|
Rodney Local
Board
10 May 2023
|
|
Local
board consultation feedback and input into the Annual Budget 2023/2024
File No.: CP2023/05639
Te take mō te
pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To
receive consultation feedback from the Rodney Local Board area on:
proposed priorities and activities for
the Rodney Local Board Agreement 2023/2024.
· proposed
local activities to discontinue, reduce spending on, or
increase fees to meet the Governing Body’s proposed reduction in
local board funding
· regional
topics and related policies for the Annual Budget 2023/2024.
2. To
recommend any local matters to the Governing Body that they will need to
consider or make decisions on in the Annual Budget 2023/2024 process.
3. To
provide input on the proposed regional topics in the Annual Budget 2023/2024 to
the Governing Body.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
4. Local
board agreements set out annual funding priorities, activities, budgets, levels
of service, performance measures and initiatives for each local board area.
Local board agreements for 2023/2024 will be included in Auckland
Council’s Annual Budget 2023/2024.
5. Auckland
Council publicly consulted from 28 February to 28 March 2023 to seek community
views on the proposed Annual Budget 2023/2024. This included
consultation on the Rodney Local Board’s proposed priorities for
2023/2024 to be included in their local board agreement and proposed
local activities to discontinue, reduce spending on, or increase fees to meet
the Governing Body’s proposed reduction in local board funding.
6. Auckland
Council received 41,147 submissions in total across the
region and 1397 submissions from the Rodney Local Board
area.
7. In
the Annual Budget process there are financial matters where local boards
provide recommendations to the Governing Body, for consideration or
decision-making. This includes any local board advocacy initiatives. The Governing Body will consider these items as part of the Annual
Budget decision-making process in June 2023.
8. Local
boards have a statutory responsibility to provide input into regional
strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws. This report provides an opportunity
for the local board to provide input on council’s proposed Annual Budget
2023/2024.
Ngā tūtohunga
Recommendation/s
That the Rodney Local Board:
a) whiwhi / receive consultation
feedback on the proposed Rodney Local Board priorities and
activities for 2023/2024 including proposed local activities to
discontinue, reduce spending on, or increase fees, to meet the reduction in
local board funding proposed by the Governing Body
b) whiwhi / receive consultation feedback
on regional topics in the Annual Budget 2023/2024 and related policies from
people and organisations based in the Rodney Local Board area
c) whakarite / provide input on regional
topics in the proposed Annual Budget 2023/2024 and related policies to the
Governing Body
d) whakarite / provide
advocacy on any local initiatives for the Annual Budget
2023/2024 to the Governing Body.
Horopaki
Context
9. Each
financial year Auckland Council must have a local board agreement (as agreed
between the Governing Body and the local board) for each local board area. The
Rodney Local Board Agreement sets out how the council will reflect the
priorities in the Rodney Local Board Plan 2020 in respect to the local
activities to be provided in the local board area. It includes information
relating to budgets, levels of service, and performance measures.
10. The local
board agreements 2023/2024 will form part of Auckland Council’s Annual
Budget 2023/2024.
11. Auckland
Council publicly consulted from 28 February to 28 March 2023 to seek community
views on the proposed Annual Budget 2023/2024, as well as local board priorities and proposed activities to be included in the
local board agreement 2023/2024.
12. Auckland Council has faced ongoing budget challenges and recent and
rapid increases in inflation and interest rates has placed significant
pressure on the council’s financial position. A forecast budget
deficit of $295 million needs to be addressed in the council’s proposed
Annual Budget 2023/2024.
Tātaritanga me ngā
tohutohu
Analysis and advice
13. This
report includes analysis of consultation feedback, any local matters to be
recommended to the Governing Body and seeks input on regional topics in the
proposed Annual Budget 2023/2024.
Consultation
feedback overview
14. As part of
the public consultation Auckland Council used a variety of methods and channels
to reach and engage a broad cross section of Aucklanders to gain their feedback
and input into regional and local topics.
15. In total, Auckland Council
received feedback from 41,147 people in the consultation period. This feedback
was received through:
· written
feedback – 35,720 hard copy and online forms, emails and letters
· in
person – 4488 through Have Your Say events (two of which were held in the
Rodney local board area)
· social
media – 939 pieces of feedback through Auckland Council social media
channels.
