Agenda of Papakura Local Board - Wednesday, 23 June 2021

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Walters Road Upgrade

File No.: CP2021/08537

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To update the board on the measures being undertaken to address safety issues on Walters Road.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Walters Road was historically on the urban fringe of Papakura and Auckland. Due to the location of neighbouring residential development and schools, pedestrian safety was not a significant issue.

3. Changes in land use and development over the last 30 years has dramatically increased all forms of traffic.

4. Auckland Transport (AT) and Healthy Waters were already aware of safety issues, pedestrian safety and open drains and had undertaken nearby works, to begin addressing the issues.

5. Papakura Normal School presented to the board in April 2021 on the safety concerns and asked AT and Healthy Waters to progress solutions to the issues raised.

6. This report updates the board on the current situation.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) receive the Walters Road upgrade report.

Horopaki

Context

7. In 1939 Papakura Army Base was established on the fringe of Papakura, bounded by Grove and Walters Road. Drainage ditches, which may have also originally had a fortification function, bounded the camp on both Walters and Grove Roads. Essentially for the next fifty years the camp was on the rural-urban boundary and there was limited pedestrian and cycle traffic. On the other side of these roads was farmland and residential development stopped on Grove Road close to the southern boundary of the camp, near Fernaig Street.

8. In 1958 Papakura Normal School opened, but most of the children attending the school came from the south and west of the school. Cosgrove School’s (1959) catchment picked up the pupils from the south and east. This meant there was little need to traverse the roads. Further, apart from local trips and access to the Ardmore Aerodrome, traffic was light meaning that cyclists and pedestrians navigated these ‘rural’ roads when necessary.

A picture containing outdoor, road, sky, tree

Description automatically generated

Oct 1968

9. With the significant downsizing of the Army base and residential development beginning to occur since the mid-1970s, traffic increased. Over the next 30 years with the sale of some army land and plan changes, the environment effectively became urban, with increases of all forms of traffic.

10. In the late 1990s works on Bruce Pulman park began on the northern side of the road and with the adoption of the unitary plan, many developments have occurred to the east of Grove Road and more recently on the north of Walters Road. This further increased traffic movements and included vulnerable road users. The dramatic increase in impervious surface has also impacted on the volume of stormwater run-off.

11. At its meeting on Wednesday 28 April 2021, pupils from Papakura Normal School presented to the local board on the dual dangers of the drainage ditch and the lack of footpath on the southern side of Walters Road. This included highlighting an incident where a child fell into the ditch in 2019.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

12. Auckland Transport and Healthy Waters were already aware of the issues on Walters Road. AT has had onsite meetings with stakeholders to address issues and a small portion of footpath and a signalized pedestrian crossing is currently being installed outside Kauri Flats School. Healthy Waters had also begun the Awakeri wetlands, which needed to be commissioned so that stormwater associated with the new development could be diverted away from open drains on Walters Road. This reduced the peak flows and therefore enable the open channels to be piped.

13. Following the school’s deputation, staff from both AT and Healthy Waters have met on a number of occasions to discuss how these issues can be resolved. There are a significant number of stakeholders along this stretch of road. The two schools, the Ministry of Defence, The Bruce Pulman Trust, private developers and other residents. A number of council departments, AT and iwi need to work together to develop a project plan to efficiently address the many issues.

14. The are many issues, in addition to staging and funding. These include:

· existing vegetation

· lack of geotechnical data

· capacity modelling

· traffic management

15. Currently AT and Healthy Waters are in the early stages of investigation and planning to progress the works. While the piping is the first component of the work, AT and Healthy Waters are working together on timing and staging. The new pipe-works need not only to accommodate existing flows but also the additional flows from paving the footpath, as well as culverting.

16. Ideally the staging should be:

· tree removal

· install and back-fill piping along with kerb and channeling, catch pits and leads to manholes and manholes to the main pipeline

· lay footpath, berm planting and road seal to the new kerb.

17. As noted, this is a complex project and will take some time to address the issues and progress will be regularly reported to the board.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

18. This project when complete will improve the safety for pedestrians and to travel along this road.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. This project involves a number of groups within council and is supported by many of its policies and outcomes.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

20. This project is of great interest to the local board and the board has asked this project be expedited.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

21. Iwi engagement will be undertaken early in the project, particularly with regard to the stormwater component of the project.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

22. This proposal will have financial implications for both AT and Healthy Waters, part of the current work is to assess these.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

23. Part of the current investigations will assess risk and recommend appropriate mitigations.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

24. This will be regularly reported to the board.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Bruce Thomas - Elected Members Relationship Manager

Authorisers

Sol Hessell - Traffic Engineering, Team leader

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval for five new public road names, two new private road names and an existing road name extension at 200-252 Park Estate Road, Hingaia

File No.: CP2021/07493

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek approval from the Papakura Papakura Local Board to name five new public roads, two new private roads being commonly owned access lots (COALs), and also to extend an existing public road name.

2. All of the roads in this report have been created by way of multiple subdivision resource consents for the development known as ‘Park Green’, at 200-252 Park Estate Road, Hingaia.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines (the Guidelines) set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names. The Guidelines state that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider / developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name/s for the local board’s approval.

4. The Park Green development is being undertaken in various stages by different developers and consultants. This report details two naming applications for Park Green as follows:

4.1) Fletcher Residential Limited (FRL) have applied to name three public roads (labelled 12, 13 and 18) and two COALs (labelled 1 and 2) for Stage 1 of Park Green (consent reference SUB60356641) at 200 Park Estate Road, Hingaia.

4.2) Civilplan Consultants Limited (CCL) have applied to name two public roads (labelled 7 and 8) for Stage 1A of Park Green (consent reference SUB60353400) at the adjacent site 252 Park Estate Road, Hingaia.

5. Ngāti Tamaoho have gifted the names for the two Stage 1 private roads (COALs) by FRL.

6. All the road name options proposed in this report have been assessed against the Guidelines and the ‘Australian & New Zealand Standard, Rural and Urban Addressing, AS NZS 4819:2011’ and the ‘Guidelines for Addressing in-fill Developments 2019 – LINZ OP G 01245’ (the Standards). The technical matters required by those documents are considered to have been met and the proposed names are not duplicated elsewhere in the region or in close proximity. Mana whenua have been consulted in the manner required by the Guidelines.

7. The names proposed by FRL for the Stage 1 roads at 200 Park Estate Road are:

i. Public Road 12: Seafoam Road

ii. Public Road 13: Aquamarine Road

iii. Public Road 18: Chartreuse Road

iv. COAL 1 (name gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho): Rauriki Lane

v. COAL 2 (name gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho): Tawake Lane

8. The names proposed by CCL for the Stage 1A roads at 252 Park Estate Road are:

vi. Public Road 7: Emerald Avenue

vii. Public Road 8: Evergreen Parade

9. Alternative name options are as follows:

Stage 1 Roads by FRL

· Turquoise Road

· Erin Road

· Kohepiro Lane

Stage 1A Roads by CCL

· Ivy Lane

· Shamrock Road

· Wintergarden Drive

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve as below, three new public road names proposed by Fletcher Residential Limited, and two new private road (COAL) names gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho for Stage 1 of the ‘Park Green’ subdivision at 200 Park Easte Road, Hingaia, in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent references SUB60356641 and BUN60356640):

i. Public Road 12: Seafoam Road

ii. Public Road 13: Aquamarine Road

iii. Public Road 18: Chartreuse Road

iv. COAL 1 (gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho): Rauriki Lane

v. COAL 2 (gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho): Tawake Lane

b) approve the two new public road names proposed by Civilplan Consultants Ltd on behalf of the applicant for Stage 1A of the ‘Park Green’ subdivision at 252 Park Easte Road, Hingaia, in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974 (resource consent references SUB60353400 and BUN60353348):

vi. Public Road 7: Emerald Avenue

vii. Public Road 8: Evergreen Parade

c) approve the extension of the existing public road name ‘Port Way’ for a newly built section of that road; the first sections having already been named by the Papakura Local Board under resolutions PPK/2019/177 and PPK/2020/130.

Horopaki

Context

10. The Park Green development is owned by Hugh Green Limited, but is being completed across various stages by different developers and consultants

11. FRL application for Stage 1 at 200 Park Estate Road: Resource consent references SUB60356641 and BUN60356640 were issued in January 2021 for the construction of 38 new residential freehold units and associated subdivision including three new public roads and two commonly owned access lots (COALs).

12. CCL application for Stage 1A at 252 Park Estate Road: Resource consent references SUB60353400 and BUN60353348 were issued in December 2020 for subdivision to create numerous new residential lots, super lots, roads and infrastructure, including two new public roads and the extension of the existing public road already named ‘Port Way’.

13. Site and location plans of both of the development stages can be found in Attachment A.

14. In accordance with the Standards, any road including public roads and any private ways, COALs, and right of ways, that serve more than five lots generally require a new road name in order to ensure safe, logical and efficient street numbering.

15. Therefore, in these development stages, all of the described roads require road names because they are either public roads or serve more than five lots. This can be seen in Attachment A, where the roads that require names are highlighted.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

16. The Guidelines set out the requirements and criteria of the Council for proposed road names and have been applied in this situation to ensure consistency of road naming across the Auckland Region. The Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named as a result of a subdivision or development, the subdivider/developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred new road name/s for the local board’s approval.

17. The Guidelines provide for road names to reflect one of the following local themes, with the use of Māori names being actively encouraged:

· a historical, cultural, or ancestral linkage to an area; or

· a particular landscape, environmental or biodiversity theme or feature; or

· an existing them in the area, or a new cohesive theme for large greenfield developments.

18. Theme: All of the proposed road names within the Park Green development follow the theme of the colour green. This is a cohesive theme covering the entire development area, chosen to represent the various features and components of the development and land. All of the names proposed in this report by FRL and CRL follow this same theme. The colour green theme reflects:

· the development’s name ‘Park Green’

· Ngāti Tamaoho’s chosen theme of ngā rākau o te tai manuka; the plants and trees of the coastline of the Manukau Harbour (Te Mānukanuka O Hoturoa). More detail on Ngāti Tamaoho’s involvement can be found in the paragraphs below

· the landowner’s name ‘Hugh Green Limited’

· the green open spaces that are to be incorporated into the development, including parks, esplanade reserves and revegetated streams and wetlands.

19. Ngāti Tamaoho gifted names and theme: The two COAL (private road) names under Stage 1 by FRL have been gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho. These names follow the central theme of ngā rākau o te tai manuka; the plants and trees of the coastline of the Manukau Harbour (Te Mānukanuka O Hoturoa). These are taonga species which grew, and in some cases still grow, on the local shorelines including those shorelines that will now become part of the Park Green development. This theme of ngā rākau o te tai manuka was chosen to complement the overall colour green theme of the development.

20. Continuity of theme: As the Park Green development requires a large number of new roads to be named across the various stages, Hugh Green Group Limited (the current landowners) see value in having a consistent naming theme for the subdivision and are planning to apply for future road naming within the development following the same green theme - with preferred names such as Clover, Juniper, Willow, Opal, and Olive, as well as continuing their collaborations with mana whenua to provide Te Reo names of the same theme.

21. FRL have provided additional commentary about the colour green theme:

“The colour green speaks to revival and health. In colour psychology, green is thought to help balance emotions and promote a sense of calm and clarity. Green is the colour you notice the most in our natural habitat – trees, grass and forests. It is the colour of springtime, regeneration. Blue-green shades are reflected in the many colours of water - sea, lakes, estuaries and waterways.

This makes the colour green very appropriate given the location of Park Green in its upper harbour setting with significant coastal edges, freshwater streams and large areas of wetlands. The location and topography offer good views to the surrounding immediate and wider context, including the Hunua Ranges, Bombay hills and Pukekohe Hill. The long harbour edge connects to nature throughout, while providing recreational opportunities in both the terrestrial and marine environments.”

22. In addition, some of the names proposed by CCL, specifically ‘Emerald’ for Road 7 and ‘Shamrock’ in the alternative name option pool, reflect both the colour green theme and also the Irish heritage of the late Hugh Green, founder of Hugh Green Limited (the landowner). Similar Irish themed names have already been approved by the Papakura Local Board for new roads in the surrounding local area that were developed by Hugh Green Limited.

23. FRL application for Stage 1 at 200 Park Estate Road: the three new public road names proposed on behalf of the applicant by FRL, and the two new private road (COAL) names gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho are set out in the table below, as well as three alternative name options for the local board to choose from:

Stage 1 Road number	Stage 1 by FRL Proposed names	Meaning (as described by FRL for the public roads and Ngāti Tamaoho for the COALs)
PUBLIC ROAD 12	Seafoam Road (applicant’s preference)	Seafoam is a shade of green which has strong associations with nature and the environment. It is a subdued tone (a mix of green, blue and gray) that is easy on the eyes and very versatile. Pale greens like seafoam green are also thought to evoke youth and innocence. It is seen as the color of luck, freshness, and renewal. As it also contains blue, the color of the ocean & sky. Seafoam green can convey a sense of tranquility.
PUBLIC ROAD 13	Aquamarine Road (applicant’s preference)	Named after the mineral, aquamarine is a delicate mixture of green, cyan, and blue. It is renowned for its crystal blue colours and ocean-esque hues. It evokes beautiful, pristine beaches and, as a result, is popular in outdoor settings. Aquamarine is a soothing, calming, peaceful and fresh hue.
PUBLIC ROAD 18	Chartreuse Road (applicant’s preference)	Named for its resemblance to the French liqueur, chartreuse sits between yellow and green in the colour wheel. Chartreuse is a vivid color that combines the vitality of green with the energy and optimism of yellow. It is thus associated with healing, good health, and a healthy lifestyle.
COAL 1	Rauriki Lane (gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho)	A reference to the Tī rauriki (Cordyline pumilio), a dwarf type of cabbage tree that was commonly grown and harvested in this area.
COAL 2	Tawake Lane (gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho)	A reference to the Maire-tawake (Syzygium maire), a tree of the swampy forests that used to grow here.

Stage 1 by FRL: Pool of Alternative Name options
Turquoise Road	Positioned between blue and green in the color wheel, turquoise is a mixture of pale blue and green or blue with a small amount of yellow. Turquoise takes its name from the gemstone, which comes from the French word for Turkish.
Erin Road	Erin is a colour which is halfway between green and spring green on the colour wheel. It is named after Erin, a poetic name for Ireland. One of the earliest known uses of the word "erin" to describe a colour appears in the poetry of Jane Johnston Schoolcraft (1800–1842).
Kohepiro Lane	A reference to Scandia rosifolia that used to grow locally – name provided by by Ngāti Tamaoho.

24. CCL application for Stage 1A at 252 Park Estate Road: the two new public road names proposed by CCL are set out in the table below, as well as three alternative name options for the local board to choose from:

Stage 1A Road number	Stage 1A by CCL Proposed names	Meaning
PUBLIC ROAD 7	Emerald Avenue	A colour of green, following the colour green theme – see the ‘Theme’ paragraphs above for further details.
PUBLIC ROAD 8	Evergreen Parade	A colour of green, following the colour green theme – see the ‘Theme’ paragraphs above for further details.
Alternative Options:	Ivy Avenue Shamrock Road Wintergarden Drive	Chosen to reflect the colour green theme – see the ‘Theme’ paragraphs above for further details.

25. Assessment: All the name options listed in the tables above have been assessed by the Council’s Subdivision Specialist team to ensure that they meet both the Guidelines and the Standards in respect of road naming. The technical standards are considered to have been met and duplicate names are not located in any close proximity. It is therefore for the local board to decide upon the suitability of the names within the local context and in accordance with the delegation.

26. Community Consultation: As Park Green is a greenfield development of over 100 ha of vacant land without an established community, consultation with the community has not been considered necessary.

27. Confirmation: Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) has confirmed that all of the proposed names are acceptable for use at this location.

28. Road Type: The listed road types are acceptable for the new roads that are to be named, suiting their form and layout.

29. Consultation: Mana whenua were consulted in line with the processes and requirements described in the Guidelines. Additional commentary is provided in the Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori section that follows.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

30. The naming of roads has no effect on climate change. Relevant environmental issues have been considered under the provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the associated approved resource consent for the development.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

31. The decision sought for this report has no identified impacts on other parts of the Council group. The views of Council controlled organisations were not required for the preparation of the report’s advice.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

32. The decision sought for this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate local impact beyond those outlined in this report.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

33. To aid local board decision making, the Guidelines include an objective of recognising cultural and ancestral linkages to areas of land through engagement with mana whenua, particularly through the resource consent approval process, and the allocation of road names where appropriate. The Guidelines identify the process that enables mana whenua the opportunity to provide feedback on all road naming applications and in this instance, the process has been adhered to.

34. Both FRL and CCL have undertaken consultation with mana whenua as detailed below. Consultation has been undertaken for both the specific roads detailed in this report, but also for the wider Park Green development as a whole, as part of an ongoing relationship with mana whenua through the development and resource consenting process.

35. Hugh Green Limited (the current landowners of the development) have come to a general arrangement with mana whenua in terms of the naming structure of the development, wherein Hugh Green Limited and its development partners (including FRL and CCL) will arrange for the naming of the public roads, but mana whenua will name the COALs, physical features and walking tracks proposed as part of the development as they see fit. All names will follow the colour green theme.

36. This arrangement suits all parties involved in the road naming process and limits the pressure on mana whenua resources to provide names, due to the sheer volume of new road names required across the Park Green development as a whole.

FRL application for Stage 1 at 200 Park Estate Road

37. Ngāti Tamaoho have gifted a number of traditional plant species names to be used in the Park Green development that were known to grow in the Park Green area of land.

38. On 16th April 2021 FRL met with Ngāti Tamaoho Trust for a half day workshop to learn about Te Rohe O Ngāti Tamaoho, their vision and mission.

39. Following the workshop, Ngāti Tamaoho Trust were approached to provide names for the commonly owned access lots under Stage 1, based on their local knowledge and connection to the whenua. Name options were kindly supplied by Ben Leonard Kairangahau - Research Historian, in keeping with the theme of 'Green'. Those names are set out in this report.

40. Subsequent approval was obtained from Ngāti Te Ata, who liked the ‘green theme’ approach for road naming and supported the names gifted by Ngāti Tamaoho.

CCL application for Stage 1A at 252 Park Estate Road

41. CCL have applied for road naming on behalf of Hugh Green Limited. As explained above, Hugh Green Limited, have discussed road naming for the Park Green development as a whole (amongst many other matters) with Ngāti Tamaoho and Ngāti Te Ata, who both identified their principal interests in the development through the area plan change and resource consent processes. These discussions and relationships have been ongoing throughout the development and consenting stages.

