I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Finance and Performance Committee will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Wednesday, 6 June 2018 9:30am Reception Lounge |
Komiti ā Pūtea, ā Mahi
Hoki /
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Cr Ross Clow |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Cr Desley Simpson, JP |
|
Members |
Cr Josephine Bartley |
IMSB Member Terrence Hohneck |
|
Cr Dr Cathy Casey |
Cr Penny Hulse |
|
Deputy Mayor Bill Cashmore |
Cr Mike Lee |
|
Cr Fa’anana Efeso Collins |
Cr Daniel Newman, JP |
|
Cr Linda Cooper, JP |
Cr Greg Sayers |
|
Cr Chris Darby |
Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM |
|
Cr Alf Filipaina |
IMSB Chair David Taipari |
|
Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO |
Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE |
|
Mayor Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP |
Cr Wayne Walker |
|
Cr Richard Hills |
Cr John Watson |
(Quorum 11 members)
|
|
Sandra Gordon Senior Governance Advisor
29 May 2018
Contact Telephone: (09) 890 8150 Email: sandra.gordon@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Terms of Reference
Responsibilities
The purpose of the Committee is to:
(a) control and review expenditure across the Auckland Council Group to improve value for money
(b) monitor the overall financial management and performance of the council parent organisation and Auckland Council Group
(c) make financial decisions required outside of the annual budgeting processes
Key responsibilities include:
· Advising and supporting the mayor on the development of the Long Term Plan (LTP) and Annual Plan (AP) for consideration by the Governing Body including:
o Local Board agreements
o Financial policy related to the LTP and AP
o Setting of rates
o Preparation of the consultation documentation and supporting information, and the consultation process, for the LTP and AP
· Monitoring the operational and capital expenditure of the council parent organisation and Auckland Council Group, and inquiring into any material discrepancies from planned expenditure
· Monitoring the financial and non-financial performance targets, key performance indicators, and other measures of the council parent organisation and each Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) to inform the Committee’s judgement about the performance of each organisation
· Advising the mayor on the content of the annual Letters of Expectations (LoE) to CCOs
· Exercising relevant powers under Schedule 8 of the Local Government Act 2002, which relate to the Statements of Intent of CCOs
· Exercising Auckland Council’s powers as a shareholder or given under a trust deed, including but not limited to modification of constitutions and/or trust deeds, granting shareholder approval of major transactions where required, exempting CCOs, and approving policies relating to CCO and CO governance
· Approving the financial policy of the Council parent organisation
· Establishing and managing a structured approach to the approval of non-budgeted expenditure (including grants, loans or guarantees) that reinforces value for money and an expectation of tight expenditure control
· Write-offs
· Acquisition and disposal of property, in accordance with the long term plan
· Recommending the Annual Report to the Governing Body
· Te Toa Takatini
Powers
(a) All powers necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities, including:
a. approval of a submission to an external body
b. establishment of working parties or steering groups.
(b) The committee has the powers to perform the responsibilities of another committee, where it is necessary to make a decision prior to the next meeting of that other committee.
(c) The committee does not have:
a. the power to establish subcommittees
b. powers that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (section 2).
Exclusion of the public – who needs to leave the meeting
Members of the public
All members of the public must leave the meeting when the public are excluded unless a resolution is passed permitting a person to remain because their knowledge will assist the meeting.
Those who are not members of the public
General principles
· Access to confidential information is managed on a “need to know” basis where access to the information is required in order for a person to perform their role.
· Those who are not members of the meeting (see list below) must leave unless it is necessary for them to remain and hear the debate in order to perform their role.
· Those who need to be present for one confidential item can remain only for that item and must leave the room for any other confidential items.
· In any case of doubt, the ruling of the chairperson is final.
Members of the meeting
· The members of the meeting remain (all Governing Body members if the meeting is a Governing Body meeting; all members of the committee if the meeting is a committee meeting).
· However, standing orders require that a councillor who has a pecuniary conflict of interest leave the room.
· All councillors have the right to attend any meeting of a committee and councillors who are not members of a committee may remain, subject to any limitations in standing orders.
Independent Māori Statutory Board
· Members of the Independent Māori Statutory Board who are appointed members of the committee remain.
· Independent Māori Statutory Board members and staff remain if this is necessary in order for them to perform their role.
Staff
· All staff supporting the meeting (administrative, senior management) remain.
· Other staff who need to because of their role may remain.
Local Board members
· Local Board members who need to hear the matter being discussed in order to perform their role may remain. This will usually be if the matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular Local Board area.
Council Controlled Organisations
· Representatives of a Council Controlled Organisation can remain only if required to for discussion of a matter relevant to the Council Controlled Organisation.
Finance and Performance Committee 06 June 2018 |
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 9
2 Declaration of Interest 9
3 Confirmation of Minutes 9
4 Petitions 9
5 Public Input 9
6 Local Board Input 9
7 Extraordinary Business 9
8 Notices of Motion 10
9 Auckland Council Group quarterly financial report and financial results to 31 March 2018 11
10 Council-controlled organisation third quarter report ending 31 March 2018 25
11 Auckland Council parent performance report for the period 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018 175
12 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
An apology has been received from Cr Collins.
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
That the Finance and Performance Committee: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 15 May 2018 and the extraordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 31 May 2018, including the confidential sections, as a true and correct record. |
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
Standing Order 7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to the Governance Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day prior to the meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes speaking time for each speaker.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public input had been received.
