Agenda of Environment and Community Committee

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

3 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 14 May 2019, as a true and correct record.

4 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

5 Public Input

Standing Order 7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to the Governance Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day prior to the meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes speaking time for each speaker.

5.1 Public input: New Zealand Green Building Council - new tools for existing buildings and homes (enabling verification to zero carbon)

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. Andrew Eagles, CEO of the New Zealand Green Building Council would like to discuss the new tools for existing buildings and homes (enabling verification to zero carbon) and incentives that Auckland Council could put in place to encourage low carbon more resilient buildings.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) receive the presentation from Andrew Eagles, CEO of the New Zealand Green Building Council in relation to new tools for existing buildings and homes (enabling verification to zero carbon) and incentives that Auckland Council could put in place to encourage low carbon more resilient buildings and thank him for his attendance.

5.2 Public input: the declaration of climate emergency: Rosie Gee

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. Rosie Gee will be in attendance to present her research, she has been undertaking regarding climate change.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) receive the presentation from Rosie Gee and thank her for attendance.

5.3 Public input: Climate Conscious Mana Rangatahi Summit

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide an update on the Climate Conscious Mana Rangatahi Summit.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The rangatahi have been working on their own climate action framework to support climate change action across Auckland in line with the development of Auckland’s Climate Action Plan. Their climate summit brought together over 100 Māori and Pasifika rangatahi who shared their visions and aspirations for taking action on climate change for the future generations of Tāmaki.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) receive the presentation.

5.4 Public input: Te Ora o Manukau representatives - Krissi Bishop and Anaru Ah Kew

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To support the Māori community submissions in response to Our Water Future, Water Strategy discussion document.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Te Ora o Manukau is a South Auckland collective of 15 Māori community organisations. Through their members and whanau networks, they collected more than 500 submissions including 376 from rangatahi (under 25s). Through its consultation with Māori communities in 2017, in partnership with Auckland Council, Te Taiao was one of the key issues identified for Te Ora o Manukau to focus on. Giving reference to the importance of water as a source of well-being both physically and spiritually, but also in acknowledging its narratives to this landscape and in supporting mana whenua to restore the mauri and minimise harm as matawaka.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) thank the representatives from Te Ora o Manukau – Krissi Bishop and Anaru Ah Kew for their presentation and attendance.

5.5 Public input: Environmental Youth Leaders for Para Kore Ki Tāmaki - Pianina Kahui-McConnell and Waiata Rameka-Tupe

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To support rangatahi Māori submissions in response to Our Water Future, Water Strategy discussion document

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. More than 400 rangatahi Māori submitted their views in response to Our Water Future, the Water Strategy discussion document. The Para Kore ki Tāmaki roopu, and broader Te Mana Rangatahi roopu played a significant role in the council’s Māori focused engagement and communications during the March consultation. Including leading messaging in the ‘If waters could talk’ video which reached more than 40,000 through Māori community partner channels. “As rangatahi, we bring our unique perspective on climate change as we take action for our future and for the future of Tamāki Makaurau. We are living in uncertain times with responsibilities to te taiao, our tūpuna and those who will follow.”

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) thank Environmental Youth Leaders for Para Kore Ki Tāmaki, Pianina Kahui-McConnell and Waiata Rameka-Tupe for their presentation and attendance.

6 Local Board Input

Standing Order 6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of that Chairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this time. The Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson) shall wherever practical, give one (1) day’s notice of their wish to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders.

This right is in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on the agenda.

6.1 Local Board Input: Waitākere Ranges Local Board chair - Auckland's Climate Change Plan for consultation

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. Greg Presland, chair Waitākere Ranges Local Board wishes to address the committee on the climate change plan for consultation. [Refer to Item 8 – Auckland’s Climate Action Framework: Consultation draft and approach of the agenda].

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) receive the presentation regarding climate change plan for consultation and thank Greg Presland, Chair Waitākere Ranges Local Board for his attendance.

7 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Auckland's Climate Action Framework: Consultation draft and approach

File No.: CP2019/07863

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the draft Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework and summary document for public consultation.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. In February 2018, the Environment and Community Committee approved the development of an integrated climate change action plan, addressing both the rising emissions in the region and the impacts of our changing climate (ENV/2018/11).

3. In November 2018, the Environment and Community Committee endorsed Auckland Council’s reapplication for membership to the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, including the requirement to develop a climate plan consistent with the Paris Agreement aspiration of 1.5°C maximum temperature rise.

4. To meet these requirements, Auckland Council has led the development of Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework, with extensive collaboration and engagement with mana whenua, public, private and voluntary sectors, reaching hundreds of Aucklanders.

5. In addition to stakeholder and subject matter expert input, the draft framework is also underpinned by extensive research and analysis. Research included emissions modelling of actions, climate projections to 2110 and a Climate Change Risk Assessment Technical Report Series, the first of its kind in New Zealand.

6. The draft framework for consultation is Attachment A and the associated summary document is Attachment B.

7. The purpose of the framework is to set strategic direction for action for the next 30 years.

8. The framework focusses on eleven key moves to deliver a net-zero emissions, climate resilient Tāmaki Makaurau:

1) Enhance ecosystem services and connectivity

2) Make development and infrastructure climate-compatible

3) Shift to decentralised renewable energy

4) Transform existing buildings and places

5) Deliver clean, efficient and accessible mobility options

6) Future-proof communities and empower individual action

7) Enable a just transition to a zero carbon, climate resilient economy

8) Grow a low-carbon, resilient food system

9) Youth and intergenerational equity

10) Resilient Māori communities

11) Lay the foundation for our success.

9. Each key move includes a number of actions to achieve its delivery. It is not an exhaustive list of actions that will be required to achieve net zero emissions. The actions range over three time periods (2023, 2030 and 2050). With a long timeframe, actions are by necessity high level in order to set the direction for change.

10. Auckland Council has responsibility for some but not all the actions.

11. It is proposed that public consultation commences 9July and runs for four weeks. Consultation is proposed through Auckland Council channels (i.e Our Auckland); targeted engagement focussing on youth, Māori and Pasifika; and leveraging our existing networks that helped to develop this plan.

12. Formal feedback will be sought from local boards after public consultation.

13. It is proposed that public feedback and a final framework subsequently be workshopped and reported to Committee for adoption.

14. It is further proposed that work continues on developing detailed and costed actions for Auckland Council as its contribution to climate action and, where required, considered for funding through the 2021 Long-term Plan.

15. These detailed Auckland Council actions will be brought to the committee in early 2020 for its consideration.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) approve the draft Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework and summary document for public consultation.

b) delegate to the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Environment and Community Committee and an Independent Māori Statutory Board member the power to correct any identified errors or minor edits, addition of mana whenua content, and to give effect to changes requested by the Committee at this meeting.

c) approve the proposed approach to public consultation from 9 July for four weeks as outlined in Attachment D of the agenda report.

d) delegate to the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Environment and Community Committee and Independent Māori Statutory Board member the power to finalise specific questions to be asked during public consultation.

e) note that a final framework, inclusive of the changes as a result of public feedback, will be reported to the Environment and Community Committee for adoption.

f) agree to the development of detailed and costed actions for Auckland Council as its contribution to climate action, for consideration by the appropriate Committee as input to the Long-term Plan.

Horopaki

Context

Previous decisions

16. Previous decisions made by the Committee in relation to Auckland’s Climate Action Plan are:

· Resolution Number ENV/2018/11

a) approve the approach to the 2018 review and update of Low Carbon Auckland: Auckland’s Energy Resilience and Low Carbon Action Plan

· Resolution Number ENV/2018/149

a) endorse Auckland Council’s membership reapplication to the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, including the requirement to develop a climate plan consistent with the Paris Agreement aspiration of a 1.5˚C maximum temperature rise

National context

17. In 2018, New Zealand Government announced its plans to introduce a new Zero Carbon Bill that will set an emissions reduction target by 2050. As a result of consultation, the new amendment bill has set the target of net zero greenhouse gases for 2050 (excluding biogenic methane which has a separate target) with a series of emissions budgets set over the next few years.

18. The bill requires Government to develop policies for climate change mitigation and adaptation and to establish an independent climate change commission to hold successive governments to account. There will be a call for public submissions on the amendment bill, which will be brought to a future Committee meeting.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework

19. The draft framework for consultation is Attachment A and the associated summary document is Attachment B.

20. Achieving net zero emissions and a climate resilient region by 2050 is no mean feat. It will require ongoing actions over the next 30 years.

21. The purpose of the framework is to set strategic direction for action for the next 30 years. Though the framework proposes initial actions across many agencies and organisations, it does not attempt to set all actions for the next 30 years. Nor does it set detailed actions for Auckland Council.

22. Actions will evolve over time. New evidence will become available. Actions will change and new actions will emerge as we measure results and move towards our goal.

23. Many of the actions – both the actions identified in the framework and possible future actions – will require further engagement with Aucklanders during their implementation. This is particularly true for actions that are within the remit of Auckland Council and/or Central Government.

24. The engagement of Aucklanders and the implementation of the framework are therefore ongoing commitments.

25. The framework focuses on 11 key moves to deliver a net-zero emissions, climate resilient Tāmaki Makaurau:

Key Move	What this means
1. Enhance ecosystem services and connectivity	A healthy and connected natural environment that restores the mauri of Tāmaki Makaurau and provides benefits for all
2. Make development and infrastructure climate-compatible	All new development and infrastructure comply with our climate goals and encourage low impact lifestyles
3. Shift to decentralised renewable energy	Energy supply is clean and secure with benefits to all
4. Transform existing buildings and places	Current buildings and spaces are revitalised to be healthy, low impact and providing multiple functions
5. Deliver clean, efficient and accessible mobility options	People have convenient and equitable access to healthy and safe ways of getting around
6. Future-proof communities and empower individual action	Individuals and the communities in which they live are adapted to climate change and lead the transition to net zero emissions
7. Enable a just transition to a zero carbon, climate resilient economy	Tāmaki Makarau sets an example for climate smart innovation, and maximises opportunities from the zero carbon transition
8. Grow a low-carbon, resilient food system	A strong and resilient rural economy that provides all Aucklanders access to low carbon, fresh and healthy food
9. Te Puawaitanga o Te Tangata: Self-sustaining Māori communities	Narrative in development, being led by Mana Whenua Kaitiaki forum (see Māori impact statement)
10. Youth and intergenerational equity	Narrative in development, being led by rangatahi (see Māori impact statement)
11. Lay the foundation for our success	Decisions are based on sound evidence and knowledge across the region and together we have the capacity, resources, and leadership to deliver

26. Within the 11 key moves, the plan lists a range of actions over three time periods (2023, 2030 and 2050). With a long timeframe, actions are by necessity high level in order to set the direction for change.

27. Work is underway to develop a detailed implementation plan to support delivery in the short term. As the plan continues to evolve into the future, more work will be required to develop forward work programmes, budgets and targeted engagement over the coming years and decades.

28. Like the Auckland Plan, the final plan will be digital, enabling it to adapt better to new information and initiatives.

Supporting evidence

29. Auckland Council has been compiling annual region-wide greenhouse gas inventories since 2009. Between 2009 and 2016, overall emissions increased by 5.6 per cent. If we continue this trend, Auckland’s emissions will increase by 27.7 per cent by 2050.

30. Emissions modelling was used to identify the key levers to achieve a net zero emissions target for Auckland. The analysis shows that to reach net zero by 2050, Auckland needs to sharply decrease emissions over the next 10 years.

31. In 2018, NIWA was commissioned to carry out climate projections to 2110 for Auckland. This work and the Climate Change Risk Assessment reports that followed it, show Auckland’s mean annual temperature is rising, our coastlines are and will be impacted by ongoing sea level rise, and rainfall patterns and extremes are changing.

Stakeholder and subject matter expert feedback

32. A summary of engagement in the development of the framework has been provided to the Committee at previous meetings and workshops. A summary report is provided as Attachment C (Parts 1 and 2).

33. At five stages of the process, Environment and Community Committee workshops were held to provide direction to staff before moving to the next stage. Additional insights and feedback on the process and content have been provided by groups established to support, check and challenge the plan and its development. These include:

· the Mayoral and Committee-appointed Independent Advisory Group

· a working group with representation across the council group, central government and district health boards

· a Tāmaki and climate change subject matter expert rōpū (group) working with mana whenua

· C40 Cities and subject matter expert workshops.

Consultation approach

34. Public consultation on the draft framework is proposed from 9 July to 9 August 2019. It is proposed to include Have Your Say events, public displays at service centres and libraries, webinars, and content on channels like Our Auckland and council’s social media platforms.

35. In addition, to gather feedback more broadly and efficiently, we will leverage networks and organisations that contributed to the development of the draft framework. These networks include representation across business, primary industries, community groups, youth, health, the council group and central government.

36. Targeted engagement will also take place focusing on youth, Māori and Pasifika, recognising particular climate impacts to those groups now and into the future. A number of events and workshops have been held with youth, and rangatahi in particular, over the course of the framework development. Like above, these networks will be supported during the consultation period to broaden the reach of public engagement and gather further input.

37. The consultation will focus on three key areas:

i) level of ambition and urgency

ii) the key moves and actions

iii) gaps and additional actions.

38. An overview of the planned consultation activity is provided in Attachment D.

39. In addition to community and stakeholder consultation, local boards will be asked for formal feedback on the draft framework after public consultation has been received.

The role of Auckland Council

40. Auckland Council has taken a leadership role in facilitating the development of this framework and will need to continue to lead by example. However, achieving the goal of net zero emissions is not the responsibility of the council only, it is Auckland’s responsibility. Consequently, not all actions are the responsibility of council.

41. Auckland Council has many roles: as an advocate on behalf of communities; as a facilitator; policy maker; regulator; and as an implementer. All these roles will come into play in taking climate action.

42. The council has already established strong climate actions and strategies, such as Urban Ngahere and the Coastal Management Framework, but there is a need to re-evaluate current strategies and policies, such as the Unitary Plan and other land use planning, to ensure alignment with our climate goals. We need to ensure that our own strategies, plans and actions support and not undermine climate actions.

