Auckland Domain Committee

19 May 2025

Synthony 2026 - 21 March 2026

File No.: CP2025/09063

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To notify the Auckland Domain Committee of the proposed Mānuka Phuel Synthony Festival 2026 event as per the Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines; and request their approval for it to be held on 21 March 2026.

2. Note TAU’s intent to seek approval from the Auckland Domain Committee at their February 2026 meeting, for Mānuka Phuel Synthony Festival to be held in the Auckland Domain on the third weekend of March in 2027.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. Tātaki Auckland Unlimited (TAU) has a three-year investment commitment to Mānuka Phuel Synthony Festival (Synthony) from 2025 – 2027. The event is an important annual fixture in the major events calendar and attracts Aucklanders, domestic and international visitors, boosts the economy through increased tourism and support for local suppliers, and provides a platform for emerging and established New Zealand artists.

4. Mānuka Phuel Synthony Festival fully satisfies all requirements as specified in the Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines, including necessary permits, safety protocols, infrastructure provisions, and environmental considerations. This application demonstrates complete alignment with both the letter and spirit of the guidelines, ensuring proper domain use while preserving public access and environmental integrity.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Auckland Domain Committee:

a) tuku / grant approval for Synthony to take place in the Auckland Domain, on 21 March 2026, including the pack in and pack out times, as proposed in the event summary of the report.

Horopaki

Context

5. The Auckland Domain is a high-demand site for a range of events. This is due to its central location, large capacity, proximity to public transport networks and the central city, and limited adjacent residents.

6. To manage these demands the Auckland Domain Committee adopted the Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines on 30 March 2015 (ADC/2016/9).

7. As per the guidelines, an event permit requires landowner approval from the Auckland Domain Committee if they:

• are ticketed and/or;

• take place over multiple days (more than 48 hours) including pack in and pack out and/or;

• require an authorised road closure.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Event Summary

8. Synthony Festival is a one-day music and arts festival showcasing national and international acts, culminating in a performance by Synthony, a New Zealand originated orchestral event that forms a unique collaboration between DJs, orchestras and feature vocalists and musicians performing the biggest dance tracks of the last 30+ years, complete with an immersive light, laser, and visual spectacle.

9. The show targets a national and international audience comprising of both male and female 20 to 55 years old, with a slight skew towards females. With iconic and well-known tracks, and the elegance of an orchestra that is universally appreciated, Synthony will be attractive across multiple markets and cultures. Through its simplicity and broad appeal, it is unique, universal and transcends cultures.

10. TAU have supported Synthony since 2019. Originally held in the Auckland Town Hall with 2,000 people, Synthony then moved to Spark Arena with an attendance of 9,000 people, to the Auckland Domain with 40,000+ attendees making it an iconic event on the Auckland calendar. TAU will continue to support the growth of the event to attract international artists and visitors and continue to benefit Auckland.

11. TAU has approved continued financial support for this event, a total investment of $1,500,000 ($500k per annum) over three financial years, 2025-2027 with a forecasted contribution to regional GDP of $3,500,000 per year, or $11,570,000 across the term, for Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland.

12. TAU expects the 2025 event to have generated 17,300 visitor nights and contribute $3,498,600 to Auckland's regional GDP. These figures will be verified by TAU’s external evaluation agency by the end of May

13. Synthony’s organisers hold a Resource Consent (LUC6041226) providing unitary plan support for five annual events, expiring in 2027.

14. Synthony’s requested event date is 21 March 2026, with pack in commencing on Friday 13 March, an Event Partner and Sponsors hosted function and rehearsal on Friday 20 March and pack out ending Wednesday 25 March.

15. There will be no rain date for Synthony 2026.

16. The delivery model for Synthony 2026 will not vary significantly from the 2025 event, however, it is expected that the 2026 event footprint will increase slightly (to include more of the top sports fields) to allow for more space for general admission space, vendors, and activations.

17. Synthony will continue to work with Auckland Stadiums Crowd Management and Security Management teams to ensure the site build for Synthony in The Domain maximises the space, protects the integrity of Auckland Domain, and offers a safe and secure event experience. Key focuses remain reducing pinch points, congestion, and ensuring safe and secure egress at the end of the event, or in case of emergency.

Event Operational Schedule

Location	Date	Time(s)	Detail	(T-)
Auckland domain, Zone 1.	Friday 13 March	0700	Pack In begins	-8
	Fri 20 Mar	TBC	Rehearsal	-1
	Sat 21 Mar	1400-2200	Event Live	0
	Wed 25 Mar	1730	Pack out ends	4

Impact Assessment

Category	Impact Assessment
Public restrictions	Minimal impact • Event is ticketed and part of the TAU Major Event programme working to enhance Auckland as a culturally vibrant city and a more resilient destination. • Event is for the wider positive benefit to public and is aligned with the Auckland Council Events Policy 2013.
Utilise Zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant Impact • Event restricts the public from a significant portion of Zone 1, however the use of the other areas of the Domain can continue with no impact or minimal disturbance to the regular park users.
Duration and timing of events (including pack in and out time)	Significant Impact • Use of zone 1, over 12 consecutive days for the event which will displace typical sporting activity. • Sports groups will be notified in advance, and where possible – provided with assistance to temporarily relocate to other facilities that meet their requirements. • The Event Organiser and Major Event Facilitator will work closely with Community Facilities and Sports Parks team(s) to minimise impacts on the sporting seasons.
Values of area occupied	Minimal Impact • The area utilised is not a significant cultural or historic heritage site and does not consist of significant trees. Feedback will be provided by Auckland Council Heritage and Arborist teams.
Pedestrian Flows	Minimal Impact • Directing of non-event pedestrians towards areas where paths are already formed
Impact on public vehicle access	Medium Impact • Grandstand Road will be closed in the lead up to Synthony in the Domain to assist in the safe build of all required infrastructure • Limited roads around Auckland Domain will be closed during event live to control the flow of patrons to the event.
Infrastructure involved	Medium Impact • Where possible structures will be weighted instead of pegged and placed only outside the dripline of trees. • Any ground penetration will first be permitted by the sports parks and/or community facilities teams. • Pack-in will be scheduled in such a way as to minimise impact on the turf surfaces wherever possible
Hanging Objects	No impact
Event Vehicle Movements	Medium Impact • Managed vehicle access by the event operator will be implemented to minimize impact to the turf and venue grounds. Furthermore, deliveries will be managed and planned via a master vehicle movement schedule to further minimise congestion in these areas. This approach was used in 2025 and proved to work well.
Access to power and water	No impact

Event Operations

Land use consent	• Synthony in the Domain has been granted Resource Consent for this activity. Reference number: LUC60412260 • Landowner approval: The event requests Landowner Approval from the Auckland Domain Committee and will continue to work alongside the Auckland Council Community Facilities and Sports Parks teams to gain the final approvals and conditions where required. • Heritage: The event will gain approval from Auckland Council Heritage through the facilitation process. • Park Management: The event will ensure that it abides by the park management conditions of their landowner approval.
Building Consent	• It is proposed that there will be a large main stage, and numerous smaller structures that will all require a building consent or exemption. Other structures include, fencing, marquees over 100m2, and gantries. • All necessary building approvals will be applied for and obtained prior to construction. • Where possible structures will be weighted instead of pegged and placed only outside the dripline of trees. Any ground penetration will first be permitted by the sports parks and community facilities teams.
Amplified sound	Performances on stage will run from approximately 1500-2200, A Noise Monitoring Plan will be submitted to Auckland Council for certification prior to the event.
Fireworks	There will be minor pyrotechnics used at this event. The Civil Aviation Authority, Fire and Emergency NZ, and Auckland Hospital will all be notified of this activity. Any relevant permits will be obtained by the Pyrotechnics contractor and kept on file by TAU
Drones	A drone will be flown by a CAA Part 102 certified drone pilot to collect promotional material for the event. Landowner consent will be requested through Auckland Council parks for the use of a drone. The CAA and local aerodromes will be notified of this activity.

Traffic Management

Road Closures

A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) will be submitted by the organiser and provided to Auckland Transport for approval. Consultation on this TMP will also be undertaken with local stakeholders, including Auckland Museum, The Wintergarden Pavilion, and Auckland Hospital.

Parking Restrictions / Advisory Signage

Parking restrictions will be in place for all vehicles during the event (except authorised and emergency vehicles).

Public Transport

The public will be encouraged to use public transport with main transport hubs of Grafton, Parnell and Newmarket promoted for this event. Auckland Transport will be engaged to provide additional services where required.

Event parking

No parking will be available on-site for event attendees. Event attendees will be encouraged to use existing public transport options. Options for integrated ticketing will continue to be explored as this was a successful option for the 2025 event.

