I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Finance and Performance Committee will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 19 June 2018 9.30am Reception Lounge |
Komiti ā Pūtea, ā Mahi
Hoki /
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Cr Ross Clow |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Cr Desley Simpson, JP |
|
Members |
Cr Josephine Bartley |
IMSB Member Terrence Hohneck |
|
Cr Dr Cathy Casey |
Cr Penny Hulse |
|
Deputy Mayor Bill Cashmore |
Cr Mike Lee |
|
Cr Fa’anana Efeso Collins |
Cr Daniel Newman, JP |
|
Cr Linda Cooper, JP |
Cr Greg Sayers |
|
Cr Chris Darby |
Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM |
|
Cr Alf Filipaina |
IMSB Chair David Taipari |
|
Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO |
Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE |
|
Mayor Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP |
Cr Wayne Walker |
|
Cr Richard Hills |
Cr John Watson |
(Quorum 11 members)
|
|
Sandra Gordon Senior Governance Advisor
13 June 2018
Contact Telephone: (09) 890 8150 Email: sandra.gordon@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Terms of Reference
Responsibilities
The purpose of the Committee is to:
(a) control and review expenditure across the Auckland Council Group to improve value for money
(b) monitor the overall financial management and performance of the council parent organisation and Auckland Council Group
(c) make financial decisions required outside of the annual budgeting processes
Key responsibilities include:
· Advising and supporting the mayor on the development of the Long Term Plan (LTP) and Annual Plan (AP) for consideration by the Governing Body including:
o Local Board agreements
o Financial policy related to the LTP and AP
o Setting of rates
o Preparation of the consultation documentation and supporting information, and the consultation process, for the LTP and AP
· Monitoring the operational and capital expenditure of the council parent organisation and Auckland Council Group, and inquiring into any material discrepancies from planned expenditure
· Monitoring the financial and non-financial performance targets, key performance indicators, and other measures of the council parent organisation and each Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) to inform the Committee’s judgement about the performance of each organisation
· Advising the mayor on the content of the annual Letters of Expectations (LoE) to CCOs
· Exercising relevant powers under Schedule 8 of the Local Government Act 2002, which relate to the Statements of Intent of CCOs
· Exercising Auckland Council’s powers as a shareholder or given under a trust deed, including but not limited to modification of constitutions and/or trust deeds, granting shareholder approval of major transactions where required, exempting CCOs, and approving policies relating to CCO and CO governance
· Approving the financial policy of the Council parent organisation
· Establishing and managing a structured approach to the approval of non-budgeted expenditure (including grants, loans or guarantees) that reinforces value for money and an expectation of tight expenditure control
· Write-offs
· Acquisition and disposal of property, in accordance with the long term plan
· Recommending the Annual Report to the Governing Body
· Te Toa Takatini
Powers
(a) All powers necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities, including:
a. approval of a submission to an external body
b. establishment of working parties or steering groups.
(b) The committee has the powers to perform the responsibilities of another committee, where it is necessary to make a decision prior to the next meeting of that other committee.
(c) The committee does not have:
a. the power to establish subcommittees
b. powers that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (section 2).
Exclusion of the public – who needs to leave the meeting
Members of the public
All members of the public must leave the meeting when the public are excluded unless a resolution is passed permitting a person to remain because their knowledge will assist the meeting.
Those who are not members of the public
General principles
· Access to confidential information is managed on a “need to know” basis where access to the information is required in order for a person to perform their role.
· Those who are not members of the meeting (see list below) must leave unless it is necessary for them to remain and hear the debate in order to perform their role.
· Those who need to be present for one confidential item can remain only for that item and must leave the room for any other confidential items.
· In any case of doubt, the ruling of the chairperson is final.
Members of the meeting
· The members of the meeting remain (all Governing Body members if the meeting is a Governing Body meeting; all members of the committee if the meeting is a committee meeting).
· However, standing orders require that a councillor who has a pecuniary conflict of interest leave the room.
· All councillors have the right to attend any meeting of a committee and councillors who are not members of a committee may remain, subject to any limitations in standing orders.
Independent Māori Statutory Board
· Members of the Independent Māori Statutory Board who are appointed members of the committee remain.
· Independent Māori Statutory Board members and staff remain if this is necessary in order for them to perform their role.
Staff
· All staff supporting the meeting (administrative, senior management) remain.
· Other staff who need to because of their role may remain.
Local Board members
· Local Board members who need to hear the matter being discussed in order to perform their role may remain. This will usually be if the matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular Local Board area.
Council Controlled Organisations
· Representatives of a Council Controlled Organisation can remain only if required to for discussion of a matter relevant to the Council Controlled Organisation.
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 9
2 Declaration of Interest 9
3 Confirmation of Minutes 9
4 Petitions 9
5 Public Input 9
5.1 Public Input - Bill Buckley, Speedway Promotions regarding the relocation of Speedway to Colin Dale Park 9
6 Local Board Input 9
6.1 Local Board Input - Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board regarding the relocation of Speedway to Colin Dale Park 10
7 Extraordinary Business 10
8 Notices of Motion 11
9 Budget to conduct by-election 13
10 Extension of Te Puru Community Charitable Trust Council-Controlled Organisation Exemption 17
11 240A Bethells Beach Te Henga - Kāinga Whakahirahira 21
12 Finance and Performance Committee - Information Report - 19 June 2018 37
13 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
14 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 55
C1 Recommendation from the Environment and Community Committee - Acquisition of land for open space - Panmure 55
C2 Insurance Renewal - Proposed Council Group Programme for 2018/2019 period 55
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
That the Finance and Performance Committee: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 6 June 2018 as a true and correct record. |
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
Standing Order 7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to the Governance Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day prior to the meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes speaking time for each speaker.
Standing Order 6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of that Chairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this time. The Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson) shall wherever practical, give one (1) day’s notice of their wish to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders.
This right is in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on the agenda.
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
There were no notices of motion.
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
File No.: CP2018/09782
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To approve additional budget for a Howick Ward by-election following the passing of Councillor Dick Quax.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Councillor Dick Quax passed away on 28 May 2018, creating a vacancy in the Howick Ward. The Local Electoral Act 2001 requires a by-election to be held to fill this vacancy.
3. This paper requests additional operating budget of $229,400 to cover the cost of this by-election.
Horopaki / Context
4. Councillor Dick Quax passed away on 28 May 2018, creating a vacancy in the Howick ward. The Local Electoral Act 2001 requires a by-election to be held to fill this vacancy.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
5. The following by-election timetable will be followed:
- public notice of by-elections Wednesday, 20 June 2018
- nominations open Wednesday, 20 June 2018
- nominations close noon, Wednesday, 18 July 2018
- delivery of voting packs from Wednesday, 22 August 2018
- close of voting noon, Thursday, 13 September 2018.
6. The estimated costs of these by-elections are set out below.
By-election area |
Estimate |
Estimate |
Estimate |
Howick
Ward |
$160,000 |
$49,400 |
$20,000 |
7. These costs are based on:
· an estimate provided by the council’s election services provider, Independent Election Services Limited, for managing and processing votes based on the number of electors in the ward.
· estimated costs related to communications, marketing and ballot box management.
· estimated costs of additional internal project resource to manage the by-election.
8. Independent Election Services Limited estimates are based on a 30 per cent voter turnout. Final costs will depend on actual number of voter returns.
