|
Resolution
number PKTPP/2022/131
MOVED by Chairperson J Fairey, seconded by Member E
Kumar:
That
the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a)
approve in principle the Three
Kings Quarry Precinct Concept Plan (as tabled at the meeting), noting that it
is a high level concept plan reflecting legal agreements and negotiations
between Fletcher Living and Auckland Council, and that community consultation
will be undertaken by the Local Board at the detailed design stage. We
further request from Fletcher Living:
i)
a version of the plan which
more clearly delineates between the open space covered by this plan and other
land in the map.
ii)
a change of name for the plan
to Three Kings Quarry Public Parks and Open Space High Level Concept Plan.
iii)
that the draft content and
design at the detail design stage be provided by Fletcher Living to the
community to enable a thorough consultation process prior to adoption.
b)
note the concerns raised by South
Epsom Planning Group and Three Kings United Group in public forum earlier
today.
c) approve
that the assets are taken on by the council upon practical completion and
conclusion of agreed maintenance periods being:
i) 2-year
developers maintenance obligation for all additional assets excluded from the
Land Exchange Agreement, specific to the open spaces within the Land Exchange
Agreement.
ii) 5-year
developers maintenance obligation of land and assets vested with the council
as part of the ongoing resource consent.
d) delegate
to the General Manager of Parks and Community Facilities authority to
negotiate the infrastructure funding agreement on terms acceptable to the
council’s Infrastructure Funding team, including maintenance periods.
e) delegate
to the General Manager of Parks and Community Facilities authority to assess
and approve engineering detail for the open space development.
f) reconfirm
the local board’s view that the publicly accessible Kingsway lifts
should be provided by Fletcher Living as per the settlement between Fletcher
Residential Limited (Fletcher), and the Societies (South Epsom Planning Group
and Three Kings United Group).
g)
note
that the Whare Manaaki as provisioned in the Three Kings Precinct Plan has
been excluded from the concept plan map as per 13c of this report and not
shown graphically on the plan due to the location not being confirmed.
h)
request
again that Fletcher Living hold public information sessions, ideally by way
of one or more public meetings, for the local community to be updated on
their development plans.
i)
request
a meeting between Fletcher Living the Societies, mana whenua and the local
board in the new term to update all parties on the development.
j)
thank
Lea van Heerden and Thomas Dixon for their attendance by Microsoft Teams.
CARRIED
|
