
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Puketāpapa Local Board will be held on:
|
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Thursday, 27 June 2024 10.00am Local Board
Office |
|
Puketāpapa Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson |
Ella Kumar, JP |
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Fiona Lai |
|
|
Members |
Roseanne Hay |
|
|
|
Mark Pervan |
|
|
|
Bobby Shen |
|
|
|
Jon Turner |
|
(Quorum 3 members)
|
|
|
Selina Powell Democracy Advisor
20 June 2024
Contact Telephone: 021 531 686 Email: selina.powell@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
27 June 2024 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Nau mai | Welcome 5
2 Ngā Tamōtanga | Apologies 5
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest 5
4 Te Whakaū i ngā Āmiki | Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence 5
6 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements 5
7 Ngā Petihana | Petitions 5
8 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations 5
8.1 Jacqui Knight (NZ Butterflies Organisation) 5
9 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum 6
10 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business 6
11 Approval of the 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Board Local Environmental Work Programme 9
12 Approval of Customer and Community Services local board work programme 2024-2025 25
13 Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two 2023/2024, grant allocations 67
14 Views on the Draft Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034 73
15 Local board feedback on the draft Mahere Hukihuki mo te Whakahaeretanga me te Whakaitinga o te Para / Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024 101
16 Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux Funding Model Options 161
17 Local Board Appointments and Delegations for the 2022-2025 Electoral Term - Temporary Delegation - Resource Consent 171
18 Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Councillors' Updates 173
19 Chairperson's Report 183
20 Board Member Reports 189
21 Record of Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Notes 195
22 Hōtaka Kaupapa/Governance Forward Work Programme Calendar 203
23 Te Whakaaro ki ngā Take Pūtea e Autaia ana |
Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Nau mai | Welcome
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Te Whakaū i ngā Āmiki | Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whakaū / confirm the additional minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 13 June 2024 as a true and correct record.
|
5 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Ngā Petihana | Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations
Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Puketāpapa Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
|
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. To enable and opportunity for Jacqui Knight representing the Moths and Butterflies of New Zealand Trust to present on a proposal for a National Butterfly Centre. Whakarāpopototanga matua Executive summary 2. The Moths and Butterflies of New Zealand Trust wishes to address the local board on a proposal for a National Butterfly Centre with a potential suitable site available within the boundaries of the Puketāpapa Local Board.
|
|
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whakamihi / thank Jacqui Knight representing the Moths and Butterflies of New Zealand Trust for their presentation.
|
|
Attachments a National Butterfly Centre presentation............................................................ 215 |
9 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of three minutes per speaker is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Approval of the 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Board Local Environmental Work Programme
File No.: CP2024/08593
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To approve the 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Board’s Local Environmental Work Programme.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Each year a Local Board Local Environmental Work Programme is developed to respond to the outcomes and objectives identified in the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan 2023 and available Local Driven Initiatives (LDI) budget from the board. The 2024/2025 programme for approval contributes towards environmental, water quality and sustainability outcomes (see attachment A).
3. This report presents the proposed Puketāpapa Local Board’s Local Environmental Work Programme and associated budgets for approval for the 2024/2025 financial year (see Attachment A).
4. The work programme has been developed through a series of workshops between November 2023 and May 2024, where the local board provided feedback to staff on programme and activity prioritisation. The development of projects has been guided by the 2023 Local Board Plan, the continued successful delivery of 2023/2024 programmes (in particular those from Healthy Waters and the Sustainable Initiatives teams) and the desire from the board to increase delivery on water quality improvements in local awa.
5. Further detail on what each project will deliver and how is detailed in the analysis and advice section and in Attachment A of this report. Feedback from these workshops has informed the proposed work programme.
6. The proposed Puketāpapa Local Board Local Environmental Work Programme includes the following activities to be delivered in 2024/2025, with budgets as listed below:
· Climate Action Activator - $40,000
· EcoNeighbourhoods - $32,000
· Manukau Foreshore Herpetofauna Survey Year 3 - $35,000
· Manukau Harbour Forum - $11,000
· Responsible Pet Ownership – SPCA cat desexing and microchipping programme -$10,000
· Te Auaunga / Oakley Creek Buffers - $10,000
· Wairaki Awa Enhancement - $17,000
7. The proposed work programme has a total value of $155,000, which can be funded from within the board’s draft locally driven initiatives (LDI) budget for the 2024/2025 financial year.
8. Updates on the delivery of this work programme will be provided through the board’s quarterly performance reports and any adjustments to the programme will be sought via the local board. The programme and projects have been prepared to be delivered within the financial year. If the board chooses to not approve the proposed local board work programme there is a risk that some outcomes will not be delivered or will need to be adjusted.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) whakaae / approve its 2024/2025 Local Environmental Work Programme and associated budget allocation, as summarised in the table below (Attachment A to the agenda report):
|
Activity name |
2024/2025 budget for approval |
|
Climate Action Activator |
$40,000 |
|
EcoNeighbourhoods |
$32,000 |
|
Manukau Foreshore Herpetofauna Survey Year 3 |
$35,000 |
|
Manukau Harbour Forum |
$11,000 |
|
Responsible Pet Ownership – SPCA cat desexing and microchipping programme |
$10,000 |
|
Te Auaunga / Oakley Creek Buffers |
$10,000 |
|
Wairaki Awa Enhancement |
$17,000 |
|
Total |
$155,000 |
Horopaki
Context
9. On an annual basis, each local board decides which activities to allocate its annual budget toward through a series of workshops. The local board feedback in these workshops has informed the development of the proposed Local Environmental Work Programme for 2024/2025 (Attachment A).
10. The proposed work programme responds to the Environmental objectives identified in the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan 2023. The specific objectives reflected in the work programme are:
· people live more environment and climate friendly and healthy lifestyles
· improve the mauri of awa, the harbour, open spaces and ngahere of Puketāpapa
· access to indigenous and culturally valued biodiversity is managed to promote enjoyment while protecting vulnerable ecosystems.
11. The following adopted strategies and plans also guided the development of the work programme:
· Te Auaunga Oakley Creek Vision and Restoration Strategy (2016)
· Wairaki Catchment Strategy (2022)
· Becoming a low carbon community: An action plan (2017)
· Puketāpapa Urban Ngahere Action Plan (2021)
· Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan (2020)
· Kia Ora Tāmaki Makaurau (2021)
· Mahere ā-Rohe Whakahaere Kaupapa Koiora Orotā mо̄ Tāmaki Makaurau - Regional Pest Management Plan (2020)
· Auckland Plan 2050, Environment and Cultural Heritage outcome “Focus area 1: Encourage all Aucklanders to be stewards of the natural environment and to make sustainable choices.”
12. The development of the work programme has been informed by staff and feedback received from the local board at workshops. The rationale for the projects and the anticipated outcomes are discussed in attachment A and the analysis and advice section below.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Proposed Local Environmental Work Programme developed for 2024/2025
13. The proposed work programme is made up of activities continuing from previous financial years, including ongoing programmes. It also includes one new initiative supported by the local board. These programmes contribute towards the delivery of the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan 2023 environmental objectives, as detailed above.
14. This report seeks local board approval for budgets and activities in 2024/2025.
15. The proposed activities for delivery as part of the board’s 2024/2025 Local Environmental Work Programme are detailed in attachment A. Additional details in the development of these programmes are as follows:
Climate Action Activator Puketāpapa ($40,000)
16. The Board has indicated it would like to continue to support the climate action activator in the 2024/2025 financial year. This programme will continue to implement the local becoming a low carbon action plan that was developed in 2017. This work will help achieve the local board’s commitment to reduce climate impacts through guiding local action in response to the climate emergency.
17. The activator will:
· respond to Auckland Council’s Climate Emergency declaration and deliver on Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri : Auckland’s Climate Plan by supporting and enabling community climate action
· support implementation of the local Puketāpapa Becoming a Low Carbon Community: An Action Plan (2017)
· facilitate collaboration between community members, iwi, youth, practitioners and local businesses and support them to identify and prioritise strategic community-based low carbon outcomes
· continue to have a strong focus on transport, specifically encouraging and enabling low carbon local journeys to respond to the increased housing density coming to the local board area
· support, broker and accelerate local climate action.
EcoNeighbourhoods Puketāpapa - $32,000
19. The board has indicated that it would like to continue to fund the EcoNeighbourhoods Puketāpapa programme in the 2024/2025 financial year.
20. EcoNeighbourhood groups are alliances made by six or more neighbours from different households who have gotten together with the aim of adopting sustainable low carbon practices and increasing their resilience to climate change impacts. Groups receive up to 12 hours facilitation support and up to $1,000 worth of incentives, discounts and/or training.
21. EcoNeighbourhoods aims to reduce emissions and increase community resilience through supporting the priorities and actions of the local community. Groups may focus their efforts on reducing energy demand, reducing waste, trying out sustainable transport options and increasing local food production.
22. The project will have eight or more groups enrolled and each group will hold at least two activities in the 2024/2025 financial year.
23. The Board allocated $32,000 to this programme in the 2023/2024 financial year. The Board has indicated that it will allocate $32,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025.
Manukau Foreshore Herpetofauna Survey Year 3 - $35,000
24. The Board has indicated that it would like to continue to support investigation into the existing herpetofauna (reptile and amphibians – specifically lizards) along the Manukau foreshore in Puketāpapa in the 2024/2025 financial year.
25. This will be the third year of delivery for this programme. In the 2023/2024 financial year, surveys were carried out at Belfast and Hillsborough reserves. In 2023/2024, the project expanded further west into Waikōwhai Park, Captain’s Bugs Reserve and Kingswood Reserve. Native lizards have been discovered, and the results of these surveys help to inform management priorities for community groups and contractors. This will also help staff to understand where to focus predation efforts in future years.
26. In 2024/2025, this programme will complete the process of surveying of all the reserves in the Manukau Foreshore area. This includes completing surveys in all the reserves from Wattle Bay to Wairaki Stream Reserve. It will provide volunteers with opportunities to participate.
27. The Board allocated $20,000 to this programme in the 2023/2024 financial year. The Board has indicated that it will allocate $35,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025, its final year.
28. Staff recommended a budget increase in the final year of this programme to allow for more reserves to be surveyed this financial year than in the previous financial years. This extra funding will allow the programme to survey of all the reserves (including minor reserves) in the Manukau Foreshore area from Wattle Bay to Wairaki Stream Reserve.
Manukau Harbour Forum - $11,000
30. In 2023/2024 financial year, each of the member local boards provided $8,000 to co-fund the Manukau Harbour Forum. This budget supported:
· the employment of a forum coordinator to work 10 hours per week
· a three-day Rangatahi Environmental Action Leaders wānanga (previously known as the youth sustainability wānanga) for up to 50 youth to raise awareness of the harbour, connecting them with the forum's objectives to improve water quality, biodiversity, reduce waste and enhance local areas
· the continued rollout of the communications plan to advocate for improving the health of the harbour and to raise awareness of the issues and initiatives relating to the harbour with a series of community wānanga to discuss priorities and concerns regarding the harbour and allow environmental community groups to connect
· seed funding for community-led initiatives promoting the health of the Manukau Harbour.
31. In April 2024, the forum provided feedback to Healthy Waters staff on the activities it would like to support through the Manukau Harbour Forum work programme in 2024/2025. The forum indicated it would like to continue activities supported in 2023/2024, as well as:
· increasing the working hours for the coordinator to better manage the workload from 10 hours per week to between 11 and 15 hours per week
· refresh of the forum’s communication plan
· procuring a consultant to assist in developing and delivering a Manukau Harbour symposium in 2025.
32. For 2024/2025, each local board has been asked to contribute $11,000 towards a proposed budget of $99,000 budget for the Manukau Harbour Forum. Manurewa, Māngere-Ōtāhuhu, Maungakiekie-Tāmaki, Ōtara-Papatoetoe, Papakura, Puketāpapa, Waitākere Ranges, and Whau Local Boards have indicated that they will allocate $11,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025. The Franklin Local Board has indicated to support the programme with $8000 due to budget constraints.
Responsible Pet Ownership – SPCA cat desexing and microchipping programme Puketāpapa $10,000
33. The Board has indicated that it would like to continue to fund the responsible pet ownership programme in the 2024/2025 financial year. The responsible pet ownership programme had been already established in other areas around Auckland, including the neighbouring Maungakiekie-Tāmaki area.
34. Cats that are not desexed or microchipped contribute to an increasing stray cat population in Auckland, which has negative impacts on native bird populations. Mount Roskill has the sixth highest density of stray cats in the Auckland region, with over 27 stray cats per square kilometre.
