Agenda of Environment and Community Committee

Environment and Community Committee

10 April 2018

Kauri Dieback Management Report Back and Decisions

File No.: CP2018/03696

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. To report back and make decisions on previous resolutions relating to kauri dieback management (ENV/2018/1), specifically on:

· a proposal to close high risk tracks in the Hunua Ranges Regional Park, by 1 May 2018,

· a proposal to close the forested area of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, with exceptions, by 1 May 2018,

· targeted engagement and consultation on both closure proposals, and

· the regional kauri dieback approach.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. Kauri dieback is spreading across the region and there is significant technical uncertainty around how best to control it. While the incidence and proliferation of kauri dieback disease is most known within the Waitākere Ranges, Auckland Council has a responsibility to stop the spread of kauri dieback across the Auckland region. This responsibility is reflected in the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan which prioritises preventing disease spread to the apparently disease-free areas of Hunua and Hauraki Gulf islands. Auckland Council’s Long-term Plan also proposes to significantly increase investment in kauri dieback management across the region.

3. In February 2018 the committee proposed to close high risk tracks in the Hunua Ranges Regional Park, subject to consultation within mana whenua (Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Whanaunga, Ngāti Pāoa and Ngāti Tamaoho) and the Franklin Local Board.

4. The proposed Hunua approach and the recommended track closures within the Hunua Ranges have been discussed with mana whenua and the Franklin Local Board; who are largely in support of this revised proposal. This consultation has resulted in a refined list for approval by the committee.

5. In addition, in February 2018 the committee also proposed to ‘close the forested areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, with exceptions, by 1 May 2018’ subject to working with Te Kawerau ā Maki, consultation with the Waitākere Ranges Local Board and targeted engagement with groups who use and benefit from the regional park.

6. Council staff worked alongside Te Kawerau ā Maki to agree the proposed closure area and to identify a list of tracks that could remain open for consultation with impacted communities.

7. Auckland Council received over 800 pieces of feedback on the Waitākere proposal. In summary, respondents expressed despair over the potential impact of the disease on kauri and the ranges. Approximately 24 per cent of submitters felt that the proposal was about right and 25 per cent thought it did not propose enough closures, suggesting that more track closures were needed to either support the principle of the rāhui or do the right thing.

8. Conversely 43 per cent of respondents felt there are too many track closures proposed and that the impact on the community would be too severe. Many mentioned specific tracks they would like to stay open. Feedback also suggested a lack of understanding about the science and the need to invest more into research and development, public education, cleaning stations and increasing knowledge about the disease.

9. To respond to this feedback three options have been assessed from a biosecurity risk perspective:

· Option A: is recommended to this committee and would involve implementing the proposal to close the forested areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, as publicly consulted on, including prioritised openings as tracks are upgraded.

· Option B: implement a more permissive approach and in addition to the proposed exceptions to closure, also keep tracks within the coastal strip open – with rolling openings.

· Option C:implement a more conservative approach and close all forested areas of the Regional Park.

10. Option A is recommended as it will provide the greatest level of protection to non-diseased areas within the Waitākere Ranges and other sites, whilst allowing for some recreational, conservation and commercial opportunity. If this option is adopted further track openings are planned to enable coastal connection and multi-day walk options as an initial priority.

11. The park closures and enforcement actions agreed to by this committee involve unbudgeted expenditure, as described in both the December 2017 and February 2018 reports and as reflected by resolutions passed by the committee in both meetings.

12. The recommended option represents $1.18M of unbudgeted work. Given contractor availability and the proximity to the end of the financial year it is recommended that unbudgeted costs of $740,000 for the current financial year (2017/2018) are approved. These unbudgeted works also involve out-sourced contractor costs.In addition to deliver this work it is recommended that approval for two FTEs is granted. The unbudgeted costs will need to be considered and approved by Finance and Performance Committee who have delegation for these matters.

13. All options will have a flow on impact for future years’ budgets. For example, if either of the proposed Long-term Plan environmental protection options are adopted additional expenditure to give effect to these closures from 2018/2019 onwards will be prioritised above the previously planned for activity.

14. A key part of the regional approach to kauri dieback management is ongoing surveillance to establish the incidence of the disease. In addition to the Waitākere Ranges, dieback is now known to be widespread within the Awhitu Pennisula and surveys in northern Auckland have highlighted many sites in apparent poor health. The largest stand of kauri forest in the Auckland region that is not yet infected is the Hunua Ranges.

15. Risks exist in the potential unintended spread of the disease to uninfected areas. By focusing biosecurity activity in the Waitākere Ranges there is the potential to cause increased human activity within apparently disease-free areas such as the Hunua Ranges. As protection of these disease-free sites is the top regional priority for kauri dieback management, decisions in relation to Waitākere need to be cognisant of mitigating perverse effects in disease-free areas.

16. As previously described any decisions relating to closures of regional parks should comply with the relevant decision-making obligations of the Local Government Act, the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Act and the Reserves Act.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendations

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) approve the track closure proposals in the Hunua Ranges Regional Park to prevent the introduction of Kauri Dieback disease in the park, by 1 May 2018 as detailed in Attachments B and C.

b) approve the proposal to close the forested areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park with exceptions (such as beaches, pasturelands and a limited number of tracks with track surface conditions to a standard that will support the requirements of the proposed controlled area notice), by 1 May 2018 as detailed in Attachments D and E.

c) direct staff to prioritise initial track upgrades and improvements in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park to re-establish coastal connectivity and multi-day walking opportunities, as suggested during feedback, to mitigate the impact on park users and operators.

d) direct staff to work with mana whenua on kauri dieback management and wider regional parks matters of significance to mana whenua.

e) note that there are significant technical risks relating to the understanding of kauri dieback disease and the impact the proposed closure approaches may have, and request staff to report back on the effectiveness of the closures, controlled area notices and additional measures within one year of commencement.

f) note that expenditure associated with the recommended approach to manage kauri dieback is not budgeted for in 2017/18 and recommend that Finance and Performance Committee approve unbudgeted expenditure up to a maximum of $740,000 in 2018/2018.

g) note that staff required to implement the recommended approach to manage kauri dieback are additional to current approved staff numbers and approve an increase in 2 full time equivalents to deliver on this activity.

h) note the regional update on kauri dieback spread, management approaches, as well as the proposed Long-term Plan environmental protection options provide for this challenge.

i) note that if either of the proposed Long-term Plan environmental protection options are adopted that any additional expenditure to give effect to these closures from 2018/2019 onwards will need to be prioritised. This will need to be prioritised above previously planned activities for kauri dieback work such as: track improvements, upgrades, landowner support, hygiene station upgrades and washdown facilities.

j) note that the status and continuance of the closures, and council’s management strategy, may be considered when the Regional Parks Management Plan 2010 comes up for review in 2020, or when the proposed National Pest Management Plan is developed, without limiting any other review..

Horopaki / Context

17. Kauri dieback is spreading across the region and there is significant technical uncertainty around how best to control it. While the incidence and proliferation of kauri dieback disease is most known within the Waitākere Ranges, Auckland Council has a responsibility to stop the spread of kauri dieback across the Auckland region. This responsibility is reflected in the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan which prioritises preventing disease spread to the apparently disease-free areas of Hunua and Hauraki Gulf islands. The Long-term Plan proposes to significantly increase investment in kauri dieback management across the region.

18. In December 2017, in response to calls for Auckland Council to take more action to protect kauri in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, the Environment and Community Committee resolved to increase the kauri dieback management approach in the Waitākere Ranges, including closing high and medium risk tracks, to support the principles of the rāhui, placed by Te Kawerau ā Maki on the ranges. (ENV/2017/183)

19. Despite significant stepped-up activity there was a high level of public non-compliance with cleaning stations, track closures and calls to respect the rāhui. That approach was increasing the risk of kauri dieback spread both within the Waitākere Ranges as well as to other kauri dieback free areas across the region such as the Hunua Ranges.

20. In February 2018 the committee considered options to ensure Auckland Council is continuing to fulfill its responsibilities for kauri dieback management by:

· Containing the disease in the Waitākere Ranges, as far as practicable, and

· Protecting healthy areas such as the Hunua Ranges.

21. Consequently, the committee passed a number of resolutions to address the kauri dieback challenge as described in Attachment A to this report. In summary the committee proposed to close the forested area of the Waitākere Ranges, high risk tracks in the Hunua Ranges and also requested council staff report back on the regional kauri dieback approach.

22. The committee’s resolutions were subject to targeted engagement with concessionaires, businesses and recreational groups who use and benefit from the regional park, and with people who live within the Waitākere Ranges, to ensure that the views and preferences of those likely to be interested in or affected by the proposal were considered alongside mana whenua and local board consultation.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

Hunua Ranges Proposal

23. In February 2018 the committee resolved to propose to close high risk tracks in the Hunua Ranges Regional Park, subject to consultation within mana whenua (Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Whanaunga, Ngāti Pāoa and Ngāti Tamaoho) and the Franklin Local Board.

24. An indicative list of tracks was recommended to be proposed to be closed from 1 May 2018. This indicative list was subsequently refined following more detailed assessment by technical staff and is attached to this report as Attachment B alongside a map of the proposed track closures in Attachment C.

25. The kauri dieback management focus for the Hunua Ranges is on preventing kauri dieback from entering the park (through the movement of contaminated soil on footwear and equipment). This differs from management at infected sites like the Waitākere Ranges where the disease is well established, and the biosecurity emphasis is on reducing movement within and outside of the regional park.

26. This management approach has informed the recommendation of tracks within the Hunua Ranges Regional Park that are proposed for temporary and one permanent closure. These are the tracks that are currently assessed as being of higher risk due to their proximity to kauri areas and the need for hygiene station improvement to achieve a greater level of protection.

27. There are several tracks that currently meet the above closure criteria but are planned to have new hygiene stations installed prior to 1 May 2018 which will enable them to remain open. These include the Wairoa Loop tracks and Waharau Lower Link tracks.

28. Some of these closures may have consequential impacts to campgrounds including Mangatangi, Workman and Thousand Acre and parks staff will work with campground users to manage this impact. Initial engagement has been undertaken with recreational user groups and concessionaires and further work is planned to ensure park users are aware of the proposed changes if adopted, and any alternative options for recreational opportunities.

29. Preventing the disease from establishing within the Hunua Ranges Regional Park while still allowing for public access will be most effectively supported through the establishment of the Controlled Area Notice being developed by the Ministry of Primary Industries combined with improved hygiene stations, particularly in kauri forest areas. Some track surface improvement work is also proposed where this will support improved kauri health and reduce risk of mud transfer to track surfaces in high value areas.

30. The draft Controlled Area Notice for the Hunua Ranges will impose the standard that requires any person entering the defined area to ensure their footwear and gear is free from visible soil. It will also be mandatory for people to use any hygiene station they encounter while visiting the area. Auckland Council staff are working closely with the Ministry for Primary Industries on the development of this notice, signage, enforcement and monitoring.

31. Given the significance of the Hunua Ranges regional parklands – as the largest council managed currently disease-free site – monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed management approach, such as visitor adherence to the Controlled Area Notice, will be important.

