Whau Local Board
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Whau Local Board held in the Whau Local Board Office, 31 Totara Avenue, New Lynn on Wednesday, 23 August 2017 at 6.00pm.
Chairperson |
Tracy Mulholland |
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Susan Zhu |
|
|
|
Members |
Derek Battersby, QSM, JP |
|
|
|
|
Catherine Farmer |
|
|
|
|
Duncan Macdonald, JP |
|
|
|
|
Te'eva Matafai |
|
|
|
|
David Whitley |
|
|
|
ALSO PRESENT
|
Clr Ross Clow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whau Local Board 23 August 2017 |
|
1 Welcome
Chairperson Mulholland opened the meeting and welcomed everyone present.
2 Apologies
3 Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
Specifically members are asked to identify any new interests they have not previously disclosed, an interest that might be considered as a conflict of interest with a matter on the agenda.
The following are declared interests of the Whau Local Board.
Board Member |
Organisation / Position |
Tracy Mulholland |
· New Lynn Business Association – Business Associate/Contractor |
Susan Zhu |
· Chinese Oral History Foundation – Committee member · The Chinese Garden Steering Committee of Auckland – Board Member |
Derek Battersby |
· Whau Coastal Walkway Environmental Trust –Trustee · New Lynn Tennis Club – Patron · West Lynn Gardens – Patron · Tag Out Trust – Chairman · New Lynn Bowling Club - Patron · Avondale RSA - Member |
Catherine Farmer |
· Avondale-Waterview Historical Society – Member · Blockhouse Bay Historical Society – Member · Portage Licensing Trust – Trustee · Blockhouse Bay Bowls – Patron · Forest and Bird organisation - Member |
Duncan Macdonald |
· Avondale Business Association – Chairman · Avondale Community Society – Chairman · Avondale RSA – Committee Member · Avondale-Waterview Historical Society - Member · Avondale Jockey Club – Member |
Te’eva Matafai |
· Pacific Events and Entertainment Trust - Co-Founder · Miss Samoa NZ - Director · Miss World Samoa - Director · Malu Measina Samoan Dance Group - Director/Founder · Pasifika Festival ATEED - Samoa Village Coordinator · Aspire Events - Director |
David Whitley |
· Rosebank Business Association - Member · Pathways to the future - Past trustee · REINZ - Member · Don Oliver Youth Sports Foundation - Past trustee · Chamber of Trade - Mentor · Lopdell House - Trustee · West Auckland Enterprise, Skills & Training (WEST) - Manager |
There was no change to the register.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
Resolution number WH/2017/87 MOVED by Member D Battersby, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 26 July 2017, as a true and correct record. b) confirm the ordinary minutes of the Draft Local Board Plan Hearings – Whau Local Board meeting, held on Wednesday, 2 August 2017, as a true and correct record. |
5 Leave of Absence
There were no leaves of absence.
6 Acknowledgements
There were no acknowledgements.
7 Ward Councillor’s Update
Apology from Cr Clow for lateness was noted.
8 Deputations
8.1 |
|
|
Silvia Spieksma made a presentation on improving footpath safety and making walking safe and enjoyable for all. This presentation relates to her submission to local board plan, hearings for which were scheduled for 2 August (Submission number 4485). A copy of the presentation was attached to the agenda and can be viewed at the Auckland Council website. |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/88 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu, seconded by Member D Whitley: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the deputation from Silvia Spieksma and thank her for the presentation. |
9 Public Forum
|
Silvia Spieksma – Avondale Community Action · Presented on current placemaking project in Avondale (temporary recreation and community hub, based around two forty foot shipping containers at 3 Guys site). The project is initiated by Auckland Police and supported by various local organisaions. |
|
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/89 MOVED by Member T Matafai, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the public forum submission from Silvia Spieksma and thank her for the presentation. |
10 Extraordinary Business
There was no extraordinary business.
11 Notices of Motion
There were no notices of motion.