9. Independent Election Services Limited estimates include a 24 per cent postage price increase effective 1 July 2018.
10. The Democracy Services department staff are now fully engaged in the planning for the 2019 elections and there is no spare capacity to manage a by-election. There are too many risks associated with delaying the planning for the 2019 Elections. Therefore, a temporary additional resource will need to be brought in, and this is reflected in the costs outlined in paragraph 6.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
11. This by-election will affect electors in the Howick ward area. It will not directly impact the Howick Local Board.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement
12. The 2016 local government election arrangements for recognising Māori will apply to this by-election. These arrangements include provision for using Te Reo Māori in candidate profile statements and candidate and voter collateral being available in Te Reo and being sent directly to Mana Whenua.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
13. By-elections are unbudgeted. There is no opportunity in the current and next financial years to absorb costs within existing budgets.
14. Staff request that the Finance and Performance Committee approve an additional operating budget of $229,400.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
15. The Local Electoral Act 2001 requires an election to be held to fill these vacancies. If budget is not approved we would not be able to meet our obligations under the Act.
16. Recent experience of conducting by-elections has shown that estimated costs are sufficient. There is little risk of exceeding the budget requested in this paper, unless voter turnout significantly exceeds the estimated 30 per cent, which is unlikely.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
17. Budgets will be amended in core financial systems and will be used for internal management reporting, regular reporting to council committees and financial control for the 2018/2019 financial year.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
Katie Watson, Senior Advisor Voter Participation |
Authorisers |
Marguerite Delbet - General Manager Democracy Services Phil Wilson - Governance Director Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
Extension of Te Puru Community Charitable Trust Council-Controlled Organisation Exemption
File No.: CP2018/05293
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To consider extending the exemption from council-controlled organisation requirements for the Te Puru Community Charitable Trust (Te Puru) to 2021.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Te Puru is a legacy council-controlled organisation (CCO) of Auckland Council which operates a community recreation centre at Te Puru Park at Beachlands/Maraetai. Te Puru has been operating with an exemption from the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 under Section 7, Exempt Organisations, since 2015.
3. Each exemption lasts for three years and at the end of that period must undergo formal consideration of whether the exemption should continue.
4. An exemption means that Te Puru does not need to prepare a Statement of Intent (SOI) or report semi-annually to the Governing Body as non-exempt CCOs are required to do.
5. Te Puru receives council funding of approximately $325,000 per year. This funding sits with the Franklin Local Board budget. A funding agreement has been entered into with Te Puru, which contains performance measures against which Te Puru’s performance is assessed.
6. Staff and the local board believe that the lease and funding agreement contain all necessary accountability and oversight measures, and that a SOI would be redundant. The funding agreement keeps Te Puru accountable to the local board and offers better local oversight of services than if Te Puru reported to the Governing Body.
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation That the Finance and Performance Committee: a) approve an exemption from council-controlled organisation requirements for Te Puru Community Charitable Trust until 2021. |
Horopaki / Context
7. Te Puru is a CCO of Auckland Council. It was established as a CCO by Manukau City Council in 2002 to provide recreational and cultural community services, particularly for those who live and work in the Clevedon area. It is governed by a trust board in partnership with Counties Manukau Sports Foundation (CMSF).
8. Te Puru is a CCO because Auckland Council appoints the majority of its trustees, in consultation with the chair of the trust and CMSF. It is also considered a public entity (requiring audit by the Office of the Auditor-General or its appointee), due to its CCO status.
9. The Local Government Act 2002 allows councils to exempt CCOs from certain requirements of that status, including preparation of a Statement of Intent (SOI), and semi-annual reporting to the Governing Body. The CCO audit requirement is not affected by exempt status.
10. Exemption was first approved by the Council Controlled Organisations Governance and Monitoring Committee at their 3 February 2015 meeting. (Resolution COU/2015/4)
11. Since that time, Te Puru has been operating under this exemption without incident and wishes to retain this status.
12. Te Puru receives approximately $325,000 in operational funding per year from Auckland Council. This is provided through a funding agreement with the Parks, Sports and Recreation department. This budget sits with the Franklin Local Board.
13. The terms of the funding agreement, including the performance measures and reporting requirements are considered to provide accountability that is at least equivalent to the accountability that would be required for a non-exempt CCO.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
14. When considering whether or not to exempt a CCO, the Local Government Act 2002 requires council to consider the following matters:
a) the nature and scope of the activities provided by the organisation; and
b) the costs and benefits, if an exemption is granted, to the local authority, the council-controlled organisation, and the community.
15. There is the option of removing the exemption which would trigger the preparation of a SOI. However, that would not provide a higher level of accountability than is already embodied in the funding agreement, so a SOI would be redundant.
16. Any reporting against the performance targets and deliverables contained in an SOI would go to the Governing Body. Under the Act, the Governing Body is responsible for the governance of CCOs.
17. As Te Puru is a provider of local recreation services, it is believed that oversight of those services is best provided by the local board and locally-based Parks, Sports and Recreation staff.
18. The performance targets and deliverables that would be contained in a SOI would be substantially similar (if not the same) as is currently in the Te Puru funding agreement. Therefore, the SOI mechanism would not provide any additional accountability.
19. Staff are of the view that it is more appropriate that Te Puru be accountable to the local board via a funding agreement, than being accountable to the Governing Body through an SOI. It is local board funding that is provided to Te Puru, therefore it is more appropriate that Te Puru is accountable to the local board.
20. There is nothing in the scale or scope of Te Puru’s activities that would suggest that it should not be exempted.
21. Staff are of the view that there would be no additional benefit gained by requiring Te Puru to prepare a SOI. Meeting the CCO requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 would also impose compliance costs on Te Puru, for no additional benefit.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
22. At its meeting of 8 May 2018, the Franklin Local Board supported the continuation of the exemption of the Te Puru Community Charitable Trust from council-controlled organisation status until 2021. (Resolution FR/2018/62)
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement
23. Te Puru undertakes a range of activities that contribute to Māori well-being, about which it reports on as part of its six-monthly reports. Through reporting against the terms of its funding agreement and engagement with Franklin Local Board, Te Puru can continue to inform the council of its contribution to Māori well-being.
24. The decision whether or not to exempt Te Puru has no impact on Māori outcomes, either positive or negative.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
25. Granting the exemption does not affect council funding as accountability for that funding is governed by the funding agreement between Te Puru and the Franklin Local Board.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
26. The main risk associated with Te Puru is that it will not achieve the targets set for it through its funding agreement. This risk is mitigated considerably by the terms of the funding agreement which allow council to withhold funding for any breach of terms of the agreement. The lease terms also protect council’s financial interest in the facility and land under lease.
27. A decision not to exempt Te Puru would not help mitigate any known risks.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
28. Te Puru will be notified of this action.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
Steven Branca - BID Partnership Advisor |
Authorisers |
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance & External Partnerships Phil Wilson - Governance Director Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
240A Bethells Beach Te Henga - Kāinga Whakahirahira
File No.: CP2018/09594
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To consider the transfer of the land at 240A Bethells Road, Te Henga to Te Kawerau ā Maki for the purpose of constructing a marae and papakāinga.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. To enable Te Kawerau ā Maki to construct a marae and papakāinga at 240A Bethells Road, staff have considered three options:
· Option 1: negotiate a long-term ground lease with Te Kawerau ā Maki
· Option 2: transfer the land to Te Kawerau ā Maki as general freehold land in Fee Simple (preferred option)
· Option 3: sell the land to Te Kawerau ā Maki.