32. This approach and the recommended track closures within the Hunua Ranges have been discussed with mana whenua and the Franklin Local Board. As described in the Māori Impact Statement and Local Board views section of this report both mana whenua and the local board are largely in support of this revised proposal.

33. Following finalisation of the Long-term Plan, the prioritisation of investment across Auckland’s kaurilands including the Hunua Ranges will be confirmed. This will inform the timelines for re-openings and hygiene station upgrades within a regional context.

Waitākere Ranges Proposal

34. The Waitākere proposal, as resolved by the Environment and Community Committee in February 2018 is to ‘close the forested areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, with exceptions, such as beaches, pasturelands and areas which would reach the requirement of a controlled area notice, by 1 May 2018, subject to working with Te Kawerau ā Maki, consultation with the Waitākere Ranges Local Board and targeted engagement with groups who use and benefit from the regional park’.

35. Council staff have worked alongside Te Kawerau ā Maki to agree the proposed closure area and to identify a list of tracks that could remain open for the purposes of consultation with impacted communities. Working back from a proposal that the forested area is closed, the criteria for a track that is proposed to be open was any of the following:

· is outside of the closed forested area

· has a track surface that is to a standard where a person can arrive with clean footwear and gear, walk that track in any weather conditions and not have soil on their shoes as they leave the track and after using a hygiene station.

· in an area away from kauri.

36. A small number of tracks within the regional park that meet these criteria are proposed to be closed as they no longer provide a meaningful destination.

37. This proposal means that the forested area of the park would be closed and a small number of tracks would remain open as described in Attachments D and E of this report. Following agreement on the proposed closure area with Te Kawerau ā Maki, staff commenced a targeted public engagement process.

38. Engagement was targeted at those who use and benefit from the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park including: concessionaires, local businesses, recreational groups, conservation groups and people who live near or visit the regional park. Feedback was sought on the proposed plan including its likely impact on people and businesses, which tracks should be a priority for future re-openings and which tracks should be exceptions to the closure.

39. This engagement included an online survey, day time drop in session at Arataki Visitor Centre, an evening public meeting, attendance at the Waitākere Experience Network meeting, recreational users groups including the New Zealand Recreational Association, Federated Mountain clubs and tramping groups. In addition individual meetings with some concessionaires and operators were held and a number of submissions were sent to council on the topic. A full list of additional submissions and copies of submissions is appended to this report as Attachment G.

40. Council staff engaged an independent specialist engagement company, Buzz Channel, to analyse the survey and feedback received on this proposal. The full report on feedback received is attached to this report as Attachment F.

41. Over 800 individual pieces of feedback were received on the proposal. In summary all submitters expressed despair over the potential impact of the disease on kauri and the Waitākere ranges. Twenty four percent of submitters felt that the proposal was about right while 25 per cent thought it did not propose enough closures. The majority view of those that felt there should be more track closures is that they support the principle of the rāhui and that closing more tracks was the right thing to do. Some felt that the area must be protected, and the tracks closed indefinitely.

42. Conversely 43 per cent of respondents felt there are too many track closures proposed and that the impact on the community would be too severe. These submitters expressed how much they love the ranges and enjoy using them as an area to walk, run, tramp and so forth and that they feel the closing all the proposed tracks would have a huge impact. Many mentioned specific tracks they would like to stay open, with specific mention of those with few kauri, as well as coastal tracks, loop tracks, tracks that could be used as multi-day or long tramps and tracks with good surfaces. A list of these tracks is included in Attachment F to this report.

43. In addition, feedback received suggested that there should be more investment in research and science about kauri dieback, more education of the public about its effects and increased work to improve the tracks and cleaning stations as opposed to closures and policing them. There was also of level of skepticism about the effectiveness of closures as there is limited understanding of the disease and some vectors, such as flooding and pest animals, which will remain regardless of a closure.

44. Overall while 24 per cent felt there should be more closures an equal amount 25 per cent felt the proposal was about right. A larger group f(43 per cent) felt that the proposal needed to be more balanced; wanting council to instigate a range of measures to limit the spread while still allowing access to certain parts of the ranges for Aucklanders to access.

45. Following discussion and explanation of the proposal with concessionaires and businesses who operate within the ranges or rely on visitation to the ranges for their activities, it has been confirmed that some can work within the proposal but may need to have their current concession agreements altered to include access to other areas not covered by their current concession. If the proposal is adopted council staff will work quickly to change these conditions and enable concessionaires to continue with their activities.

46. However, there is a smaller group of concessionaires and local businesses that have described the significant impact the proposed closure will have on their operations. Some of these groups have provided feedback on the proposal on their operations, as appended in Attachment H. Many of these groups have existing stringent biosecurity standard operating procedures to manage the risk of spread of kauri dieback from their activities and have promoted the messages around kauri protection through their work. These groups cannot operate within the proposal and are reliant on the Waitākere Ranges for their tourism activities. These groups claim that if confirmed the impact of the proposal on their business is severe.

47. There are some concessionaires who may be completely unable to conduct activities authorised under their agreements if a decision is made to close the forested area of the Waitakere Ranges Regional Park and no exemptions are granted. There will also be a small number of concessionaires who may not be able to operate under the exemptions recommended in Option A.

48. One of the key pieces of feedback relating to the impact of the proposal on concessionaires and businesses relates to the timelines for the proposed closures and rolling openings. Giving certainty around the proposal for planned upgrades to reach the requirement of a controlled area notice and enable multi-day walks would help these businesses and concessionaires in their planning.

49. Council staff are working to develop a plan for track upgrades, with multi-day walks a priority (based on existing and proposed budget scenarios). It is important to note that staff cannot provide firm timelines for these upgrades and rolling openings as these are contingent on the Long-term Plan. As soon as this information is confirmed council staff will work with affected concessionaries to communicate timeframes and options.

50. Staff also discussed this proposal and engagement approach with the Waitākere Ranges Local Board in a workshop on 8 March 2018. In summary the local board believe that ‘the forested area of Waitākere Ranges needs to be closed and only coastal beaches, coastal walks without kauri, and service roads to be left open’ as described in the local board views section of this report.

Options for the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park

51. On balance some parts of the community feel that the proposal is too severe and that it will have a significant impact on their wellbeing and the economic viability of their locally based businesses.

52. To respond to this feedback three options have been assessed from a biosecurity risk perspective:

Option A) - Implement the proposal to close the forested areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park, as publicly consulted on (Attachments D and E), including prioritised rolling openings as tracks are upgraded (Recommended Option)

· Option B) - Implement a more permissive approach and in addition to the proposed exceptions to closure, also keep tracks within the coastal strip open – with rolling openings. As shown in Attachment H.

· Option C) – Implement a more conservative approach and close all forested areas of the Regional Park

Option A – Close Forested Areas, with exceptions

53. Following direction from the committee to consult on this proposal council staff worked alongside Te Kawerau ā Maki to agree the proposed closure area and to identify a list of tracks that could remain open for the purposes of consultation with impacted communities. Working back from a proposal that the forested area is closed, the criteria for a track that is proposed to be open was any of the following:

· is outside of the closed forested area

· in an area away from kauri.

54. A small number of tracks within the regional park that meet these criteria are proposed to be closed as they no longer provide a meaningful destination.

55. This proposal means that the forested area of the park would be closed and a small number of tracks would remain open as described in Attachments D and E. A small number of the tracks remain option under this option is contingent on additional work being completed by 1 May and further discussion with Te Kawerau a Maki.

56. This option allows for recreational activities while managing a forest closure with increased compliance. The tracks to be excepted are those which would reach the requirements of a controlled area notice of clean footwear.

57. Following feedback staff have analysed submissions to see if any suggestions for additional tracks to be exception could be implemented within this framework. As the proposal was developed based on technical considerations relating to kauri dieback disease spread and the current state of the track network these changes cannot be implemented at this stage.

58. However, in response to feedback received it is recommended that if this option is approved that staff be directed to prioritise rolling openings in the regional park to multi-day walk offerings and tracks as suggested during feedback in targeted consultation

59. Staff have commenced a review of the track network within the Waitākere Ranges and have taken into account feedback from the public engagement process to identify and prioritise the order in which work will be undertaken on tracks to bring them to the required standard and reopen them to public use. Initial priority will be given to re-establishing coastal connectivity (linking the components of the Hillary Trail) and multi-day walking opportunities. It is estimated that a three to four-day walking opportunity could be re-established within twelve months, subject to budget confirmation. The estimated cost of this would be $1.93 million made up of both capital and operational funding. This would enable upgrade to a number of tracks including Hamilton Track, Karamatura Track, Donald McLean Track, Puriri Ridge Track, Omanawanui Track, Gibbons Track and Comans Track.

Option B – Close Forested Areas except for a coastal strip

60. This is the more permissive option presented to the committee in February 2018 and attached to this report as Attachment H. This proposal would close all kauri forests, with exceptions, and tracks in the kauri forested areas that do not reach the standard required by a controlled area notice. It provides a coastal strip and would not close other coastal forest types which may have some kauri but which are dominated by other coastal species such as pōhutukawa. This closure option would not apply to other areas of the regional park such as beaches, pasturelands, and would not close essential service access or prevent authorised management activity.

61. This option would respond to feedback received from submitters that they would like a multi-day walk option and more diversity of length and tracks. However, it is not recommended as it would make messaging the closure difficult and some tracks within this strip would be unable to meet the requirements of a controlled area notice, and most importantly a risk of kauri dieback spread would be present.

Option C – Full Closure

62. This option would give the clearest message and potentially the highest level of protection. This said it is not without risk. It is likely to present more challenges in terms of non-compliance with the closure and other vectors would still exist.

63. Under this option Aucklanders would have limited options for recreation and the views of distinct communities that live and work in the area would not be recognised.

64. This is a considerably different proposition to the option that has been discussed with the community and is likely to have considerably greater impact on park users, businesses and concessionaires. Accordingly, additional consultation would be required before this option could progress.

65. A technical consideration in not recommending a full closure is confidence that the risk within the recommended closure proposal can be managed while allowing some controlled access to the park.

Other Considerations – Off Track Activity & Timelines Rolling Openings

66. A number of the conservation volunteer groups operate in the Waitākere Ranges and undertake weed or pest animal control both on and off official tracks. If the recommended proposal is approved and these groups could no longer undertake this activity there would be negative impacts on the forest through a lack of pest control. This would impact on the council’s indigenous biodiversity responsibilities potentially through the loss of kōkako and other rare species that have been returned to the ranges as a result of these intensive pest control initiatives. On the other hand, the movement of volunteers can increase the risk of kauri dieback spread.

67. Other activity including research, contracted pest control and permitted activities also occur off track. These may represent a risk of spreading kauri dieback disease. Staff will work through these activities on a case by case basis to assess whether the risk can be effectively managed via kauri dieback management operational plans. Some organisations have existing kauri dieback standard processes which have been reviewed by biosecurity experts previously so this will be a case of refresh and review to ensure they are fit for purpose.

68. The uncertainty relating to the timeline for rolling openings is an issue of concern for those impacted by the proposed closure. This uncertainty is from the proposed investment scenarios currently under consideration through the Long-term Plan process. Pending increased investment, it is recommended that staff be directed to ensure the implementation of a programme of rolling openings in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park to multi-day walk offerings and tracks as suggested during feedback in targeted consultation.

