors community. The work programme will also include shared agendas for collaborative input, particularly on the Auckland Plan, the Long-term Plan and annual plans.
4. The panel will consider effective engagement in its work programme.
5. The panel’s work programme will be a living document, aligned with the forward work programme of the Auckland Council Environment and Community Committee (E&C). The E&C work programme is attached as Attachment A.
6. The Environment and Community Committee will approve the panel’s work programme by September 2017.
7. Austin Kim, Principal Advisor Panels, will guide the panel to discuss and draft the work programme.
That the Seniors Advisory Panel: a) note the process for developing the panel’s work programme.
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Environment and Community Committee Forward Work Programme |
23 |
Signatories
Author |
Austin Kim - Principal Advisor Panels |
Authoriser |
Allison Dobbie - Principal Development Advisor |
Seniors Advisory Panel 17 July 2017 |
|
ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY COMMITTEE FORWARD WORK PROGRAMME 2017 This committee deals with strategy and policy decision-making that relates to the environmental, social, economic and cultural activities of Auckland as well as matters that are not the responsibility of another committee or the Governing Body
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Priorities for 2017 will be on initiatives which:
1. Clearly demonstrate that Auckland is making progress with climate change adaptation and mitigation and taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 2. Enable green growth with a focus on improved water quality, pest eradication and ecological restoration 3. Strengthen communities and enable Aucklanders to be active and connected 4. Make measurable progress towards the social and community aspects of housing all Aucklanders in secure, healthy homes they can afford 5. Grow skills and a local workforce to support economic growth in Auckland
|
The work of the committee will:
· Deliver on the outcomes in the Auckland Plan · Be focused on initiatives that have a high impact · Meet the Council’s statutory obligations, including funding allocation decisions · Increase the public’s trust and confidence in the organisation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Priority # |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Environment and Community Committee role (decision or direction) |
Expected timeframes Quarter (month if known) |
||||||||||||||||||
FY17 |
FY18 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Jan-Mar 14 Feb 14 March
|
Apr-Jun 4 April 16 May 13 June |
Jul-Sep 18 July 8 Aug 12 Sept |
Oct-Dec 17 Oct 14 Nov 5 Dec |
|||||||||||||||||||
Environment |
||||||||||||||||||||||
1, 2 and 5 |
|
Coastal Erosion Management Strategy
|
To agree to the actions and tools to improve coastal asset management and prioritised decision-making in respect of climate change, sea-level rise and Auckland’s projected growth
|
Decision on the final strategy, approve next steps and the associated work programme(s). |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Low carbon living
|
To deliver on Low Carbon Auckland Plan commitments by the design and implementation of awareness raising and incentives programmes to reduce household, community, business and schools carbon emissions by approximately 50% of current levels. |
Strategic direction and endorse programmes as part of the Low Carbon Auckland Plan implementation. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Low Carbon Auckland / Climate Change Mitigation
|
Four-yearly review of strategic action plan due in 2018; increased engagement with and commitments via C40 Cities membership; development of proactive policy agenda to central government emerging |
Decision and endorsement of strategic direction |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 and 2 |
|
Urban Forest Strategy
|
Strategic approach to delivering on the wider social, economic and environmental benefits of a growing urban forest in the context of rapid population growth and intensification. |
Decision on strategic direction and endorsement of strategy. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (Jul) |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy / Framework |
Compilation of existing climate adaptation work and gap analysis; requirement under C40 Cities membership |
Decision and endorsement of strategic framework |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Waste Management and Minimisation Plan Review
|
To review the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan.
|
Direction on the key issues that arise through the review of the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan and the waste assessment. Endorse a draft plan for consultation, using the special consultative procedure. Progress to date: Decision: A Waste Political Advisory Group was established Resolution ENV/2016/6 Item 11 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Waste assessment endorsement |
The Waste Minimisation Act 2008 requires the committee to endorse the findings of the waste assessment |
Endorse the findings of the waste assessment |
Q3 |
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund
|
Decision making over medium and large funds from the Waste Minimisation and Innovation fund in line with the fund’s adopted policy. Funds to contribute towards council’s aspirational goal of zero waste to landfill by 2040 |
Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2017-2018 financial year.