Event Communications

Local Notification

• Event letter drop

• Advisory signage / mechanism

• Public notices

• Consultation

A letter drop will be completed in the surrounding streets to both businesses and residents leading up to the event. In response to feedback received from the public regarding Synthony 2025, these notifications will have contact numbers included.

7 days prior Traffic Management advisory signage will be displayed to advise of the parking restrictions and road closures.

As part of the ongoing consultation and event concept development, the event will continue conversations with the Auckland Hospital, Wintergarden Pavilion, Auckland Museum, Grafton Residents Association, and the Parnell Business Association.

Promotion

1) Advertising channels

2) Sponsorship / funding

Website, online, radio, television commercials and print material.

Site Map:

Synthony in The Domain 2026 draft site map is attached below.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

18. Minimising the potential climate impact of these events is a key consideration of the event permit process, in particular waste management requirements:

a) encouraging the use of public transport and low-carbon options

b) following zero waste event goals and guidelines

c) waste provider must do back-end sorting of waste.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. The TAU Major Event Facilitation team will consult with Auckland Transport, as per the event facilitation process, to ensure the road closures are adequate to support the events and minimise displacement of public, emergency services, and nearby residents.

20. The TAU Major Event Facilitation team will also consult with Community Facilities and Sports Parks to ensure access requirements are communicated to the event organisers prior to the event pack in.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

21. Feedback from the Waitematā Local Board will be sought once more detailed information becomes available.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

22. The Auckland Domain is a significant site for many iwi in the region. The Auckland Domain is a historic site of conflict and peace. The memorial on Pukekaroa Hill and the displays and interpretation managed by the Auckland War Memorial Museum pay tribute to significant events for Māori and the importance of the site to mana whenua.

23. Staff have not currently identified any significant impact for Māori in the event permit request for any of the events we are seeking approval for. However, for 2025 Ngāti Whātuā Ōrākei were engaged around site use to ensure the event did not compromise important cultural and environmental matters. A letter of support from Ngāti Whātuā Ōrākei has been provided for the 2026 event.

24. The event organiser will consult with Mana Whenua through the facilitation process where required. Consultation will be conducted if a resource consent is required and/or the utilisation of Sites of Significance.

25. Summary from TAU Investment Agreement, TAU is obligated to seek opportunities under The Treaty of Waitangi and encourages events to celebrate and showcase Māori Culture, increase accessibility to events for Māori and support Māori education and economic development. The event develops and delivers a Māori Engagement Plan as a core component of its planning and delivery process. This plan is designed to meet the following objectives, using best endeavours to ensure meaningful and effective outcomes. The event will develop and deliver a Māori engagement plan for:

· Kia ora Te Ahurea – Māori Identity and Culture: Kapa haka moment within the show / Māori performers

· Kia ora Te Reo – Māori language: Use of te reo greetings by MC, and in marketing communications

· Kia ora Te Umanga – Māori Business, Tourism and Employment: Procurement plan developed to include Māori performers, event professionals, and food vendors.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

26. The event facilitation process allows council to recover costs for remedial works that may be required following an event.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

27. The event facilitation process is designed to mitigate the event risks in public open space.

28. Although the committee may approve the event, further stakeholder consultation is required under the Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw 2022. The TAU Major Event Facilitation team will work with stakeholders including the Auckland Hospital to meet the requirements however, if one or more stakeholders’ requirements cannot be met the event may not be able to proceed.

29. The events applications currently have tentative bookings for the Domain. No conflicting sporting matches can be booked as a result.

30. The Sports Parks Bookings Team will assist in working with the relevant sporting bodies to determine if alternative locations can be found to accommodate the scheduled games – or if the pack in schedule of the event can be modified to minimise impact.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

31. As part of the 2025 post event process, the event organisers have met with key stakeholders where possible to obtain feedback that will be included in the 2026 planning. Feedback has also been requested through an online questionnaire.

32. Under the Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw 2022, all events in public open space are required to have an event permit.

33. The facilitation process outlines the series of steps to be completed for an event permit to be issued. This process is designed to ensure compliance, legality and ultimately a safe and enjoyable event.

34. Stakeholder consultation and approval will be obtained through the facilitation process from various internal and external parties. This process aims to ensure the operational plans for the event presents the minimum amount of risk and disruption possible to the land and local communities.

35. Stakeholders who are requested to either approve the event or provide feedback may include but is not limited to:

• Auckland Transport (Streetscapes, Special Events and Public Transport)

• Auckland Council Community Facilities

• Auckland Council Environmental Health (Noise)

• Auckland Council Heritage

• Auckland Council Resource Consents

• Auckland Council Waste Solutions

• Auckland Council Bylaws

• Auckland Council Alcohol Licensing

• Auckland Council Building Consents

• Auckland Council Health & Safety

• Auckland Council Street Trading

• Civil Aviation Authority

• Civil Defence

• Auckland Hospital

• Auckland Museum

• Domain Wintergardens & Wintergarden Pavillion

• NZ Police

• Fire and Ambulance

• Local Businesses and Residents

36. Following receipt of all relevant approvals required, the TAU Major Event Facilitation team will issue an event permit for the event.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇨	Full version of the site map
b ⇨	Letter of support from Ngāti Whātua Orākei

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Authors

Wai Murrell - Group Manager Events Operations & Facilitation

Freddie Swanepoel - Major Event Facilitator

Authoriser

Martin van Jaarsveld - Head of Specialist Operations

Auckland Domain Committee

19 May 2025

Auckland Domain Event Proposal – May 2025

File No.: CP2025/09086

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek in principle landowner approval for the Gardens Music Festival to be held in calendar years 2026, 2027 and 2028 at the Auckland Domain.

2. To seek in principle landowner approval for proposed events to be held in calendar years 2025 and 2026.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. Staff have received event permit applications for the Gardens Music Festival event proposed to take place in the Auckland Domain. The applications require Auckland Domain Committee approval.

· Gardens Music Festival

Friday 27 and Saturday 28 February 2026

Friday 26 and Saturday 27 February 2027

Friday 25 and Saturday 26 February 2028

4. Staff recommend that landowner approval is granted for these events for calendar years 2026, 2027 and 2028, as they are held annually and there are minimal operational changes to the event each year.

5. Staff have also received event permit applications for events proposed to take place in the Auckland Domain during calendar years 2025 and 2026. The following applications require Auckland Domain Committee approval:

· Shine for a Cure

Saturday 20 September 2025

· Spring City and Live Nation Show

Thursday 25 October 2025
Friday 31 October and Saturday 1 November 2025

· Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live)

Saturday 22 November 2025

· Golden Lights

Saturday 10 January 2026

· Audiology Concert

Friday 30 January 2026

6. As per the Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines, an event permit requires in principle landowner approval from the Auckland Domain Committee.

7. Subject to all event approvals required through the event permit and facilitation process, staff will issue a permit for the events. This process will be repeated annually.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Auckland Domain Committee:

a) whakaee / approve in principle for the Gardens Festival event to take place in the Auckland Domain in the calendar years 2026, 2027 and 2028.

b) whakaee / approve in principle for the following proposed events to take place in the Auckland Domain in the calendar years 2025 and 2026:

i) Shine for a Cure

ii) Spring City and Live Nation Show

iii) Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live)

iv) Golden Lights

v) Audiology Concert

Horopaki

Context

8. The Auckland Domain is a high-demand site for a range of public events. This is due to its central location, large capacity, public transport networks, limited adjacent residents and hospitality offerings.

9. To manage these demands the Auckland Domain Committee adopted the Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines on 30 March 2016 (resolution number ADC/2016/9).

10. As per the guidelines, an event permit requires landowner approval from the Auckland Domain Committee if they:

· are ticketed and/or

· take place over multiple days (more than 48 hours) including pack in and pack out and/or

· require an authorised road closure.

11. Auckland Council is charged with enabling more events within the community, and as such try to accept as many applications as possible. Each application is assessed on its merits, in consultation with affected stakeholders.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Gardens Music Festival

12. Staff have received an event permit request for the annual Gardens Music Festival event. The event is to be held at the Auckland Domain on Friday 27 and Saturday 28 February 2026. The permit request includes an outline of proposed operations for the event, as laid out in Attachment A of the agenda report.

13. The event is a large scale, ticketed event, proposed to be held in the Auckland Domain on the upper sports fields located in Zone 1 of the Domain. The various zones are shown in the map below.

Legend
Zone 1 - Sports fields (yellow)
1a the lower sports fields (including fields 5 - 10)
1b the upper sports fields (including fields 1 - 4)
Zone 2 - Civic Events - Museum Surrounds (blue)
Zone 3 - The Wintergardens Complex (green)
Zone 4 – Kari St Active Event Zone (orange)
No Event Zones (red)
No infrastructure zones (purple) A map of a city

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

14. It is anticipated that this event will expect approximately 15,000 to 20,000 attendees across the two-day event.

15. Table one shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table one: Impact assessment Gardens Music Festival

Category	Impact Assessment – minimal or significant
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · The event is ticketed and will be fenced, excluding the general public and park users, for health and safety reasons. · The event does provide a wider positive benefit to the general public and local economy.
Utilises zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant impact · The event will restrict the general public from a portion of Zone 1. · The use of other areas of the park can continue as there is likely to be minimal disturbance to or impact on the regular users of the Domain. · The number of events taking up Zone 1b, being the ‘cricket grounds’, will be restricted in accordance with the Auckland Domain Act, to seven days maximum for one event.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and pack out)	Significant impact · Pack in and out of the event is during the peak use periods, based on season and use. · Events can take place for up to 12 days (seven days in Zone 1) including pack in and pack out. · There will be minimal displacement of sport as the cricket wickets are currently not in use, so no sport is currently scheduled in the Domain.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The area being utilised is not close to a significant cultural or heritage site or protected trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · Pedestrians outside the event are still able to use all current existing routes within the Domain.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · A traffic management plan will be in place for seven days and some vehicle access will be restricted due to required road closures, causing a level of disruption.
Infrastructure involved	Significant impact · Event plans ensure that the grounds within the park are not adversely affected by heavy structures, to the satisfaction of the appropriate asset maintenance staff. · A turf protection plan, with added protection for cricket wickets, will be required by operational staff to ensure the ground will be protected during the event or reinstated afterwards if necessary.
Hanging objects	No impact from the event footprint
Event vehicle movements	Significant impact · Event vehicle access required through grassed areas will need to be away from trees. · Vehicles will be restricted to 1.5 tonnes. · No vehicle movements will be allowed in areas outlined as ‘No Infrastructure Zones’.
Access to power and water	No impact from the event as all water and power sources will be brought onto site as part of the event infrastructure.
Amplified noise	Significant impact · Amplified music is core to this event. · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activity provisions set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan. · Noise mitigation measures will be in place. Regular monitoring of the perimeter will be undertaken by the production manager to ensure the event remains compliant.
Use of water features	No impact from the event footprint

16. An outline of proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment A to this report.

17. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for calendar years 2026, 2027 and 2028, for the Gardens Music Festival event, scheduled to take place on the Auckland Domain.

Shine for a Cure

18. Staff have also received an event permit request for the annual Shine for a Cure event. This event is to be held at the Auckland Domain on Saturday 20 September 2025. An outline of proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment B to the report.

19. The annual event is low scale, ticketed and alcohol free. The event is held to encourage workplaces to promote healthy lifestyles and build team relationships.

20. The expected attendance for this event is approximately 1,000 people.

21. Table two shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table two: Impact assessment Shine for a Cure

Category	Impact Assessment
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · Event is ticketed; however, any member of the public can purchase a ticket, as it is a fundraiser for a not-for-profit organisation. · Event is for the wider positive benefit to public and is aligned with the Auckland Council Events Policy 2013.
Utilise zones / expanse of area occupied	Minimal impact · Event utilises a minor portion of Zone 1 for infrastructure. The participants will travel along footpaths and closed inner roads.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and out time)	Minimal impact · Event held in Zone 1, is one day only, including pack in and out time, resulting in no sport displacement.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The event will utilise the hard surface in front of the grandstand, resulting in no sport displacement. · Area being utilised is not near a significant cultural or historic heritage site or significant trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · The event footprint will spread throughout the Auckland Domain, however no fencing infrastructure will impede pedestrian movements.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · Vehicle access into and through the Domain is restricted by required road closure. · The road closures will be managed through an Auckland Transport approved traffic management plan. This will ensure park surfaces are not adversely impacted and through traffic and pedestrian safety is provided for.
Infrastructure involved	Minimal impact · Some structures (Minimal self-supporting and weighted structures) to be placed on a small area of Zone 1.
Hanging objects	No Impact
Event vehicle movements	Minimal impact · Low number of event vehicles requiring access through grassed areas away from trees.
Access to power and water	Minimal impact · Access to on-site power and water supplies.
Amplified noise	Minimal impact · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activities set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan.
Use of water features	No impact

22. An outline of proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment B to the report.

23. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for the 2025 Shine for a Cure event, scheduled to take place on Saturday 20 September 2025, on the Auckland Domain.

Spring City and Live Nation Show

24. An event permit request has also been received by staff for the Spring City Music Festival and Live Nation Show event. The events are scheduled to be held at the Auckland Domain on Thursday 25 October 2025, and Friday 31 October and Saturday 1 November 2025 respectively. An outline of proposed operations for these events is included as Attachment C to the report.

25. The events are large scale, ticketed events proposed to be held in the Auckland Domain on the upper sports fields.

26. It is anticipated that approximately 15,000 to 20,000 patrons will attend the events.

27. Table three shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table three: Impact assessment Spring City and Live Nation Show

Category	Impact Assessment – minimal or significant
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · The event is ticketed and will be fenced, restricting general public and park user access, for health and safety reasons. · The event does provide a wider positive benefit to the general public and local economy.
Utilises zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant impact · The event will restrict the general public from a portion of Zone 1. · The use of other areas of the park can continue, as there is likely to be minimal disturbance to or impact on the regular users of the Domain. · The number of events taking up Zone 1b, being the ‘cricket grounds’, will be restricted in accordance with the Auckland Domain Act, to seven days maximum for one event.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and pack out)	Significant impact · Pack in and out of the event is during the peak use periods, based on season and use. · Events can take place for up to 12 days (seven days in Zone 1) including pack in and pack out. · There will be minimal displacement of sport as the cricket wickets are currently not in use, so no sport is currently scheduled in the Domain.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The area being utilised is not close to a significant cultural or heritage site or protected trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · Pedestrians outside the event are still able to use all current existing routes within the Domain.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · A traffic management plan will be in place for seven days. Some vehicle access will be restricted due to required road closures, causing a level of disruption.
Infrastructure involved	Significant impact · Event plans ensure that the grounds within the park are not adversely affected by heavy structures, to the satisfaction of the appropriate asset maintenance staff. · A turf protection plan, with added protection for cricket wickets, will be required by operational staff to ensure the ground will be protected during the event or reinstated afterwards if necessary.
Hanging objects	No impact from the event footprint
Event vehicle movements	Significant impact · Event vehicle access required through grassed areas will need to be away from trees. · Vehicles will be restricted to 1.5 tonnes. · No vehicle movements will be allowed in areas outlined as ‘No Infrastructure Zones’.
Access to power and water	No impact from the event, as all water and power sources will be brought onto site as part of the event infrastructure.
Amplified noise	Significant impact · Amplified music is core to this event. · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activity provisions set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan. · Noise mitigation measures will be in place. Regular monitoring of the perimeter will be undertaken by the production manager to ensure the event remains compliant.
Use of water features	No impact from the event footprint

28. An outline of proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment C to this report.

29. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for 2025, for the Spring City and Live Nation Show event, scheduled to take place on the Auckland Domain.

Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live)

30. Staff have received an event permit request for the Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live) event, to be held at the Auckland Domain on Saturday 22 November 2025. The application includes an outline of proposed operations for the event, attached as Attachment D of the report.

31. The event is a large scale, ticketed event, proposed to be held in the Auckland Domain on the upper sports fields.

32. It is anticipated that this event will expect approximately 15,000 to 20,000 attendees across the event.

33. Table four shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table four: Impact assessment Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live)

Category	Impact Assessment – Minimal or significant
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · The event is ticketed and will be fenced, restricting general public and park user access, for health and safety reasons. · The event does provide a wider positive benefit to the general public and local economy.
Utilises zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant impact · The event will restrict the general public from a portion of Zone 1. · The use of other areas of the park can continue, as there is likely to be minimal disturbance to or impact on the regular users of the Domain. · The number of events taking up Zone 1b, being the ‘cricket grounds’, will be restricted in accordance with the Auckland Domain Act, to seven days maximum for one event.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and pack out)	Significant impact · Pack in and out of the event is during the peak use periods, based on season and use. · Events can take place for up to 12 days (seven days in Zone 1) including pack in and pack out. · There will be minimal displacement of sport, as the cricket wickets are currently not in use, so no sport is currently scheduled in the Domain.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The area being utilised is not close to a significant cultural or heritage site or protected trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · Pedestrians outside the event are still able to use all current existing routes within the Domain.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · A traffic management plan will be in place for seven days. Some vehicle access will be restricted due to required road closures, causing a level of disruption.
Infrastructure involved	Significant impact · Event plans ensure that the grounds within the park are not adversely affected by heavy structures, to the satisfaction of the appropriate asset maintenance staff. · A turf protection plan, with added protection for cricket wickets, will be required by operational staff to ensure the ground will be protected during the event or reinstated afterwards if necessary.
Hanging objects	No impact from the event footprint
Event vehicle movements	Significant impact · Event vehicle access required through grassed areas will need to be away from trees. · Vehicles will be restricted to 1.5 tonnes. · No vehicle movements will be allowed in areas outlined as ‘No Infrastructure Zones’.
Access to power and water	No impact from the event as all water and power sources will be brought onto site as part of the event infrastructure.
Amplified noise	Significant impact · Amplified music is core to this event. · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activity provisions set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan. · Noise mitigation measures will be in place. Regular monitoring of the perimeter will be undertaken by the production manager to ensure the event remains compliant.
Use of water features	No impact from the event footprint

34. An outline of proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment D to the report.

35. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for 2025, for the Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live) Show event, scheduled to take place on the Auckland Domain on
22 November 2025.

Golden Lights

36. An additional event permit request was received for the Golden Lights event, to be held at the Auckland Domain on Saturday 10 January 2026. The application includes an outline of proposed operations for the event, as referenced in Attachment E.

37. The event is a large scale, ticketed event, proposed to be held in the Auckland Domain on the upper sports fields.

38. It is anticipated that this event will expect approximately 15,000 to 20,000 attendees across the event.

39. Table five shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table five: Impact assessment Golden Lights

Category	Impact Assessment – minimal or significant
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · The event is ticketed and will be fenced, restricting general public and park user access, for health and safety reasons. · The event does provide a wider positive benefit to the general public and local economy.
Utilises zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant impact · The event will restrict the general public from a portion of Zone 1. · The use of other areas of the park can continue, as there is likely to be minimal disturbance to or impact on the regular users of the Domain. · The number of events taking up Zone 1b, being the ‘cricket grounds’, will be restricted in accordance with the Auckland Domain Act, to seven days maximum for one event.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and pack out)	Significant impact · Pack in and out of the event is during the peak use periods, based on season and use. · Events can take place for up to 12 days (seven days in Zone 1) including pack in and pack out. · There will be minimal displacement of sport, as the cricket wickets are currently not in use, so no sport is currently scheduled in the Domain.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The area being utilised is not close to a significant cultural or heritage site or protected trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · Pedestrians outside the event are still able to use all current existing routes within the Domain.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · A traffic management plan will be in place for seven days. Some vehicle access will be restricted due to required road closures, causing a level of disruption.
Infrastructure involved	Significant impact · Event plans ensure that the grounds within the park are not adversely affected by heavy structures, to the satisfaction of the appropriate asset maintenance staff. · A turf protection plan, with added protection for cricket wickets, will be required by operational staff to ensure the ground will be protected during the event or reinstated afterwards if necessary.
Hanging objects	No impact from the event footprint
Event vehicle movements	Significant impact · Event vehicle access required through grassed areas will need to be away from trees. · Vehicles will be restricted to 1.5 tonnes. · No vehicle movements will be allowed in areas outlined as No Infrastructure Zones.
Access to power and water	No impact from the event as all water and power sources will be brought onto site as part of the event infrastructure.
Amplified noise	Significant impact · Amplified music is core to this event. · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activity provisions set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan. · Noise mitigation measures will be in place. Regular monitoring of the perimeter will be undertaken by the production manager to ensure the event remains compliant.
Use of water features	No impact from the event footprint

40. An outline of the proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment E to the report.

41. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for 2025, for the Golden Lights event scheduled to take place on the Auckland Domain on 10 January 2026.

Audiology Concert

42. Staff have also received an event permit request for the Audiology Concert event, to be held at the Auckland Domain on Saturday 30 January 2026. This includes an outline of proposed operations for the event, see Attachment F to the report.

43. The event is a large scale, ticketed event, proposed to be held in the Auckland Domain on the upper sports fields.

44. It is anticipated that this event will expect approximately 15,000 to 20,000 attendees across the event.

45. Table six shows the impact assessment that was carried out using the criteria in section 2.4 ‘Landowner Assessment Criteria’ of the Auckland Domain Events Operational Guidelines document.

Table six: Impact assessment Audiology Concert

Category	Impact Assessment – minimal or significant
Public restrictions	Minimal impact · The event is ticketed and will be fenced, restricting general public and park user access, for health and safety reasons. · The event does provide a wider positive benefit to the general public and local economy.
Utilises zones / expanse of area occupied	Significant impact · The event will restrict the general public from a portion of Zone 1. · The use of other areas of the park can continue, as there is likely to be minimal disturbance to or impact on the regular users of the Domain. · The number of events taking up Zone 1b, being the ‘cricket grounds’, will be restricted in accordance with the Auckland Domain Act, to seven days maximum for one event.
Duration and timing of event (including pack in and pack out)	Significant impact · Pack in and out of the event is during the peak use periods, based on season and use. · Events can take place for up to 12 days (seven days in Zone 1) including pack in and pack out. · There will be minimal displacement of sport, as the cricket wickets are currently not in use, so no sport is currently scheduled in the Domain.
Values of area occupied	Minimal impact · The area being utilised is not close to a significant cultural or heritage site or protected trees.
Pedestrian flows	Minimal impact · Pedestrians outside the event are still able to use all current existing routes within the Domain.
Impact on public vehicle access	Significant impact · A traffic management plan will be in place for seven days. Some vehicle access will be restricted due to required road closures, causing a level of disruption.
Infrastructure involved	Significant impact · Event plans ensure that the grounds within the park are not adversely affected by heavy structures, to the satisfaction of the appropriate asset maintenance staff. · A turf protection plan, with added protection for cricket wickets, will be required by operational staff to ensure the ground will be protected during the event or reinstated afterwards if necessary.
Hanging objects	No impact from the event footprint
Event vehicle movements	Significant impact · Event vehicle access required through grassed areas will need to be away from trees. · Vehicles will be restricted to 1.5 tonnes. · No vehicle movements will be allowed in areas outlined as No Infrastructure Zones.
Access to power and water	No impact from the event as all water and power sources will be brought onto site as part of the event infrastructure.
Amplified noise	Significant impact · Amplified music is core to this event. · Noise limits must be consistent with permitted activity provisions set out in the Auckland Unitary Plan. · Noise mitigation measures will be in place. Regular monitoring of the perimeter will be undertaken by the production manager to ensure the event remains compliant.
Use of water features	No impact from the event footprint

46. An outline of the proposed operations for the event is included as Attachment F to the report.

47. Staff recommend in principle landowner approval for 2025, for the Audiology Concert event scheduled to take place on the Auckland Domain on 30 January 2026.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

48. Minimising the potential climate impact of these events is a key consideration of the event permitting process, in particular waste management requirements.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

49. The Event Facilitation team will consult with Auckland Transport, as per the event facilitation process, to ensure that the road closures are adequate to support the events. This will minimise the displacement of public and nearby residents.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

50. Events can cause disruption to residents and surrounding businesses. The Auckland Domain Event Operational Guidelines outlines the minimum level of consultation with affected stakeholders.

51. As part of the wider facilitation process, staff will seek feedback from the Waitematā Local Board on each specific event as more detailed information for each application becomes available.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

52. The Auckland Domain is a significant site for many iwi in the region. The Auckland Domain is a historic site of conflict and peace. The memorial on Pukekaroa and the displays and interpretation managed by the Auckland War Memorial Museum pay tribute to significant events for Māori and the importance of the site to mana whenua.

53. Staff have not currently identified any significant impact for Māori in the event permit requests for any of the events for which approval is sought.

54. The event organiser will consult with Mana Whenua through the facilitation process where required. Consultation will be conducted if a resource consent is required and/or the utilisation of Sites of Significance.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

55. The event facilitation process allows council to recover costs for remedial works that may be required following an event.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

56. The event facilitation process is designed to mitigate the risk of having events in public open space.

57. Although the committee may approve the event, further stakeholder consultation is required under the Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw 2022.

58. Event Facilitation staff will work with stakeholders including the Auckland Hospital and Auckland Museum, to meet the requirements of the Auckland Domain Event Guidelines However, if one or more stakeholders’ requirements cannot be met the event may not be able to proceed.

59. The event applications currently have tentative bookings for the Domain. No conflicting sporting matches can be booked as a result.

60. The Sports Parks Bookings Team would need to work with the relevant sporting bodies to determine if alternative locations can be found to accommodate the scheduled games.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

61. As part of the Public Trading, Events and Filming Bylaw 2022, all events in public open space are required to have an event permit.

62. The facilitation process outlines the series of steps to be completed for an event permit to be issued. This process is designed to ensure compliance, legality and ultimately a safe and enjoyable event.

63. Stakeholder consultation and approval will be obtained from various internal and external parties through the facilitation process. This process aims to ensure that the operational plan for each event presents the minimum amount of risk and disruption possible to the land and local communities.

64. Stakeholders who are requested to either approve the event or provide feedback may include, but is not limited to:

· Auckland Transport (Streetscapes, Special Events and Public Transport)

· Auckland Council Community Facilities

· Auckland Council Environmental Health (Noise)

· Auckland Transport Harbour Master

· Auckland Council Heritage

· Auckland Council Resource Consents

· Auckland Council Waste Solutions

· Auckland Council Animal Management

· Auckland Council Bylaws

· Auckland Council Alcohol Licensing

· Auckland Council Building Consents

· Auckland Council Health and Safety

· Auckland Council Street Trading

· Civil Aviation Authority

· Civil Defence

· Auckland Hospital

· New Zealand Police

· Fire and Ambulance Services

· Local businesses and residents.

65. Following receipt of all relevant approvals required, the Event Facilitation team will issue a permit for each event. This permitting process will be repeated annually.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇨	Event Proposal: Gardens Music Festival
b ⇨	Event Proposal: Shine for a Cure
c ⇨	Event Proposal: Spring City and Live Nation Show
d ⇨	Event Proposal: Headline Electronic Show (Trademark Live)
e ⇨	Event Proposal: Golden Lights
f ⇨	Event Proposal: Audiology Concert

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author	Carl Ewen - Manager Event Facilitation
Authoriser	Martin van Jaarsveld - Head of Specialist Operations

Auckland Domain Committee

19 May 2025

Parks and Community Facilities - Pukekawa, Auckland Domain Work Programme 2026-2028

File No.: CP2025/06819

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To seek endorsement of the draft Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain Capex Work Programme 2026 - 2028.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

2. This report sets out the proposed Parks and Community Facilities Capex Work Programme 2026 - 2028 for the Pukekawa Auckland Domain.

3. Key priorities in the programme include:

· Development of pathway connections between:

- Titoki Street Carpark and Football Road

- Football Road End and The Crescent

· renewal of Centennial and Watson Bequest walkways

· refurbishment of heritage glasshouses at the Domain nursery

· renewal and reconfiguration of the Titoki Street carpark

· refurbishment of Wintergarden pergolas

· renewal of water features across the Domain.

4. Several projects in the 2026/2027 and 2027/2028 work programme have been identified as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme (RAP). Approval is sought for the planning and design of these projects to commence during 2025/2026, enabling early delivery should any 2025/2026 be delayed.

5. Staff seek endorsement of the proposed Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme for the financial years 2025 – 2028.

6. Following the approval of the Regional Work Programme, work will commence on activities in the Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme 2025/2026 and continue until June 2026.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Auckland Domain Committee:

a) ohia / endorse the proposed Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme 2025 – 2028 as set out in Attachment A to this report.

Horopaki

Context

7. The Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme is funded through the regional renewals and development programme budget.

8. The Regional Work Programme will be presented to the Community Committee for approval on 29 July 2025. The 2026 – 2028 Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme, detailed in the Attachment A, forms part of the wider Regional Work Programme and sets out the projects to be delivered by Parks and Community Facilities.

9. Resolutions made by the Auckland Domain Committee relating to the Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme will be considered in any recommendation and provided verbatim to the Community Committee.

10. The projects identified in the Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme have been prioritised for investment based on a combination of feedback through a series of workshops, staff assessments of assets and key stakeholder input.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

11. The proposed Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex work programme is made up of activities continuing from previous financial years and new initiatives. This programme includes:

· the development of pathway connections includes Site 1, from Titoki Street Carpark to Football Road, and Site 2, from Football Road End to The Crescent

· renewal of Centennial and Watson Bequest walkways

· renewal of historic glasshouses

· Titoki Street carpark renewal

· refurbishment of Wintergarden pergolas

· renewal of the water features and associated infrastructure across the Domain.

12. Staff have prepared the recommended programme through an iterative process, in consideration of service outcomes sought, the condition of existing assets and demands for new assets. The process of prioritisation has included engagement with staff responsible for delivering both assets and services ‘on the ground’.

13. Budget allocations within the work programme are best estimates only. Project costings are subject to change and refinement as projects progress through the design and delivery process. Greater clarity will be determined around the specific work required and the cost of delivery of that work once the details are defined.

Risk adjusted programme

14. The Risk Adjusted Programme, introduced in 2019, allows projects to be delivered earlier if others are delayed.

15. Several projects in the 2026/2027 and 2027/2028 work programme have been identified as part of the Risk Adjusted Programme as highlighted in Attachment A.

16. Approval is sought for the commencement of these projects in the 2025/2026 financial year, so that they can replace delays in projects that may not be delivered for unforeseen reasons.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

17. Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan provides a roadmap to a zero-emissions, resilient and healthier region that is better connected to our environment and able to thrive in the face of ongoing change and disruption.

18. The delivery of activities in the proposed work programme will contribute to the objectives of Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri: Auckland’s Climate Plan. Key considerations include:

· maximum upcycling and recycling of old material

· installation of energy efficiency measures

· building design to ensure the maximum lifetime and efficiency of the building is obtained

· lifecycle impacts of construction materials (embodied emissions)

· exposure of building location to climate change hazards (sea level rise, flooding (floodplains), drought, heat island effect)

· anticipated increase in carbon emissions from construction, including contractor emissions.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

19. The 2026-2028 Parks and Community Facilities regional work programme has been developed in consultation with teams across the Parks and Community Facilities Department.

20. The intent is to improve the integration of staff advice to the committee and overall to improve the quality of advice through increased collaboration and a shared understanding across the department.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

21. Members of the Waitematā Local Board who sit on the Pukekawa Auckland Domain Committee play a key role in providing input and direction on these priorities and individual projects, as the Auckland Domain falls within the Waitematā Local Board area. Additionally, the Waitematā Local Board has specific responsibilities for overseeing the management and development of the sportsfields, ensuring that the projects align with local needs and priorities.

22. Community facilities and open spaces provide important community services to the people of the local board areas across the Auckland region. They contribute to building strong, healthy and vibrant communities by providing spaces where Aucklanders can participate in a wide range of social, cultural, art and recreational activities. These activities improve lifestyles and a sense of belonging and pride amongst residents.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

23. The Parks and Community Facilities work programme ensures that all facilities and open space assets continue to be well-maintained and benefit the local community, including Māori. When developing and delivering work programmes consideration is given to how the activities can contribute to Māori well-being, values, culture and traditions.

24. Karanga Atu! Karanga Mai! relationship approach responds to Māori aspirations and delivers on council’s statutory obligations and relationship commitments to Māori.

25. Where aspects of the proposed work programme are anticipated to have a significant impact on activity of importance to Māori then appropriate engagement will be undertaken.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

26. The Community Committee have responsibility for the regional renewals and development capital expenditure budgets. These fund the Auckland wide network of Regional Parks including areas allocated to farming activities, the Auckland Botanic Gardens and Pukekawa Auckland Domain.

27. The Pukekawa Auckland Domain proposed allocation is summarised in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Pukekawa Auckland Domain proposed work programme allocation

Pukekawa Auckland Domain Work Programme Allocation Summary	2025/2026	2026/2027	2027/2028
Proposed Allocation - Pukekawa Auckland Domain - Renewal Capex	3,327,500	1,580,000	500,000
Proposed Allocation - Pukekawa Auckland Domain (Wintergardens) - Renewal Capex	26,717	27,252	0
Proposed Allocation - Pukekawa Auckland Domain - Development Capex	232,086	550,000	0
Proposed Allocation - External Funding *Waitematā Local Board Transport Capital Fund*	1,306,236	0	0
Total Proposed Allocation	4,892,539	2,157,252	500,000

28. The proposed work programme can be accommodated within the available regional budgets. Approval of the work programme does not have significant financial implications unless projects experience a significant overspend or underspend.

29. Regular updates on the delivery of the programme will be provided to the committee. These updates will identify progress of all projects and potential amendments to the approved programme including changes to budget allocation and timing.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

30. Staff are confident the proposed work programme is deliverable within current resources. Ongoing monitoring will occur throughout the year, with regular updates on risks, issues, and mitigation strategies presented to the Committee.

31. If any activity cannot be completed on time due to unforeseen circumstances, it will be promptly communicated to the committee, with risks mitigated through the utilisation of the risk-adjusted programme (RAP) to progress projects identified as ready to proceed at the beginning of the financial year.

32. The Governing Body will be adopting the 2025/2026 Annual Plan on 26 June 2025. Changes to budget allocations may impact on the proposed work programme.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

33. Following the presentation of this report to the Komiti mō te Papa Rēhia o Pukekawa / Auckland Domain Committee on 6 May 2025, the regional work programmes will be presented to the Community Committee on 29 July 2025 for approval.

34. Delivery of activities in the approved 2025/2026 regional work programme will commence once approved and continue until 30 June 2026, including those within the Parks and Community Facilities Pukekawa Auckland Domain capex programme.

35. Where the work programme identifies further decisions and milestones for each activity, these will be brought to the Pukekawa Auckland Domain Committee when appropriate.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇨	Pukekawa Auckland Domain Capex Work Programme 2026 - 2028
b ⇨	Parks and Community Facilities - Pukekawa, Auckland Domain Work Programme 2026-2028 Presentation

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author	Linda Pillay - Manager Area Operations
Authoriser	Martin van Jaarsveld - Head of Specialist Operations

Auckland Domain Committee

19 May 2025

Proposed promotion of a local bill to amend Auckland Domain Act 1987

File No.: CP2025/08576

Te take mō te pūrongo

Purpose of the report

1. To consider options for future leasing at Auckland Domain and decide on a preferred option.

2. To decide whether to recommend to Governing Body the promotion of a local bill to amend the leasing provisions in the Auckland Domain Act 1987.

Whakarāpopototanga matua

Executive summary

3. Council’s leasing powers over Auckland Domain (Domain) are prescribed in section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987 (the Act).

4. Section 7 of the Act prescribes maximum lease terms to named lessees at defined locations within the Domain.

5. The current leases permitted under the Act (and the respective final expiry dates) are held by the following groups: Auckland Tennis Incorporated - expires 1 September 2061, Auckland Bowling Club Incorporated - expires 31 March 2033, Parnell Lawn Tennis Club Incorporated - expires 15 December 2029 and the operator at the Wintergardens café - expires 30 June 2028.

6. The final lease expiry dates for two of the leases are approaching in 2028 and 2029 respectively, and a third lease expiring in 2033.

7. Under the Act, on expiry or earlier determination of these leases, council will be unable to grant further leases at the current specified locations within the Domain.

8. The council is considering supporting the continuation of leasing activities at the current locations within the Domain, subject to the overriding policy and intention of the Act that “the Domain shall continue to be held by the council upon trust as place of public recreation and enjoyment, including at all times free access to and egress from the Domain in favour of all persons, subject to the provisions of the Act” (section 4 of the Act).

9. This report sets out the options that have been identified for achieving this objective. The options are summarised below:

Option 1. Promotion of a local bill to amend the Act to empower council to grant future leases at the same locations currently defined in the Act, to either:

a) permit leases for a specified term without naming leasing entities; or

b) permit leases for a specified term naming the current leasing entities; or

c) permit future leasing of those defined areas, at its discretion as to lessee and duration (including any rights of renewal), subject to the consultation requirements of section 138 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) (recommended)

Option 2. Promotion of a local bill to repeal the Act, which would leave the council to manage the Domain under existing general legislation such as the LGA or the Reserves Act 1977.

Option 3. Do nothing – no leasing permitted at the Domain beyond existing lease expiry dates.

10. Staff recommend option 1(c) above as the preferred option because it would empower the council to grant future leases within the existing specified areas of the Domain, in better alignment with current council leasing policy and practices.

11. If the Auckland Domain Committee (committee) supports promoting a local bill to amend the Act, staff recommend that mana whenua and public consultation on the preferred option is undertaken to inform consideration of the proposal by the Waitematā Local Board and a decision by the Governing Body.

12. Following consultation, staff will report to the Waitematā Local Board for a decision on its views on the Auckland Domain Committee’s recommendation to the Governing Body.

Ngā tūtohunga

Recommendation/s

That the Auckland Domain Committee:

a) whakaae / agree to recommend to the Governing Body that council promote a local bill to amend section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987 to empower Auckland Council to grant future leases over those parts of the Auckland Domain as described in section 7 (and shown indicatively as areas A, B, C and D as specified in the plan in attachment B), at its discretion as to lessee and duration (including any rights of renewal), subject to the consultation requirements of section 138 of the Local Government Act 2002.

b) whakaae / agree that staff undertake mana whenua and public consultation on a proposal to promote a local bill to amend section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987 as set out in resolution a) above.

c) tuhi / note that the feedback received from mana whenua and public consultation will be reported to the Waitematā Local Board to inform its consideration of the recommendation in resolution a) above, after which staff will report the outcome of the mana whenua and public consultation and the views of the Waitematā Local Board to the Governing Body for a decision.

Horopaki

Context

Domain Leasing Powers

13. Section 7 of the Act prescribes council’s leasing powers over the Domain. Under section 7, council may only grant leases in specific locations to named lessees, with the one exception of a lease permitted under section 7(1)(e) that does not name a specific lessee. As each of these leases expires, no further leasing of those sites is permitted. No leasing of alternative sites in the Domain is permitted. Section 7 of the Act is set out in Attachment A.

14. The council is considering supporting the continuation of leasing activities at the current locations within the Domain, subject to the overriding policy and intention of the Act that the Domain is held as place of public recreation and enjoyment - including at all times free access to and egress from the Domain in favour of all persons, subject to the provisions of the Act.

15. An amendment to the Act would be required to enable the council to enter into new leases with the existing lessees beyond the existing lease terms or grant a new lessee a lease of those sites upon expiry of the current leases, or to enter into leases over other parts of the Domain.

16. As the Act is a Local Act, the process to amend such legislation requires the council to ‘promote’ a Local Bill to amend it.

17. Section 7 has previously been amended through the Auckland Domain (Auckland Tennis) Amendment Act 2008. This amendment, which added subclause (2A) to section 7, was instigated by Auckland Tennis Incorporated due to its proposed investment in and development of the Tennis lease site.

18. Section 7(2A) provided for a further lease of the land leased by Auckland Tennis Incorporated, at council’s discretion, for a term or terms not exceeding 50 years in aggregate. The Domain Committee was satisfied that Auckland Tennis met relevant criteria and has granted a renewal of their lease with final expiry date of 1 September 2061 (resolution number ADC/2016/29).

Current Leases in the Domain

19. The current leases (and the respective final lease expiry dates) provided for under section 7 of the Act are set out below:

Section(s) of the Auckland Domain Act 1987	Lessee name	Site location/address	Lease Expiry Date
Section 7(1)(b) Section 7 (2A)	Auckland Tennis Incorporated (marked A on the plan in Attachment B)	1 Tennis Lane, Parnell or 20 Park Road, Grafton	1/09/2061
Section 7(1)(a) Section 7(2)	Auckland Bowling Club Incorporated (marked B on the plan in Attachment B)	100 Stanley Street, Parnell	31/03/2033
Section 7(1)(d) Section 7(2)	Parnell Lawn Tennis Club Incorporated (marked C on the plan in Attachment B)	Maunsell Road, Parnell	15/12/2029
Section 7(1) (e) Section 7(2)	Golden Fortune Auckland Limited (marked D on the plan in Attachment B)	Wintergarden Café, Kiosk Road, Grafton	30/06/2028

20. The areas of the Domain leased to existing leases under section 7 of the Act are indicatively set out in the plan in Attachment B, shaded red.

21. Section 7(1)(c) of the Act also provides for a lease to Auckland Rugby League of an area of land on the lower domain adjacent to Carlaw Park, shaded purple on the plan in attachment B. This area of the Domain has not been occupied by Auckland Rugby League since 2002. No further leasing of this area of the Domain is currently permitted under the Act. The former Rugby lease site has not been included in the land proposed to be made subject to future leasing under this report.

22. Council’s maintenance contractor for the Domain has a licence to occupy in and around the nursery area to enable them to efficiently fulfil their maintenance contract.

23. Auckland Museum Trust Board leases the Auckland Museum at the Domain under separate legislation and accordingly this report does not consider museum leasing arrangements.

Decision Making

24. The Domain is identified in the “Decision-Making Responsibilities of Auckland Council’s Governing Body and local boards” (the Allocation Table) (set out in Volume 2 of the Long-term Plan 2024-2034) as a park of regional significance with decision-making responsibility over the Domain as follows:

A screenshot of a text box

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

25. As noted in the Allocation Table, both the Governing Body and the Waitematā Local Board have delegated their decision-making responsibilities over the Domain to the Auckland Domain Committee.

26. The Domain Committee terms of reference includes “all powers of the Governing Body and Waitematā Local Board necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities including those powers conferred on Auckland Council pursuant to the Auckland Domain Act 1987”, with certain exceptions including (relevantly for current purposes) the approval of final policy and deciding significant matters for which there is high public interest, and which are controversial.

27. Staff advice is that the promotion of a local bill to amend the Domain Act would come under the exception of “the approval of final policy” and is likely to be considered a significant matter for which there is high public interest. Therefore, a decision to promote a local bill in this case would sit with the Governing Body rather than the Auckland Domain Committee. The views of the Waitematā Local Board should also be sought for consideration in any Governing Body decision.

28. Given the Auckland Domain Committee’s governance responsibility for the Domain, this report sets out options and seeks a decision of the committee on its preferred option for recommendation to the Governing Body (see options analysis in Table 1 of this report).

29. If the preferred option selected by the committee is to promote a local bill to amend (or repeal) the Act, staff recommend that the council undertake mana whenua and public consultation on the preferred option to inform the Waitematā Local Board’s consideration of the committee’s recommendation to the Governing Body for a decision.

Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu

Analysis and advice

Purpose of the Act and status of Domain

30. The purpose of the Act is to consolidate and amend the law relating to the control, management and use of the Domain.

31. The status of the Domain under section 4(1) of the Act is that it shall continue to be held by the council upon trust as a place of public recreation and enjoyment, including at all times free access to and egress from the Domain in favour of all persons. This statutory status reflects the regional importance of the Domain.

32. When a lease of land is granted, the lessee is entitled to exclusive use of the leased land area for the duration of the lease. Council’s power to grant leases over the Domain under section 7 of the Act is therefore an exception to the overriding status of the Domain as a place for public recreation and enjoyment for all persons.

33. Section 7(3) provides that “except as provided in this section, the council shall not have power to grant a lease or leases of any other part or parts of the Domain”. This reflects the intention of the Act to preserve the Domain for public recreation with free access to all, rather than providing exclusive rights to selected groups.

Leasing restrictions under section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987

34. The key restrictions on leasing under section 7 of the Act can be summarised as follows:

a) Finite lease terms – lease terms are prescribed for a finite term.

b) Fixed lease areas – lease areas within the Domain are described in section 7 of the Act (see attachment A) and as indicated in the plan in Attachment B.

c) Exclusive named lessees – only named lessees are entitled to lease the Domain land, with the exception of leases permitted under section 7(1)(e).

35. As several of the current leases will expire in the next three to eight years, council needs to decide whether to promote a local bill to amend the leasing provisions under the Act so as to enable further leases to be granted.

36. Any decision to seek to extend council’s leasing powers at the Domain, by way of amendment to section 7 of the Act, should take into account the statutory status of the Domain, reflecting its importance as a park of regional significance. In light of that, staff recommend that leasing remains restricted to certain parts of the Domain.

Future Leasing Options Analysis

37. Staff have identified several options for providing for the continuation of leasing activities at the current locations within the Domain. These options are set out, along with an analysis of their advantages and disadvantages in the following table:

Table 1. Options analysis

	Option	Advantages	Disadvantages
1.	Promote a local bill to amend the Act to empower council to grant new leases at the Domain: Amend section 7 to permit council to grant new leases for specified maximum terms at specified locations in the Domain (as per existing section 7) but without specifying named lessees.	This will allow council to plan for the future and retain flexibility when the current lease terms expire. This will provide council with the opportunity to grant leases to groups that are relevant at the time. The lease areas would continue to be restricted in line with the intention of the original Act and status of the Domain.	Lease terms remain constrained by the Act and are inflexible – similar to the existing section 7. If a specified maximum term of any new lease is prescribed under the Act, council will then need to amend the Act again in the future – which is inefficient.
2.	As above, but also restrict new leases to named entities (as per existing section 7) (Not recommended)	This option will provide certainty of tenure for existing lessees and club members. Would require the minimum level of change to section 7.	Specifying the names of the lessee entities (per the existing section 7) is likely to create a public perception that certain groups are favoured over others. Naming groups does not allow for future flexibility to adapt to the changing circumstances or needs of the public.
3.	Promote a local bill to amend the Act to allow future leases at specified locations within the Domain: Empower council to grant future leases over those parts of the Domain as described in section 7 of the Act (and shown indicatively as areas A, B, C, D as specified in the plan in attachment B), at its discretion as to lessee and duration (including any rights of renewal), subject to the consultation requirements of section 138 of the Local Government Act 2002. (recommended)	Council retains discretion over the lease term. Council holds complete discretion to select suitable lessee groups. Statutory process for leasing would trigger the same consultation requirements as leasing parks under s 138 of the LGA to bring in line with council’s current practices and policies for other LGA land. This would give council more flexibility to cater for the changing needs of the community. Restricting the areas of the Domain available for leasing reflects the intention of the Act and the statutory status of the Domain as a place for public recreation for all persons.	The existing lessees are likely to resist not being named as they have, to date, enjoyed the benefit of exclusivity. On expiry of the current ground leases, ownership of lessee’ buildings and improvements revert to the council. Near the end of the terms, the current lessees will have no incentive to invest in the maintenance and repair of their assets.
4.	Promote a local bill to repeal the Domain Act and instead manage the Domain under existing legislation – such as Reserves Act 1977 or LGA 2002. (not recommended)	Repealing the restrictive framework of the Act would enable council decision makers far greater discretion to make decisions as they see fit, subject to any relevant statutory obligations.	The Domain would lose its statutory status under the Act and there would no longer be detailed provisions for the ongoing preservation, management and use of the Domain. Likely to be controversial with perception from some that the ‘loss’ of restrictive protections in the Act may mean a permissive management framework that could negatively affect the public’s use and enjoyment of the Domain or open up more areas that would be subject to exclusive use by commercial interests. A thorough and comprehensive review of the entire Act would be required and this would need considerable resources and time. An extensive consultation process is likely. Unless areas of the Domain are specifically set aside for leasing activities, this will create uncertainty for current and future lessees.
5.	Do nothing (not recommended) No future leasing permitted when the current leases expire.	The currently leased areas will be freed up for use by the general public when the current leases expire. Council will have flexibility to determine future use of the land.	On expiry or earlier termination of the existing leases, no further leasing will be permitted under the Act. Any revenue from existing leases would end. No future lease revenue could be contemplated. Reputational risk: Council will be perceived as being passive and not proactive with the knowledge that a decision is needed to address future leasing at the Domain. The community stands to lose community facilities which provide the opportunity to partake in recreational activities. It would displace well established activities and groups without obvious alternative locations. Ownership of lessee buildings and improvements would revert to council. Council will be responsible for operating expenses and capital costs associated with asset management. Cost to remove improvements and reinstate or maintain would be a financial risk to council. Community groups who may consider future opportunities could exist as well as the existing lessees are likely to challenge a decision to allow the leases to expire.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

Promote a local bill to amend the Act to empower council to grant new leases at the Domain:

Amend section 7 to permit council to grant new leases for specified maximum terms at specified locations in the Domain (as per existing section 7) but without specifying named lessees.

This will allow council to plan for the future and retain flexibility when the current lease terms expire.

This will provide council with the opportunity to grant leases to groups that are relevant at the time.

The lease areas would continue to be restricted in line with the intention of the original Act and status of the Domain.

Lease terms remain constrained by the Act and are inflexible – similar to the existing section 7.

If a specified maximum term of any new lease is prescribed under the Act, council will then need to amend the Act again in the future – which is inefficient.

As above, but also restrict new leases to named entities (as per existing section 7)

(Not recommended)

This option will provide certainty of tenure for existing lessees and club members.

Would require the minimum level of change to section 7.

Specifying the names of the lessee entities (per the existing section 7) is likely to create a public perception that certain groups are favoured over others.

Naming groups does not allow for future flexibility to adapt to the changing circumstances or needs of the public.

Promote a local bill to amend the Act to allow future leases at specified locations within the Domain:

Empower council to grant future leases over those parts of the Domain as described in section 7 of the Act (and shown indicatively as areas A, B, C, D as specified in the plan in attachment B), at its discretion as to lessee and duration (including any rights of renewal), subject to the consultation requirements of section 138 of the Local Government Act 2002.

(recommended)

Council retains discretion over the lease term.

Council holds complete discretion to select suitable lessee groups.

Statutory process for leasing would trigger the same consultation requirements as leasing parks under s 138 of the LGA to bring in line with council’s current practices and policies for other LGA land.

This would give council more flexibility to cater for the changing needs of the community.

Restricting the areas of the Domain available for leasing reflects the intention of the Act and the statutory status of the Domain as a place for public recreation for all persons.

The existing lessees are likely to resist not being named as they have, to date, enjoyed the benefit of exclusivity.

On expiry of the current ground leases, ownership of lessee’ buildings and improvements revert to the council. Near the end of the terms, the current lessees will have no incentive to invest in the maintenance and repair of their assets.

Promote a local bill to repeal the Domain Act and instead manage the Domain under existing legislation – such as Reserves Act 1977 or LGA 2002.

(not recommended)

Repealing the restrictive framework of the Act would enable council decision makers far greater discretion to make decisions as they see fit, subject to any relevant statutory obligations.

The Domain would lose its statutory status under the Act and there would no longer be detailed provisions for the ongoing preservation, management and use of the Domain.

Likely to be controversial with perception from some that the ‘loss’ of restrictive protections in the Act may mean a permissive management framework that could negatively affect the public’s use and enjoyment of the Domain or open up more areas that would be subject to exclusive use by commercial interests.

A thorough and comprehensive review of the entire Act would be required and this would need considerable resources and time. An extensive consultation process is likely.

Unless areas of the Domain are specifically set aside for leasing activities, this will create uncertainty for current and future lessees.

Do nothing

(not recommended)

No future leasing permitted when the current leases expire.

The currently leased areas will be freed up for use by the general public when the current leases expire. Council will have flexibility to determine future use of the land.

On expiry or earlier termination of the existing leases, no further leasing will be permitted under the Act.

Any revenue from existing leases would end. No future lease revenue could be contemplated.

Reputational risk:

Council will be perceived as being passive and not proactive with the knowledge that a decision is needed to address future leasing at the Domain.

The community stands to lose community facilities which provide the opportunity to partake in recreational activities.

It would displace well established activities and groups without obvious alternative locations.

Ownership of lessee buildings and improvements would revert to council. Council will be responsible for operating expenses and capital costs associated with asset management. Cost to remove improvements and reinstate or maintain would be a financial risk to council.

Community groups who may consider future opportunities could exist as well as the existing lessees are likely to challenge a decision to allow the leases to expire.

Current community leasing guidelines across the region

38. Currently all but one of the leases enabled under the Act are community ground leases. If option 3 in Table 1 was recommended by the committee, such amendments to the Act would mean that where a proposed new lease is granted to a community / not for profit entity (as opposed to a commercial entity) the council’s policies set out in the community leasing guidelines would apply.

39. The current community leasing criteria and tenure on local parks throughout the Auckland region is guided by the Community Occupancy Guidelines 2012 (updated 2023).

40. The guidelines allow for community groups that own their buildings to automatically apply for new lease for a term of 10 years with a right of renewal of a further 10 years, and for groups that lease council-owned buildings the tenure offered is a 5-year lease with a 5 year right of renewal.

41. Included in the criteria is that all community groups must also be either an incorporated society or charitable trust and provide outcomes for the community.

42. The guidelines also provide guidance around maintenance fees and or rent.

43. Community leases also include a schedule of agreed upon outcomes that the groups must provide each year in lieu of charging commercial rental rates.

Conclusions – Recommended Option

44. If the committee wishes to support continued leasing at the Domain after the existing lease expiry dates, staff consider option 3 in Table 1 above is the most appropriate option to be promoted as an amendment to the Act.

45. Option 3 would continue to restrict leasing to defined areas of the Domain in accordance with the intention of the Act while aligning with current council leasing practices and policies for both community and commercial leasing.

Consultation requirements for promotion of local bill

46. There is no express statutory requirement to consult prior to the council deciding to promote a local bill. However, in practice there is an expectation that the council would consult before promoting a local bill of this nature.

47. Further, council, in its decision making, needs to consider the views and preferences of persons likely to be affected by, or have an interest in the matter.

48. The Significance and Engagement Policy (S & E Policy) sets out the council’s approach to assessing significance and identifies some of the matters that the council may consider when assessing the degree of significance of a matter.

49. In this case, applying the S & E Policy, staff consider that the council proposing to promote a local bill to amend the Domain Act is likely to have a relatively high degree of significance. This is because the Domain is a park of regional significance and this matter is likely to generate wide public interest, not just in the Waitematā Local Board area, but across Auckland.

50. Staff recommend that, as this matter is of relatively high significance, along with mana whenua engagement, broad public consultation be undertaken to inform any final decision made by Governing Body.

Recommended Decision-making Process

51. Given the committee’s governance responsibility for the Domain, it is appropriate for the committee to consider the options set out in this report and to make a recommendation to the Governing Body.

52. When making decisions that affect or may affect the responsibilities or operation of a local board or the well-being of communities within a local board area, the Governing Body must consider the views and preferences expressed by the local board.

53. Given the Waitematā Local Board has decision-making responsibility over part of the Domain, it is important for the Waitematā Local Board to consider this matter and provide its views to inform the Governing Body’s final decision.

54. Therefore, if the committee agrees to recommend promoting a local bill to amend (or repeal) the Act, following mana whenua and public engagement, staff will report to the Waitematā Local Board for its views, before reporting to the Governing Body for a final decision.

Tauākī whakaaweawe āhuarangi

Climate impact statement

55. A decision to recommend promotion of a local bill to amend the Domain Act is an administrative matter and does not trigger any climate change impacts.

Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera

Council group impacts and views

56. Parks and Community Facilities Community Leasing staff are supportive of the proposed amendment to the Act which would provide more certainty for existing and future lessees at the Domain. The recommended option would align with previous 2008 amendment to the Act to enable a large-scale development by Tennis Auckland. In situations where appropriate, allowing for long term leases enables lessees to undertake capital projects on their site creating better upgraded facilities for the community.

57. Parks and Community Facilities staff consider that the support of the Auckland Domain Committee is the appropriate first step in the statutory process to promote an amendment to the Act to permit future leasing within the Domain.

58. Eke Panuku Development Auckland staff responsible for managing the Wintergarden Café lease, are supportive of an amendment to the Act as the café lease is also restricted by tenure. The tenure restriction limits capital expenditure the lessee is willing to invest into the café.

Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe

Local impacts and local board views

59. The Auckland Domain Committee is aware that several of the current leases are soon to expire and it has no further powers under the Act to grant new leases at the Domain.

60. Staff understand that the committee is supportive of continued future leasing of sports clubs within the Domain and that members have requested a report on options for amending the Act to provide for continuation of leasing in the Domain.

61. The recommended option 3 in Table 1 would allow council more flexibility in future leasing decisions and align the legislation with the LGA and the council’s current leasing practices and policies.

62. Early initial engagement with the community lessees for this report was made and the Auckland Bowling Club, Tennis Auckland and Parnell Lawn Tennis Club have indicated they are supportive of a council proposal to amend the Auckland Domain Act.

63. Iwi engagement and the views of the public in relation to the preferred option will be sought through consultation, to inform the Waitematā Local Board and Governing Body’s consideration of the recommendation.

64. Staff will report to the Waitematā Local Board following consultation for the Board’s views on the recommendation, prior to reporting to the Governing Body for a final decision.

Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori

Māori impact statement

65. Auckland Council is committed to meeting its responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its statutory obligations and relationship commitments to Māori. The council recognises these responsibilities are distinct from the Crown’s Treaty obligations and fall within a local government Tāmaki Makaurau context.

66. These commitments are articulated in the council’s key strategic planning documents the Auckland Plan, the Long-term Plan 2024-2034, the Unitary Plan, individual local board plans and in Whiria Te Muka Tangata, Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Framework.

67. In consultation with mana whenua, council will seek their views and comments including whether they have interests in relation to this land, to ensure all feedback and any concerns raised are appropriately considered by the Governing Body.

68. Community leasing aims to increase Māori wellbeing through targeted support for Māori community development projects.

69. Community leases support a wide range of activities and groups. Leases are awarded based on an understanding of local needs, interests, and priorities. The activities and services provided by leaseholders create benefits for many local communities, including Māori.

70. An amendment of the Act to enable the council to continue to provide leasing on the Domain which can be used as a tool to target positive outcomes for Māori and support the council’s strategic plans.

Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea

Financial implications

71. All costs relating to the advertising, and publication of public notices required for consultation will be met by the Parks and Community Facilities Department. Costs relating to the promotion of a local bill will be met from within existing budgets.

72. If the Act is not amended the council runs the risk of the improvements vesting in council at ground lease expiry. Maintenance and future renewals of these improvements are not currently budgeted for.

Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga

Risks and mitigations

73. Mana whenua and public consultation will enable the council to consider the views and preferences of those interested in or affected by a proposal to amend the Act.

Ngā koringa ā-muri

Next steps

74. Subject to the Auckland Domain Committee deciding to recommend to the Governing Body that the council promote a local bill to amend section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987, staff will undertake mana whenua and public consultation in accordance with the committee’s business meeting resolutions.

75. Following consultation, staff will report to the Waitamatā Local Board to seek their views on this matter for reporting to a future Governing Body meeting for a decision on whether to promote a local bill.

Ngā tāpirihanga

Attachments

No.	Title	Page
a ⇨	Section 7 of the Auckland Domain Act 1987
b ⇨	Auckland Domain lease areas

Ngā kaihaina

Signatories

Author

Katerina Marinkovich - Principal Property Advisor

Authorisers

Kim O’Neill - Head of Property & Commercial Business

Martin van Jaarsveld - Head of Specialist Operations

Chairperson	Cr Desley Simpson, JP
Deputy Chairperson	Sarah Trotman, (ONZM)
Members	Houkura Member Ngarimu Blair	Member Genevieve Sage
	Member Alexandra Bonham	Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM
	Cr Christine Fletcher, QSO

Author	Phoebe Chiquet-Kaan - Governance Advisor
Authoriser	Martin van Jaarsveld - Head of Specialist Operations