Long-term Plan Investment in Kauri Dieback Management

69. Two options for increased investment in kauri dieback management are being consulted on through the draft Long-term Plan 2018-2028. Both Long-term Plan options were drafted to align to the focus in the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan of keeping kauri dieback out of currently disease-free areas in Hunua and the Hauraki Gulf islands. Associated costs for Long-term Plan options are detailed in the financial implications section below.

70. Both Long-term Plan options provide for over 150km of track upgrades across regional and local parkland, of which approximately 100km is within the Waitākere Ranges. The two options differ primarily in the quality of track upgrade that could be provided for. Option B provides for a greater proportion of tracks to be upgraded to boardwalks or geomesh, whereas in Option A the majority of track upgrades would be to metal aggregate.

71. Both Long-term Plan options provide for approximately 300 hygiene stations, of which approximately 100 would be within the Waitākere Ranges. The two options differ primarily in the quality of hygiene station provided for, with no large walk-through stations provided for within Option A but up to 100 of this style provided for in Option B.

72. In addition, both options provide for a range of other kauri dieback-related activities including vehicle washdown stations for Auckland Council and Watercare vehicles, awareness and behaviour change, research, nursery accreditation and support for landowner hygiene practices. As with previous components the two options vary in the quality and quantity of these activities provided for.

73. The significantly increased investment proposed in either option aims to reduce the rate at which kauri dieback spreads through the region and should give Auckland Council a good chance to prevent it from establishing in key areas like the Hunua Ranges and on Waiheke Island.

74. It is important to note that if either of the proposed Long-term Plan environmental protection options are adopted that additional expenditure to give effect to these closures from 2018/2019 onwards will be prioritised above track improvements, upgrades and other aspects of the kauri dieback programme such as landowner support, hygiene station upgrades and washdown facilities.

Monitoring

75. As outlined in the attached regional report Auckland Council has an annual kauri dieback surveillance programme that aims to track spread of the disease to help us prioritise efforts and understand the effectiveness of our management programme. This surveillance will continue, allowing us to monitor the overall effectiveness of measures taken to protect the Hunua Ranges and reduce the further spread of the disease within the Waitākere Ranges.

76. The existing programme of monitoring visitor compliance with track closures using track counters and cameras will be enhanced to cover more closed tracks. In addition, visitor compliance with the requirements of the Controlled Area Notice will also be monitored. The monitoring programme will look at the effectiveness of a range of different approaches to the proposed closures such as the use of barriers, signage, security cameras and presence of compliance staff or contractors.

77. Given the proposed closures are of a scale not previously tested in New Zealand, an adaptive management approach and regular review of effectiveness will need to be initiated. This is likely to be undertaken at both a regional level (through this committee) and at the national level (through the national kauri dieback programme). The national level review will take into account the proposed National Pest Management Plan that would look to increase the consistency in management of kauri dieback across all regions. Given the untested nature of these proposals staff recommend a report back to the committee within a year of commencement.

Decision Making Considerations

78. The relevant decision-making considerations under the Local Government Act 2002, Reserves Act 1977 and Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008 were outlined in the February report. In summary, the council must:

· Consider all reasonably practicable options and analyse the advantages and disadvantages of each

· Consider the views and preferences of those likely to be interested in or affected by the proposal

· Take into account the importance of kauri and the Waitākere and Hūnua Ranges to iwi

· Demonstrate that it has had particular regard to the purpose and objectives of the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act

· Administer the Reserves Act in a manner that gives effect to the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi

79. As described above and in the Maori Impact Statement below, council staff have engaged with the likely impacted communities, businesses, residents, and mana whenua authorities, in order to provide a fair opportunity to those who are interested in or affected by the decision to contribute to the council’s decision-making process. The feedback from this engagement has been incorporated into the revised options analysis set out above.

Regional Kauri Dieback Update

80. In its February 2018 this committee also requested that staff ‘provide an update on kauri dieback management across the region and the implications for currently proposed closures in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park and Hunua Ranges Regional Parks by April 2018.’

81. Council staff have developed a technical regional kauri dieback update for the committee, as per Attachment I. In summary as a unitary authority Auckland Council leads the management of kauri dieback across the region and works in partnership with mana whenua, central government and community groups on this.

82. The main regional priority is to protect apparently disease-free areas, particularly the Hunua Ranges and Hauraki Gulf Islands (excluding Aotea), by preventing disease spread to these sites. Management also focuses on slowing the rate of spread within infected areas and prioritising initiatives to reduce risk to the most ecologically significant kauri areas. The regional approach to kauri dieback is described in more detail in Attachment I.

83. A key part of the regional approach to kauri dieback management is ongoing surveillance to establish the incidence of the disease. In addition to the Waitākere Ranges, dieback is now known to be widespread within the Awhitu Pennisula and surveys in northern Auckland have highlighted a large number of sites in apparent poor health. The largest stand of kauri forest in the Auckland region that is not yet infected is the Hunua Ranges.

84. Prevention and mitigation activities carried out across the region to slow the spread of kauri dieback include:

· track upgrades (use of boardwalks and gravel paths to try and prevent mud being spread around, rerouting tracks away from kauri trees roots)

· closure of tracks through kauri forest if they don’t meet required standards to prevent disease spread

· provision and management of hygiene stations

· community education and interventions to encourage kauri-safe behaviours

· education of contractors and developers working in sensitive areas.

85. Phosphite treatments have also been used successfully in trials to suppress the infection in individual trees, although they do not cure trees and will likely need to be re-applied every three to five years. Phosphite also does not affect the disease in the soil, meaning that any regenerating kauri seedlings will continue to die in infected areas. This treatment may, however, improve the health of trees in areas that are already infected like the Waitākere Ranges. Council staff are investigating options for providing this treatment over large-scale areas through contractors and volunteers.

86. The future regional approach is dependent on:

· the decisions relating to closures in the Waitākere Ranges and Hunua Ranges Regional Park outlined in this report

· funding approved through the Long-term Plan 2018-2028

· changes to the national kauri dieback programme.

Once decisions have been confirmed on the closures and long-term plan funding, the regional work programme for kauri dieback management over the next three years will be developed. This will be updated to align with any changes are made in the national kauri dieback programme.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views

87. Ten local boards provided formal feedback on kauri dieback disease through consultation during the drafting of the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan. Nine local boards indicated support for the proposed approach of prioritising prevention of spread to the apparently disease-free areas of Hunua and Hauraki Gulf Islands. The Waitākere Ranges Local Board requested a Waitākere-specific approach with enhanced efforts to halt disease spread.

Hunua Proposal – Franklin Local Board

88. The board has no formal decision making over activity in the regional park. However, it is recognised that the Hunua Ranges provides significant recreational, amenity, and economic benefits to the board area. Therefore, the committee has welcomed formal feedback from the board on the original proposal to close some tracks in the Hunua Ranges.

89. On 13 March 2018 a workshop was held with the board on 13 March 2018 to discuss the original proposal. In addition, board members discussed with staff options to also close the popular Cossey’s and Massey Loop track, all tracks in the Hunua Ranges, or just those tracks within 100 metres of kauri. The board has infomed the refined proposal with additional tracks for the committee’s consideration.

90. The board has previously indicated its concern that track closures may negatively impact on its Hunua Trails tourism and economic development project. A proposed trail would likely require the use of the Mangatangi Hill Road, which passes kauri stands. However, this road does need to remain open for Watercare and Auckland Council operational activities. Staff will provide advice to the Hunua Trail project on how to best reduce the risk to kauri from activity on this road.

91. On 27 March 2018, the Franklin Local Board formally considered the Hunua Kauri Dieback Protection proposal at its monthly meeting. In summary, the board supported the intent of the proposed temporary closures of the amended track list to prevent the spread of kauri dieback disease. In addition the board requested:

· closures be used to manage access in the first instance, with monitoring for infoem any full closure discussions

· track closures align or cater for the proposed Hunua Trail

· council staff work with key user groups

· that when considering investment of funds as proposed in the Long-term Plan that priority be given to prevent the introduction of kauri dieback in the Hunua Ranges (Resolution number FR/2018/2).

92. The board’s formal resolutions are appended as Attachment J.

Waitākere Ranges Proposal – Waitākere Ranges Local Board

93. The Waitākere Ranges Local Board has a strong interest in the management of kauri dieback, in particular through its local board plan outcome ‘our unique natural habitats are protected and enhanced’. One of the local board’s key initiatives in its local board plan is to fund kauri dieback awareness-raising.

94. Following the committee proposal, a workshop was held with the Waitākere Ranges Local Board to discuss the proposal for the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park on 8 March 2018. At this workshop the board emphasised the importance of engaging with all affected communities; in particular the residents in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park area.

95. At the 22 March 2018 Waitākere Ranges Local Board meeting, the board provided formal feedback on the proposed kauri dieback management approach for the Waitākere Ranges. The board noted that:

· urgent action is required to save kauri

· that all tracks in the forested area of the Waitākere Ranges needed to be closed, with only coastal beaches, coastal walks without kauri, and service roads remaining open

· concern around certain tracks remaining open as they will degrade faster due to increased visitor numbers, and this added pressure will make it more challenging to stop the spread of kauri dieback

· the need for a comprehensive long-term plan for the future of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park to determine where public access can be provided is needed, while still protecting kauri

· a process needs to be developed around when tracks can be reopened, and Te Kawerau ā Maki and the community need to be involved in this process

96. The full resolutions from the kauri dieback item at the 22 March 2018 Waitākere Ranges Local Board meeting have been included as Attachment K (WTK/2018/14)

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

Tāmaki Makaurau

97. Kauri is a keystone species which supports a distinct New Zealand forest ecosystem, sustaining indigenous flora and fauna. Kauri is a taonga species and Auckland Council, in partnership with Māori, have a responsibility for the protection of the spiritual, economic and ecological values associated with this taonga and the ecosystems it supports.

98. Tāmaki Makaurau mana whenua kaitiaki kaimahi representatives have stressed the importance of the kauri species and a desire to work more closely with council and the Department of Conservation on this kaupapa. Staff will work with mana whenua on the regional approach to kauri dieback on a site by site basis.

Hunua Ranges Regional Park

99. The Hunua Ranges are of historical, customary, cultural and spiritual significance to Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Koheriki, Ngāti Tamaoho, Ngāti Pāoa, and Ngaati Whanaunga. Three tribal authorities also have kaitiakitanga status; Ngāti Maru Rūnanga, Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua and Tainui – Waikato.

100. The maunga Kohukohunui, the highest peak within the Hunua Ranges, is a Tūpuna Maunga and an important boundary marker. The Regional Parks Management Plan 2010 recognises the relationship of mana whenua in the Hunua Ranges and includes consultation on the planning, protection, development and management of the park and Māori values they contain - Policy: 17.5.4 20 (a).

101. As part of the Healthy Hunua pest control programme from 2015 council has worked with mana whenua within the Hunua Ranges rohe (Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Whanaunga, Ngāti Pāoa and Ngāti Tamaoho). Discussions on how to address the kauri dieback challenge in the Hunua Ranges Regional Park are in progress and mana whenua representatives have provided feedback on the proposal.

102. In these discussions mana whenua representatives expressed concern about the potential cumulative impact of kauri dieback, myrtle rust and other pests and the threat they present to the health of the forest.

103. In discussing the proposal to close tracks for kauri dieback protection, mana whenua representatives supported, in principle, the closure of tracks for kauri protection, but mana whenua would like a joined up discussion on managing forest health and the role of tikanga Māori (traditional cultural protocols, such as rāhui).

104. The Crown-owned Hūnua Falls Scenic Reserve and the Plows Road Conservation Area are proposed to transfer to mana whenua as Treaty settlement redress. After transfer Auckland Council will continue to be the administering body for the Hūnua Falls reserve. At Plows Road the future iwi owner will administer the land. The consequences of any track closures to these areas will continue to be worked through with mana whenua.

105. A partnership discussion will be progressed by working towards an updated Hunua Ranges management plan that would include the management of all public lands. Council staff will work towards this with mana whenua and external partners, including the Department of Conservation.

Waitākere Ranges Regional Park

106. The Waitākere Ranges Regional Park lies within the rohe of Te Kawerau ā Maki and Ngāti Whātua, which is acknowledged in the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008. It forms part of Te Waonui a Tiriwa, which is the heartland of Te Kawerau ā Maki.

Te Kawerau ā Maki

107. Te Kawerau ā Maki view kauri in very high regards as ‘both living tupuna and as raNgātira of the forest’. Te Kawerau mātauranga also records that kauri support the growth of at least 17 plant species in addition to fungi and animals, and are integral to a healthy forest where food and medicine are collected. Their connection to the health of the forest is such that decline in kauri is an indicator that the mauri of the forest is at stake, and that ultimately ‘if Te Waonui a Tiriwa perishes so too does the iwi.’

108. Te Kawerau ā Maki have stated that kauri dieback and the declining health of Waitākere forest are existential threats to the iwi. Te Kawerau ā Maki have also stated they have a sacred obligation to protect the forest as kaitiaki.

109. In early December 2017 Te Kawerau ā Maki placed a rāhui over the ‘Waitākere forest itself (the ‘ecological catchment’) to quarantine or prevent human access. They have described that ‘as a matter of tikanga the purpose of the rāhui is to enable the environment to recuperate and regenerate without the presence and impacts of humans. Its purpose is both physical and spiritual protection.’

110. The forested area of the Waitākere Ranges includes the regional park, local parks, Department of Conservation land, and private land covered by Te Waonui a Tiriwa (the Waitākere forest). The rāhui is a formal closure by mana whenua based on tikanga. This conservation measure was taken in response to the presence of kauri dieback, and the sacred obligation of kaitiakitanga, which is provided for under Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the Te Kawerau ā Maki Claims Settlement Act (2015), the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act (2008), and the Resource Management Act (1991).

111. In addition Te Kawerau ā Maki have also described that ‘the key concept of the rāhui is to close the forest completely in order to secure it from further human impact, to allow time for the environment to regenerate and to work through a program of risk assessment, mitigation design and implementation, research, and upgrades.’ This means that as tracks are upgraded and to a standard that reduces the spread of kauri dieback that precautionary ‘rolling openings’ may be appropriate.

112. Council staff have been in ongoing discussions with Te Kawerau ā Maki about how to address the kauri dieback challenge in the Waitākere Ranges. While the forested area of the ranges remains closed under the rāhui, an exceptions list, as described above was agreed with representatives from Te Kawerau ā Maki for the purposes of engaging with the community and park users.

113. This list takes a risk-based approach to openings and starts from the principle of the forest being closed. All tracks proposed to remain open, and in particular those marked with an asterisk, are subject to confirmation that they can meet the criteria outlined above by 1 May 2018.

114. Council staff will continue discussions with Te Kawerau ā Maki on the implementation of the kauri dieback protection programme for the Waitākere Ranges including tikanga and agreed communications around any rolling openings.

Ngāti Whātua

115. Council has been in correspondence with the three Ngāti Whātua authorities: Ngāti Whatua Ōrākei, Ngāti Whātua o Kaipara and Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua.

116. Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei has reiterated that it ‘supports in full the position of [their] whanaunga of Te Kawerau ā Maki’.

117. Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust has confirmed that Ngāti Whātua have a close association with Waitākere and the extensive Kauri Ngahere across Kaipara and that they are interested in maintaining close communication on this matter. in addition the Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara Development Trust has written in support of the Te Kawerau ā Maki rāhui.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

118. The park closures and enforcement actions agreed to by this committee involve unbudgeted expenditure as described in both the December 2017 and February 2018 reports and as reflected by resolutions passed by the committee in both meetings.

119. In December 2017 the committee acknowledged ‘that modified Option Four [increased track closures in the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park] requires additional capital and operating expenditure that will exceed current budgets’. (Resolution number ENV/2017/3)

120. Under further consideration of the proposals to close the Waitākere Ranges Regional Parks and high-risk tracks in the Hunua Ranges in February 2018 the Environment and Community Committee approved, ‘in principle, a targeted patrols enforcement approach, with an unbudgeted cost of $2.2M, for the proposed closures, subject to consultation’ and noted ‘that this additional activity is unbudgeted in this financial year and that the recommended option, supported by focused enforcement, could cost approximately $3.3M opex and $0.5M capex in the first year.’ (Resolution number ENV/2018/4)

121. The figures presented below are updated figures based on those in the February report (ENV/2018/9), with clarification on the component of the year one costs that would need to be invested in the current financial year (2017/2018).

122. A maximum of $1.1M of unbudgeted spend is required this financial year to implement the recommended option. There is no significant cost difference in implementing any of the options presented in this paper. The costings are made up of the items included in Table One below. The table describes the projected costs alongside a ‘risk adjusted cost’, this latter column reflects that some of the costs may not be able to be fully expended within the current financial year and that they will be assessed for expenditure from 1 July 2018.

Table One. Unbudgeted cost of implementing proposed closures of tracks in Waitākere and Hunua Ranges in 2017/2018.

Unbudgeted Item	Projected cost (if implemented fully from 1 May 2018)	Risk adjusted costs (if implementation delayed by contractor availability)
i. Kauri dieback online survey and engagement costs (targeted consultation)	15,000	15,000
ii. Additional ambassadors at track entrances (fixed contract staff)	20,000	15,000
iii. Compliance and enforcement programme (contractors to undertake patrols)	440,000	230,000
iv. Potential loss of revenue from concessionaires	40,000	40,000
v. Communications and engagement regarding closures (council’s costs, separate to MPI costs)	130,000	100,000
vi. Hygiene station upgrades in Waitākere and Hunua Ranges	85,000	85,000
vii. Extra supplies for hygiene stations	5,000	5,000
viii. Track improvements prior to May 1st (extra aggregate)	210,000	130,000
ix. Car park closures (materials and installation of barriers)	45,000	30,000
x. Track entrance closures (materials and installation of barriers)	110,000	50,000
xi. Signage costs (updating direction signage and closed track signage). MPI covering controlled area notice signage).	80,000	40,000
TOTAL	$1,180,000	$740,000

123. The majority of costs are operational, however some may be capitalised. The exact amount will depend on the final design of barriers for car parks and closed track entrances and the capitalisation of hygiene stations.The track improvements outlined above in the current financial year will not be capitalisable because they will mainly consist of the application of extra aggregate. The total proportion likely to be capitalisable will be no more than 20per cent.

124. This decision represents an additional requirement of operational resource. The table above allows for two FTE positions over the remaining months of the current financial year. Approval of these proposals also approves an increase in FTE number, contractor costs and other associated for the current financial year.

125. The largest item in Table One relates to the compliance and enforcement programme (iii and iv above). This cost is based on the first two months of the $2.2M per annum ‘targeted patrols’ compliance approach outlined to committee in February. This would involve an up-front ‘blitz’, at a number of track entrances at both the Hunua and Waitākere Ranges Regional Parks ensuring compliance with the controlled area notice requirements and enforcing the closures.

126. Council staff are working through the detailed design of the compliance programme and have begun a procurement process for this work. Given that the operation is proposed to start in May 2018 (when visitor numbers typically drop away) it is likely that fewer hours of compliance officer time will be required this financial year than originally planned.

127. Additionally, given the short notice and speciality experience required, there is a risk that the market may not have the capacity to deliver the amount of work originally anticipated in the time available.

128. Due to logistical arrangements and factors outside our control (such as contractor availability to deliver track improvements, closures and signage) the spend of $1.18M may not be achievable by the financial year end. The risk adjusted cost table column describes a scenario where the delivery is less.

129. The Ministry for Primary Industries will also cover costs (yet to be determined) towards the implementation of the proposed controlled area notices. This includes a media campaign, signage specifically relating to the controlled area notice, training of compliance officers and the effectiveness monitoring of the controlled area notices.

130. It is important to note that this committee does not have delegation to approve unbudgeted expenditure. Therefore it is recommended that the committee recommends that Finance and Performance Committee approve the risk-adjusted $0.74M of unbudgeted expenditure for the upscaled kauri dieback programme for the 2017/2018 financial year.

131. If no additional investment is allocated to environmental protection under the Long-term Plan process it is likely that approval for additional unbudgeted works will need to be approved in 2018/2019 to give effect to the recommendations in this report.

132. As noted earlier activity in the next financial year (2018/2019) is contingent on the Long-term Plan (LTP) outcomes funding an environmental levy.

133. As outlined in the February report, managing compliance with controlled area notices and significant closures were not anticipated at the time the Natural Environment Targeted Rate proposals were drafted.

134. If either of the proposed Long-term Plan environmental protection options are adopted then any additional expenditure to give effect to these closures from 2018/2019 onwards will be prioritised above track improvements, upgrades and other aspects of the kauri dieback programme such as landowner support, hygiene station upgrades and washdown facilities.

135. Continuing to fund these into future financial years will impact on other elements of the programme, including the rate at which tracks can be upgraded to re-open them. In addition, to meet these requirements some of the planned draft capital budget would need to become operational budget.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

136. Technical risks relate to a number of uncertainties within this programme. A key issue is the unknown lag time between disease spread and observable symptoms, which limits our understanding of how effective various management options are.

137. A significant investment may not stop the spread of the disease. Factors such as natural waterborne movement of the disease within catchments are poorly understood and not addressed by any of the current investment options.

138. Risks also exist in the potential unintended spread of the disease to uninfected areas. By focusing on avoiding the Waitākere Ranges there is the potential to cause increased human activity within apparently disease-free areas such as Hunua. As protection of these disease-free sites is the top regional priority for kauri dieback management, decisions in relation to Waitākere need to be cognisant of mitigating perverse effects in disease-free areas.

139. Risks also exist in relation to dependence on external agencies to progress some options, notably a National Pest Management Plan and controlled area notice. This risk can to some extent by mitigated be continuing to progress the adoption of an operative Regional Pest Management Plan.

140. There are potential risks to other recreation areas through the displacement of visitors from closed kauri areas. This may place pressure on parks infrastructure including ongoing maintenance costs. In addition, it may also impact on visitor experience.

