Agenda of Henderson-Massey Local Board - Tuesday, 19 November 2024

1 Nau mai | Welcome

2 Ngā Tamōtanga | Apologies

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

Member	Organisation	Position
Chris Carter (Chair)	1. St Lazarus Trust 2. Waitākere Badminton Club	Member Member
Peter Chan, JP	1. Cantonese Opera Society of NZ 2. Asian Leaders Forum 3. NZ-Hong Kong Business Association 4. NZ-China Business Association 5. Te Whau Pathway Environmental Trust	Member Member Member Member Trustee
Dan Collins	1. Rānui Action Project	Chair
Dr Will Flavell (Deputy Chair)	1. Asia New Zealand Leadership Network 2. Te Atatū Tennis Club 3. Waitākere Literacy Board 4. Te Kura	Member Board Member Board Member Member
Brooke Loader	1. Waitākere Licensing Trust 2. UDL Energy Complaints Scheme Advisory 3. Neighbourhood Support 4. Te Atatū Glendene Community Patrol 5. Real Estate Authority New Zealand	Member Member Member Volunteer Member
Ingrid Papau	1. Liberty Impact Community Trust 2. #WeLoveTuvalu Community Trust 3. Neighbourhood Support 4. Liberty Church 5. Rutherford Primary Board of Trustees	Board Member Member Street Contact Member Member

Member

Organisation

Position

Chris Carter (Chair)

1. St Lazarus Trust

2. Waitākere Badminton Club

Member

Peter Chan, JP

1. Cantonese Opera Society of NZ

2. Asian Leaders Forum

3. NZ-Hong Kong Business Association

4. NZ-China Business Association

5. Te Whau Pathway Environmental Trust

Member

Trustee

Dan Collins

1. Rānui Action Project

Chair

Dr Will Flavell

(Deputy Chair)

1. Asia New Zealand Leadership Network

2. Te Atatū Tennis Club

3. Waitākere Literacy Board

4. Te Kura

Member

Board Member

Member

Brooke Loader

1. Waitākere Licensing Trust

2. UDL Energy Complaints Scheme Advisory

3. Neighbourhood Support

4. Te Atatū Glendene Community Patrol

5. Real Estate Authority New Zealand

Member

Volunteer

Member

Ingrid Papau

1. Liberty Impact Community Trust

2. #WeLoveTuvalu Community Trust

3. Neighbourhood Support

4. Liberty Church

5. Rutherford Primary Board of Trustees

Board Member

Member

Street Contact

Member

Member appointments

Board members are appointed to the following bodies. In these appointments the board members represent Auckland Council:

External organisation	Lead	Alternate
Massey Matters	Will Flavell	Peter Chan
Central Park Henderson Business Association	Chris Carter	Dan Collins
Heart of Te Atatū South	Brooke Loader	Brenda Brady
Ranui Advisory Group	Dan Collins	Brooke Loader
Te Atatū Peninsula Business Association	Ingrid Papau	Brenda Brady
Waitākere Ethnic Board	Peter Chan	Brooke Loader
Waitākere Healthlink	Ingrid Papau	Brenda Brady
Te Whau Pathway Environmental Trust	Chris Carter	Dan Collins

4 Te Whakaū i ngā Āmiki | Confirmation of Minutes

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whakaū / confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 15 October 2024, as true and correct.

5 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.

6 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements

6.1

Acknowledgement: Volunteer Awards

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) acknowledge the following individuals in our community who contribute to the well-being of residents through their volunteering or other community work:

i) Tua Fono Sualauvi losefa Teio aka Aunty Tua from Massey Matters

ii) Petra Tristram from Safari West Multicultural Playgroup

7 Ngā Petihana | Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

8 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations

Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Henderson-Massey Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.

8.1 Deputation: Kai West update

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To receive a deputation on supporting community food sovereignty and resilience over the past year from Michele Eickstaedt, on behalf of Kai West.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To provide an update of Kai West’s collective work, partnership with WEAVE (collective of philanthropic organisations) and request the board to continue engaging and collaborating with Kai West.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whiwhi / receive the presentation and thank Michele Eickstaedt, from Kai West for her attendance.

8.2 Deputation: Youth Development

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To receive a deputation on youth development, from Taylah Shannon on behalf of Raise Up Massey.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To discuss the ongoing work Raise Up Massey has been doing in the local community through youth development and to connect and collaborate with the Henderson-Massey Local Board.

3. Established in 2002, Raise Up is YMCA’s youth development programme for young people aged 13-18, run by youth for youth and operates from locations across New Zealand.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whiwhi / receive the presentation and thank Taylah Shannon, from Raise Up Massey for her attendance.

8.3 Deputation: Te Puna Creative Innovation Quarter Investment Plan

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To receive a deputation on the Te Puna Creative Innovation Quarter Investment Plan from Sir Bob Harvey, John Dalzell (Silk Road) and Jasmine Millet (Tātaki Auckland Unlimited).

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To discuss a private / public investment strategy on Henderson Valley Road, train station and West City focus.

3. To seek advocacy from the local board and future connections for Te Puna investment plan targeting $300 million over 10 years.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whiwhi / receive the presentation and thank Sir Bob Harvey, John Dalzell (Silk Road), Penny Holst, Catriona Stewart (Te Puna Central Hub Manager), Jasmine Millet (Tātaki Auckland Unlimited) and Delwyn Corin (Principal Advisor - Henderson Creative Precinct) for their attendance.

8.4 Deputation: Harbourview-Orangihina Reserve

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To receive a deputation on the Harbourview-Orangihina Reserve maintenance from Brook Paterson.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To discuss options for a maintenance schedule of Harbourview-Orangihina Reserve and to put in place a programme that co-ordinates various volunteer groups in the reserve.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whiwhi / receive the presentation and thank Brook Paterson for his attendance.

9 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum

A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of three minutes per speaker is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.

9.1

Public Forum: Janette Fawcett and John Fawcett – Harbourview-Orangihina Park Community Restoration Plan (May 2021)

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whiwhi / receive the presentation on the Harbourview-Orangihina Park Community Restoration Plan (May 2021) and thank Janette Fawcett and John Fawcett for their attendance.

10 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Appointment of delegated local board member to provide feedback on stormwater activities

File No.: CP2024/15702

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To appoint a lead to provide local board views and preferences on council’s stormwater activities that take place over local parks.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Section 17 Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 (LGACA) requires that decision-making for activities that impact beyond a single local board area, and which are beneficial and effective to be managed and coordinated on an Auckland-wide basis must be exercised by the Governing Body. As such, decision-making responsibility for stormwater management and the stormwater network is allocated to the Governing Body.

3. Local boards are responsible for a wide range of non-regulatory activities of the council that are deemed to be local in nature. This includes the use of and activities in local parks and reserves. However, as parks and reserves are crucial to the stormwater network, council’s allocation of non-regulatory responsibilities acknowledges that local board decision-making over parks and reserves may be constrained where decisions relate to council stormwater management activities.

4. Prior to June 2024, staff treated all stormwater management activities on local parks as subject to local board approval. However, as part of the LTP, it was clarified that it is not appropriate to require a landowner approval from local boards for activities of the council that are required for the management of stormwater activities. This is because council’s own activities are to be undertaken under the authority that already rests with the Governing Body.

5. Although a landowner approval will not be required for the council’s own stormwater activities, LGACA requires that the Governing Body (including staff acting under delegation) consider the views and preferences of local boards when making its decisions (section 15 LGACA). Therefore, the new process now requires Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience staff to liaise directly with local boards and consider the views and preferences of local boards when making decisions (under delegation from the Governing Body). If a local board wishes to object to any decision made by staff under delegation, they can consider raising an objection with the Governing Body via the Policy and Planning Committee.

6. Staff recommend local boards appoint a lead who can identify and communicate each local board’s views and preferences over stormwater management-related decisions that impact local parks.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) kopou / appoint Brenda Brady as lead, and Brooke Loader as an alternate, for stormwater activities feedback and delegate authority to these members to:

(i) identify and communicate the local board views and preferences on proposed council stormwater management activities in local parks

(ii) represent the local board at the Policy and Planning Committee, if required, to discuss any objections to proposed council stormwater management activities in local parks.

Horopaki

Context

7. As per their legislative role and council’s allocation of non-regulatory responsibilities (pursuant to section 17 of LGACA), local boards are accountable for the range of non-regulatory activities of the council deemed to be ‘local’ in nature.

8. On the other hand, the Governing Body is responsible for decision-making over activities that are ‘regional’ in nature i.e. that extend beyond local board areas, and which are beneficial and effective to be managed and coordinated on an Auckland-wide basis.

9. Staff who manage local parks and reserves have relied on council’s allocation of decision-making responsibilities over local parks to require local board approval (referred to as landowner approval or landowner consents) for most activities that take place over local parks. This means that staff have been treating all stormwater management works that occur on parks, including those that the Governing Body has been allocated decision-making responsibilities for, as being subject to landowner approvals.

10. Although local boards have generally managed to accommodate council’s stormwater management activities in local parks, a recent case where landowner approval was likely to be withheld highlighted a misalignment between council’s agreed allocation of responsibilities and operational process assumptions.

11. Staff have now provided advice to local boards clarifying that activities allocated to the Governing Body, i.e. council’s own stormwater management activities, should not be subject to a landowner approval. They have clarified that the operational processes that facilitated this misunderstanding have been changed.

12. This change does not affect third-party applications for works over local parks that relate to or connect to the stormwater network. Those applications will continue to require landowner approval from local boards.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

13. Auckland Council’s allocation of non-regulatory responsibilities acknowledges that the decision making of local boards in relation to local parks may be constrained when such decisions intersect with council stormwater management activities, including the stormwater network. This provision ensures the Governing Body’s decision-making, and the effectiveness of the stormwater network, are not compromised.

14. A well-functioning stormwater system enhances flood resilience, reduces waterway contamination, and ensures local beaches are safer for swimming. Parks and reserves play a crucial role in this system, acting as flood plains, hosting waterways, and providing essential facilities for the effective functioning of the council’s stormwater network.

15. Decisions relating to the maintenance of the stormwater network have been delegated by the Governing Body to staff in Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience via the Chief Executive.

Process for giving input to stormwater network decisions

16. Local boards have been advised of the new process that will see Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience, instead of Land Advisory, seeking the views of local boards before making decisions (under delegation from the Governing Body) on whether to proceed with any proposed council-led stormwater projects in local parks.

17. The experience of local boards should not differ from the previous process, where consultations occurred over landowner approval applications while final decision-making is exercised by (Land Advisory) staff under delegation from local boards. Figure 1 shows the comparison between the current and updated processes.

Figure 1: Current and updated decision-making processes for stormwater activities on

local parks

Appointment of a lead to provide input to stormwater network decisions

18. To enable the effective and efficient conduct of a local board’s business, LGACA provides that a local board may delegate to a committee, subcommittee, or member of the local board, or to an officer of council, any of its responsibilities, duties, or powers, except for the exceptions listed in clause 36D, schedule 7 of the Act. The responsibilities that cannot be delegated include the duty to identify and communicate the interests and preferences of the people in the local board area in relation to the content of the strategies, policies, plans and bylaws of Auckland Council.