12 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/90 MOVED by Member D Macdonald, seconded by Member D Battersby: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the Auckland Transport Report, Whau Local Board, August 2017 b) request a full update on Waitahurangi bridge project to come to September board meeting. |
13 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolution number WH/2017/91 MOVED by Member T Matafai, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) approve the allocation of $103,750 from the Whau Event Partnership Fund for 2017/2018 for the following event organisers to deliver the following events:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolution number WH/2017/92 MOVED by Member D Whitley, seconded by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu: That the Whau Local Board: b) notes it will review the Event Partnership Fund as part of its long term plan development including free access to events.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Secretarial Note: Member Duncan Macdonald declared conflict of interest with Avondale Carols by Spiderlight event organised by Avondale Business Association and left the room when this item was discussed. |
14 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/93 MOVED by Member D Macdonald, seconded by Member D Whitley: That the Whau Local Board: a) note the finalisation of Te Whau Pathway Scheme Assessment Report dated 30 June 2017. b) approve proceeding to detailed design and resource consent for Te Whau Pathway.
|
15 |
Feedback on the proposed direction of the Auckland Regional Pest Management Plan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolution number WH/2017/94 MOVED by Member C Farmer, seconded by Member T Matafai: That the Whau Local Board: a) support the proposed approaches outlined in attachment B of the Feedback on the proposed direction of the Auckland Regional Pest Management Plan report. The board would like to make qualifying comments as follows:
|
16 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/95 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu, seconded by Member D Whitley: That the Whau Local Board: a) Approves draft positions and recommendations of the Political Working Party: Regional policy and decision-making i. Agree that council should implement new mechanisms that ensure effective local board input to regional policy decisions, via a framework that sets out, at a minimum: · A process for involving local boards in the development of regional work programmes at the beginning of each term and in an annual refresh; · Earlier and more joint engagement between local boards and the governing body in regional decision-making processes · Requirements for analysis of local impacts and local interest of regional decisions and options, and reporting of this to local boards and the governing body · Specified criteria for categorising the potential local impact and local board interest of regional decisions · Processes and methods for tailoring local board engagement in line with the local impact and local interest of regional decisions e.g. high categorisation requiring more specific local engagement and analysis, low categorisation requiring more cluster joint local board workshop sessions and less in depth analysis. · Specified methods for engagement and communication with local boards at all stages of the decision-making process. ii. Direct that local boards will be consulted on the details of these mechanisms prior to implementation. iii. Note that the Quality Advice programme is continuing to be implemented in order to improve the quality of advice to elected members for decision-making, in line with the recommendations of the Governance Framework Review. iv. Agree not to implement any formal policies or procedures that control when and how local boards may procure external or contestable advice, but note that, in principle, the Auckland Council organisation should be the first provider of advice to local boards. v. Agree not to implement any policy or procedure that would limit local boards’ ability to advocate to the governing body on regional issues. Local decisions that may have regional impacts (development of a ‘call-in’ right) vi. Note that an explicit call-in right is not possible under the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act vii. Agree not to implement any mechanism that would have the effect of ‘calling in’ or allocating decision-making to the governing body for otherwise local activities or decisions that have regional implications. viii. Direct officers that, whenever a local board is to make a decision that has potential impacts beyond the immediate local board area e.g. a sub-regional impact or an impact on regional networks, advice on those potential impacts is to be provided to the local board as a matter of course (for example through a regional impact statement). Allocations and delegations ix. Agree that the governing body delegates, subject to the necessary statutory tests being met, the following Reserves Act 1977 decision-making functions for local reserves to local boards: · declaration · classification · reclassification · application for revocation of reserve status (limited to when there is a desire by a local board to manage open space under the LGA) x. Note that officers’ advice on decision-making for exchanges of reserve land was that it should remain with the governing body, with the relevant local board consulted on these decisions xi. Note that the working party did not reach consensus on this issue, and will consider the feedback of local boards before making a recommendation xii. Agree that the Minister of Conservation’s supervisory powers remain delegated to staff, but where there is likely to be significant public interest, an independent commissioner should be engaged. The role of Auckland Transport and local boards xiii. Note the critical interface between the local place-shaping role of local boards and Auckland Transport’s jurisdiction over the road corridor and transport networks. xiv. Note that the Governance Manual for Substantive CCOs requires Auckland Transport, amongst other things, to: · develop, with local boards, a shared understanding of local board views and CCO priorities to inform the following year’s business planning, including through an annual interactive workshop ‘where local boards communicate their local board priorities and the CCOs communicate how their current year work programme will contribute to local board priorities’. · develop by 31 July each year an annual local board engagement plan, which includes a schedule ‘clearly indicat[ing] for each board, the projects and/or activities that it expects to report on, and the projects and activities that it expects to consult on, for the following year. This should be updated annually or more frequently if required.’ · report against their local board engagement plan in their quarterly performance reports to the CCO Governance and Monitoring Committee. xv. Direct Auckland Transport to meet all requirements for local board engagement as set out in the Governance Manual for Substantive CCOs. xvi. Direct Auckland Council officers to monitor Auckland Transport’s compliance with the requirements for local board engagement, as set out in the Governance Manual for Substantive CCOs, and to report this monitoring to the governing body at least annually. xvii. Note that the Mayor’s 2017 letter of expectation to Auckland Transport stipulated that council expects there to be: · better and earlier engagement and communication between Auckland Transport and local boards; · active consideration by Auckland Transport of which of its decision-making powers it could delegate to local boards (within the constraints created by the regulatory environment, safety considerations, the needs of regional networks and the role played by NZTA in decision-making). xviii. Note that the following activity statement has been included in Auckland Transport’s 2017-2020 Statement of Intent: ‘Participation in the governance review which is aimed at changing behaviours and processes across relevant Council family activities, including Auckland Transport, to enable local boards to give effect to their governance role, particularly around local place-shaping.’ xix. Note that the Governance Framework Review has investigated the potential delegation of a range of Auckland Transport powers and the working party recommends that additional work be undertaken to identify delegation opportunities xx. Direct Auckland Transport, in working with local boards, to: · Ensure that local boards have a strong governance role in determining the ‘look and feel’ of town centres and streetscapes, in line with their allocation of non-regulatory decision-making · Improve co-ordination between local place-shaping projects, such as town centre upgrades, and its renewals programmes · Provide more opportunities for local board direction on the prioritisation of minor traffic safety projects, with the exception of those which Auckland Transport considers are of critical safety importance · Be more responsive to local place-shaping initiatives in non-transport parts of the road corridor, including reducing or removing barriers to community place-making initiatives e.g. looking at ways to reduce the costs of developing traffic management plans for community events · Take direction from local boards on how and where to implement community-focused programmes xxi. Direct Auckland Transport to report to the governing body annually on how it is meeting the directions given under recommendation xx. xxii. Note that the Quality Advice programme has been working with Auckland Transport to improve the quality of advice to local boards and will shortly begin regular six monthly surveys of local board members’ satisfaction with Auckland Transport advice, engagement and reporting to local boards. xxiii. Note that the Local Board Transport Capital Fund is valued by local boards but that the level of funding means that some boards are not able to progress meaningful projects, and that improved local transport outcomes may be achieved if the size of the fund was significantly increased. xxiv. Direct officers to report to the relevant governing body committee, through the Long Term Plan process, on options for significantly increasing the Local Board Transport Capital Fund and the method of allocation of the fund. xxv. Direct Auckland Transport to implement a more systematic work programme approach to assist local boards to identify potential projects and make decisions. xxvi. Direct Auckland Transport to actively engage with governing body members (ward councillors) on transport projects and issues within their ward areas, with their comments feedback and advocacy on local activities being directed back to the relevant local board. Waiheke Local Board pilot xxvii. Agree that the governing body should endorse the Waiheke Local Board pilot project as set out in the Waiheke Local Board pilot project plan. xxviii. Note that the Waiheke Local Board will maintain oversight of local implementation of the pilot. Local boards funding and finance xxix. Agree that the enhanced status quo model be moved to immediately, noting that further work can be progressed within this framework rather than waiting for further work before implementing the enhanced status quo. · Re-name the enhanced status quo to be called, “local decision-making within a funding envelope.” · Provide additional decision-making to local boards by enabling them to increase or decrease funding allocations within and across asset based services activities provided that the impact is cost neutral, i.e. within the funding envelope. xxx. Agree that the additional work to support the Enhanced status quo model be undertaken – framework for service levels and local flexibility, options for addressing historical uneven funding, improving the information and advice that is provided to local boards. xxxi. Agree that further work on the implications of the local decision making model also be undertaken for further consideration - modelling of rates implication following the revaluation, costs to the organisation of supporting more local decision making etc. The optimum number of local boards xxxii. Agree that council should undertake no further work on changing the number of local boards until at least after the governance framework review has been completed and implemented, and the outcomes of reorganisation proposals that are underway for North Rodney and Waiheke Island are known. Methods of electing governing body members xxxiii. Agree that a change to the current system of electing governing