141. Legal risks exist for some enforcement options, especially in regards the ability to collect adequate evidence to prosecute hygiene breaches by park users.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

142. Pending approval for the recommended option staff will work in partnership with the Ministry of Primary Industries to implement the controlled area notices. Staff have been working at pace to prepare for potential 1 May options however it may be that not all hard track entrances are closed off by this date. However the messages will be clearer and council staff are working closely with the Ministry for Primary Industries on rolling out the controlled area notices from this date.

143. Post confirmation of funding options for the next ten years staff will work to prioritise, agree and communicate the timeline for any rolling openings, as resources, consents and contractors.

144. Council staff will continue to work with the Ministry for Primary Industries and other members of the national programme to develop a National Pest Management Plan and other outputs agreed to by the national governance group.

145. As there are significant technical risks relating to the understanding of kauri dieback disease and the scale of the proposed closures and use of a controlled area notice to manage a disease such as kauri dieback is untested. Council staff will be monitoring the effectiveness of the closures and working with the Ministry of Primary Industries to monitor compliance with the controlled area notice and recommend reporting back on this proposal within one year of commencement to ensure that the actions that were taken achieved the desired outcomes.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Environment and Community Committee - Feb 2018 - Kauri Dieback Update Resolutions	29
b ⇩	Proposed Hunua Ranges Track Closures	31
c ⇩	Map Hunua Revised Proposal	33
d ⇩	Map Proposed Waitakere Tracks to Stay Open - Option A	35
e ⇩	Track List - Waitakere Option A Proposed to Remain Open	37
f ⇩	Waitakere Ranges Feedback on Proposal to Close - Buzz Channel Report - March 2018	41
g	Feedback Received via Email re Proposals for Closures (Under Separate Cover)
h ⇩	Map Waitakere Option B Closure - Coastal Strip Remains Open	79
i ⇩	Auckland Council Kauri Dieback Regional Approach Update	81
j ⇩	Franklin Local Board Resolutions - Hunua Kauri Proposal - 27 March 2018	101
k ⇩	Waitakere Ranges Local Board - Resolutions Waitakere Closure Proposal - 22 March 2018	103

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Mara Bebich - Stakeholder Manager, Infrastructure & Environmental Services

Rachel Kelleher - Manager Regional Parks

Phil Brown, Manager Biosecurity

Authorisers

Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services

Ian Maxwell - Director Community Services

Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer

Environment and Community Committee

10 April 2018

Next Steps for Safeswim Programme

File No.: CP2018/00246

Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report

1. To note progress on the upgraded Safeswim programme and endorse the approach for further programme development.

Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary

2. Over 2017 Auckland Council worked with key partners (Auckland Regional Public Health, Surf Livesaving Northern Region and Watercare Services) to develop the upgraded Safeswim programme which went live on 3 November 2017.

3. The upgraded programme includes a website, static and dynamic signage at beaches and is supported by a concurrent communications campaign.

4. The upgraded Safeswim programme uses validated models to provide predictions of real-time and forecast swimming risk at 92 Auckland beaches and swimming spots.

5. The upgraded Safeswim has stimulated public awareness and debate on Auckland’s swimmability and related water quality issues. The upgraded programme has had 280,000 visits to the website compared with approximately 13,000 visits for the previous programme over a similar period.

6. A post-implementation review was conducted to ensure the upgraded programme is achieving its goals and to identify any areas for improvement (see Attachment A).

7. The review used survey data and the insights identified the need to improve public awareness and signage.

8. Council staff will use the review and evaluation to improve the programme. This will involve continuous model improvement for existing sites, and including new sites where there is a need. Additional technical work will look to improve the assessment of both public health and broader water safety risks.

9. Building on the successful communications to date, improvements to signage will be explored together with a proactive behaviour change campaign.

10. The programme allows council and its key partners to meet their duty of care around public health and broader water safety.

11. Auckland Council will integrate the Safeswim programme within its regionwide contaminant modelling programme, in order to meet its responsibilities under the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. In future, Safeswim could also potentially be used as a stormwater consent monitoring tool. In addition, it provides data to direct investigations and interventions, such as capital works, to remedy Auckland’s water quality issues.

12. The programme development outlined above is estimated to require approximately $2.5 to $3 million investment over the next 24 months. No additional funding is required for this approach as budgets for Safeswim are included in the draft Long-term Plan 2018-2028.

Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) note the findings of the review of the upgraded Safeswim programme

b) endorse the proposed future direction for the Safeswim programme.

Horopaki / Context

Decision to upgrade the Safeswim programme

13. In February 2017 the Environment and Community Committee endorsed a programme of work to upgrade the council’s Safeswim programme for monitoring and reporting on water quality at Auckland’s beaches and swimming spots ENV2017/11.

14. The previous programme had deficiencies and was under-reporting exceedances of swimmability guidelines. This created a perception that Auckland’s beaches had good water quality, potentially creating a public health risk.

15. Since February 2017, Auckland Council and key partners have collaborated to deliver an upgraded programme.

Upgraded platform delivered on time and performing well

Delivery

16. The upgraded Safeswim programme was launched on 3 November 2017, allowing Auckland beach users to access real-time predictions of water quality via the Safeswim website. Using the existing 92 beaches and swimming spots the programme was successfully rolled out over the 2017/2018 summer season.

17. The programme uses models that can predict water quality guideline exceedances in real time. These are based on real time rainfall data, supplemented with short term forecast data, as well as future forecasts. Other key parameters, such as monitored wastewater overflows, are also included.

18. Additional beach-specific warnings can also be uploaded to the website as required. For example, if key partners identify other public health or broader safety hazards, such as dangerous wind and wave conditions, the website can indicate an alert.

19. Fixed signage, directing people to the website for the real-time risk status, has been installed at all Safeswim beaches. Eleven beaches, patrolled by Surf Lifesaving Northern Region, also had adjustable signage; whereby the water quality forecast gets updated by the lifeguards during patrol hours.

20. A small digital signage trial was undertaken at three locations (Mission Bay, St Marys Bay, Takapuna). These provided a range of real-time and forecast beach information, including water quality risk and any alerts.

21. After five months of operation, the Safeswim website (www.safeswim.org.nz), has had 280,000 website visits and 141,000 unique users. The previous programme had 12-14,000 visits per season. Significant spikes in new users and website visits were observed following independent media articles publicising water quality issues. The rate of new users visiting the site continues to grow.

Model development

22. The project team has taken more than 5,000 samples since beginning the upgrade of Safeswim in February 2017 (about 1,800 were taken per annum prior to the upgrade) to build the models and help validate predictions. These data indicate an acceptable level of predictive accuracy across the Safeswim programme’s models.

23. Validation sampling indicates that the most sophisticated Safeswim models are accurately identifying between 67 per cent to 86 per cent of water quality exceedances. This meets internationally recognised performance benchmarks and compares well with the performance of the previous monitoring programme (which was identifying an estimated four per cent of exceedances).

24. Sensors are located in some parts of the wastewater system to monitor overflows. When they occur, these overflows override the Safeswim models; immediately setting the water quality to red (high risk).

Coordinated marketing, publicity and corporate communications campaign

25. The primary objectives of the Safeswim campaign were to increase awareness of the programme and to drive traffic to the Safeswim website. The audience for the campaign was all Aucklanders; targeting beach goers and recreational water users, including families and swimmers.

26. The marketing campaign went live on 15 November 2017 and ran till the end of February 2018. The media campaign primarily used digital channels, which was supplemented with an extensive radio campaign during the Christmas, New Years, Auckland Anniversary and Waitangi holiday periods.

27. The council received 24 media inquiries on Safeswim ranging from community and national newspapers to high profile national radio and television news outlets. These queries covered water quality at specific sites, signage, monitoring methods and plans to fix water quality issues, including through the water quality targeted rate in the draft long-term plan.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice

Key findings of post-implementation evaluation

28. A post-implementation evaluation was conducted by Auckland Council’s Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU). This review measured the impact of the upgraded programme, identified its strengths and areas where improvements are required (see Attachment A).

29. This review drew on the results of:

· an intercept survey of 617 beach visitors

· two online surveys (each with 1,000 plus Auckland beach users) conducted before and after the rollout of the upgraded Safeswim programme

· a media analysis.

30. The key findings of the review are outlined below; these included changes in public awareness and behaviour as a result of the Safeswim programme, and a number of areas for improvement in relation to programme delivery.

31. Public awareness and behaviour change: the review found a significant upswing in public awareness of the programme, with half of all beach users having heard of Safeswim by the end of the 2017/2018 summer period. Most who had heard of Safeswim were not yet in the habit of using the system, highlighting the need for further behaviour change efforts.

32. A significant majority of respondents also said they would not swim if Safeswim showed that a beach had poor water quality. Further work is required to help people apply this intention, however, as many people still rate long-term no-swim sites highly. About nine per cent of respondents had swum despite being warned about poor water quality.

33. Effectiveness of signage: the review noted various points for improvement relating to programme signage, including that many people missed the ‘check before you swim’ signs as they approached beaches.

34. Digital signs and the signs maintained by surf lifesavers were noticed more frequently but they were still easily missed. The signs managed by surf lifesavers were subject to user error and the trial of digital signs has experienced some connectivity issues.

35. Misinformation and misunderstandings: despite the significant increase in both people accessing the Safeswim website and media coverage of the programme, some misunderstandings persist. These include beliefs that the switch to modelling implies less sampling, that council is overstating the incidence of water quality guideline exceedances, and that council is banning swimming or closing beaches.

36. Media review: as described above, there has been an increase in the number of articles discussing solutions to the water quality problems. The proportion of water quality-related articles that mention solutions has decreased compared to the year before the launch of the upgraded Safeswim website. This is due to an overall increase in media coverage of specific alerts.

Lessons from the first summer season of operation

37. The Safeswim programme was developed rapidly in preparation for the 2017/2018 summer swimming season. The post-implementation review has identified a range of possible improvements and areas for further development as discussed below.

Programme coverage

38. Firstly, many popular swimming sites were not incorporated into the programme in the first summer season. Some sites that were included are not popular with swimmers.

39. There are very few freshwater sites in the programme, and no rivers, despite there being many popular swimming holes on rivers across Auckland.

40. To address these issues, an analysis is being undertaken to identify additional sites for inclusion in the programme. As part of this, local boards have also been asked to provide feedback on additional swimming sites that should be included in their areas.

Programme signage

41. Signs at the approaches to beaches need to explain the source and nature of risks more clearly.

42. Digital signage is popular, but subject to technological issues. These issues need to be resolved before the digital signage trial is expanded further.

43. A secondary type of digital signage - smaller and lower-cost - should be developed and trialled for use at smaller beaches or as a satellite sign at long beaches with multiple access points.

44. The on-beach signs for use at beaches patrolled by surf lifesavers should be re-designed to provide an integrated message on beach safety, with water quality and physical swimming conditions as contributing factors.

Programme communications and messaging

45. The communications strategy should be revised to focus on increasing public understanding and driving behaviour change. There should be a switch in emphasis towards proactive engagement and education that draws on international best-practice in behaviour change.

46. There should be more emphasis on engaging with communities via social media, and the website should be refined to enable users to receive customised messages for favourite beaches.

47. Communications need to include that poor water quality is also attributed to animal contamination of runoff (e.g. from birds and dogs), rather than solely from human sources.

Next Steps for Safeswim Programme

48. Council staff propose to implement the following next steps for the Safeswim programme for the 2018/2019 season:

· Plan and implement a proactive behaviour change campaign, based on the recommendations from the RIMU evaluation.

· Refine the signage strategy. Expand the use of digital signage where appropriate, once full stability of the technology is assured. Continue to investigate additional applications for the digital signs, such as Civil Defence warnings.

· Improve the website and communications strategy to clearly articulate that poor water quality in stormwater may be due to multiple sources, such as animal contamination; rather than being solely due to human wastewater.

· Work with Auckland Regional Public Health Service to confirm that the programme is assessing/expressing the public health risk around water quality in the best way possible.

· Work with Surf Lifesaving Northern Region on approaches to better identify and possibly model safety risks - for example, dangerous sea conditions or rips.

· Progress Safeswim towards a more holistic approach to public health and safety, rather than a water quality centric approach. Clarify the council and key partners responsibility with respect to managing physical risks (i.e. those likely to cause injury or drowning) and develop an approach within the programme to manage this.

· Incorporate additional Safeswim sites in the programme in time for the next peak swimming season (from 1 November 2018) in both marine and freshwater. Sites will be included where there is an identified need, and where there is sufficient data to accurately model water quality. Where there is an identified need, but insufficient data, a period of data collection may be required, prior to adding the site to the programme.

49. Over time continual improvements and extensions to existing Safeswim models will be undertaken. This will include an ongoing validation programme to improve the accuracy of currently modelled sites.

50. Existing models will be upgraded to provide better data. High use sites, such as the North Shore beaches and some sites in the Manukau Harbour, will be progressively upgraded to more sophisticated and accurate models. These will be similar to the model that currently runs for the beaches from Point Chevalier to St Heliers. In particular, the modelling programme will look for improvements in real time rainfall data accuracy, to improve the accuracy of real time water quality predictions.

51. Information from the model will be used to understand water quality issues. Auckland Council and Watercare will undertake ongoing analysis of the Safeswim data to:

· guide further investigations of the causes of water quality issues

· plan infrastructure upgrades

· prioritise capital works programming.

52. Auckland Council will integrate the Safeswim programme within its regionwide contaminant modelling programme, in order to meet its responsibilities under the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. The use of the validated Safeswim models to meet (in part) the monitoring requirements for council’s Regionwide Stormwater Discharge Consent will also be explored.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe / Local impacts and local board views

53. Local boards have a strong interest in water quality issues, as evidenced by their local board plan outcomes and budgets, with many investing in local stream, waterway and harbour restoration and protection programmes. They have also indicated a strong interest in the Safeswim programme and have advocated for the inclusion of more swimming sites within the programme, especially within the Manukau Harbour.

54. In early March 2018, local boards received a memo updating them on the progress of the programme, inviting feedback on it and requesting their input as to which additional beaches and swimming spots they wanted included in the programme.

55. Feedback from local boards included the following requests:

· more emphasis be placed on public education as there is persistent misunderstanding and some scepticism about monitoring results

· digital signs should be extended to selected high-capacity areas and incorporated into existing structures rather than being free-standing units

· requests on the placement of additional digital signs

· beaches that are frequented by recreational users should be monitored

· sufficient resources should be allocated to the programme to allow the project team to liaise with established forums (e.g. the Manukau Harbour Forum).

56. This feedback and the specific site suggestions provided by the local boards will inform and be considered as part of the inputs to adding new sites to the programme.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement

57. Mana whenua have consistently expressed their support for the programme and its philosophy of transparency and partnership.

58. Mana whenua take a broad view of the state of health of a body of water. They prioritise the health of the ecosystem and its ability to support mahinga kai - this goes hand in hand with the priority of ensuring that people do not get sick from eating kai moana. Swimming safety follows on naturally from this.

59. The ability of the Safeswim programme to better manage and coordinate the response to rāhui is important to mana whenua.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications

60. The programme development outlined above is estimated to require approximately $2.5–$3 million investment over the next 24 months. This is likely to be split evenly across the 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 financial years.

61. No additional approval of funding is required for this approach as budgets for the programme have been included in the draft Long-term Plan 2018-2028.

Ngā raru tūpono / Risks

62. It is anticipated that the expansion and improvement of the Safeswim programme will generate greater public awareness of water quality issues, reducing health and safety risks to members of the public.

63. Where new sites are added, the modelling process will include development of a high-level strategy for water quality improvements at those sites. This will be undertaken in a coordinated manner, between Auckland Council and Watercare.

64. Adding swimming sites to the Safeswim programme may potentially change patterns of beach use and expose swimmers to additional hazards (e.g. rips or other dangerous swimming conditions). The council will work closely with Surf Lifesaving Northern Region to identify and mitigate these risks.

Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps

65. As described above, pending confirmation of proposed Long-term Plan budgets the Safeswim programme will continue to evolve and improve as more work is undertaken.

66. Elected members will receive updates on changes to the programme going forward.

Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Safeswim Impact Evaluation	113

Ngā kaihaina / Signatories

Authors

Nick Vigar – Safeswim Programme Manager

Authorisers

Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services

Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer

Environment and Community Committee

10 April 2018

ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY COMMITTEE FORWARD WORK PROGRAMME 2017

This committee deals with strategy and policy decision-making that relates to the environmental, social, economic and cultural activities of Auckland as well as matters that are not the responsibility of another committee or the Governing Body

Priorities for 2018 will be on initiatives which:

1. Clearly demonstrate that Auckland is making progress with climate change adaptation and mitigation and taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

2. Enable green growth with a focus on improved water quality, pest eradication and ecological restoration

3. Strengthen communities and enable Aucklanders to be active and connected

4. Make measurable progress towards the social and community aspects of housing all Aucklanders in secure, healthy homes they can afford

5. Grow skills and a local workforce to support economic growth in Auckland

The work of the committee will:

· Deliver on the outcomes in the Auckland Plan

· Be focused on initiatives that have a high impact

· Meet the Council’s statutory obligations, including funding allocation decisions

· Increase the public’s trust and confidence in the organisation.

