Agenda of Puketāpapa Local Board

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

4 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 18 June 2020 and the extraordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 9 July 2020, as a true and correct.

5 Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.

6 Acknowledgements

At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.

7 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

8 Deputations

Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Puketāpapa Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.

At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.

9 Public Forum

A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

9.1 Public Forum - YMCA Auckland Inc

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. Dylan McLaughlin, Centre Manager, YMCA of Auckland Inc, Cameron Pool & Leisure Centre will be in attendance to deliver a brief presentation about the YMCA and the events and activities they are delivering in the community.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) thank Dylan McLaughlin, Centre Manager, YMCA of Auckland Inc, Cameron Pool & Leisure Centre for his presentation.

10 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

Puketāpapa Local Board

23 July 2020

Auckland Transport July 2020 Report

File No.: CP2020/09516

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide an update to the Puketāpapa Local Board (the Board) on Auckland Transport (AT) matters in its area and an update on its Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF).

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. A decision is not required this month. This report provides an opportunity to highlight Auckland Transport activities in the Puketāpapa Local Board area and contains information about the following:

· General advice on the 2019-2022 Local Board Transport Capital Fund and the Community Safety Fund

· Information on the Frost Road and Carr Road safety improvements

· Safety on Sandringham Road

· Information regarding public consultations sent to the Board for comment and any decisions of AT’s Transport Control Committee that affect the Board area.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) receive the Auckland Transport July 2020 update report.

Horopaki

Context

3. AT is responsible for all of Auckland’s transport services, excluding state highways. It reports on a monthly basis to local boards, as set out in its Local Board Engagement Plan. This monthly reporting commitment acknowledges the important engagement role of local boards within and on behalf of their local communities.

4. This report updates the Puketāpapa Local Board on Auckland Transport (AT) projects and operations in the local board area, it updates the local board on their consultations and includes information on the status of the Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF) and Community Safety Fund (CSF).

5. The LBTCF is a capital budget provided to all local boards by Auckland Council and delivered by Auckland Transport (AT). Local boards can use this fund to deliver transport infrastructure projects that they believe are important but are not part of AT’s work programme. Projects must also:

· be safe

· not impede network efficiency

· be in the road corridor (although projects running through parks can be considered if there is a transport outcome).

6. The CSF is a “one-off” capital budget established by Auckland Transport for use by local boards to fund local road safety initiatives. The purpose of this fund is to allow elected members to address long-standing local road safety issues that are not regional priorities and are therefore not being addressed by the Auckland Transport programme.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF)

7. Auckland Council’s original resolutions in 2012 relating to the Local Board Transport Capital Fund make it very clear that the overall budget allocation for the LBTCF is on the basis that ‘it can be managed by Auckland Transport within its annual budget’. Attachment A has the the Minutes from the Strategy and Finance Committee 02 August 2012 showing the allocation of Auckland Transport Capital Fund to local boards on the basis of the population of their respective board areas.

8. While Council’s budget allocation to Auckland Transport will only be finalised when the emergency budget is adopted, current indications are that Auckland Transport’s capital budget will be significantly constrained. This being the case, it is highly likely that there will be a negative impact on the Local Board Transport Capital Fund.

9. Until the final budget is complete Auckland Transport will not be able to advise Local Board’s on the funds available in the Local Board Transport Capital Fund. This may have an impact on progressing potential projects.

10. Auckland Transport will update local boards on the status of the Local Board Transport Capital Fund as soon as decisions around the budget are finalised.

LBTCF Projects 2016-2019

Projects

Greenways Route D – Frost Rd to Hillsborough

Pedestrian island at 65 Hillsborough Rd, by Delargey Avenue

Pedestrian crossing at 244 Hillsborough Rd, by Goodall Street

Community Safety Fund (CSF)

11. The Community Safety Fund is funded from Auckland Transport’s safety budget and is dependent on the level of funding Auckland Transport receives from Auckland Council.

12. Current indications are that this level of funding will be significantly constrained. Public consultation and the design work informed by this consultation, is progressing, with a view to having projects designed and ready to go, when money becomes available.

13. The local board’s Community Safety projects are noted below, and an update will be provided next month.

Projects

Pedestrian crossing at 383 Hillsborough Rd, by Waikōwhai Primary

Pedestrian crossing improvements at 639 Richardson Rd, by Waikōwhai Intermediate and Hay Park School

Pah Road crossing awareness

Potter Avenue raised table to replace kea crossing for Wesley Primary School

Safety Improvements on Frost and Carr Roads

14. Contractors for Auckland Transport are currently constructing a series of safety measures along Frost and Carr Roads. Despite the impact of Covid-19, work is progressing well.

15. Work is complete on the section of footpaths on the Northern side of Carr Road between 35 Frost Road and Britton Avenue.

16. Work has started on the footpaths on the southern side of Carr Road, at the Hayr Road roundabout and work has started on the five speed tables around the Frost Road roundabout. The entrance to the school was closed off in early July for one week during the school holidays.

Safety on Sandringham Road

17. Following an incident involving a pedestrian and a bus outside Wesley Intermediate, AT staff met with Board Chair J Fairey and the Wesley Intermediate School Principal.

18. The meeting was held at the bus stop on Sandringham Road opposite the school. The issue causing concern arises when buses waiting to start their route at the scheduled time, wait for more than a couple of minutes before starting their run. As the bus stop is only one length long, any other buses that need to use the stop partially block the pedestrian crossing.

19. AT is now working with the bus company to ensure that buses are only at this stop for the shortest time possible, before they start their run. Bus layover will be managed at other stops or buses will wait at the nearby May Road depot.

20. AT will continue to monitor the situation.

21. Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

22. Auckland Transport engages closely with Council on developing strategy, actions and measures to support the outcomes sought by the Auckland Plan 2050, the Auckland Climate Action Plan and Council’s priorities.