Progress to date: Decision: Approval of allocation of September 2016 funding round Resolution ENV/2016/19 Item C5 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
||||||||||||||
1 |
|
Air Quality |
Approve action plan to help achieve compliance with the National Environment Strategy on Air Quality |
Decision on air quality action. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (Jul) |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
Pest Free Auckland |
To eliminate weed and animal pests from Auckland |
Strategic direction and oversight, and to endorse the programme.
Progress to date: An update was provided at 14 March 2017 meeting: Bio News Item 16 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
Regional Pest Management Plan review |
Statutory obligations under the Biosecurity Act to control weeds and animal pests. To ensure that the plan is consistent with the national policy direction and up to date.
|
Decision and Strategic direction on weed and plants that will be subject to statutory controls. To approve the draft Regional Pest Management Plan for consultation by December 2017. Progress to date: Decision: Agreed to the inconsistencies in ACT at the 14 Feb 2017 ENV/2017/7 Item 12 Workshops held on 4 April & 3 May 2017 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
Marine Biosecurity |
Statutory obligations under the Biosecurity Act to develop and implement non-regulatory and regulatory programmes to manage marine pests. |
Strategic direction and endorse new programmes – for input into Long-term Plan preparation. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 and 2 |
|
Kauri Dieback |
To protect Auckland’s Kauri forests
|
Decision on options for management of Kauri dieback – for input into the Long-term Plan preparation Progress to date: Update was provided at the 14 Feb 2017 meeting Item 23 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
Safeswim |
To consider best future options for the delivery of Safeswim |
Decision on future forecasting options
Progress to date: Endorsed the recommended improvements by 1 Nov to the programme on 14 Feb meeting Item 16. Requested a report on costs and benefits of “white box” model A further update was provided on 14 March 2017 on food safety for seafood gatherers Item 14 |
Q3 (Feb) |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 and 2 |
|
Auckland Growing Greener |
Statutory obligations under the Resource Management Act, Biosecurity Act and Local Government Act. Consideration of items to give effect to the adopted commitment of Auckland Council to grow greener. |
Strategic direction and oversight into council’s role to improve the natural environment, and to endorse proposed incentives. This may include endorsing: · a framework to ensure planning and growth decisions are underpinned by relevant environmental data · proposed incentives for green growth · recommendations arising from a current state statutory obligations review. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
1 and 2 |
|
Seachange – Tai Timu Tai Pari |
The marine spatial plan for the Hauraki Gulf – Seachange Tai Timu Tai Pari – was completed by the independent stakeholder working group in November 2016. Staff will report on implications of the plan and options for Auckland Council implementation to the Planning Committee. The Environment and Community Committee will likely provide direction and oversee aspects of implementation. |
Strategic direction on the spatial plan and implementation actions. |
Q3 |
Q4 (Apr or May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
2 |
|
Hauraki Gulf Forum |
Possible consideration of recommendations from the Hauraki Gulf Forum arising from the completion of Seachange Tai Timu Tai Pari |
Decisions on governance and/or resourcing arrangements |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
Parks, Sport and Recreation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan |
Annual report on implementation plan |
Direction on future options for sport and recreation |
Q3 |
Q4 (June) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Sports Investment Plan |
Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in sports |
Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan Progress to date: Evaluation of current sports facilities investments and proposed changes was adopted on 14 March Resolution at Item 13 with the final draft investment plan to be adopted prior to consultation. |
Q3 (Feb & Mar) |
Q4 (May)
|
Q1 |
Q2 (Sept – Oct) |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Golf Investment Plan |
Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in golf. |
Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan |
Q3 (March)
|
Q4 (May)
|
Q1 |
Q2 (Sept –Oct) |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Active Recreation Investment and Visitor Experience |
Council’s strategic approach to outcome, priorities and investment for active walking, cycling, waterways and visitor experience on open space, parks and regional parks |
Decision on scope and phasing |
Q3 |
Q4 (Apr) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Open Space management: issues paper |
Understanding open space management, issues and options |
Decision on potential solutions and next steps
|
Q3 |
Q4 (Apr) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Regional Sports Grants |
Improving monitoring and evaluation of sports grants |
Decision on monitoring and evaluation framework |
Q3 |
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Indoor Courts |
Strategic business case for indoor courts investment |
Decision on investment approach |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Community Access Scheme |
Review of Council investment in third party facilities to increase community access |
Decisions on funding allocation of Community Access grants |
Q3 |
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Community School Partnerships |
Improve Community Access to school facilities |