3. Staff recommend the transfer of the land to Te Kawerau ā Maki. It is not required for open space purposes and this option accords with the previous decisions of the Waitākere City Council.
4. Transfer of the land would best enable the development of a marae and papakāinga.
5. Without the transfer, Te Kawerau ā Maki may not be able to develop a marae over the medium to long-term.
6. Subject to the completion of statutory processes, staff will prepare a memorandum of transfer to Te Kawerau ā Maki and the Public Works Act 1981 section 40 report.
Horopaki / Context
7. Waitākere City Council and Te Kawerau ā Maki were in discussions over the development of a marae within the traditional heartland of the iwi and in the vicinity of their ancestral village at Waiti since the mid-1990s.
8. A detailed timeline of the background to the proposal is in Attachment A, however, the following is a summary of the key developments.
· Waitākere City Council and Te Kawerau ā Maki investigated three possible sites in 1994 and 1995, before Te Henga was identified as the preferred site for a marae.
· Waitākere City Council allocated $30,000 in the 1995/1996 Annual Plan to assist Te Kawerau ā Maki to purchase 240A Bethells Road.[1] This site was also zoned as ‘Marae Special Area’ in the District Plan.
· In 1998, Waitākere City Council and Te Kawerau ā Maki entered into a memorandum of partnership, which includes an objective to establish a marae.
· Staff investigated the potential to acquire 240A Bethells Road under the Public Works Act 1981 and re-commence negotiations with the landowner. Budget for the acquisition is allocated in 2008/2009. There is also a proposal to vest the land with Te Kawerau ā Maki under the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993.
· The 2008, Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act specifically Section 29(1) acknowledges Te Kawerau ā Maki (alongside Ngāti Whātua) as tangata whenua of the heritage area, with a particular historical, traditional, cultural, or spiritual relationship with any land in the heritage area.
· In 2009, Waitākere City Council purchased the 2.6836 hectares site at 240A Bethells Road, Te Henga for ‘community development purposes.’
· Waitākere City Council proposed to classify the land as a Local Purpose (marae papakāinga) Reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.
· The consultation process on the proposed classification generated 104 public submissions and two Ministerial representations.
· In 2010, the classification was approved by an independent commissioner on condition that ‘the council provide in the proposed Deed of Lease, or any agreement entered into with Te Kawerau ā Maki for the use of the reserve, provision for the community to have the opportunity for effective input into the type and scale of the facilities to be built on site.’
· On 27 January 2011, approval was granted by the Minister of Conservation for permanent personal accommodation on the reserve (Case No. 2010/11 51) to provide for papakāinga housing.
· In 2016, Auckland Council confirmed the objectives, policies and rules of the Unitary Plan: Special Purpose Zone – Māori Purpose enable marae and papakāinga activities on the site.
· In 2018, the refreshed Auckland Plan includes a Māori Identity and Wellbeing outcome. The outcome directions and focus areas support investment in marae to be self-sustaining and prosperous, advance mana whenua rangatiratanga and celebrate Māori culture and support Te Reo Māori to flourish.
9. Te Kawerau ā Maki have previously been offered a ground lease over the land at Te Henga. This option was actively considered, however, to-date the iwi has declined to enter into a leasing arrangement with council.
10. Te Kawerau ā Maki have indicated a preference for the land to be general freehold land in Fee Simple before they develop their marae and papakāinga. In the view of the iwi this would recognise their mana and align with what they hold to be the undertakings given by the former Waitākere City Council.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
11. On 12 June 2018, the Environment and Community Committee, will consider a report recommending that the Minister of Conservation revoke the classification of 240A Bethells Road, as a Local Purpose (marae papakāinga) Reserve under the Reserves Act 1977. The Environment and Community Committee resolution will be tabled at the meeting.
12. If approved, the revocation will better enable the development of a marae and papakāinga.
13. Further council support through a disposal of the land through transfer or sale can be enabled by the reserve revocation and a decision by this Committee.
An open space assessment has been undertaken for the potential disposal of 240A Bethells Road
14. Table 1 below provides a summary of the potential disposal assessment for 240A Bethells Road against the criteria in the Parks and Open Space Acquisition Policy and the Open Space Provision Policy.
Table 1: Open space assessment of the potential disposal of 240A Bethells Road |
|||||||
Park type: Open space |
Number of lots: 125 (within one km catchment) |
||||||
Density: Low |
Number of residents[2]: 375 |
||||||
Unitary plan zone: Special Purpose Zone – Māori Purpose |
Proposed size of disposal: 26,836m² |
||||||
General valuation: $650,000 (2017) |
Settlement: To be determined |
||||||
|
|||||||
Potential future use: |
|
Cultural |
|
|
Nature / Ecological |
||
Disposal Criteria |
Comment |
Overall Rating |
|||||
Meeting community needs, now and in the future |
Not a priority: · the land does not contribute to the provision targets in the Open Space Provision Policy. |
|
|||||
Connecting parks and open spaces |
Not a priority: · the land does not connect to any existing open space. |
||||||
Protecting and restoring Auckland’s unique features and meanings |
Not a priority: · the land does have identified landscape values, its value as public open space is negligible. |
||||||
Improving the parks and open spaces we already have |
Not a priority: · the land does not improve the functionality of existing open space. |
||||||
15. Staff have identified that the land at Te Henga is not a priority for retention as assessed against council policy. Staff recommend that the land at Te Henga could be disposed for the reasons outlined below.
· There is ample provision of open space provision within Bethells Beach. Local residents and the wider community have access to Te Henga Park, Te Henga Recreation Reserve and Lake Wainamu Scenic Reserve within a 400 metre radius of 240A Bethells Road.
· The parcel of land has a very narrow access (approximately 5.8 metres wide and 395 metres long), which limits the utility of the open space and poor crime prevention through environmental design outcomes.
· There is limited growth and potential for future development given that Te Henga is situated within the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area.
Staff have identified three possible options
16. Staff have identified three options to enable Te Kawerau ā Maki develop a marae and papakāinga at Te Henga. Decision-making delegations within the options are shared as follows:
· long term lease - Waitākere Local Board
· reserve revocation - Environment and Community Committee
· disposal via transfer or sale - Finance and Performance Committee.
17. These options have been presented in their entirety throughout each part of the decision-making process. The decisions made throughout this process are either outlined in the report, or will be tabled at the Finance and Performance Committee meeting.
18. The three options are:
· Option 1: Lease - negotiate a long-term ground lease with Te Kawerau ā Maki in accordance with the classification of the land as a Local Purpose (marae and papakāinga) Reserve
· Option 2: Disposal by transfer - revoke the reserve status on the land and transfer it to Te Kawerau ā Maki as general freehold land in Fee Simple
· Option 3: Disposal by sale - revoke the reserve status on the land and to dispose of the land by way of sale to Te Kawerau ā Maki.
19. Option 1: Lease represents the status quo. This option does not provide for long-term certainty of tenure. It may enable the development of a marae and papakāinga, but it also limits the ability for iwi to obtain commercial funding.
20. Option 2: Disposal by transfer appears to accord with the decisions of the former Waitākere City Council and the Waitākere Ranges Local Board [WTK/2018/47 refers]. This option increases the likelihood of a marae being developed.
