
I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Henderson-Massey Local Board will be held on:
|
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Tuesday, 15 April 2025 3.00pm Hoani Waititi Marae 451 West Coast Road Oratia |
|
Henderson-Massey Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson |
Chris Carter |
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Dr Will Flavell |
|
|
Members |
Brenda Brady, JP |
|
|
|
Peter Chan, JP |
|
|
|
Dan Collins |
|
|
|
Oscar Kightley |
|
|
|
Brooke Loader |
|
|
|
Ingrid Papau |
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
|
Sophie Wylie Democracy Advisor
9 April 2025
Contact Telephone: 027 743 9010 Email: Sophie.wylie@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
15 April 2025 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Nau mai | Welcome 5
2 Ngā Tamōtanga | Apologies 5
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest 5
4 Te Whakaū i ngā Āmiki | Confirmation of Minutes 5
5 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence 5
6 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements 5
7 Ngā Petihana | Petitions 5
8 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations 5
8.1 Deputation: Oceania Literacy Trust update 5
9 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum 6
10 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business 6
11 Ward Councillors' Update 9
12 Henderson-Massey Local Board Grants Programme 2025/2026 17
13 Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 27
14 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two 2024/2025 grant allocations 97
15 Henderson-Massey Local Board views on the draft Contributions Policy 2025 255
16 Auckland Transport Kōkiri Quarterly Update - March 2025 461
17 Kōkiri - Setting priorities for Auckland Transport project and programme engagement 473
18 Allocation of decision-making responsibilities for council-controlled organisation activities coming in house 545
19 Local board feedback on the Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill 577
20 Public feedback on proposal to amend dog policy and bylaw 579
21 Proposed changes to the draft Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy 677
22 Chair's Report - Chris Carter 871
23 Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule) 875
24 Confirmation of Workshop Records 879
25 Te Whakaaro ki ngā Take Pūtea e Autaia ana | Consideration of Extraordinary Items
1 Nau mai | Welcome
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
|
Member |
Organisation |
Position |
|
Chris Carter (Chair) |
1. St Lazarus Trust 2. Waitākere Badminton Club |
Member Member |
|
Peter Chan, JP
|
1. Cantonese Opera Society of NZ 2. Asian Leaders Forum 3. NZ-Hong Kong Business Association 4. NZ-China Business Association 5. Te Whau Pathway Environmental Trust |
Member Member Member Member Trustee |
|
Dan Collins |
1. Rānui Action Project |
Chair |
|
Dr Will Flavell (Deputy Chair) |
1. Asia New Zealand Leadership Network 2. Te Atatū Tennis Club 3. Waitākere Literacy Board 4. Te Kura |
Member Board Member Board Member Member |
|
Brooke Loader |
1. Waitākere Licensing Trust 2. UDL Energy Complaints Scheme Advisory 3. Neighbourhood Support 4. Te Atatū Glendene Community Patrol 5. Real Estate Authority New Zealand |
Member Member Member Volunteer Member |
|
Ingrid Papau |
1. Liberty Impact Community Trust 2. #WeLoveTuvalu Community Trust 3. Neighbourhood Support 4. Liberty Church 5. Rutherford Primary Board of Trustees |
Board Member Member Street Contact Member Member |
Member appointments
Board members are appointed to the following bodies. In these appointments the board members represent Auckland Council:
|
External organisation |
Lead |
Alternate |
|
Massey Matters |
Will Flavell |
Peter Chan |
|
Central Park Henderson Business Association |
Chris Carter |
Dan Collins |
|
Heart of Te Atatū South |
Brooke Loader |
Brenda Brady |
|
Ranui Advisory Group |
Dan Collins |
Brooke Loader |
|
Te Atatū Peninsula Business Association |
Ingrid Papau |
Brenda Brady |
|
Waitākere Ethnic Board |
Peter Chan |
Brooke Loader |
|
Waitākere Healthlink |
Ingrid Papau |
Brenda Brady |
|
Te Whau Pathway Environmental Trust |
Chris Carter |
Dan Collins |
4 Te Whakaū i ngā Āmiki | Confirmation of Minutes
|
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) whakaū / confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Tuesday, 18 March 2025 as true and correct. |
5 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements
|
|
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) āhukahuka / acknowledge the following individuals in our community who contribute to the well-being of residents through their volunteering or other community work: i) Whaea Yvonne Edwards ii) Paratene Ngata-Aerengamate on behalf of Kotuku Marae Kapa Haka Roopu Rutherford College. |
7 Ngā Petihana | Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
8 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations
Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Henderson-Massey Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
|
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. To receive a deputation from Oceania Literacy Trust, on behalf of David Riley. Whakarāpopototanga matua Executive summary 2. To provide an update on the recent project Kāinga Pukapuka-Home Libraries and thank the Henderson-Massey Local Board for recent funding through the local board grant programme. |
|
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive the presentation and thank David Riley on behalf of Oceania Literacy Trust, for his attendance.
|
9 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of three minutes per speaker is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Ward Councillors' Update
File No.: CP2025/00367
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To receive a verbal update from the Waitākere Ward Councillors and a written update from Councillor Henderson.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. A period of 10 minutes has been set aside for the Waitākere Ward Councillors to have an opportunity to update the Henderson-Massey Local Board on regional matters.
|
Recommendation/s That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) whakamihi / thank Councillors Ken Turner and Shane Henderson their verbal update. b) whakamihi / thank Councillor Shane Henderson for his written update. |
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Ward Councillor Report Shane Henderson, 15 April Henderson-Massey Local Board Business Meeting |
11 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Sophie Wylie - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Henderson-Massey Local Board Grants Programme 2025/2026
File No.: CP2025/04912
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To adopt the Henderson-Massey Grants Programme 2025/2026.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy guides the allocation of local and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt its own local grants programme for the next financial year.
4. This report presents the Henderson-Massey Grants Programme 2025/2026 for adoption (Attachment A).
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) adopt the Henderson-Massey Grants Programme 2025/2026.
Horopaki
Context
5. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy guides the allocation of local and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities, and services that benefit Aucklanders.
6. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt its own local grants programme for the next financial year. The local board grants programme guides community groups and individuals when making applications to the local board.
7. The local board community grants programme includes:
· outcomes as identified in the local board plan
· specific local board grant priorities
· which grant types will operate, the number of grant rounds, and opening and closing dates
· any additional criteria or exclusions that will apply
· other factors the local board consider to be significant to their decision-making.
8. Once the local board grants programme has been adopted, the types of grants, grant rounds, criteria, and eligibility with be advertised through an integrated communication and marketing approach which includes utilising the local board channels.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
9. The aim of the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. The new Henderson-Massey Grants Programme has been workshopped with the local board and feedback incorporated into the grants programme.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
10. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to address climate change by providing grants to individuals and groups with projects that support community climate change action. Local board grants can contribute to climate action through the support of projects that address food production and food waste; alternative transport methods; community energy efficiency education and behaviour change; build community resilience and support tree planting.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
11. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.
12. Based on the main focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant council unit will provide input and advice. The main focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment, or heritage.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
13. The grants programme has been developed by the local board to set the direction of its grants programme. This programme is reviewed on an annual basis.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
14. All grant programmes respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Māori. Applicants are asked how their project aims to increase Māori outcomes in the application process.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
15. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted Long-Term Plan 2021-2031 and local board agreements.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
16. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy. Therefore, there is minimal risk associated with the adoption of the grants programme.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Community Grants Policy 2025-2026 |
21 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Bilin He - Grant Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Pierre Fourie - Grants & Incentives Manager Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025
File No.: CP2025/05885
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To adopt the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025, which provides guidance on emerging play issues and opportunities for non-playground play projects.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 provides Henderson-Massey Local Board with general information and specific project suggestions to increase the range of play opportunities it offers.
3. The play plan has been developed with community and council staff guidance. The local board has provided feedback on an earlier draft of the document. The final version of the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 is now offered to the local board for adoption.
4. A Supplementary Information document has also been provided. It includes relevant demographic information for the local board area, and insights from Regional Sports Trusts and the council’s Advisory Panels. This information has informed the advice staff provide to Henderson-Massey Local Board regarding play.
5. The play plan does not commit the local board to funding any particular play project. Instead, it will serve as a tool to support work programme planning each year.
6. The report recommends that Henderson-Massey Local Board adopt the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 and use it as a resource for the future development of play.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) whai / adopt the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 as set out in Attachment A to this report.
Horopaki
Context
7. Auckland Council’s play advocacy function promotes play opportunities beyond investment in traditional playgrounds, with play regarded as ‘an everywhere activity.’
8. The play advocacy approach complements local boards’ capital investments in play. It does not however replace the ongoing need for investment in the design and maintenance of playgrounds.
9. Staff engaged with Henderson-Massey Local Board at various workshops in 2023 and 2024. A play advocacy activity was included in the local board’s annual work programme in the 2023/2024 and the 2024/2025 financial years. In the 2023/2024 financial year a budget of $10,000 was allocated. This budget was increased to $20,000 for the 2024/2025 financial year.
10. In the 2023/2024 work programme, staff committed to delivering a ‘play plan’ for Henderson-Massey Local Board. This document provides advice on how play outcomes can be achieved with operational expenditure (OPEX) funding. It also provides guidance on relevant play issues that the local board might like to consider.
11. A draft version of the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 was discussed with the local board at a workshop in December 2024. Elected member feedback was incorporated into the final draft. Staff are seeking adoption of the plan on Attachment A.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
12. The Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 (‘the play plan’) is aligned with the Henderson-Massey Local Board Plan 2023. It is intended to be a live document for the life of the local board plan. The play plan will be revised throughout the 2026 – 2029 term of the local board.
13. The play plan complements previous staff advice about play and other council work programmes that provide play outcomes. This includes play provision assessments and play network gap analyses completed by the Specialist Operations team, and the activation programme delivered by the Out and About Auckland team.
14. The play plan highlights the need to engage effectively with rangatahi regarding play. The gap in play provision for rangatahi is well known across Tāmaki Makaurau, and the play plan offers suggestions about how this can be addressed through both operational (OPEX) and capital (CAPEX) investment.
15. Accessible play is a growing focus within the play sector. The play plan provides guidance to Henderson-Massey Local Board about the different needs of tamariki with invisible and visible disabilities. It also discusses ways that the council can address these groups’ play requirements.
16. All-ages play is also a topic of interest to most local boards. The play plan addresses this by highlighting opportunities for intergenerational play. It also advocates for greater engagement with rangatahi to learn more about this demographic’s play interests. It provides some suggestions for ways to better provide play for rangatahi and adults in formal play spaces.
17. The play plan presents elected members with specific project ideas to increase play provision across Henderson-Massey, and suggestions of local board advocacy for broader play outcomes. The project suggestions are indicative only and do not commit the local board to funding any particular project. Language has been added to the play plan to this effect.
18. In response to feedback from a range of local boards, all play plans have been revised as follows:
· a Chair’s Message has been included at the beginning of the document
· operational details such as proposed project costs have been removed, to better reflect the strategic nature of the play plan and the local board’s governance-level decision-making role
· a page has been inserted to acknowledge the opportunity for play to support the wellbeing of older adults
· the document has been divided into two separate parts: the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025, which is action-focused; and the Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 Supplementary Information document, which includes supporting insights and other reference materials.
19. Staff will use the play plan to inform discussions during work programme development. Each year, the local board may choose to allocate a budget toward play through its annual work programme development process.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
20. The play advocacy approach has an enduring positive climate impact. It encourages whānau to embrace their streets, local parks and public spaces as sites for play. This reduces the need to drive to playgrounds.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
21. The play plan has been written with input from the council’s Activation and Events teams within the Community Wellbeing department. Further review and feedback has been provided by staff in the Pools and Leisure and the Parks and Community Facilities departments.
22. The play plan highlights the value of integrating play into other council work programmes, and in the work of Council-Controlled Organisations like Auckland Transport and Watercare.
23. The Supplementary Information document includes insights from the council’s various Advisory Panels, which each represent different groups in the community. Staff engaged directly with the Advisory Panels and sought their feedback regarding play issues relevant to them.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
24. Play is of perennial interest to the wider community, with most families aware of its benefit to their tamariki. As freedom to roam and play without adult supervision has declined for tamariki in Tāmaki Makaurau during the past three decades, there has been growing pressure on the council to build and maintain playgrounds. The play advocacy approach, as set out in the play plan, both acknowledges the importance of playgrounds, and offers other ways to provide opportunities to play.
25. Tāmaki Makaurau’s four Regional Sports Trusts have the capacity to engage directly with tamariki in a school setting, and the Play Leads at each Regional Sports Trust have done so at several primary schools. The insights gathered have informed staff advice to Henderson-Massey Local Board about how to provide play beyond a playground setting. In particular, tamariki voice has identified a widespread appetite for more adventurous play.
26. The Supplementary Information document contains demographic information from the 2023 Census, highlighting changing ethnic demographics in Henderson-Massey. Analysis of the local board’s demographic data has contributed to staff advice to Henderson-Massey Local Board.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
27. The play plan references the Māori outcomes identified in the Henderson-Massey Local Board Plan 2023. It highlights several ways that play can support Māori outcomes, including:
· using Te Aranga Māori Design principles in the design of playgrounds, to communicate iwi narratives through colour choices, cultural motifs, and other elements
· developing and installing māra hūpara – Māori playgrounds that draw on pre-colonial play traditions from local iwi
· exploring ways that the Te Kete Rukuruku dual naming project could create opportunities for playful interpretation of the narratives behind gifted te reo names
· providing Māori play activations through the Out and About Auckland programme.
28. The play plan acknowledges the importance of taking an iwi-led approach for any play provision that is aligned with Māori outcomes.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
29. Although the play plan includes potential play projects, it is not a prescriptive document and does not commit the local board to funding any of the projects. Language has been included in the play plan to make this clear to all readers.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
30. The following table identifies risks associated with Henderson-Massey Local Board adopting its play plan and sets out appropriate mitigation measures.
|
Risk |
Mitigation |
|
Adopting the play plan raises community expectations regarding investment in new play projects |
Language within the play plan to emphasise the non-prescriptive nature of the document and its purpose as a guide for potential play investment only |
|
Adopting the play plan results in concern from the community that investment in CAPEX play will not continue |
Language within the play plan to confirm that non-playground play is intended to complement and not replace wider investment in play assets |
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
31. Staff will participate in annual work programme planning, drawing on the play plan to advise the local board of project opportunities.
32. The Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 will be revised on a three-year basis, to ensure it remains aligned with the Henderson-Massey Local Board’s local board plan.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 Supplementary Information |
33 |
|
b⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Play Plan 2025 |
61 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Jacquelyn Collins - Play Portfolio Lead |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager Pippa Sommerville - Manager Sport & Recreation |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two 2024/2025 grant allocations
File No.: CP2025/04120
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To fund, part-fund or decline applications received for the Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two 2024/2025.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
3. This report presents applications received in the Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two 2024/2025 (Attachment B).
4. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $79,697 for the 2024/2025 financial year, which will be allocated across two Local Grant Rounds and two Quick Response Grant rounds.
5. After Local Grant Round One, we have a remaining balance of $46,539.
6. In November, we received the following refund and allocated the following funds.
· A refund of $1,565.22 from New Zealand Blue Light Ventures Incorporated (QR1905-220).
· Approval (HM/2024/104) for the allocation of $8,096 in Film Revenue to Community Grants Henderson-Massey (Activity ID 168).
· Allocation of $14,290 to Quick Response Round One at the November business meeting.
7. In January, applicant advised that they relocated their project to Albany and forfeited the grant (QR2505-110), returning $500 to the 2024/2025 budget.
8. This leaves $42,410.22 available for allocation in the subsequent rounds.
9. Twenty-seven applications were submitted towards Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two, requesting a total of $50,677.20.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) agree to fund, part-fund, or decline the following Quick Response Grants Round Two 2024/2025 applications:
|
Application ID |
Organisation |
Main focus |
Requesting funding for |
Amount requested |
Eligibility |
|
QR2505-201 |
Youloveit Limited |
Sport and recreation |
Towards exercise videos/prescription and marketing for Improving the operational features and content from 1 May 2025 to 31 July 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-202 |
Reconnect |
Community |
Towards printing material for Care to Self-care project from 5 May 2025 to 17 October 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-204 |
The Massive Company Trust |
Arts and culture |
Towards teaching artist fees, manaakitanga and marketing costs for Massive Theatre Company and Te Pou Foundations workshop Whakapuāwai Programme from 1 October 2025 to 2 October 2025 |
$1,500.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-205 |
Silver Fern Motorsport Charitable Trust |
Community |
Towards venue hire for Free Community Driver License Programmes West Auckland from 1 May 2025 to 30 April 2026 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-206 |
Connect The Dots Charitable Trust |
Arts and culture |
Towards specialist educator and material costs for Make Moments Art Workshops for People with Dementia and Whanau from 7 May 2025 to 28 February 2026 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-207 |
West Auckland Youth Development Trust |
Community |
Towards motor vehicle expenses, Boxing Tournaments and event costs for Stepping up to greatness programme from 5 May 2025 to 31 December 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Ineligible |
|
QR2505-210 |
Massey Birdwood Settlers Association Incorporated |
Community |
Towards project materials for 100 year celebrations from 1 Mary 2025 to 31 December 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-211 |
Ministry of inspiration |
Community |
Towards purchase of NZ AquaBot Kit from 5 May 2025 to 1 September 2025 |
$2,087.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-212 |
PP Grief Support & Education Charitable |
Community |
Towards Counsellor costs for Henderson-Massey Loss and Grief Counselling from 1 May 2025 to 31 October 2025 |
$1,750.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-214 |
Mobility Assistance Dogs Trust |
Community |
Towards Veterinary Costs from 3 June 2025 to 30 September 2025 |
$1,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-215 |
Community Waitakere Charitable Trust |
Community |
Towards venue hire, catering, admin and marketing costs for Revive Rathgar project from 1 May 2025 to 30 November 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-218 |
ABEDI, HAYLEY |
Community |
Towards workshop materials and supplies, guest speaker and trainer fees, venue and setup costs, promotion and advertising, food and drink on 2 June 2025 |
$1,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-219 |
Edmonton School Board of Trustees |
Community |
Towards purchase of soil, plants, watering containers, seedlings, compost for "Growing Together: A Garden to Table Journey" project from 5 May 2025 to 19 June 2025 |
$1,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-220 |
Te Atatu Tennis Club |
Sport and recreation |
Towards upgrade meterbox and switch board from 1 May 2025 to 30 May 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-221 |
Interacting |
Community |
Towards venue hire for West Auckland weekly drama, hip hop and film making classes from 1 May 2025 to 11 July 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-222 |
NZ Barok Incorporated |
Arts and culture |
Towards venue assistant /management costs and facilitation fees from 10 July 2025 to 12 July 2025 |
$1,340.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-223 |
PHAB Association Inc Contracts Operations Account |
Community |
Towards transport, venue hire and games for PHAB Powering On project from 26 May 2025 to 23 March 2026 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-225 |
Big Buddy Mentoring Trust |
Community |
Towards office rent, psychological assessment for volunteers, advertising, mentor manager supervision cost from 1 May 2025 to 30 April 2025 |
$5,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-227 |
Mrs C R Leauga |
Sport and recreation |
Towards purchasing tracksuits from 3 May 2025 to 2 August 2025 |
$1,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-228 |
Fair Food |
Community |
Towards pallet nets for Wrapping Up Waste: Pallet Netting to Reduce Single-Use Plastics project from 19 May 2025 to 19 December 2025 |
$2,640.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-229 |
Tatai Whakapapa Trust |
Community |
Towards facilitator cost for Hīkoi Hāpori on 22 November 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-230 |
For Adventure Specialties Trust |
Community |
Towards purchase of head torches from 2 May 2025 to 30 June 2025 |
$1,559.20 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-232 |
Re-creators Charitable Trust |
Community |
Towards preparation and materials, marketing, tutoring, administration and project management fees, travel time and costs from 1 May 2025 to 29 August 2025 |
$1,800.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-233 |
Te Kowhai Print Trust Inc |
Events |
Towards venue hire for Printopia Festival of Original Print event from 2 May 2025 to 4 May 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-234 |
Te Atatu Tennis Club |
Sport and recreation |
Towards remove and replace corner steel post from 1 May 2025 to 30 May 2025 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-236 |
Mr V V Naik & Mrs A S Rege |
Arts and culture |
Towards videography, studio hire, costume, make up, photography and marketing costs for Garbha Sanskar: The Beauty of Being a Woman project on 17 May 2025 |
$1,001.00 |
Eligible |
|
QR2505-238 |
Crescendo Trust Of Aotearoa |
Arts and culture |
Towards annual lease/rent cost on 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026 |
$2,000.00 |
Eligible |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$50,677.20 |
|
Horopaki
Context
10. The local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of being a world-class city.
11. The local board grants programme sets out:
a) local board priorities
b) lower priorities for funding
c) exclusions
d) grant types, the number of grant rounds, and when these will open and close
e) any additional accountability requirements.
12. The Henderson-Massey Local Board adopted the Henderson-Massey Local Grants Programme 2024/2025, which sets application guidelines for contestable community grants submitted to the board (Attachment A).
13. The community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, and community networks.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
14. The aim of the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the report.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
15. The Local Board Grants Programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to address climate change by providing grants to individuals and groups for projects that support and enable community climate action.
16. Community climate action involves reducing or responding to climate change by local residents in a locally relevant way. Local board grants can contribute to expanding climate action by supporting projects that reduce carbon emissions and increase community resilience to climate impacts.
17. Examples of projects include local food production and food waste reduction, increasing access to single-occupancy transport options, home energy efficiency and community renewable energy generation, local tree planting and streamside revegetation, and educating about sustainable lifestyle choices that reduce carbon footprints.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
18. The focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment, or heritage. Based on the focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department will provide input and advice.
19. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
20. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Henderson-Massey Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
21. Staff will provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
22. The local board grants programme aims to respond to the council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Māori. Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Unit has provided input and support towards the development of the community grant processes.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
23. The Henderson-Massey Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $79,697 for the 2024/2025 financial year, which will be allocated across two Local Grant Rounds and two Quick Response Grant rounds.
24. After Local Grant Round One, we have a remaining balance of $46,539.
25. In November, we received the following refund and allocated the following funds.
· A refund of $1,565.22 from New Zealand Blue Light Ventures Incorporated (QR1905-220).
· Approval (HM/2024/104) for the allocation of $8,096 in Film Revenue to Community Grants Henderson-Massey (Activity ID 168).
· Allocation of $14,290 to Quick Response Round One at the November business meeting.
26. In January, applicant advised that they relocated their project to Albany and forfeited the grant (QR2505-110), returning $500 to the 2024/2025 budget.
27. This leaves $42,410.22 available for allocation in the subsequent rounds.
28. Twenty-seven applications were submitted towards Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grants Round Two, requesting a total of $50,677.20.
29. Appropriate financial officers have been consulted.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
30. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
31. Following the Henderson-Massey Local Board allocating funding to Quick Response Round Two grants, grants staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Community Grants Programme 2024/2025 |
105 |
|
b⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Quick-Response Grant Round Two Application Summary 2024/2025 |
111 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Bilin He - Grant Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Pierre Fourie - Grants & Incentives Manager Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round Two
Application Summary
Contents
1... Youloveit Ltd
2... Reconnect
3... The Massive Company Trust 9
4... Silver Fern MotorSport Charitable Trust
5... Connect the Dots
6... West Auckland Youth Development Trust
7... Massey Birdwood Settlers Association Inc
8... ministry of inspiration
9... Grief Support & Education Charitable
10. Mobility Assistance Dogs Trust
11. Community Waitakere
12. Hayley Abedi
13. Edmonton School Board of Trustees
14. Te Atatu Tennis Club
15. Interacting
16. NZ Barok Incorporated
17. PHAB Association (Auckland) Incorporated
18. Big Buddy Mentoring Trust 77
19. Catherine Leauga
20. Fair Food
21. Tatai Whakapapa Trust
22. Adventure Specialties Trust 93
23. Re-Creators Charitable Trust
24. Te Kowhai Print Trust Inc. 105
25. Te Atatu Tennis Club
26. Ambaree Rege
27. Crescendo Trust of Aotearoa. 117
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-201 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Limited Liability Company |
Activity focus: |
Sport and recreation |
|
|
Project: Advertising to motivate health and fitness |
||||
|
Location: |
Te Atatu Peninsula |
|||
|
Summary: |
advertising |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have developed the app so far (downloadable on the App Store) and managed everything so far, however we need some funds to help creating the advertising designs |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 31/07/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
1000 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Let us know but probably through introducing the project when we put up a poster, e.g. ideally we would put a poster in the library, and in that case we would tell them about the support |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Increased awareness of health and fitness, education and connection between the community. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations It actually applies for the other priorities too, as we believe that health and fitness are essential to improve the wellbeing of the community, increasing productivity, community engagement, relationships and the general overall "vibe" |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Matt Bodley |
Manager |
|
White Rabbit |
Advertising Designs |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering We will target diversity through our marketing - as it is inclusive for everyone |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - They can do exercise from home and with lesser capabilities |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes All our marketing communications will provide these values, as our product is inherently encouraging active lifestyles and fitness. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Not specifically but we will try and work with the agency to have an inclusive poster - although not specifically targeting specific genders, ages or ethnicities - just inclusive to all
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Poster/banner development |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We may still go ahead - but will be slower, and we may decide not to go ahead and other priorities will be a better use of our resources. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
none |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2193.75 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Poster/banner development |
$2193.75 |
$2000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
None or unknown at this point - the app is currently free |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
None |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
None |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
1 |
100 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
The company is pre-revenue so there are no financial reports yet - best thing to do is to go to www.youloveit.co and download the app for a good look around and feel about what we are doing |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-202 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Registered Charity |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Care to Self-care? |
||||
|
Location: |
Henderson Waitakere Libraray and various libraries. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Reconnect is hosting another youth mental health contest for Auckland high school youth, following the success of last year. We are requesting funding for this project. The funds will be used for the success of the project, which is to promote the project publically, support the youth through workshops offline and online, and acknowledge the participating youth though various incentives and awatds. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have been doing "share-the-warmth" movements for
multiple years with a diverse range of people, equipping us with the skills
to deliver a safe platform where youth can share love and gain a sense of
accomplishment and improved perception regarding the topic. |
|||
|
Dates: |
05/05/2025 - 17/10/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
500 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
90% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We would love to add the local boards contribution by acknowledging the board to our regular mailing lists, also would like to add the logo of the board to our posters pertaining to the CSC project. Also would like to add the board's contribution to our Website page too. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Reconnect has been actively addressing youth mental health
challenges, recognising that young people are particularly vulnerable in this
area. We believe that youth are the future, and it is the responsibility of
the community to provide them with the best support possible. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations Our initiative provides young people with opportunities to reflect on
and learn more about their hauora (wellbeing) while exploring creative
methods to promote mental health awareness among their peers. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Asian and Ethnic Health Services – Health NZ Te Whatu Ora |
Advisors |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language) We have used the Te whare tapa wha model of wellbeing as we promote the idea of self-care and wellbeing. This model is the holistic model that we will use as we communicate with the youth that our wellbeing is interconnected as the model suggests, and all pillars are required for a balanced healthy life. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
No - |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* As our Care to Self-care? (CSC) project is based on hauora wellbeing, we will actively promote healthier life-style choices such as drinking water by creating a water bottle with the time of day written on it to support this healthy habit. Also, as wellbeing is multifaceted, we will bring up physical activity, acts of service, and more to promote the importance of intentional healthy choices benefiting us and the community in the long run. eg, picking up rubbish, and or riding the bike to school, showing acts of kindness and more. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Our
project is specifically targeted at youth aged 13-18 (Years 9-13) across all
Auckland high schools and colleges, with a particular focus on young people in
West Auckland. While the initiative is open to all youth regardless of
background, we recognize the diverse demographic of West Auckland and aim to
create an inclusive, culturally responsive space that supports Māori,
Pasifika, Asian, and other ethnic communities who may face additional barriers
in accessing mental health resources.
We are committed to supporting all genders and ensuring our project is
accessible and welcoming to young people of all identities. Through peer-led
support, creative expression, and open conversations, we foster a safe and
supportive environment where youth feel heard, valued, and empowered to take
charge of their well-being
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Winning Self-care tool manufacturing- $2000. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: Reconnect will be using the saved funds from previous fundraisers to host the project. Also, we may have to scale down on the marketing and various costs to fit our budget. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$420.16 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$5000.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
*2024 Self-care winning entry EXAMPLE |
$420.16 |
$420.16 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Na |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Na |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Na |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
15 |
800 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-204 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Arts and culture |
|
|
Project: Massive Theatre Company and Te Pou Foundations workshop Whakapuāwai Programme |
||||
|
Location: |
Te Pou Theatre, 2 Mt Lebanon Lane, Henderson, Auckland |
|||
|
Summary: |
We seek funding for teaching artist fees, manaakitanga and digital marketing costs for a FREE workshop for rangatahi aged 14 - 25 to be held at Te Pou Theate in Henderson in October 2025. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Massive has been delivering high-quality arts experiences to
Tāmaki-Makaurau since 1991. During Massive's 30+ year history, we have
developed a significant number of rangatahi through our pathways of
performing, writing, directing and teaching who continue to work with us in
these areas of creative work. Their engagement continues to contribute to a
robust arts sector and an ever-increasing body of original theatre work
devised and performed by both emerging and established creatives. See
attached Bios of Creatives. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/10/2025 - 02/10/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
25 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Massive has a comprehensive marketing strategy to promote all company activities and events, including listing funders on our website and social media pages. |
|||
Conflicts of interest: N/A
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Since 1991, Massive has provided FREE workshop programmes for
rangatahi and emerging artists aged 14 - 25 across Tāmaki
Makaurau. Massive is committed to accessibility, ensuring that
financial barriers for participation are removed by offering all workshops
for free. By partnering with venues and arts organisations to hold our
workshops outside of our main central hub in areas such as West Auckland, we
are also removing geographical barriers that may prohibit young people from
participating. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life Through Massive's FREE theatre workshop programmes, communities can
participate in high quality arts experiences. The workshop included in
this application will take place at Te Pou Theate, a kaupapa Māori
performing arts venue for all that supports the development and presentation
of contemporary and community performing arts. We are thrilled to
partner with Te Pou to bring this free workshop to ranagatahi in the
Henderson-Massey local board area. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Te Pou Theatre |
venue and artistic partner |
|
Andi Crown Photography |
photography |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori led - either a Māori organisation that is applying or Māori directed (came about as a request from Māori), Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Te Pou Theatre is a kaupapa Māori performing arts venue which is
Māori-led and Māori-run. Te Pou invited Massive into a
partnership to deliver a free 2-day workshop as part of their
Whakapuāwai Programme, an annual programme offering opportunities for
development and connection for the Māori performing arts community. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Te Pou Theatre is a fully accessible venue with disabled carparks available for those who need them. We welcome wheelchair users and those with mobility needs (our workshop activities are easily adaptable for different levels of mobility). Massive teaching artists have undertaken neurodiversity training with Mind Over Manner, and are able to identify and work with participants in workshops, productions and schools who may present as neurodiverse or on the autism spectrum. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* Te Pou Theatre in Henderson is a smoke-free and vape-free venue (including outdoors). Wharekai/Kitchen facilities at Te Pou include recycling bins and food scraps composting bins on site, and we encourage our participants to bring lunches in re-usable containers (there is also dishwashing facilitiets on site to wash dishes). We provide access to clean water for drinking and encourage participants to keep hydrated (we do a lot of physical movement in our workshops). We also provide healthy snacks to eat such as fruit and low-sugar options (participants bring their own lunch, but Massive provides snacks). Massive is a physical theatre company and our workshops are very physical in nature, incorporating movement and high-energy activities. Te Pou is accessible on via the Western train line and numerous bus routes. Both Te Pou and Massive are also cycling-positive companies (many of our core team cycle into work daily) and encourage those who can cycle to do so (Te Pou provides secure bike parking and areas to charge e-bikes). |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
One
of Massive’s key focus areas in our audience engagement strategy is
increasing engagement through improved accessibility. We’re committed to
learning and implementing new ways of engaging with audiences from diverse,
marginalised communities, including migrant and LGBTIQ+, through continued
korero and research.
Massive also has a high level of engagement with Pasifika youth, emerging
artists and creatives, working with them to ensure they have access to
high-quality, low-cost arts experiences that might be otherwise unavailable to
them.