35. Increased desexing and microchipping of owned cats is helpful to prevent growth in the stray cat population and limit cat nuisance activity. One un-desexed female cat can have 96 to 120 kittens within its lifetime, and so stray cat numbers are growing. Cost has been identified as the top barrier preventing people from desexing their cats.
36. For $10,000, approximately 80 cats will be microchipped and desexed. Pricing for desexing varies for female cats, pregnant female cats, and male cats.
37. The Board allocated $10,000 to this programme in the 2023/2024 financial year. The Board has indicated that it will allocate $10,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025.
Te Auaunga / Oakley Creek Buffers Puketāpapa - $10,000
38. The Board has indicated that it would like to continue to fund the Te Auaunga / Oakley Creek Buffers programme in the 2024/2025 financial year.
39. This programme will support private landowners living next to high-value parks and reserves to control invasive weeds, creating a buffer to protect these areas from continued weed invasion. The programme will begin with properties surrounding Underwood and Walmsley Parks to reduce pest plants on their properties.
40. The programme will include:
· identifying key buffer areas around Oakley Creek
· identifying target weed species to be included for control
· liaising with owners and occupiers and undertake weed control with permission from the landowner
· providing advice and support for landowners and occupiers.
41. The Board allocated $10,000 to this programme in the 2023/2024 financial year. The Board has indicated that it will allocate $10,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025.
Wairaki Awa Enhancement - $17,000
42. The Board has indicated that it would like to fund the Wairaki Awa, Lynfield Reserve enhancement programme in the 2024/2025 financial year. This is a new project that aims to enhance the native flora and fauna, in particular īnanga (native freshwater fish) of the Wairaki Awa. Riparian planting will be carried out to enhance waterway health and protect biodiversity within the stream.
43. This programme will ensure the protection and enhancement of īnanga spawning habitat and will enable further monitoring data to be contributed towards the regional īnanga project. The community and local schools will be educated on the importance of protecting īnanga habitat.
44. Local Wai Care community groups will receive training to support this project and a school freshwater programme will be delivered to two classes at a local school.
45. Three īnanga spawning investigations and two community freshwater engagement events will be held in the 2024/2025 financial year.
46. The Board has indicated that it will allocate $17,000 towards this programme in 2024/2025.
Programmes not continued
Low Carbon Lifestyles
47. The local board has indicated that it will not continue to fund its low carbon lifestyles programme in the 2024/2025 financial year. The local board allocated $30,000 towards this programme in 2022/2023 and 2023/2024.
48. The focus of this project was on supporting and encouraging residents to use active and public transport for their everyday work and leisure commutes.
49. After supporting this programme for a few years, the local board has indicated that it will not support this project in 2024/2024 due to budget constraints and a desire to support other prioritised projects.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
50. In June 2019 Auckland Council declared a climate emergency and in response to this the council adopted the Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan in July 2020. In addition, the Puketāpapa Local Board has developed an action plan Becoming a Low Carbon Community (2017) which guides climate activities. The Local Environmental Work Programme specifically contributes towards the following targets from the Becoming a Low Carbon Community Action Plan:
· Create a network of low carbon (Live Lightly) champions for homes, schools, business and community
· Improving education, raise awareness and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning, with a focus on women and youth, as well as local and marginalised communities.
51. Each activity in the work programme is assessed to identify whether it will have a positive, neutral or negative impact on greenhouse gas emissions and contributing towards climate change adaptation.
52. Table 1 outlines the activities in the 2024/2025 work programme that have an impact on greenhouse gas emissions or contribute towards climate change adaptation.
Table 1: Climate impact assessment of proposed activities:
|
Activity name |
Climate impact |
|
Climate action activator |
This programme aims to reduce emissions by enabling implementation of priority actions in the Board’s low carbon action plan, and Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan, including reducing energy use, increasing access to active transport, changing purchasing habits, and reducing carbon footprints. |
|
EcoNeighbourhoods |
This programme aims to reduce carbon emissions and increase community resilience to climate impacts, using currently available solutions for immediate progress. Community climate action involves residents reducing or responding to climate change in personal lifestyle or local community-based ways, creating new social norms. |
|
Manukau foreshore herpetofauna survey |
Gaining knowledge that can be utilised in conservation management actions of our threatened species is one of the main ways to improve resilience of Auckland’s biodiversity to climate change. |
|
Manukau Harbour forum |
These programmes provide resilience to the community by ensuring that waterways are protected from stock and enhanced through native planting. Planting the right plants is important in ensuring that flooding and erosion impacts are minimised with the increased rainfall events as a result of climate change. Carbon sequestration will also be enhanced through more planting. |
|
Responsible Pet Ownership – SPCA cat desexing and microchipping programme |
This programme supports the conservation management actions of our threatened species which is one of the main ways to improve resilience of Auckland’s biodiversity to climate change. |
|
Te Auaunga (Oakley Creek) pest plant control buffer project |
Protection of native trees through undertaking pest plant control will increase carbon sequestration. Carbon sequestration is the long-term removal, capture or sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to slow or reverse atmospheric carbon dioxide pollution and to mitigate global warming. |
|
Wairaki Awa enhancement |
Enhancement of native species through undertaking planting and pest plant control will increase carbon sequestration. Carbon sequestration is the long-term removal, capture, or sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to slow or reverse atmospheric carbon dioxide pollution and to mitigate global warming. |
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
53. The work programme was developed through a collaborative approach by operational council departments, with each department represented in the integrated team that presented the draft work programme to the local board at a series of workshops.
54. In particular, the attached Local Environmental Work Programme reflects the integrated activities developed by Environmental Services, Healthy Waters, Parks and Community Facilities.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
55. The projects proposed for inclusion in the board’s Local Environmental Work Programme will have positive environmental outcomes across the Puketāpapa Local Board area. Particular focus areas for the 2024/2025 work programme include the Manukau foreshore, Wairaki Awa and Te Auaunga Oakley Creek. Wai Care and local school groups are also involved in the delivery of the work programme.
56. The projects noted above align with the 2023 Environmental outcomes in the local board plan. The proposed work programme has been considered by the local board in a series of workshops from November 2023 to May 2024. The views expressed by local board members during the workshops have informed the recommended work programme.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
57. Auckland Council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its broader obligations to Māori.
58. The work programme includes activities that aim to deliver outcomes for and with Māori, in alignment with the strategic priority areas outlined in Kia ora Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland Council’s Māori Outcome Framework). Progress on how the activities are achieving these outcomes will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.
59. Staff recognise that environmental management, water quality and land management have integral links with the mauri of the environment and concepts of kaitiakitanga.
60. Table 2 outlines the activities in the 2024/2025 work programme that contribute towards the delivery of specific Māori outcomes.
Table 2: Māori outcome delivery through proposed activities:
|
Activity name |
Māori outcome |
Māori outcome description |
|
Climate action activator |
Kaitiakitanga |
The activator will endeavor to work with mana whenua and mataawaka to identify and deliver low carbon outcomes for Māori. |
|
Manukau Harbour forum |
Kaitiakitanga and realising rangatahi potential |
Māori youth will be involved in the youth sustainability wānanga and are supported to develop and implement programmes relevant to them and their communities. The wānanga also engages with kaumātua from Makaurau Marae to provide advice and mātauranga Māori that informs programme delivery. During the wānanga, te reo Māori is actively promoted, as a key component of programme delivery. The coordinator role has a requirement to be comfortable to use and learn te reo in person and emails, they will also engage with mana whenua. |
|
Wairaki Awa enhancement |
Kaitiakitanga |
This programme
will protect local parks and streams and encourage others to be kaitiaki of
the environment. |
61. Where aspects of the proposed work programme are anticipated to have a significant impact on activity of importance to Māori then appropriate engagement will be undertaken.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
62. The proposed Local Environmental Work Programme for 2024/2025 totals to $155,000 of the Board’s locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This budget represents discretionary funding that the local board uses to support projects they wish to realise. This amount can be accommodated within the board’s total draft budget for 2024/2025.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
63. If the proposed Local Environmental Work Programme is not approved in a timely manner, there is a risk that activities may be delayed or not delivered within the financial year.
64. Risks and mitigations for new activity lines were considered during the scoping phase. There may be risks associated with trialling a new activity for the first year. These will be continually assessed and reported to the local board.
65. Resourcing of the work programme is based on current staff capacity within departments. Therefore, changes to staff capacity may also have an impact on work programme delivery.
66. Council is currently undergoing a restructure which will see some movement of departments into new directorates. Staff are working actively to ensure continuity of services and support for the Local Environmental Work Programme during this change and adoption of the work programmes at this stage also mitigates programme delivery risk.
67. Table 3 shows the key risks associated with activities in the proposed 2024/2025 work programme, as well as proposed mitigations.
Table 3: Key risks and mitigations for activities:
|
Activity name |
Risk |
Mitigation |
Rating after mitigation |
|
Climate action activator |
This programme depends on the availability of key contractors with relevant experience. |
Staff are connecting via local channels to promote this opportunity; response has been positive and therefore this risk is considered low. |
Low |
|
Eco-neighbourhoods |
The collective knowledge of this programme sits across three people (two contractor and a staff member) should both contractors be lost then there would be a significant workload to maintain. |
Contractors have indicated that they will continue with the programme in 2023/2024. Therefore, this risk is considered low. |
Low |
|
Manukau foreshore herpetofauna survey |
There is a risk that no lizards will be found through the programme. |
Both copper and ornate skinks have been recorded in Belfast reserve, these sightings suggest that both species will exist through the reserves network |
Low |
|
Manukau Harbour forum |
This project is dependent of securing a new coordinator for the 2023/2024 year. |
Staff have started to investigate possible applicants and therefore this is considered low risk. |
Low |
|
Responsible Pet Ownership – SPCA cat desexing and microchipping programme |
There is a risk of low uptake of pet owners.
|
Marketing and promotion of the free desexing and microchipping service to pet owners will be key to establishing demand. |
Low |
|
Te Auaunga (Oakley Creek) pest plant control buffer project |
There is a risk of oversubscription from residents interested in the programme leading to contractors being overwhelmed. |
Any residents that cannot be supported will be prioritised for future financial years subject to local board funding approval. |
Low-Medium |
|
Wairaki Awa enhancement |
The stream restoration outcomes are dependent on community participation. |
Volunteer groups have a long-term commitment to caring for waterways, which will encourage high community participation. |
Low |
68. Where a work programme activity cannot be completed on time or to budget, due to unforeseen circumstances, this will be signalled to the local board at the earliest opportunity.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
69. Delivery of the activity in the approved work programme will commence once approved and continue until 30 June 2025. Activity progress will be reported to the local board on a quarterly basis.
70. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for each activity, these will be brought to the local board when appropriate.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Puketāpapa Local Board Local Environmental Work Programme 2024-2025 |
21 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Nick FitzHerbert - Team Leader Relationship Advisory |
|
Authoriser |
Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Approval of
Customer and Community Services local board work programme 2024-2025
File No.: CP2024/08586
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To approve the 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Board Customer and Community Services work programme and its associated budget (Attachment A).
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. This report presents the 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Board Customer and Community Services work programme for approval from the following departments:
· Active Communities
· Connected Communities
· Community and Social Innovation
· Parks and Community Facilities
· Regional Services and Strategy.
3. In addition, the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 Customer and Community Services – Parks and Community Facilities Department work programme is presented for approval in principle.
4. To support the delivery of the local board’s outcomes and aspirations highlighted in the Puketāpapa Local Board Plan 2023, Customer and Community Services presents a work programme for local board approval each financial year.
5. The work programme details the activities to be delivered by departments within the Customer and Community Services directorate.
6. The work programme has been developed with the local board providing feedback to staff on project and activity prioritisation through a series of workshops, held between March and May 2024.
7. The work programme development process takes an integrated approach to planning activities, involving collaboration between the local board and staff from across the council.
8. Within the Customer and Community Services work programme, the Parks and Community Facilities Department has identified several projects for the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 financial years as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme (RAP).
9. Approval is sought for the planning and design of the RAP projects to commence during the 2024/2025 financial year, so they can be prioritised if other, already approved projects cannot be delivered, face higher costs or are delayed due to unforeseen reasons.
10. The work programme includes projects proposed to be funded from regional budgets subject to approval by the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee, including Slips Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development budgets (also referred to as Growth budgets) and discrete local board projects. The local board can provide formal feedback on these regional projects by way of resolutions to this report.
