I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room: Venue:
|
Wednesday, 15 May 2019 4.30pm Local Board
Office, |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Julia Parfitt, JP |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Janet Fitzgerald, JP |
|
Members |
Chris Bettany |
|
|
David Cooper |
|
|
Gary Holmes |
|
|
Caitlin Watson |
|
|
Vicki Watson |
|
|
Mike Williamson |
|
(Quorum 4 members)
|
|
Vivienne Sullivan Local Board Democracy Advisor
10 May 2019
Contact Telephone: (09) 427 3317 Email: vivienne.sullivan@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
|
DELEGATIONS HIBISCUS AND BAYS LOCAL BOARD 2016-2019
Portfolio |
Description |
Resolution |
Local Board Members |
Minor landowner approvals and landlord approvals including events |
To confirm if the matter is minor for staff to exercise their delegation for landowner approvals To approve minor landlord approvals |
HB/2016/190 |
Julia Parfitt -Chairperson Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson Gary Holmes - Alternate |
Transport Information Group |
Discuss transport issues/projects |
HB/2016/190 |
Julia Parfitt -Chairperson Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson David Cooper - Alternate |
Resource consent applications |
Input into notification decisions for resource consent applications |
HB/2016/190 |
Gary Holmes Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson David Cooper - Alternate |
Notified Resource Consents Notified Plan Changes Notices of Requirement |
To prepare and submit local board views and speak to those local board views at any hearings |
HB/2018/55 |
Gary Holmes or Julia Parfitt –Chairperson or Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson
|
Urgent Decision Making |
To make decisions on matters that cannot wait until the next ordinary meeting of the local board |
HB/2016/195 |
Julia Parfitt – Chairperson Janet Fitzgerald-Deputy Chairperson Christina Bettany - Alternates |
Infrastructure and Environmental Services |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme |
HB/2018/96 |
Chris Bettany Julia Parfitt – Chairperson Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson |
Arts, Community and Events |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme |
HB/2018/99 |
Chris Bettany Caitlin Watson Mike Williamson - Alternates |
Parks, Sport and Recreation |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme |
HB/2018/99 |
David Cooper Mike Williamson Caitlin Watson - Alternate- |
Service, Strategy and Information |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme |
HB/2018/99 |
Gary Holmes Julia Parfitt – Chairperson Vicki Watson - Alternate |
Economic Development |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme |
HB/2018/100 |
Janet Fitzgerald – Deputy Chairperson Gary Holmes Vicki Watson - Alternate |
Community Facilities and CF: Leases |
To approve minor changes to 2018/2019 work programme/s |
HB/2018/122 |
Julia Parfitt – Chairperson Janet Fitzgerald-Deputy Chairperson Caitlin Watson - Alternates |
Silverdale Led Heritage Character Design Guidelines |
To approve any minor changes |
|
Janet Fitzgerald – Deputy Chairperson Caitlin Watson |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Annual Report 2017/2018 |
To approve any minor changes |
|
Janet Fitzgerald – Deputy Chairperson |
Appointments to outside organisations
Organisation |
Local Board Member |
Vaughan Homestead (Torbay Historical Society) |
Julia Parfitt - Chairperson Chris Bettany - Alternate |
Victor Eaves Management Committee |
Mike Williamson |
Local Government New Zealand Zone One (Auckland and Northland) |
Janet Fitzgerald - Deputy Chairperson
|
Business Improvement Districts (BIDS) |
|
Destination Orewa Beach |
Vicki Watson David Cooper - Alternate |
Torbay |
Chris Bettany Julia Parfitt - Chairperson- Alternate |
Browns Bay |
Chris Bettany Gary Holmes - Alternate |
Mairangi Bay |
David Cooper Julia Parfitt - Chairperson- Alternate |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
1 Welcome 7
2 Apologies 7
3 Declaration of Interest 7
4 Confirmation of Minutes 7
5 Leave of Absence 7
6 Acknowledgements 7
7 Petitions 7
8 Deputations 7
8.1 Hibiscus Coast Forest and Bird Society 7
8.2 Bays Community Centre Update 8
8.3 Luminate Community Group 8
8.4 Future Whangaparaoa 8
9 Public Forum 8
10 Extraordinary Business 9
11 Disposal recommendations report - Whangaparāoa Road and Brightside Road properties 11
12 Future use for the former bowling club site at Silverdale War Memorial Park 23
13 Hibiscus and Bays Greenways – priority routes for implementation 89
14 Auckland Transport Update to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board May 2019 99
15 Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grant Programme 2019/2020 111
16 Business Improvement District Programme Compliance Report to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board for FY 2017-2018 119
17 Change of private road name for the Hosken Property Beach Road Limited subdivision at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay 135
18 Auckland Council's Quarterly Performance Report: Hibiscus and Bays for quarter three 2018/2019 143
19 Remuneration Authority - policy on child care allowances 187
20 Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019 and Facilities Grants 2018/2019 grant allocations 201
21 Ward Councillors Update 219
22 Governance Forward Work Calendar 221
23 Record of Workshop Meetings 229
24 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
PUBLIC EXCLUDED
25 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 235
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 17 April 2019, as a true and correct record. |
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.
Standing Order 7.7 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. Pauline Smith, Chairperson of the Hibiscus Coast branch of Forest and Bird Society, has requested a deputation to update local board members on the work of the society in the local board area. |
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) thank Mrs Smith for her presentation on the work of the Hibiscus Coast branch of the Forest and Bird Society. |
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. Debbie Russell, Bays Community Centre Manager, has requested a deputation to provide an update on then Bays Community Centre. |
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) thank Mrs Russell for her presentation on the Bays Community Centre. |
Attachments a Powerpoint Presentation...................................................................... 239 |
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. Luminate Community Group have requested a deputation to make a presentation about the range of their activities in the community.
|
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) Thank the representatives of Luminate Community Group for their presentation. |
Attachments a Powerpoint presentation....................................................................... 247 |
Te take mō te pūrongo Purpose of the report 1. Future Whangaparāoa have requested a deputation to provide the local board with an update on their activities. |
Ngā tūtohunga Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) Thank the representatives of Future Whangaparāoa for their presentation. |
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Disposal recommendations report - Whangaparāoa Road and Brightside Road properties
File No.: CP2019/06075
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board’s endorsement for Panuku Development Auckland to recommend to the Finance and Performance Committee the disposal of 23 council owned properties in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The properties at 4 and 6 Brightside Road, 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 482, 484, 486, 488, 1/490, 2/491, 492, 494, 496, 498, 498B, 500, 502, 599, 616A Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay and 750A Whangaparāoa Road, Manly were acquired for transport purposes. The properties are no longer required for this purpose. Consultation with council and its council controlled organisations (CCOs) and the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board has now taken place.
3. Panuku Development Auckland (Panuku) reported on the proposed disposal of the subject properties to the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board’s March 2019 meeting. Advice was provided by Auckland Transport (AT) regarding the status of the legacy Whangaparāoa Road widening project and confirmation that the properties are not required for Penlink (peninsula link road).
4. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board deferred confirming its formal position and requested a copy of a confidential report that was considered by the AT Board in November 2018. This request has been forwarded to AT for a response.
5. As no current or future public work use has been identified for the subject properties through the rationalisation process, Panuku recommends that they be divested.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) endorse Panuku Development Auckland’s recommendation to the Finance and Performance Committee to dispose of the following properties: i) 4 Brightside Road, Stanmore Bay; ii) 6 Brightside Road, Stanmore Bay; iii) 472 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; iv) 474 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; v) 476 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; vi) 478 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; vii) 480 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; viii) 482 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; ix) 484 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; x) 486 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xi) 488 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xii) 1/490 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xiii) 2/490 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xiv) 492 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xv) 494 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xvi) 496 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xvii) 498 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xviii) 498B Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xix) 500 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xx) 502 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xxi) 599 Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; xxii) 616A Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay; and xxiii) 750A Whangaparāoa Road, Manly. |
Horopaki
Context
6. Panuku is required to undertake ongoing review of council’s property assets. This includes identifying properties from within council’s portfolio that are no longer required for public work purposes and may be suitable for sale and development if appropriate. Panuku has a particular focus on achieving housing and urban regeneration outcomes. Identifying potential sale properties contributes to the 10-year budget (long term plan) 2018-2028 and the Auckland Plan focus of accommodating the significant growth projected for the region over the coming decades, by providing council with an efficient use of capital and prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects.
7. Once a property has been identified as potentially no longer required for public work purposes, Panuku engages with council departments and its council controlled organisations through an expression of interest process, to establish whether the property must be retained for a strategic purpose or is required for a future funded public work. Once a property has been internally cleared of any public work requirements, Panuku then consults with local boards, mana whenua and ward councillors. All sale recommendations must be approved by the Panuku Board before a final recommendation is made to the Finance and Performance Committee. The Finance and Performance Committee makes the final decision to approve a property for disposal.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Property information
8. The former Rodney District Council (RDC) acquired 4 and 6 Brightside Road, Stanmore Bay, 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 482, 484, 486, 488, 1/490, 2/490, 492, 494, 496, 498, 498B, 500, 502, 599, 616A Whangaparāoa Road, Stanmore Bay and 750A Whangaparāoa Road, Manly from 1996 to 2001 for the legacy Whangaparāoa Road widening project.
9. A Whangaparāoa Road widening project is not included as a funded project in the Regional Land Transport Plan 2018-2028 or in the Auckland Transport Alignment Project 2018. AT has confirmed the subject properties are not required for Penlink.
10. In 2018 the AT Board resolved that the properties are no longer required for its transport infrastructure purposes and the properties were subsequently transferred to council in order to progress thorough the property rationalisation process.
11. The properties at 4 and 6 Brightside Road, 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 482, 484, 492, 494, 496, 498B, 500 and 599 Whangaparāoa Road, and 750A Whangaparāoa Road are vacant sites. The properties at 486, 488, 1/490, 2/490, 498, 502 and 616A Whangaparāoa Road, are residential properties.
12. The subject properties are all zoned Residential - Single House. The properties have a combined council rating valuation of $13.9 million.
13. The properties at 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 486, 488, 1/490, 2/490, 492, 494, 496, 498B, 500, 502, 599 and 616A Whangaparāoa Road are subject to offer back obligations to the former owners in accordance with section 40 of the Public Works Act 1981.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
Internal Consultation
14. The internal consultation for the subject properties was undertaken in March 2019.
15. Council’s Heritage team advised that the subject properties have no heritage assets or issues. Council’s Engineering and Technical Services Unit did not identify any contaminated land issues associated with the properties.
16. Council’s Community Facilities department did not identify a requirement to retain the subject properties to deliver a current or future council community facilities, places or leasing service use.
17. No alternative planned or funded public work requirement for the subject properties was identified through the internal consultation process. Accordingly, the subject properties are now recommended for disposal.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
18. Panuku attended a workshop with the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board in March 2019. At the workshop the board provided informal feedback regarding the lack of notification or consultation from AT regarding the future of the subject properties.
19. In response advice was given regarding the transfer of non-service assets from AT to council, the property history investigations undertaken and the internal consultation as part of the rationalisation process prior to local board engagement.
20. The board also questioned if council can retain only the parts of the properties subject to the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Whangaparāoa Road widening designation and dispose of the residue. Advice was provided to the board that as the subject properties are not required for a planned and identified public work, they will likely trigger the offer back requirements under section 40 of the Public Works Act 1981. In addition, advice was also given that subdividing the properties would create separate titles with no legal access, requiring approval by Land Information New Zealand.
21. The board considered the Panuku disposal recommendations report on the subject properties at its 17 April 2019 business meeting. At the meeting Panuku confirmed that the AUP road widening designation will be uplifted following an approval to dispose.
22. AT staff were also in attendance to respond to questions raised by the board at the March 2019 workshop. AT staff confirmed the unplanned and unfunded status of the Whangaparāoa Road widening project and confirmed that the subject properties were not required for Penlink. The board deferred formalising its view and requested that it be provided with the confidential report relating to the release of the properties from a transport public work requirement that was considered by the AT Board in November 2018. This request has been forwarded to AT for a response.
23. This report provides the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board with a further opportunity to formalise its views regarding the subject properties.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
24. 14 mana whenua iwi authorities were contacted regarding the potential sale of the subject properties. The following feedback was received:
a) Ngāti Wai
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
b) Ngāti Manuhiri
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
c) Te Runanga o Ngāti Whatua
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
d) Ngāti Whatua o Kaipara
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
e) Ngāti Whatua Ōrākei
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
f) Te Kawerau a Maki
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
g) Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
h) Te ākitai - Waiohua
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
i) Ngāti Te Ata - Waiohua
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
j) Ngāti Paoa
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
k) Ngaati Whanaunga
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
l) Ngāti Maru
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
m) Ngāti Tamatera
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
n) Patukirikiri
No feedback has been received regarding the subject properties.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
25. Capital receipts from the sale of properties contribute to Auckland Plan outcomes and the 10-year budget (long-term plan) by providing the council with an efficient use of capital and prioritisation of funds to achieve its activities and projects. In the 2018/2019 financial year, the 10-year budget (long term plan) has forecast the disposal of non-strategic assets to the value of of $24 million.
26. In accordance with the Local Government Act 2002, the annual Panuku Statement of Intent states the activities and intentions of Panuku, the objectives those activities will contribute to and performance measures and targets as the basis of organisational accountability. For the 2018/2019 financial year Panuku is required to recommend to council’s Finance and Performance Committee properties from within council’s portfolio that may be suitable for sale to a combined value of $30 million and to sell $24 million of property by 30 June 2019.
