
I hereby give notice that an extraordinary meeting of the Rodney Local Board will be held on:
|
Date: Time: Venue:
|
Wednesday 30 April 2025 10.00am Kumeū Meeting Room 296 Main Road, Kumeū |
|
Rodney Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
|
MEMBERSHIP
|
Chairperson |
Brent Bailey |
|
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Louise Johnston |
|
|
Members |
Michelle Carmichael |
|
|
|
Mark Dennis |
|
|
|
Tim Holdgate |
|
|
|
Colin Smith |
|
|
|
Geoff Upson |
|
|
|
Ivan Wagstaff |
|
|
|
Guy Wishart |
|
(Quorum 5 members)
|
|
|
Louise Healy Democracy Advisor
24 April 2025
Contact Telephone: 021419205 Email: louise.healy@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
|
30 April 2025 |
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Nau mai | Welcome 5
2 Ngā Tamōtanga | Apologies 5
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest 5
4 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence 5
5 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements 5
6 Ngā Petihana | Petitions 5
7 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations 5
8 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum 5
9 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business 6
10 Annual Plan 2025/2026: local board consultation feedback and input 7
11 Te Whakaaro ki ngā Take Pūtea e Autaia ana | Consideration of Extraordinary Items
|
Organisation |
Position |
|
|
Brent Bailey |
Central Shooters Inc |
President |
|
Auckland Shooting Club |
Member |
|
|
Royal NZ Yacht Squadron |
Member |
|
|
Muriwai Community Association Incorporated |
Member |
|
|
Michelle Carmichael |
Fight the Tip Tiaki te Whenua Inc |
Deputy chairperson |
|
Tapora School Board of Trustees |
Staff representative |
|
|
Mark Dennis |
Helensville Tennis Club |
Elected member |
|
Helensville District Health Trust |
Committee member |
|
|
Everykid Charitable Trust |
Trustee |
|
|
Auckland Justices of the Peace Association |
Member (JP) |
|
|
Parakai Springs Complex |
Operations manager |
|
|
North West Security |
Director |
|
|
Tim Holdgate |
Landowners Contractors Association |
Vice chairman |
|
Agricultural & Pastoral Society Warkworth |
Committee member
|
|
|
Louise Johnston |
Blackbridge Environmental Protection Society |
Treasurer |
|
Colin Smith |
Landowners Contractors Association |
Committee member |
|
Geoff Upson |
|
|
|
Ivan Wagstaff |
|
|
|
Guy Wishart |
Huapai Kumeū Lions |
Member |
|
Kaipara ki Mahurangi LEC |
Member |
|
|
Kumeū Community Centre |
Committee member |
|
|
Kumeū Small Landowners Assoc |
Member |
|
|
Future Kumeū Inc Committee |
Member |
|
|
Kumeū Live (Music Events) |
Manager |
|
|
Kumeū Emergency Network |
Member |
|
|
Kumeū Community Action |
Member |
|
|
Kumeū Showgrounds Committee |
Member |
1 Nau mai | Welcome
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 He Tamōtanga Motuhake | Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
5 Te Mihi | Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
6 Ngā Petihana | Petitions
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
7 Ngā Tono Whakaaturanga | Deputations
Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Rodney Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
At the close of the agenda no requests for deputations had been received.
8 Te Matapaki Tūmatanui | Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of three minutes per speaker is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
9 Ngā Pakihi Autaia | Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
|
30 April 2025 |
|
Annual Plan 2025/2026: local board consultation feedback and input
File No.: CP2025/07894
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To receive consultation feedback from the Rodney Local Board area on:
· proposed priorities and activities for the Rodney Local Board Agreement 2025/2026
· regional topics for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
2. To recommend any local matters or advocacy initiatives to the Governing Body for consideration or decision-making as part of the Annual Plan 2025/2026 process.
3. To provide input on the proposed regional topics in the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
4. Local board agreements outline annual funding priorities, activities, budgets, levels of service, performance measures and initiatives for each local board area. The 2025/2026 local board agreements will be included in the Auckland Council’s Annual Plan 2025/2026.
5. Auckland Council publicly consulted from 28 February to 28 March 2025 to gather community feedback on the proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026. This included consultation on the Rodney Local Board’s proposed priorities for 2025/2026 to be included in their local board agreement for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
6. Auckland Council received feedback from 13,016 people in total across the region. Four hundred and forty-eight (448) were from the Rodney Local Board area and 209 were received from submitters that did not select Rodney as their local board area but indicated their response relates to Rodney. A detailed analysis on these submissions is provided in the analysis and advice section of this report.
7. As part of the Annual Plan 2025/2026 process, local boards provide recommendations to the Governing Body for consideration or decision-making. This includes any local board advocacy initiatives. The Governing Body will consider these matters during the annual plan decision-making process in May and June 2025, including:
· any new/amended business improvement district targeted rates
· any new/amended local targeted rate proposals
· the release of local board specific reserve funds
· any other local board advocacy initiatives.
8. Local boards have a statutory responsibility to provide input into regional strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws. This report provides an opportunity for the local board to provide input on council’s Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Recommendation/s
That the Rodney Local Board:
a) whiwhi / receive consultation feedback on the proposed Rodney Local Board priorities and activities for 2025/2026
b) whiwhi / receive consultation feedback on regional topics in the Annual Plan 2025/2026 from people and organisations based in the Rodney Local Board area
c) tuku / provide input on regional topics in the proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026 and key advocacy initiatives to the Governing Body.
Horopaki
Context
9. Each financial year Auckland Council must have a local board agreement (as agreed between the Governing Body and the relevant local board) for each local board area. The local board agreement outlines how the council will reflect priorities of the Rodney Local Board Plan 2023 in respect of the local activities to be provided in the local board area and includes information on budgets, levels of service, and performance measures.
10. The local board agreements for 2025/2026 will form part of the Auckland Council’s Annual Plan 2025/2026.
11. Auckland Council publicly consulted from 28 February to 28 March 2025 to seek community feedback on the proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026. The consultation content included information on regional proposals to be decided by the Governing Body, and information on the Rodney Local Board’s proposed priorities for 2025/2026 to be included in their local board agreement for 2025/2026.
12. Local boards have a statutory responsibility to identify and communicate the interests and preferences of people in their local board area in relation to the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
13. This report includes analysis of consultation feedback and seeks input on regional topics in the proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Consultation feedback overview
14. As part of the public consultation for the Annual Plan 2025/2026, Auckland Council used a variety of methods and channels to reach and engage a broad cross section of Aucklanders to gain their feedback and input into regional and local topics.
· written feedback – 10,011 hard copy and online forms, emails and letters
· in person – 3001 pieces of feedback through 89 Have Your Say events (five of which were held in the Rodney Local Board area)
· Neurodiverse Online Audio – four feedback forms.
16. Four hundred and forty-eight (448) submissions were received from residents that said they live in Rodney Local Board area and nine from local organisations.
17. Two hundred and nine (209) submissions were received from people that said they live outside the Rodney Local Board area as well as six regional organisations but indicated their response relates to Rodney.
18. All feedback will be made available on an Auckland Council webpage called “Feedback on the Annual Plan 2025/2026'” and will be accessible after 22 April 2025 through the following link: https://akhaveyoursay.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/annual-plan-2025-2026/feedback-annual-plan-2025-2026.
19. During the consultation period, the question “What do you think of our proposals for our local board area in 2025/2026?” was discovered to be missing from the online feedback form, affecting 195 submissions for Rodney Local Board (around 1700 submissions in total). The issue was later corrected, and affected submitters were contacted with a link to provide feedback on this question before the consultation closed on 28 March 2025. Of the affected submissions, 83 submitters responded to the missing question (617 in total). A review was conducted to identify the cause of the error and prevent similar issues in the future.
Information on submitters
20. The graphs below indicate the demographic categories people identified with. This information only relates to submitters living in Rodney who provided demographic information.

Graph 1: Ethnicity of submitters from Rodney residents

Graph 2: Age and gender of submitters from Rodney residents
Feedback received on the Rodney Local Board’s priorities for 2025/2026 and the Annual Plan 2025/2026
21. The Rodney Local Board consulted on the following local priorities for 2025/2026:
· Priority 1: Improving services for all communities by enhancing libraries art and youth programmes
· Priority 2: Promote physical activity and recreation by increasing play opportunities in more locations
· Priority 3: Support community groups, volunteers, and mana whenua to enhance environmental protection and restoration efforts, particularly for waterways and wetlands, while promoting waste reduction
· Priority 4: Increase maintenance service levels, such as more frequent mowing of high-profile reserves, pest control, and repair of tracks and car parks
· Priority 5: Support Rodney Greenways Plans to facilitate walking, cycling and horse riding
· Priority 6: Prepare and review plans for reserves to identify gaps to meet community needs
· Priority 7: Improve the safety of our community and environment through increased education, monitoring and compliance.
Feedback on proposals for the Rodney Local Board area in 2025/2026
22. Two hundred and eighty-two (282) submitters that live in the Rodney Local Board area (Rodney) responded to the question: “What do you think of our proposals for your local board area in 2025/2026”. Graph 3 below provides an overview of submissions received:

![]()
Graph 3: Feedback on the local board priorities 2025/2026 from those that live in Rodney
23. Sixty-two (62) per cent of individuals and 100 per cent of organisations supported all or most priorities while 26 per cent of individuals did not support most or any priorities.
24. One hundred and sixty (160) individuals and four organisations, that live or are based outside Rodney and indicated their response relates to Rodney, also responded to this question.
25. Graph 4 below provides an overview of submissions received from those that live in and outside Rodney and indicated their response relates to Rodney:

![]()
Graph 4: Feedback on the local board priorities 2025/2026 from those that live in and outside Rodney
Importance of priorities
26. Below is an overview of submissions that responded to the question “How important are these priorities to you?” from residents that live in Rodney (graph 5), and from those that live in and outside Rodney and indicated their response relates to Rodney (graph 6).

Graph 5: Overview of submissions from those that live in Rodney that responded to the seven priorities

Graph 6. Overview of submissions from those that live in and outside Rodney that responded to the seven priorities
27. The majority of the six Rodney organisations claimed that all local board priorities were very or fairly important, with priority 1 noted as very important by four out of the six organisations. Four out of the six organisations claimed that priority 4 was fairly important.
|
Very important |
Fairly important |
Less important |
|
|
1. Improving services for all communities by enhancing libraries art and youth programmes |
4 |
1 |
1 |
|
2. Promote physical activity and recreation by increasing play opportunities in more locations |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
3. Support community groups, volunteers, and mana whenua to enhance environmental protection and restoration efforts, particularly for waterways and wetlands, while promoting waste reduction |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
4. Increase maintenance service levels, such as more frequent mowing of high-profile reserves, pest control, and repair of tracks and car parks. |
1 |
4 |
1 |
|
5. Support Rodney Greenways Plans to facilitate walking, cycling and horse riding |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
6. Prepare and review plans for reserves to identify gaps to meet community needs |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
7. Improve the safety of our community and environment through increased education, monitoring and compliance. |
3 |
1 |
2 |
Graph 7: Overview of submissions from organisations based in Rodney that responded to the seven priorities
Key themes on local board priorities
28. The main themes discussed below relate to written comments provided in submissions by all those with an expressed interest in Rodney.
29. Priority 1: Improving services for all communities by enhancing libraries art and youth programmes.
· support for enhancing libraries, arts, and youth programmes, highlighting their vital role in fostering connection, wellbeing, creativity, and equitable access across Rodney’s growing and diverse communities.
30. Priority 2: Promote physical activity and recreation by increasing play opportunities in more locations.
· support for more and better play and recreation facilities especially in fast-growing areas like Milldale and Warkworth, with repeated calls for playgrounds, skate and bike parks, and swimming pools
· support emphasised the need for well-designed, safe, and inclusive spaces —particularly shade, toilets, and fencing at playgrounds — to ensure usability and comfort for families and all age groups.
31. Priority 3: Support community groups, volunteers, and mana whenua to enhance environmental protection and restoration efforts, particularly for waterways and wetlands, while promoting waste reduction.
· support for increased funding and resources for community-led environmental restoration and volunteer coordination, with recognition of the high value and cost-effectiveness these groups provide
· concern about the state of waterways and wetlands, with calls for urgent and sustained action to restore and maintain these natural assets, both to preserve biodiversity and to mitigate flooding and climate-related risks.
32. Priority 4: Increase maintenance service levels, such as more frequent mowing of high-profile reserves, pest control, and repair of tracks and car parks.
· support for improved and more consistent maintenance of parks, tracks, and public spaces, with some concerns raised about current service levels and delays in upkeep, especially in fast-growing or rural areas
· support for pest control as a priority for protecting biodiversity and maintaining the environment.
33. Priority 5: Support Rodney Greenways Plans to facilitate walking, cycling and horse riding.
· support for improving safe, connected infrastructure for walking and cycling, particularly to schools, town centres, and public transport
· some support for more safe, accessible facilities for horse riding throughout Rodney.
34. Priority 6: Prepare and review plans for reserves to identify gaps to meet community needs.
· some support to ensure they cater to diverse community needs, including recreation, and environmental protection.
35. Priority 7: Improve the safety of our community and environment through increased education, monitoring and compliance.
· support for stronger compliance measures, particularly regarding freedom camping, littering, noise, illegal parking, and environmental protection, with an expectation for increased monitoring and enforcement with some scepticism on using education alone.
Auckland Transport related feedback
36. The local board received a high number of comments in relation to Auckland Transport’s work programme. The main themes were as follows:
· request for improved maintenance and upgrading of roading infrastructure, particularly in rural and high-growth areas
· demand for more reliable, frequent, and better-connected public transport options across the region.
Other feedback
37. The local board received other feedback not directly related to the priorities. The key themes are as follows:
· concern that growth and development are outpacing planning and service delivery such as with core infrastructure and services (roads, wastewater, stormwater, footpaths, emergency services, and planning)
· dissatisfaction with the local board and council noting lack of transparency, engagement, and accountability.
39. Consultation feedback on local board priorities will be considered by the local board when approving their local board agreement between 10 - 12 June 2025. Local board key advocacy initiatives will be considered in the current report.
Overview of feedback received on regional topics in the annual plan from the Rodney Local Board area
38. The proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026 builds on the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 (LTP), setting out Auckland Council’s priorities and how services and investments are proposed to be funded. Consultation on the proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026 asked submitters to respond to key questions related to:
· the overall plan
· destination management and major events
· changes to other rates, fees and charges
· local board priorities.
39. Submitters were also encouraged to provide feedback on any of other matters included in the Annual Plan 2025/2026 consultation document.
40. The submissions received from the Rodney Local Board area on these key issues are summarised below, along with an overview of any other areas of feedback on regional proposals with a local impact.
Key Question 1: Overall Plan
41. Aucklanders were asked whether they support the overall plan including prioritising investment in:
· transport
· water; and
· fairer funding for local communities.
42. The consultation document for the Annual Plan 2025/2026 also outlined the proposed funding approach which includes a 5.8 per cent rates increase for the average value residential property, consistent with the LTP, and additional debt financing to fund $4 billion in capital expenditure.
43. The proposed 5.8 per cent rates increase for the average value residential property for 2025/2026 includes the following proposed rates changes:
· an average general rates increase of 6.4 per cent for existing ratepayers
· an average increase of 3.5 per cent to the Natural Environment Targeted Rate (NETR) and Climate Action Transport Targeted Rate (CATTR) for existing ratepayers, as set out in the LTP
· an average increase of $2.12 in the Water Quality Targeted Rate (WQTR) to cover the operating and interest costs for the programme, as set out in the LTP
· a 3.3 per cent increase to the overall Waste Management Targeted Rate (WMTR) for the typical household.
44. The graph below gives an overview of the responses from the Rodney Local Board area.

Graph 8: Overview of submissions on the Overall Plan from those that live in Rodney
45. Sixty (60) per cent of individuals supported all or most of the overall plan. The main themes from submitters that provided comments include:
· support for investment in infrastructure
· support for improved public transport services
· concern regarding rates increases.
46. Thirty-four (34) per cent of individuals did not support all or most of the overall plan. The main themes from submitters that provided comments include:
· concern regarding rates increases
· concern regarding wasteful spending
· general dissatisfaction with council.
47. One hundred (100) per cent of organisations supported most of the overall plan. There were no key themes in the comments.
Key Question 2: Destination management and major events
48. Aucklanders were asked for feedback on a bed night visitor levy paid by those in short-stay commercial accommodation, to fund destination management, marketing and major events. Without such a levy, a $7 million budget shortfall for the 2025/2026 financial year could impact the funding for major events that are expected to attract visitor expenditure, such as the ASB Classic, Auckland Marathon, and Auckland Writers Festival.
49. A bed night visitor levy of 2.5 to 3 per cent paid by those in short-stay accommodation would raise around $27 million annually to fund even more destination management, marketing and major events activities in Auckland. However, this requires central government legislative change. Auckland Council continues to work with central government on this, with public feedback helping to inform this work.
50. The graph below gives an overview of the responses from the Rodney Local Board area.

Graph 9: Overview of submissions the Bed Night Visitor Levy from those that live in Rodney
51. Fifty-seven (57) per cent of individuals supported the Bed Night Visitor Levy. The main themes from submitters that provided comments include:
· support for a targeted visitor levy provided it is fairly applied, transparently managed, and does not negatively impact affordability or local accommodation providers
· reduce cost to local residents with a shift to user pays.
52. Thirty-two (32) per cent of individuals did not support the Bed Night Visitor Levy. The main themes from submitters that provided comments include:
· concern about wasteful spending.
53. Fifty (50) per cent of organisations supported most of the Bed Night Visitor Levy. There were no key themes in the comments.
Key Question 3: changes to other rates, fees and charges
54. Aucklanders were asked to provide feedback on proposed changes to certain targeted rates and some fees and charges as outlined below.
Waste management rates changes
55. Aucklanders were asked whether they support applying the Refuse Targeted Rate to residential and lifestyle properties in Franklin and Rodney to fund the council’s rubbish collection service, replacing the current system of purchasing rubbish bags.
56. Starting in 2025/2026, residential and lifestyle properties in Franklin and Rodney will be charged a refuse targeted rate for the first time. Franklin's rate will cover a full year of service, while Rodney's will be about 83 per cent of the full charge due to its scheduled September 2025 start date. Additionally, from July 2025, waste management services and targeted rates will be introduced in Manukau's commercial areas where the service isn’t presently available.
57. Graph 10 below gives an overview of the responses from the Rodney Local Board area.

Graph 10: Overview of submissions on the Waste Management rate changes from those that live in Rodney
58. Thirty-six (36) per cent of individuals supported the proposal for waste management rate changes, while 53 per cent of individuals and 25 per cent of organisations did not support the proposal.
Changes to fees and charges
59. Other proposed changes to fees and charges included in the consultation document for the Annual Plan 2025/2026 include:
· changes to some animal management fees including an increase in the dog adoption fee from $350 to $450 and an increase vet fee from $75 to $150
· fees for some cemetery and cremation services
· realigning bach fees into pricing tiers based on occupancy levels, capacity, and location
· aligning staff charge-out rates with staff pay bands for services in regional parks.
60. There were 254 submissions from the Rodney Local Board area which referenced these fees.
61. The main theme from submitters that provided comments on the waste management rate changes and other changes to fees and charges included:
· support for pay as you throw system: fairer, more flexible, and better at encouraging waste minimisation
· general opposition to any increases to rates, fees and charges.
Other matters for feedback
62. The following matters were also included in the consultation in the long-term plan:
Draft Tūpuna Maunga Authority Operational Plan 2025/2026
63. Aucklanders were asked for feedback on the draft Tūpuna Maunga Authority (TMA) Operational Plan 2025/2026 which sets out a framework in which the council must carry out the routine management of 14 Tūpuna Maunga, under the direction of the Tūpuna Maunga Authority.
64. There were just six submissions from the Rodney Local Board area which referenced the TMA plan with no overall themes.
Any other feedback
65. Aucklanders were asked if they had any other comments. Key themes of note across other areas of feedback received from Rodney submitters included:
· general dissatisfaction with council
· concern about insufficient and poorly timed infrastructure investment, particularly in transport, roading, and essential services
· request to focus on core services and to stop wasteful spending on non-essentials
Recommendations on local matters
66. This report provides for the local board to recommend local matters to the Governing Body for consideration as part of the annual plan process, in May 2025. This includes:
· any new/amended local targeted rate proposals
· any new/amended business improvement district targeted rates
· release of local board specific reserve funds
· local advocacy initiatives.
Local board advocacy
67. Local boards can also agree advocacy initiatives which considers the consultation feedback above. This allows the Governing Body to consider these advocacy items when making decisions on the Annual Plan 2025/2026 in May 2025.
68. The advocacy initiatives approved by the local board will then be included as an appendix to the 2025/2026 local board agreement
Local board input on regional topics in the Annual Plan 2025/2026
69. Local boards have a statutory responsibility for identifying and communicating the interests and preferences of the people in its local board area in relation to Auckland Council’s strategies, policies, plans, and bylaws, and any proposed changes to be made to them. This report provides an opportunity for the local board to provide input on council’s proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026.
70. Local board plans reflect community priorities and preferences and are key documents that guide the development of local board agreements, local board annual work programmes, and local board input into regional plans such as the long-term plan and annual plan.
Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi
Climate impact statement
71. The decisions recommended in this report are part of the Annual Plan 2025/2026 and local board agreement process to approve funding and expenditure over the next year.
72. Projects allocated funding through this annual plan process will all have varying levels of potential climate impact associated with them. The climate impacts of projects Auckland Council chooses to progress, are all assessed carefully as part of council’s rigorous reporting requirements.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
73. The Annual Plan 2025/2026 is an Auckland Council Group document and will include budgets at a consolidated group level. Consultation items and updates to budgets to reflect decisions and new information may include items from across the group.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
74. The local board’s decisions and feedback are being sought in this report. The local board has a statutory role in providing its feedback on regional plans.
75. Local boards play an important role in the development of the council’s Annual Plan 2025/2026. Local board agreements form part of the annual plan. Local board chairpersons have been invited to attend Budget Committee workshops. Local board members were provided recordings or briefings of the Budget Committee workshops for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
76. Many local board decisions are of importance to and impact Māori. Local board agreements and the annual plan are important tools that enable and can demonstrate the council’s responsiveness to Māori Outcomes.
77. Local board plans, developed in 2023 through engagement with the community including Māori, form the basis of local board area priorities.
78. Some projects approved for funding could have discernible impacts on Māori. For any project or programme progressed by Auckland Council, the potential impacts on Māori, will be assessed as part of relevant reporting requirements.
79. Analysis of consultation feedback received on the proposed annual plan includes submissions made by mana whenua, matawaaka organisations and the wider Māori community who have interests in the rohe / local board area.
80. The governance team led the council-wide approach with support from Ngā Mātārae on engagement with Māori entities. This included:
· three information sessions for mana whenua on submissions and the process for submissions
· five information sessions for mātaawaka on submissions and the process for submissions
· one hearing style event for mana whenua and mātaawaka groups.
81. Nineteen mana whenua entities have interests in the Auckland Council rohe. Thirteen of the nineteen (68.42 per cent) provided verbal or written submissions on the Auckland Council’s proposals for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
82. There were six oral submissions from mana whenua and six oral submissions from mātaawaka at the Have your Say Event.
83. The following mana whenua and mataawaka organisations gave feedback on the Rodney Local Board priorities:
· Ngaati Whanaunga Inc
· Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust.
84. Ngaati Whanaunga responded to the question on local board priorities for 2025/2026; supporting most of the local board priorities but did not provide specific feedback on the priorities.
85. Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust responded to the question on local board priorities for 2025/2026; supporting most of the local board priorities. They provided the following comment:
· We are supportive on the environmental outcomes. We would like to understand the Rodney Greenways Plans as it only relates to the West Coast. We would like to understand more about the reserves plans. Lastly, we support promoting waste reduction and seek investment in a Recycling Centre in the Rodney district.
86. Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust ranked priorities three, four, six and seven as very important, priority one as fairly important and priority three as less important. They provided the following comment to explain these rankings:
· Pest and Predator control is a key outcome to save our biodiversity. Water Resilience and Climate change responses is a priority to our people.
87. Māori comprise 12 per cent of the population in the Rodney Local Board area. Thirty-four submissions from people who identify as Māori were received from people residing in the Rodney Local Board area. This represents six per cent of total submissions.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
88. The local board provides input to regional plans and proposals. There is information in the council’s consultation material for each plan or proposal with the financial implications of each option outlined for consideration.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
89. The council must adopt its Annual Plan 2025/2026, which includes local board agreements, by 30 June 2025. The local board is required to make recommendations on these local matters for the annual plan by mid-May 2025, to enable and support the Governing Body to make decisions on key items to be included in the annual plan on 28 May 2025.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
90. Recommendations and feedback from the local board will be provided to the Budget Committee for consideration as part of decision-making for the Annual Plan 2025/2026.
91. The local board will approve its local content for inclusion in the final Annual Plan 2025/2026 (including its local board agreement) and corresponding work programmes in June 2025.
92. The final Annual Plan 2025/2026 (including local board agreements) will be adopted by the Governing Body on 25 June 2025.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
|
Author |
Zigi Yates - Senior Local Board Advisor |
|
Authoriser |
Lesley Jenkins - Local Area Manager |