Information on submitters in the Rodney Local Board
area
16. There
were 1397 submissions received from people in the Rodney Local Board area.
17. The
tables and graphs below indicate the demographic categories
people identified with compared to the actual population demographics. This
information only relates to those submitters who provided demographic
information.
18. The
table below shows the organisations that provided feedback.
|
Organisations
|
|
Arts Centre
Kaipara
|
North Harbour
Budgeting Services
|
|
Asian Family
Services
|
North Harbour
Sports Council
|
|
Auckland
Bands’ Association
|
Northland Town
Planners
|
|
Auckland North
Community and Development
|
Offgrid Studios
|
|
Chandler
Contracting
|
Pest Free
Warkworth
|
|
Dencar Property
Limited
|
Puhoi
Centennial Hall
|
|
Flexercise with
Fitness League
|
Rainbows End
and Rivers Environmental Group
|
|
Friends of Awa
Matakanakana (FOAM)
|
Restore Rodney
East Incorporated Society
|
|
Harbour Sports
Trust
|
Save our Venues
|
|
Harbour
Volleyball Association
|
Shorebirds
Trust
|
|
Kumeū Arts Centre
|
Snells
Shoreline Conservation Community
|
|
Kumeū Community Gardens
|
The Northern
Action Group
|
|
Kumeū Cricket Club
|
The Royal New
Zealand Plunket Trust (Whānau Āwhina
Plunket)
|
|
Kumeū Playcentre
|
Waimauku Pony
Club
|
|
Mahurangi East
Community Centre
|
Warkworth Music
Society
|
|
Mangakura Boat
Club
|
Warkworth Town
Hall Restoration Trust
|
|
Marathon
Medical Ltd
|
Wellsford Drama
Club
|
|
Mind Over
Manner
|
Woodhill Sands
Trust
|
|
Netball North
Harbour
|
Women in
Urbanism Aotearoa
|
|
New Zealand
Technology Group
|
Young Workers
Resource Centre
|
19. All feedback will be made available on an
Auckland Council webpage called “Submissions on the Annual Budget
2023/2024” and were accessible from 26 April 2023 through the following
link: https://akhaveyoursay.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/submissions-annual-budget-2023-2024
Feedback received for the Rodney Local
Board for 2023/2024
Key priorities in Rodney Local Board Area in 2023/2024
20. The Rodney Local Board consulted on the following
priorities for 2023/2024:
· develop a new park in Milldale in partnership with a
developer to support the needs of the growing new community. Works may include
open green space, playground, pump track, basketball half court with youth
spill out area, bridges, seating, boardwalk, and toilets
· renew the Goodall Reserve
skate ramp while replacing fencing, seating and access paths
· renew Helensville River Walkway viewing platform, wharf
structure and deliver walkways improvements
· renew major assets at the Wellsford Centennial Park,
including the carpark, lighting, toilet and changing room block, tennis courts
including associated drainage, cricket nets and pitches and the storage facility
· deliver Warkworth town centre improvements guided by the
Warkworth Centre Plan developed in 2022 and continue with the Helensville town
centre improvements.
21. The majority of local respondents supported
most of the local board priorities with 61 per cent supporting most or all.
Key themes
22. Key themes across the feedback received (through written,
in-person and social media channels) from those that supported all or
most priorities included:
· that the priorities supported cohesion and wellbeing for all in the
community
· that the developer should entirely pay for the playground in
Milldale
· concern about non-essential expenditure with many suggesting
projects could be deferred and there should be more focus on fixing assets
rather than building new.
23. Key themes across the feedback received (through written,
in-person and social media channels) from those that did not support most
or any priorities included:
· that public transport, improved roading and other key infrastructure
were a greater priority than those expressed in the consultation document
· comments about the proposed priorities not being essential with the
need to focus on fixing or maintaining assets, rather than building new.