11. The work programme includes references to the recently approved 2024/2025 Annual Budget and the 2024-2034 Long-term Plan decisions.
12. On 22 June 2024, a new organisational structure for Auckland Council will go live. Staff will remap and rename the work programmes of the equivalent directorate and departments. This will be reflected in the quarter one reporting in August 2024.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) whai / approve the 2024/2025 Customer and Community Services work programme and its associated budget (Attachment A to the agenda report).
b) whai / approve in principle the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 Customer and Community Services – Parks and Community Facilities work programme (Attachment A to the agenda report).
c) whai / approve the Risk Adjusted Programme projects identified in the 2024/2025 Customer and Community Services work programme (Attachment A to the agenda report).
d) whakarite / provide feedback for consideration by the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee on projects funded from the Slips Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development budgets and discrete local board projects funded from regional budgets. (Attachment C to the agenda report).
e) tuhi ā-taipitopito / note that funding for the Coastal Renewals, Slips Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development and Local Board Discrete Project budgets is subject to approval by the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee.
Horopaki
Context
13. The Auckland Plan 2050 (Auckland Plan) is council’s long-term spatial plan to ensure Auckland grows in a way that will meet the opportunities and challenges ahead. It aims to contribute to Auckland’s social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing.

14. Local board plans align with the Auckland Plan and set out local community priorities and aspirations. The 2024/2025 Customer and Community Services work programme, in turn aligns to not only the local board plans, but the appropriate Auckland Council plans, policies and strategies.
15. Work programme activities align to the following 2023 Local Board Plan outcomes:
· Our people
· Our environment
· Our community
· Our places
· Our economy
16. Development of the work programme is based on consideration of community needs and priorities, availability of resources and funding, Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations, external partnerships and risk assessment.
17. The Customer and Community Services directorate provides a wide range of services, facilities, open spaces and information which support communities to connect, enjoy and embrace the diversity of Auckland’s people, places and natural environment. These are designed and delivered locally to meet the unique needs of the local community.
18. The work programme includes:
· the maintenance and operational budgets for parks and community facilities like libraries, pools, recreation and community centres
· programmes for community development, events, play, sport, recreation and the environment
· grants for community groups and facilities
· community leases
· provision of asset management advice
19. Attachments A and C to this report provide detail about the specific projects and programmes delivered.
20. Development of the work programme follows an integrated approach to planning activities through collaboration with the Infrastructure and Environmental Services Directorate and the following departments of the Customer and Community Services Directorate:
· Active Communities
· Connected Communities
· Community and Social Innovation
· Parks and Community Facilities
· Regional Services and Strategy.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
21. The work programme demonstrates the phasing of programme and project delivery for the 2024/2025 financial year.
22. Delivery of the work programme commences from 1 July 2024, and in some cases comprises a continuation of implementation from previous financial years, including annually occurring events or projects and ongoing programmes.
23. Table one summarises the approval status required for the three financial years presented within the work programme.
Table one: Customer and Community Services local board work programme approvals
|
Department |
2024/2025 |
2025/2026 |
2026/2027 |
|
Parks and Community Facilities |
Approve |
Approve in principle |
Approve in principle |
|
All other Customer and Community Services departments · Active Communities
· Connected Communities
· Community and Social Innovation
· Regional Services and Strategy. |
Approve |
N/A |
N/A |
24. This is the first work programme which responds to the Local Board Plan 2023. It includes new programmes and projects to deliver on the local board plan objectives and initiatives.
25. Parks and Community Facilities presents a three-year rolling work programme so delivery and financial commitments against the capital works programme can be planned.
26. Approval of unique multi-year projects, particularly capital works, in the 2024/2025 work programme may lead to contractual commitments to the future budget needed to complete the project in 2025/2026 or 2026/2027.The 2024/2025 work programme includes projects with contractual commitments approved in principle as part of the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 work programmes.
27. Draft Customer and Community Services capital (capex) work programmes for financial years 2024/2025- 2026/2027 were prepared by Parks and Community Facilities staff and discussed with local boards during workshops in March/April and May 2024.
28. The draft work programmes were based on the budgets in the central proposal and or the Fairer Funding consultation modelling, reflecting a combination of reallocation and new funding. Local board feedback was provided based on this information as the workshops occurred before Governing Body decisions on the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 (LTP).
29. On 16 May 2024, the Governing Body resolved to adopt a Fairer Funding model for local boards based on new funding only, without reallocation. Budget changes under this model will take effect from the 2025/2026 financial year.
30. The Fairer Funding model allocates new funding, approved through the Long-term Plan, to local boards currently identified as funded below their equitable levels. This allocation begins from year two of the Long-term Plan (2025/2026) to achieve significant equity for most local boards in both operational (opex) and capex budgets.
31. A new Local Board Funding Policy will be in effect from the financial year 2025/2026 to enable the Fairer Funding model. Under this new policy, local boards will no longer have the distinction of asset-based services (ABS) and locally driven initiatives (LDI) funding. These changes may impact the proposed phasing of projects due to start in 2024/2025 if boards decide to reallocate funding.
32. To start delivery of the work programme from the beginning of the financial year (1 July 2024), the work programmes must be approved in June 2024. A delay in this timeframe will jeopardise the ability to fully deliver the local boards’ build and renewal works in the coming year.
33. This local board was provided with a draft capital work programme for discussion in the Local Board Annual Plan workshop 9 in May 2024: This work programme was based on the fairer funding proposal/central proposal.
34. Any potential impacts to local projects, as a result of decisions made by the Governing Body, will be made on a project-by-project basis after July 2024.
35. The remainder of Customer and Community Services presents the work programme for a single year. Work programmes considered in subsequent years will reflect the new funding effective from July 2025.
36. The local board will formally be updated by staff on the delivery of the programme by way of quarterly performance reports. Parks and Community Facilities will continue to provide informal monthly updates on work programme performance.
Proposed amendments to the 2024/2025 work programme
37. The local board approved the 2023/2024 Customer and Community Services work programme in June 2023 and approved in principle the 2024/2025 Parks and Community Facilities capex work programme. The 2025/2026 Customer and Community Services – Parks and Community Facilities work programme was also approved in principle at this time.
38. The 2024/2025 work programme contains variations to the version which was based on the central proposal in the Long-Term Plan and approved in principle last year. This is the first year of the work programme which supports implementation of the 2023 Local Board Plan. It includes the addition of new activities, changes to existing activities, such as required budget allocation and delivery timeframes, and identifies some activities that have been stopped.
Work programme budget types and purpose
39. Work programme activities are funded from various budget sources, depending on the type of delivery. Some activities within the work programme are funded from two or more sources, including from both local and regional budgets.
40. Table two outlines the different budget types and their purpose in funding the work programme.
Table two: Work programme budget types and purpose
|
Budget type |
Description of budget purpose |
|
Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) |
A development fund used to advance local operational and capital activities at the discretion of the local board. |
|
Asset Based Services (ABS) |
Allocated to deliver local activities based on decisions regarding region-wide service levels, including allocation of funds for local asset-based services, grants and staff time to deliver activities. |
|
Local renewals |
A fund dedicated to the partial renewal or full replacement of assets including those in local parks and community facilities. |
|
Growth (local parks and sports field development) |
Primarily funded through development contributions, a regional fund to improve open spaces, including developing newly acquired land into parks, and existing open space to increase capacity to cater for growing population needs. |
|
Coastal |
A regional fund for the renewal of Auckland’s significant coastal assets, such as seawalls, wharves and pontoons. |
|
Slips prevention |
A regional fund to proactively develop new assets for the prevention of landslides and major slips throughout the region. |
|
Specific purpose funding |
Funds received by the council, often from external sources, held for specific local board areas, including compensation funding from other agencies for land acquisitions required for major projects. |
|
Discrete Local Board Projects |
Funds allocated to a local board priority project in alignment with the Long-term Plan 2018-2028. |
|
Long-term Plan discrete |
Funds associated with activities specifically named and listed in previous long-term plans, including new libraries, community centres and major sports and community infrastructure. |
|
Kauri Dieback Funding |
Part of the Natural Environment Targeted Rate (NETR) Fund, this is a regional fund used to implement the national kauri dieback programme standards. |
|
External funding |
Budget from external parties, not yet received and held by Customer and Community Services. |
Capital projects and budgets
41. The capital projects to be delivered in the Puketāpapa Local Board area, together with identified budgets and main funding sources, are shown in Attachment A.
42. The budgets associated with the work programme are estimates only, costs are subject to change and may need to be refined as the project progresses through the design and delivery process. Once activity details are more clearly defined, staff will update the work programme for approval in subsequent years.
Risk Adjusted Programme
43. The Risk Adjusted Programme was first implemented in 2019 and is designed to mitigate risk so the total budget is delivered.
44. Several capital projects in the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 work programme have been identified as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme and outlined in Attachment A.
45. Local board approval is sought for the commencement of these projects in the 2025/2026 financial year, so they can be prioritised if other, already approved projects, cannot be delivered or are delayed due to unforeseen reasons.
Regionally funded activities included in the local board work programme
46. Some activities are funded regionally and will be presented to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee for approval on 25 July 2024.
47. These projects include Slips Prevention, Local Parks and Sports Field Development budgets (also referred to as Growth budgets) and discrete local board projects funded from regional budgets.
48. The local board has decision-making responsibility for these activities within parameters set by the Governing Body, which include project location, scope, and budget. These activities are therefore included in the work programme.
49. The local board can provide feedback on the activities outlined in Attachment C. Staff will report this feedback to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee when they consider regionally funded activities.
Process for changes to the approved work programme
50. Some projects in the work programme require further local board decisions as they progress through the delivery process.
51. Where further decisions are anticipated they have been indicated in the work programme. Decisions will be sought as required through local board business meetings.
52. In response to more detailed design and costing information, community consultation, consenting requirements and similar factors, amendments to the work programme or specific projects may also be required as projects progress.
53. Amendments to the work programme or specific projects will be provided to the local board when required.
54. The work programme includes community leases. Lease renewals without variations will be processed by way of a memo, in accordance with agreed delegations.
55. Should the local board signal their intent to change or pursue a new lease that is not contemplated in the leasing work programme, a deferral of an item already programmed for delivery will need to be accommodated.
56. Staff will workshop expired and more complex community leases with the local board and then report on them at a business meeting.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
57. As Customer and Community Services is a significant service provider and property owner, the directorate has a leading role in delivering Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan.
58. In providing asset-based services, Customer and Community Services contributes most of council’s operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through its facilities and infrastructure.
59. Property managed by the directorate, in particular coastal assets, will be adversely affected by climate change. The work programme includes actions, consistent with Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri to halve council’s operational GHG emissions by 2030, and to adapt to a changing climate.
60. Actions include reducing operational GHG emissions through phasing-out gas heating in aquatic centres, improving the efficiency of facilities, investing in renewable energy, and adopting the Sustainable Asset Policy.
61. At the same time, the directorate will mitigate GHG emissions and improve climate resilience through delivering tree planting programmes across the region. This includes the transitioning of unproductive farmland on regional parks to permanent native forest and delivering ecological restoration projects with community groups.
62. Recent significant weather events have influenced criteria for renewing assets. Each renewal project will be assessed for flood plain impacts, as well as any new known consequences council has experienced due to the weather.
63. Work is ongoing to build on the above actions and embed climate change considerations into investment decision-making, planning, and corporate policies, including asset management plans and local board plans.
64. As approved through the 10-year Budget 2021-2031, council’s mandated approach to ‘deliver differently’ is also anticipated to help reduce the council carbon footprint by creating a sustainable service network. This may include a shift to digital service models or the consolidation of services into a smaller footprint.
65. Each activity in the work programme has been assessed to identify whether it will have a positive, negative or neutral impact on greenhouse gas emissions, and affect Auckland’s resilience to climate change.
66. The activities in the Puketāpapa Local Board work programme identified as having a positive or negative impact on climate change are outlined in Attachment D.
67. Types of activities in the work programme that will have positive impacts on emissions and improve community resilience to climate change, include community-led environmental and educational programmes, supporting volunteer planting, delivering council-led planting and sustainable design.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
68. The Customer and Community Services work programme was developed collaboratively by staff from the directorate’s departments and Local Board Services, to ensure the activities and delivery of the work programme are integrated, complementary, and reflect council wide priorities.
69. Development of the work programme also follows a cooperative approach to planning activities through association with other directorates like the Infrastructure and Environmental Services directorate.
