
|
Papakura Local Board Workshop
OPEN NOTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of the Papakura Local Board Workshop held in the Local Board Chambers, 35 Coles Crescent, Papakura, Auckland on Wednesday, 3 September 2025 at 10:30am.
Te Hunga kua Tae mai | present
|
Chairperson |
Brent Catchpole |
From 12noon |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Jan Robinson |
|
|
Members |
Felicity Auva'a |
Via Microsoft Teams from 11:02am |
|
|
George Hawkins |
|
|
|
Kelvin Hieatt |
|
|
|
Andrew Webster |
|
1 Ngā Tamōtanga | Apologies
|
There were no apologies.
|
2 Te Whakapuaki i te Whai Pānga | Declaration of Interest
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
There were no declarations of interest.
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 –10:30-11:30am |
|
Direction Setting Presenter/s: Victoria Hutt (Papakura Local Board Senior Advisor, Governance & Engagement)
Lee Manaia
Governance role: Setting direction / priorities / budget Proposed Outcome/s: To inform the board on upcoming events/meetings and seek board’s feedback. For members to provide strategic updates related to meetings/ briefings they have attended, highlighting opportunities for board decision making or advocacy. Attachment/s: Material unavailable at the time of agenda build. Summary of discussion Topics discussed:
· Papakura Community Arts Programme Line (ID 348): o
Staff sought direction on
the proposal to work with Papakura Library, Te Paataka Koorero o Takaanini, and
Papakura Art Gallery to create an intergenerational project offering given
that mana whenua groups are at capacity at the moment. o
Direction: Members were supportive of the approach
and emphasised that the offering must be presented to mana whenua for
feedback and inclusion. o
It was noted that $20,000
was carried forward to the 2025/2026 financial year for this project. ·
Accent Point Security System update: o
Parks & Community Facilities staff
checked with the Corporate Property team and their response was the same that
they won’t fund. A renewal is required as the system is obsolete. o
Originally the cost to upgrade was
$53,000. The security specialist advised that three additional cameras for
the Papakura Library should be installed at the same time. Also the ability
to lock down the different sites separately is required. o
Funding source will be from work
programme line 4692. Staff advised the total cost will be approximately
$60,000 plus the project manager’s time will bring the total to
approximately $65,000. o
Direction: Members gave direction to proceed with the renewal of
the Accent Point Security system and the installation of three cameras in the
Papakura Library noting this upgrade includes the ability to separately
lockdown the different council sites at Accent Point. . ·
Momentum Charitable Trust –
Thursday 25th September 2025 ·
Workshop- 10 September 2025 · Reminder upcoming events |
|
Lunch Break (11:30-12pm) |
|
Item 2 – 12:00-1:00pm |
|
Waihoehoe Road Traffic Controls Presenter/s: Bruce
Thomas
Jennifer Armstrong
Jenni Wild Gina Cain-Trelevan
Observer Alan Cole
Amanda Hopkins
Malcolm Bell
Orrin Kapua
Governance role: Setting direction / priorities / budget Proposed Outcome/s: To provide direction on the Waihoehoe Road traffic controls. Attachment/s: Attachment A: Item 2 - Waihoehoe Road upgrade Summary of discussion Staff provided an overview of the Waihoehoe Road traffic control proposal. The local board provided the following feedback: · Concern was expressed about the road design layout. There is confusing signage at the moment. Jenni concurred that the Kiwirail signage is confusing regarding not turning right to access their site. · Brent advised that there is a private development with stop/go controls on Great South Road. It is a dangerous situation when the traffic management people (TMP) people are not visible at night. They need to be wearing high viz. · Concern about water retention, locally known as “Drury Lake”, not being dealt with. Water pooling in the carpark behind the Drury shops is a concern. · Constituents living in the area are complaining about lack of knowledge about the changes in routes while construction is going on. · U-turn at the lights – will it allow from ute’s to do a u-turn? Response: the design allows for 85% of vehicles to make the u-turn. A Hummer would not be able to undertake a u-turn. · Queries what happens if the trucks want to go the other way on Tui Street. Staff response: The vehicle will need to go into the station and out the other way. A vehicle that turns left out of Tui Street can turn right at the train station and go around the roundabout to turn right. Any trucks using the area behind the Drury shops as a layover will not be able to as the area will be fenced off. The access in and out of Tui Street will have access to the existing roundabout. Intending to keep the roundabout for a very large portion of the physical works of the project. Have to have well formed new road to allow of the transfer to two lanes over to the new alignment. All the lanes will have to accommodate the future growth of the area. · How long will the temporary Tui Street public access be in place. Response: approximately 18 months. Not expecting to restrict access as need to allow for public access to the Drury Domain, Drury Hall etc. · What is the timeframe for the project? Response: Working nights, weekends – escalates the costs. Also council often constrains movements on the road. Consideration has to be given to speed versus noise, supply chain issues. There are competing considerations to take into account. · Request to assess the land stability for the cribb wall. · Pedestrian haven – where is the pedestrian haven in relation to the service station or public parking for the playground. Concern that the pedestrian refuge may cause an issue if it is too close. Response: The pedestrian refuge will be just to the south of Cameron Place. Auckland Transport have checked the concerns regarding access to the Mobil station. The pedestrian refuge is opposite where the swings are located. Action: 1) Bruce will request the Traffic Management Plan people to go out and look at the site Tui Street/ Waihoehoe as well.
|
|
Item 3 –1:00-2:00 |
|
Proposed Plan Change 78 (Papakura Specific)
Presenter/s: Craig Cairncross (Team Leader – Planning)
Joy LaNauze (Senior Policy Planner)
Ross Moffatt (Senior Policy Planner)
Governance role: Setting direction / priorities / budget Proposed Outcome/s: To brief the board about the proposed Plan Change 78 and the Papakura Local Board specific implications. Attachment/s: Material unavailable at the time of agenda build. Summary of discussion Staff provided a briefing on the proposed Plan Change 78 and the specific implications Papakura Local Board. The local board provided the following feedback: · Members expressed concern that it will be house, houses, houses. Members felt there would need to be access to shops or recreational facilities. Staff advised that the principle in terrace housing was that things like dairies, and cafés would become easier to establish. · Concerns was expressed about social impacts and neighborhood life. In particular, social housing and rentals is going to Increase. · Members made the point that we need to plan for good community outcomes. Currently developments with no off street parking is creating issues. People need a place to park their cars. Public transport is demand driven so doesn’t come online until development has happened. By that time people are used to being car centric. · Members queried the ability of existing water and waste infrastructure to cope with the proposed intensification. · Areas such as Conifer Grove where it is currently barely one way. With intensification there will be nowhere to park the car. People will park on the footpath. It is a challenge that all will have to go with for years to come.
|
|
|
a Direction Setting |
The workshop finished at 1.50pm.