42. The Stage 1A names are for public roads and therefore, in line with the consultation and arrangement with mana whenua, general green colour theme names have been proposed by CCL in order to reserve Te Reo Māori names for elsewhere in the development.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

43. The road naming process does not raise any financial implications for the Council.

44. The applicant has responsibility for ensuring that appropriate signage will be installed accordingly once approval is obtained for the new road names.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

45. There are no significant risks to Council as road naming is a routine part of the subdivision development process, with consultation being a key component of the process.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

46. Approved road names are notified to LINZ which records them on its New Zealand wide land information database. LINZ provides all updated information to other users, including emergency services.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Site & Location Plans	23

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Andrea Muhme - Planner

Emerald James - Subdivision Advisor

Authorisers

Trevor Cullen - Team Leader Subdivision

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Rescind an approved road name in order to remove a duplicate name for one new public road created by way of subdivisions at 29-40 Hayfield Way and 40 Oakland Road, Hingaia

File No.: CP2021/07125

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek approval from the Papakura Local Board to rescind resolution PKK/2018/79 for ‘Vespa Road’, as the public road that this name pertains to has inadvertently been named twice through road extensions by two separate developers. All other road names approved under this resolution will remain unchanged.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Extensive new subdivisions in the Hingaia area have resulted in one new stretch of public road being named twice through different road extensions over time, completed by different developers.

3. ‘Vespa Road’ was approved in 2018 under resolution PKK/2018/79 and ‘Pātakatuna Drive’ was approved in 2021 under resolution PPK/2021/51, both for the same stretch of new public road. This occurred because two sections of the road constructed at different times were connected to form one single stretch of road.

4. The consensus amongst the parties involved (Council and the developers) is that Pātakatuna Drive should be retained, as this name has been suggested by Ngāti Tamaoho. Further, Pātakatuna Drive was approved for the entire length of the public road under resolution PPK/2021/51, whereas ‘Vespa Road’ was only approved for the small first section of the road as part of an earlier development stage.

5. Vespa Road is currently not showing on the council’s GIS maps and no existing or new dwellings are using this road name for their address, as the surrounding land has not been fully developed yet. Therefore, no persons will be affected by the proposed rescind.

6. Rescinding resolution PKK/2018/79 for Vespa Road will resolve this name duplication issue, and council records will be updated to show Pātakatuna Drive as the single approved name for this stretch of public road. All other road names approved under resolution PKK/2018/79 will remain unchanged.

7. No new road name approvals are required from the Papakura Local Board as the resolution PPK/2021/51 to approve the name ‘Pātakatuna Drive’ will still stand.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) rescind resolution PKK/2018/79 for the road name ‘Vespa Road’, so that Pātakatuna Drive will be the only name for this road (Pātakatuna Drive is already approved under resolution PPK/2021/51).

Horopaki

Context

8. The names Vespa Road and Pātakatuna Drive have been approved for the same stretch of public road in Hingaia. It is therefore proposed to rescind resolution PKK/2018/79 for the name ‘Vespa Road’, so that Pātakatuna Drive will be the only name for this road. Pātakatuna Drive is already approved under resolution PPK/2021/51.

9. Attachment A shows the map of the road, and the extent of the approved names highlighted.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

10. The purpose of this report is to correct the issue of duplicate names being approved for a single stretch of public road.

11. No new road name approvals are required from the local board, as the name ‘Pātakatuna Drive’ approved under resolution PPK/2021/51 still stands.

12. Attached to this report is a plan that shows the duplication issue.

13. The consensus amongst the parties involved (Council and the developers) is that Pātakatuna Drive should be retained, as this name has been suggested by Ngāti Tamaoho. Further, Pātakatuna Drive was approved for the entire length of the public road under resolution PPK/2021/51, whereas ‘Vespa Road’ was only approved for the small first section of the road as part of an earlier development stage.

14. Rescinding resolution PKK/2018/79 for Vespa Road will resolve the name duplication issue, and council records will be updated to show Pātakatuna Drive as the single approved name for this stretch of public road. All other road names approved under resolution PKK/2018/79 will remain unchanged.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

15. The naming of roads has no effect on climate change. Relevant environmental issues have been considered under the provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the associated approved resource consent for the developments.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

16. The information contained in this report has no identified impacts on other parts of the council group. The views of Council controlled organisations were not required for the preparation of the report’s advice.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

17. The information contained in this report does not trigger any significant policy and is not considered to have any immediate local impact beyond those outlined in this report.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

18. Pātakatuna Drive was originally suggested by Ngāti Tamaoho, as per resolution PPK/2021/51, and this name will be retained.

19. Mana whenua consultation was undertaken as part of the original road name approvals. No new work or consultation is required as the names are contained within the same development and same geographical area, only the internal road layouts have changed.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

20. The road naming process does not raise any financial implications for the council.

21. The applicant has responsibility for ensuring that appropriate signage will be installed for the road names.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

22. There are no significant risks to the council as road naming is a routine part of the subdivision development process. The names have already been approved by the local board and this report seeks to correct a duplication error.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

23. Approved road names and locations are notified to LINZ which records them on its New Zealand wide land information database. LINZ provides all updated information to other users, including emergency services.

24. Council’s Subdivision Specialist Team will ensure that LINZ are informed of the road name updates.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Location Plans	29

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Andrea Muhme - Planner

Authorisers

David Snowdon - Team Leader Subdivision

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021 grant allocations

File No.: CP2021/07917

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To fund, part-fund or decline the applications received for the Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents applications received for the Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021 grant allocations (refer Attachment B).

3. The Papakura Local Board adopted the Papakura Local Grants Programme 2020/2021 on 22 April 2020 (PPK/2020/52) (refer Attachment A). The document sets application guidelines for contestable grants submitted to the local board.

4. The Papakura Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $217,972 for the 2020/2021 financial year.

5. At the 22 April 2020 business meeting, the Papakura Local Board resolved to allocate $2,268.05 to the Papakura Senior Citizens, from the 2020/2021 community grant budget.

6. At the August 2020 business meeting, the Papakura Local Board resolved to allocate $2,500 to Badminton New Zealand (PPK/2020/136), from the community grants budget line.

7. A total of $56,872.74 was allocated in Papakura Local and Multi-Board Grants Round One 2020/2021 and a total of $18,100.00 was allocated in Papakura Small Grants Round One 2020/2021. A total of $11,868.59 was further allocated in Papakura Small Grants Round Two 2020/2021.

8. The cancelled Carols in the Park event ($33,000) and the returned Pulman worm farm grant of $1,984.00, were both added to the grant budget. This leaves a balance of $161,346.80 to be allocated to two remaining grant rounds.

9. A total of $84,038.62 was allocated in Papakura Local Grants Round Two 2020/2021, leaving a total of $77,308.00 for the one remaining small grants round.

10. Twenty-seven applications were received for consideration in Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021, with a total amount requested of $50,957.96.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application received in the Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021 listed in Table One.

Table one:

Application ID

Organisation

Main focus

Requesting funding for

Amount requested

Eligibility

QR2114-301	Auckland Geocaching Association	Events	Towards printing at Pulman Park from 22 December 2021 to 25 December 2021	$1,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-302	Life Education Trust Counties Manukau	Community	Towards workbooks for Life Education's health and wellbeing lessons from 5 July 2021 to 5 November 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-303	Papakura & District Historical Society Incorporated	Arts and culture	Towards the purchase of children's furniture and transportation of a science exhibition at Papakura Museum from 29 November 2021 to 27 February 2022	$2,851.00	Eligible
QR2114-304	The Rising Foundation Trust	Community	Towards operating costs at Papakura High School from 13 July 2021 to 27 July 2021	$1,846.00	Eligible
QR2114-305	Papakura High School Board of Trustees	Sport and recreation	Towards fitness equipment at Papakura High School	$1,892.00	Eligible
QR2114-308	Great Potentials Foundation	Community	Towards the purchase of a fridge for Great Potentials Early Learning Centre from 1 July 2021 to 1 September 2021	$1,799.00	Eligible
QR2114-309	Papakura Support & Counselling Centre	Community	Towards branded clothing, business cards, brochures and signage at the Papakura Support and Counselling Centre from 1 July 2021 to 1 July 2023	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-310	Youthline Auckland Charitable Trust	Community	Towards programme resources and clinical supervision for Youthline from 1 July 2021 to 31 December 2021	$2,000.00
QR2114-312	Sustainable Papakura	Community	Towards vouchers for volunteers for Sustainable Papakura from 1 July 2021 to 31 July 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-313	Papakura High School Board of Trustees	Arts and culture	Towards school camp costs and transportation from 5 July 2021 to 4 July 2022	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-314	New Zealand Blue Light Ventures Incorporated	Community	Towards entry to Rainbow's End Fun Park from 11 September 2021 to 12 September 2021	$1,967.16	Eligible
QR2114-315	Auckland southern District Chinese Association Incorporated	Arts and culture	Towards performers, photography, transportation and hosting at Saint Mary’s Catholic Church and the Christmas Parade from 1 August 2021 to 31 December 2021	$1,930.00	Eligible
QR2114-317	Counties Manukau Gymnastics Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards venue hire of Bruce Pulman Park for a junior rhythmic competition on the 15 August	$1,298.00	Eligible
QR2114-319	Counties Manukau Masters Swimming Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards swimming lane hire at Massey Park Swimming Pool from 3 July 2021 to 28 August 2021	$1,456.00	Eligible
QR2114-320	South Auckland Choral Society Incorporated	Arts and culture	Towards musical director fees at Crossroads Methodist Church from 6 July 2021 to 3 October 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-321	Jenny Hipkins under the umbrella of Papatoetoe Rugby Football Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards training clothing and tracksuits at Papatoetoe Rugby Football Club	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-322	Papakura Business Association Incorporated	Events	Towards band hire and cleaning at Central Park on Opaheke Road on 5 December 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-323	Papakura Business Association Incorporated	Community	Towards the purchase of Christmas lights for the centre court Christmas tree from 22 November 2021 to 10 January 2022	$3,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-324	Totara Hospice	Community	Towards clinical care packages at Totara Hospice from 2 July 2021 to 16 July 2021	$1,708.40	Eligible
QR2114-327	Kiwanis Club of Drury Charitable Trust	Community	Towards vouchers at Red Hill Primary School, Park Estate Primary School and Drury Primary School from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022	$600.00	Eligible
QR2114-328	Papakura Bears Basketball Club under the umbrella of The Youth Spaces Charitable Trust	Sport and recreation	Towards venue hire of Papakura Recreation and Fitness from 1 July 2021 to 21 December 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-329	Drury Playcentre	Community	Towards the purchase of an easel and a cupboard at Drury Playcentre from 1 July 2021 to 31 July 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-330	Counties Manukau Sports Foundation	Sport and recreation	Towards venue hire, ambulance support, bouncy castle hire and equipment for the Whanau Triathlon Day on 20 September 2021	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-333	Papakura Tennis & Squash Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards lighting repair at Papakura Tennis and Squash Club	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2114-334	Drury United Football Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards team shirts at Drury Sports Complex from 12 July 2021 to 31 December 2024	$1,958.50	Eligible
QR2114-335	Drury United Football Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards sports shirts and shorts at Drury Sports Complex from 19 July 2021 to 31 December 2024	$1,912.50	Eligible
QR2114-336	Drury United Football Club Incorporated	Sport and recreation	Towards light replacement at Drury Sports Complex from 5 July 2021 to 31 December 2021	$1,739.40	Eligible
Total				$50,957.96

Horopaki

Context

11. The local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of being a world class city.

12. Auckland Council’s Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme:

The local board grants programme sets out:

· local board priorities

· lower priorities for funding

· exclusions

· grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close

· any additional accountability requirements.

13. The Papakura Local Board adopted the grants programme for 2020/2021 on 22 April 2020 (PPK/2020/52) and will operate three small grants and two local grants rounds for this financial year.

14. The community grants programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, and community networks.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

15. The aim of the local board grants programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the report recommendations.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

16. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to address climate change by providing grants to individuals and groups with projects that support community climate change action. Community climate action involves reducing or responding to climate change by residents in a locally relevant way. Local board grants can contribute to expanding climate action by supporting projects that reduce carbon emissions and increase community resilience to climate impacts. Examples of projects include:

· local food production and food waste reduction

· decreasing use of single-occupancy transport options

· home energy efficiency and community renewable energy generation

· local tree planting and streamside revegetation

· education about sustainable lifestyle choices that reduce carbon footprints.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

17. Based on the main focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department will provide input and advice. The main focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment or heritage.

18. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

19. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Papakura Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications in accordance with its priorities identified in the local board grant programme.

20. Staff will provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they can increase their chances of success in the future.

21. A summary of each application received through Papakura Small Grants Round Three, 2020/2021 (refer Attachment B).

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

22. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Maori wellbeing by providing grants to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Maori. Auckland Council’s Maori Responsiveness Unit has provided input and support towards the development of the community grants processes.

23. Five applicants indicated that they aim to respond to Maori outcomes

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

24. This report presents applications received for the Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021 (refer Attachment B).

25. The Papakura Local Board adopted the Papakura Local Grants Programme 2020/2021 on 22 April 2020 (PPK/2020/52) (refer Attachment A). The document sets application guidelines for contestable grants submitted to the local board.

26. The Papakura Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $217,972 for the 2020/2021 financial year.

27. At the 22 April 2020 business meeting, the Papakura Local Board resolved to allocate $2,268.05 to the Papakura Senior Citizens, from the 2020/2021 community grant budget.

28. At the August 2020 business meeting, the Papakura Local Board resolved to allocate $2,500 to Badminton New Zealand (PPK/2020/136), from the community grants budget line.

29. A total of $56,872.74 was allocated in Papakura Local and Multi-Board Grants Round One 2020/2021 and a total of $18,100.00 was allocated in Papakura Small Grants Round One 2020/2021. A total of $11,868.59 was further allocated in Papakura Small Grants Round Two 2020/2021.

30. The cancelled Carols in the Park event ($33,000) and the Pulman worm farm grant of $1,984, were reallocated to the grants budget. This leaves a balance of $161,346.80 to be allocated to two remaining grant rounds.

31. A total of $84,038.62 was allocated in Papakura Local Grants Round Two 2020/2021, leaving a total of $77,308.18 for the one remaining small grants round.

32. Twenty-seven applications were received for consideration in Papakura Small Grants Round Three 2020/2021, with a total amount requested of $50,957.96.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

33. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

34. Following the Papakura Local Board allocating funding for the small grants round three, council staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Papakura Grants Programme 2020/2021	41
b ⇨	Papakura Local Board Small Grants Round Three 2020-2021 grant applications (Under Separate Cover)

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

James Boyd - Grants Advisor

Authorisers

Marion Davies - Grants and Incentives Manager

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval of the 2021/2022 Papakura Local Board Customer and Community Services work programme

File No.: CP2021/07827

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the 2021/2022 Papakura Local Board Customer and Community Services work programme and approve in principle the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programmes (Attachment A).

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents the 2021/2022 Papakura Local Board Customer and Community Services work programme with associated budget for approval, as well as the subsequent two financial years, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programmes for approval in principle.

3. The local board approves the work programme each financial year. Delivery of the approved work programme will support the local board to achieve the outcomes and aspirations in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020.

4. The work programme details the activities to be delivered by departments within the Customer and Community Services directorate.

5. The work programme has been developed through a series of workshops between December 2020 and May 2021, where the local board provided feedback to staff on project and activity prioritisation.

6. The work programme development process takes an integrated approach to scoping activity, involving collaboration between staff from across council and the local board.

7. Several projects in the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programme have been identified as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme. Approval is sought for the planning and design of these projects to commence during 2021/2022, so that they are ready to be delivered early if approved projects for delivery in 2021/2022 are delayed for any unforeseen reason.

8. The work programme includes projects proposed to be funded from regional budgets subject to approval by the relevant Governing Body committee. The local board can provide formal feedback on these regional projects through resolution to this report.

9. The most significant risk to successful delivery of the 2021/2022 work programme is a change in COVID-19 alert levels that would impact delivery timeframes and budget.

10. Updates on the progress of the work programme delivery will be provided through the local board’s quarterly performance reports.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve the 2021/2022 Customer and Community Services work programme and associated budget and approve, in principle, the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programmes (Attachment A to the agenda report).

b) approve the Risk Adjusted Programme projects identified in the 2021/2022 Customer and Community Services work programme (Attachment A to the agenda report).

c) note that funding for the Coastal Renewals, Landslide Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development and the Natural Environment Targeted Rate budgets are subject to approval by the relevant Governing Body committee.

d) provide feedback for consideration by the relevant Governing Body committee on projects funded from the Coastal Renewals, Landslide Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development and the Natural Environment Targeted Rate budgets (Attachment D to the agenda report).

Horopaki

Context

11. Customer and Community Services provide a wide range of services, facilities, open spaces and information that support communities to connect, enjoy and embrace the diversity of our people, places and natural environment. These are tailored to the unique needs of the local community in a place-based approach.

12. The 2021/2022 Customer and Community Services work programme (included as Attachment A) outlines the local board’s priorities to be delivered within the financial year.

13. The work programme aligns to council plans, policies and strategies. Each activity in the work programme delivers to a specific objective relating to one or more of the following 2020 Local Board Plan outcomes:

· Outcome 1 – a vibrant and prosperous local economy

· Outcome 2 – a community enriched by its diversity, where people feel connected and lead active, healthy lives

· Outcome 4 – a treasured environment and heritage

· Outcome 5 – a partnership with Māori that creates a Papakura where Māori identity, culture and aspirations are embraced

14. Development of the work programme is based on the understanding of:

· local community needs

· service and asset availability

· funding availability

· the work performed by other parties, including iwi partners, Council Controlled Organisations, community groups and commercial enterprises

· risks

· feedback received from the local board at workshops.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

15. Delivery of the work programme is the realisation of the local board’s aspirations for their community, as identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020.

16. The local board has discretion to allocate a portion of their budget to a project or activity that they identify as a priority across the three-year work programme period.

17. Out of the initiatives signalled in the local board plan, the local board has prioritised the activities to be delivered in the next three years within available budgets.

18. The work programme provides a three-year view that demonstrates the phasing of programme and project delivery for the following financial years:

· 2021/2022 (to be approved)

· 2022/2023 (to be approved in principle)

· 2023/2024 (to be approved in principle).

19. The local board can approve the work programme for the first financial year and subsequently, delivery of this activity will commence from 1 July 2021. The local board can approve the following two years in principle only.

20. This allows the work programme to be presented in a future focused way that shows how the local board plan will be responded to for the entirety of its three-year strategy, without locking down future investment before that activity is properly scoped.

21. The local board will approve the 2022/2023 work programme in June 2022 and approve the 2023/2024 work programme in June 2023. This will include opportunity to make changes to these work programmes prior to approval, including adding or removing activities and budget allocations, unless funding has already been committed.

22. However, approval of unique multi-year projects, particularly capital works, in the 2021/2022 work programme will commit the local board to the future funding associated with completing the project in 2022/2023 or 2023/2024.

23. The work programme includes a continuation of delivery from previous financial years, including annually occurring events or projects, ongoing programmes, new activities and investments, and potential carry-forward items.

24. Regular updates on the delivery of the programme will be provided to the local board through quarterly performance reports. These updates will identify progress of all projects, highlight risks, and advise if amendments to the budget or delivery timeframes are required.

COVID-19 recovery is a priority for Customer and Community Services

25. A priority of the work programme is to deliver activities that respond to the impacts of COVID-19 on the following:

· newly vulnerable communities

· council financial constraints

· building community resilience for recovery.

26. Customer and Community Services is positioned well to deliver services that are key to the economic and social recovery of communities most in need, including by providing:

· safe and welcoming spaces

· inclusive events to bring the community back together

· community supports, including grants

· stronger connections with other organisations, including Council Controlled Organisations, iwi partners, business associations, community organisations and central government agencies who also serve our communities.

Delivering outcomes for, and with, Māori

27. Council has important statutory obligations with respect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi – The Treaty of Waitangi. The strategic framework that informs council’s delivery and performance measurement of Māori outcomes is Kia Ora Tāmaki Makaurau Māori Outcomes Measurement Framework.

28. Within this strategic framework, Customer and Community Services is responsible for leading activities that deliver against the following outcomes and objectives in Table 1.

Table 1: Kia ora Tāmaki Makaurau outcomes and objectives

Mana outcome	Outcome statement	Mahi objective
Kia ora te Marae	Marae are centres of excellence for whānau Māori and have an abundant presence in communities.	Invest in marae to be self-sustaining and thriving hubs for Māori and the wider community.
Kia ora te Whānau	Empowered whānau Māori across Tāmaki Makaurau.	The council group will enable whānau Māori to experience relevant and welcoming public facilities and services. It will support Māori-led services where appropriate.
Kia ora te Reo	Ko te reo Māori te mauri o te mana Māori	The council group supports te reo Māori be seen, heard, spoken and learned throughout Tāmaki Makaurau.

29. The work programme includes activities that have an objective to deliver moderate to high outcomes for and with Māori in one or more of the following strategic priority areas:

· Kaitiakitanga

· Māori business, tourism and employment

· Māori identity and culture

· marae development

· papakāinga and Māori housing

· realising rangatahi potential

· te reo Māori

· whānau and tamariki wellbeing.

30. Activities in the work programme that aim to achieve high Māori outcomes in one or more of the strategic priority areas are identified in Attachment B.

31. The Papakura Local Board work programme includes 34 activities that are identified as delivering moderate to high outcomes for Māori.

32. Progress updates on delivery of Māori outcomes will be provided to the local board through quarterly performance reports.

Types of budget

33. Work programme activities are funded from budget sources dependent on the type of delivery. Some activities within the work programme have budget allocated from two or more sources, including budgets from both local and regional programmes.

34. Table 2 outlines the different budget types and their purpose that fund the work programme.

Table 2: work programme budget types and purpose

Budget type	Description of budget purpose
Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI)	A development fund used to advance local operational and capital activities at the discretion of the local board
Asset Based Services (ABS)	Allocated by the Governing Body to deliver local activities based on decisions regarding region-wide service levels, including allocation of funds for local asset-based services
Local renewals	A fund dedicated to the renewal (servicing or replacement) of assets including those in local parks and community facilities
Growth (local parks and sports field development)	Primarily funded through development contributions, a regional fund to improve open spaces, including developing newly acquired land into parks, and existing open space to increase capacity to cater for growing population needs
Coastal	A regional fund for the renewal of Auckland’s significant coastal assets, such as seawalls, wharves and pontoons.
Landslide prevention	A regional fund to proactively develop new assets for the prevention of landslides and major slips throughout the region
Specific purpose funding	Funds received by the council from external sources held for specific local board areas and service agreements including compensation funding from other agencies for land acquisitions required for major projects
One Local Initiative (OLI)	Funds allocated by the Governing Body to a local board priority project in alignment with the Long-term Plan 2018-2028
Long-term Plan discrete	Funds associated with activities specifically named and listed in previous long-term plans, including new libraries, community centres and major sports and community infrastructure
Kauri Dieback Funding	As part of the Natural Environment Targeted Rate (NETR) Fund, this is a regional fund from the Environment and Climate Change Committee used to implement the national kauri dieback programme standards
External funding	Budget from external parties, not yet received and held by Customer and Community Services

Capital projects and budgets

35. The capital works programmes have been geo-spatially mapped to indicate the location of projects within a local board area.

36. Attachment C demonstrates the year of the three-year work programme that capital budget is proposed to be allocated to specific projects and indicates the main funding source for each project.

37. Activity budgets for capital programme delivery are estimates only, as costs are subject to change and to be refined as the activity / project progresses through the design and delivery process. Greater clarity will be determined once activity details are defined with the work programme updated accordingly.

38. Some projects are unable to be mapped as they reference multiple locations, or the work locations are yet to be determined.

Risk Adjusted Programme

39. The Risk Adjusted Programme was implemented in 2019 and is designed to mitigate risk so that the total budget is delivered.

40. Several capex projects in the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programme have been identified as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme as highlighted in Attachment A.

41. Approval is sought for the commencement of these projects in the 2021/2022 financial year, so that they can replace delays in projects that may not be delivered for unforeseen reasons.

Regionally funded activities included in the local board work programme

42. There are activities, from the Coastal Renewals, Landslide Prevention and Local Parks and Sports Field Development and the Natural Environment Targeted Rate budgets, which are funded regionally and will be approved by the Governing Body after 30 June 2021.

43. These activities are included in the work programme because the local board has decision-making responsibility for that activity within the parameters set by the Governing Body, which include project location, scope and budget.

44. These activities may be conducted by a number of teams, including within the Customer and Community Services and Infrastructure and Environmental Services directorates.

45. The local board can provide feedback on the activities outlined in Attachment D. This feedback will be presented to the relevant Governing Body committee when they consider regionally funded activities.

Process for changes to the approved work programme

46. Staff will provide progress updates to and seek approval from the local board if there are any projects that require scope, budget or timing changes throughout the financial year, or if activities need to be cancelled or added to the work programme.

47. The work programme includes community leases. Straight-forward lease renewals without variations will be processed in accordance with agreed delegations through a written memo. Expired and more complex community leases will be workshopped with the local board and reported to a business meeting.

48. For a change to the work programme considered to be minor, in that it does not substantially alter the approved work programme, staff will workshop this with the local board and then implement the change. A description of the change will be included in the following round of quarterly reporting.

49. A change to the work programme that is considered substantial, will be presented to the local board at a business meeting for approval.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

50. In June 2019, council declared a climate emergency and in response to this, council adopted the Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan in July 2020.

51. Each activity in the work programme is assessed to identify whether it will have a positive, negative, or neutral impact on greenhouse gas emissions and impact on resilience to climate change.

52. To deliver on climate goals, Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri includes eight priorities for action:

· natural environment

· built environment

· transport

· economy

· communities and coast

· food

· Te Puāwaitanga ō te Tātai

· energy and industry.

53. The work programme indicates which of these priorities each activity responds to.

54. Attachment E outlines the activities in the work programme identified to have a positive and negative climate change impact.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

55. The work programme is presented at a directorate level which reflects the integrated approach to developing the activities between the directorate’s departments of:

· Connected Communities

· Community Facilities

· Community and Social Innovation

· Parks, Sports and Recreation

· Regional Service Planning, Investment and Partnerships.

56. The Customer and Community Services work programme was developed through a collaborative approach by representatives from across council departments, directorates and Council Controlled Organisations. The integrated team developed the proposed work programme with the local board through a series of workshops.

57. Some of the activities in the work programme are delivered collaboratively between directorates, for example the Kauri Dieback programme.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

58. Delivery of the work programme is the local board’s implementation of outcomes and objectives in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020.

59. The feedback received from the local board through a series of workshops from December 2020 to May 2021 has informed the proposed Customer and Community Services work programme in Attachment A.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

60. Consideration is given to how the provision of services, facilities and open spaces can support the aspirations of Māori, promote community relationships, connect to the natural environment, and foster holistic wellbeing of whānau, hapu and iwi Māori.

61. In the local board area, 26.8 per cent of the total population identify as Māori.

62. The work programme includes activities that will have an impact on a service, facility, or location of significance to Māori. In these situations, appropriate and meaningful engagement and consultation will be undertaken, including to meet our obligations under Te Tiriti o Waitangi – Treaty of Waitangi.

63. Activities identified as delivering a moderate and high level of Māori outcomes are presented as Attachment B.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

64. The financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a reduced renewals budget per local board and significantly reduced development budgets for growth.

65. Each activity line has a budget allocation for delivery in one or more of the financial years (e.g., 2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024). Where activity lines show a zero-dollar budget, this reflects implementation costs met through staff salary or other funding sources.

66. The 2021/2022 activities recommended for local board approval can be accommodated within their draft 2021/2022 budgets.

67. The budgets allocated to activities in the financial years 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 are indicative only and are subject to change due to any increased costs, inflation or reduction to the overall available annual council budget that may occur.

68. Table 3 summarises the budget sources for each work programme financial year.

Table 3: Papakura Local Board budget allocation

Local budgets	2021/2022 (approve)	2022/2023 (approve in principle)	2023/2024 (approve in principle)
Opex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI)	$1,348,087	$1,544,625	$1,379,125
Opex: Asset Based Services (ABS)	$9,027,997	$9,027,997	$9,027,997
Capex: Local Asset Renewals - Budget (ABS)	$2,338,117	$2,110,394	$4,859,009
Capex: Local Asset Renewals - Proposed Allocation (ABS)	$2,338,117	$2,110,394	$4,859,009
Capex: Local Asset Renewals - Unallocated budget (ABS)	$0	$0	$0
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) – Budget	$130,000	$130,000	$130,000
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) - Proposed Allocation	$130,000	$130,000	$130,000
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) - Unallocated budget	$0	$0	$0
Capex: Growth projects Allocation	$2,781,899	$1,355,000	$500,000
Capex: Coastal projects Allocation	$252,500	$0	$0
Capex: Landslide Prevention projects Allocation	$0	$62,503	$96,639
Capex: Specific Purpose Funding - Allocation	$0	$0	$0
Capex: External Funding Allocation	$0	$0	$0
Capex: One Local Initiative	$0	$0	$0
Capex: Long-term Plan discrete	$369,077	$0	$0
Capex: Natural Environment Targeted Rate	$0	$0	$0

69. The proposed budgets are based on the anticipated budget allocations from the Long-term Plan 2021-2031.

70. Any 2020/2021 capex budget unspent on 30 June 2021 will be assessed for carry-forward to the 2021/2022 work programme. Carry forwards will be added to the work programme as separate activity lines.

71. Where an activity is cancelled or no longer required, the local board can reallocate the budget to an existing work programme activity or create a new activity within that financial year.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

72. If approval of the Customer and Community Services work programme is not obtained, there is significant risk that the activities within it will be delayed or not delivered.

73. Table 4 outlines the key risks and mitigations associated with the work programme.

Table 4: risks and mitigations

Risk	Mitigation
Non-delivery, time delays and budget overspend of activities that are managed through the work programme.	Having agreed processes to amend the work programme if activities need to be changed or cancelled. Utilising the Risk Adjusted Programme to progress those activities identified as ready to proceed under the Risk Adjusted Programme at the beginning of the financial year.
Unknown risks associated with trialling a new activity for the first year.	Risks and mitigations for new activity lines are considered during the scoping phase, continually assessed and reported to the local board.
The COVID-19 pandemic could have a negative impact on the progress of the work programme as some activities cannot be delivered if there is an increase in an alert level.	Development of the work programme has included consideration for all activities regarding potential impacts on delivery in the event of alert level changes. Some activities may be delayed but still deliverable within the agreed timeframes. Where activities need to be cancelled the local board can reallocate budget to other activities.

74. The majority of activities in the work programme are ongoing and annually occurring. Risks associated with these activities have been identified in previous years and are managed on an ongoing basis.

75. Other risks may also exist, including with respect to the health, safety and wellbeing of council staff. Work programmes may also need to be adjusted where these risks exist and cannot be safely mitigated via control measures.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

76. Delivery of the work programme will start following approval by the local board and continue until 30 June 2022, with progress reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

77. Regional projects will commence after approval by the Governing Body in July 2021. The local board will receive the first quarter report in November 2021.

78. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for activities, these will be brought to the local board when appropriate.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Customer and Community Services Work Programme 2021/2022	55
b ⇩	Māori Outcomes	87
c ⇩	Papakura Map	91
d ⇩	Papakura - Regional Projects	93
e ⇩	Climate Impacts	95

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Justine Haves - General Manager Service Strategy and Integration

Mace Ward - General Manager Parks, Sports and Recreation

Mirla Edmundson - General Manager Libraries & Information

Gael Surgenor - GM - Southern Initiative

Taryn Crewe - General Manager Community Facilities

Authorisers

Claudia Wyss - Director Customer and Community Services

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval of the 2021/2022 Papakura Local Board Infrastructure and Environmental Services Work Programme

File No.: CP2021/07318

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the 2021/2022 Papakura Local Board’s Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme, and approve in principle the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programmes.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents the Papakura Local Board’s Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme and associated budgets for approval for the 2021/2022 financial year, and for approval in principle for the subsequent two financial years, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 (see Attachment A).

3. The work programme responds to the outcomes and objectives identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020.

4. The work programme has been developed through a series of workshops between December 2020 and May 2021, where the local board provided feedback to staff on programme and activity prioritisation.

5. The local board indicated its support for the following activities to be delivered in 2021/2022, with budgets as listed below:

· Te Koiwi Pond enhancement - $32,700

· Papakura waste minimisation - $10,000

· Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme - $20,500

· Wai Care Papakura - $20,000

· Manukau Harbour Forum - $7,400.

6. The proposed work programme has a total value of $90,600, which can be funded from within the board’s draft locally driven initiatives (LDI) budget for the 2021/2022 financial year. Approval in principle is also being sought for activities in the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 financial years.

7. The indicative programmes and budgets for 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 are subject to change, and will be confirmed on an annual basis through the approval of the respective work programmes.

8. Updates on the delivery of this work programme will be provided through the board’s quarterly performance reports.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve its 2021/2022 Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme and associated budgets, as summarised in the table below (Attachment A to the agenda report):

Activity name	2021/2022 budget for approval
Te Koiwi Pond enhancement	$32,700
Papakura waste minimisation	$10,000
Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme	$20,500
Wai Care Papakura	$20,000
Manukau Harbour Forum Papakura	$7,400
Total	$90,600

b) approve in principle the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programmes (Attachment A to the agenda report)

c) note that the indicative programmes and budgets for 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 are subject to change, and will be confirmed on an annual basis through the approval of the respective work programmes.

Horopaki

Context

9. Each year, the local board decides which activities to allocate its annual budget toward through a series of workshops. The local board feedback in these workshops has informed the development of the Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme (Attachment A).

10. The proposed work programme responds to the outcomes and objectives identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020. The specific objectives reflected in the work programme are:

· more people enjoy the environment in and around our local parks

· more people enjoy the environment in and around our harbour and streams

· the quality of our air and water is improved

· Papakura has successful programmes to help people reduce, reuse, and recycle.

11. The following adopted strategies and plans also guided the development of the work programme:

· National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

· Waste Management and Minimisation Plan.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

12. The proposed work programme is made up of activities continuing from previous financial years, including annually occurring events or ongoing programmes. It also includes new initiatives supported by the local board. These programmes contribute towards the delivery of the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020 environmental objectives, as detailed above.

13. The work programme (Attachment A) provides a three-year view that demonstrates the phasing or continuation of programme delivery over the 2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 financial years.

14. This report seeks local board approval for budgets and activities in year one of the three-year work programme (2021/2022), and approval in principle for 2022/2023 and 2023/2024.

15. Approving in principle does not commit the local board to funding in future years, as the budget for years two and three will still need to be approved on an annual basis. However approval in principle will help staff, contractors and community groups to plan activities and resourcing in the longer-term.

16. Budgets for years two and three are subject to change, as the programmes are further refined or if local board priorities shift.

17. The proposed activities for delivery as part of the board’s 2021/2022 Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme are detailed below, alongside indicative plans and budgets for the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 financial years.

Te Koiwi Pond enhancement - $32,700

18. The board has indicated that it would like to support a new programme in the 2021/2022 financial year to fund an enhancement programme at Te Koiwi Pond. Staff recommend that the board allocate $32,700 to this programme in the 2021/2022 financial year.

19. Year one of this programme will involve a spotlight night survey of eels in the pond. This could be undertaken by Papakura Marae representatives. Year one will also involve koi carp removal, weeding around the ponds, pruning of exotic trees, and planting of native species to provide more shade for eels.

20. Years two and three of this programme will involve further weeding and planting, the removal of the downstream fish barrier, and educational signage. Further actions will be dependent on consultation with the marae and the outcomes from year one.

21. Approval in principle is also sought for $14,200 towards this programme in 2022/2023 and $11,200 in 2023/2024.

Papakura waste minimisation - $10,000

22. The board has indicated that it would like to continue supporting a community-based waste awareness and minimisation programme in the 2021/2022 financial year. This will be the fourth year of board support for this programme to which the board allocated $10,000 towards in the 2020/2021 financial year.

23. This programme supports Papakura residents to reduce their waste and live sustainably. Funding for the 2021/2022 financial year will support the delivery of workshops held within the Papakura community to empower residents to reduce their waste. Workshops provide practical skills for making a range of re-usable environmentally friendly products. Workshops will also provide education and information about living a waste-free lifestyle.

24. Approval in principle is also sought for $10,000 towards this programme in 2022/2023 and 2023/2024.

Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme - $20,500

25. The board has indicated that it would like to continue to support landowner engagement along the Papakura Stream in the 2021/2022 financial year. This will be the second year of this programme, which the board allocated $5,000 towards in the 2020/2021 financial year. Staff recommend that the board allocate $20,500 towards the continuation of this programme in 2021/2022.

26. The Papakura Stream catchment is shared between the Manurewa, Papakura, and Franklin Local Boards, and spans the Hunua Ranges to the Manukau Harbour. This programme seeks to restore five kilometres of the Papakura Stream over a three-year period. The Manurewa, Papakura, and Franklin Local Boards have each indicated that they would like to contribute equal funding for the programme.

27. An additional $5,900 extra is being sought from the Papakura Local Board to support weed control and planting maintenance in Papakura Stream Esplanade Reserve. This maintenance is required for plantings undertaken between 2018 and 2020 to ensure the plants become well established on the site.

28. In the 2020/2021 financial year, joint local board funding was used to conduct a landowner engagement survey. In 2021/2022 funding will be used for purchasing plants, community planting day events (two on public and four on private land), four community clean-up events, and landowner and business engagement. Additional funding for this programme will be sought by Conservation Volunteers New Zealand which will contribute to stock exclusion in the rural portion of the Papakura Stream catchment. Trees for Survival will provide trees for landowners who expressed interest in stream restoration in surveys carried out.

29. Approval in principle is also sought from each of these local boards for $13,000 towards this programme in 2022/2023 and $14,000 in 2023/2024. In 2022/2023 and 2023/2024, planting, clean-ups, and engagement will continue.

Wai Care Papakura - $20,000

30. The board has indicated that it would like to continue supporting a Wai Care schools programme in the 2021/2022 financial year. The board has supported this programme since 2017 and allocated $20,000 towards this initiative in the 2020/2021 financial year. Staff recommend that the board allocate $20,000 towards the continuation of this programme in 2021/2022.

31. Funding for the 2021/2022 financial year will enable education and empowerment of school students to undertake stream and marine health investigations and actions in their schools and local communities. This will include experiential education sessions to connect students with the local environment, and professional development for teachers to support student learning.

32. Facilitation of student-led inquiry and citizen science methods will also be provided to understand local issues. Funding will support the engagement of at least four Papakura schools to participate in this programme.

33. Approval in principle is also sought for $32,000 towards this programme in 2022/2023 and 2023/2024. Years two and three will focus on maintaining and expanding education, monitoring and plantings for schools and waterways in Papakura.

Manukau Harbour Forum – $7,400

34. The board has indicated that it would like to continue to fund the Manukau Harbour Forum in the 2021/2022 financial year. The board is one of nine local boards who make up the Manukau Harbour Forum (Franklin, Māngere-Ōtāhuhu, Manurewa, Maungakiekie-Tāmaki, Ōtara-Papatoetoe, Papakura, Puketāpapa, Waitākere Ranges, and Whau Local Boards). These local boards border the Manukau Harbour and have an interest in protecting and restoring the mauri of the harbour.

35. In 2020/2021, each of the member local boards provided $1,750 to co-fund the Manukau Harbour Forum and $43,650 was carried forward from the 2019/2020 financial year. This was allocated to several activities including a Manukau Harbour Forum coordinator, a youth sustainability wānanga, and a youth freshwater monitoring training programme.

36. Staff recommend that each of the nine member boards contribute a further $7,400 each towards the forum in the 2021/2022 financial year, allowing a total budget of $66,600. Staff recommend that this funding supports:

· a Manukau Harbour Forum coordinator to assist with the delivery of the forum’s goals ($45,000)

· funding for a youth sustainability wānanga which would involve around 50 students from all member local board areas to develop leadership skills, sustainability knowledge, and collaborative action projects ($15,000)

· funding to develop a communications plan for the Manukau Harbour Forum ($6,600).

37. Approval in principle is also sought for $8,000 towards this programme from each member local board in both 2022/2023 and 2023/2024.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

38. In June 2019 Auckland Council declared a climate emergency and in response to this the council adopted the Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan in July 2020.

39. Each activity in the work programme is assessed to identify whether it will have an impact on greenhouse gas emissions and contributing towards climate change adaptation.

40. Table 1 outlines the key activities in the 2021/2022 work programme that have an impact on greenhouse gas emissions or contribute towards climate change adaptation.

Table 1: Climate impact assessment of proposed activities

Activity name	Climate impact
Te Koiwi Pond enhancement	38. These programmes provide resilience to the community by ensuring that waterways are protected from stock and enhanced through native planting. Planting the right plants is important in ensuring that flooding and erosion impacts are minimised with the increased rainfall events as a result of climate change. Carbon sequestration will also be enhanced through more planting.
Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme
Manukau Harbour Forum
Papakura waste minimisation	This programme aims to reduce waste by turning waste into resources, significantly reducing damaging methane gases which are produced when sent to landfill.
Wai Care Papakura	Regeneration of waterways will connect communities to the local environment, restoring natural resources. The education component will directly link student action to carbon measures, linking adaptation behaviours and increasing community resilience for the future.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

41. The work programme was developed through a collaborative approach by operational council departments, with each department represented in the integrated team that presented the draft work programme to the local board at a series of workshops.

42. In particular, the attached Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme reflects the integrated activities developed by Environmental Services, Healthy Waters and Waste Solutions.

43. Natural Environment Strategy staff will be coordinated with on work related to the Manukau Harbour Forum and Parks, Sport, and Recreation and Community Facilities will be engaged with around Te Koiwi Pond enhancement.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

44. The programmes proposed for inclusion in the board’s Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme will have positive environmental outcomes across the Papakura Local Board area. Particular focus areas for the 2021/2022 work programme include Te Koiwi Park and along the Papakura Stream.

45. The programmes noted above align with the local board plan outcome ‘a treasured environment and heritage’. The proposed work programme has been considered by the local board in a series of workshops from December 2020 to May 2021. The views expressed by local board members during the workshops have informed the recommended work programme.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

46. Auckland Council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its broader obligations to Māori.

47. The work programme includes activities that aim to deliver outcomes for and with Māori, in alignment with the strategic priority areas outlined in Kia ora Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland Council’s Māori Outcome Framework). Progress on how the activities are achieving these outcomes will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

48. Staff recognise that environmental management, water quality and land management have integral links with the mauri of the environment and concepts of kaitiakitanga.

49. Table 2 outlines the activities in the 2021/2022 work programme that contribute towards the delivery of specific Māori outcomes.

Table 2: Māori outcome delivery through proposed activities

Activity name	Māori outcome	Māori outcome description
Te Koiwi Pond enhancement	Marae development and kaitiakitanga	This programme is designed to progress desired outcomes identified by Papakura Marae, specifically creating a habitat at Te Koiwi Pond that is suitable for eels. This programme will endeavour to progress this vision. Upon budget approval, staff will engage with mana whenua representatives to consult on the programme.
Papakura waste minimisation	Kaitiakitanga	The wider Māori community will be engaged indirectly through participation in workshops.
Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme	Kaitiakitanga	The contractor acknowledges iwi as kaitiaki of Auckland's natural world and the importance of their involvement in restoration and protection of our natural taonga. They strive to connect with iwi on this initiative and will actively seek opportunities to collaborate.
Wai Care Papakura	Te reo Māori, kaitiakitanga, and realising rangatahi potential	No direct engagement with mana whenua will occur for this programme, however through working through schools the programme will engage with the wider Māori community.
Manukau Harbour Forum	Kaitiakitanga and realising rangatahi potential	Māori youth will be involved in the youth sustainability wānanga and are supported to develop and implement programmes relevant to them and their communities. The wānanga also engages with kaumātua from Makaurau Marae to provide advice and mātauranga Māori that informs programme delivery. During the wānanga, te reo Māori is actively promoted, as a key component of programme delivery.

50. Where aspects of the proposed work programme are anticipated to have a significant impact on activity of importance to Māori then appropriate engagement will be undertaken.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

51. The proposed environment work programme for 2021/2022 totals to $90,600 of the board’s locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This amount can be accommodated within the board’s total draft budget for 2021/2022.

52. Budgets for activities in the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 financial years are indicative. While local board approval in principle is being sought for these future years through this report, formal approval will be sought on an annual basis, once budgets and programme costs are confirmed.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

53. If the proposed Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme is not approved before the start of the financial year, there is a risk that activities may be delayed or not delivered within the financial year.

54. Risks and mitigations for new activity lines were considered during the scoping phase. There may be risks associated with trialling a new activity for the first year. These will be continually assessed and reported to the local board.

55. The COVID-19 pandemic could have a further negative impact on the delivery local board work programmes if the COVID-19 Alert Level changes (New Zealand’s 4-level Alert System specifies measures to be taken against COVID-19 at each level). The deliverability of some activities will decrease if there is an increase to the COVID-19 Alert Level. Drought conditions may also lead to delays in any programmes which involve planting.

56. Resourcing of the work programme is based on current staff capacity within departments. Therefore, changes to staff capacity may also have an impact on work programme delivery.

57. Table 3 shows the key risks associated with activities in the proposed 2021/2022 work programme, as well as proposed mitigations.

Table 3: Key risks and mitigations for activities

Activity name	Risk	Mitigation	Rating after mitigation
Te Koiwi Pond enhancement	There is a risk of no contractor availability to carry out koi carp removal, weeding and planting.	Staff will engage with potential contractors early.	Low
	There is a health and safety risk of working around a stormwater pond.	Staff will ensure that an in-depth health and safety plan is followed when contractors or the community are working around the pond.	Low
	If eels are already present there is a risk in disturbing them during koi carp removal.	To mitigate this staff will ensure experienced contractors are procured.	Low
Papakura waste minimisation	There is a risk of low levels of community participation in workshops.	Staff will work through a well-established community organisation for whom workshops have been well attended in the past.	Low
Papakura Stream landowner engagement programme	There is a risk of the identified contractor being unavailable. To mitigate this staff will engage early.	Staff have already liaised with the contractor who is available and committed to doing the work on this programme.	Low
Wai Care Papakura	A lack of school engagement may mean the programme is not delivered.	Staff will work through existing connections with schools to mitigate this.	Low
Wai Care Papakura	There is a risk that staff will be unable to find a suitable contractor to deliver the schools engagement.	A contractor has been identified and is available.	Low
Manukau Harbour Forum	This programme is dependent on the sourcing of a suitable contractor to coordinate the forum and mana whenua contractor to co-deliver the wānanga.	The mana whenua contractor has worked on the programme for the past two years and has indicated they can continue to support the wānanga, subject to the forum’s agreement to continue to fund the programme. Several options have been identified for the Manukau Harbour Forum coordinator and therefore not finding a suitable contractor is considered a low risk.	Low

58. Where a work programme activity cannot be completed on time or to budget, due to unforeseen circumstances, this will be signalled to the local board at the earliest opportunity.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

59. Delivery of the activity in the approved work programme will commence once approved and continue until 30 June 2022. Activity progress will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

60. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for each activity, these will be brought to the local board when appropriate.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Infrastructure and Environmental Services work programme 2021/2022	109

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Prasanthi Cottingham - Relationship Coordinator

Authorisers

Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval of the Papakura Local Board Plans and Places work programme 2021/2022

File No.: CP2021/07949

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the Papakura Local Board Plans and Places work programme 2021/2022.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents the board’s Plans and Places work programme and associated budgets for approval for delivery within the 2021/2022 financial year.

3. The work programme responds to the following outcomes and objectives that the local board identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020:

· A treasured environment and heritage

4. The board provided feedback to staff on the projects it would like to fund in a series of workshops. The board indicated its support for the following projects, with budgets as listed below:

· Heritage Interpretation Project - $5,000

5. The proposed work programme has a total value of $5,000, which can be funded from within the board’s draft locally driven initiatives (LDI) budget for the 2021/2022 financial year.

6. Updates on the delivery of this work programme will be provided through the board’s quarterly performance reports.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve the Plans and Places work programme 2021/2022

Horopaki

Context

7. Each year, the local board decides which activities to allocate its annual budget toward, through a series of workshops. The local board feedback in these workshops have informed the work programme.

8. The work programme responds to the outcomes and objectives that the local board identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020. The specific outcome that are reflected in the work programme is:

· A treasured environment and heritage.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

9. The proposed activities for delivery as part of the board’s Plans and Places work programme 2021/2022 are detailed below. See Attachment A for further detail.

Heritage Interpretation Project - $5,000

10. Complete a comprehensive Heritage Interpretation Strategy for Papakura Local Board area.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

11. The proposed work programme does not significantly impact on greenhouse gas emissions or contribute towards adapting to the impacts of climate change.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

12. The work programme was developed through a collaborative approach by operational council departments, with each department represented in the integrated team that presented the draft work programme to the local board at a series of workshops.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

13. The proposed Plans and Places work programme has been considered by the local board in a series of workshops from November 2020 to May 2021. The views expressed by local board members during the workshops have informed the recommended work programme.

14. The activities in the proposed work programme align with the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020 outcomes.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

15. Table 2 outlines the activities in the 2021/2022 work programme that contribute towards the delivery of specific Māori outcomes.

Table 2: Māori impact assessment of proposed activities

Activity name	Māori impact
Heritage Interpretation Project	High

16. Where aspects of the proposed work programme are anticipated to have a significant impact on activity of importance to Māori then appropriate engagement will be undertaken.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

17. The proposed Plans and Places work programme budget for 2021/2022 is $5,000 of the boards locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This amount can be accommodated within the board’s total draft budget for 2021/2022.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

18. The success of this programme is dependent on the engagement and participation by the Mana Whenua and the community. The staff will leverage already established relationships to ensure uptake in the programme.

19. Where a work programme activity cannot be completed on time or to budget, due to unforeseen circumstances, this will be signalled to the local board at the earliest opportunity.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

20. Delivery of the activity in the approved work programme will commence on 1 July 2021 and continue until 30 June 2022. Activity progress will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

21. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for each activity, these will be brought to the local board when appropriate.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Plans and Places Work Programme 2021-2022 - Papakura Local Board	117

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Adam Haycock - Project coordinator

Anna Boyer - Senior Specialist: Community Heritage

Authorisers

John Duguid - General Manager - Plans and Places

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval of the Papakura Local Board External Partnerships - Business Associations work programme 2021/2022

File No.: CP2021/07994

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the Papakura Local Board External Partnerships - Business Associations work programme 2021/2022.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents the board’s External Partnerships – Business Associations work programme and associated budgets for approval for delivery within the 2021/2022 financial year (see Attachment A).

3. The work programme responds to the following outcomes and objectives that the local board identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020:

· Outcome 1: A vibrant and prosperous local economy

o Objective: Thriving business in the local board area as local people buy from local businesses.

4. The board provided feedback to staff on the projects it would like to fund in a series of workshops. The board indicated its support for the following projects, with budgets as listed below:

· Papakura Business Association (PBA) - $1,750

· Takanini business support - $20,000. The grant is divided into two parts:

o Takanini Business Association (TBA) - $5,000

o Papakura Commercial Project Group (CPG) - $15,000

5. The proposed work programme has a total value of $21,750, which can be funded from within the board’s draft locally driven initiatives (LDI) budget for the 2021/2022 financial year.

6. Updates on the delivery of this work programme will be provided through the board’s quarterly performance reports.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve the External Partnerships – Business Association work programme 2021/2022 (Attachment A to the agenda report)

Horopaki

Context

8. The work programme responds to the outcomes and objectives that the local board identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020. The specific outcome that are reflected in the work programme is:

· Outcome 1: A vibrant and prosperous local economy

o Objective: Thriving business in the local board area as local people buy from local businesses.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

9. The proposed activities for delivery as part of the board’s External Partnerships – Business Associations work programme 2021/2022 are detailed below. See Attachment A for further detail.

Papakura Business Association (PBA) – $1,750

10. To provide funding to the Papakura BID-operating business association to purchase retail spend information for the year ending 30 June 2022. The information provided in the reports will assist the business association to measure and plan ongoing business activities as part of their BID programme delivery.

Takanini business support – $20,000

11. The grant is divided into two parts:

12. Takanini Business Association (TBA) - $5,000. The grant is to assist the TBA to develop the associations capability and capacity, increase the membership base and provide administration support.

13. Papakura Commercial Project Group (CPG) - $15,000. The grant will sit with the BID Team and will be used to develop an 18-month plan for the development of the TBA. This plan will include:

· Project manage a series of engagement opportunities including an agreed number of business network meetings.

· Identify opportunities and interested parties to connect into the plan.

· To provide guidance to the TBA and CPG on tactic, strategy, and positioning for the business association.

· Two of the outcomes of this 18-month phase will be:

· Preliminary develop of a business survey

· Develop a 5-year strategic plan that sets out the future direction for the TBA and local business community, including delivering a new BID programme.

Presenting proposals to the local board

14. TBA capacity building - $5,000. Before the end of the first quarter (September 2021), TBA will present to the local board their detailed proposals on how they propose to utilize the $5,000 grant. After local board considerations and feedback has been received, funding agreements will be developed and forwarded to the business association for signing.

15. Takanini business support - $15,000. When ready, the BID Team and TBA will present to the CPG and local board an overview of the 18-month plan and timeline. Progress of the plan will be reported directly to the CPG and local board as required.

16. The External Partnerships work programme progress will be reported directly to the local board as part of the quarterly local board work programme report produced by Local Board Services.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. The proposed work programme does not significantly impact on greenhouse gas emissions or contribute towards adapting to the impacts of climate change.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

18. The work programme was developed through a collaborative approach by operational council departments, with each department represented in the integrated team that presented the draft work programme to the local board at a series of workshops.

19. The External Partnerships Team (BID Team) work collaboratively with the other council departments and CCOs who are working with business associations and or in the town centre space.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

20. The proposed External Partnerships – Business Associations work programme has been considered by the local board in a series of workshops from November 2020 to May 2021. The views expressed by local board members during the workshops have informed the recommended work programme.

21. The activities in the proposed work programme align with the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020 outcomes.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

22. Individual business associations may, through operating their BID programme, identify opportunities for niche support or development of any Māori business sector in their business area.

23. Where aspects of the proposed work programme are anticipated to have a significant impact on activity of importance to Māori, then appropriate engagement will be undertaken.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

24. The proposed External Partnerships – Business Association work programme budget for 2021/2022 is $21,750 of the boards locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This amount can be accommodated within the board’s total draft budget for 2021/2022.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

25. Table 3 shows the identified significant risks associated with activities in the proposed 2021/2022 work programme.

Table 3: Significant risks and mitigations for activities

Activity name	Risk	Mitigation	Rating after mitigation
Papakura Business Association – retail spend report	Not implemented	Quarterly reporting on progress	Low
Takanini business support – TBA	No increase in the association capacity, capabilities and membership numbers	Quarterly reporting on progress	Low
Takanini business support – 18-month plan	Little or no interest from businesses to engage in the future direction and possible establishment of a BID programme	Quarterly reporting on progress	Low

26. Where a work programme activity cannot be completed on time or to budget, due to unforeseen circumstances, this will be signalled to the local board at the earliest opportunity.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

27. Delivery of the activity in the approved work programme will commence on 1 July 2021 and continue until 30 June 2022. Activity progress will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

28. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for each activity, these will be brought to the local board when appropriate.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	External Partnerships Business Associations Work Programme 2021-2022 - Papakura Local Board	125

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Claire Siddens - Principal Advisor

Authorisers

Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governance & External Partnerships

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Approval of the Papakura Local Board Auckland Unlimited work programme 2021/2022

File No.: CP2021/07981

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To approve the Papakura Local Board Auckland Unlimited (AUL) work programme 2021/2022.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report presents the board’s AUL work programme and associated budgets for approval for delivery within the 2021/2022 financial year (see Attachment A).

3. The work programme responds to the following outcomes and objectives that the local board has identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020:

· A vibrant and prosperous local economy

· A well-planned metropolitan centre for Papakura.

4. The board provided feedback to staff on the projects it would like to fund in a series of workshops. The board indicated its support for the following projects, with budgets as listed below:

· Commercial Project Group Implementation ($90,000)

· Commercial Project Group Implementation Carried Forward from 2020/21($24,471).

5. The proposed work programme has a total value of $114,471, which can be funded from within the board’s draft locally driven initiatives (LDI) budget for the 2021/2022 financial year.

6. Updates on the delivery of this work programme will be provided through the board’s quarterly performance reports.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) approve the AUL work programme 2021/2022 (Attachment A to the agenda report).

Horopaki

Context

8. The work programme responds to the outcomes and objectives that the local board identified in the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020. The specific outcomes that are reflected in the work programme are:

· A vibrant and prosperous local economy

· A well-planned metropolitan centre for Papakura.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

9. The proposed activities for delivery as part of the board’s AUL work programme 2021/2022 are detailed below. See Attachment A for further detail.

Commerical Project Group -$90,000

10. The Papakura Commercial Project Group (CPG) was established in February 2016 with the purpose of identifying outcomes and opportunities for Papakura, with a view to setting out a number of actions that the participants in the group could work together on to deliver. The main objective of the group is to help Papakura work towards realising the Auckland Plan vision for the centre as one of the ten metropolitan centres in Auckland.

11. The Commercial Project Group comprises representatives from the Papakura Local Board, Papakura Business Association, and the Auckland Council group. It has an independent chair and draws in subject matter expertise as required.

12. The group has identified the following work stream areas that will be looked at in greater detail by the Commercial Project Group to develop a series of actions to be implemented in the coming financial year:

· Economic

· Community Participation

· Connectivity and Transport

· Town Centre planning

· Sports, Arts and Culture.

13. The Papakura Local Board is being asked to allocate $90,000 from its locally driven initiatives budget. The funding allocation will enable the continuation of the following activities in order to help support the delivery of local economic outcomes:

· Investigate the feasibility of Papakura to Clevedon Bike Trail ($50,000) including further consultant services, technical investigations and mana whenua engagement to refine the preferred route recommended by the initial feasibility study in FY 2020/2021.

· Facilitation and support of the CPG ($30,000): Meeting the costs of continuing the group and associated consultant support and in addition the delivery of key projects identified by the group in the forthcoming year.

· Support for Papakura Town Squareproject ($10,000): meeting the costs of consultant support to enable the Local Board and Papakura Business Association to ensure that the opportunities to enhance the town centre and other outcomes are maximised and delivered.

14. Outside of the above the full scope of projects and initiatives will be drafted with the input of the Commercial Project Group, and the local board. Any further initiatives requiring spend will also need to be formally approved by the CPG before progressing to the local board for approval if required.

Activities carried forward from 2020/2021

15. The Corporate and Local Board Performance team have identified projects from the Papakura Local Board locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget 2020/2021 where there was an agreed scope and cost which were not delivered. The estimated deferral amount is $24,471. The final deferral amount will be confirmed post 30 June 2021. The local board will receive detail of carry forwards in the first scheduled Performance Report for 2021/22.

16. Table 1 outlines the activities and budgets that have been confirmed as part of the deferral subject to approval, which have been added to the work programme to be delivered in 2021/2022.

Table 1: Activities with LDI operational budget carried forward from 2019/2020

Activity name	Budget
Commercial Project Group Implementation	$24,471

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. The proposed work programme does not significantly impact on greenhouse gas emissions or contribute towards adapting to the impacts of climate change.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

19. The proposed AUL work programme has been considered by the local board in a series of workshops from December 2020 to May 2021. The views expressed by local board members during the workshops have informed the recommended work programme.

20. The activities in the proposed work programme align with the Papakura Local Board Plan 2020 outcomes specifically:

· A vibrant and prosperous local economy

· A well-planned metropolitan centre for Papakura.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

21. Table 1 outlines the activities in the 2020/2021 work programme that contribute towards the delivery of specific Māori outcomes.

Table 1: Māori impact assessment of proposed activities

Activity name

Māori impact

Commercial Project Group Implementation

In implementing projects and initiatives to support the aims and objectives of the commercial projects group local Māori business within the town centre will be able to benefit from increased vitality in the centre and in turn greater spend.

Local iwi will be engaged to seek co-design opportunities and to further investigate the proposed Papakura to Clevedon Bike Trail.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

22. The proposed AUL work programme budget for 2021/2022 is $114,471 of the board’s locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This amount can be accommodated within the board’s total draft budget for 2021/2022.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

23. The COVID-19 pandemic could have a further negative impact on the delivery local board work programmes if the COVID-19 Alert Level changes (New Zealand’s 4-level Alert System specifies measures to be taken against COVID-19 at each level). The deliverability of some activities will decrease if there is an increase to the COVID-19 Alert Level.

24. Table 1 shows the identified significant risks associated with activities in the proposed 2021/2022 work programme.

Table 1: Significant risks and mitigations for activities

Activity name

Risk

Mitigation

Rating after mitigation

Commercial Project Group Implementation

Initiatives identified in the work programme do not progress as envisaged and the full amount of budget is not spent by year end.

The relevant council department is not identified to undertake the construction of Papakura to Clevedon Bike Trail once the preferred route has been confirmed.

A regular monthly CPG meeting is held with progress reporting on the activities. This will; enable early identification of any unspent funds allowing the local board to take appropriate action as required

A stakeholder group will be established to include relevant council department representatives to keep them informed with the development and recommendations

Medium

25. Where a work programme activity cannot be completed on time or to budget, due to unforeseen circumstances, this will be signalled to the local board at the earliest opportunity.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

26. Delivery of the activity in the approved work programme will commence once approved and continue until 30 June 2022. Activity progress will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Auckland Unlimited Work Programme 2021-2022 - Papakura Local Board	133

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Luo Lei – Local Economic Development Advisor

Authorisers

John Norman – Strategic Planning Manager

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Local board views on a Notice of Requirement for a new secondary school and early childhood education centre at Jesmond Road, Drury West

File No.: CP2021/07571

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To invite the Papakura Local Board’s views on a Notice of Requirement (NoR) by the Minister of Education for a new secondary school (years 7-13) and early childhood education centre (ECE) at 401 Jesmond Road and part of 281 and part of 341 Jesmond Road.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Decision-makers on a Notice of Requirement to the Auckland Unitary Plan must consider local boards’ views on the Notice of Requirement if the relevant local boards choose to provide their views.

3. Each local board has a responsibility to communicate the interests and preferences of people in its area on Auckland Council policy documents, including NoRs. A local board can present local views and preferences when expressed by the whole local board.^{^[1]}

4. The Minister of Education [MoE], as the Requiring Authority [RA], has served a notice of requirement [NoR] on Auckland Council [the council] for a designation at 401 Jesmond Road and part of 281 and part of 341 Jesmond Road, Drury West. The NoR seeks a designation for educational purposes, including a secondary school and early childhood education centre at this address.

5. The NoR was notified on 25 March 2021 and submissions closed on 27 April 2021. Three submissions were received including responses from NZ Transport Agency [NZTA] and Auckland Transport [AT]. NZTA is neutral to the NoR. AT support or support in part the NoR and suggest additional conditions. The other submission is from the owner of 341 Jesmond Rd who opposes the NoR on the grounds of the proposed access arrangements.

6. This report is the mechanism for the local board to resolve and provide its views on the NoR. Staff do not recommend what view the local board should convey.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) provide local board views on the Notice of Requirement for a new secondary school and early childhood education centre at 401 Jesmond Road and part of 281 and part of 341 Jesmond Road, Drury West.

b) appoint a local board member to speak to the local board views at a hearing [if one is held] on the Notice of Requirement.

c) delegate authority to the chairperson of Papakura Local Board to make a replacement appointment in the event the local board member appointed in resolution b) is unable to attend the private plan change hearing [if one is held].

Horopaki

Context

Decision-making authority

7. Each local board is responsible for communicating the interests and preferences of people in its area regarding the content of Auckland Council’s strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws. Local boards provide their views on the content of these documents. Decision-makers must consider local boards’ views when deciding the content of these policy documents.^{^[2]}

8. The Notice of Requirement is intended to add a new designation to the Auckland Unitary Plan [AUP (OP)]. Local boards must have the opportunity to provide their views where any process proposes a change to the Auckland Unitary Plan.

9. If the local board chooses to provide its views, the planner includes those views in the [s42a] hearing report. Local board views are included in the analysis of the NoR, along with all submissions.

10. If appointed by resolution, local board members may present the local board’s views at the hearing [if one is held] to commissioners, who will make a recommendation on the NoR.

11. Following receipt of the recommendation, the Requiring Authority would be required to advise the council, within 30 working days, whether they accept or reject the recommendation in whole or in part. Once the council has received a decision from the Requiring Authority, submitters will be advised and are then given an opportunity to lodge an appeal with the Environment Court if they are not satisfied with the outcome. Auckland Council will also have the opportunity at this stage to appeal the decision.

12. This report provides an overview of the NoR and a summary of the key themes in submissions.

13. The report does not recommend what views the local board should convey. Staff cannot advise the local board as to what its views should be, and then evaluate those views.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Notice of Requirement overview

14. This NoR was lodged by the Minister of Education and is for a new secondary school and early childhood education centre at 401 Jesmond Road and part of 281 and part of 341 Jesmond Road, Drury West.

15. The general locality of the site is shown in Figure 1 below, with the land to be designated shown in bold. The site comprises approximately 8.42 ha in area, is rectangular in shape and has a road frontage onto Jesmond Road of 460 metres.

16. The sites at 401 and part of 281 Jesmond Road [shown as areas A and B in Figure 2 below] are owned by the Crown and the MoE are currently negotiating with the owners of 341 Jesmond Road for the acquisition of part of 381 Jesmond Road [shown as Area C below].

Figure 1: General location of the site at Jesmond Road and surrounding area – the area to be designated is shown in bold

Figure 2 – Aerial photograph of subject site [taken from AEE]

17. The school site is located approximately 2km from the existing Drury township at the northern end of Jesmond Road. The existing sites [A and B] are used for rural lifestyle purposes. There are two existing dwellings [on A and B] along with some horticultural use at the rear of site A [as shown in Figure 2 above]. Area C is part of a right of way which provides access to private property at 341 Jesmond Road. The surrounding land uses are mainly rural and rural-residential in nature. However, the area is expected to experience significant urban growth in the short to medium term future given the rezoning and recent development in the area, particularly to the north-east of the school site.

18. Under the AUP:OP the site is zoned Mixed Housing Urban within the Drury 1 precinct [as shown on Figure 1 and 3]. The land to the north and east of the site is currently being developed to enable the construction of up to 1300 dwellings [Auranga A] with a mix of housing types including single dwellings, terraced housing and apartment buildings, along with local commercial centres. The land on the western side of Jesmond Road and to the south of the Drury 1 Precinct and Auranga B1 is zoned Future Urban [See Figure 3 below].

Figure 3 Proposed secondary school and ECE site [AUP : OP]

19. There is some uncertainty around the future land use and transport environment surrounding the site. The reason for this is that there is no approved plan change for the land zoned Future Urban to the west and south of the site [see figure 3 above].

20. As set out in the Transport Assessment lodged with the NOR AT are yet to confirm key elements of the future transport network in this area. However, it is known that the Auranga developer proposes to develop walking and cycling facilities in the area. Jesmond Road is also likely to be upgraded in the future, as described in NoR 2, lodged within a package of 5 x Drury Arterial NoRs in January 2021 by AT and NZTA. The Requiring Authority has advised that the development of the school will not occur until urban development in the area generates sufficient demand.

21. The site is subject to some contaminated land [asbestos] at 281 Jesmond Rd and some low-risk contaminants at 401 Jesmond Road. The land and soil disturbance activities and change in land use associated with the proposed development will require resource consents at a later stage.

22. The Minister of Education included technical reports that evaluate traffic, engineering [geotechnical] and contamination effects with their application. The reports and other application details are available from council’s website at https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/unitary-plan/auckland-unitary-plan-modifications/Pages/details.aspx?UnitaryPlanId=103

23. Council’s planner and other experts, will evaluate and report on:

· technical reports, including a Transport Assessment, a geotechnical assessment and a site investigation on contaminated land, supplied by the applicant

· submissions received

· views and preferences of the local board if the local board passes a resolution.

24. The NoR was notified on 25 March 2021 and submissions closed on 27 April 2021.

Submissions received

25. Submissions were made by three people/organizations as set out in Table 1 below

Table 1: Submissions received on NoR for Jesmond Road, Drury West

Submissions	Number of submissions
In support [with conditions]	1
Neutral	1
Oppose	1

26. AT supported the NOR subject to matters in their submission being addressed through conditions on the designation. AT’s conditions relate to vehicle access, the upgrade of Jesmond Road, amendments to the school travel plan including the need to address effects from overspill parking requirements, onsite pick-up and drop-off, staging information and suggested changes to proposed conditions on the designation.

27. NZTA is neutral to the NoR but raised concerns about the safety of the intersection at SH22/Jesmond Road. The NoR does not provide for the upgrade of this intersection but recognizes the intersection’s deficiencies. NZTA note that this intersection is required to be upgraded prior to the establishment of the school. A condition on the Establishment Outline Plan refers to consultation with NZTA over this matter to establish a solution which ensures the ongoing safety of the network.

28. MoE, AT and NZTA have been discussing these matters and suggested conditions. Continued engagement with all parties is proceeding at the time of writing this report.

29. Elly Pan and Benjamin Ban Chong Bong oppose the NoR on the grounds of the impact, in terms of access, on their land at 341 Jesmond Road. The submitters raise concerns about the provision of suitable access to their land in terms of accommodating any future development. MoE have held discussions with the submitters with regard to access and integration with the education facilities in relation to their land. However, at the time of writing, these discussions have not been finalised.

30. Information on individual submissions and the summary of all decisions requested by submitters, will be reported in the hearing report.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

31. The council’s climate goals as set out in Te Taruke-a-Tawhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan are:

· to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and

· to prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change.

32. The local board could consider in formulating its view if the NoR:

· will reduce, increase or have no effect on Auckland’s overall greenhouse gas emissions (e.g. does it encourage car dependency, enhance connections to public transit, walking and cycling or support quality compact urban form)

· prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change. That is, does the NoR elevate or alleviate climate risks (e.g. flooding, coastal and storm inundation, urban heat effect, stress on infrastructure).

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

33. Staff from Healthy Waters, Contaminated Land and Engineering [in Regulatory Services], will provide expert input into the Hearing report. The issues raised are minor and all experts can support the NoR at this stage. Any stormwater and contaminated land effects and management can be detailed at the time of the preparation of the outline plan or at regional consent stage. Geotechnical testing and investigation will take place as part of the detailed design stage to address any specific design and foundation requirements and resource consent applications may be required at a later stage.

34. The key matters raised by AT, NZTA and the owners of 341 Jesmond Road are noted above, in paragraphs 25-29 and in their submissions.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

35. The Notice of Requirement falls within the Franklin Local Board area however, it is noted that Papakura Local Board are also interested in the NoR given their involvement with the Auranga development to the north, east and the south of the proposed school site. Therefore, the Papakura Local Board’s views are also being sought at this time.

36. Factors the local board may wish to consider in formulating its view:

· interests and preferences of people in the local board area

· well-being of communities within the local board area

· local board documents, such as local board plan, local board agreement responsibilities and operation of the local board.

37. The MoE have indicated that they engaged with the local board initially in October and November 2018, with more recent correspondence in November 2020 prior to lodgement. Feedback at that stage was informal; restrictions on delegations prevent that informal feedback from being the views of the local board.^{^[3]}.

This report is the mechanism for obtaining formal local board views. The decision-maker will consider local board views, if provided, when deciding on the NoR.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

38. If the local board chooses to provide its views on the NoR, it includes the opportunity to comment on matters that may be of interest or importance to Māori people, well-being of Māori communities or Te Ao Māori (Māori world view). In the 2018 census results, 15,438 residents in the local board area identify as Māori.

39. MoE have engaged with local iwi to help identify key cultural issues associated with the project and address any potential effects this may raise. MoE have undertaken engagement with mana whenua groups including the following: - Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Maru, Ngāti Tamaoho, Ngāti Te Ata, Te Akitai Waiohua, Te Ahiwaru Waiohua and Waikato Tainui.Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Ngāti Maru, Ngāti Tamaoho, Ngāti Te Ata, Te Akitai Waiohua, Te Ahiwaru Waiohua and Waikato Tainui.

40. One iwi [Ngāti Tamaoho] requested that they be kept informed of progress and “to have the opportunity to have input into detail design but no further engagement is required at this time”. Such matters will be addressed through the outline plan phase of the project as part of the detailed design and project construction. Continued engagement with iwi to allow early input will occur as design detail progresses.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

41. There are no financial implications with the local board providing its views.

42. The local board is not exposed to any financial risk from providing its views.

43. The cost associated with processing NoR requests is recoverable from the Ministry of Education. The impacts of development associated with the NoR on infrastructure (and any associated funding/financing issues) is a matter that will be addressed in the hearing reports and at the hearing.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

44. The power to provide local board views regarding the content of a Notice of Requirement cannot be delegated to individual local board member(s).^{^[4]} This report enables the whole local board to decide whether to provide its views and, if so, to determine what matters those views should include.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

45. The planner will include, and report on, any resolution of the local board in the hearing report. The local board member appointed to speak to the local board’s views will be informed of the hearing date and invited to the hearing for that purpose.

46. The planner will advise the local board of the recommendation and decision on the NoR by memorandum.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Vanessa Leddra - Policy Planner

Authorisers

John Duguid - General Manager - Plans and Places

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Local Board views on Notices of Requirement for the Drury Arterial Network

File No.: CP2021/07880

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To invite the Papakura Local Board’s views on five Notices of Requirement (NoRs) lodged by Supporting Growth Alliance (on behalf of Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport) for the Drury Arterial Network. The NoRs seek to designate land for future strategic transport corridors within Drury and Opāheke.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Decision-makers on a Notice of Requirement to the Auckland Unitary Plan must consider local boards’ views on the Notice of Requirement, if the relevant local boards choose to provide their views.

4. Supporting Growth Alliance, on behalf of Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport, has served five Notices of Requirement (NoRs) on Auckland Council for the Drury Arterial Network. The NoRs seek to designate land for future strategic transport corridors within Drury and Opāheke. The NoRs comprise an alteration to Designation 6707 State Highway 22 and four new designations.

5. The NoRs were publicly notified on 22 April 2021 and submissions closed on 21 May 2021. 76 submissions were received across the five NoRs, including from landowners, central government entities and utility operators. The key themes arising from submissions on the NoRs focused on their spatial extent, alignment and design elements, including proposed intersection designs and their interface with adjoining sites. Submitters also highlighted transport and noise effects as key matters of concern, particularly vehicle access restrictions which would be imposed upon completion of the proposed roading projects.

6. This report is the mechanism for the local board to resolve and provide its views on the NoR. Staff do not recommend a view the local board should convey.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) provide local board views on the Notices of Requirement for the Drury Arterial Network, being an alteration to Designation 6707 and four new designations

b) appoint a local board member to speak to the local board views at a hearing on the Notices of Requirement

Horopaki

Context

8. The NoRs are intended to alter Designation 6707 – State Highway 22 (sought by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency) and add four new designations (sought by Auckland Transport) to the Auckland Unitary Plan. Local boards must have the opportunity to provide their views where any process proposes a change to the Auckland Unitary Plan.

9. If the local board chooses to provide its views, the planners include those views in the s42a hearing report. Local board views are included in the analysis of the NoRs, along with all submissions.

10. If appointed by resolution, local board members may present the local board’s views at the hearing to commissioners, who will make a recommendation on the NoRs.

12. This report provides an overview of the NoRs and a summary of the key themes raised in submissions.

13. The report does not recommend what views the local board should convey. Staff cannot advise the local board as to what its views should be, and then evaluate those views.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Notice of Requirement overview

14. The Drury Arterial Network is a package of five NoRs lodged by Supporting Growth Alliance, on behalf of Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport. The NoRs seek to provide for strategic transport corridors to support planned urban growth in Drury and Opāheke.

15. A summary of the NoRs is provided in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Description of Drury Arterials Network package of NoRs

Notice	Project Name	Description	Requiring Authority
D1	Alteration to Designation 6707 – State Highway 22 Upgrade	· Widening of existing state highway from the Drury Interchange at State Highway 1 (SH1) to Oira Creek to a four-lane urban arterial with separated active transport facilities.	Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
D2	Jesmond to Waihoehoe West FTN Upgrade	· Widening of the existing Jesmond Road from SH22 to near 256 Jesmond Road to a four-lane FTN urban arterial with separated active transport facilities. · A four-lane FTN urban arterial with separated active transport facilities from Jesmond Road to Norrie Road. It includes upgrading existing and constructing new transport corridors. · Widening of Waihoehoe Road from the Norrie Road/Great South Road intersection to Fitzgerald Road to a four-lane FTN urban arterial with separated active transport facilities.	Auckland Transport
D3	Waihoehoe Road East Upgrade	· Widening of Waihoehoe Road east of Fitzgerald Road to Drury Hills Road to a two-lane urban arterial with separated active transport facilities.	Auckland Transport
D4	Ōpāheke North-South FTN Arterial	· A new four-lane FTN urban arterial with separated active transport facilities from Hunua Road in the north to Waihoehoe Road in the south.	Auckland Transport
D5	Ponga Road and Ōpāheke Road Upgrade	· Widening of Ponga Road from Ōpāheke Road to Jack Paterson Road to a two-lane urban arterial with separated active transport facilities. · Widening of Ōpāheke Road from the extent of the FUZ in the north to Ponga Road in the south to a two-lane urban arterial with separated active transport facilities · Upgrade of the Ōpāheke Road / Settlement Road intersection to a roundabout with active transport facilities, including crossing facilities and re-grading of nine driveways.	Auckland Transport

16. The location of the NoRs are shown on Figure 1 below:

17. The indicative construction and implementation timeframes (subject to funding decisions) reported by the requiring authorities for each project are outlined below:

• NoR D1 is estimated to take 2 to 2.5 years to construct and be implemented by 2028

• NoR D2: the Jesmond Road section is estimated to take 1 to 1.5 years to construct, and the Bremner Road section is estimated to take 3 to 3.5 years to construct. Both will be implemented by 2028

• NoR D3 is estimated to take 2 to 2.5 years to construct and be implemented by 2028.

• NoR D4 is estimated to take 3.5 to 4 years to construct and be implemented by 2038

• NoR D5 is estimated to take 2 to 2.25 years to construct and be implemented by 2038

18. The NoRs include technical reports that evaluate:

• Assessment of environmental effects

• Construction noise and vibration

• Operational traffic noise and vibration

• Transport effects

• Arboricultural effects

• Flooding effects

• Ecological effects

• Landscape and visual effects

19. The reports and other application details are available from council’s website at https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/unitary-plan/auckland-unitary-plan-modifications/notices-of-requirement-to-designate-land/Pages/default.aspx

20. Council’s planners, and other experts, have evaluated and will report on:

• technical reports supplied by the applicant

• submissions

• views and preferences of the local board, if the local board passes a resolution.

21. Supporting Growth Alliance requested that the NoRs be publicly notified. The NoRs were publicly notified on 22 April 2021 and submissions closed on 21 May 2021.

22. Submissions were made by 44 persons and/or organisations:

Submissions	Support/support in part or with amendments	Neutral / unclear	Oppose/oppose in part
NoR D1 Alteration to Designation 6707 – State Highway 22 Upgrade	6	3	4
NoR D2 Jesmond to Waihoehoe West FTN Upgrade	5	3	18
NoR D3 Waihoehoe Road East Upgrade	1	1	10
NoR D4 Ōpāheke North-South FTN Arterial	3	1	8
NoR D5 Ponga Road and Ōpāheke Road Upgrade	2	2	10

23. Key submission themes are listed below:

NoR D1 Alteration to Designation 6707 – State Highway 22 Upgrade

· Opposition to the use of multi-lane roundabouts as proposed, instead preferring signalised intersections (Kiwi Property, Oyster Capital, Fletcher Residential).

· Opposition to the extent of the designation boundary, which is considered to extend beyond the area for road widening and associated works.

· Methods for disposing stormwater, future interface with adjoining sites, and noise conditions (local landowners).

· Effects of the NoR on 67 Mercer Street, which Fire and Emergency New Zealand seek to acquire for a fire station and regional headquarter.

· Protection of the North Island Main Trunk line, including through a suitable Network Utilities Management Plan (which is proposed through the designation conditions).

· Need for an archaeological assessment (Heritage NZPT).

NoR D2 Jesmond to Waihoehoe West FTN Upgrade

· Opposition to the extent of the designation boundary, which is considered to extend beyond the area required to accommodate proposed roading designs and associated construction works.

· Alignment of designation boundary, including:

o opposition to the Waihoehoe Road West alignment due to the majority of works impacting land north of the current alignment. The submitter seeks that the road be shifted south for a more equitable land take (Oyster Capital)

o integration with the Drury Central railway station

· Opposition to the proposed roundabout at Waihoehoe Road, Fitzgerald Road and the proposed Opāheke North-South Arterial (NoR D4), instead preferring a signalised intersection. Related to this, opposition to the overall extent of the designation boundary at this intersection (Kiwi Property, Oyster Capital and Fletchers)

· Effects of the NoR on existing and future landowners, including:

o extent of proposed land acquisition and effects on existing or anticipated land uses and rural/residential amenity values, and on the ongoing operation of commercial premises within the Drury township.

o steep gradient of land adjoining the upgraded road upon completion of works and consequential adverse stormwater effects and vehicle access constraints.

o ensuring that the extent of the designation used for construction works is removed expediently once works are completed, and that the NoR conditions specify a timeframe for the removal of the designations.

o submitters seeking land swaps, compensation or land offered back to them.

· Effects of the NoR on vehicle access from Great South Road to Tui Street (proposed to be a left turn in/out only), which provides access to the Drury and Districts Rugby Football and Recreation Club and community facilities (Drury community hall and library). Related to this, effects on existing on-street car parking on Tui Street.

· Climate change effects, including alignment with council’s climate emergency declared in 2019.

· Insufficient consultation with landowners.

NoR D3 Waihoehoe Road East Upgrade

· Opposition to the extent of the designation boundary, which is considered to extend beyond the area required to accommodate proposed roading designs and associated construction works.

· Opposition from several submitters affected by land acquisition proposed to accommodate a roundabout at the intersection of Waihoehoe Road, Appleby Road and Fielding Road, with submitters seeking that either the intersection be moved further north or the extent of land currently in their ownership being acquired to construct the intersection be reduced.

· Effects of the NoR on existing and future landowners, including:

o extent of proposed land acquisition and effects on existing or anticipated land uses and rural/residential amenity values

o adverse noise and dust effects, with one submitter seeking compensation for exposure to these effects

o vehicle access restrictions imposed by Waihoehoe Road (east of Fitzgerald Road) becoming an arterial

o possibility of further land acquisition being required to accommodate a suitably designed intersection with Drury Hills Road

o adverse transport effects resulting from proposing a roundabout at the intersection of Waihoehoe Road, Appleby Road and Fielding Road, compared with a signalised intersection.

o steep gradient of land adjoining the upgraded road upon completion of works and consequential adverse stormwater effects and vehicle access constraints.

• NoR D4 Ōpāheke North-South FTN Arterial

· Opposition to the extent of the designation boundary, which is considered to extend beyond the area required to accommodate proposed roading designs and associated construction works.

· Opposition to the proposed multi-lane roundabouts, with signalised intersections being preferred in terms of achieving better transport network outcomes.

· Opposition from several submitters directly affected by the proposed road footprint requesting that their land be excluded from the designation, or in the alternative, the road footprint be reduced in width from 30m to 27m to minimise land acquisition required to construct the road.

· Opposition from several submitters requesting that the proposed road designation and supporting designs be realigned and amended to:

o avoid a wetland area which qualifies for protection under the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management; and

o relocate proposed stormwater ponds and wetlands to alternative locations for the purpose of minimising land acquisition effects on submitters and to achieve better environmental outcomes

· Effects of the NoR on existing and future landowners, including:

o extent of proposed land acquisition and associated construction effects on existing land uses, including large-scale industrial activities, with one submitter seeking compensation for land acquired to construct the road

o vehicle access restrictions imposed by construction of road and it’s arterial classification

o steep gradient of land adjoining the upgraded road upon completion of works and consequential adverse stormwater effects and vehicle access constraints

NoR D5 Ponga Road and Ōpāheke Road Upgrade

· Opposition to the extent of the designation boundary, which is considered to extend beyond the area required to accommodate proposed roading designs and associated construction works.

· Opposition from a number of submitters directly affected by the proposed road footprint requesting that their land be excluded from the designation, or in the alternative that compensation be provided for permanent land acquisition, while land temporarily acquired for construction purposes be appropriately remediated, including reinstatement of vehicle access.

· Effects of the NoR on existing and future landowners, including:

o extent of proposed land acquisition and effects on existing or anticipated land uses and rural/residential amenity values, including the proposed Bellfield Estate neighbourhood centre

o proposed stormwater works within Opaheke Park

o adverse noise, vibration and dust effects, with one submitter seeking conditions which specifically address these effects on their affected property

o vehicle access from the upgraded roads

o steep gradient of land adjoining the upgraded road upon completion of works and consequential adverse stormwater effects and vehicle access constraints

24. Information on individual submissions and the summary of all decisions requested by submitters, will be reported in the hearing report.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

25. The council’s climate goals as set out in Te Taruke-a-Tawhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan are:

· to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and

· to prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change.

26. The local board could consider if the NoRs:

· prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change. That is, do the NoRs elevate or alleviate climate risks (e.g. flooding, coastal and storm inundation, urban heat effect, stress on infrastructure).

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

27. Auckland Transport are the requiring authority that have lodged the NoRs in conjunction with Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency.

28. Watercare have not submitted on the NoRs.

29. The council’s Healthy Waters and Parks Services departments have specialists within the project team, who will contribute to the reporting planners’ hearing report.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

30. The NoRs fall within both the Franklin and Papakura Local Board areas.

31. Factors the local board may wish to consider in formulating its view include:

• interests and preferences of people in local board area

• well-being of communities within the local board area

• local board documents, such as local board plan, local board agreement

• responsibilities and operation of the local board.

32. SGA advised that they have engaged with the Franklin, Papakura and Manurewa local boards and Councillors in the NoR project areas prior to their lodgement. SGA state that the purpose was to update the Local Members on the work undertaken to inform the draft business case and share feedback to the local boards on public engagement carried out by SGA within the NoR project areas.

33. Feedback provided by local boards prior to the NoRs lodgement is informal. Restrictions on delegations prevent that informal feedback from being the views of the local board.^{^[7]}

34. This report is the mechanism for obtaining formal local board views. The decision-maker will consider local board views, if provided, when deciding on the NoRs

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

35. If the local board chooses to provide its views on the NoRs, it includes the opportunity to comment on matters that may be of interest or importance to Māori, well-being of Māori communities or Te Ao Māori (Māori world view). In the 2018 census 15,438 residents in the local board area identified as Māori.

36. SGA has engaged with local iwi to help identify key cultural issues associated with the project and address any potential effects this may raise. This includes multiple hui held with mana whenua groups, which has resulted in changes to the project alignments, and exploration of mitigation measures for stormwater, flooding, and stream enhancements.

37. No mana whenua groups have submitted on the NoRs.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

38. There are no financial implications with the local board providing its views.

39. The local board is not exposed to any financial risk from providing its views.

40. The cost associated with processing the NoR requests is recoverable from Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Transport.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

41. The power to provide local board views regarding the content of a Notice of Requirement cannot be delegated to individual local board member(s).^{^[8]} To avoid the procedural risk of an individual local board member expressing the views of the local board, this report enables the whole local board to decide whether to provide its views and, if so, to determine what matters those views should include.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

42. The planners will include, and report on, any resolution of the local board in the hearing report. The local board member appointed to speak to the local board’s views will be informed of the hearing date and invited to the hearing for that purpose.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Nicholas Lau - Planner

Authorisers

John Duguid - General Manager - Plans and Places

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Local Board views on Plan Change 58 (Private) 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road, Papakura

File No.: CP2021/07512

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To invite local board views on a private plan change request by Greg and Nicky Hayhow in relation to 6.1ha of land at 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road, Papakura.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Greg and Nicky Hayhow lodged a private plan change request to the Auckland Unitary Plan to rezone 6.1ha of land at 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road, Papakura from Future Urban to Residential – Mixed Housing Urban and Business Neighbourhood Centre.

3. Decision-makers on a private plan change to the Auckland Unitary Plan must consider local boards’ views on the plan change, if the relevant local boards choose to provide their views.

4. Each local board has a responsibility to communicate the interests and preferences of people in its area on Auckland Council policy documents, including private plan changes. A local board can present local views and preferences when expressed by the whole local board.

5. Ten submissions and six further submissions (one late further submission) have been received on the plan change. The key themes arising from submissions are the on-site treatment of stormwater and associated infrastructure, the design of the internal road layout and connections with the surrounding network, traffic generation and road safety, the precinct provisions, consideration of the relevant Cultural Values Assessment, delivery and provision of other infrastructure, effects on residential amenity, water and wastewater servicing, and archaeology.

6. This report is the mechanism for the local board to resolve and provide its views on private plan change 58. Staff do not recommend what view the local board should convey.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) provide local board views on private plan change 58 by Greg and Nicky Hayhow to rezone 6.1ha of land from Future Urban Zone to Residential – Mixed Urban Zone and Business – Neighbourhood Centre Zone 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road, Papakura

b) appoint a local board member to speak to the local board views at a hearing on private plan change 58

Horopaki

Context

8. A private plan change request will be included in the Auckland Unitary Plan if it is approved. Local boards must have the opportunity to provide their views on private plan change requests – when an entity other than council proposes a change to the Auckland Unitary Plan.

9. If the local board chooses to provide its views, the planner includes those views in the hearing report. Local board views are included in the analysis of the private plan change, along with submissions.

10. If appointed by resolution, local board members may present the local board’s views at the hearing to commissioners, who decide on the private plan change request.

11. This report provides an overview of the private plan change, and a summary of submissions’ key themes.

12. The report does not recommend what the local board should convey, if the local board conveys its views on private plan change 58 (PPC58). The planner must include any local board views in the evaluation of the private plan change. The planner cannot advise the local board as to what its views should be, and then evaluate those views.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

13. The proposed plan change relates to 6.1ha of land held in four titles at 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road, Papakura. The plan change land (the site) is situated between the Papakura and Drury centres, located approximately 3km south of the Papakura Metropolitan Centre. The site is also located 2km from motorway interchanges at Papakura and Drury, and within 2.5km of the Papakura Train Station (refer to Figure 1 over page).

14. The site is currently primarily held in pasture and accommodates three residential dwellings on three of the four land holdings. There are also a number of other buildings relating to the current pastoral use of the land. A floodplain runs through the middle of the site from west to east and is subject to an existing covenant on the certificate of title restricting buildings within it. A permanent stream also runs through the site from west to east. This has been piped to the stormwater pond.

15. The site is contiguous to the urban area of Papakura with low density residential development adjoining to the north, west and south. The land to the east is zoned Future Urban zone and is predominantly in pasture.

16. Within the Auckland Unitary Plan (‘AUP’), the plan change land is zoned Future Urban Zone (refer to Figure 2 below), and is subject to the following controls:

a) Controls: Macroinvertebrate Community Index – Rural and Urban

b) Controls: Arterial Roads^{^[9]}

Figure 1: Site context

Figure 2: Existing zoning under Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)

17. The Auckland Plan seeks that most of Auckland's anticipated population and dwelling growth over the next 30 years be within the existing urban area. The remaining development is anticipated to occur in future urban areas and in rural areas. The AUP identifies approximately 15,000 hectares of rural land for future urbanisation with the potential to accommodate approximately 137,000 dwellings and 67,000 jobs.

18. The Future Urban Land Supply Strategy 2017 (‘FULSS’), sets out the sequencing of future urban land for development within Auckland, and identifies the plan change land and surrounding Drury and Opāheke area east of SH1 as being development ready by between 2028-2032. The reasons provided in support of this timeframe relate to the bulk infrastructure required to service the wider area, including augmenting the Southern and Southwestern wastewater interceptors, and the resolution of complex flooding issues in Opāheke.

19. The Drury-Opāheke Structure Plan 2019 (‘structure plan’) outlines how growth anticipated within this area can be achieved by indicating the location of future land use zonings, infrastructure and constraints within Drury and Opāheke. This includes the location of residential areas, town centres, business areas and critical infrastructure amongst other elements. The land subject to this private plan change request is identified as being Mixed Housing Urban with an area of Business – Neighbourhood centre in the south west corner.

20. Through Te Tupu Ngātahi / Supporting Growth Alliance (‘SGA’), Auckland Transport and Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency have identified the preferred transport network and interventions required to support growth in the south. Of particular relevance to this plan change request are the following projects identified by SGA:

A new train station (Drury Central) on the eastern side of SH1;

Electrification of the railway track between Papakura and Pukekohe;

Great South Road developed as a Frequent Transit Network bus route

21. In January 2020, central government announced the New Zealand Upgrade Programme (‘NZUP’), which allocated funding to transport infrastructure within Drury-Opāheke, amongst other projects. This included:

Fully funding the two new railway stations in Drury Central and Drury West, along with ‘park and ride’ facilities, with construction of the stations commencing in 2023;

Fully funding the electrification of the railway track from Papakura to Pukekohe, with construction commencing late 2020; and

State Highway 1 Papakura to Drury improvements, including three-laneing the state highway and upgrading the Drury interchange, to be completed by 2025.

22. In addition to the proposed plan change, Council is also processing several other proposed plan changes in the surrounding area which seek to live zone the Future Urban zone land out of sequence with the FULSS and the structure plan. The closest of these to the subject plan change site is PPC52 – 520 Great South Road, Papakura. This seeks to rezone 4.63ha into Mixed Housing Urban zone and to accommodate approximately 113 dwellings.

Private plan change content

23. The plan change request is set out in Attachment A. The proposed plan change seeks to rezone 6.1ha of land at 470 and 476 Great South Road and 2 and 8 Gatland Road from Future Urban Zone to Residential – Mixed Housing Urban Zone and Business Neighbourhood Centre zone in the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part 2016. A precinct is also sought to manage the roading layout and design and to introduce stormwater management provisions. No further overlays or controls are sought. The zoning sought by the plan change is shown in Figure 3 on the following page.

24. The objective of the plan change, as stated by the applicant is to:

apply an urban residential zoning and a business neighbourhood centre zone to 6.1ha of Future Urban zoned [land] in Papakura, consistent with the Council’s Drury-Opāheke Structure Plan.^{^[10]}

Figure 3: Proposed zoning sought under plan change request

25. The applicant has provided the following information to support the plan change request:

· Private plan change request, including drafted precinct provisions

· Section 32 evaluation report

· Specialist reports:

o Urban design report

o Transport assessment

o Stormwater management plan

o Engineering and infrastructure report

o Regional Policy Statement objectives and policies assessment.

Submissions

23. Ten primary submissions and six further submissions (one late) were received on Plan Change 58.

24. Key submission themes are listed below:

· Traffic generation and road safety;

· Transport infrastructure delivery and staging;

· Transport connectivity;

· Relevance of precinct

· Pedestrian and cycle network;

· Effects on residential amenity;

· Cultural values and preferences;

· Stormwater management on site and on surrounding environment

· Water and wastewater disposal;

· Other infrastructure delivery and staging

· Archaeology.

25. The submissions received are summarised in Tables 1 and 2 below:

Table 1: Summary of submissions received on Plan Change 58

Submissions	Number of submissions
Support/accept with amendments	6 (One submission (Veolia) neither supports or opposes – seeks to ensure responsibility for construction and funding of future connections to network)
Amend the plan change/ amend if it is not declined	3
Decline	1

26. Information on individual submissions, and the summary of all decisions requested by submitters, is available from council’s website:

https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/unitary-plan/auckland-unitary-plan-modifications/Pages/details.aspx?UnitaryPlanId=93

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

27. No submissions specifically relate to climate change impacts. Auckland Transport’s submission raises concerns on the early ‘release’ of Future Urban land for development ahead of the FULSS sequencing of 2028-2032 for this area. If PC58 was approved, the early release of land compared with the FULSS would enable development ahead of the planned public transport network being constructed (including a FTN on Great South Road) and therefore result in higher reliance on private vehicles in the interim.

28. The council’s climate goals as set out in Te Taruke-a-Tawhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan are:

· to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and

· to prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change.

29. The local board could consider if the private plan change:

· will reduce, increase or have no effect on Auckland’s overall greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., does it encourage car dependency, enhance connections to public transit, walking and cycling or support quality compact urban form)

· prepare the region for the adverse impacts of climate change. That is, does the proposed private plan change elevate or alleviate climate risks (e.g., flooding, coastal and storm inundation, urban heat effect, stress on infrastructure).

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

30. As referenced above, Auckland Transport have canvassed their views through a submission on the plan change. Auckland Transport’s concerns relate primarily to appropriate connectivity from the plan change area, including for active modes, into the local network and beyond and to the provision of an urban frontage (with footpaths, berms, street trees etc) is delivered and that road widening can be achieved in the future, rather than the effects of early urbanisation of the PC52 land on transport modal share. They will have the opportunity to speak to their views if required at a hearing.

31. Healthy Waters are part of Council’s internal review team and will assess relevant submissions and provide expert input into the hearing report.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

32. The private plan change request does not relate to public land for which the local board has decision-making powers.

33. This plan change relates to the Papakura Local Board area only.

34. Factors the local board may wish to consider in formulating its view:

· interests and preferences of people in local board area

· well-being of communities within the local board area

· local board documents, such as local board plan, local board agreement

· responsibilities and operation of the local board.

35. This report is the mechanism for obtaining formal local board views. The decision-maker will consider local board views, if provided, when deciding on the private plan change.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

36. Greg and Nicky Hayhow advised council that it consulted with the iwi authorities that have an interest in this area.

37. The applicant has engaged with the following iwi groups who have expressed an interest in the proposal:

a) Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki

b) Ngāti Te Ata

c) Ngāti Tamaoho.

38. Iwi authorities were provided direct notice of the plan change upon notification. Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua submitted to adopt the plan change subject to their Cultural Values Assessment (CVA) being integrated into the overall design of the Plan change.

39. The hearing report will include analysis of Part 2 of the Resource Management Act which requires that all persons exercising RMA functions shall take into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi.^{^[11]}

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

40. There are no financial implications with the local board providing its views.

41. The local board is not exposed to any financial risk from providing its views.

42. The cost associated with processing this private plan change request is recoverable from the applicants. The impacts of development associated with the private plan change request on infrastructure (and any associated funding/financing issues) is a matter that will be addressed in the hearing report and at the hearing.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

43. There is a risk that the local board will be unable to provide its views and preferences on the plan change, if it doesn’t pass a resolution. This report provides:

· the mechanism for the Papakura Local Board to express its views and preferences

· the opportunity for a local board member to speak at a hearing.

44. If the local board chooses not to pass a resolution at this business meeting, these opportunities are forgone.

45. The power to provide local board views regarding the content of a private plan change cannot be delegated to individual local board member(s).^{^[12]} This report enables the whole local board to decide whether to provide its views and, if so, to determine what matters those views should include.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

46. The planner will include, and report on, any resolution of the local board in the hearing report. The local board member appointed to speak to the local board’s views will be informed of the hearing date and invited to the hearing for that purpose.

47. The planner will advise the local board of the decision on the private plan change request by memorandum.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Lee-Ann Lucas - Senior Policy Planner

Authorisers

John Duguid - General Manager - Plans and Places

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Feedback on Equity of Service Levels and Funding Proposals - Draft Report

File No.: CP2021/07922

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide local board feedback to the Joint Governance Working Party on the funding and decision-making proposals set out in the Equity of Service Levels and Funding - Draft Report.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The local board has received and discussed the Equity of Service Levels and Funding - Draft Report at its April/May 2021 workshop.

3. The Draft Report (refer Attachment A) sets out the draft recommendations from the Joint Governance Working Party in relation to:

· improving the equity of funding allocation across local boards

· increasing the decision-making responsibility of local boards

· establishing minimum service levels

· implications of multi-board services.

4. The Joint Governance Working Party seeks local board feedback on these proposals to consider in the preparation of a final set of proposals to be reported to the Governing Body.

5. The local board’s feedback on these proposals (refer Attachment B) has been prepared on the template provided.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) provide feedback using the attached template (Attachment B) to the Joint Governance Working Party on the funding and decision-making proposals set out in the Equity of Service Levels and Funding Proposals – Draft Report.

Horopaki

Context

6. In October and November 2020 workshops, local boards considered and provided input on the Equity of Service Levels and Funding Discussion paper which presented options, in respect of local community services, to:

· increase local board decision making responsibility

· increase equity of funding allocation between local boards

· establish minimum service levels where required

· address funding of multi-board services and decision-making on their service levels.

7. The Joint Governance Working Party considered this local board input and provided direction to staff in the preparation of the funding and decision-making proposals of the Equity of Service Levels and Funding Draft Report (refer Attachment A).

8. Staff presented the Draft Report to local boards in workshops between 6 April and 6 May 2021.

9. The purpose of this report is to enable the local board to provide formal feedback on the draft recommendations which propose:

· changes to local board decision-making responsibilities over local community services

· implementation of an equity-based funding allocation approach for local community services.

10. These matters will be reported to the Joint Governance Working Party and then to the Governing Body later this year. If adopted, public consultation would be undertaken with the aim of implementing decisions progressively between 2022 and 2024.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

11. These proposals (refer Attachment A) are significant changes. If adopted by the Governing Body, these recommendations would:

· increase local board decision-making responsibilities over community services

· change the allocation of Asset Based Services (ABS) funding to local boards

· require collaboration between local boards on some multi-board service decisions

· have a high community interest

· not affect existing local board responsibility for Local Discretionary Initiatives (LDI) service decisions or the current LDI funding approach.

12. Feedback on these proposals is sought from the local board to assist the Joint Governance Working Party in providing direction to staff and the Governing Body on progressing these proposals.

13. The Working Party’s final report to the Governing Body will also update illustrative funding outcomes with asset values and ABS budgets updated and adopted under Long-term Plan 2021-31. Funding outcomes remain illustrative until funding model and financial inputs are adopted, planned for Long-term Plan 2024-34.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

14. Providing feedback on the draft report does not have a direct impact on climate change.

15. Changes made to local community services as a result of the proposed policy may have a climate impact and will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

16. If adopted, the proposed policy will impact on several divisions of the council including Customer and Community Services, Finance and Governance. Staff from these divisions have been involved in the development of these proposals.

17. Staff from these divisions will also be significantly involved in the implementation of Governing Body decisions on the proposals. A critical implementation workstream will ensure staff have the capacity and the knowledge required to enable sound advice to be provided to local boards under these proposals.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

18. Over time, these proposals have the potential to fundamentally change local community service delivery depending on the extent to which local boards and their communities make changes.

19. Local boards have discussed policy options in workshops in October and November 2021 and considered the proposed policy in workshops in April and May 2021. Local boards can also provide their input and views through their representatives on the Joint Governance Working Party.

20. This report provides the opportunity for local boards to provide their formal feedback on the Draft Report proposals.

21. More detailed discussion of the local implications of the policy proposal is included in the Draft Report, provided as Attachment A.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

22. As part of increased decision-making for asset-based services, and under local government legislation, local boards must demonstrate how Māori are involved, and their needs are reflected, in these decisions. This means that in making service decisions, local boards should be able to:

· demonstrate effective Māori involvement in the local board planning processes

· clearly articulate Māori priorities in local board funding and delivery of asset-based services.

23. It is likely that these changes will result in more responsive services for Māori communities at the local level.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

24. Introduction of the proposed policy would have several significant financial impacts, including:

· changes to local board funding allocations that may result in funding increases for some local boards and funding decreases for others

· broader local board decision-making responsibilities that will require greater flexibility in how local boards allocate their funding to service delivery

· local board decisions which would include service impacts on assets, such as investment, enhancement, renewal, optimisation and removal from service.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

25. Development of the proposed policy involved several workshops with each local board. Several local boards requested additional workshops on the proposals as their implications became better understood.

26. A range of risks associated with approval and implementation of these proposals were discussed during workshops and considered in the development of these proposals, including:

· whether there will be sufficient understanding of the proposals and support for their benefits to enable them to be adopted

· what alternative approaches might address the issues these proposals seek to address, should they not proceed

· developing alternative funding equity transition options including implications on local board funding and overall timing

· developing options to respond to concerns of local boards which might be adversely affected by equity funding proposals

· addressing local board concerns for the perceived downside of greater decision-making responsibility if the level of decision support does not increase

· ensuring the organisation is structured, resourced and adequately supported to provide the quality service advice needed by local boards to make well-informed decisions.

27. Plans are either in place or currently being developed to address these risks. The proposed two stage implementation timeline (see below) is designed to progressively grow the council capability, develop robust processes, and ensure effective and transparent management of necessary changes.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

28. Staff will report local board feedback to the Joint Governance Working Party which will consider this feedback, along with further staff advice, and provide its recommendations to the Governing Body later this year.

29. The Governing Body would undertake public consultation on its draft decisions as follows:

· under the Annual Plan 2022/23, in the case of changes to the Allocation of Decision-making Responsibilities policy

· under the Long-term Plan 2024-2034, in the case of changes to the Local Board Funding policy.

30. Proposals adopted by the Governing Body would be progressively implemented from 2022 to 2024.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇨	Equity of Service Levels and Funding Draft Report (Under Separate Cover)
b ⇩	Governance Framework Review - Service levels and funding - feedback template	169

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Gary Pemberton - Programme Change Lead

Authorisers

Justine Haves - General Manager Service Strategy and Integration

Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Delegation of feedback to be provided to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project

File No.: CP2021/07882

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To formally delegate one local board member to provide feedback to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. An Establishment Unit is being set up by the Cabinet to provide the public face of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project, undertake stakeholder and community engagement, and take forward work to resolve key outstanding questions in relation to project scope and delivery. A key output of the unit will be to develop a business case over approximately six months which looks at the available options.

3. The work of the Establishment Unit will be guided by an inclusive governance structure made up of representatives of central and local government, Treaty partners and an independent chairperson.

4. Minister of Transport Hon Michael Wood wrote to local board members in May 2021 inviting local board members to select a single representative to be appointed to the Establishment Unit Board. At the May 2021 Chairs’ Forum, Margi Watson was selected for this role.

5. The Establishment Unit now has until early September 2021 to gather the views of local boards, ward councillors, and the public.

6. Staff are requesting that local boards delegate a member to provide feedback on behalf of the local board, to ensure that feedback can be provided in a short timeframe after public feedback has been collated and provided to the local board.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) delegate one local board member to provide feedback on behalf of the local board to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project.

Horopaki

Context

7. In March 2021, the Cabinet met to agree how to progress the next steps for the City Centre to Māngere light rail project (CC2M).

8. To give effect to this, the Cabinet has directed that an Establishment Unit be set up to provide the public face of the project, undertake stakeholder and community engagement, and take forward work to resolve key outstanding questions in relation to project scope and delivery entity.

9. The Establishment Unit Board will be chaired by an independent chair appointed by the Minister of Transport and the Minister of Finance. Membership will comprise:

· a single representative (the chief executive or a senior delegate) from Auckland Council, Auckland Transport, Waka Kotahi, Kāinga Ora and the Ministry of Transport

· a representative from mana whenua

· a representative of Auckland Council’s local boards (Margi Watson)

· a representative of Auckland Council’s Governing Body (Chris Darby)

· Te Waihanga (the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission) and Treasury will support the work of the Establishment Unit Board as observers.

10. A key output of the unit will be to develop a business case over approximately six months which looks at the available options. This will enable quality decisions on key matters based on evidence, such as mode, route alignment and delivery.

11. The Mayor and Deputy Mayor have been invited to join Minister of Transport Hon Michael Wood and Minister of Finance Hon Grant Robertson as sponsors of this project. This sponsors group will play an important function in ensuring political alignment on the project between central and local government and setting strategic direction.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

12. The Auckland Light Rail team will be engaging with local boards first so that local board members are clear about the scope and programme of engagement.

13. This will take place as follows:

· 11 June: briefing the six local boards that are within the planned corridor for light rail - Waitematā, Albert-Eden, Puketāpapa, Maungakiekie-Tāmaki, Māngere-Ōtāhuhu and Ōtara-Papatoetoe

· 14 June: presentation to Chairs’ Forum

· 30 June: inviting local board chairs or their delegate to attend a Planning Committee briefing

· Further briefings will be organised to take place after the public consultation period in July/ August 2021.

14. Staff will focus on providing local board members with an understanding of the approach being taken by the Establishment Unit and key constraints, so that local board members can respond to any queries they received and champion the engagement process within their community.

15. Throughout the engagement period, the Establishment Unit will be seeking broad views, key themes (could be geographically based) and feedback on the outcomes the project is set to achieve. This will mirror the public engagement process that will also focus on outcomes and community experience.

16. In order to ensure that there is adequate time for local boards to review public feedback ahead of providing local board feedback, staff are recommending that local boards delegate a member to provide the local board’s feedback

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. Delegating to one local board member the authority to provide feedback to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project does not have any quantifiable climate impacts.

18. The Establishment Unit Board will have an opportunity to consider climate impacts as part of making recommendations on the project.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. The Mayor and Deputy Mayor have been invited to join the Minister of Transport Hon Michael Wood and Minister of Finance Hon Grant Robertson as sponsors of the project. The project sponsors will set the strategic direction for the project, including the project scope and engagement plans, and maintain political cooperation between central government and Auckland Council with regards to the project.

20. The Governing Body representative and the local board representative will be joined by the Chief Executive as the representatives of Auckland Council on the Establishment Unit Board.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

21. This delegation will provide the opportunity for all local boards to provide formal feedback to the Establishment Unit Board within the given timeframe of this first stage of work.

22. Margi Watson, as the local board representative on the Establishment Unit Board, will develop good lines of communication with other local board members. Having a local board representative on the Establishment Unit Board is not a proxy for local board engagement on this project and does not replace the need to obtain feedback from local boards.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

23. The work of the Establishment Unit will be guided by an inclusive governance structure made up of representatives of central and local government, Treaty Partners and an independent chairperson.

24. A key function of the Establishment Unit will be to undertake high quality engagement with communities, stakeholders, mana whenua and mataawaka.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

25. Delegating to one local board member the authority to provide feedback to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project does not have any financial implications.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

26. No risks have been identified for delegating to one local board member the authority to provide feedback to the Establishment Unit Board of the City Centre to Māngere light rail project.

27. The risks of not appointing a delegate may be that formal feedback is not able to be provided by the local board within the relevant timeframe or may need to be provided via the urgent decision mechanism.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

28. Staff will work with the Establishment Unit to make arrangements for local board briefings ahead of public consultation.

29. Public consultation will take place in July and August 2021.

30. Further briefings to provide analysis of the public feedback received will be provided towards the end of August 2021.

31. Delegated local board members will provide feedback on behalf of their local board by 2 September 2021.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Kat Ashmead - Senior Policy Advisor, Local Board Services

Authorisers

Louise Mason - GM Local Board Services

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Papakura Local Board feedback the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission’s He Tūāpapa ki te Ora: Infrastructure for a Better Future consultation document

File No.: CP2021/08826

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To endorse the Papakura Local Board’s feedback on the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission’s He Tūāpapa ki te Ora: Infrastructure for a Better Future consultation document.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The New Zealand Infrastructure Commission, Te Waihanga, is an autonomous Crown entity with an independent board, officially formed on 25 September 2019. The Commission seeks to lift infrastructure planning and delivery to a more strategic level and by doing so, improve New Zealanders’ long term economic performance and social wellbeing.

3. A key function of the Commission is to produce a 30-year infrastructure strategy to replace the government’s current 30-year plan. In addition, the Commission has progressively developed a pipeline of infrastructure projects which is published quarterly.

4. The Commission has released its consultation document He Tūāpapa ki te Ora, Infrastructure for a Better Future which sets out the approach that it proposes to take in developing its draft 30-year Infrastructure Strategy. This consultation is open for public submission from 12 May, with a closing date of 24 June.

5. Auckland Council has previously provided input to the Commission’s Asset Owner Survey, which was a key input in informing their draft 30-year Infrastructure Strategy. This work identified infrastructure challenges and opportunities across different sectors. Some of the key themes identified included funding and financing challenges, asset management and procurement, natural hazards and climate change, and the challenges of moving to a low emissions economy.

6. This is the main and final opportunity for Auckland Council to input into the development of the Commission’s draft 30-year Infrastructure Strategy. Following consultation, the Commission will finalise the 30-year Infrastructure Strategy and present it to the Minister for Infrastructure in September 2021.

7. The consultation document introduces the extent of New Zealand’s infrastructure problems and highlights the key issue of historic underinvestment in infrastructure. It recognises there is a significant gap between the infrastructure needed and what can be afforded. It notes there are limits to spending and that building all infrastructure desired by communities is not a viable option.

8. The document recognises that better use must be made of existing infrastructure and extending its life along with new funding and financing to provide access to more capital for new infrastructure projects. It recognises that productivity improvements in infrastructure planning, construction and management are also needed.

9. The document highlights other key challenges such as climate change, a growing and ageing population, housing affordability, increasing construction cost pressures, technological / digital change and equity.

10. The consultation document sets out a proposed vision that “infrastructure lays the foundation for the people, places and businesses of Aotearoa New Zealand to thrive for generations” and guiding decision-making principles. The document also proposes three focus areas where change is needed:

· Building a better future

This section talks about preparing infrastructure for climate change, transitioning to renewable energy, adapting to technological change, responding to demographic change, partnering with Māori and ensuring security and resilience of critical infrastructure.

· Enabling competitive cities and regions

This section talks about how infrastructure can contribute to the success of New Zealand cities by enabling more affordable housing, higher levels of productivity, improved inter-regional and international connectivity, better quality of life and urban environments that provide greater connectivity with employment, social services and recreation opportunities.

· Creating a better system

This section looks at how New Zealand’s current systems and processes for planning, determining, delivering and operating infrastructure are being challenged, and can be improved. Four categories are discussed – governance and institutions; legislation, regulation and planning; funding and financing; and procurement and delivery.

11. The consultation document also identifies five areas that have potential to make the biggest difference to New Zealand’s infrastructure system:

· Institutional and governance reform - mentions better integration and coordination between local and central government infrastructure functions.

· Getting the price right - mentions congestion pricing, water metering, waste disposal charges and including full cost of carbon in infrastructure business case appraisals.

· Supporting housing supply - mentions options such as consistent national planning rules, regional spatial planning, merging regional and district plans, creating targets for new housing development in cities, setting housing requirements through national direction.

· Supporting zero-carbon economy and preparing for climate change -mentions electrification of transport, greater use of public transport and active travel, improving energy efficiency of process heat, investment in energy sector to meet growing demand, and a planning system that enables infrastructure necessary for climate change adaptation and mitigation.

· A digital future - mentions updating national digital strategy, better data collection and transparency to understand existing infrastructure performance, costs and impacts, as well as future requirements.

12. The consultation document proposes re-drawing of local and regional authority boundaries (particularly due to expanding labour markets and the ability of local government to provide/fund/maintain/operate social and economic infrastructure).

13. The consultation document proposes changes to local and central government roles and responsibilities, with more responsibility for councils in some areas (e.g. suggestion that councils could toll roads to manage congestion) and less in other areas (e.g. central government would have more control of housing and urban development outcomes).

14. The council submission was circulated to all elected members during the week beginning 11 June 2021. Unfortunately, there will only be a short turnaround time for feedback as submissions close on 24 June 2021.

15. Local board feedback is required by 17 June 2021.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) note the Papakura Local Board’s feedback on the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission’s He Tūāpapa ki te Ora: Infrastructure for a Better Future consultation document as attached to the agenda report.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Papakura Local Board feedback the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission’s He Tūāpapa ki te Ora: Infrastructure for a Better Future consultation document	183

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author	Lee Manaia - Local Board Advisor
Authoriser	Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Eke Panuku Development Auckland - Papakura Local Board Six-Monthly Report to 31 March 2021

File No.: CP2021/06726

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To update the Papakura Local Board on Eke Panuku Development Auckland (Eke Panuku) activities within the local board area and the region, for the period from 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report is for information only and no decision-making is required.

3. This report covers our urban regeneration programme in relation to the local board area from 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021.

4. It also includes information on property management, purchases and sales in relation to the local board area, which Eke Panuku undertakes on behalf of Auckland Council.

5. Please note that this report is for seven months. This is to align future reports with other Eke Panuku reporting cycles.

6. This report is a record of events for the Papakura Local Board area during the stated period.

7. Eke Panuku is supporting the urban regeneration in Papakura such as through the Eke Panuku and Auckland Transport - Transit Integrated Development Programme, a 20-year programme that will explore urban regeneration and mixed-use development opportunities at Papakura Train Station.

8. While Eke Panuku is an urban regeneration agency, its other function within the Papakura Local Board area is to manage properties owned by Auckland Council.

9. Eke Panuku currently manages 7 leases in the Papakura Local Board area.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) receive the Eke Panuku Development Auckland six-monthly report to 31 March 2021.

Horopaki

Context

10. Eke Panuku Development Auckland is the council-controlled organisation that delivers urban regeneration in Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland). Urban regeneration is the planning of neighbourhoods and the improvement of buildings and spaces to strengthen communities and the economy to make it an even better place to live.

11. Our city is facing rapid growth. Quality development is required to accommodate this growth and to ensure people love and can afford to live in Auckland. We imagine a city of strong neighbourhoods. We work across many neighbourhoods throughout our city from large, long-term urban regeneration plans to small projects on specific sites to meet the needs of the city’s long-term growth - including more types of homes people can afford. We work alongside the locals, other parts of the council and businesses to regenerate our city in ways that benefit both our local communities and Auckland as a whole.

12. We deliver returns for the council, and at the same time, we ensure our assets contribute positively to the neighbourhoods of Tāmaki Makaurau. We manage around $2.4 billion of land and buildings owned by the Auckland Council.

13. In the period 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021, we continued our urban regeneration programme across the region, brought a $22.8m return to the council via property management, purchased six properties on behalf of the group, and sold nine properties as part of either our neighbourhood regeneration or as directed by Auckland Council.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Urban regeneration

14. As part of the Corporate Property Strategy, Eke Panuku is working with the local board on urban regeneration outcomes for 35 Coles Crescent. It is currently preparing to undertake a subdivision to enable part of the site to be retained in council ownership and addressing an encroachment.

15. Eke Panuku is also working closely with the Papakura Local Board to explore other potential urban regeneration opportunities in Papakura on a number of sites.

Transit-oriented development

16. In September 2020 the Finance and Performance Committee approved the Eke Panuku and Auckland Transport Park and Ride Integrated Development Programme. This is a 20-year programme that will explore the urban regeneration and mixed-use development opportunities at specific park and rides around the region. Papakura Park and Ride is one of the agreed sites included in the programme to be explored.

Property management and properties of Papakura Local Board interest

17. Eke Panuku manages 7 leases in the Papakura Local Board area.

18. The Papakura Local Board has expressed interest in updates on properties within the Eke Panuku property portfolio. The table below provides an update on matters of significance for the reporting period.

36 Coles Crescent, Papakura	This property was recommended for sale in December 2018 and deferred at the request of the local board for three years. Eke Panuku is now exploring opportunities with the local board to progress this as a potential urban regeneration opportunity.
26 O’Shannessey Street, Papakura	This property was recommended for sale in December 2018 and deferred at the request of the local board for three years. Eke Panuku is now exploring opportunities with the local board to progress this as a potential urban regeneration opportunity.

Acquisitions

19. Eke Panuku has purchased no properties on behalf of the Auckland Council group, in the Papakura Local Board area, during the reporting period 1 September 2020 to 31 March 2021.

Disposals

20. On behalf of the Auckland Council, Eke Panuku sells properties that are no longer required by the Auckland Council group for service use.

21. The decision to sell these properties is made by Auckland Council’s Governing Body with advice from its finance team.

22. Eke Panuku does not have a decision-making role in the sale of properties that are surplus to the council’s requirements.

23. The role of Eke Panuku is to provide property transaction services. Proceeds from these sales are returned to Auckland Council to be reinvested in council services.

24. Work is underway on the following properties which have been approved for sale in principle by the Finance and Performance Committee:

Property	Status
2R Keeney Court, Papakura	Eke Panuku on behalf of Auckland Council undertook public notification of the council's intention to revoke the reserve status in February 2021. Following completion of the reserve revocation process, the PACE Committee will consider if the proposed reserve revocation should be referred to the Department of Conservation for final approval.
35 Coles Crescent, Papakura	A council service centre – the site sale project has been initiated. Eke Panuku is in discussion with the local board about the retention of the playground, the Plunket rooms and the time capsule as well as the essential development outcomes to be achieved through the sale of this site.
143 and 145 Keri Vista Rise	The sites were purchased in 2008 by Papakura District Council for future road connection under the Public Works Act (1981). Auckland Transport confirmed that the properties are no longer required for any transport-related projects. Eke Panuku is currently undertaking the offer back to the previous owners in accordance with s40 Public Works Act 1981. Since December the two properties have been cleared of gorse and rubbish and put on a regular mowing schedule. Eke Panuku has also replaced several stormwater and wastewater lids.

25. There were no unconditional agreements reached in the Papakura Local Board area during the reporting period.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

26. The Eke Panuku Priority Location programmes support the regeneration of existing town centres while also addressing climate mitigation and adaptation.

27. Mitigation of climate change involves reducing the carbon emissions that contribute to climate change. Our Priority Locations are transport-oriented communities that utilise existing infrastructure and transport links and we seek to make local walking and cycling safe and viable alternatives to the private vehicle. Eke Panuku has also adopted a Homestar-6 minimum standard to ensure we can reduce energy, water, and landfill waste. We are working to adopt similar standards for our public realm and commercial developments, whilst also taking guidance from precinct sustainability rating tools like Green Star Communities.

28. Adaptation to climate change involves planning for the changes to our climate and associated impacts that are already happening or are projected to happen, including sea-level rise, hotter temperatures, extreme weather events, flooding and droughts. Climate change is likely to subject the Papakura Local Board area to hotter temperatures and more frequent flooding and drought. Eke Panuku seeks to future-proof our communities by:

· specifying that infrastructure and developments are designed to cope with warmer temperatures and extreme weather events

· the use of green infrastructure and water sensitive design to increase flood resilience and provide ecological and biodiversity benefits

· the provision of increased shade and shelter for storm events and hotter days

· initiatives to build community resilience.

29. In October, the Eke Panuku executive team agreed to a work programme of priority actions to help Eke Panuku deliver on the council’s sustainable procurement objectives which Eke Panuku has adopted. Targeting these objectives will help further leverage the economic, social and environmental benefits of Eke Panuku urban regeneration projects and the products and services we procure as a business. Implementation of these priority projects has commenced which focus on embedding sustainable procurement into Eke Panuku procurement processes and systems, including the inclusion of climate considerations into procurements for capital works and renewals.

30. The Eke Panuku Climate Change Strategy was adopted by the Eke Panuku Board in November. The strategy guides how Eke Panuku will support the implementation of Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Plan.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

31. Eke Panuku cannot achieve its vision alone. Our complex operating environment means we need the expertise of others. Therefore, building and maintaining strong relationships and partnerships, and working together with others in general, is an ongoing focus for us.

32. Eke Panuku Development Auckland works collaboratively with other Auckland Council departments, CCOs and Crown agencies to deliver joined-up urban regeneration in our neighbourhoods.

33. Impacts and views are considered both on a programme and project level for the neighbourhoods we work in, to maximise community outcomes.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

34. Any local or sub-regional impacts are considered on a programme and project basis.

35. Eke Panuku regularly engages with local boards on its projects and programmes within local board areas.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

36. Eke Panuku supports the aspirations described in the Auckland Plan 2050.

37. Eke Panuku has worked closely with our mana whenua partners to understand their priorities in Tāmaki Makaurau. Mana whenua have shared their top five aspirations with Eke Panuku. Below is a summary:

· Governance: We involve mana whenua in transparent decision-making.

· Culture: We will increase our practice of kaitiakitanga (by all) and increase the visibility of Māori identity and culture in our projects.

· Economic: We will create more commercial investment, procurement, and engagement opportunities for Māori.

· Social: We will foster a sense of community and connectedness and help enhance the well-being of Māori here in Tāmaki Makaurau.

· Natural environment: We will work together to ensure we are working towards significant improvements to te mauri o te taiao.

38. Eke Panuku continues to make progress on the Eke Panuku Mana Whenua Outcomes Framework actions and presented a six-month status report to mana whenua in February 2021.

39. Eke Panuku has achieved 36/40 significant initiatives in the 2020-2021 financial year. Highlights include the numerous whakawātea with our mana whenua partners to celebrate significant milestones to build the stage for the 2021 America’s Cup.

40. Following the Emergency Budget 2020/2021, Eke Panuku is still working with mana whenua to identify potential development and disposal opportunities. Eke Panuku has invited mana whenua to register commercial interests in properties Eke Panuku is preparing to dispose of on the market.

41. Eke Panuku has started a pilot programme focused on growing the capability of young leaders to enable placemaking activities. The programme, He Pia He Tauira, has hosted several wānanga with tauira to prepare for upcoming activities.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

42. There are no financial implications associated with this report.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

43. There are no risks associated with receiving this report.

44. This report must be received to meet the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

45. The next six-monthly report covers the period of 1 April to 30 September 2021.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Perin Gerrand - Engagement Coordinator

Authorisers

Joanna Glasswell - Head of Corporate Affairs

Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

Papakura Local Board

23 June 2021

Papakura Local Board Governance Forward Work Calendar - June 2021

File No.: CP2021/08016

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To present to the Papakura Local Board the three months Governance Forward Work Calendar.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Governance Forward Work Calendar is a schedule of items that will come before the local board at business meetings and workshops over the next three months. The Governance Forward Work Calendar for the Papakura Local Board is included in Attachment A of this report.

3. The calendar aims to support local boards’ governance role by:

i) ensuring advice on agendas and workshop material is driven by local board priorities

ii) clarifying what advice is required and when

iii) clarifying the rationale for reports.

4. The calendar will be updated every month, be included on the agenda for business meetings and distributed to relevant council staff. It is recognised that at times items will arise that are not programmed. Board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Papakura Local Board:

a) note the Governance Forward Work Calendar as at 14 May 2021.

Horopaki

Context

5. The council’s Quality Advice Programme aims to improve the focus, analysis, presentation and timeliness of staff advice to elected representatives. An initiative under this is to develop forward work calendars for Governing Body committees and local boards. These provide elected members with better visibility of the types of governance tasks they are being asked to undertake and when they are scheduled.

6. There are no new projects in the Governance Forward Work Calendar. The calendar brings together in one schedule reporting on all of the board’s projects and activities that have been previously approved in the local board plan, long-term plan, departmental work programmes and through other board decisions. It includes Governing Body policies and initiatives that call for a local board response.

7. This initiative is intended to support the board’s governance role. It will also help staff to support local boards, as an additional tool to manage workloads and track activities across council departments, and it will allow greater transparency for the public.

8. The calendar is arranged in three columns, “Topic”, “Purpose” and “Governance Role”:

i) Topic describes the items and may indicate how they fit in with broader processes such as the annual plan.

ii) Purpose indicates the aim of the item, such as formally approving plans or projects, hearing submissions or receiving progress updates

iii) Governance role is a higher-level categorisation of the work local boards do. Examples of the seven governance categories are tabled below:

Governance role	Examples
Setting direction / priorities / budget	Capex projects, work programmes, annual plan
Local initiatives / specific decisions	Grants, road names, alcohol bans
Input into regional decision-making	Comments on regional bylaws, policies, plans
Oversight and monitoring	Local board agreement, quarterly performance reports, review projects
Accountability to the public	Annual report
Engagement	Community hui, submissions processes
Keeping informed	Briefings, local board forums

9. Local board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar. The calendar will be updated and reported back every month to business meetings. Updates will also be distributed to relevant council staff.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

10. This report is an information report providing the governance forward work programme for the next three months.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

11. The council is required to provide Governance Forward Work Calendar to the Papakura Local Board for their consideration.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

12. All local boards are being presented with a Governance Forward Work Calendar for their consideration.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

13. The projects and processes referred to in the Governance Forward Work Calendar will have a range of implications for Māori which will be considered when the work is reported.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

14. There are no financial implications relating to this report.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

15. This report is a point in time of the Governance Forward Work Calendar. It is a living document and updated month to month. It minimises the risk of the board being unaware of planned topics for their consideration.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

16. Staff will review the calendar each month in consultation with board members and will report an updated calendar to the board.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Papakura Local Board Forward Governance Calendar as at 11 June 2021	247

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author	Rohin Patel - Democracy Advisor
Authoriser	Carol McKenzie-Rex - Local Area Manager Franklin, Manurewa, Papakura

[1] Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, section 15(2)(c).

[2] Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, ss15-16.

[3] Local Government Act 2002, Schedule 7, Part 1A, clause 36D.

[4] Local Government Act 2002, Schedule 7, clause 36D.

[5] Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, section 15(2)(c).

[6] Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, ss15-16.

[7] Local Government Act 2002, Schedule 7, Part 1A, clause 36D

[8] Local Government Act 2002, Schedule 7, clause 36D

[9] Applies to Great South Road which adjoins the plan change land

[12] Local Government Act 2002, Schedule 7, clause 36D.

Chairperson	Brent Catchpole
Deputy Chairperson	Jan Robinson
Members	Felicity Auva'a
	George Hawkins
	Keven Mealamu
	Sue Smurthwaite

No.	Report Title	Item no.	Meeting Date	Governing Body Committee or Council Controlled Organisation or Forum or Local Board
1	Notice of Motion - Member Troy Churton - Delegated authority for certain notification decisions	12	20 May 2021	Ōrākei Local Board resolutions circulated to all local boards for their information
2	Notice of Motion - Member David Wong - Request for Regular Communication and Transparency on Helicopter Activity over the Ōrākei Local Board area	13	20 May 2021	Ōrākei Local Board resolutions circulated to all local boards for their information

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Papakura Local Board Workshop Record 12 May 2021	253
b ⇩	Papakura Local Board Workshop Record 19 May 2021	255
c ⇩	Papakura Local Board Workshop Record 26 May 2021	257
d ⇩	Papakura Local Board Workshop Record 2 June 2021	259
e ⇩	Papakura Local Board Workshop Record 9 June 2021	261