Whau Local Board
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Whau Local Board held via Skype for Business on Wednesday, 22 September 2021 at 6.00pm. A record of the meeting or a written summary will be uploaded on the Auckland Council website.
present
Chairperson |
Kay Thomas |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Fasitua Amosa |
|
Members |
Catherine Farmer |
|
|
Ulalemamae Te'eva Matafai |
|
|
Warren Piper |
|
|
Jessica Rose |
From 6.05pm |
|
Susan Zhu |
|
ABSENT
|
|
|
|
IN ATTENDANCE
Member |
Glenn Wilcox |
Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whau Local Board 22 September 2021 |
|
Chair K Thomas opened the meeting, welcomed those present online and led the meeting in a karakia.
There were no declarations of interest.
Resolution number WH/2021/89 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa: That the Whau Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 25 August 2021, as true and correct.
|
There were no leaves of absence.
|
Resolution number WH/2021/90 MOVED by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa, seconded by Chairperson K Thomas: That the Whau Local Board: a) acknowledge the Police, all first responders and our community in their response to the attack in Lynn Mall in September 2021, commending the Police for their swift and decisive action that ensured no more people were hurt b) thank our community who rallied under the stress of COVID-19 Level 4, and by and large gave nothing to racism by insisting the Muslim community be made to answer for the actions of one man, noting that those actions were his alone, and instead the Whau chose to rally, come together and offer support to each other. |
There were no petitions.
There were no deputations.
There was no public forum.
There was no extraordinary business.
11 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/91 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the report from Whau
Ward Councillor, Tracy
Mulholland. |
Chair K Thomas invited Glenn Wilcox, Member of Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB), to address the local board.
|
Resolution number WH/2021/92 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) thank Glenn Wilcox, Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) Member, for his attendance.
|
12 |
Reserve revocation of 13 Davern Lane, New Lynn, and Lot 6 DP 119411 Trojan Crescent, New Lynn |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/93 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member J Rose: That the Whau Local Board: a) note that the Whau Local Board generally does not support asset sales and while it acknowledges that the sale of an asset may occasionally be necessary and that Lot 6 DP 119411 Trojan Crescent, New Lynn, does not have as many significant features as those found at 13 Davern Lane, the local board does not agree to endorse the reserve revocation on this property as it stands. b) request that, should the reserve revocation and sale of Lot 6 DP 119411 Trojan Crescent, New Lynn, proceed, staff working on this disposal process identify options for the loss of green open space to be offset by the development of a new park in the vicinity of the site to ensure no net loss of opportunity for outdoor recreation for local residents, particularly in the context of intensive housing development. c) note that the local board intends to speak to its views at a forthcoming hearing on the proposed revocations. d) note that the Parks, Arts, Community and Events Committee will consider the local board’s views and any recommendations made by Independent Commissioners regarding public submissions.
|
13 |
Draft Business Improvement District Policy (2021) Kaupapa Here ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/94 MOVED by Member W Piper, seconded by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa: That the Whau Local Board: a) welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft Business Improvement District Policy (2021). b) note its concern that BID programmes, business associations and the businesses they represent are facing many challenges because of the covid-19 pandemic, noting in particular that Auckland has had far more lockdowns than any other part of New Zealand and that the recent level 4 lockdown was the longest period any region has spent in level 4 and the economic and social impacts of this are not yet known. c) request that consultation in the Draft Business Improvement District Policy (2021) be deferred. d) support the establishment of a clearer, more timely issue resolution process, but note its concerns that Clauses 4.3 and 4.5 have the potential to create conflict between BIDs and Auckland Council and request that the wording is amended to reflect that BIDs are independent entities whose interests may not always align with those of Auckland Council. e) support the ability of business associations to amend their board charter to suit their local needs. f) note that concerns have been raise around Clause 2.4 that appears to allow for the targeted rate funds to be collected by Auckland Council and spent on an organisation other than the BID, and request the wording be amended to reflect that the BID targeted rate funding is collected only for the BIDs and no other organisations. g) note concerns around the timing of the proposed increase in the minimum targeted rate funding and how that will affect smaller BIDs in the context of COVID-19 lockdowns and economic recovery, again noting that the impacts of the recent level 4 lockdown are not yet known. h) note concerns around Clause 7.1(a) requiring BIDs to be registered Charities Services (formerly the Charities Commission) and make the following points: i) while BIDs are not-for-profit organisations, they are not and do not aspire to be charitable organisations in the traditional sense ii) the local board understands the benefits of the reporting system provided by Charities Services and the advantages of having all BIDs registered and undertaking reporting via the same mechanism, but maintains that asking BIDs to register as charities is an anomaly and will be a source of frustration for some iii) the local board request that staff keep appraised of the progress of the Incorporated Societies Bill (currently at Select Committee stage) and consider for future policy reviews whether this, or other forms of incorporation, could be considered as an alternative to charitable registration. i) thank Claire Siddens, Principal Advisor (BID’s, CCO’s External Partnerships) for her attendance to speak to the item. |
