I hereby give notice that an ordinary
meeting of the Environment and Community Committee will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 13
March 2018
9.30am
Reception Lounge
Auckland Town Hall
301-305 Queen Street
Auckland
|
|
Komiti Taiao ā-Hapori Hoki /
Environment and Community Committee
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Penny Hulse
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Alf Filipaina
|
|
|
Members
|
Cr Josephine Bartley
|
Cr Mike Lee
|
|
|
Member Renata Blair
|
Cr Daniel Newman, JP
|
|
|
IMSB Member James Brown
|
Cr Dick Quax
|
|
|
Cr Dr Cathy Casey
|
Cr Greg Sayers
|
|
|
Deputy Mayor Bill Cashmore
|
Cr Desley Simpson, JP
|
|
|
Cr Ross Clow
|
Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM
|
|
|
Cr Fa’anana Efeso Collins
|
Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE
|
|
|
Cr Linda Cooper, JP
|
Cr Wayne Walker
|
|
|
Cr Chris Darby
|
Cr John Watson
|
|
|
Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO
|
|
|
|
Mayor Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP
|
|
|
|
Cr Richard Hills
|
|
(Quorum 11 members)
|
|
|
Tam White
Senior Governance Advisor
8 March 2018
Contact Telephone: (09) 890 8156
Email: tam.white@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Terms of Reference
Responsibilities
This committee
deals with all strategy and policy decision-making that is not the
responsibility of another committee or the Governing Body. Key
responsibilities include:
·
Development and
monitoring of strategy, policy and action plans associated with environmental,
social, economic and cultural activities
·
Natural heritage
·
Parks and reserves
·
Economic development
·
Protection and
restoration of Auckland’s ecological health
·
Climate change
·
The Southern Initiative
·
Waste minimisation
·
Libraries
·
Acquisition of property
relating to the committee’s responsibilities and within approved annual
budgets
·
Performing the
delegations made by the Governing Body to the former Parks, Recreation and
Heritage Forum and Regional Development and Operations Committee, under
resolution GB/2012/157 in relation to dogs
·
Activities of the
following CCOs:
o ATEED
o RFA
Powers
(i) All
powers necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities, including:
(a) approval
of a submission to an external body
(b) establishment
of working parties or steering groups.
(ii) The
committee has the powers to perform the responsibilities of another
committee, where it is necessary to make a decision prior to
the next meeting of that other committee.
(iii) The
committee does not have:
(a) the
power to establish subcommittees
(b) powers
that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (section 2)
Exclusion of
the public – who needs to leave the meeting
Members of
the public
All members of
the public must leave the meeting when the public are excluded unless a
resolution is passed permitting a person to remain because their knowledge will
assist the meeting.
Those who are
not members of the public
General
principles
·
Access to confidential information is managed on
a “need to know” basis where access to the information is required
in order for a person to perform their role.
·
Those who are not members of the meeting (see
list below) must leave unless it is necessary for them to remain and hear the
debate in order to perform their role.
·
Those who need to be present for one
confidential item can remain only for that item and must leave the room for any
other confidential items.
·
In any case of doubt, the ruling of the
chairperson is final.
Members of
the meeting
·
The members of the meeting remain (all Governing
Body members if the meeting is a Governing Body meeting; all members of the
committee if the meeting is a committee meeting).
·
However, standing orders require that a
councillor who has a pecuniary conflict of interest leave the room.
·
All councillors have the right to attend any
meeting of a committee and councillors who are not members of a committee may
remain, subject to any limitations in standing orders.
Independent Māori Statutory Board
·
Members of the Independent Māori Statutory Board who are appointed
members of the committee remain.
·
Independent Māori Statutory Board members and staff remain if this is necessary in
order for them to perform their role.
Staff
·
All staff supporting the meeting
(administrative, senior management) remain.
·
Other staff who need to because of their role
may remain.
Local Board
members
·
Local Board members who need to hear the matter
being discussed in order to perform their role may remain. This will
usually be if the matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular Local Board
area.