43. Auckland Council is also uniquely placed to engage at all levels, from central government and industry through to communities and individuals and our role in regulation enables strong direction and leadership.

44. Because the actions identified in the framework stretch over a 30-year period they are more high level in nature and span across agencies and organisations. The specific actions Auckland Council will undertake is therefore an important next step.

45. It is proposed that council-specific actions continue to be developed. These actions will be developed in detail and costed over a 10-year period. That way the actions can be considered - in part or in full - by the future council for inclusion in its 2021 Long-term Plan.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

46. A working group was established at the start of developing the framework to provide expertise from across the council group, central government and district health boards and to ensure quick and clear delivery. Input from regular group meetings and workshops has been incorporated into the draft framework.

47. Regular meetings and workshops also took place across the council group and fed into the draft framework, from technical experts through to senior management.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

48. The framework will have implications for all local boards.

49. In June 2018, the Chief Sustainability Office visited 19 of the 21 local boards and obtained email feedback from the other two local boards to identify their main priorities related to climate change. This was followed up in September with cluster workshops to assess and test a series of ‘must haves’, which were the precursors to the actions included in the draft framework.

50. Priorities included:

· coastal erosion and inundation concerns

· affordable and accessible transport

· long term infrastructure development to consider climate impacts

· better stormwater management

· climate related education and awareness

· building community resilience

· and for Auckland Council to lead by example.

51. Local board feedback on the draft framework will be requested through formal resolutions.

52. Local boards will be key in taking climate action at a local level. Support will be provided for local board planning and alignment with outcomes.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

53. Climate change impacts and associated policy and action will have significant impacts for Māori communities.

54. A Tāmaki and climate change subject matter expert rōpū (group) was established in March 2019 which has been supporting and advising mana whenua and council on climate change issues for Māori and providing direct advice and narrative for the draft framework.

55. A rangatahi Māori and Pasifika rōpū has also been working in partnership with council on this kaupapa to develop rangatahi focused actions for the framework.

56. A joint mana whenua and Māori expert task group are finalising a Tāmaki and climate change position paper which will be used as the bridging document to weave key anchor points into the climate action framework. The Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum have been receiving monthly updates since January 2019.

57. As agreed with the Forum and workshopped with this committee, anchor points include:

· weaving the narrative into the framework, specifically the following sections: Climate change and Māori, Impacts on Māori and Developing the Plan with Māori

· a section developed by rangatahi (the Youth and intergenerational equity key move)

· a separate key move of Te puawaitanga o te tangata (Resilient Māori communities)

58. Content is currently indicated as placeholders in the draft climate action framework. Final weaving of this content into the framework for consultation is sought to be delegated to the Chair, Deputy Chair and a member of the IMSB.

59. It is also noted that mana whenua gifted the cultural narrative of Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri. This contribution is deeply acknowledged, and this cultural expression is central to the framework. It makes Auckland’s climate response unique.

60. Targeted engagement with Māori to date, and with rangatahi in particular, is noted under “Consultation approach”.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

61. Actions within the framework will result in budgetary implications for organisations across the region and identifying and unlocking appropriate funding and financing streams in the future will be critical.

62. Taking climate action will require a range of finance and/or funding mechanisms. For instance, green bonds have been a useful tool for financing council-owned assets such as electric trains but investment in clean tech may require crowd-sourcing, grants or venture capital.

63. To support this, a climate finance work package is underway to identify partnerships and broader funding mechanisms across actions such as bonds, grants, equity instruments and public/private partnerships.

64. The final framework and specific Auckland Council actions being developed will need to inform on-going Long-term Plan discussions to support delivery and avoid costs associated with inaction, such as increased maintenance costs and infrastructure failures through to missed opportunities to Auckland’s economy in delivering the transition.

65. Not all actions within council’s remit will require additional budget. Some actions can result in long-term cost avoidance – for example electrifying fleets can reduce fuel and maintenance costs. Some actions could require existing funds to be redirected if priorities change.

66. Also, not all actions will require funding, for example those related to advocacy to central government or expert input into actions led by other organisations.

67. The costs associated with different council-specific actions will consider funding sources as described above and reported to Committee.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

68. The risks of draft framework consultation have been assessed. No high or extreme risks have been identified with the proposed approach.

69. Moderate risks exist, including:

· potential reputational risk from broad community engagement and consultation

· potential regulatory compliance and legal compliance risks that setting direction for preparing for the implications of climate change may not comply with current settings

· potential strategic risk with non-alignment with New Zealand Government direction and policy

· potential governance risk in shared leadership and ownership of the framework.

70. A risk mitigation plan has been developed to address the above, including targeted engagement approaches, a legal review of the final framework, on-going partnership with central government and establishment of clear governance structures for the implementation of the framework.

71. A full risk assessment will be carried out post-consultation and will be reported to Committee.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

72. If approved, the draft framework will be consulted on across the region from 9 July for four weeks.

73. A final framework for adoption, inclusive of changes as a result of public and local board feedback, will be reported to the Environment and Community Committee.

74. If agreed, staff will continue to develop and cost specific Auckland Council actions. The actions will be brought to Committee in early 2020 for consideration and feedback, with the intention that subsequent decisions can be made about the funding of actions in the 2021 Long-term Plan.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Draft Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework for consultation	23
b ⇩	Consultation Summary	137
c ⇩	Engagement to date summary report	161
d ⇩	Summary of proposed consultation approach	249

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Parin Thompson - Principal Specialist Sustainability & Climate Mitigation

Sarah Anderson - Principal Specialist Sustainability and Climate Resilence

John Mauro - Chief Sustainability Officer

Authorisers

Jacques Victor - GM Auckland Plan Strategy and Research

Megan Tyler - Chief of Strategy

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Climate Emergency

File No.: CP2019/09765

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To support the Environment and Community Committee to consider whether and how to declare a climate change emergency.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Climate change presents significant challenges and risks to Auckland, with a wide set of implications and impacts, particularly on our most vulnerable people and communities. Our response to climate change also presents potential opportunities.

3. Auckland and Aucklanders are already feeling effects like sea level rise and flooding impacts. These impacts are expected to increase in time.

4. Auckland and Auckland Council are committed to action, including organisational and regional commitments and initiatives.

5. At the request of the committee chair, staff conducted a scan of current cities’ climate emergency declarations. Many nations and cities have declared a climate emergency, from the UK Parliament to the City of Vancouver to Nelson here in New Zealand.

6. The committee has also been previously addressed by the Extinction Rebellion group, which requested this issue be progressed. This group, alongside other community movements, have activated large scale protests and “strikes” that have seen large numbers of young people participate in globally and in New Zealand.

7. Also, an increasing number of governments around the world have recognised or declared a climate emergency in some form. This includes many local governments across several countries (at least 17 councils/cities in Australia, 96 councils/boroughs in the UK, 382 councils/cities in Canada, and 16 councils/cities in the United States).

8. While there is no standardised or official common meaning to the declarations, jurisdictions have been using the declarations to underscore the urgency and importance of taking action on climate change.

9. A declaration would likely increase the visibility of Auckland’s political commitment to leadership on climate action. Not declaring a climate emergency may result in a perception of or reputational risk in not acknowledging the urgency of acting on climate change.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) note that Auckland Council has long acknowledged the importance of and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations

b) note that Auckland Council already demonstrates leadership in the face of climate change, including incorporating climate change considerations into council’s work programmes and decisions; working with regional partners to ensure a collaborative response; advocating and engaging with central government; and leading by example in reducing our in-house emissions

c) note that climate change does not satisfy the definition of an “emergency” under the Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002, and that a declaration of a “climate emergency” has no other inherent statutory or legal implications; however, such a declaration may further highlight Auckland Council’s belief in the importance and urgency of addressing climate change

d) notes that further information on Auckland Council’s recent and planned climate change response is provided in the attachments to this report

e) consider the declaration of a climate change emergency

Horopaki

Context

10. Climate change is a significant issue for Auckland now and into the future. Implications and impacts are broad and varied, particularly on our most vulnerable people and communities.

11. Auckland and Aucklanders are already feeling effects of climate change, including sea level rise and flooding impacts. These impacts are expected to get more serious over time and will persist for the next several decades and beyond.

12. Even slight changes to variables like temperature, rainfall, sea level have serious consequences to people and communities. Heat stress, severe flooding and new pests and diseases will have direct impacts here in Auckland. The impacts of climate change elsewhere will also have impacts to Auckland. For instance, global migration from climate change or climate impacts on food supply will require Auckland to act.

13. Climate change does not happen separately from other changes like population growth, land use change, changes to food and energy security, and rising inequality. In fact, climate change may make many of these challenges even more difficult to solve or may make related impacts to people and communities even more severe.

14. Impacts from climate change are also not isolated from other regions and countries. Migration related to climate is already happening across the world. This could be displacement by flooding or drought or, in some cases, preparing for future land loss. Auckland will need to be part of the solution to support those displaced regionally, nationally, and more widely.

Statutory responsibilities of local government

15. The council’s statutory responsibilities in relation to climate change are currently set by the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and supporting regulations, especially the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement (NZCPS) and the Land Transport Management Act 2003 (LTMA).

16. The LGA states that the purpose of local government includes meeting the current and future needs of communities for effective, efficient and appropriate infrastructure and public services, taking account present and anticipated future circumstances. Whilst there is no direct reference to climate change in the LGA, the requirement of local government to provide good quality infrastructure does have links to climate change adaptation.

17. The RMA is the primary driver of local government action in relation to climate change, particularly around adaptation responses and the reduction of risk from natural hazards. The RMA requires that all persons exercising powers and functions under the RMA must have particular regard to the effects of climate change. However, it also explicitly restricts the ability of local government to consider the effects on climate change from the discharge of greenhouse gases into the air.

18. In this context, the legislated focus of local government under the LGA and RMA is on the adaptation to the effects of climate change. This includes planning to manage and minimise the effects of climate change on communities and the environment. Such effects are the consequences of extreme weather events and changing climate patterns.

19. The NZCPS, which sits under the RMA, requires the council to take a precautionary approach to the use and management of coastal resources vulnerable to climate change. The NZCPS also requires the council to integrate climate change, including sea level rise, into coastal planning.

20. Under the LTMA, the council’s Regional Land Transport Plan must be consistent with the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2018, which prioritises reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transport and supports a mode shift to lower emission forms of transport, including walking, cycling, public transport and lower emission vehicles (such as electric vehicles).

Related commitments

21. The central government is currently consulting on the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill. Auckland Council lodged an official submission on the initial Bill and will do so in this subsequent round. A draft submission is expected to be recommended to committee in July 2019.

22. Auckland Council has committed the region to a target aligned with the net zero emissions intention of the Zero Carbon Bill. Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework is meant as the main framework for delivering on this emissions reduction target, as well as increasing Auckland’s resilience to climate change impacts, through local action plans.

23. At the organisational level, Auckland Council (including Panuku, Watercare and Auckland Transport) are signatories of the New Zealand Climate Leaders Coalition, a group of over 80 businesses representing half of New Zealand emissions. As such, we are committed to aligning targets to the Paris Agreement and influencing the supply chain.

24. Council and the council group is undertaking a range of other initiatives across its different roles. Examples include:

· advocating to central government on its Zero Carbon Bill

· working with the New Zealand Climate Leaders Coalition to reduce emissions and together influencing the supply chain

· providing support thorough our Retrofit Your Home programme to help heat, ventilate and insulate homes

· delivery through providing greater transport choice and reducing emissions by transitioning to electric busses

· preparing for climate impacts through Coastal Compartment Management Plans

· providing leadership by making Auckland Council’s main headquarters a 6 Green Star retrofitted building, as well as setting resilience and emission expectations through the council group’s significant procurement levers.

25. Council has also completed a risk deep dive on the organisation’s readiness and response to climate change, which is one of its top risk. A report and findings were tabled to the Audit and Risk Committee on 5 June 2019 (Attachments B to E formed part of the report to that Committee).

26. An Environment and Community Committee workshop is planned for first week of July 2019 to discuss the findings of the deep dive.

Interpretation of meaning and other jurisdictions

27. A scan of other jurisdictions both locally and internationally has found no official or singular definition of what a climate emergency declaration means.

28. UK, Irish and Welsh parliaments have declared a climate emergency as have global cities from Adelaide to Vancouver. In New Zealand, Canterbury, Nelson and the Kāpiti Coast have declared a climate emergency.

29. While a declaration would underscore the importance in taking action on climate change, it has no inherent statutory or legal implications.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Supporting evidence

30. The scientific consensus on human-caused climate change is one of the most widely-agreed of any major topic. Evidence is widespread, and research and reports have shifted primarily toward better understanding the pace and patterns of change and impacts. IPCC is the global authority on climate change, causes, impacts and options and produces a wide range of regular reports^{^[1]}.

31. Regionally, council has been compiling annual region-wide greenhouse gas inventories since 2009. Between 2009 and 2016, overall emissions increased by 5.6 per cent. If we continue this trend, Auckland’s emissions will increase by 27.7 per cent by 2050.

32. Auckland Council has also commissioned research using IPCC methodology to better understand regional climate impacts for Auckland. This work and the following Climate Risk Assessment reports show Auckland’s mean annual temperature is rising, our coastlines are and will be impacted by ongoing sea level rise, and rainfall patterns are changing. Full reports and a summary document can be found at www.knowledgeauckland.org.nz.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

33. Time constraints prevented specific solicitation of council group views on declaring a climate emergency. However, given the working group established at the start of the Auckland Climate Action Plan development and engagement with senior leaders over the past several months, it is expected that the urgency to act on climate change is widely shared and acknowledged.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

34. Climate change is and will be relevant to all local boards. Time constraints prevented specific solicitation of local board views on declaring a climate emergency. However, direct individual and cluster engagement with all local boards over the past 12 months has provided insights into particular climate impacts and concerns and helped inform the development of the draft climate action plan. It is noted that Waitakere and Waitemata local boards have declared climate emergencies.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

35. Climate change impacts and associated policy and action will have significant impacts for Māori communities. Time constraints prevented direct engagement on a climate emergency declaration, but existing work with Māori in the development of Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework is consistent with the urgency signaled by such a declaration.