27. The 23 subject properties are not required by council for a current or future public work requirement that is funded or can realistically be funded in the future. To retain non-service properties for an undefined purpose is contrary to council’s Revenue and Funding Policy principles and would require support from the Finance and Performance Committee given the impact of not realising the sale of the non-service properties, and to allocate the operational budget required to hold the sites.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
28. The subject properties were all acquired by the former RDC for roading purposes. As such, the properties are considered to have been acquired for a “public work” for the purposes of section 40 of the Public Works Act 1981.
29. Accordingly, if 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 486, 488, 1/490, 2/490, 492, 494, 496, 498B, 500, 502, 599 and 616A Whangaparāoa Road are not required for the public work for which they were acquired and held, and are not required for an alternative planned and identified public work, they will likely trigger the offer back requirements under section 40 of the Act.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
30. Following receipt of the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board’s resolution, the properties will be presented to the Finance and Performance Committee.
31. AT will uplift the AUP Whangaparāoa Road widening designation from 472, 474, 476, 478, 480, 482, 484, 486, 488, 1/490, 2/490, 492, 494, 496, 498, 498B, 500, 502 Whangaparāoa Road and 4 Brightside Road following an approval to dispose.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Images of Whangaparāoa Road and Brightside Road properties |
17 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Anthony Lewis - Senior Advisor, Portfolio Review, Panuku Development Auckland |
Authorisers |
Letitia Edwards - Team Leader Portfolio Review, Panuku Development Auckland Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Future use for the former bowling club site at Silverdale War Memorial Park
File No.: CP2019/06095
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To approve the preferred future use for the former bowling club site at Silverdale War Memorial Park.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The future use of the former bowling club within Silverdale War Memorial Park requires confirmation to guide planning, decision-making and investment.
3. Staff have investigated current and future open space, sport and recreation and community service needs in relation to the former bowling club site and in the context of nearby public open space and facilities.
4. The investigation has been informed by a preliminary site-specific assessment of sport, recreation and community needs, including interviews with key stakeholders. This resulted in the “Needs Assessment Report – Former Silverdale Bowling Club Final Report, November 2018” (the site-specific needs assessment) (Attachment A).
5. Following a workshop with local board on 7 February 2018 to present the findings of the site-specific needs assessment, staff prepared an open space assessment (Attachment B) for the site.
6. The site-specific needs assessment, and open space assessment conclude:
· the population of the area surrounding the park is growing and good quality, flexible open space for informal outdoor recreation will be required by future residents
· Silverdale War Memorial Park serves a sports and suburb park function in the local open space network and has the potential to be enhanced as a suburb park
· the park requires further investment to provide for open space needs of the growing community and the site will play a pivotal role in providing space for a wider range of informal outdoor recreation and social experiences
· there is no requirement for additional sports fields at the park as future sports field demand can be accommodated at the nearby Metro Park and by improving the quality of the existing sports fields
· the former bowling club building previously used for indoor recreation does not require replacement. The proposed indoor recreation facility at Metro Park will provide for any future indoor recreation needs in the Silverdale-Millwater area
· the former bowling club site is not suitable for a community facility due to the distance from Silverdale town centre and the park serving an open space function
7. Staff recommend that the appropriate service use for the former bowling club site is informal outdoor recreation and that the local board consider development of a concept plan to identify a programme of investment to meet the community’s suburb park needs at Silverdale War Memorial Park.
8. Staff further recommend that the budget to renew the former bowling club building is made available to support development of an indoor recreation facility elsewhere in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area.
9. The appropriate location to deliver indoor recreation is recommended to be investigated through an options analysis study as part of the 2019/2020 local board work programme.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) confirm the role of Silverdale War Memorial Park as a sports and suburb park in meeting the present and future communities’ needs for recreation in the Silverdale/Millwater area b) approve informal outdoor recreation as being the preferred future service use for the former bowling club site at Silverdale War Memorial Park c) approve making the asset renewals budget available from the former bowling club building to support development of an indoor recreation facility elsewhere in the local board area d) request staff undertake an options analysis as part of the 2019/2020 local board work programme to deliver indoor recreation provision in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area, funded by existing department budgets e) consider development of a concept plan as part of the future local board work programme to identify a programme of investment to meet the community’s informal outdoor recreation needs. |
Horopaki
Context
10. The former Silverdale Bowling Club site (the site) is approximately one hectare, comprising the clubrooms building and bowling greens. The building is condemned with work underway to demolish it.
11. The site is part of Silverdale War Memorial Park, an 11 hectare recreation reserve held under the Reserves Act 1977.
12. Silverdale War Memorial Park serves the function of a sports and suburb park, and contains sports fields, tennis courts and club rooms, a playground, disused bowling greens and the derelict clubroom building.
13. In 2016, the Hibiscus and Bays Facilities and Reserves Committee granted a community lease for part of the site (450 m²) to the Hibiscus Men’s Shed Trust to be used for a meeting and craft project space (Resolution number HIB/2016/19).
14. The local board funded a site-specific needs assessment to guide their decision-making about the best use for the balance of the site (Resolution number HB/2017/84).
15. The analysis in this report acknowledges the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan 2017, specifically the outcome: ‘Our community enjoys access to quality parks, reserves and facilities for leisure, sport and recreation’.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Preliminary site-specific needs assessment and conclusions
16. Council staff contracted Visitor Solutions to undertake a preliminary site-specific needs assessment for Silverdale War Memorial Park. This was provided as the Needs Assessment Report – Former Silverdale Bowling Club Final Report, November 2018 (site-specific needs assessment) (Attachment A).
17. Visitor Solutions interviewed existing users of Silverdale War Memorial Park, previous users of the bowling club rooms, community facility providers in the immediate area, neighbours and potential users of the park to understand their current use of the park and future needs.
18. The site-specific needs assessment was informed by code facility plans, the Hibiscus and Bays Play Provision Assessment (2018), Sports Field Capacity Development programme, Auckland Indoor Sports Strategy (in draft), Auckland Council Open Space Provision Policy 2016 and Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan 2017.
19. Having considered the need for indoor recreation, outdoor recreation and community facilities in the immediate Silverdale-Millwater area, the recommendations from the Visitor Solutions site-specific needs assessment in Attachment A are:
· the council and local board safeguard the development potential of the site as much as possible until the council has completed its detailed open space and community facilities assessments for the Silverdale area.
· the council undertake the required detailed assessment for open space and community facilities within the Silverdale area as a matter of priority.
· the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board provide direction as to their preferred option identified within this report (with additional guidance from detailed assessments).
· undertake a detailed final development option and master planning exercise.
· undertake a feasibility analysis to determine the viability of any planned community assets.
Open space assessment
20. A detailed open space assessment (Attachment B) has been prepared for Silverdale War Memorial Park that shows that the park needs to serve an increasingly important suburb (as well as a sports) park function for the Silverdale and Millwater communities.
21. Suburb parks are larger parks which provide for a variety of informal outdoor recreation and social experiences for the whole suburb.
22. There are no other suburb sized parks in the catchment of Silverdale War Memorial Park other than Metro Park. It is unlikely any more land of a sufficient size for a suburb park would be purchased in the Silverdale/Millwater area.
23. The community have asked for more spaces to gather and a broader range of play experiences for children and youth. This requires good quality, flexible open space of a sufficient size to cater for a wide range of activities.
24. Investment in the park is therefore recommended to strengthen the role of the park and to meet the informal outdoor recreation and social needs of existing and future communities. The Hibiscus Coast Community Research (2015) and the Strategic Parks Service Assessment (2018) have recommended the following investment:
· kick about spaces
· upgrading the playground to a neighbourhood playground
· installing a 3x3 basketball court
· installing skate or BMX provision
· installing picnic and BBQ areas
· developing a walking and cycling circuit in the park connected to a future path to Silverdale town centre
· access to the Weiti River and the possibility of a pedestrian connection to the new residential area to the north of the park.
25. The site, as the only significant area of undeveloped flat land within the park, offers the best opportunity for these informal outdoor recreation opportunities to be provided.
26. Future investment would be guided by a concept plan. The priority, timing and funding for the development of the concept plan is to be considered by the local board as part of their future work programme.
27. This service use also supports the community priority to fund indoor recreation spaces by allowing the asset renewal funding from the former bowling club building to be made available in alternate locations to meet the indoor recreation needs for multiple groups in the Hibiscus and Bays local board area.
28. Staff therefore recommend that outdoor informal recreation is the appropriate future service use for the site.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
29. The report has been prepared with advice from Community and Social Policy; Parks, Sport and Recreation; and Community Facilities departments.
30. Making the asset renewals budget from the former bowling club building available for an indoor recreation facility would facilitate the opportunity to provide indoor recreation needs in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area.
31. Advice from the Parks, Sport and Recreation department is that the local board’s commitment to funding an indoor recreation facility will signal how important this facility is and will more likely attract other funders to enable development of any facility including partnering with other funders at Metro Park.
32. The options analysis (outlined in paragraph 46) will identify what the nature of the investment for an indoor recreation provision would be for this area.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
Local impacts
33. The Hibiscus Coast community research (2015) and the research for the Hibiscus and Bays Open Space Network Plan (in draft) looked at local residents’ aspirations, values and attitudes to open space. These two pieces of research identified that the local people value the green open spaces in their neighbourhood and want to provide for places for children and families to gather and play.
34. The community research participants prioritised the construction of an indoor recreation facility at Metro Park.
35. The Sport New Zealand Insights tool compiles research on people’s sport and leisure activities and is consistent with the qualitative research about what people value and want from parks.
36. The Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan and the Silverdale Centre Plan 2015 do not specifically reference the role of Silverdale War Memorial Park. Both plans support improving public spaces and recognise the part Silverdale War Memorial Park plays in connecting Silverdale town centre to the bus interchange.
Local board views
37. The Visitor Solutions site-specific needs assessment was presented to the local board at a workshop on 7 February 2019.
38. The local board provided informal feedback expressing a preference for a community facility to replace the former bowling club building.
39. Staff were requested to investigate accommodation options for air cadets and gym sports as these groups have approached the local board to request space on Silverdale War Memorial Park.
Current requests for indoor recreation
40. The New Zealand Cadet Forces, Rodney District Squadron (air cadets) used the former bowling club building before its closure. Local board members advised that tenure of the facility the air cadets are currently using is uncertain.
41. The New Zealand Cadet Forces have approached the council with a request to construct a 1500m² building on Silverdale War Memorial Park. They have indicated the building could be used by other community clubs.
42. The Auckland Sport and Recreation Action Plan provides direction on future facilities.
43. The plan supports creating facility partnerships to make the most of local facilities and resources. This approach prioritises investment in partnerships which provide multi-use, multi-sport or maximised use of recreation and sport facilities.
44. The Stakeholder and Land Advisory team have a wait list for community groups seeking to lease or access space on parks or in community buildings. The air cadets and Hibiscus Coast Softball are the only two groups on the waiting list for indoor recreation space in the Silverdale area, other than those groups who have signalled their interest in Metro Park.
45. On this basis, the planned Metro Park indoor recreation facility could provide for the current and anticipated future demand for indoor recreation space. The former bowling club building which was previously used for indoor recreation does not require replacement.
46. The Sport and Recreation team recommend that an options analysis to deliver indoor recreation provision in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area be undertaken in the 2019/2020 local board work programme. No additional budget will be required for this work.
Current requests for community facilities space
47. In addition to air cadets and Hibiscus Coast Softball, the Stakeholder and Land Advisory team’s wait list has two groups who require community facilities space in the Silverdale-Millwater area: Orewa SeniorNet and SeniorNet Hibiscus Coast Incorportaed.
48. The Community Facility Network Plan guides the Council’s investment in the provision of community facilities. The key drivers are to:
· ensure existing facilities are fit for purpose
· address gaps or duplication in provision and needs for community facilities
· meet future demand arising from population growth and changing user expectations.
49. A needs assessment for community facilities in the Silverdale-Millwater area is identified as a priority action within the revised Community Facilities Network Plan Action Plan (2019) and will be programmed against other priority actions and resource capacity.
50. A community facilities needs assessment provides a detailed analysis for a geographic area and provides direction for the development of new facilities, major upgrades to existing facilities and optimisation of facilities no longer meeting community needs.
51. Community and Social Policy staff have advised that an assessment is unlikely to recommend Silverdale War Memorial Park as a site for a community facility as the land primarily serves an open space function and it would not meet the location criteria as the site is not located in the Silverdale town centre.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
52. The top five activities Māori residents of the Hibiscus and Bays local board area participate in as identified in the Sport New Zealand Insights Tool are:
· walking for sport or leisure
· jogging/running
· swimming
· playing games
· individual workout.
53. Mana whenua were engaged in the development of the draft Hibiscus and Bays Local Parks Management Plan, including Silverdale War Memorial Park. Mana whenua provided feedback that supported the provision and safeguarding of open space.
54. Further consultation may be undertaken with mana whenua contingent on the local board’s decision on a preferred service use for the site.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
55. Asset renewals budget has been made available to replace the derelict former bowling club building. The building was previously used for indoor recreation. This report recommends that the building is not replaced and the budget assigned for the replacement of the building is made available to support the development of an indoor recreation facility elsewhere in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area.
56. The costs of the building demolition and remediation of the site are covered by existing budgets.
57. Community Facilities staff have confirmed that the funding generated for the renewal of the clubroom building will not be lost if the building is demolished, but rather utilised for an asset and location that is fit for purpose for community use.