Updated 04/04/2018

*Priority #*		*Area of work*		*Reason for work*	*Environment and Community Committee role* *(decision or direction)*		*Expected timeframes* *Quarter (month if known)*
							FY17/18
							Jan-Mar 20 Feb 13 March			Apr-Jun 10 April 8 May 12 June		Jul-Sep 10 July 14 Aug 11 Sept		Oct-Dec 17 Oct 14 Nov 5 Dec
Environment
1		Strategic approach to Climate Change		To demonstrate that Auckland is making progress with climate change adaptation and mitigation and tacking action to reduce emissions.	Strategic direction will be provided in the coming months. Progress to date: A summary of activities to prepare for climate change was given in the presentation on 8/8/17 meeting. Report was considered on 20/2/18, resolution ENV/2018/11
1		Low carbon living		To deliver on Low Carbon Auckland Plan commitments by the design and implementation of awareness raising and incentives programmes to reduce household, community, business and schools carbon emissions by approximately 50% of current levels.	Strategic direction and endorse programmes as part of the Low Carbon Auckland Plan implementation. Progress to date: Report was considered at 20/2/18 meeting. Res ENV/201811 report back in Dec18 for a decision. Independent Advisory Group was approved.		Q3 (Feb)			Q4		Q1 (Sept)		Q2 (Dec)
1		Low Carbon Auckland / Climate Change Mitigation		Four-yearly review of strategic action plan due in 2018; increased engagement with and commitments via C40 Cities membership; development of proactive policy agenda to central government emerging	Decision and endorsement of strategic direction Progress to date: Report was considered at 20/2/18 meeting. Res ENV/201811 report back in Dec18 for a decision. Independent Advisory Group was approved.		Q3 (Feb)			Q4		Q1		Q2 (Dec)
1		Climate Plan Workshop		Risks and vulnerabilities		• Committee workshop on risks and vulnerabilities • Communication strategy for broader public engagement • Local Board workshops • Mana whenua engagement (integrated throughout) • Stakeholder workshops				Q4 (April)
1		Climate Plan Workshop		Prioritisation criteria and identified actions		• Cost benefit and total value analysis • Agree prioritisation criteria • Review all actions • Draft plan						Q1 (Aug)
1		Draft Climate Plan to Committee				• Draft plan to committee • Consultation (linking to other plans, approach tbc) • Updates to action plan • Adoption of updated plan by council (Proposed December 2018)								Q2 (Dec)
1		Final Adoption of Climate Plan				Decision adopt Climate plan								Mar 2019
1 and 2		Urban Forest Strategy		Strategic approach to delivering on the wider social, economic and environmental benefits of a growing urban forest in the context of rapid population growth and intensification.	Decision on strategic direction and endorsement of strategy. Progress to date: A workshop was held on 14/06/17. Report was considered on 12/09/17 ENV/2017/116 a full draft of the strategy was considered 20/02/18, res ENV/2018/12 with a report back on the results of the LIDAR and an implementation plan on costs and benefits in Aug 2018		Q3			Q4		Q1 (Aug)		Q2
1		Waste Management and Minimisation Plan Review		To adopt a new Waste Management and Minimisation Plan.	Direction on the key issues that arise through consultation on the draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan and the waste assessment. Adopt the final plan, after hearings have been held on the draft plan. Progress to date: Decision: A Waste Political Advisory Group was established Resolution ENV/2016/6 Item 11 The Plan was adopted for consultation on 5/12/17. Res ENV/2017/185 SCP process in April for June meeting		Q3			Q4 (Jun)		Q1		Q2 (Dec)
1		Allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund		Decision making over medium and large funds from the Waste Minimisation and Innovation fund in line with the fund’s adopted policy. Funds to contribute towards council’s aspirational goal of zero waste to landfill by 2040.	Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2018-2019 financial year. Progress to date: Decision: Approval of allocation of September 2016 funding round Resolution ENV/2016/19 Item C5. Approval of grants in Dec 17		Q3			Q4		Q1		Q2
1		Air Quality		Approve action plan to help achieve compliance with the National Environment Strategy on Air Quality	Decision on air quality action.		Q3			Q4 (Apr)		Q1		Q2
1 and 2		Kauri Dieback		To protect Auckland’s Kauri forests	Decision on options for management of Kauri dieback – for input into the Long-term Plan preparation Staff will report in Feb-March18, with an update on the response, particularly, options for future management, central government actions and the regional approach. Progress to date: Update was provided at the 14/02/17 meeting Item 23 August - the full kauri dieback report can be downloaded from OurAuckland A Dec report to consider options for managing access areas. Resolution ENV/2017/183. A report back was considered in Feb 18 res ENV/2018/9 with a report back on 10/04/18.		Q3 (Feb)			Q4 (Apr)		Q1		Q2
2		Regional Pest Management Plan review		Statutory obligations under the Biosecurity Act to control weeds and animal pests. To ensure that the plan is consistent with the national policy direction and up to date.	Decision and strategic direction on weed and plants that will be subject to statutory controls. Consider submissions received on the draft plan in mid 2018 and adopt the final plan by December 2018. Progress to date: Decision: Agreed to the inconsistencies in ACT at the 14 Feb 2017 ENV/2017/7 Item 12 Workshops held on 4/04/17, 3/05/17 and 27/09/17 Draft plan was approved for consultation in Nov 2017		Q3			Q4 (Jun)		Q1		Q2 (Nov/Dec)
1 and 2		Allocation of the Regional Natural Heritage Grant		Decision-making over regional environment fund as per the grants funding policy and fund guidelines	Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2018-2019 financial year. Progress to date Allocation of the Regional Environmental Natural Heritage Grant for the 2017-2018 financial year was made on 6 Dec 2016_ENV/2016/11 Item 15		Q3			Q4		Q1		Q2 (Dec)
2		Safeswim		To consider best future options for the delivery of Safeswim	Decision on options for expansion of the Safeswim programme. Progress to date: Endorsed the recommended improvements by 1 Nov to the programme on 14/02/17 meeting Item 16. Requested a report on costs and benefits of “white box” model A further update was provided on 14/03/17 on food safety for seafood gatherers Item 16 Progress was presented at Sept meeting – scheduled to go live on 1/11/17. An update was given in 14 Nov. A further update on activity over the summer period will be provided in March 2018 and a decision sought on next steps for Safeswim.		Q3 (Mar)			Q4 (Apr)		Q1		Q2
2		National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management		The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management is being implemented, with periodic reporting to council committee on progress, and responding to ongoing central government refinement of the framework for achieving water outcomes.	Progress to date: Council submission was approved on Central Govt. Clean Water Consultation 2017 process: Minutes of 4 April ENV/2017/54 Item 12. Follow up is required for resolution b) – a workshop held on 14 June. A supplementary submission on the Clean Water Consultation package was made on 25 May 2017, Item 14 13/06/17 Decision ENV/2018/14 on engagement approach for consultation on the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management in Feb 2018. In December 2018 further decisions will be sought under the national policy statement, including: · approve final targets for swim-ability of major rivers in the Auckland region · approve the updated Progressive Implementation Plan for the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management		Q3			Q4		Q1		Q2 (Dec)
2		Food Policy Alliance		To consider food policy alliance	Decision on food policy alliance		Q3 (Mar)			TBC				Q2
1 and 2		Auckland Growing Greener		Statutory obligations under the Resource Management Act, Biosecurity Act and Local Government Act. Consideration of items to give effect to the adopted commitment of Auckland Council to grow greener.	Strategic direction and oversight into council’s role to improve the natural environment, and to endorse proposed incentives. This may include endorsing: · a framework to ensure planning and growth decisions are underpinned by relevant environmental data · proposed incentives for green growth · recommendations arising from a current state statutory obligations review.		Q3			Q4		Q1		Q2
2		Weed Management Policy		Governance group to oversee the implementation of the weed management policy. February 2017 item	Provide political direction to the Environment and Community Committee and staff in regards to weed management decisions. Report back to the Environment and Community Committee on progress within six months of establishment. An update report was presented in October, next report is due April 2018					Q4 (Apr)		Q1		Q2
2		Hunua Aerial 1080 Operation		Provide information on outcomes of the Hunua 1080 aerial pest control operation	To note outcomes of the Hunua 1080 aerial pest control operation.		Q3			Q4		Q1		Q2 (Nov)
Parks, Sport and Recreation
3		Sport and Rec Strategic Partnership Grant to Aktive Auck Sports Rec	Approval of $552,000 strategic partnership grant to Aktive Auck & Sport to deliver on agreed priority initiatives.		To approve the $552,000 strategic partnership grant to Aktive Auckland Sport & Recreation for 2017/2018 Progress to date: Report was considered 5/12/17 Resolution ENV/2017/186 – report back against KPI every six months.					Q4 (Jun)
1		Te Motu a Hiaroa (Puketutu Island)	Status update on the Te Motu a Hiaroa Governance Trust		To note further update on progress of the governance trust					Q4		Q1
3		Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan	Status report on implementation plan		Direction on future options for sport and recreation.		Q3					Q1		Q2 (Nov)
3		Sports Investment Plan	Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in sports		Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan Progress to date: Evaluation of current sports facilities investments and proposed changes was adopted on 14 March, resolution ENV/2017/39 Item 13 with the final draft investment plan to be adopted prior to consultation. An outcome measurement tool to support the Sports Facilities Investment Plan was considered and agreed at the 4 April meeting. Resolution ENV/2017/50 Item 9 The findings of the pilot will be reported in mid-2019 seeking a decision on the roll-out model.		Q3			Q4 (May)		Q1		Q2 (Nov)
3		Golf Investment Plan	Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in golf.		Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan Progress to date: Confidential workshop held 13/06/17 (what future for golf).		Q3			Q4 (Apr/May)		Q1		Q2
3		Indoor Courts	Strategic business case for indoor courts investment		Decision on investment approach		Q3			Q4		Q1 (Aug)		Q2
3		Western Springs Community School Partnership	Improve Community Access to school facilities		Decision on Business and Investment in indoor court facility at Western Springs Progress to date: The report was considered in May. Resolution ENV/2017/71 A business case will be prepared to outline the opportunity to fully invest in the indoor court development and can consider as part of the LTP 2018-2028									Q2
3		Growth Programme	Update on proposed growth funding allocation for 2018-2020		Decision on growth funding allocation							Q1
3		Regional Sports Grants	Improving monitoring and evaluation of sports grants		Decision on monitoring and evaluation framework		Q3			Q4 (May)		Q1		Q2
1		Regional Sport and Recreation grants programme 2018/2020	Review of previous grants allocation and recommendation for next round		Decision on sport and recreation grants programme objectives and approach Progress to date: Approved on 12 Sept the 2018/2019 grants programme to proceed in accordance with the Community Grants Policy suggested outcomes and assessment matrix. Applications open 30/10/17 close 8/12/17 ENV/2017/119 Workshop in April 2018		Q3			Q4 (May)		Q1 (Sep)
1	d	Review of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012: TOR	The review will assess the efficacy of the guidelines in for the council to deliver the best possible outcomes for Auckland through community leases		Decision on the terms of reference for the review of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012 Progress to date: The TOR was approved for the review to commence and will report back in May 2018. An update memo was circulated in August in response to feedback from the July meeting.					Q4 (May)
3		Active Recreation Investment and Visitor Experience	Council’s strategic approach to outcome, priorities and investment for active walking, cycling, waterways and visitor experience on open space, parks and regional parks		Decision on scope and phasing		Q3			Q4 (Apr)		Q1		Q2
3		Takaro – Investing in Play discussion document	Development of a play investment plan		Decision on approval for public release Progress to date: Approved on 16/05/17 for public release the discussion document and will report to E&C for approval in late 2017 Takaro was approved for release on 20 Feb 2018 A report back by August 18 for approval to initiate public consultation		Q3 (Feb)					Q1 (Aug)		Q2
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1		The Southern Initiative (TSI)	Provide an update on the TSI approach, priorities and achievements.		Strategic direction of the TSI approach to social and community innovation in south Auckland		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
5		Global Engagement Strategy	Provide an update and direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities. It has been three years since a new strategic direction was introduced, progress on this strategy will presented. Funded		Strategic direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities Progress to date: Monthly global engagement updates are published on each agenda		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
2		Destination Auckland Strategy	Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for any new strategies relating to international visitors.		Strategic direction relating to tourism strategies. ATEED has responsibility for the provision of initiatives in the tourism sector in Auckland. workshop held in Nov 2017, strategy to be endorsed in March.		Q3 (Mar)		Q4			Q1		Q2
5		International Education Framework	Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for growing the international education sector		Strategic direction relating to international education. ATEED has responsibility for growing the international education market in Auckland. workshop to be scheduled		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
5		Local Economic Development Framework	Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for delivering local economic development		Strategic direction relating to Local Economic Development. ATEED has responsibility for leading Local Economic development.		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2 (tbc)
5		Auckland Trade Programme	Provide strategic direction to ATEED through its consideration of options for growing Auckland’s trade and exports		Strategic direction relating to trade and exports. ATEED has responsibility for supporting the increase of Auckland’s trade competitiveness.		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
3		Options to expand revenue streams for sport facilities investment	Provide strategic direction to expand revenue streams to fund future sports facilities investment in the draft Sports Facilities Investment Plan		strategic direction to expand revenue streams to fund future sports facilities investment in the draft Sports Facilities Investment Plan Progress to date: A report was considered in Aug. Res ENV/2017/121
SOCIAL, COMMUNITY, CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
3		Community Facilities Network Plan	Update on progress and report back on strategic business case for central west.		Decision on indicative business case for central west Progress to date: A progress report was considered on 14 March. Resolution ENV/2017/36 Item 11 to report back on an indicative business case for investment in the central-west area.		Q3 (Mar)		Q4			Q1 (July)		Q2
2		Auckland Sport Sector: Facility Priorities Plan	Develop and endorse the Sports Facilities Investment Plan to enable Auckland Council to take a more co-ordinated approach to its sports facilities investment.		Decision on the Auckland Sport Sector : Facility Priorities Plan. Decision on sector’s investment priorities and investigate potential funding options. Progress to date: The plan was endorsed on 12 Sept ENV/2017/118. Staff to report back on priorities and potential funding options.							Q1 (Sept)		Q2
4		Homelessness	Implementing Regional Policy and Strategy resolution to progress work around Council’s strategic position on addressing homelessness (note this work will be informed by discussions at the Community Development and Safety Committee)		Decision on scope Decision on role and direction addressing homelessness Progress to date: Approved the scope policy 14 Feb Item 17 Auckland council’s position and role was considered at the August meeting report item 12. Staff to report back with an implementation plan. Resolution ENV/2017/118 of preferred position and role		Q3 (Feb)		Q4			Q1 (Aug)		Q2 TBC
3		Facilities Partnerships	Identify the range of current council approaches to facility partnerships, issues, opportunities and agree next steps		Decision on facility partnership approach Decision to adopt Facility Partnership Framework in December 2017 Progress to date: Update was given at 14 February meeting on Phase 1. Approval was given on the proposed timelines for Phase 2 : Minutes 14 February Item 14 preferred option		Q3 (Feb)		Q4			Q1		Q2 (Dec)
3		Citizens Advice Bureaux Services	Review of the Citizens Advice Bureaux Services RSP decision in April 2016 (REG/2016/22)		Decision on review results Progress to date: Report was considered at 20 Feb meeting. Decision: lies on the table.		Q3 (Feb)		Q4			Q1		Q2
4		Social and Community Housing Strategy and initiatives	Strategic overview of social and community housing initiatives. Wider housing portfolio and spatial outcomes of council’s role in housing is led by the Planning Committee.				Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
4		Affordable Housing Intervention	Understanding NZ and international interventions to address affordable housing		Decision on future Auckland Council approaches to affordable housing interventions		Q3		Q4 (May)			Q1		Q2
3		Te Kauroa – Library Strategy	Libraries and Information is carrying out a change programme (Fit for the future) to accelerate the implementation of this 2013-2023 strategy (approved by the Governing Body)		Direction relating to priorities and to receive update on strategic direction and implementation progress Approve an expanded and improved regional mobile library service		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
3		Central library strategic review	A strategic review of the Central Library has been commissioned to understand how the current building can meet future need and demand for services, asses the Central Library’s current and potential future role in the region, and guide decision making about future investment and development opportunities		Decide direction and receive the strategic review		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
3		Libraries	Work around the integration with customer services		Decision on matters relating to regional aspects of the proposed integration (local boards will decide on local outcomes) · workshop to be scheduled March/April with local board chairs		Q3		Q4 (Apr)			Q1		Q2
3		Intercultural Cities Network	Consideration of a proposal to join the Intercultural Cities Network to support implementation and monitoring of progress on ‘Inclusive Auckland’ actions.		Decide whether Auckland should be a member of the network		Q3		Q4 (Jun)			Q1		Q2
3		Friendly City	Identify issues and opportunities for an inclusive friendly city (Regional Policy and Strategy resolution REG/2016/92)		Strategic direction on the approach to a friendly, inclusive, diverse city. Progress to date: Memo was circulated to member in Dec 2017. Included in the information report for February meeting. Workshop tbc. in April/May prior a report in Jun/Jul.		Q3		Q4 (Apr-May)			Q1 (Jun/Jul)		Q2
3 and 5		Social Enterprise approaches for youth and long term unemployed	Improved understanding of social enterprise reach, impacts, costs and benefits		Strategic direction on councils approach to social enterprise.		Q3		Q4			Q1 (Jul)		Q2
3 and 5		Youth volunteer programmes	Intervention assessment of youth volunteer programmes on long term education and employment – understanding impacts, costs and benefits		Strategic direction on interventions approach		Q3		Q4			Q1 (Jul)		Q2
3		Events Policy	A review of what is working well and what isn’t				Q3		Q4			Q1 (Sep)		Q2
		Grant Policy Monitoring	Audit of the application of the Grants Policy		Decision on audit results		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
3		Thriving Communities Action Plan	A review of the Action Plan to understand what we are doing well and where there are areas for improvement		Decision on current state results		Q3		Q4 (May)			Q1		Q2
3		Toi Whitiki Strategy	Targeted analysis of social return on investment on specific art and culture investment				Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2 (Dec)
3		Public Art	Review of the Public Arts Policy: what’s working what’s not. Decisions relating to major public arts		Decision on review results		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2 (Dec)
LEGISLATION/CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
2		National Environmental Standards	Council response on the National Direction for aquaculture expected following scheduled release of consultation document in April 2017. The National Direction is likely to address matters relating to re-consenting, bay-wide management, innovation and research, and biosecurity.		Direction Committee agreement to a council submission on the National Direction for Aquaculture		Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
1		Child Poverty Reduction Bill	The purpose of the bill is “to encourage a focus on child poverty reduction, facilitate political accountability against published targets, require transparent reporting on child poverty levels, and create a greater commitment by Government to address child well-being.”		Direction The aims of the bill are aligned with those of the Auckland Plan and the I Am Auckland strategic action plan, specifically around ensuring equity of opportunity and outcomes for children and young people, and staff suggest a submission in broad support of the bill.				Q4 (May)
LAND ACQUISITIONS
3		Strategic acquisition issues and opportunities	Understanding current acquisition issues and options.				Q3		Q4			Q1		Q2
2		Land acquisition for stormwater purposes	Delegated responsibility of the committee. To acquire land for stormwater management and development purposes, to either support a structure plan or ad-hoc development.		Decision to acquire land. Reports will come to committee as required. Next report will be in Feb 2018 seeking authority to carry out compulsory acquisition of land in the Henderson area for a flood prevention project.		Q3 (Feb)		Q4			Q1		Q2
OTHER
		Long-term Plan	Informing the development of the 2018-2028 Auckland Council Long-term Plan				Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2