14 |
Local board feedback on the kerbside refuse charging mechanism policy |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/95 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member W Piper: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the kerbside refuse charging mechanism policy report. b) support Pay As You Throw (PAYT) as it considers rates-based charging does not incentivize responsible recycling and considers PAYT to be the best mechanism to achieve the following priorities: i) waste minimisation – minimises waste to landfill ii) equity – providing a service that is accessible for everyone regardless of income and location iii) climate change – has the lowest impact on Auckland’s greenhouse gas emissions. c) request that staff investigate an efficient option of enabling shared waste disposal between neighbouring houses or multi-apartment complexes; thus encouraging individuals to recycle as well as increasing safety and decreasing visual pollution by reducing the litterbin obstacles on footpaths on collection days. |
15 |
Public feedback on proposal to amend the Water Supply and Wastewater Network Bylaw 2015 |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/96 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member W Piper: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive public feedback on the proposal to amend the Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Ture ā Rohe Whakarato Wai me te Pae Kōtuitui Wai Para / Auckland Council Water Supply and Wastewater Network Bylaw 2015. |
16 |
Public feedback on proposal to make a new Public Trading Events and Filming Bylaw 2022 |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/97 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive public feedback on the proposal to make a new Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Te Ture ā-Rohe Tauhokohoko, Whakahaerenga me te Tango Kiriata Tūmatanui 2022 / Auckland Council Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw 2022. b) request that Auckland Council’s Bylaw Panel gives due consideration to feedback received from the Whau, namely the Rosebank Business Association, responding in context with the overall regional feedback. c) appoint Deputy Chair F Amosa to present the views in (b) to the Bylaw Panel on 19 October 2021. d) delegate authority to the local board Chair to appoint replacement(s) to the persons in (c) should Deputy Chair F Amosa be unable to present to the Bylaw Panel on 19 October 2021. |
17 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/98 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Deputy Chairperson F Amosa: That the Whau Local Board: a) support the draft Tāmaki Tauawhi Kaumātua – Age-friendly Auckland Action Plan. |
18 |
Public feedback on proposal to amend the Animal Management Bylaw 2015 |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/99 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member J Rose: That the Whau Local Board: b) note the modest number of submissions on the proposal to amend Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Te Ture-ā-rohe Tiaki Kararehe 2015 / Auckland Council Animal Management Bylaw 2015 from the Whau community and ask that the Auckland Council Bylaw Panel assess the feedback in context with the overall regional feedback received. |
19 |
Local board feedback on Auckland Transport's Parking Strategy Review |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/100 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member J Rose: That the Whau Local Board: a) welcome the opportunity to give feedback on the draft Auckland Transport Parking Strategy. b) agree that this parking strategy is necessary and support in principle a transition to a less car-focused city to support Auckland’s in delivering on its commitments under Taruke a Tawhiri – Auckland’s Climate Plan. c) reiterate its previously resolved feedback around parking as follows: i)
the Whau Local
Board is concerned that the current approach to managing the transport needs
associated with intensive urban development, particularly in brownfields
areas such as Avondale, is reactive rather than proactive ii) the Whau Local Board is concerned that in areas like Avondale where intensive brownfields development is happening the provision of infrastructure (including parking), along with access and connectivity is currently lagging behind development, as the Whau Local Board area is not considered a “growth” area, based on out-of-date information
iii) the local board supports in principle the shift away from off-street parking requirements for new housing developments, but it is concerned that new housing is already being built without off-street parking in areas with limited access to public or active transport
iv) the local board notes that the result of this is the shift towards intensive urban development with limited parking (in particular Avondale and New Lynn) is significant and compounding issues with parking and congestion, as an increasing number of people require on-street parking around busy town centres with inadequate access to alternative transport modes such as feeder buses
v) the local board notes the potential of using parking as a lever (including limiting and charging for parking) to discourage single-occupancy vehicle use and encourage mode shift towards public transport and active modes, but believes that it is irresponsible to promote this policy without first ensuring adequate access to alternative modes, and to park and ride facilities where appropriate
vi) the local board notes that the New Lynn Transport centre provides access to the rapid transit network for people throughout the western fringe and the southern Waitakere Ranges, and that provision of parking to support those who need to drive from their homes in these areas to their most convenient (or in some cases only) transport hub is essential