58. Staff also note that the funding can either be utilised for a similar facility at the same site, or at another park location in the vicinity of Silverdale War Memorial Park.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
59. The local board may not have immediate funding available to develop the space for outdoor informal recreation and will continue to receive requests from groups to use the space for community buildings. Resolving the service use as outdoor informal recreation will clearly signal the board’s intention for the future use of the space.
60. Recent investment in community facilities in the local area includes the refurbishment of Stoney Homestead and Stillwater Hall and the new Te Herenga Waka O Orewa Marae.
61. The New Zealand Cadet Forces have approached the council with a request to construct a 1500m² building on Silverdale War Memorial Park. They may have an expectation that the former bowling club building will be replaced and they will be considered as a tenant for the building. Staff can provide advice to the local board on options for the air cadets’ accommodation needs if required.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
62. If the local board agree to the recommended service use of informal outdoor recreation,and making the asset renewals budget available to invest in indoor recreation in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area staff will:
· undertake an options analysis report on delivering indoor recreation in the Hibiscus and Bays local board area as part of the 2019/2020 local board work programme, building on the work already undertaken by the site-specific needs assessment
· work with the local board to identify the priority for preparing a concept plan for the development of the site for informal outdoor recreation as part of the future local board work programme
· following the demolition of the building the site will be grassed and available as an informal recreation space for the community, pending any future development identified by the concept plan.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Visitor Solutions site-specific needs assessment |
31 |
b⇩ |
Open Space Assessment |
83 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Authors |
Shyrel Burt - Service and Asset Planning Specialist Matthew Ward - Service & Asset Planning Team Leader |
Authorisers |
Lisa Tocker - Head of Service Strategy and Integration Jonathan Hope – Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
Hibiscus and Bays Greenways – priority routes for implementation
File No.: CP2019/07550
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To rescind a previous resolution approving the detailed design, consenting and construction of a perimeter walkway around a section of Centennial Park and to seek approval to proceed with subsection six of Centennial Park Path and alternative greenway routes within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve, and the coastal walkway from Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk).
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board approved to progress with the design, consenting and construction of a perimeter walkway around part of Centennial Park, adjacent to the golf course, in October 2018.
3. The Centennial Park Bush Society approached local board members in February 2019, to request the local board abandon plans for several sections of the proposed walkway. The groups view is that the areas function well without the need for new expenditure.
4. The local board indicated support for reducing the scope of the Centennial Park walkway project at a workshop in April 2019, and reallocating funding towards alternative greenway routes within the local board area.
5. Alternative walkway routes at Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve (Orewa) and from Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk, Browns Bay) are recommended.
6. This report seeks approval to revoke a previous resolution and progress with the design, consenting and construction of alternative walkway routes. Centennial Park subsections one, two, three and four will no longer be developed at this time.
7. The construction of Centennial Park subsection six will be a priority for funding.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) agree, pursuant to standing order 1.10.1, to revoke subsections b) and d) of resolution HB/2018/166, adopted at the ordinary meeting held on 17 October 2018, which reads as follows: That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: b) approve staff proceeding with the detailed design and consenting for Section G – Centennial Park Path, subsections one, two, three, four and six and construction for Section G – Centennial Park Path, subsections two, three, four and six at a total estimated cost of $500,000 using $220,000 from the Local Board Transport Capital Fund and $280,000 Local Discretionary Initiative Capex for subsections three, four and six Note that subsection five does not require any further work and subsection one to be constructed when funding becomes available
d) request that Auckland Transport investigate available subsidy for Centennial Park Path, subsection one. and replace it with b) approve the allocation of $75,000 from the Locally Driven Initiatives capital budget Implement actions from the Hibiscus and Bays Greenways Plan in the 2018/2019 financial year, for the detailed design, consenting and construction of Centennial Park Path subsection six. c) approve the allocation of $280,000 from the Locally Driven Initiatives capital budget Implement actions from the Hibiscus and Bays Greenways Plan in the 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 financial years towards the renewal of the walkway from Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk). d) approve the allocation of $275,000 from the Locally Driven Initiatives capital budget Implement actions from the Hibiscus and Bays Greenways Plan in the 2018/2019, 2019/2020, 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 financial years towards the design and consent of greenway routes within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve. |
Horopaki
Context
8. The Hibiscus and Bays Greenways Plan was published in 2016 after significant consultation with the wider community, and in 2017 the local board prioritised seven specific greenway routes identified within the Greenways Plan for further investigation.
9. Seven feasibility reports were completed in 2018 for these routes. Consultation with Auckland Transport (AT) and key landowners was included, and the commissioning of engineers (specialist track experts) for design advice. Consultation with adjacent property owners and community volunteer groups was not within the scope of work.
10. In October 2018 staff made a recommendation to the local board to prioritise the Centennial Park greenway. This was based on the route being identified as meeting the objectives of the greenways network, benefiting the public, and the ease of delivery and cost.
11. The local board resolved (Resolution HB/2018/166) to approve staff proceeding with the detailed design and consenting of the entire route, and the construction of four of the six subsections, being subsections two, three, four and six.
12. In addition, the local board resolved to approve $40,000 (Local Discretionary Initiative Capex) for the design and construction of a walkway link between Mistletoe Place and the Taiaotea Creek Pathway. The Taiaotea Creek Pathway is currently being constructed by Healthy Waters.
13. Work on the Centennial Park greenway project began in December 2018, and two of the key stakeholders were contacted; the Pupuke Golf Club and the Centennial Park Bush Society. Copies of the feasibility study and proposed route were shared with both groups.
14. The Centennial Park Bush Society contacted staff and governors in late February 2019 and requested that the local board abandon plans for several sections of the proposed walkway as in their opinion the areas function well without the need for new expenditure.
15. Staff sought direction from governors at a local board workshop in April 2019. Governors indicated a preference for the scope of work to be reduced and the funding reallocated to other greenways routes within the local board area.
Links to the local board plan
16. The project aligns with the following Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan 2017 outcomes and objectives –
Outcome |
Objective |
Our community enjoys access to quality parks, reserves and facilities for leisure, sport and recreation |
Protect, maintain and improve access and amenity for activities on our coastlines, parks and reserves |
Our people are involved and have a strong sense of pride in the look and feel of their local areas |
Communities in our area are empowered to plan for their future |
A protected and enhanced environment |
Continue to work with the community, volunteer groups, schools, iwi and businesses to protect and enhance the environment. |
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Centennial Park greenway
17. The Centennial Park greenway was originally approved as a perimeter path providing a safe recreational and commuter route around part of the Pupuke Golf Club. The path was divided into six distinct subsections; four were approved to progress to design and construction (subsections two, three, four and six) and one to design and consenting only (subsection one). A further existing section (subsection five) was identified as not requiring any future work.
18. The local board indicated at a workshop in April 2019, that as a result of community feedback they no longer supported the original proposal. The design, consenting and construction of one section, subsection six, was identified as important for safety reasons and progressing this stage is a priority. The red circle below in Figure 1 identifies the route that is still to go ahead.
Figure 1: Route diagram overview – Centennial Park
Mistletoe Place pathway
19. The design and construction of an upgraded pathway linking Mistletoe Place and the Taiaotea Creek Pathway subsection one is still supported by the local board. This route is shown below in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Route diagram overview – Mistletoe Place
Alternative greenway priority routes
20. There is now an opportunity to prioritise alternative routes identified within the feasibility study reports to progress and allocate funding to. The recommended routes are:
Feasibility Study |
Route section |
Location |
Description |
Design / Construction |
Section D - Browns Bay to Sharon Road |
1 |
Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk). As per Figure 3 below |
Renew the existing track (following slip remediation works) |
Design and construction |
Section A – Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve to West Hoe Heights |
3
4 |
Hillcrest Road to Nukumea Stream As per Figure 4 below
Pacific Heights to Hibiscus Coast Highway (along the edge of the Nukumea Stream) As per Figure 4 below |
Formalise an existing informal track with a 490 metre long aggregate walkway and steps.
Develop a new 1390 metre long concrete path and boardwalk walkway/cycleway along the edge of the stream. |
Design
Design |
Section B – Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve to Hatfields |
1 |
Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve from Old North Road through to Hillcrest Road As per Figure 5 below
|
Upgrade an existing track and boardwalk. |
Design |
21. The routes outlined above are all identified within the feasibility study documents that were completed in 2018.
22. Consideration was given to upgrading the Crows Nest Rise Walk cliff top coastal walkway, Mairangi Bay, that is currently closed due to slips. Funding to rectify the slip damage has already been secured through alternative budgets and the work is planned for 2019. Further work on the track is not supported by staff at this point in time. Consequently, renewal of the coastal walkway between Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk) is recommended as an alternative project.
Kauri dieback
23. Local parks and reserves within the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area have recently been analysed for kauri dieback and Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve has been classified as Category A. The park has been identified as of high recreational value and contains a high value kauri ecosystem. There is a possibility that kauri are infected within the reserve.
24. Detailed investigations are currently planned to determine appropriate mitigation measures (such as track upgrades, track re-alignment and track re-routing) to prevent the park becoming a source of infection. A detailed kauri dieback mitigation programme will be presented to the local board for approval at a mid-2019 business meeting.
25. There is an opportunity to combine aspects of the potential track mitigation work within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve including any funding, with the greenway projects proposed. This has yet to be confirmed.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
26. Staff leading the slip remediation works at the Crows Nest Rise Walk and Lotus Walk have been consulted with, and are supportive of the proposal.
27. Consultation with Auckland Transport was undertaken in the preparation of the feasibility study reports. Further consultation and collaboration with Auckland Transport will occur if required, when the specific routes have been confirmed.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
28. The views of the Centennial Park Bush Society and the Pupuke Golf Club were taken into consideration by governors when considering the proposal at a workshop in April 2019.
29. Local board governors indicated support at the workshop for revising the scope of the Centennial Park greenway and for the reallocation of funding to alternative greenway routes within the local board area. Greenway routes within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve and the Crows Nest coastal walkway were discussed as possible options to progress.
30. The proposed works within Centennial Park (subsection six) are anticipated to improve safety for the local community and provide an improved level of service.
31. The upgrading of existing greenway routes in and around Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve and the development of new connections will provide increased opportunities for the community for recreation and commuter purposes. The proposed works will also help to mitigate the spread of kauri dieback and preserve the ecosystem.
32. Renewal of the Lotus Walk coastal walkway will benefit walkway users through the provision of a safer greenway route, constructed to the current design standards and levels of service.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
33. Engagement with mana whenua on the Hibiscus and Bays Greenways Local Paths Plan (2016) was undertaken as part of the consultation process.
34. Further engagement with iwi will be initiated as part of the design phase, when the specific routes to progress with have been agreed.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
35. High level indicative cost estimates for the design and construction of each route were included in the feasibility study reports. Several of the routes require significant funding to progress through to construction.
36. The current funding in the draft work programme for future years will enable design and construction of three routes (Centennial Park, Mistletoe Place and the Lotus Walk) and design only for a further three routes within the Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve area. This is summarised in the following table:
Proposed routes and funding allocation
Feasibility study |
Route section |
Location |
Description |
Design / construction |
Estimated cost |
Funding 2018/19 |
Funding* 2019/20 |
Funding* 2020/21 |
Funding* 2021/22 |
Section G - Centennial |
6 |
Perimeter of golf course adjacent to the 10th green and 11th tee |
Upgrade and formalise the existing track, including incorporating pedestrian safety solutions (eg. fencing) |
Design and construction |
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
|
|
|
Section E – Taiaotea Creek Path |
1 |
Mistletoe Place walkway |
Upgrade a section of existing pathway linking Mistletoe Place to the Taiatoa Creek walkway |
Design and construction |
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
|
|
|
Section D - Browns Bay to Sharon Road |
1 |
Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk) |
Renew the existing track (following slip remediation works) |
Design and construction |
$280,000
|
$50,000 |
$85,000 |
$145,000 |
|
Section A – Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve to West Hoe Heights |
3
4 |
Hillcrest Road to Nukumea Stream
Pacific Heights to Hibiscus Coast Highway (along the edge of the Nukumea Stream) |
Formalise an existing informal track with a 490 metre long aggregate walkway and steps Develop a new 1390 metre long concrete path and boardwalk walkway / cycleway along the edge of the stream |
Design
Design |
$35,000
$280,000** |
$10,000
|
$25,000
$20,000 |
$30,000 |
$155,000 |
Section B – Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve to Hatfields |
1 |
Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve from Old North Road through to Hillcrest Road |
Upgrade an existing track and boardwalk |
Design |
$35,000 |
$10,000 |
$25,000 |
|
|
Total funding |
|
|
|
|
|
$185,000 |
$155,000 |
$175,000 |
$155,000 |
* Funding is based on the draft forward work programme
** Additional funding would be required in future years to complete the design phase
37. Funding will be required in future years (beyond financial year 2021/2022) to progress the Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve greenways through to construction.
38. The budget previously allocated to the Centennial Park Path subsection one of $220,000 from the Local Board Transport Capital Fund will be available for reallocation. Subsection one is a proposed walkway/cycleway from the intersection of East Coast Road and Forrest Hill Road to Kowhai Road. This section of the greenway will not be progressed at this point in time.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
39. Kauri dieback may exist within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve and may be a risk to the delivery of the project. Tracks may need to be closed, and access associated with site investigation works for the design and consenting of future tracks may be restricted or not possible. This may however present opportunities to work with the kauri dieback and biosecurity teams to design and re-route walkways within the reserve.