24. Key reoccurring themes across all the feedback received
(through written, in-person and social media channels) included:
· the greatest number of submitters referred to the need
for better transport infrastructure, including public transport services
· many suggested, in regards the current financial
circumstances, that the focus should be on fixing and maintaining assets rather
than building new ones. Submitters questioned if the local board priorities
were essential, often mentioning that they were potentially “nice to
haves”
· submitters expressed support for local boards and
expressed unhappiness about local board funding being cut
· many felt that developers should be paying for the full
costs of playgrounds as part of their development contributions
· seeing that the examples listed in the local board
priorities were capital works and that the potential cuts were being proposed
to services and activities only, many submitters mentioned that they would
rather proposed services and activities were prioritised over building and
renewing assets.
Responding
to the budget challenge
25. The
council’s proposed response to mitigate the budget pressures for
2023/2024 included a proposed reduction of $16 million to local board
operational funding – this would require the Rodney Local Board to reduce
its planned operating spend by $920,755.
26. To do this,
local boards need to make tough decisions, prioritising what they do and where
they invest. Aucklanders were asked for their
priorities given the proposed reduction would mean some local activities
would have to be discontinued, have reduced spending, or increased fees.
27. The Rodney Local Board included the following local
activities in the list asking “If funding for local board activities is
reduced, which three of our services do you NOT want to reduce funding
for? (i.e. which are most important to you?)”
|
Activity
|
Detail / Service level and community implications
|
|
Grants
|
· stop or reduce grants
funding affecting up to 12 community groups or organisations with average
individual grants of $2,000
|
|
Events
|
· stop funding community
opening events for completed projects
· reduce funding for
community-led events, including ANZAC Ceremonies, A&P shows and Christmas
parades
|
|
Arts and Culture
|
· reduce grants to Kumeū
Art Centre and Helensville Art Centre
|
|
Opening hours and services of libraries
|
· reduce opening hours of
Warkworth library to six days per week (the only library in Rodney operating
above the minimum service levels)
|
|
Community programmes
|
· stop subsidies for hall users
· stop funding local community workers
to organise and run youth activities, community workshops, events, after
school programmes, markets, coffee and craft groups at local community
centres
|
|
Investigations and plans / policy development
|
· reduce supplementary
funding for concept plans and investigations of capital works which would
impact on the development of local assets (streetscapes, township
improvements, parks) in future years
|
|
Environmental volunteers in parks
|
· reduce or stop funding for
environmental volunteer groups to carry out work in council parks such as pest control,
planting, beach clean ups and weeding. This could lead to biodiversity loss,
an increase in pests and an increase in costs as contractors may need to pick
this up
|
|
Ecological restoration programmes
|
· reduce or stop funding
targeted programmes to manage and reduce pests and restore environmental
conditions working with a local contractor and volunteers in significant
ecological areas, including supporting private landowners with pest
management. This loss of
resourcing for volunteer groups could lead to a set back in biodiversity and an increase in pests
|
|
Low mow / no mow
|
· reduce or stop mowing
specific areas in local parks: ‘no mow’ in areas that are well
suited for native plants to regenerate and ‘low mow’ creating
meadow-like open spaces (not including sports fields and streetscapes)
|
|
Waste minimisation
|
· stop or reduce funding of waste
minimisation programme, which supports local builders and developers to
achieve waste diversion from construction and demolition projects and aims to
develop into a financially self-sustaining programme. Reducing funding would
lead to increased landfill and pollution.
|
28. The graphs below give an overview of the responses from
the Rodney Local Board area.
Key themes
29. The top four supported activities and the reason
respondents did not want to see these reduced or stopped are as follows:
· opening hours and services of libraries: submitters felt that libraries are an essential service
provided free of charge for all (young and old) and that they are vital to the
community, providing more than just books. Many felt that cutting the library
hours would result in a false economy
· ecological restoration programmes: many submitters who selected this service thought that
if funding was stopped gains from programming to date would be lost. They
mentioned that ecological restoration was critical to increasing our resilience
and would help mitigate the impact s of land use change. Overall submitters
felt the need to look after the environment and to act against climate change
· grants for community groups and organisations: submitters felt that grants provided much needed
support to the community and did so in a more cost-effective way than if the
services were delivered directly through the council. Many mentioned the
escalating cost of living as a reason why grants were needed. Support to
community groups and organisations through grant funding was also linked to
contributing to community cohesion
· community centres programmes and subsidies for hall users: those that selected these activities spoke to community
centres being the “heartbeat” or the “backbone” of the
community. Submitters felt that programming and activities in centres and
halls, provided key community support and cutting the subsidies would hurt
voluntary community groups.
Requests for local funding
30. There were no requests for local funding through the
Annual Budget 2023/2024 consultation.
31. Consultation feedback on local board priorities will be
considered by the local board when approving their local board agreement on 21
June 2023.
Overview of feedback received on regional topics in the Annual
Budget 2023/2024 from the Rodney Local Board area
32. The proposed Annual Budget 2023/2024 sets out Auckland
Council’s priorities and how the council plans to pay for them.
Consultation on the proposed Annual Budget asked submitters to respond to key
questions on:
1. operating
spending reductions
2. amending Auckland International
Airport Limited (AIAL) Shareholding Policy
3. managing
rates and debt
4. storm
response
5. Local
board priorities (covered in ‘Feedback received on the Rodney Local Board
for 2023/2024’ section above)
6. changes
to other rates, fees and charges.
33. Submitters
were also encouraged to give feedback on any of the other matters included in
the Annual Budget 2023/2024 consultation document.
34. The submissions received from the Rodney Local Board area
on these key issues are summarised below, along with an overview of any other
areas of feedback on regional proposals with a local impact.
Key
Question 1: operating spending reductions
35. Aucklanders were asked for feedback on a proposal to save
$125 million through reductions including:
· maintaining
the current reduced number of public transport services for 2023/2024 to save
$21 million
· reducing
funding to Tātaki Auckland Unlimited to save a further $27.5 million with
effects on service delivery (including economic development and tourism
promotion) and pricing at venues it manages such as Auckland Zoo, Auckland Art
Gallery and stadiums
· reducing
regional services such as community and education programmes, arts and culture
programmes, regional events, economic development and other social services
activities such as homelessness funding, community empowerment and funding for
youth centres to save $20 million
· reducing
local board funded activities across all boards to save $16 million (feedback
received on local impacts of the reduction is outlined in the ‘Feedback
received for the Rodney Local Board for 2023/2024’ section above)
· reducing
contestable grants to save $3 million
· no
longer directly providing early childhood education services to save $1
million.
36. Twenty-nine percent of submitters in the Rodney Local
Board area supported the proposal to proceed with reducing operating spending.
Fifty-nine per cent did not want to proceed with some or any reductions instead
preferring to increase rates or debt.
37. The graphs below give an overview of the responses to
this question from the Rodney Local Board area.
Key themes
38. Key themes of note across the feedback received included:
· whilst
362 submissions supported proceeding with the proposed reductions, a majority
did not want reductions to regional community services, public transport
services, and funding for Tātaki Auckland Unlimited. Comments were also
made about focusing on infrastructure and core services
· support
for retaining these services, including not cutting local board funding was
evident in submissions across all responses to this question.
Key
Question 2: amending Auckland International Airport Limited (AIAL) Shareholding
Policy
39. Aucklanders were asked about a planned change to the AIAL
Shareholding Policy which will allow the sale of some or all of Auckland
Council’s shares in AIAL. The proposal is to sell all the shareholding
(currently around 18 per cent of shares in Auckland Airport) which would reduce
debt by around $1.9 billion. This is projected to reduce interest costs by $87
million per year.
40. Other options were considered, including keeping all the
shares or a partial sale. These options would contribute less towards the
budget reduction target and require other actions such as further increasing
rates or debt.
41. Thirty-five per cent of submitters in the Rodney Local
Board area supported the proposal to enable the sale of Auckland Council shares
in AIAL compared to a 31 per cent support for a partial sale and 23 per cent
that did not support changing the policy.
42. The graphs below give an overview of the responses to
this question from the Rodney Local Board area.
Key themes
43. Key themes of note across the feedback received included:
· for
those against the sale of the AIAL shares felt the airport is a good
investment, it is important to have an influence on airport development and
selling public assets is unwise
· those
seeking a partial sale argued for a more balanced approach with the need to
keep some shares to influence the future of the airport and retain ability to
sell at a later date
· those
that supported the sale of all the shares felt that it was not council business
to run airports and that council should focus instead on core services. They
also noted that the funds from the sale of the shares were needed during the
current financial downturn.
Key
Question 3: managing rates and debt
44. Aucklanders were asked to provide feedback on a
proposal of a total rates increase for the average value residential property
of around 4.66 per cent or $154 per year. This would be achieved through:
· an
average increase in general rates of seven per cent
across all existing properties, including non-residential
· reducing the Natural Environment Targeted Rate (NETR) and
Water Quality Targeted Rate (WQTR) by around two thirds and using the money
already collected from these rates to continue delivering these work programmes
as planned in 2023/2024
· pausing the long-term differential strategy (the split
between business and residential rates) for one year. Under the current policy,
annual increases to general rates for business properties are less than for
non-business properties so that over time the share of general rates paid by
business properties is fairer.
45. Aucklanders
were also asked about the proposal to increase council’s use of debt by
up to $75 million in the 2023/2024 year. The proposal involves using the debt to fund some capital
expenditure that is currently planned to be funded by operating revenue.
46. Thirty-two per cent of submitters in the
Rodney Local Board area supported the proposal to increase rates compared to 19
per cent who supported either setting a higher general rates increase and
making less use of debt, with 29 percent saying set a lower general rates
increase and make greater use of debt.
47. The graphs below give an overview of the responses to
this question from the Rodney Local Board area.
Key themes
48. Key themes of note across the feedback received included:
· that
the proposed increases to both rates and debt seemed reasonable and balanced,
commenting that Auckland Council rates are already low compared to elsewhere in
New Zealand. They also supported an increase in rates to mitigate cuts to
environmental and community programmes
· those
that supported the proposal to set a higher general rate responded that there
was a need to keep up with the growing cost of infrastructure and indicated
support for paying a rates increase in order to retain essential community
services. They felt that rates needed to keep up with the rate of inflation
· the
majority of submitters who did not support an increase in rates commented that
households are already struggling financially.
Key
Question 4: storm response
49. Aucklanders were asked about a proposal to
increase council’s operating budgets by around $20 million each year to
improve the ability to prepare for and respond to future storms. This would
likely require rates to increase for 2023/2024 by around an additional 1 per
cent (on top of the 4.66 per cent increase proposed to address the budget
shortfall).
50. Sixty-five per cent of submitters from the Rodney Local
Board area supported the proposal to increase operating budgets to improve the
ability to prepare for and respond to future storms, compared to 22 per cent
that did not.
51. The graphs below give an overview of the responses to
this question from the Rodney Local Board area.
Key themes
52. Key themes of note across the feedback received included:
· those
in support of this extra charge argued that it was an essential and fundamental
part of council’s business, stating that failing to address the risks of
climate change was short sighted
· those
opposed to this proposal said central government and insurance companies should
pay and that proper analysis was required to determine what is needed before
deciding on a budget.
Key
Question 5: local board priorities
53. Aucklanders
were asked for feedback on the local impacts of the Annual Budget, feedback
received on this is outlined in the ‘Feedback received for the Rodney
Local Board for 2023/2024’ section above.
Key
Question 6: changes to other rates, fees and charges
54. Aucklanders were asked for feedback on proposals
to increase some targeted rates and other
regulatory fees and charges as set out below. If the increases are not
made, then general rates may need to be higher than proposed.
Waste management rates changes
· A 10.6 per cent increase to the base rate and targeted rate charges
for non-standard refuse bins (in the former Auckland (ACC) and Manukau (MCC)
city council areas)
· introduction of a fee for swapping bin sizes
· extension of the food scraps targeted rate to the new
areas that will receive the service this year.
Changes to other rates, fees
and charges
· re-prioritisation of additional bus service expenditure
which was planned to be funded by the Climate Action Targeted Rate (CATR) for
the 2023/2024 year
· Swimming Pool/Spa Pool Fencing Compliance Targeted Rate:
increases to reflect the actual costs of the service, and an increase in the
fee for follow up inspections
· amendment to Community Occupancy Guidelines
· changes to the Rodney Drainage District Targeted Rate
· establishment of a Business Improvement District (BID)
and BID targeted rate for Silverdale
· animal management fees
· some building and resource consenting fees
· other regulatory fees such as food licensing
registration, micro-mobility operator fees and swimming pool inspections
· cemetery fees
· review of fees for bookable spaces in council managed
pool and leisure facilities.
55. The graphs
below give an overview of the responses to this question from the Rodney Local
Board area.
|
Waste
Management Rates Change
|
Support
|
Do not support
|
Other
|
I don't know
|
|
Cost changes
in waste management
|
567
|
357
|
49
|
181
|
|
Introduce a
one-off fee of $40 for those residents wishing to change their bin size
|
739
|
274
|
32
|
108
|
|
Extend the
food scraps targeted rate to the new areas that will receive the service this
year
|
594
|
356
|
44
|
166
|
|
Changes to
other rates
|
Support
|
Do not support
|
Other
|
I don't know
|
|
Swimming
Pool/Spa Pool Fencing Compliance Targeted Rate
|
670
|
386
|
21
|
98
|
|
Change which
bus services are funded by the Climate Action Targeted Rate
|
533
|
375
|
38
|
220
|
56. The
majority of comments requested the ability to opt out of the food scraps
targeted rate as many residents, particularly rurally, use their food waste in
home composting and farm animal feed. There was also several comments regarding
the need for more reliable and frequent bus services.
Other
matters for feedback
57. Aucklanders
were asked to feedback on the Tūpuna Maunga Authority Operational Plan
2023/2024 which sets out a framework in which the council must carry out the
routine management of 14 Tūpuna Maunga.
58. Aucklanders
were also asked what else is important to them and if they had any feedback on
any other issues.
59. There was
almost no feedback in this section relating to these topics from residents in
the Rodney Local Board Area.
Annual Budget 2023/2024 related policies
The following proposals were
consulted on alongside the Annual Budget:
Revenue and Financing
Policy
60. The proposal
to pause the Long-Term Differential Strategy (LTDS) for one year would require
an amendment to the Revenue and Financing Policy.
61. Under
the current rating policy, businesses pay a greater share of rates than non-business
properties. Businesses make more use of council services like transport and
stormwater. They also place more demand on these services. Council previously
decided that the level of business rates is too high and should be reduced
gradually over time. The LTDS currently lowers the total amount of general
rates (UAGC and value-based general rate) for businesses in equal steps, from
31 per cent in 2022/2023 to 25.8 per cent by 2037/2038.
Feedback
62. One hundred
and forty-six submissions were received on the proposal. Of these, 99 supported
the proposal and 41 did not support the proposal. A further six either provided
another response or did not know. Comments from those in support included
businesses being able to afford the increase and the impact of rates on
residential ratepayers.
63. Responses
from those who did not support the proposal included the view that business
rates are too high.
64. Eight of the
146 responses were from people who identified as Māori with four in
support of the proposal, three not in support and one who did not know.
65. The Property
Council did not support the proposal citing concern for increased costs on
businesses and business rates being too high.
Māori Land
Rates Remission and Postponement Policy
66. The council
is proposing to amend the Māori Land Rates Remission and Postponement
Policy to provide a partial remission of rates to general title
papakāinga, where that land is:
· protected
from being sold out of Māori ownership
· for
the sole use of hapū/iwi (tribe).
67. This
recognises the similarities between these properties and papakāinga on
Māori freehold land. The proposed remission would apply a discount of up
to 10 per cent of the rateable land value. This is similar to what is applied
to Māori freehold land.
Feedback
68. There were 40
submissions from individuals. Of these 20 were in support of the proposal and
20 did not support the proposal. Responses in support included the positive
benefits to Māori in retaining land. Responses from those who did not
support included Māori should not have special treatment, and concern
about the resulting costs to other Aucklanders.
69. Eight of the
40 responses were from individuals who identified as Māori, all of who
supported the proposal. Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei also submitted
in support of the proposal.
Local board advocacy
70. Local boards can also provide approved advocacy
initiatives which considers the consultation feedback above. This allows the
Governing Body to consider these advocacy items when making decisions on the
Annual Budget 2023/2024 in June.
71. The advocacy initiatives approved by the local board will
be included as an appendix to the 2023/2024 Local Board Agreement
Local board input on regional topics in the Annual Budget
2023/2024
72. Local
boards have a statutory responsibility for identifying and communicating the
interests and preferences of the people in its local board area in relation to
Auckland Council’s strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws, and any
proposed changes to be made to them. This report provides an opportunity
for the local board to provide input on the council’s proposed Annual
Budget 2023/2024, proposed changes to the Revenue and Financing Policy and
Māori Land Rates Remission and Postponement Policy.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
73.
The decisions recommended in this
report are part of the Annual Budget 2023/2024 and local board agreement
process to approve funding and expenditure over the next year.
74.
Projects
allocated funding or proposed to have reduced funding through this Annual Budget
process will all have varying levels of potential climate impact associated
with them. The climate impacts of projects Auckland Council chooses to
progress, are all assessed carefully as part of the council’s rigorous
reporting requirements.
Ngā whakaaweawe me
ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
75. The Annual Budget 2023/2024 is an Auckland Council Group
document and will include budgets at a consolidated group level. Consultation
items and updates to budgets to reflect decisions and new information may
include items from across the group.
Ngā whakaaweawe
ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
76. The local board’s decisions and feedback are being
sought in this report. The local board has a statutory role in providing its
feedback on regional plans and policies.
77. Local boards play an important role in the development of
the council’s Annual Budget. Local board agreements form part of the
Annual Budget. Local board nominees have also attended Governing Body workshops
on the Annual Budget.
Tauākī whakaaweawe
Māori
Māori impact statement
78. Many local board decisions are of importance to and
impact on Māori. Local board agreements and the Annual Budget are
important tools that enable and can demonstrate the council’s
responsiveness to Māori.
79. Local board plans, developed in 2020 through engagement
with the community including Māori, form the basis of local board area
priorities. There is a need to continue to build relationships between local
boards and iwi, and the wider Māori community.
80. Analysis provided of consultation feedback received on
the proposed Annual Budget includes submissions made by mana whenua and the
wider Māori community who have interests in the rohe / local board area.
81. Ongoing conversations between local boards and Māori
will assist in understanding each other’s priorities and issues. This in
turn can influence and encourage Māori participation in the
council’s decision-making processes.
82. Some projects approved for funding could have discernible
impacts on Māori. The potential impacts on Māori, as part of any
project progressed by Auckland Council, will be assessed appropriately and
accordingly as part of relevant reporting requirements.
83. The Annual Budget 2023/2024 and related policies includes
a proposed amendment to the Māori Land
Rates Remission and Postponement Policy covered in the ‘Annual Budget related policies’ section above.
Ngā ritenga
ā-pūtea
Financial implications
84. This report is seeking the local board’s decisions
on financial matters in the local board agreement that must then be considered
by the Governing Body.
85. The local board also provides input to regional plans and
policies. There is information in the council’s consultation material for
each proposal with the financial implications of each option outlined for
consideration.
Ngā raru tūpono me
ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
86. The council must adopt its Annual Budget, which includes
local board agreements, by 30 June 2023. To meet this timeframe, the local
board is required to make recommendations on these local matters for the Annual
Budget by mid-May 2023 and present to the Governing Body to make decisions on
key items to be included in the Annual Budget on 8 June 2023.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
87. The local board will consider its local board agreement
on 21 June 2023 and corresponding work programmes on 16 July 2023.
88. Recommendations and feedback from the local board will be
provided to the Governing Body for consideration in its decision-making.
89. The final Annual Budget 2023/2024 (including local board
agreements) will be adopted by the Governing Body on 29 June 2023.
Ngā tāpirihanga
Attachments
There are no attachments for
this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors
|
Robyn Joynes - Local Board Advisor
Zigi Yates – Senior Local Board Advisor
|
|
Authoriser
|
Lesley Jenkins - Local Area Manager
|