19. The updated process in Figure 1 requires that Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience seek input from local boards. Seeking input from local boards often requires a report and a decision at a business meeting.

20. Appointing a lead to finalise and provide input on stormwater network decisions can enable efficiencies. While it is expected that stormwater projects on local parks may be referred for discussion to a local board workshop and may include site visits, relying on staff to identify the agreed local board view might lead to misunderstandings, especially if different views are expressed in workshops and site visits. Having a single point of contact on the local board who can be accountable for collating, finalising, and communicating the local board view can prevent confusion and avoid unnecessary delays in decision-making.

21. If it were not possible to identify a shared view from the local board, it is open to the lead to refer the matter to the whole local board for a decision (on the local board input). This can be done at an upcoming local board meeting.

Resolving disputes and disagreements over use of local parks

22. In circumstances where the local board does not support use of a local park for a stormwater management activity and Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience and the local board are unable to agree on reasonable conditions for the use of a local park, Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience staff are encouraged to escalate the matter to the Chief Executive for a decision. This is on the basis that the Chief Executive at an operational level may be best placed to determine issues from an organisation wide perspective and may provide some assurance to the local board that competing perspectives are being carefully balanced.

23. It would also be open to the local board to seek the intervention of the Governing Body, via the Policy and Planning Committee.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

24. This is a procedural decision and is not expected to have any impact on council’s climate commitments.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

25. This report recommends the appointment of a lead to ensure that local board input can be provided in a timely manner enabling the council to undertake its operational and statutory duties efficiently.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

26. This report seeks to appoint a local board member to perform a specific function on behalf of the local board. Any local board member who is appointed as a lead should ensure that they represent the wider local board views and preferences on each matter before them.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

27. This procedural decision is not anticipated to have a direct impact on Māori.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

28. A decision of this procedural nature is not considered to have financial implications on Auckland Council.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

29. If a local board chooses not to appoint a lead, staff will need to seek input from the local board at a business meeting. This may require a report which delays input and further risk delays to council projects.

30. Where a local board may feel dissatisfied with a proposed council stormwater project or feel that a project may adversely impact on the wellbeing of its community or other local board areas of decision making, and this cannot be resolved in discussions with Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience, staff are expected to escalate the matter to the Chief Executive. It is also open to local boards to seek intervention from the Governing Body via the relevant committee (Policy and Planning Committee)

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

31. Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience will provide a template to help the appointed lead quickly finalise and communicate the local board’s feedback.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Shirley Coutts - Principal Advisor - Governance Strategy

Authorisers

Oliver Roberts - Planning & Operations Manager

Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Eke Panuku Henderson-Massey Local Board updates October 2024- March 2025	17
b ⇩	Eke Panuku Henderson-Massey Local Board Engagement Plan 2024-2025	21

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round One 2024/2025 grant allocations

File No.: CP2024/16304

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To fund, part-fund or decline applications received for the Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round One 2024/2025.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Henderson-Massey Local Board adopted the Henderson-Massey Local Grants Programme 2024/2025, which sets application guidelines for contestable community grants submitted to the board (Attachment A).

3. This report presents applications received in the Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round One 2024/2025 (Attachment B).

4. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $79,697 for the 2024/2025 financial year, which will be allocated across two Local Grant Rounds and two Quick Response Grant rounds.

5. At the October business meeting, $33,158 was allocated to Local Grants Round One. This leaves $46,539 available for allocation in the subsequent rounds.

6. Twenty-two applications were submitted towards Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round One, requesting a total of $41,099.47.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) agree to fund, part-fund, or decline the following Quick Response Grants Round One 2024/2025 applications:

Application ID	Organisation	Main focus	Requesting funding for	Amount requested	Eligibility
QR2505-101	Communicare	Community	Towards venue hire and printing expenses for Te Atatu Seniors Group from 17 January 2025 to 27 June 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-102	West Auckland Mental Health Support Trust	Community	Towards costs of photocopier for community mental health support Centre from 13 January 2025 to 19 December 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-105	West Auckland Youth Development Trust	Community	Towards venue hire, certificates, engraving costs and contribution towards drink bottles for West City Boxing End of Year and Prizegiving Celebration from 5 December 2024 to 7 December 2024	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-106	Neuro Connection Foundation	Community	Towards Installation of 4 CCTV cameras for Neuro Connection in Tui Glen Park from 2 December 2024 to 20 December 2024	$1,727.43	Eligible
QR2505-110	New Zealand Guitar Ensemble Charitable Trust	Arts and culture	Towards venue hire and catering for NZ Guitar Ensemble 20th Annual Concert on 12 April 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-112	NZ Ethnic Social Services Trust	Community	Towards venue hire, food items, petrol cost and gift cards for volunteers and MC, disposal dishes, games and activities for Iranian Family Gathering for Social Inclusion and Cohesion on 14 December 2024	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-121	Phab Association Inc Contracts Operations Account	Community	Towards venue hire for PHAB In Henderson from 10 December 2024 to 1 December 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-125	Youthline Auckland Charitable Trust	Community	Towards contribution of annual costs to supervise and train volunteers for Youthline Helpline Support for Henderson-Massey Youth from 1 January 2025 to 1 January 2026	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-126	Henderson Croquet Club Incorp	Community	Towards annual management; annual hosting and email addresses; x3 extra pages; initial website setup from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-127	BBBS Auckland	Community	Toward promotional materials, social media campaign and room hire for Volunteer Mentor Recruitment from 1 December 2024 to 31 May 2025.	$1,705.00	Eligible
QR2505-128	Mobility Assistance Dogs Trust	Community	Towards vet cost from 22 January 2025 to 31 March 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-129	United North Piha Lifeguard Service Inc	Sport and recreation	Towards Personal Locator Beacons (PLB’s) & Orange Flotation Pouch and Wetsuit Hangers for United North Piha Lifeguard Service (United) SAR squad from 2 December 2024 to 28 February 2025	$1,993.04	Eligible
QR2505-131	Great Potentials Foundation New Zealand	Community	Towards the salaries of MATES Programme Manager and MATES Coordinator to deliver MATES programme in Henderson High School and Henderson Intermediate School from 1 January 2025 to 1 April 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-132	Life Education Trust Auckland West	Community	Towards 7 days of school visit with mobile classroom for Sponsoring school visit in West Auckland project from 3 February 2025 to 31 October 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-133	Momentum Charitable Trust	Community	Towards facilitated fees for one-day life and financial skills programmes at Henderson Probation Centre from 2 December 2024 to 31 December 2024	$1,695.00	Eligible
QR2505-134	Tuvalu Christian Church Group	Community	Towards catering and refreshments for Youth end of year celebration from 13 December 2024 to 14 December 2024	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-135	A J Felix	Sport and recreation	Towards uniforms and gazebo for Tournaments from 18 January 2025 to 20 October 2025	$989.00	Eligible
QR2505-137	Warriors Community Foundation	Community	Towards a contribution of coordinator cost to deliver programmes in Henderson Massey Schools from 1 February 2025 to 31 July 2025	$2,000.00	Eligible
QR2505-138	Crescendo Entertainment Group Limited	Arts and culture	Towards admin/project management, marketing & social media costs, 2 x facilitators wages and venue hire for Make a Podcast Workshop from 20 January 2025 to 21 January 2025	$1,390.00	Eligible
QR2505-139	Sustain and Enable Limited	Community	Towards workshop costs, promotion and marketing cost, venue hire and refreshments, travel expenses, accountability report and energy efficiency devices for Hapori Awheawhe Pūngao (Community Energy Education Workshops) from 6 January 2025 to 2 February 2026	$3,068.00	Eligible
QR2505-140	Action Education Inc	Arts and culture	Towards office rent from 1 January 2025 to 28 February 2025	$1,532.00	Eligible
QR2505-141	Mr Leuelu Omeli	Arts and culture	Towards materials for cultural costumes and attires for Faauma-Isala Lineage and Family Heirloom from 1 March 2025 to 26 April 2025	$1,000.00	Eligible
Total				$41,099.47

Horopaki

Context

7. The local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of being a world-class city.

8. The local board grants programme sets out:

a) local board priorities

b) lower priorities for funding

c) exclusions

d) grant types, the number of grant rounds, and when these will open and close

e) any additional accountability requirements.

9. The Henderson-Massey Local Board adopted the Henderson-Massey Local Grants Programme 2024/2025, which sets application guidelines for contestable community grants submitted to the board (Attachment A).

10. The community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, and community networks.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

11. The aim of the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the report.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

12. The Local Board Grants Programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to address climate change by providing grants to individuals and groups for projects that support and enable community climate action.

13. Community climate action involves reducing or responding to climate change by local residents in a locally relevant way. Local board grants can contribute to expanding climate action by supporting projects that reduce carbon emissions and increase community resilience to climate impacts.

14. Examples of projects include local food production and food waste reduction, increasing access to single-occupancy transport options, home energy efficiency and community renewable energy generation, local tree planting and streamside revegetation, and educating about sustainable lifestyle choices that reduce carbon footprints.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

15. The focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment, or heritage. Based on the focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department will provide input and advice.

16. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

17. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Henderson-Massey Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.

18. Staff will provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

19. The local board grants programme aims to respond to the council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Māori. Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Unit has provided input and support towards the development of the community grant processes.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

20. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $79,697 for the 2024/2025 financial year, which will be allocated across two Local Grant Rounds and two Quick Response Grant rounds.

21. At the October business meeting, $33,158 was allocated to Local Grants Round One. This leaves $46,539 available for allocation in the subsequent rounds.

22. Twenty-two applications were submitted towards Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round One, requesting a total of $41,099.47.

23. Appropriate financial officers have been consulted.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

24. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

25. Following the Henderson-Massey Local Board allocating funding to Quick Response Round One grants, grants staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Henderson-Massey Community Grants Programme 2024/2025	35
b ⇩	Henderson-Massey Quick-Response Grant Round One Application Summary 2024/2025	41

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Bilin He - Grant Advisor

Authorisers

Pierre Fourie - Grants & Incentives Manager

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Annual Plan 2025/2026 - Input on Regional Consultation Content

File No.: CP2024/17761

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide input on regional consultation content and local board advocacy for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Annual Plan 2025/2026 contains the proposed budget and funding impact statement for the year, identifies any variations from the financial statements and funding impact statement in the 10-year budget for the relevant year, and provides for integrated decision-making and coordination of the council’s resources. The Governing Body is responsible for adopting the Annual Plan. As part of this process, local boards develop annual local board agreements which are agreed between local boards and the Governing Body (and are included in the Annual Plan).

3. Consultation on the Annual Plan 2025/2026 is planned to take place late February to late March 2025. These dates are yet to be confirmed and so are subject to change.

4. This report seeks the views of the local board on priority regional topics to be included in the Annual Plan 2025/2026 consultation.

5. The Budget Committee will approve regional items for consultation on 4 December 2024. The regional and local consultation items (adopted in separate report) will then be incorporated into the Annual Plan 2025/2026 consultation document and supporting information, which is also planned to be adopted by the Budget Committee on 19 February 2025.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whakarite / provide feedback on the draft Mayoral Proposal including potential regional consultation topics and local board advocacy for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.

