I hereby give notice that an ordinary
meeting of the Appointments and Performance Review Committee will be held on:
|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday, 3
November 2020
10.00am
Room 1, Level
26
135 Albert St
Auckland
|
|
Kōmiti Mō Te Kopou Me Te
Arotake Whakatutukitanga / Appointments and Performance Review Committee
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson
|
Hon Phil Goff, CNZM, JP
|
|
|
Deputy Chairperson
|
Cr Christine Fletcher, QSO
|
|
|
Members
|
Cr Josephine Bartley
|
|
|
|
Cr Pippa Coom
|
|
|
|
Cr Chris Darby
|
|
|
|
Cr Alf Filipaina
|
|
|
|
Cr Richard Hills
|
|
|
|
Cr Desley Simpson, JP
|
|
|
|
IMSB Chair David Taipari
|
|
|
Ex-officio
|
Deputy Mayor Cr Bill Cashmore
|
|
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
Suad Allie
Kaitohutohu Mana Whakahaere Matua /
Senior Governance Advisor
28 October 2020
Contact Telephone: (09) 977 6953
Email: suad.allie@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Responsibilities
The Appointments and Performance Review Committee is
established to:
1.
review the chief executive’s performance and recommend to the
Governing Body the terms and conditions of the CE’s employment including
any performance agreement measures and annual remuneration
2.
make appointments to Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs), Council
Organisations (COs) and exempt CCOs and COs, with the exception of Ports of
Auckland Limited and Auckland International Airport Limited
3.
receive updates on appointments to the council organisations, Ports of
Auckland Limited and Auckland International Airport Limited, as well as any
relevant updates on shareholder voting undertaken at Auckland International
Airport Limited annual general meetings
4. approve policies
relating to the appointment of directors and trustees to CCOs and COs.
Powers
All powers necessary to perform
the committee’s responsibilities.
Except:
(a) powers
that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (section 2)
(b) where
the committee’s responsibility is limited to making a recommendation only
(c) the power to
establish sub-committees.
Exclusion of the public – who
needs to leave the meeting
Members of the public
All members of the public must leave the
meeting when the public are excluded unless a resolution is passed permitting a
person to remain because their knowledge will assist the meeting.
Those who are not members of the public
General principles
·
Access to confidential information is managed on a “need to
know” basis where access to the information is required in order for a
person to perform their role.
·
Those who are not members of the meeting (see list below) must
leave unless it is necessary for them to remain and hear the debate in order to
perform their role.
·
Those who need to be present for one confidential item can remain
only for that item and must leave the room for any other confidential items.
·
In any case of doubt, the ruling of the chairperson is final.
Members of the meeting
·
The members of the meeting remain (all Governing Body members if
the meeting is a Governing Body meeting; all members of the committee if the
meeting is a committee meeting).
·
However, standing orders require that a councillor who has a
pecuniary conflict of interest leave the room.
·
All councillors have the right to attend any meeting of a
committee and councillors who are not members of a committee may remain,
subject to any limitations in standing orders.
Independent Māori Statutory Board
·
Members of the Independent Māori
Statutory Board who are appointed members of the committee remain.
·
Independent Māori Statutory Board
members and staff remain if this is necessary in order for them to perform
their role.
Staff
·
All staff supporting the meeting (administrative, senior
management) remain.
·
Other staff who need to because of their role may remain.
Local Board members
·
Local Board members who need to hear the matter being discussed
in order to perform their role may remain. This will usually be if the
matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular Local Board area.
Council Controlled Organisations
·
Representatives of a Council Controlled Organisation can remain
only if required to for discussion of a matter relevant to the Council Controlled
Organisation.
|
Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
03 November
2020
|
|
ITEM TABLE
OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Apologies 7
2 Declaration of
Interest 7
3 Confirmation
of Minutes 7
4 Petitions 7
5 Public Input 7
6 Local Board
Input 7
7 Extraordinary
Business 8
8 Process for the
appointment of board members to the Auckland War Memorial Museum, and the
Museum of transport and technology 9
9 Process report
for the appointment of directors to Auckland's council controlled organisations 13
10 Open process report for
setting the Chief Executive's 2020/21 performance objectives 17
11 Consideration of
Extraordinary Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
12 Procedural
Motion to Exclude the Public 19
C1 CONFIDENTIAL Board Appointments
to the Auckland War Memorial Museum and Museum of Transport and Technology 19
C2 CONFIDENTIAL: Board appointments
to Auckland's council-controlled organisations 19
C3 CONFIDENTIAL: Setting the Chief
Executive’s 2020/21 performance objectives (Covering report) 20
At the close of
the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Declaration
of Interest
Members are
reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a
conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other
external interest they might have.