Standing Order 6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of that Chairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this time. The Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson) shall wherever practical, give one (1) day’s notice of their wish to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders.
This right is in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on the agenda.
At the close of the agenda no requests for local board input had been received.
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
There were no notices of motion.
Finance and Performance Committee 06 June 2018 |
|
Auckland Council Group quarterly financial report and financial results to 31 March 2018
File No.: CP2018/06933
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To inform the Finance and Performance Committee of the financial performance of the Auckland Council Group, for the nine months to 31 March 2018, as set out in the attached unaudited quarterly financial report.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. This report is part of the regular quarterly reporting to the Finance and Performance Committee on the Auckland Council Group’s financial performance, financial position and cash flows for the nine months to 31 March 2018.
3. The group generated an operating surplus, before gains and losses, of $788 million, for the nine months to 31 March 2018, compared to the phased budget of $898 million. The unfavourable variance of $110 million was driven by the change in accounting treatment for the City Rail Link transaction (-$229 million), offset against vested asset revenue ($119 million).
4. The total net assets increased by $635 million, to $36,411 million, as at 31 March 2018.
5. During the nine months, the group has invested $1,115 million, to expand and renew the community and infrastructure assets. These were funded by operating cash flows and the balance from borrowings.
6. The Auckland Council Parent and Council Controlled Organisations will be reporting their individual performance to this meeting in separate reports.
7. The key performance highlights for the committee members to discuss with the council parent and Council Controlled Organisations during their presentations at this committee meeting are:
· Employee benefits of the group were favourable against budget by $6 million. Details are as follows:
|
(Un)Favourable |
Auckland Council |
23 |
Auckland Council Investments Limited Group (Ports of Auckland) |
(6) |
Auckland Transport |
(5) |
Regional Facilities Auckland |
(2) |
Panuku Development Auckland |
1 |
Budget reclassification |
(5) |
· Capital expenditure of the group for the nine-month period was $240 million behind phased budget. The actual capital expenditure and phased budget excludes the funding to City Rail Link Limited.
Actual |
Phased budget |
Variance (un)favourable |
|
Auckland Transport |
436 |
502 |
(66) |
Auckland Council |
320 |
377 |
(57) |
Auckland Council Investments Council Group |
89 |
130 |
(41) |
Panuku Development Auckland |
8 |
46 |
(38) |
Watercare Services Group |
229 |
257 |
(28) |
Regional Facilities Auckland |
26 |
43 |
(17) |
Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development |
7 |
- |
7 |
Total |
1,115 |
1,355 |
(240) |
· Regional Facilities Auckland’s revenue was lower against the approved revised budget. However, costs have not reduced proportionately, resulting in an unfavourable net direct expenditure variance for the nine-month period.
Horopaki / Context
8. This report discloses the financial performance, financial position and cash flows of the council group, for the nine months ended 31 March 2018. This paper has been prepared to inform the committee members and to enable them to ask questions of staff at the committee meeting.
Overall financial performance is in line with phased annual plan
9. The council group generated an operating surplus before gains and losses of $788 million for the nine months ended 31 March 2018, compared to the phased budget of $898 million.
Quarter 3 financial performance ($ million) |
Actual |
Phased budget |
Variance |
Revenue |
3,642 |
3,748 |
(106) |
Expenses |
2,854 |
2,850 |
4 |
Operating surplus before gains and losses |
788 |
898 |
(110) |
Net other (losses) gains |
(142) |
35 |
(177) |
Surplus before income tax |
646 |
933 |
(287) |
10. The operating surplus before gains and losses unfavourable variance of $110 million is largely driven by the accounting treatment of the City Rail Link of $229 million, offset by the favourable variance on vested asset revenue of $119 million.
11. Total revenue excluding gains was $106 million lower than phased budget, mainly driven by the following:
(in $ million) |
Variance to budget |
Favourable/ |
Explanation |
Grants and subsidies |
(219) |
|
When the Annual Budget 2017/2018 was approved, the accounting treatment for City Rail Link had not been finalised. Subsequently, with the execution of the contracts, the accounting treatment has differed from that included in the Annual Budget 2017/2018, with the budgeted grant recognised as a reduction against “Property, plant and equipment” in the statement of financial position and the finance charge from the Crown recognised in the statement of financial performance. Remaining favourable variance of $10 million, net of City Rail Link accounting treatment difference, relates to higher grants and subsidies from New Zealand Transport Agency driven by timing of funding. |
Vested assets |
119 |
|
Higher due to timing and volume of vesting of assets in the council group. |
Finance revenue |
23 |
|
Higher than expected. Mainly driven by the Crown’s reimbursement of finance charges on City Rail Link stage 1 works and first quarter initial funding to City Rail Link Limited, totaling $14.5 million and higher level of cash and short-term deposits. |
Development contributions |
(30) |
|
Lower than expected due to timing of developments. |
Fees and user charges |
(5) |
|
Lower than expected resource and building consents revenue and public transport revenue, offset by favourable port operations revenue driven by new subsidiaries, Nexus and Conlinxx. |
Others |
6 |
|
Higher than expected dividend income and other revenue. |
12. Total expenditure excluding losses was $4 million higher than phased budget, mainly driven by the following:
(in $ million) |
Variance to budget |
Favourable/ |
Explanation |
Weathertightness expense |
(69) |
|
Weathertightness provision increase due to provision assumption changes and increase in repair costs for multi-unit dwelling claims. |
Depreciation and amortisation |
44 |
|
Lower than budget mainly driven by delays in the completion of projects and revised useful lives of transport assets as a result of the latest revaluations. |
Consultancy and professional fees |
10 |
|
Lower than expected due to the timing of the projects. |
Employee benefits |
6 |
|
Mainly driven by unfilled vacancies at the council parent. |
Other operating expenses |
5 |
|
Lower than expected repairs and maintenance and utilities costs. |
|
(un)favourable |
Auckland Council |
23 |
Auckland Council Investments Limited Group (Ports of Auckland) |
(6) |
Auckland Transport |
(5) |
Regional Facilities Auckland |
(2) |
Panuku Development Auckland |
1 |
Budget reclassification |
(5) |
14. Regional Facilities Auckland’s revenue was lower against the approved revised budget. However, costs have not reduced proportionately, resulting in an unfavourable net direct expenditure variance for the nine-month period.
15. The net other losses of $177 million are primarily non-cash book entries, driven by the decrease in the fair value of interest rate swaps, resulting from lower long-term interest rates.
Group net assets increased by $635 million
16. The group net assets increased by $635 million, to $36,411 million, during the nine months to 31 March 2018.
Actual |
Actual |
||
31-Mar-18 |
30-Jun-17 |
Movement |
|
Assets |
48,543 |
47,359 |
1,184 |
Liabilities |
12,132 |
11,583 |
549 |
Net assets |
36,411 |
35,776 |
635 |
Borrowings, net of cash and cash equivalents |
8,315 |
7,969 |
346 |
The principal contributors being the:
· movement in receivables of $384 million mainly due to net uncollected rates receivables not yet due but recognised at the time of the issuance of the 2017/2018 rating notices
· net increase of $702 million in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investment property and investments in associates and joint ventures, mainly attributed to City Rail Link Limited
partly offset by:
· increase in borrowings, net of cash and cash equivalents, of $346 million.
Cash flows applied to fund infrastructure asset expansion and renewals
17. During the nine months, the group has invested $1,115 million to expand and renew community and infrastructure assets. These were funded by operating cash flows and the balance from borrowings.
Capital expenditure for the nine months amounted to $1,115 million
18. The group’s capital expenditure for the nine months to 31 March 2018, of $1,115 million, is 82% of the phased budget of $1,355 million. The actual capital expenditure and phased budget excludes the funding to City Rail Link Limited. The actual funding made to City Rail Link Limited for the nine months to 31 March 2018 was $65 million, against the phased budget of $59 million.
19. Excluding the funding to City Rail Link Limited, the capital expenditure of the group, for the nine-month period, was $240 million behind the phased budget.
Actual |
Phased budget |
Variance (un)favourable |
|
Auckland Transport |
436 |
502 |
(66) |
Auckland Council |
320 |
377 |
(57) |
Auckland Council Investments Council Group |
89 |
130 |
(41) |
Panuku Development Auckland |
8 |
46 |
(38) |
Watercare Services Group |
229 |
257 |
(28) |
Regional Facilities Auckland |
26 |
43 |
(17) |
Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development |
7 |
- |
7 |
Total |
1,115 |
1,355 |
(240) |
Credit rating financial ratio continues to be managed within threshold, but limited headroom
20. The credit rating ratio has increased closer to the threshold of 270% from 251% at 30 June 2017 to 261.5% at 31 March 2018.
21. This ratio increase is due to the 9% increase in debt from 30 June 2017 compared to only 4% increase in adjusted revenue. The adjusted revenue is net of capital expenditure related revenue such as development contributions and capital grants and subsidies.
22. The higher level of borrowings reflects the higher level of pre-funding for this financial year.
23. Increase in debt is also driven by increase in the net present value of the operating lease commitments, mainly driven by the finalisation of further agreements since 30 June 2017, under the Public Transport Operating Model of Auckland Transport. These agreements were determined to contain a lease.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
24. This report relates to the financial performance of the Auckland Council Group, which does not include reporting at a local board level. Each local board receives reports specific to their area. Accordingly, the views of local boards have not been sought.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement
25. The report is limited to financial performance of the Auckland Council Group and does not affect the achievement or reporting of council’s contribution to Māori outcomes. The council’s contributions to Māori outcomes are reported in the annual report.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Auckland Council Group Financial report 31 March 2018 |
17 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Authors |
Gina Cruz - Group Accountant - Policies & Standards Dan Keys - Senior Financial Accountant |
Authorisers |
Kevin Ramsay - General Manager Corporate Finance and Property Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 06 June 2018 |
|
Council-controlled organisation third quarter report ending 31 March 2018
File No.: CP2018/08435
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To receive the reports of each substantive council-controlled organisation (CCO) for the quarter ending 31 March 2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The CCO quarterly reports provide an update on strategic issues, achievements, risks, key projects, financial results and performance results. These reports support the consolidated group financial statements for the quarter ending 31 March 2018.
3. In line with current reporting obligations, it is the responsibility of the board of each CCO to keep the committee, as the shareholder, informed of key risks and issues, and the status of their operating and financial performance.
4. Representatives of the CCO boards, Chief Executives and Chief Financial Officers of the CCOs will be presenting at the meeting.
5. Attachment A summarises the contents of the CCO quarterly reports. More details are available in the full reports from the CCOs in the attachments.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Summary of CCO third quarter report ending 31 March 2018 |
27 |
b⇩
|
Watercare third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
33 |
c⇩
|
RFA third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
61 |
d⇩
|
AT third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
85 |
e⇩
|
ATEED third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
115 |
f⇩
|
Panuku third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
139 |
g⇩
|
ACIL third quarter report for the period ending 31 March 2018 |
163 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
Robert Irvine - Head of Group Financial Planning |
Authorisers |
Ross Tucker - Acting General Manager, Financial Strategy and Planning Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 06 June 2018 |
|
Auckland Council parent performance report for the period 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018
File No.: CP2018/07859
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To provide an overview of the Auckland Council organisation (the parent entity) performance results for the period 1 July 2017 to 31 March 2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
Service Performance
2. This report includes results against LTP performance measures. Only some of the total set of measures are reported on a quarterly frequency.
3. This quarter, 43 measures are reported. 27 measures (63 per cent) reached their target and 16 (37 per cent) did not.
4. Within the themes subsections, the status of each performance measure is indicated with the following icons:
· Ο indicates performance measures that have achieved, or are better, than target
· Ο indicates performance measures that have not achieved the target
5. For performance measures showing a red status, an explanation of the performance is provided.
Financial Performance
6. This report shows how the organisation is performing against the revised budget and outlines any associated financial risks.
7. The YTD March 2018 quarter’s net operating result was $42 million better than budget. This was mainly due to lower than budgeted interest costs ($21 million below budget) and staff costs ($16 million below).
8. YTD March 2018 capital expenditure was $320 million (53 per cent of the full year $608 million budget), with $288 million budget remaining for the rest of the financial year. The current forecast is that year end capital expenditure will be $495 million.
9. Appendices to this report include information on professional services expenditure, LGOIMAs and customer services. Group financial results and CCO performance results are in separate agenda papers.
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Finance and Performance Committee: a) receives the performance report for the Auckland Council parent for the period of 1 July 2017 to 31 March 2018. |
Horopaki / Context
10. The following subsections outline performance by each theme used in the Annual Report. For each theme, highlights, financial performance and service performance are summarised. The themes are:
· Auckland Development
· Environmental Management and Regulation
· Parks Community and Lifestyle
· Governance and support.
11. Following the subsections on themes, an additional subsection provides a consolidated commentary on financial performance.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Auckland Development theme
Auckland Development Highlights
12. Highlights for the Auckland Development theme include:
· The public consultation period for the draft Auckland Plan 2050 has concluded. This was a joint consultation with the 10-year budget 2018-2028. 50 Have Your Say consultation events were held, and 32,000 pieces of feedback were received. Many written submissions were analysed using robots, which can automatically and swiftly categorise submissions (a previously people-intensive and slow process). Recommendations for any changes as a result of the feedback received will be discussed at Planning Committee workshops in early May 2018 and decisions made at Planning Committee meetings.
· 39 submissions were received on the Notice of Requirement for the proposed second runway at Auckland Airport. The second runway has been consented, however the airport now requires it to be 72 meters longer than that previously consented to allow for longer range aircraft to land safely. The second runway is planned to be operational in 2028.
· The Green Bonds framework has been developed and Auckland Council is set to be the first New Zealand council to issue Green Bonds later this year. Green Bonds raise funds for assets and projects that have positive environmental and sustainability impacts.
· The Environment Committee approved the Urban Forest Strategy in February. The strategy aims to grow the benefits of Auckland’s urban ngahere (the network of trees, bushes and green areas), with a target to increase the green canopy cover across Auckland to 30 per cent, with no local board areas being less than 15 per cent.
Auckland Development Financial Performance
$million |
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
FY Annual Plan |
|
Net operating expenditure |
98 |
107 |
9 |
9% |
138 |
Capital expenditure |
52 |
85 |
33 |
39% |
141 |
13. Net operating expenditure for the Auckland Development theme was $9 million below the revised March year-to-date budget. Higher rental property revenue, lower staff costs due to vacancies, a delayed community grant, and delayed repairs and maintenance, were the reasons for the lower spending.
14. Capital expenditure was $33 million below the March year-to-date revised budget. In Hobsonville, a strategic land acquisition has been delayed, and the project is awaiting cost recharges by external contractors. This was offset by the Totara Stormwater Ponds project progressing ahead of plan.
Auckland Development Service Performance
15. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Auckland Development that were able to be measured this quarter.
Auckland Development |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Percentage of Unitary and Area Plan changes and Notices of Requirement processed within statutory timeframes |
100% |
100% |
Ο |
100% |
Proportion of actions from strategies and action plans that are being implemented according to timeframes (LTP) |
90% |
80% |
Ο |
90% |
Environmental Management and Regulation theme
Environmental Management and Regulation Highlights
16. Highlights for the Environmental Management and Regulation theme include:
· The Auckland region-wide stormwater network discharge consent was notified in February. The single consent covers a 35-year period, with a six-yearly review programme. It covers the maintenance, operation, upgrade and extension of the stormwater network and it incorporates targets associated with the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management programme.
· In an effort to make Waiheke Island one of the world’s only populated, predator-free islands, the Waiheke Collective submitted a proposal to Predator Free 2050 for central government funding. The proposal is seeking $5.3 million towards the total cost of $15.8 million to free the island of rats and mustelids by 2025.
· Repairs are continuing across the region to recover from the coastal storms in January. In the North, emergency repairs to Stanmore Bay’s damaged beachfront were completed. In the South, repairs to Hudson’s Beach seawall will be completed in March, and work on the Clarkes Beach seawall will start later in the year.
· The residential food scraps service started in March, with Papakura being the first area to get the new three-bin service. The food scrap service will help to reduce rubbish entering into Auckland’s landfills, and be implemented across all urban areas in the region by 2020.
Environmental Management and Regulation Financial Performance
$million |
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
FY Annual Plan |
|
Net operating expenditure |
219 |
214 |
(5) |
(2%) |
290 |
Capital Expenditure |
97 |
94 |
(3) |
(4%) |
117 |
17. Net operating expenditure for the Environmental Management and Regulation theme is over the March year-to-date revised budget by $5 million. This is primarily driven from lower revenue, a result of lower than budgeted growth in building consent volumes. Capital expenditure is $3 million ahead of budget with Healthy Waters, Development Programme Office and Waste Management projects progressing ahead of schedule.
18. Building consents revenue as at March year-to-date is $9.2 million below budget, and at year-end is forecast to be $11 million below budget. This reflects a 9 per cent fall in building consent volumes compared to the same quarter last year (19,900 YTD March 2018 vs 21,954 YTD March 2017).
Environmental Management and Regulation Service Performance
19. There is a significant issue with the process used for calculating the percentage of building consent applications processed within 20 working days. In an interim audit, Audit NZ has discovered issues with when the statutory clock starts, and issues of documentation to validate when the clock is stopped and started as consents are processed. The issues are:
· When a consent application is received, workloads means it can often take a few days before it begins to be processed. Previously, two days were allowed to accommodate this. However, under new Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment guidance, the clock must begin on the day the application is received, if that application has the correct information in it. Prior to February 2018, it appears that this was not being done consistently.
· There are also ongoing issues with documenting decisions to stop and start the clock during the processing period in order to obtain further information from the customer. This issue was disclosed in the 2016/17 Annual Report, and it has continued into this current year. From February 2018 onwards, a greater focus has been put on monitoring compliance and ensuring the correct process is followed.
This means that, as at year-end, we may have to discount the results to reflect that, prior to February 2018, we may not have been following due process. We will also have to clearly disclose these issues in our Annual Report.
Currently the year-to-date result shows that 88% of
building consents are processed within 20 working days; however the year-end
result is likely to be discounted to a level significantly lower than this.
20. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Building and Resource Consents that were able to be measured this quarter.
Building and Resource Consents |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Percentage of customers satisfied with the overall quality of building control service delivery |
50% |
65% |
Ο |
55% |
New technologies and processes have been introduced which over the long term will have a positive impact on customer satisfaction, but which over the short term have negatively impacted on satisfaction as they are bedded in. These include Newcore, Consenting Made Easy, and streamline consenting services. |
||||
Percentage of Building Consent applications processed within 20 working days |
88% |
100% |
Ο |
80% |
Whilst the 88% result looks like a large improvement over the previous year’s result, Audit NZ has identified issues with the way that we start and stop the statutory clock, and the documentation supporting that. This will have a major impact on the year-end result that we will report (which will be discounted to reflect these issues). |
||||
Percentage of customers satisfied with the overall quality of resource consents service delivery |
48% |
55% |
Ο |
58% |
As with building consents, new technologies and processes have been introduced which over the long term will have a positive impact on customer satisfaction, but which over the short term have negatively impacted on satisfaction as they are bedded in. These include Newcore, Consenting Made Easy, and streamline consenting services. |
||||
Percentage of non-notified Resource Consent applications processed within 20 working days |
71% |
100% |
Ο |
78% |
Processing times have been impacted by the introduction of new systems and processes, and the recent restructure which has created vacancies in specialist roles. |
||||
Percentage of notified Resource Consent applications processed within 70 working days. |
55% |
100% |
Ο |
45% |
Processing times have been impacted by the introduction of new systems and processes, and the recent restructure. |
21. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Licensing and Compliance Services that were able to be measured this quarter.
Licensing and Compliance Services |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Percentage of urgent animal management complaints such as dog attacks responded to within one hour |
99% |
95% |
Ο |
99.5% |
Percentage of known dogs that are registered |
90% |
100% |
Ο |
88% |
The dog database requires ongoing maintenance to update records for dogs who have died or moved out of the area. |
||||
Percentage of noise complaints responded to within 30 minutes for urban areas or 60 minutes for rural areas |
58% |
80% |
Ο |
77% |
Contractors are not meeting their contracted service KPIs. In order to address issue, we have applied a reduction to monthly invoicing to sanction for repeated poor performance. These performance issues were also considered during the recent renewing of contracts. |
||||
Percentage of complainants satisfied with noise control services |
53% |
52% |
Ο |
59% |
Percentage of registered food premises graded annually |
82% |
95% |
Ο |
95% |
The result is below target due to renewal of licenses and the transition to the Food Act 2016. Those businesses that renew will be graded; however those who apply for transition will be verified in accordance with Food Act requirements. |
||||
Percentage of customers satisfied with the food and hygiene licensing service |
79% |
70% |
Ο |
82% |
Percentage of D/E graded food premises re-inspected within one month |
97% |
95% |
Ο |
98% |
Pressures remain on the licensing area to meet the workload required under the Food Act 2016. The current measures relate to food businesses inspected in terms of Food Hygiene Regulations. |
||||
Percentage of high-risk alcohol premises inspected annually |
39% |
100% |
Ο |
100% |
39% of premises have been inspected, with the remainder of premises to be inspected over the last quarter of the year. This is in line with business practice in previous years where the bulk of inspections are done at the end of the financial year. |
||||
Percentage of customers satisfied with the alcohol licensing service |
85% |
68% |
Ο |
83% |
Percentage of bylaw-related requests for service (e.g. illegal signs, public nuisance, street trading) responded to within three days |
76% |
83% |
Ο |
80% |
Percentage of requests by iwi that are relevant and within their area of interest that are responded to within three statutory days |
100% |
100% |
Ο |
100% |
22. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Solid Waste and Environmental Services that were able to be measured this quarter.