36. It is noted that the Iwi Chairs Forum, alongside the Māori Council, the Māori Womens' Welfare League, and urban Māori organisations, have formed a National Māori Climate Network organisation. A spokesman for the group said that New Zealand should declare an environment and climate emergency to highlight the severity of the problem and the urgency that is required.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

37. While climate change has and will have a range of significant financial implications for Auckland and council, there are no financial implications directly related to the declaration of a climate emergency.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

38. The risks of declaring a climate change emergency are:

· a lack of clarity in the mandate given through a declared climate emergency

· a perception or reputational risk in not acknowledging the urgency of climate change, council’s intended response and existing commitments

· diminished alignment with other local governments in NZ and globally.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

39. The draft Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Action Framework may provide an organising structure for the collective council and cross-sector response should there be an Auckland declaration of climate emergency.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Auckland Council climate change commitments	257
b ⇩	Local government roles and responsibilities	259
c ⇩	Current state of council mitigation and adaptation actions	261
d ⇩	Climate change projections for Auckland	265

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Jacques Victor - GM Auckland Plan Strategy and Research

Authorisers

Megan Tyler - Chief of Strategy

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Review of the Auckland Film Protocol

File No.: CP2019/09460

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek approval for recommended amendments to the Auckland Film Protocol for the purpose of public consultation.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Auckland Film Protocol (the Protocol) was adopted by the Governing Body on 28 May 2015 (minute GB/2015/36). Since the Protocol was adopted in 2015 there have been a number of changes to legislation and to Auckland Council’s policy and planning framework. The purpose of the review of the Protocol was to:

· ensure that the Protocol is up-to-date; and

· identify emerging trends, issues or opportunities that should be addressed in the Protocol.

3. This report identifies proposed improvements to the Protocol; which have been classified into three categories:

· Substantive amendments: proposed changes to the Protocol which result in a substantive policy change. The report sets out options for change and the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

· Updates to reflect current legislation and Auckland Council policy: proposed amendments to the Protocol to ensure that the document is up to date and reflects current legislation and current Auckland Council policy, plans and rules. The report sets out a summary of the proposed changes.

· Structural and editorial improvements: amendments improve the logic, flow and readability of the document but do not change the meaning of the Protocol. The report sets out a summary of the proposed changes and the rational for the proposed change

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) approve for public consultation, subject to further direction from the Committee, the amended Auckland Film Protocol (Attachment B of the agenda report).

b) delegate to the Chair of the committee and the Manager Creative Industries, ATEED who has managerial oversight of Screen Auckland, the authority to make any changes to the proposed Auckland Film Protocol to reflect decisions from this meeting or to correct minor errors, prior to it being released for public consultation.

Horopaki

Context

Background

4. The Auckland Film Protocol (the Protocol) sets out:

· the commitment of the Auckland Council Group to supporting filming in Auckland;

· expectations and rules that filmmakers must abide by when filming in Auckland; and

· provides guidance for filmmakers on the process for approval to film in Auckland.

5. The Protocol was adopted by the Regional Development and Operations Committee (minute RDO/2013/27) on 14 March 2013.

6. A review of fees for filming in the Auckland Region was undertaken in 2014 and a new set of region‑wide charges was recommended; providing a simplified and harmonised range of charges. The Governing Body adopted a region‑wide schedule of film fees and a revised Protocol on 28 May 2015 (minute GB/2015/36).

7. Auckland’s growing film industry supports our aspiration, outlined in the Auckland Plan 2050, for Auckland to be prosperous, with many opportunities, delivering better social and economic outcomes for everyone. The economic importance of the film industry in Auckland has been growing steadily, bringing jobs and opportunity to those directly involved in the industry and positive impacts for the wider economy. This in turn leads to better social outcomes and improved quality of life for all Aucklanders. Television programmes, feature films and television commercials produced in Auckland are enjoyed by audiences all over the world. Showcasing Auckland to the world, enhancing our reputation, our sense of pride in who we are, encouraging visitors and attracting skills and talent to Auckland.

Review of the Protocol

8. Since the Protocol was adopted in 2015 there have been a number of changes to legislation and to Auckland Council’s policy and planning framework. The purpose of the review of the Protocol is to:

· ensure that the Protocol is up-to-date; and

· identify emerging trends, issues or opportunities that should be addressed in the Protocol.

9. Content of the Protocol was reviewed against legislation referenced in the document and against policies and plans of the Auckland Council group to identify areas where the Protocol should be updated.

10. Engagement with staff involved in the process of assessing and approving film permit applications, from across the Council group, was undertaken to inform the review and proposed amendments to the Protocol.

11. Meetings with staff involved in the process of assessing and approving film permit applications, from across the Auckland Council Group, were held to inform the review and proposed amendments to the Protocol and to:

· test and discuss matters identified during review;

· identify emerging issues and trends which should be covered in the protocol.

Engagement to inform the review

Local Boards

12. Workshops were held in September and October 2018 to engage with local boards that experience a high volume of filming. A high-level summary of the key feedback from these workshops is provided in Attachment A.

Iwi

13. Mana whenua interests are represented by 19 iwi (tribal) authorities in Tāmaki Makaurau, Auckland. The 19 iwi authorities were invited, in writing, to inform the review of the Protocol. Some input from mana whenua has been received and has informed the proposed changes to the Protocol. Those mana whenua who responded were generally supportive of the proposal to increase emphasis on the importance of protecting Auckland’s environmental and cultural heritage, in particular the need to ensure that sites of significance are protected whether or not they are scheduled in the Unitary Plan. Mana whenua also expressed an interest in ensuring that iwi history, stories and legends are appropriately represented in film and that the representation or use of culturally significant sites is appropriate.

Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority

14. Meetings were held with staff of the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority (Tūpuna Maunga Authority) to inform the review and seek advice on engagement with the Board of the Tūpuna Maunga Authority. In terms of engagement with the Board of Tūpuna Maunga Authority, the general advice was that the Board has set policy on filming and the proposed changes are consistent with the policy so further engagement with the Board is not necessary. All comments made by officials of the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority have been incorporated into the proposed amendments to the Protocol

Screen Sector

15. The screen sector was invited to participate in a survey in April 2019 to inform the review of the Protocol; a total of 27 responses were received. The survey asked a series of general questions about the Protocol and experiences of filming in public open space in Auckland. A high-level summary of key feedback received to date is provided in Attachment A.

People’s Panel

16. A People’s Panel survey was undertaken in September 2018; a total of 4,762 responses were received. The survey asked a series of questions on views on and experiences of filming in Auckland. A high‑level summary of key feedback is provided in Attachment A.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Proposed amendments to the Auckland Film Protocol

17. This report identifies proposed improvements to the Protocol; which have been classified into three categories:

· Substantive amendments: proposed changes to the Protocol which result in a substantive policy change. The report sets out options for change and an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

· Structural and editorial improvements: amendments which do not change the meaning of the Protocol but do improve the logic, flow and readability of the document. The report sets out a summary of the proposed changes and the rational for the change.

18. A workshop was held with the Environment and Community Committee on the 7 May. The amendments proposed in this report are consistent with the direction of the Committee provided at the workshop.

19. A copy of the draft Protocol is included as Attachment B and shows the recommended proposed changes to Protocol:

· proposed updates and amendments to content are shown in blue text;

· minor deletions are shown in the draft document in track changes; and

· deletions – where whole sections or paragraphs have been deleted from the document, these are shown in Appendix two of the draft Protocol document.

Substantive amendments

Film permit timeframes

20. Feedback on film permit timeframes has been received from local boards and the screen sector. Feedback from local boards indicated that the timeframes for landowner approval are very tight, particularly when considering complex or contentious applications. While feedback from the screen sector indicated that the length of time required to get a permit and uncertainty around whether a permit will be granted can make it challenging to film in Auckland.

21. Staff have identified two options for consideration. The draft Protocol, included as Attachment B shows the option recommended by staff.

Table one. Film permit application approval timeframes.

Option

Advantages and disadvantages

One: status quo (recommended)

The current timeframe for a permit to be granted is 3‑5 working days, depending on the impact of filming and sensitivity of the location.

The Protocol states that a permit for major impact filming may take longer.

Advantages:

· 3-5 working days is comparable with the time frame for granting a film permit in:

o Other major international cities in the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom;

o Queenstown, Wellington and Dunedin; and

· Ensures continuation of existing level of service to the film sector.

Disadvantages:

· Does not address landowner concerns around responding to applications within the current time frames.

Two: amend the permit timeframes (not recommended)

Two amended time frames are suggested:

· Option 2(a) the permit time frame is amended to be “up to five working days”.

· Option 2(b) the permit time frame is increased to 5‑7 working days.

Advantages:

· Addresses landowner concerns around responding to applications within the current time frames.

Disadvantages:

· Risk that it will act as a disincentive to clients making Auckland internationally uncompetitive; and

· Would result in a reduced level of service to the film sector.

Core commitments

22. The core commitments section sets out a commitment to filmmakers to be film‑friendly and open to filming, a commitment to Auckland to consider the impacts of and mitigate the effects of filming and expectations of filmmakers when filming in public open space.

23. Staff have identified two options for consideration. The draft Protocol, included as Attachment B shows the option recommended by staff

Table two. Auckland Film Protocol core commitments.

Option

Advantages and disadvantages

One: Status quo (not recommended)

No change to the core commitments section.

Advantages:

· Ensures continuity of policy messaging.

Disadvantages:

· The core commitments section contains commitments to different audiences; but these are not clustered diffusing messages.

Two: Enhanced status quo (recommended)

The core commitments are reordered and simplified to clarify the Protocols:

1. Commitment to filmmakers – to be film‑friendly and open to filming in Auckland;

2. Commitment to Auckland – to consider the impacts of and mitigate the effects of filming;

3. Commitment to fostering collaborative and cooperative relationships and building mutual awareness and understanding between parties; and

4. Sets out what is expected of filmmakers.

Advantages:

· The section retains the same policy intent but simplifies and clarifies policy messages, improving transparency and accountability.

Disadvantages:

· Could be perceived as a change in Auckland Council’s policy on supporting filming in Auckland.

Updates to content to reflect legislation and current Auckland Council policy

24. The Protocol sets out information about legislation, polices, plans and rules that apply when filming in public open space across Auckland. The proposed changes are recommended to ensure that the Protocol reflects current legislation and current Auckland Council policy, plans and rules.

Table three. Summary of recommended amendments to the Protocol to ensure it reflects current legislation and current Auckland Council, policy, plans and rules.

Topic	Summary of proposed change
Health and Safety at Work Act 2015	That content is updated to: · reflect the new Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 and revised industry guidance; and · increase emphasis on health and safety. That new content is added on the requirement for filmmakers to prepare a site‑specific health and safety plan as part of their application for a permit.
Auckland Unitary Plan	That content is updated to reflect the Auckland Unitary Plan policies and rules. For example, in relation to region‑wide rules around filming as a temporary activity.
Filming on Tūpuna Maunga	When the Protocol was revised in 2015 some content noting that the Tūpuna Maunga were governed by the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority with council responsible for management. However, governance arrangements were reasonably new and since 2015 the Maunga Authority has developed policy and processes in relation to filming. Given this it is proposed that content is updated, noting that: · applications to film on Tūpuna Maunga are assessed by the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority on a case‑by‑case basis, taking into account objectives and policies set out in the Tūpuna Maunga Integrated Management Plan; and · approval to film is subject to conditions and restrictions set by the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority.
Sustainability and waste	That the Protocol be updated to include reference to Auckland Council’s goal of being zero waste by 2040 and to encourage the film sector to do their part. The Protocol previously referred filmmakers to the “Greening the Screen” website which provided guidance on sustainable filming and reducing waste. However, this website is no longer maintained. Given this, it is proposed that additional content is added to the protocol around minimising and reducing waste to landfill.
Protection of native species	That new content is added noting that we have many unique and treasured native species which can be threatened by pests and pathogens. That Auckland Council may place additional conditions on film permits in response to threats to native species.
Kauri dieback	That additional content is added on kauri dieback to increase emphasis, including noting: · the importance of protecting kauri and the ease with which kauri dieback is spread; · the closure of some areas of public open space in Auckland; and · requirements to clean gear and equipment according to council specifications.
Protecting our historic heritage	That new content is added noting that filming around historic heritage sites will be subject to additional conditions to ensure the protection of these sites.
Filming on the water	That new content is added noting: · the Auckland Harbourmaster is responsible for ensuring maritime safety on all navigable waters in Auckland; · filming on the water is subject to maritime rules and to the Auckland Council Navigational Bylaw; and · if filming affects the normal operation of other vessels or water users, the permission of the Harbourmaster will be required.
Helicopters	That new content is added noting: · that under the Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013, permission is required to take‑off, land, pick up a person or item on public open space; except in an emergency; and · use of a helicopter must comply with Civil Aviation Rules, Health and Safety requirements and with noise levels in the Auckland Unitary Plan and the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan.
Drones	That new content is added noting that if a drone is used for filming, that: · use of drones for filming must comply with Civil Aviation rules; · filmmakers must be courteous to other users of public open space and must comply with the Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013 and Council guidelines on the use of drones in public open space.
Related policies, publications and websites	That new content is added to the related policies, publications and websites page, including links to Screen Safe, Work Safe, the Civil Aviation Authority and to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. That websites, such as Greening the Screen, which are no longer maintained or relevant be removed from this section.

Proposed structural and editorial changes

25. Table one shows a summary of the type of structural and editorial changes which are proposed and the rational for making these changes.

Table Four. Summary of proposed structural and editorial changes.

Structural and editorial improvements	Rationale for change
Introduction That an introduction is added to the Protocol to communicate key messages around: · what Auckland offers filmmakers; · how Auckland benefits, including the positive social and economic impacts; and · filming being a controlled activity to manage and mitigate the impacts of filming communities and businesses.	· Reinforces key policy messages set out in the Core Commitments section of the Protocol. · Outlines Auckland Council’s rationale for supporting filming in Auckland.
Key New Zealand Legislation That a new section is added that provides an outline and links to key New Zealand legislation referred to in the Protocol.	· Provides information while placing the onus on the filmmaker to develop a thorough understanding of the legislative frameworks within which they must operate.
Structural and minor changes · the addition of a table of contents; · reordering of content; · new headings to increase emphasis of some sections.	· Improves navigation, readability and flow.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

26. Engagement with staff involved in the process of assessing and approving film permit applications, from across the Council group, was undertaken to inform the review and proposed amendments to the Protocol.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

27. Landowner approval is required to film on any public open space in the Auckland region. Local boards are responsible for landowner approvals for local parks and reserves. Engagement with local boards that experience a high volume of applications for film permits has been undertaken to inform the review of the Auckland Film Protocol.

28. Once public consultation has been completed a report to all local boards will be prepared, summarising key consultation findings and seeking formal feedback on the proposed changes to the Auckland Film Protocol.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

29. ATEED has an ongoing relationship with several mana whenua and mataawaka groups, across its whole portfolio of activity. To inform the review of the Protocol the 19 iwi Authorities were invited, in writing, to inform the review. In relation to film permit applications Māori views and input may be obtained in several ways where there is a potential impact on particular land or sites. This is usually coordinated either by the film facilitator, or through the relevant parks manager.

30. Specific processes are in place for the tūpuna maunga, with all commercial filming on the maunga requiring the approval of the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority (Tūpuna Maunga Authority). Screen Auckland facilitates all requests for approval to film on the tūpuna maunga. Approval to film will be subject to conditions and restrictions set by the Tūpuna Maunga Authority. Meetings were held with staff of the Tūpuna Maunga Authority to inform the review and ensure that proposed amendments are consistent with the policy of the Tūpuna Maunga Authority.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

31. The proposed amendments to the Protocol do not impact on existing levels of service and are not anticipated to impact on operational budgets.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

32. The next steps in the review of the Auckland Film Protocol are outlined in Table five below.

Table 5. Next steps and indicative timeframes for the review of the Auckland Film Protocol

Activity	Expected timeframe
Public consultation on the draft Protocol. It is proposed that public engagement be undertaken through the ShapeAuckland website, with submissions open for a three week period in June and July 2019. The consultation will commence with a media release and will be advertised through online media. Stakeholders, including the film sector, will be informed and directed to ShapeAuckland to share their views.	June / July 2019
Public consultation feedback summarised and presented to local boards; with local boards invited to provide formal feedback on the draft Auckland Film Protocol.	July / August 2019
Public consultation feedback and proposed amendments to the Auckland Film Protocol presented to the Environment and Community Committee for approval.	September 2019

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Summary of key themes from engagement	277
b ⇩	Draft Auckland Film Protocol	281

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Marie Jenkins – Screen Facilitiation Manager, ATEED

Authoriser

Michael Brook – Manager Creative Film Protocol

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Public feedback on the Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei discussion document

File No.: CP2018/25165

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To note public feedback on the Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei discussion document. Also note the basis of the framework for developing the draft Auckland water strategy.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To develop a water strategy Auckland Council engaged with the public about water issues. The discussion document, Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei (Attachment A) received over 7,200 written and in-person submissions.

3. Feedback demonstrated the public’s depth of knowledge and passion about water issues.

4. The public supported the overall vision of the water strategy, values, principles and big issues identified in the discussion document (see analysis of feedback in Attachment B).

5. Support was slightly lower for the ‘resilience value’ included in the discussion document, with feedback suggesting some submitters found it hard to understand.

6. Many submitters expressed an expectation that the council will move quickly from strategy to action. Community priorities for action included cleaning up our waterways, providing safe and reliable drinking water, providing recreational opportunities and responding to climate change and sea level rise.

7. Some submitters raised issues they felt need more attention in the water strategy, including:

· rural water issues, including the difference between urban and rural water values and future security of supply

· the importance of water for cultivation, irrigation and food production

· the importance of water for businesses, industries and economic development

· the potential of rain tanks, water reuse and other measures to meet future needs.

8. Finally, submitters asked that a strategy be developed to align with existing council plans and policies (such as the Unitary Plan) and national legislation.

9. Submitters also said that mana whenua should be involved in an ongoing partnership to apply a Te Ao Māori lens to development of the strategy and its implementation.

10. Overall, public feedback showed support for the framework. Staff recommend it be adopted with minor alterations to the resilience value to clarify its meaning (see Attachment C).

11. The next step is to draft the strategy and proceed to public consultation in early 2020.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendations

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) note the public feedback received on the Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei discussion document.

b) note the amended Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei framework, as shown in Attachment C of the agenda report, as the basis for developing the Auckland water strategy.

c) direct staff to consider the community priorities and issues raised in public feedback, (as summarised in Attachment B of the agenda report), in the development of the Auckland water strategy.

Horopaki

Context

12. The health of Auckland’s waters is a critical issue. Decades of growth and development have had negative impacts on Auckland’s water quality, and on freshwater and marine environments.

13. Population growth and climate change will further amplify the challenges, with greater demand for water services, and an increased risk of flooding and coastal inundation. The Environment and Cultural Heritage outcome of the Auckland Plan 2050 identifies the need to proactively adapt to a changing water future and develop long-term solutions.

14. In response, Auckland Council has commenced a process to prepare a strategy for Auckland’s waters, with the following purpose:

The strategy will provide strategic direction for the council group to meet the challenges and opportunities for improved management for water in all its forms. It will establish the outcomes needed for Auckland’s waters, as part of implementation of the Auckland Plan.

15. In December 2018 the Environment and Community Committee approved the release of the discussion document Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei for public feedback (see attachment A). Prepared collaboratively across the council family, the document identified the water issues that Auckland faces.

16. As a framework for discussion, it identified:

· an aspirational vision for our water future

· five values that describe the reasons we attach importance to water

· four big issues that are at the core of our water challenge

· six principles that will guide our actions at the council as we move forward

· four processes that we need to work on, to support quality decisions.

17. The release of Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei had two main objectives:

· raising public awareness of the significant water issues that are facing Tāmaki Makaurau

· generating feedback on the proposed framework for a water strategy.

Public engagement process

18. The consultation period was open from 17 February 2019 until 19 April 2019. The council received 4,762 written responses and 2,667 in-person responses (see analysis of submissions in Attachment B).

19. By aligning the release of the document with the Annual Budget consultation, the council was able to improve the efficiency of the consultation and reach further with a limited budget. The consultation period was also timed to coincide with the water-themed month of Our Auckland, including the hard copy magazine delivered across Tāmaki Makaurau, billboards, and on-line content.

Public consultation events

20. Water was the focus of 70 public events during the consultation process involving more than 2,600 people, including:

· Auckland Conversations

· Business Improvement Districts

· Regional Stakeholders Panel

· Mana Whenua Hui

· Developers Forum

· two Pasifika Fono

· three Radio Waatea live discussions

· young water professionals workshop

· four council advisory panels – Rural, Youth, Senior and Pacific.

21. Attendees at the events expressed strong support for the need to do better with our water management, especially in taking care of our natural waterways, beaches and harbours. Many participants stressed that water is essential to life and must be looked after accordingly. Submitters noted that as Auckland continues to grow, we should ensure that we are planning for future water needs, and that we aren’t creating new problems, such as building in places that are likely to flood.

22. Further details of the engagement process are provided in Attachment B.

Innovative Māori engagement

23. Staff placed emphasis on engagement with Māori and rangatahi. 18 per cent of submitters identified as Māori or Māori/New Zealand European compared to 11 per cent of the regional population. This high proportional response rate is likely due to staff working with community partners and tailoring engagement to suit audiences.

24. Community partners included Te Kaha o Te Rangatahi, Te Ora o Manukau, Te Whanau Waipareira, Para Kore ki Tāmaki, and Hapai Te Hauora. Tailored engagement included a video call for submissions shared on social media, a simplified submission form, and three live-broadcast debates on Radio Waatea. Online and radio content reached more than 50,000 Māori through these networks.

25. A hui was held with the Mayor, councillors, and ten representatives from seven mana whenua entities (Ngāti Tamaoho Settlement Trust, Te Ara Rangatu o Te Iwi o Ngaati Te Ata Waiohua, Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, Ngāti Whātua o Kaipara, Ngaati Whanaunga, Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust, and Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua). A summary of feedback from this hui is included in the submissions report in Attachment B.

A wide range of respondents

26. Participants at events were wide ranging with regards to age, ethnicity and location of residence.

27. Tables 1 and 2 show the ethnicity and age of submitters who provided written feedback.

Table 1. Ethnicity of those providing written submissions

Ethnicity	Written feedback received (%)	Auckland 2013 census (%)
European	39	59
Māori	18	11
Pacific	9	15
Asian	18	23
Other	16	3

28. These show a good proportional representation from Māori, and people aged 15-34. These are both groups with typically low participation rates in consultation processes.

Table 2. Age distribution of those providing written submissions

Age	Written feedback received (%)	Auckland 2013 census (%)
15-34 years	23	30
35-54 years	32	25
55+ years	33	23
Not answered	12

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

High level of support in written submissions

29. 4,675 written submissions were received, mostly responding to the Have Your Say questionnaire. Submissions were largely supportive of the values and issues included in the discussion document. They also highlighted the range of water related issues that Aucklanders are concerned about.

30. Figures 1 and 2 below show the level of support from questionnaire respondents for each of the proposed values and issues that were included in the discussion document.

Figure 1. Support for proposed values

31. Overall, many questionnaire respondents were strongly or somewhat supportive of all five proposed values.

32. Questionnaire respondents showed the lowest level of support for the resilience value, even as they identified concerns about resilience-related issues such as flooding and climate change. Some feedback indicated that the explanation of resilience was difficult for submitters to understand.

33. Māori respondents also expressed high levels of support for all the values, with particularly high levels of support for the Ecosystem, Recreation and amenity and Culture values. Like other submitters, Māori submitters expressed the lowest level of support for the Resilience value (see analysis in Attachment B).

34. Responses to the issues were consistent – with submitters showing high levels of support for all four issues but the lowest levels for ‘adapting to a changing water future.’

Figure 2. Support for issues

35. Mana whenua drew attention to the need for a holistic approach to water, and for continued collaboration in developing and implementing the water strategy. This will be particularly important when applying a Te Ao Māori lens to define and develop the concepts and issues raised in the discussion document.

36. A detailed analysis of the submissions is provided in Attachment B. This feedback will be used to guide preparation of the draft strategy.

Implications for the proposed framework

37. The proposed framework was set out in the discussion document (see Attachment A). The feedback from the engagement process suggests that the framework is generally fit for purpose, and that the priority for the public is to move quickly from words to implementation. This was a key theme from the feedback received.

38. A small number of key stakeholders proposed specific changes to the framework, often requesting stronger emphasis on an issue that they felt needed more attention. These are discussed in detail in the submissions report in Attachment B with staff advice on how the feedback should be incorporated into Auckland’s water strategy.

39. A summary of community priorities, issues and the recommended staff response is also provided below for the committee’s consideration.

Summary of public feedback and staff advice for incorporating this into the strategy

40. Adopt the framework as the basis for developing the water strategy.

41. Note the challenge to explain resilience concisely.

42. The water strategy development process should reflect the community priorities that were shared in feedback on the discussion document, including:

· recognising the importance of water for life, and taking good care of it

· the strong value placed on our natural environments and recreational opportunities

· the desire to clean up our receiving waters and prevent further degradation (especially from land-based sources, wastewater, stormwater, litter and plastics)

· the importance of safe and reliable drinking water

· increasing the capacity of our networks for future growth, including developing alternative water sources and increased storage

· the need to act on climate change and address flooding and sea level rise

· the kaitiaki role of mana whenua and the opportunity to bring a Māori world view alongside western science and decision-making processes

· an expectation that the council will move quickly from strategy to action.

43. The water strategy development process should reflect the following issues raised in submissions:

· rural issues, including the different water values held in rural and urban areas, future security of rural water needs and the impacts of rural development as well as urban growth

· the importance of water for cultivation, irrigation and food production

· the importance of water for businesses, industries and economic development

· the potential of rain tanks, water reuse and efficiency measures for meeting future water needs

· the role of all Aucklanders in protecting and enhancing Auckland’s waters, and in building resilience

· issues for marine waters such as marina infrastructure

· management of groundwater.

44. The water strategy should ensure:

· alignment with legislation, council plans and policies including the Unitary Plan

· existing council group strategies and technical work are used to inform actions under the ‘adapting to a changing water future’ issue.

· mana whenua are supported through an ongoing partnership to develop methods to apply a Māori world view in the strategy and its implementation,

· a map of Auckland’s water catchments is included

· stakeholders’ roles and responsibilities are described.

Recommendations arising from public feedback

45. Overall, public feedback showed strong support for most aspects of the draft framework. Staff recommend that it be adopted and used to guide development of the full draft strategy, with slight amendments to the resilience value (see amended framework in Attachment C).

46. Staff also recommend that the community priorities and issues raised in public feedback and summarised above be considered in the development of the strategy.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

47. There is broad agreement across the council group that there is a need for better integration in water-related matters, and that improvements in investment and decision-making processes are possible.

48. The water strategy is being developed across the council group. A Political Reference Group has been established including representatives from Watercare, Auckland Transport. Panuku is also represented at management level, on the Executive Steering Group. Staff from Watercare and Auckland Transport contributed to the preparation of Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei and will continue to be involved in developing the water strategy.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

49. Staff held workshops with all local boards in late 2018 on the Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei discussion document and sought their formal feedback through business meetings. Local board resolutions were provided to Environment and Community Committee in December 2018 when the discussion document was approved for public consultation.

50. Local boards hosted many of the Have Your Say consultation events and helped to ensure local views were fed into the engagement. They will continue to be actively involved in the development of the strategy.

51. Memos will be circulated to each local board highlighting issues raised in public feedback that relate to their areas. A detailed list of these issues is included in the submissions report in Attachment B. Examples include concern over:

· local impacts on water - for example, the proposed landfill site in the Dome Valley, on-site wastewater treatment in the Waitākere Ranges, increasing intensification in the Upper Waitematā Harbour and sedimentation in Okura

· local opportunities for improvement – for example, the water sensitive design in the Whenuapai development, Herald Island stormwater infrastructure

· the health of local waterways – for example, Takapuna Beach, Mission Bay, Lake Pupuke, Makarau River, Manukau Harbour and beaches.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

52. Involving mana whenua in governance and decision-making roles has been identified as an integral part of developing the water strategy. Co-governance of Auckland’s waters is a possible future development. The strategy needs to acknowledge and prepare for this scenario.

53. Mana whenua priorities have been incorporated into the proposed framework, starting with the vision of te mauri o te wai, as proposed by the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum. A representative of the forum sits on the Political Reference Group, and staff regularly meet with the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum.

Feedback from Māori submitters

54. As noted above, Māori engagement was a priority during the engagement process and written submissions were received from 843 individuals identifying as Māori.

55. Overall, responses from Māori submitters demonstrated high levels of ‘strongly support’ for all proposed values and issues, with particularly high support for the Ecosystem Value. Māori submitters expressed the lowest level of support for Resilience (like other submitters).

56. Māori submitters recorded higher levels of support for the ‘Culture value’ than ‘Water use.’ This response pattern differed from other submitters and may reflect the importance to Māori of ensuring that the cultural value of water is fully considered in the draft strategy.

Mana whenua views

57. The mana whenua hui provided a useful summary of perspectives from Ngāti Tamaoho Settlement Trust, Te Ara Rangatu o Te Iwi o Ngaati Te Ata Waiohua, Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, Ngāti Whātua o Kaipara, Ngaati Whanaunga, Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust, and Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua (see summary in Attachment B). A submission from the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum reinforces the messages received in the hui.

58. Discussion at the hui emphasised that water is a taonga – we need to stop wasting it, and we should be able to gather food from rivers, estuaries and their margins. Participants in the hui expressed the view that this is a birth right and we need to increase the value we place on being able to live in harmony with natural environments.

59. Participants wanted the strategy to drive holistic management of land and water, and account for the cumulative effects of human activities on the mauri of Auckland’s waters.

60. Mana whenua emphasised the importance of collaboration between council departments and effective partnership between the council and mana whenua, from governance to project design and delivery. Continued partnership is necessary to enable:

· the vision advanced by the strategy is well understood and implemented faithfully

· matauranga Māori effectively informs decision-making

· immediate actions are taken to address pressing issues (like cleaning up rivers and preventing sewage overflows) and balanced with far-sighted actions in preparation for future issues (like climate change, water allocation and water supply).

61. Mana whenua at the hui acknowledged the apparent openness of the council to developing a strategy that shows a genuine commitment to improving the health of Auckland’s waterbodies. Mana whenua noted the importance of reporting outcomes in a transparent way.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

62. By combining communications with the Annual Budget consultation, the costs of carrying out consultation were substantially reduced. Approximately $60,000 was expended on the Have Your Say and standard communication channels for Our Water Future - Tō tātou wai ahu ake nei. An additional $25,000 was allocated to support the focus on Māori engagement.

63. Consultation on the draft water strategy (mid 2020) is expected to cost in the order of $180,000 – depending on the scale of engagement and whether the consultation can be aligned with other council consultations. Funds for this are available through the council’s operational budgets, approved in the Long-Term Plan 2018-2028.

64. Any financial implications of the strategy will be captured in the Long-term Plan 2021-2031.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

65. An initial risk assessment was carried out in June 2018, with four main risks identified to delivering the project on time and within budget. Table 3 updates this assessment.

Table 3. Risks to the water strategy, performance to date and proposed mitigations

Risk description	Performance to date	Updated assessment	Mitigation/control
Difficulty mobilising resources	A virtual team from across the council group has contributed their expertise to the project and deadlines have been achieved.	Medium risk. Balancing the demands of developing the strategy with pre-existing workloads continues to be a challenge.	Continued support from the Executive Steering Group for staff dedicating time to strategy development and completion
Scope creep	Initial plans were revised to include a discussion document phase, in part due to the breadth of the subject. The discussion document and public engagement have helped to confirm the scope.	Medium risk. There is a continuing challenge to present a succinct strategy when covering such a broad subject.	Guidance from the Political Reference Group and Executive Steering Group to keep scope of strategy focused.
Central government changes to legislation and policy	These changes have yet to be announced. The vision, values and issues identified in the discussion document are unlikely to be incompatible with legislative or policy change.	Medium risk. Changes to legislation and policy may affect how the council develops and implements the strategy. Consequences could be either positive or negative depending on the nature of the changes.	Maintain involvement in central government processes and communicate with central government officials about the strategy
Inconsistent practices and adoption of the strategy	This has not yet been an issue, as the strategy is still under development. Internal cross-council engagement has built understanding of the mandates and priorities for different parts of the council family.	Medium risk. The strategy will need strong buy-in across the council to ensure proactive implementation.	Ensure that council staff with water responsibilities are engaged in the development of the strategy, and that the strategy is relevant to their needs.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

66. Staff will now develop Auckland’s water strategy. The timeline is shown below in Table 4.

Table 4. Timeline for completion of Auckland water strategy

Month	Milestone
June – Dec 2019	Preparation of draft water strategy
Jan – Mar 2020	Local board engagement on draft strategy Mana whenua and council family engagement on draft strategy
April 2020	Report to appropriate council committee seeking approval of draft strategy for public consultation
May – July 2020	Public consultation on draft water strategy
September 2020	Approval of water strategy

67. Completing the water strategy by September 2020 will allow the strategy’s directions to inform development of the Long-term Plan 2021-2031, and any plan changes required by the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei: Discussion document and feedback form	343
b ⇩	Our Water Future - Tō Tātou Wai Ahu Ake Nei: Public engagement and analysis report	395
c ⇩	Framework for adoption, including amended Resilience value	495

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Andrew Chin – Auckland Waters Programme Director

Authorisers

Craig McIlroy – General Manager Healthy Waters

Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme

File No.: CP2019/02113

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To confirm the allocation of funding to applicants from the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2019/2020.

2. To confirm the 2020/2021 programme’s opening/closing dates and funding budget of $508,000.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. The Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme supports regional sport and recreation organisations to deliver regional projects through the allocation of grants for operational project costs.

4. Twenty-nine applications were received requesting a total of $995,813 from an available funding pool of $508,000. Staff assessed applications for eligibility against the Community Grants Policy 2014 and the assessment matrix criteria.

5. Thirteen applications from sport and recreation organisations are recommended for funding allocation following a briefing to elected members at the Environment and Community Committee workshop on 9 May 2019 and the assessment process.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) approve the following allocation of funding from the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2019/2020 budget, for the amounts outlined below:

Organisation	Project description	Funding Allocation $
John Walker Find Your Field of Dreams Foundation	Community Swim, fast moving water WERO programme, Primary Sport, BLENNZ Sport, Youth Leadership Programme, Run/Jump & Throw for Gold, Lift for Gold West/South, and secondary schools water safety initiative	200,000
Auckland Paraplegic and Physically Disabled Association	Junior Disability Sport Inclusion and Diversity programme	18,100
Tuileapa Youth Mentoring Services	Youth basketball programme	14,900
Blind Sport New Zealand Incorporated	Multi-sport kid’s clubs for blind and low vision youth	10,000
Bowls New Zealand Incorporated	Barefoot Bowls	10,000
North Harbour Softball Association	Game Development Programme	18,000
Aktive - Greater Auckland Aquatic Action Plan	Water Skills for Life swimming lessons	40,000
Aktive - He Oranga Poutama	Pouwhakahaere Karapu Māori - building capacity of Māori sports organisations	45,000
Hockey New Zealand	Junior participation programmes	20,000
Community Leisure Management	Active Youth Wellness	25,000
Netball Northern	Junior Netball	55,000
New Zealand Golf	Futures golf	30,000
Manukau Auckland Volleyball	Volleyball for fun	22,000

b) approve the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2020/2021 to open for applications on 24 January 2020, and close on 6 March 2020 allocating $508,000 from July 2020, in accordance with the Community Grants Policy 2014.

Horopaki

Context

6. Council’s region-wide investment programme in sport and recreation seeks to inspire Aucklander’s to be more physically active. The Community Grants Policy (2014) and the Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan inform the outcomes and implementation of the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme (see Attachment A).

7. The Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme primarily grants operational funding for regional initiatives delivered by community sport and recreation entities. The purpose of the programme is predominantly to enable children and young people to participate in sport and recreation. The programme also provides affordable access to groups with low participation rates: Māori, people with health and wellbeing needs, and people facing other barriers.

8. The Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2019/20 opened to applicants on 25 January and closed on 8 March 2019. Twenty-nine applications were received requesting a total of $995,813 from an available funding pool of $508,000. Of the twenty-nine applications received thirteen were considered strongly aligned (see Attachment B), seven partially aligned and nine not aligned, to the Community Grants Policy 2014 and the Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan.

9. Funding requests were primarily for salary and programme costs which included coaching, venue hire, administration costs and equipment. There was a wide range in both the quality and size of applications received and funding requests ranged from $1,800 to $230,000.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

10. The applications were assessed for eligibility against the Community Grants Policy 2014. The eligible applications were then assessed by Council staff using the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme’s assessment matrix. The matrix weightings comprise of 15% for inputs and outputs, 30% for evidence of demand, 20% for evidence that the programme will result in an increase in sport and recreation participation and other benefits, 20% for alignment with strategic priorities and 15% for detailed project information. The assessment process includes an outcome measurement tool modelled on the Treasury’s CBAx model. This model provides a clear line-of-sight between council investment and Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan outcomes. It also improves the monitoring and evaluation of the grants programme.

11. Through this process the applications were grouped into three categories and draft funding allocations were recommended for the strongly aligned applications. The strongly aligned applications provide an effective investment option to support areas of identified need as outlined in the Community Grants Policy 2014. These areas include increasing the sport and recreation participation of children and young people, provided affordable access to groups with low participation rates, particularly Māori, populations with health and wellbeing needs and those facing other barriers.

12. On 9 May 2019 this committee considered the applications at a workshop. Applications were grouped into three categories: strongly aligned, partially aligned and not aligned, as determined by the Community Grants Policy 2014. The ‘strongly aligned’ applications were received from regional sector organisations, showed clear regional benefit and aligned to the policy outcomes. The ‘partially aligned’ applications were not as strongly aligned to the policy outcomes and in most cases did not demonstrate strong regional impact. The ineligible applications were ‘not aligned’ to the policy outcomes and were not considered to provide regional impact. Some of these applications were for capital works and had underdeveloped project plans.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

13. Staff from Community and Social Policy, as well as Parks, Sport and Recreation have provided input to the assessment of the applications to the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme. Leisure Services staff will provide input and collaborate with recipient organisation’s where programme delivery occurs within Auckland Council Leisure Centres.

14. No council-controlled organisations are directly affected by the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

15. Projects supported through the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme are primarily regional, however they are often delivered at a local level in schools, sports centres and facilities. The projects impact upon local communities by offering affordable access to physical activity opportunities and experiences to children and young people with low participation rates.

16. Local Boards were consulted during the development of the Community Grants Policy 2014 and the Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan; collectively, they inform the outcomes and implementation of the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme. During consultation, Local Boards acknowledged that there are organisations and projects that do not qualify for local board funding and need a regional funding option offered through this Grants Programme.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

17. The Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan supports the desired outcomes for Māori within the Māori Plan for Tāmaki Makaurau to improve the health and wellbeing of Māori.

18. The Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme offers funding to deliver on Te Waka Oranga - Parks, Sports and Recreation Māori Responsiveness Plan. One of the grants programme’s primary outcomes is to increase Māori participation in sport and recreation activities.

19. The strongly aligned application from He Oranga Poutama supports Māori sports clubs through building club capacity and capability. Another six strongly aligned applications target populations that specifically include Māori communities and participants.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

20. The draft Long Term Plan provides the ongoing annual amount of $508,000 for the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme.

21. Successful applicants enter into a funding agreement with council which enables staff to monitor the organisations performance through reporting and accountability requirements.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

22. Staff mitigate risks through carrying out a robust assessment process when considering the applications.

23. The financial risk to council is mitigated through the practice of paying the annual grant in two part-payments. This enables staff to withhold payment if late or substandard reports are received or the organisation’s performance is poor.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

24. Over the next few weeks, all applicants will be notified of the funding allocation decisions made by this committee. Staff will support organisations whose applications were partially or not aligned to the Community Grants Policy 2014. This support may include encouraging the organisations to seek other funding options or working towards developing their application for next year. Staff will also meet with successful applicants and agree on project plans, funding agreement outcomes, measures and reporting requirements.

25. It is proposed the Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2020/2021 opens for applications on 24 January 2020, and closes on 6 March 2020 allocating $508,000 from July 2020, in accordance with the Community Grants Policy 2014.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Schedule Six: Regional Sport and Recreation Grants programme	503
b ⇩	Summary - Regional Sport and Recreation Grants Programme 2019 / 2020	505

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Geraldine Wilson - Activation Advisor - Outdoors

Authorisers

Mace Ward - General Manager Parks, Sports and Recreation

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment

File No.: CP2019/03854

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To agree to the recommended key moves in the Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment investigated the current and future need for community facilities to address projected population growth.

3. Key assessment findings were:

· existing community facility provision is adequate for the current population and can accommodate some growth

· by 2021 existing library provision may not be sufficient to deliver to population growth

· Franklin Pool is nearing capacity and Jubilee pool is operating under capacity but there are limited opportunities to significantly increase its use

· provision of indoor courts at the Franklin Leisure Centre is sufficient until 2026 and for a population of up to 40,000

· the scale of projected growth in Paerata in the next 10-15 years could warrant investment in a multi-purpose community space located in Paerata.

4. The key moves to address the assessment findings are to:

i) investigate options to make Franklin and Jubilee pool services fit for purpose and respond to the needs of the growing population, commencing in 2020

ii) identify options to maximise use of existing community facilities for increased utilisation or operational efficiency, commencing in 2022

iii) reassess the need for additional indoor courts in Paerata when the population nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026

iv) investigate the need for a new multipurpose space in Paerata in 2026 when the population nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026.

5. There is a risk that the actual rate of population growth is different to projections. To mitigate this risk the projections will be updated when the latest census data become available.

6. The local board endorsed the key recommendations of the Pukekohe-Paerata community facilities provision assessment.

7. The next steps are to update the Community Facilities Action Plan to include key moves identified in this report and commence investigations into aquatic provision.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) agree to the recommended key moves in the Pukekohe-Paerata community facilities provision assessment as following:

i) investigate options to make Franklin and Jubilee pool services fit for purpose and respond to the needs of the growing population commencing in 2020

ii) identify options to maximise use of existing community facilities for increased utilisation or operational efficiency commencing in 2022

iii) reassess the need for additional indoor courts in Paerata when the population nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026

iv) investigate the specific needs for a multipurpose community space in Paerata when the population nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026.

b) agree that the recommended key moves from the Pukekohe-Paerata community facilities provision assessment be included in the updated Community Facilities Action Plan.

Horopaki

Context

Background to the investigation into community provision

8. The Community Facilities Network Plan 2015 guides council’s investment in the provision of community facilities. The Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment addresses priority action 33 of the action plan for the Franklin Local Board to:

· monitor growth patterns and investigate the need for library and community space provision in the Paerata/Wesley area to address population growth.

9. Due to levels of growth anticipated for Pukekohe-Paerata the scope of the assessment was expanded to incorporate community facilities including: libraries, arts, community spaces, bookable spaces, pools and leisure facilities. This addressed:

· priority action 34 to investigate the need for aquatic and leisure space in the wider Pukekohe area to address population growth and demand for different aquatic activities. As part of this investigation consider improvements to existing facilities

· non-priority action 36 to investigate the future of the Pukekohe Borough Building considering the relationship with other community facilities in the vicinity and how collectively these facilities are meeting community needs.

10. The purpose of the Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment is to determine if there are gaps in current services or facility provision, if there are likely to be gaps in the future and when they might appear.

11. The study area is defined by the future urban zone around Pukekohe-Paerata where much of the growth will occur in the next 30 years. To support the cost-effective delivery of community facilities, Auckland Council uses a three-stage process for investigating and investing in new or substantially changed community services or facilities. The three stages are:

12. The Pukekohe-Paerata assessment is phase one of the process and included:

· desktop research on recent studies in the area, development of demographic profile, analysis of population projections and existing community consultation

· a review of existing council and non-council facility provision (considering network plan guidelines)

· identification and assessment of issues, opportunities and a gap analysis.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

13. High level findings of the Pukekohe-Paerata community provision assessment are provided in a summary report as Attachment A and outlined below.

Growth and community profile

Growth over the next 30 years will create demand for additional services and facilities	Urbanisation of rural areas will result in changing needs for community services/facilities:
· population growth in Pukekohe-Paerata will reach 64,356 in the next 30 years when nearly half of the population will reside in new developments at Paerata · the increased number of people living and working around the area will place pressure on existing services and create demand for new services and facilities, particularly in Paerata.	· increased urbanisation occurring across Pukekohe but focussed in Paerata may increase pressure on existing facilities and create new demand as reduced lot sizes of residences increase demand for community facilities · reinforces the need to strategically locate facilities particularly where population densities are increasing and support access and participation and reduce overcrowding of existing facilities.
Some disparity of opportunity due to socio-economic factors and isolation	The resident population of Pukekohe-Paerata is changing and services/facilities will need to respond
· a lower median household income in the area compared to the Auckland median and a higher number of single person households. This is partially due to the high number of retirees living in the area · barriers to the use of community facilities are more likely to be felt by lower income households · people who live alone are more likely to feel lonely or isolated and may require more support through community services · barriers to use and participation such as transport and cost are more likely to be felt by larger households, single income households or those on a fixed income.	· one of Auckland’s highest proportions of residents aged over 65 in Auckland and increasing to 21 per cent over the next 30 years · older residents are higher users of arts and community centres and are a potential growth demographic for aquatics and leisure · younger people with families are anticipated to live in the new development areas and are high users of community facilities, particularly aquatic facilities · a higher proportion of New Zealand European and Māori living in the area compared to Auckland · the changing demographic across Pukekohe-Paerata creates opportunity to better target services particularly to increase participation in low user groups and to locate new facilities in areas of growth.

Gap analysis

14. Facility provision in Pukekohe-Paerata was analysed against the guidelines in the Community Facilities Network Plan to identify gaps and opportunities. Key findings were:

Service Type

Demand

Gap Analysis

Community, Arts, Libraries

Population will increase to 64,356 within the next 30 years with nearly half residing in Paerata

Library – current provision is adequate but potential capacity issues may emerge by 2021 as the population grows

Arts - adequate provision of arts spaces in Pukekohe town centre but a potential gap in Paerata in the medium to long-term

Venues for Hire - high provision of bookable spaces, but being used at a third of potential

Growth in Paerata is likely to trigger the need for community space including library, arts and venues for hire located in Paerata within the next 10 to 15 years

Potential to maximise use of existing community facilities for increased utilisation or operational efficiency

Aquatic

Two facilities in Pukekohe serve a catchment of 30,000

Capacity measures indicate Jubilee Pool is operating under capacity and Franklin Pool is near capacity

Potential for optimisation or operational efficiencies

Population growth suggests additional capacity may be required in the future

Leisure

Two indoor courts are available in Franklin Pool and Leisure Centre

Use is increasing but not meeting proper standards for basketball i.e. a sprung floor

Population growth in Drury and Tuakau is likely to increase future use of facilities in Pukekohe-Paerata

Council’s agreed provision indicates existing facilities are sufficient for a population of 18,000-40,000 which will be reached by 2026

Growth is likely to trigger the need for additional provision of indoor courts particularly in Paerata

15. Key moves to address the gaps are to:

Key move	Commencement
investigate options to make Franklin and Jubilee pool services fit for purpose and respond to the needs of the growing population by 2020	in 2020
consider the need for additional indoor courts to support population growth, particularly growth forecast in Paerata in the next 10 to 15 years	when the population of Paerata nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026
identify options to maximise use of existing community facilities for increased utilisation or operational efficiency	in 2022
investigate the need for a new multipurpose space in Paerata subject to growth in the next 10 to 15 years to support population growth and emerging community needs	when the population of Paerata nears 20,000, which is estimated to be in 2026

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

16. Some delivery experiences to date were drawn from across community services who support key moves.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

17. In March 2018 the Franklin Local Board endorsed the recommended key moves in the Pukekohe-Paerata community provision assessment report. Resolutions are provided as Attachment B.

18. The board also requested that options to make the existing pools more fit for purpose include looking at the feasibility of:

· amalgamating aquatic facilities in Pukekohe

· developing the Jubilee Pool site as a fit for purpose indoor/outdoor aquatic centre

· re-purposing Franklin Sport and Leisure Centre pool as a dedicated indoor court space.

19. These options will be assessed as part of the next stages of work.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

20. The Franklin Local Board has a higher percentage of people identifying as Māori than the Auckland average (17.7 per cent compared to 10.7 per cent for Auckland).

21. Views of Māori were sourced from existing recent social research. Māori expressed a desire for culturally appropriate activities for youth and family friendly activities and events.

22. Improvements to programmes, services and facilities, particularly aquatic and leisure, are likely to benefit Māori as they are a significant percentage of the community.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

23. Investigation works identified in the recommendations will be undertaken within existing resources. Initiatives with financial implications can be considered in future Annual Plan and Long-term Plan processes.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

24. Demographic and growth projections may change and the recommendations may require updating when new evidence, like the New Zealand Census results, become available. Implications from any changes can be considered and mitigated as part of future work.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

25. Investigations into aquatic facilities and community facility optimisation and operational efficiencies will be progressed.

26. The Community Facilities Network Action Plan will be updated to include actions from this report.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a	Summary report - Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment (Under Separate Cover)
b ⇩	Franklin Local Board resolutions - Pukekohe-Paerata community facility provision assessment	515

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Rhoda Fowler - Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Kataraina Maki - GM - Community & Social Policy

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Submission to the draft Strategy for our ageing population - Better later life – He Oranga Kaumātua 2019 to 2034

File No.: CP2019/05367

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the submission to the Office for Seniors on the Better Later Life / He Oranga kaumātua 2019-2034 draft Strategy.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Auckland Council (the council) is submitting to the Office for Seniors on their draft Strategy, Better Later Life/ He Oranga kaumātua 2019-2034 (the Strategy) Attachment A.

3. The council submission is in support of the Strategy, particularly:

· the whole-of-life and whānau centred approach to ageing

· the importance of recognising diversity

· providing housing choices and options so people can age in the community

· encouraging accessible built environments so people can participate in their community

· improving access to services, especially for our most vulnerable groups

· enhancing opportunities for social connection and participation.

4. The submission proposes that the Strategy would be strengthened by:

· supporting initiatives that enable working older people to transition to retirement

· focusing more on addressing existing and immediate needs and inequities

· strengthening the presence of culture and diversity throughout the Strategy

· involving kaumātua Māori in the design and delivery of services and a ‘by-Māori-for-Māori’ approach in the Strategy’s implementation

· encouraging legislative changes to ensure implementation of universal design principles

· committing to substantially reducing elder abuse with the goal to eliminate

· amending “recognition of diversity” to include “valuing diversity”

· ensuring intergenerational equity is considered when implementing the Strategy

· working with the private sector to ensure they provide for older peoples’ needs

· including discussion on the ‘whole of journey experience’ in accessible and affordable transport.

5. The submission will be made to the Office for Seniors by 13 June 2019. Council staff will continue to work with central government and others to assist with implementation of the Strategy.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Environment and Community Committee:

a) approve the Auckland Council’s submission on the Better Later Life / He Oranga kaumātua 2019-2034 draft Strategy Attachment B of the agenda report

b) delegate authority, through the Chief Executive, to appoint a manager to be responsible for making changes to the submission to reflect decisions made by the Environment and Community Committee and lodge the submission by 13 June 2019.

Horopaki

Context

6. In August 2018, council submitted on the government’s Discussion Document on a Strategy for an Ageing Population. This was approved by the Environment and Community Committee on 14 August 2018 (see resolution number ENV/2018/107).

7. In April 2019, the government released the Better Later Life / He Oranga kaumātua 2019 to 2034 draft Strategy and invited submissions.

8. The aim of the Strategy is to ensure everyone can participate, contribute and feels valued as they age. It outlines a vision and guiding principles along with what needs to happen to achieve the vision.

9. The Strategy is intended to be used by central and local government, non-governmental organisations, businesses and communities to improve outcomes for all New Zealanders as they age.

10. It complements and links to other government strategies, including; Healthy Ageing Strategy 2016, New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016 and New Zealand’s Carers’ Strategy 2008 and New Zealand’s Carers’ Strategy Action Plan 2014-2018.

11. The Strategy and council’s draft submission was circulated to all elected members, Independent Māori Statutory Board members (IMSB), and the council’s advisory panels. Members were also invited to attend a drop-in session. Feedback from this process has been incorporated in council’s submission.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

12. The council’s submission is in general support of the Strategy and its desired outcomes for older people. The Strategy aligns with the Auckland Plan 2050, where all Aucklanders feel they belong and can participate in society.

13. Supporting the Strategy is consistent with council’s commitment to becoming a member of the World Health Organisation Global Network of Age-friendly Cities and Communities.

14. The submission supports the Strategy’s vision and guiding principles, particularly:

· the whole-of-life and whānau centred approach to ageing

· the importance of recognising diversity.

15. We agree with the key action areas and what needs to happen to achieve them, particularly the focus on:

· providing housing choices and options so people can age in the community

· encouraging accessible built environments so people can participate in their community

· improving access to services, especially for our most vulnerable groups

· enhancing opportunities for social connection and participation.

16. The council submission proposes that the Strategy would be strengthened by:

· supporting initiatives that enable working older people to transition to retirement

· increasing the focus on addressing existing and immediate needs and inequities

· involving kaumātua Māori in the design and delivery of services and a ‘by-Māori-for-Māori’ approach in the Strategy’s implementation increasing the focus on culture and diversity throughout the Strategy, particularly for the design and delivery of places and services to meet diverse needs

· making legislative changes to ensure implementation of universal design and greater accessibility in the built environment

· making a commitment to substantially reducing elder abuse with the goal to eliminate

· amending “recognition of diversity” to include “valuing diversity”

· ensuring intergenerational equity is considered when implementing the Strategy

· working with the private sector to ensure they provide for older peoples’ needs considering the ‘whole of journey experience’ to ensure accessible and affordable transport

· strengthening the language used throughout the Strategy to be more directive, demonstrating and ensuring the government’s commitment to action.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

17. Council staff, including council controlled organisations provided input to the development of the submission.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

18. The local board members who provided feedback generally supported the submission. Some examples of specific feedback that has been incorporated includes:

· amending “recognition of diversity” to include “valuing diversity”

· extending the goal of substantially reducing elder abuse to aiming to eliminate it

· referencing more explicitly in the submission the need to consider the diverse needs of our rural and island communities.

19. Waiheke Local Board and Aotea Great Barrier Local Board provided specific written feedback that gives insight to their respective unique situations. As this feedback highlights for government the challenges faced by our rural and island communities, these have been appended to the council submission.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

20. The needs of kaumātua Māori are considered throughout the Strategy. It also incorporates a whole-of-life and whānau centred approach to ageing.

21. The submission recommends the Strategy involve kaumātua Māori in the design and delivery of services, using a ‘by-Māori-for-Māori’ approach in the Strategy’s implementation.

22. The submission also notes the importance of considering intergenerational equity. Implementation of the Strategy shouldn’t unfairly burden working young people, which could impact more on Māori communities with younger demographic profiles. This point, raised by IMSB, has been incorporated into the submission at paragraph 17.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

23. There are no financial implications arising from approving the submission.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

24. There are no risks arising from approving this submission.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

25. The submission will be made to the Office for Seniors by 13 June 2019.

26. Council staff will continue to work with central government and others to assist with implementation of the Strategy.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Better Later Life He Oranga Kaumatua 2019 to 2034 draft Strategy	521
b ⇩	Auckland Council submission on the Better Later Life He Oranga Kaumatua 2019 to 2034 draft Strategy	577

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Rebecca Kruse - Policy Advisor

Authorisers

Kataraina Maki – General Manager - Community & Social Policy

Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division

Environment and Community Committee

11 June 2019

Komiti Taiao a Hapori Hoki /

ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY COMMITTEE FORWARD WORK PROGRAMME 2018

This committee deals with strategy and policy decision-making that relates to the environmental, social, economic and cultural activities of Auckland as well as matters that are not the responsibility of another committee or the Governing Body

Committee Priorities:

1. Clearly demonstrate that Auckland is making progress with climate change adaptation and mitigation and taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

2. Enable green growth with a focus on improved water quality, pest eradication and ecological restoration

3. Strengthen communities and enable Aucklanders to be active and connected

4. Make measurable progress towards the social and community aspects of housing all Aucklanders in secure, healthy homes they can afford

5. Grow skills and a local workforce to support economic growth in Auckland

The work of the committee will:

· Deliver on the outcomes in the Auckland Plan

· Be focused on initiatives that have a high impact

· Meet the Council’s statutory obligations, including funding allocation decisions

· Increase the public’s trust and confidence in the organisation.

Area of work	Reason for work		Decision or direction			Expected timeframes Quarter (month if known)
						FY18/19			FY19/20
						Jan-Mar 2019 12 Feb 12 March		Apr-Jun 2019 9 April 14 May 11 June	Jul-Sep 2019 9 July 13 Aug 10 Sept		Oct-Dec
Strategic approach to Climate Change	To demonstrate that Auckland is making progress with climate change adaptation and mitigation and taking action to reduce emissions. Next steps · Develop draft plan March – May 2019 · Draft plan to committee for input and adoption June 2019 · Public consultation of draft plan July-August 2019			Strategic direction will be provided in the coming months. Progress to date: A summary of activities to prepare for climate change was given in the presentation on 8/8/17 meeting. Report was considered on 20/2/18, resolution ENV/2018/11 Dec 18 – approval for consultation Feb – Mar 19 - targeted public engagement Apr 19 – feedback presented to elected members Jun 19 – final strategy for adoption Progress to date report was considered December 2018 meeting. Res ENV/2018/170 Workshop scheduled 23 May 2019				Q4 (June)
Low carbon living	To deliver on Low Carbon Auckland Plan commitments by the design and implementation of awareness raising and incentives programmes to reduce household, community, business and schools carbon emissions by approximately 50% of current levels.			Strategic direction and endorse programmes as part of the Low Carbon Auckland Plan implementation. Progress to date: Report was considered at 20/2/18 meeting. Res ENV/2018/11 report back in Dec 18 for a decision. Independent Advisory Group (IAG) was approved. Chairs Planning and Env & Community Cttees, an IMSB member and the Mayor’s office to decide on the membership of the IAG.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Low Carbon Auckland / Climate Change Mitigation	Four-yearly review of strategic action plan due in 2018; increased engagement with and commitments via C40 Cities membership; development of proactive policy agenda to central government emerging Climate Plan Workshop: Risks and vulnerabilities (June) • Committee workshop on risks and vulnerabilities • Communication strategy for broader public engagement • Local Board workshops • Mana whenua engagement (integrated throughout) • Stakeholder workshops Prioritisation criteria and identified actions (Jul/Aug) • Cost benefit and total value analysis • Agree prioritisation criteria • Review all actions • Draft plan • Draft plan to committee (Dec 2018 • Consultation (linking to other plans, approach tbc) • Updates to action plan • Adoption of updated plan by council (Proposed December 2018) • Final Adoption of Climate Plan (Mar 09)			Decision and endorsement of strategic direction Progress to date: Report was considered at 20/2/18 meeting. Res ENV/201811 report back in Dec18 for a decision. Independent Advisory Group was approved. Workshops scheduled: 4/7/18 and 26/09/18. An update was on 12/06/18 meeting agenda. Report reapplication for C40 Cities membership was considered at 13/11/2018 meeting. Res ENV/2018/149 reapplication for membership was approved		Q3		Q4	Q1
Urban Forest Strategy	Strategic approach to delivering on the wider social, economic and environmental benefits of a growing urban forest in the context of rapid population growth and intensification.			Decision on strategic direction and endorsement of strategy. Progress to date: A workshop was held on 14/06/17. Report was considered on 12/09/17 ENV/2017/116 a full draft of the strategy was considered 20/02/18, res ENV/2018/12 with a report back on the results of the LIDAR and an implementation plan on costs and benefits in Aug 2018. An update was included in the 14 Aug agenda regarding several workstreams covered by the 18 high level implementation actions. A report on a full progress on implementing the strategy will be in August 2019.		Q3		Q4	Q1 (Aug19)
Allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund	Decision making over medium and large funds from the Waste Minimisation and Innovation fund in line with the fund’s adopted policy. Funds to contribute towards council’s aspirational goal of zero waste to landfill by 2040. Full review of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund will be undertaken. Outcomes provided with the section 17a review report in March 2019.			Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2018-2019 financial year. Decision: Approval of allocation of September 2016 funding round Resolution ENV/2016/19 Item C5. Approval of grants in Dec 17 Progress to date: Report was considered on 4/12/18 to note allocations for the 2018/2019 small to med September funding round, res ENV/2018/176. Item C1 approval of medium to large grants September 2018 round April 2019 - email to committee re: small grants round opening 1 April to 30 April. A copy of the memo is attachment C of the Summary of Environment and Community Committee Information – updates, memos and briefings – 9 April 2019 report. – April agenda.		Q3 (Mar)		Q4	Q1
Auckland’s water strategy	The health of Auckland’s waters is a critical issue. Both freshwater and marine environments in Auckland are under pressure from historic under-investment, climate change and rapid growth. The draft Auckland Plan 2050 identifies the need to proactively adapt to a changing water future and develop long-term solutions.			Decision and strategic direction and priorities as part of the Auckland Plan. Consider the development of an Auckland’s waters strategy to be adopted for consultation December 2018. Progress to date: A report was considered on 12/06/18 to approve the proposed scope, timeframe and budget for the development of the strategy. Res ENV/2018/78 Key milestones: · June 2018 – develop a strategic summary of water related outcomes, identify integrated water outcomes, · July-Oct 2018 – high level regional options are developed and assessed for the five draft themes – consultation with mana whenua Progress to date: A Report was considered December 2018 - discussion document ahead of public consultation Res ENV/2018/168. Key timeframes: · Public consultation on discussion document 17 Feb – 17 March · Public engagement feedback to committee, April 2019 · Draft options for the finalisation of Auckland’s water strategy, and associated work programmes to be present to committee in June 2019 Workshop – April water discussion document, and to foreshadow and seek the councillors’ input on the contents of the report that will be coming to them in June				Q4 (June 19)
Regional Pest Management Plan review	Statutory obligations under the Biosecurity Act to control weeds and animal pests. To ensure that the plan is consistent with the national policy direction and up to date.			Decision and strategic direction on weed and plants that will be subject to statutory controls. Consider submissions received on the draft plan in mid-2018 and adopt the final plan by December 2018. Decision: Agreed to the inconsistencies in ACT at the 14 Feb 2017 ENV/2017/7 Item 12 Workshops held on 4/04/17, 3/05/17 and 27/09/17 Draft plan was approved for consultation in Nov 2017 Funding for implementation of the proposed RPMP through LTP. A memo was distributed and is attached to the July agenda. Key milestones: · workshops with local boards on public feedback – September - October 2018 · workshops with local boards on public feedback – September - October 2018 · engagement with mana whenua – September – October 2018 · workshop with Environment and Community Committee – October – November 2018 · formal feedback from local boards at business meetings – October – November 2018 · approval of final plan by Environment and Community Committee – March 2019 Progress to date: 12 March 2019 report to consider the adoption of the Regional Pest Management Plan 2019-2019. Adoption was approved and the motion was put in parts:ENV/2019/22 – ENV/2019/32		Q3 (Mar)		Q4	Q1
Inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan	To ensure the plan is consistent with Auckland Council’s: - proposed Regional Pest Management Plan - current and future marine biosecurity programmes - response to SeaChange – Tai Timu Tai Pari Hauraki Gulf Marine Spatial Plan. Next steps: · Memo to local boards and mana whenua with the final discussion document and plans for informal public consultation February – March 2019 · Informal public and key stakeholder consultation March – May 2019 · Feedback and recommended next steps reported back to participating councils, including Environment and Community Committee and the Upper North Island Strategic Alliance July 2019			Decision on the development of the discussion document for an inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan for public consultation. A memo was distributed on 31/05/18 advising the committee on the Auckland Council’s participation in the development of a discussion document for an inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan, through the Top of the North Marine Biosecurity partnership. Progress to date: 12 February 2019 report To approve the discussion document for an inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan, ahead of informal public consultation between March and May 2019. Res ENV/2019/9				Q4 (July)
Allocation of the Regional Natural Heritage Grant	Decision-making over regional environment fund as per the grants funding policy and fund guidelines			Decision on the annual allocation of the Waste Minimisation and Innovation Fund for the 2018-2019 financial year. Allocation of the Regional Environmental Natural Heritage Grant for the 2017-2018 financial year was made on 6 Dec 2016_ENV/2016/11 Item 15 Progress to date Report Item 16 to December 2018 committee to approve grant recommendations for the 2018/2019 Regional Environment and Natural Heritage Grant programme funding round. Res ENV/2018/175		Q3		Q4	Q1
National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management	The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management is being implemented, with periodic reporting to council committee on progress, and responding to ongoing central government refinement of the framework for achieving water outcomes. In December 2018 further decisions will be sought under the national policy statement, including: · approve final targets for swim-ability of major rivers in the Auckland region · approve the updated Progressive Implementation Plan for the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management Next steps: · public consultation on the Auckland Water Strategy discussion document 17 February to 17 March · public engagement feedback presented to elected members – April 2019 · Draft options for the finalisation of the Auckland Water Strategy, and associated work programmes to be presented to the Environment and Community Committee – June 2019			Progress to date: Council submission was approved on Central Govt. Clean Water Consultation 2017 process: Minutes of 4 April ENV/2017/54 Item 12. Follow up is required for resolution b) – a workshop held on 14 June. A supplementary submission on the Clean Water Consultation package was made on 25 May 2017, Item 14 13/06/17 Decision ENV/2018/14 on engagement approach for consultation on the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management in Feb 2018. A report was considered on 26/6/18 : Res ENV/2018/78 · June 2018: develop strategy · July to Oct 2018 – High level regional options are developed and assessed for the five draft themes in consultation with mana whenua, local boards and key stakeholders. · Dec 2018- Draft Auckland's waters strategy presented to Environment and Community Committee for approval for release for public consultation · Feb to Apr 2019 - Targeted public engagement on the draft Auckland's waters strategy in February to March 2019. · Apr 2019 - Feedback analysed and presented to elected members in April 2019 · Jun 2019 - Final strategy presented to Environment and Community Committee for adoption Progress to date: Report Item 9 to December 2018 committee meeting- To approve the Auckland Water Strategy discussion document, ahead of public consultation from 17 February 2019 to 17 March 2019. Res ENV/2018/168		Q3		Q4 (June)	Q1
Food Policy Alliance	To consider food policy alliance			Decision on food policy alliance		Q3 (Mar)		TBC
Auckland Growing Greener	Statutory obligations under the Resource Management Act, Biosecurity Act and Local Government Act. Consideration of items to give effect to the adopted commitment of Auckland Council to grow greener.			Strategic direction and oversight into council’s role to improve the natural environment, and to endorse proposed incentives. This may include endorsing: · a framework to ensure planning and growth decisions are underpinned by relevant environmental data · proposed incentives for green growth · recommendations arising from a current state statutory obligations review.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Hunua Aerial 1080 Operation	Provide information on outcomes of the Hunua 1080 aerial pest control operation			To note outcomes of the Hunua 1080 aerial pest control operation.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Parks, Sports and Recreation
Sport and Rec Strategic Partnership Grant to Aktive Auck Sports Rec	Approval of $552,000 strategic partnership grant to Aktive Auck & Sport to deliver on agreed priority initiatives. 2019 reporting schedule: · January 2019 - Interim report from 1 July – 31 December 2018 · June 2019 - confirm 2019/20 priorities, outcomes and measures · July 2019 – Annual report from 1 January 2019 – 30 June 2019 · September 2019 - Audited Financial Statements from 1 July 2018 – 30 June 2019			To approve the $552,000 strategic partnership grant to Aktive Auckland Sport & Recreation for 2017/2018 Progress to date: Report was considered 5/12/17 Resolution ENV/2017/186 – report back against KPI every six months. A report was considered on 10 July 2018 to approve the strategic partnership grant of $552,000 per annum for a three-year term (2018-2021) Res ENV/2018/90 A funding agreement will be prepared for Aktive that ensures clear accountability and KPIs for each of the four geographical areas (North, West, Central and Southern) for the investment. (TBA)
Te Motu a Hiaroa (Puketutu Island)	Status update on the Te Motu a Hiaroa Governance Trust			To note further update on progress of the governance trust.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan	Status report on implementation plan			Direction on future options for sport and recreation.		Q3			Q1
Sports Investment Plan	Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in sports Next Steps: · public consultation February to March 2019 · final approval of plan will be sought June 2019 · Implementation of the plan will occur in stages over the next three to five years, depending on council budgetary and planning processes.			Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan – approval of guidelines Evaluation of current sports facilities investments and proposed changes was adopted on 14 March, resolution ENV/2017/39 Item 13 with the final draft investment plan to be adopted prior to consultation. An outcome measurement tool to support the Sports Facilities Investment Plan was considered and agreed at the 4 April 2017 meeting. Resolution ENV/2017/50 Item 9 The findings of the pilot will be reported in mid-2019 seeking a decision on the roll-out model. Progress to date: December 2018 report - Item 13 To approve the draft Increasing Aucklanders’ participation in sport: Sport investment plan 2019-2039 for public consultation in early 2019. Resolution ENV/2018/172 Adoption July 2019 committee meeting.		Q3		Q4 (June 2019)	Q1
Golf Investment Plan	Council’s strategic approach to outcomes, priorities and investment in golf.			Decision on issues papers Draft Plan approval Finalise and adopt investment plan Progress to date: A workshop was held on 12 Sept and information is available on OurAuckland.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Indoor Courts	Strategic business case for indoor courts investment			Decision on investment approach		Q3		Q4	Q1
Western Springs Community School Partnership	Improve Community Access to school facilities			Decision on Business and Investment in indoor court facility at Western Springs Progress to date: The report was considered in May 2017. Resolution ENV/2017/71 A business case will be prepared to outline the opportunity to fully invest in the indoor court development and can consider as part of the LTP 2018-2028.		Q3		Q4	Q1
Growth Programme	Update on proposed growth funding allocation for 2018-2020			Decision on growth funding allocation					Q1
Regional Sport and Recreation grants programme 2018/2020	Review of previous grants allocation and recommendation for next round			Decision on sport and recreation grants programme objectives and approach Progress to date: Approved on 12 Sept the 2018/2019 grants programme to proceed in accordance with the Community Grants Policy suggested outcomes and assessment matrix. Applications open 30/10/17 close 8/12/17 ENV/2017/119 Workshop in April 2018. Report was considered on 8/5/18 and resolved ENV/2018/57 . Approved applications for 2019/2020 funding round on 25/1/2019 and close on 8/3/19 for allocation from July 2019. Report to June 2019 Committee meeting.		Q3		Q4 (June)	Q1 (Sep)
Review of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012: TOR	The review will assess the efficacy of the guidelines in for the council to deliver the best possible outcomes for Auckland through community leases			Decision on the terms of reference for the review of the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012 Progress to date: The TOR was approved for the review to commence and will report back in July 2018 subject to TLP. An update memo was circulated in August 2017 in response to feedback from the July 2017 meeting. Joint workshop with local board chairs held 20/6/18. Report was considered November 2018 and resolved ENV/2018/150		Q3		Q4	Q1
Active Recreation Investment and Visitor Experience	Council’s strategic approach to outcome, priorities and investment for active walking, cycling, waterways and visitor experience on open space, parks and regional parks			Decision on scope and phasing		Q3		Q4	Q1 (Aug)
Takaro – Investing in Play discussion document	Development of a play investment plan			Decision on approval for public release Progress to date: Approved on 16/05/17 for public release the discussion document and will report to E&C for approval in late 2017 Takaro was reported to committee approved for release on 20 Feb 2018 A report back by August 2018 for approval to initiate public consultation		Q3			Q1 (Oct)
Regional Parks Management Plan 2010 – variation to incorporate land at Piha into the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park	To approve variation to incorporate land purchased at Piha to be known as Taitomo Special Management Zone as part of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park			Decision on approval to a variation Progress to date: Approved on 20/2/2018 Res ENV/2018/15 report Manager, Regional Parks, will prepare an integrated vegetation management and fire–risk reduction plan in consultation with the local community and report back on the resourcing needs for its effective implementation.					Q1 (tbc)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Southern Initiative (TSI)		Provide an update on the TSI approach, priorities and achievements.		Strategic direction of the TSI approach to social and community innovation in south Auckland		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Global Engagement Strategy		Provide an update and direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities. It has been three years since a new strategic direction was introduced, progress on this strategy will presented. Funded		Strategic direction of Auckland Council’s global engagement strategy and priorities Progress to date: Monthly global engagement updates are published on each agenda		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Options to expand revenue streams for sport facilities investment		Provide strategic direction to expand revenue streams to fund future sports facilities investment in the draft Sports Facilities Investment Plan		strategic direction to expand revenue streams to fund future sports facilities investment in the draft Sports Facilities Investment Plan Progress to date: A report was considered in Aug. Res ENV/2017/121		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
SOCIAL, COMMUNITY, CULTURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Community Facilities Network Plan		Update on progress and report back on strategic business case for central west.		Decision on indicative business case for central west Progress to date: A progress report was considered on 14 March. Resolution ENV/2017/36 Item 11 to report back on an indicative business case for investment in the central-west area. Progress to date Report Item 9 April 2019 to approve the revised Community Facilities Network Plan Action Plan (2019) including implementation progress and status of existing actions from 2015 to 2018, and to confirm actions for the period 2019 – 2021. Res ENV/2019/48		Q3 (Mar)	Q4			Q1		Q2
Auckland Sport Sector: Facility Priorities Plan		Develop and endorse the Sports Facilities Investment Plan to enable Auckland Council to take a more co-ordinated approach to its sports facilities investment.		Decision on the Auckland Sport Sector: Facility Priorities Plan. Decision on sector’s investment priorities and investigate potential funding options. Progress to date: The plan was endorsed on 12 Sept ENV/2017/118. Staff to report back on priorities and potential funding options.						Q1		Q2
Homelessness		Implementing Regional Policy and Strategy resolution to progress work around Council’s strategic position on addressing homelessness (note this work will be informed by discussions at the Community Development and Safety Committee)		Decision on scope Decision on role and direction addressing homelessness Progress to date: Approved the scope policy 14 Feb Item 17 Auckland council’s position and role was considered at the August meeting report item 12. Staff to report back with an implementation plan. Resolution ENV/2017/118 of preferred position and role		Q3	Q4			Q1 (Aug)		Q2
Facilities Partnerships Policy		Identify the range of current council approaches to facility partnerships, issues, opportunities and agree next steps Next steps: · January – March 2019 policy summary released · April – June 2019 implement initial operational guidance and systems · July 2019 detailed operational design and testing continues. Benefits realisation plan developed		Decision on facility partnership approach Decision to adopt Facility Partnership Framework in December 2017 Update was given at 14 February meeting on Phase 1. Approval was given on the proposed timelines for Phase 2 : Minutes 14 February Item 14 preferred option A report seeking approval to engage on a draft facility partnerships policy on 12/06/18. Resolution ENV/2018/74 Progress to date: December 2018 - report seeking approval of the Facility Partnerships Policy. Res ENV/2018/173		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Citizens Advice Bureaux Services		Review of the Citizens Advice Bureaux Services RSP decision in April 2016 (REG/2016/22)		Decision on review results Progress to date: Report was considered at 20 Feb meeting. Decision: lies on the table. A supplementary report was considered on 10 April 2018, Res ENV/2018/48 and with changes for an updated funding model to be agreed by 1 April 2019 Report was considered at 14 May meeting. funding model decision Res ENV/2019/58		Q3 (Feb)	Q4			Q1		Q2
Social and Community Housing Strategy and initiatives		Strategic overview of social and community housing initiatives. Wider housing portfolio and spatial outcomes of council’s role in housing is led by the Planning Committee.				Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Affordable Housing Intervention		Understanding NZ and international interventions to address affordable housing		Decision on future Auckland Council approaches to affordable housing interventions		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Te Kauroa – Library Strategy		Libraries and Information is carrying out a change programme (Fit for the future) to accelerate the implementation of this 2013-2023 strategy (approved by the Governing Body)		Direction relating to priorities and to receive update on strategic direction and implementation progress Approve an expanded and improved regional mobile library service Progress to date: workshop held on 7 March with local board chairs. Workshop notes were attached to the 10 April agenda		Q3	Q4			Q1 (Sep)		Q2
Central library strategic review		A strategic review of the Central Library has been commissioned to understand how the current building can meet future need and demand for services, asses the Central Library’s current and potential future role in the region, and guide decision making about future investment and development opportunities		Decide direction and receive the strategic review		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Libraries		Work around the integration with customer services		Decision on matters relating to regional aspects of the proposed integration (local boards will decide on local outcomes)		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Intercultural Cities Network		Consideration of a proposal to join the Intercultural Cities Network to support implementation and monitoring of progress on ‘Inclusive Auckland’ actions.		Decide whether Auckland should be a member of the network		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Investing in Aucklanders (Age Friendly City)		Identify issues and opportunities for an inclusive friendly city (Regional Policy and Strategy resolution REG/2016/92)		Strategic direction on the approach to a friendly, inclusive, diverse city. Progress to date: Update reports were circulated on 18 April 2018 and 14 Dec 2017. Staff report findings and the proposed next phase in 2018. A report on the Findings was considered on 12/06/18 meeting. Resolution ENV/2018/75 approval for up to five inclusion pilots. A report back on the advantages and any obstacles to Auckland becoming an Age Friendly City as part of the World Health Organisation’s Global Network.		Q3	Q4			Q1 (Jul)		Q2
Social Enterprise approaches for youth and long term unemployed		Improved understanding of social enterprise reach, impacts, costs and benefits		Strategic direction on council’s approach to social enterprise.		Q3	Q4			Q1 (Jul)		Q2
Youth volunteer programmes		Intervention assessment of youth volunteer programmes on long term education and employment – understanding impacts, costs and benefits		Strategic direction on interventions approach		Q3	Q4			Q1 (Jul)		Q2
Events Policy		A review of what is working well and what isn’t				Q3	Q4			Q1 (Sep)		Q2
Grant Policy Monitoring		Audit of the application of the Grants Policy		Decision on audit results		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Toi Whitiki Strategy		Targeted analysis of social return on investment on specific art and culture investment				Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Public Art Policy		Review of the Public Arts Policy: what’s working what’s not. Decisions relating to major public arts		Decision on review results Progress to date: The report was considered on 14/08/18. Resolution ENV/2018/103 : report back on implementation within 18 months		Q3	Q4 (Apr)			Q1		Q2
Current Development Contribution revenue and expenditure – funding for open space purposes		Highlight the new parks and open spaces for Aucklanders’ use and enjoyment		A report was considered on 14/08/178 on Open Space acquisition in 2017/18 financial year. resolution ENV/2018/104 to report back on DC revenue and expenditure by funding area for open space purposes based on current based on the current DC policy.								Q2
Investigation in North-west Community Provision		Investigation to identify any current gaps in services or facilities or in the future		Decision on the investigation findings Progress to date: A report was considered on 13/10/18 on the findings. Res ENV/2018/131. Staff will progress the key moves outlined in the report.		Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
LEGISLATION/CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
National Environmental Standards		Council response on the National Direction for aquaculture expected following scheduled release of consultation document in April 2017. The National Direction is likely to address matters relating to re-consenting, bay-wide management, innovation and research, and biosecurity.			Direction Committee agreement to a council submission on the National Direction for Aquaculture	Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
LAND ACQUISITIONS
Strategic acquisition issues and opportunities		Understanding current acquisition issues and options.				Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2
Land acquisition for stormwater purposes		Delegated responsibility of the committee. To acquire land for stormwater management and development purposes, to either support a structure plan or ad-hoc development.	Decision to acquire land. Reports will come to committee as required. Next report will be in Feb 2018 seeking authority to carry out compulsory acquisition of land in the Henderson area for a flood prevention project.			Q3 (Feb)	Q4			Q1		Q2
OTHER
Long-term Plan		Informing the development of the 2018-2028 Auckland Council Long-term Plan				Q3	Q4			Q1		Q2

