|
Date:
Time:
Meeting Room:
Venue:
|
Tuesday 18
April 2023
1.00pm
Council
Chambers and via Microsoft Teams Town Hall 301-317 Queen St, Auckland, 1010
|
|
Waitematā Local Board
OPEN ATTACHMENTS
|
ITEM TABLE OF
CONTENTS PAGE
1 Deputation
- The Auckland Performing Arts Centre
A. TAPAC -
Prsentationa and Supporting Document 3
12 Chairperson's
Report
A. Chair Sage Board
Report April 2023 21
13 Board
Members Reports
A. Member Alex
Bonham Report April 2023 37
B. Member Richard
Northey Report April 2023 47
14 Indicative
Business Case: Tāmaki Pātaka Korero - Auckland Central Library
A. Central Library
Indicative Business Case (full report) 53
B. Presentation
slides to Waitematā Local Board 139
C. Mana whenua and
community engagement feedback report 165
D. Cost benefit
analysis report 195
16 Auckland
Transport Katoa Ka Ora Speed Management
A. Form for local
board to provide views on proposed Approaches One-Five 247
B. Katoa, Ka Ora -
Waitematā workshop 249
17 Watercare
- Wastewater Network Strategy
A. Memo -
Wastewater Network Strategy 269
20 Waitematā
Local Board workshop records
A. Workshop Records
28 March 2023 281
B. Workshop Records
4 April 2023 285
21 Governance
Forward Work Calendar
A. April Governance
Forward Work Calendar 289
|
Waitematā
Local Board
18 April 2023
|
|
Attachment
A
Form
for local board to provide views on proposed Approaches One to Five
Please provide your formal views
in the format request below by selecting one statement per approach.
Please refer to the supporting
document Katoa, Ka Ora Speed Management Plan for Auckland, for your local
board, in Attachment B.
Consistent Approaches
1. Approach One -
Easy to understand approach (select one below)
The local board views that:
a. the easy-to-understand
approach would benefit the community as proposed.
b. the easy-to-understand
approach would not benefit the community as proposed.
c. the local board has
local knowledge to share that could help to improve the easy-to-understand
approach. This information has already been shared with AT at a LB workshop and
will be reviewed by AT in accordance with their responsibility as a road
controlling authority.
2. Approach Two -
High benefit cost ratio approach (select one below)
The local board views that:
a. the high benefit cost
ratio approach would benefit the community as proposed.
b. the high benefit cost
ratio approach would not benefit the community as proposed.
c. the local board has
local knowledge to share that could help to improve the high benefit cost ratio
approach. This information has already been shared with AT at a LB workshop and
will be reviewed by AT in accordance with their responsibility as a road
controlling authority.
Tailored Approaches
3. Approach Three -
Responsive to community and partner requests approach (select one below)
The local board views that:
a. partner and community
requests are prioritised.
b. Auckland Transport
determines the priority of these requests.
c. these requests are
proposed in a later phase of the programme.
4. Approach
Four – High percentage of roads approach (select one below)
The local board views that:
a. a high total percentage
cover should be consulted on in this phase of the programme.
b. Auckland Transport
should determine the percentage coverage for this phase of the programme.
c. a low total percentage
cover should be consulted on in this phase of the programme (with roads being
revisited in a future phase).
5. Approach Five
– Early implementation approach following consultation and Auckland
Transport Board approval (select one below)
The local board views that:
a. approved changes are
implemented early in the 2024-2027 plan.
b. Auckland Transport
determines the priority of implementation.
c. Approved
changes are implemented at a later stage in the 2024-2027 plan.