Solid Waste and Environmental Services |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Domestic kerbside refuse per capita per annum |
145kg |
110kg |
Ο |
144kg |
Domestic rubbish sent to landfills has significantly reduced. However the target will not be met until food waste initiatives are fully implemented in 2020 (given food waste comprises 45% of domestic waste). The food waste service was started in Papakura this quarter, and will be progressively rolled out across Auckland region’s urban areas. |
||||
Total number of Resource Recovery Facilities |
5 |
4 |
Ο |
4 |
Percentage of the council-controlled closed landfill discharge consents achieving Category 1 or 2 compliance rating |
100% |
98% |
Ο |
100% |
Percentage of threatened species under active management |
28% |
34% |
Ο |
34% |
A review of the species programme has been conducted by Council officers.127 threatened species have been identified in the Auckland region requiring management. Of these, 36 are under active management. |
||||
Percentage of indigenous ecosystems under active management |
70% |
68% |
Ο |
68% |
Number of hectares under community pest control |
124,000 |
90,000 |
Ο |
124,000 |
Percentage of land area with less than 5% residual trap catch for possums |
38% |
52% |
Ο |
52% |
After a review of the methods used to capture this measure in light of the very large areas being managed by community groups on the Awhitu and Tapora peninsulas, and the small contract used to manage the South Kaipara peninsula, we have determined that 38% of the region being under 5% residual trap catch. |
||||
Proportion of kauri areas on Auckland Council land that have active management or exclusion measures in place for kauri dieback disease |
68% |
70% |
Ο |
68% |
The area that Auckland Council manages with kauri is 51,750 ha which includes Waitakere and Hunua regional parks. Management occurs on 35,200 ha and includes exclusion areas, track closure and hygiene stations with associated signage.
The target for this measure has grown from 60 per cent in 2016-2017 to 70 per cent in 2017-2018, but resourcing has not been adequate to keep expanding the area protected without compromising the quality of protection in the areas already under management. This is apparent in the Waitakere Ranges, where our latest survey shows that Kauri dieback continues to spread despite protection measures. There are many drivers for this, but significant investment is required to upgrade tracks to prevent the spread from mud, better public compliance with track closures and protection areas and improved hygiene stations to increase the effectiveness and likelihood of the public using them. |
||||
Proportion of schools participating in sustainability education programmes |
59% |
58% |
Ο |
73% |
23. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Stormwater Management that were able to be measured this quarter.
Stormwater Management |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Stormwater manholes that pop open in flood events are made safe within two hours |
100% |
100% |
Ο |
66% |
Auckland Council stormwater compliance with resource consents for discharge from the stormwater system, measured by the number of: a) abatement notices, and b) infringement notices, and c) enforcement notices, and d) successful prosecutions received in relation to those resource consents |
0 |
0 |
Ο |
0 |
The number of complaints received about the performance of the stormwater system per 1000 properties connected to Auckland Council’s system |
0.51 |
3.0 |
Ο |
1.01 |
Proportion of environmental programmes led or supported, with Māori participation |
50% |
15% |
Ο |
41% |
Parks, Community and Lifestyle Highlights
24. Highlights for the Parks, Community and Lifestyle theme include:
· Arts and culture’s biggest event programme for the year, Music and Movies in Parks came to a close over Easter. 54 individual outdoor events were held.
· The Arts & Culture delivered a very successful POP programme bringing interactive art out of the galleries and theatres and into the streets around the central city. POP Marbles, POP Ping Pong, POP Big Bang (an installation of 25 light-up drums) and POP Plinths featured across Freyberg Place, Aotea Square and Grey Lynn Park. Performance based projects POP Poi and POP Riders featured in different sites throughout the programme. After being successful in the central city with the Waitemata Local Board, POP will now have two-week run at Mangere and Ōtāhuhu in conjunction with the Mangere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board.
· Vector Lights was launched January 2018, as part of a 10+-year smart energy partnership between Vector and Auckland Council (in collaboration with NZTA). Vector is strongly committed to provide innovative and efficient technology systems.
· Over 800 people participated in the annual Round the Bays event in early March. Auckland Council organised the event, and many council staff role-modelled the being active, more often goal by running in the event.
· In March Active Recreation successfully completed the rollout of the new Envibe operating system across its 19 centres. Our customers now have one system that provides access to multiple facilities, provides multiple payment options and helps us to communicate more effectively with our customers. Over 70,000 customer details were transferred into Envibe.
· The Pacifica Mamas: Korero Mai exhibition opened at Waitakere Central Library in March. The vibrant and colourful display of woven works by the Pacifica Mamas, in collaboration with Angelique Tuaputa, was brought together to celebrate of Pasifika art, culture, language and history.
· Green accreditation: Green Star Performance was launched in New Zealand late last year and is an internationally recognised sustainability rating system. Three council staff staff are now Green Star accredited professionals and shortly, the Waikumete, Schnapper Rock and Manukau Memorial Gardens crematorium facilities will be the first in the world to receive a Green Star Performance rating.
· The One Million Trees programme is progressing well with 174,000 plants having been already planted, with a further 550,000 scheduled for next year.
· 10 Auckland parks have been recognised internationally through the Green Flag awards. These were Long Bay Regional Park (Long Bay), Sanders Reserve (Paremoremo), Auckland Domain (Grafton), Waikumete Cemetery (Glen Eden), Olympic Park (New Lynn), Tāwharanui Regional Park (Tāwharanui Peninsula), Parrs Park (Glen Eden), Wenderholm Regional Park (Waiwera), Ambury Regional Park (Mangere Bridge) and Tapapakanga Regional Park (Orere).
· An important element of the Westgate development, Te Hauāuru Park, was officially opened in March. Te Hauāuru Park provides a 1.1 hectare town centre park containing public toilets, lawn event space, civic market areas, a water feature and specimen trees.
Parks, Community and Lifestyle Financial Performance
$million |
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
FY Annual Plan |
|
Net operating expenditure |
380 |
385 |
5 |
1% |
497 |
Capital expenditure |
127 |
184 |
57 |
31% |
279 |
25. Net operational expenditure for the Parks, Community and Lifestyle theme is $5 million below the March year-to-date revised budget. This is a combination of lower costs as a result of the timing of community events programmes, and repairs and maintenance delays, offset by recreation revenue being lower than budget mainly due to delays in fees standardisation and changes to membership models.
26. Capital expenditure is $57 million behind, mainly due to timing of land acquisitions for parks and sports development, together with slower renewals for leisure facilities and major sports fields. There has also been slower than expected progress for new build projects such as the Westgate multi-purpose community facility. The forecast is that the capital expenditure budget will be spent by the year end.
Parks, Community and Lifestyle Service Performance
27. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Parks, Community and Lifestyle that were able to be measured this quarter.
Parks, community and lifestyle |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Total permitted events taking place across the city |
1154 |
2200 |
Ο |
1610 |
Since targets were set, opportunities have been identified for relaxing permitting requirements to ensure that permits are only required where there is a clear reason and benefit for doing so. This reduces administrative cost end effort for event organisers. Most events occur during the warmer months of the year and our full year outlook is similar to what was achieved last year. |
||||
Percentage of community facilities bookings used for health and wellbeing related activity |
23% |
20% |
Ο |
23% |
Number of visits to Auckland Libraries website |
5.98m |
5.48m |
Ο |
6.71m |
Number of library items borrowed |
11.44m |
11.25m |
Ο |
15.34m |
Use of libraries as digital community hubs: number of internet sessions per capita (PC and WIFI) |
3.51m |
1.5m |
Ο |
4.61m |
Percentage of items borrowed that are e-collections (e.g. eBooks, Audiobooks) |
14% |
13.75% |
Ο |
11.5% |
Percentage of city park service requests completed on time |
52% |
90% |
Ο |
89% |
The result to date has been influenced by migration to the new RUA contract for City Parks, an internal restructure and the implementation of new IT systems. Results are expected to improve as systems and processes are embedded. Due to the recent storms, this service improvement has been delayed, however they are working with the call centres for potential improvements. |
||||
Percentage of all assets that are graffiti free across the city |
94% |
94% |
Ο |
94% |
Number of volunteer hours worked in regional parks each year |
42,000 |
80,000 |
Ο |
84,860 |
The full year target of 80,000 volunteer hours is expected to be achieved by the end of the year. |
||||
Number of key sites of significance on Tūpuna Maunga with mitigation measures to improve or maintain their condition |
32 |
25 |
Ο |
33 |
Number of activities that mana whenua are engaged in on Tūpuna Maunga |
23 |
7 |
Ο |
17 |
Governance and Support theme
Governance and Support Highlights
28. Highlights for the Governance and Support theme include:
· A Heads of Agreement was signed with Te Akitai for the purchase and development at 20 Barrowcliffe Place, Manukau to deliver approximately 200 housing units. Most of these housing units will be affordable homes. The development of Barrowcliffe Place is an important part of Panuku’s wider Transform Manukau programme.
· The 2018 Kura Kāwana programme (the development programme for council’s elected representatives) will start delivering programmes in the coming months, with Civil Defence and Emergency Management, Diversity and Inclusion, and Resource Management Act among the topics that will be available.
· ATEED and GridAkl will soon share ICT resources and actively collaborate in a co-design lab to collectively solve complex problems that affect the city. It is hoped that Auckland Transport and Watercare will also join the collaboration.
Governance and Support Financial Performance
$million |
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
FY Annual Plan |
|
Net operational expenditure |
162 |
200 |
37 |
19% |
181 |
Capital expenditure |
45 |
63 |
18 |
29% |
65 |
29. Net operational expenditure is $37 million lower than March year-to-date revised budget due to lower net interest costs.