body members from existing wards is not warranted purely to address alignment between governing body members and local boards xxxiv. Note that the statutory review of representation arrangements for Auckland Council must be completed by September 2018. xxxv. Note that the Local Government Act Amendment Bill No. 2, which proposes a simplified process for local government-led reorganisation processes, is currently before Parliament. xxxvi. Agree that council should continue to advocate to central government for legislative amendments that would allow changes to the number of governing body members in line with population changes, and simplification of the process for changes to numbers and boundaries of local boards. b) support officers’ advice on decision-making for exchanges of reserve land was that it should remain with the governing body, with the relevant local board consulted on these decisions. c) request that local board members be referred to as local board councillors. This change in terminology is anticipated to assist members of the community identifying that local board elected members are part of council. d) propose that consideration with regard to continuation of a joint local board/governing body political working party focusing on matters of governance impacting on both governance arms be made at the conclusion of the process noting discussion and points to be considered are still progressing. e) request the Governance Framework Review to investigate mechanisms that support the operations and governance roles of the Manukau Harbour Forum. |
17 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/96 MOVED by Member D Battersby, seconded by Member D Macdonald: That the Whau Local Board: a) note the monitoring and reporting requirements set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 and the draft local board information proposed for the Auckland Council Annual Report 2016/2017. b) receive the draft local board report to be included in the Auckland Council Annual Report 2016/2017. c) approve the message from the chairperson, which provides the local board’s comments on local board matters in the Annual Report 2016/2017. d) give authority to the chairperson Tracy Mulholland and deputy chairperson Susan Zhu to make typographical changes before submitting for final publication. |
18 |
Locally Driven Initiative Discretionary Capital Programme for financial year 2017/2018 for Whau Local Board |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/97 MOVED by Member T Matafai, seconded by Member D Whitley: That the Whau Local Board: a) approve up to $20,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to commission design options to improve the New Lynn Transit Laneway. b) approve up to $60,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to utilise as a minor asset quick response fund in consultation with the Local Board. c) approve up to $20,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to improve the Memorial Square to better activate and improve safety.
e) approve up to $45,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to install a mesh screen to the recreation hall in the New Lynn Community Centre. f) approve up to $50,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to begin the delivery of drinking fountains in the local open space and urban centres. g) approve up to $35,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to light the large tree and supply power on Barron Green by the Green Bay Community House. h) approve up to $15,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to refurbish the entranceway of the Blockhouse Bay Community Centre. |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/98 MOVED by Member D Macdonald, seconded by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu: That the Whau Local Board: a) in accordance to Standing Order 3.10.16, agree to revoke resolution d) unanimously as new information was received concerning the matter.
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/99 MOVED by Member D Macdonald, seconded by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu: That the Whau Local Board: d) approve up to $300,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to deliver the Te Whau pathway in Queen Mary and Rizal Reserves.
|
|
For clarity full resolutions for this item are: That the Whau Local Board: a) approve up to $20,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to commission design options to improve the New Lynn Transit Laneway. b) approve up to $60,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to utilise as a minor asset quick response fund in consultation with the Local Board. c) approve up to $20,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to improve the Memorial Square to better activate and improve safety. d) approve up to $300,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to deliver the Te Whau pathway in Queen Mary and Rizal Reserves. e) approve up to $45,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to install a mesh screen to the recreation hall in the New Lynn Community Centre. f) approve up to $50,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to begin the delivery of drinking fountains in the local open space and urban centres. g) approve up to $35,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to light the large tree and supply power on Barron Green by the Green Bay Community House. h) approve up to $15,000 of the 2017/2018 LDI Capex budget for the Community Facilities team to refurbish the entranceway of the Blockhouse Bay Community Centre. |
19 |
Auckland Council’s Quarterly Performance Report: Whau Local
Board |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/100 MOVED by Member D Battersby, seconded by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the performance report for the financial quarter ending 30 June 2017. |
20 |
Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Six-Monthly Update 1 January to 30 June 2017 |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/101 MOVED by Member D Macdonald, seconded by Member D Battersby: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the Panuku Development Auckland Local Board Update 1 January to 30 June 2017. b) acknowledge Panuku Development Auckland staff for their collaborative and supportive work with the Whau Local Board.