Decision and direction on investment and development of partnerships with schools |
Q3 |
Q4 (April) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Regional Sport and Recreation Grant Programme |
Contestable grant programmes |
Decision – funding decisions on allocation of Regional Sport and Recreation grants |
Q3 |
Q4 (April) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||||||
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT |
||||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
|
The Southern Initiative (TSI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
Tripartite Economic Alliance |
Provide direction on preparation for Guangzhou 2017 Tripartite summit and seek approval for the renewal of the Tripartite Economic Alliance 2017 Tripartite Summit funded out of Global Partnerships and Strategy budget, CCO’s budget and through sponsorship. |
Direction and approval of the extension of the Tripartite Economic Alliance beyond its initial three year period. Progress to date: Update provided at 14 March 2017 meeting – summit in Sept 2017 item 16 |
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
Global Engagement Strategy |
Provide an update and direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities. It has been three years since a new strategic direction was introduced, progress on this strategy will presented. Funded |
Strategic direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities |
Q3
|
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
Visitor Plan Review |
Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for any new strategies relating to international visitors. |
Strategic direction relating to tourism strategies. ATEED has responsibility for the provision of initiatives in the tourism sector in Auckland |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
International Education Framework |
Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for growing the international education sector |
Strategic direction relating to international education. ATEED has responsibility for growing the international education market in Auckland. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
Local Economic Development Framework |
Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for delivering local economic development |
Strategic direction relating to Local Economic Development. ATEED has responsibility for leading Local Economic development. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
5 |
|
Auckland Trade Programme |
Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for growing Auckland’s trade and exports |
Strategic direction relating to trade and exports. ATEED has responsibility for supporting the increase of Auckland’s trade competitiveness. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
SOCIAL, COMMUNITY, CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Libraries |
Work around the integration with customer services |
Decision on matters relating to regional aspects of the proposed integration (local boards will decide on local outcomes) |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (tbc) |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Community Facilities Network Plan |
Update on progress and report back on strategic business case for central west. |
Decision on indicative business case for central west |
Q3 (Mar) |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
4 |
|
Social and Community Housing Strategy and initiatives |
Strategic overview of social and community housing initiatives. Wider housing portfolio and spatial outcomes of council’s role in housing is led by the Planning Committee. |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
4 |
|
Homelessness |
Implementing Regional Policy and Strategy resolution to progress work around Council’s strategic position on addressing homelessness (note this work will be informed by discussions at the Community Development and Safety Committee) |
Decision on scope Decision on role and direction addressing homelessness Progress to date: Approved the scope policy 14 Feb Item 17 |
Q3 (Feb) |
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
4 |
|
Implementation of Housing Taskforce |
The Housing Taskforce is led by His Worship the Mayor. The taskforce is likely to recommend actions to council and some of these actions may fall under the Environment and Community Committee remit. |
Strategic direction on interventions to pursue |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
4 |
|
Affordable Housing Intervention |
Understanding NZ and international interventions to address affordable housing |
Decision on future Auckland Council approaches to affordable housing interventions |
Q3
|
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Te Kauroa – Library Strategy |
Libraries and Information is carrying out a change programme (Fit for the future) to accelerate the implementation of this 2013-2023 strategy (approved by the Governing Body) |
Direction relating to priorities and to receive update on strategic direction and implementation progress Approve an expanded and improved regional mobile library service |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Central library strategic review |
A strategic review of the Central Library has been commissioned to understand how the current building can meet future need and demand for services, asses the Central Library’s current and potential future role in the region, and guide decision making about future investment and development opportunities |
Decide direction and receive the strategic review |
Q3 |
Q4
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Facilities Partnerships |
Identify the range of current council approaches to facility partnerships, issues, opportunities and agree next steps |
Decision on facility partnership approach Decision to adopt Facility Partnership Framework in December 2017 Progress to date: Update was given at 14 February meeting on Phase 1. Approval was given on the proposed timelines for Phase 2 : Minutes 14 February Item 14 |