Council
Controlled Organisations
·
Representatives of a Council Controlled
Organisation can remain only if required to for discussion of a matter relevant
to the Council Controlled Organisation
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
ITEM TABLE
OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 7
2 Declaration of
Interest 7
3 Confirmation
of Minutes 7
4 Petitions 7
5 Public Input 7
6 Local Board
Input 7
7 Extraordinary
Business 8
8 Notices of
Motion 8
9 Destination
Strategy update 9
10 Reserve Revocation Report
- 129R Bairds Road, Ōtara 11
11 Reserve Revocation Report
- 32 Harbour View Road, Te Atatu 35
12 Summary of Environment and
Community Committee information - updates, memos and briefings - 13 March 2018 41
13 Consideration of
Extraordinary Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
14 Procedural
Motion to Exclude the Public 55
C1 Acquisition of land for open
space - Flat Bush 55
C2 Acquisition of land for open
space at Swanson 55
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Declaration
of Interest
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a
conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other
external interest they might have.
3 Confirmation
of Minutes
|
That the Environment and Community Committee:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Tuesday, 20 February 2018, including the
confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
4 Petitions
At the close of
the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
5 Public
Input
Standing Order
7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to the
Governance Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day
prior to the meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting
Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet
the requirements of Standing Orders. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes
is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes
speaking time for each speaker.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for public input had been received.
6 Local
Board Input
Standing Order
6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of that
Chairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this
time. The Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson)
shall wherever practical, give one (1) day’s notice of their wish
to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any
application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders.
This right is
in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on the
agenda.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for local board input had been received.
7 Extraordinary
Business
Section 46A(7)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“An item
that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local
authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member
explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The
reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the
discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“Where an
item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed
at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor
matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member
explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the
public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or
recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to
a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
8 Notices
of Motion
There were no
notices of motion.
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
Destination
Strategy update
File No.: CP2018/02395
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. Steve
Armitage, General Manager Destination, ATEED (Auckland Tourism, Events and
Economic Development) will provide a presentation on the Destination
Strategy prior to its public launch.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. ATEED previously presented the Destination Strategy to the
Environment and Community Committee workshop on 9 November 2017. At the time
ATEED explained the engagement to date, provided a picture of Auckland
in the context of other international destinations and prompted
discussion as to how Auckland could develop as a destination.
3. ATEED captured the committee members’ comments and combined
them with the input from a broader range of stakeholders from the public
sector, tourism, events and international education industries. Since that time
a team has been distilling all of the information received and preparing a
formal strategy ready for launch.
4. An executive steering group representing all sectors has played an
active role in reviewing and refining the document, reinforcing the
collaborative nature of the strategic planning process, and ensuring commitment
to it. Such commitment is exemplified in the decision by all parties involved
to sign the completed strategy.
5. As the Destination Strategy has evolved significantly from what was
previously presented to the committee ATEED wishes to share the latest version
before launching it in the public with the co-signatories.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Environment and
Community Committee:
a) receive
the update on the Destination Strategy.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Michael Goudie – Senior Advisor External
Relations.
|
|
Authorisers
|
Steve Armitage - General Manager
– Destination
Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
Reserve Revocation Report - 129R Bairds
Road, Ōtara
File No.: CP2018/00672
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
approve a request to the Minister of Conservation to uplift the reserve status
of 129R Bairds Road, Ōtara.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. 129R
Bairds Road, Ōtara has been cleared for disposal by the Finance and
Performance Committee [FIN/2017/50], subject to satisfactory conclusion of
required Reserves Act processes. The property is an unclassified reserve under
the Reserves Act 1977, held for the purpose of off street parking.
3. Panuku
Development Auckland has undertaken iwi consultation and public notification
under s.24 of the Reserve Act 1977 on the property.
4. Two
objections were received for 129R Bairds Road. Both objections were
concerned with parking provision and access to the service lane.
5. One
of those objections was from the Ōtara Business Association, on behalf of
the owners and tenants of the surrounding retail properties. Further to
discussions, the Ōtara Business Association has resolved to withdraw its
objection on the condition that Council retains ownership of the property. As
this withdrawal is conditional, the objection continues to stand.
6. One
other objection was received from Trustee Management Limited which owns and
leases two of the adjoining properties to multiple tenants. The objection
stated tenants’ concerns regarding the loss of car parking, adverse
effects on deliveries and refuse removal. The objection has not been withdrawn.
7. The
concerns of the objectors relate to the potential risks to local businesses
posed by revocation of the reserve status of the property and its subsequent
sale, which could result in the loss of the current amenity. This concern could
be partially or fully allayed by the terms and conditions attached to any
disposal.
8. This
report recommends to the committee to request the Minister of Conservation that
the reserve status be uplifted on the basis that there is sufficient off
street parking in the immediate vicinity.