Chairperson	Cr Penny Hulse
Deputy Chairperson	Cr Alf Filipaina
Members	Cr Josephine Bartley	Cr Richard Hills
	IMSB Member Renata Blair	Cr Mike Lee
	IMSB Member James Brown	Cr Daniel Newman, JP
	Cr Dr Cathy Casey	Cr Greg Sayers
	Deputy Mayor Cr Bill Cashmore	Cr Desley Simpson, JP
	Cr Ross Clow	Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM
	Cr Fa’anana Efeso Collins	Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE
	Cr Linda Cooper, JP	Cr Wayne Walker
	Cr Chris Darby	Cr John Watson
	Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO	Cr Paul Young
	Mayor Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP

Date	Subject
8/05/2019	Waitemata Local Board
17/05/2019	Memorandum on the natural environment targeted rates
17/05/2019	Memorandum on the water quality targeted rates
30/05/2019	Memorandum Regional Pest Management Plan appeals
4/06/2019	Memorandum Papakura food scraps collection service update
5/06/2019	Memorandum update on kauri dieback management, including trackupgrade plan for the Waitākere Ranges
5/06/2019	Memorandum International Relations Activity update

Date	Subject
7/05/2019	Auckland Water Strategy
7/05/2019	Options for on-shore processing of recyclables specifically paper and cardboard – CONFIDENTIAL
7/05/2019	Auckland Film Protocol
9/05/2019	Regional Sports and Recreation Grants Programme 2019
14/05/2019	Regional Work Programmes – Local Parks and Sportsfields Development
23/05/2019	Climate Change
23/05/2019	Waikumete Cemetery Development

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Forward Work Programme	593
b	Waitemata Local Board (Under Separate Cover)
c	Memorandum on the natural environment targeted rates (Under Separate Cover)
d	Update on water quality targeted rate-funded projects (Under Separate Cover)
e	Memorandum Regional Pest Management Plan appeals (Under Separate Cover)
f	Memo Papakura food scraps collection service update (Under Separate Cover)
g	Workshop Auckland Water Strategy (Under Separate Cover)
h	Workshop Auckland Film Protocol (Under Separate Cover)
i	Workshop Regional Sports and Recreation Grants Programme 2019 (Under Separate Cover)
j	Workshop Regional Work Programmes - Local Parks and Sportsfield Development (Under Separate Cover)
k	Workshop Climate Change (Under Separate Cover)
l	Workshop Waikumete Cemetery Development (Under Separate Cover)
m	International Relations Activity Update (Under Separate Cover)
n	Memorandum - update on kauri dieback management, including trackupgrade plan for the Waitākere Ranges (Under Separate Cover)

Author	Suad Allie - Governance Advisor
Authoriser	Koro Dickinson - Executive Officer - Operations Division