Q3 (Feb) |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Intercultural Cities Network |
Consideration of a proposal to join the Intercultural Cities Network to support implementation and monitoring of progress on ‘Inclusive Auckland’ actions. |
Decide whether Auckland should be a member of the network |
Q3 |
Q4 (Jun) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Friendly City |
Identify issues and opportunities for an inclusive friendly city (Regional Policy and Strategy resolution REG/2016/92) |
Strategic direction on the approach to a friendly, inclusive, diverse city. |
Q3 |
Q4 (Apr-May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Smoke-free Policy |
Improve policy and implementation |
Decision on updated Smokefree policy |
Q3 |
Q4 (May-Jun) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 and 5 |
|
Social Enterprise approaches for youth and long term unemployed |
Improved understanding of social enterprise reach, impacts, costs and benefits |
Strategic direction on councils approach to social enterprise. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (Jul) |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 and 5 |
|
Youth volunteer programmes |
Intervention assessment of youth volunteer programmes on long term education and employment – understanding impacts, costs and benefits |
Strategic direction on interventions approach |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (Jul) |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Events Policy |
A review of what is working well and what isn’t |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 (Sep) |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Grant Policy Monitoring |
Audit of the application of the Grants Policy |
Decision on audit results |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Thriving Communities Action Plan |
A review of the Action Plan to understand what we are doing well and where there are areas for improvement |
Decision on current state results |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Nov) |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Toi Whitiki Strategy |
Targeted analysis of social return on investment on specific art and culture investment |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
|
|||||||||||||
3 |
|
Public Art |
Review of the Public Arts Policy: what’s working what’s not. Decisions relating to major public arts |
Decision on review results |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
|
|||||||||||||
LEGISLATION/CENTRAL GOVERNMENT |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2 |
|
National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management |
To update the committee on the Progressive Implementation Plan The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management is being implemented, with periodic reporting to council committee on progress, and responding to ongoing central government refinement of the framework for achieving water outcomes. |
Direction on the Plan and to receive updates |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
2 |
|
National Environmental Standards |
Council response on the National Direction for aquaculture expected following scheduled release of consultation document in April 2017. The National Direction is likely to address matters relating to re-consenting, bay-wide management, innovation and research, and biosecurity. |
Direction Committee agreement to a council submission on the National Direction for Aquaculture |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
LAND ACQUISITIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||
3 |
|
Strategic acquisition issues and opportunities
|
Understanding current acquisition issues and options. |
|
Q3 |
Q4 (May) |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
2 |
|
Land acquisition for stormwater purposes |
Delegated responsibility of the committee. To acquire land for stormwater management and development purposes, to either support a structure plan or ad-hoc development. |
Decision to acquire land. Reports will come to committee as required. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
OTHER |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Long-term Plan |
Informing the development of the 2018-2028 Auckland Council Long-term Plan |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||||||||||||
COMPLETED |
||||||||
3 |
|
I am Auckland - Youth Strategy |
Implementation of strategy. Identify areas of success and improvement opportunity |
Decision: Approval for the development and an implementation plan was considered on 14 Feb 2017 Resolution ENV/2017/10 Item 15 |
Q3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
UNESCO Auckland City of Music |
Decide whether to commit to being a UNESCO City of Music (from Regional and Strategy and Policy resolution REG/2016/70) |
Decision: Endorsement was given at 14 March Resolution ENV/2017/35 Item 10 |
Q3 (March) |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
2 |
|
Weed Management Policy Implementation |
To ensure implementation of the Weed Management policy occurs, and that how it will be implemented is reported to elected members |
Decision: Appointment by the Mayor to a Political Advisory Group - Committee agenda 14 Feb 2017 Item 23 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
2 |
|
Allocation of the Regional Natural Heritage Grant |
Decision-making over regional environment fund as per the grants funding policy and fund guidelines |
Decision: Allocation of the Regional Environmental Natural Heritage Grant for the 2017-2018 financial year was made on 6 Dec 2016_ENV/2016/11 Item 15 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 (Dec) |
3 |
|
One Voice Auckland Sport and Recreation |
One Voice – sector wide advisory group for sport and recreation |
Decision – Appointment of 3 Elected Members to One Voice: Crs Cooper, Filipaina & W Walker – Committee Resolution ENV/2017/53 Item 13 |
Q3 (March) |
|
|
|