Massive Company’s kaupapa of original story telling and artist-led,
devised theatre means that the work created is closely tied to the cultural
roots of the creatives involved. This makes Massive theatre content more
accessible than other arts experiences might be for these communities, as they
recognise their own stories being reflected on the stage.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1500.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
For teaching artist fees, manaakitanga and some marketing costs |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will need to apply to alternative funding sources. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1500.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Teaching Artist fees - x 2 TAs for x 2 days |
$1200.00 |
$1200.00 |
|
Manaakitanga (kai, tea, coffee, fruit) |
$100.00 |
$100.00 |
|
Digital marketing - social media posts,etc |
$200.00 |
$200.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
N/A - free event |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Venue Hire - Te Pou Theatre - 2 x days in space |
$800.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
2 |
10 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
We are thrilled to be working wiht Te Pou Theatre again in 2025 to offer free workshops for rangatahi. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
LG2520-226 |
Massive Nui Ensemble workshop - Term 2 and Term 3 2024/2025 Waitematā Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-204 |
Massive Theatre Company and Te Pou Foundations workshop Whakapuāwai Programme 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
RegAC_25_2_032 |
Sideways Into the Light professional show development (script) Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 2 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2520-132 |
Massive free development workshop programmes 2025 2024/2025 Waitematā Quick Response Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2509-132 |
MASSIVE Foundations workshop programme - Mangere 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2513-124 |
Massive Foundations workshop programme - Ōtara Apr 2025 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,595.00 |
|
LG2520-131 |
Massive Wharenui community arts hub 2024/2025 Waitematā Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegAC_25_Pr026 |
Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $7,219.00 |
|
RegAC_25_Pr029 |
Sideways Into the Light development Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 1 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2420-241 |
Massive Nui Ensemble week-long wānanga 2023/2024 Waitematā Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2413-254 |
Massive FREE Foundations Workshop - Papatoetoe 2023/2024 Otara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,227.93 |
|
LG2405-242 |
Te Ao Hou - Massive Emerging Artists Production 2024 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2420-201 |
Massive Free Workshop Programmes 2023/2024 Waitematā Local Grants, Round Two - Accountability not satisfactory |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
ASF2401-101 |
2024 Albert-Eden Accommodation Support Fund - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegAC_24_051 |
I LOVE YOU G (professional production) Regional Arts and Culture project grants 2024 - Acquitted |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
RegAC_24_050 |
Te Ao Hou (Emerging Artists Production EAP 2024) Regional Arts and Culture project grants 2024 - Acquitted |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
QR2405-109 |
When the Tide Turns 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2401-138 |
When the Tide Turns (Working Title) Rehearsals 2023/2024 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Follow up |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LG2311-254 |
The Directors Lab Intensive - Week 2 (November 2023) 2022/2023 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2311-244 |
My Hands Are in Soil (EAP 2023) - Rehearsals 2022/2023 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2320-229 |
My Hands Are in Soil (rehearsals) 2022/2023 Waitematā Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,891.00 |
|
LG2301-257 |
Half of the Sky Production - Rehearsals 2022/2023 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
ASF202315 |
2023 Waitematā Accommodation Support Fund - Project in progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
RegAC22_2063 |
Half of the Sky Remount and Auckland Season Regional Arts and Culture grants 2022/2023 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
RegAC22_2042 |
My Hands are in Soil (Emerging Artist Production 2023 Regional Arts and Culture grants 2022/2023 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
RegSR22_2302 |
Regional Arts and Culture 2022/23 strategic relationship - Acquitted |
Approved $90,000.00 |
|
RegPr23_1_026 |
Development for Two Theatrical Productions Regional Arts and Culture 23_1 Project grants_Rd1 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegPr23_1_018 |
Regional Arts and Culture 23_1 Project grants_Rd1 - Acquitted |
Approved $8,838.00 |
|
LG2311-113 |
The Director's Lab – October Intensive 2022/2023 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,182.82 |
|
EOI01 |
Regional Arts and Culture EOI strategic relationship 2022/23 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2209-240 |
Emerging Artist Production 2022 (title TBC) 2021/2022 Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,554.00 |
|
ASF202204 |
2022 Waitematā Accommodation Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
RegPr22_2_0028 |
Emerging Artist Production 2022 Regional Arts and Culture project grants round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $15,000.00 |
|
LG2210-121 |
The Director's Lab - December Intensive 2021/2022 Manurewa Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,402.00 |
|
RegPr_22_1004_ |
Half of the Sky Regional Arts and Culture 2021/22 Project Grants Round 1 - Strategic Relationship EOI Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ASF202109 |
2021 Waitematā Accommodation Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $2,880.00 |
|
RegPr013 |
Massive Production 2021 Regional Arts and Culture grants 2020/2021 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ASF202005 |
2020 Waitematā Accommodation Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
RegPr20_200022 |
Te Whare Kapua / The Cloud House Regional Arts and Culture grants programme 20_2 Projects - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
RegPr20_100027 |
Kia Puawai Regional Arts and Culture grants programme 20_1 Projects - Project in Progress |
Approved $21,000.00 |
|
RegSR20_100002 |
Regional Arts and Culture grants programme 20_1 Strategic relationship - Acquitted |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
RegPr19_200023 |
Massive 2019 season: Like a River, I Disagree and Half of the Sky Regional Arts & Culture Grants Programme 19_2 - Project in Progress |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
RegPr18_200040 |
Regional Arts & Culture Grants Programme 18_2 Projects - Assessment 18_2 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegPr18_200029 |
Sightings Regional Arts & Culture Grants Programme 18_2 Projects - Project in Progress |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
RegAC18_1_SR_08 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grant Programme 18_1 Strategic Relationship - Project in Progress |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
RegAC18_1_EOI_00013 |
Regional Arts & Culture Grant Programme 18_1 SR EOI - Strategic Relationship EOI Accepted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
ASF1720-005 |
2017 Waitematā Accommodation Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $1,800.00 |
|
RegAC17_2_003 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grant Programme 17_2 Project - Assessment 17_2 |
Approved $1,800.00 |
|
RegAC17_2_002 |
Hope Burns Regional Arts and Culture Grant Programme 17_2 Project - Assessment 17_2 |
Approved $9,000.00 |
|
17_1_SR_002 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 17_1 Strategic Relationship - Assessment 17_1 |
Approved $15,000.00 |
|
LG1609-239 |
The Island 2015/2016 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CASF_161700023 |
Accommodation support for 99 Queen Street, Auckland 2016/2017 Central Community Group Accommodation Support Grant - Acquitted |
Approved $3,300.00 |
|
RegAC16_2_057 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 16_2 - Assessment 16_2 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegAC16_2_042 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 16_2 - Assessment 16_2 |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LG1609-136 |
The Wholehearted - Massive Company's premium production for 2016. 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
RegAC16_1_051 |
Regional Arts and Culture Grant 2015/2016 Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 16_1 - Assessment 16_1 |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
QR1601-143 |
Massive Company Open Rehearsals for "The Wholehearted" 2015/2016 Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
AA15_2_023 |
THE WHOLE HEARTED - (working title) Arts Alive Round 2 2014/2015 - Assessment Panel Arts Alive 2015 Round 2 |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
IRCF14/15 069 |
Annual operating costs 2015 Interim Regional Fund 2014/15: Arts and Community - Paid |
Approved $15,000.00 |
|
IRCFAOct1300006 |
Annual operating costs 2014 Interim Regional Community Fund: Arts Organisations - Pre-eligibility |
Approved $15,000.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-205 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Free Community Driver License Programmes West Auckland |
||||
|
Location: |
Henderson, Massey and nearby localities where community venues are available |
|||
|
Summary: |
Silver Fern MotorSport Charitable Trust is a not for profit community organisation that provides free driver license training and testing to disadvantages communities. Our history in West Auckland for the past 15-years as a youth charity is well established, and we service both youth and adults in the Henderson and Massey locality for driver licensing. We are seeking $2,000 towards venue hire costs of community facilities in West Auckland to run driver license training programmes. Through our programmes we will reach over 100 people who face financial, social and other barriers to gaining a license. We receive no funding for venue hire costs, and we always prioritise use of Auckland council community venues as our preferred option for venues. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have been working with high needs communities in West Auckland for 15-years, particularly youth. We have been delivering specifically driver license training programmes for the past 10 years, alongside our Youth Automotive Programme which was our founding programme working with young offenders and vulnerable rangatahi. We deliver learner, restricted and full license training and operate 5 Instructor vehicles. In addition to West Auckland, we also operate in South Auckland and North Waikato. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 30/04/2026 |
|||
|
People reached: |
100-250 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Through our website, we can also display the Council logo on 5 Instructor vehicles if this is of interest to Council. We also can attend events to promote how Council assist us. We advise participants of our funders who make it possible for us to deliver programmes to the community. We also write case studies and happy to provide photos for Council newsletters to show benefits of our programmes to Henderson and Massey residents. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
* Supporting vulnerable rangatahi and whanau who face barriers to
gaining a license, targeting Henderson, Massey residents |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations Through supporting vulnerable communities who face barriers to gaining a drivers license, this supports both individuals and whanau to upskill so that they can become more employable, be more connected to community and help people with self development. We currently live in challenging financial times, and through our support we are able to make a positive difference in peoples lives that prevents disengagement and also ensures a safer community. We work closely with Waitakere Police to provide restorative pathways for people who are identified by Police who are driver license non-compliant. We offer an alternative to traffic fines and charges, helping people become license compliant, while also raising awareness on driver and vehicle safety. We work with a high proportion of Maori and Pacific, with in excess of 65% of referrals received. We also work closely with other NGOs, WINZ and Oranga Tamariki agencies to support high needs whanau. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Our referrals to programmes are over represented as Māori and Pacific. We also have a Māori Driving Instructor employed full time with our Trust. We work closely with local Marae and local NGOs who send referrals of high needs communities to us. We are a well established provider of 15 years and recognised as a quality provider. We hold Level 2 Social Services approval status. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Ensure our venue is well chair accessible, which Mill Cottage is we believe. We also work with a high number of rangatahi with learning difficulties, anxiety and ADHD disorders. We do have a responsibility for drive safety so will always ensure participants are medically cleared to seek a license if we have any concerns. We have high success working with high needs communities with mental health and learning disabilities. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* We have a non-smoking, no vaping policy which we enforce at our programmes. We provide free water (no fizz) drinks to participants. We promote use of hybrid or electric vehicles when engaging clients about vehicle efficiency and benefits to the environment. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
We are open to all genders, ages (16 years and up), and ethnicities. Generally, Māori, Pacific rangatahi 16-24 are our largest catchment.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
We are seeking 2000 towards venue hire costs based on $50 per day, 4 day programmes, and total of 10 programmes over a year. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would need to reduce the number of programmes delivered, however we hope that Council can fully support this given we have secured funding for staffing and driver license fees costs. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
no it is free to participants including training, test fees and water provided |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2000.00 |
$0.00 |
$41607.60 |
$2000.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Venue hire costs (4 days (all day rate), $50 per day, 10 progs) |
$2000.00 |
$2000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
0 |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
NZTA (covers staffing and driver license test fees) |
$41607.60 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Staffing - Tutor contractor |
$11200.00 |
|
Staffing - Programme Manager |
$12800.00 |
|
Staffing - Programme Coordinator |
$9097.60 |
|
Driver License Fees (83.6 ex gst ea), 100 participants |
$8360.00 |
|
Drinks (donated by SFMCT) |
$150.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
0 |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
We attach some case studies as examples of work we do in the
community. We also attach some historical letters of endorsements. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-205 |
Free Community Driver License Programmes West Auckland 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2121-117 |
Safety Resources For Rangatahi Training Programmes 2020/2021 Whau Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG1921-102 |
Getting Started Programme 2018/2019 Whau Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
HM15_2008 |
Silver Fern MotorSport Youth Training & Mentorship Programme Whau Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
HM14_2034 |
Silver Fern MotorSport Youth Training and Mentorship Programme LB - Henderson-Massey Local Board Community Grant - Round 2 2013/2014 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
YPF14_100003 |
Silver Fern Motorsport Youth Training & Mentorship Programme West - Youth Programme Fund - Round 1 2013/2014 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-206 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Arts and culture |
|
|
Project: Make Moments Art Workshops for People with Dementia and Whanau |
||||
|
Location: |
Te Atatu Peninsula Community Centre |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funds to support access to arts for people living with dementia and disability in the Henderson-Massey area through our Make Moments art programme run in collaboration with Dementia Auckland at Te Atatu Peninsula Community Centre. We facilitate weekly art high-quality art workshops for people living with dementia and their whanau to support creative ageing and inclusion. We are seeking support towards to cost of the specialist Artist Educator and the art materials. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Make Moments has been facilitated across Auckland for over 10 years,
reaching an average of 3000 per year. We continue to offer Outreach to groups
to ensure every older person has access to the arts for improved wellbeing
and intellectual stimulation. We are experienced in working with people
living with dementia and encourage mental and social connectivity through
dignified and meaningful activity in community spaces, we are uniquely placed
to help combat the major challenges facing older people. |
|||
|
Dates: |
07/05/2025 - 28/02/2026 |
|||
|
People reached: |
200 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will use the Local Board logo on all printed material as well as in a Thank You For Funding Social Media post on our social media accounts. We will also tag the Local Board in each of the posts connected the project which will be a minimum of 42 posts |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Our participants often experience barriers to participation due to
physical disabilities, neurological conditions, age-related vulnerabilities,
and social isolation. This is significant, because while service delivery /
support agencies in the age-care and disabilities sector provides outstanding
services to our target audience, the primary mandate is to provide wellbeing
outcomes through clinical or “health-oriented”
interventions. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life Our older population is growing disproportionately to other ages in
Auckland, and is as diverse and multicultural as any group. Art is natural
leveller and our workshops always focus on the many perspectives of different
people and cultures towards the same subject matter. We bring people together
around a shared purpose and activity, encouraging of experimentation and joy,
rather that art instruction. Art opportunities give people with dementia an
opportunity to express themselves in visual way, taking away any pressure for
verbal communication for people whose verbal fluency is in decline.
Creativity is within us all and witnessing the joy and sense of pride our
community experience when making art demonstrates the success of this
project. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Dementia Auckland |
Venue and Morning Tea |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language) Our Māori, Pasefika and Cantonese-speaking Artist Educators reviewed our arts programme content and delivery to ensure it is inclusive and reflective of our diverse communities. Our educators and community also translated our online and printed art packs in Samoan, Tongan, Mandarin and Cantonese and these were well received by our participants during lock down. Our content and examples and arts processes always include works by our Māori, Pasefika artists as examples for our themes (home, family etc) to ensure that all participants feel included and valued. Our programmes always include food and refreshments (Manaakitanga is expressing kindness and respect for others, emphasising responsibility and reciprocity). |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - As outlined in our mission, and our vision, Connect the Dots
strives to engage, through creativity, those who experience physical or
intellectual disabilities. Our project is accessible in terms of the physical
space we use, we make it appropriate for those with physical or accessibility
needs. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* We encourage healthy food options and encourage our participants to move about in the workshops, gathering their materials and being active with some of the more physical processes like printmaking. We also demonstrate careful use of art materials encouraging zero waste of supplies and by reusing yoghurt containers for water containers etc and not washing anything into the waterways. We travel to workshops with an Electric Vehicle or E Bike to ensure our regional programme is not harming the environment. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
We specifically support those over 65 years of age, but do not specifically target gender or ethnicity groups, but of course all genders and ethnicities are welcome and encouraged to participate in our workshops. Some of our participants are people with Early-Onset dementia which means that they are under 65.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Henderson-Massey |
100 |
$2000.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
We are seeking contribution for the specialist educator to facilitate 20 Make Moments Art workshops. We will contribute the art materials and administrative time for the scheduling, reviews, marketing and reporting, and Dementia Auckland will contribute the venue and morning tea costs. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would need to reduce the number of workshops |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$3839.73 |
$0.00 |
$1000.00 |
$839.73 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Specialist Artist Educator x 20 workshops @ $150/workshop |
$3000.00 |
$2000.00 |
|
Art Materials |
$839.73 |
$0.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
0 |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Dementia Auckland |
$1000.00 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Venue Hire @ 91.20 per workshop |
$3648.00 |
|
Specialist art materials donated by Connect the Dots |
$839.73 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
3 |
120 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
We would love the Board to hear from our participants to get their perspective on what the programme brings to their lives. We have attached a report which has some links in it to our website to hear our impact. Thank you. We have been facilitating this weekly workshop in Te Atatu Peninsula for over 2 years now and are seeking funding so we can keep it zero cost for the community in these times of economic hardship. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-206 |
Make Moments Art Workshops for People with Dementia and Whanau 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2514-233 |
Make Moments Art Workshops for Isolated Older People 2024/2025 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2507-250 |
Make Moments Art Workshops for Isolated Older People 2024/2025 Howick Local Board Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_025 |
Make Moments Art Making Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - South East 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
RegAC_25_2_018 |
Make Moments Art Programme Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 2 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2413-264 |
Make Moments Papatoetoe Rugby Club 2023/2024 Otara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Grant not uplifted |
Approved $600.00 |
|
LG2411-210 |
Seniors Studio 2023/2024 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
RegAC_24_075 |
Arts Participation For Auckland Rugby Clubs members experiencing dementia or brain injury Regional Arts and Culture project grants 2024 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
NHM24_083 |
Community Connection for Older Aucklanders and people with dementia or disability through Creative Arts Projects Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 23/24 - Submitted |
Approved $0.00 |
|
QR2414-121 |
Make Moments Haumaru Housing Art Workshops 2023/2024 Papakura Small Grants Round One (Small) - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
CCS24_1_115 |
Make Moments Art Making Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,917.00 |
|
CCS22_1_085 |
Make Moments at Home Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,411.00 |
|
CCS20_2_032 |
Art Tours for Blind Low Vision Adults and Workshop for Blind Low Vision Children Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - South East 20_2 |
Approved $1,170.00 |
|
RegPr20_100001 |
Make Moments: Art Workshops for Auckland's Older People Regional Arts and Culture grants programme 20_1 Projects - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB1920-123 |
Make Moments art workshops 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $8,775.16 |
|
RegPr19_1_00015 |
Make Moments Regional Arts and Culture Grant Programme 19_1 Projects - Project in Progress |
Approved $12,000.00 |
|
CCS18_2_101 |
Make Moments Exhibition Creative Communities Scheme 18_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
QR1814-205 |
Make Moments 2017/2018 Papakura Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $378.00 |
|
QR1813-200011 |
Make Moments 2017/2018 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $378.00 |
|
QR1810-206 |
Make Moments 2017/2018 Manurewa Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,124.00 |
|
QR1815-102 |
Make Moments 2017/2018 Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $540.00 |
|
CCS17_1_012 |
Girls to the Front Franklin Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - South Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS17_1_067 |
Girls to the Front Manurewa Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - South Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1703-117 |
Girls to the Front Franklin 2016/2017 Franklin Local Grant, Round One - Grant not uplifted |
Approved $845.00 |
|
QR1715-106 |
Make Moments in Puketapapa Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round One, 2016/17 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1701-102 |
Girls to the Front 2016/2017 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_2_137 |
Art workshops for people living with dementia and their caregivers Creative Communities Scheme 2016_2 - South Assessment Committee Round 2 2016 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_2_082 |
Cross-Cultural Textile Art Workshops at Mangere East Community Centre Creative Communities Scheme 2016_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,400.00 |
|
QR1609-224 |
Girls to the Front 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $750.00 |
|
QR1609-220 |
Make/Do Mangere 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,700.00 |
|
QR1609-219 |
Mind the Gap 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_1_112 |
Like A Girl Summer Holiday Project Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - South Assessment Committee Round 1 2016 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_1_105 |
Girls the Front Term 1 and 2 2016 Manurewa Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $7,170.58 |
|
CCS16_1_038 |
Mind The Gap - Intergenerational School Holiday Programme (Mangere) Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,600.00 |
|
CCS16_1_037 |
Mind The Gap - Intergenerational School Holiday Programme Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - South Assessment Committee Round 1 2016 |
Approved $3,600.00 |
|
CCS16_1_113 |
Make/Do: Applied Arts Workshops for migrants and refugees Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,500.00 |
|
CCS16_1_039 |
Make/Do Safari Mums 2016 Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - Central Assessment Committee Round 1 2016 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_1_036 |
Make Moments Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $9,465.00 |
|
QR1615-107 |
Make Moments in Puketapapa Puketāpapa Quick Response, Round One, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $300.00 |
|
QR1614-106 |
Make Moments in Papakura 2015/2016 Papakura Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1613-102 |
Make Moments in Otara 2015/2016 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1609-103 |
Make Moments - Mangere Arts Centre 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1607-102 |
Make Moments in Howick/Pakuranga 2015/2016 Howick Quick Response, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1603-109 |
Make Moments in Franklin 2015/2016 Franklin Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $585.00 |
|
QR1601-103 |
Make/Do Sandringham 2015/2016 Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1609-102 |
Mind the Gap- Intergenerational Arts Project 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG1613-106 |
Mind the Gap - Intergenerational Arts Project 2015/2016 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,035.29 |
|
QR1610-103 |
Like A Girl Summer Project in Manurewa 2015/2016 Manurewa Quick Response, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR1610-102 |
Make Moments in Manurewa 2015/2016 Manurewa Quick Response, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR1601-147 |
Girls to the Front Re-Boot Sandringham 2016 2015/2016 Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1610-101 |
DO NOT SUBMIT Girls to the Front October Holiday Workshops 2015 2015/2016 Manurewa Quick Response, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR1610-113 |
DO NOT SUBMIT Girls to the Front 4.0 Manurewa 2015/2016 Manurewa Quick Response, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
A-E1415_100066 |
Make, Do LB - Albert-Eden Local Board Community Grant 2014/2015 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
A-E1415_100065 |
Good Hood: Family Art Day at Sandringham Community Centre LB - Albert-Eden Local Board Community Grant 2014/2015 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CDC15-1072 |
Girls to the Front Central - Community Group Assistance Fund - Round 2 2014/2015 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,137.62 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-207 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Stepping up to greatness |
||||
|
Location: |
West City Gym, 333 Great North Road, Henderson |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funding to support youth to participate in sparring and competative events for West City Boxing. We currently have 23 youth registered with Boxing New Zealand (2 of which are female) and we hold inter-club events at our gym, as well as visit other gyms. This is fostering a group of youth who are committed and dedicated to their sport, as well as their peers. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have been working diligently to develop and grow our work over the past five years. We have a high demand for our services with over 100 youth on the waiting list wanting to to participate in our services. |
|||
|
Dates: |
05/05/2025 - 31/12/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
100 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
80% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We acknowledge the local boards contribution on our website. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
We provide a positive and caring environment for young people to
grow, develop and succeed in all areas of their lives. We encourage
leadership, mentoring and team building within our youth. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Develop projects that meet community aspirations across local board boundaries with Waitākere Ranges and Whau Local Boards Our organisationis a long-standing community organisation that focus
on connectedness, diversity and inclusion. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Mayhem Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Peach Boxing |
Inter-club activities, mentoring and skill training |
|
North Shore Youth Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Shane Cameron Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Coast Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Pacific Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Universal Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Bens Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
Auckland Boxing Association |
Opportunities to compete |
|
Pacific Boxing |
Inter-club activities |
|
|
|
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering We have over 30% of our youth identifying as Maori descent. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
No - |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes As a youth organisation that promotes sport, recreation and physical
activity we encourage, support and mentor healthy decisions with our young
people. We provide water fountains and encourage youth with "water
as the first choice". |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Our organisation works primarily with youth from nine to eighteen years of age. We currently have over 200 youth participating in programmes each week. 25% are female. Over 85% identify as Maori or Pacific descent.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Transporting youth to and from inter-club activities and boxing bouts. Registration fees and specalist training camps. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will continue to fundraise for these activites to continue. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
no |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$19275.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$19275.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Motor vehicle expenses |
$11909.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Boxing Tournaments and event costs |
$7366.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
5 |
50 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-207 |
Stepping up to greatness 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-105 |
West City Boxing End of Year and Prizegiving Celebration 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2505-133 |
Keeping our young people active and participating 2024/2025 Henderson Massey Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR2405-209 |
Youth on the Move 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2405-241 |
Making space to participate 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2405-108 |
West Auckland Youth Development celebration and prizegiving event 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $500.00 |
|
LG2205-118 |
Building Identity and Belonging in Young People 2022/2023 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
0084 |
WEST AUCKLAND BOXING ACADEMY AND RECREATION CENTRE Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund 2022 - |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2205-125 |
Moving On Up 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR2105-119 |
West Auckland Boxing Academy 2020/2021 Henderson -Massey Quick Response Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2005-127 |
West Auckland Boxing Academy 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
LG1905-235 |
West Auckland Boxing Academy 2018/2019 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,400.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-210 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Registered Charity |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: 100 year celebrations |
||||
|
Location: |
Massey |
|||
|
Summary: |
Our Association is celebrating 100 years of serving Massey and wish to hold a number of events and carry out a number of projects to help us celebrate 100 years since the incorpoartion of our group including holding an open day when our hall users will show off their different activities to the public, writing a history of the Association, producing calendars, hosting a social/birthday, allowing users to have free a night/event, allowing a few community groups to use the hall |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Our organisation was formed in 1925 and has owned and operated the hall since 1956 (hall first mooted in 1948 and site use granted in 1954 |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 31/12/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
1000 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
90% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
on facebook , electronic sign and in The Westerly |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
1. Better understanding of the history of Massey |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations Our Association has been operating a community hall since 1956 that is used by pacfic island groups, youth, the elderly and enables the groups to call the hall their home. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Hall users |
demonstration activities |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - There ramps into the building for wheel chairs and have had wheel chairs in the hall |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* In uprades the hall has made over recent years, for example led lights has led to a reduction in the power bill,. Activities include the hall encourage people to get out into the community and participate whether martial art classes (2 in the hall), scrap book classes or cake decorating or St John Massey Youth, the hall is well used and has been an asset for Massey and West Auckland for many years and will continue to be |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Yes
the Waitakere Cake Decorators are mainly Women (some maybe Maori), and possibly
in older age group.
Massey St John Youth are from around 10 to 20 and could include Maori
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Rodney |
2 |
$0.00 |
|
Waitakere Ranges |
3 |
$0.00 |
|
Upper Harbour |
5 |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
we are planning in providing the groups that currently use the hall with a free day, we are going to hold a demonstration weekend when people can try their hand at say cake decorating, hold a social to which local board members, trustees, key hall user organizers can meet, write a history of the organisation and distribution of calendars |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: cut some of the free calanders |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
free |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2316.00 |
$0.00 |
$2000.00 |
$440.30 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
calanders |
$1276.00 |
$1276.00 |
|
social |
$500.00 |
$500.00 |
|
1.free use hall for users 2. social (cost unknown estimate $500 3. calanders |
$540.00 |
$540.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
everything is free |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Henderson Massey Local Board |
$2000.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
40 |
200 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-210 |
100 year celebrations 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
HM14_2002 |
rates assistance LB - Henderson-Massey Local Board Community Grant - Round 2 2013/2014 - Awaiting payment |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-211 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: NZAquaBots-under water robots protecting marine reserves |
||||
|
Location: |
Henderson-Massey |
|||
|
Summary: |
MOI is seeing funding to support NZAquaBots programme in the
Henderson/Massey area by providing funds for a 2 for 1 offer to teams. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Ministry of Inspiration has been delivering the NZAquaBots programme
since 2012. It began in Nelson-Tasman and is additionally on offer in
Christchurch, Wellington, Blenheim, Masterton, Auckland, Rotorua, and
Whakatane. In 2024 over 800 youth participated in the |
|||
|
Dates: |
05/05/2025 - 01/09/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
80 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
This will be done on social media as well as each 2 for 1 offer will be acknowledged at the school itself. We will record which schools receive the 2 for 1 offer and ask them to also acknowledge the funding. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
NZAquaBots programme responds to the needs of the community by
bringing STEAMS initiatives to youth. NZAquaBots goes beyond the local pool,
it promotes the relevance of science and technology in the lives of hard-to
reach youth and it broadens the community’s ability to engage in
science and technology. The programme activities engages families and the
wider community. The judges for the competition and mentors for the building
come from the local science industry such as: |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · The community leads the way in kaitiakitanga Kaitiakitanga represents the guardianship and management of the land,
whenua. New Zealand's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) stretches from 12 to 200
nautical miles offshore and ranks among the largest in the world. Rich in
natural biodiversity, the EEZ also holds significant potential for future
economic opportunities, including seabed minerals and energy generation.
Ensuring a balance between harnessing these resources and managing
environmental impacts sustainably is in the best interest of all New Zealanders.
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Tapuawae Roa |
judges, te reo Māori support |
|
Foundation North |
programme delivery |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering We are collaborating with Tapuwae Roa to enhance te reo Māori in our programme delivery and to engage in Kura Kaupapa in the different regions. MOI is developing a glossary of words with English/Māori translation to encourage use. This is being developed with local kura involvement. Tapuwae Roa also provides judges for the competitions. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - It is dependent on the level of disability. As somethings can not be accessed by some people. MOI would strive to involve all in the process. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice The regional/national competitions are held at a local pool which is
often very hot and |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
It targets all youth aged 8-18.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2087.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
10 NZAB robots for a 2 for 1 offer to NEW participating schools |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will not be able to offer a 2 for 1 offer to new participants. As we deliver the programme, the master classes, and the competition for free, the only cost the school incurs is the cost of the bots. The board donating 8 bots would be a significant boast to the growth of the programme in this area. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
Participants must buy the NZAB bot kit but everything else is free. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2087.00 |
$0.00 |
$5000.00 |
$3000.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
NZAquaBot kits |
$2087.00 |
$2087.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
|
$ |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Foundation North |
$5000.00 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
10 |
50 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
NZAB is the largest robotic programme in Aotearoa When you build the bots with youth you see amazing growth in confidence, leadership, and problem solving skills. Robot building and competing is very challenging-anything can go wrong and it does,therefore, resilience is required. MOI works tirelessly to provide FREE opportunities for youth-that is why we do not charge for the competition and seek funding to help schools participate. If successful we'd love to have members of the local board stop by a build session or be a judge at the competition and see what it is all about. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-212 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Henderson-Massey Loss and Grief Counselling |
||||
|
Location: |
214 Universal Drive, Henderson and 9 Devon Street, Te Atatū South |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking $1,750 to fund 25 subsidised counselling sessions for individuals in the Henderson-Massey local board area who need professional support through loss and grief. The losses we support go beyond bereavement and include redundancy, relationship breakdowns, pet loss, migration, loss of faculty, and more. There is a growing need in our community for accessible loss and grief support, and many people struggle to afford counselling during these challenging times. This funding upholds our kaupapa of ensuring that support is available to everyone, regardless of their financial situation, by covering the cost of a contracted counsellor at our Centre. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
With 15 years of experience, we have a proven track record of delivering meaningful outcomes and fulfilling the benefits outlined in our counselling grant applications. Given that much of our counselling support relies on grant funding, our administration and counselling teams are highly skilled in aligning the right funding sources with the right clients. This ensures that every dollar is maximised to achieve the best possible outcomes while meeting the priorities of each grant provider. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 31/10/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
8 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will acknowledge the boards contribution through social media, on our website, in our monthly newsletters, and to our Henderson-Massey clients and counsellors. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
The benefits of our project include: |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations Our project supports Henderson-Massey's priority by removing barriers
to mental wellbeing support, ensuring that individuals can process grief in a
way that allows them to regain confidence, rebuild their lives, and actively
contribute to their communities. Loss impacts everyone, but not all
individuals have the tools, resources, or financial means to navigate it.
Without support, unresolved grief can hold people back from achieving their
aspirations and participating fully in society. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Waitakere Hospital |
Referrals |
|
Local mental health organisation |
Referrals |
|
Local schools e.g. Massey High School |
Referrals |
|
Local funeral homes |
Referrals |
|
Local GP's |
Referrals |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We offer online counselling for those unable to travel. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes Our spaces are smoke-free and counsellors encourage their clients to lead a healthy lifestyle to aid them in their loss and grief journey. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Our
project supports people of all genders, ages, and ethnicities, ensuring that
everyone has access to the help they need through loss and grief. We have a
culturally diverse counselling team, allowing us to provide tailored support
that respects each client’s background and needs. Our clients reflect
this diversity, with over 14% identifying as Māori, 7% as Pasifika, and 9%
as Asian.
We take a personalised approach, matching individuals with the right counsellor
and resources to ensure they receive the best possible support. While 73% of
our clients identify as female and 26% as male, our services are open to all.
In the last six months, we have provided counselling to people aged between 5
and 91, with most clients falling within the 24 to 62 age range. Regardless of
gender, age, or ethnicity, we are committed to making professional loss and
grief support accessible to all who need it.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Henderson-Massey |
100 |
$1750.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1750.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Counsellor costs |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would reduce the number of subsidised counselling sessions offered. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
Sliding scale between $0 - $70 |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$3500.00 |
$1750.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Counsellor Costs |
$1750.00 |
$1750.00 |
|
Overheads, supervision, consumables etc |
$1750.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Client contributions, other grants (for operational expenses) and donations |
$1750.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-212 |
Henderson-Massey Loss and Grief Counselling 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2508-209 |
Kaipatiki Loss and Grief Counselling 2024/2025 Kaipātiki Local Grant, Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2513-112 |
Subsidised Counselling for Loss and Grief in Ōtara-Papatoetoe 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2508-105 |
Loss and Grief Counselling 2024/2025 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2324-235 |
Loss and Grief Counselling 2023/2024 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
NHM24_009 |
Developing a Loss and Grief Community Hub Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 23/24 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2408-103 |
Local Community Counselling Support for all Forms of Loss 2023/2024 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $900.00 |
|
LG2413-111 |
Loss and Grief Counselling Support to Promote Health and Wellbeing 2023/2024 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $500.00 |
|
LG2205-163 |
Loss and Grief Counselling to Support Diversity and Difference 2022/2023 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
REGCD22_031 |
Improving Resilience and Wellbeing in our Community Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2022/2023 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2308-215 |
Free and subsidised loss and grief counselling support 2022/2023 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2301-111 |
Loss and Grief Counselling to Build Resilience 2022/2023 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
LG2313-115 |
Loss and Grief Counselling Support to Promote Health and Wellbeing 2022/2023 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
LG2208-202 |
Local Community Counselling Support for all Forms of Loss. 2021/2022 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2205-119 |
Grief and Loss Counselling to Embrace Diversity and Difference 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2108-203 |
Local community counselling support for all forms of loss. 2020/2021 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,400.00 |
|
QR1608-405 |
Projector for Education Programme and Seminars Kaipatiki Quick Response, Round Four, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $500.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-214 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Veterinary costs support |
||||
|
Location: |
N/A |
|||
|
Summary: |
To support the Veterinary costs of our Mobility Dogs. While we can plan for scheduled visits e.g. desexing there are other occasions when a visit is required for ill health and/or injury, |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have been operating for over 20 years and have National and International accreditation. |
|||
|
Dates: |
03/06/2025 - 30/09/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
21 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
85% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Performance Report and newsletter to stakeholders. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
We are able to support those Veterinary clinics who understand our business and the appropriate care and advice for our staff and clients. Our clients are aware of which clinics to attend and are introduced when they are matched with their Mobility Dog. We know that clients are respected and given full explanations related to the health of their Mobility Dog. Anyone in the community can apply to be matched with a Mobility Dog and our team are able to assist with that process. We also make sure that other community Disability Charities are constantly updated on our work. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Support communities of ethnicity and identity to develop community-led planning and initiatives that empower and celebrate diversity Diversity is a part of our culture and is to be celebrated. By empowering our clients, we can ensure they are able to celebrate their diversity and ethnicity and develop their personal growth plans. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Veterinary clinics |
Provision of care |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Our Mission is to support those with disabilities. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* Exercise is important for clients and Mobility dogs and messaging is provided constantly. We also talk to clients about the benefits of smoke free environs. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
We support all genders and ethnicities.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Veterinary Costs |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would continue to seek Trust/Foundation grants and increase our 'donation' offerings to individual donors. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
N/A |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$29451.00 |
$0.00 |
$2000.00 |
$20000.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Veterinary Expenses |
$29451.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Mangere-Otahuhu LB |
$2000.00 |
Pending |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
21 |
100000 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-214 |
Veterinary costs support 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2509-211 |
Support for Veterinary Costs 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - GA Assessment Completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2510-320 |
Support for provision of dog food 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Three - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
NHM25_031 |
Supporting members of the community to fulfil their potential with confidence Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2024/2025 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2507-140 |
Food for Mobility Dogs 2024/2025 Howick Quick Response Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2505-128 |
Veterinary Costs 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $500.00 |
|
QR2520-107 |
Senior Trainer salary 2024/2025 Waitematā Quick Response Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2514-103 |
Support for Veterinary costs 2024/2025 Papakura Small Grants Round One (Small) - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR2501-145 |
Purchase of a puppy to enter our training programme 2024/2025 Albert-Eden Quick Response Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR2513-106 |
Support for purchase of Dog Food 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2509-115 |
Purchase of Dog Food for our dogs in training. 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2510-129 |
Dog medical operational costs 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $500.00 |
|
QR2420-207 |
Salary support 2023/2024 Waitematā Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR2409-221 |
Mobility Dog purchase 2023/2024 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2401-201 |
Salary support 2023/2024 Albert-Eden Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2414-209 |
Veterinary costs 2023/2024 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2418-216 |
Mobility Dog placement 2023/2024 Waiheke Local Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2407-250 |
Veterinary costs for Mobility Dogs 2023/2024 Howick Local Grants, Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
NHM24_004 |
Canine staff salaries Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 23/24 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2414-116 |
Veterinary costs 2023/2024 Papakura Small Grants Round One (Small) - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2420-121 |
Client Applicant coordinator 2023/2024 Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2402-126 |
Supporting operational costs 2023/2024 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2412-113 |
Supporting provision of Mobility Dogs for individuals 2023/2024 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2409-103 |
Support for a puppy purchase to enter our training programme. 2023/2024 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2401-105 |
Operational salary support 2023/2024 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,100.00 |
|
LG2413-106 |
Support for Mobility Dog food 2023/2024 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2410-112 |
Veterinary costs 2023/2024 Manurewa Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $800.00 |
|
QR2205-249 |
Vet costs for Mobility Dogs 2022/2023 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2309-263 |
Puppy purchase and training support 2022/2023 Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2302-221 |
Mobility Dog food 2022/2023 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2301-254 |
Client placement coordinator salary 2022/2023 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2307-229 |
Veterinary costs for Mobility Dogs 2022/2023 Howick Local Grants, Round Two - Review accountability |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2312-209 |
Mobility Dogs Veterinary costs 2022/2023 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2320-212 |
Purchase of a puppy to enter our programme 2022/2023 Waitematā Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
REGCD22_045 |
Canine trainer salary Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2022/2023 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2320-130 |
Mobility Dog for community members 2022/2023 Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
LG2312-220 |
Support for salary costs 2022/2023 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
LG2210-443 |
Veterinary costs for Mobility Dogs 2021/2022 Manurewa Local Grants, Round Four - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2207-225 |
Support for Veterinary costs 2021/2022 Howick Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2209-315 |
Supporting veterinary costs for Mobility Dogs 2021/2022 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Quick Response Grant, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2205-318 |
Veterinary costs for Mobility Dogs 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $568.53 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-215 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Revive Rathgar |
||||
|
Location: |
Rathar Road area, Lincoln North |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funding to contribute to the costs of holding 3 community hui in 3 different locations in the Rathgar road area. These are likely to be: Seed 2 Harvest, one of the Secondary Schools and a kindergarten. This will attract different members of the community These hui aim to build on the Revive Rathgar hui held last year whioch saw 54 community members attend and share their aspiations for changes/improvements in this area. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Community Waitakere plays a unique role in providing community and neigbourhood development with this being a cornerstone of our work, supporting communities to lead activities/projects that improve place and a sense of belonging is an approach we have many years of experience in. We have supported/delivered numerous initiatives/events/programmmes in communities. Some examples of these are ;Ethnic Women's Swim programme, Ethkick Football tournament, Pomaria community hub, marae and kura support. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 30/11/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
150 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We would acknowledge the local board support on our written material and verbally at each community hui. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
The benefits to the community in the short term are; |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations This project is centred around elevating community voice and advocating to decision makers to see improvements/changes in their local environments. From the first community hui, the community identified 3 key themes that they wish to pursue; these are, Alleyway improvements (including lignting and safety), a pedestrian crossing on Larnach road and a community hub. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Seed 2 Harvest |
Community partner |
|
Walking Access Commission |
Member of steering group |
|
Residents from the Rathar Road area |
Community partners |
|
Te Ohu Whanhaungatanga |
Member of steering group |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering The make up of the community in this area incliudes on average 20% Maori, we can assume (as happened in the first hui) Maori will be well represented and have their aspirations for the are heard ion the 3 community hui we host. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We will ensure the venues provide adequate access. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes We will ensure our community hui are smokefreee and provide healthy kai/drinks for the participants. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
No, this is for the wider residents/community in the Rathgar Road area.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Venure hire |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We are committed to this project as momentum has already begun and there is real appetite from the local community to continue with this. We are not funded to do this work specifically so if Local board funding was not available, we would have to look to cut costs and deliver less. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2000.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Venue hire |
$1200.00 |
$1200.00 |
|
Kai and refreshments |
$450.00 |
$450.00 |
|
Admin and marketing costs |
$350.00 |
$350.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
3 |
30 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-218 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Informal group/ no legal structure |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Connecting Women in the Henderson-Massey Area: Eco-Friendly Gardening Workshop. |
||||
|
Location: |
Massey Community Hub |
|||
|
Summary: |
I am seeking funding to host an Eco-Friendly Gardening Workshop for New Mums, a community-led initiative that promotes sustainability and well-being. This event will provide new mothers, particularly Māori and Pasifika mums, with the opportunity to learn about indoor gardening, sustainable practices, and cultural connections to nature. Participants will create their own small herb or vegetable gardens using eco-friendly materials, while also learning from expert speakers on the benefits of growing their own food. This project aligns with the local board’s priorities by fostering community connectedness, empowering diverse communities, and promoting a low-carbon lifestyle. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
I have experience delivering community gardening projects and
sustainability initiatives through my work at Auckland Council. As a
Programme Coordinator, I have been involved in project management,
stakeholder engagement, and organising community-focused initiatives. My
background in urban planning, environmental monitoring, and sustainability
has allowed me to contribute to various projects that promote green spaces
and environmental awareness. |
|||
|
Dates: |
02/06/2025 - 02/06/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
I'm expecting to engage 30-40 mothers and women with young children under one year old in the Henderson-Massey area. The event will provide a supportive space for these participants, fostering community connections, environmental awareness, and sustainable practices. |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
95% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Event Signage: Displaying the Henderson-Massey Local Board’s
logo at the event. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Empowerment of New Mothers: The event offers new mothers,
particularly those with babies under one year old, an opportunity to learn
sustainable gardening practices. It helps build confidence, creates a sense
of community, and provides a supportive space for mothers to connect. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Support communities of ethnicity and identity to develop community-led planning and initiatives that empower and celebrate diversity My Eco-Friendly Gardening Workshop for New Mums directly supports the
priority of supporting communities of ethnicity and identity to develop
community-led planning and initiatives that empower and celebrate diversity
by creating a space that welcomes and engages mothers from diverse
backgrounds, particularly Māori and Pasifika communities. The workshop
will feature cultural insights into traditional gardening practices,
fostering a deeper connection to sustainable living within these communities.
|
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering my project will target Māori outcomes by ensuring active
Māori participation. To achieve this, the event will include culturally
relevant elements, such as incorporating Māori greetings and sharing
traditional Māori knowledge related to planting and sustainability. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - This project will be made accessible to people with disabilities by ensuring the venue and activities are inclusive. The venue will be wheelchair accessible, with seating and facilities that accommodate individuals with mobility impairments. For the outdoor gardening activity, we will ensure there are accessible stations or alternative activities for participants with mobility challenges, such as providing raised garden beds or opportunities to assist in other ways, like organizing or handling materials. We will also ensure that the promotional materials for the event are available in accessible formats, such as large print or online, to support individuals with visual impairments. Additionally, we will communicate clearly about any accommodations needed and make adjustments to ensure all participants can engage meaningfully in the project. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice Healthy Food & Drink Options: We will provide healthy,
sustainable food choices, prioritizing water as the first drink option. This
will encourage mums to make healthier beverage choices while avoiding sugary
or unhealthy drinks. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Yes, this project specifically targets women, particularly mothers who have recently given birth and have children under one year old. It aims to support Māori and Pasifika women in the Henderson-Massey community, providing a culturally inclusive space for them to connect, learn, and engage in environmentally sustainable activities. The project is designed to be accessible to all women, with a focus on supporting the local Māori and Pasifika communities through culturally relevant content and engagement.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Workshop Materials and Supplies. Guest Speaker and Trainer Fees. Venue and Setup Costs. Promotion and Advertising. Healthy Food and Drink |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: Facilitator and Educational Content: I would ensure the workshop
facilitator's fee is covered first, as their expertise is critical to the
success of the project. This will allow the participants to gain valuable
knowledge about sustainability and tree planting. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
There will be no cost of participation for this project. The workshop is fully funded by the grant, ensuring that all mothers in the community can participate free of charge. Our goal is to make this event accessible to all, especially new mothers, without any financial barrier. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1000.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1040.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Workshop Materials and Supplies. Guest Speaker and Trainer Fees. Venue and Setup Costs. Promotion and Advertising. Healthy Food and Drink |
$1000.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
There will be no income involve |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
There is no donation at the moment. I may ask for donation in advertisement or when discuss the programme with local providers |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
1 |
40 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-219 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
School |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: "Growing Together: A Garden to Table Journey" |
||||
|
Location: |
Edmonton Primary School |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funding to enhance and expand our Garden to Table project at our West Auckland school. This initiative provides students with hands-on learning experiences in gardening, sustainability, and healthy eating. Funding will allow us to improve our garden infrastructure, purchase essential tools and plants, and develop a functional kitchen space for preparing and sharing the food grown. With this support, we aim to foster lifelong skills, environmental awareness, and community engagement among our students. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have a specific group of teachers , teacher aides and parents who have run this programme for two years |
|||
|
Dates: |
05/05/2025 - 19/06/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
300 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
we will publish it on our face book page and in our newsletter |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Our Garden to Table project will bring our diverse community together by creating a shared space for learning, collaboration, and sustainability. Through hands-on gardening and cooking experiences, participants will develop essential life skills, promote healthy eating, and celebrate the rich cultural traditions of food. This initiative will foster connections between generations, encourage environmental responsibility, and empower our community with knowledge and confidence in growing and preparing fresh, nutritious meals. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Support communities of ethnicity and identity to develop community-led planning and initiatives that empower and celebrate diversity We bring our community together. Our Garden to Table project will bring our diverse community together by creating a shared space for learning, collaboration, and sustainability. Through hands-on gardening and cooking experiences, participants will develop essential life skills, promote healthy eating, and celebrate the rich cultural traditions of food. This initiative will foster connections between generations, encourage environmental responsibility, and empower our community with knowledge and confidence in growing and preparing fresh, nutritious meals. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Enviro schools and their teacher aides |
time |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering 1. Whanaungatanga (Relationships & Community) |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - The gardens are spaced apart and on the flat so wheel chairs and move freely around them |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes Our "Growing Together: A Garden to Table Journey" project will promote a healthy environment by encouraging sustainable gardening practices such as composting, organic farming, and water conservation. By growing our own food without harmful chemicals, we will reduce our carbon footprint and support local biodiversity. The project will also educate our community on waste reduction, recycling, and the importance of eco-friendly habits. Through hands-on experiences, participants will develop a deeper connection to nature and learn how small actions can contribute to a healthier planet for future generations. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
All genders, ages and ethnic groups reflecting our community - which are , Maori, Pasifika, Chinese, Indian
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Henderson-Massey |
100 |
$749.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
soil, plants , watering containers, seedlings, compost |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: we would spend the school money |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1098.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$600.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
2x water container |
$498.00 |
$249.00 |
|
40x soil for containers |
$600.00 |
$500.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
5 |
30 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-220 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Incorporated Society |
Activity focus: |
Sport and recreation |
|
|
Project: Upgrade meterbox and switch board |
||||
|
Location: |
572c Te Atatu Rd, Te Atatu Peninsula, Auckland, 0610, New Zealand |
|||
|
Summary: |
Te Atatu Tennis Club seeks funds for upgrading the electrical meterbox/switchboard. The current board is very old and at capacity, and we have been advised by our preferred electrical suppliers to upgrade and meet current regulations. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
There has been little in the way of improving infrastructure at the club for several years, hence there is a real need now to get certain things upgraded. We will rely heavily on the knowledge of our electrical company partners to deliver the end result. They are the ones that will project manage bringing the electrical board up to standard, which is their expertise. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 30/05/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
300 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will put a facebook post out to our subscribers of the generous donation, and also post on the facebook group called 'Te Atatu Peninsula' with our gratitude, which has over 26,000 members. We would consider adding Henderson-Massey Board as a sponsor on our Tennis Club homepage |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Community benefits include: |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Our town centres are thriving, safe and inviting By helping Te Atatu Tennis Club improve its withering infrastructure, the Henderson-Massey Board supports a local club to 'keep the lights on' literally. Based in the heart of Te Atatu Peninsula village, the Club a) creates a safe, friendly, healthy atmosphere within the village b) keeps young minds active playing tennis rather than loitering in the village which would create an unsafe feeling environment and c) lifts peoples spirits through exercise which improves the mental attitude of the community that use it |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
No - |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes The project allows for the continuation of the health benefits of fitness in the community. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
The beauty of this project is that it benefits the current and future users of the tennis club and clubrooms ranging in age from 4-70+ and all ethnicities - of which many pasifika and maori are represented as members and visitors.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
The $2000 part funds about 58% of the non gst costs of getting the new electrical board |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: Unable to amend the project plan, however we could opt for the lower cost quote from CanDo Electical of $2,679.14 + gst |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
$0 |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$3409.26 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1409.26 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Upgrade meterbox and switch board |
$3409.26 |
$2000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-234 |
Remove and replace corner steel post 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-220 |
Upgrade meterbox and switch board 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2405-235 |
Refurbishment of tennis court floodlights 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2205-105 |
Historic Documents and Trophies Display Cabinet 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $600.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-221 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: West Auckland weekly drama, hip hop and film making classes |
||||
|
Location: |
St Michael's Anglican Church and Corban Estate Arts Centre |
|||
|
Summary: |
Seeking for funding to go towards weekly venue hire in Henderson. Our participants come to St Michael Anglican Church to learn drama and hip hop every Friday. We also hold film making classes at Corban Estate Arts Centre every Friday. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Our classes have run since 2007. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 11/07/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
75 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Through facebook posts, announcements to groups, and if we advertise using posters; the Auckland Council logo will be placed on it. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
People in the disabled community have something to come to weekly which creates routine and structure in their lives. They meet new people and make new friends, learn new skills, learn what else is happening at the venues we hire such as other art activities and community events that they could join, grow in confidence to join and be part of the community and teach people what meaningful lives people with disabilities can have and therefore, lower stigma. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life Each community has an identity and part of that identify is culture
and creativity. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Dance Klinik |
Dance tutor |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language) We incorporate Te Reo into our classes, learn about the culture, myths and legends and use that as a tool to drive ideas for our shows. Eg, last year, we incorporated Matariki and the stars and what they represented as a focus for our show. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We hire venues that are accessible to people with disabilities, the groups are all made of people with disabilities so the lessons are catered to their needs and abilities. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* The venue we hire are smoke free and our students are young so do not
smoke |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
No, it's for anyone and everyone. We do target 16 years and up (students transitioning from high school and working out what to do when they leave school)
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Venue hire |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will continue to look for philanthropic funding |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
Yes, $8-10 |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$16745.00 |
$5000.00 |
$7333.00 |
$800.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Venue Hire |
$3300.00 |
$2000.00 |
|
Admin |
$1200.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Tutors |
$5720.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Editing and equipment hire |
$675.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Assistant tutors |
$2700.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Class materials and expenses |
$550.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Storage |
$2600.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Student Fees |
$5000.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Creative Communities |
$7333.00 |
Pending |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
2 |
40 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-221 |
West Auckland weekly drama, hip hop and film making classes 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_215 |
Weekly Classes West 2025 Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - North West 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2510-367 |
Interacting Classes - Manurewa 2025 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Three - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS2425_1_279 |
Weekly Community Classes for people with disabilities (South and Howick T4- T1 2025) Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R1 - South East 25_1 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS2425_1_180 |
Classes for People with DIsabilities - West (October - April 2025) Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
REF25-100048 |
InterACT 2025! 2024/2025 Regional Event Fund - Round 1 - Application |
Approved $16,000.00 |
|
MB2324-2106 |
InterACT Festival 2024! 2023/2024 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2419-242 |
West Weekly Classes for People with Disabilities 2024 2023/2024 Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS24_1_142 |
Classes for People with Disabilities - West (October 2023 - April 2024) Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Paid |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
CCS24_1_232 |
Weekly Community Classes for Young People with a Disability - Central T4 2023 and T1 2024 Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Paid |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
CCS24_1_226 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disabilities (South - T4 2023 and T1 2024) Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Paid |
Approved $9,000.00 |
|
REF24-100021 |
InterACT 2024! 2023/2024 Regional Event Fund - Round 1 - Assessment |
Approved $16,000.00 |
|
CCS_23_2110 |
Acting2advocate Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - North West 23_2 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2223-274 |
InterACT Festival 2023! 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
CCS23_1143 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability - South T1 and 2 2023 Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $4,800.00 |
|
CCS23_1060 |
Acting2advocate- I watch, I act, I learn Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,100.00 |
|
REF23-100024 |
InterACT 2023! 2022/2023 Regional Event Fund - Round 1 - Application |
Approved $16,000.00 |
|
CCS22_2_156 |
Classes for People with Disabilities - West (July - December 2022) Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_2 - Project in Progress |
Approved $9,600.00 |
|
CCS22_1_249 |
Interacting Summer Holiday Programme - Film Making 2022 Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,400.00 |
|
CCS22_1_043 |
Acting2Advocate Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,300.00 |
|
MB2022-165 |
Interact Disability Arts Festival 2021! 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
LG2105-219 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability (West)2021 2020/2021 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round Two - Review accountability |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB2021-257 |
InterACT Festival 2021 Live (or online)! 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
CCS21_3_227 |
Weekly Community Classes for Young People with a Disability - North (Term 2, 3 and 4) 2021 Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $6,300.00 |
|
CCS21_3_234 |
Film classes in the Holidays Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,060.00 |
|
CCS21_3_194 |
Weekly Community Classes for Young People with a Disability - Central (Term 2, 3 and 4) 2021 Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Project in Progress |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
CCS21_3_134 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability - South (T2, 3 and 4) 2021 Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Project in Progress |
Approved $4,600.00 |
|
CCS21_3_121 |
Classes for People with Disabilities - West (T2, 3 and 4) 2021 Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $13,537.00 |
|
CCS21_3_053 |
Acting2advocate Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,840.00 |
|
CCS21_2_095 |
Weekly Community Classes for Young People with a Disability - Central (T4 and T1 2021) Creative Communities Scheme 21_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,740.00 |
|
CCS21_2_094 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability - South (T4 and T1 2021) Creative Communities Scheme 21_2 - South East 21_2 |
Approved $3,270.00 |
|
CCS21_2_088 |
Weekly Community Classes for People with Disabilities - West (T4 and 1 2021) Creative Communities Scheme 21_2 - North West 21_2 |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
CCS21_2_047 |
Acting2Advocate Creative Communities Scheme 21_2 - South East 21_2 |
Approved $3,200.00 |
|
QR2114-18 |
InterACT 2020 (online)! 2020/2021 Papakura Small Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2101-139 |
InterACT 2020 (online)!! 2020/2021 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS21_1_083 |
Acting2Advocate- I watch, I act, I learn Creative Communities Scheme 21_1 - North West 21_1 |
Approved $3,200.00 |
|
QR2005-223 |
Storage Hire for Interacting 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $800.00 |
|
MB1920-250 |
InterACT Festival 2020! 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2001-231 |
Interacting Plus - Weekly Community Classes in drama and Arts 2019/2020 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CCS20_2_134 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability - South (T2 and 3) Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - South East 20_2 |
Approved $5,950.00 |
|
CCS20_2_133 |
Weekly Community Classes for Young People with a Disability - Central (T2 and 3) Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - Central & Gulf Islands 20_2 |
Approved $4,980.00 |
|
CCS20_2_095 |
Weekly Community Classes for People with Disabilities - West (T2 and 3) Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - North West 20_2 |
Approved $8,575.00 |
|
CCS20_2_033 |
A2A action group Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - North West 20_2 |
Approved $3,620.00 |
|
REF20-200014 |
InterACT2020! Regional Event Fund 2019/2020 - Round 2 - Application |
Approved $0.00 |
|
QR2010-139 |
Weekly Community Classes for people with disabilities out South 2019/2020 Manurewa Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2019-120 |
Weekly Community Film Classes for people with disabilities 2019/2020 Waitākere Ranges Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $800.00 |
|
QR2005-129 |
Weekly community classes for people with disabilities out west 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2010-133 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability 2019/2020 Manurewa Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2001-136 |
Interacting 2019/2020 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2005-129 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LG2021-127 |
InterACT 2019 2019/2020 Whau Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2019-109 |
InterACT 2019 2019/2020 Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB1819-237 |
InterACT Festival 2019 2018/2019 Multi-board Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,280.00 |
|
CCS19_2_109 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,800.00 |
|
CCS19_2_018 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,200.00 |
|
CCS19_2_094 |
weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,600.00 |
|
REF19-2-00006 |
InterACT 2019! Regional Event Fund 2018/2019 - Round 2 - Application |
Approved $14,000.00 |
|
CCS19_1_146 |
weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,400.00 |
|
CCS19_1_148 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $6,300.00 |
|
CCS19_1_147 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 19_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,700.00 |
|
LG1805-219 |
InterACT 2018 2017/2018 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,654.00 |
|
CCS18_2_164 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
CCS18_2_165 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,200.00 |
|
CCS18_2_145 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,400.00 |
|
REF18S00005 |
InterACT 2018! Regional Event Fund 2017/2018 - Round 2 Strategic Priorities - Application |
Approved $14,000.00 |
|
CCS18_1_257 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,200.00 |
|
CCS18_1_254 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
CCS18_1_250 |
Weekly community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 18_1 - Central 18_1 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1719-206 |
InterACT Disability Arts festival 2016/2017 Waitākere Ranges Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $6,963.00 |
|
CCS17_2_115 |
Arts for all-holiday programmes for children, youth and adults with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - Central Committee 17_2 |
Approved $4,072.00 |
|
CCS17_2_140 |
community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - North Committee 17_2 |
Approved $2,350.00 |
|
CCS17_2_138 |
community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - Central Committee 17_2 |
Approved $2,350.00 |
|
CCS17_2_137 |
community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - South Committee 17_2 |
Approved $4,200.00 |
|
CCS17_2_135 |
community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - West Committee 17_2 |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
REF17S00022 |
Interact 2017! Regional Event Fund 2016/2017 - Round 2 Strategic Priorities - Application |
Approved $12,000.00 |
|
CCS17_1_224 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - North Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Approved $2,200.00 |
|
CCS17_1_220 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - Central Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Approved $2,200.00 |
|
CCS17_1_132 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - South Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Approved $4,032.50 |
|
CCS17_1_079 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2017_1 - West Assessment Committee Round 1 2017 |
Approved $5,868.00 |
|
LG1621-202 |
InterACT 2016! 2015/2016 Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $5,500.00 |
|
CCS16_2_014 |
Community performing arts classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2016_2 - Regional Assessment Committee Round 2 2016 |
Approved $12,600.00 |
|
LESF26 |
InterACT 2015 2015/16 Round 1 Local Events Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LESF34 |
InterACT 2015 Events Round Zero Apps - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
CCS15_2_149 |
Community classes for young people with a disability in drama, songwriting and film making Creative Communities Scheme 2015_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $6,566.00 |
|
00100 |
Creative Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2015_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $17,000.00 |
|
LESF00062 |
InterACT 2014 2014/2015 Round1 Local Events Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LESF00061 |
InterACT 2014! 2014/2015 Round1 Local Events Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
LESF00001 |
InterACT 2014! 2014/2015 Round1 Local Events Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
2014_200135 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2014 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $0.00 |
|
2014_200138 |
To run performance arts related weekly workshops for young people with a disability during term times. Creative Communities Scheme 2014 Round 2 - North Assessment Committee - Round 2 2014 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
2014_200132 |
community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2014 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $6,200.00 |
|
2014_200131 |
Community classes for young people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 2014 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $0.00 |
|
CCS14_100168 |
Creative community classes for people with a disability Creative Communities Scheme 14_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,300.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-222 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Incorporated Society |
Activity focus: |
Arts and culture |
|
|
Project: NZ Barok Baby Baroque Free Kids' Concerts |
||||
|
Location: |
Te Manawa, 11 Kohuhu Lane, Massey, Auckland |
|||
|
Summary: |
NZ Barok is seeking funding to pay the fees for two venue personnel and six guest artists for their free Baby Baroque concerts at Te Manawa Community Hub on Friday 11 July. Blending baroque music with dynamic storytelling in both English and Te Reo Māori, this is a fun, dynamic hour-long concert that brings tamariki and their whānau right in amongst the orchestra, introducing them to baroque music and its instruments. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Our Baby Baroque Free Kids’ Concerts utilise our string core
players. To provide orchestral colour we include professional guest artists
playing trumpet, bassoon, recorder and percussion. |
|||
|
Dates: |
10/07/2025 - 12/07/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
600 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
50% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
The event will be advertised on Facebook, Instagram, the NZ Barok website and through targeted mailouts. NZ Barok will acknowledge the local board's contribution on each of these platforms. On the days of the concert we will have signs and banners to acknowledge support. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Story-telling and music are both critical to early learning and a sense of belonging. The Baby Baroque concerts combine these elements in a highly engaging way, allowing whānau.members to interact with each other and with other whānau around them. We supply egg shakers and colourful scarves to everyone so they can have fun participating in the concerts together. We have assembled a collection of tiny violins and cellos so that tamariki can have a go with help from the musicians after the concert. For the other woodwind and brass instruments, musicians are available to answer any questions and to play to children up close which is extremely popular with whānau. Whānau with babies are also made welcome and can bring in their strollers and car seats and participate in any way they wish. Te Manawa Community Hub also has easy access for wheelchairs. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life Access and participation are the main drivers for NZ Barok, performing the Baby Baroque Kids' Concerts for free. The cost of concerts is a barrier to many families, so removing that barrier makes a significant difference to being able to participate. We select concert spaces that are community hubs with buildings/concert spaces not linked to any religion or faith. This enables a diverse range of cultures within Tamaki Makaurau to feel more at ease and connect with each other. The stories written by Catherine Polglase for each concert are accessible for young children, are well paced and are interspersed with carefully selected musical excerpts. This makes the experience accessible and engaging for all tamariki and whānau. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language) In 2019 Whina Te Whiu joined NZ Barok as Pou Tikanga Māori – Māori Cultural Adviser, to support the orchestra with making the Baby Baroque concerts a bi-cultural experience. Te Reo is seamlessly integrated throughout each performance, both spoken and sung. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Te Manawa is an accessible venue with good wheelchair access and facilities for people with disabilities. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Thiese are highly interactive concerts which include many
oppotunities for audience members to move, dance and sing. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
This project targets tamariki from 0 6 years old and their whānau from all ethnicities.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki |
50 |
$1340.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1340.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
We are requesting funding to cover the fees for two venue personnel and six guest artists for the performances at Te Manawa on Friday 11 July. Please note that there will be further performances on Saturday 12 July at Te Oro Music and Arts Centre in Glen Innes. Attached contracts are for work on both days and we are asking Henderson-Massey to cover the costs for performances at Te Manawa only. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We may reduce the number of guest artists participating or amend the amount of money each player receives. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
These concerts are free for all tamariki and whānau.to attend. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2680.00 |
$207.00 |
$5000.00 |
$2174.50 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Venue Assistants x 2 |
$400.00 |
$200.00 |
|
Guest Artist Fees x 6 |
$2280.00 |
$1140.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Merchandise sales at concerts: NZ Barok CDs, shakers, and scarves |
$200.00 |
|
Interest earned in bank account |
$7.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Auckland Council Creative Communities |
$3660.00 |
Pending |
|
Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board |
$1340.00 |
Pending |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Venue hire for Te Manawa and Te Oro |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Attached is a letter of support from an audience member who attends NZ Barok concerts regularly and attended a Baby Baroque concert at Te Manawa in 2024. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-222 |
NZ Barok Baby Baroque Free Kids' Concerts 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_170 |
NZ Barok Baby Baroque Concerts Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - Shared 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
RegAC_25_2_037 |
Melody, Harmony and Fire - Neapolitan Baroque Masterpieces Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 2 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
RegAC_25_Pr024 |
NZ BAROK CELEBRATING 20 YEARS 2004-2024 Concerts 18-19 October 2024 Regional Arts and Culture project grants 24/25 Rd 1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
QR2405-219 |
NZ Barok Baby Baroque Free Kids' Concerts 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2412-217 |
NZ Barok Celebrating 20 years 2004 - 2024 2023/2024 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2421-235 |
NZ Barok Baby Baroque Free Kids’ concerts - New Lynn 2023/2024 Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS24_2_058 |
NZ Barok: Baby Baroque Concerts & Midwinter Christmas Concert by Candlelight Creative Communities Scheme 2023/24 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
RegAC_24_045 |
Mid-Winter Christmas Concert by Candlelight (July) and NZ Barok 20th Anniversary Concerts (October) Regional Arts and Culture project grants 2024 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2307-227 |
Baby Baroque Kids' Concerts 2023 2022/2023 Howick Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,320.00 |
|
CCS_23_2215 |
Free Baby Baroque Kids' Concerts performed at Te Manawa and Te Tuhi during school holidays (Fri 7th- Sat 8th July) 2023 Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,270.00 |
|
RegAC22_2073 |
NZ Barok Baby Baroque Concerts (July) and Telemania Concerts (Oct) Regional Arts and Culture grants 2022/2023 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $7,954.00 |
|
RegPr_22_1076_ |
NZ Barok Hark, Sweet Music Regional Arts and Culture 2021/22 Project Grants Round 1 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
CCS21_3_176 |
Baby Baroque Free Family Concerts South Auckland Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
RegPr039 |
Viva Vivaldi and Baby Baroque concerts (postponed from 2020 Programme) Regional Arts and Culture grants 2020/2021 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
CCS21_1_130 |
Hark, Sweet Music Creative Communities Scheme 21_1 - Central & Gulf Islands 21_1 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS20_2_102 |
Viva Vivaldi Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - Cancelled Creative Communities Projects |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CCS20_2_148 |
Viva Vivaldi Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - Central & Gulf Islands 20_2 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS20_1_197 |
Subscriber Concert 2 'The Enchanted Forest' Takapuna performance Creative Communities Scheme 20_1 - North West 20_1 |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CCS20_1_275 |
Subscriber Concert 2 'The Enchanted Forest' 2 x Remuera performances Creative Communities Scheme 20_1 - Central & Gulf Islands 20_1 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegPr20_100054 |
2019/2020 Programme Regional Arts and Culture grants programme 20_1 Projects - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LG1912-222 |
Baby Baroque Free Kid’s Concert 2018/2019 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1910-236 |
Baby Baroque Free Kid’s Concert 2018/2019 Manurewa Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,200.00 |
|
LG1902-232 |
Baby Baroque Free Kid’s Concert 2018/2019 Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG1913-205 |
Baby Baroque Free Kid's Concert 2018/2019 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
RegPr19_1_00060 |
2019 First Subscription Concert x3 (May) and Baby Baroque Free Kids' Concerts x4 (July) Regional Arts and Culture Grant Programme 19_1 Projects - Project in Progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
QR1802-301 |
Baby Baroque Free Kids’ Concert! 2017/2018 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1812-213 |
Baby Baroque Free Kids’ Concerts! 2017/2018 Ōrākei Quick Response, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegAC18_1_00043 |
Regional Arts & Culture Grants Programme 18_1 Projects - Assessment 18_1 |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegAC18_1_00033 |
2018 Concert Series and Free Children's Concert Regional Arts & Culture Grants Programme 18_1 Projects - Project in Progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
17_1_021 |
2017 Concert Series & free concert Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 17_1 Project - Assessment 17_1 |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
RegAC16_1_025 |
2016 Subscription Series Regional Arts and Culture Grants Programme 16_1 - Assessment 16_1 |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
AA15_100016 |
NZ Barok 2015 Concert Series Arts Alive 2014/15 Round 1 - Acquitted Arts Alive 2014/15 Round 1 |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
AA14_100025 |
Celebration Concert Series 2014 Arts Alive - Acquitted Arts Alive 2013/14 Round 2 |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-223 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Registered Charity |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: PHAB Powering On |
||||
|
Location: |
247 Edmonton Road, Te Atatu and Salvation Army, 3A Trading Place, Henderson and Hub west, 27 Corban Ave, Henderson |
|||
|
Summary: |
PHAB club Operational costs and new games |
|||
|
Expertise: |
PHAB Association have over 20 years experience delivering outstanding
social and |
|||
|
Dates: |
26/05/2025 - 23/03/2026 |
|||
|
People reached: |
200 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
99% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Social media, newsletters. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Benefits include: |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations With additional funding, PHAB can continue weekly social
experiences offered to members.. This ensures that people with disabilities
can engage more regularly in social activities and can help meet the demand
for diverse and inclusive programs. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Everything we do has accessibility at the forefront. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* All our clubs and events/activities are smoke free |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Women
Gender diverse
Pasfika
Youth
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Transport, venue hire and games |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would have to cut back on activities and outings |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
It's difficult to quantify: We do charge $16 per session/event you attend. However to ensure we are accessible to everyone, we are very flexible on this. For example some Of those in residential care will pay $8 per session/event. Some we know just can’t afford it so we don’t charge them. Others try to make a donation occasionally, if we have siblings in a group we will only charge $8 per session per sibling |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$5918.05 |
$6000.00 |
$13000.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
games x3 of each game |
$446.05 |
$446.00 |
|
Transport |
$4500.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
venue Hire - Te atatu |
$972.00 |
$554.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
It's difficult to quantify: We do charge $16 per session/event you attend. However to ensure we are accessible to everyone, we are very flexible on this. For example some Of those in residential care will pay $8 per session/event. Some we know just can’t af ford it so we don’t charge them. Others try to make a donation occasionally, if we have siblings in a group we will only charge $8 per session per sibling |
$6000.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
The Wests |
$10000.00 |
Pending |
|
Sky City |
$3000.00 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
food |
$300.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
2 |
50 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2413-219 |
More PHAB Life 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2509-233 |
Working it Out 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2501-240 |
Moving On 2024/2025 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-223 |
PHAB Powering On 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2514-235 |
Empowering Youth, Strengthening Communities 2024/2025 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2510-339 |
"Presence-ability" 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Three - Follow up |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2507-205 |
Supporting Disabled Youth in Making a Difference 2024/2025 Howick Local Board Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2502-201 |
Everyone can Thrive 2024/2025 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round Two - SME assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2507-111 |
Voice of Disabled Youth in Community 2024/2025 Howick Quick Response Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR2514-110 |
Mixing it up with PHAB Clubs 2024/2025 Papakura Small Grants Round One (Small) - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2510-230 |
Socialising in our Community 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2505-121 |
PHAB In Henderson 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR2515-101 |
Supporting PHAB Clubs 2024/2025 Puketapapa Quick Response Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2506-161 |
Community Life 2024/2025 Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2501-112 |
Keeping Up the Great Work 2024/2025 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2510-156 |
Community Time Manurewa 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2501-142 |
PHAB Clubs Keeping On 2024/2025 Albert-Eden Quick Response Grant, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2502-105 |
Repair Lights 2024/2025 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
QR2414-208 |
Fun and Noise!. 2023/2024 Papakura Small Grants Round Two (Small) - Project in progress |
Approved $849.18 |
|
CCS24_2_003 |
Inclusive Matariki Art Exhibition Creative Communities Scheme 2023/24 round 2 - Awaiting Invoice |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
NHM24_023 |
Stronger Together - Inclusion for All Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 23/24 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2407-145 |
Social and Community Connection for all 2023/2024 Howick Quick Response, Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR2414-125 |
Social and Community Connection For All 2023/2024 Papakura Small Grants Round One (Small) - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS_23_2203 |
Through Our Eyes Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
MB2223-272 |
Community Recovery and Revitalization - South 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Review accountabliity |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
MB2223-271 |
Community Recovery and Revitalization - Central + West 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
MB2223-270 |
Community Recovery and Revitalization - North 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Review accountabliity |
Approved $6,500.00 |
|
LG2302-227 |
Community Recovery and Rejuvenation 2022/2023 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
QR2202-217 |
PHAB Mid Winter Matariki Celebration 2021/2022 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2022-256 |
Covid Recovery - Supporting Well Being and Resilience 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $5,500.00 |
|
MB2022-257 |
Covid Recovery - Supporting Resilience and Wellbeing 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
MB2022-244 |
Covid Recovery - supporting wellbeing and resilience 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $11,000.00 |
|
QR2202-117 |
PHABulous Fun Summer Celebration 2021/2022 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response Grant, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $489.00 |
|
MB2021-261 |
Enhancing Resilience and Wellbeing through Social Connection + Belonging 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Grant not uplifted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
MB2021-241 |
Enhancing Resilience and Wellbeing through Social Connection and Belonging 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
MB2021-260 |
Enchancing Resilience and Wellbeing through Social Connection + Belonging 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
LG2102-246 |
Enhancing Resilience and Wellbeing Through Social Connection + Belonging 2020/2021 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
CCS21_3_174 |
Enhancing Resilience and Wellbeing Through Arts and Creative Expression Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
QR2102-112 |
PHAB summer party for disabled youth 2020/2021 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2107-117 |
East Juniors PHAB Youth Group 2020/2021 Howick Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LG2113-102 |
PHAB Pasifika 2020/2021 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
MB1920-2116 |
PHAB Pasifike building wellness and connection 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB1920-2106 |
Building Social Connection and Wellness - Central 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
MB1920-297 |
Building Social Connection and Wellness - North 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
LG2002-232 |
Building Social Connection and Wellness 2019-2020 Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round Two - Follow up |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
CCS20_2_135 |
Fully accessible art workshops Creative Communities Scheme 20_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
QR2002-135 |
Skills Development for local Takapuna youth 2019/2020 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $998.75 |
|
MB1920-157 |
Youth With Disabilities Disco 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1902-302 |
PHAB Takapuna Youth centre upgrade 2018/2019 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB1819-265 |
Diversity For All - Central and West 2018/2019 Multi-board Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
MB1819-266 |
Diversity For All - South 2018/2019 Multi-board Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $10,400.00 |
|
MB1819-263 |
Diversity For All - North Shore 2018/2019 Multi-board Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $9,000.00 |
|
CCS19_2_138 |
Culture 101 Creative Communities Scheme 19_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
LG1901-168 |
Movement For All 2018/2019 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - SME assessment completed |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS19_1_217 |
Hear My Voice Creative Communities Scheme 19_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
MB1819-191 |
Movement For All 2018/2019 Multi-board Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $9,500.00 |
|
LG1902-136 |
InclusionForAll 2018/2019 Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,600.00 |
|
QR1813-321 |
PHAB Pasifika ArtSpace 2017/2018 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR1802-312 |
PHAB ArtSpace 2017/2018 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG1813-232 |
Pasifika Embrace 2017/2018 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LG1801-132 |
Skills For All 2017/2018 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1813-127 |
Skills For All 2017/2018 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
LG1805-124 |
Skills For All 2017/2018 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR1806-113 |
Skills For All 2017/2018 Hibiscus and Bays Quick Response, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1821-112 |
Access All 2017/2018 Whau Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1813-116 |
Phusion Inclusion 2017/2018 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG1702-233 |
PHAB Takapuna Social Clubs Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round Two 2016/2017 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,400.00 |
|
LG1715-215 |
PHAB Royal Oak Social Club Puketāpapa Local Grants, Round Two, 2016/17 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1702-420 |
Sustainability For All Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Four, 2016/17 - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR1706-322 |
Albany Social Club Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round Four, 2016/17 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1708-317 |
PHAB Social Clubs Kaipātiki Quick Response, Round Three, 2016/2017 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1701-240 |
PHAB Social Clubs 2016/2017 Albert-Eden Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1713-236 |
PHAB Social Clubs 2016/2017 Otara-Papatoetoe Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $600.00 |
|
QR1705-230 |
PHAB Henderson Social Clubs 2016/2017 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $400.00 |
|
QR1717-315 |
Albany Social Clubs Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round Three, 2016/17 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CCS17_2_186 |
Art For All Creative Communities Scheme 2017_2 - Regional Committee 17_2 |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
REGCD17-65 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Regional Community Development 2016/2017 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RENH16/1768 |
Sustainability For All Regional Environment and Natural Heritage Fund 2016 - 2017 - Project completed - report received |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
LG1708-112 |
PHAB Social and Recreational Clubs Kaipatiki Local Grants, Round One, 2016/2017 - Acquitted |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
QR1701-103 |
PHAB Social Clubs 2016/2017 Albert-Eden Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG1702-116 |
PHAB Employment Workshops Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round One 2016/2017 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LG1715-107 |
PHAB Development Workshops Puketāpapa Local Grants, Round One, 2016/17 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LG1611-229 |
PHAB Development Workshops Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
QR1613-421 |
PHAB Pasifika work-ready workshops 2015/2016 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response, Round Four - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1620-535 |
Engaging With Our City 2015/2016 Waitematā Quick Response, Round Four - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
AENC3 |
Youth with Disabilities Disco Albert Eden non-contestable, 2015/2016 - Review accountability |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
PKTNC3 |
Youth with Disabilities Disco Puketapapa non-contestable, 2015/2016 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR1602-407 |
PHAB Social Clubs Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Four, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG1610-211 |
PHAB Pasifika Social Clubs 2015/2016 Manurewa Local Grant, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LG1609-222 |
Pasifika Youth Social Clubs 2015/2016 Mangere-Otahuhu Local Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1610-317 |
Pasifika Youth Social Club 2015/2016 Manurewa Quick Response, Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR1606-324 |
Orewa Social Group Hibiscus and Bays Quick Response, Round Three, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $700.00 |
|
QR1617-301 |
PHAB Albany social group Upper Harbour Quick Response, Round Three, 2015/16 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1605-216 |
West Auckland Social Clubs Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $500.00 |
|
REGCD16157 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Regional Community Development - Acquitted |
Approved $25,000.00 |
|
LG1610-05 |
PHAB Pasifika 2015/2016 Manurewa Local Grants, Round One - Multiboard |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1611-142 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult groups Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
RegRSR1643 |
Active Choice Exercise (ACE) Regional Sport and Recreation Grant 2015/2016 Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1602-138 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult groups Devonport-Takapuna Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,600.00 |
|
LG1606-155 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult groups Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1609-151 |
PHAB Pasifika 2015/2016 Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1608-135 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult groups Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round One, 2015/16 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS16_1_189 |
PHAB Phusion Creative Communities Scheme 2016_1 - North/West Assessment Committee Round 1 2016 |
Approved $4,000.00 |
|
HM15_2049 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Henderson-Massey Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
HB15_2040 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
KP15_2026 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Kaipatiki Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
DT15_2027 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
OP15-2049 |
PHAB Pasifika Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board Community Group Funding 2014/2015 Round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
CDC15-1091 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Central - Community Group Assistance Fund - Round 2 2014/2015 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
WTA1_141500072 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Waitemata Local Board Discretionary Community Funding - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
PKT1_141500044 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Puketapapa Local Board Discretionary Community Funding - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
MT1_141500072 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board Discretionary Community Funding - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
OP15-1020 |
PHAB Pasifika Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
KP15_1030 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Kaipatiki Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 1 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
UP15_1016 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Upper Harbour Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 1 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,100.00 |
|
DT15_1022 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 1 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
SCF-15045 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups North - Strengthening Communities Fund, 2014/2015 Round 1 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
LESF00231 |
"We Are" 2014/2015 Round1 Local Events Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
UH14_2029 |
PHAB Youth and young adults groups LB - Upper Harbour Local Board Community Grant - Round 2 2013/2014 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
SCF14_100039 |
PHAB Youth and Young Adult Groups North - Strengthening Communities Fund - Round 1 2013/2014 - Accountability being reviewed |
Approved $25,000.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-225 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives |
||||
|
Location: |
Throughout the ward, in the boys' homes and in the community |
|||
|
Summary: |
Mentoring for Henderson-Massey boys who do not have a father in their lives. We will match boys (7-14) with good men willing to volunteer their time to help guide the boys into adulthood, leading by example and showing them what it means to be a good man. Currently we have 23 Henderson-Massey Ward boys matched or waiting. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have been matching boys since 1996 and we have matched almost 1200 boys without any safety concerns. Our gold-standard screening programme ensures each volunteer can provide what each individual boy needs. 865 of our matches have lasted more than a year; 523 more than 3 years and 350 for 5 years or more |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 30/04/2026 |
|||
|
People reached: |
69 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will add the board's logo to our funder webpage |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
The Big Buddy Mentoring Programme envisions a community in which
every boy experiences a nurturing one-to-one relationship with at least one
adult male, which in turn allows each of them to develop into their full
adult potential; capable of making informed, |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · The community leads the way in kaitiakitanga Boys with a Big Buddy in their lives are more confident, because they
feel more secure. They become more resilient and are willing to try new
things. Their caregivers regularly report improved behavior, better results
at school and say that their boys are just happier. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering About 25% of the boys who participate in our programme identify as Màori and about 10% of volunteer mentors are Màori. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We spend time with the boys and their caregivers so our Mentor Manager can understand what he needs in a Big Buddy mentor. The manager then carefully selects a potential mentor and supports the match through the early stages. If a boys has special needs or physical limitations, this is taken into account during the volunteer selection process. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes We encourage our big Buddies to take the boys out and spend time together walking the dog, fishing or mowing the lawn. Shared activities strengthen the bond. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Boys aged 7-14.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$5000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Cost of matching boys with mentors |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will continue to apply for grants and donations so the project can continue. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No. We do not charge any fees. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$67941.00 |
$0.00 |
$25000.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Office rent |
$34439.00 |
$500.00 |
|
Psych assessments for volunteers |
$12000.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Advertising for volunteers |
$20002.00 |
$3000.00 |
|
Mentor Manager supervision |
$1500.00 |
$500.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Lottery community |
$5000.00 |
Pending |
|
Foundation North |
$5000.00 |
Pending |
|
Lion Foundation |
$5000.00 |
Pending |
|
Constellation Trust |
$5000.00 |
Pending |
|
Milestone Foundation |
$5000.00 |
Pending |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
23 |
3588 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
LG2508-229 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Kaipātiki Local Grant, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2517-223 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Upper Harbour Local Grants Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2515-218 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2413-216 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-225 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2509-227 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Follow Up |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2512-222 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Ōrākei Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2519-232 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Waitakere Ranges Local Grants Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2501-234 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
ASF2501-111 |
2025 Albert-Eden Accommodation Support Fund - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2520-210 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Waitematā Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2510-319 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Three - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2514-218 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2507-234 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Howick Local Board Local Grant Round Two - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2502-214 |
Mentoring boys who dont have a father in their lives 2024/2025 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round Two - SME assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
MB2324-250 |
Recruiting volunteer mentors for boys without fathers in their lives 2023/2024 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $15,000.00 |
|
ASF2401-109 |
2024 Albert-Eden Accommodation Support Fund - Project in progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
ASF2301-117 |
20223 Albert-Eden Accommodation Support Fund - Acquitted |
Approved $7,000.00 |
|
MB2223-215 |
Recruiting volunteer mentors for boys without fathers in their lives 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $11,000.00 |
|
LG2307-228 |
Recruiting volunteer mentors for boys without fathers in their lives 2022/2023 Howick Local Grants, Round Two - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
REGCD22_033 |
Cultural competency project Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2022/2023 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2022-236 |
Recruiting volunteer mentors for boys without fathers in their lives 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
LG2201-210 |
Office rent 2021/2022 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB2022-113 |
Recruiting mentors for boys without a father in their lives 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $8,500.00 |
|
LG2110-409 |
Finding mentors for boys who do not have a father 2020/2021 Manurewa Local Grants, Round Four - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2102-227 |
Finding volunteer mentors for boys without a dad 2020/2021 Devonport-Takapuna Quick Response, Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR2117-303 |
Recruiting mentors for boys who do not have a father 2020/2021 Upper Harbour Quick Response Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2121-206 |
Laptop computer for Mentoring Manager 2020/2021 Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2111-306 |
Laptop computer for Mentor Manager 2020/2021 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grant Round Three - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2101-214 |
Office rent 2020/2021 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
RegCD00013 |
CRM replacement Regional Community Development grants programme 2020/2021 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2011-230 |
Computer and phone for mentor manager 2019/2020 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2021-213 |
Office rent 2019/2020 Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
REGCD2001 |
To match 10 Auckland boys with a Big Buddy mentor Regional Community Development 2019/2020 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
REGCD19-56 |
Stakeholder survey Regional Community Development 2018/2019 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1911-133 |
Mobile phone for volunteers coordinator 2018/2019 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG1721-203 |
Matching adult male volunteer mentors with fatherless boys 2016/2017 Whau Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG1616-101 |
purchase 2 iphones allowing staff to link to database when working in community. Rodney Local Grants Round One 2015/16 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
WH15_2001 |
Part salary Whau Local Board Community Group Funding - 2014/2015 Round 2 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
IRCF14/15 012 |
Interim Regional Fund 2014/15: Arts and Community - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CWF15_1010 |
Epson EH-TW550 Projector and Samsung Galaxy S5 Black Smartphone & Epson EH-TW550 Projector West - Community Wellbeing Fund, 2014/2015 Round 1 - Accountability extended |
Approved $900.00 |
|
CGF15_1016 |
Purchase Apple MacBook Pro Computer & Apple iPhone North - Community Grants Fund, 2014/2015 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CGAF1_141500015 |
Purchase of new Apple iPad 32GB and Apple iPhone 64GB for the Central Ak Co-ordinator.. Central Community Group Assistance Fund: Round 1 2014-2015 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
YPF14_2010 |
Part salary for the West Auckland Volunteer Coordinator West - Youth Programme Fund - Round 2 2013/2014 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
CGFN14_100009 |
Making Big Buddy/Little Buddy matches North - Community Grants Fund - 2013/2014 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CGAF14_100020 |
Part salary for Volunteer Co-ordinator, SteveSaboto, Central Auckland Central - Community Group Assistance Fund - Round 1 2013/2014 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CGAF14_100020 |
Part salary for Volunteer Co-ordinator, SteveSaboto, Central Auckland Central - Community Group Assistance Fund - Round 1 2013/2014 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CWF14_100002 |
Replacement of laptop for Volunteer Co-ordinator in West Auckland West - Community Wellbeing Fund - Round 1 2013/2014 - Accountability extended |
Approved $1,309.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-227 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Informal group/ no legal structure |
Activity focus: |
Sport and recreation |
|
|
Project: Supporting U13 Boys League Team Season and Training Camps |
||||
|
Location: |
Waitemata Seagulls League Club- Ranui Domain |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are the Under 13s Boys Waitemata Seagulls league team. We are the only Youth team representing Waitemata Seagulls in the 2025 competition grade for the 2025 season. We currently have 23 players of Pasifika and Maori descent and 4 coaching and managing staff who are part of our team. We are seeking funding to go towards supporting our team training camps, weekly league games and weekly prizegiving presentations. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
We have coached and managed many sports teams over the years
including touch teams, |
|||
|
Dates: |
03/05/2025 - 02/08/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
100 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will thank the local board on our social media through our team pages. We will also add the local board logo to any team gear we fundraise or get sponsorship for. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Our team are already being recognised as an important team within the Waitemata Seagulls League club this year as they are the oldest youth team at the club has this year. This means all the Under 6-12 teams are already looking up at our team as role models. It is no secret that Ranui is an impoverished community and the work we are doing with the kids is keeping them motivated, out of trouble and building healthy relationships both within the team and the community. Ranui Domain is a popular public space used by teams as well as the public for exercise and leisure. Our team spend allot of time down at the park. Our community benefits from all the positivity that comes when you see a group of 20 plus kids working hard, training together, having fun and building positive relationships. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Support communities of ethnicity and identity to develop community-led planning and initiatives that empower and celebrate diversity Our team have big goals we are seeking to achieve in the 2025 year.
Wellbeing and development through participation in sport, particularly rugby
league, is an aspiration our coaching and management team are seeking to
achieve within our group of boys this year. We have a large team of kids of
different ethnicities who each value and carry their culture and identity
with pride. Our kids are keen to keep learning and developing their fitness
and skills and want to grow within themselves, our team and the community. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Waitemata Seagulls Club |
They provide clubroom, sports field, uniform |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Our assistant coach and Manager are of Maori descent and bring values of tikanga, matauranga and reo to our team environment. Our assistant coach and manager have direct input into team planning for the season. At least a third of our team are of Maori descent and we encourange them and their whanau to get amongst our team and support them in any way they can. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
No - |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes We will promote a healthy environment by leading by example and being smoke free during team trainings and events. We will provide healthy food options at any Training days and continue to encourage active lifestyles through our fitness and training sessions we provide. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Our team are a group of 23 adolescent boys aged 13 or 12 years old. They are all of Maori or Pasifika ethnicity. Our team support all members of our team and their extended whanau.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Funding will go towards paying for food and drink contributions for our training camps as well as go towards team expenses on Saturday game days including team prizes awarded to 3 players every week after each game. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would seek assistance from families to assist with costs or undertake fundraising. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
no |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1000.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Food and prizegiving costs |
$1000.00 |
$1000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Use of club room for Training camp |
$200.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
4 |
200 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Attached are some photos from one of our training sessions. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-228 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Registered Charity |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Wrapping Up Waste: Pallet Netting to Reduce Single-Use Plastics |
||||
|
Location: |
Fair Food |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funding to replace single-use plastic pallet wrap with reusable pallet netting for food distribution. This will eliminate 4800 meters of plastic waste, helping reduce our environmental impact while sharing more than 70 tonnes of rescued food. The funding will cover the initial cost of the netting and support the transition to a more sustainable, waste-free solution for transporting kai to our recipient groups. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Fair Food has extensive experience in food rescue and community engagement, operating in West Auckland since 2011. The HMLB was part of Fair Food's founding. While we currently divert 99.7% of our “waste” from landfill, we are always looking for ways to reduce our carbon footprint with the diverse communities we support. By switching from single-use plastic wrap to pallet netting, we will maintain the same processes but will be reducing waste, helping to further align our daily operations with Auckland’s zero-waste aspirations. This adaptation will improve our environmental impact while continuing to provide essential food support to the community. We hope it will be a model that can be replicated by food businesses and community organisations. |
|||
|
Dates: |
19/05/2025 - 19/12/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
6123 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
90% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Fair Food will announce this sustainable solution at our Matariki event with all of our local charity partners. We will thank the Local Board directly and will acknowledge their contributions when we utilise these new materials. We will also feature it in our volunteer newsletter. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Switching to reusable pallet netting will have a wide range of
community benefits. It will significantly reduce the amount of plastic waste
going to landfill, directly supporting our shared goal of being zero-waste. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Support communities and businesses to work towards zero waste to landfill by 2040 and to increase their ability to live low-carbon lifestyles Everything we do at Fair Food is about building community resilience in a changing climate. We are a community-led initiative, turning leftover food into a lifeline for families in need while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Everyday we get at least 2 tonnes of fresh food back out into the community instead of going to landfill, while teaching sustainable food practices. Last year, we redistributed 723,380 kilos to 70 community groups across Tāmaki Makaurau. By introducing pallet netting, we aim to further reduce waste by replacing single-use plastic wrap with a reusable alternative, supporting Henderson-Massey's zero-waste vision. Our efforts will empower community organisations to adopt sustainable practices in a way that works at all income levels and lifestyles. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Food distributors and wholesalers in West Auckland |
Adopting similar practices based on our model |
|
West Auckland supermarkets and food manufacturers |
Providing 70 tonnes of kai for free |
|
Vision West, Hope Foodbank, Asylum Seekers, Ranui Baptist, other Henderson community groups |
Use the pallet netting and return it |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Māori communities are the largest recipients of food support from Fair Food, and Māori live in the areas most vulnerable to climate change. Some of the target organisations for this project are Māori-led, and Fair Food is guided by the Te Ao Māori perspective of our Board and staff. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Using a more sustainable pallet wrapping system will make it easier for people with limited mobility to assist with the packing and unpacking of food boxes. It will reduce injuries by having less manual handling of heavy boxes. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* At Fair Food, we always promote a healthy environmental approach with
climate-friendly kai. By replacing single-use pallet wrap with reusable
pallet netting, we are taking a direct step toward waste minimisation and to
becoming zero-waste organisation. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Fair Food works with ethnic social service agencies to provide culturally appropriate kai to a diverse group of new migrants and asylum seekers. These organisations will benefit from the pallet netting.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2640.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Fair Food is requesting coverage for the full cost of the reusable pallet wrapping system. The pallets, reusable banana boxes, tonnes of food, transport, and logistics will all be covered by Fair Food. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would order few pallet wraps and be more selective about which organisations may borrow them. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2640.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$110856.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
24 pallet nets at $110 each |
$2640.00 |
$2640.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
None. |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
75 tonnes of kai to recipient groups at avg of $1.50 per kilo |
$110541.00 |
|
216 banana boxes each week ($56 per 1000) |
$315.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
933 |
3300 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Attached is our 2024 impact snapshot. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-228 |
Wrapping Up Waste: Pallet Netting to Reduce Single-Use Plastics 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
MB2324-275 |
Culturally appropriate kai access 2023/2024 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Project in progress |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
ACG-R510 |
Homegrown help: share your backyard bounty 2023/2024 Auckland Climate Grant Response Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LFHW202441 |
Zero waste indigenous kai tahi Love Food Hate Waste Fund 2024 - Project in progress |
Approved $2,744.00 |
|
ACG-S2037 |
Homegrown help: share your backyard bounty 2023/2024 Auckland Climate Grant strategic round - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
WMIF2023-085 |
Zero waste food manufacturing WMIF August 2023 - 4b. Grant Completed |
Approved $16,945.00 |
|
QR2321-233 |
Taking care of our volunteers 2022/2023 Whau Quick Response Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,892.00 |
|
MB2223-273 |
Take care of our volunteers 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,248.00 |
|
LFHW2023035 |
Low income low waste Love Food Hate Waste Fund 2023 - Project in progress |
Approved $3,836.00 |
|
REGCD22_074 |
Connected community kai for tamariki Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2022/2023 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ACG-R1079 |
Community connections through climate-friendly kai 2022/2023 Auckland Climate Grant: Response Round One - Review project report |
Approved $31,877.00 |
|
WMIF2101-033 |
'Pay as you feel' up-cycled bread & spread breakfast cafe WMIF April 2021 - 3c. Awaiting accountability report |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
LFHW2001-27 |
Fair Food 'Pay as you feel' BREAD & SPREAD (or Toast & Toppings) Breakfast Cafe, at Everybody Eats Love Food Hate Waste Fund 2020 - 2021 - Paid- awaiting accountability |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
WMIF2002-140 |
Up-cycling surplus food, accelerating community engagement, diverting more from landfill WMIF September 2020 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
WMIF1802-063 |
Fair Food HQ WMIF September 2018 - 4a. Project Completed - Report Received |
Approved $19,500.00 |
|
WMIF1602-80 |
Doubling Fair Food's Food Rescue Capacity WMIF September 2016 - 4b. Grant Completed |
Approved $25,000.00 |
|
WMIF1314042 |
Evaluation WMIF April 2014 - 4c. Grant not uplifted |
Approved $3,223.57 |
|
WH14_2032 |
Fair Food LB - Whau Local Board Community Grant - Round 2 2013/2014 - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
HM14_2037 |
Fair Food LB - Henderson-Massey Local Board Community Grant - Round 2 2013/2014 - Accountability extended |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
PKT14/300006 |
Fair Food LB - Puketapapa Local Board Community Grant - Round 3 2013/2014 - Acquitted |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-229 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Incorporated Society |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Hīkoi Hāpori |
||||
|
Location: |
Te Atatu |
|||
|
Summary: |
To facilitate local families to learn more about the history of the area in a narrated walk. This is an opportunity to share stories about the area, promote local parks for recreation and physical activity and to meet new people in the community. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Prior to this Trust being established (2024) we have successfully completed a series of weekend learning sessions for families learning about family ties, traditional Māori customs and practises and the Māori language. We also have governance, operational events planning and management experience as well as budget, reporting and evaluation skills. |
|||
|
Dates: |
22/11/2025 - 22/11/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
up to 50 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
50% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will highlight in our promotion and any reporting done the funding provided by the local board |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
_The benefits include 1) Connection to the local area and stories 2) Access and experience to local recreational spaces in the community 3) Building local community relationships |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Māori identity is visible, valued and understood throughout the rohe We believe that sharing the local and traditional stories of the area with the local families from the community will raise the awareness and better understanding of the Māori world view. This project will promote the Māori language, the local environment and access to recreational shared spaces. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori led - either a Māori organisation that is applying or Māori directed (came about as a request from Māori), Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Our Trust is made up of Māori Trustees. Our Trust purpose has a strong focus on Māori aspirations, The narrated walk is from mana whenua. We have strong networks with Māori whānau in the area for promotion of the event. We will be active be practising tikanga for this event. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We welcome differently abled people with those that can assist them if needed to be mobile along a walk way in Te Atatu to participate. There will be parts of the pathway that is not accessible to mobility aids. There will be some written material about some stories as well. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice In promotion of event and on the day verbally with attendees |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
All genders, ages and ethnicities are welcome.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
The entire project |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would revise the numbers of attendees able to participate |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2000.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Narrated walk |
$1500.00 |
$1500.00 |
|
Logistics, promotion and reporting |
$500.00 |
$500.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-230 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Purchasing head torches for wellbeing adventure programmes |
||||
|
Location: |
1 / 4 Winston Place, Henderson, Auckland 0610 |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are requesting funding to purchase 10 x head torches for use on our Auckland wellbeing adventure programmes and adventure therapy programmes, particularly for our caving experience days but also for nighttime use whilst camping on multi-day adventures. The majority of our clients are rangatahi, and for most caving is a new and exciting challenge. We use caving experiences to help rangatahi explore their emotions and reactions to unfamiliar situations, how to stay calm & thoughtful when outside their comfort zone, how to support others, work as a team, communicate effectively, and responsible decision making. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Adventure Specialties Trust was founded 40 years ago on the
philosophy that the outdoors offers a unique opportunity for impactful
change, and we have been delivering these programmes in our local communities
ever since. In 2024 alone we ran 205 programmes nationally, supporting 4,969
participants. Our staff are experts in outdoor safety management and
leadership as well as skilled at delivering our therapeutic outcomes. |
|||
|
Dates: |
02/05/2025 - 30/06/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
1673 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
30% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
In both our Annual Review/Social Impact Report and on our website. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Our work is almost entirely built on collaboration with multiple
community partners including schools, alternative education centres,
community groups and government agencies. Our partners are making huge
strides in helping local tamariki, rangatahi, families and adults, but lack
the resources, expertise, or equipment to bring the outdoors element to their
work. We also run open-enrolment programmes to give individuals in need the
opportunity to access our support directly. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations Adventure Specialties Trust has been a cornerstone in our community
for 40 years. Based in Henderson, we provide purposeful outdoor adventure
programmes which facilitate therapeutic outcomes and positive growth to help
meet community needs. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - We run specific programmes for people living with disabilities. We also are able to accommodate those living with disabilities who are not specifically a part of a group focused on their disability. It would depend on the nature of the disability, but we design our programmes with the primary intention that no one is excluded due to circumstances they cannot control. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* Many of our participants do not have the financial resources,
confidence or role models in their life to get outside and get active for
their health and wellbeing. By providing a safe, inclusive environment with
quality equipment, experienced instructors and supportive peers, we remove
barriers and give an opportunity to try new activities such as kayaking, bush
walking, surfing, caving, rock climbing, coasteering, swimming, cycling and
orienteering. Our aim is that the participants develop an ongoing love of
outdoor recreation activities and the confidence to pursuit these adventures
as a future hobby with friends and family. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
We work with multiple different groups in our community. These include schools and alternative education partners working with tamariki and rangatahi, programmes for girls and young women, Māori, Pasifika community groups, unemployed and many more. As an indication of our age range, the majority are tamariki or rangatahi with approximately 23% aged 6-12years, 68% are aged 13 - 18 years, 4% are aged 19-25 years, and 5% are aged 26 years old and above.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1559.20 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
10 x head torches. Please note, our preferred headtorches are the Petzi Aria 2 with rechargeable packs as these are rechargeable units and therefore reduce carbon admissions, however these have a higher overall price of $1559.20. The two other quotes are for Petzi Pixa 3 which are a lower overall cost option. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will change to purchasing the Petzi Pixa 3 head torch option, or purchase a reduced number of head torches. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1559.20 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Head torches |
$1559.20 |
$1559.20 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-230 |
Purchasing head torches for wellbeing adventure programmes 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2505-165 |
Replacement equipment purchase 2024/2025 Henderson Massey Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
QR2405-222 |
Fitting braking system to kayak trailer 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2405-253 |
Kayaks for Adventure Therapy & Adventure with Purpose programmes 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2405-105 |
Replacement fridge 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2205-185 |
Kayaking equipment 2022/2023 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2205-213 |
Snorkel equipment 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $936.12 |
|
ATBF037 |
Girls Adventure Journey 2021/2022 Community Bike Fund - Accountability overdue |
Approved $1,410.00 |
|
QR2205-108 |
Updating Water Helmets 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $900.00 |
|
QR2105-312 |
Paddle jackets and vacuum 2020/2021 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round Three - Acquitted |
Approved $700.00 |
|
QR2105-215 |
New Rock Climbing shoes and Carabinas 2020/2021 Henderson -Massey Quick Response Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $1,400.00 |
|
QR2105-104 |
Upgrading Raincoats 2020/2021 Henderson -Massey Quick Response Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR2005-210 |
Updating boogie boards 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two - Grants refunded |
Approved $800.00 |
|
LG2005-233 |
Covid Response Programmes 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Local Grants, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2005-105 |
Update wetsuits 2019/2020 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1905-201 |
New adventure equipment 2018/2019 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR1905-116 |
Purchase outdoor equipment 2018/2019 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR1805-205 |
New Hard Drive and Screen 2017/2018 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR1805-102 |
Update Sea Kayaking Sprayskirts 2017/2018 Henderson-Massey Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,578.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-232 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Community |
|
|
Project: Community Upcycling Workshops & Events |
||||
|
Location: |
Our Green Space in Massey and community centres and libraries across Henderson Massey |
|||
|
Summary: |
Community Upcycling Workshops for adults, tamariki and rangatahi. Teaching practical DIY skills, frugal living techniques and mindful creativity during school holidays and the upcoming Matariki. We will deliver community activation sessions to ease the burden on households. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
The ReCreators have been delivering workshops for nearly 6 years across Tamaki Makaurau and the Waikato. Our team is made up of approx 20+ creatives with a huge variety of skills from woodworking, sewing, crocheting, manufacturing design, carving etc. Our financial year stats for FY23/24 show that we have delivered 959 events across 122 community venues and with 13130 participants paying 23 creatives representing the countries and cultures of 13 countries. |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 29/08/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
45 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
60% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Tagged in Socials and on our event posters with logos |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
We deliver events for both tamariki, rangatahi and adults. They are
popular because they are fun and we partner with community groups like Ranui
Library, Pest Free Swanson, Communitiy Waitakere, Te Manawa and other
organisations in delivery. Reviewing the feedback we have been given to
|
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life We host fun community events focusing on creative reuse and a low
carbon economy. Through an artistic lense, we explain that by upcycling,
people are preventing extraction from Papatūānuku (water, soil,
trees, biodiversity) and minimising landfill. But more than |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Te Manawa |
Venue and marketing |
|
River Care |
Pest Free organisation for rat trap distrobution |
|
Ranui Library |
Venue and marketing |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language) We aim to include mātauranga and tikanga Māori in our designs especially for Matariki. The ReCreators support the inclusion of Te Reo and indigenous practices in our classes. Our core belief is around kaitiakitanga. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Held in community centres and libraries with activities suitable to varying abilities. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* We promote healthy living through our core zero waste, climate action and community development values. We encourage mindfulness through crafting (which takes people off technology), we also promote intergenerational activities and learning of skills that can be taken back to the family and community. Due to the nature of the materials used we see it breaks down equity barriers and allows all people to be proud of their creations. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Yes - we are an inclusive and diverse organisation and have always promoted that through our wānanga.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Whau |
20 |
$4960.00 |
|
Waitakere Ranges |
20 |
$4960.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1800.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
To deliver free or heavily subsidised events, we need to be adequately funded. This is becoming harder and harder. The skills that we teach are fundamental for a life with climate change. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will deliver what has been funded. Our contribution includes the labour it takes to gather materials and organise volunteer events including the use of our RE: MAKER SPACE which has commercial rent |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
Free for tamariki and community activtations. If woodworking for adults then we charge a small fee to ensure that people show up and respect the funding that goes into these activities. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$1800.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Rent and travel costs |
$240.00 |
$240.00 |
|
Marketing |
$170.00 |
$170.00 |
|
Project Management |
$260.00 |
$260.00 |
|
Prep and Design |
$400.00 |
$400.00 |
|
Admin |
$130.00 |
$130.00 |
|
Tutor |
$600.00 |
$600.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Events intended to be free or otherwise ticketing will be taken from funding total |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Wood and textiles |
$200.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
3 |
6 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2509-239 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2413-221 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2512-243 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Ōrākei Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-232 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2501-257 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Albert Eden Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2519-202 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Rat Trap Making 2024/2025 Waitakere Ranges Local Grants Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_008 |
Community Upcycling Craft & Woodworking Wānanga Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - South East 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_007 |
Community Upcycling Craft& Wood Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - North West 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_006 |
Community Upcycling Craft & Woodworking Wānanga Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - Central 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2514-206 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2520-206 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Waitematā Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2510-308 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Events 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round Three - GA Assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2507-215 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Howick Local Board Local Grant Round Two - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
NHM25_038 |
Kai Resilience - Reclaimed & Regenerative Garden Education Initiatives Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 2024/2025 - Submitted |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2521-112 |
Make & GIve for Xmas/ School Holiday Events 2024/2025 Whau Quick Response Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
QR2520-128 |
Summer & School Holiday Upcycling Events 2024/2025 Waitematā Quick Response Grant Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
LG2517-113 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Upper Harbour Local Grants Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,960.00 |
|
QR2519-103 |
Community Rat Traps for Primary Schools 2024/2025 Waitākere Ranges Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,200.00 |
|
WMIF2024-027 |
Scaling timber reclaimation - shared CNC/thicknesser for C&D waste community WMIF August 2024 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2502-136 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Devonport Takapuna Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2508-116 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Kaipatiki Local Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2514-140 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Papakura Local Grant, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2512-105 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Ōrākei Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2511-112 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2521-105 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Whau Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2505-117 |
Community Upcycling Workshops & Rap Trap Production 2024/2025 Henderson Massey Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,200.00 |
|
QR2513-112 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Quick Response Grant, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2509-102 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2515-103 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Puketāpapa Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,880.00 |
|
CCS2425_1_030 |
Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
CCS2425_1_029 |
Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $4,800.00 |
|
CCS2425_1_028 |
Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R1 - Project in Progress |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
QR2501-106 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Albert-Eden Quick Response Grant, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,500.00 |
|
LG2519-102 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2520-104 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Waitematā Local Grant Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2510-111 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2024/2025 Manurewa Local Grants Round One - Project in progress |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
MB2324-224 |
Community DIY skills-based upcycling workshops 2023/2024 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $17,725.00 |
|
CCS24_2_032 |
Project Name * Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2023/24 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $12,850.00 |
|
CCS24_2_031 |
Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2023/24 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $7,000.00 |
|
CCS24_2_030 |
Community Upcycling Craft Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 2023/24 round 2 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,700.00 |
|
NHM24_016 |
Empowering Communities: Reclaimed & Regenerative Garden Education Initiatives Ngā Hapori Momoho - Thriving Communities Grant 23/24 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ACG-R4037 |
Garden beds/community compost bins from deconstructed wood (AT Eastern Busway) 2023/2024 Auckland Climate Grant Response Round One - Assessment |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2411-149 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
LG2417-101 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Upper Harbour Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
QR2409-101 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Māngere-Otāhuhu Quick Response, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2415-102 |
Community DIY Skills-Based Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Puketāpapa Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
LG2401-107 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Albert Eden Local Grant Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $3,200.00 |
|
LG2413-116 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2405-103 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
LG2412-106 |
Community Upcycling (DIY skills) Workshops 2023/2024 Ōrākei Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS24_1_016 |
Creative DIY upcycling classes for climate action Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Acquitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS24_1_015 |
Creative DIY upcycling classes for climate action Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
CCS24_1_014 |
Creative DIY upcycling classes for climate action Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
LG2420-103 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Waitematā Local Grants, Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,000.00 |
|
LG2410-125 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2023/2024 Manurewa Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
QR2301-314 |
Community Upcycling DIY Workshops 2022/2023 Albert-Eden Quick Response Grant, Round Three - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ACG-R236 |
Perfectly Imperfect Pop-Up Shop at RE:MAKERSPACE - Volunteer Manager 2022/2023 Auckland Climate Grant: Response Round Two - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
QR2319-226 |
Community DIY skills making rat traps 2022/2023 Waitākere Ranges Quick Response, Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $750.00 |
|
QR2303-243 |
Community Upcycling DIY Workshops 2022/2023 Franklin Discretionary Community Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2314-260 |
Community DIY Upcycling Workshops 2022/2023 Papakura Local Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2309-289 |
Community Skills-Based DIY Upcycling Workshops 2022/2023 Māngere-Otāhuhu Local Grants, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2311-252 |
Community Upcycling DIY Workshops 2022/2023 Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
LG2205-172 |
RE:MAKERSPACE pop up Perfectly Imperfect Fruit and Veg Shop. 2022/2023 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $2,500.00 |
|
CCS_23_2071 |
Creative upcycling classes for children, teens & adults Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $12,200.00 |
|
CCS_23_2070 |
Community upcycling workshops for adults, teens & children Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,000.00 |
|
CCS_23_2069 |
Community upcycling workshops for adults, rangatahi & tamariki Creative Communities Scheme 2023_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $8,000.00 |
|
QR2318-207 |
Upcycling community DIY art and craft activation events 2022/2023 Waiheke Quick Response Grant, Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QRTP2312-114 |
Upcycling community DIY art and craft activation events 2022/2023 Ōrākei Quick Response and Tree Protection, Round One - Review accountability |
Approved $2,758.00 |
|
QR2320-118 |
Upcycling community DIY art and craft activation events 2022/2023 Waitematā Quick Response Grant, Round One - Follow up |
Approved $1,000.00 |
|
ACG-S143 |
Upcycling for Kai Resilience & DIY Skills to Live Lightly 2022/2023 Auckland Climate Grant: Strategic Round - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
ACG-R1004 |
Upcycling for Kai Resilience & DIY Skills to Live Lightly 2022/2023 Auckland Climate Grant: Response Round One - Withdrawn |
Withdrawn $0.00 |
|
WMIF2022-036 |
Circular Design Programme (deconstruction wood & textiles) WMIF August 2022 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
WMIF2022-029 |
Revived Design: A zero-waste marketplace for designers/educators WMIF August 2022 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2223-111 |
Upcycling community DIY art and craft activation events 2022/2023 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $15,707.00 |
|
CCS23_1016 |
Creative upcycling classes for children and adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $10,060.00 |
|
CCS23_1033 |
Creative and practical upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $11,400.00 |
|
CCS23_1034 |
Creative upcycling classes for children and adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $9,100.00 |
|
CCS22_2_077 |
Creative upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $2,450.00 |
|
CCS22_2_079 |
Creative upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,000.00 |
|
CCS22_2_078 |
Creative and practical upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_2 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,900.00 |
|
MB2022-202 |
Community Upcycling DIY Workshops 2021/2022 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $19,850.00 |
|
CCS22_1_063 |
Upcycling workshops for adults and children Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,480.00 |
|
CCS22_1_007 |
Upcycling classes for children & adults (Xmas Gifts & Summer Activations) Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $7,500.00 |
|
RENH21/22083 |
Upcycled Gardening for Communities Regional Environment and Natural Heritage Grant 2021 - 2022 - Review Project Report |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
CCS22_1_064 |
Upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS22_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $3,250.00 |
|
MB2021-228 |
DIY skills-based upcycling classes & Circular Design Course 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $19,266.00 |
|
CCS21_3_030 |
Creative and practical upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Project in Progress |
Approved $6,000.00 |
|
CCS21_3_029 |
Creative and practical upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Acquitted |
Approved $5,565.00 |
|
CCS21_3_028 |
Creative and practical upcycling classes for children & adults Creative Communities Scheme CCS21_3 - Project in Progress |
Approved $2,100.00 |
|
RegCD00023 |
Zero Waste Product Design - Circular Economy Education in Tamaki Makaurau Regional Community Development grants programme 2020/2021 - Submitted |
Approved $0.00 |
|
WMIF2002-033 |
Revived Design - Designing Solutions for Our Planet WMIF September 2020 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
MB2021-136 |
Skills-based upcycling workshops enabling communities to creatively reuse. 2020/2021 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $10,500.00 |
|
CCS21_1_163 |
Creative upcycling events for adults and kids Creative Communities Scheme 21_1 - North West 21_1 |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
CCS21_1_158 |
Creative upcycling events for children and adults Creative Communities Scheme 21_1 - Central & Gulf Islands 21_1 |
Approved $4,500.00 |
|
MB1920-216 |
Online & practical upcycling workshops enabling communities to creativily reuse. 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round Two - Acquitted |
Approved $3,000.00 |
|
REGCD2021 |
Making Upcycling Mainstream - Where Circular Economy meets Social Enterprise Regional Community Development 2019/2020 - Submitted |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS20_1_003 |
The ReCreators Upcycling Workshops Creative Communities Scheme 20_1 - North West 20_1 |
Approved $3,040.00 |
|
MB1920-103 |
Community Upcycling Workshops 2019/2020 Multi-board Local Grants Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $5,500.00 |
|
WMIF1802-083 |
The Re-Creators - helping humans help the planet WMIF September 2018 - 5a. Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-233 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Informal group/ no legal structure |
Activity focus: |
Events |
|
|
Project: Printopia Festival of Original Print |
||||
|
Location: |
Corban Estate Arts Centre, 2 Mount Lebanon Lane, Henderson |
|||
|
Summary: |
We are seeking funding to cover venue hire fees. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
This is the fourth on an annual event held at the same venue. Audience numbers have grown from 300 people in 2022 to 1,500 in 2024. Our group who runs the festival are experienced print artists, educators and I have worked for several years in Event Management. |
|||
|
Dates: |
02/05/2025 - 04/05/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
1,500 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
22% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will acknowledge the board in our newsletter with1,000 subscribers and social media of 3,000 followers. We will invite the Henderson Massey Board to attend the opening night event and give them our sponsor gift of a limited edition print by our emerging artist, Brie Rate, a Corban Estate Studio Artist. The board will also be mentioned in our Post Evaluation Report. |
|||
Conflicts of interest: My sister, LEELA BHAI is a council employee at the Ellen Melville Centre in Central Auckland.
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
For local residents, the festival is a way to meet people in their
community and to foster wellbeing through artistic expression. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Culture and creativity are an integral part of community life The festival encourages people from the local community to come
together for this free three-day event where they can engage in art
activities open to all ages and levels of ability. Visitors can meet
likeminded people while attending one of the many free events. They can have
a go at printing a piece of up cycled clothing, notebook, or small artwork,
attend an artist presentation, workshop or shop at the Print Fair. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Corban Estate Arts Centre |
Provide free marketing and a 50% discount on venue hire. |
|
Print Council Aotearoa NZ |
Provide free marketing and volunteer recruitment for the festival. |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Toi Whakaata / Māori Printmaking Collective is a nationwide
organisation engaged in research for the intersection of traditional print
theory and practice and indigenous knowledge and practice. Its members are
made up of established printmakers including senior printmaker Gabrielle
Belz. Toi Whakaata is involved in international exhibitions, print exchanges
and residencies across the Asia-Pacific. |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - All buildings and toilets have wheelchair access and a lift for people who are unable to use the stairs. Live printing events have enough volunteers to assist people who may need assistance due to a disability. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice, Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes, Encourage the reduction of carbon emissions or increase community resilience to the impacts of climate change* Corban Estate Arts Centre is a smoke-free venue and will be promoted
as smoke-free through social media posts, newsletters and Health and Safety
briefings for our volunteers, artists and vendors. During the event
volunteers will remind visitors and there will be appropriate signage on
site. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
The festival programming and marketing aims to attract a diversity of gender, age and ethnicities so that everyone who attends can feel welcome and a sense of belonging.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
We would like funding to cover the venue hire fees. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We would be in $2,000 debt. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
Workshops are ticketed, though at an accessible price point. We will be asking for a koha for participation in the live printing activities as a way to try and fundraise, though in the past they have always been free. |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2111.75 |
$22740.00 |
$16000.00 |
$19392.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Venue Hire |
$2111.75 |
$2111.75 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Workshop fees |
$16320.00 |
|
Vendor fees |
$3745.00 |
|
Printopia Festival Memberships |
$675.00 |
|
Donations During the event |
$2000.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Creative Communities Grant |
$10000.00 |
Approved |
|
Foundation North |
$5000.00 |
Approved |
|
Print Council Aotearoa NZ Grant |
$1000.00 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Materials for workshops and live printing |
$2500.00 |
|
International guest speaker fees and tutor fees |
$2500.00 |
|
Audio Visual Fees |
$1200.00 |
|
Venue hire 50% discount |
$211.75 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
70 |
350 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-233 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-233 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
LG2405-110 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Local Grants Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS24_1_108 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print Creative Communities Scheme 24_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $16,832.00 |
|
LG2319-102 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print 2022/2023 Waitākere Ranges Local Grants, Round One - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
CCS23_1088 |
Printopia Festival of Original Print Creative Communities Scheme CCS23_1 - Acquitted |
Approved $20,000.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-234 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Incorporated Society |
Activity focus: |
Sport and recreation |
|
|
Project: Remove and replace corner steel post |
||||
|
Location: |
572C Te Atatu Road, Te Atatu Peninsula, Auckland, 0610, NZ |
|||
|
Summary: |
The Te Atatu clubroom is a two storey building with external steel posts supporting the outside corners of the building. Due to the way the existing post was erected, it has rusted through. We seek funding to replace one corner steel post that supports the outside of the clubrooms. |
|||
|
Expertise: |
There has been little in the way of improving infrastructure at the
club for several years, |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/05/2025 - 30/05/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
300 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
We will put a facebook post out to our subscribers of the generous
donation, and also post |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
Community benefits include: |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Our town centres are thriving, safe and inviting Te Atatu Tennis Club is a hub for sport, but also a community venue
(the least expensive hirage cost of any venue on the Peninsula). By
supporting this project, the Henderson Massey board makes the building safe
for hire. We need to make the building safe for those that use it. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
No - |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes The project allows for the continuation of the health benefits of fitness in the community. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
The
beauty of this project is that it benefits the current and future users of the
tennis club
and clubrooms ranging in age from 4-70+ and all ethnicities - of which many
pasifika and
maori are represented as members and visitors.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
the removal and replacement of the corner galvanised steel beam. Our preferred supplier is 'The Steelworks' Engineering with a quote of $2,036.18 for the full works (exc gst) - this funding will cover nearly all funds required |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: Our preferred supplier is already the least expensive, so we can't cut costs further, however we would use our own limited resources to fund the steel post |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
no |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$2036.18 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$36.18 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Installation of steel post |
$2036.18 |
$2000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
no |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-234 |
Remove and replace corner steel post 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2505-220 |
Upgrade meterbox and switch board 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
QR2405-235 |
Refurbishment of tennis court floodlights 2023/2024 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - Declined |
Declined $0.00 |
|
QR2205-105 |
Historic Documents and Trophies Display Cabinet 2021/2022 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Round One - Acquitted |
Approved $600.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-236 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Informal group/ no legal structure |
Activity focus: |
Arts and culture |
|
|
Project: Garbha Sanskar: The Beauty of Being a Woman |
||||
|
Location: |
Henderson creek park |
|||
|
Summary: |
I am seeking funding for a video project titled "Garbha Sanskar: The Beauty of Being a Woman." This project aims to celebrate and honour the profound blessing of motherhood through a video featuring an Indian dance performance. The video will highlight the beauty and significance of the female body and the essence of being a woman, emphasizing the importance of Garbha Sanskar in motherhood and womanhood. Additionally, the project will embrace the current pregnancy journey, showcasing the unique and beautiful experience of expecting mothers |
|||
|
Expertise: |
I am M.A in Performing arts. Learning dance for 23 year now. Teaching dance for last 10 years. Recipient of Indonesian arts and cultural scholarship 2017. |
|||
|
Dates: |
17/05/2025 - 17/05/2025 |
|||
|
People reached: |
500+ |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
100% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
To publicly acknowledge the local board's contribution, As I am considering this will only local board funding to maintain the quality for project and give full justice to one source Funding I will include a special thanks section in the video credits, highlighting their support. Additionally, I will mention their contribution in any promotional materials, social media posts, and press releases related to the project. During community events or screenings of the video, I will verbally acknowledge their support and display their logo prominently. This ensures that the local board's contribution is recognized and appreciated by the community. |
|||
|
Community benefits |
|
|
Identified community outcomes: |
|
|
|
The dancer featured in the video is currently pregnant, which can
positively influence the audience. This project will create a sense of pride,
unity, and empowerment within the community, while also promoting cultural
appreciation and gender equality. |
|
Alignment with local board priorities: |
|
|
|
Henderson-Massey · Communities are empowered to lead and deliver on their aspirations The concept of celebrating motherhood through an Indian dance video aligns with the priority of empowering communities to lead and deliver on their aspirations. By creating this video, I am taking the initiative to highlight the beauty and significance of motherhood and womanhood, which can inspire and uplift others in the community. This project not only showcases cultural heritage through dance but also promotes the empowerment of women by celebrating their strength and beauty. It encourages the community to take pride in their identity and aspirations, fostering a sense of unity and empowerment. |
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· No Māori outcomes identified
|
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - This is video presentation and will be available for free for everyone including all Genders, Abilities ,Age groups etc. Also will be available internationally. |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Encouraging active lifestyles including movement or fitness programmes This project promotes a healthy environment by fostering mental well-being through positive reinforcement of motherhood and womanhood, encouraging community cohesion and cultural awareness, and empowering women to be positive role models. It creates a supportive and inclusive community atmosphere. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Yes, my project specifically supports women by celebrating motherhood and womanhood. It aims to empower and uplift women of all ages by highlighting the beauty and significance of their roles. Additionally, the project promotes cultural appreciation by featuring an Indian dance performance, which can resonate with individuals of Indian ethnicity and those interested in Indian culture. This inclusive approach fosters a sense of pride and unity within the community.
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Waitakere Ranges |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$1001.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
Videography and Choreography Hours |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: I am mainly aiming to get the funding to cover Videography and choreography cost. This presentation would include focusing on the Indian dance performance and the video production, as these are central to celebrating motherhood and womanhood. I would seek alternative ways to reduce costs, such as sourcing costumes and makeup from local community resources, local businesses to support or volunteers, minimise use of hired rehearsal space. Additionally, I would consider scaling down the production size or duration while still maintaining the project's essence and impact. This approach ensures that the project's primary objectives are met, even with limited funding. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
NA |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$870.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Videography X 2 hours |
$300.00 |
$600.00 |
|
Studio hire for rehearsal X 20 hrs |
$20.00 |
$400.00 |
|
Costume |
$100.00 |
$100.00 |
|
Make up |
$150.00 |
$150.00 |
|
Photography X 2 days |
$200.00 |
$400.00 |
|
Social Media Marketing Meta Ads |
$100.00 |
$100.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Other funding sources |
Amount |
Current Status |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
Nil |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
2 |
10 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Garbha Sanskar is an ancient Indian practice that promotes a positive and healthy environment for the fetus during pregnancy. It involves activities like a balanced diet, meditation, and listening to calming music. The goal is to support the mental, physical, and emotional development of the baby by reducing stress and fostering a nurturing atmosphere. |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
QR2505-236 |
Garbha Sanskar: The Beauty of Being a Woman 2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two - GA assessment completed |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
CCS25_2_094 |
Nayika: Celebrating Womanhood Creative Communities Scheme 2024/25_R2 - North West 25_2 |
Undecided $0.00 |
|
2024/2025 Henderson-Massey Quick Response Grant Round Two QR2505-238 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Legal status: |
Charitable Trust |
Activity focus: |
Arts and culture |
|
|
Project: Youth Music Mentoring Programmes 2025 |
||||
|
Location: |
8-14 Henderson Valley Road, Henderson |
|||
|
Summary: |
The Crescendo Trust of Aotearoa is seeking funds towards our lease
costs. Following Crescendo’s feasibility study in 2023, it was
identified that relocating to the Henderson area would support predicted
growth in our target audiences, resulting in geographic accessibility |
|||
|
Expertise: |
Crescendo has been delivering impact since 2012, working with some of
the hardest to reach populations in |
|||
|
Dates: |
01/07/2025 - 30/06/2026 |
|||
|
People reached: |
200 |
|||
|
% of participants from Local Board |
40% |
|||
|
Promotion: |
Crescendo will acknowledge Henderson-Massey Local Board on our website and social media and in our annual report. |
|||
|
Collaborating organisation/individual |
Role |
|
Nil |
Nil |
|
Demographics |
|
|
Māori outcomes: |
· Māori involvement in the design/concept, Māori focus - tikanga (practices), mātauranga (knowledge), reo (language), Māori participation - Māori priority group, target group, high representation or Māori staff delivering Our programmes are underpinned by the Māori health model Te
Whare Tapa Whā, and provide a wraparound |
|
Accessible to people with disabilities |
Yes - Support for Disabilities and Neurodiversity: |
|
Healthy environment approach: |
Promote smoke-free messages, Include waste minimisation (zero waste) messages, Healthy options for food and drink, including water as the first choice All of Crescendo's programmes and premises are smokefree and we offer
direction to smoking cessation support services as required. |
|
|
|
Does your project support any genders, ages or ethnicities specifically?
Crescendo's
programmes are free for all young people aged 15 - 24 years.
Approximately 50% of the young people Crescendo work with are from West
Auckland, and the demographic we are targeting is only predicted to increase.
The majority of our rangatahi 60% are of Māori and Pasifika descent and
come from low socio-economic
backgrounds. Approximately 60% of the rangatahi we work with are not in
education, employment or training
(NEET).
Across boards collaboration
|
Local board benefitting |
Estimated reach from this area (%) |
Amount requested from this board |
|
Nil |
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Financial information |
|
|
Amount requested: |
$2000.00 |
|
Requesting grant for: |
We are requesting funding towards Crescendo's annual lease/rent costs. |
|
If part funded, how would you make up the difference: We will be applying to other funders such as gaming trusts, and other local boards, and may reapply to the Henderson-Massey Local Grant round when it is open. |
|
|
Cost of participation: |
No |
|
Total expenditure |
Total income |
Other grants approved |
Applicant contribution |
|
$44243.00 |
$0.00 |
$25000.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Expenditure item |
Amount |
Amount requested from Local Board |
|
Lease / Rent costs |
$44243.00 |
$2000.00 |
|
Income description |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Amount |
Current Status |
|
|
Foundation North |
$15000.00 |
Approved |
|
Lottery Community |
$10000.00 |
Approved |
|
Donated materials |
Amount |
|
Nil |
$0.00 |
|
Total number of volunteers |
Total number of volunteer hours |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Additional information to support the application: |
Nil |
|
Funding history |
||
|
Application ID |
Project title Round - Stage |
Decision Allocation |
|
No previous applications |
||
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Henderson-Massey Local Board views on the draft Contributions Policy 2025
File No.: CP2025/04877
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To invite local board views on the draft Contributions Policy 2025 for inclusion in the Governing Body decision report on 1 May 2025
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The most-recent full review of the contributions policy, was completed and adopted in December 2021, based on the investments in the Long-term Plan 2021-2031. This was operational from 10 January 2022.
3. In April 2023, the Governing Body adopted the Contributions Policy 2022 Variation A which added investments over a 30-year period to support growth in Drury.
4. In June 2024, the council adopted its new Long-term Plan 2024-2034, which sets out capital expenditure plans for this period. The Contributions Policy 2025 now proposed for adoption reflects these decisions.
5. The draft Contributions Policy 2025 also includes investments over a longer time horizon for the Inner Northwest, and Auckland Housing Programme (AHPs) and to update the investments to be made in Drury beyond 2031. This follows through on the agreement in principle from December 2021 (FIN/2021/119) and subsequent noting in April 2023 (GB/2023/63).
6. The remaining Investment Priority Area (IPA), the City Centre/City Rail Link (CRL) stations, will be added as a next step later in 2025/early 2026 as more information becomes available, Also in this timeframe updates will be made for additional investments in Drury West, and stormwater in Mt Roskill and Māngere.
7. The Governing Body approved consultation on the draft Contributions Policy 2025 in September 2024 and consultation took place from September to December 2024.
8. A memorandum and summary of feedback received from consultation was circulated to all local board and Governing Body members in February 2025. These are attached to this report as Attachment F.
9. This was followed up with Subject Matter Expert (SME) attendance at local board workshops as requested by individual local boards.
10. Any local board views agreed through this report will form an attachment to the decision-making report being presented to Governing Body on 1 May 2025.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) tuku / provide views on the draft Contributions Policy 2025 for inclusion in the Governing Body decision report on 1 May 2025.
Horopaki
Context
11. Development contributions (DCs) allow for an equitable and proportionate share of the total cost of growth-related capital expenditure to be recovered from the development community. The Contributions Policy sets out how the council will recover from new development an appropriate and fair share of the cost of infrastructure investment attributable to growth.
12. Auckland's population has grown substantially over the 12 years to the end of 2024, from 1.4 million to over 1.8 million at an average of 1.4 per cent annually. It is forecast to continue to grow, with approximately 200,000 more Aucklanders expected by 2034. The population is expected to grow by a further 400,000 by 2054[1].
13. To support the development enabled by the Auckland Unitary Plan, we are facing both immediate and longer-term demands for infrastructure in growth areas. If we do not adequately plan for the delivery and funding of this infrastructure, the cumulative effects of this development could lead to an unfair rates burden on future ratepayers or a risk of infrastructure shortfalls for future residents.
14. Auckland Council’s current contributions policy was introduced in January 2022 and later updated from June 2023 to extend cost recovery in Drury over a 30-year period instead of the previous 10-year approach.
15. Between September and November 2024, the council consulted on a proposal to adopt a new policy that incorporates updated capital expenditure from the Long-term Plan 2024-2034, revised growth and interest rate forecasts, adjustments to project costs, and extended investment planning for Drury.
16. The proposed policy also expands the 30-year cost recovery model to other Investment Priority Areas, including the Inner Northwest (Red Hills, Westgate, and Whenuapai) and Auckland Housing Programme (AHP) areas in Tāmaki, Māngere, and Mt Roskill. In addition, several smaller adjustments aim to ensure fairer cost distribution between ratepayers and developers.
17. The policy proposed for consultation included $10.3 billion in growth-related capital investment in the period to 2034, increasing the average development contribution from $21,000 to $30,000, while contributions in Drury would rise from $70,000 to $83,000. The proposed policy also provided for $10.9 billion of investment in Drury, Inner Northwest, and the AHP areas in the period beyond 2034. With these investments included the average DC price across the region would rise to $50,000. Different charges apply to different geographical areas based on the relevant activity funding areas in the proposal.
18. The Consultation Document (CD) provided to support consultation set out the key issues to be considered in assessing the proposal. The CD can be found at Attachment C. The key changes set out in consultation are summarised below.
Update for decisions in the LTP 2024-2034 and updates to Drury
19. The draft Contributions Policy 2025 that was consulted on updated the capital expenditure projects to reflect the decisions made since 2021 and the associated investment planned over the 10-year timeframe of the LTP.
20. The key changes include:
· Level crossings – Takanini ($550 million)
· Development of new town square in Henderson ($12.5 million)
· Waterview catchment separation ($59 million) – updated costs.
21. The current contributions policy included projects which are now funded as part of the NZ Upgrade Programme. Government decisions on the NZ Upgrade Programme had not been made at the time the Contributions Policy 2022 Variation A was adopted. We are now removing these projects from the policy as they are not expected to require council funding and there is no basis to recover any costs for them. Contributions collected for these projects to date will be re-allocated against similar projects within the same funding area.
22. The assessment of requirements for stormwater infrastructure in Drury has now been completed. This identified one project the council would need to deliver in addition to those that would be provided by developers as a condition of resource consent, and this has been included in the draft policy. Some adjustments have now also been made to the timing of projects including reducing investment and deferral of the timing of open space acquisitions. The assumptions made for investments in Drury over the longer horizon have also been reviewed based on the latest available information and the capital expenditure included in the policy has been updated. This includes updated land cost assumptions, alignment with the Cost Estimation guide published by Auckland Transport, and the latest growth forecasts. These changes raised the DC price for Drury that was consulted on from $70,000 to $83,000.
23. The draft policy will include a list of over 1,700 programmes and projects for which the council will seek to recover the growth share of costs through development contributions (see Attachment B).
24. The table below shows the total investments with a growth component in transport, stormwater, reserves, and community facilities over the LTP period and their funding source in the CD. In this analysis and that which follows later it is assumed that National Land Transport Fund from Waka Kotahi will fund 51 per cent funding of qualifying transport projects.
|
Funding source
|
CAPEX investment type $ millions |
||||
|
Transport |
Reserves |
Community spaces |
Stormwater |
Total funding |
|
|
Total NZTA/Waka Kotahi |
3,569 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,569 |
|
Total rates |
3,072 |
557 |
301 |
463 |
4,393 |
|
Total development contributions |
893 |
1,005 |
127 |
309 |
2,334 |
|
Total CAPEX |
7,534 |
1,562 |
428 |
772 |
10,296 |
25. As a result of the capital expenditure changes in the period to 2034, updated forecasts of NZTA/Waka Kotahi funding and dwelling construction, and adjustments to the investments in Drury before and after 2034 the weighted average development contributions price for a standard residential unit would rise from $21,000 under the Contributions Policy 2022, Variation A to $30,000 under the draft Contributions Policy 2025. The average price increase is driven by the increased level of investment within the LTP period in the Investment Priority Areas (IPA). This is a weighted average and varies widely by location depending on the investments the council plans to make to support growth in each area.
Inclusion of investments in IPA areas beyond 2034
26. The consultation proposed the addition of investments beyond 2034 to support growth in the IPA areas. The proposed investments and consequent changes to DC prices for each of the IPA areas is set out below.
Inner Northwest
27. The LTP provides for investment of $155 million in transport and $139 million in reserves between 2024 and 2034. The table below shows the investments with a growth component in transport, reserves, and community facilities beyond 2034 and their funding sources. No stormwater investment is required by the council as the nature of infrastructure needed in this area is such that it is expected to be delivered by developers as a condition of resource consent.
|
Total investments and funding source by activity in the Inner Northwest over a longer horizon $ millions |
|||
|
Funding source |
Transport |
Reserves |
Community facilities |
|
Total NZTA/Waka Kotahi |
1,142 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total rates |
558 |
118 |
82 |
|
Total development contributions |
1,366 |
903 |
133 |
|
Total CAPEX |
3,066 |
1,021 |
215 |
28. The additional funding requirement would increase the contributions price for the Inner Northwest from an average of $25,167 per household unit equivalent (HUE) to an average of around $98,000 per HUE when the investments beyond 2034 are added. Different charges apply to different geographical areas based on the relevant activity funding areas in the proposal. The proposed charges are set out in the table below.
|
Changes to funding area charges in the Inner Northwest over a longer horizon |
|
||||
|
Funding area |
Current DC charge |
Proposed DC for investments within the LTP period incl regional and sub-regional DCs |
Proposed DC price for investments beyond LTP |
Total proposed price including all investments incl regional and sub-regional DCs |
|
|
Whenuapai |
$25k |
$27k |
$75k |
$102k |
|
|
Redhills |
$25k |
$27k |
$62k |
$89k |
|
|
Westgate |
$23k |
$34k |
$61k |
$95k |
|
Māngere Auckland Housing Programme area
29. The LTP provides for investment of $46 million in transport and $23 million in reserves between 2024 and 2034. The table below shows the transport investments with a growth component beyond 2034 and their funding sources. Investments in stormwater infrastructure will be added in 2025 once further work is completed.
|
Total investments and funding source by activity in Māngere over a longer horizon $ millions |
|||
|
Funding source |
Transport |
Reserves |
Community facilities |
|
Total NZTA/Waka Kotahi |
292 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total rates |
531 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total development contributions |
89 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total CAPEX |
912 |
0 |
0 |
30. The additional funding requirement would increase the contributions price for the Māngere Auckland Housing Programme from an average of $18,123 per HUE to an average of around $29,000 per HUE when the investments beyond 2034 are added.
Mt Roskill Auckland Housing Programme area
31. The LTP provides for investment of $44 million in transport and $15 million in reserves between 2024 and 2034. The table below shows the transport investments with a growth component beyond 2034 and their funding sources. Investments in stormwater infrastructure will be added in 2025 once further work is completed.
|
Total investments and funding source by activity in Mt Roskill over a longer horizon $ millions |
|||
|
Funding source |
Transport |
Reserves |
Community facilities |
|
Total NZTA/Waka Kotahi |
594 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total rates |
677 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total development contributions |
344 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total CAPEX |
1,615 |
0 |
0 |
32. The additional funding requirement would increase the contributions price for the Mt Roskill from an average of $20,406, per HUE to an average of around $52,000 per HUE when the investments beyond 2034 are added. Different charges may apply depending on the combination of activity funding areas a development falls within. The primary driver of the higher DCs in the above range is the recovery of historic stormwater investments in the Inner West Triangle and the Waitematā Central funding areas.
Tāmaki Regeneration area
33. The LTP provides for investment of $76 million in transport, $67 million in stormwater, $87 million in reserves, and $1 million in community facilities between 2024 and 2034. The table below shows the investments with a growth component in transport, community facilities and stormwater beyond 2034 and their funding sources.
|
Total investments and funding source by activity in Tāmaki over a longer horizon $ millions |
||||
|
Funding source |
Transport |
Reserves |
Community facilities |
Stormwater |
|
Total NZTA/Waka Kotahi |
181 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total rates |
194 |
0 |
41 |
18 |
|
Total development contributions |
171 |
0 |
19 |
788 |
|
Total CAPEX |
546 |
0 |
60 |
806 |
34. The standard of service for stormwater in Tāmaki has been planned to deliver the same level of service as in the Inner Northwest and Drury. This is higher than the service level presently provided by historical investment in the other brownfields areas that aren’t expected to develop. Accordingly, the scale of and cost of the investment required to redevelop the area is substantial.
35. The additional funding requirement would increase the contributions price for Tāmaki from $31,157 per HUE to $119,114 per HUE when the investments beyond 2034 are added.
Other proposed changes to the policy
Funding areas
36. Changes were proposed to funding areas to provide a more refined allocation of costs to development areas to better reflect beneficiaries of the planned infrastructure. The new proposed funding areas include:
· new sub-regional funding areas at Paerata, Whau, Inner Northwest
· a new local funding area at Avondale.
37. Changes to neighbouring funding areas were proposed to accommodate these new areas.
38. A number of other refinements were proposed to local and sub-regional funding areas to better reflect the beneficiaries of infrastructure. Details of these changes are included in Attachment E: Funding area maps.
Other changes
39. Some technical changes were proposed to the policy to clarify its intent and ensure fairness. Changes were highlighted in the draft policy in Attachment A.
40. Aside from the proposed changes discussed, the Contributions Policy 2022, Variation A was recommended as appropriate and fit for purpose and it was proposed to continue the unamended provisions in the current policy into the new policy.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
41. Key issues addressed in the CD related to the uncertainty inherent in taking a 30-year view of growth and the infrastructure investment required to support that along with the impact that higher DCs would have on current landowners planning to develop and whether higher DCs would impact on house prices. Key points made in the advice that supported the adoption of the draft policy for consultation on these issues is set out below. Further advice on these matters and other issues raised in consultation will form part of the advice to the council on 1 May.
42. The uncertainty associated with long-term planning is managed through the three-yearly review of our infrastructure planning priorities and funding through the council’s LTP. This allows the council to manage the risk of the pace of growth changing from our forecasts and consequent changes in the required infrastructure.
43. Continuing with a 10-year focus would continue the uncertainty for developers, landowners, and other infrastructure providers. It would also make it difficult to recover a fair share of the funding of expected capital expenditure in years 11-30 from early developers to address the longer-term cumulative impacts of their development. This would risk development occurring without adequate infrastructure and place more demand on future ratepayers.
44. These changes will not materially impact on house prices, which are driven by supply and demand and are not determined via a cost-plus methodology. That is, the developers are price takers. Their market power is limited, given they are part of a larger market, and their products are substitutable for near equivalents. Higher DC prices will eventually flow through to lower prices for raw land as the cost of enabling infrastructure is capitalised into the land value. However, they may have a short-term negative impact on the pace of development as developers respond to the change. Developers must absorb the cost into a lower land value. Depending on their financial position, they may either proceed with development, defer development and hold the land awaiting future value uplift, or on-sell the land to another developer. Staff consider that these short-term effects are outweighed by better cost signalling and associated longer-term benefits.
45. As these investments are being planned over decades, they are subject to refinement as investment plans are developed further, development intentions change, and economic conditions fluctuate. Future contributions policies will be updated as more refined information becomes available.
Consultation
46. Public consultation ran from 30 September to December 2024, featuring webinars, in-person events, and an opportunity for submitters to present directly to councillors.
47. Materials released to support consultation included the following documents attached to this report:
· Attachment A: Draft Development Contributions Policy 2025
· Attachment B: Schedule 8 Assets for which development contributions (DCs) will be used
· Attachment C: Consultation Document - Contributions Policy 2025
· Attachment D: How we set Development Contributions – Cost Allocation Methodology
· Attachment E: Funding area maps.
Feedback received
48. A total of 147 submissions were received, including 46 from organisations.
49. Key concerns raised included the impact of higher contributions on house prices and development, uncertainty around 30-year planning and cost escalation, the scale of stormwater investment in Tāmaki, delays in infrastructure investment, consideration of alternative funding sources, transparency of information, and specific issues with funding areas and projects.
50. A full analysis of the feedback can be found in Attachment F.
Updates for Final Policy for Adoption
51. Officers are analysing the points raised in the submissions. Advice on these points and further analysis conducted since the consultation process, including updated growth and economic forecasts, will be incorporated in advice to the Governing Body for decision making, planned for 1 May 2025. Potential changes to the proposed policy will also be presented at that time.
52. The Government has announced intended reforms to infrastructure funding and financing as part of the Going for Housing Growth policy program. The reforms are planned for implementation alongside council long-term plans in 2027. The exact form the reforms take will only be confirmed once legislation has passed. Staff consider that the Contributions Policy will still be required for at least the next two years and the council should continue with the updates and improvements proposed.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
53. Planning now for the funding of investments to support growth in the IPAs will ensure that the council is better able to deliver the infrastructure required for development in the IPAs to manage climate impacts of development and to connect to the rest of the city with a reduced climate impact. The proposal provides for early developers to meet a share of the costs of the infrastructure they will benefit from and create the need for, to address the cumulative impacts of growth.
54. If plans for securing a share of funding with DCs from early developers aren’t made now, greater demands will fall on future ratepayers to deliver this infrastructure. While adjustments can be made to the DC policy in the future these can’t retrospectively secure revenue from early developers. General rates are the only practical alternative funding source to make up this shortfall. Given the competing demands on general rates there is a real risk that all the funding required won’t be available in the future. This will mean the council won’t be able to deliver the level of investment required, leading to a greater negative climate impact.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
55. The information prepared for consultation on the draft Contributions Policy 2025 was developed in conjunction with the following council-controlled organisations and council units:
· Auckland Transport
· Public Law
· Policy
· Planning and Resource Consents
· Eke Panuku Development Auckland
· Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience
· Service Strategy and Partnerships
· Chief Economist Unit
· Spatial Analysis and Modelling.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
56. The DC price varies by location depending on the cost of infrastructure required to support development in an area. These locations do not usually align to local board areas.
57. A local board briefing session was held on 30 September 2024 to brief members on this topic. Local boards have received a memorandum to update them on the review of the contributions policy and the feedback from public consultation. 18 local boards accepted an offer for workshop briefing sessions which were held in March. The purpose of this report is to seek local board views.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
58. Development contributions are assessed against the demand that different types of development generate on council infrastructure. Māori developments are assessed under broader development types based on the demand they generate. For example, kaumātua housing is treated the same as retirement villages, and marae are considered under community facilities.
59. Iwi authorities with mana whenua interests were contacted prior to the start of consultation to seek expressions of interest in discussing and providing feedback on the proposed changes. All iwi authorities were also notified when consultation opened, further advising of how they could have their say. The Mana Whenua forum and other council forums were advised of the consultation.
60. Seven submitters on the proposal identified as Māori. One response supported the proposed changes to update the policy for changes to the LTP and to reflect growth beyond 2034 in the IPA areas and four were opposed. In regard to the changes to Drury and the other changes proposed two were in favour and two against. The only comment received was that new development needs to be fully funded by developers.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
61. The Long-term Plan 2024-2034 assumes DCs revenue of $2.0 billion over the LTP period. After completing the analysis of the cost of investments in the LTP that can be recovered with DCs and the impact of the proposed policy changes, it was estimated that the revenue would be $2.6 billion. The achievement of this revised revenue forecast requires, as a first step, the implementation of a contributions policy updated for the capital expenditure decisions in the LTP, and the other changes proposed in this report.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
62. Forecasting long-term growth, infrastructure investment, and development contributions (DCs) carries risks, but these can be managed through the triennial long-term plans, policy adjustments, and reallocation or refunds of DCs if planned assets are not delivered.
63. There is a risk that projected development and DC revenue may not be met, which will be managed by monitoring consent applications and DC revenue.
64. The council ensures its contributions policy complies with legislation, but given the proposed increases in DCs, some developers may challenge the policy.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
65. The Governing Body will consider the feedback and updates to the proposed policy and make a decision on the final policy adoption on 1 May 2025.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Attachment A: Draft Development Contributions Policy 2025 |
265 |
|
b⇩ |
Attachment B: Schedule 8 Asset for which development contributions (DCs) will be used |
309 |
|
c⇩ |
Attachment C: Consultation Document - Contributions Policy 2025 |
339 |
|
d⇩ |
Attachment D: How we set Development Contributions – Cost Allocation Methodology |
367 |
|
e⇩ |
Attachment E: Funding area maps |
435 |
|
f⇩ |
Attachment F: Memorandum and Summary of consultation feedback |
447 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Andrew Duncan - Manager Financial Policy |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Auckland Transport Kōkiri Quarterly Update - March 2025
File No.: CP2025/06377
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide an update on projects in the local board’s Kōkiri Agreement 2024/2025 and seek any requests for changes.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Kōkiri Agreement 2024/2025 is a local board’s engagement plan with Auckland Transport’s (AT) work programme.
3. Developing the agreement is an annual process. During this process AT provides advice on its work programme, seeks feedback from the local board, responds to this feedback, and establishes an endorsed plan for engaging on work in the local board area.
4. This report provides an update on projects in the local board’s Kōkiri Agreement and provides an opportunity for the local board to request changes to the agreement.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) whiwhi / receive the April 2025 quarterly update on the Kōkiri Agreement 2024/2025
Horopaki
Context
5. In mid-2023, Kōkiri was initiated to build a more structured and supportive relationship between local boards and Auckland Transport. Kōkiri is an annual process that includes the following steps:
a) October/November - AT provides quality advice to local boards on the next financial year’s work programme
b) March - Local boards provide their feedback, prioritising projects or programmes and requesting levels of engagement for each project
c) April/May - AT responds to that feedback, and a Kōkiri Agreement is written for each local board
d) June/July – AT seeks formal endorsement of the Kōkiri Agreement from local boards.
6. AT reports quarterly on the prioritised projects and programmes listed in the local board’s Kōkiri Agreement.
7. This process provides a clear annual structure for engaging with AT. Local boards are able to influence Auckland Transport’s work programme through the annual Kōkiri process and by providing any requests for changes through the quarterly reporting.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
8. Kōkiri Agreements prioritise the projects or programmes that are of most interest to the local board. Clear local board prioritisation provides AT with expectations of transport related objectives, in addition to the objectives provided in the local board plan. This information helps AT to either inform its planning or to offer better explanations for why certain projects or programmes cannot be delivered. guidance
9. However, plans evolve and change, so AT reports quarterly on progress of projects in the Kōkiri Agreement. This means that local boards are kept informed and have a regular opportunity to provide formal feedback to AT about their work programme.
10. The levels of engagement in the Kōkiri Agreement are derived from the International Association for Public Participation’s (IAP2) doctrine and are as follows:
|
Collaboration |
AT and the local board are working together to deliver the project or programme. The local board leads the process of building community consensus. The local board’s input and advice are used to formulate solutions and develop plans. Local board feedback is incorporated into the plan to the maximum extent possible. |
|
Consultation |
AT leads the project or programme but works with the local board providing opportunities to input into the plan. If possible, AT incorporates the local board’s feedback into the plan; and if it is not able to provides clear reasons for that decision. |
|
Informing |
AT leads the project or programme informing the local board about progress. Local board members may be asked to provide their local knowledge and insight by AT, however there is no expectation that the project must be modified based on that input. |
This agenda report includes the following attachments:
· Attachment A - provides updates about all projects and programmes currently listed in this local board’s Kōkiri Agreement
· Attachment B - is a quarterly update on road maintenance activities.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
11. This report does not have a direct impact on climate, however the projects it refers to will.
12. AT engages closely with the council on developing strategy, actions and measures to support the outcomes sought by the Auckland Plan 2050, the Auckland Climate Action Plan and the council’s priorities.
13. AT reviews the potential climate impacts of all projects and works hard to minimise carbon emissions. AT’s work programme is influenced by council direction through Te-Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
14. Kōkiri is a product of the Local Board Relationship Project. AT started the project in response to a 2022 ‘Letter of Expectation’ directive from the Mayor that stated in part that:
“The Statement of Intent 2023-2026 must set out how AT will achieve closer Local Board involvement in the design and planning stage of local transport projects that affect their communities.”
15. The Kōkiri agreement gives effect to this intent. AT receives local board feedback via regular engagement. AT also surveys local board members quarterly about engagement, providing an indication of satisfaction.
16. The Kōkiri agreement was developed working closely with Auckland Council’s Governance and Engagement Department.
17. The Kōkiri agreement is reported to the Local Board Chair’s Forum on a regular basis.
18. This work relies on historical engagement with both Auckland Council and with other major Council-Controlled Organisations (CCO) through the previous Joint CCO Engagement Plans.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
19. The local board endorsed the Kōkiri Agreement at its 16 July 2024 business meeting. This report provides the first quarterly update on projects in the Kōkiri.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
20. Auckland Transport is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its broader legal obligations in being more responsible or effective to Māori.
21. AT’s Māori Responsiveness Plan outlines the commitment to 19 mana whenua in delivering effective and well-designed transport policy and solutions for Auckland. We also recognise mataawaka and their representative bodies and our desire to foster a relationship with them. This plan is available on the Auckland Transport website - https://at.govt.nz/about-us/transport-plans-strategies/maori-responsiveness-plan/#about
22. Kōkiri is focused on AT’s interaction with local boards, as such Māori input was not sought at a programme level. However, when individual projects or operational activities have impact on water or land, Auckland Transport engages with iwi to seek their views. These views are shared in reports seeking decisions from the local board.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
23. Generally, this report has limited financial implications for the Henderson-Massey local board because Auckland Transport funds all projects and programmes. However, local boards do have a transport budget, called the Local Board Transport Capital Fund.
24. Updates about Local Board Transport Capital Fund projects are included in this report, but financial implications are reported separately, in project specific decision reports.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
25. If a local board provides any formal direction on changes to the Kōkiri Agreement, there are risks to consider. First, the local board needs to be able to commit to the time required for the level of engagement requested. If decisions are not able to be made or are slowed down by local board decision-making, there can be significant financial costs.
26. Auckland Transport suggests that this risk is mitigated by the local board providing sufficient workshop time to allow for timely discussion of activities listed in Kōkiri.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
27. After receiving this report, AT will respond to any resolutions received.
28. In March 2025, AT will conduct its annual Forward Works Programme brief which starts the process to develop the Kōkiri Agreement 2025-2026.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey - 2503 Attachment A to Kōkiri Quarterly Update March |
465 |
|
b⇩ |
Henderson-Massey - 2503 Attachment B to Kōkiri Quarterly Maintenance and Renewals March |
471 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
|
|
Authorisers |
John Gillespie - Head Stakeholder & Community Engagement Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Kōkiri - Setting priorities for Auckland Transport project and programme engagement
File No.: CP2025/06380
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To receive Auckland Transport’s proposed Forward Works Programme 2025/2026 (Attachment A to the agenda report) and confirm the level of engagement for the prioritised projects.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland Transport has been building a more structured and effective process for local boards to engage with and influence transport projects and programmes.
3. The Kōkiri Agreement is the local board’s engagement plan with Auckland Transport’s work programme.
4. At this stage in the second year of Kōkiri (part of the Local Board Relationship Project), Auckland Transport is seeking formal views on the proposed work programme for 2025-2026 (Attachment A).
5. Auckland Transport workshopped the forward works programme with the local board on 5 November 2024 to aid developing views on priorities.
6. After the local board provides formal views, Auckland Transport will provide a response via memo to the local board before delivering the draft local board transport agreement (Kōkiri) to June 2025 business meetings for adoption.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) request Auckland Transport to apply the following levels of engagement to the projects in the Forward Works Programme 2025-2026 (Attachment A):
i) Collaborate
A) Duncan Avenue speed calming – Investigation/optioneering
B) Peninsula Primary School crossing upgrade
ii) Consult
Public Transport Minor Projects
A) First and Final Leg – Henderson – Look at improvement opportunities for access to Henderson rail station
B) Henderson Station Lifts and Escalators Renewals – construction
Auckland Cycling Programme
C) Hobsonville Cycle Connection – currently design phase – construction 2025/2026
Road Safety
D) 27-39A Pomaria Road Crossing – currently investigation phase – construction 2025/2026
E) Don Buck Road/Universal Intersection Improvements - currently investigation phase – construction 2025/2026
Capital Projects
F) Supporting Growth Alliance – North/West - Route protection of the North/West future strategic transport network
G) Redhills Growth Improvements – Fred Taylor Drive, Redhills - Upgrades to Fred Taylor Drive and Dunlop Road in partnership with developers - currently construction phase
National Ticketing Systems – currently design phase – design and build 2025/2026
Parking and Kerbside Programme
H) Paid Parking Metropolitan Centre’s – currently investigation phase – consultation 2025/2026
Community Response
I) 6 Waipareira Avenue, refuge upgrade – currently design phase – construction 2025/2026
J) 18 Pooks Road, Ranui, zebra crossing - currently design phase – construction 2025/2026
K) Edmonton Road / Matuhi Rise Intersection Improvements - currently design phase – construction 2025/2026
L) 15 Ranui Station Road near Ranui Primary School - currently design phase – construction 2025/2026.
iii) Inform
Public Transport Minor Projects
A) Bus Stop Improvements programme – currently design phase – construction 2025/2026
Road Corridor Renewals Programme
B) Road Corridor Renewals
C) Road Corridor Renewals – Resurfacing
D) Road Corridor Renewals – Footpaths
Public Transport Services
E) Currently 23 routes in this local board area
iv) Advocacy Issues
Auckland Cycling Programme
A) Support initiatives that help remove barriers to cycling e.g. access to a safe affordable bike and learn to ride programmes:
B) Ranui and Swanson area
C) Rathgar Road
D) Lincoln Road
Community Response
Prioritise transport projects that improve safety and health and contribute to climate action and social outcomes:
E) setting speed limits around schools for the current speed limit to stay not be reversed
F) prioritise the long list of non-priority projects where requests have come through for pedestrian improvements around schools and arterial routes:
G) Pomaria Road pop-up protection,
H) Te Atatu Peninsula Primary School,
I) Don Buck Road / Swanson Road / Universal Drive roundabout,
J) Edmonton Road / Alderman Drive roundabout
K) 3.6km pop-up protection on existing painted cycle lanes Don Buck Road.
Horopaki
Context
Project Kōkiri
7. In mid-2023, Kōkiri was initiated to build a more structured and supportive relationship between local boards and Auckland Transport (AT).
8. The project was in part a response to the 2020 Review of Auckland Council’s Council-controlled Organisations which highlighted the need for local boards and Auckland Transport to work more meaningfully and collaboratively.
9. AT has taken steps to improve information flow and local board decision-making, including:
· instituting an annual forward works programme briefing for all local boards
· increasing the number of updates sent to local boards
· providing local board insights in all project engagement
· participating in Auckland Council’s CCO Engagement Plan reporting.
10. Auckland Transport aims to provide a better basis for communication and understanding of roles, responsibilities, limitations, and opportunities.
11. The overall purpose of this process is to identify local board interest in Auckland Transport projects and programmes and to clearly express the preferred levels of local board engagement.
12. The levels of engagement are derived from the International Association for Public Participation’s (IAP2) doctrine; and are as follows:
|
Collaborate |
Auckland Transport and the local board are working together to deliver the project or programme. The local board leads the process of building community consensus. The local board’s input and advice are used to formulate solutions and develop plans. Local board feedback is incorporated into the plan to the maximum extent possible. |
|
Consult |
Auckland Transport leads the project or programme but works with the local board providing opportunities to input into the plan. If possible, Auckland Transport incorporates the local board’s feedback into the plan; or provides clear reasons if it is not able to. |
|
Inform |
Auckland Transport leads the project or programme informing the local board about progress. Local board members may be asked to provide their local insights, however there is no expectation that the project must be modified based on that input. |
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
13. Auckland Transport have reviewed priorities identified in the Henderson-Massey Local Board Plan 2023 aligned to transport goals and have considered these where possible.
14. Auckland Transport presented its 2025-2026 forward works programme at a workshop 5 November 2024.
15. This report seeks local board feedback on the proposed work programme and local board priorities on the levels of engagement (collaborate, consult and inform) for the list of projects and programmes.
16. Auckland Transport resource is limited. Projects in the collaborate and consult require significant staff and elected member time such as:
· providing quality advice, including technical advice on options and their costs as well as benefit analysis. Often this advice involves written advice and the opportunity to ask experts questions at a workshop.
· considering the advice, time is required for members to process and understand the advice provided.
· making a formal decision, i.e. feedback about a project or programme requires a report to be submitted and a resolution made at a public meeting.
17. Auckland Transport recommends the local board reserves categorising projects in collaborate and consult for the projects of highest priority, such as local board transport capital fund projects.
18. Other projects and programmes that may be at the ‘collaborate’ level include any projects which the local board has delegated financial control over either by Auckland Transport, council or by another government agency like New Zealand Transport Agency.
19. There may also be projects or programmes that a local board wants to deliver but is not currently identified in AT planning. Local boards may choose to advocate for these projects or programmes.
20. There may be projects or programmes that the local board considers are not supported by the community it represents. This report provides an opportunity for the local board to express its community’s concerns about proposed work. AT will consider and may decide not to proceed with these projects based on the local board’s feedback.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
21. Auckland Transport engages closely with the council on developing strategy, actions and measures to support the outcomes sought by the Auckland Plan 2050, the Auckland Climate Action Plan and the council’s priorities.
22. Auckland Transport reviews the potential climate impacts of all projects and works hard to minimise carbon emissions. AT’s work programme is influenced by council direction through Te-Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
23. In 2022, the mayor provided Auckland Transport with a Letter of Expectation which directed Auckland Transport to improve the relationship with local boards, including providing more opportunity to influence decision-making. Specifically, that:
“The Statement of Intent 2023-2026 must set out how Auckland Transport will achieve closer local board involvement in the design and planning stage of local transport projects that affect their communities.”
24. Auckland Transport’s ‘2023-26 Statement of Intent’ reflects this direction stating that:
“We (Auckland Transport) will engage more meaningfully and transparently with local boards, recognising that they represent their communities, and that they should have greater involvement in local transport projects that affect those communities. This means a genuine partnership where we seek to understand the unique and diverse needs of each local board at a regional level, not just by project. We will work in partnership to integrate those needs into our planning. We will support local boards to communicate integrated local transport planning to their communities.”
25. Project Kōkiri provides an annual process where local boards prioritise a group of key programmes or projects, identifying them to AT, and setting engagement levels that capture the local board’s expectations. This plan forms the basis for regular reporting on key programs and projects. Project Kōkiri will be supported by regular updates to provide transparency.
26. Project Kōkiri was developed working closely with Auckland Council’s Governance Division. It has also been reported generally monthly to the Local Board Chair’s Forum and discussed with a reference group of local board chairs.
27. Further, this work relies on historical engagement with Auckland Council and other Council Controlled Organisations.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
28. The local board had a forward works programme briefing on 5 November 2024 to receive quality advice on the programme. The response from both elected members and staff supporting local boards has been positive. They have been specifically supportive of the large amount and quality of information provided, the detailed discussion with subject matter experts, and attendance at workshops by Auckland Transport executive leaders.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
29. Auckland Transport is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its broader legal obligations in being more responsible or effective to Māori.
30. AT’s Māori Responsiveness Plan outlines the commitment to 19 mana whenua tribes in delivering effective and well-designed transport policy and solutions for Auckland. We also recognise mataawaka and their representative bodies and our desire to foster a relationship with them. This plan is available on the Auckland Transport website - https://at.govt.nz/about-us/transport-plans-strategies/maori-responsiveness-plan/#about
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
31. This decision has no financial implications for Henderson-Massey Local Board because Auckland Transport funds all projects and programmes.
32. Local boards do have a transport budget through the local board transport funds, and these projects are included in this report. However, their financial implications are reported separately.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
33. The proposed decision does carry some risk. First, the local board needs to be able to commit to the time required for the level of engagement requested. If decisions are not able to be made or are slowed down by local board decision-making, there can be significant financial costs to AT and therefore the ratepayer.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
34. After receiving this report, AT will review the formal feedback from all local boards.
35. AT may engage with the local board directly after receiving their formal resolutions to clarify positions or to discuss the proposed levels of engagement.
36. By mid-May 2025, AT will provide a memo outlining its response to this report. This memo will provide the basis for future engagement.
37. In June 2025, AT will draft a report with an attached annual ‘Kōkiri’ (local board transport agreement) stating how AT and the local board will engage over the next 12 months
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
2025-2026 Forward Works Programme Brief |
479 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Owena Schuster - Elected Members Relationship Partner |
|
Authorisers |
John Gillespie - Head Stakeholder & Community Engagement Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Allocation of decision-making responsibilities for council-controlled organisation activities coming in house
File No.: CP2025/06343
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek feedback from local boards on the proposed approach to allocating decision-making responsibilities between the Governing Body and local boards as part of Annual Budget 2025/2026 decisions. In particular, for urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities which move into Auckland Council as a result of council-controlled organisations (CCO) reform decisions.
2. To identify any additional matters requiring review.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
3. The CCO reform package in the Mayoral proposal, considered whether CCOs and the Auckland Council Group are structured in the best way to deliver on the long-term plan and its broader vision for Auckland. The goals of the reform included improving democratic accountability, strategic direction and council group effectiveness and efficiency.
4. In December 2024 the Governing Body confirmed structural changes to move urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities into Auckland Council no later than 1 July 2025.
5. This means that decision-making responsibility for the activities currently governed by the Eke Panuku and Tātaki Auckland Unlimited (TAU) boards needs to be allocated by the Governing Body to either the Governing Body or local boards in accordance with section 17 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. This will be recorded in the allocation of decision-making table (allocation table) for inclusion in the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
6. For urban regeneration, staff recommend decision-making for the overall programme and associated budgets, and the city centre and waterfront programme sit with the Governing Body. Decision-making responsibility for implementing agreed priority location programmes would sit with local boards.
7. It is recommended that decision-making responsibility in relation to property and marina management also sit with the Governing Body, noting that further work is underway through the Group Property Review which might result in changes in the future.
8. In the future, new urban regeneration or development programmes could be established. The council proposes to undertake further work to clarify how these processes can best reflect the principle of subsidiarity.
9. For economic development activities staff do not consider that substantive changes to the existing allocation table are required. The allocation table already outlines that decisions on the regional economic development strategy, business improvement district (BID) policy, city centre and Auckland-wide economic development programmes sit with the Governing Body. Local boards have always held decision-making responsibilities for influencing local BID programmes, local economic development plans, projects and other local initiatives.
10. Staff are aware that legislative change is proposed to bring several Auckland Transport functions into the council parent and the matters covered in this report should assist with the process of allocation of those decisions to the Governing Body or local boards in the future.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) provide feedback on staff proposals relating to the allocation of decision-making responsibility for:
i. the urban regeneration and property management activities currently governed by the Eke Panuku board
ii. the economic development activities currently governed by the Tātaki Auckland Unlimited board
to either the Governing Body or local boards in accordance with section 17 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009
b) note that staff recommendations and feedback from local boards will be considered at the Governing Body meeting on 29 May 2025 and associated changes to the allocation of decision-making table will be implemented as part of Annual Plan 2025/2026 decisions
c) note that further work is required in relation to determining the future decision-making allocation on:
i. funding of new priority urban regeneration or development locations as additional programmes are identified
ii. how anticipated demand from local boards for local economic development and urban regeneration advice is to be addressed
iii. property management decisions (undertaken as part of the Group Property Review)
d) provide feedback on any other matters requiring review.
Horopaki
Context
CCO reform decisions included moving urban regeneration, property and economic development activities in-house
11. The CCO reform included analysis on the rationale for and performance of the current CCO model, and structural reform options for three CCOs – Auckland Transport, Eke Panuku and Tātaki Auckland Unlimited. The goals of the reform are to improve:
i. democratic accountability over projects and services delivered to Aucklanders by CCOs
ii. strategic alignment between council decision making and what CCOs do for Aucklanders
iii. the effectiveness and efficiency of how the Auckland Council Group operates.
12. Decisions on CCO reform were made on 12 December 2024 (GB/2024/179) and included transferring and integrating urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities into council. Key reasons for this integration include:
· Urban regeneration – strengthening council’s ability to coordinate planning, strategy and delivery in a place-based way, including around strategic growth opportunities, large-scale developments and urban regeneration.
· Property management – improving processes for buying, managing and selling council assets and improving collaboration across the council group to achieve greater financial and strategic value from property assets.
· Economic development – increasing the council’s economic policy capability, identifying new opportunities and integrating advice on economic development issues into broader decision-making.
13. As a result, there may be some additional decisions to be made by the Governing Body or local boards, that were previously made by the Eke Panuku and Tātaki Auckland Unlimited Boards.
Legislation sets how decision-making is allocated, including the use of the subsidiarity principle
14. The basis on which decision-making responsibility is allocated is what is known as the subsidiarity principle, as set out in Section 17 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 (LGACA). This states that decision-making should be local unless the nature of the activity is such that decision-making on an Auckland-wide basis will better promote the well-being of communities across Auckland because:
· the impact of the decision will extend beyond a single local board area, or
· effective decision-making will require alignment or integration with other decisions (that sit with the GB), or
· the benefits of a consistent or co-ordinated approach across Auckland will outweigh the benefits of reflecting the diverse needs and preferences of the communities within each local board area.
15. The Governing Body is responsible for allocating decision-making responsibility for non-regulatory activities in accordance with the principles outlined above, after considering the views and preferences expressed by each local board. The allocation of decision-making responsibility is then recorded in the Decision-making responsibilities of Auckland Council’s Governing Body and local boards Policy, which is included in each year’s Annual Plan (or the long-term plan every third year). The core part of this policy is what is generally known as the allocation table, which lists the non-regulatory activities for which the Governing Body and local boards have decision-making responsibility.
16. The allocation table, with proposed changes shown, is included at Attachment A. Also included at Attachment B is a list of the current Eke Panuku activities in the local board area, to provide current context.
17. These proposals were workshopped with the Governing Body on 26 March 2025 and a recording of that meeting was emailed to all local board members on 28 March and can be found here. The presentation is available here.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
18. This section is divided into the three key activities being transferred to Auckland Council: urban regeneration, property management and economic development. It outlines where decision-making responsibility currently sits or is proposed to sit and the rationale.
Allocation of decision-making responsibility for urban regeneration (new section in allocation table)
19. While activities that enable urban regeneration (such as planning, development streetscape improvements) are already covered in the allocation table, staff are proposing identifying urban regeneration as a stand-alone activity to enhance clarity.
20. Given the complexity and advanced state of council’s priority location urban regeneration programme, there is a need to minimise the risk of implementation being slowed down. Staff propose that this change is managed using the following principles:
· delivery of approved urban regeneration programmes will continue, using current business cases and detailed budgets (approved by the Eke Panuku board)
· the Governing Body will allocate budgets to these programmes.
21. The proposed allocations relate to current programmes and in part are in recognition that these must continue without issues despite the structural change. Further decisions will need to be made for new programmes that will be developed over time which cannot be accommodated prior to 1 July. This includes the governance and budget allocation of any new programmes.
Proposed additions to the allocation table
22. The principles set out in Section 17 of the LGACA (set out at Paragraph 14 above) have been applied to existing urban regeneration activities. Table One sets out the proposed additions to the allocation table, with the reasoning for Governing Body or local board decision-making set out below. Note that the high-level wording is consistent with conventions in the existing allocation table.
Table One – Proposed additions to the allocation table for urban regeneration
|
Proposed Governing Body decision-making |
Proposed local board decision-making |
|
· Auckland-wide urban regeneration programme outcomes and objectives · Urban regeneration in city centre and waterfront · Overall funding plan for priority locations · Allocation of budget for priority location plans including sequencing of urban regeneration projects within annual budget envelopes · Identification of priority locations for urban regeneration programme |
· Implementation of priority location plans, within parameters set by the Governing Body · Local urban regeneration projects that are not part of the Auckland-wide urban regeneration programme, for example streetscape improvements or local service property optimisation projects
|
Proposed allocation to Governing Body: decision-making over urban regeneration programmes
23. Decision-making responsibility for regional urban regeneration activities is proposed to be allocated to the Governing Body as follows:
· Auckland-wide urban regeneration programme outcomes and objectives – the overall programme has region-wide outcomes, such as commercial and housing development. Therefore, the Section 17 principles of taking a consistent and coordinated approach across Auckland and enabling alignment with other decisions that sit with the Governing Body, are considered to be met.
· Urban regeneration in the city centre and waterfront – these programmes are recommended to sit with the Governing Body because the scale, influence and impact of these programmes extend beyond just the Waitematā Local Board area. The success of the city centre is important for Aucklanders, New Zealanders and visitors as a regional destination.
· Overall funding plan for priority locations – the Governing Body will allocate overall funding for the lifetime of programmes, often over 10-20 years or more.
· Allocation of budget for priority location plans including sequencing of urban regeneration projects within annual budget envelopes - the nature of revenue and funding available for urban regeneration and the manner in which programmes progress, is based on elements such as market forces, and regulatory processes. This means that budgets cannot easily be apportioned to local boards and need to sit with the Governing Body, at least initially.
· Identification of priority locations for urban regeneration programme – decision-making over identification of priority locations for the overall programme is proposed to sit with the Governing Body as new locations and programmes will form part of the Auckland-wide network.
Proposed allocation to local boards: decision-making over urban regeneration programmes
24. The following activities are proposed to be allocated to local boards:
· Implementation of priority location plans, within parameters set by the Governing Body – this will include an annual work programme specifying projects, sites and/or activities in the local board area.
· Local urban regeneration projects that are not part of the Auckland-wide urban regeneration programme, for example streetscape improvements or local service property optimisation projects – these may be projects that a local board has identified as a local priority in its local board plan and has allocated local funding to.
Further work to be done to review urban regeneration decision-making activity
25. In alignment with council’s direction to empower local boards to carry out their local leadership role, staff consider that it may be possible to allocate further responsibilities to local boards. However, further work is required to test this assumption.
26. Staff propose that the current work being overseen by the Joint Governance Working Party also consider ways to give local boards a meaningful role in shaping the case for any new urban regeneration or development priority areas.
Practical application of decision-making for urban regeneration in 2025/2026
27. Table Two outlines how the allocation of urban regeneration responsibilities would work in practice. The table also includes a column outlining the work and decisions that staff would undertake under delegation.
Table Two – Proposed urban regeneration programme decision-making in practice
|
Governing Body (or Committee) |
Local Boards |
Staff via Chief Executive general delegation (from GB and local boards) |
|
· Approves Auckland Plan, land use and infrastructure policy · Approves urban regeneration investment through the LTP/Annual Plan, including: o Urban regeneration budget o Revenue target from asset recycling (property sales) o City Centre Targeted Rate programme · Approves new priority locations or regional urban regeneration programmes · Approves parameters for investment in priority locations including strategic outcomes, high-level costs, benefits, and delivery timeframes.
· Decision-maker for city centre and waterfront programmes · Approves acquisition of property · Approves disposal of non-service property |
· Consulted prior to LTP, annual plan, new priority locations and for city centre and regional programmes · Endorses high-level programme business case for priority locations, including masterplan · NEW Approves annual work programme specifying projects, sites and/or activities in the local board area · NEW Approves annual placemaking and activation plans and budget for its area · NEW Approves urban regeneration project plans within the parameters set out within approved programme business cases (i.e. scope, cost, location, benefits delivered) |
· Provides advice to Governing Body and local boards to inform their respective decisions in relation to urban regeneration · Implements approved urban regeneration programme business cases and projects in accordance with delegations · Executes property transactions, including preparing go-to-market strategies for development sites (within parameters set by local boards) · Provides regular delivery performance reporting to Governing Body and local boards · Works closely with local boards, both formally and informally, from urban regeneration plans, to design of public realm projects to property optimisation, regular workshops, meetings and site visits |
Allocation of decision-making responsibilities for property and asset management
28. Auckland Council will become responsible for Eke Panuku functions including the management of commercial properties, property transactions (sales and acquisitions) and management of significant assets like the city centre marinas.
29. Table Three sets out the statutory decision-making responsibilities of the Governing Body, which may be delegated to local boards. This is outlined in the first section of the Decision-making responsibilities of Auckland Council’s Governing Body and local boards Policy.
Table Three – Property and marina management statutory decision-making
|
Governing Body statutory decision-making |
Local board decision-making that is delegated from the Governing Body |
|
· Regulatory decisions and statutory responsibilities e.g. disposals |
· Service optimisation decisions over local service property |
30. Table Four sets out non-regulatory decisions, which can be allocated to local boards, reflected in the allocation table.
Table Four – Property and marina management non-regulatory decision-making (new text in the ‘facilities and asset management section)
|
Governing Body decision-making (statutory and non-regulatory activities) |
Local board decision-making (non-regulatory and delegated decisions) |
|
· Commercial property and marina management · Management of the non-service property infrastructure as identified in the Infrastructure Strategy |
· Acquisition of new local community facilities (including local libraries, local sport and recreation facilities, local parks and reserves), and their specific location, design, build and fit out within budget parameters agreed with the Governing Body |
Governing Body decision-making over property and asset management
31. The Governing Body has an overarching statutory responsibility for managing the network of facilities and overall financial oversight of the council.
32. Commercial property and marina management are allocated to the Governing Body because these properties are not delivering local council services and are an important financial contributor to council budgets. This is also the case with management of non-service property in line with the Infrastructure Strategy.
Local board decision-making over property and asset management
33. Local boards oversee the delivery of community services (such as libraries and community services), in ‘local service properties’. The Governing Body has delegated some decision-making to local boards enabling them to oversee the disposal of local service properties and reinvest this to achieve other community outcomes. This is called service property optimisation, for example by merging two council services into one building and selling the other property. Local boards also have decision-making over the acquisition of new local community facilities including their specific location, design, build and fit out within budget parameters agreed with the Governing Body.
The Group Property Framework is intended to provide principles, guidance and recommendations which will assist in improving decision-making on council’s property portfolio
34. The group property framework is intended to provide an overarching guide to the management of property across the council group, based on robust principles and agreed definitions. The scope of the group property review was agreed by the Revenue and Expenditure Committee in September 2024 (link to scope).
35. Some local boards have previously expressed concerns around a lack of information and advice on local service and non-service properties, including how property classifications are changed. The draft framework is expected to include recommendations that may address these concerns, for example:
· clarifying whether properties are service, non-service, local and non-local to ensure that local boards are given clear advice and decision-making over optimisation opportunities
· recommending a matrix team be established consisting of key property staff across council to present the full options to local boards for property optimisation options in their area.
Allocation of decision-making for economic development activities
36. Economic development activities currently delivered by TAU are being transferred to Auckland Council. There are no substantive changes proposed for the decision-making responsibility for these activities, as reflected in Table Five.
37. While the allocation of decision-making is not proposed to change, council will need to make additional decisions on economic development initiatives, for example in areas such as the Auckland Innovation Network and the Te Puna creative precinct. This change is intended to increase democratic accountability.
Table Five – Economic development decision-making (no new allocations, some minor changes proposed)
|
Governing Body decision-making |
Local board decision-making |
|
· Regional economic development strategy and Business Improvement District (BID) Policy · Auckland-wide and city centre economic development programmes and initiatives
|
· Business improvement district (BID) programmes including establishment of new BIDs within parameters set by the BID Policy and recommending BID targeted rates to the Governing Body · Local economic development plans, projects and initiatives within parameters set by regional strategies, policies and plans |
Business improvement district (BID) programmes
38. In relation to the BID Programmes, the BID Policy outlines key decision-making responsibilities that sit with local boards and expressly recognises that within Auckland Council, local boards are the primary relationship lead with BID operating business associations. Other responsibilities that sit with local boards in relation to BIDs include:
· approval of the establishment of a new BID programme and boundary area
· approval of any changes or amendments to an existing BID programme boundary area
· annually recommending BID programme targeted rate grant amounts to the Governing Body
· recommending to the Governing Body proposed changes to a BID targeted rate mechanism.
39. Local boards may provide additional support to BID-operating business associations and BID programme delivery through their local board annual work programmes and budgets. In business districts or town centres that are not part of (or not big enough to form) a BID programme, some local boards actively partner with local businesses to develop or deliver initiatives that promote local economic development.
Local economic development plans and initiatives
40. In 2024, the reference to local economic development plans, projects and initiatives in the allocation table was removed from the allocation table after TAU funding for local economic development support ceased. The proposal to reinstate this in the allocation acknowledges that budget and resources support an activity rather than define its existence as a council function.
41. Local boards have in the past expressed interest in receiving greater support for developing and implementing local economic development initiatives in their areas. While there is currently no additional resource for local economic development activities, it is anticipated that local boards will continue to seek staff advice on these activities, and this will need to be addressed. Note that some local boards have funded economic brokers to deliver local economic development outcomes.
Clarifications around economic development in the allocation table
42. Staff also propose the following minor edits to the allocation table to bring it up to date with current policies, which are shown in Attachment A:
· removing reference to BID strategic direction in the allocation to local boards. The removal of this acknowledges that the business association is a membership based incorporated society in structure and it is the members of that society who set the strategic direction of the association and its activities. Council can advocate for a common strategic direction between the local BID programme and local board but is not the decision maker of the BIDs strategic direction.
· removing reference to Auckland Economic Development Action Plan 2021-2024 and investment framework from the Governing Body’s allocation because this action plan is out of date.
· removing reference to regional business events, and branding and marketing for the city centre, metropolitan centres and spatial priority areas as set out in the Future Development Strategy from the allocation to Governing Body because these examples aren‘t reflective of current and planned activity delivered by the economic development function.
Other amendments to the allocation table
43. As shown in Attachment A, other changes to the allocation table are designed to enhance clarity. These include formatting changes that separate activities that have been, to date, clustered together in the allocation table e.g. separation of planning and development activities from economic development activities, creation of a facilities and asset management category/activity, incorporating the existing allocation of asset renewals and upgrade responsibilities (currently at the end of the table) into the facilities and asset management section.
44. The changes also include new explanatory notes for new activities e.g. clarification of the purpose of the urban regeneration programme.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
45. No climate impacts have been identified as a result of the changes proposed in this report.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
46. The transfer of urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities to Auckland Council will have a range of impacts on the Auckland Council Group. These include direct political direction to staff, improved integration of activities and outcomes and efficiency gains.
47. While there are no new resources or budgets proposed as a result of the transfer of these activities, it is likely that demand for advice and support may increase with direct political decision-making.
48. The Governing Body will make a decision on the proposed allocation of decision-making responsibility for the transferred Eke Panuku and TAU activities on 29 May 2025, and these will be reflected in the allocation table as part of Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
49. Existing urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities are coming in house from 1 July. The major change local boards will see, is where staff come to them seeking approval of urban regeneration activities, rather than support, endorsement, or for information.
50. As noted elsewhere in this report, when existing urban regeneration programmes are completed, new programmes and activities will be considered. It is expected that local boards will have a greater role in decisions on those.
51. Greater clarity around property management decision-making will be provided in the Group Property Framework.
52. Local economic development remains under local board decision-making responsibility. Until additional resource and/or budget is provided advice on new local economic development activity will not be possible, unless local boards fund this themselves.
53. Changes to decision-making may result in increased local board member workloads, which will be assessed as activities are integrated into council.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
54. There are no specific Māori impacts identified with the proposals outlined in this report. Engagement with Māori in relation to urban regeneration, property management and economic development is expected to continue in line with current practices.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
55. No direct financial implications are anticipated from the reallocation of decisions to the Governing Body or local boards. Staff advice to support decision-making will continue, even if the decision-maker changes (for example some decisions made by the Eke Panuku Board will now be made by local boards).
56. There will be financial implications if new urban regeneration or economic development programmes or projects are started. Local boards wishing to undertake new programmes or projects will need to fund them.
57. The financial implications of integration of urban regeneration, property management and economic development functions into council (for example the dis-establishment of Eke Panuku as an entity) are being addressed by other workstreams under in CCO Reform programme.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
58. The proposals in this report are intended to ensure a seamless transfer of urban regeneration, property management and economic development activities into council. Any issues that arise are not anticipated to be significant and will be addressed on a case-by-case basis.
59. With activities coming in house, political scrutiny and oversight may increase and create the need to change direction. This is considered to be more likely with new programmes than with current programmes but will need to be monitored and managed. This risk is balanced against the benefits of improved democratic accountability.
60. As outlined in this report, a number of decisions will need to be made as existing urban development programmes advance to a point where resources are freed up to develop new programmes. As part of this it is anticipated that a review of current decision-making will be undertaken to ensure particularly local boards have the right degree of decision-making over local programmes and associated budgets. Staff consider there is time to manage this change and in terms of the allocation of decision-making, any further change can be reflected in Annual Plan 2026/2027.
61. Some local boards may advocate for additional or new urban regeneration and/or economic development programmes in their areas. This may be reflected in local board plans which new local boards will develop post-Election 2025. A process to manage that will need to be established. Some local boards may also wish to fund such programmes to support commencement and resource needs will need to be carefully considered to respond to this.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
62. The Governing Body will make decisions on the allocation of decision-making responsibility on 29 May 2025. Local board feedback and resolutions will be reflected in the staff report. Any changes to the allocation table will be included in the Annual Plan 2025/2026, which is due to be adopted by the Governing Body on 26 June 2025.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Proposed changes to the allocation table of decision-making responsibilities of Auckland Council’s Governing Body and local boards |
557 |
|
b⇩ |
Eke Panuku projects overview – as outlined in agreed local board engagement plan 2024-2025 |
575 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
John Nash - Programme Manager Shirley Coutts - Principal Advisor - Governance Strategy |
|
Authorisers |
Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Local board feedback on the Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill
File No.: CP2025/06175
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To invite local board feedback on the Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill (the Bill) seeks to enable Time of Use Charging (TOUC) in New Zealand. It has been referred to the Transport and Infrastructure Select Committee with a closing date of 27 April 2025.
3. A joint project team from Auckland Council and Auckland Transport is leading work on the TOUC schemes in Auckland. This work provides a strong evidence base to support council’s submission advocating for policy settings that would enable a successful scheme in the city. The work programme builds on work done over recent years, particularly “The Congestion Question” report by the Ministry of Transport from 2020 and the Select Committee inquiry into congestion pricing in Auckland in 2021.
4. In parallel to the council/AT programme, the government has been advancing work to enable TOUC in New Zealand. The Bill was introduced to Parliament on 4 March 2025.
5. At its meeting on 5 December 2024, the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee requested staff prepare a submission on this draft bill.
6. On 12 February 2025, local board chairs and transport leads were invited to a Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee workshop that outlined key aspects of the legislation and the proposed recommendations. The workshop presentation materials can be found in the agenda of the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee - Thursday, 6 March 2025.
7. The programme team will develop a draft submission and seek endorsement from the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee at its 3 April 2025 meeting.
8. An insights report will be a component of the draft submission, and this includes a summary, and all details of prior local board feedback provided in September and October 2024 (see Attachment A). The report will be included in the 3 April committee paper.
9. Local boards acknowledged the need to address congestion but raised concerns about transport accessibility, impacts on low-income communities, and those who must drive at peak times. The most common feedback emphasised the need for viable public transport alternatives and reinvesting revenue into improving services, particularly in deprived areas.
10. Many boards also stressed that public transport issues must be resolved before introducing a time-of-use charge, as many residents lack flexibility in work hours or commute options. Concerns were also raised about financial burdens on households, with suggestions for exemptions and daily caps. Safety issues related to alternative routes to avoid charges were another key theme. Feedback focused on ensuring the scheme is effective, fair, and simple, with appropriate mitigations and revenue allocation.
11. Providing feedback on this is an opportunity to influence how TOUC schemes can be implemented in a way that is beneficial for Auckland. It does not commit the council to implementing a TOUC scheme.
12. The work programme has regularly reported to, and taken guidance from, the AT Design and Delivery Committee and the council TOUC Political Reference Group. Additionally, local boards have provided resolutions on the necessary core principles for an effective scheme.
13. The government’s policy objectives are broadly aligned with those identified by the council and AT TOUC programme. However, there are some aspects of the Bill that are not consistent, particularly regarding scheme governance, mitigations and revenue. Further details are available in the workshop presentation (link above).
14. Local boards received a briefing from the project team on 24 March.
15. Any feedback from local boards will be appended to the Auckland Council /Auckland Transport (AT) submission. This is due by 4pm on 22 April 2025.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) tuku / provide feedback on the Land Transport Management (Time of Use Charging) Amendment Bill.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇨ |
Insights Report - Auckland Transport & Auckland Council Time of Use Charging programme (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Michael Roth - Lead Transport Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager Louise Mason - General Manager Policy Lou-Ann Ballantyne, General Manager, Governance and Engagement |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Public feedback on proposal to amend dog policy and bylaw
File No.: CP2025/06542
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek local board views on how the Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel should address public feedback from people in the local board area to the proposal to amend matters of regional significance in the Auckland Council Dog Policy and Bylaw.
2. To delegate one or more local board members to represent local board views on the public feedback to the Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
3. Staff have prepared a summary of public feedback to enable the local board to provide its views on how the Panel should address public feedback from people in the local board area to the proposal to amend matters of regional significance in the Dog Policy and Bylaw.
4. The Governing Body adopted a proposal to amend matters of regional significance in the Kaupapa mo ngā Kurī | Policy on Dogs 2019 and Ture a Rohe Tiakina Kurī | Dog Management Bylaw 2019 in December 2024, and appointed a Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel to consider all public feedback and make recommendations, before a final decision is made.
5. The proposal to adopt an amended policy and bylaw seeks to improve council’s approach to dog management in Auckland by minimising the risk of danger and distress to people, stock, poultry, domestic animals and protected wildlife, nuisance to people, damage to property and environment, risk of not meeting the needs of dogs and their owners and the inherent risk of conflict between users of shared spaces in Auckland.
6. Council received responses from 5,207 people and organisations at the close of feedback on 23 February 2025. All public feedback is summarised in Attachment A. Feedback related to the local board area is in Attachment B. A user-friendly view of the feedback related to the local board by proposal can be viewed on council's AKHaveYourSay web page.
7. All feedback is summarised by the following topics:
|
· Proposal 1: Limit to number of dogs walked (six on leash, with maximum three of the six off leash at any one time) |
· Proposal 12B: Muriwai Regional Park |
|
· Proposal 2: Auckland Botanic Gardens |
· Proposal 12C: Tāwharanui Regional Park |
|
· Proposal 3: Hunua Ranges Regional Park |
· Proposal 12D: Wenderholm Regional Park |
|
· Proposal 4: Long Bay Regional Park |
· Proposal 13A: Restructure the policy to more clearly show its goal, focus areas, council actions, and rules |
|
· Proposal 5A: Mahurangi Regional Park East |
· Proposal 13B: Clarify rule that all dogs classified as menacing must be neutered |
|
· Proposal 5B: Mahurangi Regional Park West |
· Proposal 13C: Clarify who can provide behavioural assessments in relation to menacing dog classifications |
|
· Proposal 5C: Mahurangi Regional Park Scott Point |
· Proposal 13D: Clarify what areas in Auckland require a license to keep multiple dogs on a property |
|
· Proposal 6: Pākiri Regional Park |
· Proposal 13E: Clarify how dog access rules are set |
|
· Proposal 7: Shakespear Regional Park |
· Proposal 13F: Clarify Auckland-wide dog access rules |
|
· Proposal 8: Tāpapakanga Regional Park |
· Proposal 13G: Clarify or correct errors in Policy Schedule 2: Dog access rules |
|
· Proposal 9: Te Ārai Regional Park |
· Proposal 13H: Remove outdated information in Policy Schedule 2: Dog access rules |
|
· Proposal 10: Waitawa Regional Park |
· Proposal 13I: Update dog access rules for Tūpuna Maunga (ancestral mountains) |
|
· Proposal 11: Whakanewha Regional Park |
· Proposal 13J: Remove outdated/duplicated bylaw content |
|
· Proposal 12A: Ambury Regional Park |
|
8. Staff recommend that the local board provide its views on how the Panel should address feedback from people in the local board area, and if it wishes, present those views to the Panel. Taking this approach will assist the Panel in making recommendations to the Governing Body about whether to adopt the proposal.
9. There is a reputational risk that the feedback from the local board area is from a limited group of people and does not reflect the views of the whole community. This report mitigates this risk by providing local boards with a summary of all public feedback.
10. Local boards can (if they wish) present their views to the Panel on 23 May 2025. The Panel will consider local board views and all public feedback before making recommendations to the Governing Body in June 2025. The Governing Body will make a final decision mid-2025.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) tūtohi / receive the public feedback from people in the local board area to the Governing Body proposal to amend matters of regional significance in the Auckland Council Kaupapa mo ngā Kurī | Policy on Dogs 2019 and Ture a Rohe Tiakina Kurī | Dog Management Bylaw 2019 in the agenda report.
b) whakarato / provide its views on how the Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel should address public feedback to the proposal in (a) to assist the Panel in its deliberations.
c) whakatuu / appoint one or more local board members to present the views in (b) to the Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel.
d) tuku mana / delegate authority to the local board chair to appoint a replacement to any appointed member in (c) who is unable to present to the Panel.
Horopaki
Context
The local board has an opportunity to provide its views on public feedback
11. The local board in accordance with council’s collaborative governance model[2] now has an opportunity to provide its views on how the Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel should address public feedback from people in the local board area to the proposal.
12. Local board views must be provided by resolution to the Panel. The local board can also choose to present those views to the Panel at a meeting scheduled for 23 May 2025.
13. The nature of the local board views is at the discretion of the local board but must remain within the scope of the proposal and public feedback. For example, the local board:
ü could indicate support for matters raised in public feedback
ü could recommend how the Policy and Bylaw Panel address matters raised in public feedback
û should not express its views on the proposal itself (that opportunity was provided prior to public consultation, the focus now is on how to respond to public feedback).
Council is required to have a policy on dogs and a bylaw to implement the policy
14. The Dog Control Act 1996 requires Auckland Council to have a policy on dogs and a bylaw to give effect to it by specifying rules that dog owners must comply with.
15. Council’s objective is to ‘keep dogs a positive part of the life of Aucklanders’ by:
· maintaining opportunities for owners to take their dogs to public places
· adopting measures to minimise the problems caused by dogs (including by promoting responsible dog ownership)
· protecting dogs from harm and ensuring their welfare.
16. The rules are enforced by the Animal Management unit using a modern regulator approach to compliance (for example information, education and enforcement).
17. The policy and bylaw are part of a wider regulatory framework that includes the following:
· The Dog Control Act 1996 manages matters relating to dog ownership, including their care, control and owner responsibilities for damage caused by their dog.
· The Animal Welfare Act 1999 ensures that owners of animals and persons in charge of animals attend properly to the welfare of the animal.
· The Code of Welfare for Dogs 2018 provides information to the owners and persons in charge of dogs about the standards they must achieve to meet their obligations under the Animal Welfare Act 1999.
The Governing Body proposed amending matters of regional significance in the policy and bylaw for public feedback
18. On 12 December 2024, the Governing Body adopted a proposal to amend matters of regional significance in the Auckland Council Kaupapa no ngā Kurī / Policy on Dogs 2019 and Ture ā Rohe Tiakina Kurī / Dog Management Bylaw 2019 (GB/2024/181). It also appointed a Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel to consider all public feedback and make recommendations, before a final decision is made by the Governing Body.
19. The proposal arose from a statutory review of the Dog Policy and Bylaw (see figure below).

20. The proposal seeks to improve council’s approach to dog management in Auckland by minimising the risk of danger and distress to people, stock, poultry, domestic animals and protected wildlife, nuisance to people, damage to property and environment, risk of not meeting the needs of dogs and their owners from irresponsible dog ownership and the inherent risk of conflict between users of shared spaces in Auckland.
21. The main proposals are outlined in the Table below:
|
Main proposals |
|
Auckland Botanic Gardens · Change the off-leash area to align with the current signposted off-leash boundaries, to provide for temporary changes for events and to transition to on-leash as parts of the off-leash area are developed in accordance with the Gardens Master Plan. · Prohibit dogs from waterways. · Prohibit dogs from the Huakaiwaka Visitor Centre, Café area (except the western café terrace), designated food concession areas and Potter Children’s Garden. · Clarify rules in other areas. |
|
Hunua Ranges Regional Park · Prohibit dogs from tracks and roads that connect to the Kohukohunui track, the Kokako Management Area and Piggott’s Habitat and on single use mountain bike tracks (currently on-leash). |
|
Long Bay Regional Park · Amend the summer daytime rule for the beach south of Vaughan Stream from on-leash to prohibited (off-leash access before 10am and after 5pm in summer and at any time in winter unchanged). · Clarify rules in other areas, including access to beach from southernmost carpark and prohibited tracks and bays. |
|
Mahurangi Regional Park · Prohibit dogs on Cudlip Point Loop Track (currently on-leash). · Allow dogs on-leash at all times at Scott Point (currently on-leash time and season). · Clarify rules in other areas (including dogs prohibited at Mahurangi Regional Park (East) and heritage grounds at Scott Point. |
|
Pākiri Regional Park · Prohibit dogs on the associated beach. |
|
Shakespear Regional Park · Apply an on-leash time and season rule to the open grass areas between Army Bay and Okoramai Bay (currently off-leash). · Clarify rules in other areas (such as boundary of Army Bay and Okoramai Bay beaches, on-leash tracks and prohibited areas). |
|
Tāpapakanga Regional Park · Provide off-leash access on beach and on-leash access on area between beach and car park at any time (currently prohibited during lambing season) · Clarify rules in other areas (such as prohibited at the campgrounds and bach, and during lambing). |
|
Te Ārai Regional Park · Prohibit dogs on Forestry Beach (Te Ārai Beach South to Pakiri Beach) and associated coastal tracks. · Clarify access to off-leash area at disused quarry. |
|
Waitawa Regional Park · Change eastern part of Mataitai Beach from off-leash to on-leash. · Change Waitawa Beach from off-leash to on-leash. · Prohibit dogs on single use mountain bike tracks. · Clarify other areas where dogs are prohibited (such as farm paddock during lambing, campground and bach). |
|
Whakanewha Regional Park · Provide on-leash access on tracks from Omiha (Rocky Bay) to the on-leash area of the Park. |
|
Ambury, Muriwai, Tāwharanui and Wenderholm regional parks · Clarify current rules (no change to dog access). |
|
Reorganise, simplify and clarify Policy and Bylaw content, including: · using a goal, focus area, action and rule structure · clarifying approach to setting dog access rules · clarifying the policy to neuter classified dogs and who can provide behavioural assessments · clarifying Auckland-wide dog access rules such as for council carparks and camping grounds, working dogs, dogs in vehicles and private ways · removing outdated information in Schedule 2 for example outdated landmarks · updating dog access rules on Tūpuna Maunga (ancestral mountains) · removing Bylaw content that is covered in the Policy or is outdated. |
22. The proposal was publicly notified for feedback from 20 January until 23 February 2025.
23. Council received feedback from 5,186 people and 30 organisations (5,207 in total)
· 4,046 on the proposal to limit the number of dogs walked and the general policy and bylaw matters and
· 3,084 on the proposal to clarify or change regional park dog access rules.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
24. A total of 240 people from the Henderson-Massey Local Board area provided feedback to the proposal.
25. There was majority support for proposals to reorganise, simplify and clarify Policy and Bylaw content, split support for proposals to clarify dog access rules at Muriwai and Wenderholm Regional Parks, and majority opposition for the proposal to limit the number of dogs walked and the remaining proposals to change or clarify dog access rules at other regional parks.
26. Key themes from the Auckland-wide feedback highlighted concerns with limiting the number of dogs and clarifying or changing the dog access rules at most of the regional parks.
27. While some proposals may not be supported, public feedback also seeks alternatives other than the status quo. For example:
· for Proposal 1: limit to number of dogs walked, of the 66 per cent (2,397) of Auckland-wide feedback opposed to the proposal:
o six per cent (146) supported a limit of four dogs, with no more than two off-leash
o five per cent (113) supported a limit of four dogs, with no more than two off-leash unless licence obtained
o four per cent (100) supported a limit of eight dogs, with no more than four off-leash
o 638 comments (around 30 per cent) supported introducing a dog walker license for qualified dog walkers.
· for proposed changes to regional park rules, Auckland-wide individuals who opposed the changes:
o generally wanted council to provide more dog-friendly or off-leash areas
o some were not opposing the proposals, but instead expressing the view that the current rules are too restrictive.
Overview of local board area and Auckland-wide support for proposed changes
|
Topic (Proposals P1 – P13) |
Local board feedback |
Auckland-wide feedback |
|||
|
Support |
Opposition |
Support |
Opposition |
||
|
Limit the number of dogs walked (six on leash, with maximum three of the six off leash at any one time) |
22 per cent |
74 per cent |
33 per cent |
66 per cent |
|
|
P2 |
Auckland Botanic Gardens |
30 per cent |
70 per cent |
34 per cent |
62 per cent |
|
P3 |
Hunua Ranges Regional Park |
38 per cent |
54 per cent |
33 per cent |
56 per cent |
|
P4 |
Long Bay Regional Park |
20 per cent |
73 per cent |
26 per cent |
70 per cent |
|
P5A |
Mahurangi Regional Park East |
15 per cent |
74 per cent |
27 per cent |
62 per cent |
|
P5B |
Mahurangi Regional Park West |
14 per cent |
75 per cent |
28 per cent |
60 per cent |
|
P5C |
Mahurangi Regional Park Scott Point |
15 per cent |
74 per cent |
29 per cent |
61 per cent |
|
P6 |
Pākiri Regional Park |
9 per cent |
83 per cent |
15 per cent |
81 per cent |
|
P7 |
Shakespear Regional Park |
32 per cent |
63 per cent |
39 per cent |
51 per cent |
|
P8 |
Tāpapakanga Regional Park |
33 per cent |
63 per cent |
34 per cent |
55 per cent |
|
P9 |
Te Ārai Regional Park |
15 per cent |
81 per cent |
18 per cent |
76 per cent |
|
P10 |
Waitawa Regional Park |
22 per cent |
74 per cent |
30 per cent |
61 per cent |
|
P11 |
Whakanewha Regional Park |
25 per cent |
65 per cent |
35 per cent |
51 per cent |
|
P12A |
Ambury Regional Park |
33 per cent |
58 per cent |
37 per cent |
55 per cent |
|
P12B |
Muriwai Regional Park |
45 per cent |
52 per cent |
46 per cent |
47 per cent |
|
P12C |
Tāwharanui Regional Park |
26 per cent |
61 per cent |
43 per cent |
45 per cent |
|
P12D |
Wenderholm Regional Park |
45 per cent |
48 per cent |
42 per cent |
44 per cent |
|
P13A |
Restructure the policy to more clearly show its goal, focus areas, council actions, and rules |
65 per cent |
24 per cent |
71 per cent |
17 per cent |
|
P13B |
Clarify rule that all dogs classified as menacing must be neutered |
76 per cent |
16 per cent |
81 per cent |
13 per cent |
|
P13C |
Clarify who can provide behavioural assessments in relation to menacing dog classifications |
73 per cent |
14 per cent |
83 per cent |
6 per cent |
|
P13D |
Clarify what areas in Auckland require a license to keep multiple dogs on a property |
65 per cent |
28 per cent |
74 per cent |
17 per cent |
|
P13E |
Clarify how dog access rules are set |
72 per cent |
23 per cent |
75 per cent |
13 per cent |
|
P13F |
Clarify Auckland-wide dog access rules |
72 per cent |
23 per cent |
76 per cent |
17 per cent |
|
P13G |
Clarify or correct errors in Policy Schedule 2: Dog access rules |
66 per cent |
17 per cent |
67 per cent |
12 per cent |
|
P13H |
Remove outdated information in Policy Schedule 2: Dog access rules |
76 per cent |
14 per cent |
80 per cent |
9 per cent |
|
P13I |
Update dog access rules for Tūpuna Maunga (ancestral mountains) |
49 per cent |
27 per cent |
49 per cent |
26 per cent |
|
P13J |
Remove outdated or duplicate bylaw content |
78 per cent |
12 per cent |
81 per cent |
7 per cent |
Note: percentages do not add up to 100. For example, ‘I don’t know’ responses are not included in Table.
28. The proposal, proposed policy and bylaw can be viewed in the links. A summary of all public feedback is in Attachment A and a copy of all public feedback related to the local board area to meet council’s statutory requirements is in Attachment B. A more user-friendly view that consolidates the comments from all public feedback related to the local board by proposal can be viewed on council's AKHaveYourSay web page.
Staff recommend the local board provide its views on public feedback
29. Staff recommend that the local board provide its views on how the Governing Body Panel should address public feedback from people in the local board area to the proposal by resolution, and if it wishes, present those views to the Panel on 23 May 2025.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
24. The Dog Policy and Bylaw do not directly address the climate change goals in Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Plan. For example, the Policy and Bylaw focuses more on keeping dogs as a positive part of the lives of Aucklanders.
25. There are no implications for climate change arising from decisions sought in this report.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
26. The Dog Policy and Bylaw impacts the operations of several council departments, including Animal Management, Biodiversity, Regional Parks and Natural Environment teams. Relevant staff are aware of the impacts of the proposal and their implementation role.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
27. The Dog Policy and Bylaw impact local governance and are of high interest.
28. Views from all local boards on a draft proposal were sought in October 2024 and are summarised in the 3 December 2024 Regulatory and Safety Committee agenda (Attachment C to Item 11).
29. This report provides an opportunity to give local board views on how the Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel should address public feedback from people in the local board area to the proposal, before a final decision is made.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
30. The Dog Policy and Bylaw support manaakitanga, whanaungatanga and kaitiakitanga in the Independent Māori Statutory Board’s Māori Plan for Tāmaki Makaurau and the Schedule of Issues of Significance by providing regulations that help protect people and the environment from harm caused by dogs.
31. Mana whenua and mataawaka were notified of the proposal and given the opportunity to provide feedback through face-to-face meetings, in writing, online and in-person.
32. Six per cent (369) of the public feedback received was from people who identified as Māori. Of that feedback:
· 74 per cent (166) did not support the proposal to limit the number of dogs that could be walked, with 58 per cent preferring no change to the current rule
· there was general overall support (more than 50 per cent) to reorganise, simplify and clarify the Policy and Bylaw content, however there was less support (47 per cent) to update dog access rules for Tupuna Maunga (ancestral mountains)
· there was generally opposition to proposed changes to regional park dog access rules.
33. Ngati Manuhiri Settlement Trust supported the majority of the proposals to simplify and clarify the Policy and Bylaw content and proposed changes to Long Bay, Mahurangi, Pākiri, Shakespear, Tāwharanui, Te Ārai and Wenderholm Regional Parks.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
34. There are no financial implications arising from decisions sought in this report. Costs associated with the special consultative procedure and Dog Policy and Bylaw implementation will be met within existing budget.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
35. The following risk has been identified:
|
Then... |
Mitigation |
|
|
The feedback from the local board area is from a limited number of people. |
The feedback may not reflect the views of the whole community. |
This risk is mitigated by providing local boards with a summary of all public feedback. |
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
36. The Governing Body Dog Policy and Bylaw Panel will consider all local board views and public feedback on the proposal, deliberate and make recommendations to the Governing Body in June 2025. The Governing Body will make a final decision mid-2025.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Summary of public feedback to the proposed changes to the dog policy and bylaw |
589 |
|
b⇨ |
Public feedback from people in Henderson-Massey Local Board area (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Kylie Hill - Principal Policy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Louise Mason - General Manager Policy Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Proposed changes to the draft Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy
File No.: CP2025/06381
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek local board endorsement of the amended Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy following public consultation.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. On 10 December 2024, the Policy and Planning Committee approved public consultation on the draft of Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy [PEPCC/2024/131 and PEPCC/2024/132].
3. A total of 402 pieces of feedback were received, through consultation and a People’s Panel survey. Overall, there is strong support for the draft strategy but also opportunities to make changes. A detailed feedback report is provided in Attachment A.
4. Having considered public feedback, as well as local board resolutions on the draft strategy, staff propose changes to the draft strategy, the most significant being:
· more explicitly emphasising the importance of equity and accessibility in providing open spaces and play, sport and recreation opportunities (including in the strategic directions, investment principles and policies)
· greater emphasis on the importance of environment and biodiversity outcomes (including in the investment principles and Policy one)
· greater emphasis on the purpose and benefits of regional parks (in Policy two)
· including the capacity-focused approach (Option package two) for open space provision standards (in Policy two)
· refining the strategic directions based on a range of other consultation feedback
· making the decision-making responsibilities of local boards clearer
· clarifying the meaning of ‘value for money’
· providing clearer direction in the policy section to ensure local boards receive the necessary advice for decision-making
· clarifying that the council attempts to acquire land early in the development process as budget is available.
5. The proposed changes are reflected in the amended strategy (see final draft in Attachment B with track changes).
6. Local boards have called for a better understanding of local impacts. Staff have developed examples of implementation scenarios, existing good practices and potential local applications of the new open space provision standards (see Attachment C), noting that much of how the strategy is implemented is at the discretion of each local board.
7. In addition, staff are working with local board advisors to scope how advice to local boards could be improved to deliver on the strategy. To date, we have identified potential improvements: consolidating information provided to local boards, involving local boards earlier in planning processes, improving alignment between regional and local planning cycles, funding and budgets and providing information on trade-offs (see Attachment D).
8. The Policy and Planning Committee will consider adopting the final amended strategy in May 2025. The agenda report will contain the local board resolutions.
9. If the final amended strategy is adopted, staff will develop an implementation and monitoring plan, including tools and guidance, to support delivery by local boards and the Governing Body. Staff will also continue to scope improvements to local board advice.
Recommendation/s
That the Henderson-Massey Local Board:
a) ohia / endorse the final amended Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy in Attachment B.
b) ohia / endorse updating the open space provision standards in the strategy with Option package two – capacity-focused approach: provide more open space than currently enabled in high- and medium-density areas where residents have low or moderate levels of provision.
Horopaki
Context
The draft strategy outlines how we will provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities
10. As a regional public policy, the draft of Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy sets the strategic directions we seek to achieve for open space, sport and recreation in Auckland and against which we will monitor progress. It forms a unifying roadmap for the council group to deliver and for other non-council organisations and community groups to contribute.
11. It brings together five existing strategies, policies and plans and provides a refreshed and consolidated approach to planning and investment. It aims to provide open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to benefit all Aucklanders, now and in the future, to improve the health of Tāmaki Makaurau.
The development of the draft strategy was supported by an advisory structure
12. The development of the draft strategy was informed by a strong evidence base and supported by an advisory structure that met regularly to provide input and direction.
13. The advisory structure includes the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group (featuring two councillors, two local board members and one Houkura member), an advisory and Māori rōpū (with mana whenua, mataawaka and sector representatives) and key kaimahi from across the council group.
14. Local boards were also engaged throughout the development of the draft strategy via memos, presentations, briefings, workshops and business meetings (refer Attachment A, pages 3-4).
Gathering Aucklanders’ views provides an opportunity to further refine the draft strategy
15. On 10 December 2024, the Policy and Planning Committee approved public consultation on the draft strategy [PEPCC/2024/131 and PEPCC/2024/132].
16. Consultation was designed to seek Aucklanders’ views on the draft strategy and identify any relevant questions, concerns or additional information to strengthen or modify it.
17. Consultation took place from 10 February to 10 March 2025 and was advertised on Our Auckland and in libraries. Staff also requested that local board engagement advisors and key stakeholders share the consultation opportunity with their communities and networks. The engagement approach involved online submissions via the Have Your Say project page, by email or postal mail, as well as in person drop-in sessions at libraries and Pasifika Festival and hui with the demographic advisory panels, key stakeholders and mataawaka.
18. Staff also ran a People’s Panel survey in December 2024.
19. The five topics we asked for feedback on were:
· Where we are heading (strategic directions)
· Our approach to investment (investment principles)
· Making the most of our open spaces (policy one)
· Providing the right open spaces in the right places (policy two), including two options for open space provision outlined below
· Supporting Aucklanders to be more active more often (policy three).
20. The consultation included the following two option packages to update the open space provision standards:
· Option package one – High-density focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high-density areas
· Option package two – Capacity focused: provide more open space than currently enabled in high- and medium-density areas where residents have low or moderate levels of existing provision.
21. These two option packages are explained in more detail from paragraph 31.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
The consultation feedback shows we are on the right track
22. We received 149 pieces of consultation feedback, as well as 253 responses to the People’s Panel survey. Attachment A provides a detailed summary of the feedback.
23. Submitters included members of the public, a range of partners and stakeholders (including organisations such as Aktive, Forest and Bird, Healthy Auckland Together, Property Council New Zealand and Te Whānau o Waipareira) and members of the council’s demographic advisory panels.
24. There is strong support for:
· the draft strategy overall
· the five draft strategic directions, with the highest support for Strategic direction five: support Aucklanders to live healthy, active lives
· the four draft investment principles, with the highest support for investment principle one: taking a benefits-led approach to improve the holistic wellbeing of people, places and the environment
· all three policies, with the highest support for Policy one: making the most of our open spaces.
25. Overall, submitters prefer a capacity-focused approach (Option package two) – taking an equity lens to deliver more open space where it is needed most in high- and medium-density areas – rather than a high-density-focused approach (Option package one) – delivering more open space in high-density areas – for open space provision standards.
26. Analysis of the qualitative feedback outlined a range of key themes:
· open and green spaces are essential for mental and physical health
· all Aucklanders must have access to safe, well-maintained open spaces
· open space planning needs to be an integral part of urban planning
· open spaces must serve a wide range of functions
· our resources should be used efficiently.
Staff propose changes to the draft strategy in response to the feedback
27. Staff considered the feedback received and are proposing amending the strategy as a result (see Attachment A, pages 38-47).
28. A summary of the most significant proposed changes is shown in Table One. In addition, staff have made minor changes to address specific feedback, clarify intent and meaning or update technical information.
|
Table One: Proposed changes to the draft strategy based on consultation feedback · More explicitly emphasise the importance of equity and accessibility in the strategy on pages 7, 8, 11, 34, 46, 81, 82, 85 and in the glossary · Include greater emphasis on the importance of environment and biodiversity outcomes on pages 14, 20, 25, 29, 31, 44, 45 and 46 · Include greater emphasis on the purpose and benefits of regional parks on page 78 · Include the capacity-focused approach (Option package two) for open space provision standards and delete the high-density focused approach (Option package one) on pages 46, 48, 49 and 52 · Refine the strategic directions based on a range of other consultation feedback on pages 11, 12 and 14. |
Staff also propose changes to the draft strategy in response to local board resolutions
29. Staff have also amended the draft strategy in response to local board feedback received in November and December 2024. The key changes are presented in Attachment A (pages 48-49) and summarised in Table Two below.
|
Table Two: Proposed changes to the draft strategy in response to local board feedback · Make the decision-making responsibilities of local boards clearer, moving the table previously on page 23 to page 9 · Clarify the meaning of ‘value for money’ in the strategy on page 17 and in the glossary · Provide clearer direction in the policy sections to ensure local boards receive the necessary advice for decision-making on page 28 · Clarify that the council attempts to acquire land early in the development process on page 58. |
30. All proposed changes are included in track changes in the amended strategy (Attachment B).
Staff recommend a capacity-based approach to open space provision standards
31. As part of the strategy development, staff are proposing updated provision standards for pocket parks and neighbourhood parks to provide better open space outcomes in high- and medium-density areas and greenfield areas. The provision standards help us to ensure we are providing the right open spaces in the right places so Aucklanders can play, be active and enjoy nature.
|
Summary of option packages analysis – for more details refer CP2025/06381 A report to local boards and to the Policy and Planning Committee in late 2024 provided detailed analysis of the two option packages. Staff recommended Option package two as the preferred option. Both packages are outlined below. They reflect different ways of adding to our existing open space network across Auckland to continue serving the needs of a growing population.
Urban density is based on the Auckland Unitary Plan zones. Varying provision standards based on planned intensification levels enables us to better provide according to the likely demand for public open space, as well as likely private open space provision levels. The capacity measure is a proposed addition to the existing policy. While the quantity of open space provision per capita is not a meaningful metric in isolation, it provides a basis of comparison when considering future provision across Auckland’s urban areas. There is no accepted international or national capacity standards. Based on local observations and international examples, we propose that capacity is considered low when below 10m2 of open space per person, moderate when between 10 and 20m2 and high when more than 20m2. Both packages involve trade-offs, as shown below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32. To illustrate how the two open space provision option packages would apply on the ground, staff have developed some case studies (with maps), which are provided in Attachment C.
Consultation feedback supports the capacity-based approach
33. Overall, respondents expressed the importance of open space for mental and physical wellbeing and their desire for open space provision to be an integral part of neighbourhood planning. Feedback highlighted the importance of taking an equity lens to open space provision, targeting areas where it is needed most.
34. Consultation feedback (see Attachment A, page 33) shows an overall preference for a capacity-focused approach to open space provision (Option package two). The support for Option package 2 amongst Have Your Say submitters is similar across Auckland, and slightly higher in the north area.
Figure One: Preference for open space provision standards

35. Stakeholders and partners also favour Option package two over Option package one.
36. Property Council New Zealand, however, expressed concerns that either package was too rigid and that they would increase the cost of the council’s development contributions levy and ultimately development. The development sector also wishes for more delivery partnerships with the council. This can be investigated at implementation stage.
37. Based on previous analysis and consultation feedback, staff recommend that the final amended strategy includes Option package two.
Staff will continue work to support implementation of the strategy
38. Both local boards and the Governing Body have decision-making responsibilities for the provision of open space, sport and recreations services and assets.
39. Staff have developed examples of local board planning and delivery scenarios and case studies of what good practice looks like (see Attachment C). They provide an overview of how key parts of the strategy could be applied locally and examples of things that are already being done well and we would like to see more of. These are included to aid local board understanding of what delivery could look like. How the strategy would be implemented if adopted would be at the discretion of local boards and the Governing Body in accordance with their decision-making responsibilities.
40. Following feedback from local boards on the draft strategy prior to consultation, staff have been working with local board advisors and operational staff to understand opportunities to improve advice and support to local boards for implementation of the strategy.
41. The multitude of documents, information and processes owned and managed by a range of teams across the council currently makes it difficult to provide concise, consistent and up-to-date advice to local boards. This impacts their ability to understand trade-offs and prioritise decisions to deliver for their communities.
42. Preliminary findings point to potential improvements, such as consolidating information provided to local boards, involving local boards earlier in planning processes, improving alignment between regional and local planning cycles, funding and budgets and providing information on trade-offs (see Attachment D).
43. Staff will continue investigating potential improvements to the advice local boards receive, which will inform the development of an implementation and monitoring plan for the strategy (if adopted).
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
44. The draft strategy considers how to adapt to the challenges posed by climate change and work to mitigate it, including by reducing emissions. One of the five strategic directions is to enhance our resilience to climate change and our contribution to mitigation, including through reducing carbon emissions, in line with Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland's Climate Plan.
45. The draft strategy outlines what we will do to make this happen, including developing the blue-green network, accelerating the use of nature-based solutions, improving the environmental performance of our open spaces and facilities and adapting our open spaces and facilities on the coast and in flood-prone areas.
46. While we already contribute to this strategic direction, the draft strategy proposes a ’do more’ approach to implementation. This is in recognition of the significant impacts of climate change on Aucklanders now and in the future.
47. The investment approach in the draft strategy also includes a greater emphasis on identifying and quantifying the environmental benefits of our investment and designing initiatives to deliver multiple benefits, such as making recreation parks better able to support stormwater management.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
48. Kaimahi from across the council group have provided input throughout the development of the draft strategy.
49. Implementing the strategy will span across the investment areas identified in the council’s performance management framework.
50. If the final amended strategy is adopted, an implementation and monitoring plan will be developed to support delivery. Kaimahi from across the council group will continue to provide input into this plan.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
51. Levels of support for the draft strategy was broadly similar among Have Your Say respondents across the region. Attachment A provides sub-regional breakdowns of the results.
52. Local boards have been engaged throughout the development of the draft strategy. Two local board members were in the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group: Member Sandra Coney and Member Margi Watson. In addition, staff provided memos and briefings and presented at workshops and business meetings.
53. Local boards provided resolutions on the draft strategy going for consultation at their November / December 2024 business meetings.
54. While there was general support for the strategic directions and investment principles in the draft strategy, local boards made a range of resolutions seeking better guidance from staff on open space matters, particularly the understanding of local impacts.
55. Staff have attempted to respond to local boards’ request for more targeted advice (see paragraphs 38 to 43 and Attachment C and Attachment D).
56. Local boards will consider how to deliver on the strategy, if adopted, as part of their local board plans and work programmes.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
57. The views of mana whenua and mataawaka have been sought throughout the development of the draft strategy.
· The Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group includes one Houkura member, first Tony Kake, replaced subsequently by Pongarauhine Renata.
· Both the advisory and Māori rōpū included mana whenua and mataawaka representatives. All iwi were invited to join the rōpū or engage in the manner that best suited them.
· Mana whenua and mataawaka organisations were kept up to date with progress and invited to provide feedback during the consultation process.
58. Guided by the Māori rōpū, the draft strategy incorporates a te ao Māori lens, one of the expectations of success set by the Governing Body and a key theme identified in the background paper. It is adapted from the te ao Māori framework developed for Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri – Auckland Climate Plan, and builds on a single value, manaakitanga. It includes a focus on investing in ‘by Māori for Māori’ solutions, building the capacity and capability of mana whenua and mataawaka and partnering with mana whenua to co-design our spaces and places.
59. Consultation feedback on the draft strategy highlighted the importance of focusing on equity and addressing barriers to participation for Māori. This can be achieved by targeting investment, supporting Māori-led initiatives, aligning delivery with Māori health providers to improve overall wellbeing and providing spaces and places that are safe, affordable and accessible.
60. Feedback also called for embedding Māori leadership at decision-making and implementation levels, including support for co-governance arrangements which is reflected in the strategy.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
61. The strategy will be implemented using available budgets set during long-term plan and annual plan processes. When constrained by resourcing, the investment principles will support decision-makers in prioritising investment.
62. The draft strategy reflects the resource constraints faced by the council and the need to deliver value for money. The proposed investment approach emphasises the importance of establishing a robust evidence-based approach to investment and prioritisation to better support elected decision-makers.
63. Advice around investment in open space and sport and recreation will be based on a better articulation of costs and benefits, including in relation to local board plan priorities. This will be supported by a new tool to enable better identification, description and quantification of these benefits to help local boards prioritise investment.
64. Consideration of a broad range of funding and delivery tools will support implementation, including making the most of what we have, delivering differently and partnerships.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
65. Potential risks and mitigations are outlined below:
|
If… |
Then… |
Possible mitigations… |
|
Local boards do not think the final amended strategy addresses their concerns |
They will be less likely to support it, and the committee will be less likely to adopt it. Medium reputational, strategic and delivery risk. |
· Staff have proposed changes to the draft strategy to reflect local board feedback. · Delivery of the strategy will be also supported by an implementation and monitoring plan. The three-yearly plan will set out what we will deliver and track progress against the five strategic directions. As part of this, staff are working to improve advice and support to local boards. |
|
The final amended strategy does not provide clear enough direction to implementers |
The strategy may not be incorporated into business as usual. Low reputational, strategic and delivery risk. |
· Implementers provided regular input into development of the final amended strategy. · The implementation context, including financial constraints, has also informed the final amended strategy. · Staff are working with local boards on the advice and support they need for implementation. · Staff will continue to work with colleagues in planning for and supporting delivery, and monitoring progress. |
|
The final amended strategy is perceived as unfunded. |
Decision-makers may be less likely to adopt it. Medium financial, reputational and strategic risk. |
· The final amended strategy sets strategic directions and investment principles to guide prioritisation and enable better informed discussions on future budget allocation. |
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
66. Staff will include local board views when seeking adoption of the strategy from the Policy and Planning Committee in May 2025. The five existing strategies, policies and plans forming Auckland Council’s open space, sport and recreation policy framework would be rescinded.
67. Staff will present the consultation feedback and proposed changes to the strategy to the Open Space, Sport and Recreation Joint Political Working Group at its meeting on 11 April 2025. Input and direction from the joint political working group will be reflected in the agenda report to the Policy and Planning Committee.
68. Staff will also present the consultation feedback and proposed changes to the strategy to the Local Board Chairs’ Forum on 14 April 2025.
69. If the final amended strategy is adopted, staff will develop an implementation and monitoring plan for committee’s approval. The plan will be developed with input from relevant staff across the council group, including Governance and Engagement. The plan would help embed the strategy’s investment principles into how we work, deliver on the strategic directions and monitor and evaluate delivery against the directions.
70. Local boards have significant decision-making responsibilities with regards to implementing the strategy at the local level. This involves delivering open spaces and sport and recreation opportunities to their communities in line with the strategy through development of their local board plans and work programmes.
71. Staff will continue working with local boards on improvements to advice, recognising that different local boards and / or clusters of local boards may require different and bespoke advice, and that the organisation is pivoting to support this.
Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Feedback analysis report |
687 |
|
b⇩ |
Manaaki Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Open Space, Sport and Recreation Strategy (final draft version with track changes) |
743 |
|
c⇩ |
Putting things into practice – scenarios, examples of good practices and applications of the two open space provision option packages (with maps) |
843 |
|
d⇩ |
Preliminary findings for improving advice to local boards |
869 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Authors |
Aubrey Bloomfield - Senior Policy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Lou-Ann Ballantyne - General Manager Governance and Engagement Carole Canler - Senior Policy Manager Louise Mason - General Manager Policy Trina Thompson - Local Area Manager Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Chair's Report - Chris Carter
File No.: CP2025/00359
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To provide an update on projects, meetings, and other initiatives relevant to the local board’s interests.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Local board members are responsible for leading policy development in their areas of interest, proposing and developing project concepts, overseeing agreed projects within budgets, being active advocates, accessing and providing information and advice.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive Chair Chris Carter’s April 2025 report. |
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Chair Chris Carter’s report - April 2025 |
873 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors |
Sophie Wylie - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule)
File No.: CP2025/00377
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To present the Henderson-Massey Local Board Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule).
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. The Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule) was previously the governance forward work programme calendar for the Henderson-Massey Local Board (Attachment A). The policy schedule is updated monthly, reported to business meetings and distributed to council staff.
3. The policy schedule aims to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on meeting agendas is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is expected and when
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The policy schedule also aims to provide guidance for staff supporting local boards and greater transparency for the public.
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) whiwhi / receive the Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule) for April 2025. |
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Local Board Hōtaka Kaupapa (Policy Schedule) - April 2025 |
877 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors |
Sophie Wylie - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
|
15 April 2025 |
|
Confirmation of Workshop Records
File No.: CP2025/00386
Te take mō te pūrongo / Purpose of the report
1. To present records of workshops held by the Henderson-Massey Local Board.
Whakarāpopototanga matua / Executive summary
2. Briefings/presentations provided at the workshops held are as follows:
4 March 2025
1. Grants Review
2. Bridge Ave – Waka ama: options for water access
3. EcoMatters Work Programme Update
4. Climate Action Activator Work Programme update
5. Local board budget update and cost pressures
11 March 2025
1. Eke Panuku Unlock Henderson
2. Community Led Partner - Funding Increase
3. Proposed land acquisition for a neighbourhood park
4. Development Contributions 2025 proposal
5. Northwest Rapid Transit - refined emerging preferred option
6. Leasing update - EOI Glen Haven Cottage
25 March 2025
1. Redhills Precinct open space service provision
2. Parks and Community Facilities monthly update
3. Auckland Transport monthly update
4. Corban Estate Arts Centre (CEAC)
|
Ngā tūtohunga / Recommendation/s That the Henderson-Massey Local Board: a) tuhi ā-taipitopito / note the workshop records for 4, 11, 25 March 2025. |
Ngā tāpirihanga / Attachments
|
No. |
Title |
Page |
|
a⇩ |
Henderson-Massey Local Board workshop records for March 2025 |
881 |
Ngā kaihaina / Signatories
|
Authors |
Sophie Wylie - Democracy Advisor |
|
Authorisers |
Adam Milina - Local Area Manager |
[1] The current population estimate is based on the most recent population estimates from StatsNZ. The post-covid period has been one of particularly high volatility with growth exceeding expectations. Future forecasts are based on the current ‘most likely’ Auckland growth scenario, AGSv1.1, These figures are the central scenario noting that the low and high are +/- 300,000 either side.
[2] The Local Board Involvement in Regional Policy, Plans and Bylaws – Agreed Principles and Processes 2019