Horopaki

Context

6. The Annual Plan 2025/2026 contains the proposed budget and funding impact statement for the year, identifies any variations from the financial statements and funding impact statement in the 10-year budget for the relevant year, and provides for integrated decision-making and coordination of the council’s resources. The Governing Body is responsible for adopting the Annual Plan. As part of this process, local boards develop annual local board agreements which are agreed between local boards and the Governing Body (and are included in the Annual Plan).

7. When making decisions, the Governing Body has a statutory obligation to consider the views and preferences of the local boards if the decision affects, or may affect, the responsibilities or operations of the local board or the well-being of communities within its local board area.

8. Public consultation on the Annual Plan 2025/2026 is planned to take place late February to late March 2025. These dates are yet to be confirmed.

9. Aucklanders will be able to provide feedback during the consultation period through a variety of channels, which include face-to-face (for spoken and New Zealand sign language interaction), written and social media.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

10. At the beginning of this annual plan process, the Mayor and Councillors provided direction to staff including a request for options relating to the following areas:

· Council-Controlled Organisation Reform,

· Planning and paying for growth, and

· Funding major events, destination marketing and visitor attraction.

11. Local board chairs were invited to attend the Budget Committee workshops on the development of the regional topics for consultation. Local board members were provided recordings or briefings of the Budget Committee workshops for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.

12. The draft Mayoral Proposal is scheduled to be released the week of the local boards’ meeting to approve feedback on the Mayoral Proposal including the Annual Plan regional consultation topics. The draft Mayoral Proposal will be tabled as Attachment B when it is released. The final Mayoral proposal, which outlines the mayor’s priorities for consultation will be released toward the end of November after local boards have presented their feedback to the Budget Committee.

13. The local board is asked to provide feedback on the draft Mayoral Proposal for the Annual Plan 2025/2026 consultation. The feedback from the local boards will be collated and provided to the Budget Committee to consider when making decisions, including agreeing regional items for consultation on 4 December 2024.

14. Staff are also proposing to consult on the following changes to targeted rates and fees and charges:

· changes to waste management targeted rates to reflect updated budget forecasts including a 3 per cent increase to the overall waste management targeted rate for a typical household

· the introduction of the refuse targeted rate to the former Rodney and Franklin districts in conjunction with the rollout of rates funded refuse to these areas

· possible changes to some Business Improvement District (BID) targeted rates (noting that relevant boards have received advice and will provide a formal recommendation in May 2025 on whether the Governing Body should set each rate depending on ballot results and compliance)

· changes to some animal management fees including an increase in the dog adoption fee from $350 to $450 and an increase vet fee from $75 to $150

· changes to some cemetery fees

· changes to other fees and charges that are over and above inflationary adjustments including:

o changing deposit levels for some regulatory services to better reflect actual final charges,

o realigning bach fees into pricing tiers based on occupancy levels, capacity and location and

o aligning staff charge out rates with staff pay bands for services in regional parks.

15. More information on proposed targeted rates and fees and charges can be found in the ‘Proposed changes to targeted rates and fees and charges for Annual Plan 2025/2026’ memorandum as attachment A.

16. Local boards may also have advocacy items they want to advocate for to the Governing Body.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. The decision to consult is procedural in nature. These decisions are unlikely to result in any identifiable changes to greenhouse gas emissions. The effects of climate change will not impact the decisions.

18. Some of the proposed initiatives or projects included in the consultation content may have climate change impacts. The impacts of any initiatives or projects Auckland Council chooses to progress as a result of this consultation will be assessed as part of the relevant reporting requirements.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. The Annual Plan 2025/2026 is an Auckland Council group document and will include budgets at a consolidated group level.

20. Consultation items and updates to budgets to reflect decisions and new information may include items from across the group. This will be reflected in the report on regional consultation items going the Budget Committee on 4 December 2024.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

21. Local board chairs have been invited to be involved in the development of the regional topics for consultation by attending Budget Committee workshops. Local board members were provided recordings or briefings of the Budget Committee workshops for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.

22. Local boards will have further opportunities to provide information and views as the council progresses through the Annual Plan 2025/2026 process.

23. Aucklanders will have the opportunity to give feedback on regional and local proposals through the public consultation on the Annual Plan 2025/2026. All feedback received from submitters that indicate that they reside in the local board area will be analysed by staff and made available for consideration by the local board.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

24. The approach to Māori engagement for Annual Plan 2025/2026 will be finalised once consultation topics are confirmed, including development of bespoke materials.

25. There is a need to continue to build local board relationships with iwi and the wider Māori community. Ongoing conversations will assist the local board and Māori to understand each other’s priorities and challenges.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

26. The local board provides input to regional plans and proposals. There will be information in the council’s consultation material for each plan or proposal with the financial implications of each option outlined for consideration.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

27. Under the Local Government Act 2002, the consultation document for the Annual Plan must be audited. The draft consultation document (including local consultation content) will be prepared by staff and audited in December and January ahead of adoption by the Budget Committee in mid-February.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

28. The Budget Committee will agree items for consultation and approve the consultation approach for the Annual Plan 2025/2026 on 4 December 2024.

29. Following the decisions on consultation content, staff will prepare the consultation document and supporting information for the Annual Plan 2025/2026. These will be adopted by the Budget Committee on 19 February 2025.

30. Following consultation, the Governing Body and the local board will make decisions on the Annual Plan 2025/2026 and local board agreements respectively in June 2025.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Proposed changes to targeted rates and fees and charges for Annual Plan 2025/2026’ memorandum	159
b ⇩	Draft Mayoral Proposal for consultation on the Annual Plan 2025/2026 (To Be Tabled)	165

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Phoebe Peguero - Senior Advisor Operations and Policy

Authorisers

Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Local board views on draft changes to cemetery bylaw / code

File No.: CP2024/15700

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To receive local board views on draft proposed changes to Auckland Council’s bylaw and code about council cemeteries and crematoria.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. To enable the local board to provide its views on draft proposed changes to the Auckland Council Ture ā-Rohe mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Bylaw 2014 (Bylaw) and Arataki Tikanga mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Code of Practice 2014 (Code), staff have prepared a draft statement of proposal in Attachment A.

3. The changes are in response to a review by the Regulatory and Community Safety Committee and its request for development of options and a proposal for improvements.

4. Key draft proposed changes are to:

· add a bylaw approval framework that clarifies when and how council approval is required, for example for burial and headstones.

· clarify who must comply with an approval and any council directions, for example the approval holder, a person acting on behalf of the approval holder, and cemetery visitors.

· move rules from the Code to operational guidance (for example, on the types of approval conditions that may apply), and the Bylaw (for example, the approval framework and general rules about adornments).

· update the bylaw structure, definitions and wording for clarity.

5. Staff recommend the local board provide its views on the draft proposed changes. Taking this approach will help develop a proposal to improve the regulatory framework.

6. There is a reputational risk that the proposed changes or the local board’s views do not reflect the view of people in their local board area. This risk would be partly mitigated by the opportunity for the local board to provide views on public feedback prior to deliberations.

7. The Regulatory and Safety Committee will consider the local board views in December and recommend a proposal to the Governing Body. Public consultation on the proposal is scheduled for early 2025, and deliberations and final Governing Body decision later in 2025.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whakarite / provide feedback on draft proposed changes to the Auckland Council Ture ā-Rohe mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Bylaw 2014 and Arataki Tikanga mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Code of Practice 2014, in the draft statement of proposal in Attachment A of the agenda report.

Horopaki

Context

The Bylaw and Code help to manage council cemeteries and crematoria

8. Council seeks to minimise public safety risks, cemetery misuse, distress to families, obstruction, and damage to property, heritage and the environment from the use of council cemeteries and crematoria by the public, by:

· using a bylaw to set a framework that enables council to make detailed rules in a separate code

· using a code that requires council approval for certain services and activities (for example, for burial and headstones) and sets general rules (for example, for adornments), at council cemeteries and crematoria only

· council cemetery and Aotea Great Barrier Island service centre staff using an education-focused approach to compliance (information and advice)

· managing council cemeteries within a wider regulatory framework.^{^[1]}

9. Council in 2014 made the the Auckland Council Ture ā-Rohe mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Bylaw 2014 and Arataki Tikanga mo ngā Wāhi Tapu me ngā Whare Tahu Tupāpaku | Cemeteries and Crematoria Code of Practice 2014 (GB/2014/67). The Bylaw was amended in 2021 for ease of understanding (GB/2021/10).

A recent Bylaw and Code review identified improvements

10. In July 2024, the Regulatory and Community Safety Committee completed a review of the Bylaw and Code and requested development of options for improvements and a proposal on the preferred option (RSCCC/2024/46).

11. A summary of the draft proposed changes is contained in Attachment A of this report.

The local board has an opportunity to provide its views on the draft proposed changes

12. The local board has an opportunity to provide its views on the draft proposed changes in Attachment A by resolution to the Regulatory and Safety Committee before a final proposal is adopted for public consultation.

13. For example, the board could support the draft proposed changes for public consultation, recommend changes or defer comment until it has considered public feedback on the proposal.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

The draft proposed changes seek to improve the council cemetery management framework

14. The draft proposed changes seek to amend the current Bylaw and revoke the Code.

15. The Table below summarises the key draft proposed changes. Attachment A contains more details, including other options considered.

Proposed key change	Reasons for proposal
· Add a bylaw approval framework that clarifies when and how council approval is required.	· Reflects current operational practice to require approvals, for example for burial, cremation, monuments, burial plots, vaults, mausolea, ash scattering and disinterment. · More reasonable and authoritative approach, for example clearly provides council discretion to set approval conditions. · Matters requiring approval are fundamental elements of regulations that are better located in a bylaw (not a code).
· Move rules from the Code to: · operational guidance such as on the council website (for example, on the types of approval conditions that may apply in a particular case) · the Bylaw (for example, approval framework and general rules).	· More flexible (cemetery management can directly amend operational guidance for the efficient provision of services). · Removes duplicate, out-of-date, and detailed approval conditions which are already in operational guidance. · Streamlines regulatory framework by removing unnecessary rules (code).
· Clarify who must comply with an approval and any council directions (for example the approval holder, a person acting on their behalf, and cemetery visitors).	· Reflects current operational practice for effective and efficient service provision and facility management.
· Update bylaw structure, definitions, and wording for clarity.	· Reflect current operational practice. · Easier to read, understand and comply with. · Aligns with best practice drafting standards (removes duplication of legislation and internal operational matters).

Staff recommend the local board consider providing its views on the draft proposal

16. Staff recommend that the local board consider the draft proposed changes and whether it wishes to provide its views by resolution to the Regulatory and Safety Committee. Taking this approach will help develop a proposal to improve the regulatory framework.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. There are no implications for climate change arising from this decision.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

18. The draft proposed changes impact the Cemetery Services and Aotea Great Barrier Island service centre units of council.

19. Relevant staff input was sought to inform the draft proposed changes, and staff are aware of the impacts of the changes and their implementation role.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

20. The Bylaw and Code have a potential impact on local governance and public interest in previous reviews has been low.^{^[2]}

21. 12 interested local boards held workshops on the draft options and proposed changes to inform any views in response to this report.

22. Local boards will have a further opportunity to provide views on any local public feedback to any proposed changes prior to deliberations in 2025.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

23. The Bylaw and Code support whanaungatanga, rangatiratanga, manaakitanga and kaitiakitanga in Houkura | the Independent Māori Statutory Board’s Māori Plan for Tāmaki Makaurau and the Schedule of Issues of Significance by providing regulations that support council services to meet social, cultural and physical needs, and support the role of the Waikumete Urupā Komiti (Komiti) at Te Urupā o Waikumete (Waikumete Cemetery).^{^[3]}

24. Feedback from three mana whenua representatives highlighted concerns with burial capacity and costs, waste associated with adornments, and climate change impacts of common practices. Feedback from the Komiti included to clarify the Komiti role.

25. Mana whenua, mataawaka, and Komiti feedback will be sought on any proposed changes as part of the public consultative process.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

26. There are no financial implications to the local board for any decisions on the draft proposed changes.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

27. The following risk has been identified:

If…

Then…

Mitigation

… the draft proposed changes or the views of the local board on the draft proposed changes differ from the views of people in the community.

… there may be negative attention to council regarding the Bylaw and Code.

(low reputational risk)

The local board will have an opportunity to consider any public feedback and provide its formal views to a Panel prior to the final decision being made.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

28. Staff will present the local board views and a Statement of Proposal of proposed changes to the Bylaw and Code to the Regulatory and Community Safety Committee on 3 December 2024.

29. Public consultation on the Proposal is scheduled for early 2025, and deliberations and final Governing Body decision later in 2025.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Draft Statement of Proposal to amend Cemeteries and Crematoria Bylaw 2014 and revoke Cemeteries and Crematoria Code 2014	173

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Elizabeth Osborne - Policy Analyst

Authorisers

Louise Mason - General Manager Policy

Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy – Part 1

File No.: CP2024/17417

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek local board feedback on Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. The Parks, Arts, Community and Events Committee directed staff to refresh and consolidate five regional strategies, policies and plans that guide Auckland Council‘s planning and investment for open space, sport and recreation.

3. In response, staff have drafted an open space, sport and recreation strategy (see Attachment A) that responds to the challenges and opportunities of a growing and changing Auckland (refer background paper reported to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee in April 2024).

4. The work has been guided by the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group, an advisory and Māori rōpū and key council kaimahi, as well as targeted engagement with partners and key stakeholders. Two local board members are on the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group. Local boards members have also been involved through briefings and workshops.

5. The draft strategy aims to provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to benefit all Aucklanders now and in the future to improve the health of Tāmaki Makaurau. It provides a refreshed and simplified approach to planning and investment and sets five strategic directions and four investment principles.

6. The draft strategy also contains three supporting policies that set expectations for delivery. They are presented in a separate report on this agenda for ease of understanding and to avoid lengthy reports. This enables local boards to tailor their feedback to the different components of the draft strategy.

7. The draft strategy reduces duplication and complexity and reflects the key challenges and opportunities Auckland currently faces, taking a holistic view to better support decision-makers to respond to the needs and preferences of local communities.

8. Staff will include local board feedback in the agenda report when seeking approval from the Policy and Planning Committee to engage with Aucklanders on the draft strategy. If approved, engagement will take place in early 2025. Following engagement, the strategy will be finalised and presented again to local boards for consideration and to the Policy and Planning Committee for adoption.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whakarite / provide feedback on the strategic directions and investment principles in Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy, for consideration by the Policy and Planning Committee.

b) ohia / endorse Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy, going for public consultation.

Horopaki

Context

Open space, sport and recreation contribute to all six Auckland Plan 2050 outcomes

9. Open space, sport and recreation deliver a wide range of benefits, from enhancing the physical and mental health and wellbeing of Aucklanders to climate change mitigation and resilience. They contribute to all six Auckland Plan 2050 outcomes, with activities spanning across the council’s investment areas.

10. In addition to the council, many organisations contribute to providing open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities for Aucklanders. By enhancing collaboration and partnerships with other providers and having clear common directions for success we can focus our collective efforts to maximise benefits to Aucklanders.

Staff are delivering an approved programme of work

11. In August 2022, the Parks, Arts, Community and Events Committee approved the development of a refreshed and consolidated open space, sport and recreation policy framework [PAC/2022/68], which currently consists of:

· Parks and Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan (2013)

· Parks and Open Space Acquisition Policy (2013)

· Open Space Provision Policy (2016)

· Auckland Sport and Recreation Strategic Action Plan 2014-2024 (2014, refreshed 2017)

· Increasing Aucklanders’ Participation in Sport: Investment Plan 2019-39 (2019).

12. The committee set clear expectations that the draft strategy:

· retain Auckland Council leadership

· enable collaboration with open space, sport and recreation interests and sectors

· enable integration using a te ao Māori framework

· reflect changes in Auckland Council’s legislative, strategic and fiscal environment

· align the five documents to achieve better coordination of long-term decision-making and forward planning.

Staff have drafted a strategy underpinned by evidence and guided by an advisory structure

13. Staff developed a strong evidence base to inform the drafting of the strategy. Evidence includes assessment of the existing policy framework, relevant legislative, strategic and fiscal documents, horizon scanning of current and future trends, relevant data, contemporary literature. Staff also undertook targeted engagement with partners and key stakeholders.

14. This evidence base is provided in a background paper that outlines eight key challenges and opportunities for the draft strategy to consider. It was reported to the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee and local board members in April 2024.

15. Three key themes cut across the challenges and opportunities presented:

· focus on wellbeing and resilience: we can increase Auckland’s and Aucklanders’ oranga (wellbeing) by encouraging our communities to be more active more often and taking an ecosystem approach in the face of climate change

· make the most of what we have: we can make better use of Auckland’s many assets to deliver multiple benefits for people and the environment

· work within budget constraints: this calls for different responses, such as relying less on assets to deliver services, working with partners and the community and prioritising our efforts where they deliver the most value.

16. An advisory structure made up of the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group, an advisory and Māori rōpū (with mana whenua, mataawaka and sector representatives) and council kaimahi has provided input and direction throughout work. Details of memberships and frequency of meetings are provided in Attachment B.

17. The development of the draft strategy has been informed by local board views through the two local board members on the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group. Staff also engaged with local boards through targeted engagement on the background paper, memos, briefings and workshops (see paragraph 54).

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

The draft strategy combines open space and sport and recreation, and consolidates existing policies into a single document

18. The draft strategy brings together the domains of open space and of sport and recreation. Combining these two domains reflects the significant contribution investment in open space makes in enabling Aucklanders to live healthy, active lives. Walking, running and playing are the most popular forms of physical activity among Aucklanders.

19. The draft strategy consolidates and simplifies all five existing strategies, policies and plans into a single document. It provides decision-makers and implementers with a single source of information and contains:

· five strategic directions and four investment principles that set out where we are heading and how we will get there

· supporting policies that set the council's expectations for delivery (this more technical information is presented in a separate report on this agenda).

The draft strategy connects and builds on key council strategies

20. The draft strategy takes a te ao Māori lens. It builds on and simplifies Te Ora ō Tāmaki Makaurau, the wellbeing framework developed with the Mana Whenua Kaitiaki Forum in response to Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan.

21. It speaks to the role that open space, sport and recreation play in contributing to four dimensions of wellbeing (oranga): tāngata, whānau, whenua and wai, all of which contribute to the health of Tamaki Makaurau.

22. It sets five holistic strategic directions, integrating the domains of open space and sport and recreation to better recognise their interrelated nature.

23. It also sets four investment principles to guide our investment approach. The investment principles are adapted from those adopted in Ngā Hapori Momoho: Thriving Communities Strategy 2022-32.

24. It is underpinned by a single value that will guide implementation: manaakitanga, a te ao Māori process of showing respect, generosity and care for resources and for others. Manaakitanga was chosen by the Māori rōpū for this kaupapa as it fosters community connection, supports caring for the land and each other and promotes a spirit of unity.

25. The draft strategy on a page is shown below.

Figure 1: Strategy on a page

Five strategic directions outline where we are heading to contribute to te ora ō Tāmaki Makaurau

26. The draft strategy aims to provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to benefit all Aucklanders now and in the future to improve the health of Tāmaki Makaurau.

27. It contains five strategic directions that reflect the importance of Auckland’s green, blue and grey open spaces and places and take an ecosystem view of people, place and the environment.

28. Each strategic direction is presented on a page outlining: why it matters, how we manaaki (i.e. what we will do to make it happen) and our implementation focus (see Attachment A, pages 9-14).

29. They were developed in response to the challenges and opportunities articulated in the background paper. In addition to feedback received on the challenges and opportunities, the five strategic directions were refined iteratively based on input and direction from our advisory structure.

Four investment principles guide our approach to prioritising investment to deliver on the five strategic directions

30. The existing policy framework contains several different approaches to prioritising investment, with little guidance about how they relate to each other.

31. The refresh and consolidation of the existing framework provides an opportunity to design a more effective approach to investment, one that is:

· streamlined – to reduce complexity

· consistent – to provide a more robust approach to prioritisation and enable better comparison of options

· flexible – to reflect and adapt to differences across communities and changes in demand over time.

32. Staff considered a prescriptive ‘action plan’ approach to investment where specific detailed priorities are identified. However, this would maintain the risk of investment prioritisation being rigid and very ‘point in time’, failing to keep pace with change and new opportunities.

33. A principles-based approach was considered to better provide both the consistency and flexibility needed. It can be more easily applied across the entire scope of the draft strategy, allow for investment to be responsive to changing circumstances, and still ensure that investment is appropriately targeted.

34. Staff reviewed existing council policies for relevant investment principles in an effort to reduce duplication.

· The principles adopted as part of the Increasing Aucklanders’ Participation in Sport: Investment Plan 2019-2039 were viewed as specific to that context, rather than to the broader scope of the draft strategy

· Those adopted as part of the council’s Ngā Hapori Momoho: Thriving Communities Strategy 2022-32 were regarded as well aligned to the strategic context and direction of the draft strategy. They have been slightly adapted to specifically respond to the unique open space, sport and recreation delivery and funding environment. They can support investment priorisation for sports and recreation.

35. The four investment principles for the draft strategy (see Attachment A, pages 15-23) are:

· take a benefits-led approach to improve the holistic wellbeing of people, places and the environment

· invest based on evidence of need and the voices of Aucklanders

· honour our Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations

· work together towards a healthy future, using all our resources.

The draft strategy supports decision-makers and delivers for Aucklanders

36. When scoping this programme of work, two alternative approaches to refreshing and consolidating the five existing strategies, policies and plans that form the policy framework were considered: keeping the status quo or refreshing the individual documents without consolidating them. Those two options were discarded based on a technical assessment and feedback from stakeholders. The refresh and consolidation approach was approved by the Parks, Arts, Community and Events Committee.

37. The option not to have any regional strategy for open space, sport and recreation was not considered. Having a whole of region direction is considered valuable. Having no regional strategy may provide more local flexibility but would risk not delivering equitable outcomes for all Aucklanders as well as creating inefficiencies through a less integrated network. Providing regional direction is also needed to support regional decision-making as well as to enable joint delivery with our partners and stakeholders.

38. The draft strategy better supports decision-makers to respond to the needs and preferences of their communities than existing plans and policies. This is because it reduces duplication and complexity. It is contemporary and reflects the key challenges and opportunities Auckland currently faces. It takes a holistic view: it reflects the interrelationship between open spaces and sport and recreation, encompasses green, blue and grey spaces, takes an ecosystem view, and has a strong focus on wellbeing, climate change, the environment and biodiversity.

39. Delivery of the strategy will be supported by an implementation and monitoring plan. The three-yearly plan will set out what we will deliver and track progress against the five strategic directions. A key consideration is how to best support local boards in making decisions and delivering the relevant priorities expressed in their local board plans.

The draft strategy will be refined based on the views of Aucklanders

40. Going for consultation will enable us to gather the views of Aucklanders, as well as our partners and stakeholders. This would add to the inputs from previous targeted engagement and from our advisory structure and help us refine the draft strategy.

41. Consultation would involve running an online Have Your Say submissions campaign, a limited series of regional events, hui with partners and stakeholders, as well as a People’s Panel survey. We will work closely with local board engagement advisors to maximise our reach to local groups and residents.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

42. Auckland faces significant challenges from climate change, including rising temperatures, becoming more drought prone, higher probability of extreme weather events and threats from coastal erosion, storm surges and flooding.

43. These challenges will impact our open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities. Hotter temperatures and extreme weather events will disrupt the ability of Aucklanders to engage in play, sport and recreation. Heatwaves, drought and water restrictions will affect the health of vegetation in our open spaces and its ability to moderate temperatures and mitigate the urban heat island effect.

44. The draft strategy considers how to adapt to these challenges and work to mitigate climate change by reducing emissions. One of the five strategic directions is to enhance our resilience to climate change and our contribution to mitigation, including through reducing carbon emissions, in line with Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Plan.

45. The draft strategy outlines what we will do to make this happen, including:

· develop the blue-green network to better manage stormwater

· accelerate the use of nature-based solutions in our open spaces and built environment to improve water capture and storage, green the city and reduce temperatures in urban areas

· improve the performance of our open spaces and facilities to reduce negative environmental impacts, including carbon emissions

· adapt our open spaces and facilities on the coast and in flood-prone areas.

46. While we already contribute to this strategic direction, the draft strategy proposes a ’do more’ approach to implementation. This is in recognition of the challenges we are facing and their significant impacts on Aucklanders now and in the future.

47. The investment approach in the draft strategy also includes a greater emphasis on identifying and quantifying the environmental benefits of our investment and designing initiatives to deliver multiple benefits, such as making recreation parks better able to support stormwater management.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

48. Kaimahi from across the council group have provided input throughout the development of the draft strategy (see Attachment B).

49. This includes staff from Policy; Parks and Community Facilities; Community Wellbeing; Planning and Resource Consents; Group Strategy, Transformation and Partnerships; Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience; Engineering, Assets and Technical Advisory; Financial Advisory; Governance and Engagement; Chief Sustainability Office; Environmental Services; Māori Outcomes; Auckland Transport; Eke Panuku and Tātaki Auckland Unlimited.

50. Implementing the draft strategy will span across the investment areas identified in the council’s performance management framework.

51. We will continue to work closely with colleagues in planning for and supporting delivery, and monitoring progress.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

52. Local boards have a role in communicating the views and preferences of their local communities. Parks and sport and recreation assets are highly valued by Aucklanders, whether they use them or not. This is reflected in outcomes and priorities expressed in local board plans.

53. Local boards have been represented by the two local board members on the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group: Member Sandra Coney and Member Margi Watson. The direction and input received are summarised in memos after each meeting.

54. In addition, staff have engaged with local boards as follows:

· November 2023: targeted engagement on the background paper

· April 2024: memo presenting the background paper

· June 2024: memo presenting the draft strategic directions

· June 2024: briefing to all members on the draft strategic directions

· July 2024: briefing to all members on the investment principles

· July 2024: workshop with the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee, local board chairs and Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group members on the investment principles and open space provision options

· August 2024: briefing with all members on the open space provision options

· August and September 2024: individual local board workshops on the draft strategy, including a high-level overview of the proposed policies

· October 2024: workshop with the Policy and Planning Committee, local board chairs and Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group members on the open space provision options.

55. Both the Governing Body and local boards have a role in delivering the regional strategy in accordance with their allocated decision-making responsibilities. For local boards this includes:

· acquisition of local parks and local sport and recreation facilities (within budget parameters agreed by the Governing Body) and their specific location and development

· local parks improvement and place-shaping, the use of and activities within local parks (including community events and programmes) and the use of local sport and recreation facilities (including leasing and changes of use)

· local sport and recreation programmes and initiatives and local community funding and grants.

56. Local boards will consider how to deliver on the strategy, once adopted, as part of their local board plans and work programmes.

57. The strategy will support local boards in their investment and prioritisation decisions, as outlined in Attachment A, page 23. It represents a number of beneficial shifts for local boards including:

· from having to navigate the application of five strategies, policies and plans to having a single coherent document to support decision-making by local boards and advocacy within annual and long-term planning processes

· from a narrow focus on costs to a wider focus on the value created by better understanding the full range of benefits delivered by different projects

· from having a one size fits all approach to having a consistent yet flexible approach to better reflect differences in local boards’ context and priorities and support local boards to deliver in response to local needs

· from having multiple uncoordinated investment frameworks to ensuring investment is evidence-based in response to needs and supports equitable outcomes

· from a focus on the council as the sole provider to strengthening the opportunity to use a wider range of potential funding sources and delivery options.

58. Local board feedback on the draft strategy will be reported to the Policy and Planning Commitee when it considers whether to approve the draft strategy going for consultation.

59. We will work with Governance and Engagement to ensure we reach local community groups and residents during consultation on the draft strategy.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

60. Mana whenua have special relationships to open spaces and places in Tāmaki Makaurau through whakapapa, including the tūpuna maunga and other sites and places of significance. They are kaitiaki of the whenua and wai.

61. Open spaces and physical activities play an important role in achieving te tuakiri Māori me tōna oranga – a thriving Māori identity and wellbeing in Tāmaki Makaurau. Young Māori are active participants in play, sport and recreation, but this declines as they get older and historic inequities exist.

62. The views of mana whenua and mataawaka have been sought throughout the development of the draft strategy including:

· regular meetings of the advisory and Māori rōpū, which includes mana whenua and mataawaka representatives

· Houkura representation on the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group to provide input and direction

· invitation to mana whenua and mataawaka organisations to provide feedback as part of the targeted engagement on the background paper.

63. All iwi were invited to join the rōpū or engage in the manner that best suited them. Mana whenua have also been kept up to date with progress via memos.

64. The draft strategy incorporates a te ao Māori lens, one of the expectations of success set by the Parks, Arts, Community and Events Committee and one of the key themes identified in the background paper. This includes:

· Te Ora ō Tāmaki Makaurau wellbeing framework adapted and simplified by the Māori rōpū to sit at the heart the draft strategy with four dimensions of wellbeing (oranga): tāngata, whānau, whenua and wai

· manaakitanga as a single value to guide implementation

· a focus on honouring our Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations embedded in our investment approach

· Māori as a key target group for investment in play, sport and recreation.

65. Implementation of the draft strategy includes a focus on investing in ‘by Māori for Māori’ solutions, building the capacity and capability of mana whenua and mataawaka and partnering with mana whenua to co-design our spaces and places.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

66. There are no financial implications for the local board associated with providing feedback on the draft strategy.

67. The development of, and consultation on, the draft strategy can be completed within the existing policy department budget.

68. Each strategic direction specifies an implementation focus, from emphasising continuing to do things that work well and embedding emerging practices to delivering differently and doing more.

69. Two strategic directions have a focus on doing more:

· Direction 2 ‘Deliver innovative open spaces in high-density areas’ – because population growth and intensification mean we have more people living closer together with less private green space and our ability to deliver more parks is constrained

· Direction 3 ‘Enhance our response to climate disruption’ – because significant climate change impacts and extreme weather events mean we need to make our city greener and spongier.

70. Implementation will be enabled through available budgets set during long-term plan and annual plan processes.

71. The draft strategy reflects the resource constraints faced by the council and the need to deliver value for money. The proposed investment approach emphasises the importance of establishing a robust evidence-based approach to investment and prioritisation to better support elected decision-makers.

72. Advice around investment in open space and sport and recreation will be based on a better articulation of costs and benefits, including in relation to local board plan priorities. This will be supported by a new tool to enable better identification, description and quantification of these benefits to help local boards prioritise investment.

73. Consideration of a broad range of funding and delivery tools will support implementation, including making the most of what we have, delivering differently and partnerships.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

74. Potential risks and mitigations are outlined below:

If…	Then…	Possible mitigations…
Aucklanders, key stakeholders and partners are not supportive of the draft strategy.	Decision-makers may be less likely to adopt the draft strategy. Low reputational, strategic and delivery risk.	· Stakeholders and partners were supportive of the refresh and consolidation They have been involved through the programme of work. · Engagement provides a further opportunity to seek the views of Aucklanders, partners and stakeholders and refine the draft strategy to reflect feedback as required.
The draft strategy does not provide clear enough direction to implementers.	The draft strategy may not be incorporated into business as usual. Low reputational, strategic and delivery risk.	· Implementers provided regular input into development of the draft strategy. · The implementation context, including financial constraints, has also informed the draft strategy. · Implementers will be further engaged to develop the draft strategy’s implementation and monitoring plan.
The draft strategy is perceived as unfunded.	There may be less support for the draft strategy and decision-makers may be less likely to adopt it. Medium financial, reputational and strategic risk.	· The draft strategy sets strategic directions and investment principles to guide prioritisation and enable better informed discussions on future budget allocation.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

75. Staff will include local board feedback when seeking approval from the Policy and Planning Committee in December 2024 to consult on the draft strategy.

76. If approved, public consultation will begin in February 2025 and run for approximately one month.

77. The findings from the public consultation and an updated draft strategy will then be reported to local board business meetings ahead of going to the Policy and Planning Committee for adoption.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy – draft strategic directions and investment principles	209
b ⇩	Advisory structure memberships and meetings	233

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Aubrey Bloomfield - Senior Policy Advisor

Authorisers

Carole Canler - Senior Policy Manager

Louise Mason - General Manager Policy

Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy – Part 2

File No.: CP2024/17416

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek local board feedback on the proposed policies in Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy, including on two options to update the open space provision standards.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. Staff have drafted Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy. It aims to provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to benefit all Aucklanders now and in the future and improve the health of Tāmaki Makaurau. It contains:

· five strategic directions and four investment principles (see Part 1 report on this agenda).

· three supporting policies for making the most of our open spaces, for open space provision and acquisition, and for the council’s investment in play, sport and recreation (see Attachment A).

3. The proposed policies are the focus of this report. They set Auckland Council’s expectations for delivery. Like Part 1, their development has been guided by an advisory structure and engagement with local boards.

4. They build on adopted policies and plans. Proposed updated and new information is as follows:

· new objectives to guide the development of Auckland's existing open space network

· two options to change current open space provision standards and add to our existing open space network to continue serving the needs of a growing population:

o Package 1 – High-density focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high-density areas (mostly located in brownfield areas)

o Package 2 – Capacity focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high- and medium-density areas where residents have low or moderate levels of provision (recommended by staff as the best way to balance open space outcomes and value for money).

· more targeted council investment in play, sport and recreation to enable more equitable participation.

5. As a next step, staff will seek approval from the Policy and Planning Committee in December 2024 to undertake consultation on the draft strategy, including the proposed policies and the two options for open space provision standards. The committee report will include local board feedback.

6. If approved, consultation would take place early in 2025. The policies are detailed and technical in nature and intended for use by individuals and local and regional organisations that will deliver the draft strategy. This will be reflected in our approach to consultation.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) whakarite / provide feedback on the proposed policies in Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau, the draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy, for consideration by the Policy and Planning Committee

b) tuhi ā-taipitopito / note the two options for updated open space provision standards for consultation:

i) Package 1 – High-density focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high-density areas

ii) Package 2 – Capacity focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high- and medium-density areas where residents have low or moderate levels of provision.

Horopaki

Context

Proposed policies in the draft strategy set the council’s expectations for delivery

7. The draft Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy aims to provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to benefit all Aucklanders now and in the future and improve the health of Tāmaki Makaurau.

8. It provides a refreshed and simplified approach to planning and investment and sets five strategic directions, outlining where we are heading, and four investment principles, outlining how we will get there. This material is presented in a separate report on this agenda (see Part 1).

9. What the council will deliver is informed by three policies contained in the draft strategy. The policies set the council’s expectations for delivery through objectives, rules or guidelines. They contain detailed technical information intended for a professional audience (e.g. developers, consultants, council kaimahi, sport funding agencies).

10. Budgets for delivery are set through the annual and long-term plan processes.

11. The policies build on the Parks and Open Space Acquisition Policy 2013, the Open Space Provision Policy 2016 and the Increasing Aucklanders’ Participation in Sport: Investment Plan 2019-39, and propose updated and new information detailed in this report.

12. Local boards have key decision-making responsibilities in relation to open spaces and play, sport and recreation, and the proposed policies are designed to support them to deliver for their communities.

13. A separate three-yearly implementation and monitoring plan will detail what we will deliver. It will include priorities for delivery and track progress against key performance indicators.

Staff considered evidence and political input and direction in developing the proposed policies

14. The proposed policies in the draft strategy have been developed using:

· a strong body of evidence, including the background paper and a fit for purpose review of the Open Space Provision Policy 2016, options development and testing through working examples and assessment

· input from the advisory and Māori rōpū and key council kaimahi

· input and direction from the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group; the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee; the Policy and Planning Committee and local boards.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Policy 1: Making the most of our open spaces

15. Auckland has an extensive network of green, blue and grey open spaces and facilities that are much used and valued by Aucklanders.

16. The quality, accessibility and functionality of those spaces and places are essential to drive participation and use. In addition, increasing demand from population growth and intensification, as well as financial and land availability challenges, mean we need to deliver more from our existing assets.

17. The policy for making the most of our open spaces sets four objectives and proposes new tools and guidelines to support delivery of the objectives (see Attachment A, pages 28-41).

Proposed objectives	Proposed new tools and guidelines
1. Increase the range of benefits our open space network delivers consistent with each space’s primary purpose	· Identification of opportunities to deliver multiple benefits from our open spaces · An overview of the primary and secondary purposes of different open space types to assist with identifying risks and trade-offs associated with delivering additional functions · A risk appetite framework to support strategic asset owners taking on more risk to realise greater benefits from the open space network
2. Improve the quality of our open spaces	· Best practice guidance for improving the quality of our existing open spaces
3. Improve our network to provide diverse recreation opportunities accessible to all Aucklanders	· An open space recreation opportunities tool that outlines the diverse range of opportunities we want to provide for Aucklanders to be physically active, recreate and connect with nature across the network and how we can provide them
4. Improve open spaces’ accessibility and functionality by prioritising connections and linkages across all types of open space	· Planning and development responses to ensure the delivery of quality connections and linkages across all types of open space, including using streets and footpaths, along waterways and the coast, and in our blue-green network

18. The policy informs the planning, development and management approach for open spaces by Auckland Council, its council-controlled organisations, private developers and external development agencies such as Kāinga Ora.

Policy 2: Open space provision and acquisition

19. The open space provision and acquisition policy sets standards and methods for the types of open space we need, how we acquire them, and how we achieve quality outcomes from our open space network.

20. The policy sets two objectives and proposes new rules and guidelines to support delivery of the objectives (see Attachment A, pages 42-76).

Proposed objectives

Proposed new rules and guidelines

5. Plan for the provision of a high-quality open space network that keeps pace with growth and celebrates our cultural landscapes

· Two options for updated provision standards for pocket parks and neighbourhood parks to deliver better open space outcomes in high-density and greenfield development (see paragraphs 21 to 36)

· New open space capacity measure to enable us to compare provision levels across areas and over time (for more details see paragraph 25)

6. Ensure the acquisition of fit for purpose open space land that provides value for money and is sustainable in the long-term

· Updated criteria for prioritising potential acquisitions aligned with our strategic directions

· Updated acquisition process to include the development of an open space land acquisition priority plan to provide a 10-year and 30-year view of the open space acquisition pipeline

· Strengthened acquisitions standards (mandatory standards and site assessment criteria) to ensure acquisitions are fit for purpose and align with our strategic directions

· Detailed qualitative standards (including location, configuration, accessibility, coastal inundation and soil contamination) to ensure we acquire quality open space land from the start

· Emphasis on reconfiguring, redistributing or redeveloping open spaces rather than disposing of them to help us cater for growth

· Methodology to identify future regional park acquisitions so we can continue to meet the needs of Aucklanders

21. The policy informs developers, planners, implementers and decision-makers in their planning and investment decisions to expand Auckland’s existing open space network to best respond to Aucklanders’ needs and balance value for money and affordability considerations. It is an important consideration in regulatory and planning processes such as plan changes, structure plans and resource consents.

We propose to change provision standards for pocket and neighbourhood parks as part of Policy 2

22. As part of Policy 2, staff are proposing updated provision standards for pocket parks and neighbourhood parks to provide better open space outcomes in high-density areas and greenfield areas (see Attachment A, page 45).

23. Two options for updating the provision standards are outlined below. Those options reflect different ways of adding to our existing open space network across Auckland to continue serving the needs of a growing population.

Density	Park type	Current provision standards	Package 1 High-density focused	Package 2 Capacity focused (recommended)
High-density areas or other areas developed to an equivalent density	Pocket parks	1000-1500m² provided at no capital cost to the council	1000-1500m² acquired at cost to the council regardless of capacity	1000-1500m² in areas with moderate or low capacity acquired at cost to the council
	Neighbourhood parks (within 400m walking distances)	3000m² to 5000m²	5000m² regardless of capacity	2000m² to 5000m² depending on capacity
Medium-density areas	Pocket parks	No pocket parks	1000-1500m² provided at no capital cost to the council
Medium-density areas	Neighbourhood parks (within 400m walking distances)	3000m² to 5000m²	No change	2000m² to 5000m² depending on capacity
Low-density areas	Neighbourhood parks (within 600m walking distances)	3000m² to 5000m²	3000m²

24. Urban density is based on the Auckland Unitary Plan zones. Varying provision standards based on planned intensification levels enables us to better provide according to the likely demand for public open space, as well as likely private open space provision levels.

25. The capacity measure is a proposed addition to the existing policy. While the quantity of open space provision per capita is not a meaningful metric in isolation, it provides a basis of comparison when considering future provision across Auckland’s urban areas. There is no accepted international or national capacity standards. Based on local observations and international examples, we propose that capacity is considered low when below 10m² of open space per person, moderate when between 10 and 20m² and high when more than 20m².

Both Package 1 and Package 2 involve trade-offs

26. Both options involve trade-offs, as shown below.

	Trade-offs
Package 1 High-density focused	Delivers more open space in high-density areas than current policy but larger parks might be difficult to acquire due to land ownership and cost Is a simple standard to understand but not tailored to where provision is most needed


Package 2 Capacity focused	Is more affordable than Package 1 but does not deliver the same level of additional open spaces in high-density areas Takes an equity lens by focusing provision where most needed but is more complicated to understand and apply

27. Both options are included in the draft strategy (see Attachment A, page 45). The final strategy will reflect the option (or variation of) that the Policy and Planning Committee chooses through resolution after consultation.

28. In addition, improving open space outcomes where needed can be supported by increasing access to and functionality of existing open space, including connection, linkage and access open spaces. This is reflected in Policy 1 – Objective 4 (Improve open spaces’ accessibility and functionality by prioritising connections and linkages across all types of open space).

HOW WERE THESE TWO OPTION PACKAGES DEVELOPED?

The current provision policy is generally consistent with good practice but could be improved

· The proposed change to existing open space provision standards responds to a fit for purpose review of Auckland Council’s current Open Space Provision Policy 2016. The review found that it was generally consistent with good practice, but there was room for improvement and innovation. In particular, it found that the policy is not working effectively in high-density urban areas and is delivering low capacity in greenfield areas.

· Staff investigated how to vary the quantity of open space provided to best respond to this problem. The process for revising the open space provision standards is outlined in Attachment B. It includes significant political input and direction.

Staff developed options to vary the quantity of open space and improve open space outcomes

· To vary the quantity of open space, staff developed 12 options along a policy continum involving changes to the size, distribution and / or number of pocket and neighbourhood parks as they are the most common types of parks. The options also included increasing access to and functionality of other types of open space (e.g. riparian margins and esplanade reserves).

· Provision standards for suburb and destination parks, civic squares, and connection, linkage and access open spaces set in the Open Space Provision Policy 2016 are unchanged.

· After applying the 12 options in four brownfield and greenfield working examples and assessing them against a set of criteria, staff developed five packages of options that vary provision according to urban density and open space capacity.

· This will enable investment to be targeted where it is needed most, focusing on areas with less open space per person, to respond to both Auckland’s population growth and the council’s financial constraints. The five packages of options are:

Package 1

High-density focused

Package 2

Capacity focused

Package 3

Budget focused

Package 4

Doing things differently

Package 5

Consolidating and simplifying

Acquire pocket parks and larger neighbourhood parks in high-density areas and increase access to / functionality of existing public and private open space

Acquire pocket parks in high-density areas depending on capacity, vary the size of neighbourhood parks depending on capacity and increase access to / functionality of existing public and private open space

Do not acquire new land for open space, instead enable pocket parks in medium-density areas and increase access to / functionality of existing public and private open space

Acquire pocket parks and increase access to / functionality of existing public and private open space

Maintain existing provision standards but acquire pocket parks in high-density areas and increase access to / functionality of existing public and private open space

Based on assessment and political direction two options are presented for local board feedback

· The five packages were assessed using four additional working examples (two greenfield areas and two brownfield areas). The results of the assessment are below.

Criteria	Package 1 High-density focused		Package 2 Capacity focused		Package 3 Budget focused	Package 4 Doing things differently		Package 5 Consolidating and simplifying
Alignment	üü		üü		üüü	üüü		üü
Open space outcomes	üü		üüü		ü	ü		üü
Response to growth	üü		üüü		ü	ü		üü
Value for money	üü		üü		üü	üü		üü
Achievability	üü		üü		üüü	üüü		üü
Key:		ü Low		üü Medium			üüü High

· Based on this assessment and direction from the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group; the Planning, Environment and Parks Committee; and the Policy and Planning Committee, two options are presented for local board feedback: Package 1 and Package 2.

· Both Package 1 and Package 2 scored well across the brownfield and greenfield working examples. Staff recommend Package 2 as it was the highest scoring package.

Policy 3: Auckland Council’s investment in play, sport and recreation

29. Regular physical activity, whether it be play, sport or recreation, provides significant health and wellbeing benefits. While many Aucklanders are physically active, not everyone is getting enough physical activity in their lives and some are missing out as they face barriers to participation.

30. The policy for Auckland Council’s investment in play, sport and recreation sets three objectives and proposes new planning and investment approaches and indicators of what success looks like to support delivery of the objectives (see Attachment A, pages 77-88).

Proposed objectives	Proposed new planning and investment approaches and indicators of success
7. Increase physical activity levels by targeting our investment to low-participating communities and addressing disparities	Planning and investment approach: · balance investment to increase physical activity levels across four key groups: all Aucklanders, Māori, young people (5-17 years old) and low participation groups (based on Active New Zealand surveys, Auckland Council and Aktive information) · invest to enable Aucklanders to be more physically active, whether through play, recreation or community sport. Indicators of what success looks like: · increasing numbers of adult Aucklanders meeting physical activity guidelines (150-plus minutes per week) · increasing numbers of Aucklanders aged 5-17 years meeting physical activity guidelines (420-plus minutes per week) · increasing numbers of Māori in Tāmaki Makaurau meeting physical activity guidelines · increases in specific community groups with low levels of physical activity meeting physically activity guidelines · increase in the proportion of the regional sport and recreation grants directed to low participation groups and emerging physical activity opportunities that target these groups.
8. Deliver a fit for purpose, future proofed facility network that makes the most of what we have	Planning and investment approach: · plan for a regional sport and recreation facilities network to provide opportunities for Aucklanders to be physically active through their choice of activity, focusing primarily on facilities for community sport · accelerate the transition to multi-use and adaptable facilities to provide more opportunities for community participation, including high-level guidance on developing multi-use facilities · improving the performance of our facilities to reduce negative environmental impacts and supporting the development of universally accessible facilities so more people in our community can use them. Indicators of what success looks like: · increasing community satisfaction with the level of access to sport and recreation facilities and the range of opportunities provided.
9. Strengthen partnerships with mana whenua and mataawaka, local communities and other sport and recreation providers	Planning and investment approach: · partner with others to improve public access to existing non-council facilities and identify joint solutions for delivery of opportunities for Aucklanders · work with communities to understand barriers to participation, including guidance on co-designing with the community · support delivery of play, sport and recreation opportunities by Māori for Māori. Indicators of what success looks like: · increasing number of Auckland schools and tertiary institutions making their sport and recreation facilities available for public use over time · increasing number of sport and recreation initiatives delivered by Māori for Māori · a more visible Māori presence in sport and recreation spaces, places and activities.

31. The policy outlines how Auckland Council will fund and invest in play, sport and recreation alongside many other organisations delivering these opportunities to Aucklanders at both the local and regional level.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

32. Delivering the proposed policies in the draft strategy will positively contribute to Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Plan’s core goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to the impacts of climate change.

33. The proposed policies help enable the achievement of strategic direction three in the draft strategy: ‘Enhance our response to climate disruption.’ This focuses on better planning and designing our open spaces and places network to respond to climate change and prioritising our investment to make Auckland greener and spongier.

34. The proposed policies provide:

· guidance on delivering multiple benefits from our open spaces (including designing or retrofitting recreation parks to contribute to water retention)

· guidance on increasing connections between open spaces to green the city and manage stormwater (such as blue-green corridors)

· clear qualitative standards to ensure we acquire fit for purpose land for open spaces, including relating to flood plains, overland flow paths and coastal inundation

· a planning and investment approach focused on improving the performance of our spaces and places to reduce negative environmental impacts, including carbon emissions.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

35. Kaimahi from across the council group have provided input throughout the development of the draft strategy.

36. The proposed policies were developed with detailed input from Policy; Parks and Community Facilities; Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience; Community Wellbeing and Engineering, Assets and Technical Advisory. This helps ensure that the proposed policies provide the necessary information and clarity to support implementation.

37. Staff will continue to work closely with colleagues in planning for and supporting delivery.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

38. The proposed policies are designed to support local boards to deliver open spaces and play, sport and recreation opportunities for their communities in line with their local board plan priorities.

Allocated decision-making responsibilities

Examples of proposed policies to support decision-making

Acquisition of new local parks (within budget parameters agreed by the Governing Body) and their specific location and acquisition of new local sport and recreation facilities (within budget parameters agreed by the Governing Body) and their specific location, design, build and fit out

Local parks improvement and place-shaping, the use of and activities within local parks and the use of local sport and recreation facilities

Local sport and recreation programmes and initiatives and local community funding and grants.

Standards to ensure the acquisition of fit for purpose open space land, including relating to location, configuration and accessibility

Best practice guidance for improving the quality of existing open spaces

A tool to support the provision of a diverse range of accessible recreation opportunities across the open space network

Standards to ensure the acquisition of fit for purpose open space land, including relating to location, configuration and accessibility

Guidance on developing multi-use sport and recreation facilities and maximising community benefits.

39. Two local board members were on the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group: Member Sandra Coney and Member Margi Watson. In addition, staff have engaged with local boards on the proposed policies in workshops and briefings between July and October 2024.

40. Local board views on the proposed policies, including on the two options for updating the open space provision standards, will be reported to the Policy and Planning Committee when staff seek approval to undertake consultation on the draft strategy.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

41. In a Māori worldview, Auckland's open spaces and places are interconnected parts of the natural world, imbued with spiritual and ancestral significance.

42. The draft strategy puts manaakitanga, a te ao Māori way of showing respect, generosity, and care for one another and for our resources, at the forefront of open space, sport and recreation to achieve oranga tāngata, whenua, wai and whānau.

43. The proposed policies provide:

· guidance on delivering multiple benefits from our open spaces (including reflecting mana whenua culture and identity and drawing on mātauranga Māori to protect and enhance our environment, biodiversity and heritage)

· best practice guidance for improving the quality of existing open spaces (including emphasis on the importance of integrating indigenous knowledge from mana whenua)

· a planning and investment approach that targets increased participation in physical activity by Māori Aucklanders (including in traditional Māori sports) and supports the delivery of sport and recreation opportunities by Māori for Māori.

44. The views of mana whenua and mataawaka have been sought in the development of the proposed policies. This includes input from the advisory and Māori rōpū (with mana whenua and mataawaka representatives) and input and direction from the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group (with a Houkura representative).

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

45. There are no financial implications for the local board associated with providing feedback.

46. The development of, and consultation on, the draft strategy can be completed within the existing policy departmental budget.

47. Implementation will be enabled through available budgets set during the long-term plan and annual plan processes.

48. The proposed policies reflect the resource constraints faced by the council and the need to deliver value for money. They place a greater emphasis on making the most of our open spaces and facilities, as well as recognising the need to continue to cater for a growing Auckland and to target our investment where it is needed most and will have the greatest impact.

49. All the options for changes to the open space provision standards involve high-level trade-offs, including on cost. The recommended changes (Package 2) take an equity lens, balancing the higher cost of acquisition of larger parks in some areas to address capacity issues with acquiring smaller parks in areas that are already well served.

50. The emphasis on reconfiguring, redistributing or redeveloping open spaces rather than disposing of them includes the opportunity to make greater use of the service property optimisation process. This means that money generated by disposing of an open space can be used by local boards to fund already-planned open space acquisition or development.

51. The strengthened acquisition standards will help ensure that we acquire fit for purpose open space land from the outset, with a positive flow on effect to the cost of developing and managing our open spaces.

52. The draft strategy also proposes developing an open space land acquisition priority plan every three years to provide a 10-year and 30-year view of the open space acquisition pipeline. This will support decision-makers, including local boards, in understanding the trade-offs between meeting the expectations set in the draft strategy and budgetary allocation.

53. Our investment in sport will be primarily focused on community sport, where participation levels are higher and we can achieve the most impact. Investment will also be targeted to low-participating communities and addressing disparities.

54. The draft strategy proposes changes to the Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund to increase the proportion directed to low participation groups and emerging physical activity opportunities, with a corresponding decrease in the amount of contestable funding available.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

55. Potential risks and mitigations relating to the proposed policies are outlined below:

If…

Then…

Possible mitigations…

The proposed policies, and open space provision options, go for consultation.

Some Aucklanders may feel unable / unwilling to provide their views due to the technical nature and complexity of the information.

Low reputational and strategic risk.

Consultation material will simplify the content of the draft strategy.

The two open space provision packages will be articulated in plain English and supported by images to explain what density could look like.

Staff will present at stakeholders’ meetings (as resources allow). This will enable us to answer questions and provide clarity where needed.

We will engage with mana whenua and mataawaka separately in a way that suits them.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

56. Staff will include local board feedback when seeking approval from the Policy and Planning Committee at its December 2024 meeting to consult on the draft strategy, including the proposed policies and open space provision options.

57. If approved, public consultation will begin in February 2025 and run for approximately one month.

58. The findings from the public consultation and an updated draft strategy will then be reported to local board business meetings ahead of going to the Policy and Planning Committee for adoption.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy – proposed policies	247
b ⇩	Process to develop revised open space provision standards	317

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Aubrey Bloomfield - Senior Policy Advisor

Authorisers

Louise Mason - General Manager Policy

Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement

Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

Henderson-Massey Local Board

19 November 2024

Auckland Council's Performance Report: Henderson-Massey Local Board for quarter one 2024/2025

File No.: CP2024/17698

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To provide the Henderson-Massey Local Board with an integrated performance report for quarter one, 1 July – 30 September 2024.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report includes financial performance, progress against work programmes, key challenges the board should be aware of and any risks to delivery against the 2024/2025 work programme.

3. All operating departments with agreed work programmes have provided an update against their work delivery programme. All of the activities within the agreed work programme are currently on-track (green) to be delivered, including any multi-year projects that have progressed as expected.

4. The key activity updates from this period are:

· Customer and community services achievements: All funding agreements for the 2024-2025 work programme have been signed and agreed outputs are underway.

· Māori Responsiveness: Kaitūhono at Hoani Waititi Marae: The funding agreement for the Kaitūhono position at Hoāni Waititi Marae has been signed. The three western local boards are party to this agreement and focus will be on delivery over the coming year.

· Ope Hauāuru: Seeks to generate momentum for resilient, sustainable futures for the communities of Henderson-Massey. Building Sustainable Community: Four new schools (Freyberg School, Te Atatū Intermediate, Rangeview Intermediate, and Rutherford College) are now participating in Ope Hauāuru. The focus of the work at these schools includes food security and waste reduction.

5. Net operating expenditure is eight per cent over budget for the quarter. This is mainly due to community partners receiving their funding in full for the year during the first quarter. Capital expenditure was $9.6 million for the quarter and approximately 121 per cent above budget. This overspend is due to good progress in delivery for the Te Whau Pathway, Tui Glen Reserve / Inanga / Chilcott Brae shared path and the West Wave Aquatic renewal. Staff expect that operating and capital spend will meet budget at year end.

6. The Customer and Community Services capital budget has been revised to incorporate delayed delivery or earlier commencement of individual projects or other changes that are of material value.

7. Funds were set aside for the Young Enterprise Scheme (YES) following the drafting of the 2024/2025 work programme. However, these were not included in the work programme when it was approved. This report provides the opportunity for the local board to approve the Young Enterprise Scheme (H-M) (Activity ID 1262) and associated budget of $2,000 into the 2024/2025 work programme.

8. The budget associated with Film Revenue of $8,096 is proposed for re-allocation to Community Grants Henderson-Massey (Activity ID 168) as per the Operating performance financial summary commentary in Attachment B.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:

a) receive the performance report (Attachment B) for quarter one ending 30 September 2024.

b) note that the 2024/2025 Customer and Community Services Capital Expenditure work programme has been updated to reflect financial deferrals.

c) whakaae / approve Young Enterprise Scheme (H-M) (Activity ID 1262) and associated budget of $2,000 into the 2024/2025 work programme from unallocated locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget.

d) whakaae/approve the allocation of Film Revenue of $8,096 to Community Grants Henderson-Massey (Activity ID 168).

Horopaki

Context

9. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has an approved 2024/2025 work programme (Attachment A) for the following operating departments:

· Customer and Community Services

· Local Environmental

· Plans and Places

· Auckland Emergency Management

· Local Governance.

10. Since the approval of the work programmes, Council has undergone a restructure, resulting in changes to directorates and departments. These have been updated in the work programmes and the changes are outlined in the table below.

Table 1: Changes to departments and units in work programmes

Previous department / unit in work programme	Current department / unit in work programme
CCS: Active Communities – Leisure	Community: Pools & Leisure
CCS: Active Communities – Sport and Recreation	Community: Community Wellbeing - Sport and Recreation
CCS: Connected Communities – Community Delivery	Community: Community Wellbeing - Community Delivery
CCS: Grants	Group Finance: Grants and Incentives
CCS: PCF – Community Leases	Community: Parks and Community Facilities - Community Leases
CCS: PCF – Operations	Community: Parks and Community Facilities - Operations
CCS: PCF – Project Delivery	Community: Parks and Community Facilities - Project Delivery
CCS: PCF – Specialist Operations	Community: Parks and Community Facilities - Specialist Operations
CCS: RSS – Events	Community: Community Wellbeing - Events
CCS: RSS – Māori Outcomes	Community: Community Wellbeing - Māori Outcomes
CCS: RSS – Service and Asset Planning	Policy, Planning & Governance: Policy - Service and Asset Planning
CPO: Plans and Places	Policy, Planning & Governance: Planning & Resource Consents - Planning
GOV: Auckland Emergency Management	Resilience & Infrastructure: Auckland Emergency Management
GOV: Local Board Services	Policy, Planning & Governance: Governance - Local
I&ES: Environmental Services – Natural Environment Delivery	Community: Environmental Services - Natural Environment Delivery
I&ES: Environmental Services – Sustainability Initiatives	Community: Environmental Services - Sustainability Initiatives
I&ES: Healthy Waters	Resilience & Infrastructure: Healthy Waters & Flood Resilience
I&ES: Resilient Land & Coasts	Resilience & Infrastructure: Engineering Assets & Technical Advisory

11. The graph below shows how the work programme activities meet Local Board Plan outcomes. Activities that are not part of the approved work programme but contribute towards the local board outcomes, such as advocacy by the local board, are not captured in this graph.

Graph 1: Work programme activities by outcome

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Local Board Work Programme Snapshot

12. The graph below identifies work programme activity by RAG status (red, amber, green and grey) which measures the performance of the activity. It shows the percentage of work programme activities that are on track (green), in progress but with issues that are being managed (amber), and activities that have significant issues (red) and activities that have been cancelled/deferred/merged (grey).

Graph 2: Work programme by RAG status

13. The graph below shows the activity status of activities which shows the stage of the activity in each departments work programmes. The number of activity lines differ by department as approved in the local board work programmes.

Graph 3: Work programme by activity status and department

Key activity updates

14. Connected community achievements: All funding agreements for the 2024-2025 work programme have been signed and agreed outputs are underway.

15. Māori Responsiveness: Kaitūhono at Hoani Waititi Marae: Fund a sustainable, long-term programme of activities that build and strengthen relationships across West Auckland Māori communities, respond to key aspirations and deliver Māori outcomes: The funding agreement for the Kaitūhono position at Hoāni Waititi Marae has been signed. The three western local boards are party to this agreement and focus will be on delivery over the coming year.

16. Ope Hauāuru: Ope Hauāuru seeks to generate momentum for resilient, sustainable futures for the communities of Henderson-Massey. Building Sustainable Community: Four new schools (Freyberg School, Te Atatū Intermediate, Rangeview Intermediate, and Rutherford College) are now participating in Ope Hauāuru. The focus of the work at these schools includes food security and waste reduction. There is also growing interest in flood mitigation, with plans to design and install swales and water harvesting systems. Contractors from EcoMatters continue to engage with all schools in the Henderson-Massey local board area and are building on these existing relationships.

Young Enterprise Scheme (YES)

17. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has previously funded the Young Enterprise Scheme (H-M) (Activity ID 1262) in previous years.

18. Funds were set aside for the Young Enterprise Scheme (YES) following the drafting of the 2024/2025 work programme. However, these were not included in the work programme when it was approved.

19. The YES events are delivered by the Auckland Business Chamber on behalf of the Young Enterprise Trust. The responsibility within the Council for the Young Enterprise Scheme (YES) currently sits with the Auckland Council Grants team.

20. The proposed budget for the Young Enterprise Scheme (H-M) (Activity ID 1262) is $2,000 of the boards locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget. This amount remains unallocated and can be accommodated from within the local board’s total draft budget for 2024/2025.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

21. Receiving performance monitoring reports will not result in any identifiable changes to greenhouse gas emissions.

22. Work programmes were approved in June 2024 and delivery is underway. Should significant changes to any projects be required, climate change impacts will be assessed as part of the relevant reporting requirements. Any changes to the timing of approved projects are unlikely to result in changes to emissions.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

23. When developing the work programmes council group impacts and views are presented to the boards. As this is an information only report there are no further impacts identified.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

24. This report informs the Henderson-Massey Local Board of the performance ending 30 September 2024.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

25. The majority of the funded community groups have wide ranging work programmes that target māori and pacific outputs. These are popular programmes, many emanating from Rānui 135 (RAP), MPHS Community Trust and Massey Matters.

26. Harbourview-Orangihina - develop and implement signage suite. Develop a suite of signage for wayfinding, education and interpretation. Include bilingual signage, placemaking symbology and/or artistic expressions based on natural and heritage themes of the park plus educational signage for sites with heritage and Māori values. Consultation with iwi and internal stakeholders is underway. Next steps will be to engage a specialist consultant to develop a design package.

27. Henderson-Massey Local Parks Management Plan: Develop a multi-park management plan that assists the Henderson-Massey Local Board in managing use, development and protection of all parks, reserves and other open space they have allocated decision-making for: On 6 August 2024, staff attended a local board workshop to introduce the project scope and timeframes. A Māori Engagement Plan has been drafted to inform discussion with mana whenua. Next steps will be to commence mana whenua engagement and prepare for public consultation.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

28. The proposed budget for the Young Enterprise Scheme (H-M) (Activity ID 1262) is $2,000 and can be funded from the local board’s available locally driven initiatives (LDI) operational budget 2024/2025.

29. The budget associated with Film Revenue of $8,096 is proposed for re-allocation to Community Grants Henderson-Massey (Activity ID 168) as per the Operating performance financial summary commentary in Attachment B.

Financial Performance

30. Operating expenditure of $9.6 million is $510,000 above budget for the quarter.

31. Asset based services (ABS) expenditure is in line with budget. Locally Driven initiatives (LDI) programmes are $508,000 over budget due mainly to a number of community partners who received their funding agreements paid in full for the year during the first quarter.

32. Operating revenue of $1.5 million is $99,000 below budget. This is mainly as a result of lower income overall from West Wave Aquatic Centre and property rentals.

33. Capital Expenditure of $9.6 million is over budget by $5.3 million. This is mainly due to work on Te Whau pathway (Section 5), West Wave Aquatic Centre comprehensive renewal, upgrade shared path at Tui Glen Reserve / Inanga / Chilcott Brae and Kelston Community Centre/Te Pae o Kura renewal ahead of schedule.

34. The financial report for the three months ended 30 September 2024 for the Henderson Massey local board area is in Appendix B.

Revised Capital Expenditure Budget

35. Capital expenditure budgets are revised to reflect changes in timing of delivery for individual projects.

36. Projects that were still in progress at 30 June 2024 have had their remaining required budget carried forward to the current or future financial years to fund the remaining works.

37. If a multi-year capital project was completed earlier than anticipated, the budget is reduced or brought forward to 30 June 2024 to reflect early completion.

38. Consideration is also given to the status of current capital projects and where required budgets are rephased in whole or part to outer years to reflect current timelines for delivery.

39. The net budgetary impact of these changes is reflected in the revised budget for the board.

40. The Customer and Community Services Capital Expenditure work programme financial allocations have been updated in accordance with the carry forwards.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

41. While the risk of non-delivery of the entire work programme is rare, the likelihood for risk relating to individual activities does vary. Capital projects for instance, are susceptible to more risk as on-time and on-budget delivery is dependent on weather conditions, approvals (e.g. building consents) and is susceptible to market conditions.

42. Information about any significant risks and how they are being managed and/or mitigated is addressed in the ‘Activities with significant issues’ section.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

43. The local board will receive the next performance update for quarter two (October - December 2024), at the February business meeting.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇩	Attachment A - Henderson-Massey Local Board Q1 WP Update	331
b ⇩	Attachment B - Henderson-Massey Local Board 24 25 Q1 Financial Appendix	363

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors	Michelle Knudsen - Lease Board Advisor
Authorisers	Adam Milina - Local Area Manager

[1] For example, the Burial and Cremation Act 1964, Cremation Regulations 1973 and Burial and Cremation (Removal of Monuments and Tablets) Regulations 1967.

[2] Local boards have delegated authority for council cemeteries that are inactive (function as local parks; no longer in regular use) and active (on Aotea Great Barrier Island). Only 17 local boards have council cemeteries in their area (not Albert-Eden, Henderson-Massey, Manurewa or Ōrākei).

[3] Committee with an advisory role for Te Urupā o Waikumete in partnership with council.

Chairperson	Chris Carter
Deputy Chairperson	Dr Will Flavell
Members	Brenda Brady, JP
	Peter Chan, JP
	Dan Collins
	Oscar Kightley
	Brooke Loader
	Ingrid Papau

Authors	Laura Hopkins - Democracy Advisor
Authorisers	Adam Milina - Local Area Manager