23. One of AT’s core roles is providing attractive alternatives to private vehicle travel, reducing the carbon footprint of its own operations and, to the extent feasible, that of the contracted public transport network.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

24. The impact of information in this report is mainly confined to Auckland Transport. Where LBTCF projects are being progressed by Auckland Council’s Community Facilities group, engagement on progress has taken place. Any further engagement required with other parts of the Council group will be carried out on an individual project basis.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

Traffic Control Committee resolutions

25. There were no decisions of the Traffic Control Committee that affected the Puketāpapa Local Board area in the last reporting period.

Consultations

26. AT provides the Puketāpapa Local Board with the opportunity to comment on transport projects being delivered in their area. The consultations below were sent to the board during July.

Location

Proposal

The Avenue, Lynfield

This proposal aims to address current concerns at the bus stop beside Lynfield Reserve and provide extra bus layover space. The work consists of:

· Indented bus bays

· Relocate existing bus layover supplementary signage

· Extending the median islands to discourage buses from making U-turns at Oriana Avenue

· Relocate existing bus shelter

386-390 Hillsborough Road, Waikowhai

This proposal aims to provide better facilities for bus drivers. Works consists of:

· the creation of three new indented bus layovers on Hillsborough Road

· Supplementary sign will be provided to ensure the bus layover is for temporary usage only

· A new Exeloo toilet near the new bus layovers will be provided.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

27. There are no specific impacts on Māori for this reporting period. AT is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi-the Treaty of Waitangi-and its broader legal obligations in being more responsive or effective to Māori. Our Maori Responsiveness Plan outlines the commitment to with 19 mana whenua tribes in delivering effective and well-designed transport policy and solutions for Auckland. We also recognise mataawaka and their representative bodies and our desire to foster a relationship with them. This plan is available on the Auckland Transport website - https://at.govt.nz/about-us/transport-plans-strategies/maori-responsiveness-plan/#about.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

28. The recommendation to receive this report has no financial implications.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

29. Auckland Council consulted on its Emergency Budget 2020/2021 from Friday 29 May to 19 June 2020. We will have more certainty on the impacts to the AT programme when the budget is adopted in July 2020.

30. AT’s capital and operating budgets will be reduced through this process. Some projects we had planned for 2020/2021 may not be able to be delivered, which will be disappointing to communities that we had already engaged with.

31. Both the Community Safety Fund and the Local Board Transport Capital Fund may be impacted by these budget reductions.

32. The only way to mitigate this risk is to clearly communicate the board’s intentions so staff supporting it may plan ahead and to make the best use of any available funds.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

33. Auckland Transport will provide another update report to the Board in August 2020

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	20200917 Auckland Transport July 2020 Report - Strategy and Finance Committee Minutes 08 August 2012	13

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Bruce Thomas – Auckland Transport Elected Members Relationship Manager

Authorisers

Jonathan Anyon – Auckland Transport Manager Elected Member Relationship Member Unit

Nina Siers - Relationship Manager for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Puketāpapa

Puketāpapa Local Board

23 July 2020

Statement of proposal to amend the Alcohol Control Bylaw

File No.: CP2020/08955

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek support on the statement of proposal to amend the Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Te Ture a Rohe Whakararata Waipiro 2014 / Auckland Council Alcohol Control Bylaw 2014 before it is finalised for public consultation.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To enable the local board to provide its views on the statement of proposal to amend the Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Te Ture a Rohe Whakararata Waipiro 2014 / Auckland Council Alcohol Control Bylaw 2014, staff have prepared a draft proposal.

3. The draft proposal would continue to enable council to make alcohol bans in certain public places to reduce crime and disorder caused or made worse by alcohol consumed there.

4. The main proposals are to include new temporary alcohol bans for major events at Mount Smart Stadium, Western Springs Stadium, Eden Park and Auckland Domain, and to make the Bylaw easier to read and understand.

5. Staff recommend that the local board provide its views on the draft proposal.

6. There is a reputational risk that the draft proposal or the local board’s views do not reflect the views of people in the local board area. This risk would be partly mitigated by future public consultation processes. The local board will have an opportunity to consider any public feedback and provide formal views to a Bylaw Panel prior to the final decision.

7. The local board’s views will be provided to the Regulatory Committee on 1 September 2020 who will recommend a statement of proposal for public consultation to the 24 September Governing Body meeting. Public consultation is scheduled for October 2020, Bylaw Panel deliberations for March 2021, and a final decision by the Governing Body for April 2021.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) support the draft statement of proposal in Attachment A of this agenda report to amend the Auckland Council Alcohol Control Bylaw 2014 for public consultation.

Horopaki

Context

The Alcohol Control Bylaw enables council to make alcohol bans in public places

8. The Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Te Ture a Rohe Whakararata Waipiro 2014 / Auckland Council Alcohol Control Bylaw 2014 (Bylaw) aims to reduce crime or disorder in certain public places caused or made worse by alcohol consumed there.

9. The Bylaw achieves this by providing a framework that enables alcohol bans to be made by resolution of the relevant delegated authorities – the Regulatory Committee, Auckland Domain Committee or local boards. Alcohol bans are enforced by the New Zealand Police.

The Regulatory Committee have decided to amend the Alcohol Control Bylaw

10. The Regulatory Committee requested staff commence the process to amend the Bylaw on 9 May 2019 (REG/2019/28). The process leading to this decision is summarised below.

11 April 2019

(REG/2019/19)

Regulatory Committee endorsed the statutory bylaw review findings that:

· a bylaw about the consumption or possession of alcohol in public places is still the most appropriate way to address crime or disorder in certain public places caused or made worse by alcohol consumed there

· the current Bylaw does not give rise to any implications under, and is not inconsistent with, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

· the current Bylaw structure and wording could be improved.