vii) the local board notes that the unique geography and topography, alongside the relatively sparsely distributed population, of the Waitakere Ranges puts significant constraints on future provision of frequent bus services and makes active modes unrealistic for most, and access to park and ride facilities is critical to people in these communities viii) local board notes that people’s ability to access the rapid transit network (particularly once the City Rail Link comes online) will be a huge benefit to people in the southern Waitākere Ranges and their foothills (including areas such as Green Bay, Blockhouse Bay, and the southern and western parts of New Lynn), but only if they have the ability to access that network ix) the local board is aware that there is high demand for parking capacity at train stations right along the western rail line, but Auckland Transport’s current preference for new park and rides to be considered only at the outer fringe of the public transport network (thereby ruling out all but a few of the northernmost stations on the western rail line) is short-sighted and of little use to communities in (for example) Huia, Langholm, Woodlands Park and Cornwallis, for whom New Lynn station is the most obvious and sensible choice x) the local board notes that the New Lynn Urban Plan 2010 makes specific provision for a multi-storey park and ride in New Lynn (Auckland’s only Transport-oriented Development) xi) the local board notes that a parking study in New Lynn undertaken in 2017 reinforced the need for this facility, identifying a significant shortfall in future parking capacity xii) the local board notes that Auckland Council does not have the funds to deliver the multi-storey park and ride in New Lynn in the current Long-term Plan and that funding from central government would appear to be the only way to deliver transformative change to reduce carbon emissions in light of council’s heavily constrained funding. d) note its concern about the potential for current public parking spaces to be lost through the Auckland Council Group’s asset recycling programme in future, particularly in Avondale and New Lynn. e) request that any proposals for future repurposing of council-owned land currently used for parking include serious consideration of options that would at least retain current public parking capacity if not increase it. f) note its concern, given these issues, about the possibility of increased utilisation of time restriction or charging around the New Lynn town centre until there is evidence of a commitment to a significant increase in commuter parking capacity, ideally through the delivery of a multi-story park and ride. g) note its concern around the possibility of any increases in parking restriction around any town centres until there is a demonstrable commitment by all relevant agencies to address the issue of lack of parking capacity caused by intensive residential development, through multiple levers including investment in feeder buses, safe and convenient active transport connections and any other mechanisms to reduce parking demand. h) acknowledge that some residents experiencing issues with on-street parking by commuters, including some reports of poor parking behaviours (for example parking on berms or too close to driveways), may support introduction of time restrictions around our town centres but note that this will only serve to push the problem further out unless the broader issues around lack of commuter parking and lack of feasible alternatives to private vehicle use for the first leg of an inbound commuter journey are addressed. i) note that Auckland Transport is currently unable to enforce parking on berms and request urgent advocacy by Auckland Transport and Auckland Council to relevant agencies to enable this enforcement to be introduced. j) note its concern about the potential impact of the removal of minimum off-street parking requirements under the Government Policy Statement on Urban Development and sees it as critical that the issues set out above be addressed before the required changes come into effect. k) note the need to ensure a fair, equitable and reasonable transition from a city that is designed around cars to a city with little or no free on-street parking, noting in particular the impact of this transition on the elderly, the disabled, more deprived communities, and parents with young children. |
20 |
Avondale Streetscape Footpath Replacement – Stage 2: Allocation of 2021-2023 Local Board Transport Capital Fund |
|
Resolution number WH/2021/101 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member W Piper: That the Whau Local Board: a) reiterate its concern around the ongoing delays affecting the Avondale Streetscape Footpath Replacement project. b) request that Auckland Transport progress the completion of Stage 2 of the Avondale Streetscape Footpath Replacement project as an urgent priority. c) allocate $1,075,477 from its Local Board Transport Capital Fund towards the completion of the Avondale Streetscape Footpath Replacement project – Stage 2, noting Auckland Transport’s contribution of 50 per cent of the cost of the lighting upgrade which is not included in the agenda report. d) thank Owena Schuster, Elected Member Relationship Partner (Auckland Transport) for her attendance to speak to the item. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 1.9.3. Member C Farmer requested that her dissenting vote be recorded.
21 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/102 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member S Zhu: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the decision made under delegation on 24 August 2021 providing feedback from the Whau Local Board for inclusion in Auckland Council’s submission on the Department of Internal Affairs’ consultation on changes to Māori ward and Māori constituency processes. b) receive the decision made under delegation on 9 September 2021 providing feedback from the Whau Local Board for inclusion in Auckland Council’s submission on the Three Waters reform proposal.
|
22 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/103 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member J Rose: That the Whau Local Board: a) approve the addition of two extraordinary meeting dates to the 2019-2022 Whau Local Board meeting schedule to accommodate the Annual Budget 2022/2023 timeframes as follows: i) Wednesday, 1 December 2021, 11.00am ii) Wednesday, 11 May 2022, 11.00am.
|
23 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/104 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member W Piper: That the Whau Local Board: a) note the records of the workshops held on 18 August, 1 and 8 September 2021. |
24 |
|
|
Resolution number WH/2021/105 MOVED by Chairperson K Thomas, seconded by Member C Farmer: That the Whau Local Board: a) receive the governance forward work calendar for September 2021. |
25 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
There was no consideration of extraordinary items.
6.28pm The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Whau Local Board HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:.......................................................