70. Examples of collaboration on delivery are the kauri dieback programme which is delivered by the Parks and Community Facilities and the Infrastructure and Environmental Services directorate, as well as pathway connections funded by Auckland Transport but delivered by Parks and Community Facilities.
71. The new Auckland Council organisational changes and structure will come into effect on 22 June 2024, work programmes will be remapped to reflect the new structure of the organisation following the adoption of the work programme. This will be reflected in the quarter one reporting in August 2024.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
72. The feedback received from the local board through a series of workshops in March/April and May 2024 has informed the proposed Customer and Community Services work programme.
73. A focus area of the work programme is to respond to local board aspirations through consideration of the local board plans. The work programmes consider communities of greatest need and the building of capacity within those communities through community-led delivery and partnerships.
74. Planning and delivery of some activities involves consultation with the community to ensure their aspirations are understood and responded to.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
75. The Auckland Plan’s focus on Māori culture and identity is encapsulated in the outcome: Māori Identity and Wellbeing.
76. Kia Ora Tāmaki Makaurau, council’s Māori outcomes performance measurement framework, captures the majority of council’s Māori outcome strategy and planning. The framework responds to the needs and aspirations Māori in Tāmaki Makaurau, both mana whenua and mataawaka, have identified as mattering most for them.
77. Local boards play a vital role in representing the interests of all Aucklanders and are committed to the Treaty-based obligations and to enabling effective Māori participation (kia ora te hononga).
78. Local Board Plans include Māori outcomes and align Kia Ora Tāmaki Makaurau Outcomes with key initiatives in the local board plan.
79. The work programme delivers on the local board plan key initiatives and includes activities which have an objective to deliver outcomes for and with Māori. Attachment B sets out the activities in the work programme that aim to achieve high Māori outcomes in one or more of the strategic priority areas. They involve ongoing collaboration with Māori or are delivered by Māori.
80. The provision of services, facilities and open spaces support the realisation of the aspirations of Māori, promote community relationships, connection to the natural environment and foster holistic wellbeing of whānau, hapū and iwi Māori.
81. Projects or programmes in Attachment A may also contribute to Māori outcomes but are not highlighted as they are identified to have a low or no impact.
82. Engagement with Māori is critical. If not already completed, engagement will occur on a programme or individual project basis, where appropriate, prior to any work commencing. Engagement outcomes with Māori will be reported back separately to the local board at the appropriate time.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
83. Each activity line has a budget allocation in one or more of the financial years e.g. 2024/2025 2025/2026 and 2026/2027. Where activity lines show a zero-dollar operating expense opex budget, this reflects implementation costs met through staff salary or other funding sources.
84. The 2024/2025 activities recommended for local board approval can be accommodated within 2024/2025 budgets and staff resources.
85. The budgets allocated to activities in the financial years 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 in the Parks and Community Facilities budgets are indicative and are subject to change due to any increased costs, inflation or reduction to the overall available annual council budget that may occur.
86. Table three summarises the budget sources and allocation for each work programme financial year.
Table three: Puketāpapa budget allocation
|
Local budgets |
2024/2025 (approve) |
2025/2026 (approve in principle |
2026/2027 (approve in principle |
|
Operational (Opex): Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) |
744,971 |
0 |
0 |
|
Opex: Asset Based Services (ABS) |
8,843,594 |
0 |
0 |
|
Capital (Capex): Local Asset Renewals - Budget (ABS) |
1,884,959 |
4,963,896 |
5,130,009 |
|
Capex: Local Asset Renewals - Proposed Allocation (ABS) |
1,884,959 |
1,859,520 |
1,491,880 |
|
Advanced Delivery RAP* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Capex: Local Asset Renewals - Unallocated budget (ABS) |
0 |
3,104,376 |
3,638,128 |
|
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) – Budget |
408,588 |
416,041 |
424,460 |
|
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) - Proposed Allocation |
355,950 |
326,868 |
289,054 |
|
Advanced Delivery RAP* |
34,421 |
0 |
0 |
|
Capex: Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) - Unallocated budget |
18,217 |
89,173 |
135,406 |
|
Capex: Growth projects Allocation |
250,000 |
1,557,234 |
1,950,000 |
|
Capex: Slips Prevention projects Allocation |
183,682 |
0 |
0 |
|
Capex: Long-term Plan discrete |
0 |
304,000 |
0 |
|
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS |
12,263,156 |
4,047,622 |
3,730,934 |
87. The budgets are based on the allocations in the Long-term Plan 2024-2034. Budgets are subject to change during council’s Annual Budget and future long-term plan processes.
88. During delivery of the 2024/2025 work programme, where an activity is cancelled or no longer required, the local board can reallocate the associated budget to an existing work programme activity or create a new activity within that financial year. This process will include agreement from each department and will need to be formally resolved on by the local board.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
89. The most significant risk is that delivery of the Customer and Community Services work programme is dependent on the local board approving the work programme by the end of June 2024. Approval of the work programme later into the financial year will result in delays to delivery.
90. The majority of opex activities in the work programme are ongoing and occur annually. Risks associated with these activities have been identified in previous years and are managed on an ongoing basis.
91. Storm recovery investigation work is still in progress. In most cases, some provision has been made to manage the impacts, but mitigation will need to be refined and worked through with the local boards.
92. There are constraints with accessing geotechnical reports and assessing the asset need and location. Consideration also needs to be given to long term flood impacts. Insurance proceeds need to be understood and will, in part, reduce the liability of recovery. Unfortunately, many insurance claims will take time to assess and process.
93. Table four outlines the key risks and mitigations associated with the work programme once it has been approved.
Table four: risks and mitigations
|
Risk |
Mitigation |
|
Non-delivery, time delays and budget overspend of activities that are managed through the work programme. |
Having agreed processes to amend the work programme if activities need to be changed or cancelled. Utilising the Risk Adjusted Programme to progress those activities identified as ready to proceed under the Risk Adjusted Programme at the beginning of the financial year. |
|
Health, safety and wellbeing factors, including external influences relating to work programme delivery may impact the delivery of activities, resulting in activities requiring adjustment. |
Health and safety assessments will be conducted prior to commencement of projects. Work programme activities and projects will be adjusted accordingly where these risks occur during the delivery phase. |
|
Extenuating economic and environmental conditions, as well as the possibility of further COVID-19 outbreaks, may continue to create capex delivery challenges, including increased material and labour costs, as well as shortages in both sectors, this in turn will lead to increased overall project costs and may lead to delays in project delivery. |
Development of the work programme has included consideration of potential impacts on delivery due to extenuating economic and environmental conditions, as well as possibly of further COVID-19 outbreaks for all activities. Timeframes for some activities are set to enable delivery within the agreed timeframe despite possible delays. Increased costs and delays will be managed as part of the ongoing management of work programmes via additional RAP projects, and the rephasing of projects to accommodate increased budget and address material shortages. Where activities need to be cancelled the local board can reallocate the budget to other activities. |
|
Adverse weather impacts - delays to construction due to soft ground conditions and being unable to construct in the rain has impacted delivery of the capex work programme in the 2022/2023 financial year. Should this continue, which with climate change is likely, this will once again impact delivery. |
Having agreed processes to amend the work programme if activities need to be changed or cancelled.
Delays will be managed as part of the ongoing management of work programmes via additional RAP projects. |
|
The geopolitical factors may result in further inflationary and supply chain pressures. |
Potential inflationary pressures have been modelled into key forecasts, however, uncertainties remain.
The ongoing cost increase may become unsustainable, and may require a reprioritization of potential work programmes, capital spend and a potential discontinuation of some programmes. |
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
94. The new Auckland Council organisational changes and leadership structure will come into effect on 22 June 2024, staff will remap the work programmes and budgets to reflect the new structure of the organisation.
95. Delivery of the Customer and Community Service work programme is scheduled to start on 1 July 2024 and continue until 30 June 2025.
96. Regionally funded projects are an exception and will commence after they have been approved by the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee in July 2024.
97. The local board will receive progress updates on a quarterly basis, with the first quarterly report available in November 2024.
98. When further decisions for activities are needed at project milestones, these will be brought to the local board at the appropriate time.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Customer and Community Services Work Programme 2024/2025 |
39 |
|
b⇩ |
Māori Outcomes |
57 |
|
c⇩ |
Regionally Funded Projects |
61 |
|
d⇩ |
Climate Impacts |
63 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Darryl Soljan - Manager Customer Experience - North & West Libraries Claire Stewart - General Manager Active Communities Taryn Crewe - General Manager Parks and Community Facilities Justine Haves - General Manager Regional Services & Strategy Pam Elgar - GM Community and Social Innovation |
|
Authorisers |
Claudia Wyss - Director Customer and Community Services Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two 2023/2024, grant allocations
File No.: CP2024/08600
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To fund, part-fund or decline the applications received for Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two 2023/2024.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. This report presents applications received for the Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two (Attachment B) 2023/2024.
3. The Puketāpapa Local Board adopted the Puketāpapa Local Board Community Grants Programme 2023/2024 on 20 July 2023 (Attachment A). The document sets application guidelines for community contestable grants.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) whakaae / agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application in Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two 2023/2024 listed in the following table:
|
Application ID |
Organisation |
Main focus |
Requesting funding for |
Amount requested |
Eligibility |
|
QR2415-201 |
Urdu Hindi Cultural Association of New Zealand Incorporated |
Arts and culture |
Towards the venue hire, stage decoration, videography and editing costs for a “Ghazal Night – Poetry Symposium” at the Fickling Centre on 2 November 2024. |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-202 |
Royal Oak Scottish Country Dance Club |
Arts and culture |
Towards venue hire. |
$1,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-203 |
The Air Training Corps Association of New Zealand-No 3 Squadron Air Training Corp |
Community |
Towards annual rental of photocopier/printer between July 2024 to June 2025. |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-204 |
Squash Auckland Incorporated |
Sport and recreation |
Towards the BoardPro software annual subscription fees. |
$1,897.50 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-207 |
Pet Whisperer Rescue Trust |
Community |
Towards food cost for desexed stray cats from 1 July 2024 to 1 January 2025 |
$1,124.63 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-208 |
The Scout Association of New Zealand-Waikowhai Scouts |
Community |
Towards the upgrade and refurbishing of the toilet area at the Waikowhai Scout Den, including the purchase and installation of two new toilets, cisterns and seats, two basins, taps, electric califont and plumbing costs. |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-209 |
Roskill Chinese Group |
Community |
Towards venue hire for the monthly meetings of the Roskill Chinese Group from 1 September 2024 to 1 September 2025. |
$1,656.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-211 |
Blue Light Ventures Incorporated |
Community |
Towards the cost of tickets to "Rainbows End" for 65 youth from the Puketapapa Local Board area. |
$1,865.50 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-212 |
Action Education Incorporated |
Arts and culture |
Towards the facilitator fees, travel, administration, equipment, and resources to deliver 8 spoken word poetry workshops at the Marcellin College. |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2415-213 |
Breathe Move Enliven Limited |
Arts and culture |
Towards venue hire, catering, leadership and musicians fees (drummer and guitarist fees) for 4 three-hour "Songs for Peace" events. |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$17,543.63 |
Horopaki
Context
6. The local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of being a world class city.
7. Auckland Council’s Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme.
8. The local board grants programme sets out:
· local board priorities
· lower priorities for funding
· exclusions
· grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· any additional accountability requirements.
9. The Puketāpapa Local Board adopted the Puketāpapa Local Board Community Grants Programme 2023/2024 on 20 July 2023 (Attachment A). The document sets application guidelines for community contestable grants.
10. The community grants programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications and community networks.
11. The local board has set a total community grants budget of $138,543 for the 2023/2024 financial year. An additional fund of $50,209 was reallocated to the Community Grants budget. A total of $165,890.57 was allocated in the previous grant rounds. This leaves a total of $22,861.43 to be allocated to one quick response round.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
12. The aim of the local board grants programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the report recommendations.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
13. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to address climate change by providing grants to individuals and groups with projects that support community climate change action. Community climate action involves reducing or responding to climate change by residents in a locally relevant way. Local board grants can contribute to expanding climate action by supporting projects that reduce carbon emissions and increase community resilience to climate impacts. Examples of projects include:
· local food production and food waste reduction
· decreasing use of single-occupancy transport options
· home energy efficiency and community renewable energy generation
· local tree planting and streamside revegetation
· education about sustainable lifestyle choices that reduce carbon footprints.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
14. Based on the main focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department will provide input and advice. The main focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment or heritage.
15. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
16. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Puketāpapa Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications in accordance with its priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
17. Staff will provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they can increase their chances of success in the future.