9 May 2019

(REG/2019/28)

Regulatory Committee instructed staff to draft an amended Bylaw (Option two) after considering four options:

· Option one: status quo – retain Bylaw that makes alcohol bans by resolution

· Option two: amend the current Bylaw – improve the status quo

· Option three: replace the current Bylaw – new bylaw that contains all alcohol bans

· Option four: revoke Bylaw – no bylaw and instead rely on other existing methods.

Staff prepared a proposal in line with decisions of the Regulatory Committee

11. Staff have prepared a draft statement of proposal (draft proposal) to implement the decision of the Regulatory Committee to amend the Bylaw (Attachment A).

12. The draft proposal includes the reasons and decisions leading to the proposed amendments and a comparison between the existing and amended bylaws.

The local board has an opportunity to provide its views on the proposal

13. The local board now has an opportunity to provide its views on the draft proposal in Attachment A by resolution to the Regulatory Committee before it is finalised for public consultation.

14. For example, the local board could support the draft proposal for public consultation, recommend changes before it is finalised, or defer comment until after it has considered public feedback on the proposal.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

The draft proposal makes improvements to the current alcohol control bylaw

15. The draft proposal seeks to improve the use of alcohol bans for major events^{^[1]} and make the Bylaw easier to read and understand. The table below summarises the proposed changes.

Summary of proposed changes to the Alcohol Control Bylaw 2014

Proposals	Reasons for proposals
· Make new event-based temporary alcohol bans for all major events at Mount Smart Stadium, Western Springs Stadium, Eden Park and Auckland Domain in the Bylaw.: · The new event-based temporary alcohol bans will replace existing event-based temporary alcohol bans made by resolution^{^[2]}for Mount Smart Stadium, Eden Park and Auckland Domain for ‘Christmas in the Park’ and the Lantern Festival. Changes to these existing resolutions would: o for Mount Smart Stadium extend the ban to apply to all major events, not just concerts o for Eden Park extend the ban to include Eden Park stadium, and two fan trails if they are activated as part of the event^{^[3]} o for Auckland Domain extend the ban to all major events (not just the Lantern Festival) and extend the times of the ban to start one hour earlier and finish one hour later. The ban for the Auckland Domain ‘Christmas in the Park’ event would remain unchanged. · Replace with a related information note clauses about alcohol ban signage, and clauses about legislative decision-making criteria. · Clarify exceptions to alcohol bans for licensed premises and the transport of alcohol, council’s ability to make temporary alcohol bans and Bylaw wording.	Including new event-based temporary alcohol bans made in the Bylaw: · more easily enables a preventative approach to alcohol-related crime or disorder at or near event venues used for major events · removes time and cost to process individual requests for event-based temporary alcohol bans where: o the event venue has in the past, is currently, and will in the future be used for major events o a ban has been used in the past for major events at the event venue. · creates more consistent event-based temporary alcohol ban times and application. Replacing some clauses with related information notes and providing clarifications: · removes provisions that are unnecessary to state in the Bylaw but are useful as extra information · provides rules that are easier to read and understand.

Proposals

Reasons for proposals

· Make new event-based temporary alcohol bans for all major events at Mount Smart Stadium, Western Springs Stadium, Eden Park and Auckland Domain in the Bylaw.:

· The new event-based temporary alcohol bans will replace existing event-based temporary alcohol bans made by resolution^{^[2]}for Mount Smart Stadium, Eden Park and Auckland Domain for ‘Christmas in the Park’ and the Lantern Festival. Changes to these existing resolutions would:

o for Mount Smart Stadium extend the ban to apply to all major events, not just concerts

o for Eden Park extend the ban to include Eden Park stadium, and two fan trails if they are activated as part of the event^{^[3]}

o for Auckland Domain extend the ban to all major events (not just the Lantern Festival) and extend the times of the ban to start one hour earlier and finish one hour later.

The ban for the Auckland Domain ‘Christmas in the Park’ event would remain unchanged.

· Replace with a related information note clauses about alcohol ban signage, and clauses about legislative decision-making criteria.

· Clarify exceptions to alcohol bans for licensed premises and the transport of alcohol, council’s ability to make temporary alcohol bans and Bylaw wording.

Including new event-based temporary alcohol bans made in the Bylaw:

· more easily enables a preventative approach to alcohol-related crime or disorder at or near event venues used for major events

· removes time and cost to process individual requests for event-based temporary alcohol bans where:

o the event venue has in the past, is currently, and will in the future be used for major events

o a ban has been used in the past for major events at the event venue.

· creates more consistent event-based temporary alcohol ban times and application.

Replacing some clauses with related information notes and providing clarifications:

· removes provisions that are unnecessary to state in the Bylaw but are useful as extra information

· provides rules that are easier to read and understand.

The draft proposal complies with statutory requirements

16. The draft proposal has been prepared in accordance with statutory requirements and best practice drafting guidelines:

· The proposed inclusion of event-based temporary alcohol bans for major events at certain venues in the Bylaw is a reasonable limitation on people’s rights and freedoms because the bans only apply temporarily to a limited area for large scale events.

· The amended Bylaw is a more appropriate form of bylaw because the inclusion of event-based temporary alcohol bans for major events at certain venues enables a preventative approach to alcohol-related crime or disorder.^{^[4]} The amended Bylaw would also be easier to read and understand.

· The amended Bylaw has no implications under, and is not inconsistent with, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the Act). There are potential limitations to freedoms protected by the Act of expression, peaceful assembly, movement, security against unreasonable search and seizure, and to not be arbitrarily arrested. These limitations are justified because alcohol bans help prevent harm to the public, and because council’s ability to make alcohol bans is subject to legislative criteria which ensures any ban is justified, appropriate and proportionate.