21. Option 3: Disposal by sale has been discarded because it does not align with the decisions of the former Waitākere City Council. Iwi also do not favour this option. Selling land directly to a single party rather than on the open market also lacks transparency, which raises significant reputational and legal risk for council.
Staff have developed evaluation criteria to help the Committee assess its preferred option
22. Staff have developed evaluation criteria to enable the Committee to compare the three proposed options. These criteria are:
· possible impact on the development of the marae and papakāinga by Te Kawerau ā Maki
· strategic alignment with the Auckland and Unitary Plans
· alignment with the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008
· open space requirements to meet the needs of the local community.
23. These criteria were selected because they allow for objective assessment against the immediate outcome Auckland Council is seeking to achieve - development of the marae and papakāinga. Assessment against long-term outcomes as well as the legislative framework that applies to the Waitākere Ranges area. Open space provision is another important consideration.
24. The evaluation criteria are unweighted; each are deemed to be of equal importance.
25. Table 2 provides an assessment of the option against the evaluation criteria.
Table 2: Assessment of options against criteria
Criterion |
Option 1: Lease |
Option 2: Disposal (Transfer) |
Option 3: Disposal (Sale) |
Marae development |
√ |
√√√ |
√√ |
Strategic alignment |
√ |
√√ |
√√ |
Legislative alignment |
√ |
√√ |
√ |
Open space needs |
|
√√ |
√√ |
26. Staff recommend Option 2: Disposal by transfer to Te Kawerau ā Maki. This option:
· best meets the assessment criterial overall, particularly enabling a marae and papakāinga to be built and meeting legislative requirements
· has the strongest alignment with aspirations and preference of Te Kawerau ā Maki
· is supported by the Waitākere Ranges Local Board.
27. The key trade-off between the recommended option and the other two options is essentially financial:
· Option 1: Lease - council would retain ownership of the land with an indicative valuation of $650,000
· Option 3: Disposal by Sale - council could partially offset the initial $935,000 cost of acquisition.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
28. The Waitākere Ranges Local Board has sought to enable the development of a marae and papakāinga at Te Henga.
29. The Local Board, at its meeting of 24 May 2018 resolved that it:
(a) supports the possible revocation of the classification of 240A Bethells Road, Te Henga, identified as Section 1 SO 427404 comprising 2.6836 hectares and contained in CFR538253, as a Local Purpose (marae papakāinga) Reserve under the Reserves Act 1977.
(b) supports the possible transfer of the 240A Bethells Road, Te Henga, identified as Section 1 SO 427404 comprising 2.6836 hectares and contained in CFR538253, to Te Kawerau ā Maki as general freehold land in Fee Simple for the purpose of constructing a marae and papakāinga.
30. Local residents of Bethells Beach attended the 24 May 2018 meeting of the Local Board and spoke during public input in support of efforts to facilitate the development of a marae and papakāinga by Te Kawerau ā Maki at Te Henga.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact statement
31. Te Kawerau ā Maki have clearly stated their aspirations to establish a marae within their traditional heartland and in the vicinity of their ancestral village at Waiti. They have also noted that they are the only mana whenua group without an iwi-based marae.
32. Te Kawerau ā Maki have indicated a preference for the land to be general freehold land in Fee Simple before they develop their marae and papakāinga.
33. On 10 May 2018, the Chairpersons of the Environment and Community Committee, Councillor Penny Hulse, and the Finance and Performance Committee, Councillors Ross Clow, wrote to Te Kawerau ā Maki. The purpose of this letter was to outline the steps that council proposes to undertake to enable the development of the marae and papakāinga at Te Henga.
34. A formal response from Te Kawerau ā Maki will be provided at the Committee meeting to inform decision-making.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
35. 240A Bethells Road was acquired for $935,000 (inclusive of GST) in 2009.
36. An indicative valuation, based on council’s geographic information system data, records a rateable value of $650,000. This valuation reflects the zoning of the land as Māori Purpose Zone and Outstanding Natural Features and Landscape Overlays as well as the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Overlay.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
37. The land at 204A Bethells Road Te Henga was purchased by Waitākere City Council in 2010 for ‘community development purposes’ with the intention that the land be used by Te Kawerau ā Maki to develop a marae and papakāinga.
38. Any memorandum of transfer to Te Kawerau ā Maki would be subject to the development of the land in accordance with Unitary Plan provisions for the Special Purpose – Māori Purpose Zone.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
39. Subject to the completion of statutory processes, staff will prepare a memorandum of transfer to Te Kawerau ā Maki and the Public Works Act 1981 section 40 report.
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Timeline |
27 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
Paul Marriott-Lloyd - Senior Policy Manager |
Authorisers |
Graham Pryor - GM Maori Responsiveness & Relationships Kataraina Maki - GM - Community & Social Policy Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
Finance and Performance Committee - Information Report - 19 June 2018
File No.: CP2018/09654
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To receive a summary and provide a public record of memos or briefing papers for the Committee’s information and any other information that may have been distributed to committee members since 15 May 2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. This is a regular information-only report which aims to provide greater visibility of information circulated to committee members via memo or other means, where no decisions are required.
3. The following information-only report is attached:
· Finance and Performance Committee Forward Work Programme to 30 June 2018 (Attachment A).
4. The following presentations/memos/reports were presented/circulated as follows:
· 1 June 2018 – Memo from Sarah Holdem, Principal Adviser, CCO Governance and External Partnerships related to work on non-substantive council-controlled organisations and council organisations - (Attachment B).
· 6 June 2018 – Workshop - 10-year Budget performance measures update/Green Bond Issuance (confidential – no attachment).
5. The workshop papers and any previous documents can be found on the Auckland Council website at the following link: http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/
· at the top of the page, select meeting “Finance and Performance Committee” from the drop-down tab and click ‘View’;
· under ‘Attachments’, select either HTML or PDF version of the document entitled ‘Extra Attachments’.
6. Note that, unlike an agenda decision report, staff will not be present to answer questions about thee items referred to in this summary. Committee members should direct any questions to the authors.
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Finance and Performance Committee: a) receive the information report – 19 June 2018. |
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩
|
Finance and Performance Committee Forward Work Programme to 30 June 2018 |
39 |
b⇨ |
1 June 2018 – Memo from Sarah Holdem, Principal Adviser, CCO Governance and External Partnerships related to work on ‘non-substantive council-controlled organisations and council organisations (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
Author |
Sandra Gordon - Senior Governance Advisor |
Authoriser |
Matthew Walker - Acting Group Chief Financial Officer |
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE FORWARD WORK PROGRAMME TO 30 JUNE 2018 The purpose of the Committee is to control and review expenditure across the Group to improve value for money; to monitor the overall financial management and performance of Auckland Council parent and Auckland Council Group; to make financial decisions required outside the annual budgeting processes and to perform the responsibilities of another committee, where it is necessary.
|
||||||||||||
Priorities for 2017/18 will be on initiatives which: 1. Strategic Reviews: Long-term Plan 2018-2028 Development 2. Monitoring 3. Acquisitions and disposals 4. Other financial decisions |
The work of the committee will: 1. approve the Long-term Plan 2018-2028 including financial policy, the consultation document and supporting information for recommendation to the Governing Body 2. monitor achievement of financial and other measures of performance and services levels and recommend the Annual Report to the Governing Body 3. approve acquisition and disposal of property related to the Committee’s responsibilities. 4. review and approve financial policy and non-budgeted expenditure. |
|||||||||||
Lead |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Finance and Performance Committee role - decision or direction |
F&P Delegations |
Expected
timeframes |
|
||||||
FY18 FY19 |
|
|||||||||||
Jan-Mar |
Apr-Jun |
Jul-Sep |
Oct-Dec |
|
||||||||
Strategic Reviews: Long-term Plan 2018-2028 Development |
|
|||||||||||
Chief Financial Office |
Rating and funding policy |
· General Rates · Interim transport levy (Remain as a funding source or alternative option implemented) · New targeted rates (water quality and natural environment) · Regional Fuel Tax · Business rates differentials · Local targeted rate (for specific local activities) · Local Board targeted rates (for specific local projects) · Revenue and financing policy · Rates remission and postponement policy · Panuku disposals and reinvestment in unlock locations |
Recommend changes for Mayoral Proposal Decide on Mayoral Proposal for inclusion in consultation document Consider submissions Decide on final LTP Progress to date Long-Term Plan: 21/11/17 – 10-Year Budget 2018-2028 and Auckland Plan Refresh – How Aucklanders will provide feedback during the public consultation FIN/207/164 and FIN/2017/165 30/11/17 – Receipt of Mayoral Proposal for the 10-year budget 2018-2018 FIN/2017/181 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2028 – Process Overview FIN/2017/184 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2018 – Mayoral Proposal items for consultation Resolutions FIN/2017/186, FIN/2017/187, FIN/2017/188, FIN/2017/189, FIN/2017/190, FIN/2017/191, FIN/2017/192 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2028 – Other matters for consideration FIN/2017/195, FIN/2017/196, FIN/2017/197 Adopted by Governing Body: 12/12/17 GB/2017/159 Various workshops and Have Your Say Events held during March 2018 10-year Budget 31/5/18 – 10-year Budget – 2018-2018 Mayor’s final proposal FIN/208/77-84 |
Delegations include development of the Long-term Plan 2018-2028 including financial policy. Preparation of the consultation document and supporting information for recommendation to the Governing Body |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
|||
Lead |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Finance and Performance Committee role - decision or direction |
F&P Delegations |
Expected
timeframes |
|
||||||
FY18 FY19 |
|
|||||||||||
Jan-Mar |
Apr-Jun |
Jul-Sep |
Oct-Dec |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Rodney Local Board Targeted Rate: Rodney Local Board Decision FIN/2018/87 31/5/18 – Fees, charges and other rating matters FIN/2018/89 31/5/18 – Adoption of the Rates Remission and Postponement Policy FIN/2018/92 31/5/18 – Contributions Policy FIN/2018/90 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 Regional Fuel Tax GB/2018/90 Panuku Developments Auckland: 23/5/17 – Unlock Henderson FIN/2017/60 23/5/17 – Transform Onehunga FIN/2017/61 20/6/17 - Panuku Development Auckland Limited debt to equity conversion FIN/2017/89 19/9/17 – Funding of Panuku work in the Unlock locations resolutions - FIN/2017/119 and FIN/2017/120 11/12/17 – Unlock Avondale FIN/2017/168 1/3/17 – Workshop on Progressing Urban development 20/3/18 – Progressing Urban Development FIN/2018/40 Reporting dates for policies: 11/12/17 – Approval of Treasury Management Policy FIN/2017/161 7/2/18 – Workshop on Development Contributions and Rates Remission Postponement Policy. 27/2/18 – Council’s debt funding strategy FIN/2018/10 For information on the previous annual plan process, please refer to the table at the end of this document. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Chief Financial Office |
Expenditure Review |
· Key focus areas for net cost reduction · Identifying programmes for Maori outcomes · Local board ‘one local initiative’ · Governance funding review · Capex review |
Recommend changes for Mayoral Proposal Decide on Mayoral Proposal for inclusion in consultation document Progress to date Reporting dates: 31/5/18 – Proposal for One Local Initiatives FIN/2018/85 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|
||||
Lead |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Finance and Performance Committee role - decision or direction |
F&P Delegations |
Expected
timeframes |
||||||
FY18 FY19 |
|||||||||||
Jan-Mar |
Apr-Jun |
Jul-Sep |
Oct-Dec |
||||||||
Chief Financial Office |
Long-term Plan process |
Statutory process · Consultation process – including hearings for community to be heard and local board engagement meetings (Have Your Say events). Approach to communication of investments in LB areas to be considered · Elected members consideration of feedback · Decision-making for Long-term Plan · Long-term Plan adoption |
Agree consultation items Adopt consultation documents and supporting material and recommend to Governing Body Adopt local board agreements Adopt Long-term Plan and set rates and recommend to Governing Body Progress to date Reporting dates: 21/11/17 – 10-Year Budget 2018-2028 and Auckland Plan Refresh – How Aucklanders will provide feedback during the public consultation FIN/207/164 and FIN/2017/165 30/11/17 – Receipt of Mayoral Proposal for the 10-year budget 2018-2018 FIN/2017/181 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2028 – Process Overview FIN/2017/184 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2018 – Mayoral Proposal items for consultation Resolutions FIN/2017/186, FIN/2017/187, FIN/2017/188, FIN/2017/189, FIN/2017/190, FIN/2017/191, FIN/2017/192 11/12/17 – 10-year budget 2018-2028 – Other matters for consideration FIN/2017/195, FIN/2017/196, FIN/2017/197 Adopted by Governing Body: 12/12/17 FIN/2017/159 10-year Budget 31/5/18 – 10-year Budget – 2018-2018 Mayor’s final proposal FIN/208/77-84 31/5/18 – Proposal for One Local Initiatives FIN/2018/85 31/5/18 – Rodney Local Board Targeted Rate: Rodney Local Board Decision FIN/2018/87 31/5/18 – Fees, charges and other rating matters FIN/2018/89 31/5/18 – Adoption of the Rates Remission and Postponement Policy FIN/2018/92 31/5/18 – Contributions Policy FIN/2018/90 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 Regional Fuel Tax GB/2018/90 |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||
See end table for programme |
|||||||||||
Chief Financial Office |
Growth Infrastructure Targeted Rates, Development Contributions, Local Targeted Rate for local activities, Local Board Targeted Rate for specific projects |
· Growth Instructure Targeted Rates – if required to be implemented to a specific growth area · Development Contributions – amendment to the Contributions policy · Local targeted rate for local activities – this may be considered dependant on the Governance Review project decisions · Local Board targeted rate for specific projects – if the Local Board would like to consult on implementing a local targeted rate for specific project in their area |
Update Recommend changes for Mayoral Proposal Decide on Mayoral Proposal for inclusion in consultation document Consider submissions Decide on final LTP Progress to date Reporting dates: Workshop held 7/2/18 regarding the development contribution policy Targeted rates: 27/2/17 – Accommodation Provider Targeted Rate Remission FIN/2018/22 27/2/18 – Rates remission and postponement policy review FIN/2018/23 31/5/18 – Rodney Local Board Targeted Rate: Rodney Local Board Decision FIN/2018/87 31/5/18 – 10-year Budget – 2018-2018 Mayor’s final proposal FIN/208/77-84 31/5/18 – Contributions Policy FIN/2018/90 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 |
Delegations include development of the Long-term Plan 2018-2028 including financial policy. Preparation of the consultation document and supporting information for recommendation to the Governing Body |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||
Proposed 2018 Long-term Plan Schedule |
|
Aug – Nov 2017 |
Process for early discussions on
direction, priorities and prioritisation (within this time period) is currently
being prepared and will require Mayoral advice and approval.