18. A summary of each application received through Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round Two, 2023/2024 applications is provided in Attachment B.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
19. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Māori. Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Unit has provided input and support towards the development of the community grants processes.
20. Four applicants applying to Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two, 2023/2024 indicate projects that target Māori or Māori outcomes.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
21. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted 10 Year Budget 2021-2031 and local board agreements.
22. The local board has set a total community grants budget of $138,543 for the 2023/2024 financial year. An additional fund of $50,209 was reallocated to the Community Grants budget. A total of $165,890.57 was allocated in the previous grant rounds. This leaves a total of $22,861.43 to be allocated to one quick response round.
23. Ten applications were received for Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round Two 2023/2024, requesting a total of $17,543.63.
24. Relevant staff from Auckland Council’s Finance Department have been fully involved in the development of all local board work programmes, including financial information in this report, and have not identified any financial implications.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
25. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
26. Following the Puketāpapa Local Board allocating funding for round two of the quick response, grants staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇨ |
Puketāpapa Local Board Community Grants Programme 2023/2024 (Under Separate Cover) |
|
|
b⇨ |
Puketāpapa Quick Response Round Two 2023/2024 - grant applications (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Moumita Dutta - Senior Grants Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Pierre Fourie - Grants & Incentives Manager Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Views on the Draft Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034
File No.: CP2024/08699
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide views on the Draft Auckland Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland Transport (AT) is leading engagement on the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034 (RLTP) and is seeking local board views.
3. Public engagement on the draft RLTP finished on 17 June 2024. AT has provided local boards with summaries of public feedback to aid local boards in developing their views.
4. This report formalises the local board’s views. Local boards are recommended to use the template in Attachment A to provide their views.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) provide views on the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034 using the template in Attachment A to this report.
Horopaki
Context
What is the Regional Land Transport Plan
5. The draft Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) is the Auckland region’s bid for national funding for transport in Auckland. It is a 10-year investment proposal.
6. Auckland Transport (AT) produces the RLTP on behalf of the Regional Transport Committee (RTC) which is comprised of members of the AT Board and includes representatives from New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and KiwiRail.
7. The draft RLTP includes projects proposed in the national State Highway Investment Proposal and KiwiRail’s Rail Network Investment Programme. It also includes projects from the Department of Conservation.
8. After local boards provide their feedback, the process to finalise and adopt the RLTP has the following steps.
a) It is considered and endorsed by the RTC and by Auckland Council’s Transport and Infrastructure Committee (TIC).
b) The final RLTP is submitted to the NZTA’s board for consideration no later than 1 August 2024.
c) The NZTA Board considers every region’s submitted RLTP and produces the National Land Transport Plan by 1st October 2024. This sets out the activities and projects provisionally expected to receive funding from the National Land Transport Fund (subject to confirmation of business cases).
9. Auckland Council’s financial contribution to the draft RLTP is set through the Long-term Plan.
Local board views
10. The statutory role of local boards within the development of the RLTP is to state the expectations of their communities. Local boards do not decide whether transport projects or programmes are included in the draft RLTP, but perform an important role by providing a community perspective about the proposed programme.
11. Local boards are encouraged to present their feedback directly to the RTC during hearings on 26 and 27 June 2024. Local board feedback is considered by the RTC, which is the legislated decision-making body for transport matters in Auckland.
12. Local board views will also inform the Transport and Infrastructure Committee when it deliberates at its 4 July 2024 meeting.
Information about public engagement
13. Public engagement was conducted from 17 May 2024 – 17 June 2024. The engagement met the requirements for a special consultative procedure as outlined in the Local Government Act 2002.
14. AT’s engagement included:
· mailing notification of engagement to 550,000 households across Auckland
· running radio, print and social media notification of engagement
· providing opportunities to engage electronically through the AT website
· conducting more than 20 community drop-in sessions at which communities could engage with officers from AT, NZTA and Kiwi Rail
· providing hard copies of the draft RLTP and paper submission forms at libraries and Auckland Council service centres
· meeting with Auckland Council’s advisory panels
· constituting an RTC hearings panel and hearing submissions from the public.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
A summary of the draft RLTP
a) Fast and connected. Improvements that make public transport faster, more accessible, and more reliable
b) Resilient. Investments that ensure our network is ready for challenges and less vulnerable to storms, flooding and other emergencies
c) Productive. Projects that support regional growth and productivity like technology to better manage traffic flow and make journeys quicker and more reliable at peak times
d) Safe. Investments that support a network that gets everyone home safely
e) Sustainable. Investments that help Auckland reduce its transport emissions.
16. The draft RLTP proposes a $63 billion programme of investment in renewals, maintenance and operations, public transport services and new projects. However, the costs of this programme are a lot more than Auckland is likely to receive. Therefore, AT is leading engagement on behalf of the RTC on which projects are the highest regional priorities for funding. The draft RLTP proposes that the following items are effectively mandatory and should receive funding in all circumstances:
a) renewal and maintenance of local roads, rail and state highway networks, to ensure these remain fit for purpose into the future and that whole-of-life costs and disruptions are minimised
b) existing public transport services, along with improvements such as more rail services enabled by the City Rail Link and the expansion of the frequent bus network
c) completing projects already committed to or in progress (for example, Eastern Busway and City Rail Link).
17. This leaves choices around which new capital projects should be a priority, especially over the next three years. The main options are that AT concentrates on:
a) smaller projects that can be delivered quickly to improve the speed and reliability of our bus and ferry network, including dynamic bus lanes, improved stations and low-emissions options
b) larger rapid transit projects that will provide new high-speed public transport links across Auckland but will cost more and take longer to deliver
c) smaller projects that can be delivered quickly to optimise traffic movement on our road network and motorways and encourage more sustainable travel from key growth areas
d) major state highway projects that will improve resilience, reliability and travel times on the motorway network and enhance our links to other regions
e) cycling projects that will increase the size of the cycling network
f) investment in safety infrastructure to reduce deaths and serious injuries on our transport network.
18. The draft RLTP proposes that public transport projects are generally our highest priority for funding, followed by projects to optimise local roads, address growth challenges and expand the cycling network. It concludes that delivering all of the State Highway improvements, while still important, is a lower priority for available funding.
19. The draft RLTP also includes a proposal for the Local Board Transport Capital Fund of $62.8 million across all local boards over three years. For comparison, the fund was $7 million for the 2023/2024 financial year, but in the draft RLTP this increases to $19.8 million for 2024/25, $21.3 million for 2025/26 and $21.7 million for 2026/27. Local boards are recommended to provide their views on the proposed increase to the fund in their feedback.
Providing local board views
20. RLTP’s are developed every three years. This is an opportunity for local board elected members to influence longer-term transport planning in Auckland.
21. AT recommends local boards use all the information gathered from their local board plan, the Long-term Plan and RLTP processes to help inform their feedback.
22. Additionally, all local boards are supported by an AT Elected Member Relationship Partner (EMRP) who has provided opportunities for workshops or discussions with subject matter experts about the draft RLTP. The workshops were also an opportunity to support local boards to prioritise their feedback.
23. The Puketāpapa Local Board workshopped the draft RLTP on 23 May 2024.
24. Attachment B provides the workshop presentation with the EMRP’s advice, using their local knowledge of the area.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
25. AT engages closely with Auckland Council when developing strategy. The actions and measures that support the outcomes sought by the Auckland Plan 2050 and the council’s directions on climate change through Te-Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan all inform the priorities. The draft RLTP is informed by these discussions and AT reviews the potential climate impacts of all projects to minimise carbon emissions.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
26. The draft RLTP is developed with input from Auckland Council, the Mayor’s Office, officials from Auckland Council and the Transport and Infrastructure Committee.
27. One of the most important council inputs is the budget expectations set for AT during development of the Long-term Plan. This process confirms Auckland Council’s funding offer to AT that is made based on agreed assumptions about levels of service.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
28. Local board plans inform development of the council’s Long-term Plan which identifies levels of transport funding that AT should expect from Auckland Council. Local board plans are reviewed by AT and provide information that informs transport planning. Essentially, the draft RLTP is the result of a long engagement with local boards and the community.
29. The RLTP team engaged with local boards directly in October and November 2023. The team discussed current priorities and plans for engagement.
30. During the same period, local boards received their annual AT Forward Works Programme briefing that provided an update about AT’s current and planned work programme. In March 2024, local boards provided feedback about their priorities, which was shared within AT.
31. The draft RLTP was endorsed by the Transport and Infrastructure Committee and approved by the RTC for consultation. This was then circulated publicly on 17 May 2024, initiating a month-long period of public engagement.
32. Local boards were able to request information about the draft RLTP either by asking their AT Elected Member Relationship Partner or contacting the project team directly. Elected Member Relationship Partners organised workshops with local boards to discuss providing feedback.
33. The Puketāpapa Local Board workshopped the draft RLTP on 23 May 2024. Attachment B provides the workshop presentation with the EMRP’s advice, using their local knowledge of the area.
34. Additionally, local boards are provided with summaries of feedback from public consultation in their area.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
35. Auckland Transport is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its broader legal obligations in being more responsible or effective to Māori.
36. Auckland iwi were engaged during the development of the draft RLTP and were individually informed of the public engagement.
37. AT’s Māori Responsiveness Plan outlines the commitment to 19 mana whenua iwi in delivering effective and well-designed transport policy and solutions for Auckland. We also recognise mataawaka and their representative bodies and our desire to foster a relationship with them. This plan is available on the Auckland Transport website - https://at.govt.nz/about-us/transport-plans-strategies/maori-responsiveness-plan/#about
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
38. There are no direct financial implications for local boards in receiving this report.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
39. Broadly, the key risk associated with this RLTP is increased public expectations for delivery of projects that may not receive National Land Transport Plan funding. This will be mitigated by highlighting key parts of the programme that are expected to be subject to higher risk, based on Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024 activity class allocations. There is also a risk that NZTA does not fund elements of AT’s programme contained in the RLTP.
40. The most significant direct risk to local board budgets is a reduction in the currently proposed Local Board Transport Capital Funding. Local boards can mitigate this risk by clearly advocating their position on this fund.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
41. The RTC will review the feedback from all local boards and consider it during its deliberations about the RLTP.
42. Local board formal views will be provided to the Transport and Infrastructure Committee when it resolves on the RLTP at its 4 July 2024 meeting.
43. The draft RLTP will be considered by the RTC and confirmed by 1 August 2024, after which the document becomes a confirmed programme for transport work in Auckland.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Template for local board views on the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2024-2034 |
79 |
|
b⇩ |
RLTP workshop presentation material with local advice |
83 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Ben Stallworthy, Principal Advisor Strategic Relationships, Auckland Transport |
|
Authorisers |
Louise Mason - General Manager Policy Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Local board feedback on the draft Mahere Hukihuki mo te Whakahaeretanga me te Whakaitinga o te Para / Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024
File No.: CP2024/08754
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek the local board’s feedback on the draft Mahere Hukihuki mo te Whakahaeretanga me te Whakaitinga o te Para Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council’s draft Te Mahere Hukihuki mo te Whakahaeretanga me te Whakaitinga o te Para, Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024 (draft plan) continues the Zero Waste journey of council’s previous waste plans. However, it has a strengthened focus for actions at the top of the ‘waste hierarchy, with a greater emphasis on reducing, redesigning, reusing or repairing items, while maintaining support for actions at the recycling level.’
3. The draft plan proposes 12 key priorities which are outlined in the snapshot summary in Attachment A.
4. On 30 November 2023 the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee approved the draft plan for public consultation (resolution PEPCC/2023/165). This includes the draft Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan 2024 which is an appendix to the regionwide draft plan.
5. The draft plan was formally consulted on alongside the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 in February and March 2024.
6. Auckland’s Waste Assessment 2023 was prepared to inform the draft plan and reflect the requirements of Te rautaki para Aotearoa / the New Zealand Waste Strategy. This was made available with the draft plan as part of the for public consultation process, pursuant to sections 50 (3)(a) and 44(e) of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008.
7. Consultation on the draft plan sought feedback on key aspects of the plan, from the overall direction to specific priorities for action. The key proposals included:
· a shift to fortnightly rubbish collections
· a focus on construction and demolition waste and five further priority waste materials: organic, plastics, packaging and textile waste, and biosolids
· support for product stewardship (including a container return scheme)
· addressing litter and illegal dumping.
8. There was also a question relating to the draft Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan and an opportunity to provide any other comments.
9. Council received 2,737 written submissions on the draft plan. In addition, Auckland Have Your Say Events (AKHYS) with the public attracted 1,410 responses on proposals within the plan. At these AKHYS events, particular attention was given to receiving feedback on the fortnightly rubbish collection proposal.
10. The majority of written submissions supported six out of the seven consultation questions, ranging from 64 per cent support for the general direction of the draft plan to 84 per cent support for the proposed priority for addressing litter and illegal dumping. Notably the proposal to shift to fortnightly collections received the most mixed feedback. In written submissions 53 per cent of submitters did not support the proposed shift to fortnightly rubbish collections. Whereas, 56 per cent of people providing feedback at AKHYS events, supported this proposal.
11. A workshop was held with the local board between May and June to discuss a summary of the submissions. The presentation from this workshop is also included Attachment B and covers:
· the level of support for the proposals outlined in the feedback form, both regionally and from residents of this local board
· themes from local board residents on the feedback form questions
· feedback from any organisations linked to the local board area.
12. Staff are seeking local board feedback on the draft plan. This will be incorporated into a report with recommended changes to the draft plan for final consideration and adoption by the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee in September 2024.
13. Once the final version is adopted, the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024, including the Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan 2024, will be the guiding document for waste management and minimisation services in the Auckland region over the next six years (2024-2030).
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) whakarite / provide feedback on the draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024, including the Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan 2024.
Horopaki
Context
14. Auckland Council is required by the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 to review its waste management and minimisation plan (waste plan) every six years. This waste plan is Council’s guiding document for achieving effective and efficient waste management and minimisation in Tāmaki Makaurau / Auckland.
15. On 30 November 2023 the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee approved Te Mahere Hukihuki mo te Whakahaeretanga me te Whakaitinga o te Para / draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024 (draft plan), for public consultation (resolution PEPCC/2023/165).
Local boards have provided feedback that informed the draft plan
16. As part of drafting the 2024 plan, council staff worked with mana whenua, and sought input from, local boards, the Governing Body, the Auckland Council Group and community partners. Feedback from local boards on the proposed direction of the draft plan was sought in August 2023 and incorporated into the draft plan.
17. Resolutions from all local boards on the proposed direction of the draft plan can be located here.
Draft plan vision, key priorities and targets
18. The draft plan (available at AKHYS.co.nz) builds on the previous waste plans of 2012 and 2018, continuing the Zero Waste journey. However, it has a strengthened focus for actions at the top of the ‘waste hierarchy’:
· reduce, rethink, redesign
· reuse repair, repurpose.
19. This is reflected in the revised vision, principles and 12 key priorities of the plan which are summarised in the snapshot document in Attachment A. The key proposals included in the feedback form are identified below:
· a shift to fortnightly rubbish collections
· a focus on construction and demolition waste and five further priority waste materials: organic, plastics, packaging and textile waste, and biosolids
· support for product stewardship (including a container return scheme)
· addressing litter and illegal dumping, and
· a specific question relating to the draft Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan and an opportunity to provide any other comments.
20. A new draft Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan 2024 is included within the plan, reflecting the unique waste needs of the islands.
Consultation materials and process
21. Public consultation included a publicity campaign to promote the draft plan through digital, print and radio platforms, while also working through our community partners and business contacts and through council’s channels such as, OurAuckland and social media accounts.
22. Staff attended ten Auckland Have Your Say (AKHYS) events across the region, including two on the Hauraki Gulf Islands of Waiheke and Aotea / Great Barrier Island.
23. Alongside the draft plan, the following materials were made available on the AKHYS website:
· the Waste Assessment 2023 (a document of research that informs the draft plan)
· the snapshot summary of the draft plan (translated into Māori, Samoan, Tongan, Chinese, Korean, Hindi and New Zealand sign language, which was also made available in an ‘easy read’ format)
· submission feedback forms (translated into Māori, Samoan, Tongan, Chinese, Korean, and Hindi)
· a document of frequently asked questions on the fortnightly rubbish collection proposal.
24. Two webinars on the draft plan were held alongside a video introduction to the plan. Two hearing-style events for Māori organisations and regional organisations and interest groups were held in March 2024.
25. Staff also workshopped the plan with six advisory panels hosted by Auckland Council. Attachment D summarises the panels’ key points. The panels offered unique perspectives from their communities, for example, that many disabled people have large amounts of medical waste that they cannot influence, so actions are needed to target health providers or suppliers and support these communities to reduce waste.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Consultation Questions
26. Consultation asked respondents whether they supported key aspects of the draft plan, from the overall direction to specific priorities for action, as identified in paragraph 18.
27. A copy of the consultation feedback form for the draft plan is provided in Attachment E.
Submissions – regionwide
28. A summary of submissions on the draft plan as presented to the board between May and June 2024 is appended to this report as Attachment B.
29. A total of 2,737 written submissions were received including online, hard copy surveys and emails, including 11 verbal submissions at hearing-style events for organisations, of which eight organisations also provided a written submission.
30. In addition, AKHYS events with the public attracted 1,410 responses on various proposals in the draft plan. These predominantly addressed the fortnightly rubbish collection proposal, as staff made this a key focus of face-to-face interactions with Auckland residents.
31. A majority of written submitters supported six out of the seven consultation questions, as shown in Attachment B. Support ranged from strong support for the general direction of the draft plan (64 per cent), priority waste materials (70 per cent) and product stewardship (73 per cent) to very strong support for actions on construction and demolition waste (79 per cent) and the proposed priority for addressing litter and illegal dumping (84 per cent).
32. The proposal to shift to fortnightly collections received the most mixed feedback. In written submissions 53 per cent of submitters did not support the proposed shift to fortnightly rubbish collections. Whereas 56 per cent of people providing feedback at AKHYS events, supported this proposal.
Submissions breakdown by local board
33. The number of written submissions per local board area is shown in Attachment C and identifies the total number of submissions per person by local board and the total number of Have Your Say responses.
34. The submissions by local board area largely reflected the summarised regional results, with all supporting six out of the seven consultation questions. The exception was Question 2A fortnightly rubbish collections, where results were more varied. Table 1 below shows the level of support for this proposal by local board area.
35. Table 1 does not include feedback from AKHYS events on this topic by local board area as local board information was not captured from people at these events. The responses from the Have Your Say events are captured separately at the bottom.
Table 1: Breakdown of submissions to Q2A Fortnightly rubbish collections by local board area (red = majority do not support; green = majority support).
|
Local Board |
Support (%) |
Don't know (%) |
Other (%) |
Do not support (%) |
Total number of submissions |
|
Albert-Eden |
39 |
1 |
5 |
55 |
278 |
|
Aotea/Great Barrier |
70 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
10 |
|
Devonport-Takapuna |
50 |
2 |
4 |
44 |
116 |
|
Franklin |
26 |
1 |
8 |
64 |
72 |
|
Henderson-Massey |
31 |
1 |
5 |
63 |
142 |
|
Hibiscus and Bays |
49 |
3 |
5 |
43 |
159 |
|
Howick |
31 |
1 |
4 |
64 |
208 |
|
Kaipātiki |
52 |
2 |
4 |
42 |
181 |
|
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu |
29 |
3 |
2 |
66 |
62 |
|
Manurewa |
29 |
0 |
3 |
69 |
77 |
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki |
19 |
1 |
36 |
44 |
335 |
|
Ōrākei |
27 |
0 |
4 |
69 |
249 |
|
Ōtara-Papatoetoe |
25 |
0 |
7 |
68 |
69 |
|
Papakura |
44 |
2 |
2 |
52 |
52 |
|
Puketāpapa |
29 |
2 |
6 |
63 |
51 |
|
Rodney |
44 |
3 |
6 |
47 |
115 |
|
Upper Harbour |
43 |
0 |
3 |
53 |
118 |
|
Waiheke |
65 |
3 |
3 |
29 |
31 |
|
Waitākere Ranges |
41 |
0 |
13 |
46 |
80 |
|
Waitematā |
48 |
1 |
7 |
43 |
136 |
|
Whau |
48 |
2 |
4 |
45 |
97 |
|
AKHYS Events |
56 |
6 |
0 |
38 |
798 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
3436 |
Request for local board feedback
36. Local boards are being asked whether they support the proposed approach for the draft 2024 Waste Plan. Staff are particularly interested in hearing local board views on the 12 priorities for action outlined in the summary document in attachment A – Summary Snapshot – draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024, and on the goals and actions of the of the Hauraki Gulf Islands plan.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
Auckland’s climate emissions and waste
37. Responding to the challenge of climate change is a key priority for Auckland Council and in 2020, the council approved Te-Tāruke-a-Tawhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan, the region’s plan to tackle this challenge. The plan includes actions and priorities relevant to reducing emissions related to waste to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions through reduced consumption-emissions and emissions generated by disposal, dealing with climate-related risks and looking at the opportunities that may arise.
38. To address the urgency to move to a low waste and low emissions economy, Auckland’s Waste Assessment 2023 placed an emphasis on identifying the emissions factors of all waste streams. This resulted in retaining focus on reducing construction and demolition waste and expanding the list of priority wastes for the draft plan to include textiles and biosolids. Including actions that aim to reduce disposal of materials with high emissions factors to landfill will further support meeting our climate change obligations.
39. From a council perspective, information on embodied carbon of materials (where available) and emissions from transport and energy associated with collecting and processing waste are other common greenhouse gas factors to consider when making decisions on important waste issues, and this has helped to shape the draft plan considerations.
40. Over the lifetime of the proposed 2024 plan, the impact of greater diversion both from food scraps collection and general recycling will result in an estimated reduction in carbon emissions from waste by 125,000 tonnes CO2-e per annum increasing to 250,000 tonnes over the 20-year project period. Fortnightly refuse collection maximises this opportunity by reducing waste and associated emissions further.
41. This plan focuses on actions at the top of the waste hierarchy to design out waste and keep resources in their highest value for as long as possible; the expanded Resource Recovery Network and shift to a circular economy proposed within the plan should ultimately result in fewer greenhouse gas emissions.
42. A focus on waste-related emissions reduction is not only important because of the human impact, but because climate-related disasters and events can result in significant amounts of waste from damaged properties, assets and possessions, along with waste streams such as ash, sediment, vegetation or hazardous wastes. These wastes are often hard to divert from landfill due to high contamination levels.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
43. In developing the draft plan, staff worked with departments and Council-controlled Organisations (CCOs) within the Auckland Council Group that are likely to create or manage waste in their operations. This included work to test the direction and actions within the plan related to operational waste or are within scope of other council units or CCOs, such as managing public waste and biosolids, and closed landfills.
44. We also worked across units to capture data on operational waste. Initial data collection indicates that construction and demolition together with soils and biosolids are among the largest waste streams from council activities. Demonstrating best practice in waste minimisation within the council is a clear opportunity to change the way our staff and suppliers approach waste minimisation, such as transitioning from demolition to deconstruction approaches when renewing assets and capital expenditure.
45. Acknowledging the complexity of establishing meaningful baselines for operational waste across the Auckland Council Group, the target for in-house operational waste is staged within the draft plan to set specific deadlines for data collation and establishing baselines, before setting targets in 2025 for the years 2026 to 2030. The initial in-house operational waste targets can be found on pages 23 and 24 of the draft plan, and a section on how the council is leading the way in meeting those targets can be found on page 57 of the draft plan.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
46. Local boards are integral to the success of the draft plan, particularly in working with local communities to promote waste minimisation.
47. A local board briefing was held on 7 August 2023, with an update on the Waste Assessment 2023 and the review of the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2018. This was followed by a report to all local boards in August 2023, providing an opportunity to give feedback on proposed priority actions to be included in the revised plan.
48. Staff also sought feedback from the local boards of Aotea Great Barrier, Waiheke (which includes Rakino Island) and Kawau (Rodney Local Board) seeking early input on the draft Hauraki Gulf Islands Waste Plan 2024.
49. All 21 local boards provided feedback in August 2023, which in turn was provided to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee when they approved the draft plan for consultation on 30 November 2023. These points were considered in drafting the draft plan and will be considered when developing work programmes. Staff will continue to liaise with local boards to ensure their concerns are addressed.
50. During May and June 2024 staff have scheduled workshops with all 21 local boards to provide an overview of regional and local consultation responses, with an opportunity for local boards to ask questions and clarify any areas of concern prior to providing a formal response through this report.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
51. The zero-waste vision of the draft plan is aligned with the broader holistic framework and values of te ao Māori, and staff have continued to seek close engagement with Māori to strengthen the plan through the post-draft consultation phase. This included working closely with representatives from Te Ahiwaru, supported by Māori specialists, and Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei (NWŌ), supported by technical experts. Key feedback from these iwi included the need:
· to address commercial waste through creating a Resource Recovery and Infrastructure Plan (RRIP).
· for future work with Mana Whenua to strengthen te ao Māori in the draft plan. Both Te Ahiwaru and Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei suggest reflecting the Māori priorities and te ao Māori throughout the plan. NWŌ suggest this be done through creating the RRIP noted above.
· for better alignment between the WMMP and the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP), with suggested wording to reflect the role of the AUP in land use planning for waste infrastructure.
52. Para Kore, a national Māori zero waste organisation, provided a submission strongly supporting the direction of the plan but noting they expected to see more at the top of the waste hierarchy. They suggest the plan ‘defers to Central Government’ and that the language of the plan revolves too much around diversion from landfill rather than actions further up the hierarchy.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
53. The actions proposed in the draft plan are achievable within existing funding, being a combination of:
· commercial revenue, which includes revenue generated from waste management and minimisation activities, such as gate fees at council’s Waitakere Waste and Resource Recovery Facility, income from investment, and user-pays charges for bin tags and bags for kerbside refuse collections (until shift to regionwide rates-funded service)
· targeted rates for rubbish collections, recycling collections, food scraps collections, and a minimum base charge that covers inorganic collections and the resource recovery network
· general rates that cover litter and illegal dumping removal, and enforcement of the Waste Bylaw and the Litter Act
· waste disposal levy revenue
· Long-term Plan 2024-2034 budgets when confirmed e.g. for expansion of the Resource Recovery Network.
54. The actions rely on council capability and resourcing, alongside collaborative efforts with external partners and stakeholders. Should specific council-led research or advocacy actions identify the need to implement new initiatives, separate business cases will be developed and where appropriate, external funding sought through central government funding for infrastructure and enabling private sector investment.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
55. If local board views are not captured, the direction of the plan will not reflect the range of local views and issues. We are mitigating this risk by providing this opportunity for local board feedback.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
56. Local board feedback on the draft plan will be incorporated into a report with recommended changes to the draft plan. This will be taken to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee in August or September 2024 for their consideration and adoption.
57. Once approved, the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024 will form the basis of Auckland Council’s work on waste for the next six years (2024-2030).
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Attachment A – Summary Snapshot – draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2024 |
111 |
|
b⇩ |
Attachment B – Summary of submissions as workshopped with the local board |
131 |
|
c⇩ |
Attachment C – Number of submissions by local board area |
151 |
|
d⇩ |
Attachment D – Summary of advisory panel responses |
153 |
|
e⇩ |
Attachment E - Copy of consultation feedback form |
155 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Sarah Le Claire - Waste Planning Manager Tania Utley – Senior Waste Planning Specialist |
|
Authorisers |
Parul Sood - General Manager Waste Solutions Barry Potter - Director Infrastructure and Environmental Services Louise Mason – General Manager – Local Board Services Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux Funding Model Options
File No.: CP2024/08755
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek feedback on a new strategic funding model for Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux Inc (ACABx) is the regional governing body for the nine Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux (CAB) who operate at 32 sites across 19 local boards (not in Upper Harbour or Aotea/Great Barrier).
3. In 2023/2024 Auckland Council granted ACABx $2.224 million, of which $2.1 million was allocated to CAB. ACABx uses the balance of this funding to pay building lease costs on behalf of CAB and to meet its administration costs. Council also provides subsidised leases for office space at peppercorn rent, however this arrangement is outside the scope of this report. Recent Long-term Plan decisions continue the council’s funding for the next three years.
4. The current three-year funding agreement expires on 30 June 2024, and a new agreement needs to be completed in August/September in time for funds to be allocated to CAB for 2024/2025.
5. The current funding model was jointly developed by council staff and ACABx and approved by the council in 2019. This was an interim/transitional model which sought to address population and deprivation changes across the region, during which time a strategic plan was to be developed by CAB. Due to operational complexities including COVID-19, this transition was extended to 30 June 2024.
6. CAB have developed a Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027, which aligns closely with the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 direction. Council staff have worked with ACABx to develop two new funding model options - both of which support implementation of the strategic plan - and a new three-year funding agreement incorporating new outcome measures.
7. Together a new funding model and a new funding agreement will allow the effective and efficient delivery of the CAB strategic plan whilst better meeting the needs of Aucklanders.
8. Three funding model options are considered in this report:
· Option One: No change, current funding model. The council allocates funds between sites via ACABx based on existing operational costs, as part of an extended transition towards the 2019-model based on the population and deprivation at each site. This model is not supported by ACABx or recommended by council staff.
· Option Two: Subregional model. The council allocates funding between four subregions via ACABx, based on the current number of sites in each subregion and the Auckland-wide average site operational cost. Funding allocations to sites/services would then be made by the three subregional bureaux operating in the north, west, and centre/east. In the south, where there are five bureaux, the fourth tranche of allocations would be made by ACABx following consultation with those bureaux. In addition, ACABx would retain $150,000 per annum for advancing strategic service priorities as identified through its yearly operational plans.
· Option Three: Regional and outcomes focussed model. ACABx allocates the council funding across sites/services while advancing strategic service priorities. This ”bulk-fund” model allows ACABx to invest strategically, with a regional outcome focus, co-ordination and reporting. This option is supported by ACABx and recommended by council staff.
9. A briefing of local board members on 20 May presented the options in this report.
10. Local board feedback, provided through a resolution to this report, will be presented to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee for consideration as part of their decision on the funding model at their July meeting.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) provide feedback, if any, on the preferred option for a new strategic funding model for Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux.
Horopaki
Context
CAB and ACABx structure
11. There are nine independent Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux (CAB) operating 32 sites in the Auckland region, across 19 local boards (not in Upper Harbour or Aotea):
· Three CAB operate at a subregional level in the north, west, and centre/east with 22 sites between them.
· Six smaller CAB, one in the north and five in the south, operate 10 sites between them.
12. CAB staff and volunteers offer free information, advice, referral and client advisory services to Aucklanders.
13. Auckland Citizens Advice Bureaux Incorporated (ACABx) is the regional body for CAB. It was established in 2012 to seek and allocate investment from Auckland Council and other funders, and to develop the strategic direction for CAB services across Auckland. Members of the nine CAB elect a board of six representatives, and a chairperson.
Image: Auckland CAB and ACABx Structure

Number and type of client interactions
14. During 2022/2023, there were 100,842 client interactions with Auckland CAB. This is an increase of over 26,000 on the previous year, showing numbers are rebuilding after the impact of COVID-19. However, these figures are still below the 156,892 client interactions in 2018/2019.
15. The changing mode of client interaction may have implications for future CAB operations, which are largely based in council facilities. For the first two quarters of 2023/2024, 54 per cent of these interactions were face to face, a decrease from 64 per cent in 2018/2019. In contrast, the number of phone and electronic interactions have increased during the same period from 36 per cent to 46 per cent of all interactions. In 2023, 1.18 million CAB website visits were made from Auckland.
16. Changes in service mode are reflected in the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027 which aims for CAB to reach out to their customers, whether in an office-based service or by other channels such as pop-ups or digital services. It is important to note however that CAB offices also provide essential access to technology for those who are unable to access and/or use digital services. They host many clinics and other organisations, for example budget, food parcel and quit smoking services and community law, relationship mediation, counselling and rates rebate clinics. CAB offices also allow adherence to the Citizens Advice Bureaux New Zealand membership principle of Confidentiality and Privacy, which mandates bureaux provide a space where people can seek assistance in complete privacy.
Implementation of June 2023 Governance Body decisions
17. On 8 June 2023, the Governing Body resolved to (GB/2023/100):
(f) agree to consider the following approach to preparing the next 10-Year Budget 2024-2034 for consultation and addressing the council’s persistent budget challenges:
(ii) In relation to the Citizens Advice Bureaux of Auckland, funding is provided subject to:
a) ongoing quarterly performance reporting, including number of Aucklanders served by CAB and types of services utilised;
b) proactively work with council to seek sustainable central government funding with the aim of 50 per cent being derived from central government sources by FY 2024/2025;
c) proactively work with council to determine future service delivery model that aligns with council’s Long-term Plan 2024-2034 direction.
18. In response to the above resolution:
a) Council staff and ACABx have prepared new reporting formats to be used from July 2024 to improve the focus on regional impact, while retaining the ability to access data at the site level. Client service satisfaction metrics will also be included.
b) The Mayor and Chair of ACABx made a joint request to the Minister for Social Development and Employment and for the Community and Voluntary Sector, asking for shared financial support from the government in acknowledgement of the shared nature of CAB services provided to Aucklanders. The outcome of this request is yet to be determined.
c) ACABx have worked with volunteers, managers and boards representing CAB to produce the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027. This has established agreement on a three-to-five-year vision for a regional CAB service, strategic priorities and how the goals around these priorities are to be achieved, and time frames and resources required. This plan aligns closely with the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 direction. The ACABx Chair and board members presented the plan during Public Input to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee at their meeting on 23 May 2024.
Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027
19. The Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027 has five priorities:
· Auckland CABs working together for better outcomes for clients
· services that meet the needs of clients in a changing environment
· sustainable and adequate funding
· more Aucklanders aware of CAB and the services available to them
· sufficient number of high performing and values driven volunteers.
20. A key element of the strategic plan is to focus on proactive services that meet the needs of clients in a changing environment. This will be a combination of physical premises that provide facilities for those needing or preferring private onsite services, while supporting volunteers to deliver services by phone or online.
21. An overview of the intent of the strategic plan is reproduced below.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
22. A funding agreement between the council and ACABx sets out the basis and mechanism for funding allocations amongst CAB. The current three-year funding agreement expires on 30 June 2024. While the funding agreement references the intention to complete the transition to a funding model agreed in 2019, this has proven operationally complex to implement for the reasons set out below and so this transition was extended to 30 June 2024.
23. A decision is needed on a funding model in July 2024, so that a new funding agreement can be completed in August/September 2024. This will enable funds to be allocated to CAB for 2024/2025 and give certainty as to the model in place beyond that.
24. Three funding model options with a comparative analysis/assessment and their associated advantages and disadvantages/challenges are presented below. The two new options have been jointly developed by council staff and ACABx with the intention of allowing the effective and efficient delivery of the CAB strategic plan whilst better meeting the needs of Aucklanders.
25. The funding model options differ only in terms of the decision-makers determining the specific allocations, and the basis of these allocations. The overall funding amount across all models is the same, including the funding ACABx retains to pay building lease costs on behalf of CAB and to meet its administration costs.
26. All funding options enable the implementation of the cash reserves policy agreed in 2023 between ACABx representing CAB and the Director of Customer and Community Services on behalf of the council. This policy is to form part of the new funding agreement and allows bureaux to hold up to six months operating costs in reserve.
Option One: No change, current funding model. Based on operational costs, intended to transition to a population/deprivation basis
27. The council currently allocates funds between CAB via ACABx based on existing operational costs at each site, as a transition to a model jointly developed by ACABx and council staff and approved by the Environment and Community Committee in 2019 (ENV/2019/58)
28. The 2019 model intended to make allocations based on the population and deprivation associated with each site following a two-year transition, during which time a Regional Network Service Provision Framework was to be developed to plan for future growth and service needs. However, work on this framework ceased in 2020 due to COVID-19 and has now been replaced by the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027.
29. The current funding model does not provide CAB the flexibility to implement the outcomes intended under their strategic plan. Retaining this option is not supported by ACABx or recommended by council staff.
Option Two: Subregional model
30. Under this model, the council would allocate funding via ACABx to four subregions. Three subregional bureaux already operate in the north, west, and centre/east. Note that the Wellsford CAB would be included in the northern subregion alongside the seven sites managed by North Shore CAB for the purposes of subregional funding allocations and decision-making. In the south, five bureaux operate independently. Subregional funding would be determined based on the current number of sites in each subregion and the Auckland-wide average site operational cost. Funding allocations to sites/services would then be made by the three subregional bureaux and in the south by ACABx following consultation with the five bureaux operating there.
31. In addition, ACABx would retain $150,000 per annum for advancing strategic service priorities as identified through the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027. Examples of these priorities for 2024/2025 include working with rangatahi in schools and in particular school leavers, raising awareness of CAB, and increasing engagement with Māori.
Option Three: Regional and outcomes focussed model
32. Under this model, ACABx would allocate the council funding across sites/services while advancing strategic service priorities, guided by the CAB strategic plan. In this way, ACABx and CAB will be enabled to develop a regional focus whilst better meeting the needs of Aucklanders. Together, ACABx and CAB will be incentivised and resourced to deliver on and be accountable for the outcomes (strategic goals and priorities) set out in their strategic plan. They will become more flexible and efficient in the way they address these outcomes and will demonstrate to the council and other funders their effectiveness and sustainability.
33. This model has close similarities to other regional service grants where a regional body allocates the funds granted across the various local subsidiary bodies, such as the arrangement with Surf Life Saving Northern Region Inc.
34. ACABx support this option, which is recommended by council staff.
Table 1: Comparative analysis/assessment of funding models
|
Analysis/assessment criteria
ü partially meets üü fully meets |
1. Current model |
2. Subregional model |
3. Regional and outcomes focused model |
|
How funds are allocated
|
Existing operational costs in each bureau, transitioning to 90% population & 10% deprivation funding |
Number of sites currently in each subregion, and average site operating cost $150,000 per annum retained by ACABx to implement strategy |
As determined by ACABx to achieve strategic and operational plans, in consultation with bureaux |
|
Decision-maker |
Council |
Subregional bureaux in the north, west, and centre/east and ACABx in the south |
ACABx |
|
Equity |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Population / demographic change |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Community need |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Efficiency / effectiveness |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Delivery of ACABx strategic plan, aligning with LTP |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Attractiveness to potential new funders |
X |
ü |
üü |
|
Advantages |
· Continues current local service delivery availability and channels |
· Allows greater flexibility in determining service delivery sites/channels within subregions · Includes allocation of funding towards implementation of strategic plan
|
· “Regional and outcomes first” focus - focuses on strategic plan delivery · In line with similar regional grants allocation mechanisms and includes regional reporting
|
|
Disadvantages / Challenges |
· Is not a regional service approach · Does not support implementation of strategic plan the council has asked for, e.g. investments into improving Māori outcomes |
· Is not a regional service approach · Partially supports implementation of strategic plan the council has asked for. ACABx retains only limited funding to support this, and would need to work with subregional bureaux to extend outcomes · Changes to service delivery may impact on some communities and volunteers, e.g. in optimizing locations of physical sites |
· High trust funding. Requires willingness of the council to “step back” and provide ACABx and CAB space and accountability to implement strategic plan · Changes to service delivery may impact on some communities and volunteers, e.g. in optimizing locations of physical sites |
Proposed implementation of new funding model
35. Under Option Two or Option Three, subregional bureaux or ACABx respectively will assess local community needs before making funding allocations that would result in any changes to the nature of the services delivered in that community, for example, if the locations of existing sites were to be optimized. In recent years, bureaux have trialled enhancements to standard service offerings, such as “pop-up” service centres at weekend markets, attendance at student orientation events, and greater use of social media. ACABx will ensure that those communities most in need of CAB services will be a focus for alternative or enhanced service offerings and will work closely with CAB in those communities to achieve this.
36. ACABx have indicated that if the council agree to Option Three (Regional and outcomes focused model), in 2024/2025 ACABx will distribute the funding between the subregions in a way that allows current operations to be maintained. This will allow time to continue the development of the operational plan underpinning the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027, and review and confirm that the allocation of the funding is meeting CAB needs.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
37. CAB across Auckland helped Aucklanders during and following the 2023 weather events and have recently engaged with Auckland Emergency Management to understand how they can enhance that support in future.
38. The application of all the funding model options presented contribute to building communities’ abilities to be resilient. Resilience is a measure of adapting and responding to situations, which could include climate change. However, the specific climate impact activities for each funding model option were not assessed.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
39. The views of council units and departments including those involved with community delivery, community facility leasing, and regional funding agreements have been obtained as inputs to this report.
40. In support of ACABx’s proposal to maintain existing operations at bureaux sites through 2024/2025 under Option Three, if this option is agreed to, the council’s Property & Commercial Business unit propose to extend all of the existing 25 CAB leases operating at council facilities on a month-by-month basis until June 2025. Nearly all of these leases have expired. Renewing on a month-by-month basis for 12 months will avoid those leases having to be renewed at the higher rate now being applied to new leases, and the rental fee and either OPEX or maintenance fee that would otherwise need to be charged. Twelve months will also give ACABx and CAB time to consider any operational decisions required regarding future site locations.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
41. Local board feedback, provided through a resolution to this report, will be presented to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee for consideration as part of their decision on the funding model at their July 2024 meeting.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
42. In 2022/2023 Māori represented nine per cent of those seeking support from Auckland CAB. CAB data shows Māori disproportionately experience inequity and hardship in accessing essentials such as food, shelter, and financial resources. It also reveals difficulties for whānau Māori in navigating systems that do not uphold their mana or meet their needs. Furthermore, Māori face significant barriers in access to justice in relation to knowing and acting on their rights. These challenges are further exacerbated for Māori who find themselves struggling to engage in an increasingly digital world.
43. All CAB volunteers complete a “Mauri Manaia and the Treaty of Waitangi” training module as part of their probation learning requirement. Some CAB also offer additional Te Reo and Te Ao Māori training. Auckland CAB Bureaux have Māori volunteers and managers, some of who are members of their governance boards.
44. Auckland CAB through their Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027 intend to engage with mana whenua and mataawaka with a clearly defined kaupapa for that engagement and work with them for positive outcomes for Māori in the Auckland region. Two areas of focus include proposed work with rangatahi in schools (in particular Māori school leavers) and efforts to increase Māori representation on ACABx’s board and to identify Māori leads for projects intended to address Māori outcomes. Reporting on Māori outcomes will be a requirement of the funding agreement.
45. This mahi has linkages to the council’s Māori Outcomes Framework - Kia ora Tāmaki Makaurau, in particular Kia ora te Kāinga, Kia ora te Whānau, and Kia ora te Rangatahi.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
46. The Long-term Plan budget confirms funding for CAB services over the next three financial years. For the 2024-2025 year this is confirmed at $2,030,725. Subsequent years have an inflationary uplift of two per cent.
47. Commercial Finance (Customer & Community Services) supports Option Three as it transitions ACABx to a more strategic and long-term approach in the delivery of its outcomes. The change in accountability in how funding is distributed will assist in this transition. The current operating model is no longer adequate to meet the changing needs of the community and the delivery of its services. There is no financial impact to current Long-term Plan budgets from this change.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
48. Implementation of the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027 may lead to changes in site locations, to meet community needs. This may impact volunteers and communities, although CAB envisage that improved alternative service offerings will be available to communities such as “pop-up” service centres at weekend markets, attendance at student orientation events, and greater use of social media.
49. ACABx has undertaken that under either of the two new funding model options proposed there will be no closures of current sites in 2024/2025, and beyond that any site closure will require community and council consultation. The new funding agreement will set out the council’s expectation that it will be engaged early regarding any proposed site changes, and mitigations.
50. The funding agreement will require ACABx to report on planned and delivered service changes, including outcomes for Māori, as part of annual reporting on the delivery of the Auckland CAB Regional Strategic Plan 2024-2027.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
51. Following the PEP committee decision in July 2024 on a funding model and Long-term Plan budget decisions, council staff will prepare a new three-year funding agreement with ACABx incorporating new outcome measures as appropriate, including new customer satisfaction metrics. Drafting will be undertaken with ACABx and delegation for sign off falls to the Director of Customer and Community Services (Director Community from 22 June 2024).
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Wayne Levick - Regional Partnerships Lead |
|
Authorisers |
Claudia Wyss - Director Customer and Community Services Megan Tyler - Chief of Strategy Louise Mason - General Manager Local Board Services Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Local Board Appointments and Delegations for the 2022-2025 Electoral Term - Temporary Delegation - Resource Consent
File No.: CP2024/08684
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. The local board resolved at their 18 April 2024 meeting to delegate Member B Shen as Lead and Deputy Chair F Lai as alternate for resource consent delegations. [PKTPP 2024/40].
2. This report is seeking a temporary short term delegation from a local board member to assist the Local Board Resource Consent Lead for the period Thursday, 27 June 2024 to Thursday, 18 July 2024.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
3. The local board resolved at their 18 April 2024 meeting report titled ‘Local board appointments and delegations for the 2022-2025 electoral term’ to delegate Member B Shen as Lead and Deputy Chair F Lai as alternate for resource consent matters.
4. Board member Bobby Shen the current lead will be overseas on leave from council business from the afternoon of Thursday, 27 June 2024 to Saturday, 13 July 2024. Deputy Chair Fiona Lai the alternate will be overseas on leave from council business from Sunday, 07 July 2024 to Thursday, 18 July 2024. During this time there will be an absence of a delegated authority Alternate to assist the Lead with resource consent matters to:
i) provide the local board views, if any, on whether a resource consent should proceed as a non-notified, limited notified or fully notified application
ii) prepare and provide local board’s views, if any, on notified resource consents and speak to those views at any hearings if required
5. This report is seeking a temporary short-term delegation from a local board member to assist the Local Board Resource Consent Lead for the period Thursday, 27 June 2024 to Thursday, 18 July 2024 due to the absence of a delegated Alternate during this time.
Recommendation/s
That the Puketāpapa Local Board:
a) kopou / appoint members XX for the period Thursday, 27 June 2024 to Thursday, 18 June 2024 as alternate on resource consent matters and delegate authority to that member to:
i) provide the local board views, if any, on whether a resource consent should proceed as a non-notified, limited notified or fully notified application
ii) prepare and provide local board’s views, if any, on notified resource consents and speak to those views at any hearings if required
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Councillors' Updates
File No.: CP2024/08606
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide an opportunity for the Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Councillors to update the local board on Governing Body issues they have been involved with since the previous local board meeting.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Standing Orders 5.1.1 and 5.1.2 provides provision in the local board meeting for Governing Body members to update their local board counterparts on regional matters of interest to the local board.
|
Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Councillors updates. |
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Councillor Fairey Ward Councillor Report May 2024 |
175 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Chairperson's Report
File No.: CP2024/08608
Te take mō te p,ūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To provide the Chairperson, Ella Kumar, with an opportunity to update local board members on the activities she has been involved with since the last meeting.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. It is anticipated that the Chairperson will speak to the report at the meeting.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive Ella Kumar’s Chairperson’s update.
|
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Ella Kumar's Chairperson Report - May 2024 |
185 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Board Member Reports
File No.: CP2024/08607
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To provide an update to the local board members on the activities they have been involved with since the last meeting.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. It is anticipated that Local Board members will speak to their reports at the meeting.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive the member reports. |
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Board member report Fiona Lai |
191 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Record of Puketāpapa Local Board Workshop Notes
File No.: CP2024/08610
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide a summary of Puketāpapa Local Board (the Board) workshop notes.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The attached summary of workshop notes provides a record of the Board’s workshops held in May 2024.
3. These sessions are held to give informal opportunity for board members and officers to discuss issues and projects and note that no binding decisions are made or voted on at workshop sessions.
4. For openness and transparency the Puketāpapa Local Board agreed to release their workshop material presentations. The presentation material from workshops held can be viewed at this link https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/about-auckland-council/how-auckland-council-works/local-boards/all-local-boards/puketapapa-local-board/Pages/puketapapa-local-board-workshops.aspx
|
Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive the Puketāpapa Local Board workshop notes for: 09 May 2024, 23 May 2024 and 13 June 2024 |
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Workshop Record 09 May 2024 |
197 |
|
b⇩ |
Workshop Record 23 May 2024 |
199 |
|
c⇩ |
Workshop Record 13 June 2024 |
201 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
27 June 2024 |
|
Hōtaka Kaupapa/Governance Forward Work Programme Calendar
File No.: CP2024/08609
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To present the Puketāpapa Local Board with its updated Hōtaka Kaupapa/governance forward work programme calendar (the calendar).
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The calendar for the Puketāpapa Local Board is in Attachment A. The calendar is updated monthly reported to business meetings and distributed to council staff.
3. The calendar was introduced in 2016 as part of Auckland Council’s quality advice programme and aims to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on meeting agendas is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is expected and when
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar also aims to provide guidance for staff supporting local boards and greater transparency for the public.
|
Recommendation/s That the Puketāpapa Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive the Hōtaka Kaupapa/governance forward work programme calendar as at 19 June 2024.
|
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Hōtaka Kaupapa/Governance Forward Work Programme Calendar as at 19 June 2024 |
205 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Selina Powell - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Nina Siers - Local Area Manager |
|
Puketāpapa Local Board 27 June 2024 |
|
Item 8.1 Attachment a National Butterfly Centre presentation Page 215