Staff recommend the local board consider providing its views on the proposal

17. Staff recommend that the local board consider the draft proposal and whether it wishes to provide its views to the Regulatory Committee.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

18. There are no implications for climate change arising from this decision.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. The draft proposal impacts the operation of units across the council group involved in events, processing alcohol ban requests and alcohol ban signage. Those units are aware of the impacts of the proposal and their implementation role.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

20. The Bylaw is important to local boards as they have the delegated authority to make local alcohol bans, and because alcohol bans help to improve public safety in their local areas.

21. The main view of local board members during the bylaw review was to retain local board decision-making authority for local alcohol bans. The proposal supports this by retaining the current decision-making authority. The process for the local board to make alcohol bans by resolution will remain the same.

22. The local board has an opportunity in this report to provide its views on the proposal to the Regulatory Committee.

23. The local board will also have further opportunity to provide its views to a Bylaw Panel on any public feedback to the proposal from people in the local board area.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

24. The Bylaw has significance for Māori as users and kaitiaki / guardians of public space. Māori are also over-represented in alcohol-related hospital visits, the criminal justice system and as victims of crime.

25. Māori health advocacy organisations, Te Puni Kōkiri and the Maunga Authority support the use of alcohol bans as a tool to reduce alcohol-related harm.

26. The draft proposal supports this view by retaining the ability for council to use alcohol bans.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

27. There are no financial implications to the local board for any decision to support the draft proposal for public consultation. The Governing Body at a later date will consider any financial implications associated with public notification and signage.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

28. There is a reputational risk that the draft proposal or the local board’s views do not reflect the views of people in the local board area. This risk would be partly mitigated by future public consultation processes. The local board will have an opportunity to consider any public feedback and provide its formal views to a Bylaw Panel prior to the final decision.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

29. Staff will present a proposal and any local board views to the Regulatory Committee on 1 September 2020. The next steps are shown in the diagram below.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Statement of proposal to amend the Alcohol Control Bylaw	21

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Elizabeth Osborne - Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Paul Wilson - Team Leader Bylaws

Nina Siers - Relationship Manager for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Puketāpapa

Puketāpapa Local Board

23 July 2020

Adoption of the Puketāpapa Local Board Agreement 2020/2021

File No.: CP2020/09474

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To adopt a Local Board Agreement 2020/2021 and a local fees and charges schedule for 2020/2021.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Each financial year, Auckland Council must have a local board agreement between the Governing Body and the local board, for each local board area.

3. From 20 February to 21 March 2020, the council consulted on the Annual Budget 2020/2021 (annual plan) including local board priorities (consultation part 1). Local boards considered this feedback between 4 to 8 May 2020.

4. From 29 May to 19 June 2020, the council carried out further consultation (part 2) on regional topics for the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 (the new name for this year’s annual plan) due to considerable pressure on the council’s financial position caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

5. Local boards are now considering local content for the Emergency Budget 2020/2021, which includes a local board agreement and a local fees and charges schedule for 2020/2021.

6. Normally the local board agreement would include a message from the chair, local board advocacy and other content. This year due to time constraints caused by COVID-19, the content of the Emergency Budget document, including the Local Board Agreements, is being reduced to only the parts that are a statutory requirement. This includes key projects, levels of service and performance measures, and Financial Impact Statement (FIS).

7. On 30 July 2020, the Governing Body will meet to adopt Auckland Council’s Emergency Budget 2020/2021, including 21 local board agreements.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) adopt a Local Board Agreement 2020/2021, tabled at the meeting, (Attachment A).

b) adopt a local fees and charges schedule for 2020/2021, tabled at the meeting, (Attachment B).

c) delegate authority to the Chair to make any final minor changes to the Local Board Agreement 2020/2021.

d) note:

i) that Local Board Agreement 2020/2021 local activity budgets will be updated to reflect final budget decisions made by the Governing Body on 16 July 2020.

ii) that the resolutions of this meeting will be reported back to the Governing Body when it meets to adopt the Annual Budget 2020/2021 on 30 July 2020.

Horopaki

Context

8. Each financial year, Auckland Council must have a local board agreement between the Governing Body and the local board, for each local board area, outlining local priorities, budgets and intended levels of service. They are informed by the local board plans, which are strategic documents that are developed every three years to set a direction for local boards, by reflecting the priorities and preferences of the communities within the local board area. Local board plans can also provide a basis for local board feedback on regional content in the annual plan (Emergency Budget 2020/2021).

9. Local board chairs have had the opportunity to attend Finance and Performance Committee workshops on key topics and provide local board views on the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 to the Finance and Performance Committee.

10. From 20 February to 21 March 2020, the council consulted with the public on the Annual Budget 2020/2021 (consultation part 1). Local events were held in the Puketāpapa Local Board area to engage with the community and seek feedback on both regional and local proposals. Feedback was received through written and event channels.

11. A report analysing the feedback on local board priorities, as well as feedback from those living in the local board area related to the regional topics from consultation part 1, was included on the 7 May 2020 business meeting agenda.

12. Local boards considered this feedback, and their input on regional topics was reported to the Emergency Committee on 21 May 2020.

13. From 29 May to 19 June 2020, the council carried out further consultation on regional topics for the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 (consultation part 2) due to considerable pressure on the council’s financial position caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

14. A report analysing local feedback on the regional topics from consultation part 2 (Emergency Budget) was included on the 9 July 2020 business meeting agenda.

15. Local boards considered feedback, and then the local board chairs held discussions with the Finance and Performance Committee on 14 July 2020 on regional proposals in the Emergency Budget. The local board input was also reported to the Finance and Performance Committee on 16 July 2020.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

16. Both staff and the local board have reviewed the feedback received on the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 from both consultations and local boards have received reports analysing the feedback. It is now recommended that local boards adopt a Local Board Agreement 2020/2021 (Attachment A), and a local fees and charges schedule for 2020/2021 (Attachment B).

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. The decisions recommended in this report are procedural in nature and will not have any climate impacts themselves.

18. Some of the proposed projects in the Local Board Agreement may have climate impacts. The climate impacts of any projects Auckland Council chooses to progress with will be assessed as part of the relevant reporting requirements.

19. Some of the proposed projects in the Local Board Agreement will be specifically designed to mitigate climate impact, build resilience to climate impacts, and restore the natural environment.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

20. Local boards worked with council departments to develop their local board work programmes for 2020/2021 that will be adopted at August business meetings. The local board work programmes help inform the local board agreements.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

21. This report seeks local board adoption of its content for the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 and other associated material, including the Local Board Agreement 2020/2021.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

22. Many local board decisions are of importance to and impact on Māori. Local board agreements and the annual plan (Emergency Budget 2020/2021) are important tools that enable and can demonstrate the council’s responsiveness to Māori.

23. Local board plans, which were developed in 2017 through engagement with the community including Māori, form the basis of local priorities. There is a need to continue to build relationships between local boards and iwi, and where relevant the wider Māori community.

24. Of those who submitted on the consultation part 1 including local board priorities from the Puketāpapa Local Board area, 3 identified as Māori. On the consultation part 2, 21 submitters identified as Māori. No iwi entities from the Puketāpapa Local Board rohe made a submission to the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 through either consultation. These submissions were provided to the local board for consideration when finalising its local board agreement.

25. Ongoing conversations will assist local boards and Māori to understand each other’s priorities and issues. This in turn can influence and encourage Māori participation in the council’s decision-making processes.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

26. The local board agreement includes the allocation of locally driven initiatives (LDI) funding and asset-based services (ABS) funding to projects and services for the 2020/2021 financial year.

27. LDI funding is discretionary funding allocated to local boards based on the Local Board Funding Policy, which local boards can spend on priorities for their communities. Local boards can also utilise LDI funding to increase local levels of service if they wish to do so.

28. Funding for asset-based services (ABS) is allocated by the Governing Body to local boards based on current levels of service to run and maintain local assets and services including parks, pools and recreation facilities, community facilities, and libraries.

29. Local boards have the decision-making and oversight responsibility in respect of local fees and charges within parameters set by the Governing Body. A local fees and charges schedule for Active Recreation, Community Venues for Hire (including Library rooms for hire) for 2020/2021 is adopted alongside the Local Board Agreement. The fees and charges have been formulated based on region-wide baseline service levels and revenue targets. Where fees and charges are amended by a local board that results in lower revenue for the council, the shortfall will need to be made up by either allocating LDI funds or reducing expenditure on other services to balance overall budgets.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

30. Decisions on the local content of the Emergency Budget 2020/2021, including the Local Board Agreement 2020/2021 and a local fees and charges schedule for 2020/2021, are required by 24 July 2020 to ensure the Governing Body can adopt the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 at its 30 July 2020 meeting.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

31. The resolutions of this meeting will be reported to the Governing Body on 30 July 2020 when it meets to adopt the Annual Budget 2020/2021, including 21 local board agreements.

32. Minor changes may need to be made to the attachments before the Emergency Budget 2020/2021 is adopted, such as correction of any errors identified and minor wording changes. Staff therefore recommend that the local board delegates authority to the Chair to make minor final changes if necessary.

33. Local board agreements set the priorities and budget envelopes for each financial year. Work programmes then detail the activities that will be delivered within those budget envelopes. Work programmes will be agreed between local boards and operational departments at business meetings in August 2020.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Local Board Agreement 2020/2021	77
b ⇩	Local fees and charges schedule 2020/2021	79

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Samantha Tan Rodrigo - Local Board Advisor - Puketāpapa

David Rose – Lead Financial Advisor - Financial Strategy and Planning

Beth Corlett – Advisor Plans and Programmes – Local Board Services

Authorisers

Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services

Nina Siers - Relationship Manager for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Puketāpapa

Puketāpapa Local Board

23 July 2020

ATEED six-monthly report to the Puketāpapa Local Board
1 July – 31 December 2019

File No.: CP2020/09525

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. This report provides the Puketāpapa Local Board with highlights of ATEED’s activities in the Puketāpapa Local Board area as well as ATEED’s regional activities for the six months 1 July to 31 December 2019.

2. This report should be read in conjunction with ATEED’s Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 reports to Auckland Council (available at www.aucklandnz.com). Although these reports focus primarily on the breadth of ATEED’s work at a regional level, much of the work highlighted has significant local impact.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. This report provides the Puketāpapa Local Board with relevant information on the following ATEED activities:

· Supporting local business growth

· Filming activity

· Young Enterprise Scheme

· Youth connections

· Local and regional destination management and marketing

· Delivered, funded and facilitated events

4. Further detail on these activities is listed under Analysis and advice.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) receive ATEED’s update to the Puketāpapa Local Board for the period 1 July – 31 December 2019.

Horopaki

Context

5. ATEED has two areas of focus:

Economic Development – including business support, business attraction and investment, local economic development, trade and industry development, skills employment and talent and innovation and entrepreneurship.

Destination - supporting sustainable growth of the visitor economy with a focus on destination marketing and management, major events, business events (meetings and conventions) and international student attraction and retention.

6. These two portfolios also share a common platform relating to the promotion of the city globally to ensure that Auckland competes effectively with other mid-tier high quality of life cities.

7. ATEED works with local boards, Council and CCOs to support decision-making on local economic growth, and facilitates or co-ordinates the delivery of local economic development activity. ATEED ensures that the regional activities that ATEED leads or delivers are fully leveraged to support local economic growth and employment.

8. In addition, ATEED’s dedicated Local Economic Development (LED) team works with local boards who allocate locally-driven initiatives (LDI) budget to economic development activities. The LED team delivers a range of services[5] such as the development of proposals, including feasibility studies that enable local boards to directly fund or otherwise advocate for the implementation of local initiatives.

9. ATEED delivers its services at the local level through business hubs based in the north, west and south of the region, as well as its central office at 167B Victoria Street West.

10. Additional information about ATEED’s role and activities can be found at www.aucklandnz.com/ateed

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

11. As at 31 December 2019^{^[6]}, 1876 businesses had been through an ATEED intervention or programme. Of these, 23 businesses were in the Puketāpapa Local Board area – 8 businesses went through Destination-related programmes and 15 businesses went through Economic Development-related programmes.

Economic Development

Supporting Local Business Growth

12. This area is serviced by the Business and Enterprise team in the South hub, based in Te Haa o Manukau. The team comprises of Business and Innovation Advisors and administration support. The role of this team is to support the growth of Auckland’s key internationally competitive sectors and to support to provide quality jobs.

13. A key programme in achieving this is central government’s Regional Business Partnership Network (RBPN). This is delivered by ATEED’s nine Business and Innovation Advisors (BIA), whose role is to connect local businesses to resources, experts and services in innovation, R&D, business growth and management.

14. ATEED’s BIAs engage 1:1 with businesses through a discovery meeting to understand their challenges, gather key data, and provide connections / recommendations via an action plan.

15. Where businesses qualify (meet the programme criteria and/or align to ATEED’s purpose as defined in the SOI) the advisors facilitate government support to qualifying businesses, in the form of:

· Callaghan Innovation R&D grants (including Getting Started, project and student grants (https://www.callaghaninnovation.govt.nz/grants)

· Callaghan Innovation subsidised innovation programmes

o (https://www.callaghaninnovation.govt.nz/innovation-skills)

· RBPN business capability vouchers (NZTE), where the business owner may be issued co-funding up to $5,000 per annum for business training via registered service providers. Voucher co-funding is prioritised to businesses accessing this service for the first time, in order to encourage more businesses to engage with experts to assist their management and growth.

· NZTE services such as Export Essentials (https://workshop.exportessentials.nz/register/)

· Referrals to NZ Business Mentors via The Chamber of Commerce.

16. During the reporting period, ATEED Business and Innovation Advisors engaged with 18 businesses and individuals in the Puketāpapa Local Board area, 0 for innovation advice and services and 13 for business growth and capability advice and services. From these engagements:

0 connections were made to Callaghan Innovation services and programmes

3 RBPN vouchers were issued to assist with business capability training

2 referrals were made to Business Mentors New Zealand

0 connections were made to ATEED staff and programmes

12 connections were made to other businesses or programmes.

Other support for new businesses

17. During the period, ATEED also ran workshops and events aimed at establishing or growing a new business and building capability. 4 people from the Puketāpapa Local Board area attended an event below:

· Starting off Right workshop - 0

· Business clinic – 2

· Innovation clinic - 2

Filming activity within the Puketāpapa Local Board area

18. ATEED’s Screen Auckland team facilitates, processes and issues film permits for filming activity in public open space. This activity supports local businesses and employment, as well as providing a revenue stream to local boards for the use of local parks.

19. Between 1 July and 31 December 2019, a total of 310 film permits^{^[7]} were issued in the Auckland region, 5 of these permits were issued in the Puketāpapa Local Board area.

20. The Puketāpapa Local Board area’s share of film permit revenue was $918.26^{^[8]} for the period (total for all boards combined was $38,208.55).

21. Some of the key film productions that were issued permits to film in the Puketāpapa Local Board area were:

· Volkswagen TV commercial

· New World TV commercial

Young Enterprise Scheme (YES)

22. The Auckland Chamber of Commerce has delivered the Lion Foundation Young Enterprise Scheme (YES) since January 2018. ATEED maintains a strategic role. During the period, there were 58 schools participating in the Auckland YES programme, representing 1364 students completing the programme. There are currently 2 schools from the Puketāpapa Local Board area participating in the YES programme. The Puketāpapa Local Board contributed $1,000 to this scheme.

Local Jobs and Skills Hubs

23. ATEED is the regional partner for the network of Auckland Jobs and Skills Hubs. These multi-agency hubs support employers at developments where there is a high and sustained demand for local labour and skills development. The Auckland network includes Ara (Auckland Airport development), CBD (Wynyard Quarter and city centre development), and Tāmaki hubs. The new Manukau and Northern hubs launched in August of 2019 with new initiatives underway. ATEED-established City Centre Hub reports a total of 480 people into employment, 2,092 training outcomes and 14 apprenticeships facilitated as at 28 February 2020. ATEED is the backbone organisation for the CBD Jobs and Skills Hub, where Māori represented over a third (36 percent) of job placements towards a 40 percent target.

24. ATEED provided funding to CRL Progressive Employment programme for at risk youth supporting training and developing capability within businesses. Five of six youth graduated the 18-week programme in October into jobs; evaluation report received which shows programme delivered excellent results

Offshore talent attraction

25. The Auckland Smart Move Q1-Q2 campaign, launched in July with Immigration New Zealand resulted in 2,126 tech and construction job applications from high-skilled offshore migrants, reaching more than 121,000 offshore high-skilled professionals.

Destination

North, West, South East and Gulf area destination management and marketing activity

26. Over the period, the ATEED Tourism Innovation Team has cemented its highly effective regional cluster and program development. The city is managed on a North/West and Great Barrier area and South/East/Central and Waiheke area. This is a proactive programme that is generating success and clustering of businesses capability, skills and delivery across the entire city.

27. Results are visible and reported, including:

· East/South and North/West visitor maps

· A Tourism Innovation Partnership Fund which identifies and focuses on capability building and content & product development

· Groups include the Franklin Tourism Group, now closely aligned with East Auckland Tourism, the Waiheke Tourism Cluster, the Matakana Cluster and the Waitakere Ranges Cluster as well as more bespoke groups on Great Barrier and specific territories.

· Project & opportunity awareness for operators

· Regional showcase days, product awareness and updates, site familiarity visits (Famils), and opportunity discussions

· Innovation sessions with topics such as capability building for smaller operators, common issues and themes, key takeaways, and networking opportunities

28. The Auckland Visitor Survey Insights Report is the culmination of significant development in qualitative and quantitative data capture across all of Auckland. The report identifies the region by main areas, north, south, east, west, and gulf islands, and delivers a valuable and timely insight into visitors’ characteristics, behaviour, experience and perceptions of the Auckland region. This report will be available for local board access in the New Year.

Regional destination management and marketing activity

29. Auckland cruise ship activity for the year 2018/19 reported growth for Auckland with visitor expenditure of $192.5m (note: this is not the GDP figure previously taken from Cruise NZ as it is no longer available). This is up from $145m in 2017/18. Passenger numbers in 2018/19 were up to 238,000 from 211,000 in 2017/18.

30. It was a strong six months of highly visible activities designed to attract visitors from overseas and around New Zealand to Auckland using various platforms:

· Social media including Instagram @Visitauckland.

· Media and PR including Auckland Insider article. Best escapes for a long weekend and Appetite for Auckland. Online Food stories.

· Marketing Programs such as the Australian ‘Short Break to Auckland’ campaign in October 2019.

· Collateral to continue in the AA Auckland Visitor Summer Guide 2019 -2020.

· Creating a B-roll of striking footage and images of Tāmaki Makaurau for free use by tourism operators and promoters across the Auckland region and the gulf.

· Focus was also given to Trade and Content development including Elemental AKL 2020.

Māori Tourism Development activity that may be relevant to local boards:

31. ATEED continued to support and advocate for the development of new Māori tourism experiences and unique marketing opportunities in support of the priorities contained in the Destination AKL 2025 strategy.

Maori Tourism Innovation Partnership Programme – Pilot

32. In alignment to the Destination AKL Strategy, ATEED has developed a new Tourism Innovation Partnership Fund to enable and support sustainable growth of Maori Tourism in Tāmaki Makaurau. Funding is available to Iwi, Hapū, Marae, Urban Māori Authorities and Māori Tourism collectives to apply for during the 19/20 financial year. So far, we have supported the following two initiatives:

1. Ngai Tai ki Tamaki/Te Haerenga have been awarded $25,000 to develop and promote day tours to Rangitoto and Motutapu through walking and e-bike tours.

2. Te Manu Taupua (with support from the Tupuna Maunga Authority & Nuu Limited) have been awarded $20,000 to grow digital capacity and capability to amplify the cultural narratives of Tāmaki Makaurau. These resources will then be used to educate and develop cultural competency within Auckland’s tourism industry.

Examples of separate local board area activity includes:

· Waitematā - Feasibility study for a Māori Cultural Centre

RFA, ATEED and Panuku in partnership with mana whenua (in particular, Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, Ngāti Pāoa and Te Kawerau a Maki) are in the final stages of finalising a feasibility study for a Māori Cultural Centre, with a penultimate draft being circulated internally. The cultural centre is closely linked to the city centre work being undertaken by the Auckland Design Office.

· Ōtara-Papatoetoe - Elemental – Te Ahi Kōmau Event

ATEED, in collaboration with Panuku are supporting The Cause Collective and Papatūānuku Marae in the delivery and marketing of an indigenous food and cultural storytelling event as apart of Elemental 2020 programme.

· Albert-Eden – Whau Café

In collaboration with the Tūpuna Maunga Authority, ATEED supported the marketing and promotion of a new Māori centred café and visitor centre called Whau Café located in the historic kiosk on Maungawhau. Whau Café officially opened to the public in December 2019 and has been successfully operating since.

· Rodney - Capability Development

ATEED is supporting Te Hana Community Development Charitable Trust with the re-prioritising of their commercial tourism aspirations and product development. ATEED is also involved in the Auckland Council working group, to support Te Hana with renewing and re-accessing the lease model as well and supporting further community engagement focused initiatives.

Delivered, funded and facilitated events

33. During the period, the inaugural Elemental AKL winter festival was held 1-31 July. There were 67 events across the region, and 120 restaurants that took part through Elemental Feast. The new festival generated more than 1000 media stories.

34. ATEED delivered the Auckland Diwali Festival which was held at Aotea Square and Upper Queen Street from 12-13 October 2019. Approximately 65,000 people attended, up 9% from an estimated 59,990 in 2018. The festival had more than 40 food stallholders, more than 50 hours’ live entertainment and over 200 performances

35. ATEED led the cross-council communications and programme implementation of the 2019 New Year’s Eve coverage to alert Aucklanders and visitors to the road closures, extra public transport options, event highlights and TV viewing options, with positive feedback received.

36 During the period, residents of the Albert-Eden Local Board area were also able to enjoy events funded or facilitated by ATEED across the Auckland region, including the New Zealand International Film Festival, ASB Auckland Marathon, the Virgin Australia Supercars Championship, The Food Show, New Zealand Fashion Week, the ITM Auckland SuperSprint, Taste of Auckland, EQUITANA Auckland, 19/20 Nacra/49ers Class Sailing World Champs, Wondergarden, Auckland On Water Boat Show.

37 A full schedule of major events is available on ATEED’s website, aucklandnz.com

Go With Tourism

38 Go with Tourism (GWT) is a jobs-matching platform that targets young people (18-30 years) and encourages them to consider a career in Tourism. In 2019, Go with Tourism was rolled out nationally with launches in Queenstown and Wanaka. The platform signed over 300 businesses for the first time in the 6 months between July and December 2019.

39 The most popular industries in the GWT programme in Auckland (as classified by ANZSIC code) were Accommodation and Food Services (61%), Arts and Recreation Services (19%), Transport, Postal and Warehousing (5%), and Administrative and Support Services (5%).

40 In Puketāpapa Local Board, 1 business has signed up to use the platform out of a total of 165 in the Auckland region.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

41 ATEED is currently considering how we respond to climate impacts in our projects and programmes. In the interim, ATEED assesses and responds to any impact that our initiatives may have on the climate on a case-by-case basis.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

42 ATEED assesses and manages our initiatives on a case-by-case basis and engages with the Council group where required.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

43. Local Board views are not sought for the purposes of this report. Local Board views were sought for some of the initiatives described in this report in a six month decision-making process.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

44 The proposed decision to receive the six-monthly report has no impact on Māori. ATEED assesses and responds to any impact that our initiatives may have on Māori on a case-by-case basis.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

45 The proposed decision of receiving the report has no financial implications.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

· The proposed decision to receive the six-monthly report has no risk. ATEED assesses and manages any risk associated with our initiatives on a case-by-case basis.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

· ATEED will provide the next six-monthly report to the Local Board in August 2020 and will cover the period 1 January to 30 June 2020.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Stephanie Sole – Strategy and Planning (ATEED)

Authorisers

Quanita Khan – Manager Operational Strategy and Planning (ATEED)

Nina Siers - Relationship Manager for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Puketāpapa

Puketāpapa Local Board

23 July 2020

Arts Community and Events venue partners interim service approach - Delegated Decison

File No.: CP2020/09610

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To inform the Puketāpapa Local Board that a delegated decision was made and approved under delegation to the Chair and Deputy Chair for the Wallace Arts Centre on the interim payment.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. At the 18 June 2020 Puketāpapa Local Board Business Meeting the board considered Item 23: Arts Community and Events venue partners interim service approach report. The Puketāpapa Local Board passed resolution PKTPP/2020/72:

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) agree that the decision concerning the interim payment for the Wallace Art Centre be delegated to the Chair and Deputy Chair.

b) that the delegation be exercised after the local board has a workshop on this proposal.

3. The Puketāpapa Local Board held a workshop on the 09 July 2020 where officers attended from Arts Community and Events this item was discussed.

4. Following the workshop held on the 09 July 2020 the Chair and the Deputy Chair in agreeance with the local board members made the following decision:

That the Puketapapa Local Board

a) approve interim payment be made to Wallace Arts Centre for $99,551 plus CPI for the 3 month period 1 July to 30 September.

b) acknowledge that a further decision will be made regarding the level of payment for the rest of FY20/21 after the Emergency Budget has been fully resolved and future funding levels are known.

c) note the commitment of Council’s Arts Community and Events to work with the Local Board to undertake a full review and renewal of the relationship agreement for the Wallace Arts Centre in the FY 20/21 work programme, and that this will be reflected in the funding agreement with James Wallace Arts Trust (JWAT) for the remainder of FY20/21 once that is decided upon.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Puketāpapa Local Board:

a) note the decision made under delegation by Chair H Doig and Deputy Chair J Fairey:

i) approve interim payment be made to Wallace Arts Centre for $99,551 plus CPI for the 3 month period 1 July to 30 September.

ii) acknowledge that a further decision will be made regarding the level of payment for the rest of FY20/21 after the Emergency Budget has been fully resolved and future funding levels are known.

iii) note the commitment of Council’s Arts Community and Events to work with the Local Board to undertake a full review and renewal of the relationship agreement for the Wallace Arts Centre in the FY20/21 work programme, and that this will be reflected in the funding agreement with James Wallace Arts Trust (JWAT) for the remainder of FY20/21 once that is decided upon.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	20200723 Arts Community and Events venue partners interm service approach memo delegated decision	91

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author	Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor - Puketāpapa
Authoriser	Nina Siers - Relationship Manager for Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Puketāpapa

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	20200619 Puketāpapa Local Board feedback on COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Bill	95

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Chair, Harry Doig's Report - 04 June - 30 June 2020	101

[1] Council’s Events Policy refers to major events as events having a regional, national and international profile.

[2] MT/2017/144 (Mt Smart); AE/2015/119 (Eden Park); RBC/2015/41 and WTM/2016/110 (Christmas in the Park); ADC/2017/43 (Lantern Festival).

[3] There are two Eden Park Fan Trails designed for fans to walk to Eden Park. One starts at Ponsonby Road (activated on ‘match days’) and one starts from Queen Elizabeth Square (last used during the 2011 Rugby World Cup).

[4] Section 147A of the Local Government Act 2002.

[5] This activity is subject to local boards prioritising local economic development, and subsequently allocating funding to local economic development through their local board agreements.

[6] Q2 FY 2019/20 result for ATEED’s SOI KPI2

[7] This does not reflect all filming that takes place in studio, private property or low impact activity that wouldn’t have required a permit.

[8] This includes Local Board fees only, other permit fees directed to Auckland Transport (Special Events) and Regional Parks. Figures exclude GST and are as per the month the permit was invoiced, not necessarily when the activity took place.

Chairperson	Julie Fairey
Deputy Chairperson	Harry Doig
Members	Ella Kumar, JP
	Fiona Lai
	Bobby Shen
	Jon Turner

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Julie Fairey's report, 05 June - 30 June 2020	105
b ⇩	Ella Kumar's report, 01 June - 30 June 2020	109
c ⇩	Bobby Shen's report, 01 June - 30 June 2020	113

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 11 June 2020	123
b ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 18 June 2020	125
c ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 25 June 2020	127
d ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 02 July 2020	129
e ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 08 July 2020	133
f ⇩	Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Record, 09 July 2020	135