3 Confirmation
of Minutes
|
That the Appointments and Performance Review Committee:
a)
confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting,
held on Tuesday, 25 August 2020 and the extraordinary
meeting on 8 September 2020 , including the confidential section, as a true
and correct record.
|
4 Petitions
At the close of
the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
5 Public
Input
Standing Order
7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to the
Governance Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day
prior to the meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting
Chairperson has the discretion to decline any application that does not meet
the requirements of Standing Orders. A maximum of thirty (30) minutes
is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes
speaking time for each speaker.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for public input had been received.
6 Local
Board Input
Standing Order
6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of that
Chairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this
time. The Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson)
shall wherever practical, give one (1) day’s notice of their wish
to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the discretion to decline any
application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders.
This right is
in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on the
agenda.
At the close of
the agenda no requests for local board input had been received.
7 Extraordinary
Business
Section 46A(7)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“An item
that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local
authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member
explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The
reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the
discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A)
of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended)
states:
“Where an
item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed
at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor
matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member
explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the
public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or
recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to
a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
|
Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
03 November
2020
|
|
Process
for the appointment of board members to the Auckland War Memorial Museum, and
the Museum of transport and technology
File No.: CP2020/13808
Te take mō te
pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To
receive information regarding the reappointment of directors for the Auckland
War Memorial Museum and the Museum of Transport and Technology and note that a
decision will be made in the confidential part of this meeting.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland
Council appoints directors to the boards of the Auckland War Memorial Museum
(AWMM) and the Museum of Transport and Technology (MOTAT). Regional
Facilities Auckland (RFA) supports the board appointment process by undertaking
the candidate selection process and making recommendations regarding
appointments to the council.
3. The
council appoints five of the ten members to the AWMM board. There are two
board appointments to be considered this year by the council.
4. The
council appoints six of the ten members to the MOTAT board. There are
three board appointments to be considered this year by the council.
5. A
confidential report is on this agenda requesting the committee to make
decisions regarding the re/appointment of board members to AWMM and the MOTAT.
|
Ngā tūtohunga
Recommendation/s
That the Appointments and
Performance Review Committee:
a) note
that there is a confidential report on today’s committee agenda that
provides information to make decisions regarding recommendations received
from Regional Facilities Auckland regarding the board members on the Auckland
War Memorial Museum and the Museum of Transport and Technology boards
b) note
that the report is confidential due to the personal information contained in
it, and the final appointment decisions will be made publicly available at
the conclusion of the appointment process.
|
Horopaki
Context
6. The
board appointment process for appointing directors to any CCO and external
partnership board is outlined in the diagram below.
7. The
confidential reports on this agenda provide advice and options to assist the
committee to make decisions regarding the shortlist candidates for interviews.
Diagram 1. Board Appointment Process
8. The
significant difference in the process for these appointments compared to the
appointment of CCO directors is that RFA supports the AWMM and MOTAT board
appointment processes by undertaking the candidate selection process and making
recommendations regarding appointments to the council.
9. The
confidential report provides recommendations received from RFA regarding the
board members on the AWMM and the MOTAT boards.
Links to legislation
10. The Auckland
War Memorial Museum Act 1996 and the Museum of Transport and Technology Act
2000 govern the board appointment processes of these institutions. The
advisory and management agreement requires RFA to recommend candidates to
Auckland Council for these appointments.
11. A
subcommittee of the RFA board has undertaken the candidate selection process
for these appointments which is consistent with Auckland Council’s
Appointment and Remuneration Policy for Board Members of Council Organisations.
12. A separate
confidential paper on today’s agenda considers the recommendations made
by RFA.
Auckland War Memorial Museum
13. Auckland
Council appoints five of the ten members to the AWMM board based on RFA’s
recommendations. Four board members are appointed by the Auckland Museum
Institute, and one board member is appointed by Taumata-a-Iwi, AWMM’s Māori
Committee provided for by the Auckland War Memorial Museum Act 1996.
14. RFA’s
board appointment subcommittee has worked with the Auckland Museum Institute to
jointly interview and identify candidates for the AWMM board.
Museum of Transport and Technology
15. Auckland
Council appoints six of the ten members to the MOTAT board. The other
four are appointed by the MOTAT Society.
16. RFA’s
board appointment subcommittee worked with the deputy chair of the MOTAT board
to jointly identify and interview candidates for the MOTAT board. The MOTAT
Society runs a separate board appointment process for their appointments.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
17. There are no
negative climate impacts as a result of the board appointments to AWMM and
MOTAT.
Ngā whakaaweawe me
ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
18. There are no
significant impacts on other parts of the council group as a result of these
appointments, as AWMM and MOTAT are not part of the council group.
However, both of these organisations receive significant funding from the
council, and therefore the appointment of quality directors will help ensure
that funding is used appropriately.
Ngā whakaaweawe
ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
19. Board
appointments to CCOs are the role of the Governing Body. Local boards can
participate in the nomination process for each director vacancy. The
nomination of a candidate requires the consent of that candidate.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
Māori
Māori impact statement
20. The
policy states that “the Selection Panel will interview and assess
candidates against the required skills, knowledge and experience and may
consider other factors such as:
· the
council’s board diversity and inclusion policy (see section 4)
· candidates
with knowledge of Te Ao Māori and established Māori networks.”
21. Council’s
appointment policy notes that board appointments will be made on the basis of
the skills, knowledge and experience which the board as a whole requires to be
effective with due regard to the benefits of diversity on the board.
22. Council’s
Diverse and Inclusive Framework has a focus on increasing diversity on external
partnerships (and CCOs) and fostering a strong and diverse talent pipeline for
its appointment process.
23. The policy therefore encourages the identification of experienced
Māori directors for consideration for appointment to boards.
24. One AWMM
board member is appointed by Taumata-a-Iwi. Taumata-a-Iwi is a committee
established to ensure that the AWMM board’s policy aligns with Māori
values, and matters enshrined in te Tiriti o Waitangi. Taumata-a-Iwi also
advises on matters of Māori protocol within the museum and between the
museum and tangata whenua at large.
25. The MOTAT
board has a statutory duty to observe and encourage the spirit of partnership
and goodwill envisaged by te Tiriti o Waitangi, including implications for Māori,
and elements of Māori cultural property that only tangata whenua can
provide appropriate care for.
Ngā ritenga
ā-pūtea
Financial implications
26. The costs
associated with these appointments will be managed from existing budgets.
Ngā raru tūpono me
ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
27. There are
risks associated with all board appointments, specifically a reputation risk
to:
i) ensuring
all candidates are appropriately screened to meet the skill requirements for
directors of a board such as this and that they have appropriate governance
experience especially within public-facing entities.
28. To mitigate
any potential risks of disqualified directors or under-qualified candidates the
following controls are in place:
(a) a thorough
due diligence process will be completed on all candidate applications in line
with the council’s recruitment policy
(b) completion
of the council’s director consent form prior to interview, which requires
directors to confirm that there is nothing that would disqualify them from
being a director
(c) a thorough
reference check of candidates who are approved for appointment to the CCOs and
any other additional interviews as required.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
29. Details
regarding the next steps are provided in the confidential section of the
confidential report on this agenda.
Ngā tāpirihanga
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author
|
Josie Meuli - Senior Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance &
External Partnerships
Phil Wilson - Governance Director
|
|
Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
03 November
2020
|
|
Process report for the appointment of
directors to Auckland's council controlled organisations
File No.: CP2020/14444
Te take mō te
pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To
provide an update on the programme of appointments to the boards of
Auckland’s council-controlled organisations (CCOs).
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland
Council appoints directors to the boards of its council-controlled organisations.
3. On
25 August 2020, this committee approved the commencement of the annual board
appointment programme for 2020. This included agreeing the relevant
skills required to fill vacancies on the CCO boards (APR/2020/11).
4. The
process for identifying and interviewing candidates for these roles continues,
and a confidential report on this agenda asks the committee to make decisions
on shortlisting candidates for vacancies on the boards of:
(i) Auckland
Transport – two director vacancies
(ii) Panuku
Development Auckland – chair and one director vacancy.
|
Ngā tūtohunga
Recommendation/s
That the Appointments and
Performance Review Committee:
a) note
there is a confidential report on this meeting agenda requesting the
committee make decisions regarding the shortlisting of candidates for
interview for vacancies on the boards of Auckland’s council-controlled
organisations.
b) note
that these reports are confidential due to the personal information contained
in them, and that the final appointment decisions will be made publicly
available at the conclusion of the appointment process.
|
Horopaki
Context
5. The
board appointment process for appointing directors to any CCO and external
partnership board is outlined in the following table.
6. The
confidential report on this agenda provides advice and options to assist the
committee to make decisions regarding the candidates that were shortlisted for
interviews.
Tātaritanga me ngā
tohutohu
Analysis and advice
7. On
25 August 2020, this committee approved the commencement of the annual board
appointment programme for 2020. This included agreeing the relevant
skills required to fill vacancies on the CCO boards (APR/2020/11).
8. The
process for identifying and interviewing candidates for these roles continues,
and a confidential report on this agenda asks the committee to make decisions
on shortlisting candidates for vacancies on the boards of:
(iii) Auckland
Transport – two director vacancies
(iv) Panuku
Development Auckland – chair and one director vacancy.
9. Candidates proposed for interview for the Watercare vacancy will be
brought to the 1 December 2020 Appointments and Performance Review Committee
meeting for consideration.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
10. There are no
negative climate impacts as a result of the proposed CCO board appointments.
Ngā whakaaweawe me
ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
11. The
appointment of appropriate directors to the CCO boards has an impact on the
performance of the council group, however there is no significant impact on
other parts of the council group as a result of the overall appointment
programme.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe
me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
12. Board
appointments to CCOs are the role of the Governing Body. Local boards can
participate in the nomination process for each director vacancy. The nomination
of a candidate requires the consent of that candidate.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
Māori
Māori impact statement
13. Auckland
Council’s appointment and remuneration policy for board members of
council organisations (the policy) states that the council “values and
supports the benefits that diversity of thought, experience and skills bring to
our CCO Boards.
14. We recognise
that increasing diversity and fostering inclusive Board culture is an essential
element in supporting high performing boards, driving long-term success and
delivering better outcomes for the communities of Auckland”.
15. The policy
therefore encourages the identification of appropriately experienced Māori
directors for consideration for appointment to CCO boards.
16. In addition,
an Independent Māori Statutory Board member is involved in the appointment
process by being a member of the selection panel. This ensures that a Māori
perspective informs the recommendations of the selection panel during the
shortlisting, interviewing and appointment processes.
17. The
Independent Māori Statutory Board is also represented on this
committee. This ensures a Māori perspective is brought to the
decision-making process, and that the Independent Māori Statutory
Board’s views are considered by the
committee.
18. At the 25
August 2020 meeting this committee agreed to strengthen the focus areas in
vacancy briefs by including the following statements in the common priorities
for all director vacancy briefs (advertisements):
(i) Uphold
the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, readiness to promote improved
outcomes for Māori and knowledge of Te Ao Māori established networks
(APR/2020/10).
Ngā ritenga
ā-pūtea
Financial implications
19. The
costs associated with these appointments will be managed from existing budgets.
Ngā raru tūpono me
ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
20. There are risks associated with all board appointments including:
i) Reputational:
all candidates are appropriately screened to meet the skill requirements for
appointment to entities such as these and that they have appropriate governance
experience especially within public-facing entities. To mitigate any
potential risks of disqualified directors or under-qualified candidates:
(a) a
thorough due diligence process will be completed on all candidate applications
in line with the council’s appointment policy
(b) short-listed
candidates have completed the council’s director consent form prior to
interview which requires directors to confirm that there is nothing that would
disqualify them from being a director
(c) thorough
reference checks of candidates who are approved for appointment to Auckland
Transport are being conducted by Kerridge and Partners.
ii) Reputational:
breach of privacy if confidential candidate information is provided to media
outlets prior to final decisions being made by the committee. The risk is
fewer and potentially less qualified candidates being attracted into future
board appointment programmes. To mitigate the risk staff will continue to
highlight the need for maintaining confidentiality during the board appointment
programme.
iii) Governance:
the risk of an unbalanced board where a loss of institutional knowledge impacts
decision-making. Conversely, retaining board members for too long can
mean the board lacks innovation and fresh thinking.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
21. Staff will
give effect to the committee’s resolutions.
22. The
appointment of candidates to some vacancies is expected to be reported to this
committee on 1 December 2020.
23. A media
statement will be provided by the Mayor following the approval of the successful
candidates.
Ngā tāpirihanga
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author
|
Josie Meuli - Senior Advisor
|
|
Authorisers
|
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance &
External Partnerships
Phil Wilson - Governance Director
|
|
Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
03 November
2020
|
|
Open process report for setting the
Chief Executive's 2020/21 performance objectives
File No.: CP2020/15337
Te take mō te
pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To
agree a set of performance objectives for Auckland Council’s Chief
Executive, Mr Jim Stabback, for the 2021 Financial Year (year ending 30 June
2021).
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. As
set out in the Governing Body terms of reference, the Appointments and
Performance Review Committee is responsible for reviewing the Chief
Executive’s performance and for recommending to the Governing Body the
terms and conditions of the Chief Executive’s employment, including any
performance agreement measures.
3. Under
the Local Government Act 2002, the council is responsible for appointing a
Chief Executive and for setting performance expectations. Under clause 34(2) of
Schedule 7, the local authority and the Chief Executive must enter into a
performance agreement. The Chief Executive is responsible to the council for
meeting his or her statutory obligations under section 42(2), and his or her
performance expectations under the performance agreement.
4. Jim
Stabback commenced as Auckland Council Chief Executive on 1 September 2020 on a
five-year term. Given the appointment is part way through the current financial
year, and the impact of the Emergency Budget on current year performance,
council officers recommend that the first set of performance objectives for the
incoming Chief Executive is for the current financial year, period ending 30
June 2021.
5. Subject
to the decisions of this committee, the Chief Executive’s performance
objectives will be recommended to the Governing Body which will consider this
matter at its meeting on 26 November 2020.
6. The
substantive discussion on this matter will take place in the confidential part
of the agenda as it will involve the performance of the Chief Executive as well
as the setting of performance objectives yet to be agreed between the Chief
Executive and Governing Body.
|
Ngā tūtohunga
Recommendation/s
That the Appointments and
Performance Review Committee:
a) note
that there is a confidential report included in the agenda that provides
information regarding the setting of performance objectives for Auckland
Council’s Chief Executive for the 2021 Financial Year (year ending 30
June 2021).
|
Ngā tāpirihanga
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Shameel Sahib - Head of Corporate Strategy
Kurtis Bell - Integration Lead - Culture & Leadership
|
|
Authorisers
|
Patricia Reade - Acting Chief Executive
Phil Wilson - Governance Director
|
|
Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
03 November
2020
|
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information
and Meetings Act 1987
That the Appointments
and Performance Review Committee
a) exclude
the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general
subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the
reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific
grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution
is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests
protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by
the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in
public, as follows:
C1 CONFIDENTIAL
Board Appointments to the Auckland War Memorial Museum and Museum of Transport
and Technology
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each
matter
|
Particular
interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s)
under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of
natural persons, including that of a deceased person.
In
particular, the report contains private information about candidates being
appointed to the Auckland War Memorial Museum and Museum of Transport and
Technology.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
C2 CONFIDENTIAL:
Board appointments to Auckland's council-controlled organisations
|
Reason for
passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular
interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s)
under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section
7.
|
s7(2)(a) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of
natural persons, including that of a deceased person.
In
particular, the report contains private information about candidates who have
applied for director vacancies on the boards of Auckland Transport and
Panuku Development Auckland.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
C3 CONFIDENTIAL:
Setting the Chief Executive’s 2020/21 performance objectives (Covering
report)
|
Reason for
passing this resolution in relation to each matter
|
Particular
interest(s) protected (where applicable)
|
Ground(s)
under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution
|
|
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
s7(2)(a) -
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of
natural persons, including that of a deceased person.
In
particular, the report contains information that relates to the setting
of performance objectives that are yet to be agreed between the Governing
Body and the Chief Executive. The committee may discuss matters relating to
the performance of the Chief Executive.
|
s48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the
disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under
section 7.
|
