Upper Harbour Local Board
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Upper Harbour Local Board held in the Upper Harbour Local Board Office, 30 Kell Drive, Albany and via Microsoft Teams on Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 9.35am.
present
Chairperson |
Lisa Whyte |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Margaret Miles, QSM, JP |
|
Members |
Anna Atkinson |
|
|
Uzra Casuri Balouch, JP |
|
|
Nicholas Mayne |
|
|
Brian Neeson, JP |
|
Upper Harbour Local Board 12 May 2022 |
|
|
There were no declarations of interest.
Resolution number UH/2022/45 MOVED by Chairperson L Whyte, seconded by Member A Atkinson: That the Upper Harbour Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 21 April 2022, as a true and correct record.
|
There were no leaves of absence.
There were no acknowledgements.
There were no petitions.
There were no deputations.
There was no public forum.
There was no extraordinary business.
11 |
Minutes of the Upper Harbour Local Board meeting held Thursday, 21 April 2022 |
|
Resolution number UH/2022/46 MOVED by Chairperson L Whyte, seconded by Deputy Chairperson M Miles: That the Upper Harbour Local Board: a) note that the open unconfirmed minutes of the Upper Harbour Local Board meeting held on Thursday, 21 April 2022, are attached at item 11 of the agenda for the information of the local board only and will be confirmed under item 4 of the agenda.
|
12 |
Local board consultation feedback and input in the Annual Budget 2022 - 2023 |
|
Resolution number UH/2022/47 MOVED by Chairperson L Whyte, seconded by Deputy Chairperson M Miles: That the Upper Harbour Local Board: a) provide input on regional topics in the proposed Annual Budget 2022/2023 to the Governing Body; on the basis of the 350 submitters who provided input on some or all of the following: Climate Action Targeted Rate i) note that 61 per cent of submitters from the Upper Harbour Local Board area that responded to this question supported the proposal to introduce a Climate Action Targeted Rate, while 33 per cent did not support the proposal. ii) note that there are mixed views on the local board regarding the introduction of a Climate Action Targeted Rate, however there is support to deliver on the outcome of responding to the climate emergency. iii) acknowledge the current financial constraints faced by Auckland Council, noting that the current proposed general rates would not deliver on the outcomes proposed to be delivered by the Climate Action Targeted Rate. iv) request that local board views are sought on any projects being delivered as part of the climate action package in the Upper Harbour local board area v) request there be regular reporting to local boards and the general public on the outcomes being delivered with the targeted rate and that the package is reviewed on a regular basis for effectiveness Budget Pressures vi) note that 49 per cent of submitters from the Upper Harbour Local Board area that responded to this question supported the proposal to manage Auckland Council’s on-going budget pressures while 25 per cent did not support the proposal and 18 per cent did not know. vii) support the proposal to use the Government’s ‘Better Off’ support package funding as a lever to manage the budget pressures.
viii) note that there is insufficient information on the proposal to delay capital investment as a budget lever and request the opportunity to provide local board views on the proposal once further information is available.
ix) note that there is insufficient information on the proposal to implement cost reductions in the form of efficiency savings and potential reduction in services as a budget lever and request the opportunity to provide local board views on the proposal once further information is available. x) support the previously agreed general rates increase for 3.5 per cent for 2022/2023. xi) request that local board views are sought prior to any decisions on the sale or long-term lease of non-strategic assets.
Operating spending prioritization xii) note that 57 per cent of submitters from the Upper Harbour Local Board area that responded to this question supported the proposal to prioritise operating spending to help manage on-going budget pressures while 11 per cent did not support the proposal and 24 per cent did not know. xiii) note that there is insufficient information on the proposal to prioritise operating spending to help manage on-going budget pressures, and request the opportunity to provide local board views on the proposal once further information is available.
Waste service standardisation – pay-as-you-throw vs rates funded xiv) note that 42 per cent of submitters from the Upper Harbour Local Board area that responded to this question supported the proposal to move to a rates funded system. xv) note that 49 per cent of submitters from the Upper Harbour Local Board area that responded to this question did not support the proposal to move to a rates funded system and preferred a pay-as-you-throw system. xvi) support a pay-as-you-throw system in the local board area. xvii) support the implementation of a food scrap service in the local board urban area. xviii) request that there be increased investment for education of waste management particularly on recycling and composting.
Waste service standardisation – other xix) support the standardisation of the opt-out rules for residential multi-unit developments. xx) support the standardisation of the opt-out rules for residential and lifestyle properties with between two and nine units. xxi) support the standardisation of the opt-out rules for non-residential properties. xxii) support the application of a minimum base charge to every separately used or inhabited part of a property.
b) Provide the following advocacy initiatives for the Annual Budget 2022/2023 to the Governing body and inclusion in the 2022/2023 Local Board Agreement: i) confirm the long-term intention and seek the Governing Body to accept the vesting to Auckland Council of the new community pontoon and jetty at Marine Recreation Centre in Hobsonville. ii) retention of the Local Board Transport Capital Fund at current budget levels. iii) retention of the Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) capital budgets at current budget levels. iv) prioritisation of investment for open space acquisition and development in areas where there is a known need and gap in the network, for example the land identified in the Whenuapai structure plan. v) support the delivery of stage 2 of Scott Point Sustainable Sports Park and enable public access to land acquired in Whenuapai. vi) prioritisation and consideration of a community partnership model to deliver outcomes such as the proposed sub-regional indoor court facility in Albany. vii) a long-term solution for a library, including continuous provision, within the Albany area. viii) continue to support the whole of Te Onekiritea/Bomb Point being permanently available as public open space. ix) adequate levels of renewals funding to ensure assets are well maintained. |
Note: Item 12 – Local Board consultation feedback and input in the Annual Budget 2022-2023 – an updated link for the feedback submissions can be found: https://akhaveyoursay.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/submissions-annual-budget-2022-2023
13 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
There was no consideration of extraordinary items.
10.15 am The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance and attention to business and declared the meeting closed.
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Upper Harbour Local Board HELD ON
DATE:.........................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:.......................................................