|
Resolution number PPK/2017/214
MOVED
by Deputy Chairperson F Auva'a, seconded by Member MV Turner:
That the Papakura
Local Board:
a) provide
the following feedback on the six outcome areas and the Development Strategy
as follows:
i)
Belonging and Participation Outcome
§ Strategic directions:
·
BP_SD1 – supported. Uphold the value
of free open space for local communities.
·
BP_SD2 – supported.
§ Focus areas:
·
BP_FA1 – supported.
·
BP_FA2 - another bullet point required, to
provide facilities and open space that encourage people to be active.
·
BP_FA3 – supported.
·
BP_FA4 – supported.
·
BP_FA5 – supported.
·
BP_FA6 – supported. It is
imperative to retain the Southern Initiative in the Auckland Plan.
·
Measures
·
80% of people should feel connected to the
community.
·
80% of people who are part of social
networks and groups.
·
Members disagreed with the measure of 30
minutes moderate activity in the last 7 days. The goal should be to have an average
of 30 minutes of moderate activity a day. What does this measure relate to,
is it an individual goal or facility usage?
·
The board suggests rewording the:
-
“At least 30 minutes of moderate
activity in the last 7 days” measure, eg: percentage of population
engaged in 30 minutes of moderate activity in the last 7 days.
This measure is surveying people to
determine how physically active they are. Another bullet point is
needed to strengthen the BF_FA2 column, ie: to provide facilities and open
space that encourage people to be active.
·
“Perception of safety when walking
along in your neighbourhood after dark.” The board feels the
perception of safety is broader than “walking alone in your
neighbourhood” and it is not just after dark. The measure is too
specific. The measure should be based on the perception of safety
survey undertaken by council of which the perception of safety when walking
in your neighbourhood after dark is one of the many questions asked to gauge
how people perceive safety in their area.
·
Development Strategy
·
The development strategy should also have
an additional bullet point with the theme of providing facilities and open
space that encourage people to be active.
ii)
Maori Identity and Wellbeing Outcome
Members strongly felt that more work was required on the
protection of historical sites and mana whenua sites that exist in Papakura.
Pahurehure Inlet Protection Society for instance has put in all the
Māori historical sites when the group submitted their plan.
§ Strategic directions:
·
MIW_SD1 – supported.
·
MIW_SD2 – supported.
·
MIW_SD3 – supported
·
MIW_SD4 – supported.
§ Focus areas:
·
MIW_FA1 – supported.
·
MIW_FA2 – supported.
·
MIW_FA3 – supported.
·
MIW_FA4 – supported.
·
MIW_FA5 – supported.
·
MIW_FA6 – supported.
·
MIW_FA7 – supported.
·
Measures
·
In the last bullet point add the word
“identified” after the words “No further loss of
…..”.
The board suggests adding the following measures:
·
Percentage of Māori employed in public led
development projects
·
Percentage of apprenticeships offered to Māori in the required skill
areas and seen through to full qualification in public led development
projects.
·
Development Strategy
·
Supported.
iii)
Environment and Cultural Heritage
Outcome
§ Strategic directions:
·
EC_SD1 – supported. Add a
bullet point - to ensure council records include the
historic sites identified by previous councils.
·
EC_SD2 – supported.
·
EC_SD3 – supported.
·
EC_SD4 – supported.
§ Focus areas:
·
EC_FA1 – supported.
·
EC_FA2 – supported, add
“including biodiversity threats” to the last bullet point
·
EC_FA3 – supported.
·
EC_FA4 – supported.
EC_FA5 – supported. The board would like to
see the improvement of the Manukau Harbour water quality as a focus area.
·
Measures
·
A measure to be included around addressing
the demand on infrastructure caused by growth and natural causes (eg: natural
springs).
·
Need a plan to protect the Manukau Harbour
from unwanted pests (eg: pacific oysters and mangroves).
·
Add a measure around the percentage of
alternative or innovative stormwater treatment projects
·
A measure focused on sustainability may be
required to align with EC_FA1.
·
Add a measure that regularly monitors the
Manukau Harbour Water quality.
·
A measure to be included to measure the
impact of climate change over time.
·
Development Strategy
·
Will the general public understand what is
meant by the terminology “green” and “blue”
environments. The Auckland Plan is a document that everyone will need
to easily understand.
·
An input relating to environmental
sustainability should be added.
iv)
Homes and Places Outcome
The Auckland Design Manual should be referenced in this area.
§ Strategic directions:
·
HP_SD1 – supported, also include a
bullet point that:
-
Promotes sustainability and encourage the
construction of green eco-friendly buildings.
·
HP_SD2 – supported.
·
HP_SD3 – supported.
·
HP_SD4 – supported, also promote
vertical green spaces as they contribute to people’s well-being and air
quality.
§ Focus areas:
·
HP_FA1 – supported. Add a
bullet point about ensuring roading infrastructure in developments allows for
kerbside parking on both sides of the road so that emergency vehicles and
future public transport vehicles have access.
·
HP_FA2 – supported.
·
HP_FA3 – supported.
·
HP_FA4 – supported.
·
HP_FA5 – supported.
·
HP_FA6 – supported.
·
HP_FA7 – supported.
·
Measures
·
Add a measure about the types of housing
and accommodation on offer.
·
Development Strategy
·
Green eco-friendly buildings and vertical
green walls need to be incorporated in the development strategy.
v)
Access and Connectivity Outcome
§ Strategic directions:
·
AC_SD1 – supported.
·
AC_SD2 – supported.
·
AC_SD3 – supported.
§ Focus areas:
·
AC_FA1 – supported.
·
AC_FA2 – supported, also give
consideration to rail separation, projects that improve the east/west
movement of traffic, a third rail line north/south, pinch points in the south
to west motorway links, eg: Weymouth Bridge.
·
AC_FA3 – supported.
·
AC_FA4 – supported.
·
AC_FA5 – supported.
·
AC_FA6 – supported, also ensure the
safety of those walking and cycling with upgrading rural roads at the same
time as development is occurring.
·
AC_FA7 – supported.
·
Measures
·
Supported.
·
Development Strategy
·
Supported.
vi)
Opportunities and Prosperity Outcome
§ Strategic directions:
·
OP_SD1 – supported.
·
OP_SD2 – supported.
·
OP_SD3 – supported.
§ Focus areas:
·
OP_FA1 – supported.
·
OP_FA2 – supported.
·
OP_FA3 – supported.
·
OP_FA4 – supported.
·
OP_FA5 – supported.
·
Measures
·
The measure “median wage of Māori and the Auckland median
wage” may need some clarification. What is being measured the
median wage of Māori against the Auckland median wage or the median wage of all
Aucklanders of which Māori is a part of? How does this equate to the living wage?
·
Add a measure comparing the median wage
with the living wage.
·
A measure to be added around pay equality.
·
Development Strategy
·
Supported.
vii)
Development Strategy
Provide a definition of what a “metropolitan
town centre” is. People do not know what is meant by a
metropolitan area.
Provide mechanisms that allow for council to guide
the development of identified metropolitan town centres, ie: council
purchasing property, and finding the partners that will develop the sites in
line with the vision. Minimise the potential of market forces driving
ad hoc development. Provide the leadership and financial support that
will ensure a quality outcome for the development of the metropolitan area
and how that relates to development and growth in the nearby area.
Growth is happening very fast. We must ensure proactive mechanisms that
allow for proactive co-ordinated development of a metropolitan area.
b) note
that the resolutions of this meeting will be reported back to the Planning
Committee for consideration in the drafting of the refreshed Auckland Plan.
CARRIED
|
