Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum held in the Kaipātiki Local Board Office, 90 Bentley Avenue, Glenfield on Wednesday, 28 October 2020 at 6.06pm.
Chairperson |
John Gillon |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Danielle Grant, JP |
|
Members |
Paula Gillon |
|
|
Melanie Kenrick |
|
|
Cindy Schmidt |
|
|
Andrew Shaw |
|
ABSENT
Members |
Ann Hartley, JP |
|
|
Adrian Tyler |
|
ALSO PRESENT
Kaipātiki Local Youth Board Chairperson |
Zaidyn Corbett |
|
Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum 28 October 2020 |
|
Chairperson John Gillon opened the meeting followed by Member Paula Gillon leading the
meeting with a Karakia.
Resolution number KAI/2020/30 MOVED by Member M Kenrick, seconded by Deputy Chairperson D Grant: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) accept the apology from Member A Hartley and Member A Tyler for absence. |
There were no declarations of interest.
Resolution number KAI/2020/31 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson D Grant, seconded by Member C Schmidt: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 26 August 2020, as true and correct. |
There were no leaves of absence.
There were no acknowledgements.
There were no petitions.
Resolution number KAI/2020/32 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Deputy Chairperson D Grant: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) agree that item 11 – Kaipātiki Local Youth Board update be accorded precedence at this time. |
Kaipātiki Local Youth Board update |
|
|
Zaidyn Corbett, Kaipātiki Local Youth Board Chairperson, was in attendance to address the board in support of this item.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/33 MOVED by Member A Shaw, seconded by Member C Schmidt: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) receive the Kaipātiki Local Youth Board update. b) thank the Kaipātiki Local Youth Board for their attendance and presentation. |
8.1 |
|
|
Craig Harris, Vicar, was in attendance to address the board in support of this item.
A presentation titled ’The Cedar Centre – 56A Tramway Road ‘ was tabled. A copy of the tabled presentation is available on the Auckland Council website as a minutes attachment.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/34 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Member P Gillon: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) receive the deputation from The Cedar Centre. b) thank Craig Harris and The Cedar Centre for their presentation. |
|
a 28 October 2020 - Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum - The Cedar Centre - 56A Tramway Road - presentation |
8.2 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
Carol Ryan, Chief Executive and Amberlee Wharton, Manager were in attendance to address the board in support of this item. A presentation titled ‘Hearts and Minds – Strengthening the wellbeing and resilience of people and communities’ was tabled. A copy of the tabled presentation is available on the Auckland Council website as a minutes attachment.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/35 MOVED by Member C Schmidt, seconded by Member M Kenrick: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) receive the deputation from Hearts and Minds. b) thank Carol Ryan and Amberlee Wharton for their attendance and presentation. |
|
a 28 October 2020 - Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum - Hearts and Minds - Strengthening the wellbeing and resilience of people and communities - presentation |
8.4 |
|
|
Julie Gannaway, Treasurer and Trefor Roberts, Committee Member, were in attendance to address the board in support of this item.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/36 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Member A Shaw: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) receive the deputation from North Shore Woodturners Guild. b) thank Julie Gannaway and Trefor Roberts for their attendance and presentation. |
There was no public forum.
There was no extraordinary business.
12 |
Feedback on Libraries and Service Centre Integration projects |
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/37 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Deputy Chairperson D Grant: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) supports the proposal to transfer customer service centre services to online and libraries, and provides the following specific feedback: i) expresses concern for potential job losses, the training required for library staff to be able to offer the range of services, and a perception of a downgrade in the council level of service ii) note that there remains a significant number of people who do not or cannot access online services, and therefore require a human interface iii) expresses concern that there may be confusion or inconvenience with council services split between libraries and third-party shops iv) requests that libraries are upgraded where possible to enable electronic payments to be accepted (for example for dog registration fees) so that members of the public can continue to conduct all of their council-related matters in person and at a single location v) requests that the Glenfield service desk area is refurbished into a useable space as quickly as possible and that regional budget is allocated for this vi) requests a high level of communication with the public on the changes, including clear signage located in the libraries to advertise the new services, and the Glenfield service centre to give clear direction on where to go for each service, and for these signs to remain for at least 12 months while the change is embedded in the populace vii) request that information on how the success of the implementation will be measured and for this to reported to the Kaipātiki Local Board 12 months after implementation. |
13 |
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/38 MOVED by Member P Gillon, seconded by Deputy Chairperson D Grant: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) provide the following feedback on the Resource Recovery Network Strategy update (Attachment A of the agenda report): i) we support the Resource Recovery Network Strategy refresh, including the intent to build more community recycling centres, and note that the strategy aligns with the updated Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2018, Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Action Plan and the Kaipātiki Local Board Plan 2020. ii) we believe the key goal should be on resource recovery and diverting waste from landfill. iii) the council strategy should be focused on reduction of landfill waste for the following reasons: A. council should be trying to achieve a circular economy and reducing landfill use; recycling does not necessarily achieve that especially given the precarious nature of some overseas recycling markets B. recovery of resources is an activity that will enable Auckland Council to make progress towards its aspirations of being ‘Zero Waste by 2040’ and ‘Net Zero Emissions by 2050’; resource recovery centres are an operational tool for achieving this C. the process of resource recovery generates ‘multiple environmental, social, cultural and economic benefits for Auckland’. iv) we support a community-led hub-and-spoke model for northern Auckland, that delivers local solutions for the local community. v) we believe the location of the resource recovery centres in areas where they will achieve the most in terms of reduction of waste to landfill is key; as such, it is not a particular type/function of building that is required to do this, rather an overall network made up of different types/functions of buildings vi) the draft strategy refresh proposes that two of the sites should be resource recovery parks and nine community recycling centres, but we are of the view that a sub-regional network, including smaller drop-off points that feed into a larger resource recovery centre (hub-and-spoke model), may be a better solution for parts of Auckland with less available land for full resource recovery centres and a large waste stream; there is also a difference between what some of the current community recycling centres are capable of collecting based on the land they can occupy and the business they are able to build. vii) we support the extension of operational funding to support new and existing resource recovery centres and to fund the development of a more strategic approach to delivering the Resource Recovery Network by understanding the waste stream of different communities in Auckland. viii) we recognise the importance of groups, such as Kaipātiki Project, the North Shore Resource Centre, Kaipātiki Community Facilities Trust, the community houses/centres, other northern local boards, local business improvement districts (including Northcote Town Centre and Birkenhead Town Centre), education bodies, second-hand shops, and waste-related social enterprises, working together in a community-led model to develop a fit-for-purpose strategy for a sub-regional part of the Resource Recovery Network in the north, with the ultimate purpose of diverting as much waste as possible to recovered resource. ix) we recognise that investment needs to be made in both the physical infrastructure and the capability and capacity building of our community groups. This includes the mapping of existing and planned resources centres, which includes our existing community houses and centres, ensuring the hub and spoke network model is able to cater for, and upskill, as the network evolves. x) we believe resource recovery network needs to dovetail into existing activities such as Repair Cafes and share information about which places and spaces support which collection activities xi) Activation staff embedded in local community would support a community-led development model to grow of a zero waste/ resource recovery network, in collaboration with Council initiatives. xii) request that council staff work with the local board, other northern local boards, business improvement districts, and community providers in a collaborative way to investigate possible sites for a Resource Recovery Park in the North and a Resource Recovery Centre in Kaipātiki (excluding reserve land or park land under the LGA), such as in the following areas: A. light industrial-zoned areas of the Wairau Valley B. light industrial-zoned area of Beach Haven C. central Northcote as part of the redevelopment of the town centre D. other industrial or commercial sites within Kaipātiki
xiii) we are concerned that an increased waste levy could result in an increase of dumping in public areas and outside second-hand shops, as has happened since changes in the inorganic collection system, and request that options to mitigate this (in addition to the proposed resource recovery network) are considered alongside any increase in the levy. b) note that local board feedback will be included in a report to Environment and Climate Change Committee in November 2020 seeking adoption of the updated Resource Recovery Network Strategy. c) request speaking rights at the Environment and Climate Change Committee meeting in November 2020 to speak to its feedback on the Resource Recovery Network Strategy refresh jointly with other local boards. d) request that local board feedback on the Resource Recovery Network Strategy refresh be circulated to all local boards for their information. |
14 |
|
|
A document titled ‘Auckland Council Regional Parks Management Plan Review – Formal feedback from the Kaipātiki Local Board’ was tabled. A copy of the tabled document is available on the Auckland Council website as a minutes attachment.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/39 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Member M Kenrick: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) adopt the tabled document as formal feedback from the Kaipātiki Local Board on the Regional Parks Management Plan discussion document. b) approve the Chairperson, Deputy Chairperson and Member Melanie Kenrick to provide verbal feedback at the appropriate council committee meeting. |
|
a 28 October 2020 - Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum - Auckland Council Regional Parks Management Plan Review Formal feedback from the Kaipātiki Local Board |
15 |
|
|
16 |
16.1 |
|
|
Member Andrew Shaw provided a verbal update on Birkdale Intermediate community garden, safety issues outside of Birkdale Intermediate and the upcoming meeting on these safety issues.
|
|
Resolution number KAI/2020/40 MOVED by Member A Shaw, seconded by Member M Kenrick: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) note the verbal report from Member Andrew Shaw. |
17 |
Governing Body and Independent Maori Statutory Board Members' Update |
|
18 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
There was no consideration of extraordinary items.
8.24 pm The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Kaipātiki Local Board Community Forum HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:........................................................