9. Property descriptions, details of the notification process and the
objections received are set out in Attachments A to D.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Environment and
Community Committee:
a) having
considered the objections agrees to submit a request to the
Minister of Conservation to uplift the reserve status of 129R Bairds Road,
Ōtara comprised of an estate in fee simple of 1,133 m2 more
or less being Lot 12 DP 55184 contained in
certificate of title NA41D/929.
|
Horopaki / Context
10. 129R Bairds Road is a flat, polygonal parcel of approximately 1,133
square metres with an unclassified reserve status, held for the purpose of off
street parking. It was approved for sale by the Finance and Performance
Committee, subject to the satisfactory conclusion of any required statutory
processes, as the property is no longer required by Auckland Council for
reserve purposes (FIN/2017/50).
11. When the
property was being considered for disposal, the Parks and Recreation Policy
team reported that there is sufficient existing public land nearby (currently
car park), that it does not improve existing open spaces, and that the
site’s location and configuration at the back of the shops makes it
unsuitable for public open space.
12. The property is zoned Business – Town Centre under the
Auckland Unitary Plan (operative in part). It is situated in the middle of the
Ōtara Town Centre service area (Kew Lane Grounds), and is currently used
for car parking.
13. The
property is surrounded by a service lane and 30 retail units back onto the
service lane area. There are 24 owners of the retail units that use the
service lane.
14. The
service lane and the car park have in the past been the focus of illegal
rubbish dumping and other antisocial behavior, such as vandalism.
15. The
Ōtara Business Association currently has a licence to occupy the property
(129R Bairds Road) and manages the car parking arrangements and security of the
area for the benefit of the retail occupiers.
16. Letters
were sent to nine Mana Whenua iwi authorities on 16 June 2017. No objections
were received, but Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua suggested
that 129R Bairds Road be returned to Ngāti Te Ata
pursuant to the Crown’s right of first refusal obligations.
17. A
public notice was placed in the Manukau Courier on 13 July 2017 and also on the
council’s website, and the notification period ran through to 15 August
2017. The notice remained on the council’s website for the duration
of the notification period.
18. Letters
were sent to the 24 owners of the 30 adjoining properties on 11 July 2017.
19. Two
objections to the proposal were received relating to the potential loss of car
parking for the benefit of the centre’s retailers, and possible effects
on service lane access. One objection was from the Ōtara Business
Association on behalf of its members, and had a petition with 35 signatures
attached. The other was from Trustee Management Limited, an owner of two
retail units let to multiple tenants.
20. The submissions received for 129R Bairds Road are set out in
Attachments A and B.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
21. The
objection from the Ōtara Business Association stated that the Association
has a licence to occupy 129R
Bairds Road and is managing the property, that it has invested time and money
in improving the property (significantly reducing levels of antisocial behaviour), and that its disposal would
have implications for deliveries to the shop units, and storage and disposal of
refuse.
22. In
subsequent correspondence the Association suggested that the
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board was not aware of the implications for local
retailers of disposal of the property (see Attachment A). This view is not
supported by notes taken at the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board workshop on
31 May 2016, when disposal of the property was discussed.
23. The
objection from Trustee Management Limited was concerned with the loss of the
car park amenity, and potential adverse effects on deliveries and the removal of
refuse.
24. Following
receipt of the two objections, separate meetings were held with the Ōtara
Business Association (with a local board member present), and with Trustee
Management Limited (via its solicitor).
25. The
Association subsequently resolved that it would conditionally withdraw its
objection; however, it remains adamantly opposed to the disposal of the
property, and wishes instead to enter into a longer-term lease. Trustee
Management Limited has not withdrawn its objection.
26. Given
that the Ōtara Business Association has made a conditional withdrawal, the
objection continues to stand.
27. The uplifting of reserve status would help to integrate the property
into its commercial environment, enabling more effective management of the
property. The concerns of the objectors relate to the potential risks to local
businesses posed by revocation of the reserve status of the property and its
subsequent sale, which could result in the loss of the current amenity. This
concern could be partially or fully allayed by the terms and conditions
attached to any disposal.
28. Panuku recommends that the Environment
and Community Committee requests the Minister of Conservation to uplift the
reserve status of the property on the basis that there is sufficient off street
parking in the immediate vicinity.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
29. The Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board endorsed the proposed reserve
revocation and disposal of 129R Bairds Road, Otara at its 15 August 2016
business meeting.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
30. Panuku consulted all the relevant Mana Whenua iwi authorities of the
proposal to revoke the reserve status of the property and the responses to this
engagement are contained in Attachment C of this report. In summary, no
objections to the proposal were received from mana whenua.
31. Ngāti Te
Ata Waiohua suggested that 129R Bairds Road be returned to Ngāti
Te Ata or that redress or compensation be provided. Ngāti
Te Ata Waiohua were advised that as the land was in the
ownership of Auckland Council it was not subject to Right of First Refusal
provisions.
32. Ngāti Te
Ata Waiohua’s suggestion and the response are set out in Attachment D.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
33. If the reserve status of the property is not revoked, the current
licence arrangement would remain in place, whereby the council receives $500
per annum from the Ōtara Business Association. It would not be possible to
manage the land more effectively on a commercial basis.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
34. If the reserve status of the property is not revoked, the property
would remain in council ownership and require ongoing maintenance of $1500 per
annum and management as open space.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
35. If
the committee resolves to recommend proceeding with the application to revoke
the reserve status of the property, council officers will forward the
resolution to the Department of Conservation together with the objections received.
36. If
the Minster approves the request, a notice will be published in the New Zealand
Gazette authorising the revocation, and this will be submitted to Land
Information New Zealand for issue of title.
37. Panuku will then determine the best timeframe for the completion of
the disposal process for the property.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Otara Business Association: objection and withdrawal
|
15
|
|
b⇩
|
Trustee Management Limited objection
|
21
|
|
c⇩
|
129R Bairds Road - Iwi Consultation Process and
Responses
|
23
|
|
d⇩
|
Correspondence - Ngati te Ata Waiohua
|
25
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Carl May - Property Acquisitions & Disposals
Advisor, Panuku Development Auckland
|
|
Authorisers
|
Nigel Hewitson - Manager Property Disposals, Panuku
Development Auckland
Ian Wheeler - Director Portfolio Management, Panuku
Development Auckland
Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment and
Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment and
Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment and
Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment and
Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
Reserve Revocation Report - 32 Harbour
View Road, Te Atatu
File No.: CP2018/02196
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
approve a request to the Minister of Conservation to uplift the reserve status
of 32 Harbour View Road.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. 32 Harbour View Road, Te Atatu has been cleared for disposal by the
Finance and Performance Committee [FIN/2017/97], subject to satisfactory
conclusion of required Reserves Act processes. The property is a recreation
reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.
3. The reason that this reserve was not required for reserve purposes
is that the area is already adequately served with open space, as advised by
the Parks and Recreation Policy team in the rationalisation process.
4. Panuku Development Auckland has undertaken iwi consultation and
public notification on the property under s.24 of the Reserve Act 1977. The details of the iwi consultation and
responses are set out in Attachment A.
5. No
objections were received from the iwi consultation, nor from the notification
of the proposal to the public and to adjoining owners.
6. This report recommends to the committee to request the Minister of
Conservation that the reserve status be uplifted to allow the disposal process
of the property to be progressed.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation
That the Environment and
Community Committee:
a) agree to submit a request to the Minister of Conservation to uplift
the reserve status of 32 Harbour View Road, Te Atatu comprised of an estate
in fee simple of 600 m2 more or less, being Lot 286 DP 84406 contained in certificate of title CT-102D/200.
b) agree, on approval from the Minister of Conservation to uplift the
reserve status, that staff prepare a report for Planning Committee approval
to change the open space zone to an appropriate residential zone.
|
Horopaki / Context
7. 32
Harbour View Road, Te Atatu is a rectangular, vacant corner section of
approximately 600 sq m. It is bordered to the east and north by
residential properties and to the south and west by road.
8. The
property is zoned Public Open Space – Informal Recreation under the
Auckland Unitary Plan (operative in part).
9. In
July 2016, when the property was being considered for disposal, the Parks and
Recreation Policy team reported that there are other open spaces in the near
vicinity (such as Harbourview-Orangihina Park). The property does not meet the
criteria for retention when assessed against the council’s parks and open
space acquisitions policy.
10. The Finance and Performance Committee approved the disposal of this
site on 26 July 2017, subject to the satisfactory conclusion of any required
statutory processes, as the property is no longer required by Auckland Council
for reserve purposes [FIN/2017/97].
11. Letters were sent to nine Mana Whenua iwi authorities on 20 October
2017. No objections were received.
12. A public notice was published in the Western Leader 9 November 2017
and also on the council’s website, and the notification period ran
through to 13 December 2017. The notice remained on the council’s website
for the duration of the notification period. No objections were received.