|
21 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/102 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu, seconded by Member D Macdonald: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the six-monthly report period 1 January to 30 June 2017. b) look forward to working with ATEED on the refresh of the Whau Economic Development Plan to deliver more quality local jobs and stronger businesses.
|
22 |
Whau Local Board Input - Review of Citizens Advice Bureaux services |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/103 MOVED by Member T Matafai, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) endorse the input to review of Citizens Advice Bureaux services (Attachment A). |
23 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2017/104 MOVED by Member D Battersby, seconded by Member D Whitley: That the Whau Local Board: a) note the Whau Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar – August 2017.
|
24 |
Confirmation of Workshop Records: 12 July 2017 to 9 August 2017 |
|
Resolution number WH/2017/105 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson S Zhu, seconded by Member D Macdonald: That the Whau Local Board: a) confirm the records of the workshops in Attachments A - C held on the following dates: · 12 July 2017 · 19 July 2017 · 9 August 2017 |
25 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
There was no consideration of extraordinary items.
Resolution number WH/2017/106 MOVED by Member D Battersby, seconded by Member D Macdonald: That the Whau Local Board: a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting. b) agree that Clr Ross Clow be permitted to remain for Confidential Item C1: Indicative Business Case - Whau Community Facilities after the public has been excluded, because of his knowledge of the board area, which will help the Whau Local Board in its decision-making. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows. This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:
C1 Indicative Business Case - Whau Community Facilities
The text of these resolutions is made available to the public who are present at the meeting and form part of the minutes of the meeting. |
7.27pm The public was excluded.
Resolutions in relation to the confidential items are recorded in the confidential section of these minutes and are not publicly available.
7.54pm The public was re-admitted.
restatementS
It was resolved while the public was excluded:
C1 |
|
|
a) support investment in an aquatic and recreation centre in Whau in the first half of the 2018 to 2028 ten year budget. b) note that the final scope for the aquatic and recreation centre will be subject to the development and approval of a Detailed Business Case based on Option Four: ‘New aquatic and leisure centre’ including the location of either New Lynn or Avondale subject to availability and cost of land. c) note that the NZ Treasury Better Business Case cost benefit analysis for the aquatic and recreation centre identifies that the benefits are least 1.5x costs and that calculation did not include additional benefits of urban renewal, relieving facility network pressures, social and operational efficiencies. e) support expanded investment in a new multipurpose community facility in the Avondale town centre in the first two years of the 2018 to 2028 ten year budget. f) note that the final scope for Avondale multipurpose library and community centre will be subject to the development and approval of a Detailed Business Case based on Option Two: ‘New Multipurpose community facility’. g) note that the NZ Treasury Better Business Case analysis for the Avondale multipurpose library and community centre identifies that the benefits include delivery of council’s strategic objectives regarding: a. no drop in service and provision levels, b. meeting community needs now and in the future, c. meeting council’s commitment to increasing participation, d. ensuring all Aucklanders have opportunities for civic engagement and social connectedness, e. delivery of Unlock Avondale benefits including · providing a catalytic project and focal point for town centre redevelopment · creating a concentrated area of quality community space to help drive quality development in the broader area particularly housing f. integration and efficiency benefits. i) support the existing operational funding for the community centre and library to be allocate to the new Avondale multipurpose community facility k) request that Auckland Council include in its financial consideration land previously divested in Avondale particularly at Racecourse Parade and Trent Street and land currently being planned for development through Panuku Development’s high level project plan in the Avondale town centre area particularly along Great North Road. l) agree that the report not be restated in open minutes until the reason for confidentiality no longer exists. m) agree that the resolutions a), b), c), e), f), g), i), k) and l) be restated in open minutes. |
7.54pm The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Whau Local Board HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:........................................................