Discussions include: Infrastructure funding; Infrastructure investment;
Service delivery and cost review; Local Boards projects, funding and
advocacy; Other budget and non-financial policy issues; Revaluations and
rating policy 30/11/17 – Receipt of Mayoral Proposal for the 10-year budget 2018-2018 FIN/2017/181 |
Sep - Dec 2017 |
Audit of consultation material |
11 Dec 2017 |
Mayoral Proposal /Consultation items,
including local content agreed 12/12/17 - Adopted by Governing Body FIN/2017/159 |
21 March 2018 |
21/3/18 - Consultation Document and Supporting Information, adopted, including local content 21/3/18 |
28 Feb – 28 Mar 2018 |
Public Consultation |
Apr – May 2018 |
Processing of consultation feedback and briefing of elected members |
May 2018 |
Budget discussions and decision-making (both locally and regionally) 10-year Budget 31/5/18 – 10-year Budget – 2018-2018 Mayor’s final proposal FIN/208/77-84 Proposal for One Local Initiatives FIN/2018/85 Rodney Local Board Targeted Rate: Rodney Local Board Decision FIN/2018/87 Fees, charges and other rating matters FIN/2018/89 Adoption of the Rates Remission and Postponement Policy FIN/2018/92 Contributions Policy FIN/2018/90 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 Regional Fuel Tax GB/2018/90 |
May - June 2018 |
Audit of Long-term Plan |
27 June 2018 |
Adoption of Long-term Plan, including Local Board Agreements |
Lead |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Finance and Performance Committee role - decision or direction |
F&P Delegations |
Expected timeframes Highlight financial year quarter and state month if known |
|||||||||||||
FY18 FY19 |
||||||||||||||||||
Jan-Mar |
Apr-Jun |
Jul-Sep |
Oct-Dec |
|||||||||||||||
Monitoring |
||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance and Property |
Quarterly business improvements and performance report |
To monitor council parent financial and non-financial performance results |
Receive generally no decisions Progress to date Reporting dates: 13/12/16 - Auckland Council organisation report for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 September 2016 FIN/2016/160 21/2/17 - Auckland Council organisation performance report for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2016 FIN/2017/9 26/5/17 - Auckland Council organisation performance report for the period 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017 FIN/2017/68 21/09/17 - Organisation Performance 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2017 FIN/2017/133 24/11/17 - 1 July 2017 – 30 September 2017 FIN/2017/177 12/03/18 - 1 July 2017 – 31 December 2017 FIN/2018/34 6/6/18 – Auckland Council parent performance report for the period 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018 FIN/2018/98 |
The committee is responsible for monitoring achievement of financial and other measures of performance and service levels |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Corporate Finance and Property |
Auckland Council group quarterly financial results |
To monitor Auckland Council group financial performance |
Receive generally no decisions Progress to date Reporting dates: 13/12/16 - Auckland Council Group first quarter financial results to 30 September 2016 FIN/2016/161 21/3/17 - Auckland Council Group quarterly financial report and financial results to 31 December 2016 FIN/2017/28 26/5/17 - Auckland Council Group quarterly financial report and financial results to 31 March 2017 FIN/2017/70 21/09/17 – Report for adoption of the 2016/2017 Annual Report FIN/2017/132 24/11/17 - Quarterly financial report and financial results to 30 September 2017 FIN/2017/176 12/03/2018 - Six monthly financial results to 31 December 2017 FIN/2018/32 6/6/18 – Auckland Council Group quarterly financial report and financial reports to 31 March 2018 FIN/2018/95 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Financial Strategy and Planning |
CCO financial monitoring (separate from governance or strategic planning issues) |
To monitor CCO financial and non-financial performance results |
Receive validate/challenge Progress to date Reporting dates: 13/12/16 - Council-controlled organisations first quarter report for 30 September 2016 FIN/2016/158 11/4/17 – CCOs second quarter report for 31 December 2017 26/5/17 – Council-controlled organisations third quarter report for 31 March 2017 FIN/2017/69 21/09/17 - Fourth quarter report for 30 June 2017 (public excluded) FIN/2017/130 24/11/17 - First quarter report for 30 September 2017 FIN/2017/178 12/03/18 – Second quarter report ending 31 December 2017 FIN/2018/18 31/5/18 – Approval of council-controlled organisations accountability policy FIN/2018/91 6/6/18 – Council-controlled organisation third quarter report ending 31 March 2018 FIN/2018/96 and FIN/2018/97 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Te Waka Anga Mua ki Uta |
Māori Transformational Activity and Expenditure Report |
To monitor progress on expenditure and delivery of Maori transformational activity (includes Te Toa Takitini) |
Receive generally no decisions Progress to date 23/5/17 - 23/5/17 – Third Quarter of 2016/17 13/12/17 - Te Toa Takitini - Quarter One Māori Responsiveness portfolio report FIN/2016/159 15/08/17 – 2016/2017 Year-End Report FIN/2017/112 12/12/17 – Quarter One Report for 2017/2018 financial year FIN/2017/202 20/03/18 – Quarter Two Report for 2017/2018 financial year FIN/20178/14 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Te Waka Anga Mua ki Uta |
Māori Transformational Activity and Expenditure Report |
To monitor progress on expenditure and delivery on projects to deliver Māori outcomes |
Receive generally no decisions Progress to date 12/12/17 Report FIN/2017/291 12/3/18 Response Report FIN/2018/45 |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Te Waka Anga Mua ki Uta |
Te Tiriti O Waitangi Audit Response Work Programme |
To monitor progress in responding to 3 yearly Te Tiriti O Waitangi audit |
Receive generally no decisions Progress to date Reporting dates:
|
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Corporate Finance and Property |
Annual Report |
Statutory requirement |
Recommend to Governing Body Progress to date Reporting dates: 13/12/16 - Approval of the Audit New Zealand audit engagement and review engagement letters FIN/2016/165 13/12/16 – Final Management Report on the audit of Auckland Council for the year ended 30 June 2016 FIN/2016/167 21/9/17 - Auckland Council Organisation Performance 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2017 FIN/2017/133 21/09/17 - Approval and Recommendation for adoption of the 2016/2017 Annual Report and Summary Annual Report for Auckland Council and group FIN/2017/132 28/9/17 – Adopted by Governing Body: GB/2017/112 Note: there is a delegation from the Committee to Chair and Deputy Chair to recommend to the Mayor and CE to release the preliminary results to the NZ Stock Exchange so that Council can meet NZX reporting deadlines. |
The committee delegations include recommending the Annual Report to the Governing Body |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Corporate Finance and Property |
Half Year Report |
NZ Stock Exchange requirement (for listed companies) |
Decision to release the half year report to the NZ Stock Exchange Progress to date Reporting dates: Note: there is a delegation from the Committee to Chair and Deputy Chair to recommend to the Mayor and CE to release the announcement and interim report to the NZ Stock Exchange so that Council can meet NZX reporting deadlines. 13/12/16 - Approval of the 31 December 2016 half year pro forma financial statements and accounting policies FIN/2016/166 |
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Acquisitions and disposals |
||||||||||||||||||
Panuku |
Recommended disposals or acquisitions. These reports are as required, but generally monthly. |
Panuku Development Auckland is tasked with identifying council owned land that is surplus to requirements. These disposals may also include Service Property Optimisation. |