40. Funding in the current draft work programme will not be sufficient to progress with construction of any walkways within Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve. It is proposed to progress with design and consenting only. Construction costs have been estimated in 2018 as $2,320,000 and additional funding will be required. There is a risk that staging the construction over multiple years may result in an escalation in construction costs.
41. Engagement with the community will be undertaken as part of the design and consenting phase. There is a risk that individuals within the community may not be in support. This may delay the projects and result in additional costs through the resource consent and engagement stages.
42. Resource consent is required for the routes and the preparation and processing of consents may have an impact on the time frame for construction.
43. Sections of the proposed Section A – Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve to West Hoe Heights, route section four (Pacific Heights to Hibiscus Coast Highway, along the edge of the Nukumea Stream) are shown over private property. Landowner agreements would need to be obtained for these sections and are a risk to the delivery of the project.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
44. Detailed design and resource consent applications will be progressed in mid-2019 for the Centennial Park subsection six walkway, and the Mistletoe Place walkway. Construction is planned for spring/summer 2019/2020.
45. The Sharon Road to Manly Esplanade (Lotus Walk) renewal project will be designed and consented in financial years 2018/2019 and 2019/2020, with construction planned for financial year 2020/2021.
46. Design and consenting for the Alice Eaves Scenic Reserve walkways will be progressed over financial years 2018/2019 through to 2021/2022.
47. Collaboration with iwi on aspects of the design for each of the walkways and any interpretive markers or signage, will be undertaken as the project progresses.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Angela Levet – Senior Growth Development Specialist |
Authorisers |
Rod Sheridan - General Manager Community Facilities Jonathan Pope – Acting Relationship Manager |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Auckland Transport Update to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board May 2019
File No.: CP2019/06752
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide an update to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board members on transport related matters in their area, including the Local Board Transport Capital Fund.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. This report summarises the local board’s transport capital fund, issues raised by elected members and local board staff, consultation activity and Traffic Control Committee decisions made affecting the Hibiscus and Bays area since the last update report. In addition, it provides information on Auckland Transport’s recent speed bylaw consultation, its new public transport network, parking changes around North Shore Hospital, and abandoned vehicles.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) receive the Auckland Transport Update to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board May 2019 report. |
Horopaki
Context
3. This report updates the local board on Auckland Transport (AT) projects and operations in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area. It summarises consultations and Traffic Control Committee decisions, and includes information on the status of the Local Board Transport Capital Fund (LBTCF).
4. AT is responsible for all of Auckland’s transport services, excluding state highways. We report on a monthly basis to local boards, as set out in our Local Board Engagement Plan. This monthly reporting commitment acknowledges the important engagement role local boards play in the governance of Auckland on behalf of their local communities.
5. The LBTCF is a capital budget provided to all local boards by Auckland Council and delivered by AT. Local boards can use this fund to deliver transport infrastructure projects that they believe are important to their communities but are not part of AT’s work programme. Projects must also:
· be safe
· not impede network efficiency
· be in the road corridor (although projects in parks can be considered if there is a transport outcome).
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
Local Board Transport Capital Fund
6. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board’s share of the LBTCF allocated with effect from 1 July 2018, as per the local board funding policy, is $1,237,015 per annum.
7. The total remaining in the current electoral term for the Hibiscus Local Board is $1,131,459.
8. The table below reflects the status of projects to which LBTCF has already been committed during this political term:
Status update on current of Local Board Transport Capital Fund projects |
||||
Project |
Description |
Current status |
Changes since last update |
Funds allocated in current political term |
091 – Mairangi Bay Art Walk |
Construction of footpath amenities on Hastings Road, Mairangi Bay from the retail centre to Mairangi Bay Reserve |
Completed |
No |
$17,508 |
411 – Torbay Revitalisation |
Upgrade of Torbay town centre |
Completed |
No |
$602,537 |
558 - Orewa Pedestrian Crossings |
Facilities to improve pedestrian safety at the intersections of Moana and Moenui Avenues with the Hibiscus Coast Highway |
Completed |
No |
$127,510 |
578 - Orewa Boulevard Stage 3 |
Extension of existing Boulevard concept from Riverside Road to Empire Road |
A second workshop to be held on 9 May 2019. |
No |
$1,330,000 |
579 - Torbay Parking Stage 2 |
Construction of 5 car park spaces on the Auckland Council reserve at 1022 Beach Road, Torbay |
Completed |
Yes |
$69,024 |
580 – Town Centre Slow Zones |
Traffic Calming in the town centres of Mairangi Bay and Torbay |
Discussed at a workshop on 14 March. |
Yes |
$689,731 |
644 - Centennial Park Path |
Auckland Council led Greenways project in Centennial Park, Campbells Bay |
Detailed design and construction |
Yes |
$220,000 |
581 – Seat Upgrades, Orewa |
Supply and installation of 14 arm rests on seven seats located in the area between 292 and 350 Hibiscus Coast Highway, Orewa |
Completed |
Yes |
$5,306 |
9. A speed reduction on Hibiscus Coast Highway and those roads intersecting within the Boulevard area associated with Project 578 - Orewa Boulevard Stage 3 was included in AT’s Speed Limit Bylaw Review which was subject to public consultation until 31 March 2019. Further discussions on the design options and costings for the project took place on 9 May 2019 following completion of the detailed designs. Further updates will be provided as the project progresses.
10. Speed reductions in the Mairangi Bay and Torbay town centres associated with Project 580 – Town Centre Slow Zones, was included in AT’s Speed Limit Bylaw Review which was subject to public consultation until 31 March 2019. A discussion on the design options to limit speeds within the town centres took place at a workshop on 14 March 2019. Further updates will be provided as the project progresses.
11. Project 644 - Centennial Park Path, Campbells Bay, is being led by Auckland Council’s Community Facilities team, which discussed the scope of the project at a workshop on 4 April 2019. The local board resolved to allocate $220,000 from its LBTCF to the detailed design and construction of this project (HB/2018/166).
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
12. The impact of information (or decisions) in this report is/are confined to AT and do/does not impact on other parts of the council group.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
Auckland Transport consultations
13. Over the last reporting period, AT has invited the local board to provide its feedback on the following proposals:
Location |
Proposal |
Details and Local Board Feedback |
Fitzwilliam Drive, Torbay |
Proposed bus stop outside 4 Fitzwilliam Drive, Torbay. |
Members had been consulted previously on a proposed bus stop for Fitzwilliam Drive. Documentation, which included an updated plan for the bus stop and pedestrian refuge, together with background to the changes required, was forwarded to East Coast Bays subdivision members on 22 February 2019. No objections were received from the local board. |
Laurence Street, Manly |
Proposed road marking upgrade on Laurence Street, Manly. |
Documentation explaining a proposal to upgrade the road markings on Laurence Street, Manly, where road markings do not currently meet AT’s standards, was sent to Hibiscus Coast subdivision members on 22 February 2019. No objections were received from the local board. |
50 Silverdale Street, Silverdale |
Proposal to relocate a bus shelter outside 50 Silverdale Street, Silverdale. |
Documentation illustrating a proposal to relocate the bus shelter located outside the school at 50 Silverdale Street, Silverdale, was sent to Hibiscus Coast subdivision members on 27 February 2019. No objections were received from the local board. |
Manly Esplanade and Bayview Road, Browns Bay |
Traffic and parking control resolution required by The Sands Retirement Village, Browns Bay. |
Documentation describing signs and road markings associated with two new raised zebra crossings at the Sands Retirement Village development, on Bayview Road and Manly Esplanade, Browns Bay was forwarded to members on 6 March 2019. Members were subsequently advised on 14 March 2019 that AT’s Road Safety Team had asked that increased visibility be provided for the northern raised zebra crossing on Manly Esplanade, requiring the removal of three on-street car parking spaces, and that AT’s Parking Design Team had requested that P120 parking Monday to Sunday, 8am to 6pm, be installed on the three remaining parking spaces on Manly Esplanade. No objections were received from the local board. |
Traffic Control Committee decisions
14. AT's resolution and approval process ensures the most appropriate controls and restrictions are put in place and can be legally enforced. Decisions made by AT’s Traffic Control Committee in relation to regulatory processes relevant to the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board during March 2019 are shown below.
Decision |
Report Type |
Nature of Restriction |
Decision |
Arran Road, Browns Bay |
Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes |
No Stopping At All Times
|
Carried |
Bay Street, Rushden Terrace, Red Beach |
Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined |
No Stopping At All Times, Bus Stop, Lane Arrow Markings, Give-Way Control, Flush Median
|
Carried |
Donald Street, D'Oyly Drive, Brookvale Park, Stanmore Bay |
Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined |
No Stopping At All Times, Flush Median, Edge Lines, Traffic Island, Give-Way Control
|
Carried |
Laurence Street, Cross Street, Ladies Mile, Whangaparaoa |
Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined |
No Stopping At All Times, Bus Stop, Traffic Islands, Flush Median, Road Humps, Give-Way Control, Stop Control |
Carried |
Ladies Mile, Kawau Island Avenue, The Circle, Manly Park Avenue, Laurence Street, Glengarry Avenue, Manly
|
Temporary Traffic and Parking Changes (Event - Weet-Bix Kids Tryathlon) |
Temporary Traffic and Parking restrictions |
Carried |
Wainui Road, Silverdale Street, Silverdale |
Permanent Traffic and Parking Changes Combined |
No Stopping At All Times, Lane Arrow Markings, Edge Lines, Traffic Islands, Roundabout Controlled By Give-Way
|
Carried |
Issues Raised by Elected Members
15. Most issues raised by elected members and local board staff are resolved promptly by AT’s Elected Member Relationship Manager. Those which require further investigation are responded to by the relevant department of AT through its customer response team. The following list summarises these issues to 29 April 2019:
|
Issue |
Location |
Status |
1 |
Spur / Duck Creek Roads, Stillwater |
Request for safety improvements on Spur / Duck Creek Roads, Stillwater. |
Member Parfitt asked on 9 November 2018 on behalf of the Stillwater Community Association that the road into Stillwater from East Coast Road (Spur/Duck Creek) be double yellow lined all the way, making it a no passing road. The Association also asked for the selective placement of speed humps, the installation of No Overtaking signage at strategic points along the road, the installation of signage to warn motorists against cutting corners, and a focused social media campaign to get this message across, with the Association offering to assist with this campaign. On 11 December 2018 Member Parfitt was advised that an initial review of the suggestions raised had been carried out and further detailed investigation programmed. Under Investigation by Traffic Engineering with a response expected in June 2019.
|
2 |
Whangaparaoa General |
Investigation of safe cycling and pedestrian routes from Red Beach to Whangaporaoa College. |
On 30 January 2019 Member Fitzgerald asked that AT investigate safe ways for pedestrians and cyclists to travel from the Red Beach area to Whangaparaoa College, suggesting that this may be via Vipond and Brightside Roads in Stanmore Bay to the College rather than the busy Whangaparaoa Road, and by connecting some of the existing footpaths or pocket parks such as D’Oyly Reserve. On 12 April 2019 Member Fitzgerald was directed to AT's website for details of AT's current and future cycle investment programme and advised that AT works with the NZ Transport Agency and Auckland Council to develop its programme and deliver projects. The Whangaparaoa area has not been identified as a priority area in the ‘Cycling investment programme 2018-2028’ so any cycling improvements in the area will probably be undertaken in conjunction with other transport projects. The criteria for identifying priority areas includes population and employment density, concentration of schools and proximity to existing cycle infrastructure, etc. Nevertheless, AT is always keen to hear suggestions so they can be considered when transport projects are being planned and prioritised. |
3 |
Hibiscus Coast Busway Station and services, Silverdale |
Request for additional services and ground coordinator at the Hibiscus Coast Busway station, Silverdale. |
Crs Watson and W Walker asked for comments on the suggestions of a resident that additional services be added to Hibiscus Coast bus services to clear queues at peak times, and that an AT ground coordinator be made available in the morning at the Hibiscus Coast Busway Station to manage queues of people. On 9 April 2019 the councillors were advised that AT recognises that additional morning peak services would be useful to minimise customer wait times, particularly in the absence of adequate shelters. A major reschedule of timetables is due in August 2019, and services on the Hibiscus Coast will be reviewed at that time. In the meantime, additional temporary shelters until the new station is open are under investigation. AT will continue to monitor capacity on Hibiscus Coast bus services and overcrowding at bus stops, and will deploy resource to mitigate risk when necessary. The ground coordinator at Albany Station is provided by the bus operator to assist with boarding, ensure buses depart on time and to help with revenue collection. |
4 |
Hastings and Beach Roads, Mairangi Bay |
Request for 'No Right Turn' sign at the corner of Hastings and Beach Roads, Mairangi Bay. |
Member Parfitt requested a 'No Right Turn' sign at the corner of Hastings and Beach Roads, Mairangi Bay on 14 March 2019, so that motorists will turn left and use the roundabout at Montrose Terrace to turn back onto Beach Road, rather than causing congestion at the bottom of Hastings Road as they wait to turn right onto Beach Road. On 30 March 2019 Member Parfitt was advised that an initial review had been undertaken but that further investigation was needed. The outcome of this investigation was expected by late-June 2019. Under investigation by Traffic Engineering. |
5 |
Danbury Drive, Torbay |
Request for the installation of NSAAT restrictions in the cul de sac head of Danbury Drive, Torbay. |
The Office of Erica Stanford MP requested the installation of NSAAT restrictions in the cul de sac head of Danbury Drive, Torbay, noting that parents park in a haphazard and dangerous way in the area before and after school, creating safety issues. Under investigation by Traffic Engineering. |
6 |
Albany Park and Ride and environs |
Congestion at Albany Park and Ride and environs. |
The Office of Mark Mitchell MP forwarded complaints from a constituent on 31 March 2019 about parking congestion at the Albany Park and Ride. On 10 April 2019 the MP's Office was advised that an additional 135 parking spaces were under construction at the Albany Busway Station and due to be available for use in mid-May 2019. The new North Shore bus network introduced by AT at the beginning of October 2018 was designed to provide better connected and more frequent feeder bus services to access Albany bus station. Increased use of feeder buses by commuters, for whom those services are a viable option, is anticipated to provide improved park and ride access for commuters who do not have alternatives to access the station. |
T
housands have their say on speed bylaw
16. Public consultation closed on AT’s Speed Bylaw on 30 March 2019, with the receipt of over 11,700 submissions on a proposal to reduce speeds on some 700km of high-risk roads around the region, 90 per cent of these are in rural areas.
17. Auckland is facing a road safety crisis with a 78 per cent increase in deaths and a 68 per cent rise in serious injuries since 2014. Lowering speeds and working with New Zealand Police to enforce those limits is a proven tool internationally to be one of the easiest and most effective interventions available.
18. A number of submissions were made by organisations representing large sections of the community, such as District Health Boards, universities and school Boards of Trustees, the Automobile Association, Victim Support and local boards. AT also received many submissions from people wanting their local street or neighbourhood to have speeds lowered.
19. Submissions are currently being analysed and a full report will be available in June 2019. If adopted, the speed limit changes will come into effect in August this year.
20. The bylaw is one aspect of a 10-year $700 million road safety programme designed to focus not only on speed but to also to bring Auckland’s roads up to Safe System standards. The Government and Regional Land Transport Plan have identified safety on our roads as apriority. In line with this, Auckland Road Safety partners (AT, the Transport Agency, New Zealand Police, Accident Compensation Commission) have identified a number of actions to improve Auckland road safety outcomes in the short term, including:
· Improved Safe System road safety governance structures and knowledge transfer.
· Speed management, technology and enforcement of safe driving behaviours. This includes having all 12 red light cameras operating at the same time. Over the next five years, the number of cameras in place will increase to 42.
· Safety engineering investments at high-risk intersections and road corridors.
· Mass action safety improvements for vulnerable road users.
· Ensuring Safe System design improvements through Capital, Maintenance and Renewals programmes.
· Support for increased Auckland Road Policing activities and further investment in technology.
21. Speed is not the only lever being used to bring down high rates of deaths and serious injuries. Investments in making roads and roadsides safer, working even more on our existing education and outreach programmes, and working closely with New Zealand Police will also be part of the programme.
22. For further information on the Safer Speeds Programme go to: https://at.govt.nz/projects-roadworks/safe-speeds-programme/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2DI722lvmo.
Services and passenger trips on Auckland’s new transport network
23. A complete re-working of Auckland’s public transport network has delivered more services and strong growth in passenger numbers.
24. AT’s New Network saw an 11 per cent increase in trips during February 2019, with close to 98 million trips for the year, the highest number of passenger trips since the 1950s.
25. The number of people now using public transport has reached record levels not seen since the days when trams travelled Auckland’s streets. While the distance travelled by Auckland buses has increased 32 per cent each year, running costs have been held to just seven per cent. Aucklanders are getting both better services and value for money, finding public transport a reliable and efficient way to get around Auckland.
26. In 2012 AT decided something had to be done to drive an increase in the numbers using public transport; although there were about 70 million trips a year, the rate of growth was barely matching the population rise. Something radical was required so AT discarded the existing route map in favour of the New Network.
27. Simplicity is the key to the New Network. On 30 main bus routes, AT introduced a minimum 15 minute frequency, 7am to 7pm, seven days a week. The new services arrived at the same time as electric trains, newer buses, double decker buses, new stations and integrated ticketing which means passengers now pay for their entire journey rather than each part of it.
28. Auckland now has a public transport system which is working for more people. There has been an increase of 163 per cent in the number of people that live within 500 metres of a rapid or frequent service and patronage is up in all parts of the city.
29. The last region to be implemented will be Waiheke in October 2019 where AT is also working to complete additional infrastructure, improve capacity on some services and provide even more frequent routes.
30. It is acknowledged that there are still issues to work through, including the national shortage of bus drivers. AT is also investigating first-and-final leg solutions to access the New Network without residents needing to use their cars. An On-Demand Rideshare roadmap to expand AT Local services to complement or replace local scheduled feeder bus services is being developed and other options to allow people to access public transport are bike, e-bike, e-scooter and ride-share, services that are likely to be delivered by the private sector.
31. A few fast facts include:
· Service levels increased 32 per cent, creating more than 300 jobs
· Fleet size increased 15 per cent, capacity was up 20 per cent at peak times
· Buses now travel 59.1 million kilometres every year
· New Network South implemented 30 October 2016 – trips up 24 per cent (September 2017) up 8 per cent (September 2018.
· New Network West implemented 11 June 2017 – trips up 16 per cent (May 2018)
· New Network East implemented 10 December 2017 – trips up 22 per cent (October 2018)
· New Network Central implemented 8 July 2018 – trips up 10 per cent (October 2018)
· New Network North implemented 30 September 2018 – trips up 22 per cent (October 2018).
Parking changes around North Shore Hospital
32. To make it easier to find a car park around North Shore Hospital, AT has introduced a mix of paid, P120 and unrestricted spaces.
33. The changes took effect on Thursday, 4 April 2019 and include:
· Paid parking at $1 per hour on Shea Terrace, Mary Poynton Crescent and part of Northcote Road from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. No time restrictions.
· P120 parking on sections of Brook Street, Thornton Road, Kowhai Street, Lake View Road, Lake Pupuke Drive, Rangitira Avenue and Ngaio Street, from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. Large sections of each street remain unrestricted.
34. There is extremely high demand for on-street parking around the hospital and a recent survey by AT identified that at times the parking spaces on the streets near the hospital were close to 100 per cent full all the time. As a result, those who needed to visit the hospital and surrounding area simply could not find a park and were having to park inside the hospital grounds at a much higher hourly rate.
35. These changes mean that people will be able to find an affordable parking space nearby, with the P120 restrictions in residential streets also making it easier for people to visit local residents.
36. In addition, the new bus network means significantly better connections to North Shore Hospital and nearby Smales Farm Station. From 78 buses each day, there are now 213 buses each day stopping right outside the hospital. As a consequence, there has been an increase of 180 percent in the use of the bus stops outside the hospital. North Shore Hospital now has services from early morning to late evening, with direct connections to Beach Haven, East Coast Bays, Glenfield, Milford, Northcote, and Takapuna.
37. Consultation on the changes was carried out in May 2018, with AT announcing in December 2018 that charging would be implemented by mid-2019.
38. More information on parking around North Shore Hospital is available at: https://at.govt.nz/projects-roadworks/changes-to-on-street-parking-around-north-shore-hospital/
Abandoned Vehicles
39. Members often comment that abandoned vehicles take too long to be removed after being reported.
40. Under Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1974 there are several steps AT staff must follow before lawfully removing and disposing of a vehicle. As a result, it may be several months before a vehicle is physically removed.
41. The following steps must be taken by AT staff before removing an abandoned vehicle:
· Relevant infringement notices must be issued.
· Attempts to locate and notify the owner of the vehicle using registration details, engine or chassis numbers.
· Removal of the vehicle for storage if necessary and where possible, with the NZ Police first being formally notified.
· Should the owner not respond, AT will advertise its intention to either sell the vehicle within ten days or dispose of it in other ways. If AT staff assess the vehicle to be of no value, advertising may not be necessary.
· The vehicle is declared abandoned if an owner or interested party (e.g. a finance company) does not come forward.
· Once deemed abandoned, the vehicle is legally deregistered and sold to cover towing, storage or other costs. The vehicle can be disposed of by AT or a new buyer.
· Abandoned vehicles claimed before a sale will be returned to the registered owner once payment for costs incurred is made.
· If the vehicle sells, AT will deduct costs and the remaining proceeds will be held for 12 months, during which previous owners may claim the proceeds.
42. New Zealand Transport Agencv staff must follow the same process for vehicles abandoned on motorways or state highways.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
43. The proposed decision of receiving the report has no impacts or opportunities for Māori. Any engagement with Māori, or consideration of impacts and opportunities, will be carried out on an individual project basis.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
44. There are no financial implications in receiving this report.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
45. There are no risks associated with receiving this report.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
46. AT will provide a further report to the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board at its next meeting.
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Ellen Barrett – Elected Member Relationship Manager – Auckland Transport |
Authorisers |
Jonathan Anyon – Elected Member Relationship Team Manager – Auckland Transport Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grant Programme 2019/2020
File No.: CP2019/06444
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To adopt the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grant Programme 2019/2020.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
3. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year.
4. This report presents the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grants Programme 2019/2020 for adoption (see Attachment A).
Recommendation That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) adopt the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grant Programme 2019/2020. |
Horopaki
Context
5. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy guides the allocation of local, multi-board and regional grant programmes to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders.
6. The Community Grants Policy supports each local board to review and adopt their own local grants programme for the next financial year. The local board grants programme guides community groups and individuals when making applications to the local board.
7. The local board community grants programme includes:
· outcomes as identified in the local board plan
· specific local board grant priorities
· which grant types will operate, the number of grant rounds and opening and closing dates
· any additional criteria or exclusions that will apply
· other factors the local board consider to be significant to their decision-making.
8. Once the local board grants programme 2019/2020 has been adopted, the types of grants, grant rounds, criteria and eligibility will be advertised through an integrated communication and marketing approach which includes utilising the local board channels.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
9. The aim of the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. The new Hibiscus and Bays Grants Programme has been workshopped with the local board and feedback incorporated into the grants programme for 2019/2020.
10. The new grant programme includes grant round dates which exclude decision dates coinciding with the local government elections in October 2019.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
11. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.
12. The main focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment or heritage. Based on the main focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department, will provide input and advice.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
13. The grants programme has been developed by the local board to set the direction for the 2019/2020 financial year. This programme is reviewed on an annual basis.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
14. All grant programmes respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to organisations delivering positive outcomes for Māori. Applicants are asked how their project aims to increase Māori outcomes in the application process.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
15. The allocation of grants to community groups is within the adopted Long-term Plan 2018-2028.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
16. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy. Therefore, there is minimal risk associated with the adoption of the grants programme.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
17. An implementation plan is underway and the local board grants programme will be locally advertised through the local board and council channels, including the council website, local board Facebook page and communication with past recipients of grants funding.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Community Grants Programme |
115 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Marion Davies - Grant Operations Manager |
Authorisers |
Andrew Clark - General Manager Commercial and Finance Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
Business Improvement District Programme Compliance Report to Hibiscus and Bays Local Board for FY 2017-2018
File No.: CP2019/06115
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board’s recommendation to the Governing Body to strike the Business Improvement District targeted rates for the Browns Bay Business Association, Mainstreet Orewa Incorporated trading as Destination Orewa Beach (Business Association), Mairangi Bay Business Association and Torbay Business Association for the 2019-2020 financial year.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. Auckland Council’s Business Improvement District programme supports business associations by collecting a targeted rate from commercial properties within a defined geographic area. The funds from the targeted rate are then provided by way of a grant to the relevant Business Improvement District.
3. The Business Improvement Districts are incorporated societies that are independent of council. For the council to be confident that the funds provided to the Business Improvement Districts are being used appropriately, council requires the Business Improvements Districts to comply with the Business Improvement District Policy (2016) (Hōtaka ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi).
4. The Business Improvement District Policy (2016) (Hōtaka ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi) was developed to encourage improved governance by Business Improvement District committees and staff to improve financial management, programme delivery and transparency to their members.
5. This report indicates that the Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations are in compliance with the Business Improvement District Policy (2016) (Hōtaka ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi). Information presented in this report is based on documents submitted by these business associations to council’s Business Improvement District programme team.
6. Staff recommend that as the Business Improvement Districts have met the requirements of the Business Improvement District Policy (2016) (Hōtaka ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi), the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board should, therefore, recommend to the Governing Body to strike the targeted rates sought by the Business Improvement Districts.
Recommendation That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) recommend to the Governing Body to strike the targeted rates for inclusion in the Annual Budget 2019-2020 for the following Business Improvement District programmes: · $150,000 for Browns Bay Business Association; · $232,220 for Mainstreet Orewa Incorporated trading as Destination Orewa Beach (Business Association); · $63,000 for Mairangi Bay Business Association; and · $15,415 for Torbay Business Association. |
Horopaki
Context
7. The council adopted the Business Improvement District Policy (Hōtaka ā-Rohe Whakapiki Pakihi) (the BID Policy) in 2016. The BID Policy outlines the principles behind the council’s Business Improvement District (BID) programme; creates the process for establishing, expanding, and disestablishing BIDs; prescribes operating standards and guidelines; and sets accountability requirements. Attachment A provides an overview of key elements of the BID programme.
8. BID targeted rates are applied to all commercially-rated properties within a designated area around a town centre or commercial precinct. Those funds are transferred to the business association operating the BID programme.
9. There are currently 48 BID programmes throughout Auckland which represent more than 25,000 businesses and a combined $17.7 million in targeted rates investment. Refer to Attachment B for current and proposed targeted rates budgets for all BIDs.
10. Under the Auckland Council shared governance arrangements, local boards are allocated several decision-making responsibilities in relation to BIDs. One of these is to annually recommend BID targeted rates to the Governing Body. The local board should recommend the striking of the targeted rate if it is satisfied that the BID is substantially complying with the BID Policy.
11. Recommendations arising from this report are put into effect with the Governing Body’s approval of the Annual Budget 2019-2020 and striking of the targeted rate.
12. This report is a requirement of the BID Policy. The local board must decide whether to endorse the BID targeted rates.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
13. The council’s BID programme team monitors compliance with the BID Policy on an ongoing basis and provides governance advice to BID-operating business associations as needed or requested.
14. As BID programmes are operated by private independent societies, their programmes and services are provided according to their members’ stated priorities. In recognition of their independent corporate status, the policy does not prescribe standards for programme effectiveness. Staff, therefore, cannot base recommendations on these factors, but only on the policy’s express requirements.
Compliance with the BID Policy
15. The BID Policy is the means for council to ensure accountability for BID targeted rate funding and to encourage good governance. This is achieved by requiring regular reporting by BID-operating business associations specifically by providing to council the following documents, and staying in touch with their local board(s) at least once a year:
· Current Strategic Plan – evidence of achievable medium- to long-term opportunities.
· Audited Accounts – assurance that the BID-operating business association is managing its members’ BID targeted rate funds responsibly.
· Annual Report on the year just completed – evidence that programmes are addressing priority issues that benefit BID targeted ratepayers.
· Business Plan for the coming year – detailed one-year programme, based on the Strategic Plan, to be achieved and resourced.
· Indicative Budget for the following year – Auckland Council’s Annual Budget requires targeted rates to be identified a year in advance to inform the Annual Budget process which sets all rates.
· Board Charter – establishes guidelines for effective board governance and positive relationships between the association and its members.
· Annual Accountability Agreement – certification that these requirements have been met.
· Programme Agreement – a good faith agreement between each BID-operating business association and council that sets basic parameters of the council-business association relationship.
16. The BID Policy requires each business association to ratify the BID grant amount/targeted rate and budget for the following financial year. The Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations presented for members’ approval, their 2019-2020 BID grant amount/targeted rate and budget at their 2018 Annual General Meetings (AGM). Their 2018 AGM minutes show resolutions supporting this action and requesting the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board to recommend to the Governing Body the striking of the BID targeted rates for 2019-2020.
17. The Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations comply with the BID Policy and, therefore, it is recommended that the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board recommends to the Governing Body the striking of the targeted rate relevant to these business associations.
18. The recommendation of this report is supported by evidence of compliance with the BID Policy by the Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations. Refer to Attachments C, D, E and F for details.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
19. The proposed decision does not impact other parts of the council group.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
20. Recommending that the Governing Body strikes the targeted rates for the Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations means that these BID programmes will continue to be funded from targeted rates on commercial properties in their districts; and provide services in accordance with their members’ priorities as stated in their strategic plans.
21. By continuing these services and programmes, the Browns Bay, Destination Orewa Beach, Mairangi Bay and Torbay business associations should better serve their town centres and members, and support business growth.
22. We do not comment on the effectiveness of individual BID programmes as that is a matter for the members to assess.
23. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board approved a similar recommendation for the BID programmes last year (resolution number HB/2018/80), as did the other 17 local boards that have BID programmes operating in their areas.
24. Several local boards provide additional funding to local business associations, however, accountability for that funding is set by funding agreements between the local board and the business association. Those requirements are apart from the requirements of the BID Policy and are not covered in this report.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
25. BIDs work for the benefits of all members, including Māori businesses.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
26. There are no financial implications for the local board. Targeted rates for BID-operating business associations are raised directly from commercial ratepayers in the district and used by the business association for improvements within that district. The council’s financial role is only to collect the BID targeted rates and pass them directly to the business association on a quarterly basis.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
27. There are reputational risks to the council if ratepayer funds are misused, but this is rare. Otherwise, there are no direct financial risks to the local board or council that could result from this recommendation to approve the BID targeted rates.
28. The requirements of the BID Policy are intended to help minimise the potential for BIDs to misuse funds, by requiring each BID to plan for the intended use of funds, report on its activities to its members, and to have its accounts audited.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
29. If the local board endorses this report, it will recommend to the Governing Body that the BID targeted rates be struck as part of its approval of the Annual Budget 2019-2020.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
BID programme key elements |
123 |
b⇩ |
BID programme funding |
125 |
c⇩ |
Browns Bay |
127 |
d⇩ |
Mainstreet Orewa Inc (Destination Orewa Beach) |
129 |
e⇩ |
Mairangi Bay |
131 |
f⇩ |
Torbay |
133 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Paul Thompson - BID Programme Specialist |
Authorisers |
Alastair Cameron - Manager - CCO Governanceand External Partnerships Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
Change of private road name for the Hosken Property Beach Road Limited subdivision at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay
File No.: CP2019/06796
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To seek the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board approval to amend the recently approved private road name ‘Bays Rise’ to ‘The Bays Rise’ for the new private road name for the subdivision and unit development being undertaken by Hosken Property Beach Road Limited, at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board approved the private road name ‘Bays Rise’ for the private road at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay at its meeting held on 17 April 2019 under resolution HB/2019/51.
3. The name ‘The Bays Rise’ was the applicant’s, Hosken Property Beach Road Limited, preferred name and although ‘Bay’s Rise’ is acceptable to them the name has been rejected by Land Information New Zealand due to potential conflict with existing road names within a 20 km radius.
4. It is unfortunate in originally reporting this matter that further attention wasn’t paid to the difficulty Land Information New Zealand had with the name ‘Bays Rise’ without the prefix “The” being included.
5. The writer has re-contacted Land Information New Zealand for them to reconsider the matter but they have reconfirmed their position.
6. In the event the local board may not consider ‘The Bays Rise’ appropriate the applicant would like the alternative names as originally reported to be reconsidered:
· Seaboard Way (alternative)
· Coastline Way (alternative)
· Nearshore Rise (alternative)
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) revoke part of resolution HB/2019/51 dated 17 April 2019 which reads as follows: approve the road name ‘Bays Rise’ for the private road within the jointly owned access lot constructed for the subdivision and unit development being undertaken by Hosken Property Beach Road Ltd at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974. and replace it with: b) approve the road name ‘The Bays Rise’ for the private road within the jointly owned access lot constructed for the subdivision and unit development being undertaken by Hosken Property Beach Road Ltd at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974. Or c) revoke part of resolution HB/2019/51 dated 17 April 2019 which reads as follows: approve the road name ‘Bays Rise’ for the private road within the jointly owned access lot constructed for the subdivision and unit development being undertaken by Hosken Property Beach Road Ltd at 481 & 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974. and replace it with d) approve either the road name ‘Seaboard Way’, ‘Coastline Way’ or ‘Nearshore Rise’ for the private road within the jointly owned access lot constructed for the subdivision and unit development being undertaken by Hosken Property Beach Road Ltd at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay in accordance with section 319(1)(j) of the Local Government Act 1974. |
Horopaki
Context
7. The eight lot subdivision and associated eight residential units, Council Ref BUN60070321, was approved on 30 June 2017 and is close to completion.
8. In accordance with the national addressing standard and conditions of the subdivision consent, a jointly owned access lot is required to be named as it serves six or more lots.
9. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board approved the private road name ‘Bays Rise’ for the private road at 481 and 483 Beach Road, Murrays Bay at its meeting of 17 April 2019 under resolution HB/2019/51.
10. The name ‘The Bays Rise’ was the applicant’s preferred name however ‘Bay’s Rise’ has been rejected by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ), due to potential conflict with existing road names within a 20 km radius.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
11. The Auckland Council Road Naming Guidelines allow that where a new road needs to be named the developer shall be given the opportunity of suggesting their preferred road names for Local Board approval.
12. Auckland Council’s road naming criteria typically require that road names reflect:
· A historical or ancestral linkage to an area;
· A landscape, environment or biodiversity theme or feature; or
· An existing (or introduced) thematic identity in the area.
· The use of Māori names is actively encouraged.
The applicant submitted the following names for consideration.
Preferred Name |
Meaning |
The Bays Rise |
The term “The Bays” is commonly used and known as being synonymous with the stretch of coast the development is in. The development gently rises from Beach Road.
|
Alternative Names |
Meaning |
Seaboard Way
Coastline Way
Nearshore Rise
|
As above these names reflect the general connection of the development to the East Coast Bays coastal area.
|
13. The names reflect the applicants desire to use names that show a general connection to the East Coast Bays coastal area.
14. The applicant contacted all local iwi groups, (16), associated with the locality and received 4 responses. The iwi that responded either deferred to other iwi or had no objection to the Applicants names.
15. LINZ has confirmed that the road names are acceptable however they have re-confirmed the shortened version of ‘The Bays Rise’ to ‘Bays Rise’ is not acceptable due to potential conflict with existing road names within a 20 km radius.
16. The proposed names meet the council’s road naming guidelines as they reflect the wider environs that the site is located in.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
17. The decision sought for this report does not trigger the significance policy and is not considered to have any immediate impacts on any council groups.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
18. The decision sought for this report does not trigger any significance policy and is not considered to have any immediate impact on the community.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
19. The applicant has previously contacted all local iwi groups, (16), associated with the locality and received no objections or alternative name suggestions.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
20. The applicant is responsible for ensuring appropriate signage will be installed once approval is obtained for the road name.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
21. There are no significant risks to Council as road naming is a routine part of the subdivision development process with consultation being a key part of the process.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
22. Approved road names are notified to Land Information New Zealand which records them on its New Zealand wide land information database which includes street addresses issued by councils.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
481 and 483 Beach Road, Locality Map |
139 |
b⇩ |
481 and 483 Beach Road, Scheme Plan |
141 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
John Benefield – Senior Subdivision Advisor, Takapuna |
Authorisers |
Trevor Cullen - Team Leader Subdivision Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
Auckland Council's Quarterly Performance Report: Hibiscus and Bays for quarter three 2018/2019
File No.: CP2019/07260
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board with an integrated quarterly performance report for quarter three, 1 January – 31 March 2019.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. This report includes financial performance, progress against work programmes, key challenges the board should be aware of and any risks to delivery against the 2018/2019 work programme. This is a retrospective report intended to provide a transparent overview and reflect the progress of how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board work programme is tracking at the end of quarter three 2018/2019.
3. The work programme is produced annually and aligns with the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Plan outcomes.
4. The key activity updates from this quarter are:
· The majority of the sports field construction works in the Deep Creek Reserve are completed, lights have been installed at Freyberg Park, the Stillwater basketball half court is complete, all six light poles at Red Beach Park are now erected, Lakeside Reserve carpark upgrade is complete, at Stanmore Bay Leisure Centre the internal pool hall renewal works and exterior painting are complete, and the construction of the new container toilet block at Metro Park East was completed.
· The Centennial Park walkway project was on track to be completed at the end of the quarter, and Metro Park eastern walkways are 95% complete.
· Future Whangaparāoa was very busy in quarter three; they worked with the Trust securing a new lease until February 2020, delivered the Whangaparāoa wellbeing network meeting, a teen eco-retreat event, activation of the Equip family and whanau support and education group, activation of a Health Hub pop-in initiative, and staff progressed of the needs analysis grant to Future Whangaparāoa.
· The Pest Free Coordinator is working well with community groups to deliver the Hibiscus and Bays Pest Free Strategy. The first round of site preparation has been completed at Weiti with the second round planned for early April. A community planting day is being planned for Weiti River involving the local business community and Conservation Volunteers New Zealand.
· During quarter three staff administered a contestable grants scheme supporting youth-led activity. Three expressions of interest were received and staff have worked with the respondents to further develop their proposals. Delivery of the grants will occur in quarter four.
· Volunteer activity in Hibiscus and Bays is high with one guided walk hosted, three volunteer training days were held, the annual Centennial Park Family Bush Camp was held and groups are now planning for the 2019 planting season.
· Quarter three resulted in very high attendance at shows, exhibitions, classes and performances at Centrestage Theatre, Estuary Arts Centre and Mairangi Arts Centre.
5. All operating departments with agreed work programmes have provided a quarterly update against their work programme delivery. Most activities are reported with a status of green (on track), amber (some risk or issues, which are being managed) or grey (cancelled, deferred or merged). The following activities are reported with a status of red (behind delivery, significant risk:
· Crows Nest Walk, 16 Brighton Terrace, Murrays Bay (ID 1907)
A report has been completed on options to repair the slip and this has been outlined to residents at public meetings in February and March. A workshop discussion was held with the Board in March and a final report will come to the Board in June 2019.
· Wade Landing Reserve – develop access way (ID 3135)
The project is not required at this point in time and has been placed on hold. If the adjacent private property is developed in the future this project will be reactivated.
6. The financial performance report compared to budget 2018/2019 is attached. There are some points for the local board to note.
7. Overall, the net operational financial performance of the board is tracking slightly above revised year to date budget (103 percent). Revenue is slightly unfavourable to budget for the year to date and is likely to be on target for the full financial year. From the local boards’ Locally Driven Initiatives (LDI) funding, the majority of projects are underway and on track to be completed during the year. Capital projects underway or completed include Metro Park East toilet and walkway development, Red Beach toilet and lighting development, Deep Creek Reserve development and sand-field renewals at Silverdale War Memorial Park and Stanmore Bay Park.
8. In the March update from the local board Strategic Broker, the board indicated that they would like to support Business Whangaparaoa Incorporated to assist the growth of business and the local economy on the Whangaparaoa Peninsula from Red Beach to Gulf Harbour. This proposed $8,000 of operational funding would come from the Eco-Tourism Plan Development work programme line due to similarities in the outcomes of this funding.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) receive the performance report for the financial quarter ending 31 March 2019 reallocate $8,000 operational funding from the Eco-Tourism Plan Development (ID 382) to the Connecting Communities project (ID 1270) to support Business Whangaparaoa Incorporated assist the growth of business and the local economy on the Whangaparaoa Peninsula. |
Horopaki
Context
9. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board has an approved 2018/2019 work programme for the following operating departments:
· Arts, Community and Events;
· Parks, Sport and Recreation;
· Libraries and Information;
· Community Services: Service, Strategy and Integration;
· Community Facilities: Build Maintain Renew;
· Community Leases;
· Infrastructure and Environmental Services;
· Local Economic Development.
· A strong local economy
· Our communities have excellent transport choices
· Our community enjoys access to quality parks, reserves and facilities for leisure, sport and recreation
· Our people are involved and have a strong sense of pride in the look and feel of their local places
· A protected and enhanced environment
11. The graph below shows how the work programme activities meet Local Board Plan outcomes. Activities that are not part of the approved work programme but contribute towards the local board outcomes, such as advocacy by the local board, are not captured in this graph.
Graph 1: work programme activities by outcome
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
12. The work programme activities have two statuses; RAG status which measures the performance of the activity (amber and red show issues and risks); and activity status which shows the stage the activity. These two statuses create a snapshot of the progress of the work programmes.
13. The graph below identifies work programme activity by RAG status (red, amber, green and grey). It shows the percentage of work programme activities that are on track (green), in progress but with issues that are being managed (amber), and activities that have significant issues (red) and activities that have been cancelled/deferred/merged (grey).
Graph 2: Hibiscus and Bays Work Programme by RAG status
14. The graph below identifies work programme activity by activity status and department. The number of activity lines differ by department as approved in the local board work programmes.
Graph 3: work programme activity by activity status and department
Key activity updates from quarter three
15. The following key initiatives have progressed through quarter three:
· Local board plan key initiative: “Encourage communities to lead the revitalisation of our town centres as opportunities become available”
This key initiative progressed through the efforts of Future Whangaparāoa with the Trust securing a new lease until February 2020, delivery of the Whangaparāoa wellbeing network meeting, a teen eco-retreat event, activation of the Equip family and whanau support and education group, activation of a Health Hub pop-in initiative, and staff progressed of the needs analysis grant to Future Whangaparāoa.
· Local board plan key initiatives: “Use the local board Transport Capital fund to prioritise the development of walkway and cycleway connections including safe crossings” and “Prioritise walkway and cycleway connections to parks, reserves, beaches, town centres and public transport networks”
The Centennial Park walkway project was on track to be completed at the end of the quarter, and Metro Park eastern walkways are 95% complete.
· Local board plan key initiative: “Improve parks and coastal facilities so they are adaptable for a range of activities, e.g. all-ability playgrounds, events, toilets, drinking water fountains, shades, barbeques, lighting, bicycle racks, and passive and family-friendly use”
The majority of the sports field construction works in the Deep Creek Reserve are completed, lights have been installed at Freyberg Park, the Stillwater basketball half court is complete, all six light poles at Red Beach Park are now erected, Lakeside Reserve carpark upgrade is complete, at Stanmore Bay Leisure Centre the internal pool hall renewal works and exterior painting are complete, and the construction of the new container toilet block at Metro Park East was completed.
· Local board plan key initiative: “Review Reserve Management Plans to ensure they are fit for purpose and meet current and future needs” and local board agreement key initiative: “The Hibiscus and Bays Open Space Management Plan will be progressed to provide one reserve management plan for all parks and reserved within the local board area”
These key initiatives are being progressed and we are still awaiting approval to go to public notification. This is expected to progress in quarter four.
· Local board agreement key initiative: “Our key advocacy project will address coastal erosion and protect Orewa Beach Esplanade and reserves. We will focus on key parts of the beach and reserve area and phase the work that is required”
This key initiative gained Governing Body approval for funding in two parts; the Kohu to Marine View section which is yet to gain consent to renew the northern seawall and is subject to an Environment Court hearing in May; and the southern seawall adjacent to Orewa Reserve. A strategic assessment of public use of this area has begun over the summer period and findings will be included in a business case.
· Local board agreement key initiative: “Ecological restoration and environmental programmes in local parks will be delivered and supported by volunteers”
The coordinator is working well with community groups to deliver the Hibiscus and Bays Pest Free Strategy. The first round of site preparation has been completed at Weiti with the second round planned for early April. A community planting day is being planned for Weiti River involving the local business community and Conservation Volunteers New Zealand.
· Local board plan key initiative: “Encourage our youth to work with us; to have a voice and opportunities to learn, develop and become leaders”
During quarter three staff administered a contestable grants scheme supporting youth-led activity. Three expressions of interest were received and staff have worked with the respondents to further develop their proposals. Delivery of the grants will occur in quarter four.
· Local board plan key initiatives: “Identify, develop and support opportunities for communities to influence decisions that respond to the unique needs in their area and to run engagement processes themselves at neighbourhood and town centre level, e.g. community-led place-making “ and “Work with our partners to ensure that activities in our community facilities meet the needs of our residents”
Future Whangaparaoa delivered a range of community capacity building programmes during quarter three, as detailed above. The East Coast Bays Community Project committee decided not to umbrella the needs analysis until they had reviewed their governance situation.
· Local board plan key initiative: “Support our local arts centres to continue to be sustainable and inclusive and embrace diversity”
This key initiative progressed during quarter three with very high attendance at shows, exhibitions, classes and performances at Centrestage Theatre, Estuary Arts Centre and Mairangi Arts Centre.
· Local board plan key initiatives: “Investigate how we can work towards becoming a pest-free local board area” and “Continue to support eco/biodiversity corridors, such as the North-West Wildlink, and support community restoration initiatives that protect natural assets”
The Pest Free Coordinator, hosted by the East Coast Bays Community Project, is working well with community groups to deliver the Hibiscus and Bays Pest Free Strategy.
Volunteer activity in Hibiscus and Bays is high with one guided walk hosted, three volunteer training days were held, the annual Centennial Park Family Bush Camp was held and groups are now planning for the 2019 planting season.
· Local board agreement key initiative: “Continue to develop an eco-tourism strategy”
This key initiative progressed as New Zealand Tourism Research Institute (NZTRI) are continuing to make progress with the research. They are organising a Visitor Strategy Group tour with local operators in order to build momentum about the strategy.
Activities with significant issues
16. The following work programme activities have been identified by operating departments as at significant risk:
· Crows Nest Walk, 16 Brighton Terrace, Murrays Bay (ID 1907)
A report has been completed on options to repair the slip and this has been outlined to residents at public meetings in February and March 2019. A workshop discussion was held with the Board in March 2019 and a final report will come to the Board in June 2019.
· Wade Landing Reserve – develop access way (ID 3135)
The project is not required at this point in time and has been placed on hold. If the adjacent private property is developed in the future this project will be reactivated.
· Develop Orewa Community Centre community management (ID 2114)
The Local Board sought interest among specific community members about the management of the Orewa Community Centre but no interested parties have come forward.
Activities on hold
17. The following work programme activities have been identified by operating departments as on hold:
· Rock Isle Beach Reserve – rebuild toilet block (ID1945)
A large, undocumented midden has been discovered on site and local iwi have been notified. A full archaeological assessment is underway and then an archaeological consent will be lodged with Heritage New Zealand.
· (One Local Initiative) Orewa Beach – Kohu – Marine View – renew northern seawall (ID 2857)
The outcomes of the Environment Court Hearing which commences in the week of the 6th May 2019 will determine whether consent is granted or not, thereby determining the future of this project.
· HB: Greenways Plan Service Assessment (Priority Route Identification Phase 2) (ID 422)
This project is currently on hold until existing greenways priorities are progressed.
· Mairangi Bay Beach Reserve, Sidmouth Street, Mairangi Bay: Proposed new lease to Mairangi Bay Surf Lifesaving Club Incorporated for additional land (ID 2478)
The Mairangi Bay Surf Lifesaving Club Incorporated is still in the design and feasibility stage of their planned development. This project is on hold until the full extent of the proposed development by the club is known.
· Metro Park – develop netball and hockey grounds – concept plan phase 1 (ID 3024)
On hold until further notice as Parks, Sports and Recreation undertake community partnership discussions.
· Work with Silverdale Business Association to facilitate employment in Silverdale (ID 1380)
There has been no further engagement with the Business Association and this project is on hold.
· HB: Greenways Plan Service Assessment (Priority Route Identification Phase 2) (ID 422)
This project is currently on hold until existing greenway priorities are progressed.
· Long Bay Beach Reserve, 1045 Beach Road, Torbay: Lease renewal for the Sir Peter Blake Marine Education and Recreation Board Incorporated (ID 2472)
Staff are currently in the process of revoking the Reserves Act 1977 status of an affected parcel of land. Legal Services are still finalising their advice regarding the revocation of the reserve status and the project remains on hold until this is received.
Changes to the local board work programme
16. These activities are deferred to the 2019/2020 work programme:
· Sherwood Reserve – renew footbridges – physical works likely to be delivered 2020.
· Stanmore Bay Park – renew seawall – moved to Coastal and Geotechnical Services Team and to be reported back in December 2019.
· HB: Responsible Litter Disposal Service Assessment (ID 424)
This project has been cancelled and is now being managed by the Community Facilities Department. This work will now be included in the 2019/2020 Community Facilities work programme.
· R 33 Watea Road, Torbay: lease to Torbay Senior Citizens Club Incorporated (ID 1277)
The lease renewal is cancelled. This item will be provided for in the new three year Community Facilities work programme as the Local Board wishes to call for expressions of interest.
Cancelled activities
18. No activities have been cancelled.
Activities merged with other activities for delivery
19. These activities have been merged with other activities for efficient delivery:
· Lakeside Reserve – renew roading and carpark (ID 1930)
This project has been merged with project ID 1946, Sherwood Reserve – renew carpark. Through this merge, Lakeside Reserve project has been completed.
Budget movements across activities for delivery
20. In the March update from the local board Strategic Broker, the local board indicated that they would like to support Business Whangaparaoa Incorporated to assist the growth of business and the local economy on the Whangaparaoa Peninsula from Red Beach to Gulf Harbour.
21. This funding will proactively support a growing community group who will continue to foster business opportunities and networks in Hibiscus and Bays area. It will also allow the organisation to continue their networks, their events and their mentoring and training activities.
22. It is proposed that this funding can be reallocated by moving $8,000 operational funding from the Eco-Tourism Plan Development (ID 382) to the Connecting Communities project (ID 1270).
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
23. When developing the work programmes council group impacts and views are presented to the boards. As this is an information only report there are no further impacts identified.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
24. This report informs the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board of the performance for the quarter ending 31 March 2019.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
25. Māori as stakeholders of council are affected and have an interest in any report on the quarterly financial results. However, the recommendation to the Local Board of receiving the report has no particular benefit to, or adverse effect on, Māori. Some specific work programme items of interest are outlined below.
· Capacity Building – Hibiscus Coast (ID976)
Future Whangaparāoa delivered a range of capacity building workshops including promotion of Tiriti o Waitangi workshops.
· Responding to community needs: Hibiscus Coast and East Coast Bays (ID 977)
The East Coast Bays Community Project committee will potentially hold a Matariki event as part of the Activate Red Beach project.
· HB: Maori Naming of Reserves and Facilities Phase 2 (ID 575)
During the third quarter a new Te Kete Rukuruku project manager has been appointed. Work has focussed on managing overlapping interests and getting mana whenua access to GIS systems. Reporting and adoption of names is unlikely to occur until later in 2019.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
26. This report seeks to reallocate $8,000 operational funding from work programme item 382 (Eco-Tourism Plan Development) to work programme item 1270 (Connecting Communities). This is detailed in the ‘Changes to local board work programme’ section of this report.
27. Operating expenditure relating to Asset Based Services (ABS) is tracking above budget by $507,000 for the year to date, while the LDI operational projects are currently $313,000 below budget. This is due to projects yet to draw down on financial allocations.
28. Capital spend of $6.6 million represents investments in the Metro Park East toilet and walkway development, Red Beach toilet and lighting development, Deep Creek Reserve development and sand-field renewals at Silverdale War Memorial Park and Stanmore Bay Park. The board has also seen progress on a number of projects from their discretionary LDI capital fund.
29. The complete Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Financial Performance report can be found in Appendix B.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
30. While the risk of non-delivery of the entire work programme is rare, the likelihood for risk relating to individual activities does vary. Capital projects for instance, are susceptible to more risk as on-time and on-budget delivery is dependent on weather conditions, approvals (e.g. building consents) and is susceptible to market conditions.
31. Information about any significant risks and how they are being managed and/or mitigated is addressed in the ‘Activities with significant issues’ section.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
32. The local board will receive the next performance update for quarter four following the end of the financial year (June 2019).
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Work Programme 2018/2019 Q3 Report |
153 |
b⇩ |
Quarterly Performance Report March 2019 - Financial Appendix |
183 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Danielle Hancock – Senior Local Board Advisor |
Authoriser |
Jonathan Hope - Local Board Advisor - Rodney |
15 May 2019 |
|
Remuneration Authority - policy on child care allowances
File No.: CP2019/07379
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To provide feedback on the Remuneration Authority’s proposed policy on child care allowances.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. The Remuneration Authority has previously received submissions from members in other councils stating that if childcare were a claimable expense, then serving in local government might be a more realistic option for parents who are currently deterred from considering the role because of the costs of childcare. Some jurisdictions in other countries provide such allowances.
3. The authority has distributed its proposed policy in order to get feedback from councils and individual elected members. The proposed policy is in Attachment A. The authority has asked for feedback by 31 May 2019 and intends to include the provision in its determination that comes into force on 1 July 2019.
4. At present, the authority determines allowances for vehicle mileage, travel time and communications. Each individual council considers its approach to the expenses and allowances and writes its own policies within the upper limits set by the authority. If the authority determines that childcare allowances are permissible the council could include, within the framework established by the authority, specific rules in the council’s expenses policy.
5. A draft submission on the proposed policy has been prepared and is attached as Attachment B. Elected members can provide individual comments to the Remuneration Authority if they wish, by 31 May 2019.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) endorse the draft submission on the Remuneration Authority’s proposed policy on childcare allowances.
|
Horopaki
Context
6. Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) has formed a Young Elected Members (YEM) committee with members representing LGNZ Zones. These are elected members who are under the age of 40 years. The YEM network has raised the matter of childcare costs with the Remuneration Authority. They cite examples such as a member of a smaller council who is 24 years of age and on a salary of $18,707. Another, struggling to pay for childcare on her councillor’s salary of $20,634 opted instead to bring her child to meetings[1].
7. The group makes the point that other costs of attending to council duties can be claimed, such as mileage and communications, but not the cost of childcare. The group is broadly interested in developing the ability of younger elected members.
8. The Remuneration Authority has researched childcare allowances and is now inviting feedback on its draft policy, which includes the eligibility and payment conditions which will be included in the authority’s formal determination.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
9. The Remuneration Authority has recognised the need to address childcare costs if those with families are not to be deterred from standing for local government office.
10. Salaries paid to Auckland local board members and governing body members are generally higher than in smaller council districts in New Zealand, where it is likely elected members particularly struggle to meet childcare costs from their salaries. Nevertheless, the provision of the allowance may encourage greater diversity in those standing for election in Auckland.
11. The cost to the council and the ratepayer is reasonable in terms of the total budget for elected members’ remuneration but is a significant help for the member who has to arrange childcare. The policy places a cap of $6,000 per annum for any member. LGNZ statistics show that approximately 6 per cent of elected members are 40 years of age or below[2]. On that basis, the cost to Auckland Council, if 6 per cent of members (10 members) claimed the allowance, would be $60,000.
12. The Remuneration Authority indicates it is in discussion with the Inland Revenue Department about how the allowance will be treated for tax purposes (as income or as an expense reimbursement). It is possible it will be taxed at source (that is by the council) prior to payment.
13. Payment of the allowance under the proposed conditions requires evidence of the expense incurred. This is supported.
14. The allowance cannot be paid to family members. This is supported.
15. The proposed conditions state that a local authority may pay the childcare allowance as a contribution towards expenses incurred by the member for childcare provided while the member is engaged on local authority business. This wording may be too wide. Consider a member who has regularly arranged childcare, irrespective of undertaking council duties, deciding to spend two hours preparing for the next council meeting while the children happen to be in childcare. The member would be “engaged on local authority business” and could claim the childcare cost of those two hours.
16. Staff researched conditions around payment by other councils in other jurisdictions. One council simply paid the full cost of child care. Another specified the meetings and events that could be claimed. Staff believe the intent of the provision is to make a contribution toward the cost of child care where that is necessary in order for the member to undertake council duties, such as attend meetings. The wording should indicate more clearly that the payment is for childcare costs that are necessary in order for the member to undertake council duties and are not simply childcare costs that are incurred at the same time the member is undertaking council duties and would have been incurred anyway, if the member was not attending to council duties.
17. Other conditions are:
i) the child is under 14 years
ii) payment cannot be greater than $15 per hour and cannot be greater than the actual expense
iii) childcare cannot be for more than 8 hours in any 24 hour period.
These are supported.
18. Staff recommend that the council supports the proposed policy with the comment, outlined above, that the purpose should more clearly reflect that the expense is a necessary expense in order for the member to attend to duties.
19. Staff also note that the council itself will decide its own provisions to include in its expenses policy, within the framework set by the authority.
20. Members can provide individual comments to the Remuneration Authority if they wish, by 31 May 2019.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
21. The Remuneration Authority’s policy applies only to elected members and does not impact the group.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
22. The policy affects all elected members, including local board members.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
23. The Remuneration Authority’s policy may assist those in the Māori community who are potential candidates for election but are deterred by the costs of childcare.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
24. There will be financial implications. As noted in the body of the report, the additional cost is likely to be less than $60,000 and will impact the cost centre for elected members’ remuneration.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
25. There is a small risk of the provision being abused (false claims submitted). The requirement for evidence of the amount paid will mitigate this risk.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
26. This report is being presented to local boards for their feedback. It is also being circulated to Governing Body members for their feedback. The draft submission will be amended if there is a clear majority position in favour of an amendment.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Childcare Allowance Proposed Draft Policy Paper |
191 |
b⇩ |
Remuneration Authority draft policy - child care allowances - submission |
199 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Warwick McNaughton - Principal Advisor - Democracy Services |
Authorisers |
Marguerite Delbet - General Manager Democracy Services Jonathan Hope – Acting ?Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019 and Facilities Grants 2018/2019 grant allocations
File No.: CP2019/06605
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To fund, part-fund or decline applications received for the Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019, including multiboard applications.
2. To fund, part-fund or decline applications received for the Hibiscus and Bays Facilities Grant round 2018/2019.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
3. This report presents applications received in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019 (see Attachment B), including multiboard applications (see Attachment C), and applications received in the Facilities Grant round (see Attachment D).
4. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board adopted the Hibiscus and Bays Grants Programme 2018/2019 on 7 June 2018 (see Attachment A). The document sets application guidelines for contestable community grants submitted to the local board.
5. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $694,120 for the 2018/2019 financial year, including $195,274 carried over from the 2017/2018 financial year.
6. At the 17 December 2018 Hibiscus and Bays Local Board meeting, $150,000 from the community grants budget was allocated to a new Facilities Grant round (HB/2018/216).
8. This leaves a total of $196,600.76 to be allocated between one local grant round and one quick response grant round, and $150,000 to be allocated to the facilities grant round.
9. Fifty-five applications were received for the Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019, including fifteen multiboard applications, requesting a total of $395,078.41.
10. Six applications were received for the Facilities Grant round requesting a total of $227,649.41.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application received in Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019, listed in Table One.
b) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application received in Hibiscus and Bays Multiboard Grants Round Two 2018/2019, listed in Table Two.
c) agree to fund, part-fund or decline each application received in the Hibiscus and Bays Facilities Grant round 2018/2019, listed in Table Three.
|
Horopaki
Context
11. The local board allocates grants to groups and organisations delivering projects, activities and services that benefit Aucklanders and contribute to the vision of being a world class city.
12. The Auckland Council Community Grants Policy supports each local board to adopt a grants programme.
13. The local board grants programme sets out:
· local board priorities
· lower priorities for funding
· exclusions
· grant types, the number of grant rounds and when these will open and close
· any additional accountability requirements.
14. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board adopted their grants programme for 2018/2019 on 7 June 2018 and will operate three quick response, two multiboard and two local grant rounds for this financial year.
15. At the 17 December 2018 Hibiscus and Bays Local Board meeting, $150,000 from the community grants budget was allocated to a new Facilities Grant round (HB/2018/216).
16. The community grant programmes have been extensively advertised through the council grants webpage, local board webpages, local board e-newsletters, Facebook pages, council publications, radio, and community networks.
Tātaritanga me ngā tohutohu
Analysis and advice
17. The aim of the local board grant programme is to deliver projects and activities which align with the outcomes identified in the local board plan. All applications have been assessed utilising the Community Grants Policy and the local board grant programme criteria. The eligibility of each application is identified in the report recommendations.
Ngā whakaaweawe me ngā tirohanga a te rōpū Kaunihera
Council group impacts and views
18. Based on the main focus of an application, a subject matter expert from the relevant department, will provide input and advice. The main focus of an application is identified as arts, community, events, sport and recreation, environment or heritage.
19. The grants programme has no identified impacts on council-controlled organisations and therefore their views are not required.
Ngā whakaaweawe ā-rohe me ngā tirohanga a te poari ā-rohe
Local impacts and local board views
20. Local boards are responsible for the decision-making and allocation of local board community grants. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board is required to fund, part-fund or decline these grant applications against the local board priorities identified in the local board grant programme.
21. The local board is requested to note that section 48 of the Community Grants Policy states “We will also provide feedback to unsuccessful grant applicants about why they have been declined, so they will know what they can do to increase their chances of success next time.”
22. A summary of each application received in the Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019 (see Attachment B), including multiboard applications (see Attachment C), and applications received in the Facilities Grant round (see Attachment D) is provided.
Tauākī whakaaweawe Māori
Māori impact statement
23. The local board grants programme aims to respond to Auckland Council’s commitment to improving Māori wellbeing by providing grants to individuals and groups who deliver positive outcomes for Māori. Auckland Council’s Māori Responsiveness Unit has provided input and support towards the development of the community grant processes.
24. Seventeen applicants applying to the Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two, including five multiboard applicants, indicated that their project targets Māori or Māori outcomes.
Ngā ritenga ā-pūtea
Financial implications
25. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board has set a total community grants budget of $694,120 for the 2018/2019 financial year, including $195,274 carried over from the 2017/2018 financial year.
26. At the 17 December 2018 Hibiscus and Bays Local Board meeting, $150,000 from the community grants budget was allocated to a new Facilities Grant round (HB/2018/216).
27. A total of $4,005 was allocated to the Quick Response Grants Round One, $287,238.24 was allocated to the Local Grants Round One and $26,146 was allocated to the Quick Response Round Two. Additionally, $36,130 has been allocated to other initiatives (HB/2018/168, HB/2018/172 and HB/2018/177).
28. Furthermore, a refund from “Equestrian 4 Everyone” (LG1906-136) totalling $6,000 was returned to the 2018/2019 grants budget. This group has ceased operations and the grant was not uplifted. This leaves a total of $196,600.76 to be allocated between one local grant round and one quick response grant round, and $150,000 to be allocated to the facilities grant round.
29. Fifty-five applications were received for the Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019, including fifteen multiboard applications, requesting a total of $395,078.41.
30. Six applications were received for the Facilities Grant round requesting a total of $227,649.41.
Ngā raru tūpono me ngā whakamaurutanga
Risks and mitigations
31. The allocation of grants occurs within the guidelines and criteria of the Community Grants Policy and the local board grants programme. The assessment process has identified a low risk associated with funding the applications in this round.
Ngā koringa ā-muri
Next steps
32. Following the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board allocation of funding for the Local Grants Round Two and the Facilities Grant round, Commercial and Finance staff will notify the applicants of the local board’s decision and facilitate payment of the grant.
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Hibiscus and Bays Grant Programme 2019/2020 |
215 |
b⇨ |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Grants Round Two 2018/2019 Grant Applications (Under Separate Cover) |
|
c⇨ |
Hibiscus and Bays Multiboard Round Two 2018/2019 Grant Applications (Under Separate Cover) |
|
d⇨ |
Hibiscus and Bays Facilities Grant 2018/2019 Grant Applications (Under Separate Cover) |
|
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Makenzie Hirz - Senior Community Grants Advisor |
Authorisers |
Marion Davies - Grant Operations Manager Shane King - Head of Operations Support Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
File No.: CP2019/00123
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board allocates a period of time for the Ward Councillors, Councillor Wayne Walker and Councillor John Watson, to update them on the activities of the Governing Body.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) thank Councillors Walker and Watson for their update.
|
Attachments
There are no attachments for this report.
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Vivienne Sullivan - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authoriser |
Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Governance Forward Work Calendar
File No.: CP2019/00129
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. To present the local board with a Governance Forward Work Calendar.
Whakarāpopototanga matua
Executive summary
2. This report contains the Governance Forward Work Calendar: a schedule of items that will come before the local board at business meetings and workshops over the next 12 months.
3. The calendar aims to support local boards’ governance role by:
· ensuring advice on agendas and workshop material is driven by local board priorities
· clarifying what advice is required
· clarifying the rationale for reports.
4. The calendar will be updated every month. Each update will be reported back to business meetings. It is recognised that at times items will arise that are not programmed. Local board members are welcome to discuss changes to the calendar.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) receive the Governance Forward Work Calendar report. |
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Governance Forward Work Calendar |
223 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Vivienne Sullivan - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authoriser |
Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
15 May 2019 |
|
File No.: CP2019/00136
Te take mō te pūrongo
Purpose of the report
1. The Hibiscus and Bays Local Board held workshop meetings on 11 April 2019 and 2 May 2019.
Recommendation/s That the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board: a) endorse the record of the workshop meetings held on 11 April 2019 and 2 May 2019.
|
Attachments
No. |
Title |
Page |
a⇩ |
Workshop Record, 11 April 2019 |
231 |
b⇩ |
Workshop Record, 2 May 2019 |
233 |
Ngā kaihaina
Signatories
Author |
Vivienne Sullivan - Local Board Democracy Advisor |
Authoriser |
Jonathan Hope – Acting Relationship Manager |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution follows.
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:
C1 Acquisition of land for open space at Silverdale
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interest(s) protected (where applicable) |
Ground(s) under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution |
The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities. s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). In particular the report identifies land the council seeks to acquire for open space purposes. |
s48(1)(a) The public conduct of the part of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exists under section 7. |
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board 15 May 2019 |
|
Item 8.2 Attachment a Powerpoint Presentation Page 239