I hereby give notice that an ordinary
meeting of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 27
November 2018
4:00pm
Onehunga
Community Centre,
83 Church Street,
Onehunga
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Chris Makoare
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Debbie Burrows
|
|
|
Members
|
Don Allan
|
|
|
|
Bernie Diver
|
|
|
|
Nerissa Henry
|
|
|
|
Maria Meredith
|
|
|
|
Alan Verrall
|
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
|
Tracey Freeman
Democracy Advisor
21 November 2018
Contact Telephone: 021 537 862
Email: Tracey.Freeman@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of
Interest 5
4 Confirmation
of Minutes 5
5 Leave
of Absence 5
6 Acknowledgements 5
7 Petitions 5
8 Deputations 5
8.1 Papaya Stories - Silent Disco Citywalk 5
9 Public
Forum 6
10 Extraordinary Business 6
11 Governing Body Member's
Update 7
12 Chairperson's Report 9
13 Board Member's Report 15
14 Proposed New Community
Facilities lease to Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated 17
15 Allocation of Local Board
Transport Capital Fund towards the Tamaki Path Project. 47
16 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local
Grants Round Two 2018/2019 grant allocations 83
17 Trial of Online Voting at
the 2019 Local Elections 161
18 Local Government Elections
2019 - order of names on voting documents 173
19 Auckland Regional Pest
Management Plan consultation feedback and recommended changes 183
20 Feedback on proposed
topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy 229
21 Draft Contributions Policy 247
22 Disposal recommendations
report - 22 and 28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington 393
23 Request to rename a
private road (Whiro Lane) within Fenchurch Stage 2B (Stage 3). 401
24 Road Name Approval: New
Roads in the regeneration of Hinaki Neighbourhood in Point England 413
25 Road Name Approval: 3 New
Roads in the regeneration of the Line Road and Epping Street Neighbourhood in
Glen Innes. 423
26 Quarter One Performance
Report: Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board 431
27 Regional Facilities
Auckland First Quarter Performance Report For the Quarter Ending 30 September
2018 463
28 Governance Forward Work
Calendar 493
29 Record of
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board Workshops 497
30 Consideration
of Extraordinary Items
2 Apologies
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration
of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from
decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any
private or other external interest they might have.
4 Confirmation
of Minutes
|
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Tuesday, 23 October 2018, including the
confidential section, as a true and correct record.
|
5 Leave
of Absence
At the close of
the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of
the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Petitions
At the close of
the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Deputations
Standing
Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required
to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are
approved by the Chairperson of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board. This
means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published
agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the
meeting.
|
8.1 Papaya
Stories - Silent Disco Citywalk
|
|
Te take mō te
pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. Providing
Yana Papaya the opportunity to present to the local board on the Papaya
Stories project called the Silent Disco Citywalk.
Whakarāpopototanga
matua / Executive summary
2. As
per standing orders the Chairperson has approved the deputation request from
Yana of Papaya Stories.
|
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) Thank
Yana Papaya for their attendance.
|
9 Public
Forum
A period of
time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to
address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3
minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary
Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt
with at that meeting if-
(a) The
local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The
presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the
public,-
(i) The reason why
the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The
reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent
meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item
may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That
item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority;
and
(ii) the presiding
member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to
the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no
resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item
except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for
further discussion.”
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Governing
Body Member's Update
File No.: CP2018/20784
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
provide Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board an update on local activities that
the Governing Body representative is involved with.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Opportunity
for the Governing Body representative to update the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board on projects, meetings, events and issues of interest to the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board and its community.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
the Governing Body Member’s update.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Tracey Freeman - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Chairperson's Report
File No.: CP2018/20785
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
keep the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board informed on the local activities
that the Chairperson is involved with.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Providing
the Chairperson with an opportunity to update the local board on the projects
and issues they have been involved with since the last meeting.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
the Chairperson’s report.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Chairperson's Report October/November 2018
|
11
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Tracey Freeman - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Board Member's Report
File No.: CP2018/20786
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
keep the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board informed on the local activities
that the local board members are involved with.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Providing
board members with an opportunity to update the local board on the projects and
issues they have been involved with since the last meeting.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
the board member’s report.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Tracey Freeman - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Proposed New Community Facilities lease
to Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated
File No.: CP2018/21831
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
grant a new community lease to Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated at 44
Lagoon Drive, Panmure.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
lease has reached final expiry and is currently holding over on a month by
month basis on the same terms and conditions.
3. The
club applied to council for a new community lease in May 2015 for the part of
the building it occupies at 44 Lagoon Drive, Panmure.
4. Council
will undertake the maintenance of the building under the new lease agreement,
these costs will be categorised as operational expenditure (OPEX) and will
affect the local board’s Asset Based Services (ABS) budget.
5. The
building is within Domain Reserve sited at 36-46 Lagoon Drive in Panmure.
The total area of Domain Reserve is 1.1116 hectares. The land is held in
fee simple by the Auckland Council as a classified recreational reserve and is
subject to the Reserves Act 1977.
6. A
lease to the club is anticipated in the reserve management plan for the site.
7. This
report recommends the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki local board grant a new
community lease to Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated for five years,
commencing 1 December 2018 subject to conditions.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board:
1. approve
a new community lease to Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated at 44
Lagoon Drive, Panmure, legally described as Part Allotment 64, Allotment 45,
Allotment 79 and Part Allotment 78, Section 2 Village of Panmure, for the
part of the building being 180 m2 (more or less) it occupies at Domain
Reserve, on the following terms and conditions:
a) term – one term of five years commencing 1 December 2018
b) rent
– $1.00 plus GST per annum
c) maintenance fee - $1000.00 plus GST per annum
d) council will undertake on-going maintenance of the exterior and
structural condition of the building
e) the club to repair all the wall and playing surfaces of the squash
courts
f) the club to maintain all of the interior of the building including squash playing areas
g) the club unequivocally accepts the current condition of the
building without further recourse to council for assistance to remedy
building defects and repairs
h) a Community Outcomes Plan to be agreed with the club to be
attached as a schedule to the new lease
i) an early termination clause allowing council, in its sole
discretion, to terminate the lease at any time by giving the club not less
than six (6) months’ written notice.
j) all other terms and conditions to be in accordance with the Auckland Council Community Occupancy Guidelines July 2012.
2. the arrears owing under the current lease to be backdated to the
end of March 2016 which amounts to $23,475; and the rent from April 2016 to
present date be charged at $1 per annum;
3. the board use $6,000 from Community Response Fund and $17,477 from
Parks Response Fund to write off the arrears owed by the club which totals
$23,477.00.
|
Horopaki / Context
8. The
Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated has requested a new lease of the
premises it occupies at Domain Reserve, 44 Lagoon Drive, Panmure.
9. Processing
of the new lease was delayed as maintenance and condition issues with the
building were investigated together with other matters affecting the club and
council.
10. These matters
have now been progressed and this report discusses and makes recommendations in
this regard.
11. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board is the delegated authority in matters relating
to local, recreation, sport and community facilities, including community
leasing matters.
12. The Panmure
Squash Rackets Club was incorporated on 23 February 1978. The club is an
incorporated society, and is affiliated to, Squash Auckland and Squash New
Zealand. It was founded in 1965 by a group of local residents who shared
the vision of fostering squash in East Auckland.
13. The club has
a rich history of successful players who have represented Auckland in national
events and New Zealand in world championship events. Ross Norman (who is
still a current member of the club) was World Squash Champion in 1986 and
inducted into the New Zealand Sports Hall Of Fame.
14. The
club’s purpose is: “To raise the profile of squash, to promote a
healthy and active lifestyle by enabling the local and wider community to
embrace and maximise the use of the club’s squash facility.”
This purpose aligns directly with the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Plan
2017, supporting more Aucklanders to be more active.
15. The club is
committed to full utilisation of the facility. It consists of five squash
courts, a gymnasium, showers and changing areas, a licensed bar, lounge and
deck area. Events are run for members and non-members throughout the
year.
16. The financial
accounts provided indicate that the club’s funds are sufficient to meet
its current and future liabilities and are being managed appropriately.
The club has all necessary insurance cover, including public liability
insurance in place
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
The land
and building
17. The land at
36-44 Lagoon Drive, Panmure consists of four separately defined but adjoining
land parcels described as Part Allotment 64, Allotment 45, Allotment 79 and
Part Allotment 78, Section 2 Village of Panmure. The total area of Domain
Reserve is 1.1116 hectares.
18. The Domain
Road Reserve Management Plan, adopted in 1989 contemplates the lease to the
Panmure Squash and Rackets Club.
19. The club has
been based at the present site for over 53 years. It is the largest
‘squash only’ facility in Auckland with 280 members, and the second
largest squash club in New Zealand.
20. The building
on the land is owned by Auckland Council and houses the YMCA on the northern
side and the squash club on the southern end.
21. A building
assessment was undertaken by Community Facilities, Asset Management
Intelligence Support team (AMIS) to assess the overall condition of the
building and provide options for the continued use of the facility (Attachment
B).
22. The report
graded the overall condition of the building as a three, being average.
However, some parts of the building, particularly the building wall component
in the squash courts, were graded four, being in poor condition.
23. Cracking of
the squash court walls, along with moisture damage has been an ongoing issue
with the building dating back 20 years. Five consultant reports have been
commissioned over time to identify the cause of the cracks and remedial
action. Despite repairs, cracks continued to appear and this has
adversely affected the performance requirement of the squash courts.
24. The cracking
of the interior plaster surface of the walls is believed to be the result of a
number of factors ranging from:
(i) poor
workmanship such as joints between old and new plaster works
(ii) deflection
of walls from grout infill of the hollow block walls and shrinkage movement;
and
(iii) possible
intrusion from the pohutukawa tree roots located on the south side of the building
growing into the building foundation and walls.
25. A mechanical
and electrical (M&E) report commissioned in 2012 has also confirmed the
heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system in the squash court
building is at the end of its economic life.
26. AMIS advise
that it is not economical to continue to repair the cracks to the playing
surface walls, as these continue to resurface shortly after repair, as has been
evidenced in previous years. The cost to council to renew the building is unreasonably
high and several options in this regard was provided to the board for
information and consideration.
27. The options provided by AMIS were:
|
Option
|
Description
|
Cost
|
|
Option 1
|
Repair
and replace the existing court walls by demolishing the existing blockwork
and replace with light weight block or a glass wall system that can be used
as the court playing surface. Further studies need to be carried out to
confirm the cost estimate
|
$15,000-$20,000 per court.
|
|
Option 2
|
Convert
the affected courts to other usage where structural walls are not a
functional requirement of the use. The remaining courts can be upgraded. This
also requires further investigation and design.
|
The estimated construction cost based on Quotable Value for this
is in the region of $600,000.
|
|
Option 3
|
Demolish
and rebuild facility. This is not an option
until an alternative facility for squash is built.
|
Estimated cost of $2,000,000.
|
|
Option 4
|
Do nothing and continue on a
monthly lease with the squash club.
|
|
28. The cost
incurred by option 4 which has not been included in AMIS’ report, would
include the growing arrears which would remain an issue with the club, and
maintenance costs for the building which council would have to undertake given
the condition issues of the building.
29. The building
is not technically fit for its current purpose (for playing squash), as the
internal court surfaces need renewal/replacement and the HVAC system needs
replacing. A breakdown of the internal and external issues is detailed in
Appendix 5 of the building assessment report (pages 15 to 16), along with
recommendations to address these.
30. If the
structural walls are not used for squash, or if a glass panel wall is built in
front of them for squash, this removes the issue of the building not being fit
for purpose. The club is agreeable to fix the squash courts at its own cost to
remedy this issue.
31. The club has
confirmed that it has been successful with an application for a grant to
purchase the glass fronts for the squash walls, pending the granting of a new
lease. It has also confirmed approval from club management to proceed
with the installation.
32. Removing this
building from the network of squash facilities in Auckland would leave a
network gap for squash. As noted earlier in the report, Panmure is one of the
largest squash clubs and there are little or no alternative options to use
other facilities such as schools or amalgamation with another club. The
club want to remain at the present site. A new lease will allow them to continue
their activities and service the needs of members on the current site.
33. Options for a
replacement facility either at this location or elsewhere have not been
advanced. Discussion between council and the club are yet to commence.
34. The inclusion
of an early termination clause will address the future proposals underway with
the site and provide flexibility with the lease should those developments be
brought forward.
Arrears
35. Issues with
arrears date back to 2012. Between 5 April 2012 and 30 March 2016 no
payments were made by the club as required by the lease. Council issued
the club with two breach notices dated 2 February 2016, and 23 March 2016
pursuant to the provisions of the lease.
36. Council and
the club came to an agreement on the arrears, and payments recommenced in March
2016 and stopped again in May 2017.
37. On the 1 July
2017, the outstanding arrears for rent and maintenance charges owed by the club
totalled $35,011.
38. At the
workshops on 3 April and 17 July 2018, the local board requested that the
invoicing for rent be deferred until the building and leasing issues with the
club were resolved.
39. If the board
adopts the recommendations of this report, all arrears and rent accrued to the
present date, will be paid prior to the formalisation of any new lease
agreement.
Advice
40. The terms in
the new lease will be sufficient to address the issues related to the condition
of the building, squash courts and outstanding arrears. Staff advise
there is a required need for the activities undertaken by the club, and the
club’s goals are well supported by the community.
41. Staff
recommend that the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board approve a new lease to
Panmure Squash Rackets Club Incorporated subject to conditions.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
42. Discussions
between the club and council began in April 2018 with a meeting between the
club, officers from council, and some members of the local board. The
result of that meeting is detailed in the proposed terms of the new lease
stated in the recommendations.
43. Following
that meeting other issues related to maintenance; the legal effects relating to
the condition of the building, and public engagement process for a new lease,
required further investigation and consideration by council. Once these matters
were determined, the proposed new lease was workshopped with the local board in
August 2018.
44. The local
board indicated granting a new lease to the club, and using Locally Driven
Initiative (LDI) funds ($6,000 from Community Response Fund
and $17,477 from Parks Response Fund) to write off the arrears owed,
which totals $23,477.
45. It is within
the local board’s delegated authority to write off the debt using their
LDI funding.
46. The
recommendations in this report fall the under local boards’ delegated
authority relating to local recreation, sports and community facilities.
47. The
recommendations also support outcomes in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local
Board Plan 2017, being an active and engaged community. The recommendation to
approve the new lease ensures facility accessibility to cater to the needs of
the club as well as those of other groups and the public who use the facility.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
48. Auckland
Council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi
and its broader legal obligations to Māori. The Council recognises
these responsibilities are distinct from the Crown’s Treaty obligations
and fall within a local government Tamaki Makaurau context.
49. These
commitments are also articulated in the council’s key strategic planning
documents the Auckland Plan, the 2015-2025 10-year Budget, the Auckland Unitary
Plan and local board plans.
50. Support for
Māori initiatives and outcomes are detailed in Te Toa Takitini, Auckland
Council’s Māori Responsiveness Framework.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
51. The building
is currently part of the community facilities portfolio and there will be no
change to the status of the property. Current budgets will continue to
apply.
52. The club will
be funding the cost of remedial works to the courts from their own resources,
and will meet the ongoing maintenance cost for these works, and for the
internal maintenance of the building for the duration of the new
lease.
53. There is a
direct financial cost of $23,477 in forgiving the arrears. This needs to be
funded and cannot be written off in terms of the council financial policies.
The report recommends that the cost of this be met from the LDI funding
allowance of $6,000 from Community Response Fund and $17,477
from Parks Response Fund.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
54. Should the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board resolve not to grant a new community
lease, this decision will materially affect the club’s ability to provide
its services to the local community and undertake its core activities.
There is significant risk that the club’s eligibility for future grant
funding will also be affected, which would inhibit the club’s future
development and erode recreational benefits derived by the wider
community.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
55. Subject to
the grant of a new community lease, council staff will work with the squash
club to finalise Community Outcome Plan and the Deed of Lease.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Site Plan
|
23
|
|
b⇩
|
AMIS Building Assessment Report
|
25
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Valerie Vui - Community Lease Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Rod Sheridan - General Manager Community Facilities
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Allocation of Local Board Transport
Capital Fund towards the Tamaki Path Project
File No.: CP2018/22599
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
revoke clause E of resolution MT/2017/30, approve the allocation of the
Auckland Transport Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF) to complete the
link from Omaru Creek to Kiano Place as part of the Tāmaki Path and
approve the allocation of the LBTCF to undertake investigation design on the
link to Kotae Road.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. In
March 2017, the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board resolved to approve the
Tāmaki Path project to proceed to detailed design and delivery (MT/2017/30).
As part of this resolution, the board placed a hold on the path proposed for
Section B - Point England Reserve coastal Local Path (from end of new Omaru
Bridge to Kotae Road and Kiano Place).
3. Staff
recommend that the board complete the link from Omaru Creek to Kiano Place so
that the Tāmaki Path does
not come to an abrupt end after the bridge and cost savings can be made. Staff
also recommend undertaking investigation design on the link to Kotae Road.
4. Local
boards can use the LBTCF to deliver transport infrastructure projects that are
not part of Auckland Transport’s work programme. There is
$1,609,391 in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board’s
LBTCF that needs to be allocated by June 2019.
5. This report recommends that the board approve the allocation of the
LBTCF towards the link from Omaru Creek to Kiano Place as part of the Tāmaki Path project, and towards
investigation design on the link to Kotae Road.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) revoke clause E of resolution MT/2017/30:
e. place on hold the path proposed for section B - Point England
Reserve coastal Local Path (from end of new Omaru Bridge to Kotae Road and
Kiano Place) at this time in response to objection from local residents.
b) approve
the allocation of $320,000 from the local board transport capital fund to
complete the link from Omaru Creek to Kiano Place, providing connection for
the Tāmaki Path after
the bridge.
c) approve
the allocation of $60,000 from the local board transport capital fund to investigate,
consult, consent and provide a fixed cost estimate to allow the board to make
a final decision on the link to Kotae Rd.
|
Horopaki / Context
6. The
Tāmaki Estuary Walkway Plan was developed in 2012 and adopted by the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board in 2013.
7. In
April 2016, the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board approved the Tāmaki
Path project (also referred to as the Tāmaki Estuary Greenway) to proceed
to the stage of developed design and consent planning (MT/2016/54).
8. During
public consultation a petition was received from the Wai-o-taiki Residents
Association (WRA), which outlined residents’ concerns for Wai-o-taiki
Reserve.
9. The
petition data was not included in the analysis of the consultation data as the
petition raised various issues that were outside the scope of the Tāmaki
Path project. Staff recommended the local board facilitate a separate response
to the WRA and their concerns.
10. Complete
analysis of the consultation feedback is attached in Appendix B.
11. In
March 2017, the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board approved the Tāmaki
Path project to proceed to detailed design and delivery (MT/2017/30). As part
of this resolution, the board placed a hold on the path proposed for Section B
- Point England Reserve coastal Local Path (from end of new Omaru Bridge to
Kotae Road and Kiano Place) in response to objection from local residents. The
full resolution is attached.
12. The
Tāmaki Path project is now in the construction phase and works are
currently underway.
13. Contractors
have built a temporary road from Kiano Place to the new Omaru Creek Bridge to
transport materials for the construction of the bridge. There is an opportunity
to convert this temporary road into a concrete path connection from the Omaru
Creek Bridge to the reserve entrance at Kiano Place.
14. The
LBTCF is a capital budget provided to all local boards by Auckland Council and
delivered by Auckland Transport. Local boards can use this fund to deliver
transport infrastructure projects that they believe are important, but are not
part of Auckland Transport’s work programme. Projects must:
· be safe;
· not impede network efficiency;
· be in the road corridor (although projects running through parks can
be considered if there is a transport outcome).
15. There
is currently $1,609,391 remaining in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki LBTCF, which
must be allocated by June 2019.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
16. Options
for the link from the Tāmaki Path - Omaru Creek bridge include:
|
Option
|
Notes
|
Cost
|
|
Option 1 (recommended) – revoke
the existing resolution and complete the link from Omaru Creek Bridge to
Kiano Place so that the Tāmaki Path does not come to an abrupt end after the bridge.
|
The link to Kotae Road will also be
investigated, consulted upon and consented for future connection
opportunities and to provide the board with a fixed price estimate of the
works which will allow them to make a final decision on the link to Kotae Rd.
|
Estimate cost for a separate project
to link the Tāmaki Path
to Kiano Place is $550,000, however if the works are approved to be carried
out by the existing contractors onsite before they finish, the estimate cost
of the works is $320,000.Estimate cost for investigation, consultation and
consent application for the link to Kotae Road is $60,000.
|
|
Option 2 – revoke the existing
resolution and complete both the links to Kiano Place and Kotae Road as per
the original proposed routes.
|
This will need further investigation
to determine whether it is feasible and seek mana whenua’s support.
|
Estimate cost
for these works is $780,000, which will only be completed once a new consent
has been granted. This allows for the temporary haul road to remain onsite,
however the contractor will have to disestablish from site and therefore
additional preliminary and general costs will be incurred by the project.
|
|
Option 3 - rescind the existing
resolution and complete both the links to Kiano Pl and Kotae Rd as per the
alternative proposed routes.
|
This will need further investigation
to determine if this is feasible and seek mana whenua’s support.
|
Estimate cost
for these works is $880,000, which will only be completed once a new consent
has been granted. This allows for the temporary haul road to remain onsite,
however the contractor will have to disestablish from site and therefore
additional preliminary and general costs will be incurred by the project.
|
17. Extending
the proposed path as per Option 1 from the Omaru Creek Bridge to Kiano Place
would have the following benefits:
· Less chance of contamination of the various shell middens onsite as
no further disturbance is necessary to carry out these works
· A formed concrete shared path access from Kiano Place to Pt England
Reserve, Riverside Reserve, Dunkirk Reserve, Mt Wellington War Memorial Reserve
and Panmure Wharf Reserve, as well as an on-road link from Mt Wellington War
Memorial Reserve to Panmure Town Centre and Panmure Basin Reserve
18. Staff
recommend proceeding with Option 1, which also allows for investigation, design
and consents for a future link to Kotae Road.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
19. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board has supported this project by adoption of
the Local Board Greenways Plan, and the development of the Tāmaki Estuary
Walkway Plan which was adopted by the local board in 2013. It is also captured
as a priority project in the Local Board Plan 2014.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
Māori
views have been heard through the consultation process and Te Ao Māori
values have influenced:
· path alignment
· inclusion of cultural artwork into the pedestrian bridge
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
20. Current
summary of the LBTCF:
21. Estimate
cost for a separate project to link the Tāmaki Path to Kiano Place is
$550,000. However, if the works are approved to be carried out by the existing
contractors onsite before they finish the estimate cost of the works is
$320,000, resulting in cost savings of up to $230,000.
22. Estimate cost for investigation, consultation and consent
application for the link to Kotae Road for future connection opportunities is
$60,000.
23. The
total cost of Option 1 is $380,000, to be allocated from the LBTCF. This leaves
$1,229,391 remaining.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
24. Auckland
Transport is not delivering this project and has no ability to impact or change
the scope or cost of the project, meaning that additional cost to the
completion of this project will need to be allocated from other budgets or a
new application to the LBTCF will need to be made.
25. The
decision not to approve the path while the project is under construction would
increase the cost of completing this project in the future by $230,000 taking
the total cost $550,000.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
26. Following
approval from the board, next steps is to complete the link to Kiano Place and
start investigation design for the connection to the Tāmaki Path from Kotae Road.
27. The board will receive monthly updates on the progress of this
project through regular Community Facilities reporting.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Tamaki Path Options Background and Photos
|
53
|
|
b⇩
|
Tamaki Path Public Consultation Analysis
|
63
|
|
c⇩
|
Tamaki Path Resolution
|
81
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Melanie Dale - Elected Member Relationship
Manager
|
|
Authorisers
|
Jonathan Anyon – Manager, Elected Members
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grants Round
Two 2018/2019 grant allocations
File No.: CP2018/21632
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
fund, part-fund or decline applications received for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two 2018/2019.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board adopted the Local Grants Programme
2018/2019 on 24 April 2018 (see Attachment A). The document sets application
guidelines for contestable community grants submitted to the local board.
3. This
report presents applications received in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants,
Round Two 2018/2019 (see Attachment B).
4. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board has set a total community grants budget of
$120,000 for the 2018/2019 financial year. A total of $58,748.00 was allocated
in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round One 2018/2019. This leaves a
total of $61,252.00 for two remaining local grant rounds in 2018/2019.
5. Fifteen
applications were received for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round Two
2018/2019, requesting a total of $106,413.00.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) Agree
to fund, part-fund or decline each application in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grant Round Two 2018/2019.
Table One:
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round Two 2018/2019 grant applications
|
Application ID
|
Organisation
|
Main focus
|
Requesting funding for
|
Amount requested
|
Eligibility
|
|
LG1911-203
|
The
Synergy Project Trust
|
Community
|
Towards the Oranga Family
Christmas festival costs.
|
$9,200.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-205
|
The
Operating Theatre Trust, trading as Tim Bray Productions
|
Arts and culture
|
Towards the cost of tickets
and bus transport.
|
$2,716.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-212
|
Tamaki
Community Development Trust
|
Community
|
Towards counselling,
transport, food and prizes for programme costs for vulnerable families.
|
$10,000.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-214
|
Auckland
Regional Migrant Services Charitable Trust
|
Community
|
Towards transport cost s for
the safari multicultural playgroup project
|
$6,000.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-215
|
Mount
Wellington Playcentre
|
Community
|
Toward operations costs for
the Mt Wellington playgroup.
|
$4,072.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-218
|
KidsCan
Charitable Trust
|
Community
|
Towards the purchase of
raincoats for children in schools in the local board area.
|
$8,000.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-220
|
Panmure
Business Association
|
Events
|
Towards management event costs
for the Panmure Basin Fun Day.
|
$15,000.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-223
|
Parenting
Place
|
Community
|
Towards programme subsidies
for participants, volunteer expenses, course manuals and co-ordinator
expenses.
|
$4,516.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-224
|
Kāhui Tū Kaha
|
Community
|
Towards costs for the Oranga
wellbeing and lifestyle programme.
|
$12,958.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-225
|
Youthline
Auckland Charitable Trust
|
Community
|
Towards a contribution for the
Youthline helpline cost.
|
$5,000.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-226
|
Chinese
Conservation Education Trust
|
Community
|
Towards transport costs and
refreshments for the New Zealand Chinese environment education programme.
|
$9,060.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-227
|
Country
Magic and Friends Club Incorporated
|
Events
|
Towards costs for the
“Elvis in Polynesia” event.
|
$13,455.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-228
|
Shakti
Asian Women's Centre Incorporated.
|
Community
|
Towards costs for the family
violence awareness workshops for new migrants.
|
$4,012.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-229
|
Ellerslie
Toy Library
|
Environment
|
Towards the purchase of
technology that would enable the toy library to go paperless.
|
$874.00
|
Eligible
|
|
LG1911-230
|
Alcohol
Healthwatch Trust
|
Community
|
Towards costs associated with
conducting a compliance audit of off-licence premises.
|
$1,750.00
|
Ineligible
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$106,413.00
|
|
|
Horopaki / Context
6. The
local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects,
activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision
of being a world class city.
7. The
Auckland Council Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a
grants programme. The local board grants programme sets out:
· local board
priorities
· lower priorities
for funding
· exclusions
· grant types, the
number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· any additional
accountability requirements.
8. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board adopted their grants programme for
2018/2019 on 24 April 2018 and will operate three local
grants rounds for this financial year.
9. The
community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council
grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook
pages, council publications, radio, and community networks.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
10. The aim of
the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which
align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications
have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board
grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the
report recommendations.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
11. Local boards
are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community
grants. The Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board is required to fund,
part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board
priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
12. The local
board is requested to note that section 48 of the Community Grants Policy
states “We will also provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants
about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to
increase their chances of success next time.”
13. A summary of
each application received through Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants Round
Two 2018/2019 is provided (see Attachment B).
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
14. The local
board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment
to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants
to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Māori.
Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Unit
has provided input and support towards the development of the community grant
processes.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
15. The
allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted 10-year budget
2018-2028 and local board agreements.
16. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board has set a total
community grants budget of $120,000.00 for the 2018/2019 financial year.
A total of $58,748.00 was allocated in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant
Round One 2018/2019. This leaves a total of $61,252.00 for two remaining local
grant rounds in 2018/2019.
17. Fifteen
applications were received for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round Two
2018/2019, requesting a total of $106,413.00.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
18. The
allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community
Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has
identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
19. Following the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board allocating funding for round two local
grants, commercial and finance staff will notify the applicants of the local
board’s decision.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grants Programme 2018/2019
|
89
|
|
b⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round Two 2018/2019
grant applications
|
91
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Helen Taimarangai - Senior Community Grants Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Marion Davies - Grant Operations Manager
Shane King - Head of Operations Support
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-203
|
|
|
The Synergy Project Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Oranga
Family Christmas Festival
|
|
|
Location:
|
Oranga Community Centre & Fergusson Park
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Family fun day which offers activities which families can participate
in and enjoy. Bouncy castles, inflatable obstacle courses, inflatable soccer
course, top town traditional team games, live music, free BBQ, outdoor
basketball/netball/touch competition. Encourages the community to meet their
neighbours, use their parks and buildings, help facilitate some of the
activities, community to adopt a custodian role in making the community safer
and remove the negative stigma being associated with so far.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
08/12/2018 - 08/12/2018
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
Team of 15 Facilitators
|
People reached:
|
1200
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
Facebook, Instagram, Radio, Billboards around community, newspaper
article and advertising. Tv on local community shows.
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
We have been working for approximately three years now in the community.
We have identified that with more activities in and around the community
being delivered it has help decrease the safety issue that has plagued the
community for years. The people are voicing to us as we work with their
children and youth, they would like to see more community/family events in
their area. More families are coming out and use the parks. The highlight is
they see their neighbours and kids facilitating these small events and
activities. The opportunity to provide a platform where the locals can
showcase their own cultures and identity has made a huge positive impact in
the Oranga/Onehunga Community
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
Increase physical and mental wellbeing of young people. Reduction in
crime and safety issues in and around Oranga and Fergusson Park through
increase activities. Create a safe environment for youth to participate,
celebrate and express their talents and gifts in a safe
environment. Youth and Community have a sense of ownership and become
role models for others through mentorship and life skills workshop offered by
Synergy Projects. Building local leadership capacity in the neighbourhood.
Pathways created into education and business for young people and the
community. Community getting to know their neighbours by attending
these events and supporting
them in providing for the needy and vulnerable families of Oranga.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
The Festival is an integral part of the community which happens every
year. The local community attend to celebrate their diversity, their
culture, contribute by operating stalls, performing on the main stage, and
help facilitate workshops and sites of the festival.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
To Wahi Community Shop
|
Facilitators
|
|
|
Reflectionz
|
Stalls and Facilitators
|
|
|
Oranga Society
|
Entertainment
|
|
|
Te Papapa Rugby
|
Facilitate Games
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori focus - tikanga (practises),
mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language)
Our many facilitators are well versed in Te Reo Maori and also run
programmes in the community which address and connect with the local Maori
Community.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - All areas are disabled friendly. Site assigned for wheel
chair access only.
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
The whole venue both the Centre and Fergusson park are smoke free
areas. Well signage but hope the Council. Have also ordered signs from
the HPA agency.
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Have contacted the Zero Waste Events team for bins and recycling
stations on the day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
10%
|
50%
|
50%
|
50%
|
%
|
50%
|
100%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$9200.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We require funding for the entertainment, artists to perform, staging
costs, outdoor PA system for sound, signage for event, advertising costs with
paper and radio, administration cost and facilitation costs.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
Reduce costs where possible, scale down the activities and seek
further sponsorship elsewhere.
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Stallholders fee of $20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$10,400
|
$200
|
$0
|
$1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equipment, Marquee, Staging
|
$2,650
|
|
|
Permits, Advertising, Signage, Uniforms
|
$1,470
|
|
|
Artist & Performers
|
$2,000
|
|
|
Bouncy Castle, Kids Zone
|
$2,480
|
|
|
Facilitation Cost & Admin
|
$1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
Stall Holders paying $20 per stall (10 Stalls)
|
$200
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
80 hours
|
40
|
$800
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
NCE1911-005
|
Oranga
Family Christmas Festival
2018/2019
Non-Contestable Events - Maungakiekie-Tamaki - Awaiting funding
agreement
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1911-119
|
E3 Triple
Ex Youth Mentoring & Training
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
NCE1811-010
|
Oranga
Community Open Day
2017/2018
Events - Maungakiekie-Tāmaki - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1811-307
|
Music Lab
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Three - Project in
progress
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1811-233
|
Driveway
Mural
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
CCS18_1_148
|
Music Lab
Creative
Communities Scheme 18_1 - Central 18_1
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-129
|
Family
& Kids Day Out
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016 financial
year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-205
|
|
The Operating Theatre
Trust, trading as Tim Bray Productions
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Arts and culture
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Gift
a Seat Outreach Programme
|
|
Location:
|
The PumpHouse Theatre, 2A Manurere Ave, Takapuna Auckland 0622
|
|
Summary:
|
We will invite eighty-six students and four teachers from Ruapotaka
School to attend 'The Man Whose Mother was a Pirate' during our Education
season in April 2019. We are applying for funding to support for show tickets
and bus fares to alleviate the financial barriers, and make theatre
accessible.
|
|
Dates:
|
08/04/2019 - 12/04/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
20
|
People reached:
|
90
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
In promoting the show we’ll follow our comprehensive
promotional timetable including
social media campaigns, digital EDM campaigns to our extensive
databases. We have a database of 5,260 contacts.
We‘ll work with Sally Woodfield (SWPR) our publicist who will
contact long-lead as well as
weekly and daily publications and media outlets.
Advertising will be booked in local and regional media.
As a charity, we have $10,000 a month in Google AdWords to utilise
for free.
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
Numerous studies around the world have shown that access to theatre
helps boost literacy and cultivates imaginative thinking in children. A study
conducted at UCLA in the US, for instance, which looked at 25,000 students
involved in the performing arts, showed consistent participation helped
improve academic performance and even bumped up standardised test scores.
Low Decile Schools have expressed the need directly to us in
communication around the project. The schools and their families can't afford
the cost of tickets and transport, and therefore don't have access to the
quality live professional productions that we offer.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
The aim is to unlock children's imaginations of today so we can
ignite the creative minds of tomorrow.
By making theatre accessible to all children, we are realising one of
our values as an organisation.
A chance for the school to participate in a learning experience
outside the classroom, assisted by a free Teachers’ Resource Guide we
create which has cross curricula activity ideas.
"The productions always blend in with the English and Arts
curriculum in al strands and so it is a very good learning aid. The teacher's
resource guide before and after provides lots of ideas and ways to follow up
so bringing this into the classroom." Gael Vickers, Principal
Ruapotaka.
We offer active participation of children and young people through
the associated Theatre
Workshops that are geared around each of the shows.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
active participation - Our young people are engaged
in the community and have access to a wide range of opportunities
Unlocking imaginations today ignites the creative minds of tomorrow.
Since 2005 we have been offering free tickets (Gift a Seats) to our
theatre performances to low decile schools, many come from the Maungakiekie -
Tamaki.
Through our Gift a Seat outreach programme the young people from
Ruapotaka School in Panmure will have access to our live professional theatre
performance of "The Man Whose Mother was a Pirate" by Margaret Mahy
in April 2019 at the Pumphouse Theatre in Takapuna.
Teachers will receive The Man Whose Mother was a Pirate's free
Teachers Resource Guide before and after the show which aligns with the
school curriculum, it is jam packed full of cross curricular activities to
use inside the classroom, and enhances their literacy, comprehension and
reading outcomes.
The cost of tickets for the show and the bus fare is generally
prohibitive for these children and the schools, many of the students have
never been over the harbour bridge let alone to a live theatre performance,
so as you can imagine, by the time they get to the theatre in Takapuna they
are incredibly excited.
As explained in the thank you letters attached from local schools in
the Maungakiekie - Tamaki area.The response and encouragement from the
teachers and students are heartfelt and encouraging affirming that these
performances is not just entertainment but are a vital part for
children’s development; socially, educationally and building confidence
- often sparking ideas for their own performances and getting involved in the
arts themselves.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
The PumpHouse Theatre
|
Since 2004, venue partnership and sponsor of our Educational Seasons
|
|
Volunteering Auckland
|
Assisting with aligning volunteers with our theatre company -
ushering.
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - In 2017 we were given an award in the Creative New Zealand Arts
Access Aotearoa Awards - "Tim Bray Productions is Highly Commended for
pioneering NZSL interpreted performances for Deaf children and providing
audio described performances for blind and low-vision audiences. The company
is an outstanding model of inclusion."
Since 2004 we’ve offered New Zealand Sign Language interpreted
performances and we were at the forefront of this arts accessibilty amongst
New Zealand theatre companies.
Since 2015, we have provided Audio-Described performances for blind
and visually-impaired audiences.
Our Gift a Seat programme allows these children to attend with
pre-paid tickets
We offer discounted Companion Tickets to carers.
PumpHouse Theatre is accessible by wheelchairs
Wairau Valley Special School teenage students volunteer as ushers.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
We request that any of our cast or crew who smoke do not smoke in
view of the audience
coming to see our shows as they are role models to our young
audiences.
The PumpHouse Theatre is a smoke-free environment.
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
We will store the newly built set, costumes and props for The Man
Whose Mother was a Pirate till we stage the show again or tour it. In the
effort to reduce waste the majority of our marketing material has gone to
digital. Pumphouse theatre are working towards electronic ticketing we hope
this will be in effect by April next year. Any children that come to the show
with their lunches are encouraged to take all waste home with them.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
%
|
100%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$2716.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Tickets costs and transport for 90 students from Ruapotaka School to
'A Man whose Mother was a Pirate' by Margaret Mahy (Education Season 8 - 12
April 2019).
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Yes $25.00 for A reserve seating
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$3,766.52
|
$0
|
$250
|
$1,050
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Show ticket cost: 90 people @ 21.74
|
$1,956.52
|
|
Bus transport: 2 buses for 90 people
|
$760
|
|
Project support BDM 25 hours @30.00
|
$750
|
|
Teachers Resource Guide
|
$300
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
No project income for the Gift a Seat outreach
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
10 Individual donations @ $25.00
|
$250
|
Approved
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
5
|
|
$102.75
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1911-205
|
Gift a
Seat Outreach Programme
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - SME assessment
completed
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
MB1819-144
|
(changed
to one) theatre production for children – The Man Whose Mother Was A
Pirate by Margaret Mahy
2018/2019
Multi-board Local Grants, Round One - Awaiting payment
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
RegPr19_1_00054
|
Annual
Season of Theatre for Children
Regional Arts
and Culture Grant Programme 19_1 Projects - Assessment 19_1
|
Approved
$10,000.00
|
|
|
LG1802-217
|
Two
productions: The Great White Man-Eating Shark And Other Stories by Margaret
Mahy and Bad jelly The Witch
2017/2018
Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$6,000.00
|
|
|
RegPr18_200032
|
Margaret
Mahy's 'The Great White Man-Eating Shark and Other Stories'
Regional Arts
& Culture Grants Programme 18_2 Projects - Assessment 18_2
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
RegPr18_200024
|
Regional Arts
& Culture Grants Programme 18_2 Projects - Project in Progress
|
Approved
$12,600.00
|
|
|
CCS18_2_219
|
Audio
Described Performances and Touch Tours
Creative
Communities Scheme 18_2 - North 18_2
|
Approved
$3,570.00
|
|
|
RegAC18_1_00047
|
Regional Arts
& Culture Grants Programme 18_1 Projects - Assessment 18_1
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS18_1_228
|
Audio
Described Performances and Touch Tours
Creative
Communities Scheme 18_1 - North 18_1
|
Approved
$5,565.00
|
|
|
RegAC18_1_00054
|
2018 Season
of Theatre for Children
Regional Arts
& Culture Grants Programme 18_1 Projects - Project in Progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1802-136
|
Two
Productions: The Santa Claus Show '17 / Pippi Long stocking
2017/2018
Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,500.00
|
|
|
LG1702-232
|
The Great
Piratical Rum bustification / Mrs Wishy-Washy
Devonport-Takapuna
Local Grants, Round Two 2016/2017 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
RegAC17_2_069
|
Regional Arts
and Culture Grant Programme 17_2 Project - Assessment 17_2
|
Approved
$7,000.00
|
|
|
CCS17_2_252
|
Audio
Described Performances and Touch Tours
Creative
Communities Scheme 2017_2 - North Committee 17_2
|
Approved
$5,480.00
|
|
|
REF17S00037
|
The Great Piratical
Rum bustification by Margaret Mahy
Regional
Event Fund 2016/2017 - Round 2 Strategic Priorities - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS17_1_201
|
Audio
Described Performances and Touch Tours
Creative
Communities Scheme 2017_1 - North Assessment Committee Round 1 2017
|
Approved
$5,480.00
|
|
|
LG1702-121
|
"The
Santa Claus Show '16" and "Puff the Magic Dragon" (note
permission to change the Piratical show to Puff was granted by Kim Hammond
7/12/16)
Devonport-Takapuna
Local Grants, Round One 2016/2017 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
17_1_032
|
Regional Arts
and Culture Grants Programme 17_1 Project - Assessment 17_1
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1602-218
|
Bad jelly
the Witch / A Lion in the Meadow and Other Stories
Devonport-Takapuna
Local Grants, Round Two, 2015/16 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$10,000.00
|
|
|
QR1602-405
|
Celebrating
25 Years - 2016 Season of Theatre for Children
Devonport-Takapuna
Quick Response, Round Four, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS16_2_197
|
Audio
Described Performances and Touch Tours
Creative
Communities Scheme 2016_2 - North/West Assessment Committee Round 2
2016
|
Approved
$4,000.00
|
|
|
REF16S00027
|
The Whale
Rider
Regional
Event Fund 2015/2016 - Round 2 Strategic Priorities - Application
|
Approved
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1602-151
|
Jane and
the Dragon
Devonport-Takapuna
Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS16_1_186
|
NZSL
Interpreted Performances and Audio Described Performance.
Creative
Communities Scheme 2016_1 - North/West Assessment Committee Round 1
2016
|
Approved
$5,673.48
|
|
|
RegAC16_1_040
|
2016
Season of Theatre for Children
Regional Arts
and Culture Grants Programme 16_1 - Assessment 16_1
|
Approved
$16,300.00
|
|
|
REF1600051
|
The Santa
Claus Show '15
Regional
Event Fund 2015/2016 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-212
|
|
Tamaki Community
Development Trust
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Counselling
and Program Costs
|
|
Location:
|
4A Court Crescent, Panmure, Auckland 1072
|
|
Summary:
|
Counselling for women and children who have been through trauma,
domestic violence and abuse, and abusive relationships. Many women still
experience the impacts of abuse even when they have left the relationship.
Some are badly broken and healing can take a long time. Our aim is that we
provide that support to women in a safe environment and that women and
children are able to heal from this trauma, believe in themselves and move on
to a better place in life.
Group programs for women and children that are part of the wrap
around support that we offer to families and women to help them develop
pro-social skills, self-efficacy, and self-worth.
Our maths club aims to help children with maths.
|
|
Dates:
|
01/11/2018 - 31/10/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
5
|
People reached:
|
200
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
The work that we do is advertised on our website, our facebook page
and our brochures.
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
We receive referrals from Oranga Tamariki and from local schools of
families that are needing support. We work with for e.g. families who split
up because Mum is drug dependent and Dad is now taking care of the children
on his own, but he also wears an ankle bracelet and has his own issues.
Counselling is part of the wrap around support that we provide for children
and families who are victims of this.
In February of this year an Education Review report found that NZ
children's confidence to do Maths fell between years 4 and 8 and Chief Review
Officer, Nicolas Pole found that it had been dropping "alarmingly"
for some time.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
We want mums to have better self-esteem, improve in self-efficacy and
be better mums/parents to their children. We also want to see children
attending school, doing well at it, at least enough so that they can be in
gainful employment or even attain Tertiary education.
Children attending school programs are assured of a bright spot in
their week - helping to combat the sadness that they may be experiencing at
home. They also learn pro-social skills and skills such as cooking that
will help in their future in terms of healthy and cheaper meals. Obesity
among children and adults because of unhealthy consumption of food is a
problem among many Maori and Pasifika communities and also financial issues.
Learning to cook, practicing their maths skills with one on one help is a
means of enabling children to know that there is another better way to live
their lives.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
The following needs that will be met are illustrated through our key
outcomes that we have achieved:
Providing wrap around support to families that meet their needs in a
holistic way, often outside the specific issue that is sited at the beginning
of the referral. We provide counselling for women and children mainly, but
are open to counselling men also. Marked improvements are seen in
children who have behavioural issues such as a child no longer lying and
stealing because she is getting attention and being listened to and given
guidance.
Clear behavioural and emotional regulation changes in children that
help them to stay in class longer and being taken off "daily
reports" and other behavioural management lists in schools. This work
includes finding what makes a child really engage and what motivates them to
improve their behaviour. We have found that among other things,
community activities such as cooking classes (one of our programs) really
help to facilitate this change in children.
Facilitating increased stability, improved education engagement and
outcomes and increased positive peer groups in children.
Working alongside mothers to address their own health issues and
those of their families. Empowering mothers is a big part of the Family
Workers' mahi and Counselling is a significant help to this.
We act as a translator and facilitator for families when engaging
with other organisations particularly with OT through care and protection and
youth justice Family Group Conferences (FGC's). This helps families to feel
less threatened by the process and more readily able to engage and take ownership
of the issues presenting.
We provide transport to Counselling for a lot of our women,
especially those who may have a very young baby in their care and need this
type of support i.e. do not have their own transport or a baby sitter.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
Glen Innes Family Centre
|
Run Parenting programs and Anger Management programs
|
|
Dunkirk Activity Centre and Dance Therapy
|
Provide the venue and Therapists for ART programs for children
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori participation - Māori priority
group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering
We have 2 Maori family workers out of a total of 6 staff, but the
majority of clients we work with are Maori.
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - Our counselling work is open to anyone and everyone needing
counselling support or counselling therapy and includes those with
disabilities who could and would benefit from counselling therapy. If a
person seeks counselling support and they are unable to afford counselling
elsewhere, we are able to provide them with this support, as long as there
are spaces available, otherwise they will go on the waiting list and will be
seen in chronological order or depending on the urgency of their situation.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
We don't actively promote smoke-free messages but our promotion of
healthy lifestyles is incidental to our work. None of
our workers smoke.
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
We have just joined the Zero Waste Network of NZ. However, our normal
practices is saving compost for the gardens and ensuring that we use the
Council blue bins for paper products only.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$10000.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting funding for Counselling costs, and program costs.
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
We would continue with the whole project by seeking funding
elsewhere. This project is part of the core services that we offer.
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$17,760
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Counselling Costs $29*440hours
|
$12,760
|
|
Program Costs-Transport
|
$4,000
|
|
Program Costs - Snacks
|
$500
|
|
Program Costs - Prizes
|
$500
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1911-212
|
Counselling
and Program Costs
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Submitted
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-203
|
Mentoring
support for boys or boys and their Dad's.
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-132
|
Paddle
Boarding for the Summer.
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1711-218
|
Printer
for Family Workers
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two, 2016/17 - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,642.00
|
|
|
QR1712-202
|
Robotics
2016/2017
Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-214
|
|
Auckland Regional Migrant
Services Charitable Trust
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: 1.
WISE Collective 2. Safari Playgroup
|
|
Location:
|
Panmure Community Centre, 7-13 Pilkington Road, Panmure, Auckland
|
|
Summary:
|
1. WISE Collective
The project empowers refugee background women and isolated migrants
with the skills, experience and confidence, to create positive networks and
also share their own skills and culture in the community, seek employment and
take entrepreneurial ventures that help them generate income for their
families (e.g. WISE Catering). Women are positively impacted through both
educational and recreational activities resulting in overall wellbeing.
2. Safari Multicultural Playgroup Project:
A safe space for both children and mothers to learn; children learn
through play whilst their mothers learn English, NZ parenting, education and
other skills/information. It also offers workshops and speakers from key
service providers to help prepare families and empower mothers for life in
Auckland e.g. Plunket.
|
|
Dates:
|
07/12/2018 - 30/06/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
7
|
People reached:
|
WISE:40 women from refugee background or isolated migrants. SAFARI:
20 families per playgroup (242 enrolled families across Auckland)
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
• E-Newsletter
sent to our networks
• Social
Media (Facebook, Twitter - ARMS social media, group community pages and local
area social media)
• Digital
channels (ARMS website, ARCC Website, Google Adwords and SEO)
• Through
our existing relationships and their networks with agencies, other NGOs and
community groups (MOE, Plunket)
• Word
of mouth
• Traditional
advertising (print media e.g. local, regional and national newspaper such as
Multicultural Times and Manukau Courier)
• Flyers
and posters distributed in key touch points (e.g. Local libraries, CABs)
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
ARMS conducted a study involving over 1000 migrant and refugee
backgrounds, showing several issues around the need for meaningful
employment, education, community safety and wellbeing, English language
skills, poverty, housing, social support and outlets for recreation, leisure
and cultural expression.
This community is disadvantaged and face issues such as isolation and
poor social cohesion. The need for WISE has grown, resulting in two new hubs.
WISE not only empowers these women with skills, networks and resources to
pursue new careers and further education, but has also resulted in a new
sense belonging and connectedness to their community; improving their mental,
emotional and social wellbeing. Safari addresses similar needs, taking into
account the needs of both women and their children.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
1. Less social isolation and increased social cohesion and
connections for the communities involved in these projects to the wider
community in which they live.
2. Greater knowledge and use of support agencies, community
facilities, community activities.
3. Better settlement and integration of the communities taking part
in WISE and Safari project, that celebrates their diversity through business
ventures and celebrations.
By taking part in English language lessons, informative workshops and
seminars and recreational activities, these communities will build their
support networks in the wider community and increase their social cohesion,
becoming less isolated. With service providers invited to deliver specific
workshops based on the needs of the community, they are not only informed but
gain a new contact in the community.
An essential part to helping these communities gain the confidence in
actively participating in their local communities involves ensuring that
their culture is valued and the diversity they bring to their communities is
celebrated. This means continuing to give opportunities for them to share and
celebrate their culture through food, song, dance and even generate income as
seen with WISE Catering.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
WISE (Women Inspired, Strong and Enterprising) Project:
• This is a partnership project with ARCC (Auckland resettled
community coalition) that brings together former refugee and isolated migrant
women to connect with each other, key service providers and their wider
community in a safe space. The project is tailored to their specific needs
giving them opportunities to develop a range of skills that help them
network, get socially connected, share their own skills and even provide them
with the opportunity to generate income for their families through
entrepreneurial ventures. At the project the women are able to practice in a
safe social setting, their newly learnt English language helping them gain
confidence to participate more in the project but also in their wider
communities.
Safari Multicultural Playgroup Project:
• The Safari Playgroups is a partnership project with ARCC and
were set up to respond to the needs of mothers from refugee and isolated
migrant backgrounds, often recently arrived in NZ, who have minimal English
and connections in the community. Such families can often have 2 – 4
children, no transport, and very little if any family support. All of the
children who attend are from low-socio economic backgrounds with the majority
of the family’s experiencing high needs in terms of not only lack of
transportation, but also financial, social and health issues. Most of the
children do not speaking English and some children have developmental
delay.
The model is unique as it provides multiple benefits, for mothers and
their children, as well as for service providers who seek to connect with
hard-to-reach families. Mothers who are involved in the Safari Playgroups
benefit not only from English classes run by trained ESOL teachers but they also
benefit from the workshops and speakers who visit from key service providers;
which helps foster relationships and connections with the wider community
especially in key areas. The families find out about our playgroup through
being referred by DHBs, maternal mental health, midwives, emergency family
housing, Family start and Plunket.
Both projects put people first by making sure the services delivered
meet their unique needs, walking alongside them and empowering them to
participate in their local communities, by showing them the value of their
contribution, their culture and the benefits to themselves and their families
of getting involved.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
Auckland Resettled Community Coalition
|
Programme started as partnership project and they continue to refer
women and families to them.
|
|
Red Cross
|
They refer women and families to our projects
|
|
Refugees as Survivors NZ
|
They refer women and families to our projects
|
|
Plunket
|
Delivers information sessions and workshops as well as provide
referrals.
|
|
English Language Partners
|
They provide English Lessons and referrals.
|
|
NZ Police
|
Delivers information sessions and workshops as well as provide
referrals.
|
|
Family Start
|
Delivers information sessions and workshops as well as provide
referrals.
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - Our project ensures we are accessible to people to disabilities
by holding it in locations that have disability access (e.g. ramps and/or
elevators). We also are accessible through the delivery of our project which
is purposely delivered where our communities live, making transport less of a
barrier.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
Specific ethnic group Māori, Pacific Peoples, Chinese, Korean,
Indian, Other Asian, Middle Eastern, Latin American, African, Other: Burmese
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
WISE and Safari invite different service providers that help inform
participants of locally available services as well as promoting healthy
living including being smoke-free. Service providers provide take-away
resources that give participants information about the importance of being
smoke-free for themselves and their families and also if need be, what they
can do and where they can go to get support if they wish to quit. All our
projects operate on premises that are smoke-free as well which we ensure is
reiterated.
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Yes we have. We have invited Auckland Council representatives that
work in the area of waste minimisation to deliver information sessions and
workshops, in particular for our WISE project. This has resulted in
participants being equipped with the necessary information to start their own
compost bins at home and adopt behaviours that help minimise waste e.g.
bringing their own shopping bags and reducing their consumption of single use
plastics like drink bottles. In addition, our projects try to operate in a
way that reduces waste, by choosing recycled or eco-friendly products,
reducing our printing and reusing resources beyond their original usage.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
0%
|
100%
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
20%
|
%
|
%
|
80%
|
%
|
15%
|
%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$6000.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting contribution to salary and project costs including
koha for our volunteers (travel reimbursements etc).
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
A contribution to project coordination, travel costs and associated
overheads.
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
There is no cost for participants involved in either WISE or Safari.
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$92,602
|
$0
|
$44,440
|
$0
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Projects Coordinator($58,240 full time) time allocated on this
projects, 12 hrs
|
$17,472
|
|
Project worker 15 hrs
|
$15,600
|
|
WISE project worker 6 hrs
|
$6,240
|
|
Van transport (for families) for 40 weeks @ $80 per day, 4 days per
week
|
$12,800
|
|
Volunteer expense including travel reimburse.
|
$2,300
|
|
Vehicle mileage
|
$980
|
|
Programme materials/resources for 12 months
|
$14,400
|
|
Charges for English Language tutor ($37 per hour x 3 hours per week x
40 weeks)
|
$4,440
|
|
Admin cost including office, space , HR contribution to audit,
accounts insurance etc.
|
$9,410
|
|
Rental for premises for 4 terms
|
$4,800
|
|
Cell phone
|
$360
|
|
Evaluation
|
$3,000
|
|
Professional development expenses for the Project Supervisor/ Worker/
Assistant
|
$800
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
MoE operational grant for Safari
|
$24,000
|
Approved
|
|
Local board funding (yet to be secured)
|
$5,000
|
Approved
|
|
Foundation North for contribution to WISE
|
$11,000
|
Approved
|
|
Adult education funding for English class
|
$4,440
|
Approved
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1911-214
|
1. WISE
Collective 2. Safari Playgroup
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Submitted
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
PKTSRG1819021
|
Puketāpapa
Strategic Relationships Grant 2018-2019 - Submitted
|
Approved
$15,115.00
|
|
|
LG1801-243
|
WISE
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,600.00
|
|
|
WMIF1702-099
|
WISE
Collective Waste Minimisation Project
WMIF
September 2017 - 5a. Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
REGCD18-50
|
WISE
CATERING/KITCHEN
Regional
Community Development 2017/2018 - Project in progress
|
Approved
$15,000.00
|
|
|
LG1805-126
|
Safari
Playgroup West
2017/2018
Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,300.00
|
|
|
LG1808-129
|
WISE
Collective Hub - North
2017/2018
Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1820-137
|
Cafe
training for women
2017/2018
Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,800.00
|
|
|
QR1801-113
|
International
Migrants Day 2017
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
PKTSRG1718010
|
Puketāpapa
Strategic Relationships Grant 2017-2018 - Submitted
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1708-228
|
WISE
Collective Hub - North
Kaipātiki Local
Grants, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1701-222
|
ARMS and
WISE Collective
2016/2017
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Refund requested
|
Approved
$3,636.00
|
|
|
REGCD17-30
|
The WISE
Collective Project.
Regional
Community Development 2016/2017 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$35,000.00
|
|
|
WMIF1602-106
|
ARMS Waste
Minimisation Project
WMIF
September 2016 - 5a. Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
PKTSRG16175
|
WISE
Collective Hub
Puketāpapa
Strategic Relationships Grant 2016/17 - Submitted
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
LFHW1601-30
|
WISE
Collective Catering and Foodstall Team
2016/17 Love
Food Hate Waste Fund - Aquitted
|
Approved
$780.00
|
|
|
LG1713-114
|
Safari
Multicultural Playgroup - South
2016/2017
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grant, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1708-113
|
WISE
Collective Hub - North
Kaipatiki
Local Grants, Round One, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1712-109
|
Ethnic
Communities 10th Commemoration of Tangata Tiriti Programme
2016/2017
Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-215
|
|
Mt Wellington Playcentre
|
|
Legal status:
|
Other: Affiliated to an Incorporated Society
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Continued
running of Mt Wellington Playcentre for 2019 (part funding)
|
|
Location:
|
174 Penrose Road, Mount Wellington, Auckland 1060
|
|
Summary:
|
We run six sessions per week per term. A typical day would include
providing our children with activities like painting, playdough, water play,
sandpit, collage, baking and carpentry - all of which require consumables and
varied resources.
Several times a term we also host formal adult training sessions for
our families - to maintain our licensed status and deepen our knowledge.
These ensure sessions are engaging and adhere to Te Whariki early childhood
curriculum.
As we expand our membership, especially in the under twos category of
children, we are required to provide a safe sleeping space for our youngest
members - therefore we need to upgrade our sleeping room in early 2019 from
having two cots to four sleeping spaces in cot bunks.
|
|
Dates:
|
01/01/2019 - 31/12/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
35
|
People reached:
|
135 children and their families if the project goes ahead at the
increased capacity.
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
We always look for ways to grow our Playcentre membership by
promoting our centre. Our centre is listed on the main Playentre website
www.playentre.org.uk and we run a public facing Facebook page which will be
regularly refreshed with new content. We also work in partnership with the
SPACE programme, so that when its members graduate we look to transition them
on to Playcentre sessions - this has worked particularly well in 2018.
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
Our Playcentre is busy and utilised every weekday of term time.
We run Playcentre sessions Monday, Wednesday and Friday for mixed-age
children from birth up to school age. On Tuesday and Thursday we host three
parent and baby/toddler sessions (SPACE sessions run by SPACE NZ Trust) which
also use our site and resources.
Our enrolments have grown in 2018 and we currently have 32 children
attending over the three Playcentre sessions. SPACE sessions have been so
successful that they are increasing their capacity from 15 to 20 children for
each session in 2019.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
Playcentre benefits the children who attend by allowing them to learn
and grow through play - preparing them for a confident entry into
school.
The Playcentre is parent-led and creates a sense of belonging and
support for local families - the relationships and friendships we make last
for years beyond Playcentre. We also help to develop new parenting skills
which are underpinned by a formal education programme. We firmly believe
these skills are taken into the family home and beyond by our parents.
Additionally as a self-managed centre, the organisational and
business skills parents learn also benefit the wider community - including
areas like finance, planning, budget management, fundraising, property
management, administration, education provision, and leadership.
The SPACE programme also benefits parents and babies/toddlers,
offering support, practical advice and parenting skills for new parents.
Increasing the capacity of these sessions with the installation of new cot
bunks will allow this positive effect to reach further into the growing
community.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
creating opportunities for our young people - Our
community is a safer place
At Playcentre we believe that children learn best through their play.
It enables them to explore the world, develop their own theories on how
things work and get along with children of mixed ages and adults - all in an
environment where they are valued and feel safe.
Playcentre children have families who are supporting their learning
and maintaining the link between the centre and home environment - something
the Ministry of Education and the Education Review Office have highlighted as
being a major contributing factor to their future success at school.
Playcentre also creates a small community for the families who
attend, with opportunities for families to socialise together. Our Playcentre
is open to everyone and we believe the positive impact on the families who
attend is carried through to the wider community.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori focus - tikanga (practises),
mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language)
Te Whare Tikanga Māori, is a governance body within Playcentre
Aotearoa and is recognised as the organisations Partner; this is enabled
through Playcentre's commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Te Whare Tikanga Māori has identified that ngā
mātāpono of Rangatiratanga, Mana, Whanaungatanga and Wairuatanga
underpin Playcentre philosophy and ngā wāriu of Aroha,
Kaitiakitanga, Manaakitanga, Te Reo, Pono, Tika and Maramatanga guide our
actions and behaviours.
Our Playcentre in Mount Wellington incorporates tikanga,
mātauranga and reo in all sessions and practices, for example we do
karakia, pakiwaitara and waiata for our children regularly and we have adults
attending who are proficient in te reo. We also host Te Kimiora o
Tamaki hui (our regional Māori rōpū).
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - Our centre is gated for children's safety, but we have an
access ramp and an accessible toilet.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
Our Playcentre is a smoke free environment. There is signage on the
entrance way to support this.
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
As standard we minimise water wastage during water play, and all food
scraps are composted and used in the vegetable patch. We also recycle
materials wherever possible.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
60%
|
%
|
%
|
40%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$4072.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting funding for two key element for our Playcentre -
both of which are required to meed our Ministry of Education licensing
criteria:
1. The one-off purchase of two bunk cots to enable our under
twos capacity to grow from 15 to 20.
2. The funding for education enrichment supplies for 2019 to
facilitate a wide variety of painting, craft, collage, carpentry, baking,
dress up and reading activities for our children - this is part of our annual
expenditure.
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
As the cots are a licensing requirement we would go ahead with this
critical up-front purchase. We also have a list of required consumable
education resources to make available for our children's learning, but this
can be managed as a staggered cost throughout the year.
For the project to continue we would need to reprioratise centre
activities and look for areas to make savings in order to enable us to
purchase the cot bunks at the start of 2019. We would then approach other
organisations and hold fundraising activities throughout the year to make up
the shortfall.
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Members who attend once a week pay $50 per term per family, members
who attend twice a week with $35 koha per term per family.
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$4,071.55
|
$1,500
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
2 x cot bunks
|
$2,871.55
|
|
General education supplies
|
$1,200
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
Member donations
|
$1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
6240
|
|
$128,232
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-218
|
|
|
KidsCan Charitable Trust
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Incorporated Society, Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Raincoats
for Kids
|
|
|
Location:
|
Across 18 KidsCan partner schools, located in the Maungakiekie-Tamaki
region.
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Raincoats for Kids programme gives children in low decile schools
their very own “Warriors” branded raincoats. Often this raincoat
is the first new item of clothing a child has ever had, we hear of children
sleeping in their coats as they are the warmest piece of clothing they own.
Shoes and socks are also available for schools to order if needed.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
04/02/2019 - 30/06/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
26
|
People reached:
|
5361
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
KidsCan constantly receives feedback from principals and teachers in
the community who have children in their classes with no food, footwear, warm
or dry clothing and very limited access to healthcare or health items.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
Community well-being and in particular the well being of children is
extremely important to KidsCan. By running our programmes through
schools we are encouraging disadvantaged children to attend school, improving
their educational outcomes and allowing them the greatest opportunity to
reach their full potential in life. This leads to a happier community with
more educated young people. Our programmes are proven to reduce anger,
theft and violence - supporting youth who may be at risk can change lives and
help break the poverty cycle.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
active participation - Our young people are engaged
in the community and have access to a wide range of opportunities
Community well-being and in particular the well being of children is
extremely important to KidsCan. By running our programmes through
schools we are encouraging disadvantaged children to attend school, improving
their educational outcomes and allowing them the greatest opportunity to
reach their full potential in life. This leads to a happier community with
more educated young people. Our programmes are proven to reduce anger,
theft and violence - supporting youth who may be at risk can change lives and
help break the poverty cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori participation - Māori priority
group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering
Maori and Pacifika children make up 74.52% of children attending
KidsCan partner schools. Our programmes significantly improve the
well being and educational outcomes for these children.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - KidsCan partner schools are decile 1-4, if a child is attending
one of these partner schools they can take part in our programmes regardless
whether they are able bodied or have disabilities.
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
95%
|
5%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$8000.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We would love funding to purchase raincoats for the children. Children
who are cold and hungry are not able to learn very well, they are distracted,
irritable and light headed. A Massey University study completed in 2010
has proven that our programmes reduce theft and anger - as well as improving
attention in class and attendance rates in schools.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
Any funding would be greatly appreciated and can be utilised to
purchase raincoats for the children.
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Not Applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$17,423
|
$9,423
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
Raincoats for Kids
|
$17,423
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
IOOBY members
|
$6,138
|
|
|
General donations
|
$2,485
|
|
|
Other funding
|
$800
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1801-235
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1821-211
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$4,000.00
|
|
|
LG1820-233
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Waitematā Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1808-316
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$4,854.00
|
|
|
LG1809-233
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$4,000.00
|
|
|
LG1810-230
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Manurewa Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1813-209
|
Food for
Kids
2017/2018
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Project in
progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1805-231
|
Food for Kids
2017/2018
Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
LG1811-209
|
Children's
Programmes - Maungakiekie-Tamaki
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1710-225
|
Food for
Kids
2016/2017
Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1708-230
|
Food for
Kids
Kaipātiki Local
Grants, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1713-228
|
Food for
Kids
2016/2017
Otara-Papatoetoe Local Grant, Round Two - Review accountability
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
REGCD17-53
|
Orchards
in Schools
Regional
Community Development 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-220
|
|
Panmure Business
Association
|
|
Legal status:
|
Incorporated Society
|
Activity focus:
|
Events
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Panmure
Basin Fun Day
|
|
Location:
|
On, in and around the Panmure Basin
|
|
Summary:
|
The aim of the day is to showcase the clubs that utilise this area
for recreational activity as well as give local community groups and
organisation the opportunity to be involved. Children and family free
fun activities are situated at intervals around the Panmure Basin giving
children the opportunity to be creative and active as they explore the 3.1 km
path that surrounds the Basin. In 2018, a Recycle Raft Race was added
and 5 groups built and competed in the race. The event also highlights the little
known natural feature of the Basin to families in greater Auckland.
|
|
Dates:
|
10/02/2019 - 10/02/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
200
|
People reached:
|
5000
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
Social media
Household flyers
AO sized posters in the town centre
Corflute signs at the Panmure Basin
Panmure Business Association Newsletter
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
This event has been going since the 1960's and is part of the local
history. In 2016, the original organisers, the Panmure Basin Advisory
Committee, were unable to find volunteers who would pull the event
together. The Panmure Business Association had long recognised the
value of the event and rallied support from 12 local businesses and organisations.
The group applied to the Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board to cover the cost of
and event organiser, which they did. The first event following the new
model was in 2017 and proved to be successful. The event earlier this
year had an increased public turnout and was very well received.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
Community groups and organisation participation.
Increased public involvement and enjoyment of the activities on
offer.
Increased understanding about Panmure Basin as a great recreational facility
that is centrally located and accessible to all.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
The Panmure Basin Fun Day has been held on the Panmure Basin since
the 1960's. The aim of the day is to showcase the clubs that utilise
this area for recreational activity as well as give local community groups
and organisation the opportunity to be involved and give the children of
Tamaki an interactive fun free day out. The event also highlights the little
known natural feature of the Basin to family's in greater Auckland.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
Fresh Concept
|
Event permit, infrastructure, pack in and out
|
|
Panmure Lagoon Yacht Club
|
Sailing on the Basin, the Recycle Raft Race
|
|
The Men's Shed
|
Making and racing cars
|
|
YMCA Pool and Stadium
|
Bouncy castle, kids games
|
|
Rotary Club of South Auckland
|
Pirate activity trail
|
|
Panmure Library
|
Library bus and kids activities
|
|
Panmure Historic Society
|
Informing people about the history of the Basin
|
|
Uriera Performing Cultural Group
|
Performance and Maori cultural activities
|
|
Tamaki Estuary Protection Society
|
Environmental awareness, promoting Panmure Basin clean ups
|
|
Tamaki WRAP
|
Recycling and environmental information
|
|
Skate School
|
Skate Board Competition
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - The Panmure Basin walkway is accessible to people with
disabilities with the exception of the steep hill that leads to Ireland Rd.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
This is a large, open space area that would be extremely difficult to
ensure that it was smoke free.
We would be happy for Auckland Council to supply us with Smoke Free
signs that we would place at strategic locations such as the entry/exit
points around the 3.1km pathway.
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Waste and recycle bins will be placed in the main activation
points. On the day we have litter cleaners make sure there is no loose
rubbish lying around.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$15000.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Event Management
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$15,000
|
$0
|
$25,185
|
$2,000
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Event Management
|
$15,000
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
Mt Wellington Foundation Ltd
|
$25,185
|
Pending
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
200
|
|
$4,110
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1911-220
|
Panmure
Basin Fun Day
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Submitted
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
NCE1811-003
|
Panmure
Basin Fun Day
2017/2018
Events - Maungakiekie-Tāmaki - Acquitted
|
Approved
$15,000.00
|
|
|
NCE1811-002
|
Panmure
Christmas Street Party
2017/2018
Events - Maungakiekie-Tāmaki - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1711-240
|
Panmure's
Christmas Street Party
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two, 2016/17 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
NCE1711-001
|
Panmure
Basin Fun Day
Events -
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki non-contestable, 2016/2017 - Review
accountability
|
Approved
$15,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-223
|
|
|
Parenting Place
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Toolbox
parenting groups in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
|
|
|
Location:
|
Community venues, social service agencies, churches, and private
homes within the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki local board area. A large
proportion of these courses will happen at the Parenting Place, 300 Great
South Road, Greenlane.
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Through our range of six-session Toolbox parenting courses, we
provide practical parenting skills & strategies that can be implemented
in any family situation, regardless of income, ethnicity, education, or
ability. In the Building Awesome Whānau Toolbox course,
evidence-informed parenting techniques are presented in a way that is
understandable, relevant and culturally appropriate. This course is
being widely utilised with at-risk and vulnerable families in conjunction
with the many social service agencies we collaborate with. Our aim is
to increase the number of at-risk families completing a parenting programme
and reduce disparities in health and social outcomes within this
sector. We plan to run 28 courses in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki over the
next 12 months benefitting 252 parents and their families.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
01/01/2019 - 13/12/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
16
|
People reached:
|
252
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
We will promote all the Toolbox courses on the Parenting Place
website, social media, community notice boards, ECE centres, schools, and
other places in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki community. Toolbox courses
are well known and don't require high amounts of promotion. The social
service agencies and community partners we work with also promote courses on
our behalf to their contacts.
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
Studies show raising the confidence and competence of parents through
parenting programmes has positive effects in reducing negative outcomes like
child abuse, teenage pregnancy, and youth suicide. Sustained increase
in demand by participants, as well as the continued enthusiasm and support
for our programmes by our community partners, is evidence Toolbox parenting
courses are meeting an important need. Each year more community groups
request we train their people as Toolbox facilitators, or run Toolbox courses
on their behalf. Last year 75% of courses were run through community
and social service organisations.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
The community outcomes Toolbox courses in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
will provide are:
1. A foundation for long-term systematic social change through its
impact upon families involved. For an alarmingly large number of
attendees, the material is completely new. They may be several
generations removed from functional family life and for them, the knowledge
presented is revolutionary. As individual lives are transformed through
parenting education, the community is transformed.
2. Ensuring that every person who wants to improve their wellbeing
through parenting by attending a Toolbox course is able to.
3. Ensuring the courses are engaging, relevant, up-to-date,
applicabole to life and enjoyable so that most participants attend at least 5
out of 6 sessions.
It is our firm belief that our delivery of effective, empowering
programmes and resources makes a measurable difference to the lives of
children and parents. This is evidenced in feedback from recipients,
community groups and social service agencies we collaborate with along with
and external reviews of the Toolbox programme.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
The aim of the Toolbox parenting programme is to help parents create
strong and healthy families, by providing them with a 'toolbox' of parenting
education skills and strategies. These skills enable parents to provide
a safe, caring and nurturing environment in which to raise their
family. As parents' lives are transformed through receiving parenting
education, neighbourhoods will also be transformed. Over the six weeks
of a Toolbox course, the participants often form connections and bonds that
extend past the end of the course. In this way, Toolbox courses have a
flow-on effect that increases participation in and contributes to building
strong communities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
Solomon Group - Panmure
|
Social service agency hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting
courses.
|
|
|
Tamaki Community Development Trust
|
Social service agency hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting
courses.
|
|
|
Roskill South Oasis
|
Social service agency hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting
courses.
|
|
|
Merivale Onehunga
|
Social service agency hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting
courses.
|
|
|
Glen Innes Family Centre
|
Social service agency hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting
courses.
|
|
|
St Mary's Church
|
Community venue hosting & promoting Toolbox parenting courses.
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori participation - Māori priority
group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering
The Building Awesome Whānau Toolbox course is designed
specifically for Māori families.
It was developed in collaboration with Māori staff, Toolbox
facilitators, educators, kaumātua, social service agencies and Māori
families. This Toolbox considers needs, strengths, and socio-economic nature
of Māori. The best evidence-informed parenting techniques and insights
are presented in a way that is understandable, relevant and culturally
appropriate.
Particular attention is paid to using appropriate and understandable
language in all material.
Although designed for Māori it has proven to have appeal and
efficacy with a wide range of vulnerable families. Our ultimate aim is that
it will increase the number of at-risk families completing a parenting
programme and reduce disparities in health and social outcomes within this
sector.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - Toolbox parenting course are open and accessible to any parent
seeking help and support.
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
Toolbox courses aim to put the wellbeing of Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
families and young people first. Toolbox participants receive messages
about the importance of creating family values and living by them.
Through this process, parents are encouraged to examine their beliefs,
habits, routines and home life and this often leads to a reduction in
negative habits such as smoking and drinking happening in the home.
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Not specifically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
30%
|
70%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$4516.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
If successful, a grant from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board
would be used to contribute towards additional fee subsidies for low income
parents, course manuals, coordinator manuals and volunteer facilitator
expenses.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
If only part of our project is funded, we will still run Toolbox
courses in Maungakiekie-Tāmaiki however we may deliver fewer courses
than the number requested by the community and will not be able to offer as
many subsidies as needed.
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Toolbox course fees are subsidised by our fundraising - participants
are charged $75 per individual and $110 per couple (incl. GST). We
often subsidise this fee further, sometimes up to 100%, if funding allows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$15,279
|
$14,487
|
$18,765
|
$1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
Subsidies for low-income participants
|
$5,070
|
|
|
Volunteer expenses
|
$5,880
|
|
|
Course manuals
|
$2,621
|
|
|
Coordinator expenses
|
$1,708
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fees from participants
|
$14,487
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
Ministry of Social Development funding
|
$13,765
|
Approved
|
|
COGS - Auckland City
|
$1,000
|
Approved
|
|
David Levene Foundation
|
$1,500
|
Approved
|
|
Foundation North
|
$1,000
|
Pending
|
|
CR Stead Trust
|
$1,500
|
Approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
504
|
$10,338
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
QR1913-3-1022
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses, focusing on Maori & vulnerable families
2018/2019
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1918-106
|
Attitude
Life Skills Presentations for Waiheke High School 2019
2018/2019
Waiheke Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$500.00
|
|
|
QR1905-105
|
Attitude
LifeSkills and Well Being Programmes for Henderson-Massey Schools 2019
2018/2019
Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Awaiting funding agreement
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
QR1920-118
|
Attitude
Lifeskills & Wellbeing Programmes for Waitemata Schools 2019
2018/2019
Waitematā Quick Response, Round One - SME assessment completed
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1821-316
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses
2017/2018
Whau Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,987.00
|
|
|
LG1809-230
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses, focusing on Maori & vulnerable families.
2017/2018
Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,707.00
|
|
|
LG1813-230
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses, focusing on Maori & vulnerable families.
2017/2018
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1813-225
|
Attitude
Mental Health & Wellbeing Presentations for Otara-Papatoetoe Schools
2017/2018
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Project in
progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1801-212
|
Attitude
Mental Health and wellbeing presentations in Albert-Eden schools 2018
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,505.00
|
|
|
LG1814-214
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations for Papakura High Schools
2017/2018
Papakura Local Grant, Round 2 - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1806-208
|
Mental
Health and Wellbeing Presentations for Hibiscus and Bay Schools
2017/2018
Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,073.00
|
|
|
QR1817-207
|
Attitude
Mental Health and Wellbeing Presentations at Upper Harbour Schools
2017/2018
Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1807-301
|
Attitude
Mental Health & Wellbeing Presentations for Howick Schools
2017/2018
Howick Local Grants, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
QR1803-303
|
Toolbox
parenting courses in Franklin
2017/2018
Franklin Quick Response, Round Three - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-308
|
Attitude
Mental Health and Wellbeing Presentations in Maungakiekie/Tamaki schools 2018
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Three - Submitted
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1815-305
|
Attitude
Mental Health and Wellbeing Presentations in Puketapapa Schools
2017/2018
Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round Three - Withdrawn
|
Withdrawn
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1810-207
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses, focusing on Maori & vulnerable families.
2017/2018
Manurewa Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,400.00
|
|
|
LG1807-309
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses in Howick.
2017/2018
Howick Local Grants, Round Three - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1812-208
|
Attitude
Life-Skills Presentations in Orakei District High Schools
2017/2018
Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1810-201
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations for Manurewa High Schools
2017/2018
Manurewa Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,420.00
|
|
|
QR1809-204
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations for young people in Mangere-Otahuhu
schools.
2017/2018
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Project in
progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1801-138
|
Delivery
of Attitude life-skills presentations in Albert-Eden schools
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-116
|
Attitude
life-skills and wellbeing presentations in Maungakiekie/Tamaki schools for
2018
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1805-107
|
Attitude
Mental Health & Wellbeing Presentations for Henderson & Massey High
Schools
2017/2018
Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1815-101
|
Attitude
life-skills and wellbeing presentations in Puketāpapa schools for 2018
2017/2018
Puketāpapa Local Grants, Round One - Submitted
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1714-206
|
Attitude
Life Skills presentations for Papakura Schools
2016/2017
Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - Review accountability
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1710-215
|
Provision
of Toolbox Parenting Courses, focusing on Māori & vulnerable
families
2016/2017
Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Review accountability
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1707-204
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations for Howick Local Board High Schools
2016/2017
Howick Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
QR1706-310
|
Attitude
Life Skills Training Presentations at Hibiscus Coast and Bay High Schools
Hibiscus and
Bays Quick Response, Round Three, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1710-208
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations for Manurewa schools
2016/2017
Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,671.00
|
|
|
QR1718-304
|
Attitude
Life Skills Presentations at Waiheke High School
Waiheke Quick
Response, Round Three, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1720-309
|
Attitude
life-skills presentations at Waitemata High Schools
2016/2017
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Three - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1717-303
|
Attitude
Life Skills Training Presentations at Upper Harbour High Schools
Upper Harbour
Quick Response, Round Three, 2016/17 - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
REGCD17-26
|
Building
Awesome Whanau Toolbox parenting groups in 2017
Regional
Community Development 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1713-222
|
Toolbox
parenting courses especially targeting Maori and vulnerable families in
Manukau.
2016/2017
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,975.00
|
|
|
QR1721-233
|
Parenting
courses specifically developed for high needs, at-risk parents and
caregivers.
2016/2017
Whau Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$500.00
|
|
|
QR1712-208
|
Attitude
Life-Skills Presentations in Orakei District High Schools
2016/2017
Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
QR1718-205
|
Attitude
Life Skills Presentations at Waiheke High School
Waiheke Quick
Response, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1706-201
|
Attitude
Life Skills Training Presentations at Hibiscus Coast and Bay High Schools
Hibiscus and
Bays Quick Response, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1720-214
|
Attitude
life-skills presentations at Waitemata High Schools
2016/2017
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1709-116
|
Mental
health and wellbeing presentations for young people in Mangere-Otahuhu
schools.
2016/2017
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Grant, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,800.00
|
|
|
LG1715-102
|
Attitude
life-skills and wellbeing presentations in Puketāpapa schools
Puketāpapa
Local Grants, Round One, 2016/17 - Review accountability
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
LG1611-239
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations and resources designed to increase
wellbeing in young people.
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1607-245
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations and resources designed to build
resilience in young people.
2015/2016
Howick Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,353.00
|
|
|
QR1620-539
|
Attitude
life-skills presentations at Waitemata High Schools
2015/2016
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Four - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1606-231
|
Mental
health & wellbeing presentations and resources designed to increase
wellbeing in young people.
Hibiscus and
Bays Local Grants, Round Two, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1617-209
|
Attitude
life-skills presentations at Upper Harbour Local Board high schools.
Upper Harbour
Local Grants, Round Two, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1614-204
|
Mental
health and wellbeing presentations and resources designed to build resilience
in young people
2015/2016
Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,400.00
|
|
|
QR1601-433
|
Attitude
life-skills presentations at Albert-Eden high schools
2015/2016
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round Five - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,100.00
|
|
|
QR1618-325
|
Attitude presentations
at Waiheke High School
Waiheke Quick
Response, Round Three, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1610-219
|
Provision
of Toolbox parenting courses, especially targeting Māori and vulnerable
families
2015/2016
Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,640.00
|
|
|
LG1610-209
|
Mental
health and wellbeing presentations and resources designed to build resilience
in young people.
2015/2016
Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,797.00
|
|
|
LG1603-239
|
Provision
of Toolbox Parenting Courses, especially targeting vulnerable families
2015/2016
Franklin Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1621-115
|
Provision
of parenting courses specifically developed for high needs, at-risk parents
and caregivers
2015/2016
Whau Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1606-153
|
Youth
development and mental health programmes for Auckland region schools 2015/16
Hibiscus and
Bays Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-224
|
|
|
Kāhui Tū Kaha
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust, Limited Liability Company, Other: Kahui Tū
Kaha is a Registered Charity and Limited Liability Company owned by Affinity
Services Charitable Trust. Affinity Services Charitable Trust is under the
auspices of Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Oranga:
Wellbeing and Lifestyle
|
|
|
Location:
|
Auckland Council community venues: Onehunga Community Centre
Kitchen Hub, Church Street, Onehunga; Te Oro Arts Centre, Line Road, Glen
Innes; Royal Oak Community Gardens, Erson Ave, Royal Oak; other venues
and locations as required.
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Pathways to healthier living, greater skills and confidence,
community inclusion and employment, for adults who have mental health
concerns, through Te Whare Tapa Wha and the core values of Kāhui Tū
Kaha: manaakitanga, rangatiratanga and whakawanaungatanga.
Providing community based programmes that meet the needs and interests of
Maori, Pasifika peoples and migrant and refugee groups, cater for diversity
and are inclusive of all. Participants will develop skills and
knowledge in areas that enhance health and lifestyle, including healthy
cooking, organic growing and recycling, personal development, health topics
and pre-employment skills. Specific content will be arrived at through
targeting the needs of different groups and all programmes will include skill
and knowledge-based certificates that will contribute to CVs for employment.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
14/01/2019 - 20/12/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
Four experienced staff
|
People reached:
|
100
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
Through our networks via email, brochures, on websites, and if
possible, newspaper articles
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
We have been involved in a pilot study through which we have
established where there are accessible, existing classes and groups for
people with mental health concerns and where there are a lack of
opportunities, and what some of the barriers might be to accessing existing
programmes. The three programmes that will be included in the project
are not currently well catered for in a way that is accessible for people who
are recovering from mental health issues. We have trialled pilot
programmes to establish needs and interests, and found that they were well
attended. Some areas that we will target and address relate to
establishing confidence through safe practices (eg. in cooking) and social
abilities within different contexts.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
Participants attending the programme will gain knowledge and skills
which improve their wellbeing, confidence and social connection within the
community. They will have the knowledge and resources to create a
healthier lifestyle through the topic areas of the project and will have
benefited from the environment provided which is enhanced through the core
principles of Kahui Tū Kaha services. This will lead to greater
community confidence and participation.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
Our programmes are based on the core principles of Kāhui Tū
Kaha: manaakitanga, enhancing the mana of others; rangatiratanga, supporting
people's self-determination; and whakawhanaungatanga, establishing
relationships, sense of belonging, family connections and kinship. Our
project is to further develop selected programmes that have been piloted and
proven successful, in order to create greater opportunities for skill
development, subject knowledge and community connection, leading to community
confidence, integration and greater wellbeing. Three programmes are
targeted for development: "Cooking: Around the World Healthy
Eating - Levels 1 and 2", "Oranga: Organic Gardening and
Recycling", and "Living the Vision: Tūruapō Tumeke
- personal development, health topics and pre-employment skills".
Programmes in the project will be based in Onehunga, Royal Oak, and Glen
Innes/ Panmure. Participants in the programmes of the project will be
adults 18 years and over who have mental health needs ranging from mild to
significant. Referral will take place through ADHB Community Mental
Health facilities of Manaaki House, Cornwall House, Loto Fale and Manawanui;
and through our multi-team referral process. Others will be
self-referring under their GP, as anyone over 18 years is eligible to attend
to improve their holistic wellbeing. People who attend our programmes
find existing community programmes inaccessible without support.
Barriers can include lower functioning cognition and coordination due to
symptoms and medication; social anxiety, lack of finance, and lack of
confidence in abilities. Our project will provide greater adherence in
pathways that lead to full on-going participation and inclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori led - either a Māori organisation
that is applying or Māori directed (came about as a request from Māori).
We are an iwi organisation and all of our programmes are delivered
using Māori frameworks and kaupapa. This includes Māori
practices of karakia, waiata, manaakitanga, rangatiratanga and
whakawhanaungatanga within the course of our sessions, and use of Te Whare
Tapa Wha model of health. Approaches used are based on the research of
Dr Mason Durie and other Māori health researchers. Two of four
team members are Maori and the project leader has a bicultural upbringing and
background. We have access to ongoing advice from our Pou Tāhuhu
Kaupapa Māori Development Manager, kaumatua and kuia within the
organisation. Our team have a proven record of assisting Māori
people into fuller lives beyond our service, which has been documented in
evaluations.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - Our primary client group includes people with psychiatric
disabilities and have physical disabilities. Venues chosen are
accessible and we are inclusive of all people.
*Please note regarding next question: Ngāti
Whātua have stated that they seek to use Kāhui Tū Kaha as a
means of discharging their responsibility to manaakitanga to all people in
their rohe.
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
Our team are all certificated in smoking cessation and the project
leader is certified to prescribe nicotine replacement products. Our
organisation requires us to actively promote options to gain support in
quit-line initiatives each three months with each person involved in our
programmes. The risks of smoking and the benefits of being a non-smoker
will be included as a topic in the "Oranga: Wellbeing and Lifestyle
programmes, as this is a natural fit. In our focus on Te Whare Tapa
Whā, the role of smoking in disease and benefits of being smoke free
will be explored through each of the four taha. Healthy smoke-free city
environments will also be included as a topic.
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Our "Oranga: Organic Gardening and Recycling" programme of
the project will directly target the transformation of waste products into
useful/ reusable resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$12958.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Hire of Auckland Council venues, additional equipment, consumables
and specialist resources that are required to provide quality programmes, and
for additional transport for participants where required.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
Scale down the project to provide for fewer programmes and for less
people
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$12,958
|
$0
|
$0
|
$22,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cooking ingredients/ cleaning products, etc for Level 1 & 2
groups of 8 participants each per term $800 x 4 =
|
$3,200
|
|
|
Replacement of utenclls/ aprons ($80 for 10) and equipment through
wear and tear
|
$200
|
|
|
Development of cookbooks - spiral bound colour photocopy manuals $20
ea x 16 per term x 4
|
$1,280
|
|
|
Printing of certificates
|
$120
|
|
|
Mental Health First Aid workshops within "Living the Vision: Tūruapō
Tumeke! programme - $25 x 15 participants x 4 terms
|
$1,500
|
|
|
Living the Vision: Tūruapō Tumeke workbooks, printing,
stationary $20 x 6 participants x 4 terms
|
$480
|
|
|
Guest presenters/ kaiako/ topic specialists - 10 x $60
|
$600
|
|
|
Additional transport for special events/ group community access
|
$200
|
|
|
Onehunga Community Centere Kitchen Hub venue hire 10 weeks x 2 groups
x 4 terms
|
$1,600
|
|
|
Te Oro Arts Centre Venue Hire/ Panumure alternative venue - $51.20 2
hrs x 10 x 4 terms
|
$2,048
|
|
|
Venue Hire for Mental Health First Aid $20 x 16 hours x 4
|
$1,280
|
|
|
Oranga: Organic Gardening & Recycling gloves &
small tools
|
$200
|
|
|
Oranga: Organic Gardening & Recycling plant/ seeds/ potting mix/
grout/ mosaics decorative materials/ handouts
|
$250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
$
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1911-224
|
Oranga:
Wellbeing and Lifestyle
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Submitted
|
Undecided
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS18_2_178
|
Kapahaka,
Pacifika Dancers (and Other Cultural Performers)
Creative
Communities Scheme 18_2 - Regional 18_2
|
Approved
$10,000.00
|
|
|
QR1801-227
|
Tūruapō
Tumeke! Living the Vision Project
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1811-228
|
Glen Innes
Community Arts Project - Ngā Toi
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$8,900.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-225
|
|
|
Youthline Auckland
Charitable Trust
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Supporting
the Youthline Helpline
|
|
|
Location:
|
13 Maidstone Street, Grey Lynn, Auckland
|
|
|
Summary:
|
This application is seeking a contribution of $5,000 to the cost of
operating the Youthline Helpline. Youthline is a first point of contact for
young people in New Zealand to access a wide range of youth development and
support services. In most instances that first point of contact is our
national, free, 24/7 Helpline that is accessible by phone, text and
email.
The Helpline costs us over $500,000 per year to operate. It is
staffed by 200 volunteer counsellors who are supervised by clinical triage
staff. It is the most important thing we do. The Helpline operates from our
Youth Development and Community Centre in Grey Lynn and is part of a national
network.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
01/12/2018 - 30/11/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
200
|
People reached:
|
50000
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
The Youthline Helpline is promoted and marketing across a wide range
of media including the Youthline website, Facebook page and various
promotional activities. We have an extensive communications contact plan in
place.
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
Youthline has been supporting young people for over 48 years. The
need for our services is well established and ongoing.
Last year in the Auckland area we received an estimated 56,300 calls,
texts and emails seeking support through our Helpline – with 2,300
being from young people in the Maungakiekie-Tamaki area. For those who
contact us by text 1 in 3 present with mental health issues and 1 in 7
presents with suicide issues.
Youthline’s Helpline is part of an integrated, wraparound
support service for young people in need. For many, picking up the phone, or
sending a text, is a courageous act and the start of a journey to personal
development and fulfilling potential.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
For many of the vulnerable young people we work with the first
contact point with us is through the Helpline.
We are then able to link them with the help they need. We offer
support services and positive role models to encourage, motivate and inspire
young people to reach their full potential and create a resilient community.
We offer a range of personal development programmes. We aim to equip
them with skills and insights on how to build self-esteem and improve
mental-health, how to actively problem-solve, recover from setbacks and build
resilience. Through their improved emotional and self-management skills young
people are more likely to be in education, training and employment.
We know that when young people feel connected to their community and
valued by others they gain confidence and self-esteem. This in turn
provides them with the strength to make improved life decisions, to think
about the long term and reduces risk-taking behaviour.
Youthline aims to provide all young people with skills and strategies
to help strengthen and improve the relationships they have with the
significant adults they interact with, i.e. parents, whānau and
teachers. If we can do this then the community in which they live will
benefit.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
Young people in need who contact Youthline through our Helpline often
feel lonely, alone, disengaged and desperate. They often have no sense of
belonging to family, school or community.
Over 48 years Youthline has been supporting young people in need.
The helpline is an early intervention service operating from a
strengths-based, person centred approach. This approach is integral to the
delivery of Youthline's Phone, Text and Email Helpline service.
Youthline helpline staff respond to situations of low to high and
imminent risk across all mediums of contact, providing a continuum of support
and linking service users with other agencies in their own communities.
Utilising and promoting Youthline's strengths-based, wrap around approach,
Youthline staff are responsible for the quality assessment and management of
clients (young people and their families), including those with high and
complex needs.
Youthline services equip youth with skills and insights on how to
build self-esteem and improve mental-health, how to actively problem-solve,
recover from setbacks and build resilience. Counsellors link them with local
support services to assist their ongoing development. Through their improved
emotional and self-management skills young people are less likely to fall
into helplessness, depression, addictive behaviours, dangerous relationships
and unemployment.
Research shows that when young people are engaged in community
activities, linked with whanau, and given the opportunity to feel that they
are part of something and encouraged to reach their potential, that risk
taking behaviour is reduced. Youthline works inclusively with youth,
from those young people who are most vulnerable to youth leaders who are championing
change. Our clinical support workers counsel/mentor young people
identified as needing one on one support to encourage and inspire them.
They aim to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each young person,
then identify goals and milestones and develop a plan for successful
implementation and progression. By walking beside a young person and
providing positive role models Youthline aims to see every young person
become a positive contributor to society with a strong sense of belonging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
Na
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - All our facilities have accessibility for people with
disabilities
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
Youthline Auckland supports the Auckland Council’s Smokefree
Policy and its commitment to working proactively with others towards making
Auckland smokefree by 2025. We have a smoke free policy in place and
can offer support, advice and referrals to young people who wish to give up
smoking. We ensure that the young people we work with are aware of our
support for making Auckland smokefree and how we can help them if necessary.
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
na
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
10%
|
75%
|
15%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$5000.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Youthline requests funding of $5,000 towards the costs of our free
crisis helpline support to young people in the Maungakiekie-Tamaki local
board area.
In the last year Youthline received an estimated 2,340 contacts for
support through our helpline specifically from the local board area. There
are 10,540 young people aged 15-24 years living in the area - 1 in 4
contacted us for help.
The area’s share of the direct costs of the national Helpline
of $503,603 is $7,897. We are requesting a contribution of $5,000
specifically towards the telecommunications - telephone, text and VOIP -
costs of $107,400.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
Yes, the show must go on. We are extremely proactive in applying for
funding from a wide range of funders.
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$503,603
|
$0
|
$253,491
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
National Helpline Cost
|
$503,603
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
Auckland Council - Franklin LB
|
$1,552
|
Approved
|
|
Auckland Council - Orakei LB
|
$1,300
|
Approved
|
|
Auckland Council Waiheke LB
|
$202
|
Approved
|
|
Auckland Council - Waitakere Ranges LB
|
$1,152
|
Approved
|
|
AC Waitemata LB
|
$1,000
|
Approved
|
|
AC Manurewa LB
|
$2,000
|
Approved
|
|
AC Whau LB
|
$2,000
|
Approved
|
|
AC Hibiscus and Bays
|
$2,125
|
Approved
|
|
AC Upper Harbour
|
$1,288
|
Approved
|
|
AC Howick
|
$2,000
|
Approved
|
|
AC Papakura
|
$2,000
|
Approved
|
|
Bay Trust
|
$10,000
|
Approved
|
|
South Waikato District Council
|
$3,872
|
Approved
|
|
Trust Waikato
|
$10,000
|
Approved
|
|
Lottery Community
|
$140,000
|
Approved
|
|
Sky City Community Trust
|
$64,000
|
Approved
|
|
L W Nelson Trust
|
$5,000
|
Pending
|
|
John Ilott Trust
|
$2,000
|
Pending
|
|
AC Upper Harbour
|
$2,000
|
Pending
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
5000
|
12672
|
$363,159.6
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
QR1909-126
|
Helpline
Coordinator Costs
2018/2019
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Awaiting
payment
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1902-122
|
Helpline
Coordinator Salary
2018/2019
Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1911-128
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1915-139
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Puketāpapa Local Grants, Round One - Awaiting payment
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
LG1913-154
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1909-149
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,380.00
|
|
|
LG1918-121
|
Youthline
Helpline Triage Service
2018/2019
Waiheke Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1912-129
|
Youthline
Helpline Triage Service
2018/2019
Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1910-148
|
Youthline
Helpline Triage Team
2018/2019
Manurewa Local Grants, Round One - Submitted
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1921-138
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Whau Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1920-139
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1919-118
|
Youthline
Helpline Coorfdinator
2018/2019
Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round One - Awaiting funding
agreement
|
Approved
$2,298.00
|
|
|
LG1903-154
|
Youthline
Helpline Coordinator
2018/2019
Franklin Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1903-125
|
Helpline
Triage Costs
2018/2019
Franklin Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1908-132
|
Youthline
Helpline
2018/2019
Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
LG1902-132
|
Youthline
Helpline
2018/2019
Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round One - Awaiting payment
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
QR1821-320
|
Providing
free helpline counselling support to young people in need
2017/2018
Whau Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1814-329
|
Provide
free helpline counselling to support young people in need
2017/2018
Papakura Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1807-242
|
Provide
free helpline counselling to support young people in need
2017/2018
Howick Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1810-338
|
Provide
free helpline counselling to support young people in need
2017/2018
Manurewa Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1806-313
|
Provide
support to youth through the free helpline
2017/2018
Hibiscus and Bays Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,125.00
|
|
|
LG1820-244
|
Supporting
young people in Central auckland
2017/2018
Waitematā Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1809-263
|
Supporting
Young People in South auckland
2017/2018
Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1810-248
|
Supporting
Young People in Manurewa
2017/2018
Manurewa Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,500.00
|
|
|
LG1819-205
|
Youth
Crisis Intervention Support
2017/2018
Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
LG1812-212
|
Youth
Crisis Intervention Support
2017/2018
Ōrākei Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1821-209
|
Youth
Crisis Intervention Support
2017/2018
Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,500.00
|
|
|
LG1811-321
|
Youth
Crisis Intervention Support
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Three - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1807-327
|
Youth
Crisis Intervention Support
2017/2018
Howick Local Grants, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1818-312
|
Provide
helpline support to youth and their families
2017/2018
Waiheke Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$202.00
|
|
|
QR1803-321
|
Provide helpline
support to youth and their families
2017/2018
Franklin Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,552.00
|
|
|
LG1815-220
|
Youthline
Helpline Service Delivery Costs
2017/2018
Puketāpapa Local Grants, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1815-302
|
Provide
free helpline support to youth
2017/2018
Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
QR1817-208
|
Provide
free helpline counselling support to youth
2017/2018
Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,288.00
|
|
|
QR1819-303
|
Provide
support to youth through the free helpline
2017/2018
Waitākere Ranges Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,152.00
|
|
|
QR1801-325
|
Provide
helpline support to youth and their families
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round Three - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1812-220
|
Provide
helpline support to youth and their families
2017/2018
Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,300.00
|
|
|
QR1820-323
|
Supporting
Free Youth Helpline
2017/2018
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Three - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
QR1801-233
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Auckland Central Series
2017/2018
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,676.00
|
|
|
QR1802-224
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Auckland North Series
2017/2018
Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$838.00
|
|
|
QR1809-224
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Auckland South Series
2017/2018
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Project in
progress
|
Approved
$1,616.00
|
|
|
QR1820-221
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Auckland Central Series
2017/2018
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$900.00
|
|
|
QR1806-205
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Auckland North Series
2017/2018
Hibiscus and Bays Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,676.00
|
|
|
QR1815-105
|
Supporting
young people into employment - Central Series
2017/2018
Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$838.00
|
|
|
QR1817-111
|
Supporting
young people into employment
2017/2018
Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,036.00
|
|
|
QR1802-114
|
Supporting
young people into employment
2017/2018
Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,676.00
|
|
|
LG1817-118
|
Supporting
Young people from Auckland North to Thrive
2017/2018
Upper Harbour Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1806-149
|
Supporting
Young people from Auckland North to Thrive
2017/2018
Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
CCS18_1_244
|
Youth Spoken
Word Workshops
Creative
Communities Scheme 18_1 - Central 18_1
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1814-110
|
Supporting
youth from Papakura to Thrive
2017/2018
Papakura Local Grant, Round 1 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1810-121
|
Supporting
young people and their communities to thrive
2017/2018
Manurewa Local Grants, Round One - Review accountability
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
LG1809-110
|
Youth from
Mangere- Otahuhu are engaged and supported to thrive
2017/2018
Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$5,000.00
|
|
|
REGCD18-81
|
Engaging
diverse community participation to empower youth
Regional
Community Development 2017/2018 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1809-314
|
Supporting
local facilities to meet the needs of the community
2017/2018
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round 1 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,996.00
|
|
|
LG1813-125
|
Supporting
South Auckland young people and their community to thrive
2017/2018
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1803-115
|
Supporting
Struggling youth to have better mental health and wellbeing
2017/2018
Franklin Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1820-133
|
Supporting
Waitemata Youth Wellbeing outcomes
2017/2018
Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1705-314
|
Basic
Youth and Community Counselling Volunteer Training Course
Henderson-Massey
Quick Response, Round Three, 2016/17 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,180.00
|
|
|
LG1716-239
|
Mentoring
and support for youth within the Rodney area
Rodney Local
Grants, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1717-406
|
Driving
Lessons for Young people
Upper Harbour
Quick Response, Round Four, 2016/17 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1715-214
|
Youthworker
mentoring and support for Youth within Puketapapa
Puketāpapa
Local Grants, Round Two, 2016/17 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
QR1702-421
|
Driving
Lessons for young people on the North Shore
Devonport-Takapuna
Quick Response, Round Four, 2016/17 - Project in progress
|
Approved
$1,800.00
|
|
|
LG1708-224
|
Driving
Lessons for young people on the North Shore
Kaipātiki Local
Grants, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
REGCD17-52
|
Increase
youth engagement through initiation of online Messenger software
Regional
Community Development 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1702-230
|
Devonport-Takapuna
youth leading initiatives for positive community health outcomes
Devonport-Takapuna
Quick Response, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
QR1712-222
|
Supporting
Orakei youth health, wellbeing and participation
2016/2017
Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
QR1721-232
|
Supporting
Whau youth health, wellbeing and participation
2016/2017
Whau Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1710-215
|
Supporting
Manurewa youth wellbeing and participation
2016/2017
Manurewa Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1701-234
|
Encouraging
Albert-Eden youth to transition into positive, vocal contributors to their
community
2016/2017
Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1716-212
|
Supporting
Rodney youth wellbeing, leadership and participation
Rodney Quick
Response, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1706-213
|
Supporting
Hibiscus and Bays youth wellbeing, leadership and participation
Hibiscus and
Bays Quick Response, Round Two, 2016/2017 - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1720-230
|
Supporting
Waitemata youth health and participation
2016/2017
Waitematā Quick Response, Round Two - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1707-225
|
Supporting
leadership and development of Howick youth
2016/2017
Howick Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted
|
Approved
$3,000.00
|
|
|
QR1707-119
|
Providing
volunteer training to support struggling Howick youth
2016/2017
Howick Quick Response, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1706-112
|
Encouraging
community participation and promoting youth support services at local events
Hibiscus and
Bays Quick Response, Round One, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1719113
|
Promoting
youth support and wellbeing services at local events
2016/2017
Waitakere Ranges Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$1,000.00
|
|
|
LG1716-135
|
Empowering
and supporting Rodney youth to become positive community participants
Rodney Local
Grants, Round One, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1718-105
|
Youth
workers supporting Waiheke youth
Waiheke Quick
Response, Round One, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
QR1703-115
|
Youth
workers supporting Franklin youth safely transition into adulthood
2016/2017
Franklin Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1709-128
|
Management
of youth development services in South Auckland
2016/2017
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Grant, Round One - Acquitted
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
LG1701-123
|
Encouraging
Youth Participation and Volunteering to Build the Albert-Eden Community
2016/2017
Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,000.00
|
|
|
QR1716-110
|
Empowering
Rodney youth to plan for their community’s future
Rodney Quick
Response, Round One, 2016/2017 - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1705-134
|
West
Auckland Youth Advisory Group Facilitation
2016/2017
Henderson-Massey Local Grants - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
LG1712-116
|
Supporting
Orakei youth to have a voice and build resilience
2016/2017
Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Declined
|
Declined
$0.00
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-226
|
|
|
Chinese Conservation
Education Trust
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: NZ
Chinese Environmental Education Programme
|
|
|
Location:
|
Panmure Basin and Point England
|
|
|
Summary:
|
To run a series of events with the following aims:
• To
educate local Chinese residents about the history of Panmure Basin (including
Maori settlement) and to foster a sense of belonging through a connection
with the area.
• To
promote the conservation and awareness of the urban shag colony in Panmure
Basin; including education workshops on responsible fishing behaviours that
will reduce the risks to these birds.
• To
conduct a beach clean-up at Point England with local Chinese residents and
other community members, as well as an opportunity to learn about the life
cycle of rare NZ dotterels/Pied Stilt and how residents can mitigate their
impact on native shorebirds.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
01/02/2019 - 30/06/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
4
|
People reached:
|
200 but can reach out to over 20,000 through our articles on the
Chinese medias & CCET's social medias
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
We will promote our activities on the Community news sections on
Chinese Newspapers, Chinese TV, Chinese website :Skykiwi and also on all our
social medias. We will also promote the activities in Maungakiekie Tamaki
Local Board Libraries, CAB, local newspaper.
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
The Chinese Conservation & Education Trust along with the Tamaki
Estuary Environmental Forum identified a strong need to enhance the awareness
and participation of local Chinese residents in environmental issues. This
ethnic group comprises over a quarter of the population in
Maungakiekie-Tamaki ward, however they are frequently excluded from
environmental initiatives through communication barriers. We aim to address
these problems through a community-led platform that will encourage Chinese
residents to become active participants in environmentally-friendly
behaviours and community programmes. No one else that we are aware of is
undertaking this work and through CCET we have the best outreach into this
community.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
1. Our primary
outcome is to build community spirit and harmony through fostering a sense of
stewardship/kaitiakitanga for the environment – focusing in particular,
on the Tamaki Estuary. Local Chinese will be encouraged to engage in
environmental initiatives that will promote the healthy ecology of the
waterways, terrestrial habitats, and the protection of our threatened
shorebird species.
2. To improve Chinese
residents’ understanding of ecology, water quality, and conservation
within a New Zealand context; this will help NZ Chinese to connect more with
the wider community and share in the responsibilities of keeping our
environment clean and green.
3. To educate Chinese
fishers on environmentally-responsible fishing behaviours that will mitigate
their impact on threatened shorebirds – especially shags. Chinese
residents enjoy fishing around the Tamaki Estuary, however sometimes their
practices have a negative impact on shorebirds (e.g. consume hooks). By
raising the awareness of important taonga species (like the shags) within the
Chinese community we hope to improve their fishing experience, protect birds
more effectively, and ease tensions within the wider community re appropriate
fishing practices.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
putting people first - People are cared for and
enabled to participate, celebrate and contribute to the community
The Chinese community in Maungakiekie-Tamaki Ward comprises
approximately one quarter of the population, with that number set to rise as
immigration continues. This minority group - although a significant component
of the community - often gets inadvertently excluded from
environmental/ecological activities and discussions and is subsequently
unable to participate or contribute to these issues. This is largely due to
communicative barriers and a poor baseline understanding of environmental
issues that affect our city.
This project serves to celebrate our Chinese community by helping
them to understand some of the environmental issues that affect the Tamaki
Estuary and Panmure/Point England area. By ‘Putting People First’
we will be able to encourage Chinese residents to actively engage with
environmental initiatives, build interest in our fauna, and adopt
eco-friendly behaviours that will help mitigate anthropogenic impacts on the
local waterways and terrestrial habitats. It is important that as a community
we champion the smaller ethnic groups to take on environmental challenges,
because only together can we make real change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
Tamaki Estuary Environmental Forum
|
Project support and coordination
|
|
|
Corina (Pam Howlett’s Cormorant Sanctuary
|
Education (shags)
|
|
|
Shaun Lee (Forest & Bird rep)
|
Education (shorebirds)
|
|
|
Clair Hobi (Conservation Volunteers NZ)
|
Rubbish Clean Ups
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori focus - tikanga (practises),
mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language)
Many Chinese residents have a poor understanding of Maori culture and
customs, this is largely due to the limited exposure they have to indigenous
culture in day-to-day life. This project meets Local Board criteria by:
• Providing
Te Reo – Chinese translation of Maori history in the Panmure Basin
area.
• Promoting
key Maori philosophies such as kaitiakitanga and the Maori World View, which
have many crossovers with Chinese belief systems.
• Improving
Chinese residents’ understanding of Maori history in the area.
• Promoting
sustainability messages, with particular emphasis on Maori fisheries
sustainability.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
No -
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
Specific ethnic group Chinese
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
N/A
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Through our workshop events (i.e. Shag Colony Conservation) and the
Point England beach clean up we will be promoting zero waste messages; these
will be put into the context of estuarine ecology and the threats to
shorebirds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$9060.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Facilitators, Transportation, refreshment
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
If we don’t get funding we can’t do this project. We will
amend our plan and do fewer workshops
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$1,200
|
$0
|
$1,000
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
2 bus hires
|
$800
|
|
|
Refreshment
|
$400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
Nil
|
$0
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
TEEF
|
$1,000
|
Approved
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
Loud speaker
|
$200
|
|
video camera
|
$500
|
|
Computer software
|
$200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
200
|
30
|
$4,726.5
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
Applications prior to the 2015/2016
financial year have all been accounted for and omitted from this summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-227
|
|
Country Magic & Friends
Club Incorporated
|
|
Legal status:
|
Incorporated Society
|
Activity focus:
|
Events
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Elvis
in Polynesia
|
|
Location:
|
Onehunga and District R.A.S.A (Inc), The Onehunga Function Centre, 57
Princess Street, Onehunga, Auckland
|
|
Summary:
|
An event paying tribute to commemorate the memory of the worlds'
greatest entertainer Elvis Presely. With our project event we aim to deliver
a family-friendly event that involves all communities, nationalities,
ages and genders. The benefits to our target audience is underpinned by the
Whare Tapa Wha Model of Holistic Health and Wellbeing (Taha tinana (physical
health), Taha wairua (spiritual health), Taha whānau (family health),
Taha hinengaro (mental health).
|
|
Dates:
|
23/02/2019 - 23/02/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
80 people
|
People reached:
|
400 people
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
social media, radio, promotion through other event organizers,
newspaper advertisement, posters, word-of-mouth, event program
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
On the 14 April, 2018 we ran an inaugural event was a Huge Success
with large number of attendance. Our patron, Donna Presley (First cousin to
Elvis Presley) supported our event and encouraged and agreed (including all
those who attended) to create a yearly event. Donna Presley will be attending
the 2019 Event. Our youth and our older adults have also requested for a
repeat show. There have been inquiries from New Zealand, Australia and
England already by tribute artists requesting details of next years event.
Word-of-mouth from other music clubs helped to spread the excitement and
promote our show for next year.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
*RSA - Benefits from patrons attending function, location and
facilities will gain free exposure from holding the event.
Social and cultural interchanges between different age groups and
nationalities
A social event brings the different communities together promoting
social interaction, creates new friendships, physical, spiritual and
emotional pleasure through dance and movement.
Provides a source of income to small businesses who offer their
services and expertise directly involved in setting up the show.
The volunteers are a source of support for the event and gives them a
sense of community involvement and purpose of belonging
Friends and families are directly involved in organizing and
volunteer their time to run the show
Provides a new learning (skills) for judges, collators, scrutineers,
emcee, volunteers, runners and the organizers in how to run a show of this magnitude
and caliber.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
active participation - Our young people are engaged
in the community and have access to a wide range of opportunities
Our project supports the selected priority as it is a family
orientated show, held at an accessible and disability friendly
venue.
Being around other people helps the older person keep a positive
outlook on life and a healthy mental state. For all peoples it reduces social
isolation, reduces depression and promotes movement through physical
activity. Our platform is an opportunity for the selected group to showcase
their learned skills, build better self-esteem, and promote a feeling of
accomplishment. A prestigious event gives people a sense of purpose in their
daily lives, a positive feeling of belonging and contributing to a community.
Socializing and partnering the older adult with our youth helps them to
understand and embrace their similarities and differences, while encouraging
learning about the other group.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori focus - tikanga (practises),
mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language)
We will perform a Wero (a challenge) to our international guest Donna
Presley (our patron)
We will open the show with a karakia (prayer)
We have contestants that are Maori
Our show will be guided by the Tapa Wha Holistic Health and Wellbeing
Model (spiritual, psychological, whanau, physical)
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - There is a lift to access the area where the show will be held
on the 2nd floor of the venue. There are disability toilets, designated
Disability parking, outside ramp for wheelchairs, a ramp access from the hall
to the restaurant area, lots of wheelchair room for wheelchair access inside
and outside of the show venue area, the tables and chairs are
transferable/stack able to make room for wide wheelchairs.
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
An advertisement will be placed in the program to promote Smoke
Cessation. This is consistent with the Tapa Wha Health and Wellbeing Model,
we will make verbal reminders throughout the event about no smoking in
premises.
We will ensure that the 'no smoking signs are displayed around the
venue'
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
Yes, an advertisement will be placed in the program to promote waste
minimisation (zero waste) - in line with the Tapa Wha Health and Wellbeing
Model.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
99%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$13455.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting funding for the full cost of the project please.
Venue hire, trophies, event styling, stage backdrop, opening
entertainment, Music equipment and music engineer, construction of the stage,
Guest artist appearance, Videographer, Photographer, Event stage signage,
Computer consumables, Program booklet and itinerary
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
apply to other organisations for funding well before event date
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
Contestant entry fee $50, Ticket/Door sales $20,
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$11,695.59
|
$3,249.5
|
$0
|
$800
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Venue Hire
|
$1,500
|
|
Trophies
|
$2,535.75
|
|
Stage Backdrop
|
$750
|
|
Drums of the Pacific
|
$700
|
|
Rock Factory Equipment + service
|
$2,047.34
|
|
Guest Artist
|
$800
|
|
Photographer
|
$500
|
|
Video
|
$700
|
|
Elvis Sign
|
$600
|
|
Computer consumables + services
|
$700
|
|
program booklets
|
$862.5
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
registration @ 16
|
$700.5
|
|
door sales @ $20.00
|
$2,049
|
|
raffle sales
|
$500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
Approved
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
n/a
|
$
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
220
|
88
|
$2,000
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
No previous funding history
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-228
|
|
Shakti Asian Women's Centre
Inc.
|
|
Legal status:
|
Incorporated Society, Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Project:
Communities Without Violence
|
|
Location:
|
Onehunga
|
|
Summary:
|
Our Project aims to increase awareness on family violence within
ethnic communities in the Maungakiekie local board area. Especially among new
migrant and refugee women who have settled in the area and are often unaware
of their rights. We will hold 3 dedicated workshops to increase awareness and
discuss topics such as legal rights, safety, parenting in terms of forced and
underage marriage not being acceptable in NZ. We also want to design
multilingual resources (easy to carry leaflet) for participants which
captures important information such as warning signs of violence and how to
seek support.
|
|
Dates:
|
01/03/2019 - 31/12/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
2
|
People reached:
|
100
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
Promotion:
|
We will print posters and distribute them at local libraries, CAB's
and health clinics. We will also advertise in ethnic newspapers and community
newsletters.
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
According to the 2013 census carried out showing the ethnic diversity
in the Maungakiekie local board area, there are just over 16,000 Asian,
African and Middle Eastern residents in the local community. We believe this
number would have and only continue to increase with Auckland becoming
increasingly culturally diverse. From our 22 years of experience in the
Family Violence sector, we have seen the barriers to accessing support
that ethnic migrant and refugee women face, including language, isolation and
social stigma/family shame.Through this project we want to break down the
barriers to access and positive participation in the wider community.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
Increased awareness of family violence.
Another benefit would be the reduction of domestic violence and
family violence within ethnic communities in the Maungakiekie local board
area. Many cases go unreported as women stay in abusive relationships as
there is a great lack of awareness of their rights, the NZ legal system and
culturally competent services available to them. Reaching these women as new
migrants/refugees is an effective way in bridging the gap and detecting
family violence.
We also want to be able to engage other community support agencies in
the Muaungakiekie-Tamaki local board area to create a connected and
integrated response system to family violence and increase prevention and
safety measures.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
a safer community - Our community is a safer place
The project looks at the an approach to foster safer communities and
address family violence before they escalate and result in violence. It
specifically targets vulnerable new migrant and refugee women in the
Maungakiekie local board area who are often unaware of the New Zealand legal
system, their rights and support services available to them. Being equipped
with information will mean that women who were experiencing violence in their
home countries do not see a perpetuation of violence here in New Zealand.
Creating greater understanding of safety and enhancing their ability to live
and thrive in a safe local community.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
No -
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
Specific ethnic group Chinese, Korean, Indian, Other Asian, Middle
Eastern, African
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
We will choose smoke free venues
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
We will use re-cylable cutlery and cups and also promote another one
of our upcycling workshops for participants who attend.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
100%
|
%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
%
|
%
|
10%
|
90%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$4012.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting funding to contribute to the costs of coordinating
and facilitating the workshops as well as creating and printing multi-lingual
resources and materials around family violence awareness for new migrants.
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
If the project can only be part funded, we would need to look at ways
to downsize the project, potentially reducing the number of workshops.
However we do hope the full amount requested could be funded in order to
ensure the project is able to have a greater reach and achieve desired social
outcomes.
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No fees for participants
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$7,392
|
$0
|
$0
|
$3,080
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Venue Hire
|
$513
|
|
Facilitation Koha
|
$150
|
|
Project Coordination
|
$3,080
|
|
Design of brochures
|
$500
|
|
Printing of brochures
|
$299
|
|
Promotional posters design and print
|
$550
|
|
Refreshments
|
$300
|
|
Volunteer Reimbursement
|
$2,000
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
refreshment donations from supermarkets
|
$300
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
220
|
|
$4,521
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
LG1808-207
|
Project
ReachOut: Building community resilience against family violence.
2017/2018
Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$4,000.00
|
|
|
LG1811-220
|
Project
ReachOut: Building community resilience against family violence
2017/2018
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress
|
Approved
$2,500.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-229
|
|
Ellerslie Toy library
|
|
Legal status:
|
Incorporated Society
|
Activity focus:
|
Environment
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
Project: Help
our toy library go paperless!
|
|
Location:
|
7 Harrison Road, Mt Wellington.
|
|
Summary:
|
As a toy library we are continually looking at ways to help the
environment, we model this with the library focus of hiring toys, so our
members purchase less toys, and don't usually purchase toys that aren't going
to be well loved for a long time. Currently we are wanting to go fully
paperless, we need a way for our community volunteers to access the library
database to check in toys and see details of a toy. Without a tablet we will
use approx.. 120 pages of A4 paper a month printing receipts so members can
bring these back to check. With the purchase of a tablet we can bring that
number close to 0.
|
|
Dates:
|
18/12/2018 - 31/05/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
People delivering:
|
3
|
People reached:
|
70 families
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
50%
|
|
Promotion:
|
Will put a post on facebook, saying how we are now paper free thanks
to..... grant.
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
As mentioned above our toy library is always looking for ways to
further help the environment and it seems like a good project for us to look
to.
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
Within our community there will be less paper usage in our toy
library. It will also mean that if we get a grant for this, it is a cost we
do not need to pay for with our toy library budget, so we are able to keep
our membership fees as low as possible, so it is affordable for our community
and we keep our membership numbers at a suitable level.
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
heading towards zero waste
As a toy library we are continually looking at ways to help the
environment, we model this with the library focus of hiring toys, so our
members purchase less toys, and don't usually purchase toys that aren't going
to be well loved for a long time.
Currently we are wanting to go fully paperless, we need a way for our
community volunteers to access the library database to check in toys and see
details of a toy. Without a tablet we will use approx 120 pages of A4 paper a
month printing receipts so members can bring these back to check. With the
purchase of a tablet we can bring that number close to 0.
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
No -
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
As explained above.
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
80%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
Financial information
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$874.00
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
Tablet and laptop.
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
No
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
$874
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
Samsung galaxy tab
|
$391
|
|
Lenovo notebook
|
$483
|
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$0
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
|
$0
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
$0
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
No previous funding history
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Grants, Round Two
LG1911-230
|
|
|
Alcohol Healthwatch Trust
|
|
|
Legal status:
|
Charitable Trust
|
Activity focus:
|
Community
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
None identified
|
|
|
Project: Whanau
Against Alcohol Marketing – off-licence signage community audit
|
|
|
Location:
|
Off-licence premises across Maungakiekie-Tamaki local board area.
Community feedback hui proposed to be held at Panmure Community Hall, 7-13
Pilkington Road, Panmure.
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Alcohol Healthwatch staff will conduct an audit of external signage
at all off-licence premises throughout the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local
Board area, and then assess compliance with relevant regulatory frameworks,
namely the Auckland Signage Bylaw 2015, Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act, and
the Advertising Standards Authority Code for Advertising and Promotion of Alcohol.
Staff will then produce a report detailing compliance and
non-compliance in the Local Board area.
Results will be fed back to Local Board members and community
stakeholders, with a workshop held in the community.
Community members will be empowered to recognise non-compliant
signage (not just for off-licences) and to take appropriate actions to
improve the visual amenity of their neighbourhoods.
|
|
|
Dates:
|
03/12/2018 - 30/06/2019
|
Rain dates:
|
-
|
|
|
People delivering:
|
Three. Nathan Cowie, Health Promotion Advisor at Alcohol
Healthwatch will carry out the bulk of the work conducting the audit,
analysis, and reporting. Dr Grant Hewison, Solicitor for Communities
Against Alcohol Harm will peer-review the audit report. Dr Nicki
Jackson, Executive Director of Alcohol Healthwatch will Chair the community
feedback hui with assistance from Nathan Cowie.
|
People reached:
|
We would be very happy to reach an audience of 30-70 community
stakeholders from across the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Area.
|
|
|
% of participants from Local Board
|
100%
|
|
|
Promotion:
|
Once the data collection and analysis phase of the project is
complete, we will be holding a community hui to disseminate the findings and
encourage community stakeholders to take appropriate action. We will seek
to promote this hui with media coverage in local newspapers and newsletters,
community notice boards, social media advertising targeted to the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Area, emails to community networks, and
making use of any community communication networks available through the
local board.
|
|
|
Community benefits
|
|
|
Identified need:
|
|
|
|
Alcohol advertising is pervasive in New Zealand society. Unlike
for tobacco, there has been little regulatory response to alcohol
advertising. A recent study by University of Otago researchers found
children were exposed to alcohol advertising an average of 4.5 times per day,
in settings including off-licence shop fronts (see Chambers et al 2018).
Travelling around Maungakiekie-Tāmaki it is possible to see alcohol
advertisements adorning signs and windows at licensed premises. Many of
these signs may be non-compliant with the Auckland Council Signage Bylaw
2015. This project intends to test compliance, and empower community
members to take their own actions to reduce the non-compliant signage in
their neighbourhoods.
|
|
|
Identified community outcomes:
|
|
|
|
The first outcome of this project is to establish the degree to which
external signage at off-licence premises do or do not comply with relevant
regulatory frameworks.
The second outcome will be to present the findings to community
stakeholders, and empower those stakeholders to take action on non-compliant
signage identified in the Audit.
The third outcome will be that action is taken by licence holders or
relevant regulatory authorities that results in greater compliance, and thus
a reduction in alcohol advertising, and corresponding improvement in visual
amenity in neighbourhoods.
Fourth, community stakeholders will be empowered and equipped to
identify, and take appropriate actions regarding non-compliant signage at
other locations, such as on-licence and club licence premises, and other
locations.
|
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities:
|
|
|
|
a safer community - Our community is a safer place
Alcohol and drug use has a profound effect on perceptions of
community safety. Maungakiekie-Tāmaki has developed a comprehensive
Alcohol Action Plan, together with a Safety Plan.
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki residents in 2011 identified a number of concerns
with drinking and alcohol, with 79% of residents surveyed feeling that
“violence, assaults, and fighting usually involves drunk people”,
71% agreeing that “we have a problem when it comes to drinking in our
communities”, and 93% of residents thinking “numbers of small
bottle stores are too high”. While it is difficult to reduce the
numbers of off-licences, some communities have had some success in preventing
new bottle stores from opening.
Alcohol outlets in a community give rise to harm through a variety of
mechanisms or pathways. The more that alcohol is available in a community,
the higher its prevalence of hazardous drinking and harm. Secondly, the
clustering of outlets increases competition which can drive prices down and
result in outlets staying open for longer to win the customer purchase.
Thirdly, outlets can be a blight on the community landscape, in particular as
a result of ubiquitous alcohol advertising. Such advertising can also
normalise alcohol in a community, increasing the likelihood that a young
person will start drinking, as well as drinking more heavily. Persons wishing
to remain sober or have alcohol dependencies are also negatively impacted by
an abundance of visual cues in relation to alcohol in their community.
Laws and regulations in New Zealand seek to minimise the harm from
alcohol outlets in a community. For example, Auckland Council has
adopted its Signage Bylaw 2015 which seeks to minimise the harm from physical
alcohol advertising signs. The Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 prohibits
advertising that promotes excessive consumption, and this includes mechanisms
such as advertising discounts of 25% or more. Finally, the Advertising
Standards Authority Code for Advertising and Promotion of Alcohol addresses
the content of individual advertisements, such as those that may appear on
the frontage of bottle stores or on billboards in the community.
We believe that the harm from alcohol can be minimised by ensuring
that alcohol advertising in a community complies with the above codes, bylaws
and legislation. However, we believe that there is a low level of awareness
among the community of these relevant policies and laws.
As such, this project proposes to audit the existing exterior signage
at off-licence premises in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki local board area (Healthspace.ac.nz
reports there were 48 off-licences in 2016), checking each instance of
exterior signage against the above regulatory frameworks, and communicating
the results of the audit back to community stakeholders. Community
stakeholders can then be walked through the process of recognising
non-compliant signage, empowered to contact those responsible for
non-compliant signage, and if necessary making complaints to the appropriate
enforcement bodies.
Reducing the amount of alcohol advertising and promotion in the
community will improve the amenity and good order of the community, and may
have an impact of reducing the normalisation of alcohol in the community, and
give young people (in particular) less encouragement to start drinking, or to
drink heavily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual
|
Role
|
|
|
Communities Against Alcohol Harm / Dr Grant Hewison, Solicitor
|
Peer review
|
|
|
Demographics
|
|
|
Māori outcomes:
|
Māori participation - Māori priority
group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering
New Zealand research demonstrates that Māori children have
exposures to alcohol advertising that are five times greater than European
children (Chambers et al, 2018). In particular, the most common forms of
alcohol advertising exposure among Māori children were alcohol sports
sponsorship and off-licence shopfront advertising. Reducing the harms from
off-licence advertising can therefore have positive, pro-equity outcomes.
|
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities
|
Yes - We will inspect the venue to ensure it has appropriate access
and bathroom facilities for wheelchairs.
|
|
|
Target ethnic groups:
|
All/everyone
|
|
|
Promoting SmokeFree:
|
Our project will not have a direct role in promoting smoke-free
messages in the Local Board area. However, the outcomes of the project can
contribute significantly to enabling a smoke-free Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
community.
This is because alcohol use is closely associated with tobacco use
disorders in New Zealand (Wilson et al, 2012). There is evidence that alcohol
use impedes New Zealander’s quitting and increases the risk of relapse
to smoking.
As such, restrictions around alcohol advertising which lead to
reduced alcohol consumption could in turn contribute to reduced tobacco
smoking. These favourable outcomes could reduce inequities in life expectancy
and morbidity.
|
|
|
Zero waste minimisation
|
No, this project will not be including waste minimisation messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of males targeted
|
Percentage of females targeted
|
All - not targeted male/female
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-5 years
|
< 15 years
|
15-24 years
|
25-44 years
|
45-64 years
|
>65 years
|
All ages
|
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
100%
|
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
Amount requested:
|
$1750.00
|
|
|
Requesting grant for:
|
We are requesting funding for the mileage costs associated with
conducting the audit, design and printing costs for the reports and
factsheets, media communications, koha for peer review, and venue hire and
modest catering for the community hui.
Alcohol Healthwatch will cover the cost of staff salaries, which is
the costliest part of the project.
|
|
|
If part funded, how would you make up the
difference:
|
|
|
Cost of participation:
|
There is no cost of participation for this project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
Total income
|
Other grants approved
|
Applicant contribution
|
|
|
$9,950
|
$0
|
$0
|
$8,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure item
|
Amount
|
|
|
Staff Time
|
$8,200
|
|
|
Mileage approx 250-300kms
|
$200
|
|
|
Design and printing of factsheet and report
|
$900
|
|
|
Media release & publicity
|
$200
|
|
|
Volunteer Koha
|
$200
|
|
|
Catering - community hui
|
$100
|
|
|
Venue hire - community hui
|
$150
|
|
|
Income description
|
Amount
|
|
|
Not applicable
|
$0
|
|
|
Other funding sources
|
Amount
|
Current Status
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Donated materials
|
Amount
|
|
Not applicable
|
$0
|
|
Total number volunteer hours
|
Total number specialised volunteer hours
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
10
|
$200
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Funding history
|
|
|
Application
ID
|
Project
title
Round - Stage
|
Decision
Allocation
|
|
|
No previous funding history
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Trial of Online Voting at the 2019 Local
Elections
File No.: CP2018/20801
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
seek local board feedback on:
· the
trial of online voting at the 2019 local elections
· the
subset of voters to participate in the online voting trial.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
postal system is declining. The frequency of postal deliveries is decreasing
and the cost of sending mail is surging. An alternative method to postal voting
must be put in place to secure the future of local democracy over time.
Following the overall trend of transactions and activities moving online,
online voting is the natural progression. It will increase convenience and accessibility
for voters and has the potential to increase voter turnout.
3. Following
the 24 May 2018 Governing Body’s in-principle support for an online
voting trial at the 2019 local body elections, Auckland Council has entered
into a collaborative agreement with eight other councils to work together
towards the trial.
4. The
project comprises three phases. The first phase, from now to December 2018,
includes a procurement process aimed at selecting a preferred provider and all
participating councils, seeking their Governing Body’s approval to
proceed with the trial based on a full business case.
5. The
security of the online voting solution is paramount. The participating councils
are committed to offering a similar or higher level of security than postal
voting. The solution will fulfil stringent security requirements and will be
designed, implemented and tested with the assistance from external Information
and Communications Technology (ICT) security experts.
6. In
the case of Auckland Council, only a specified class of electors (a subset)
will be offered to participate in the online voting trial. The other eight
councils are intending to offer online voting to all their voters. In all
cases, voters will retain the ability to vote by post.
7. The
Local Electoral Matters Bill states that the specified class of electors can be
defined according to one or a combination of geographical areas or another
common factor, like overseas residence or disability.
8. The
size of the subset is still to be confirmed by the Minister of Local
Government, but will likely include between 10 and 30 per cent of
Auckland’s voting population.
9. The
subset needs to be representative of the overall voting population. Staff have
conducted an analysis of the population across the 21 local board areas based
on a range of criteria. The preliminary results (refer Attachments A and B)
show that no individual area is perfectly representative and that a combination
of several areas will increase the representativeness of the sample of
electors.
10. Staff
recommend also including in the subset, the voters that are most
disproportionately impacted in their ability to participate with the sole
postal method, i.e. the overseas and disabled voters.
11. This paper
seeks local board feedback on the participation of Auckland Council in the
trial and on the subset of voters eligible to participate in the trial.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) provide
feedback on:
i) the
trial of online voting at the 2019 elections
ii) the
subset of voters to participate in the trial.
|
Horopaki / Context
12. For several
years, Auckland Council has been supportive of trialling online voting for
local body elections. At its December 2016 meeting, the Finance and Performance
Committee resolved to ‘request the Minister of Local Government to
explore a pilot trial of an electronic voting system including
by-elections’ [resolution number FIN/2016/164].
13. On 27 July
2017, the Governing Body approved the council’s submission on the
previous parliament’s Justice and Electoral Select Committee inquiry into
the 2016 local authority elections (which has not concluded yet). The
submission advocated for councils to be able to trial online voting [resolution
number GB/2017/83]. Local boards provided feedback and input into the
submission, with several boards expressing support for online voting.
14. At its 24 May
2018 meeting, the Governing Body agreed in principle to an online voting trial
for the 2019 local body elections, subject to the following conditions:
· the
costs being acceptable
· the
legislation and regulations being in place on time
· identified
risks being manageable
· the
council giving its final approval to proceed.
15. The Local
Electoral Matters Bill, which amends the Electoral Act 1993 and the Local
Electoral Act 2001 to enable the conduct of trials of new voting methods is
still before Parliament. Councillor Richard Hills and staff made an oral
presentation to the Justice Select Committee on Auckland Council’s
submission on the bill on 29 August 2018. The select committee is due to report
back on 9 November 2018.
16. The enabling
regulations are being drafted. The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA)
released an exposure draft of the regulations on 19 October 2018, which is open
for consultation until 2 November 2018. Two engagement events for community
representatives and stakeholders have been organised in Wellington on 26
October 2018 and Auckland on 31 October 2018.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Why online voting?
Future-proofing local democracy
17. The
internet has become an integral part of everyday life. Many of the transactions
that used to be carried out by post have long been replaced by online options,
to the extent that people expect online facilities for their day-to-day
activities. Online voting is therefore a natural progression and constitutes an
opportunity to modernise the operation of local democracy in New Zealand.
18. The
current postal voting method relies entirely on New Zealand Post providing an
effective and reliable service. It is a reality that the postal service is
declining. Fewer New Zealanders choose to communicate via post, particularly
first time and younger voters, many of whom have never posted a letter.
19. The
frequency of delivery is decreasing and the cost of sending mail is surging.
The postal cost for the 2019 Auckland local elections will increase by an
estimated 77 per cent compared with 2016, because of a postage price increase
of almost 60 per cent and an increase in the number of electors of
approximately 70,000.
20. It will
become increasingly difficult to deliver postal voting effectively and
affordably. Therefore, it is crucial to have a viable alternative to postal
voting in place, and online voting is the obvious choice.
Online voting has the potential to increase voter turnout
21. Voter turnout
has been dropping in both national and local elections in New Zealand. In the
Auckland 2016 local elections, the voter turnout was 38.5 per cent. This means
that almost two out of three eligible electors did not vote.
22. Online voting
has the potential to enhance participation in elections. Auckland Council
conducted voter awareness research after the 2016 local elections[1]. The results
strongly indicate that if online voting was available, electors would be more
inclined to vote.
23. When asked
‘If you had the choice of online voting or postal voting in the future,
which would you prefer?’, 74 per cent of the respondents across all age
groups in the 2016 survey said they would prefer online voting to postal
voting. Focusing on the non-voter group alone, 82 per cent of respondents said
they would prefer online voting to postal voting and 25 per cent said online or
app-based voting would make them more likely to vote.
24. The results
reflect an appetite for online voting, particularly when faced with the
inconvenience of postal voting: 13 per cent of non-voters (4 per cent of all
respondents) completed voting papers but did not post them. Factors such as not
knowing where to find a post box, the additional effort of physically taking
papers to a post box and the confusion caused by the postal deadline and the
actual close of the voting period a few days later, created further barriers to
voter participation. Removing these barriers alone would potentially have
pushed the overall voter participation in Auckland’s 2016 local elections
from 38.5 per cent to 42.5 per cent.
25. International
experience and research demonstrates the positive effect that online voting can
have on voter turnout. Some non-voters and infrequent voters are drawn to
internet voting in Canada and European countries such as Estonia and
Switzerland. This means that some electors who have not voted previously voted
for the first time, or on a more regular basis, because online voting was an
option.
26. In Estonian
parliamentary elections, turnout has increased by 2.3 per cent since online
voting was introduced in 2005. Post-election surveys in Estonia show a large
proportion of people indicated they wouldn’t have voted if online voting
wasn’t offered.
27. At the
municipal level in Canada, researchers examining online voting over time found
that internet voting increased voter turnout by 3.5 per cent.
28. The
introduction of electronic voting for overseas military voters in various
United States (US) jurisdictions has resulted in significant improvements
in turnout. In Cook County, one of the largest electoral jurisdictions in the
US, turnout increased from 11 per cent to 53 per cent after the introduction of
internet voting in 2012.
Online voting improves accessibility
29. Currently, a
large part of the disability community requires support to complete and post
voting papers.
People
with vision impairment, for example, cannot vote secretly and without the
assistance of a support person. Online voting, coupled with screen-reading technology,
would allow them to vote unaided.
30. International
postal timeframes can make it difficult for overseas voters to submit their
votes in time. For them as well, online voting would make it easier to
participate in the New Zealand local elections.
Online voting offers a better voting experience
31. Online voting
will make the voting process easier and faster, increase the speed and accuracy
of results and reduce costs of local elections over time.
32. Estonia,
where online voting has been used in elections from 2005 and is now well
established nationwide, has attempted to quantify the efficiency gain for using
online voting as opposed to booth voting. It calculated that, in the Estonian
parliamentary elections of 2011, the cumulative time savings in online voting
were 11,000 working days, or €504,000 ($890,000) in average wages.[2]
33. Online voting
offers the potential to reduce voter errors. Technology can help prevent a
voter from accidentally spoiling their ballot or submitting an incorrect or invalid
vote.
34. International
experience suggests that a real tangible benefit of online voting is to
substantially improve the voting experience of voters, making it more
convenient to vote when, where and how they want.
35. Online voting
also offers potential for greater information and engagement. It provides
end-to-end verifiability so that a voter is able to verify that their vote was
received. These benefits will improve the experience of those who were already
intending to vote and has the potential of addressing some of the barriers for
non-voters.
Booth voting is not a viable option
36. Booth voting
is provided for in the Local Electoral Act 2001 and is authorised under
regulations. However, reverting to booth voting on a single election day as an
alternative or complementary option to postal voting is not a viable solution.
37. Election day
is increasingly losing its meaning for people as they want the convenience to
vote when it suits them, as shown by the growth in advance voting in recent
years’ general elections, with a significant 47 per cent of advance
voting at the 2017 general election compared with 29 per cent in 2014 and 15
per cent in 2011.[3]
38. A third
argument against using booth voting for local elections is the complexity of
the local election voting process. Compared with parliamentary elections,
voting in local government elections takes more thought and more time, making
booth voting impractical.
39. In Auckland
for instance, electors need to vote for the Mayor, one or two councillors for
their ward, between five and eight local board members, as well as District
Health Board (DHB) members and, in some cases, licensing trust members. Using
an actual example from the 2016 local elections, a Waitākere
Ward/Henderson-Massey Local Board elector had to make a choice between 74
candidates standing for 21 positions, as follows:
· Mayor:
19 candidates for one position
· Waitākere
Ward: nine candidates for two positions
· Henderson-Massey
Local Board: 24 candidates for eight positions
· Waitākere
Licensing Trust (Ward 2): six candidates for three positions
· Waitematā
DHB: 16 candidates for seven positions.
Making the trial happen
40. To organise
the trial, Auckland Council is partnering with eight other councils. They are
Gisborne District Council, Marlborough District Council, Matamata-Piako
District Council, Palmerston North City Council, Selwyn District Council,
Hamilton City Council, Tauranga City Council and Wellington City Council.
41. The nine
councils have obtained in-principle political and executive approval to trial
online voting at the 2019 elections, have formally entered into a participation
agreement and have formed an Online Voting Working Party.
42. The working
party is working closely with the DIA to ensure the necessary legislative and
regulatory framework is in place on time to enable the proposed trial in 2019.
43. The working
party is following a three-phase approach to organise the trial, as detailed
below.
Phase 1 – July to December 2018
44. The working
party is currently developing a business case, which will define the scope and
costs of the proposed trial, and explain how any risks to the security and
integrity of the solution will be managed. The business case will also outline
how the nine councils will share the costs of the trial.
45. As part of
the business case development, the working party issued a request for a
proposal to potential suppliers in September 2018. Responses are being
evaluated by a panel of representatives from the working party and ICT experts.
A preferred provider will be selected by mid-November 2018.
46. Based on the
business case, the governing bodies of the nine councils will be asked to
confirm their participation in the trial in December 2018.
47. In the case
of Auckland Council, the business case and paper seeking the approval of the
Governing Body will be presented at the 13 December 2018 meeting and will
include feedback from local boards.
48. During this phase, the participating councils are also engaging with
the parties that will be involved in the trial, including regional
councils, DHBs and licensing trusts. Auckland Council staff have started
engaging with representatives from all Auckland DHBs and licensing trusts.
Overall, their reaction to the trial has been positive but the additional costs
will ultimately be a decisive factor in securing their support.
Phase 2 – January to ‘go/no-go’ date
49. After
the list of participating councils has been confirmed, the councils will enter
into an agreement with the provider and start developing the
online voting solution.
50. The
trial can only proceed if the regulatory framework is in place on time,
otherwise there will be insufficient time to be ready by October 2019. The
working party and the supplier will agree the date by which regulations need to
be in place for the trial to proceed – the ‘go/no‑go’
date.
51. If
the decision is ‘no-go’, the working party will negotiate with the
supplier how to proceed. Options will be to either continue to develop a system
to use for any by-elections, or shelve the work for a future trial.
Phase 3 – ‘Go’ date to October 2019
52. If
regulations are in place on time, phase 3 will include:
· development,
testing and audit of the online voting solution
· deployment
of the solution for the elections
· evaluation
of the trial after the elections.
How it will work in practice
53. Full details
of how the online solution will work and how it will integrate with the election
providers’ systems to ensure the integrity of the whole election process
is maintained will only be available once the tender process is completed and a
vendor has been selected.
54. The chart
below provides an overview of the experience of an elector choosing to cast
their vote online:
Security and integrity
55. No
information technology (IT) or voting system is 100 per cent secure, but the
Online Voting Working Party is committed to developing an online voting
solution that will guarantee a similar or higher level of security than
currently offered by postal voting.
56. The request
for proposal to vendors includes stringent requirements to ensure that the
integrity and security of the online voting solution will be maintained at all
times.
57. The solution
will be independently audited by international IT security experts.
58. The
participating councils are assisted by the former Chief Information Officer for
the New South Wales Electoral Commission, which has been using online voting in
their state elections, as well as ICT security experts from the Government
Chief Digital Office. The participating councils have also enlisted additional
external ICT security resources to assist with the evaluation of the
vendors’ proposals and, in a later stage, with the design, implementation
and testing of the online voting solution.
Selecting a subset of electors eligible to vote online
Why a subset, and what subset
59. Any new
voting system must meet the test of being free, fair and regular, provide for
universal, equal and secret suffrage, and be fully trusted by voters. It
therefore needs to be robustly tested and trialled.
60. A trial will
also increase public awareness of online voting and enable users to become
familiar with the new technology, thereby building trust and credibility in the
system. Building trust and gaining support is one of the most critical parts of
the process. Without trust, the system will be unusable, and the integrity of
the whole electoral system could be called into question.
61. The
Government considers that trialling online voting for the whole Auckland
electorate, equalling approximately a third of the New Zealand electorate, is
too big a risk. Auckland Council will only be allowed to trial online voting
with a specified class of electors (a subset). Choosing a representative sample
of eligible voters is therefore important to ensure that evaluation of the
trial is robust.
62. The other eight
councils participating in the trial intend to offer online voting to all their
voters. In all cases, voters will retain the ability to vote by post.
63. The
Local Electoral Matters Bill states that it is the regulations that will
authorise the use of online voting by a specified class of elector for the
trial. The bill defines a class of electors as:
· an
area or subdivision in which the specified class of electors is eligible to
vote, or
· any
other characteristic that makes online voting suitable for the specified class
of electors.
64. The
recommendation to the Governing Body will be to ask the Government that the
subset of Auckland electors eligible to vote online be made of:
· overseas
voters
· people
with a disability
· voters
in specific local board areas.
Selection parameters for the subset
Size
65. The first
consideration for defining the subset is its size. The subset should be of
reasonable size for implementation and risks to be manageable, but significant
enough to enable testing, research and a robust evaluation.
66. The initial
thinking presented to the Governing Body was to include in the sample
approximately 110,000 voters, or 10 per cent of the voting population.
Estimating the potential uptake based on overseas experience with online
voting, it is believed a maximum of 30 per cent of voters within the
subset would actually use the solution and vote online. This means an online
voting solution would be built for a potential 33,000 voters using the
solution; only 3 per cent of the overall Auckland electorate.
67. It is now
being considered to increase the size of the subset to approximately 330,000
voters, or 30 per cent of the voting population. With the same estimated uptake
of 30 per cent, approximately 99,000 voters would use the online voting
solution; about 9 per cent of the overall Auckland electorate.
68. Confirmation
is pending from the DIA as to how large a subset the Minister of Local
Government would allow Auckland Council to include in the trial.
69. For
comparison purposes, the other larger participating councils are the Wellington
city and Hamilton city councils, with respectively an approximate 153,000 and
103,000 voters eligible to participate in the online voting trial.
Accessibility
70. It is
considered the trial should benefit those who are most disproportionately
impacted in their ability to participate with the single postal method.
Therefore, it is recommended having overseas and disabled voters as part of the
subset. This group constitutes an estimated 30,000 voters.
71. Because
overseas and disabled voters will be enrolled across the Auckland region, they
will potentially vote online for all the wards and local boards.
Representativeness
72. The subset
must be defined in such a way that it cannot call into question the neutrality
and integrity of the electoral process or of the elections results.
73. It needs to
be representative of the Auckland voting population, based on a range of
criteria that correlate with voter turnout. These include:
· age
· ethnicity
· income
· education
level.
74. Having a
representative sample will also help conduct a more robust evaluation of the
trial.
Other considerations
75. The cost and
ease of implementation of the solution must also be considered. The more voters
take part in the trial, the higher the cost. Offering online voting as an option
to a subset of electors will also require a targeted communication campaign. A
complex subset will make communication and logistics costlier and has the
potential to confuse voters. Therefore, it is preferable to avoid geographical
areas where the boundaries between wards and local boards are no longer
aligned, following the review of representation arrangements which is to be
implemented for the 2019 local elections.
76. It was
considered whether internet accessibility needed to be a criterion. The most
recent data available, which comes from the State of the Internet report
released by Internet New Zealand in 2017, shows that 93 per cent of New
Zealanders have access to the internet, either at home, work or both.
Therefore, it is not a belief that internet accessibility will be an issue for
Auckland, except for Great Barrier Island.
Selecting the geographic area(s)
77. The
council’s Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU) has conducted in-depth
statistical analysis of the population across Auckland’s 21 local boards.
The analysis compares the population in each local board area against the
overall Auckland population using age, ethnicity, income and qualification
levels. The results of the analysis are included in Attachments A and B.
78. The analysis
considered the average voter turnout in each area compared to Auckland overall,
but this added parameter did not impact the results, so it was removed from the
graphs provided for simplicity purposes.
79. The analysis
shows that certain local board areas have a more diverse population make up
than others, and that no single board is perfectly representative of the
overall Auckland population. The subset will therefore need to be made up of a
combination of local board areas, allowing larger discrepancies to cancel each
other out and making the sample representative as a whole.
80. The final
combination will depend on the total number of voters allowed in the subset and
will be finalised once DIA confirms that number.
81. The final
recommendation on the subset will be presented to the Governing Body at its
13 December 2018 meeting. As part of this paper, local board feedback is
being sought on the possibility of this local board area being included in the
final subset, to be reported to the Governing Body when they are considering
the final recommendation.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe / Local impacts and local board views
82. Trialling
online voting will impact elections in all local boards areas.
83. Local board
feedback will be reported to the Governing Body for consideration when making
its final decision regarding the selection of the subset and the continued
participation in the trial.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
84. Voting
turnout has historically been lower among Māori than non-Māori.
Māori who are younger and less well-off are the least likely to vote.
85. Findings from
a recent qualitative research project focusing on Pacific and Māori
revealed that online voting was popular among a large majority of participants.
Participants did not express concerns about online voting and some saw the
solution as more secure than postal voting.
86. A
representative sample of the Auckland Māori population will be included in
the subset to participate in the trial as Māori ethnicity is one of the
criteria used to choose the geographic subset.
87. At this
stage, no formal engagement has been conducted with Māori groups and
community. Staff will engage with communities and stakeholders, including
Māori, as part of the development of an online voting system should a
trial be confirmed to proceed for the 2019 local elections.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
88. The full
costs of implementing an online voting solution will be known after the tender
process is completed and a vendor selected.
89. The budget
for the online voting trial is not included in the long-term plan and will
require approval from the Governing Body, as the financial decisions relating
to election costs is part of its responsibilities. A business case detailing
the costs and benefits of participating in the trial will be presented to the
Governing Body at its 13 December 2018 meeting.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
90. Risks and
mitigation measures are covered in the analysis section of this paper.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
91. Feedback from
the local boards will be reported to the meeting of the Governing Body on
13 December 2018.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Local board population analysis
|
171
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Elodie Fontaine - Advisor - Democracy Services
|
|
Authorisers
|
Marguerite Delbet - General Manager Democracy Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Local Government Elections 2019 - order
of names on voting documents
File No.: CP2018/22175
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
provide feedback to the Governing Body on how names should be arranged on the
voting documents for the Auckland Council 2019 elections.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
Local Electoral Regulations 2001 provide a local authority the opportunity to
decide by resolution whether the names on voting documents are arranged in:
· alphabetical order of surname
· pseudo-random order
· random order.
3. Pseudo-random
order means names are listed in a random order, and the same random order is
used on every voting document.
4. Random
order means names are listed in a random order and a different random order is
used on every voting document.
5. The
order of names has been alphabetical for the 2010, 2013 and 2016 Auckland
Council elections. An analysis conducted on these election results shows there
is no compelling evidence that candidates being listed first were more likely
to be elected. The analysis is contained in Attachment A.
6. Staff
recommend that the current approach of alphabetical printing is retained for
the 2019 council elections, as the benefits to the voter outweigh any
perception of a name order bias problem.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board:
a) recommend to the Governing Body that candidate names on voting
documents should be arranged in alphabetical order of surname.
|
Horopaki / ContextOptions available
7. Clause
31 of The Local Electoral Regulations 2001 states:
(1) The
names under which each candidate is seeking election may be arranged on the
voting document in alphabetical order of surname, pseudo-random order, or
random order.
(2) Before
the electoral officer gives further public notice under section 65(1) of the
Act, a local authority may determine, by a resolution, which order, as set out
in subclause (1), the candidates' names are to be arranged on the voting
document.
(3) If
there is no applicable resolution, the candidates' names must be arranged in
alphabetical order of surname.
(4) If
a local authority has determined that pseudo-random order is to be used, the
electoral officer must state, in the notice given under section 65(1) of the
Act, the date, time, and place at which the order of the candidates' names will
be arranged and any person is entitled to attend.
(5) In
this regulation,—
pseudo-random
order means an arrangement where—
(a) the order of the names of the
candidates is determined randomly; and
(b) all voting documents use that order
random order means an arrangement where the order of the names of the candidates
is determined randomly or nearly randomly for each voting document by, for
example, the process used to print each voting document.
Previous elections
8. In
2013, the council resolved to use alphabetical order of names. A key
consideration was an additional cost of $100,000 if the council chose the
random order.
9. In
2016, there was only a minimal additional cost to use random order due to
changes in printing technology. An analysis of the 2013 election results was
conducted to assess whether there were any effects due to being listed first.
The analysis showed there was no compelling evidence of bias towards those listed
first. Most local board feedback was to continue listing candidates
alphabetically and the Governing Body resolved to use alphabetical order.
10. All
district health boards (DHBs) in the Auckland Council area decided to use
random order of names. In the voting pack that Auckland electors received,
voting documents for Auckland Council elections were alphabetical and voting
documents for district health board elections were random.
11. The
following table shows the order decided by city and regional councils for the
2016 elections:
|
Auckland Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Hawke's Bay
Regional Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Invercargill City
Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Manawatu-Wanganui
Regional Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Northland
Regional Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Southland
Regional Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Taranaki Regional
Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Upper Hutt City
Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
West Coast
Regional Council
|
Alphabetical
|
|
Bay of Plenty
Regional Council
|
Random
|
|
Christchurch City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Dunedin City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Canterbury
Regional Council
|
Random
|
|
Hamilton City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Hutt City Council
|
Random
|
|
Napier City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Nelson City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Otago Regional
Council
|
Random
|
|
Palmerston North
City Council
|
Random
|
|
Porirua City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Tauranga City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Waikato Regional
Council
|
Random
|
|
Wellington City
Council
|
Random
|
|
Wellington
Regional Council
|
Random
|
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Options for 2019
Pseudo-random order and random order
12. Random
order printing removes the perception of name order bias, but the pseudo-random
order of names simply substitutes a different order for an alphabetical order.
Any perceived first-name bias will transfer to the name at the top of the
pseudo-random list. The only effective alternative to alphabetical order is
random order.
13. A
disadvantage to both the random printing options is voter confusion, as it is
not possible for the supporting documents (such as the directory of candidate
profile statements) to follow the order of a random voting paper. Making voting
more difficult carries the risk of deterring the voter from taking part.
Alphabetical order
14. The
advantage of the alphabetical order printing is that it is familiar and easier
to use and understand. When there is a large number of candidates competing for
a position, it is easier for a voter to find the candidate the voter wishes to
support if names are listed alphabetically.
15. It
is also easier for a voter if the order of names on the voting documents
follows the order of names in the directory of candidate profile statements
accompanying the voting document. The directory is listed in alphabetical
order. It is not possible to print it in such a way that each copy aligns with
the random order of names on the accompanying voting documents.
16. The
disadvantage of alphabetical printing is that there is some documented
evidence, mainly from overseas, of voter bias to those at the top of a voting
list.
Analysis of previous election results
17. An
analysis of the council’s election results for 2010, 2013 and 2016 is
contained in Attachment A. It shows that any bias to those at the top of the
voting lists is very small. The analysis looked at:
· impact on vote share (did the candidate at the top of the list
receive more votes than might be expected?)
· impact on election outcome (did being at the top of list result in
the candidate being elected more often than might be expected?).
18. The
analysis shows that for local boards, being listed first increased a
candidate’s vote share by approximately 1 percentage point above that
which would be statistically expected if voting was random. There was no
detectable impact of being listed first on the share of votes received in ward
elections.
19. There
is no compelling evidence that candidates being listed first were more likely
to be elected in the last three elections.
20. Staff
recommend that the current approach of alphabetical printing is retained for
the 2019 council elections, as the noted benefits to the voter outweigh any
perception of a name order bias problem that statistical analysis of previous
election results show does not exist.
Online voting
21. Auckland
Council intends to offer online voting to specified classes of electors for the
2019 elections, which is the subject of a separate report on this agenda. An
online voting solution has the potential to improve the voting experience, even
if names are ordered randomly.
22. Online
voting should present the same voting document to users as the paper
equivalent. If names are in random order on the voting document, then the same
random order will need to be presented to the online user. This could increase
the complexity of the voting solution.
23. On
balance, staff consider that alphabetical order of names is preferable for an
online voting trial.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe / Local impacts and local board views
24. Feedback
from local boards will be reported to the Governing Body when the Governing
Body is asked to determine the matter by resolution.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
25. The
order of names on voting documents does not specifically impact on the Māori community. It is noted that
candidates can provide their profile statements both in English and Māori.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
26. There are no
financial implications associated with the options for order of names.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
27. If names are
ordered alphabetically, there is the risk of perceived bias. If names are
randomised, there is the risk of increasing the complexity of the voting
experience and deterring voters. The statistical analysis that has been
conducted shows that the risk of bias is very small.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
28. The feedback
from the local board will be reported to the Governing Body.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Order of names for voting documents
|
177
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Warwick McNaughton - Principal Advisor - Democracy
Services
|
|
Authorisers
|
Marguerite Delbet - General Manager Democracy Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Auckland Regional Pest Management Plan
consultation feedback and recommended changes
File No.: CP2018/21012
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
receive a summary of consultation feedback from local board residents on the
Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan, and to provide feedback on recommended
changes to the document.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Auckland
Council is currently developing a new Regional Pest Management Plan. This plan
is prepared under the Biosecurity Act 1993, and describes the pest plants,
animals and pathogens that will be managed in Auckland. It provides a framework
to minimise the spread and impact of those pests and manage them through a
regional approach. Once operative, the Regional Pest Management Plan will
provide a regulatory framework to support the council’s biosecurity
activities, including those funded through the natural environment targeted
rate.
3. The
Proposed Regional Pest Management plan was approved for public consultation by
the Environment and Community Committee in November 2017 (resolution numbers
ENV/2017/161 to ENV/2017/167) and consulted on in February and March 2018
alongside the Long-term Plan 2018-2028.
4. A
workshop was held with the board on 18 September 2018 to discuss the
consultation feedback and proposed staff responses.
5. Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board residents provided 51 submissions on the plan, representing four
per cent of overall submissions. The views of local board residents were
similar to regional views, with high levels of support across all topics
excluding the addition of cats as a pest. The extent of cat
control resulting from the plan is likely to be less extensive than the
concerns noted in many submissions. Staff are exploring options to mitigate
submitter concerns in the wording of the final plan.
6. This
report requests the board’s formal feedback on recommended changes to the
Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan arising from key submission themes.
Submission themes and corresponding changes are summarised in Attachment A.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
a summary of consultation feedback from Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board
residents on the Proposed Auckland Regional Pest Management Plan.
b) provide
feedback on the recommended changes to the Proposed Regional Pest Management
Plan based on consultation feedback.
|
Horopaki / Context
7. Auckland
Council is currently reviewing its 2007 Regional Pest Management Strategy. The
new Regional Pest Management Plan will prescribe council’s approach to
pest management to reflect best practice and changes to various pest plants and
animals in the Auckland region. The review is also in direct response to, and
compliant with, the National Policy Direction for Pest Management 2015.
8. The
review of the Regional Pest Management Plan began with an issues and options
paper discussed with elected members, followed by a public discussion document
which was used as a basis for engagement with mana whenua, stakeholders and
elected members.
9. At
its November 2017 meeting, the Environment and Community Committee approved the
proposed Regional Pest Management Plan for public consultation alongside the
Long-term Plan 2018-2028 (resolution numbers ENV/2017/161 to ENV/2017/167).
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
10. Consultation
on the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan took place in February to March
2018 alongside consultation on the Long-term Plan and other statutory planning
documents. A total of 1,262 submissions were received, which represents a
significant increase on the approximately 400 submissions that were received on
the 2015 discussion document. The breakdown by submission type is shown in
Table 1 below.
Table 1: Proposed Regional Pest
Management Plan breakdown by submission type (Auckland-wide)
|
Submission type
|
Number of submissions
|
Percentage of submissions
|
|
Online form
|
1035
|
82%
|
|
Hardcopy form
|
183
|
15%
|
|
Non-form (e.g. email, letter)
|
44
|
3%
|
11. Of the 1,262
submissions received, 23 were pro-forma submissions from Forest and Bird. The
number of submissions received by local board area is shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Breakdown of Proposed Regional
Pest Management Plan submissions by local board area
|
Local board
|
Number of
submitters
|
Percentage of
submitters
|
|
Albert-Eden
|
116
|
9%
|
|
Devonport-Takapuna
|
53
|
4%
|
|
Franklin
|
50
|
4%
|
|
Great Barrier
|
24
|
2%
|
|
Henderson-Massey
|
46
|
4%
|
|
Hibiscus and
Bays
|
85
|
7%
|
|
Howick
|
52
|
4%
|
|
Kaipātiki
|
98
|
8%
|
|
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu
|
17
|
1%
|
|
Manurewa
|
18
|
1%
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
|
51
|
4%
|
|
Ōrākei
|
64
|
5%
|
|
Ōtara-Papatoetoe
|
7
|
1%
|
|
Papakura
|
21
|
2%
|
|
Puketāpapa
|
12
|
1%
|
|
Rodney
|
162
|
13%
|
|
Upper Harbour
|
41
|
3%
|
|
Waiheke
|
37
|
3%
|
|
Waitākere
Ranges
|
87
|
7%
|
|
Waitematā
|
51
|
4%
|
|
Whau
|
41
|
3%
|
|
Regional
|
5
|
0%
|
|
Not Supplied
|
69
|
5%
|
|
Outside Auckland
|
55
|
4%
|
|
Total
|
1,262
|
|
12. The
consultation feedback form included eight questions relating to key programmes
in the Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan that were described in a summary
document (see Attachment B for details around each of the proposed approaches).
The responses received for each question from residents of the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board area are summarised below in Table 3, and
show a high level of support across all these topic areas.
Table 3: Feedback from
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board residents on the Proposed Regional Pest
Management Plan
|
Question
|
Response
|
Percentage of submissions
local board
|
Percentage of submissions
regional
|
|
1. What is your view on the
proposed approach to pest plant management in parks?
|
Full support
|
27%
|
26%
|
|
Partial support
|
17%
|
17%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
2%
|
3%
|
|
Full do not support
|
2%
|
2%
|
|
Other comments
|
51%
|
53%
|
|
2. What is your view on the
proposed approach to managing kauri dieback?
|
Full support
|
37%
|
27%
|
|
Partial support
|
29%
|
29%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
11%
|
5%
|
|
Full do not support
|
3%
|
2%
|
|
Other comments
|
21%
|
37%
|
|
3. What is your view on the
proposed approach to prevent the spread of pests to the Hauraki Gulf Islands?
|
Full support
|
43%
|
46%
|
|
Partial support
|
18%
|
19%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
13%
|
12%
|
|
Full do not support
|
0%
|
2%
|
|
Other comments
|
28%
|
21%
|
|
4. What is your view on the
proposed approach to managing pests on Aotea/Great Barrier?
|
Full support
|
40%
|
44%
|
|
Partial support
|
23%
|
20%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
7%
|
4%
|
|
Full do not support
|
3%
|
2%
|
|
Other comments
|
27%
|
30%
|
|
5. What is your view on the
proposed approach to managing pests on Kawau Island?
|
Full support
|
54%
|
43%
|
|
Partial support
|
22%
|
23%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
8%
|
7%
|
|
Full do not support
|
3%
|
4%
|
|
Other comments
|
14%
|
23%
|
|
6. What is your view on the
proposed approach to managing pests on Waiheke Island?
|
Full support
|
48%
|
44%
|
|
Partial support
|
18%
|
21%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
3%
|
5%
|
|
Full do not support
|
6%
|
3%
|
|
Other comments
|
24%
|
28%
|
|
7. What is your view on the
proposed approach to the management of rural possums?
|
Full support
|
41%
|
38%
|
|
Partial support
|
25%
|
28%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
3%
|
7%
|
|
Full do not support
|
6%
|
4%
|
|
Other comments
|
25%
|
23%
|
|
8. What is your view on the
proposed approach to the management of freshwater pests?
|
Full support
|
44%
|
46%
|
|
Partial support
|
19%
|
23%
|
|
Partial do not support
|
11%
|
4%
|
|
Full do not support
|
0%
|
3%
|
|
Other comments
|
26%
|
25%
|
13. In addition
to the eight themed questions covered in Table 3, a further open-ended question
elicited responses about a wide range of other topics covered in the proposed
plan.
14. The most
commonly raised topic in the open-ended question was the issue of cat
management. A wide range of views on this topic were expressed, including
requests for increased cat management beyond that in the proposed plan. The
majority of submissions on this topic voiced concerns about cats being included
as pests. These submitters cited animal welfare issues and concerns that
domestic cats throughout Auckland would be at risk under the proposed plan.
Staff are exploring options for mitigating these concerns, which in many cases
reflect a perception of more extensive cat control than was envisaged in the
plan. Options for mitigating concerns include clarifying the spatial extent of
the proposed approach in the final plan, and alternatives to the use of the
term ‘pest cat’.
15. Staff have
worked through submissions to determine any changes to be recommended for the
final plan. Attachment A identifies key themes where amendments to pest
management programmes in the proposed plan were sought by submitters, along
with proposed staff responses. Feedback themes have been grouped according to
the questions in Table 3 (above), along with an ‘other’ category to
capture feedback related to other topics.
16. This report
seeks formal feedback from the board at its November 2018 business meeting on
the recommended changes to the Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan in
response to consultation feedback.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
17. During
engagement on the issues and options paper and wider public consultation on the
discussion document, key issues were raised in relation to cats, possums,
widespread pest plants, and the ban of sale of some pest species. In addition
to these regional issues, the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board provided
feedback on locally specific issues of importance to the area, including
pigeons, weeds on council land, rabbits, and the importance of education around
pests.
18. Proposed
approaches to be taken in relation to these issues were workshopped with the
board in June 2017. At its August 2017 business meeting the board provided
formal feedback on these proposed management approaches. A copy of this
feedback is appended in Attachment C.
19. A recent
workshop with the board was held on 18 September 2018 to discuss the
consultation feedback and the recommended amendments to the plan, as set out in
Attachment A.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
20. Section 61 of
the Biosecurity Act requires that a Regional Pest Management Plan set out the
effects that implementation of the plan would have on the relationship
between Māori, their culture, their traditions and their ancestral
lands, waters, sites, maunga, mahinga kai, wāhi tapu, and taonga.
21. Engagement
has been undertaken with interested mana whenua in the Auckland region during
development of the plan, and formal submissions were received from the mana
whenua groups listed below. In addition, staff are working closely with mana
whenua on the development and implementation of a range of biosecurity
programmes, providing opportunities for mana whenua to exercise kaitiakitanga,
through direct involvement in the protection of culturally significant sites
and taonga species.
· Mana
Whenua Kaitiaki Forum
· Te
Kawerau ā Maki
· Te
Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua
· Te
Uri o Hau
· Te
Tira Whakamātaki - Māori Biosecurity Network
22. Submissions
were largely supportive of the approaches set out in the proposed plan, and key
themes noted in feedback from mana whenua included:
· the
need to enhance rather than protect ecosystem function and resilience
· the
need to recognise ecological value outside Significant Ecological Areas
· the
need to identify performance measures to enable people to readily evaluate
success
· the
need to adopt management strategies that incentivise good management approaches
· the
importance of community education and involvement in pest management
· mana
whenua participation in pest management in collaboration with Auckland Council.
23. Staff have
prepared a summary of mana whenua feedback, including proposed staff responses.
This document will be circulated to mana whenua submitters for their
consideration in November and December 2018. This content will be included in
the final submission summary that is reported to the Environment and Community
Committee in March 2019, alongside the final plan. This content will be made
available to all local boards prior to the committee meeting.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
24. The Proposed
Regional Pest Management Plan presents a major change in pest management in
Auckland, and therefore requires a significant increase in investment. As part
of consultation on the Long-term Plan 2018-2028, the council sought community
views on two options for increased investment in the natural environment funded
by a targeted rate.
25. On 31 May
2018 the Governing Body approved the introduction of a natural environment
targeted rate to raise $311 million for environmental initiatives. These
initiatives include addressing kauri dieback and targeted ecological protection
(resolution GB/2018/91).
26. This level of
investment allows substantial (approximately 80 per cent), but not full,
implementation of the Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan. Some changes to
the proposed plan will be made to fit the funding envelope, most notably
reducing the spatial extent of parks supported by pest plant control in buffer
zones, and removing the moth plant good neighbour rule from the Hauraki Gulf
Islands. These changes are addressed in further detail in Attachment A.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
27. There
are no significant risks arising from the board giving feedback on the Proposed
Regional Pest Management Plan at this time. However, if the board chooses not
to give feedback this would create a risk that their views will not be
reflected in the final Regional Pest Management Plan.
28. If adoption of the Regional Pest Management Plan is delayed, this
will create significant risks to the council’s ability to achieve targets
for protecting native biodiversity, through effectively regulating the control
of pest plants, animals and pathogens.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
29. Attachment A
has been prepared to facilitate local board feedback on the recommended changes
to the proposed Regional Pest Management Plan.
30. Staff will
progress development of the final Regional Pest Management Plan in line with
the process and indicative timeframes outlined in Table 4 below. A copy of the
final plan and supporting information (including a full submissions analysis
report and staff recommendations) will be provided to local boards for
information prior to Environment and Community Committee adoption in March
2019.
Table 4: Timeframes for the
finalisation of the Regional Pest Management Plan
|
Action/Milestone
|
Indicative timeframe
|
|
Mana whenua engagement to
address changes proposed in submissions
|
September – October 2018
|
|
Local boards resolve formal
feedback at business meetings
|
November – December 2018
|
|
Environment and Community
Committee workshop
|
November 2018
|
|
Staff draft final plan
|
December 2018 – February
2019
|
|
Environment and Community
Committee adopt plan
|
March 2019
|
|
Closing the loop with local
boards and submitters
|
April – May 2019
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Key submission themes and recommended amendments to
the Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan consultation feedback
|
191
|
|
b⇩
|
Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan 2018 - Summary
Document
|
201
|
|
c⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board feedback on the
Proposed Regional Pest Management Plan - August 2017
|
213
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Dr Imogen Bassett – Biosecurity Principal
Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Gael Ogilvie – General Manager Environmental
Services
Barry Potter – Director Infrastructure and Environmental
Services
Louise Mason – General Manager Local Board
Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Feedback on proposed topics for
inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy
File No.: CP2018/22293
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To provide formal feedback on the proposed topics for inclusion in
the Auckland Water Strategy.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Both
freshwater and marine environments in Auckland are under pressure from historic
under-investment, climate change and rapid growth. The Auckland Plan 2050
identifies the need to proactively adapt to a changing water future and develop
long-term solutions.
3. In
response to these challenges, the Environment and Community Committee approved
the scope of a strategy for Auckland’s waters at its June 2018 meeting
(resolution ENV/2018/78). The strategy will provide strategic direction for the
council group to meet the challenges and opportunities for improved management
for water in all its forms. It will establish the outcomes needed for
Auckland’s waters, as part of implementation of the Auckland Plan.
4. Staff
from across Auckland Council, Watercare and Auckland Transport have started
developing the draft Auckland Water Strategy by first identifying
Auckland’s water issues.
5. A
comprehensive engagement programme has also commenced. This has included mana
whenua engagement through the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum as well as separate
workshops with operational kaitiaki.
6. Staff
have also attended workshops with all 21 local boards, the governing body and
subject matter experts to present the progress of the strategy, and to
introduce key topics to be addressed in the strategy.
7. A
draft discussion document is now being developed. This document will set out
the key water topics, and propose a framework for the water strategy, for
public feedback.
8. This
report provides an update on the development of the strategy and requests
formal feedback from the local board on the proposed topics for inclusion in
the strategy (see Attachment A). A template to guide local board feedback has
been included as Attachment B to this report.
9. Feedback
from local boards will be summarised as part of a report to the Environment and
Community Committee in December 2018, seeking approval of a water strategy
discussion document, ahead of public consultation from February to April 2019.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) provide
feedback on the proposed topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy
(Attachment A of the agenda report)
b) note that local board feedback on proposed topics for inclusion in
the Auckland Water Strategy will be included in a report to the Environmental
and Community Committee in December 2018, seeking approval of the draft
Auckland Water Strategy discussion document for public consultation in early
2019.
|
Horopaki / Context
10. The health of Auckland’s waters is a
significant issue. Decades of pressure have had negative impacts on water
quality, and on freshwater and marine environments. This pressure will continue
to increase if changes are not made to the way that water is valued and
managed. Population growth and climate change will further amplify the
challenges, with greater demand for water services, and an increased risk of
flooding and coastal inundation.
11. The Auckland Plan notes a key challenge of ‘environmental
degradation’ and identifies the need to proactively adapt to a changing
water future and develop long-term solutions (focus area five of the Auckland
Plan’s environment and cultural heritage outcome). Other focus areas of
the Auckland Plan speak to the need to future-proof Auckland’s infrastructure,
make sustainable choices, and fully account for past and future impacts of
growth.
12. The Environment and Community Committee agreed to the development of
the Auckland Water Strategy at its 12 September 2017 meeting. The committee
noted that water is often described and managed in categories, such as
stormwater, wastewater and drinking water. An overarching strategy for
Auckland’s waters, in all their forms, was identified as a way of
ensuring the full range of desired outcomes for water are defined and achieved
in an integrated way.
13. Several drivers give weight to the timely development of this
strategy. These include heightened public awareness of water quality risks, and
strong support from the public for improvements to water quality through the
ten-year budget, central government initiatives (such as the National Policy
Statement for Freshwater Management and the Department of Internal Affairs
review of three waters outcomes) and the need to update existing strategies due
to significant population growth. It also responds to mana whenua aspirations
surrounding te mauri o te wai.
14. Since the strategy’s initiation in September 2017, staff have
undertaken preliminary analytical work and engagement across the council group.
This includes resolving the intersection of the strategy with the section 17A
three waters review, mapping the council group’s current water-related
activities, and analysing the public feedback on the proposed Auckland Plan and
10-year budget.
15. An extensive local board and mana whenua engagement programme has
been undertaken. In September and October 2018, staff presented the proposed
topics to be addressed through the water strategy to all 21 local boards. Mana
whenua have been engaged at both a governance and operational level. The Mana
Whenua Kaitiaki Forum provided strategic direction while operational kaitiaki
provided direction on the values. Subject matter experts from across the
council group, local boards and the governing body have also provided feedback
on the key topics.
16. This report provides a progress update on the development of the
strategy, and also provides an opportunity for the local board to provide
formal feedback on the proposed topics for inclusion in the strategy
(Attachment A).
Tātaritanga
me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Purpose and proposed
topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy
17. The
Auckland Water Strategy will provide strategic direction for the council group
in how meet the challenges and opportunities for improved water management. It
is expected that the strategy will define the approaches taken around water in
other strategies and plans as they are subsequently developed and reviewed.
18. The proposed topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy
(see Attachment A) were developed through the review of the existing policies
and strategies, and through a series of workshops and discussions with staff
from Auckland Council family, including Watercare and Auckland Transport.
19. Attachment A describes the current strategic context, purpose,
vision, values, issues, processes and principles that are proposed to inform
the development of the discussion document for the draft Auckland Water
Strategy.
Request for
local board feedback
20. Further to the workshops held with local boards in September and
October 2018, local boards are formally requested to provide feedback on the
draft topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy, ahead of the
Environment and Community Committee’s consideration in December 2018.
Attachment B provides a template to guide local board feedback.
21. The draft vision for inclusion in the Auckland Water Strategy is
‘Te mauri o te wai – the life supporting capacity of water –
is protected and enhanced’. Local boards are requested to provide
feedback on whether this vision is right for the communities they represent.
22. The draft values for inclusion in the strategy are detailed below.
Local boards are requested to provide feedback around whether these values
cover the aspects of water that are most important to the boards:
· ecology
· water use
· culture
· recreation and
amenity
· resilience.
23. The draft issues to be addressed through the strategy are detailed
below. Local boards are requested to provide feedback on whether these categories
capture the issues that are of greatest concern to them:
· cleaning up our
waterways
· meeting future water
needs
· growth in the right
places
· adapting to a
changing water future.
24. The draft processes to be worked on through the strategy are detailed
below. Local boards are requested to provide feedback on whether these
categories capture the processes that they are most concerned with:
· creating our water
future together
· setting priorities
for investment
· achieving net
benefits for catchments
· applying a
Māori world view.
25. The draft principles to be included in the strategy are detailed
below. Local boards are requested to provide feedback on whether or not they
agree with these principles:
· recognise that water
is a taonga
· work with natural
ecosystems
· deliver catchment
scale thinking and action
· focus on achieving
the right-sized solutions with multiple benefits
· work together to
plan and deliver better water quality outcomes
· look to the future.
26. As the development of the strategy has progressed, it has become
clear that it will need to be developed in stages. Many of the water challenges
that have been identified require more analysis and public engagement before a
strategy can be agreed. For this reason, the discussion document that is
proposed to be released early 2019 will be focused on identifying and agreeing
the water issues that Auckland faces within a proposed framework of vision,
values and principles. From there, the governing body will be able to review
and agree a staged programme that builds on the framework towards a final
strategy.
27. Local board feedback on the draft topics outlined in Attachment B
will be summarised as part of the report to the Environment and Community
Committee in December 2018, requesting approval of a draft discussion document
for public consultation. A further update on the Auckland Water Strategy will
be provided to local boards in February 2019.
Ngā
whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
28. Local
boards have a strong interest in improving water quality across the Auckland
region and currently fund many local projects focused on restoration of local
waterways.
29. Staff attended a local board chairs’ meeting on 13 November
2017 to introduce the concept of the strategy and expected range of activities
arising from the strategy. Board chairs indicated their interest in continued
involvement.
30. Staff presented the scope, summary and the progress on the strategy’s
development to all 21 local boards between 30 August 2018 and 23 October 2018.
Key themes in the feedback provided by local boards at these workshops included
the need to:
· acknowledge water as
being a precious commodity that needs to be preserved as the population grows
· increase the focus
on the health of Auckland’s harbours
· identify future
drinking water sources
· educate people
around resilience, water usage, and the impacts of their activities on the
environment
· strengthen
regulation and compliance to protect waterways.
31. This report presents the proposed topics for inclusion in the
Auckland Water Strategy, and seeks a formal feedback from the local board ahead
of Environment and Community Committee approval of a discussion document in
December 2018 for public consultation in early 2019. Key questions to guide
local board feedback have been included as Attachment B.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
/ Māori impact statement
32. Mauri
(life force) is a fundamental concept of the Māori world view. The state
of mauri is an indicator of overall environmental, cultural and social
wellbeing. All water sources have an inherent mauri that can be diminished or
enhanced.
33. Enhancing
the mauri of waterways is of key significance to mana whenua in their role as
kaitiaki of Auckland’s waters. Early engagement with mana whenua to
promote kaitiakitanga and embed mana whenua values into this work will be
critical to the success of the actions outlined in this report.
34. The
development of the Auckland Water Strategy has been
guided by the strategic advice provided by the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Governance
Forum. The forum has determined it will provide its own strategic advice, to
ensure that core mana whenua principles and values are given the attention they
need. The forum requested that one of their members be included on the
governance group for the development of the strategy. This has been achieved
with the Auckland’s Water Political Reference Group, and recognises the
longstanding whakaaro and kōrero that mana whenua have provided on this
kaupapa.
Ngā
ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
35. The
budget to develop the Auckland Water Strategy was included as part of the
Long-term Plan 2018-2028. This budget covers operational expenses, primarily
staff time, and will be used to support public engagement.
36. The
budget required to deliver any actions arising from the strategy will be sought
through the Long-term Plan 2021-2031 process.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
37. An
initial risk assessment for the programme has been carried out, as shown in
Table 1 below.
Table 1: Auckland Water
Strategy work programme risks and proposed mitigations
|
Risk type
|
Risk description
|
Consequence description
|
Rating
(High-Medium-Low)
|
Mitigation/Control
|
|
Scope expansion
|
Water is a broad subject,
and the level of detail and number of topics to cover can grow and change
rapidly
|
Unable to deliver to time
and cost
|
Medium
|
Guidance from the
Political Reference Group and Executive Steering Group
|
|
Central government changes
to legislation and policy
|
There are several central
government work programmes focusing on water underway such as the Department
of Internal Affairs Three Waters review and the Office of the Auditor
Generals Water Programme. The strategy will need to adapt to any changes in
direction from central government.
|
Unable to deliver to time
and cost
|
Medium
|
Anticipate where possible,
communication plans to include government stakeholders
|
|
Inconsistent practices and
adoption of the strategy
|
The strategy is not
adopted and reflected in the plans of the operational and delivery
organisations of the council group
|
Outcomes of the strategy
are not delivered, substantive actions to deliver the strategy are not
undertaken
|
Medium
|
Ensure that the delivery
teams of the council group are engaged in the development of the strategy
|
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
38. The
next steps in the development of the Auckland Water Strategy have been outlined
in Table 2:
Table
2. Timeframes for the development of the Auckland Water Strategy
|
Activity
|
Expected
timeframe
|
|
Formal local board
feedback sought on proposed topics of the Auckland Water Strategy for the
discussion document
|
November 2018
|
|
Internal discussions
on the topics for inclusion in the draft discussion document, and
presentations to the Watercare and Auckland Transport boards
|
November-December
2018
|
|
Draft discussion
document reported to Environment and Community Committee for approval ahead
of public consultation
|
December 2018
|
|
Public consultation
on the Auckland Water Strategy discussion document
|
February-April 2019
|
|
Public engagement
feedback presented to elected members
|
April 2019
|
|
Draft options for
the finalisation of the Auckland Water Strategy, and associated work
programmes to be presented to the Environment and Community Committee
|
June 2019
|
39. Local boards will receive a further update on the Auckland Water
Strategy in February 2019.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Proposed topics for inclusion in the Auckland Water
Strategy
|
235
|
|
b⇩
|
Local board feedback template
|
243
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Andrew Chin – Auckland Waters Portfolio Manager
|
|
Authorisers
|
Barry Potter – Director Infrastructure and
Environmental Services
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Draft Contributions Policy
File No.: CP2018/21205
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
seek feedback from local boards on the draft Contributions Policy 2019.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. It
is estimated that the Auckland region is short 45,000 dwellings to meet current
demand for housing. A further 313,000 dwellings and work places to support
250,000 jobs will be required by 2050 to meet expected growth. To manage this
growth the council has identified the:
i) location
and nature of growth - through the Auckland Plan and Unitary Plan
ii) location
and type of infrastructure required to support growth - through the Development
Strategy and structure plans
iii) when
and where it will invest $7.2 billion of growth-related infrastructure in the
next ten years to support development - through the Long-term Plan 2018-2028
(10-Year Budget).
3. Growth
related capex has risen from $5.1 billion in the Long-term Plan 2015-2025 to
$7.2 billion in the current 10-Year Budget. We have also updated our
projection of development growth across the next ten years. The council
will repay the borrowing raised to pay for the investment in infrastructure
through general rates, targeted rates, user charges, third party funding (like
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) subsidies) and development contributions.
4. A
review has been undertaken of the current contributions policy and the council
has adopted a draft Contributions Policy 2019 (see Attachment A) for
consultation which includes a number of changes.
5. To
recover the increased investment in growth related infrastructure the
indicative urban development contribution price rises from around $21,000 to
$26,000 (excl. GST). As a result, the development contribution revenue
the council expects to collect will rise to $2.7 billion from $2.23 billion
under the current policy.
6. The
demand placed on transport by different types of development has been
reviewed. The analysis shows that retail and commercial development place
substantially higher demand on transport infrastructure than is reflected in
the current policy. The draft policy includes higher unit of demand
factors for transport, and hence prices, for retail and commercial development
with smaller decreases for other development types. This would more
fairly reflect the demand different development types place on the need to
invest in infrastructure.
7. The
draft Contributions Policy 2019 also proposes:
· extending
the timeframe for the payment of development contributions on residential
construction. This will better align the time that residential builders
pay their DCs with the time when they sell their developments
· refining
and changing funding areas to better match investment with beneficiaries,
including adding areas for:
i) transport to
reflect areas where significant local infrastructure investment is planned
ii) reserves to provide
more detail on projects and their location
· minor
amendments including changes to development types.
8. Consultation
on the draft Contributions Policy 2019 is taking place from 19 October until 15
November 2018 including:
· Five
have your say events held across the region
· engagement
with Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum
· opportunity
for submitters to personally present their feedback to councillors on 23
November.2018
9. Local
board November meetings will consider the draft Contribution Policy 2019 and
resolve their feedback to inform the Governing Body’s decision making in
December.
10. Consultation
is supported by a Consultation Document and Supporting Information, Attachments
B and C respectively, which set out:
· an
overview of how the council is responding to growth and how development
contributions fit within this context
· describes
how we set development contributions charges
11. Details the
key changes in our draft Contributions Policy and why we have proposed them.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) resolve
feedback on the Contributions Policy 2019.
|
Horopaki / Context
12. The current
policy is known as the Contributions Policy 2015 (Variation A) and reflects the
Long-term Plan (LTP) 2015-2025. Development contributions have recovered
approximately $400 million of funding for growth projects in the last three
years.
13. Council
reviewed the current policy and recommended that it be amended to reflect
changes to capital expenditure in the 10-Year Budget. At its meeting on 30
April 2018 the Governing Body agreed to consult on the draft Contributions
Policy 2019 in May 2018.
14. Feedback from
the development community requested more detailed supporting information and a
longer period for consultation on the draft policy. In response, at its meeting
on 27 June 2018 the Governing Body agreed to extend the current policy until 31
January 2019 so that additional supporting information for the policy could be
prepared and further consultation on the 2019 policy undertaken.
15. The policy
has been reviewed in accordance with the following principles:
· purpose
and principles of development contributions under the Local Government Act 2002
· equitable
sharing of costs of growth between ratepayers, developers and other members of
the community having regard to such matters as who causes the costs and who
receives the benefits
· equitable
sharing of costs of growth between different types of development and different
funding areas
· revenue
predictability for the council and cost certainty for developers
· administrative
simplicity
· ensuring
legislative compliance.
16. Schedule Five
to the attached draft Contributions Policy 2019 considers the appropriateness
of development contributions as a funding source in accordance with the
requirements of section 101(3) of the Local Government Act 2002. Our Revenue
and Financing Policy sets out how the council will fund capital and operating
expenditure for each of its activities including its decisions to use DCs to
fund growth capital expenditure.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Capital expenditure and funding for
Auckland’s growth
Capital investment and development contribution revenue
17. The
table below sets out the changes in development contribution (DC) revenue by
activity between the current policy and the draft Contributions Policy 2019.
|
DC
revenue by activity ($ billion)
|
Current
DC policy
|
Draft
DC policy 2019
|
|
Transport
|
0.7
|
1.1
|
|
Stormwater
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
|
Parks and community
infrastructure
|
1.0
|
1.1
|
|
Total
|
2.2
|
2.7
|
Contributions
pricing
18. The 10-Year
Budget assumes that a Contributions Policy 2019 will be adopted reflecting the
Revenue and Financing Policy position that growth-related
infrastructure investment should be funded from development contributions.
The 10-Year Budget assumes that the policy will provide for DCs to recover $2.7
billion of the cost of the planned investment in growth infrastructure.
19. The
indicative urban DC will rise from around $21,000 to $26,000 (excl. GST).
DCs vary widely depending on the type of development and the infrastructure
needed to support growth in different locations.
20. Some
infrastructure investments provide benefits across the region or respond to
cost pressures driven by growth irrespective of location. Under the
proposed policy to recover these costs every development would pay $8,090 per
Housing Unit Equivalent (HUE) for regional infrastructure. However, the
sub-regional and local requirements for infrastructure vary depending on the
infrastructure required to support growth in that area and the capacity of
existing infrastructure. As a result, DC prices would vary across the
region e.g.
· Manurewa-Papakura
- new DC price will be $42,182 to reflect increase in stormwater and parks
investment
· Manukau
Central - new DC price will be $22,572 as there is capacity available in
existing network infrastructure.
Impact
of increasing DC price
21. Raising
the price of DCs:
· better
aligns DCs with actual cost of infrastructure
· increases
certainty that infrastructure will be delivered
· encourages
developers to more accurately price land purchased for development to reflect
future DC costs
· negatively
impacts developers who have paid for land based on current DC prices.
22. Economic
research indicates that increasing the DC price does not generally increase
house prices. House prices are determined by the balance of supply and
demand. Development is only cost plus where the value of land for
housing is the same as its value in alternative uses i.e. agriculture.
The price of land that can be developed for housing or business use in Auckland
is much higher than its value in agricultural use.
23. Developers
generally establish the price they will pay for land based on:
Expected
sale price of finished house (as set by the market – supply and demand)
- Land
development costs
- Construction
costs
- Council
cost including DCs
- Profit
margin
= Price paid for land
Alternative
options considered
24. There are two
alternatives to the proposed increase in development contributions;
· defer
or halt planned capital projects supporting growth
· increase
ratepayer funding of these projects.
25. The
increase in development contributions price over period of the 10-Year Budget
is forecast to provide an additional $500 million of revenue. Without
this revenue the council would need to reduce its planned capital expenditure
by between $1 billion and $4 billion depending on which projects were
prioritised. This sum exceeds the loss in revenue because development
contributions make up varying proportions of the funding of individual projects[4].
This option was not adopted as these investments are vital to:
· maintaining
service levels in the face of growth pressures
· supporting
making land available for new development in both the greenfields and
brownfields.
26. To maintain
the planned level of investment without increasing development contributions
would require an increase in rates funding of between $50 million and $200
million per annum. This is equivalent to an additional general rates
increase of between 3 and 13 per cent. Land owners, developers and the
owners of new construction are the beneficiaries of the portion of investment
in infrastructure that supports growth. This option was not proposed as
it is appropriate that the growth share of funding comes from the beneficiaries
via development contributions not general ratepayers.
Possible
legislative changes to funding of Community Infrastructure
27. Central
government has recently introduced the Local Government (Community Well-being)
Amendment Bill which would restore the Council’s ability to use DCs to
fund a broader range of community infrastructure (including, for example,
public swimming pools and libraries). If the legislation passes the
council can consider changing its capital budgets and amending the policy to
include the growth component of any qualifying expenditure.
Unit of demand factors
28. Different
types of development place different demands on infrastructure. The
council uses unit of demand factors to fairly share the cost of infrastructure
across development types.
29. Demand
factors are set relative to the standard residential dwelling of between 100m2
and 249m2. A standard residential dwelling is referred to as a
household equivalent unit (HUE). For example a retirement unit is charged
30 per cent of the rate for transport that a residential dwelling pays i.e. 0.3
HUE.
Non-residential
transport
30. Transport
demand factors are calculated using data on the daily volume of trips generated
from each development type. For residential development the demand factor
is adjusted for relative occupancy levels between residential development
types.
31. A
review of the statistical trip generation data shows that retail and commercial
developments generate substantially more trips than residential and other
development types. These results are consistent with officers’
experience of case by case analysis undertaken by the former councils of the
transport impacts of this type of development.
32. The
transport demand factors proposed are set out in the tables below.
Because non-residential developments are usually larger than residential
dwellings the demand factors are translated into HUEs per 100m2.
|
Units of demand per 100m2
|
|
Development Type
|
Current
DC Policy
|
Draft DC
Policy 2019
|
|
Commercial
|
0.37 HUE
|
0.73 HUE
|
|
Retail
|
0.47 HUE
|
2.79 HUE
|
|
Education and Health
|
0.37 HUE
|
0.37 HUE
|
|
Production and Distribution
|
0.29 HUE
|
0.10 HUE
|
|
Other non-residential not
specified above
|
0.36 HUE
|
1.00 HUE
|
33. These
transport demand factors are comparable with those for other councils. Hamilton
sets the rate for high demand non-residential at 2.75 HUEs (which includes
retail) and Queenstown 2.83. Christchurch and Wellington also use higher
factors for commercial and retail development.
34. The
demand factors derived from the analysis above produce substantial price
changes for retail and commercial development. As this type of
development represents a small proportion of overall development the price
reduction for other development types is lower.
35. As
the transport component of DCs varies across the region based on the need for
investment in each area the exact price effects will vary. In broad
average terms the DC transport price for retail will rise by $18,000 per 100m2
and $2,900 for commercial if the proposed demand factors are used in comparison
to the current factors. It will fall by $1,450 per 100m2 for production
and $500 for a standard residential dwelling. The impact is illustrated
with examples based on two recent developments below
· 5,000m2 retail mall development in the North would pay
$1.3 million under the proposed demand factors whereas they would have paid
$224k under the current demand factors.
· 50,000m2 production development in the South would pay
$410k under the proposed demand factors whereas they would pay $1.15 million
under the current demand factors.
36. Two
alternative options to making the changes to non-residential transport unit of
demand factors were considered:
· retaining the status quo
· move to the new factors in equal steps over a three year period.
37. Retaining
the status quo was rejected on the basis that the evidence clearly shows that
transport demand is much higher for retail and commercial development than for
other development types. At present other development is effectively
subsidising retail and commercial development. Large developers operating
nationwide will be aware of these differences in DC prices.
38. As
the price increases are substantial the council could consider a three year
transition. This option was rejected as it would extend the current
subsidisation. The price changes are substantial however the
subsidisation is also large. It is likely that developers operating
nationwide will have been expecting this change for some time.
39. It
was also noted that a transition could create administration issues and present
revenue risks that may be difficult to forecast. Developers often lodge
consents early when they become aware of pending changes to contributions
prices. A transition of this nature would create incentives for all
development types around the staging of transitional price changes.
Retail developers may try to lodge consents prior to the date of changes and
others may delay applications. This is likely to have implications for
both our revenue forecasts and our consenting and DC assessment teams.
Reserves
acquisition, reserve development and community facilities
40. The
council’s unit of demand factors for reserves acquisition, reserve
development and community facilities are based primarily on the relative
occupancy of different types of residential development compared to a standard
residential dwelling.
41. Officers are
reviewing the relative use of reserves and community facilities by the
occupants of different residential development types. Part of this review
involves undertaking an extensive survey of usage of reserves and community
facilities by Aucklanders. To ensure this survey provides the best
information it needs to cover Aucklanders’ use across seasons.
42. The results
of the survey are expected to be available early next year. Officers will
report the results of the review, including the survey data, in the first
quarter of next year. If the review suggests changes should be considered
to the units of demand for reserves acquisition, reserve development and
community facilities the policy can be amended at that time following
consultation, if appropriate.
Remissions for Māori development and social housing
43. The current
contributions policy does not provide for remissions or waivers of DCs. Feedback from Māori and
social housing developers is that the requirement to pay DCs is an additional
challenge to overcome that presents a further barrier to development. Iwi
have raised the many difficulties associated with developing Māori
land, as well as noting their recent gifting of land for parks and the
historic confiscation of land for public works.
44. Officers
do not recommend the use of DC remissions. Support for Māori
development and social housing is better made transparently from a fixed grant
budget or considered on a case by case basis. Grants enable the council
to make decisions on the relative merits of individual proposals rather than
automatically supporting or rejecting applications on predetermined criteria.
45. The
council currently offers support for DCs for Māori development through the
Marae and Papakāinga grant made available through the Māori Cultural
Initiatives Fund. The policies governing the fund are currently being
reviewed and will be considered by the Community Development and Safety
Committee later this year.
46. Council
does not currently offer a regional grant scheme that enables funding of DCs
for social housing. The council’s position to date has been that
social housing is a government responsibility. However, the council did
provide a one-off grant of $475,000 to the City Mission for the development of
the HomeGround facility. The grant was based on an estimate of DCs and
consenting costs. Officers recommend that if the council wishes to
consider extending support for DCs for social housing then this should be
through the development of a grants scheme as part of the Annual Plan
2019/2020. A grant can be used to fund any development costs and not just
council fees, as was the case with the HomeGround grant.
47. DCs
are set to recover the cost of planned growth infrastructure from developers.
Any remission of DCs would reduce revenue. The loss of revenue from a remission
scheme cannot be recovered from other developers as they are only required to
pay the cost of the demand they place on infrastructure. Remissions of
DCs for some developers do not change the level of demand for infrastructure
from other developers.
48. Revenue
would instead need to be made up by reductions in expenditure or increases in
general rates. Remissions administered under the Contributions Policy
would need to provide for automatic trigger tests and hence an unconstrained
budget.
49. Further
discussion of remissions for Māori development and social housing is set
out in Attachment D.
Payment timing
50. Developers
prefer to pay development contributions as close as possible to the potential
realisation of their investment e.g. sale of land or buildings. The
current payment timing for the main development types (other triggers make up a
very small proportion of development contributions) are at the issue of:
· land
title for subdivisions – around one year before sale
· building
consent for residential development – around six to twelve months before
sale
· code
compliance certificate for non-residential development – around time of
sale.
51. DCs invoiced
on building consent for residential development are approximately 25 per cent
of total DC revenue. Residential developments are currently required to
pay DCs when the building consent is issued. Officers propose to adjust the
payment timing for residential developments as follows:
· a
consent that creates five or more dwelling units will be treated as non-residential
development. This will allow the DCs to be invoiced at time the Code Compliance
Certificate (CCC) is applied for. This will extend the time until council
receives payment by an average of 12 months.
· all
other residential consents will be invoiced six months after building consent
is issued.
52. This change
will support residential developers by better aligning the requirement to pay
DCs with developers’ cash flows. Reducing the amount of capital
investment required prior to construction will make it easier for developers to
finance and progress residential projects. This proposal formed part of
consultation on the draft Contributions Policy 2019 in May and was supported by
all of the 17 submissions that commented on it.
53. The proposed
changes will lead to a one-off reduction in the council’s DC revenue of
$10 million for 2018/2019. The council can manage this change within its
present budget. The change is not material over the 10-Year Budget period
as all developments will still pay, just slightly later.
54. The
council includes the interest cost of the difference between the receipt of DCs
and the timing of investment in growth related projects. The cost of
receiving DC payments on residential building development slightly later will
be factored into the DC price. The proposal will increase the DC price by
between $100 and $200 (or less than 1 per cent) on average depending on the
units of demand used for transport.
55. Considered
was also given to retaining the status quo. However, preference was given
to the easing of cash flow demands on residential builders rather than land
developers focusing on subdivision and non-residential builders.
Residential builders are often operating at a smaller scale with more limited
access to capital. Providing them additional time eases their cash flow
demands and supports the dwelling construction the council is seeking.
56. Neither the
proposal or the status quo present any risk to the council in terms of payment
security. The council has statutory powers to recover unpaid DCs,
including registering a statutory charge on property where DCs have not been
paid. While the council has some aged DC debt this is a very small
proportion of the DCs invoiced over the last 8 years. In this time the
council has written off less than $100,000 of DC debt out of $740 million
invoiced.
57. Two
administrative changes are also proposed to payment timing and
enforcement. Developers who require a land use consent but cannot be
assessed for DCs on a resource consent or building consent will be required to
pay on land use consent. At present non-residential developments are
required to pay on issue of a code of compliance certificate (CCC) or
certificate of public use (CPU). Some developments do not require a CCC
or CPU to operate and are avoiding payment. It is proposed that all
non-residential developments will be required to pay at the latest 24 months of
issue of a building consent. This provides sufficient time for developers
to realise their investment whilst ensuring securing of payment for council.
Other proposed changes to the Policy
Funding
areas
58. The draft
Contributions Policy 2019 includes seven additional funding areas for
transport. These funding areas allocate the cost of transport infrastructure to
the priority growth areas in Northwest, Dairy Flat/Wainui/Silverdale, Greater
Tamaki and Albany, and transport infrastructure, solely, mainly road sealing,
for the benefit of rural areas in the North, West and South.
59. Changes have
also been made to the funding areas for reserves to provide a more refined
allocation of these costs to development areas. The Greenfield, Urban and
Rural funding areas have been replaced with Northern Greenfield, Southern
Greenfield, Northwest Greenfield and Urban funding areas. As a result the DC
costs better reflect the differences in investment required to meet the needs
of future growth. A new funding area has also been created for reserves
and community facilities in Greater Tamaki to reflect the specific needs and
plans for that area.
60. Two new
stormwater funding areas have also been added where investment is now planned
Hauraki Gulf Islands and Omaha/Matakana.
Development
Types
61. Amendments
are also proposed to the following development types to better reflect the demand
they place on infrastructure or clarify definitions. Maintaining the
status quo for these areas was rejected to ensure an appropriate level of cost
was recovered and reduce the administration costs associated with customer
confusion.
Student accommodation
62. Create a new
‘student accommodation units’ category for student accommodation
(administered by schools/universities). This category will have a lower
price for transport and open space than a standard residential dwelling because
of lower occupancy.
Small ancillary dwelling units
63. Change the
‘size’ definition of small ancillary dwelling units to those with a
gross floor area less than or equal to 65m². This aligns the Contributions
Policy with the definition in the Unitary Plan to avoid customer confusion.
Retirement villages
64. Amend the
definition of a ‘Retirement Village’ to align with the Unitary Plan
to avoid customer confusion.
Accommodation units for short term rental
65. Amend the
definition of Accommodation Units to clarify that they include properties used
for short term rental. Long-term rentals will continue to be treated as
dwelling units.
A long-term view of growth infrastructure costs
66. The 10-year
Budget 2018-2028 includes over $26 billion of investment for Auckland including
significant investment to support new development over the next 10 years. This
investment is not, however, sufficient to enable all the future urban areas to
be developed now or all of the intensification projects to proceed immediately.
67. The proposed
contributions policy seeks to recover a fair share of the infrastructure costs
currently planned from developments that are enabled by or benefit from this
planned infrastructure. In areas that already have sufficient infrastructure,
or it is planned within the next ten years, the policy describes the
contribution to the cost of this infrastructure that will be charged to
different types of development.
68. For areas where
the infrastructure provision is not already provided or scheduled for the
2018-2028 period development cannot yet proceed due to the infrastructure
constraints. We will continue to work on determining the cost and funding
arrangements for the infrastructure required. The development charges for these
areas included in the draft Contributions Policy 2019 do not yet fully reflect
the true cost of providing infrastructure in those areas. For some of these
development areas, particularly greenfield areas, the council infrastructure
cost per house has been estimated at around $70,000. Once the costs and funding
arrangements are clear growth charges will be updated to ensure they are paying
their fair share when the areas are able to be developed.
69. Limits on the
council’s ability to borrow mean that additional investment, even if it
is eventually funded by developers, would require new or alternative financing
mechanisms. We continue to work on new ways to partner with others to build and
finance infrastructure. If we can do this successfully this will enable more
development areas to be supported earlier.
Public Consultation
70. Public
consultation will run from 19 October to 4pm on 15 November.
71. Five
Have Your Say Events (HYSE) have been planned to take place during the public
consultation period:
· South - Manukau
· North - Takapuna
· Central – CBD
· Retirement village developers - CBD
· Western Springs Garden Hall (evening).
72. The location
and timing of HYSE are scheduled to provide for developers and the public to
engage with the council at locations and timings organised to suit their needs
and preferences. These five HYSE events provide an opportunity for
developers and other interested parties to learn more about the draft policy
and provide feedback. All comments will be captured and reported through
to the Finance and Performance Committee to help inform decision-making on the
final policy.
73. It is planned to ask those providing written feedback if they would
like to register their interest in personally presenting their feedback to
councillors on Friday 23 November. This will provide time for 30
presentations allowing 15 minutes for each presentation including
questions. Seventeen submitters expressed an interest to be heard following
the May consultation. The invitation will note that it may not be
possible to make time to hear everyone if the event is over-subscribed given
the need to manage costs and limitations on councillors’ available
time. If necessary, slots would be allocated on a “first come,
first served” basis.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
74. The DC price
varies by location depending on the cost of infrastructure required to support
development in an area. The funding areas are set out in the attached policy
documents.
75. Officers
provided briefings on the draft Contributions Policy 2019 to local board
cluster meetings in October.
76. Local boards have a statutory responsibility for
identifying and communicating the interests and preferences of the people in
its local board area in relation to the context of the strategies, policies,
plans, and bylaws of Auckland Council. This report provides an opportunity for
the local board to give input on the draft Contributions Policy 2019.
77. Local board
decisions and feedback are being sought in this report to inform the Governing
Body’s consideration of the adoption of the Contribution Policy 2019 in
December.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
78. Council does
not hold information on the ethnicity of developers. The impact on
Māori will be similar to the impact on other developers.
79. Feedback from
Māori received in the May consultation has been considered as part of the
development of the revised draft Contributions Policy 2019. Key issues raised
were that the Contributions Policy should:
· reflect
the Auckland Plan 2050 outcome to support Māori identify
and wellbeing, for example by exempting (remitting) DCs for Māori
developments
· include
specific development types for Māori development.
80. The remission
of DCs for Māori development is discussed in this
report.
81. Development
types are created based on evidence that different types of development
generate different levels of demand for infrastructure. The policy does not
currently contain specific Māori development types. Māori
developments are categorised under broader development types based on the
demand they generate. For example, kaumātua housing is treated the same as
retirement villages, and marae fall under community facilities. As more
Māori developments occur, evidence of demand generation can be used to
reclassify developments or create new development types.
82. Māori
have expressed aspirations for their land that includes new forms of
development that may not fit into existing development types. Legislation
provides for the reconsideration of DC assessments for individual developments
where evidence is available to show that the demand it will generate is less
than its classification under the existing policy. Council also proactively
reviews the availability of evidence for demand, and amends the Contributions
Policy for new or adjusted development types and demand factors as evidence
becomes available. Council will continue to work with Māori to
ensure that the Contributions Policy, in its design and its application,
appropriately reflects the realities of Māori development.
83. Feedback from
iwi on the draft Contributions Policy 2019 will be sought as part of public
consultation and via engagement with the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum. Mana
Whenua will also be invited to present their feedback to the councillors
through the formal engagement for stakeholders referred to in the public
consultation section above.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
84. The financial
implications are set out in the report.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
85. Investment in
DC funded growth related infrastructure carries the risk of development
projections, and therefore DC revenue, not being met. These risks will be
managed through monitoring consent applications and DC revenue.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
86. Public
consultation on the draft Contributions Policy 2019 is to be held from 19
October to 15 November 2018 as above. Feedback
would be reported to the Governing Body workshop on 29 November. Officers
would report on adoption of the final policy to the 13 December meeting of the
Governing Body.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Draft Contributions Policy 2019
|
259
|
|
b⇩
|
Consultation Document
|
345
|
|
c⇩
|
Supporting Information
|
367
|
|
d⇩
|
Remission of Development Contributions for Maori
Development and Social Housing
|
387
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Felipe Panteli - Senior Policy Advisor
Beth Sullivan - Principal Advisor Policy
Andrew Duncan - Manager Financial Policy
|
|
Authorisers
|
Ross Tucker - Acting General Manager, Financial
Strategy and Planning
Louise Mason – General Manager Local Board
Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Disposal recommendations report - 22 and
28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington
File No.: CP2018/19084
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. This
report seeks the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local
Board’s endorsement for Panuku Development Auckland (Panuku) to recommend
to the Finance and Performance Committee the disposal of two council owned
properties in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board
area.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. 22 and 28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington are residential properties
that were acquired for transport purposes. The properties are no longer
required for this purpose. The rationalisation process commenced in
September 2018. Consultation with council and its CCOs, iwi authorities
and the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board has now taken place. No
current or future council service use has been
identified for both properties through the rationalisation process. Both properties
have been identified by Panuku as suitable for disposal for strategic
development (housing) outcomes. As such, Panuku
recommends that they be divested.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) endorse Panuku Development Auckland’s recommendation to the
Finance and Performance Committee to dispose of 22 and 28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington.
|
Horopaki / Context
3. Panuku
is required to undertake ongoing review of council’s property assets.
This includes identifying properties from within council’s portfolio that
are no longer required for council service uses and may be suitable for sale
and development if appropriate. Panuku has a particular focus on achieving
housing and urban regeneration outcomes. Identifying potential sale properties
contributes to the 10-year Budget 2018-2028 and the Auckland Plan focus of
accommodating the significant growth projected for the region over the coming
decades, by providing council with an efficient use of capital and
prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects.
4. Once
a property has been identified as potentially no longer required for council
service purposes, Panuku engages with council departments and its CCOs through
an expression of interest process, to establish whether the property must be
retained for a strategic purpose or is required for a future funded council
service use. Once a property has been internally cleared of any council
service requirements, Panuku then consults with local boards, mana whenua and
ward councillors. All sale recommendations must be approved by the Panuku
Board before a final recommendation is made to the Finance and Performance
Committee. The Finance and Performance Committee makes the final decision
to approve a property for disposal.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Property
information
5. The
former Auckland City Council acquired 22 and 28A Waipuna Road for the Auckland
Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative. However the route was not
designated and Auckland Council and Auckland Transport subsequently decided not
to proceed with the Mt Wellington Highway/Waipuna Road route.
6. In
2018 AT advised that the properties were no longer required for its current or
future transport or infrastructure purposes. Both properties were
subsequently transferred to council for rationalisation.
7. 22 Waipuna Road is a 675m2 site with two single story
residential units located on it. The Auckland
Unitary Plan zoning is Residential - Terrace House and Apartment
Building. It has a rating valuation of
$910,000.
8. 28A Waipuna Road is a single story residential unit held as a
crosslease with a ½ share in the fee simple title of the 726m2
site. The Auckland Unitary Plan zoning is Residential
- Terrace House and Apartment Building. It has
a rating valuation of $650,000.
9. 22 and 28A Waipuna Road are not subject to offer back
obligations to the former owners in accordance with section 40
of the Public Works Act 1981.
Internal
Consultation
10. The rationalisation process for both properties commenced in
September 2018. No alternative council service uses were identified
through the internal consultation. 22 and 28A Waipuna Road have been identified by Panuku as
suitable for development, specifically to deliver housing outcomes. A
proposed disposal of the properties to Housing New Zealand would provide an
opportunity for (housing) development outcomes.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
11. 22
and 28A Waipuna Road are not specifically mentioned in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Plan.
12. Panuku attended a workshop with the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board in October 2018. The Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board provided
informal feedback that while it was supportive of the proposed disposal of 22
and 28A Waipuna Road, it requests that a disposal to the Crown considers the
current land exchange negotiations between Auckland Council and Housing New
Zealand. Panuku provided advice that if the properties are disposed of to
the Crown, then it will pass the local board’s request to council in any
subsequent negotiations.
13. This
report provides the local board with an opportunity to formalise its views
regarding both properties.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
14. 15
mana whenua iwi authorities were contacted regarding the potential disposal of
22 and 28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington. The following feedback was
received.
a) Te
Runanga o Ngāti Whatua
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
b) Ngāti
Whatua o Kaipara
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
c) Ngāti
Whatua Ōrākei
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
d) Te
Kawerau a Maki
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
e) Ngāi
Tai ki Tāmaki
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
f) Ngāti
Tamaoho
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
g) Te
ākitai - Waiohua
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
h) Ngāti
Te Ata - Waiohua
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
i) Te
Ahiwaru
No feedback was
received regarding the properties.
j) Ngāti
Paoa
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
k) Ngaati
Whanaunga
Ngaati Whanaunga advised
that the properties are located in a place of cultural significance,
specifically as ‘kaainga mahinga kai’.
Panuku replied to Ngaati Whanaunga confirming its
interests had been noted on the property file and that the information would be
considered by council’s governing body when the properties are
recommended for disposal. Panuku sought further clarification regarding
site-specific issues, including kaitiaki recommendations around future
management of the land, acknowledgements or other outcomes that council needs
to consider as part of a decision to approve the properties for disposal.
At the time of this report being written, no further response has been
received. If approved for disposal, Panuku will follow up with Ngaati
Whanaunga.
l) Ngāti
Maru
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
m) Ngāti
Tamatera
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
n) Te
Patukirikiri
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
o) Waikato-Tainui
No feedback was received
regarding the properties.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
15. Capital
receipts from the sale of properties contribute to Auckland Plan outcomes and
the LTP by providing the council with an efficient use of capital and
prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects. In the
2018/2019 financial year, the LTP has forecast the disposal of
non-strategic assets to the value of $24 million.
16. In accordance
with the Local Government Act 2002, the annual Panuku SOI states the activities
and intentions of Panuku, the objectives those activities will contribute to
and performance measures and targets as the basis of organisational
accountability. For the 2018/2019 financial year Panuku is required to
recommend to the council’s Finance and Performance Committee properties
from within council’s portfolio that may be suitable for sale to a
combined value of $30 million and to sell $24 million of property by 30 June
2019.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
17. No risks have
been identified in the recommendations contained in this report.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
18. The Crown has expressed interest in acquiring 22 and 28A Waipuna
Road should both properties be approved for disposal. This will be
explored further should the Finance and Performance Committee approve the
proposed disposals.
19. The adjoining property at 28B Waipuna Road, Mt
Wellington was acquired from private ownership by Panuku under delegation using
its strategic development fund. Should the Finance and Performance
Committee approve the proposed disposal of 22 and 28A Waipuna Road, it is
intended to package together a disposal with other adjacent council owned
properties previously approved for disposal by the Finance
and Performance Committee in order
to provide an opportunity for development (housing) outcomes.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
22 Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington images
|
397
|
|
b⇩
|
28A Waipuna Road, Mt Wellington images
|
399
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Anthony Lewis - Senior Advisor, Portfolio Review,
Panuku Development Auckland
|
|
Authorisers
|
Rachel Hume - Team Leader Portfolio Review, Panuku
Development Auckland
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Request to rename a private road (Whiro
Lane) within Fenchurch Stage 2B (Stage 3).
File No.: CP2018/21637
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
seek approval from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board to rename a private
road (Whiro Lane) in the regeneration
neighbourhood of Fenchurch Stage 2B (Stage 3) in Glen Innes (Special Housing Area).
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Auckland Council has Road Naming Guidelines that set out the
requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. These
requirements and criteria have been applied in this situation to ensure
consistency of road naming across the Auckland Region.
3. In terms of the renaming of an existing road, the guidelines
acknowledge that road names are intended to be enduring and the renaming of
roads is discouraged unless there are compelling reasons for a change.
4. The renaming of “Whiro Lane” is requested by Tāmaki
Regeneration Company (“TRC”), due to the negative meaning and
connotation of the Māori word “Whiro” (meaning: evil, bad),
which was brought to the attention of TRC by a local resident. TRC deemed it
insensitive to place “Whiro” in such close proximity to the newly
named Te Nohotu Road, which acknowledges a recently deceased local community
member.
5. TRC has proposed the following names for consideration by the Local
Board, to rename the private road (JOAL Block D, Lot 202) within the Fenchurch 2B (Stage 3) development:
(Note: Names in bold and with an
asterisk have been suggested by relevant iwi):
Preferred Name:
· Takerei
Way
Pool of Alternative
Names:
· Takero Lane*
· Manihera
Lane
· Konatu
Lane
6. The proposed road names have been assessed to ensure that they meet
Auckland Council’s Road Naming Guidelines and the National Addressing
Standards for road naming. Mana Whenua were also consulted.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) Approve renaming the private road (‘Whiro Lane’) to
Takerei Way within the Fenchurch 2B (Stage 3) development, Glen Innes, in
accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource
consent reference BUN60078215, SUB60239003 - R/JSL/2016/2382).
|
Horopaki / Context
7. Location
and Site plans of the development can be found in Attachments A and B.
8. In accordance with the National Addressing Standards for road naming
(the AS/NZS 4819-2011 standard), the JOAL requires a road name because it
serves more than 5 lots.
9. TRC,
along with its development partner, RPV Rawa, will deliver a mix of state,
affordable and market houses amongst the 85 new houses to be built in Stages 2,
3 and 4, which lie in an area between Leybourne Circle, Te Nohotu Road and
Sunnymead Road. For Fenchurch 2B (Stage 3), this requires the creation of one
public road and three JOALs.
10. The
private road (Lot 202) to be renamed, which was created by way of subdivision
(reference BUN60078215, SUB60239003 - R/JSL/2016/2382), will service 9 new houses, 2 of which will be state houses.
11. Developer,
RPV Rawa, requires renaming the road before lodging the 224c, which is expected
to be around February 2019.
12. Local iwi have
also provided a Te Reo road name option, detailed below.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
13. The Auckland
Council Road Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as
a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be
given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name/s for the
Local Board’s approval.
14. Auckland Council’s road naming criteria typically require that
road names reflect:
- a historical or ancestral linkage to an area;
- a particular landscape, environmental or biodiversity theme or
feature; or
- an existing (or introduced) thematic identity in the area.
- the use of Maori names is actively encouraged.
15. Assessment: The names proposed by the Applicant have been assessed to ensure
that they meet Auckland Council’s Road Naming Guidelines and the National
Addressing Standards for road naming.
16. Road types: The road type ‘Lane’, has been assessed as acceptable,
in suiting the form and layout of the respective road to be renamed, as per the
Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines.
17. Confirmation: Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) has confirmed that all of the
proposed names are acceptable and not duplicated elsewhere in the region.
18. Iwi
Consultation: All relevant local iwi were written
to (via email) and invited to comment. Nga Maunga Whakahii o Kaipara and Ngati
Whatua Orakei responded to defer their interests to the other Ngati Whatua
entities. Ngāti Paoa Iwi Trust and Te Ahiwaru Waiohua both supported the
applicants proposed name ‘Manihera Takerei’, which the applicant
has now separated and included as two proposed names ‘Takerei Lane’
and ‘Manihera Lane’. Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Trust proposed a
name which the applicant has included in this application.
19. No objections or additional comments were raised by Mana Whenua for
any of the other proposed names.
20. Community Consultation: Proposed road
names have been produced via consultation with the community and key stakeholder
groups, such as TRC’s Community Liaison Committee, Lalaga Pasifiki, the
Glen Innes and Panmure Business Associations, and other community
organisations. Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board members were also canvassed
in 2017 for potential new names.
21. The applicant also contacted local residents for comment on the
proposed road names, including the resident that raised the complaint against
“Whiro Lane”. This resident suggested a name which has been
included as the applicant’s preferred road name option.
22. Permission: from relatives has been
obtained for the use of Manihera Takerei’s name.
Background of
‘Whiro Lane’ and reasons for renaming
23. In 2017, TRC conducted community engagement for potential new road
names. This engagement included TRC staff contributions, where a staff member
submitted the road name suggestion “Whiro”, with the meaning: Maori
name for the planet Mercury.
24. TRC conducted iwi consultation in September
2017. No comment or feedback was received on the proposed name ‘Whiro
Lane’.
25. The Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board approved ‘Whiro
Lane’ on the 28 November 2017, as part of the Fenchurch 2B (Stage 2) road
naming submission.
26. New road signs were installed throughout the Fenchurch 2B
development during early August 2018, which is when local resident, Mr Patuwai,
became aware of ‘Whiro Lane’ and informed TRC of its alternate
negative meaning: In Māori mythology, Whiro (or Hiro in the Tuamotus) is the lord of darkness, or the
embodiment of all evil.
27. Mr Patuwai’s father (Te Nohotu) had died in early September
2017 and a private road (JOAL) was named after him in 26
September 2017 as part of the Fenchurch 2B (Stage 1) development. The two newly named roads (‘Te Nohotu
Lane’ and ‘Whiro Lane’) are in
close proximity to each other (refer to Attachment
A).
28. TRC’s Neighbourhood Liaison Team (NLT) had
the ‘Whiro Lane’ road sign removed on 10th August 2018.
29. Theme: Preferred and alternative road
name options for the approved new JOAL were selected to acknowledge the history
of a respected member from this once close-knit community.
30. The Applicant’s proposed names and meanings for Fenchurch 2B
(Stage 3) is set out in the table below:
|
Preferred Name & Meaning for Fenchurch 2B (Stage 3) Lot 202
|
|
Preferred Name
|
Meaning (as described by
applicant)
|
|
Takerei
Way
|
Maunsel Takerei lived on Aveline Place. He was an influential
part of this Community and supported neighbourhood families. He and his wife
Marie were the only family in Aveline Place who bought their house which was
a significant achievement for his whanau. Marie Takerei sold the house in
January 2018. Maunsel passed away in the early 2000’s and left behind a
very strong family of children, grandchildren and community friends.
Name nominated by Mr Patuwai and supported by iwi.
|
31. TRC
has provided a pool of names that can be used as alternatives for Fenchurch 2B
(stage 3):
|
Pool of Alternative Names &
Meaning for Fenchurch 2B (Stage 3) Lot 202
|
|
Proposed Names
|
Meaning (as described by
applicant)
|
|
Manihera Lane
|
Manihera is the given name of Maunsel
Takerei, as noted in ‘Takerei Way’ meaning above.
|
|
Takero Lane
|
Te Reo Māori word: Mercury.
Suggested by Iwi
Note: Although like ‘Whiro’, this
name translates to the planet Mercury, ‘Takero’ only has one
alternative meaning: ‘Unahi o Takero’, which means shooting
star, meteor.
|
|
Konatu Lane
|
Te Reo Māori word: [verb] to stir,
mix, blend.
To acknowledge and reflect the diverse
community in Tāmaki.
Suggested by a Submitter: “based on new residents and families
who will live there and will blend together as a community which many of us
did in Glen Innes in the 60s, 70s and 80s”.
|
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
32. The decision
sought for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not
considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
33. The review
sought from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board on this report is linked
to the Auckland Plan Outcome “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s
point of difference in the world”. The use of Maori names for roads,
buildings and other public places is an opportunity to publicly demonstrate
Maori identity.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
34. The applicant has responsibility for
ensuring that appropriate signage will be installed accordingly once approval
is obtained for the new road names.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
35. There are no significant risks to
council as road naming is a routine part of the subdivision development
process, with consultation being a key part of the process.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
36. Approved road names are notified to Land
Information New Zealand who records them on their New Zealand wide land
information database which includes street addresses issued by councils.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Attachment A - Site Plans
|
407
|
|
b⇩
|
Attachment B - Location Plan
|
411
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Elizabeth Salter - Subdivision Technical Officer
|
|
Authorisers
|
Trevor Cullen - Team Leader Subdivision
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Road Name Approval: New Roads in the
regeneration of Hinaki Neighbourhood in Point England
File No.: CP2018/21733
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
seek approval from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board to name a new
public road, as well as a new private road, being a jointly owned access lot,
created by way of a subdivision development, in the regeneration of Hinaki
Neighbourhood in Point England (Special Housing Area). The extension of an
existing road also needs to be named.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Auckland
Council has Road Naming Guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria
of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have
been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming across the
Auckland Region.
3. The
Applicant, Tamaki Regeneration Company (“TRC”), has proposed the
following names for consideration by the Local Board for the new roads within
the Hinaki developments:
|
Table
1: Hinaki Development Proposed Road Names
|
|
Road
Reference
|
Preferred
Names
|
Road
Type
|
|
Public
Road 1 (Extension)
Proposed
to retain existing name
|
Parata
|
Street
|
|
Public
Road 2 (Extension)
Proposed
to retain existing name
|
Parata
|
Street
|
|
Public
Road 3
|
Leiite
Setefano
|
Street
|
|
JOAL
1 (Private)
|
Ngakahikatea
|
Lane
|
|
Pool
of Alternative Names for Hinaki
Development:
|
|
These
alternative names can be used for any of the roads listed above, except
Public Road 1 and 2 (Extensions of ‘Parata Street’), as this
existing road name is proposed to be retained.
|
Kaute
|
Road
|
|
Papatotara
|
Lane
|
|
Lumanai
|
Lane
|
|
Matawhero
|
Lane
|
|
Masina
|
Lane
|
4. The
proposed road names have been assessed to ensure that they meet Auckland
Council’s Road Naming Guidelines and the National Addressing Standards
for road naming. Mana Whenua were also consulted.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) Approve the retention of the existing road name
‘Parata Street’ for the public road to be extended in the Hinaki
development site (Public Road 1 and 2), pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the
Local Government Act 1974.
b) Approve 2 names for the following new
roads within the Hinaki development, Glen Innes, in accordance with section
319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent references
BUN60312399, LUC60312421, SUB60312424):
· Public Road 3: Leiite Setefano Street
· JOAL 1: Ngakahikatea Lane
|
Horopaki / Context
5. Resource
consent BUN60312399, SUB60312424 was issued 27 August 2018 for the amalgamation
of 51 existing residential lots into 13 vacant superlots for future
redevelopment.
6. In
partnership with developer(s), TRC will
deliver approximately 250 new houses between Tripoli Road, Pilkington Road and
Hinaki Street. This will require the creation of 3 new public roads and four
new JOALs to service a mix of state, affordable and market houses.
7. All
four JOALs will serve as rear accessways for houses that front
existing (or extended) public streets. As they serve less than 5 lots, they are
not required to be named. However, JOAL 1 is to be included in this application
for naming, to prevent potential confusion for users, due to its three entry
points from a public road, one being its T junction with Road 3.
8. Two of the new public roads (Road 1 and Road 2) are an extension to
an existing public road, currently named ‘Parata Street’. This
cul-de-sac will become an extended open-ended roadway, for which applicant TRC
requests to retain the existing road name out of respect for the existing
residents, and to avoid any confusion of addressing
along the continuous roadway.
9. Location
and Site plans of the Hinaki development can be found in Attachments A and B.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
10. The Auckland Council Road
Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as a result of
a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the
opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name/s for the Local
Board’s approval.
11. Auckland Council’s road naming criteria typically require that
road names reflect one of the following local themes, with the use of Maori names
being actively encouraged:
- a historical
or ancestral linkage to an area;
- a particular
landscape, environmental or biodiversity theme or feature; or
- an existing
(or introduced) thematic identity in the area.
12. Theme: Preferred road name
options for the proposed new roads were selected based on nominations by the
community and descendants of people who had provided significant long-term
service and devotion to the local area. Other proposed road names reflect the
character and landscape of this neighbourhood – from the past and into
the future.
13. The Applicant’s proposed names and meanings are set out in the
table below:
|
Table
2: Hinaki Development Preferred Road Names & Meanings
|
|
Road
reference
|
Preferred
Name
|
Meaning
(as described by applicant)
|
|
ROAD 1 (extension)
|
Parata Street
|
Apply the
existing road name “Parata Street” to the road extension which
will transform the current cul-de-sac into a through road. To retain
consistency for the private resident in this street and keep the historical
link for the neighbourhood.
|
|
ROAD 2 (extension)
|
Parata
Street
|
Same as above
|
|
ROAD 3
|
Leiite Setefano Street
|
Rev. Leiite
Setefano (deceased) had been an active stalwart in this community, leading
many of the foundation Pacific Island families in the Glen Innes and Panmure
communities. He was well respected for his church and community development.
He was the First Island Minister to a multi-racial parish now called Pacific
Islands Presbyterian Church, Tamaki. His family home is one of the few
remaining private residences adjoining the Hinaki redevelopment.
|
|
JOAL 1
|
Ngakahikatea Way
|
Nanny
Ngakahikatea was born in the 1800's. Throughout her lifetime, she came into
contact with all the Kiingitanga monarchs (including Potatau Te Wherowhero,
Tawhiao, Mahuta, Te Rata, and Te Atairangikahu), and was around when the
current monarch, Kiingi Tuheitia was born. Her descendants have lived in the
Pt England/Glen Innes area over several generations and many still live here
and maintain strong links to this area. This Waikato-Tainui Kuia, was over
120 years of age when she passed away at 245 Pilkington Road, Point England,
in 1975.
|
14. TRC
has provided a pool of names that can be used as alternatives for Hinaki Development:
|
Table
4: Hinaki Development Pool of
Alternative Names
(To
be used for ROAD 3 and JOAL 1)
|
|
Proposed
Name
|
Meaning
(as described by applicant)
|
|
Kaute Road
|
Cook Island Māori word chosen to
reflect the diversity of cultures within Tāmaki.
According to submitter: “It is a
word to describe the hibiscus flower, found on all islands in and throughout
the Pacific including here in the warmer areas of NZ. Tamaki has a high
concentration of Pacific tenants and organisations. It would be nice to have
a familiar term as a street name.”
‘Kaute’ is also a Te Reo
Māori verb meaning ‘to count, add up’.
|
|
Papatotara Lane
|
Te Reo Māori word for the inner
side of the bark of the Totara, and a term used to refer to high-ranking
women. Used in Ngaati Whanaunga’s waiata.
A word chosen to acknowledge the
long-established Māori habitation of this area and inspire young women
of the future.
(Suggested by iwi as part of a Mana
Whenua engagement in 2017 for another road name).
|
|
Lumanai Lane
|
Samoan word means 'the future'.
Lumanaʻi, as a verb - to have
before one, to have in prospect, either of time or place.
A word chosen to inspire future
generations in this neighbourhood.
|
|
Matawhero Lane
|
Te Reo Māori name for the planet
Mars.
Inspired by the Matariki Festival held
in Glen Innes every year.
|
|
Masina Lane
|
A Samoan word - in reference to the
moon.
Inspired by the Matariki Festival held
in Glen Innes every year.
|
15. Assessment:
The names proposed by the Applicant have been assessed to ensure that they meet
Auckland Council’s Road Naming Guidelines and the National Addressing Standards for
road naming.
16. Confirmation:
Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) has confirmed that all of the proposed
names are acceptable and not duplicated elsewhere in the region.
17. Road
type: ‘Street, ‘Road’ and ‘Lane’ are
acceptable road types for the new private road, suiting the form and layout of
the road, as per the Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines.
18. Iwi
Consultation: A list of more than 20 proposed names was submitted by Tamaki
Regeneration Company to Mana Whenua for consideration on 10 September 2018 through
to 01 October 2018. Most responses from mana whenua were to defer to other
groups, who in turn provided no further responses or comments.
19. Only
Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki replied with an objection to some names on the
list - these comments were respected and those names have not been submitted as
part of this application.
20. No
objections or additional comments were raised by Mana Whenua for any of the
other proposed names
21. Community
Consultation: Proposed road names for the Hinkai development have been
produced via consultation with the community and key stakeholder groups, such
as TRC’s Community Liaison Committee, Lalaga Pasifiki, the Glen Innes and
Panmure Business Associations, and other community organisations. Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board members were also canvassed in 2017 for potential
new names.
22. Permission:
from relatives has been obtained for the use of the names Ngakahikatea and
Leiite Setefano.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
23. The decision sought for this report does not trigger any significant
policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
24. The review sought from the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland
Plan Outcome “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference
in the world”. The use of
Maori names for roads,
buildings and other
public places is an opportunity to publicly
demonstrate Maori identity.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
25. The
applicant has responsibility for ensuring that appropriate signage will be
installed accordingly once approval is obtained for the new road names.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
26. There are no significant
risks to council as road naming is a routine part of the subdivision
development process, with consultation being a key part of the process.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
27. Approved road
names are notified to Land Information New Zealand who records them on their
New Zealand wide land information database which includes street addresses
issued by councils.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Attachment A - Site Plan
|
419
|
|
b⇩
|
Attachment B - Location Plans
|
421
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Elizabeth Salter - Subdivision Technical Officer
|
|
Authorisers
|
Trevor Cullen - Team Leader Subdivision
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Road Name Approval: 3 New Roads in the
regeneration of the Line Road and Epping Street Neighbourhood in Glen Innes.
File No.: CP2018/21762
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
seek approval from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board to name the
extension of 3 new roads created by way of a subdivision development in the
regeneration of the Line Road and Epping Street Neighbourhood in Glen Innes.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Auckland
Council has Road Naming Guidelines that set out the requirements and criteria
of the Council for proposed road names. These requirements and criteria have
been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming across the
Auckland Region.
3. The
Applicant, Tāmaki Regeneration Company (“TRC”), has proposed
the following names for consideration by the Local Board:
|
Table
1:
Line - Epping Development Proposed Road Names
|
|
Road
Reference
|
Preferred
Names
|
Road
Type
|
|
Public
Road 1 (Extension)
Proposed
to extend existing name
|
Eastview
|
Road
|
|
Public
Road 2 (Extension)
Proposed
to extend existing name
|
Harlow
|
Crescent
|
|
Public
Road 3 (Extension)
Proposed
to extend existing name
|
Harlow
|
Crescent
|
4. The
proposed road names have been assessed to ensure that they meet Auckland
Council’s Road Naming Guidelines and the National Addressing Standards
for road naming. Mana Whenua were also consulted.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) Approve the name ‘Eastview Road’ for
the new public road (Road 1) to be extended in the Line-Epping development
site, pursuant to section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974
(resource consent references BUN60301818, LUC60301809, SUB60301810).
b) Approve renaming the existing road type of the
public road ‘Harlow Place’ to ‘Harlow Crescent’
within the Line-Epping development site, Glen Innes, in accordance with
section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent
references BUN60301818, LUC60301809, SUB60301810).
c) Approve the name ‘Harlow Crescent’ for the new public
road (Road 2) to be extended in the Line-Epping development site, pursuant to
section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent
references BUN60301818, LUC60301809, SUB60301810).
d) Approve the name ‘Harlow Crescent’ for the new public
road (Road 3) to be extended in the Line-Epping development site, pursuant to
section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent
references BUN60301818, LUC60301809, SUB60301810).
|
Horopaki / Context
5. Location
and Site plans of the Hinaki development can be found in Attachments A and B.
6. Resource
consent BUN60301818, LUC60301809, SUB60301810 was issued 30 August 2017 for the
construction of 114 new dwellings, and the staged subdivision of the site,
involving the creation of 49 residential lots, 3 JOALs, 3 roads to vest, and 1
reserve to vest.
7. The 3 public roads are proposed to be extensions to existing public
roads:
· Road 1
will be the extension to Eastview Road that will connect Line Road and Epping
Street. Applicant TRC requests to extend the name
‘Eastview Road’ (Road 1) out of respect for the existing residents, and to avoid any
confusion of addressing along the continuous roadway.
· The
cul-de-sac ‘Harlow Place’ will become an extended open-ended
roadway with the creation of Road 2, which will link around back into Epping
Street. It will service 10 lots.
· Road 3
will be an extension off Road 2 to service five lots. TRC has confirmed this
cul-de-sac will not be extended in any future development.
8. TRC
requests the road type of ‘Harlow Place’ be changed to
‘Harlow Crescent’ to better suit the new crescent shaped
thoroughfare that this road will become from the extension of Road 2.
9. Applicant TRC requests to name Road 2 and Road 3 ‘Harrow
Crescent’ to avoid any confusion of addressing along the continuous
roadway.
10. The
3 JOALs (jointly owned access lots) also shown on the site plan, will serve as
rear accessways for houses that front existing (or extended) public streets. As
each of the JOALs will serve less than 5 lots, they are not required to be
named.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
11. The Auckland Council Road
Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as a result of
a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the
opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name/s for the Local
Board’s approval.
12. Auckland Council’s road naming criteria typically require that
road names reflect one of the following local themes, with the use of Maori
names being actively encouraged:
- a historical
or ancestral linkage to an area;
- a particular
landscape, environmental or biodiversity theme or feature; or
- an existing
(or introduced) thematic identity in the area.
13. The Applicant’s proposed names and meanings are set out in the
table below:
|
Table
2: Hinaki Development Preferred Road Names & Meanings
|
|
Road
reference
|
Preferred
Name
|
Meaning
(as described by applicant)
|
|
ROAD 1 (extension)
|
Eastview Road
|
As this new
publicly vested Road will appear as an extension of an existing road directly
opposite, it is requested to retain the name ‘Eastview’. Only one
new house is expected to be facing the new road.
|
|
ROAD 2 (extension)
|
Harlow
Crescent
|
Retain
existing name of “Harlow” to provide continuity of place for
existing local community. Change of road type suffix only.
|
|
ROAD 3
(extension)
|
Harlow Crescent
|
Retain
existing name of “Harlow” to provide continuity of place for
existing local community. Change of road type suffix only.
|
14. Road
type: ‘Road’ and ‘Crescent’ are acceptable road
types, suiting the form and layout of the new extended roads, as per the
Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari
ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
15. The decision sought for this report does not trigger any significant
policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
16. The review sought from the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board on this report is linked to the Auckland
Plan Outcome “A Maori identity that is Auckland’s point of difference
in the world”. The use of
Maori names for roads,
buildings and other
public places is an opportunity to publicly
demonstrate Maori identity.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
17. The
applicant has responsibility for ensuring that appropriate signage will be
installed accordingly once approval is obtained for the new road names.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
18. There
are no significant risks to council as road naming is a routine part of the
subdivision development process, with consultation being a key part of the
process.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
19. Approved road names are notified to Land Information New Zealand who
records them on their New Zealand wide land information database which includes
street addresses issued by councils.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Attachment A - Site Plan
|
427
|
|
b⇩
|
Attachment B - Location Plan
|
429
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Elizabeth Salter - Subdivision Technical Officer
|
|
Authorisers
|
Trevor Cullen - Team Leader Subdivision
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Quarter One Performance Report:
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board
File No.: CP2018/22162
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
provide the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board with an integrated quarterly
performance report for quarter one, 1 July – 30 September 2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. This
report includes financial performance, progress against work programmes, key
challenges the board should be aware of and any risks to delivery against the
2018/2019 work programme.
3. The
work programme is produced annually and aligns with the
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Plan 2017 outcomes.
4. Key
activity updates from this quarter:
· The
board allocated a total of $58,748 through it’s first local community
grant round
· The
board allocated it’s community response fund to undertake engagement on
the draft Tamaki Open Space Network Plan
· The
Sir Woolf Fisher Park was reopened on 7 July 2018
· Lagoon
Stadium has seen a decrease in centre visits this quarter.
5. All
operating departments with agreed work programmes have provided a quarterly
update against their work programme delivery. All activities are reported with
a status of green (on track) or amber (some risk or issues, which are being
managed). There are no activities with a red status this quarter (behind
delivery, significant risk).
6. The
financial performance report compared to budget 2017/2018 is attached. There
are some points for the local board to note:
· The
overall operating result is four per cent above budget due to higher operating
revenue and expenditure.
· Revenue
is 26 per cent above budget due to higher than expected revenue from community
halls and centres.
· Operating
expenditure is five per cent above budget in Asset Based Services (ABS)
expenditure, particularly in the full facility parks contract.
· Locally
driven initiatives operating expenditure is slightly below budget as the
Integrate ACE activity programme is in the planning stage.
· Capital
expenditure is above budget by 473 per cent as coastal asset renewals and
greenway and walkway development continue from last financial year.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
the performance report for the financial quarter ending 30 September 2018.
|
Horopaki / Context
7. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board has an approved 2018/2019 work programme
(Attachment A) for the following operating departments:
· Arts,
Community and Events
· Parks,
Sport and Recreation
· Libraries
and Information
· Community
Services: Service, Strategy and Integration
· Community
Facilities: Build Maintain Renew
· Community
Leases
· Infrastructure
and Environmental Services
· Plans
and Places.
8. Work
programmes are produced annually, to meet the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local
Board outcomes identified in the three-year Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board Plan 2017. The local board plan outcomes are:
· Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
is an active and engaged community
· Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
is a community that cares about its environment
· Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
is the place to be
· Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
has quality infrastructure to match growth
9. The
graph below shows how the work programme activities meet local board plan
outcomes. Activities that are not part of the approved work programme but
contribute towards the local board outcomes, such as advocacy by the local
board, are not captured in this graph.
Graph 1: Maungakiekie-Tāmaki work
programme activities by outcome
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu / Analysis and advice
Local Board Work Programme Snapshot
10. Two
status categories are used to describe work programme activities –
‘RAG status’ which is short for red /amber /green (and grey)
measures the performance of the activity while ‘activity status’
shows the stage of the activity. ‘RAG status’ and ‘activity
status’ create a snapshot of progress of the work programme.
11. The
graph below identifies work programme activity by RAG status (red, amber, green
and grey). It shows the percentage of work programme activities that are on
track (green), in progress but with issues that are being managed (amber),
activities that have significant issues (red) and activities that have been
cancelled/deferred/merged (grey). There are no red or grey activities for this
quarter.
Graph 2: Maungakiekie-Tāmaki work programme by RAG status
12. The
graph below identifies work programme activity by activity status and
department. The number of activity lines differ by department as approved in
the local board work programme.
Graph 3: Maungakiekie-Tāmaki work programme
activity by activity status and department
Key activity updates from quarter one
13. Local
community grants: The local board has completed it’s first local
grant round of the financial year. A total of $58,748 was allocated, leaving
$61,252 for the remaining two grant rounds.
14. Community
Response Fund: The local board allocated $10,000 to Tamaki Open Space
Network Plan Engagement. There are no remaining funds.
15. Local
Civic Events: Sir Woolf Fisher Park was publicly reopened on 7 July 2018
with 100 people attending the event. Free food and sport activities were
offered to attendees.
16. Lagoon
Stadium: this quarter has seen a 52 per cent decrease in centre visits.
17. Onehunga
Bay Reserve: the concept plan has been further implemented through the
completion of construction this quarter.
18. Libraries
preschool programming: 105 preschool sessions were delivered with a total
of 4669 attendees this quarter.
Activities on hold
19. The
following work programme activity has been identified by operating departments
as on hold:
o Stone
Cottage – renew roof and joinery: This project is currently on hold
due to seismic implications. The seismic team will undertake an investigation
and recommend a way forward for this project.
Capital expenditure carry forwards
20. The
Community Facilities capital expenditure carry forwards were approved by the
Finance and Performance Committee on 17 October 2018. A list of the carry
forwards has been provided as an attachment to this report (Attachment C).
Commentary on these items has not been provided this quarter as the carry
forward activities were not approved by the committee until after the end of
the first quarter. Commentary on these items will be included in the quarter
two report as these activities are brought into the 2018/2019 work programme.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te
poari ā-rohe /
Local impacts and local board views
21. This
report informs the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board of the performance for
the quarter ending 30 September 2018.
Key performance indicators
22. As
most of the 10-Year Budget 2018-2028 key performance indicators are annual
measures and do not change quarterly, staff have removed them from the
quarterly performance report and will present the key performance indicators in
the annual report at the end of the year.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori / Māori impact
statement
23. The
local board remains committed to integrating and supporting work that
contributes to outcomes for Māori. This includes enhancing partnerships
and collaborative ways of working with mana whenua and mataawaka. For instance,
in June 2018, the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board signed a relationship
agreement with Ngāti Pāoa.
24. The
local board continues to support the redevelopment of Ruapotaka Marae. As an
urban marae, this project has specific impact on the wider Māori
community.
25. All
three libraries in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board area are committed
to ‘celebrating Te Ao Māori and strengthening responsiveness to
Māori’. Each of the libraries have celebrated Matariki and
Māori Language Week, by providing a variety of events such as Te Reo story
times at each library and Matariki kai and gardening event at Panmure library.
Financial Performance
26. Revenue
from venue hire of community centres and community halls are slightly above
budget. This has contributed to a 26 per cent increase in expected revenue for
this quarter.
27. Operating
expenditure is five per cent above budget in ABS expenditure. This is
particularly due to higher than expected expenditure within the full facility
parks contract.
28. Locally
driven initiatives operating expenditure is 24 per cent below budget as some
activities, such as the Integrate ACE activity programme, are in planning
stages.
29. Capital
expenditure is above budget by 473 per cent as renewal of
coastal assets in Dunkirk Reserve and the Tamaki Path construction continue
from last financial year.
30. The
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Financial Performance report is attached
(Attachment B).
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea / Financial implications
31. This
report is for information only and therefore there are no financial implications
associated with this report.
Ngā raru tūpono / Risks
32. While
the risk of non-delivery of the entire work programme is rare, the likelihood
for risk relating to individual activities does vary. Capital projects for
instance, are susceptible to more risk as on-time and on-budget delivery is
dependent on weather conditions, approvals (e.g. building consents) and is
susceptible to market conditions.
Ngā koringa ā-muri / Next steps
33. The
local board will receive the next performance update following the end of
quarter two, 31 December 2018.
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Q1 Work Programme Update FY19
|
437
|
|
b⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Q1 Financial Performance
Report FY19
|
455
|
|
c⇩
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki FY18 Capex Carry Forwards
|
461
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Ben Moimoi - Local Board Advisor - Puketapapa
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Regional Facilities Auckland First
Quarter Performance Report For the Quarter Ending 30 September 2018
File No.: CP2018/22347
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
update the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board on the performance of Regional
Facilities Auckland for the quarter ending 30 September 2018.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) receive
the Regional Facilities Auckland quarterly performance report for the quarter
ending 30 September 2018.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
RFA First Quarter Report 30 September 2018
|
465
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author
|
Judy Lawley - Manager Local Board Engagement
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason – General Manager Local Board
Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
File No.: CP2018/22143
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
present the board with the governance forward work calendar.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
governance forward work calendar for the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board
is in Attachment A.
3. The
calendar aims to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring
advice on meeting agendas is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying
what advice is required and when
· clarifying
the rationale for reports.
4. The
calendar is updated every month. Each update is reported to business meetings.
It is recognised that at times items will arise that are not programmed. Board
members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
a) note
the attached Governance Forward Work Calendar.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
|
495
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Tracey Freeman - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
Record of Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local
Board Workshops
File No.: CP2018/22144
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To
provide a summary of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board workshops for 30th
October, 6th, 13th and 20th November 2018.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The
workshops are held to give an information opportunity for board members and
officers to discuss issues and projects, and note that no binding decisions are
made or voted on at workshop sessions.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s
That the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board:
3. note
the local board record of workshops held on 30th October, 6th,
13th and 20th November 2018.
|
Ngā
tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
a⇩
|
Record of Workshops
|
499
|
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors
|
Tracey Freeman - Democracy Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services
Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager
|
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki
Local Board
27 November
2018
|
|