Decision to proceed with recommended disposals or acquisitions. Progress to date Note: A full list of properties to be disposed or acquired is included at the end of this document. |
Delegations include “Acquisition and disposal of property related to the Committee’s responsibilities. Note – this includes parks acquisitions in excess of delegations of Environment and Community Committee |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Other Financial Decisions |
||||||||||||||||||
CCO/External Partnerships |
Auckland Regional Amenities Levy |
Statutory process |
Decision to approve submission on draft Funding Plan Decision to approve levies Progress to date Reporting dates: 21/2/17 – Presentations from amenities - New Zealand Opera, Auckland Theatre Company, Coastguard Northern Region, Watersafe Auckland and Surf Life Saving Northern Region FIN/2017/4 21/2/17 - Auckland Regional Amenities draft funding plan 2017-2018, proposed Auckland Council submission FIN/2017/5 21/3/17 – Presentations from amenities – Stardome Observatory and Planetarium; New Zealand Maritime Museum; Auckland Philharmonia Orchestra; Auckland Rescue Helicopter Trust; and Auckland Arts Festival FIN/2017/18 21/3/17 - Approval of Auckland Regional Amenities Funding Act levy 2017/2018 FIN/2071/19 27/2/18 - Presentations from amenities – Auckland Festival Trust; Surf Life Saving Northern Region; Auckland Theatre Company; and Stardome Observatory and Coastguard Northern Region FIN/2018/5 27/2/18 - Auckland Regional Amenities Draft Funding Plan 2018/2019 - proposed Auckland Council submission FIN/2018/6 20/3/18 - Integration of NZ Maritime Museum to Regional Facilities Auckland FIN/2018/37 20/3/18 - Presentations from amenities – NZ Opera: Auckland Philharmonia Orchestra; Auckland Rescue Helicopter; and Drowning Prevention Auckland/Watersafe Auckland Inc FIN/2018/38 17/4/18 – approval of Auckland Regional Amenities Funding Act levy FIN/2018/63 |
The committee is responsible for establishing and managing a structured approach to the approval of non-budgeted expenditure (including grants, loans or guarantees) that reinforces value for money and an expectation of tight expenditure control |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
CCO/External Partnerships |
MOTAT and Auckland War Memorial Museum Levy |
Statutory process |
Decision to approve levies Progress to date Reporting dates: 21/3/17 – AWMM – approval of 2017/2018 levy FIN/2017/20 21/3/17 – MOTAT – approval of 2017/2018 levy FIN/2017/21 23/5/17 – AWMM letter – approval of 2017/2018 levy 17/4/17 – MOTAT – approval of 2018/2019 levy FIN/2018/61 17/4/17 - AWMM – approval of 2018/2019 FIN/2018/62 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Parks, Sports and Recreation |
Loan write-offs and restructuring (as required) |
Responding to proposals and recommendations |
Decision to approve proposed write-offs and restructuring Progress to date Reporting dates:
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Parks, Sports and Recreation |
Review of existing community loans and guarantees, consideration of new applications and development of a policy framework |
Existing arrangements have been entered into without clear policy direction |
Decision on whether Council should continue, change or exit from existing arrangements Progress to date Reporting dates:
|
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Chief Financial Office |
Budget Update (as required). This includes significant unbudgeted one-off expenditure. |
Financial management |
Decision to agree recommended budget changes outside of AP/LTP budgeting cycle. Progress to date Reporting dates: Note: A full list of properties recommended for disposal is included at the end of this document. |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Chief Financial Office |
Development contributions policy review |
Work request by committee |
Decision on whether to amend current DC policy Progress to date Reporting dates: 7/2/18 – workshop held 31/5/18 – Contributions Policy FIN/2018/90 Adopted by the Governing Body: 31/5/18 GB/2018/91 |
The committee is responsible for approving the financial policy |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Procurement/ Treasury & Financial Transactions |
Consideration and adoption of Group policies for Treasury, Insurance and Procurement (includes formal Treasury Management Policy) |
Mayoral Office request |
Decision on whether to amend current policy Progress to date Reporting dates: 13/12/2016 - Delegation for approval of releasing interim and full year group results to New Zealand Stock Exchange FIN/2016/168 11/4/17 - Responsible investment policy and Diversified Financial Asset Portfolio review Resolutions - FIN/2017/44, FIN/2017/45 and FIN/2017/46 20/06/17 - Review of the Diversified Financial Assets Portfolio FIN/2017/88 19/9/17 – Approval of Group Policies FIN/2017/121 11/12/17 – Approval of Treasury Management Policy FIN/2017/161 27/2/17 – Council’s debt funding strategy FIN/2018/10 19/6/17 – Insurance Renewal – Proposed Council Group Programme for 2018/19 period |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
Consideration and adoption of Group policy relating to Business Cases |
Mayoral Office request |
Decision on whether to adopt a new policy Progress to date Reporting dates: 19/9/17 – Approval of Group Policies FIN/2017/121 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Treasury & Financial Transactions / Legal and Risk |
Decision on placement of insurance programme |
Financial Management |
Decision on whether to adopt a new policy Progress to date Reporting dates: 19/9/17 – Approval of Group Policies FIN/2017/121 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
|||||||||||
Engineering & Technical Services / Treasury & Financial Transactions / Procurement |
Consideration and adoption of Group policies for Performance Bonds |
Mayoral Office request |
Decide whether to amend current policy Progress to date Reporting dates: 12/3/18 – Green Bond Framework Establishment and Potential Green Bond Issuance FIN/2018/31 |
The committee is responsible for approving the financial policy of the Council parent organisation |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
CCO/External Partnerships |
Statements of Intent |
Shareholder feedback on draft SOIs |
Decide on shareholder comment on SOIs Progress to date Reporting dates: 15/8/17 – Approval of 2017/2020 Statements of Intent FIN/2017/111 19/9/17 – Approval of Watercare Services Limited Statement of Intent 2017-20 FIN/2017/122 12/12/17 - Letters of Expectation for Council-controlled Organisations, 2017-2018 FIN/2016/170 20/3/18 – Letters of Expectation for 2018-2021 17/4/18 – proposed shareholder comments on Draft Council-controlled organisation statements of intent FIN/2018/64 |
Exercising relevant powers under Schedule 8 of the Local Government Act 2002, which relate to the Statements of Intent of CCOs |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
||||||||||
Lead |
Area of work |
Reason for work |
Finance and Performance Committee role - decision or direction |
||
Completed |
|||||
Treasury & Financial Transactions |
Review of non-rateable land |
Programme required to ensure Council’s policies are being implemented consistently |
Decision on whether or not land should be rated Reporting dates: 13/12/16 - Third Quarterly Report on Non-Rateable Property Rating Treatment FIN/2016/162 13/12/16 - Auckland Council's submission on the Rates Rebate (Retirement Village Residents) Amendment Bill FIN/2016/163 21/3/17 – Memo - Fourth Quarterly Report 20//6/17 – Memo – Fifth Quarterly Report 19/9/17 – Memo – Sixth Quarterly Report 30/11/17 – Memo 20/3/18 - Memo |
||
|
Previous annual plan process
13/12/16 |
Annual Budget 2017/18 – Mayoral Proposal on items for Public Consultation FIN/2016/173 |
1/6/17 |