COMPLETED

I am Auckland - Youth Strategy

Implementation of strategy. Identify areas of success and improvement opportunity

Decision: Approval for the development and an implementation plan was considered on 14 Feb 2017 Resolution ENV/2017/10 Item 15

UNESCO Auckland City of Music

Decide whether to commit to being a UNESCO City of Music (from Regional and Strategy and Policy resolution REG/2016/70)

Decision: Endorsement was given at 14 March Resolution ENV/2017/35 Item 10

(March)

Weed Management Policy Implementation

To ensure implementation of the Weed Management policy occurs, and that how it will be implemented is reported to elected members

Decision: Appointment by the Mayor to a Political Advisory Group - Committee agenda 14 Feb 2017 Item 23

One Voice Auckland Sport and Recreation

One Voice – sector wide advisory group for sport and recreation

Decision – Appointment of 3 Elected Members to One Voice: Crs Cooper, Filipaina & W Walker on 4 April – Committee Resolution ENV/2017/53 Item 13

(Mar)

Regional Sport and Recreation Grant Programme

Contestable grant programmes

Decision - Allocation of the budget 2017/2018 was approved on 4 April Resolution ENV/2017/51 Item 10

(Apr)

Community Access Scheme

Review of Council investment in third party facilities to increase community access

Decision – Allocation of funding of Community Access grants was approved on 16 May Resolution ENV/2017/73 Item 18

(May)

Community School Partnerships

Improve Community Access to school facilities

Decision and direction on investment and development of partnerships with schools

Update on Community and School Partnership project was provided 16 May 2017 Item 20

Approval for entering into a partnership agreement with Western Springs College and MOE to secure 4 additional indoor courts for school and community use was granted 15 May 2017 ENV/2017/71 Item 17

(May)

Waste assessment endorsement

The Waste Minimisation Act 2008 requires the committee to endorse the findings of the waste assessment

Endorse the findings of the waste assessment

Endorsement of Waste Political Advisory Group to progress the implementation of a food waste at 16 May 2017 meeting Item 19 and resolution ENV/2017/74 Item 19

Will be notified alongside the draft waste management plan

(May)

Pest Free Auckland

To eliminate weed and animal pests from Auckland

Strategic direction and oversight, and to endorse the programme.

An update was provided at 14 March 2017 meeting: Bio News Item 16.

Marine Biosecurity

Statutory obligations under the Biosecurity Act to develop and implement non-regulatory and regulatory programmes to manage marine pests.

Strategic direction and endorse new programmes – for input into Long-term Plan preparation.

Included in the Regional Pest Management Plan report

Implementation of Housing Taskforce

The Housing Taskforce is led by His Worship the Mayor. The taskforce is likely to recommend actions to council and some of these actions may fall under the Environment and Community Committee remit.

Strategic direction on interventions to pursue

Governing Body on 27 July 2017 adopted the Housing Taskforce report Item 10

1, 2 and 5

Coastal Erosion Management Strategy

To agree to the actions and tools to improve coastal asset management and prioritised decision-making in respect of climate change, sea-level rise and Auckland’s projected growth.

Decision on the final strategy, approve next steps and the associated work programme(s).

Progress to date:

Decision 8 August meeting –adopt the coastal management framework approach for the Auckland Region report. Resolution ENV/2017/116.

Staff to regularly report back on progress and issues arising from the coastal compartment plans work programme

1 and 2

Seachange – Tai Timu Tai Pari

The marine spatial plan for the Hauraki Gulf – Seachange Tai Timu Tai Pari – was completed by the independent stakeholder working group in November 2016. Staff will report on implications of the plan and options for Auckland Council implementation to the Planning Committee. The Environment and Community Committee will likely provide direction and oversee aspects of implementation.

Strategic direction on the spatial plan and implementation actions.

Progress to date:

The initial assessment was considered at the 2 May Planning Committee meeting, resolution PLA/2017/50 Item 9

Political Ref Group was established.

Approval of TOR and work programme was considered in Sept ENV/2017/115

Hauraki Gulf Forum

Possible consideration of recommendations from the Hauraki Gulf Forum arising from the completion of Seachange Tai Timu Tai Pari.

Decisions on governance and/or resourcing arrangements.

Tripartite Economic Alliance

Provide direction on preparation for Guangzhou 2017 Tripartite summit and seek approval for the renewal of the Tripartite Economic Alliance

2017 Tripartite Summit funded out of Global Partnerships and Strategy budget, CCO’s budget and through sponsorship.

Direction and approval of the extension of the Tripartite Economic Alliance beyond its initial three year period.

Progress to date:

Update was provided at 14 March 2017 meeting – summit in Sept 2017 Item 16

Smoke-free Policy

Improve policy and implementation

Decision on updated Smokefree policy

Progress to date: considered the report for adoption at the August meeting. Resolution ENV/2017/113

Approval of the policy on 17 Oct Resolution ENV/2017/142

Productivity Commission – inquiry transition into low carbon economy

Council’s submission to the Productivity Commission’s low emissions economy issues paper

Decision to proposed key themes for submission to the Productivity Commission’s low emissions economy issues paper

Progress to date:

A report was considered on 12 Sept meeting. Endorsed the key themes Resolution ENV/2017/117

Auckland Council submission lodged in Oct

Demographic Advisory Panels

Identifying Panels’ priorities for advice to the council for 2017/18

Decision Approving demographic advisory panels work programme

Progress to date:

Disability and Seniors Advisory Panels work programme were approved in Sept.

Ethnic Peoples and Youth Advisory Panels were approved in Oct

Pacific Peoples and Rainbow Panels were approved in Nov

Open Space management: issues paper

Understanding open space management, issues and options

Decision on potential solutions and next steps

Progress to date:

Staff have done some work on this item to identify the key issues impacting on open space, however, the final product does not require a decision from the governing body. Aspects of this work have also been superseded by the Governance Review and well as the current review of the Occupancy Guidelines

(Apr)

Allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund

Decision making over medium and large funds from the Waste Minimisation and Innovation fund in line with the fund’s adopted policy. Funds to contribute towards council’s aspirational goal of zero waste to landfill by 2040.

Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2017-2018 financial year.

Chairperson	Cr Penny Hulse
Deputy Chairperson	Cr Alf Filipaina
Members	Cr Josephine Bartley	Cr Mike Lee
	Member Renata Blair	Cr Daniel Newman, JP
	IMSB Member James Brown	Cr Dick Quax
	Cr Dr Cathy Casey	Cr Greg Sayers
	Deputy Mayor Bill Cashmore	Cr Desley Simpson, JP
	Cr Ross Clow	Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM
	Cr Fa’anana Efeso Collins	Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE
	Cr Linda Cooper, JP	Cr Wayne Walker
	Cr Chris Darby	Cr John Watson
	Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO
	Mayor Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP
	Cr Richard Hills

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Environment and Community Committee Forward Work Programme	291
b	20180404_ Auckland Council Written Evidence - Environment Committee - Kauri Dieback (Under Separate Cover)
c	20180403_Memo re Global Activity update - April (Under Separate Cover)
d	20180328_Memo re: Swimmability Targets - March 2018 (Under Separate Cover)
e	20180319_Memo re: Sale and supply of Alcohol_Renewal of Licences_Amendment Bill (No2) (Under Separate Cover)
f	20180314_Memo re: CPTPP Auckland Council Update March 2018 (Under Separate Cover)
g	20180327_Weed Management Policy update to ECC April 2018 (Under Separate Cover)
h	20180307_Workshop re Fit for the Future (Under Separate Cover)
i	20180313_Workshop re updates on Kauri Dieback, Myrtle Rust, Safeswim and Fire Foam from the Ministry for the Environment (Under Separate Cover)

Author	Tam White - Senior Governance Advisor
Authoriser	Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer