Agenda of Puketāpapa Local Board

Chair, Harry Doig will deliver the welcome message.

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

4 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 6 December 2018 and the extraordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 13 December 2018, as a true and correct record.

5 Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.

6 Acknowledgements

At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.

7 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

8 Deputations

Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Puketāpapa Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.

At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.

9 Public Forum

A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.

10 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

Puketāpapa Local Board

21 February 2019

Auckland Transport's Monthly Update

File No.: CP2019/01197

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide an update to the Puketāpapa Local Board (the Board) on transport related matters in their area.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report notes the Board’s resolutions of November 2018 requesting rough order of costs for six transport capital fund projects.

3. It updates the Board on progress on its local board transport capital fund (LBTCF) projects and the amount of funds still to be allocated.

4. Provided is information on Auckland Transport’s (AT) upcoming consultation on the Speed Management Bylaw.

5. AT’s quarterly report on its activities in the Board area and regionally, is attached for the period of October to December 2018.

6. Relevant consultations and decisions of the transport control committee as they affect the Puketāpapa Local Board are noted.

7. Information on the status of significant projects in the Board area is provided.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) receive the Auckland Transport February 2019 report.

Horopaki

Context

8. This report addresses transport related matters in the local board area.

9. AT is responsible for all of Auckland’s transport services, excluding state highways. It reports on a monthly basis to local boards, as set out in its Local Board Engagement Plan. This monthly reporting commitment acknowledges the important engagement role local boards play within and on behalf of their local communities.

10. The LBTCF is a capital budget provided to all local boards by Auckland Council and delivered by Auckland Transport (AT). Local boards can use this fund to deliver transport infrastructure projects that they believe are important but are not part of AT’s work programme. Projects must also:

· be safe

· not impede network efficiency

· be in the road corridor (although projects running through parks can be considered if there is a transport outcome).

Quarterly Reporting October to December 2018

11. The following quarterly report material is attached to this monthly report:

· Attachment A – report from Auckland Transport departments on their activities in the Puketāpapa Local Board area and regionally over the last quarter (October to December 2018).

· Attachment B – report on Travelwise Schools activities in the Puketāpapa Local Board area over the last quarter.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Responses to resolutions

12. At its November meeting, the Board asked AT to provide rough order of costs for six projects for the Board to consider using its LBTCF. Rough order of costs were discussed at the February 2019 Infrastructure and Heritage Cluster meeting. Recommendations from the cluster will be considered at the March 2019 business meeting.

Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF)

Puketāpapa Local Board Transport Capital Fund Financial Summary
Total Funds Available in current political term	$2,702,161
Remaining Budget left	$676,123

13. The Board still has a significant amount of budget to be spent in this term.

Update on Puketāpapa Local Board Transport Capital Fund Projects

14. The table below reflects the status of projects which are progressing using the LBTCF.

Project	Description	Status	Projected Cost
Fearon Park Pathway	A shared path to be constructed through Fearon Park.	The shared path is now completed.	$190,000
Richardson Road carpark realignment and Lighting project	A project to shift parking in the carpark to facilitate the construction of a shared path past the kindergarten. This will complete the missing link in the Mt Roskill safe route scheme.	Construction is well advanced and should be substantially complete in March 2019.	$220,000
Keith Hay Park Lighting – Southern Section	Continuing the lighting project from the northern section to the southern end of the park past Noton Road carpark to Richardson Road.	Contract for the work has been awarded with work to take place April to June 2019 to meet stakeholders’ requirements.	$350,000
Greenway Cycling Project – Route D (modified)	This route includes shared paths on Frost Road and then a combination of traffic calming measures, signs, markings along Britton and Dornwell Roads, shared paths through the laneways and then traffic calming on Hayr Road and Haughey Avenue through to, but not across Hillsborough Rd.	The scheme design was presented to the Board in November. The next step is for the project to move to public consultation.	$600,000 (allocated)

Progress being made on significant investigations and projects in the Board area

Project	Details	Status
Safer Communities 2018-21	This programme focuses on walking improvements in the Mount Roskill community. It aims to create safer walking environments for local people to get to and from key destinations such as schools, public transport hubs, shops, community centres and more, on foot.	Concept designs for Frost and Carr Rd were discussed with the Board in 2018 and have been to public consultation. The project team will come back to the Board in March 2019 to discuss changes to Mt Albert Road/Hayr Rd area and the analysis of the first consultation.
Mt Roskill Village Upgrade/ Dominion Road Double Decker Route	Changes are being made to the bus stops in the village area to accommodate double decker buses. Footpath renewals will take place at the same time along with a streetscape improvement project, funded by the Board. The Board approved a draft streetscape design on 16 August 2018. Some changes arose from Auckland Transport internal feedback, an independent road safety audit and a hui. Key design themes are retained.	The work in the village is planned to integrate with other changes needed to accommodate double decker buses. Work has begun moving the bus stop and associated works. The improvement work will follow and is expected to be completed by May 2019.
Carlton Street	AT has reviewed the safety audit completed by consultants and provided responses to the matters raised at the May 2018 public meeting. AT is working through bus friendly infrastructure designs that will ensure all vehicles travel slowly on Carlton Street.	A new design for Carlton Street is being developed for consultation.
Mt Eden Road Buslane Upgrade	Tender documents have been finalised and approval from the Traffic Control Committee has been obtained. The intention is to combine the work in the Puketāpapa and Albert-Eden Local Board areas with a planned reseal of sections of Mt Eden Road.	The work around Mt Eden village will proceed. Some of the work in the Puketāpapa Local Board area is on hold. Mt Eden Rd (Mt Albert Rd to Duke St) will still be resealed this financial year. This resurfacing will include the traffic lanes and flush median. i.e. the parking shoulder areas will be left.
Duke Street Traffic Calming	Speed calming devices will be constructed on Duke Street similar in design to the existing devices.	It is expected that this improvement will be completed by the end of March 2019.
Queenstown Road Pedestrian Facility	The provision of a mid-block signalised crossing to replace the existing pedestrian refuge.	Work on the signalised crossing is due to begin in February 2019.

Speed Management Bylaw Consultation

15. AT is fast-tracking implementation of a speed management plan for Auckland and delivering an ambitious $700 million safety infrastructure acceleration programme estimated to reduce DSi by up to 18% over an initial three-year period and by up to 60% by 2028. It will deliver major, minor and mass-action safety engineering projects, including speed management on high-risk routes and locations across the network.

16. As part of this programme, AT is proposing to change speed limits across Auckland using The Speed Limits Bylaw. This is the legal process for changing speed limits as per Section 27.1 of the Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017. This will affect approximately 10% of Auckland’s local roads.

17. In December 2018, Auckland Transport’s Board approved a public consultation on the Bylaw. This is in accordance with the special consultative procedure under the Local Government Act 2002 and in accordance with the Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2017 with regard to the new speed limits themselves.

18. The consultation will start on February 28, 2019 and last for approximately one month. The Bylaw will contain a complete list of the roads proposed for speed limits changes and will include information on their current speed limits and the new proposed speed limits.

19. No roads in the Puketāpapa Local Board area are impacted by these changes but residents are fully entitled to give feedback on the proposed changes in other areas of Auckland.

20. Following consultation, the feedback will be analysed, and any required changes made. The Auckland Transport Board will then make and pass the new bylaw with the recommended changes.

21. Once consultation on the bylaw is complete and the bylaw is adopted there will need to be changes of signage and sometimes supporting engineering measures to encourage driving at slower speeds. These measures could include installing raised zebra crossing, raised tables, speed humps and narrowing roads.

New 191 Bus Routebus

22. A new bus route will come into service this month. The route will connect Lynfield with Blockhouse Bay, Rosebank Road and New Lynn.

23. The 191 will start operating from Sunday 24 February. Information including the timetable and route map is now on our website at: AT.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/service-announcements/107-bus-service-replaced-by-191-bus-service

24. The timetable can be found here: https://at.govt.nz/media/1979361/191-timetable.pdf

25. The route map is available at : https://at.govt.nz/media/1979360/191-route-map.pdf

26. Now that the map and timetable is finalised AT has commenced a public information campaign to tell people about this new bus service. Posters will be installed at bus stops from early February and newspaper, email and social media advertising will follow.

27. Key schools and retirement villages will be individually notified of the changes.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

28. The impact of information in this report is confined to Auckland Transport and does not impact on other parts of the Council group. Any engagement with other parts of the Council group will be carried out on an individual project basis.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

Local Board Workshop – November 2018

29. AT held a workshop with the Board in November 2018. This provided an opportunity to discuss the LBTCF, progress of the Board’s cycling project (Route D), introduce the Integrated Corridor Project and other local issues.

Auckland Transport Consultations

30. AT provides the Puketāpapa Local Board with the opportunity to comment on transport projects being delivered in their area.

Project

Description

Farnol Street, Hillsborough

AT is proposing to install No Stopping at All Times (broken yellow lines) parking restrictions on Farnol Street in Hillsborough, resulting in the removal of nine on street spaces.

This will improve accessibility and manoeuvrability along Farnol Street, particularly for larger vehicles including emergency service and rubbish collection vehicles. The width of the road means that it is

not possible to park vehicles on both sides without obstructing the road. Currently vehicles parking in this way are blocking access.

Traffic Control Committee resolutions

31. These are the decisions of the Traffic Control Committee that affected the Puketāpapa Local Board area in November, December 2018 and January 2019:

Street/Area	Description	Work	Decision
Aldersgate Road, Hillsborough Road, Hillsborough	Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined	No Stopping At All Times, Lane Arrows, Road Hump, Flush Median, Stop Control	Carried
Cape Horn Road, Hillsborough Road, Hillsborough	Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined	No Stopping At All Times, Rescinded, Road Hump, Give-Way Control	Carried
The Avenue, Commodore Drive, Halsey Drive, Canberra Avenue, Hillsborough Road, Dominion Road Extension, Rangitiki Crescent, Glass Road, Budgeon Street, Caronia Crescent, Strathnaver Crescent, Niagara Crescent, James Tyler Crescent, Lynfield	Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined to support the 191 route	No Stopping At All Times, Bus Stop, Bus Shelter, P2 Parking, Removal Of Bus Stop, Traffic Island, Pedestrian Crossing, School Crossing Point, School Patrol, Flush Median, Traffic Island, Stop Control, Give-Way Control, Edge Lines	Carried
Greenville Avenue, Elphinestone Avenue, Mt Roskill	Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined	No Stopping At All Times	Carried
Mount Eden Road, Kingsway, Duke Street, Rewa Road, Grahame Breed Drive, Hunters Park Drive, Roskill Way and streets in the Albert-Eden Board area	Permanent Traffic and Parking changes Combined to support the bus lane changes on Mt Eden Road.	No Stopping At All Times, Bus Lane, Ambulance Service, Cycle Lane, Clearway, Bus Stop, P5 Parking, P60 Parking, P30 Parking, P15 Parking, P120 Parking, Paid Parking Area, Loading Zone, Angle Parking, Bus Shelter, No Right Turn, Right Turn Only, Lane Arrow Markings, Traffic Islands, Flush Median, Shoulder Marking, Stop Control, Give-Way Control, Traffic Signal Control, Pedestrian Crossing, Edge Line	Carried

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

32. The proposed decision of receiving the report has no impacts or opportunities for Māori. Any engagement with Māori, or consideration of impacts and opportunities, will be carried out on an individual project basis.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

33. There are no financial implications that result from receiving this report.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

34. There are no risks associated with receiving this report.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

35. The Puketāpapa Local Board will discuss AT’s responses from its November 2018 resolutions at its February Infrastructure and Heritage Cluster. That body will then make recommendations to the Puketāpapa Local Board in regard to further transport projects.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	AT's Quarterly Report to the Board (October to December 2018)	15
b ⇩	AT's Quarterly Report on Travelwise Schools in Puketāpapa Local Board Area (October to December 2018)	29

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors	Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor - Puketapapa
Authorisers	Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager

Puketāpapa Local Board

21 February 2019

Adoption of the Puketāpapa Open Space Network Plan

File No.: CP2019/00052

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To adopt the Puketāpapa Open Space Network Plan.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Adoption of the open space network plan will assist local board decision-making and provide a framework for the development of open space over the next 10 years.

3. The purpose of the plan is to set out actions to deliver a quality and sustainable, open space network that can respond to, and accommodate, anticipated population growth.

4. Implementation will provide the community with access to a range of recreational, social, cultural and environmental experiences.

5. The plan includes:

· the current state of the open space network and the challenges it is facing

· five key moves that provide the framework to deliver a quality and sustainable network

· prioritised actions that will deliver the key outcomes.

6. There is no additional funding to implement projects in the open space network plan beyond renewal of existing assets and planned capital expenditure.

7. The lack of funding to implement all identified actions could create a reputational risk. The local board can use the plan to advocate for increased funding as part of Annual and Long-term Plan processes.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) adopt the Puketāpapa Open Space Network Plan (Attachment A).

b) delegate approval of any minor amendments to the document to the Chairperson of the Puketāpapa Local Board.

Horopaki

Context

8. An open space network plan has been prepared for the Puketāpapa Local Board area.

9. This plan outlines the local board’s objectives and priorities for the future development of local parks and open spaces.

10. The plan responds to growth and increasing diversity anticipated in the Puketāpapa area including changes in demographics and patterns of usage.

11. The plan was prepared in consultation with the local board, partners and key stakeholders. It is informed by Puketāpapa Neighbourhood Parks Research.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

12. The plan analyses the current state of the Puketāpapa open space network and sets out five key moves. They provide the framework for actions covering future development and management of the open space network over the next 10 years.

13. The plan is strategically aligned to three Auckland Plan focus areas:

Belonging and Participation - Focus area 1

Create safe opportunities for people to meet, connect, participate in and enjoy community and civic life.

Belonging and Participation - Focus area 7 Recognise the value of arts, culture, sport and recreation to quality of life.

Homes and Places - Focus area 5 Create urban places for the future.

Puketāpapa Open Space Network Plan

Current state

14. The main strengths of the existing open space network include:

· balance of sport parks, ecological areas and passive open space

· adequate provision of sports fields

· a community that treasures the environment and works to protect and enhance the waterways

· a rich cultural heritage.

15. The main challenges relating to existing open space include:

· limited opportunities for diverse play (to cater to all ages and abilities)

· poor environmental quality of the waterways and coastline (Oakley Creek)

· limited connections within the open space network; between parks, growth areas and town centres; and across the existing greenways network.

Key moves

16. Five key moves have been identified to guide actions to develop the open space network. They respond to the issues and opportunities identified in the current state analysis.

· High quality parks network – provide for a range of open space experiences by optimising existing open space and the development of distinctive parks

· Treasured environment – ensure sustainable management of open space including improving water quality and biodiversity

· Inclusive communities – respond to community needs, reflect Māori identity, culture and heritage, celebrate the community’s identity and foster belonging

· Active involvement and wellbeing – support healthy lifestyles, improve awareness and encourage appropriate use of open space

· Opportunities to connect – improve connectivity between communities and places, while enhancing ecological corridors.

17. The long-term goal is for a quality and sustainable open space network.

Principles, advocacy, decision-making and actions

18. The primary purpose of the network plan is to provide actions to improve the open space.

19. Prioritisation principles provide direction for planning and implementing park development. The following list of principles assist in prioritising the actions:

· existing capital works programmes and contractual commitments

· areas zoned for high growth (metropolitan centre, town centres, local centres, mixed use, terrace housing and apartments) and where there is a gap in provision identified

· areas of deficiency and/or poor-quality open space prioritised over areas of good provision and/or good quality open space

· cost benefit of individual actions

· planning and funding cycles and other influences such as land acquisitions, infrastructure projects, integrated planning with neighbouring local boards and other stakeholders such as environmental services.

20. Focus areas and actions have been prioritised according to the principles.

21. An overview of the key moves and prioritised actions are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Overview of key moves, focus areas and prioritised actions

Key move	Focus areas	Actions
High quality parks network	Open space provision	· investigate and fill identified gaps in provision for recreational activities, with a focus on greenway routes and play facilities · undertake a Puketāpapa play provision assessment and deliver the outcomes subject to available funding
	Optimise existing open space	· partner with developers throughout the Puketāpapa Local Board area · investigate optimisation opportunities
	Develop distinctive parks	· investigate provision of a major playground facility at Monte Cecilia Park · achieve a parks excellence award for a park within Puketāpapa
Treasured environment	Ensure sustainable management of open space	· undertake a study of tree cover in parks and open space
	Manage and improve water quality	· partner with mana whenua, community and volunteer groups to improve water quality of rivers and streams throughout Puketāpapa · support and advocate for large scale capital works to naturalise and daylight sections of the Te Auaunga (Oakley Creek) through Mount Roskill War Memorial Park, Keith Hay Park and Freeland Reserve
	Improve biodiversity	· implement actions as set out in the Te Auaunga (Oakley Creek) Catchment Management Plan
Inclusive communities	Reflect Māori identity, culture and heritage	· investigate opportunities for signage and narratives within the open space network relating to iwi/hapū
	Celebrate the community’s identity and belonging	· engage the community in park design to bolster identity, connectedness and a sense of belonging
	Respond to the needs of the community equitably	· ensure gender, age and cultural needs are appropriately incorporated during the design of recreational opportunities
Active involvement and wellbeing	Support healthy lifestyles	· support the implementation of the Healthy Puketāpapa Action Plan as it relates to parks and open space
	Improve awareness of open space	· provide signage that connects the community with parks and open space to build stronger neighbourhoods
	Encourage appropriate use of open space	· continue to investigate the needs for sports fields to optimise their use and provide opportunities for communities to participate in their chosen sport
Opportunities to connect	Improve connectivity between communities and places	· continue to improve the Waikōwhai Walkway · deliver high priority routes in the Greenways Plan · increase tree cover within the local board area
	Enhance ecological corridors	· continue to support volunteer community groups
	Improve awareness of connections	· improve greenways signage with Auckland Transport and Auckland Council

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

23. The plan has been developed in consultation with relevant council departments. Their views are reflected in this plan.

24. Community Facilities, Community Services, Auckland Transport and Environmental Services will implement the network plan.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

25. Local communities will benefit from the actions in this plan. These include increased sport and recreation participation opportunities, leading to improved health and wellbeing.

26. Staff engaged the Puketāpapa Local Board in the preparation of the network plan through a series of workshops:

· 3 August 2017 – introduction to the open space network plan

· 5 October 2017 – discussion relating to the current state and analysis

· 30 November 2017 – discussion relating to the key moves

· 26 April 2018 – discussion relating to prioritisation principles and actions from key moves

· 2 August 2018 – discussion relating to the draft open space network plan and agreeing the prioritisation of the key actions

· 23 August 2018 – discussion relating to final draft plan: content, format and photographs.

27. The local board’s views, as expressed at the workshops have been incorporated into the network plan.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

28. Māori identity and well-being are an important outcome in the Auckland Plan. The implementation of this network plan responds to and supports the following focus areas:

Māori identity and well-being - Focus Area 1

Meet the needs and support the aspirations of tamariki and their whanau.

Māori identity and well-being - Focus area 7

Reflect mana whenua mātauranga and Māori design principles throughout Auckland.

29. Quality parks and open spaces help to facilitate Māori participation in sport and recreation.

30. The local board consulted with mana whenua groups on the draft plan in September 2018.

31. Staff engaged with mana whenua at the Parks and Recreation South/Central Mana Whenua Engagement Forum in September 2017. The following key were issues raised:

· Improve environmental quality, including water quality

§ rain gardens and vegetated swales.

· Keep open space open accessible to all

§ reduce the number of buildings on parks

§ stop enabling businesses and commercial operators to use park land.

· Make parks attractive places for locals to use them

§ promote natural play and Māori games and sports

§ always involve mana whenua in the process

§ prevent crime and make parks feel safe

§ promote use of local parks with local residents – make them aware

§ exercise equipment trails to enable people to get healthy.

· Story-telling

§ Te Aranga design principles in all park design and development

§ Māori naming, wayfinding, cultural narratives.

32. These views have been incorporated into the key moves and prioritised actions.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

33. Actions identified within the network plan will need to be accommodated within existing budgets. No additional funds have been allocated.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

34. The lack of funding to implement all identified actions could create a reputational risk. The local board can use the plan to advocate for increased funding as part of Annual and Long-term Plan processes.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

35. The plan will be implemented over the next 10 years as budgets allow.

36. It is anticipated that the delivery of specific projects will draw on a wide range of potential partners who can contribute advice, assistance, funding and support.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Puketāpapa Open Space Network Plan	37

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Paul Clark - Principal Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Andrew Wood - Parks & Rec Policy - Kakariki Team Leader

Paul Marriott-Lloyd - Senior Policy Manager

Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager

Puketāpapa Local Board

21 February 2019

Puketāpapa Local Board

21 February 2019

Feedback on draft Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039

File No.: CP2019/01183

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek local board feedback on the draft Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To respond to population growth and demographic change, Auckland Council has developed a plan for how it will invest in sport for the next 20 years.

3. The Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039 seeks to:

· increase participation in sport by targeting communities of greatest need and addressing disparities

· deliver a broad range of programmes, services and facilities that respond to the diverse needs of Auckland’s communities

· address population growth and changing sport preferences through regular assessments of, and changes to, programmes, services and facilities to maximise participation.

4. The draft plan was endorsed by the Environment and Community Committee in December 2018 for public consultation [CP2018/07771].

5. This report invites local boards to formally indicate their support for the draft plan and any additional feedback on the draft plan they would like the committee to consider prior to the plan’s adoption.

6. Staff have engaged with local boards informally at various stages throughout the development of the plan. Local boards members’ views and concerns have helped shape the key components of the plan.

7. A summary of consultation feedback will be prepared for the Environment and Community Committee for consideration. Final decision on the adoption of the plan will be sought in May 2019.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) endorse the draft Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039 and provide any additional feedback for consideration of the Environment and Community Committee.

Horopaki

Context

The plan sets out a new investment approach, which better responds to growth and the changing needs of Aucklanders

8. Auckland is experiencing rapid population growth and social change. Our diverse communities have different preferences and requirements for sport and recreation activities.

9. The draft Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039 is the council’s response to these changes. It sets out a new approach to regional investment in sports facilities, programmes and services for Aucklanders over the next 20 years.

10. The plan will:

· target communities of greatest need and address disparities

· deliver a broad range of programmes, services and facilities that respond to the diverse needs of Auckland’s communities

· address population growth and changing sport preferences through regular assessments of, and changes to, programmes, services and facilities.

11. The draft plan has three main sections:

· Section one: ‘Why we invest’ explains the reasons for having an investment plan and the strategic context.

· Section two: ‘What we invest in’ explains the outcomes sought from the council’s sports investment, the scope and focus of that investment and the principles that will guide future investment decisions.

· Section three: ‘How we will work’ explains the investment framework that will be adopted to achieve the outcomes.

12. The development of the draft plan involved several Governing Body decisions, local board engagement, public consultation and research. The attached draft plan provides the chronological timeline for developing the plan.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Adoption of the plan will contribute to multiple strategic outcomes

13. Sport is one of the key areas the council invests in to deliver on the ‘Belonging and Participation’ outcome in Auckland Plan 2050.

Belonging and Participation

· Focus Area 7 – Recognise the value of arts, culture, sports and recreation to quality of life

· Direction 1 – Foster an inclusive Auckland where everyone belongs

· Direction 2 – Improve health and wellbeing for all Aucklanders by reducing disparities in opportunities.

14. The draft plan focuses on delivering a single outcome: increasing Aucklanders’ participation in community sport. This aligns with the vision of the Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan 2014-2024: ‘Aucklanders: more active, more often.’

15. The multiple benefits delivered to local communities through increased sport participation will also contribute directly to the health, social and economic outcomes for Aucklanders as set out in the local board plans.

Achieving the desired outcomes requires putting people at the heart our investment

16. The plan sets out a targeted, people-centric approach to increase sport participation in Auckland. Future sport investment will focus on meeting the needs of three distinct groups of people:

1.	People who already play sport:
	There will be more fit-for-purpose facilities and programmes to keep them actively involved in sport.
2.	People who play a new sport (like futsal)
		Currently there are limited opportunities to play, but in the future, there will be more fit-for-purpose facilities and programmes that cater to new and emerging sports.
3.	People who currently do not participate in sport
	Auckland Council will create more opportunities and make it easier for them to take up sport.

17. A key step towards increasing sport participation rates in these targeted groups is through addressing disparities.

18. Decision-makers will use a set of principles to prioritise multiple investment projects. ‘Equity’ has the highest weighing to ensure all Aucklanders enjoy the same outcomes. The full list of principles includes:

· Equity (40 per cent of assessment) – Sport investment should ensure equity of outcomes across the population regardless of age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status or where people live.

· Outcome-focused (30 per cent) – There needs to be a clear line of sight between each investment and the outcomes it delivers.

· Financial sustainability (30 per cent) – Investment decisions need to be financially sustainable for council and sports organisations.

· Accountability (10 per cent) – Auckland Council has responsibility to act in the best interests of Auckland.

There will be changes to the way we currently invest in sport

19. The draft plan sets out four key shifts in our approach as illustrated in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Key shifts

20. Figure 2 below explains the reasons for these key shifts, the problems they will tackle and the benefits for Aucklanders.

Figure 2: Intervention logic map

21. The plan will ensure robust, evidence-based decision-making and ongoing monitoring of benefits delivered to our communities.

22. Performance data will be collected to measure the return on investment. This will be shared with investors and ratepayers.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

23. Once adopted, the plan will have a direct impact on council’s internal investment processes, particularly regarding how future projects will be assessed and monitored.

24. Parks, Sport and Recreation staff have been engaged throughout the development of the draft plan. Their feedback, particularly regarding how the proposed changes can be adopted in practice, has helped shape the investment framework and the scenarios in the draft plan.

25. Parks, Sport and Recreation staff have also facilitated the council’s engagement with the sport sector through Aktive, the council’s strategic partner for sport. The general feedback is supportive of the new investment approach to improve participation and deliver better outcomes for Aucklanders.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

The local boards have an important role to play in shaping the draft plan

26. The local boards have an important role to play in the council’s sport investment. They:

· set outcomes and priorities for local sport investment through local board plans

· identify local sports facility and programmes needs and advocate for investment through the Long-term Plan and Annual Budget processes

· have allocated decision-making responsibility for local sport facilities and initiatives including:

- the specific location, design, build and fit-out of new local sports facilities within budget parameters agreed with the Governing Body

- the use of local sport facilities and initiatives including leasing and changes of use

- local recreation and sports programmes

· manage local and sub-regional facility partnership relationships, funding or lease agreements and performance reporting

· work together to support facilities that benefit several local board areas.

27. Staff have engaged with local boards informally at various stages throughout the development of the draft plan. Local boards members’ views and concerns have helped shape the key components of the plan.

Previous engagement with local boards showed general support for an investment plan

28. Staff met with local boards between February and April 2018 and sought informal feedback on the key components of the plan.

29. Feedback from local boards was generally supportive of a new investment plan for sports facilities to ensure consistency, efficiency, transparency and outcome delivery.

30. Challenges relating to population growth, land supply and budgetary constraints were highlighted. Local boards also noted challenges specific to their areas and populace.

31. Feedback showed a strong preference to have a flexible approach to accommodate diverse local needs.

Formal local board feedback is sought between February and March 2019

32. Staff are seeking to understand local boards’ views on the draft plan and request a formal decision at local boards’ business meetings during February and March 2019.

33. Staff would particularly value local board feedback on the following parts of the draft plan (refer Attachment A), which are likely to have the most bearing on local board decision-making:

· the key shifts in the council’s future investment approach in sport (page 4)

· the benefits of sports to Auckland communities, particularly Te Ao Māori (page 9)

· the difference between equity and equality in the context of sport investment (pages 22-23)

· the proposed investment framework (pages 24-36).

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

34. Sport participation contributes directly to the following ‘Māori Identity and Wellbeing’ outcome in Auckland Plan 2050:

Māori Identity and Wellbeing

· Direction 1 – ‘Advance Māori wellbeing’

· Focus area 1 – ‘Meet the needs and support the aspirations of tamariki and their whanau’

35. According to Sport New Zealand data weekly sport participation of Māori in Auckland (76.8 per cent) is similar to European (76.3 per cent), but higher than Asian (70.7 per cent) and Pasifika (69.1 per cent).

36. Research also show pockets of sedentary Māori who do not have adequate opportunities to participate in sport. They will be a target group for investment.

37. Feedback from the Mana Whenua Forum and Aktive Māori Advisory Group during public consultation on the discussion document informed the development of the plan.

38. A key area of focus was the delivery of outcomes through increased Māori participation. Means of achieving this goal include partnerships with iwi and Māori organisations, to manage demand efficiently and to use sports programmes and facilities as a social hub to strengthen cultural and community connections.

39. Partnerships will draw on Māori-centric models and collective models of learning so that key Māori concepts become embedded in sport service design and delivery.

40. Staff will seek further feedback from the Mana Whenua Forum and Aktive Māori Advisory Group as part of the consultation on the draft plan.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

41. Once adopted, the plan will guide all council investment in sport.

42. An immediate focus will be to establish a clear and contestable process for the allocation of the $120 million Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund established in the Long-term Plan 2018-2028.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

43. Staff have identified reputational and operational risks associated with the adoption of the draft plan. These risks will be mitigated through regular communication and engagement with key stakeholders.

Type

Risk

Mitigation

Reputational

Some people might worry the plan will change arrangements already in place, or ongoing council investment.

Clear communication with key stakeholders and funding recipients that the plan will guide decisions on future investment only, unless a current project is already scheduled for review.

Operational

The transition to the new investment approach will be operationally complex. It impacts multiple teams across the council, and new business processes, guidance and forms will need to be designed to support it.

Detailed implementation planning will be required to ensure the transition is as smooth as possible. Changes will be phased in over the next three to five years.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

44. Staff will undertake public consultation from February to March 2019.

45. The consultation will be conducted in various forms:

· local boards will be asked to formally indicate their support for the draft plan during business meetings and provide any additional feedback

· the public will be invited to submit their feedback via ShapeAuckland

· targeted interviews will be conducted with community groups including Māori, Pasific and Asian people

· the sport sector will be invited to provide their formal views through Aktive.

46. A summary of consultation feedback and a final plan will be prepared for consideration and adoption by the Environment and Community Committee around May 2019.

47. Implementation of the plan will occur in stages over the next three to five years, depending on council budgetary and planning processes. An indicative timeline of the potential changes is presented in section three of the draft plan.

48. Figure 3 below shows the next steps in a flow chart.

Figure 3: Next steps

This plan will inform the development of other investment plans

49. The draft plan sets out an overarching investment framework to help decision-makers prioritise investment between different sports.

50. Separate, but related plans are being developed to guide council’s investment in golf and play facilities. These plans will be consistent with the overarching framework set out in Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Draft Increasing Aucklanders’ Participation in Sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039	103

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Nancy Chu - Principal Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Paul Marriott-Lloyd, Senior Policy Manager, Parks and Recreation Policy

Lesley Jenkins, RM – Rodney, & Hibiscus & Bays, Acting GM – Local Board Services

Victoria Villaraza, Relationship Manager

Puketāpapa Local Board

21 February 2019

Quarterly Performance Report for Quarter Two 2018/2019: Puketāpapa Local Board

File No.: CP2019/01219

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide the Puketāpapa Local Board with an integrated quarterly performance report for quarter two, 1 October – 31 December 2018.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report includes financial performance, progress against work programmes, key challenges the board should be aware of and any risks to delivery against the 2018/2019 work programme. This is a retrospective report intended to provide a transparent overview and reflect the progress of how the Puketāpapa Local Board work programme is tracking at the end of quarter two 2018/2019.

3. The work programme is produced annually and aligns with the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan outcomes.

4. The key activity updates from this quarter are:

· the Waikowhai Walkway Action Plan was adopted by the board in September

· Te Tohu o Te Auaunga Design Guide was adopted in October

· the Principles for Accessible Design of Parks within Puketāpapa were adopted by the board in October

· the Puketāpapa Christmas Festival was held on 1 December 2018

· the three local boards jointly funding the Waitītiko, Waiateao (Meola and Motions Creek catchments) and the Three Kings to Western Springs Aquifer Initiative project (Albert Eden, Puketāpapa and Waitemata), agreed that the remaining budget for this project be used for water quality monitoring of the Three Kings Aquifer

· the Low Carbon Network developed Pedal Puketāpapa, a map of the area created to encourage more people to enjoy the area by bicycle

· the new Puketāpapa Local Board offices in the former Mt Roskill Borough Building were officially opened on 13 October 2018, followed by an open day for the community.

5. All operating departments with agreed work programmes have provided a quarterly update against their work programme delivery. Most activities are reported with a status of green (on track), six are amber but in progress (some risk or issues, which are being managed) and one is grey (cancelled, deferred or merged). Notable activities on hold (amber) are:

· Monte Cecilia Park - restore historic whare (pending a business case from the James Wallace Arts Trust (JWAT) in relation to the proposed leasing of the whare)

· Waikowhai Coastal Walkway - development of priority walkway routes (pending capital expenditure budget allocation)

· Puketāpapa accessibility improvements (pending capital expenditure budget allocation)

6. The Three Kings Reserve sand carpet installation has been cancelled (Grey) and the capex budget transferred to Keith Hay Park for sports field irrigation.

7. As a result of the realignment of the Puketāpapa Business Engagement Programme, the local board has $25,000 to reallocate within the current financial year. There is also a further $2,500 from an underspend in Events Delivery Support available for reallocation.

8. The financial performance report compared to budget 2018/2019 is attached (Appendix B). There are some points for the local board to note:

· for the six months ended on 31 December 2018, Puketāpapa Local Board capital investment was $1.9 million and net operational cost of service was $4.9 million.

· operating expenditure during this period was $5.2 million, 6.4% over budget mainly due to higher costs in full facility contract maintenance, than planned.

· operating revenue is 24% above budget, largely due to regional lease revenue coded locally in error. An increase in community facility hire also contributed to this result.

· capital expenditure is 15.8% under budget, mainly due to a delay in sport development work at Keith Hay Park and installation of lighting at Mt Roskill War Memorial Park.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) receive the performance report for the financial quarter ending 31 December 2018

b) note the change of location for the training site for the Local Employment through Freeland Reserve Stream Restoration project (ID910).

c) note the change in scope for Waitītiko, Waiateao (Meola and Motions Creek catchments) and the Three Kings to Western Springs Aquifer Initiative (Waitematā) and that the remaining $19,277 budget (funded by three local boards) for this project will be used for water quality monitoring of the Three Kings Aquifer (ID881).

d) note that Youth Connections has been transitioned to The Southern Initiative from 1 November 2018 (ID1237).

e) approve the realignment of the Business Engagement programme (ID356) and reallocation of the budget for this activity.

Horopaki

Context

9. The Puketāpapa Local Board has an approved 2018/2019 work programme for the following departments, units or Council Controlled Organisations:

· Arts, Community and Events;

· Parks, Sport and Recreation;

· Libraries and Information;

· Community Facilities: Build Maintain Renew;

· Community Leases;

· Infrastructure and Environmental Services;

· Local Economic Development ATEED;

· Plans and Places.

· The Southern Initiative

10. Work programmes are produced annually, to meet the Puketāpapa Local Board outcomes identified in the three-year Puketāpapa Local Board Plan. The local board plan outcomes are:

· Vibrant and popular parks and facilities

· Urban development meets community needs

· Treasured and enhanced natural environment

· Transport choices meet our varied travel needs

· Thriving local economy and good job opportunities

· Improved wellbeing and safety

· Connected communities with a sense of belonging

11. The graph below shows how the work programme activities meet Local Board Plan outcomes. Activities that are not part of the approved work programme but contribute towards the local board outcomes, such as advocacy by the local board, are not captured in this graph.

Graph 1: Work Programme activities by outcome

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Local Board Work Programme Snapshot

12. The work programme activities have two statuses; RAG status which measures the performance of the activity (amber and red show issues and risks); and activity status which shows the stage of the activity. These two statuses create a snapshot of the progress of the work programmes.

13. The graph below identifies work programme activity by RAG status (amber, green and grey). It shows the percentage of work programme activities that are on track (green), in progress but with issues that are being managed (amber), and activities that have been cancelled/deferred/merged (grey).

Graph 2: Work Programme by RAG status

14. The graph below identifies work programme activity by activity status and department. The number of activity lines differ by department as approved in the local board work programmes.

Graph 3: Work Programme activity by activity status and department

Key activity updates from quarter two

15. Te Tohu o Te Auaunga Design Guide was adopted in October. This document will support how the tohu (symbol) will be applied along the awa. The design guide has also been adopted by the Albert Eden and Whau Local Boards as Te Auaunga also flows through these local board areas.

16. The three local boards (Albert Eden, Puketāpapa and Waitemata) jointly funding the Waitītiko, Waiateao (Meola and Motions Creek catchments) and the Three Kings to Western Springs Aquifer Initiative, met in November to consider the next steps for the project. They agreed that the remaining $19,277 budget for this project be used for water quality monitoring of the Three Kings Aquifer.

17. The Puketāpapa Christmas Festival was held on 1 December 2018. The wider theme of this year’s event was Carols by Candlelight as this was the 60th anniversary of Carols by Candlelight at Three Kings Reserve. This event was surveyed and results will be provided to the board when available.

18. The Low Carbon Network developed a Pedal Puketāpapa, a map of the area created to encourage more people to cycle and enjoy the local maunga, eateries, picnic sites and market. Pedal Puketāpapa was launched at the Wesley Markets in quarter two.

19. The Waikowhai Walkway Action Plan was adopted by the board in September. This will guide the board’s ongoing investment in this extensive coastal path network.

20. The Principles for Accessible Design of Parks within Puketāpapa were adopted by the board in October. These have been categorised into three stages involved in visiting a park: planning, arriving and enjoying. Funding will be considered in future years.

21. The Puketāpapa Local Board held an open day event during Auckland Heritage Festival on 13 October 2018, to commemorate and celebrate the restoration of the Mt Roskill Municipal Chambers. Originally opened in June 1957, the building continues to serve as a centre for local government in the area and is the new home of the Puketāpapa Local Board.

Activities on hold

22. The following work programme activities have been identified by operating departments as on hold:

· Auckland Council – JWAT Joint Liaison Board relationship monitoring. Local Board Services staff met with Arts and Culture staff in November 2018 to discuss the processes of governance and operations and how these are reported back to the local board. This work will be on-going.

· Monte Cecilia Park - restore historic whare. Staff have developed advice for the local board in response to a request from JWAT for funding. JWAT are using this funding for a consultant to develop a business case and high-level financial projection in relation to a proposed lease of the Pah Homestead whare.

· Waikowhai Coastal Walkway – development of priority walkway routes. This project is currently unfunded. Staff are developing further advice for the local board’s consideration of funding allocation.

· Puketāpapa – Accessibility Improvements. This project is awaiting a funding decision. Staff are developing further advice for the local board’s consideration of funding opportunities.

· Puketāpapa Business Engagement. The local board requested a realignment of this programme in Q1. A Pop-Up Business School has been recommended as an alternative project for this year and is awaiting a local board decision. If the local board proceeds with this option, there will be a residual balance of $17,500 for reallocation to other local board activities.

Changes to the local board work programme

Deferred activities

23. In this quarter no activities have been identified as being deferred from the 2018/ 2019 work programme.

Cancelled activities

24. This activity has been cancelled:

· Three Kings Reserve – installation of sand carpet (ID2740). Staff identified that sand carpeting was not required at Three Kings Reserve. The funding for this project has been reallocated to Keith Hay Park for irrigation (ID 2739).

Activities merged with other activities for delivery

25. In this quarter no activities have been merged with other activities for efficient delivery:

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

26. When considering budget reallocation and developing or changing work programmes, council group advice was sought and presented to the local board. Community Facilities Operations and Infrastructure and Environmental Services have been asked to advise on the reallocation of $25,000 from the Puketāpapa Business Engagement activity (ID356) which has been placed on hold.

27. The advice from ATEED in relation to the Pop-up Business School have been considered in the preparation of this report’s advice.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

28. This report informs the Puketāpapa Local Board of the performance for the quarter ending 31 December 2018 and was workshopped with local board members on 7 February 2019

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

29. The Puketāpapa Local Board is committed to strengthening and formalising its relationship with mana whenua and mataawaka. “Māori are recognised and affirmed as mana whenua” is an objective within the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan 2017.

30. Parks Services staff have continued to work with mana whenua on key parks projects throughout the local board area in Q2 and presented on the FY18/19 work programme at the Central/South Parks Sport and Recreation Mana Whenua Forum in November. Initial feedback was received on several projects, and most of the representatives indicated interest in a site walkover at Margaret Griffen Park, Hillsborough Cemetery and War Memorial Park. This has been scheduled for February 2019.

31. Parks staff also undertook a site walkover in December with interested mana whenua representatives in the lower and middle catchment areas of Te Auaunga – Oakley Creek to discuss opportunities for implementation of Te Tohu o Te Auaunga.

32. Mana Whenua have attended the monthly hui for Te Kete Rukuruku and continue to work with staff on the partnership programme for Māori naming of parks and places.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

33. The local board are being asked to decide on reallocation of $25,000 resulting from the realignment of the Puketāpapa Business Engagement Programme (ID356). Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development (ATEED) have presented the option of a Pop-Up Business School, which the local board is considering.

34. Auckland Council staff have been asked to provide options for increasing delivery capacity for the Puketāpapa Low Carbon Network (ID888) and Waikowhai Coast – remove pine trees (ID1230) programmes

35. The local board has also indicated it would like to allocate $2,500 for a survey to be conducted at the Matariki Kite Day event. There is an underspend in Puketāpapa Events Delivery Support (ID91) of $2,500 which could be allocated to this survey.

Financial Performance

36. Operating expenditure is $316,000 above budget. This is due to higher full facility maintenance costs than planned.

37. Operating revenue is $65,000 over budget mainly due to regional lease revenue coded locally in error. This will be corrected for the Q3 report to the local board. Greater utilisation of Fickling Convention Centre and Mt Roskill War Memorial Hall also contributed to this result.

38. Overall capital expenditure of $1.9 million is below budget by $353,000. This was mainly due to sport development work at Keith Hay awaiting facility partnership agreement to be finalised and installation of lighting at Mt Roskill War Memorial park following redesign.

39. The Puketāpapa Local Board Financial performance report is in Appendix B

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

40. While the risk of non-delivery of the entire work programme is rare, risk relating to individual activities does vary. Capital projects for instance, are susceptible to more risk as on-time and on-budget delivery is dependent on weather conditions, approvals (e.g. building consents) and is susceptible to market conditions.

41. There are no activities identified with significant risks (red) in Quarter 2. Then activities have some risk (amber) but are being managed and/or mitigated.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

42. The local board will receive the next performance update following the end of quarter three (March 2019).

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	20190221 Puketāpapa Q2 Operating Performance Report Dec 18	151
b ⇩	20190221 Puketāpapa Work Programme 2018/2019 Q2 Report	157

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

John Adams - Local Board Advisor

Mary Hay - Local Board Advisor - Puketapapa

Authoriser

Victoria Villaraza - Relationship Manager

Chairperson	Harry Doig
Deputy Chairperson	Julie Fairey
Members	Anne-Marie Coury
	David Holm
	Shail Kaushal
	Ella Kumar, JP

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Anne-Marie Coury's report, 01 December 2018 - 31 January 2019	193
b ⇩	Julie Fairey's report, 22 November 2018 - 07 February 2019	195
c ⇩	David Holm's report, 30 November 2018 - 07 February 2019	199
d ⇩	Shail Kaushal's report, 28 November 2018 - 07 February 2019	201