30. Capital expenditure is $18 million behind the YTD March 2018 budget. This is due to the slower than budgeted timing of ICT and business enablement projects.
Governance and Support Financial Service Performance
31. The following table summarises the performance against the LTP measures relating to Governance and Support theme that were able to be measured this quarter.
Governance and Support |
FY18 |
FY17 |
||
Performance measures |
Quarter 3 result |
Quarter 3 target |
Status |
Actual Result |
Number of complaints regarding council demographic processes upheld by the Auditor General or Ombudsman |
0 |
0 |
Ο |
0 |
Financial Performance
32. This section summarises financial results for the quarter ended 31 March 2018 for the Parent.
33. Operating revenue is $347 million, $16 million below the year-to-date budget, mainly due to the lower than budgeted revenue for building consents.
34. Operating expenditure was $1,598 million, $58 million less than the March year-to-date revised budget. Major items which are under budget include:
· Staff costs are $15.6 million below budget, reflecting the effort within the organisation to actively consider whether each vacancy is required and applying more controls around recruitment of new staff;
· Finance expenses are $20.7 million below budget, due to lower than expected interest rates;
· Professional services/Outsourced services are $4.7 million under budget, due to work programmes progressing slower than expected;
· Repairs and maintenance costs are $6 million under budget due to the timing of work programmes.
35. The net operating surplus is $463 million, $39 million higher than the year-to-date budget.
36. The net non-operating deficit is $324 million. This is $452 million less than the year-to-date budget and, as detailed in prior quarters’ reports, is due to variances arising from City Rail Link transactions proposed in the Annual Plan 2017/2018. With the execution of the contracts, these City Rail Link transactions were recognised in the balance sheet.
37. March year-to-date capital expenditure is $320 million, which is 53 per cent of the full programme of $608 million approved for the year. The full year capital expenditure is forecast to be $532 million.
38. Capital projects that have been completed over the quarter were the:
· Renewal and upgrade of Franklin Swim Sport and Fitness Centre;
· Town Hall power supply upgrade and heritage footpath restoration;
· Installation of LED lighting at Warkworth Showgrounds sportsfields, including community hard courts, and the upgrade and undergrounding of overhead lines;
· Replacements and clean-up work for foreshore assets damaged during the recent storms.
$million |
Actual as at March 2018 |
Projected per Annual Plan 2018 |
Actual audited June 2017 |
Assets |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
13,811 |
14,237 |
13,660 |
Other assets and investments |
24,953 |
24,806 |
24,494 |
Less liabilities |
|
|
|
Borrowings |
8,068 |
7,827 |
7,705 |
Other liabilities |
1,939 |
1,874 |
1,854 |
Net assets (ratepayers’ equity) |
28,758 |
29,342 |
28,597 |
39. The increase in property, plant and equipment since June 2017 is due to a high level of work in progress for capital projects in Community Facilities, Healthy Waters and corporate properties, together with Stormwater-vested assets being capitalized. Other assets and investments were higher than June 2017; mainly due to prefunding of foreign bonds has increased cash holding, with no refinancing requirements to late 2018.
Treasury management
40. Treasury management information can be found in Appendix 2 - Treasury report. This report includes treasury compliance information together with information about the performance of treasury activities against benchmarks.
41. Total borrowing at March 2018 was $8.1 billion. The forecast closing debt at year-end remains at $8.1 billion, compared to end of year closing budget of $8.5 billion.
42. The March 2018 cost of funds was 5.14 per cent which is below the budgeted cost of funds of 5.30 per cent but above the 7-year benchmark. The average duration of our debt portfolio at March 2018 was 6.15 years.
43. The Diversified Financial Assets portfolio was liquidated in September 2017 (as approved by the Governing Body), meaning that $8 million of budgeted gains was not realised.
Employee numbers
44. Employee numbers are expressed in full-time equivalent (FTE) terms - which means everyone is converted to the equivalent of forty hours per week.
45. The table below shows the trend of both FTE and FTE per 1,000 residents in Auckland for the council parent organisation. Overall the FTE number has increased by 42 compared to end of June 2017 as vacancies in Regulatory Services and Community Services are filled.
|
Q3 FY18 |
Q4 FY17 |
Q4 FY16 |
Number of full-time equivalents (FTE) |
6,133 |
6,091 |
6,102 |
FTE per 1,000 residents |
3.70 |
3.70 |
3.78 |
46. There has been ongoing difficulty recruiting skilled staff in a number of front lines areas, such as Regulatory Services.
47. Controlling FTE numbers is a core focus for the parent. Each vacancy is now requiring Executive Leadership Team member approval, and is subject to a finance review prior to being recruited. All roles above $100,000 remuneration require approval by the Executive Leadership Team as a group before being recruited.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement
49. This report’s high-level content and recommendations have no particular benefit or adverse effect on Māori. Individual items in the highlights and achievements section may have benefits or adverse effects on Māori that are specific to those initiatives.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
50. There are no legal financial or resourcing implications arising from receipt of this report.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
51. There are no risks arising from the receipt of this report.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
52. There are no next steps from this report.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Q3 FY18 Appendices 1-7 |
189 |
b⇩
|
Appendice Capital projects report |
207 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
David Gurney - Manager Corporate Performance & Reporting |
Authorisers |
Kevin Ramsay - General Manager Corporate Finance and Property Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |