Agenda of Manurewa Local Board

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 Welcome 5

2 Apologies 5

3 Declaration of Interest 5

4 Confirmation of Minutes 5

5 Leave of Absence 5

6 Acknowledgements 5

7 Petitions 5

8 Deputations 5

9 Public Forum 5

10 Extraordinary Business 5

11 Notices of Motion 6

12 Declaration by Local Board Member 7

13 Manurewa Youth Council Update 9

14 Manurewa Ward Councillors Update 21

15 Members' Update 23

16 Chairperson's Update 25

17 Auckland Transport Update to the Manurewa Local Board - March 2018 27

18 David Nathan Park: approval of the reserve management plan and to update the conservation plan 33

19 Allocation of Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Scholarship 2017/2018 71

20 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by DR Developments Ltd at 9 - 11 James Road, Manurewa. 75

21 New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Devi Group of Companies Limited at 57 Senator Drive, Manurewa. 79

22 Manurewa Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar - March 2018 85

23 Manurewa Local Board Achievements Register 2016-2019 Political Term 93

24 Manurewa Local Board Workshop Records 103

25 Consideration of Extraordinary Items

1 Welcome

The meeting will begin with a prayer.

2 Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

3 Declaration of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

4 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Manurewa Local Board:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 15 February 2018, as a true and correct record.

5 Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.

6 Acknowledgements

At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.

7 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

8 Deputations

Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Manurewa Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.

At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.

9 Public Forum

A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.

10 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

11 Notices of Motion

There were no notices of motion.

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

Auckland Transport Update to the Manurewa Local Board - March 2018

File No.: CP2018/02577

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. The purpose of this report is to respond to resolutions and requests on transport-related matters, provide an update on the current status of the Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF), request approval for new LBTCF projects, provide a summary of consultation material sent to the board, and provide information on transport-related matters of specific interest and application to the Manurewa Local Board and its community.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. This report covers:

a) improvements at the Manurewa bus/train station

b) Manurewa town centre clock

c) Regional Land Transport Plan 2018 update

d) current status of Local Board Transport Capital Fund projects.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board:

a) receive the report entitled “Auckland Transport Update to the Manurewa Local Board – March 2018.

Horopaki / Context

Local projects and activities of interest to the board

Manurewa bus/train station improvements

3. The construction of the bus layovers within the Manurewa bus station area was undertaken in late February and has been completed.

4. Installation of the exeloos is programmed to start in the week beginning 19 March, and is expected to be completed in five weeks. Information regarding the installation of the drivers’ portacom will be provided once available.

5. For the planned improvements at the Station Road overflow park-and-ride (to mitigate the parking loss at the main park-and-ride), contractors are currently undertaking a full lighting and CCTV design, which is due by the end of February. A design is expected shortly on the upgraded signage for the Station Road carpark.

Manurewa town centre clock

6. The Manurewa town clock is located within road reserve and has been maintained by Auckland Transport since the 2010 amalgamation.

7. The Manurewa Local Board has indicated an interest in upgrading the clock as it has not been in good working order for some years.

8. At a workshop on 1 March, the Manurewa Local Board considered and discussed various options with a representative of the Precision Watch Co Ltd (watch and clock repair specialists). Precision maintains almost 30 clocks around the Auckland region, and has been maintaining the Manurewa clock since the 1970s, in both its current and previous location.

9. As a result of the workshop, the board has requested Precision to provide a firm estimate for restoring the clock, for consideration at a future meeting.

Hill Road P180 parking restrictions outside Auckland Botanic Gardens

10. Auckland Transport’s Traffic Control Committee (TCC) granted approval for the new P180 parking time restrictions at its meeting on 9 February.

11. The signs were installed over the weekend of 17/18 February 2018.

Consultation documents on proposed improvements

12. Consultation documents for the following proposals have been provided to the Manurewa Local Board for its feedback and are summarised here for information purposes only.

13. Following consultation, Auckland Transport considers the feedback received and determines whether to proceed further with the proposal as consulted on, or proceed with an amended proposal if changes are considered necessary.

Proposed safety improvements, Browns Road and Dalgety Drive intersection, Manurewa

14. Auckland Transport is proposing intersection improvements at the Browns Road and Dalgety Road intersection, including cutting back the two corners of the intersection and creating a shared path along the south side of the intersection.

15. Currently, heavy vehicles are having accessibility issues when turning left from Dalgety Drive into Browns Road, which has resulted in trucks mounting the kerb. The signal poles on the corner have been hit several times over the last year and this also puts pedestrians waiting to cross at the lights at significant risk.

16. The kerb cut-back is therefore required to ensure heavy vehicles will no longer mount the kerb and thus provide a safer waiting environment for pedestrians. Auckland Transport will look to extend the paved area at the back of the footpath near the netball courts to maximise the waiting area for pedestrians as much as it is practical within the road reserve.

Traffic Control Committee (TCC) report

17. Decisions of the TCC during the month of February 2018 affecting the Manurewa Local Board area are shown below.

Date	Street (Suburb)	Type of Report	Nature Of Restriction	Decision
9-Feb-18	Wattle Farm Road, Acacia Cove Village (Wattle Downs)	Permanent Traffic and Parking changes combined	No Stopping At All Times, No Passing, Traffic Island, Stop Control	Carried
9-Feb-18	Hill Road (The Gardens)	Permanent Traffic and Parking changes combined	P180, Lane Arrow Markings, Shoulder Marking, Flush Median, Give-Way, Traffic Island, Edge Line	Carried
23-Feb-18	Halsey Road, Great South Road, Sturdee Road, Jellico Road (Manurewa)	Permanent Traffic and Parking changes combined	No Stopping At All Times, Traffic Island, Speed Hump, Give-Way, Stop Control, Flush Median, Edge Line	Carried

Regional and sub-regional projects

Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) 2018

18. The Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) is a plan of how transport delivery agencies intend to respond to growth and other challenges facing Auckland over the next 10 years. It includes a 10-year prioritised delivery programme of transport services and activities.

19. AT prepares the draft RLTP jointly with the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) and KiwiRail. It is a statutory plan describing how these agencies intend to respond to growth and other challenges facing Auckland over the next ten years. It will include a ten-year, prioritised, delivery programme of transport services and activities.

20. The original intention was to consult on the plan alongside Auckland Council’s Long Term Plan. However, the consultation has been “de-coupled” and moved into April to ensure it is informed by, and strongly aligned with, the Government’s soon to be released Policy Statement on Transport and a refreshed Auckland Transport Alignment Project.

Southern corridor improvements (SCI) project update

21. As part of the SCI project, a new temporary road layout was put in place southbound through the Takanini Interchange on the morning of 1 March.

22. The two southbound traffic lanes were split to provide a safe work area in between the lanes during motorway upgrades. The lanes were split just before the Takanini southbound off-ramp, for approximately 800m, before converging again before the motorway on-ramp (see diagram below).

Takanini Overbridge Temporary Southbound Layout

23. Splitting the lanes is to enable the construction crew to connect the newly constructed portion of bridge to the existing motorway. The construction activity is known as a ‘stitch’. The stitch involves breaking the concrete barrier and existing edge of the bridge. Steel reinforcement is then connected to the existing bridge reinforcement and new concrete poured to fill the area in between.

24. This lane split will be in place until around the middle of the year.

25. The NZTA has asked motorists to drive with care through this area as they get used to the new layout.

26. For more information about closures and detours, visit the NZTA website:

www.nzta.govt.nz/auckland-southern-corridor.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF) update

27. The board’s current LBTCF projects are included in the table below (in which ROC = rough order of costs, and FEC = firm estimate of cost):

ID#

Project Description

Progress/Current Status

353

Hill Road pedestrian link:

A project to improve pedestrian links on Hill Road between Great South Road and the Botanic Gardens

· FEC = $525,000

· Spend to date = $416,744

· Project first initiated in Oct-14 but scale reduced in Nov-15 to six new crossing points and safer intersections only (proposed cycleway removed).

· Construction approved in Nov-15 based on FEC of $575,000 (later reduced to $525,000).

· Project completed except for site at the Hillcrest Grove intersection.

Project update:

· Given previous consultation is more than a year old, AT will repeat consultation with all surrounding properties as well as the corner property.

· Internal consultation has been completed, including with the board. Some internal feedback means the design will be updated.

· External consultation will follow (including a site visit to the corner property with a Mandarin speaker) before the resolution report is taken to the TCC. This can be expected in April.

354

Manurewa covered walkway:

A project to improve connectivity between the Manurewa bus station, rail station, and Great South Road (through Southmall) by building a weather-proof canopy to link all three.

· FEC = $1,172,000

· Spend to date = $1,088,864

· Project initiated in Oct-14 and construction approved in Nov-15. FEC has changed a number of times due to scope changes.

· Following a further request, ROCs were provided in Mar-17 for canopies over the station ramps. The ROC for a solid (metal) roof was $721,632 while the ROC for a structureflex roof was $795,072.

· The board withheld making a decision on covering the ramps until potential opportunities relating to Te Mahia train station could be identified with AT.

Project update:

· All requested AT physical works have now been completed.

· The designer art mesh to be installed on the southern side of the overbridged will be handled by Council’s Public Arts team.

545

Wattle Farm Road new central pedestrian refuge:

A project to improve pedestrian inter-connectivity between Acacia Cove Village and Bupa Retirement Village

· FEC = $29,000 ($16,300 from LBTCF, $12,700 from Bupa)

· Spend to date = $5,787

· The board approved construction on 14-Dec-17 based on the total project firm estimate of $29,000 and an agreed cost share of $16,300 from the board and $12,700 from Bupa.

· AT is planning for works on the pedestrian refuge to be undertaken in conjunction with AT’s installation of footpaths in the immediate area.

Project update:

· The resolution plan and report has been approved by the TCC committee.

· Construction is likely to begin in April. Timeframes will be confirmed in the next few weeks following receipt of the contractor’s work programme.

546

Te Mahia station upgrade:

A project to work in conjunction with AT to upgrade the station beyond the basic scope of works identified by AT

· Capped allocation of $2m

· Spend to date = $3,060

· On 17-Aug-17, the Manurewa Local Board passed a resolution noting that $2.5 million of the LBTCF had been identified to contribute towards the Te Mahia rail station upgrade project.

· On 16-Nov-17, under confidential business, the board considered and endorsed a package of works to be funded by the LBTCF, and approved a maximum allocation of $2 million.

Project update:

· The tender documents for the Te Mahia station upgrade civil works and structures have been issued.

· The tender for the civil works element has been received and is nearing final review. Due to clarifications, commencing the civil works (i.e. shelter foundations on the platform) is being rescheduled for mid to late March.

· The structural element tender was due on 28 February.

28. The Manurewa Local Board’s Transport Capital Fund to date is summarised below.

Manurewa Local Board Transport Capital Fund summary:

Total Funds Available in current political term (includes 2019/20 FY)	$3,068,375
Amount committed to date on projects approved for detailed design and/or construction	$531,705
Capped contribution amount to joint Te Mahia station upgrade project	$2,000,000
Remaining budget left available to allocate by the end of the current political term	$536,670

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

29. The local board’s views on Auckland Transport projects will be taken into account during consultation on any proposed scheme. Any implications are discussed in the relevant section of the report.

30. Local board views on transport capital projects are discussed and addressed during the design phase of the projects and will be considered in the relevant section of the report at the time.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

31. No specific issues with regard to impacts on Maori are triggered by this report and any engagement with Maori will be carried out on an individual project basis.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

32. All proposed schemes are subject to prioritisation, funding and consultation.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

33. No significant risks have been identified.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

34. Auckland Transport provides the Manurewa Local Board with the opportunity to comment on transport projects being delivered in the local board area.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Jenni Wild – Elected Member Relationship Manager (South); Auckland Transport

Authorisers

Jonathan Anyon – Manager Elected Member Relationship Unit, Auckland Transport

Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

David Nathan Park: approval of the reserve management plan and to update the conservation plan

File No.: CP2018/02940

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. To consider submissions on the draft David Nathan Park Reserve Management Plan, approve the final plan, and approve funding to update the conservation plan for the park.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. A draft reserve management plan for David Nathan Park (68R Hill Rd, Manurewa) was publicly notified in November last year. The plan (attachment A) sets out the vision, objectives and policies to manage David Nathan Park and priorities for its development.

3. Five submissions were received on the plan. These are included in Attachment B. Four of the submissions were generally supportive of the plan and one was not.

4. This report considers the points that are made in the submissions and recommends an amendment to policy 2.3 so that a concept plan includes consideration of a small children’s playground or play area.

5. Ngāti Te Ata and Te Ākitai Waiohua also provided input into the plan and suggested that they provide a mihi. A recommendation is made that members Dalton, Allan and Cattle endorse a mihi to be included in the plan.

6. The first priority of the reserve management plan is to update the conservation plan, subject to funding. The conservation plan will help guard against inappropriate development, inform decisions around assets in the park that don’t relate well to the heritage values, support applications for resource consents to develop the park, and show the council is taking a lead in protecting this significant heritage asset.

7. The cost of updating the conservation plan is up to $30,000. It is recommended that the board support the updating of the conservation plan by setting aside the remaining funding for this project ($15,000) and adding a further $15,000 from available Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) opex budgets.

8. Once the board adopts the reserve management plan, it will have immediate statutory effect. The actions of the plan will be prioritised through the review of the Strategic Business Plan for the park and homestead.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board:

a) adopt the David Nathan Park Reserve Management Plan 2018 included in Attachment A, subject to the following recommended change:

that policy 2.3 be amended so that a concept plan includes consideration of: a small children’s playground or play area.

b) nominate members Dalton, Allan, and Cattle to endorse a mihi to be inserted into the plan.

c) note that the full estimated cost of a conservation plan is $30,000.

d) approve the development of an updated Conservation Plan for David Nathan Homestead and Park as a continuation of the 2017/2018 work programme line item and budget: “David Nathan Park: Develop Reserve Management Plan” (ID 2007) using the remaining funding of $15,000.

e) approve reallocation of Locally Driven Initiatives opex funding of up to $15,000 from the 2017/2018 work programme line item MR: Teaching Gardens (ID 2042), towards the development of a Conservation Plan for David Nathan Homestead and Park.

f) note that the adoption of the draft reserve management plan does not concur that funding will be allocated to implement development proposals.

Horopaki / Context

9. On 16 November 2017, the Manurewa Local Board approved the draft reserve management plan for David Nathan Park (68R Hill Rd, Manurewa) for public notification (resolution number MR/2017/249). The board also resolved that the entire board would hear and consider any submissions and make a decision on the final plan.

10. The draft reserve management plan (refer attachment A) sets out a vision for the park and objectives, policies and priorities to guide use, development, protection and management of the park.

11. The plan was notified in accordance with section 41(6)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977 including an advertisement in the Manukau Courier on 28 November 2017. A survey was included on the ShapeAuckland website asking submitters for feedback on parts of the plan. Consultation closed on 30 January 2018.

12. The submissions are considered below together with recommendations for an amendment and adoption of the David Nathan Park Reserve Management Plan.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

13. Five submissions were received during the consultation period; one by email and four through the ShapeAuckland survey. None of the submitters requested the opportunity to speak to their submission. The submitters are listed in attachment B. Four of the submissions generally supported the plan and one did not.

14. A common theme across the feedback was support for protecting the values of the site and especially the European historical values.

15. The opposing submission indicated two main issues – that the plan is an opportunity to reduce the cost to ratepayers of council expenditure (no specific suggestions given) and that policies addressing the special relationship of mana whenua with the land were not supported as they favour one group above another.

16. The suggestion to reduce the costs of the plan was re-stated a number of times. However, as it did not elaborate on what costs in particular were of concern, it is difficult to address those comments. Paragraphs 31-32 below provides information on the financial implications of the plan noting both cost savings and cost implications where budget allows for redevelopment of the park.

17. In regard to the submitter’s comments relating to favouring of mana whenua, it is noted that Auckland Council is committed to meeting their obligations to Māori created through legislation and enabling the contribution of Māori to Auckland’s future. This commitment is outlined in the council’s strategic documents including the Auckland Plan, the Long-Term Plan and the Manurewa Local Board Plan for 2017 which includes initiatives to partner with mana whenua. Paragraphs 29-30 below provides information on mana whenua input into the draft plan.

18. The other submissions were generally supportive of the direction of the plan and policies, and provided specific suggestions for improvements to assets and programming that fit within the drafted policy direction including:

· support for a market day and improved café with garden seating

· support for a small stage area or rotunda for small gatherings and concerts

· suggestion for a billboard outside the park with a photo of the homestead to raise its profile

· support for programming to improve education on the historical values of the park and homestead

· support for greater pedestrian and cycle connectivity of the park with the town centre and neighbourhood including pedestrian crossings over Hill and Grande Vue Roads

· ensuring community consultation is undertaken on any improvements suggested for the park.

19. However, four comments noted items that do not clearly sit within the draft policy framework. These are to:

· keep the playground and improve it with a swing set

· extend classes currently provided

· alter the text in the section 2 - Vision for the park - so as not to raise the profile of the park to a wider Auckland audience due to the small size of the park and keeping the park as a tranquil retreat for locals

· remove the carpark in the longer term.

20. Staff have considered each comment in turn and recommend the following:

Staff comment	Staff recommendation
a. To keep the playground and improve with a swing set
The draft plan includes policies relating to the playground. These include, that an update of the draft conservation plan considers the existing playground and makes recommendations regarding its potential removal, replacement or re-design; and that the design of new assets including play equipment, reflects the site’s historic character and amenity values. However, the plan does not clearly support the continued provision of a children’s play area. A child’s play area is generally supported as it will help realise the vision for the park to be a place where the community “connect, create and play”. It is appropriate that a concept plan for the park consider the provision of a play area. However specific equipment such as a swing set should be subject to public consultation through the creation of a concept plan.	Amend policy 2.3 so that a concept plan includes consideration of: a small children’s playground or play area
b. To extend classes currently provided
This is an operational matter that is more appropriately planned through the Nathan Homestead arts and culture programme.	No change to the draft plan.
c. To alter the text in the section 2 - Vision for the park - so as not to raise the profile of the park to a wider Auckland audience due to the small size of the park and keeping the park as a tranquil retreat for locals
The draft plan acknowledges the challenges associated with multiple demands for use on a small site (section 4.2 of Attachment A). However, the plan also outlines the opportunities to showcase the significant values including relatively rare heritage values that will be of interest to wider Auckland residents. The plan is intended to provide direction to ensure the values are not compromised through multiple demands so as to manage that risk. Staff also note the comments of another submitter that the park is “a hidden highlight of Manurewa and needs to be more visible to the public”. It is noted also that the publicly consulted Local Board Plan for Manurewa 2017 includes an action to increase the promotion of Nathan Homestead.	No change to the draft plan.
d. To remove the carpark in the longer term
While the carpark is not in keeping with the heritage values of the site, staff consider that it is essential to the functioning of the homestead as a community facility in the foreseeable future. The draft plan includes a policy for the update of the draft conservation plan to review the carpark area and recommend changes to improve that area.	No change to the draft plan

21. It is recommended that the local board approve the David Nathan Park Reserve Management Plan; included in attachment A, subject to the recommended change as outlined in the table above.

22. If the board do not adopt the plan, it will continue to be managed on an ad hoc basis until such time as an open space management plan is put in place.

Conservation Plan

23. The reserve management plan includes three key priorities for planning the park’s future. These are subject to funding being available and include:

i. update the conservation plan to include the whole of the park

ii. determine the future of any structures or assets using guidance on recommendations from the conservation plan

iii. develop a concept plan with input from heritage landscaping professionals, mana whenua and communities of interest.

24. A conservation plan sets out the heritage values of a site and how those should be protected. It will:

· help guard against inappropriate development and provide professional heritage advice to inform decisions about developing the park (such as moving the café, restoring heritage gardens, providing a band rotunda or updating the playground)

· help protect the heritage values from inappropriate renewals or maintenance work

· provide regulatory planners with information on the site and how it is managed in order to inform resource consent applications for development of the park (conservation plans are often a condition of consent for any change or use or renovations).

· show that the council is leading by example in protecting such important assets in accordance with best practice.

25. A draft plan exists which relates primarily to the homestead. This could be extended to the whole site including the water tower, the dairy, the gardener’s cottage, tennis courts and landscaping.

26. It is recommended that the board support updating the conservation plan. A professional estimate of the cost has been provided at $26,000. With a 10% contingency, it is recommended that $30,000 be set aside. There is approximately $15,000 remaining in the 2017/2018 work programme line item “David Nathan Park: Develop Reserve Management Plan” (ID 2007). which can be used for the conservation plan. The additional $15,000 is recommended to be funded by reallocating available budget from the 2017/2018 work programme line item MR: Teaching Gardens (ID 2042). This item was included in the work programme for 2017, but the scope was not agreed at the time. Staff recommend that these budgets are used to complete the Conservation Plan in 2017/2018.

27. If the board choose not to update the conservation plan at this time, then there is a small risk that inappropriate renewals, maintenance or development is carried out.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

28. The reserve management plan provides a vision for the park and a pathway to achieving that vision. It has been written to reflect local views including public consultation and local board input. Previous consultation was described in the report to the Manurewa Local Board for approval of the draft plan on 16 November 2017.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

29. Te Ākitai Waiohua and Ngāti Te Ata provided input into the drafting of the plan. This has helped shape policies as reflected in the plan to actively work with mana whenua to manage and develop David Nathan Park.

30. An invitation has also been extended to Te Ākitai Waiohua and Ngāti Te Ata to draft an introductory mihi to the plan. This mihi is still pending, and it is recommended that Members Dalton, Allan, and Cattle endorse a final mihi.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

31. The objectives and policies of the reserve management plan carry various implications for both financial benefits and costs. Benefits include potential reductions in the cost and time to process resource consents, licences and consultation where proposed development aligns with the policies of this plan. However, implementation of the plan to improve and enhance the park carry cost implications.

32. The reserve management plan recommends three key priorities in order to achieve the vision of the park. These are outlined in paragraph 23 above and include updating the conservation plan and developing a concept plan for the park. A conservation plan has been estimated to cost $30,000. A concept plan for a small park with these values might typically cost $35,000-$50,000. However, it is not recommended that work on a concept plan begin until there is capital funding available for it to be implemented.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

33. There are no notable risks associated with the management plan. However, the production of the plan should reduce the risk of ad-hoc development, use and maintenance that may undermine the historic, cultural, and ecological values of this important reserve.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

34. Should the board adopt the reserve management plan, recommended implementation actions will be prioritised through the three yearly Strategic Business Plan for the park and homestead. This is due for revision this year.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Draft David Nathan Park Reserve Management Plan	39
b ⇩	Submissions	69

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Tania Utley - Service and Asset Planning Specialist

Authorisers

Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Mace Ward - General Manager Parks, Sports and Recreation

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

Allocation of Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Scholarship 2017/2018

File No.: CP2018/01250

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. To note the outcome of the Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Scholarship 2017/2018 allocation.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. The Manurewa Local Board allocated $25,000 from the 2017/2018 LDI budget for youth leadership.

3. The board approved the Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Leadership Scholarship scheme in the Arts, Community and Events 2017/2018 work programme on 6 June 2017 (MR/2017/110).

4. Fourteen young people living in Manurewa submitted their applications by 11 December 2017, requesting a total of $27,700.

5. On 8 February 2018, the Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Scholarship Panel reviewed all the applications and allocated a total of $22,300 to all 14 applicants.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board:

a) note the decision made by the Manurewa Rangatahi Youth Leadership Scholarship Panel on the allocation of scholarships as detailed below:

First name	Surname	Areas of study or development	Requested	Approved
Anastasia	Ratu	Destiny School	$2000	$1600
Atrena Qasho	Youkhana	Bachelor of Biomedical Sciences in the University of Auckland	$2000	$1000
Audrey	Whitley	Bachelor of Health Sciences at Auckland University of Technology	$2000	$2000
Ayden Josiah	Toa’fa	Year 12 Sacred Heart China Culture & Educational Tour	$2000	$2000
Ben	Haurua	Te Wananga Takiura O Nga Kura Kaupapa Māori O Aotearoa	$2000	$2000
Damian	Piilua	Tai Poutini Polytechnic, Musical Arts Degree	$1700	$1700
Fanga’fua Telesia	Po’oi	Bachelor of Business at AUT	$2000	$2000
Garling	Wu	2018 Electroacoustic Music Conference in Florence, Italy	$2000	$2000
Kataraina	Tims	Te Wānanga Takiura o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori o Aotearoa, Bachelor of Teaching Kura Kaupapa Māori	$2000	$1000
Kimiora Rose	Reihana Te Momo	Bachelor of Visual Arts - photography	$2000	$2000
Mariah Kate	Ashby	Bachelor of Mathematical Sciences, AUT	$2000	$1000
Tonisha	Rohe	Te Wānanga Takiura o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori o Aotearoa, Certificate - Rūmaki Reo	$2000	$1000
Victoria	Kolose	Bachelor of Sport, Health and Physical Education, University of Auckland	$2000	$1000
Zechariah	Soakai	Rhodes Poetry Retreat 2018 in Rhodes	$2000	$2000
TOTAL			$ 27,700	$22,300

b) acknowledge the change of circumstances for one applicant, Anastasia Ratu, and adjust the value of the scholarship awarded from $1600 to $1680.

Horopaki / Context

6. On 1 June 2017, the Manurewa Local Board allocated $25,000 of their 2017/2018 LDI budget dedicated for youth rangatahi scholarships, to assist young people in undertaking tertiary education or training (MR/2017/110).

7. During October-December 2017, staff promoted the scholarship through social media, face-to-face engagement, and distributing posters and application forms to local high schools, libraries, community halls, recreation centres and the Manurewa marae.

8. Fourteen applications were received.

9. Applicants were aged 15-23 years old, from diverse ethnic backgrounds: four New Zealand European Māori, two Māori, two Samoan, one Assyrian, one Cook Island Māori, one New Zealand European, one Samoan Māori, one Samoan Tongan and one Tongan.

10. The combined amount requested was $27,700.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

11. The assessment panel used the scheme’s objectives and criteria to allocate funds. These are:

· to assist young people to achieve their potential through tertiary education or training, and through participation in conferences and events both in New Zealand and overseas to invest in and build future leaders in the community

· to provide coaching, mentoring, learning and development opportunities for young people.

12. This scholarship is open to young people who:

· are aged 14-24 years old who are New Zealand citizens or residents and reside in the Manurewa Local Board area

· show leadership potential or have contributed to leadership/volunteer activities during the past 12 months promoting youth participation in the community

· are undertaking study at a tertiary or training institution in 2018

· are participating in a conference or event either in New Zealand or overseas in 2018 that is significantly based on youth leadership and development

· on receiving a scholarship, agrees to provide a written report to the board outlining how the scholarship was used to support their education and training for 2018.

13. Local board members and three members of the Manurewa Youth Council formed the assessment panel and held a workshop on 8 February 2018 to review all the applications and allocate funding. The panel has decision making authority as decided by the local board in 2016, and carried over to this scholarship round.

14. Subsequently one of the applicants, Anastasia Ratu, advised of a change of circumstances from her application.

15. Anastasia is now enrolled at the Manurewa High School, and explained that the change of school has incurred additional costs such as new books, uniform, school fees and fees for extra curriculum activities.

16. Staff recommend that the local board acknowledges the change of circumstances and that the amount awarded be adjusted from $1600 to $1680.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

17. The scholarship scheme delivers on a key objective in the Manurewa Local Board Plan 2017: more young people with skills and clear goals that enable successful transitions into employment.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

18. The local board area has a high percentage of Māori residents with 25.3 per cent of Manurewa’s population identify as Māori, compared to 10.7 per cent in Auckland as a whole.

19. Te reo Māori was used in promotional posters and the application form. Staff visited the Manurewa marae to explain the scope of the scholarship and to distribute forms.

20. Fifty percent (seven) of the applicants identify as Māori.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

21. The assessment panel awarded a total of $22,300.00 to all 14 applicants. If the change of circumstance is taken into account, the total would be $22,380. This is within the budget allocated for the scholarship project.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

22. One applicant, an Auckland Council employee, and the mother of another applicant, also an Auckland Council employee, were required to provide conflict of interest declarations. While these instances were taken into account by the assessment panel, it was concluded that these applicants were not affected by this connection.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

23. Staff have notified applicants of the panel’s decisions. Scholarship payments will commence following the local board’s acknowledgment of the allocation and Anastasia’s change of circumstances.

24. Scholarship recipients have been asked to provide the local board a written report and/or presentation when their scholarship experience is complete.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Lucia Davis – Specialist Advisor

Authorisers

Graham Bodman - General Manager Arts, Community and Events

Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by DR Developments Ltd at 9 - 11 James Road, Manurewa.

File No.: CP2018/01961

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Manurewa Local Board, for a new road name for a road created by way of subdivision at 9 – 11 James Road, Manurewa.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. Auckland Council has road naming guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming in Auckland.

3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names “Kanga Lane” (applicant’s preferred road name), and “Radha Lane” were determined to meet the road naming policy criteria.

4. Local iwi groups were consulted and the only iwi to respond was Ngai Paoa. Ngai Paoa was content to defer to other iwi and had no objections. Responses from all other iwi contacted were not received.

5. The name “Kanga Lane”, proposed by the applicant and the name “Radha Lane” are recommended for approval to the local board.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for the approval:

a) the road name “Kanga Lane”, proposed by the applicant, for the new road created by way of subdivision at 9 – 11 James Road, Manurewa, while noting that “Radha Lane” also meets the road naming criteria.

Horopaki / Context

6. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allowed that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the council’s approval.

7. The road to be named is a shared driveway to serve 11 dwellings. DR Developments Limited applied and was granted this subdivision under resource consent MC_52174 SP12706 (BUN60081839 - LUC60291815 and SUB60299989).

8. The applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the road created as part of the development at the parent site address.

Preference	Proposed New Road Name	Meaning
Preferred Name	Kanga Lane	Means maize or corn
First Alternative	Radha Lane	Means prosperity or success, is a Hindu Goddess
Second Alternative	Rishi Lane	Means wise or clever

Figure One: Location and Layout of new Road.

9. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to local boards.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

10. The applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines.

11. The proposed suffix of “Lane” is appropriate in this circumstance, as the road is a short private driveway to 11 dwellings. Other suffixes also meet the definition, being: “Place”, “Close”, “Court” and “Way”. The applicant’s preference was “Lane”.

12. As the applicant’s preferred name “Kanga Lane” meets the criteria, it is recommended for consideration for approval while noting that the name “Radha Lane” is also appropriate as it complies with all the criteria of the road naming guidelines.

13. No consultation has been undertaken with Land Information New Zealand.

14. The applicant has emailed all the 16 relevant iwi groups, and gave a 15 week day window for iwi to respond. Ngai Paoa replied, and were content to defer to other iwi. No other responses were received.

15. New Zealand Post was consulted and indicated that “Rishi Lane”, was not acceptable as there is already an existing “Rishi Way” in Mangere. “Kanga Lane” and “Radha Lane” as provided by the applicant are both acceptable from their perspective.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

16. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

17. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Māori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Māori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Māori identity. Local iwi were consulted and did not wish to provide any input into the decision.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

18. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with the council’s administrative charges.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

19. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board for this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

20. The Resource Consenting Team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Samantha Kealey – Resource Consents Planner

Authorisers

Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents

Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

New Road Name Approval for the residential subdivision by Devi Group of Companies Limited at 57 Senator Drive, Manurewa.

File No.: CP2018/02224

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval from the Manurewa Local Board, for two new road names for two private ways on a subdivision at 57 Senator Drive, Manurewa.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

3. Following assessment against the road naming criteria, the road names ‘Rasela Lane and Rishita Lane’ (applicant’s preferred road names), or their alternative names - ‘Harish Lane and Vijaya Lane’ or ‘Vandana Lane and Tanisha Lane’, and the names suggested by iwi, were all determined to meet the road naming guideline criteria.

4. Local iwi groups were consulted and several responses were received. The responses are summarised as follows:

(a) Ngāti Te Ata did not support the use of any of the names proposed by the developer, but indicated that it would put forward Maori names. None had been received.

(b) Te Akitai Waiohua did not support the use of any of the names proposed by the developer and suggested the names – Parehua Lane and Taupuni Lane.

(c) Ngaati Whanaunga also did not support the use of any of the names proposed by the developer and suggested six other names instead of those proposed (these are listed below).

(d) Ngāti Paoa stated that they would like to defer this project to other mana whenua with lead cultural interest in the area on Manurewa.

(e) A response was received from Ngāti Whātua Orakei which confirmed that it did not require further engagement.

(f) No responses were received from the other iwi groups contacted.

The results of this consultation are detailed below.

5. As the subdivision is completed and sections are ready for building and/or sale, the applicant company urgently requests that a decision on road names be made.

6. If the names ‘Rasela Lane and Rishita Lane’, (the applicant’s preferred names) are not approved, it is requested that the board choose two other names from the pairs of names suggested by one of the iwi groups.

7. The applicant has proposed a road type with “Lane” as a suffix and have expressed that they do not have any particular preference. In this case, appropriate suffixes include “Lane” or “Way” as appropriate.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, considers for approval:

a) the road names ‘Rasela Lane and Rishita Lane’, proposed by the applicant, for the two new private ways created by the subdivision at 57 Senator Drive, Manurewa.

Horopaki / Context

8. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allowed that where a new road, private road or private way needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name for the local board’s approval.

9. Two new private ways were created as part of the new residential development (granted under resource consent BUN 60081513) including 30 two storey dwellings. Each private way will serve as access to 15 residential houses.

10. The applicant has proposed the following names for consideration for the two private ways created as part of the development at 57 Senator Drive, Manurewa.

Figure One: Location and Layout of new private ways off Senator Drive, Manurewa.

Applicant’s proposals

Preference	Proposed New Road Names	Meaning
Preferred Name	Rasela Lane and Rishita Lane	‘Rasela is a multi-cultural name used by people of Samoan, Indian and Roman background. It symbolises different nationality and holds the meaning of melodious. Rishita is a Hindu name signifying the best and/or saintly.
First Alternative	Harish Lane and Vijaya Lane	'Harish is a Hindu name commonly known as the name of Hindu god Lord Shiva. Vijaya is a Sanskrit word symbolising victory.
Second Alternative	Vandana Lane and Tanisha Lane	‘Vandana stands for worship and Tanisha is a Sanskrit word symbolising ambition.

Names Proposed by Nigel Denny, Kaitiaki Manager of Te Akitai Waiohua

Preference

Proposed Road Names

Meaning

Parehua Lane

Parehua = Terrace

“Terrace sites of indeterminate age have also been discovered in the hills between Redoubt Road and Alfriston Road.”

Taupuni Lane

Taupuni = Camp

“Te Akitai Waiohua established camps around the local area.”

Names Proposed by Ngaati Whanaunga

Mike Baker on behalf of Ngaati Whanaunga supports the themes used by the applicant for the two new roads and proposes the following names:

Preference	Proposed Road Names	Meaning
	Kaha Lane	Kaha = Courageous, capable. “A leadership trait”
	Reretau Lane	Reretau = To be in harmony, harmonious. “In-sync with the environment“
	Toanga Lane	Toanga = Bravery, valour “A leadership trait”
	Humarie Lane	Humarie = Pleasant, peaceful “A tranquil and peaceful place”
	Rawe lane	Rawe = Excellence “A quality and standard to strive for”
	Angitu Lane	Angitu = Successful, fortunate “Ambitious trait”

11. The Auckland Council, by way of the Auckland Council Long Term Plan (2012 - 2022), allocated the responsibility for the naming of new roads, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974, to local boards.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

12. The applicant’s proposed road names have been assessed against the criteria set out in the Auckland Council road naming guidelines.

13. The proposed road names suggested by the applicant company and the two iwi groups listed above all meet the criteria for reasons including the following:

· Consultation has been undertaken with mana whenua to ensure appropriateness and correct spelling of the proposed names.

· The names are relatively easy to pronounce, spell and write.

· There are no existing similar/same road names within Auckland Council’s boundary.

14. Consultation was undertaken with NZ Post and LINZ, and both parties have confirmed that the applicant company’s proposed names are acceptable to these organisations. The names suggested by the two iwi groups have been checked against the LINZ master list and none of them are duplications of existing road names in the Auckland Council area.

15. The applicant has not proposed a road type and have expressed that they do not have any particular preference. In this case appropriate suffixes include ‘Lane’ or ‘Way’.

16. As the applicant’s preferred names (Rasela Lane and Rishita Lane) meet the criteria, it is recommended for consideration for approval. If these road names are not approved by the Board, it is recommended that alternative names be chosen as a pair from the names suggested by one or other of the iwi groups.

17. All of the road names proposed by the applicant company and the iwi groups meet the council’s road naming criteria and could be chosen.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

18. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

19. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board in this report is linked to the Auckland Plan Outcome, “A Māori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference in the world”. The use of Māori names for roads, buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate Māori identity.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

20. The cost of processing the approval of the proposed new road name and any installation of road name signage is recoverable in accordance with the council’s administrative charges.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

21. The decision sought from the Manurewa Local Board in this report is not considered to have any legal or legislative implications.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

22. The Resource Consenting team is involved in ensuring that appropriate road name signage will be installed accordingly once an approval is obtained for the new road name.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Roger Low - Senior Subdivision Advisor

Samantha Kealey – Resource Consent Planner

Authorisers

Ian Smallburn - General Manager Resource Consents

Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Manurewa Local Board

15 March 2018

Manurewa Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar - March 2018

File No.: CP2018/02289

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. To present to the Manurewa Local Board the six months Governance Forward Work Calendar.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. This report introduces the Governance Forward Work Calendar: a schedule of items that will come before local boards at business meetings and workshops over the next six months. The Governance Forward Work Calendar for the Manurewa Local Board is included in Attachment A.

3. The calendar aims to support local boards’ governance role by:

i) ensuring advice on agendas and workshop material is driven by local board priorities

ii) clarifying what advice is required and when

iii) clarifying the rationale for reports.

4. The calendar will be updated every month, be included on the agenda for business meetings and distributed to relevant council staff. It is recognised that at times items will arise that are not programmed. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s

That the Manurewa Local Board:

a) note the Governance Forward Work Calendar as at 1 March 2018.

Horopaki / Context

5. The council’s Quality Advice Programme aims to improve the focus, analysis, presentation and timeliness of staff advice to elected representatives. An initiative under this is to develop forward work calendars for governing body committees and local boards. These provide elected members with better visibility of the types of governance tasks they are being asked to undertake and when they are scheduled.

6. Although the document is new, there are no new projects in the Governance Forward Work Calendar. The calendar brings together in one schedule reporting on all of the board’s projects and activities that have been previously approved in the local board plan, long-term plan, departmental work programmes and through other board decisions. It includes governing body policies and initiatives that call for a local board response.

7. This initiative is intended to support the boards’ governance role. It will also help staff to support local boards, as an additional tool to manage workloads and track activities across council departments, and it will allow greater transparency for the public.

8. The calendar is arranged in three columns, “Topic”, “Purpose” and “Governance Role”:

i) Topic describes the items and may indicate how they fit in with broader processes such as the annual plan.

ii) Purpose indicates the aim of the item, such as formally approving plans or projects, hearing submissions or receiving progress updates

iii) Governance role is a higher-level categorisation of the work local boards do. Examples of the seven governance categories are tabled below:

Governance role	Examples
Setting direction / priorities / budget	Capex projects, work programmes, annual plan
Local initiatives / specific decisions	Grants, road names, alcohol bans
Input into regional decision-making	Comments on regional bylaws, policies, plans
Oversight and monitoring	Local board agreement, quarterly performance reports, review projects
Accountability to the public	Annual report
Engagement	Community hui, submissions processes
Keeping informed	Briefings, cluster workshops

9. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar. The calendar will be updated and reported back every month to business meetings. Updates will also be distributed to relevant council staff.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

10. This report is an information report providing the governance forward work programme for the next six months.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

11. All local boards are being presented with Governance Forward Work Calendars for their consideration.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

12. The projects and processes referred to in the Governance Forward Work Calendar will have a range of implications for Māori which will be considered when the work is reported.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

13. There are no financial implications relating to this report.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

14. This report is a point in time of the governance forward work calendar. It is a living document and updated month to month. It minimises the risk of the board being unaware of planned topics for their consideration.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

15. Staff will review the calendar each month in consultation with board members and will report an updated calendar to the board.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Manurewa Local Board Forward Governance Work Programme - March 2018	89

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors	Trina Bishop - Democracy Advisor
Authorisers	Manoj Ragupathy - Relationship Manager Manurewa & Papakura

Chairperson	Angela Dalton
Deputy Chairperson	Rangi McLean
Members	Joseph Allan
	Stella Cattle
	Sarah Colcord
	Angela Cunningham-Marino
	Ken Penney

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Manurewa Local Board 1 February 2018 Workshop Record	105
b ⇩	Manurewa Local Board 8 February 2018 Workshop Record	109
c ⇩	Manurewa Local Board 22 February 2018 Workshop Record	111