Annual Budget 2017/2018 - Overview to decision-making FIN/2017/73 Annual Budget 2017/2018 - Local Board budget update FIN/2017/74 Annual Budget 2017/2018 – Local Board Feedback FIN/2017/75 Final Annual Budget 2017/2018 – Mayoral Proposal resolutions - FIN/2017/76, FIN/2017/81, FIN/2017/83, and FIN/2017/85 |
27 June 2018 |
Adoption of Long-term Plan, including Local Board Agreements |
Panuku disposals/service property optimisation/land exchanges and acquisitions resolutions:
Date |
Property address(es) |
Resolution |
Date |
Property address(es) |
Resolution |
13/12/16 |
Report Units 1-28/150 Mt Wellington Highway, Mt Wellington; and 1/16 Sarona Avenue, Glen Eden |
15/8/17 |
Report 187 Flat Bush School Road, Flat Bush; |
||
21/2/17 |
Report 523a Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mt Wellington; and 525-529 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mt Wellington |
Report Unlock Old Papatoetoe - 17 St George Street, Papatoetoe; part 27 St George Street, Papatoetoe; 104 St George Street, Papatoetoe; and 109 St George Street, Papatoetoe |
|||
21/2/17 |
Report Land up to 9ha to NZTA for the Northern Corridor Improvements Project |
Report 31-35 Mill Road, Helensville |
|||
21/2/17 |
Report Statutory land exchange process – Rosedale Park |
24/10/17 |
Report 19 Anzac Avenue, Browns Bay; 10 Felton Matthew Avenue, St Johns; and part Bombay Road, Bombay |
Resolutions |
|
21/3/17 |
Report Part of 770R Great South Road, Manukau |
21/11/17 |
Report Unlock Avondale Unlock Avondale – 93-99 Rosebank Road, Avondale |
||
11/4/17 |
Report 19 Anzac Road, Browns Bay (deferred); 6 Butler Avenue, Papatoetoe; part of 129R Bairds Road, Otara; 315A Glengarry Road, Glen Eden; Section 1 East Coast Road, Redvale; 78a Great South Road, Papakura; Section 1 493 State Highway 16, Kumeu; Allotment 137 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks; Allotment 138 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks; Allotment 139 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks; Allotment 140 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks; Allotment 141 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks; and Allotment 147 Ahuroa Parish, Woodcocks Road, Woodcocks |
FIN/2017/49, FIN/2017/50 |
12/12/17 |
Report 80 Vincent Street, Howick (motion lost); 41 Cheshire Street, Parnell; 108 Hepburn Street, Freemans Bay; 9 Matama Street, Glen Eden; and 58/7 Rowlands Road, Mt Wellington |
|
23/5/17 |
Report 3 Memorial Drive, New Lynn |
Report Land exchange at Hillary Crescent, Belmont and Northboro Reserve – Recommendation from the Environment and Community Committee |
|||
26/7/17 |
Report 55a Alnwick Street, Warkworth; 45 Oraha Road, Huapai; 32 Harbourview Road, Te Atatu’ 145a West Tamaki Road, Glen Innes; 343 Swanson Road, Ranui; 24 Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; 26 Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; 27b Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; 1/77 Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; 93 Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; 134a Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington; and 3/136b Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington |
27/2/18 |
Report 61-117 Clark Road, Hobsonville; and Report 37 New Windsor Road, Avondale (SPO) |
||
17/4/18 |
Report – Unlock Panmure - 59 Mountain Road, Mount Wellington; 59a Mountain Road, Mount Wellington; 3 Mountwell Crescent, Mount Wellington; 7 Mountwell Crescent, Mount Wellington; 3 Kings Road, Panmure; 15 Forge Way, Mount Wellington; 7 and 9 Jellicoe Road, Mount Wellington; 30-34 Potaka Lane, Panmure; 486-492 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mt Wellington; 516 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; Former 528 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; 530 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; 532-534 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; 535 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; 536 Ellerslie-Panmure Highway, Mount Wellington; 7-11 Queens Road, Panmure; 39-41 Queens Road, Panmure; 11-13 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 16 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 20 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 22 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 26 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 28 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 30 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 32-34 Lagoon Drive, Panmure; 1-19/10 Basin View Lane, Panmure; 23 Domain Road, Panmure; and 28-30 Pilkington Road, Mount Wellington. |
20/3/18 |
Report 3.8ha of reserve land in Upper Harbour Local Board for New Zealand Transport Agency Northern Corridor Improvements |
||
17/4/18 |
Report – 156 Blockhouse Bay, Avondale; 2a Stokes Road, Mt Eden; 570 Great South Road, Papatoetoe; 139 Kolmar Road, Papatoetoe; and 66R Hallberry Road, Mangere East |
|
|
|
Budget Update:
Date |
Property address(es) |
Resolution |
13/12/16 |
Report Additional OPEX budget of up to $104,000 to conduct a by-election for a Howick Local Board Member; and release of $2.7m from existing budget for Putney Way streetscape upgrade, ahead of the Transform Manukau business case |
|
21/3/17 |
Report Additional CAPEX budget of $960,000 to complete Freyberg Place upgrade; new OPEX budget of $80,000 for Karangahape Road destination marketing; contribution of $300 to the city feature lighting project (led by Heart of the City) – both funded from the City Centre Targeted Rate reserve. |
|
20/6/17 |
Report Conversion of $3.1m CAPEX budget for multi-purpose community facility in Takanini |
|
26/7/17 |
Report Purchase of additional trains (rescinded 24/10/17 FIN/2017/189) |
|
19/9/2017 |
Report Release and allocate Takapuna off-street car park reserve fund $4,269611 to the Gasometer public car park project; release $6.1m form existing Transform Manukau $2.6 CAPEX and $2m OPEX and Transform Onehunga $1.5 OPEX. |
|
24/10/17 |
Report Approve procurement of 15 3-car electric multiple units of $133m; release of Franklin Parking Reserve Fund ($128,214) for upgrade of carpark at Kitchener Road, Waiuku; OPEX of $828,000 for two by-elections; OPEX budget of $115,400 for by-election for Waitemata Local Board. |
|
12/12/17 |
Report Update on the purchase of additional trains for Metro Rail |
|
27/2/18 |
Report Up to $3.2m CAPEX for fit-out for ATEED office and up to $0.8m OPEX for make good of current head office; $3.85m CAPEX for Rawene remedial works; updated city centre targeted rate-funded work programme; and property acquisitions at 155-167 Fanshawe Street and 100 Halsey Street, Auckland |
Resolutions - FIN/2018/17, FIN/2018/18 |
17/4/18 |
Report Up to $740,000 of additional expenditure ($655,000 OPEX and $85,000 CAPEX) to manage kauri dieback; two additional FTE employees and out-sourced contractors to manage the closures and noting additional expenditure to be prioritised for kauri dieback work such as track improvements, upgrades, landowner support, hygiene station upgrades and washdown facilities. |
Finance and Performance Committee 19 June 2018 |
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
That the Finance and Performance Committee:
a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:
C1 Recommendation from the Environment and Community Committee - Acquisition of land for open space - Panmure
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities. s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). In particular, the report identifies land that the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. |
s48(1)(a) The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
C2 Insurance Renewal - Proposed Council Group Programme for 2018/2019 period
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities. s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). In particular, the report contains proposed insurance policies, premiums and terms from insursers which are the subject of consideration and negotiation. |
s48(1)(a) The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |