I hereby give notice that an extraordinary meeting of the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 27 July 2021 12.30pm Woodside Room |
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Apulu Reece Autagavaia |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Dawn Trenberth |
|
Members |
Dr Ashraf Choudhary, QSO, JP |
|
|
Dr Ofa Dewes |
|
|
Lotu Fuli |
|
|
Swanie Nelson |
|
|
Ross Robertson, QSO, JP |
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
Carol McGarry Democracy Advisor
19 July 2021
Contact Telephone: +64 27 591 5024 Email: carol.mcgarry@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board 27 July 2021 |
|
1 Welcome 5
2 Apologies 5
3 Declaration of Interest 5
4 Public Forum 5
4.1 Public Forum - Taking action on alcohol outlet signage - improving amenity and preventing harm 5
5 Draft proposal to make a new Signs Bylaw 7
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
”
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board 27 July 2021 |
|
Draft proposal to make a new Signs Bylaw
File No.: CP2021/09863
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek support on the draft proposal to make a new Auckland Council and Auckland Transport Ture ā-Rohe mo nga Tohu 2022 / Signs Bylaw 2022 and associated controls before it is finalised for public consultation.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. To enable the local board to decide whether to support a proposal to make a new signs bylaw and associated controls, staff have prepared a draft proposal.
3. The draft proposal is the culmination of decisions by the Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport on the review of the current Signage Bylaw 2015. These decisions were made at meetings to consider the review’s findings in June 2020 and options in October 2020 and April 2021 and provided direction on the content of the draft proposal.
4. The draft proposal would continue to enable council to manage the problems signs can cause in relation to nuisance, safety, misuse of public places[1], the Auckland transport system and environment.
5. The main draft proposals in comparison to the current bylaws about signs are to:
· combine the current Signage Bylaw 2015 and Election Signs Bylaw 2013
· increase the current portable sign prohibited area to cover the entire City Centre Zone
· increase the maximum area of flat wall-mounted signs in the Heavy Industry Zone to 6m2 (currently 2.88m2 for sale of a property and 5m2 for goods, services or events)
· retain the intent of the rules in the current bylaws (unless otherwise stated) in a way that is up to date and more certain
· use a bylaw structure, format and wording more aligned to the Auckland Unitary Plan and current council drafting standards.
6. Staff recommend that the local board support the draft proposal.
7. There is a reputational risk that the draft proposal or the local board’s support do not reflect the views of people in their local board area. This risk would be partly mitigated by the opportunity for the local board to provide views on public feedback prior to a final decision.
8. Local board support on the draft proposal will help develop a proposal for the Regulatory Committee to recommend to the Governing Body and for the Board of Auckland Transport. Public consultation is scheduled for September and October, deliberations for March 2022 and a final Governing Body and Board of Auckland Transport decision for April 2022.
Recommendation/s
That the Local Board:
a) support the draft Statement of Proposal in Attachment A of this agenda report to make a new Auckland Council and Auckland Transport Ture ā-Rohe mo nga Tohu 2022 / Signs Bylaw 2022 and associated controls for public consultation.
Horopaki
Context
The draft proposed Bylaw and controls regulate most signs in Auckland
9. The draft proposed new Auckland Council and Auckland Transport Ture ā-Rohe mo nga Tohu 2022 / Signs Bylaw 2022 and associated controls seek to manage the problems signs can cause in relation to nuisance, safety, misuse of public places, Auckland transport system and environment.
10. The draft proposed new bylaw and controls:
· would continue to provide for signs related to activities on the same property as long as they meet certain conditions for their design, construction and duration of display
· would continue to limit signs unrelated to the day-to-day activities on the land it is located (for example signs on footpaths)
· would continue to provide more opportunities to display signs about elections, polls and referendums during an election period that would not normally be allowed
· would continue to be enforced by the Licencing and Regulatory Compliance unit using a graduated compliance model (information / education / enforcement)
· would remain part of a wider regulatory framework[2]
· must be adopted using a public consultative process and commence before 28 May 2022 to avoid a regulatory gap (the Signage Bylaw 2015 expires on 28 May 2022).
The proposal is the outcome of a statutory review of the current signage bylaw
11. The Regulatory Committee (committee) and Board of Auckland Transport (board) requested staff commence the process to make a new bylaw and controls following a statutory review of the Auckland Council and Auckland Transport Signage Bylaw 2015 (refer diagram below).
2015 Signage Bylaw review process
12. Staff have prepared a draft proposal to implement the decision of the committee and board (Attachment A). The draft proposal includes the reasons and decisions which led to the proposed new bylaw and controls and provides a comparison between the current bylaws and the proposed new bylaw and controls.
The local board has an opportunity to provide its views on the draft proposal
13. The local board has an opportunity to support the draft proposal in Attachment A by resolution to the Regulatory Committee and the Board of Auckland Transport before it is finalised for public consultation.
14. The board could support the draft proposal for public consultation, recommend changes or defer comment until after it has considered public feedback on the proposal.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
The draft proposal improves how council manages signs in Auckland
15. The draft proposal makes a new bylaw and controls about signs to better manage the problems signs can cause in relation to nuisance, safety, misuse of public places, Auckland transport system and environment.
16. The table below summarises the main proposals in comparison to the current bylaws:
Reasons for proposals |
|
· To make a new bylaw and associated controls that combine the current Signage Bylaw 2015 and Election Signs Bylaw 2013. · The current bylaws will be revoked. |
· reduce confusion from having two bylaws about signs. · clarify intention to provide more opportunities to display election signs during pre-election periods than would otherwise be allowed for a sign that does not relate to activities on the property. |
· To increase the current portable sign prohibited area to cover the entire City Centre Zone. |
· prioritise the area for pedestrians and place-making activities. · remove potential safety risks, nuisance and clutter. · improve accessibility for mobility and vision-impaired pedestrians. |
· To increase the maximum area of flat wall-mounted signs in the Heavy Industry Zone to 6m2. |
· allow more visible display of information in an area which has a larger built form and a lower priority on amenity values. (current maximum is 2.88m2 for sale of a property and 5m2 for goods, services or events on a property). |
· To retain the intent of the rules in the current bylaws (unless otherwise stated) in a way that is up to date and more certain. |
· retain the effect of rules considered to still be appropriate. · ensure rules are current, clear, and easier to understand and comply with. |
· To use a bylaw structure, format and wording more aligned to the Auckland Unitary Plan and current council drafting standards. |
· ensure rules are easier to understand and comply with. · comply with current council bylaw drafting standards. · assist future reviews of the Auckland Unitary Plan in relation to the most appropriate distribution of sign rules. |
The draft proposal complies with statutory requirements
17. The draft new bylaw and controls has been prepared in accordance with statutory requirements to:
· help manage the problems signs can cause in relation to nuisance, safety, misuse of public places, the Auckland transport system and environment
· use a structure, format and wording that are easier to read, understand and comply with than the current bylaws about signs and meet current council bylaw drafting standards
· be authorised by statute, not be repugnant to other legislation, or be unreasonable
· not give rise to any implications and not be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act
· not be inconsistent with other Acts, regulations and bylaws (refer footnote 2).
Staff recommend the local board support the draft proposal
18. Staff recommend that the local board consider whether to support the draft proposal by resolution to the Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
19. There are no implications for climate change arising from this decision.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
20. The draft proposal impacts the operations of several council departments and council-controlled organisations. This includes Auckland Council’s Licencing and Regulatory Compliance Unit and Parks, Sports and Recreation Department, Auckland Unlimited, Panuku and Auckland Transport.
21. Relevant staff are aware of the impacts of the draft proposal and their implementation role, and the proposal is being developed jointly with Auckland Transport.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
22. The draft proposal impacts local governance, for example it regulates signs about community events and signs on local facilities and parks.
23. Representative local board views were provided in April 2021 through a joint working group established by the Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport.[3] Group members unanimously supported a new bylaw and controls that would be more aligned to the Auckland Unitary Plan and provided suggestions on the detailed content of the Bylaw.[4]
24. The Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport considered these views on 20 April 2021 (REG/2021/20) (29/04/2021:18). The committee and board directed staff to draft a new bylaw and controls. Group suggestions on detailed content have been considered in preparing the draft proposal.
25. This report gives the local board an opportunity to provide its support on the draft proposal by resolution to the Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport.
26. The local board will have further opportunity to provide its views to a Bylaw Panel on how the Panel should address matters raised in public feedback to the proposal related to its local board area.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
27. The proposal contributes to the Independent Māori Statutory Board’s Māori Plan for Tāmaki Makaurau and the Auckland Plan 2050’s Māori Identity and Wellbeing outcome by supporting Māori who want to make their businesses uniquely identifiable and visible.
28. The proposal also helps protect all people living in Tāmaki Makaurau from the potential harms and nuisances that signs can cause.
29. People identifying as Māori presented views during the 2015 signage bylaw review. This feedback primarily identified ways to improve inappropriate signage standards. The draft proposal addresses those views by clarifying and updating standards.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
31. There are no financial implications to the local board for any decisions to support the draft proposal for public consultation. The Governing Body and the Board of Auckland Transport will consider any financial implications associated with public notification at a later date.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
32. The following risk has been identified:
If... |
Then... |
Mitigation |
The draft proposal or the local board’s support do not reflect the view of people in the local board area. |
There may be negative views about council’s process to develop the proposal. |
The local board will have an opportunity to consider any public feedback and provide its formal views to a Bylaw Panel on how the Panel should address the matters raised in the feedback prior to the final decision being made. |
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
33. Staff will present a proposal and any local board support to the Regulatory Committee and Board of Auckland Transport in August 2021.
34. If at any time a joint bylaw is not able to progress, Auckland Council will continue to progress a bylaw for sign-related matters it is responsible for.
35. If the Governing Body of Auckland Council and the Board of Auckland Transport decide to proceed with a joint bylaw, the subsequent steps include public consultation, local board views on public feedback, Bylaw Panel deliberations and a final decision by the Governing Body of Auckland Council and Board of Auckland Transport (refer to the diagram in Context).
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Attachment A - Draft proposal for new signs bylaw and controls |
13 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Authors |
Victor Faletutulu - Graduate Policy Advisor Steve Hickey - Policy Analyst |
Authorisers |
Paul Wilson - Senior Policy Manager Rina Tagore Acting Local Area Manager |
[1] For example, local parks, reserves, civic spaces, footpaths and roads.
[2] Resource Management Act, Auckland Unitary Plan, Auckland Council District Plan – Hauraki Gulf Islands Section, Electoral Act, Local Electoral Act, Electoral (Advertisements of a Specified Kind) Regulations, Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices, New Zealand Transport Agency (Signs on State Highways) Bylaw, New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority codes, Human Rights Act, Auckland Council Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw and Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw.
[3] Local board representatives were Margi Watson (Albert-Eden Local Board) and Mike Turinsky (Howick Local Board)
[4] Suggestions included: retaining the current size of signs advertising commercial sexual services in non-residential areas as there is insufficient evidence to justify a change; requiring council event signs to meet the Bylaw’s standards; clarifying requirements for landowner approval and the definition of community event; clarifying how election signs are regulated between parliamentary and local elections, and within and outside of the election period..