13. Letters were sent to the three adjoining owners on 7 November 2017.
No objections were received.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
14. Panuku recommends that the Environment
and Community Committee requests the Minister of Conservation to uplift the
reserve status of the property on the basis that the property is not required
for reserve purposes. The revocation of reserve status is required if the
disposal process is to be continued.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
15. The Henderson-Massey
Local Board endorsed the proposed reserve revocation and disposal of 32 Harbour
View Road at its 21 March 2017 business meeting.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
16. Panuku consulted all the relevant Mana Whenua iwi authorities of the
proposal to revoke the reserve status of the property and the responses to this
engagement are contained in Attachment A of this report. In summary, no
objections to the proposal were received from mana whenua.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
17. If the status
of reserve is lifted from 32 Harbour View Road, a plan change will be necessary
to change the open space zoning to an appropriate residential zoning in order
to allow the highest and best value of the land to be realised. Staff
will prepare a report for approval by the Planning Committee to rezone the
land.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
18. If the reserve status of the property is not revoked, the property
would remain in council ownership and require ongoing maintenance of $300 per
annum and management as open space.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
19. If
the committee resolves to recommend proceeding with the application to revoke
the reserve status of the property, council officers will forward the
resolution to the Department of Conservation.
20. If
the Minster approves the request, a notice will be published in the New Zealand
Gazette authorising the revocation, and this will be submitted to Land
Information New Zealand for issue of title.
21. Panuku will then determine the best timeframe for the completion of
the disposal process for the property.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
32 Harbour View Road - Iwi Consultation Process and
Responses
|
39
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Carl May - Property Acquisitions & Disposals
Advisor, Panuku Development Auckland
|
|
Authorisers
|
Nigel Hewitson - Manager Property Disposals, Panuku
Development Auckland
Ian Wheeler - Director Portfolio Management, Panuku
Development Auckland
Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment and
Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
Summary of Environment and Community
Committee information - updates, memos and briefings - 13 March 2018
File No.: CP2018/02565
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To note progress on the forward work programme - Attachment A.
2. To provide a public record of memos, workshop or briefing papers
that have been distributed for the Committee’s information since 20 February
2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
3. This is regular information-only report which aims to provide public
visibility of information circulated to committee members via memo or other
means, where no decisions are required.
4. The following papers/memos were circulated to members:
· 20180301_Global
Activity Memo
· 20180301_State of our Gulf 2017 – Hauraki Gulf
– Tīkapa Moana / Te Moana-nui-ā-Toi State of the Environment
Report 2017
· 20180306_Kaipara Harbour Sedimentation Mitigation Study
Memo
· 20180307_Enterprise Booking System memo
Note that staff will not be present
to answer questions about the items referred to in this summary. Committee
members should direct any questions to the authors.
5. This
document can be found on the Auckland Council website, at the following link: http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/
o at the top of the page, select
meeting “Planning Committee” from the drop-down tab and click
‘View’;
o under ‘Attachments’,
select either the HTML or PDF version of the document entitled ‘Extra
Attachments”.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Environment and
Community Committee:
a) receive
the information report.
|
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Environment and Community Committee Forward Work
Programme
|
43
|
|
b⇨
|
20180301_Global Activity Memo (Under Separate
Cover)
|
|
|
c⇨
|
20180301_State of our Gulf 2017 – Hauraki Gulf
– Tīkapa Moana / Te Moana-nui-ā-Toi State of the Environment
Report 2017 (Under Separate Cover)
|
|
|
d⇨
|
20180306_Kaipara Harbour Sedimentation Mitigation
Study Memo (Under Separate Cover)
|
|
|
e⇨
|
20180307_Enterprise Booking System memo (Under
Separate Cover)
|
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Tam White - Senior Governance Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
|
Environment
and Community Committee
13 March 2018
|
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information
and Meetings Act 1987
That the Environment and Community Committee:
a) exclude
the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general
subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the
reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific
grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution
is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests
protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by
the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in
public, as follows:
C1 Acquisition
of land for open space - Flat Bush
|
Reason for
passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular
interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s)
under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
s7(2)(h) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority
to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities.
s7(2)(i) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority
to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including
commercial and industrial negotiations).
In
particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open
space
|
s48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
C2 Acquisition
of land for open space at Swanson
|
Reason for
passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular
interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s)
under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
s7(2)(h) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority
to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities.
s7(2)(i) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority
to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including
commercial and industrial negotiations).
In
particular, the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open
space purposes.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
